Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 07 - CU20-26 Baywest Development TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER RON STOMBAUGH, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEETING DATE: MAY 18, 2021 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION CU20-26 BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT: Robert Pruett of Landev Engineers, Inc. PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: The subject property is located at 3200 Grapevine Mills Parkway and is proposed to be platted as Lot 2R-A1, Block A, Grapevine Vineyard. The property contains 10.53 acres and has approximately 400 feet of frontage along Grapevine Mills Parkway and 454 feet of frontage along the southbound State Highway 121 service road. REQUESTED CONDITIONAL USE AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to establish a master site development plan for the development of a multifamily complex. At an October, 2004 meeting, the subject property as well as the adjoining properties to the immediate east received a conditional use permit for the establishment of a planned commercial center. This 14.73-acre site was partially developed with two, multi-tenant buildings along Grapevine Mills Parkway comprising 9,340 s.f. and 9,990 s.f. respectively in size. In January, 2006 a 10,101 s.f. Cracker Barrel restaurant was approved to the south of the subject site and later that year at the May, 2006 meeting, a 45,000 s.f. L.A. Fitness was approved on the 10.5-acre subject site. With this request the applicant intends to utilize the master site development plan process to demolish the former L.A. Fitness structure that has been closed and dormant for a number of years and redevelop the site with two, four-story multifamily structures totaling 475 units. Access to the site will be provided by several existing drives at Grapevine Mills Parkway, the southbound S.H. 121 service road, and from Stars and Stripes Way. An additional drive is proposed further to the south along Stars and Stripes Way. Both proposed structures will be approximately 47 feet in height; the north building will contain 213 units and the south building will contain 262 units. Total density for the site is 45 units per acre. The unit mix is as follows:  Efficiency units (612-720 s.f.) 32 units  One-bedroom units (756-900 s.f.) 240 units  Two-bedroom units (1,132-1,406 s.f.) 177 units  Three-bedroom units (1,520-1,841 s.f.) 26 units Parking will be primarily provided in the form of structured parking for both buildings. Based on the included parking study, 760 parking spaces are required at a parking ratio of 1.6 spaces per unit; a strict application of the ordinance would require 950 spaces. The applicant has provided 761 structured spaces within the two buildings (341 spaces in the north building and 420 spaces in the south building). The applicant is also providing an additional 107 surface spaces for a total of 868 spaces to accommodate the multifamily project (1.83 spaces per unit). Contained within your packet is an affidavit of compliance signed and sealed by the project architect stating the project is in compliance with the recently adopted Design Standards Manual for Multifamily and Vertical Mixed Use Development. Specifically, the multifamily portion of the subject site is immediately adjacent to the east of District 5, Grapevine Mills North District. This area was not included with the district given it was considered developed at the time the standards were developed. This district has eight district specific standards along with the general standards required of all districts. The applicant has included graphic exhibits that demonstrate compliance with specific elements of the design standards. PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned “CC” Community Commercial District and is developed with two, multi-tenant retail structures, and a vacant, former L.A. Fitness building. HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject and surrounding properties were rezoned in the 1984 City Rezoning from “I-1” Light Industrial District to “HCO” Hotel Corporate Office District and “PID” Planned Industrial Development District. The subject property was rezoned (Z96-08) in June 1996 to “CC” Community Commercial District for a retail shopping development that never occurred. The property to the west currently occupied by the Grapevine Mills Mall and its associated outparcel development was rezoned in 1995 to “CC” Community Commercial District to facilitate the development of the mall. Conditional use request CU04-32 (Ord. 04-66) approved by Council at the October 19, 2004 meeting established a planned commercial center on the subject site. Conditional use request CU05-05 (Ord. 2005-11) was considered and partially approved at the February 15, 2005 to allow a restaurant dance/club (Midnight Rodeo/Hondo’s Grill. At the February 23, 2005 meeting of the Site Plan Review Committee, CU05-05 was approved with revised southern and eastern elevations. At the August 23, 2006 meeting of the Site Plan Review Committee, CU06-37 approved an expansion of 162-square feet of outdoor dining for an existing Quizno’s restaurant. At the February 28, 2007 meeting of the Site Plan Review Committee, CU07- 07 approved an expansion to a previously approved outdoor dining area from 386-square feet to approximately 530-square feet. At the July 17, 2012 meeting conditional use request CU12-26 was approved allowing for on-premise alcohol beverage sales, outdoor dining, and outdoor speakers in conjunction with a restaurant (Fuzzy’s Tacos) on the subject site. Conditional use request CU18-08 was approved at the April 17, 2018 meeting which approved a master site development plan on a 19-acre parcel of land to the north and east of the subject site which allowed for façade changes to an existing 49,000+ s.f. multi-tenant building, the construction of an additional 27,400 s.f. of new retail and restaurant spaces apportioned between four buildings and the construction of two, four story multifamily structures, two, three story brownstone structures and associated parking for a total of 432 multifamily units. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: “CC” Community Commercial District—Ashley Furniture, Lazy Boy Furniture Gallery, Room Store, NTB Tire, Baker and Wallis multifamily development SOUTH: “CC” Community Commercial District—Cracker Barrel, State Highway 121, Fellowship Church of Grapevine EAST: “CC” Community Commercial District—vacant WEST: “CC” Community Commercial District—Grapevine Mills Mall, Rooms To Go, Danni Sushi, Chuck-E-Cheese AIRPORT IMPACT: The subject tract is located within "Zone B" Middle Zone of Effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. In Zone B, the following uses may be considered only if sound treatment is included in building design: multi family apartments, motels, office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, personal and business services. Single family residential and sound sensitive uses such as schools and churches should avoid this zone. The applicant’s proposal is an appropriate use in this noise zone. MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as Commercial land use. The applicant’s proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan. THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION: The Thoroughfare Plan designates Grapevine Mills Parkway as a Type A Major Arterial with a minimum 100 feet of right-of-way, developed as six lanes with a median and dedicated left turning lanes. /rs 1A 4.267 @ Av (TAD 1 cc ri viet CT? RC' & C PPrS ";'A" 1RA 2.025 @ I F—L—J 0 100 I I I Feet 200 300 400 ,GRU r'�t � X . f�IN �. W- pE 4 6 Stars & Stripes TR 1 F 149@ TR 1 3.377 @ CU20-26 Baywest Development Date Prepared: 5/3/2021 This date has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department. Various official and unofficial sources were used to gather this Information. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this date, however, no guarantee Is given or implied as to the accuracy of said dale. �T -h x -A -,S VIm I* PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant / agent:/company/contact Landev Engineers, Inc. (Robert Pruett) Street address of applicant / agent. 1801 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 101 City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent: Richardson, Texas 75080 Telephone number of applicant / agent: (972) 385-2272 Email address of applicant/agent PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property cuaoz'o CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Fax number of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent (214) 384-2072 3200 Grapevine Mills Parkway, Grapevine, Texas 76051 Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11 " sheet) Lot 2RA, 5R & 6R Block A Addition Grapevine Vineyards Size of subject property 10.5311 Acres Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: CC Master Site Plan - Commercial & Multi -family Circle yes or no, if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes M Minimum / maximum district size for conditional use request. 10.532 acres Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: Form "A" 458,735 Square foots::e Section 25.C.25 - Master Site Development Plan for uses allowed within Section 22, R-MF Multi -family development district - PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner. LCG Grapevine II, LP (Bay West Development) Street address of property owner., 2 Henry Adams Street, Suite 2M-33 City / State / Zip Code of property owner. San Francisco, CA 94103 Telephone number of property owner. (408) 680-4938 {� DEC 4 2020 By m"Po" am" Contact Pete Beritzhoff at Email: cuao •alo Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document 5rl In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations (example: buffer yards, distance between users) !( In the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. i� Application of site plan approval (Section 47, see attached Form "8'). 61f The site Galan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Recruirements. V All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. 5All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled N( Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. R( l have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowiedcte that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Robert L. Pruett <?4y� Print Applicant's Name. Applicant' signature: AM The State of Texas county of Dallas Before Me Lindsey Pierce on this day personally appeared Robert L. Pruett (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this 2nd day of November A.D. 2020 UNDSEY PIERCE i My Notary► ID #y12'50?89y245 (Y'y n`And e f Tex Exomtleptem 024 Bill R. Poland Print properly Owners Name: Propertowner ' Sig to The State Of California _ County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared _ (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D. 2020 _ Notary In And For State Of Texas n r W1 l DEC 4 2020 By CALIFORNIA ACKNOWLEDGMENT cuao-:6 CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California 1 County of SAN FRANCISCO J} On NOVEMBER 5. 2020 before me, Date personally appeared TIT i.l, PO LAND TAMI NICOLAS - NOTARY PUBLIC Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer Name(s) of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. s A I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the TAMI NICOLAS laws of the State of California that the foregoing `` Notary Public - Camornia : •=0.�, San Francisco co icy paragraph is true and correct. ' Commission R 2255534 My Comm. Expires Sep 18. 2022 WITNESS my hand and official seal. Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: r nrxb t �� I7 I Oih� Document Date: NOVEMBER 5, 2020 f Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: BILL POLAND ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer is Representing: Number of Pages: Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer is Representing: 02019 National Notary Association fn By_ _� ORDINANCE NO. 2021- 016 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ISSUING CONDITIONAL USE CU20- 26 TO ESTABLISH A MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTIFAMILY COMPLEX FOR LOT 2R-A1, BLOCK A, GRAPEVINE VINEYARD ADDITION (3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY) IN A DISTRICT ZONED “CC” COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a conditional use permit by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the Ordinance No. 2021-016 2 overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this conditional use permit, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the conditional use permit lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this conditional use permit and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this conditional use permit for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City Ordinance No. 2021-016 3 of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code, by granting Conditional Use Permit No. CU20-26 to establish a master site development plan for the development of a multifamily complex in a district zoned “CC” Community Commercial District Regulations within the following described property: Lot 2R-A1, Block A, Grapevine Vineyard Addition (3200 Grapevine Mills Parkway) all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein conditional use permit. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safely from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Ordinance No. 2021-016 4 Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 18th day of May, 2021. APPROVED: _________________________________ William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ Matthew C.G. Boyle City Attorney District -Specific Design Standards 1. Architectural Accommodations of Grade Change Complies: Does the plan retain grade to support the building plate including terraces, pati- Yes No In Spirit os, decks and any accessory buildings adjoined to the primary structure? X Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District 2. Pedestrian Connection Beyond The Project And District Complies: Does the plan provide pedestrian connections from units within the project to Yes No In Spirit existing trails, sidewalks or other public and private walkways. Does the plan provide pedestrian connections to places within the development that abut pedestrian walkways that the City's approved plans identify for the future? Comments: Proposed plan provides ample connections from units to existing sidewalks and pedestrian paths around existing neighboring retail pads. Articulation of centralized courtyard encourages pedestrian connection through project. See Exhibit 1 3. Preserve and/or Restore The Natural Characteristic Of The District Does the plan include landscape development that continues the natural charac- teristics of the projects surroundings? Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District Complies: Yes No In Spirit 7 4. Perpetuate Residentially Derived Styling And Forms Does the plan use the following architectural components? . Pitched roof (gable or hip) • Organized roof massing where a dominant roof has subordinate roofs that extend form it. . 12 inch roof overhang . Roofed porches and balconies . No more than 45 horizontal feet of continuous wall without a horizon- tal offset of at least 4 feet . Dormers that break the cornice • Windows that align both horizontally and vertically . Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmet- rically within the form Three stories maximum. These three stories may be over a parking podium. . Openings are treated with a jamb and/or head surround . The Void -to -Solid relationship for window -in -wall elements is less than 50% Comments: Complies: Yes No In Spirit Ix Due to Proximity to Grapevine Mills Mall, and similar commercial projects south of Stars & Stripes Lane, the proposed project derives styles and forms from Commercial Precedents (req. #8). Proposed design features that comply with the requirements of this district include: roofed porches and balconies, windows that align both horizontally and vertically, and a solid -void relationship for windows -in -wall of less than 50%. See Exhibit 2 2 5. Provide Buffer Adjacent To Residentially Adverse Conditions Does the plan provide a buffer between residential land use and adjacent envi- ronmental conditions (e.g. loud sound) that would negatively impact the livabili- ty of the residential land? Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District 6. Provide A Land Use And Scale Transition Between Multifamily/Vertical Mixed -Use Development And Abutting Single Family Development. If the plan abuts an area of single-family residential land use, does it provide a "residential transition"? A residential transition must include two components: • Height Transition: For any element with a height above 35ft, this ele- ment can't exceed one foot above 35ft in height for every lft of setback beyond 15ft. For example, you may have 36ft at 16ft setback, 37ft at 17ft and so on. . Scale Transition: Any element located within 20ft of a property line abutting a single-family land use must not have an elevation face area more than 1200 sq. ft. Comments: Multifamily use does not abut any single family uses. See Exhibit 1 Complies: Yes No In Spirit C F 7 Complies: Yes , No In Spirit i1 3 7. Provide Development That Maximizes Uses Appropriate To The Value Of The Complies: Setting And/Or Characteristic Of The Context. Yes No In Spirit If the surrounding street -level use is NOT predominately residential, does the plan provide —or is the structure such that it could be leased to provide —first - floor or street -level land uses that are consistent with the context? If the plan has a distinct locational opportunity (such as being close to logistic, movement or transit hubs), does it provide —or is the structure such that is could be leased to provide —first -floor or street -level land uses that are consistent with this context? If the answer to either question is YES, does the plan provide —or could be rent- ed to provide —these land uses for at least 70% of the street -fronting first -floor space? Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District. 8. Perpetuate Commercially Derived Styling And Forms Complies: Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms that include the following Yes No In Spirit elements: F 1 • A predominately flat roof concealed by a raised parapet of at least 12in in height . All openings are vertically and horizontally aligned . Balconies are projected . Steel construction is exposed • The first floor plate is at least 15ft high at the street level . Void -to -solid relationships are 50% or greater void Comments: Project utilizes flat roofs and strict vertical and horizontal alignments of window openings. Exposed steel balconies project at building corners; within the building balconies are recessed to provide relief within the horizontal plane (see req. #4). Floor to floor height at increased at Level 1 but below 15' requirement, due to a lack of retail use at the ground floor. Solid -to -void requirement met at leasing area; remainder of building meets solid -to -void requirements of residentially -inspired district. See Exhibit 2. 9. Preserve And Extend Thematic Streetscapes Complies: Does the plan continue the established streetscape of its surrounding District? Yes No In Spirit This includes: D F . Matching light fixtures and spacing of light fixtures . Matching tree species, scale, placement and spacing . Matching paving material and paving pattern • Continuation of defined inset areas for on -street parking Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District 10. Maintain Compatibility With District Thematic Sign Features. Does the plan Complies: provide signage that is compatible with signage in the surrounding District? This Yes No In Spirit includes: • Maintaining the relationship of signage to street -fronting building planes . Marinating the general appearance of the District's signage . Maintaining sign illumination consistent with the District and its nightscape • Use of sign types consistent with the District and the context. This in- cludes commercial tenant signs, premise signs and project signs. Comments: Signage will comply with district thematic sign features. 11. Provide Responsive Interface To Open Space And Open Space Amenities. Does the plan address open space in ways that extend the open space into the project? This includes: . Elimination of parking aprons in the foreground between the structure and the open space . Extension of landscape species and patterns characteristic of the open space into the project . Orientation of buildings to that building placement breaks free from the normal orthogonal relation to street and bears relationship to features of the larger landscape . Extension of trails into the project . Use of fence design that does not visually disrupt the continuous ground plane Comments: Complies: Yes No In Spirit { The proposed building siting provides a large open space between the two buildings in the center of the site. This open space is uninterrupted by parking aprons, providing a hardscaped plaza for visitor parking, extends the proposed landscaping through the proposed open space, and extends pedestrian pathways through the project and creates opportunities for more pathways on adjacent, undeveloped land. See Exhibit 1 12. Resort/Lodge/Prairie Styling And Forms. Does the plan use architectural styles derived from resort/lodge/prairie architectural precedents? These include • Flat pitched gable or hipped rooves with long and un-interrupted ridges and cornices . Large roof overhangs with structural bracing such as brackets, angled braces, canted braced and exposed rafters . Tapered columns that are full masonry or have masonry bases • Use of flat roofs to accent pitched roofs • Variable plate heights . Vertical and Horizontal alignment of openings • Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmet- rically within the form • Use of decks and terraces . Architecturally enclosed balconies . Projected window jambs and/or headers • Structural details derived from timber construction detailing • Use of siding and masonry . Upper story insets within, or projections over, a lower story base Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District Complies: Yes No In Spirit 13. Curvilinear Organization Of The Development Plan Complies: Does the plan have a curvilinear organization? This includes: Yes No In Spirit Gracefully meandering streets and drives with bends in the street and '1 F7 7 drive alignment that is responsive to grade o Merging street intersections where operations permit • Organically -shaped parking areas . Building orientations that are not tied to uniform street frontage • Drifted groupings of trees in lieu of straight rows with uniform spacing Comments: The proposed buildings do align with one boundary, Stars & Stripes Way, and maintain non -orthogonal boundaries to the remaining site boundaries. The proposed drives meander around perimeter of building, providing access to pockets of head -in parking spaces placed along slight curves in the drive to meet a lease agreement requirement with a neighboring property. Drifts of trees line the perimeter of the site. See Exhibit 1 14. Conceal Visibility Of Service And Parking Functions Does the plan place service and parking functions so that such functions are NOT in the foreground yard space between any arterial or primary street and the buildings that are facing that street? Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District Complies: Yes No In Spirit 11 15. Perpetuate Historic/Indigenous Derived Architectural Styling And Forms. Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms derived from the historic or indigenous character of the District? Such aspects include: • Commercially -scaled first floor with a 15ft plate • For building of three floors or greater, a tripartite architecture . Decorative and embellished front parapet . Street canopy . Portrait orientation of openings and subversion of openings • Continuous vertical corners often expressed as pilasters . Occasional use of roof forms as accent elements on the front elevation . Void -to -Solid ratio with greater void at the street level and greater solid at other levels . Treatment of openings with jamb and/or header surrounds . Use of belt courses to establish horizontal reference for placement of openings . Use of decorative brick bands and details Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District Complies: Yes No In Spirit 7 1 9 16. Use Of Thematic Exterior Material, If Such Material Is Characteristic Of Dis- Complies: trict And Complies With The General Material Standards. Yes No In Spirit If there is a surrounding District context, does the plan continue with the use of F the dominant and characteristic material of the surrounding District? If so, is the use of that material in compliance with the General Material Stan- dards of the Building Manual? Dominant use of material means material that comprises at least 70% of the building exterior excluding openings. Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District 17. Orthogonal/Block Orientation Of The Development Plan. Does the plan have Complies: a block/orthogonal organization? This includes: Yes No In Spirit • Straight streets with right angle intersections 1 E X • Continuous street wall defined by alignment of buildings • Uniform spacing of street trees and street fixtures . Continue the urban blocks which are adjacent to the project . Have decorative cross walks or other intersection enhancements Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District T$] 18. Pedestrian/Residential Activity Connection Between The Public Street And Complies: Living Units Fronting The Street. Yes No In Spirit Does the plan present the public street with an external expression of the resi- dential activity? This means that the street level of the residential development is not commercially used or made capable for commercial use. This includes porches, stoops, terraces, patios, fenced front yards and steps up from an ap- proach grade. Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District 19. Maintain Height And Scale Compatibility With The Height And Scale Char- Complies: acteristic Of District. Yes No In Spirit When height and scale are important attributes of the surrounding District's identity, is the plan compatible with this height and scale? Such compatibility can be achieved through one or both of the following: • Upper -story setbacks that create a building mass at the street consistent with context . Horizontal offsets at the street level which reduce the lower floor pre- sentation of mass when the characteristic block size is exceeded. This creates the image of a block that is further subdivided through built rec- ognition of individual properties as described in the "Bay Modulation' section of the Building Manual. Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District m 20. Use Of Bay Modulation Patterns That Are Compatible With Bay Modulation Complies: Of The District. Yes No In Spirit Does the plan create a street frontage that continues the bay modulation of the ' 7 F7 block? Bay modulation refers to the architectural expression of individual build- ings within the block face. This is important to emulate the traditional block face of a downtown where buildings are normally built lot -line to lot -line in direct juxtaposition. In such downtowns, there is a complex street wall referred to as the "Bay" and the rhyth- mic and varied offset and appearance of that bay is referred to as "Bay Modula- tion." Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District W 21. Provide An Urbanized Streetscape. Does the plan provide an urbanized streetscape along the primary street frontage that is consistent with the char- acteristic urban street fabric within the District? Key features of an urbanized streetscape include: . The architectural plane fronting the primary street must create a con- tinuous street wall along the primary street frontage. Buildings must establish a "built -to" zone which extends from the primary street front property line and extends into the property a distance of 3ft and at least 75% of the primary street frontage much lie within this zone. NOTE: the location and depth of this zone may be modified upon City approval when the modification results in lateral expansion of a sidewalk space for a sidewalk restaurant or sidewalk retail or in the creation of an arcade along the street. • Street trees used in the streetscape should continue the use of an exist- ing tree species when the larger urban setting contains a thematic tree. If the surrounding urban setting does not have a thematic tree, the plan must choose from a list of approved plants. . Street lights must continue the uniform spacing and placement charac- teristic of the surrounding primary street. When a larger urban setting contains a thematic light or light standard, the plan must use that light standard. When no thematic light exists, the plan must choose a light or light standard appropriate for urban streetscape use. • Decorative paving should continue the characteristic paving material and pattern of the urban context when that context includes a thematic sidewalk treatment. When no thematic treatment exists, the project must use a sidewalk paving material and pattern appropriate for urban streets - cape use. Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District Complies: Yes No In Spirit F X 13 22. Provide A "Borrowed Landscape" For The Primary Street Frontage Does the plan provide a "borrowed landscape" along the primary street frontage that preserved the general character of the District? This includes: . Elimination of parking aprons or walls between the building and street unless the landscape space abutting the street is greater than 20ft . Creation of an expanded parkway that is varied in dimension with the minimum parkway expansion being 15ft from the street right of way and with variations in width occurring at least every 200ft. Creation of pads for horizontal mixed use qualifies as varied Borrowed Landscape space . Use of a pedestrian trail in lieu of a pedestrian sidewalk. Sidewalks within the borrowed landscape space must be meandering pedestrian ways at least 8ft wide. Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District Complies: Yes No In Spirit F7 El X. 14 23. Promote Horizontal Mixed Use Complies: Yes No In Spirit Does the project create opportunities for stand-alone retail/restaurant pads with- iX in the street frontage of the primary street? In no case should the provision of a retail pad consume more than 50% of the multifamily frontage. Where the multifamily frontage is 300ft or less, a retail pad leave -out is not required. This retail pad requirement may be waived upon City Approval but a requirement for variable street definition (#24) still applies Comments: Retail pads along Grapevine Mills Pkwy to remain with the proposed building sited mid -block. The inclusion of a multifamily use here creates the desired horizontal mixed -use block. See Exhibit 1 24. Provide Variable Street Definition Within The Block Face Along Primary Complies: Streets Yes No In Spirit Does the plan create a variable street definition through the variable setback of 11 multifamily structures fronting the primary street? No more than 50% of the project frontage may adhere to a uniform setback dimension. Horizontal offsets in the development plan set back line must be no less than 10 ft. Comments: N/A to Grapevine Mills North District 15 District Specific Stan- 360/Airport Grapevine Grapevine Gaylord/SH Central Tran- dards (A = Applicable) District Mille South Mills North 26 District sit District District District 1 Architectural accommo- A A dation of grade change 2 Pedestrian connection A A A A A beyond project and district 3 Preserve/restore charac- A A teristic natural mosaic 4 Residentially derived A A* styling and forms/ pitched roof 5 Buffer adjacent environ- A mental encroachments 6 Land use/scale transition A A from MF/SF 7 Maximize value capture A A opportunities 8 Commercially derived A A** A styling and forms 9 Preserve/perpetuate A thematic streetscape 10 Compatible with district, A A A thematic signage features 11 Responsive interface A A A with open space and amenities 12 Resort/lodge derived A A styling and forms 13 Curvilinear organization A A A A of development plan 14 Conceal visibility of ser- A A A vice/parking functions from arterials/primary roads 15 Historic/indigenous A derived styling/forms 16 Use of thematic exterior A material if characteristic of district and complies with standards A* = When closer to topography and golf course A** = When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas 16 17 Orthogonal, block orga- A nization of development plan 18 Pedestrian/residential A activity connection between street and living unit fronting street 19 Height and scale com- A patibility with height and scale characteristic of district 20 Bay modulation pattern A compatibility with the- matic bay modulation of district 21 Urbanized streetscape A 22 Provide "Borrowed" A landscape for street en- hancement 23 Promote horizontal A A A mixed -use 24 Variable street definition A to create a more complex street scape A* = When closer to topography and golf course A** = When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas M General Standards for Multifamily Development Part A: Site and Design a. Contextual Relationships 1. Community Structure: Each plan for a project larger than 100 units must Complies: provide: Yes No In Spirit i. Benches: at least one every 700ft or one per block, whichever is less 11 E ii. Bike Racks: a capacity for 4 bikes at each residential building and 14 at the central pedestrian facility iii. Trash Disposal Units: one trash receptacle at each bench iv. Pedestrian Lighting: one light standard at least every 100ft Comments: Buildings organized around central pedestrian plaza. Building elements i-iv are included in plan. See Exhibit 5. 2. Cognitive Structure: Development site plans should avoid a "maze -like" Complies: arrangement of streets and drives and should provide a clear demarcation of Yes No In Spirit sub -areas arranged with reference to an internal destination. Comments: Buildings organized in distinct north -south blocks bisected by a sequence of public open spaces along a pedestrian pathway "spine". See Exhibit 3. 3. Edge Definition: Planting of the edge must provide visual concealment of Complies: at least 70% of the perimeter fence using evergreen plants. Moreover, at least Yes No In Spirit 70% of these plants must have foliage from ground to top capable of providing a screen. Edge screening must be planted in natural drifts that appear as native plant clusters. Comments: Project will not be surrounded by fencing. 4. Traffic Calming: Any multifamily plan must illustrate traffic calming mea- Complies: sures using traffic tables, intersections, traffic circles, chokers, roadway neck Yes No In Spirit downs at intersections, center island narrowing or rumble strips. Speed bumps are prohibited. Comments: Traffic tables included at pedestrian crossings at internal drives. See Exhibit 1 18 b. Connections Beyond the Project 1. Relationship With And Connections To The City Fabric: The site plan for any multifamily development must portray the extent to which the following elements of the City Fabric are continued or otherwise responded to: i. Curb Cuts and Driveways: Development plans much seek to continue flow between projects by coordinating points of ingress and egress so that efficient maneuvers to and from serving public streets are possible. Coordination of routing traffic volumes anticipated by individual project TIAs is a required consideration of a development plan being considered by the City. ii. Thoroughfares And Roadways: A development plan that lays within the path of a thoroughfare as planned or committed to by adjacent devel- opment or of a thoroughfare that has been adjusted by the Council must make provision for the extension of the right of way of such thoroughfare when traffic projected densities necessitate extension. iii. Trails: A proposed multifamily development plan must consider appropriate trail routing through the proposed development so that a cohesive trail network can evolve over time. iv. Open Space: The proposed development plan must consider exten- sion of the open space or expansion of the open space, or consider how development portrayed by the development plan can relate to and define the open space. v. Contextual Characteristics: Any multifamily development plan must illustrate how various aspects of the context will also be manifest in the development design. Key aspects of the context include streetscape themes, continuity of water or water bodies, extension of indigenous plan drifts, continuity of road sections, treatment of parking, protection of and continuity with adjacent land uses, continuation of tree canopies and canopy species, continuity of natural features, extension of surface water management strategies, and continuity of edge treatments. Comments: Complies: Yes No In Spirit 17 (i.) Existing curb cuts aligned with neighboring property to remain along Stars & Stripes Way, second curb cut placed in near alignment with adjacent curb cuts; no adjacent curb along either southern, eastern, or western property bounds. (ii.) Project does not connect with any existing thoroughfare plans. (iii & iv) Pedestrian paths ring the project; a significant open space/pedestrian path cuts through the center of the project block providing opportunities for adjacent properties to connect to mid -block passage. (v) The planning established in this plan provides a framework of connections to which the surrounding area can connect to, furthering coherent pedestrian and vehicular passage around Grapevine Mills Mall. See Exhibit 5 p 19 c. Lot Occupancy 1. In a development plan that's required to be curvilinear as outlined by the Dis- Complies: trict Specific Standards, such a plan must establish a building relationship to the Yes No In Spirit street such that: X 7 F i. At least 60% of the interior street and drive -fronting buildings within the development plan design and 75% of buildings facing public streets serving the project must be sited so that the front building plane (the plane facing the street) is not parallel to the street right of way. ii. A minimum of 30% of the yard space along interior streets and drives, and 50% of the yard space fronting public streets serving the project, must be covered by a landscape approach defined by organic plant mass- ing and natural drifts. Comments: Mid -block development fronts portion of northern boundary and ESE boundary of site. Due to building's position behind existing retail pads, and non -orthogonal site boundary, internal drives and surface parking bend to meet site constraints. Forecourts are inserted along streetscapes allowing (ii) for the insertion of organic drifts of planting to populate street edges. See Exhibits 1, 4. 2. Building Relation to the Street and Orthogonal Plan Layouts: Plan designs Complies: that are required to be orthogonal, as outlined by the District Specific Standards, Yes No In Spirit must establish a building relationship to the street such that: i. The development plan must establish a "build -to" line for the interior streets and drives of the project that will vary from the required 3ft build - to line along the plan's exterior public streets as specified in the District Specific Standards. This build -to line must be at least 9ft form the street or drive back of curb. ii. The presence of repetitive stoops, terraces or porches which project into the yard space created by the build -to line cannot be closer than 5ft to the street or drive back of curb and must project at least 4ft from the primary building mass. These projections must be architecturally contained such that they are part of the overall facade composition. The offset space created between the projected stoop, porch or terrace and the primary building mass must be a landscape space, leaving a 5ft minimum pedestrian space at the street edge. Comments: N/A — Grapevine Mills North District requires non -orthogonal plan. 20 d. Parking: Placement and Configuration 1. Parking Facility Type: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Structured Parking: Parking within the Transit Center Character Zone must be structured when the project exceeds 20 units per acre. Projects exceeding 40 units per acre in any other Character Zone must provide structured parking. ii. Surface Parking Areas: Projects with a unit density between 28 and 39 units per acre that provide aggregated surface parking must comply with the following: 1. Aggregated parking areas with more than 70 parking spaces (not including street or drive head -in parking) must be located in a place that is not visible to the primary street serving the project or located so that the parking area may be screened. Parking garages located such that they front a public street must have architectural eleva- tions that complement the design style of the multifamily structures. "Complement" in this context means that they must share similar horizontal offsets, organization of openings, and use of materials. 2. Aggregated parking areas in non -orthogonal development plan designs must also have a curvilinear configuration. 3. Aggregated parking areas must be landscaped Comments: Required parking for multifamily development provided in two above -grade structured garages. The lone garage edge not wrapped by the buildings, is clad with a facade compatible with the multifamily buildings. Parallel parking spaces along the firelane are broken up by tree islands. Head -in parking provided to comply with a lease agreement with a neighboring property is non -orthogonal, landscaped, and placed adjacent to the neighboring property and it's access routes. See Exhibit 4. 2. Head -in parking along streets: Before the parking demand for aggregated Complies: parking areas is determined, head -in street and drive parking must be provided Yes No In Spirit to the extent permitted by the streetscape design., Comments: Additional on -site parking provided for adjacent retail uses follows a landscaped, curved path. See Exhibit 4. 21 e. Site Open Space Requirement 1.Open space as a percent of total development area: At least 20% of the site area identified in any multifamily plan must be set aside as open space. Site areas that qualify as open space set asides include: i. Areas protecting existing natural features and/or plant communities ii. Areas used for the surface management of storm water that are not structures iii. Any retained water iv. Project amenity areas that are visually accessible from streets and/or drives v. Playgrounds vi. Pedestrian trails vii. Borrowed street landscape areas viii. Pedestrian accessible areas between structures open to access by the project population Comments: Ref. Landscape and Zoning plans. See Exhibits 6,7. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 7 7 2. Form giving influence: Open space provided within any development plan Complies: must serve as a frontage for at least 25% of the structures within the project, Yes No In Spirit where buildings can define the edge of open space, except for the Transit Center 17X [I El District where street frontage is prioritized. Comments: The central pedestrian spine and smaller, exterior courtyards both define the form of the multifamily buildings and also serve well in excess of 25% of the building edges. See Exhibit 5. 22 f. Preservation of Natural Drainage 1. Natural Drainageways: Any development plan for multifamily development Complies: in Grapevine must illustrate the extent to which natural drainage within the lot, Yes No In Spirit parcel or tract exists and is preserved through design initiatives that preserve, F restore or replicate natural drainage patterns. Any disruption of natural drainage patterns must be approved by the City of Grapevine. Comments: With the exception of one previously planned building, the site is currently fully developed with associated paving, drainage systems and flow patterns. The design of the existing storm system accounts for the previously planned, yet -to -be constructed building.The site drainage systems currently discharge at three outfall points. The proposed redevelopment of the site honors the approved, current drainage area sizes and flow patterns so that there is no increase in flows at any of the three existing discharge points. 23 g. Storm Weather Management Facilities 1. Storm weather management structures: Any development plan for mul- tifamily development in the City of Grapevine, where structured storm water management solutions are requires must adhere to the following: i. Minimize structured means of water management: Plans must min- imize the use of cross drainage structures, armored channels, concrete flow ways, and other structured solutions to storm water management, unless such structures are for the purpose of creating a pedestrian or urban activity at a water edge. ii. Maintain natural shapes and form in the creation of detention/re- tention facilities and created drainageways (a.k.a. flow management facilities): Water collection points and/or pools created by nature have shapes that are clearly organic. Therefore, plans should avoid straight lines, hard angles, and regular geometric shapes in the creation of flow management facilities. iii. Landscape with natural elements: Where storm water management design creates conditions that support indigenous plants, measures must be taken to landscape such facilities in ways that allow such plants. iv. Respect natural sub -systems: Proper design of flow management fa- cilities should, where appropriate, include diverse ecological settings such as deep water (limnetic zones) in combination with shallow water (lit- toral zones), wetlands, ephemeral flows, and greater states of hydration which can support plant communities associated with these zones. Comments: Complies: Yes No In Spirit This is a redevelopment of an existing commercial project with no storm water management structures. There will be no increase in storm water discharge rates upon development of the multi -family project. No storm water management structures are proposed with this multi -family project. h. Grading 1 Grading for multifamily development in the City of Grapevine must adhere to Complies: the following: Yes No In Spirit i. Avoid steep grades: Grades equal to or greater than 20% are consid- ered steep and shall not be graded to create building lots. However, indi- vidual buildings which make grade transition within the building, porch or terrace expansions are permitted and therefore the limited disturbance of grade needed to accomplish this is permitted also. ii. Conform to standards for tree protection: Any tree over three inches in caliper remaining on a lot, parcel or tract (that is, trees not approved for removal) and exposed to the building activity or within 30ft of the building activity (hereinafter regulated trees) shall be protected as fol- lows: a. Tree fencing: Regulated tree trunks shall be protected within a visible "tree fence" at least 36 inches tall and protecting the tree and ground around the tree to a minimum distance from the trunk equal to the distance of the tree drip line or 10 feet, whichever is less. b. Tree marking: All regulated trees shall be marked with a green surveyor tape which indicates "Protected Tree" status. c. Ground compaction avoidance: Measures shall be taken to min- imize ground compaction within the dripline of a Regulated Tree. Grading within the ground protected by a tree fence is prohibited. d. Maintenance of normal hydration: Measures shall be taken to maintain normal hydration of a Regulated Tree. Comments: There will be no area at any building where the grade exceeds 20%. Part B: Building Design Standards a.Street Interface 1. Semi-public space adjacent to streets: i. Canopies and store fronts are limited to urban setting such as primary street frontage in the Transit Center Character Zone. ii. In any single building block, there must be at least one expression of a first -floor, semi-public space within the street -facing elevation. If a cano- py of storefront is used to meet this standard, it must occupy at least 50% of the length of the elevation. 2. Residential Design Standards: If building frontage defines the edge of an open space, each building block must have at least one first -floor pedestrian space that is part of the architectural design. i. Store fronts must be set within a minimum first -floor plate height of 15ft. and must be comprised of vertical and horizontal subdivisions with- in which any area of un-supported glass is no smaller than 16 square feet. Vertical and horizontal subdivisions shall be at least two inches wide. Comments: Complies: Yes No In Spirit 17 Each building locates semi-public leasing offices along at the western end of the site, each facing the internal pedestrian way. See Exhibit 8. 2. Residential Design Standards: If building frontage defines the edge of an open Complies: space, each building block must have at least one first -floor pedestrian space that Yes No In Spirit is part of the architectural design. X, 17 F i. Store fronts must be set within a minimum first -floor plate height of 15ft. and must be comprised of vertical and horizontal subdivisions with- in which any area of un-supported glass is no smaller than 16 square feet. Vertical and horizontal subdivisions shall be at least two inches wide. Comments: Faces of the building which define one of the public open spaces are augmented with stoops extending from a fronting unit's balcony stack. Additionally, leasing offices and various resident -amenity spaces are located along building faces which define open spaces. See Exhibit 8. 26 b. Elevation Composition 1. The exterior design of any multifamily structure must comprise an overall Complies: pattern. This pattern includes: Yes No In Spirit i. Regulating lines that organize its elements FX7 7 ii. Proportioning iii. Hierarchy of dominant and subordinate elements Comments: Building proportion organized around solid void relationships - primarily between solid wall and balcony recess, with a second level of articulation established between the solid wall cut by a single window, and a solid wall but by a window and contrasting brick infill. Massing hierarchy established through variation in height and material at building level 4, and through planar levels between recessed balconies and dominant building face. See Exhibits 2,9. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 27 b. Elevation Composition (continued) 2. Openings and features of any building must have a common justification. Complies: Yes No i. When a pitched roof design is used, all windows —except dormer win- dows —must be below the cornice detail. �- ii. When a flat roof design is used, all windows must be at least 2ft below the parapet. iii. When both a pitched roof and flat roof design are used in the same elevation, the window heads must align horizontally. iv. Windows may abut the cornice detail if the window header modulates the banding or detailing of the cornice. v. Openings within an elevation must have a common reference line that engages the sill or head. vi. Windows within an elevation must have a common vertical reference line from the first to the top floor. vii. Windows must align with the features that define the architectural form. For example, windows in a gable cannot be arbitrarily distributed within the face of the gable unless specifically approved by the City. viii. Excepting first floor store front or vertical mixed -use structure, all openings must be square or portrait in orientation. ix. Windows, doors and other openings must be articulated within a pro- jected surround or header unless otherwise approved by the City. Comments: Windows comply with above requirements, See Exhibits 2,9. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 28 In Spirit 17 b. Elevation Composition (continued) 3. All elevations of a structure must receive equal treatment of style on all el- Complies: evations of a structure so as to avoid the common pitfall whereby only the Yes No In Spirit street -facing facade is adequately styled and structured. x__ F7 E Comments: All building elevations have received similar treatment in material and detail. 4. Forms created within the elevation, such as towers, bays and plate changes, Complies: must be derived from functions within the plan. Design approaches which seek Yes No In Spirit to decorate a "space plan" derived independent of the elevation design are pro- hibited. Comments: Elevations and floor plans have been designed in tandem. Changes in bay depth and corresponding material changes correspond with changes in program in the plan. 29 b. Street wall complexity and exterior offsets 1. Building offsets: Complies: Yes No i. Residential building blocks may not have more than 50 linear feet of X wall without a wall offset. ii. Horizontal wall offsets must be at least 4ft. This may include balconies if contained within the confines of the offset. Any balconies projected from the face must have an architectural enclosure. iii. Architectural forms such as enclosed porches, stair towers, projected bays or stacked balconies maybe projected from the building block or recessed within it and must be accompanied by a roof in the roof massing that corresponds to the architectural form. Comments: The proposed building complies with the requirements listed above. See Exhibit 8. In Spirit 11 011 d. Void to Solid Ratio 1. For the first floor of a vertical mixed -use plan wherein the first floor has a Complies: commercial use, the void -to -solid ratio must be greater than or equal to 1.5:1 Yes No In Spirit (the amount of void being greater than the amount of solid). The solid portions of the first floor facade must extend vertically to the floors above and parapet —J detail. Comments: The proposed building has no mixed -use element integrated into the first floor. Storefront is included at the Leasing areas on both buildings; these areas meet the above requirement. See Exhibit 2. 2. For floors above the first floor in a vertical mixed -use plan (or for all floors in Complies: a residential plan), the void -to -solid ratio must be less than or equal to 0.5:1 (the Yes No In Spirit amount of void being less than the amount of solid). Comments: The proposed building has no mixed -use element integrated into the first floor. The multifamily use maintains a solid to void ratio of - 0.33:1 See Exhibit 2. 31 e. Architectural Enclosures 1. All projected stair towers, elevator shafts, and cantilevered building projec- Complies: tions (other than balconies) must be architecturally enclosed. This means that Yes No In Spirit they must be enclosed in an architectural skin and must be expressed as a roof form. X; Comments: All vertical circulation are enclosed in the same manner as the rest of the building. 32 f. Roof form: Rooves and the roof lines they create are essential design elements for higher -value structures. Visible roof design must: 1. Be legible. There must be a clear organization of a dominant roof mass from Complies: which subordinate roof masses extend. Yes No In Spirit Comments: Roofs are structured along the same formal hierarchy within the building elevations. See Exhibits 2, 9. 2. Be balanced. A single roof pitch must be used within the total composition. Different roof pitches are permitted for tower forms which are not engaged with the general roof form. Permitted roof forms include gables, hips, barrels if used a secondary forms, sheds if used as secondary forms, and flat. Comments: No pitched roofs are used in the proposed buildings. Complies: Yes No In Spirit � , F 33 g. Style Integrity 1. The use of architectural detailing associated with a style must use the charac- Complies: teristic detailing of that style. Yes No In Spirit Comments: The proposed building employs a style common to contemporary commercial architecture. In this formulation, the building diagram articulates brick masses cut by stucco recesses; each material employing semi -traditional detailing, but with restraint typical of early modern architecture. See Exhibit 2. 2. The use of systems or materials that replicate the work of a trade or artisan are Complies: prohibited. Construction details which are traditionally derived from the work Yes No In Spirit of an artisan (such as a metal smith, carpenter or stonemason) must use a mate- rial in which the characteristic craftsperson can work. 7 Comments: No systems or materials are proposed that would require the work of an artisan (other than masons), or that would require an artisan to work with a material not standard to their craft. 34 h. Chimneys 1. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the chimney must be ter- Complies: minated with a chimney cap that conceals the metal spark arrestor and visually Yes No In Spirit reads as a traditional tile flue system, unless otherwise approved by the City. F Comments: The proposed buildings do not have any chimneys. 2. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the chimney shaft must be Complies: enclosed with unit masonry, stone or 3-coat stucco with a minimum dimension Yes No In Spirit of 4.5ft x 3ft, unless otherwise approved by the City. 71 E F Comments: I — The proposed buildings do not have any chimneys. 3. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the rise of the chimney shaft Complies: must be detailed so that the chimney has complexity in plan as well as elevation. Yes No In Spirit Comments: The proposed buildings do not have any chimneys. 35 Part C: Building Construction Standards a.Materials and Application of Materials 1. Primary Material. At least 70% of the exterior fagade of a 4-story structure or Complies: 80% of the exterior facade of a 3-story structure or 100% of the exterior fagade of Yes No a structure less than 3 stories must be one of the following: i. Brick. Clay brick, modular size, hard -fired and meeting severe weath- er standards. Embossed or molded brick is generally prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. All brick shall be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all building corners —both inside and outside —must be executed in a toothed masonry fashion. Weeping or slumped joints are prohibited. ii. Stone. Stone must be laid in a typical load -bearing pattern. Character- istics of such pattern include: 1. Tight mortar joints with no more than 30% of joints larger than 3/8 inches. 2. Coursed patterns such as Ashlar, Coursed Chopped Stone and Coursed Rubbed Stone. Mosaic and un-coursed rubble stone -work are prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. 3. Cultured stone or other faux stone products are prohibited. 4. All stone must be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all cor- ners —both inside and outside —must be executed in a toothed ma- sonry fashion. iii. Other Stone. Cut stone/smoothed-face stone or Cut stone/smoothed- face stone that is mechanically attached with a stone veneer system may be used provided that the system uses a true stone. Comments: The proposed project complies - 70% of the 4-story building to be brick. See Exhibit 2. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 7 El In Spirit F7 W. a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 2. Secondary Material. No more than 30% of the building facade may be a sec- Complies: ondary material. This includes: Yes No In Spirit i. Stucco. 3-coat stucco on lath over a structural frame with expansion JA joints concealed by filling the joint with expandable filler that is troweled flat with the stucco, is the same color as the stucco and that matches the stucco surface texture is permitted. Dryvit/EFS type systems are prohibit- ed. Stucco is not permitted in the Central Transit District. ii. Metal. Architectural metal wall systems are permitted. iii. Siding. Wood or Cementacious siding is permitted in those Character Zones where pitched roof styles are permitted. Comments: The proposed project complies - 30% of the 4-story building to be stucco. 3. Roof Material. Acceptable materials include: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Flat Roof. Flat rooves may be either a built-up bituminous roof or a membrane roof provided that it is installed in accordance with the man- ufacturer's specifications and issued a 30-year warranty. All flat rooves must be hidden from ground level view, behind a 12-inch parapet. ii. Pitched Roof. These may be either a standing -seam metal roof with standing folded and soldered seams, a commercial metal roof if approved by the City, slate, clay tile, or 40-year high profile composition single. All composition shingle rooves must have closed valleys. Concrete single products with a relief greater than 1/2 inch are prohibited. iii. Parapet Cap. These must be either clay brick, cut stone, cast stone, tile, or terra cotta. Pressed metal maybe used if is it specifically created to decoratively cap a parapet and if specifically approved by the City. Comments: All proposed roofs are flat and in compliance with (i). A cast -stone parapet cap terminates all masonry walls in compliance with (iii). See Exhibit 9. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 37 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 4. Material Change. Material changes in any elevation may occur only under the Complies: following conditions: Yes No i. Change occurs at an inside corner. ii. Change that occurs at an outside corner must wrap the corner and change at a location at least 12 inches from that corner and be designed as the termination of an architectural detail. iii. Change that occurs wherein the different material is contained within a distinct architectural form that projects from the primary architectural mass. iv. Change that reflects an offset between a lower and an upper floor where the offset is at least 6 inches. Material changes within the same architectural plane are prohibited. Comments: In Spirit F1 All material changes occur at inside corners, outside corners such that the masonry facade wraps the outside corner a minimum of 12 inches, or at a stack of projecting balconies so as to frame the balcony stack. See Exhibit 9. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 38 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 5. Relief. The City seeks to promote relief and dimension in architectural surfac- Complies: es, details, and motifs with the following requirements: Yes No In Spirit i. The following materials are prohibited: Fiberglass, Styrofoam or stuc- co -over- styrofoam, plastic, aluminum. Stucco applied to look like pro- jected stone, Stucco applied to look like cast stone, Stucco applied to look like terra cotta, cementacious boards used in any application which makes a corner, cementacious boards used in any application which makes a mitre or decorative shape, Masonite or Masonite products, com- position wood products used as an exterior material, trimcraft used as a soffit board, or other smooth finished soffit board. ii. Relief in the treatment of cornices, overhangs, gable projections, bay windows, dormers, water tables, belt coursers, sills, surrounds, timber components and other expressions must be executed in ways that pro- duce depth, shadow and texture. iii. In coursed rubble stonework, stones must be laid into the wall as the stone would lay on the ground. No more than 20% of the stones in any elevation may be "flipped" sideways. iv. The minimum projection in any built-up profiles and decorative assembly must be 3/ inch per element of the assembly. A cornice detail comprised of three stepped bricks must have a total projection of 2 and 1/4 inches. Comments: No prohibited materials are proposed. Brick cornices will comply with minimum dimensions stated and are designed to cast shadows upon building elements below. See Exhibit 9. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 39 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 6. Carpentered Exterior Trim. Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. All carpentered exterior trim must be high -quality finished grade wood stock. ! ii. If a trim installation is to be joined along any continuous run of mate- rial, the required joint must be a "spline joint" iii. All outside corners must be mitered and blocked with sufficient clo- sure that the joint is not visible from the street. iv. Corners must be closed by a carpentered joint. Trim clips are prohib- ited. v. Facia and gable rake must be stepped at the drip mold unless hidden by a gutter. vi. Carpentered trim that forms the veneer pocket must have a complex- ity achieved in trim mold, built-up step molding, or other traditional detail such as a dentil mold. Comments: No carpentered exterior trim appears on the project. 40 b. Wall Construction 1. Wall Section. All wood -framed exterior walls must be constructed as follows: Complies: Yes No i. When shim- or flange -mounted windows are used in masonry ve- neered walls, framing may be conventional 2x4 framing. Ix ii. When shim -mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or oth- er permitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, exterior walls must be framed with 2x6 members in order to achieve a 3.5-inch minimum offset within the opening. iii. When flange -mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or other permitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, a double 2x4 framing assembly is required that allows the flange to be mounted on the inner 2x4 section with the second 2x4 section providing the required offset from the window sash or door at the opening. Comments: Walls to be framed with 2x6 studs, all windows will comply with 3.5" min. offset. See Exhibit 9. 2. Parapets. Where there is a flat roof, a parapet must extend at least 12 inches Complies: above the roof surface and conceal the roof material from ground -level view. Yes No 'I. Comments: The proposed project complies, parapet heights are called out in wall sections. See Exhibit 9. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE M In Spirit In Spirit 7 41 b. Wall Construction (continued) 3. Cornice Detail. All wall terminations at the roof must have a cornice detail comprised of at least 2 projected elements. Parapets must have a cap detail com- prised of at least 2 projected elements. Comments: Wall terminations will have at least 2 projected elements. See Exhibit 9. 4. Window Surrounds, Belt Courses and Base Courses. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 17 17 Complies: Yes No i. All openings in the exterior skin must have an architecturally appro- F_ F priate header and sill with an optional jamb. The required header and sill I^ must project at least 3/4 inches beyond the wall veneer. Window headers or sills may be either stone, cast stone, terra cotta, heavy timber (where appropriate for the style), or wood (where appropriate for the style). ii. Other architectural details like belt courses and base courses must be executed in the above materials and have a minimum projection of 3/4 inch per element of detail. In Spirit 7 Comments: Architecturally appropriate surrounds will be used. In brick walls, windows receive an inset head course and outset sill course for accent and water proofing. In stucco walls, windows are detailed as to provide a clean, border -less window; the "donut" look is not desired. Window head, sill, and jamb details are designed as to re -enforce the vertical and horizontal alignment of the facade. See Exhibits 2, 9. 42 c. Roof screening and appurtenances 1. Roof Projections. No plumbing stacks, venting stacks, skylights, or attic Complies: ventilators may penetrate the roof surfaces facing the street/drive. If there are Yes No multiple street/drive facing exposures, no roof projection may penetrate the roof slope that slopes to the "fronting" street or drive. All such penetrations must be I—. mounted straight and perpendicular to the ground (except for skylights and attic ventilators) and painted to blend with the roof color. Turbine vents are prohibit- ed. All vent stacks must have lead jacks. Comments: All proposed roofs are flat, surrounded by a raised parapet. See Exhibit 9. 2. Roof Mechanical. Roof mechanical must be screened behind a parapet wall or Complies: platform that is recessed into a pitched roof so that the incline of the roof slope Yes No creates a parapet wall. X 7 Comments: Mechanical systems to be screened on roof. 3. Gutters, Downspouts, Scuppers and Collection Boxes. These must be copper or an enduring prefinished metal with a minimum 20-gauge thickness. Gutters must be a minimum of 6 inches, half -round profile and attached with gutter straps. Downspouts must be a minimum of 4 inches and round. Elbows and bends must be a minimum of 4 inches, plain and round. Fascia mounted gutter systems are prohibited unless custom designed and integral to the architecture. In Spirit 17 Complies: Yes No In Spirit 17 Comments: No downspouts to be located on exterior of building; building to be internally drained. 43 d. Windows and Glazing 1. Glazing and Glazing Systems. Reflective glass is prohibited. Tinted glass and Complies: dark adhesive films where the transmission coefficient exceeds 27% is prohibited. Yes No In Spirit Stained glass is allowed provided that the glass is crafted in accordance with sol- dered camping or "H" camping. No acrylic or pourable techniques are allowed. Glazing systems may be used in certain accent areas of specifically approved by the City. Comments: Clear, Low-E insulated glass proposed throughout. No tinted glass, adhesive films, stained glass, or acrylic glazing systems are proposed. 44 Part D: Landscaping, Fencing and Screening a. Site Landscaping 1 Leaf Mass Between Buildings. All multifamily development must provide Complies: trees between buildings. At least 60% of the planted area must be comprised of Yes No over -story (canopy). Comments: See Exhibits 5, 10. 2. Layered Landscaping at Building Entries. Landscaping must be provided at building entries and must be "layered" The building entry landscaping area must be comprised of at least 3 layers: one upper layer of medium evergreen shrub approximately 30-36 inches high and 2 layers of shorter shrubs or one shrub and an ornamental grass. These must be planted in beds having a minimum width of 72 inches. Upper layer shrubs must be 5-gallon container plants planted 30 inches on center with triangular spacing. Lower layer shrubs may be 3-gallon container plants planted 24 inches on center with triangular spacing. Comments: In Spirit F Complies: Yes No In Spirit Our planting design mimics our hardscape layout with our layered planting groups extending perpendicular from the building entrance to create different experience in the space. The "layered" planting becomes a rhythm as you move through the corridor. See Exhibit 5. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 45 a. Site Landscaping (continued) 3. All landscape beds must be associated with walkways, roadways, amenity Complies: feature, buildings or screens. Floating, ornamental or non -associated landscape Yes No beds are prohibited. Comments: All landscape beds are associated with walkways and amenity features. No floating or non -associated beds are present. See Exhibits 3, 4, 5. 4. Plant Sizing. Shrubs that serve a screening function must be sized at the time of planting such that they can serve as an effective screen within 2 years of the planting date. 3-gallon plants must be planted 30 inches on center with triangu- lar spacing and 2-gallon plants must be planted 24 inches on center with trian- gular spacing. Smaller container and bedding plants must be planted at least 12 inches on center with triangular spacing.. Comments: All specified planing shall comply. Complies: Yes No _% In Spirit 17 In Spirit 11 46 b. Fences and Screening Walls 1. Fence Materials. Visible perimeter fences that are compliant with the General Complies: Standards may be made of unit masonry, wrought iron with unit masonry corner Yes No In Spirit columns, or masonry. If masonry, corner column and masonry interim column spacing is not to exceed 15ft and must have a masonry knee wall supporting wood or wrought iron infill. Comments: N/A - no perimeter fences or screening walls are proposed. 2. Gate Materials. Gates in fences constructed in accordance with DbI above Complies: may be made from wrought iron with a wrought iron frame (complying with Yes No In Spirit General Standards) or wood with frame members measuring a minimum of 1 and lh inches thick by 3 and 1/2 inches wide and planks measuring at least 1 and '/2 inches thick. Gates must be comprised of the same material as the fence. Comments: N/A - gates are not proposed. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 47 b. Fences and Screening Walls (continued) 3. Corner Expression of Support Structure. All property corners of a property Complies: line fence much be supported by a masonry column that is at least 10 square Yes No In Spirit inches. F Comments: N/A - no perimeter fences or screening walls are proposed. 4. Thin wall construction, cast or embossed concrete walls, picket materials not Complies: in compliance with the General Standards, iron fences with mechanical connec- Yes No In Spirit tion assemblies, pre -fabricated decorative elements designed to slip over stock or tubular steel shapes, and plastic or vinyl fence component systems are prohibit- ed. Comments: N/A - no perimeter fences or screening walls are proposed. 48 c. Street Visible Wrought Iron 1.Frames and other structural support members may not be less than 1 and 3/ inches in either width measurement or 1 and 3/4 inches in diameter if round. Comments: N/A - no perimeter fences or screening walls are proposed. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 17 F 2. Pickets that are 5ft in length or height or less must have a minimum width of Complies: 3/4 inches in either width dimension or diameter. When pickets are longer or tall- Yes No In Spirit er than 5ft, the minimum with dimension is increased to 1 inch in the dimension that faces the street or 1 inch in diameter. LA- 11 F Comments: N/A - no perimeter fences or screening walls are proposed. 3. Panels must be made of metal plate material with a minimum thickness of 3/16 inches. Comments: N/A - no perimeter fences or screening walls are proposed. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 49 Complies: Yes No In Spirit c. Street Visible Wrought Iron (continued) 4. The wall thickness of any tubular steel must not be less than 3/32 inches. Comments: N/A - no perimeter fences or screening walls are proposed. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 17 7 7 S. Decorative elements such as finials and rings must be made of solid stock Complies: material and welded to the pickets or to the frame made from the pickets if the Yes No In Spirit pickets are solid stock material. Attachments to the pickets or frame and all other components of the wrought iron construction must be welded. Mechanical con- x` nections are prohibited. Comments: N/A - no perimeter fences or screening walls are proposed. rn STARS AND STRIPES WAY AFFIDAVIT SUPPLEMENT GRAPEVINE, TEXAS gff BAYW EST DEVELOPMENT APRIL 27, 2021 - =10-mit GRAPEVINE MILLS BLVD (e ,t�; WA t. ri N � at; U_ S; • STARS AND STRIPES WAY 4 �R AREA- 0F CL REQUEST f cl E LL E a_ �+ A Q ai 0 EXHIBIT 1 DISTRICT SPECIFIC STANDARD 2 - PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION BEYOND THE PROJECT AND DISTRICT FIRE LANE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION EXTENDS ACROSS FIRE LANE AS RAISED TRAFFIC TABLE FLANKED BY BOLLARDS,TYP. J STORY WOOD FRAME \ MULTIFAMILY i2 UNITS_@ 980 SF AVG —AMENITY "GATEWAY" TRELLIS ` LEASING ARRIVAL LEASING PLAZA ------------------- ow FIRE LANE rr 36 SURFACE PARKING SPACES FOR'RETAIL TENANTS PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIO TO FUTURE qw GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY DISTRICT SPECIFIC STANDARD 23 - PROMOTE HORIZONTAL MIXED USE „ , = 40 SURFACE _ 11PARKING'SPACES Baywest Stars and Stripes Multifamily gff BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT - STRICT HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OF WINDOWS, DOORS. - FLAT ROOF BEHIND PARAPETS - EXPOSED STEEL BALCONIES -TALLER GROUND FLOOR - INCREASED GLAZING AT PUBLIC AREAS - BUILDING INSETS CORRESPOND TO UNIT PROGRAM: PUBLIC SPACES ARE AT THE BUILDING FORE, PRIVATE SPACES ARE RECESSED. - VOID TO SOLID RATIO OF 0.33 : 1 - 70% OF BUILDING FACADE IS BRICK UAW EXHIBIT A 1 DISTRICT SPECIFIC STANDARD 8 - GENERAL STANDARDS - PART B: BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS - COMMERCIALLY DERIVED STYLING AND FORMS B. ELEVATION COMPOSITION ■ 1 PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 2 .� SHADE STRUCTURE W/ SEATING �3 CORRIDOR PLAZA 4° 4 FITNESS LAWN 51 ACTIVITY LAWN LEASING PLAZA W/ TABLE SEATING 7 SHELTERED WALKWAY CONNECTION DROP OFF / SEATING �9' VEHICLE COURT 10° LEASING OFFICE ENTRY EXHIBIT 3 DISTRICT SPECIFIC STANDARD 11 - RESPONSIVE INTERFACE WITH OPEN SPACE AMENITIES Baywest Stars and Stripes Multifamily BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT A) BUILDINGS DO NOT HUG THE PROPERTY LINE, INSTEAD THEY ERODE STRATEGICALLY TO CREATE DEFINED, USABLE OUTDOOR SPACE. B PROPOSED DRIVE MEANDERS THROUGH THE SITE, BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS. ,C PROVIDED HEAD - IN ON -STREET PARKING FACILITATES AN EXISTING LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. D , ALL REQUIRED MULTIFAMILY PARKING IS PROVIDED FOR IN THE SCREENED STRUCTURED PARKING. EXHIBIT DISTRICT SPECIFIC STANDARD 13 - CURVILINEAR ORGANIZATION OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN Baywest Stars and Stripes Multifamily i 49ff BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT BUILDINGS ARE ORGANIZED AROUND A CENTRAL SPINE, PROVIDING PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO NEIGHBORING DEVELOPMENTS • ..... FORM —GIVING OPEN SPACE SERVES >25% OF BUILDING EDGE B` LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH AMENITY REQUIREMENTS, BENCHES, BIKE RACKS, ETC. E CURB CUTS ARE ALIGNED WHERE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES PERMIT. "t IoXC f C I 1 u ' BA M FT CROSSWALK CONNECTION BEYOND PROJECT COMPLIES TO DISTRICT - SPECIFIC STANDARDS PROPERTY LI BE ITYP) 25BUILDING SETBACK - PLANTER WALL III FITNESS WALL FITNESS GATE 11 II FITNESS LAWN o N_ 0 FT t SPAS �l7 r • COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 22 DAB1 — I EXHIBIT 5 GENERAL STANDARDS — PART A: SITE AND DESIGN 0PONMUNmm e NassmsFs PUN WITH T VICI NITY MAP LEGEND O LARGE CANOPY TREE CEDAR ELM H 50'-60' W 40'-50' BURR OAK H 50'-60' W 40'-50' LIVE OAK CHOAK H 40'-80' W 60-100' H 40'-60' W 50'-60' MEDIUM CANOPY TREE CANOPY T TEXAS RED OAK H 30'-35' W 20'-30' WESTERN SOAPBERRY H 30. W 25'-35' OAK H 20'-35' W 15-20' 35. BLACEYIGTO BIGTOOTH MAPLE H 40'-50' W 25'-35' ORNAMENTAL TREE O CHITALPA H 20'-35' W 20'-35' CRAPE MYRTLE H 15'-25' W 6'-15' TEXAS REDBUD H 15'-20' W 15'-20' CONCRETE PAVING OBRUSHED CONCRETE PAVING DECOMPOSED GRANITE ® MIXED PLANTING MEDIUM EVERGREEN GROUNDCOVER LAWN DOG WASTE STATION —.-----.--- PROPERTY LINE ---------- BUILDING SETBACK PLANTING DESCRIPTION:: A. MIXED PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 12" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (10) #5 CONTAINER SHRUBS; (10) #3 CONTAINER SHRUBS PER 100 SQ.FE PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. B. MEDIUM EVERGREEN PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 12" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (6) #7 CONTAINER SHRUBS PER 100 SQ.FT.. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. C. SEASONAL COLOR PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 8" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (100) 4" POT SEASONAL COLOR PLANTS PER 100 SQ.FT. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. C. GROUNDCOVER PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 8" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (45) #1 CONTAINER GROUNDCOVER PLANTS PER 100 SO.Fr. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. D. LAWN AREA PROVIDE MIN. 6" TOPSOIL COMPOST MIX WITH BERMUDA TIE 419 SOLID AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. PIAN NDRTH 0 10�40 Feet CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: GU2P_ ADDRESS: 320D GRAPENNE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY wTE: ALANNWGAND?D SCOMMIBSiDN DATE: SHEET u0�vnaTUEra oEvdauwr.N:R.7cL'S Baywest Stars and Stripes Multifamily i l:. 49ff BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT OPEN SPACE (NON -VEHICULAR) FIRE LANE RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE O VEHICULAR CIRCULATION SEC.22-RMF PROPOSED SEC.22-RMF PROPOSED SEC.22-RMF PROPOSED SEC.22-RMF PROPOSED HEIGHT 35' MAX. 55' MAX. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA (75% MAX.) (75% MAX.) NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS: 474 NUMBER OF BEDROOMS - 761 NUMBER OF STORIES 2 MAX. 4 TOTAL OPEN SPACE (20% MIN.) 160,523 SF. (34.9%) EFFICIENCIES 600 - 749 SF (15% MAX.) 32 (7%) PARKING SPACES (2 / UNIT) 803 (1.6 / UNIT) TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE (50% MAX.) 204,180 SF. (44.5%) RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE PER UNIT 250 SF. MIN 264 SF. 1-BEDROOM 755 - 899 SF -- 241 BUILDING SEPARATIONS - TOTAL LOT AREA 2 AC. MIN. 10.53 AC. (458,713 SF.) TOTAL PAVED AREA 2-BEDROOM 900 - 999 SF - 178 BUILDING 1 - 3 FLOOR AREA RATIO 1.78 : 1 NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS/AC. 20 MAX. 54.1 3-BEDROOM 1,000 SF + 23 BUILDING 2 - 4 cn 0 m S 00° 49" o n Wc� O _0— — — _- — -' z TYP S 00° 31 tom ONNECTION T( PUBLIC R.O.W. _ I Q MULTIFAMILY BUILDING) 00 -L �UILUIIVV 0CY IIVIN 50'MIN. a o POOL X <COURTYARD :.X} M N 06 cn . LL z Q Q ��I•/� V/ 0 ? J D C' o OQ^p F_ N - _-r__, _. .. may: S 01 ° 46' 31" W - 556.94' EXISTING 24' WIDE FIRE LANE Q CONNE - / D II/� EASEMENT WIDENED TO 26 L _ _ . _ _�- m �PRIVA' . .. _ -.- SIDE Yi O N W m N w Z GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY EXHIBIT 6 GENERAL STANDARDS - PART A: SITE AND DESIGN E. OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT 62 PARKING SPACES ARE DEED RESTRICTED TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTY N 010 46'57" E - 191.87' v ;CONNECTION TO PUBLIC R.O.W. CONNECTION TO PRIVATE DRIVE ZING I 5 . I . DE YARD SETBACK oR io I w °r° w LL fV Go z NECTIO�O N 84° 39' 50" W - 37.62' LiPUBLIC R.O.W. Baywest Stars and Stripes Multifamily It 49ff BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT v 9 U) w a. it r� 0 z Q U) a v) 1 VEHICLE COURT 4 OPEN LAWN 7 FITNESS LAWN 10 STREET SCAPE 2 DRIVE COURT DROPOFF 5 LEASING PLAZA 8 SPINE FIRE LANE 3 TRELLIS WALKWAY CONNECTION 6 PUBLIC PLAZA 9 CROSSWALK EXHIBIT 7 GENERAL STANDARDS - PART A: SITE AND DESIGN E. OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT Baywest Stars and Stripes Multifamily k, 49ff BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT AAj LEASING OFFFICE AND AMENITY SPACES LOCATED ADJACENT TO PUBLIC I OPEN SPACE. t,B) GROUND FLOOR UNITS HAVE STOOPS IN -LINE WITH BALCONIES ABOVE. THESE SLOTS ARE 5' DEEP TO BREAK THE BUILDING MASS AT REGULAR INTERVALS. I I p10 I WALL ASSEMBLY #5 ROOF ASSEMBLY #1 c PRE -FABRICATED STEEL CANOPY m ROOF TRUSS BEARING 7 I FLOOR ASSEMBLY#1 -51D WALL ASSEMBLY #3 m m BEYOND 6 A-510 PRE -FABRICATED STEELBALCONY ( ) EVEL 4 T.O.D. — — � 35' WALL ASSEMBLY #5 7 FLOOR ASSEMBLY#1 A-510 - N WALL ASSEMBLY#3 I BEYOND 6 A-510 PRE -FABRICATED STEELBALCONY EVEL 3 T.O.D. 23'-1 WALL ASSEMBLY #5 I 7 A-510 FLOOR ASSEMBLY 91 v c� WALL ASSEMBLY #3 BEYOND 6 A-510 PRE -FABRICATED STEEL BALCONY LEVEL 2 T.O.D. I WALL ASSEMBLY#5 WALL ASSEMBLY#3�� a BEYOND 6 A-510 I i 1)=� LEVEL 1 — — —0 - 7 F-III -I -I 1 1-F IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 4 Wall Section 04 n LEVEL 1 - BUILDING 1 - FLOOR PLAN 3I ' = 1'-0" 1 - 20�-O- EXHIBIT 8 GENERAL STANDARDS - PART B: BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS - A.STREETINTERFACE Baywest Stars and Stripes Multifamily gff BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT O' 9 EXHIBIT 9 GENERAL STANDARDS — PART B: BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS — A. MATERIALS AND APPLICATION OF MATERIALS B. WALL CONSTRUCTION 5 \ ROOF ASSEMBLY #1 PRE -FABRICATED STEEL CANOPY A-510 i 7 WALL ASSEMBLY #5 A-510 FLOOR ASSEMBLY #1 A-510 PRE -FABRICATED STEEL BALCONY 7 A-510 WALL ASSEMBLY #5 FLOOR ASSEMBLY #1 A-510 PRE -FABRICATED STEEL BALCONY 7 A-510 WALL ASSEMBLY #5 FLOOR ASSEMBLY #1 /117 A-510 PRE -FABRICATED STEEL BALCONY 7 A 510 0 iD ROOF TRUSS BEARING 44'-88"" LEVEL 4 T.O.D. co 36,-0" Ts - N c m / I T N a> LEVEL 2 T.O.D. "' 12'-88"" WALL ASSEMBLY #5 � (V 6 =1I1=1II III=III Wall Sectinn ng LEVEL 1 — 0. 1 A-510 ROOF ASSEMBLY #1 WALL ASSEMBLY #3 WALL ASSEMBLY #4 3 A-510 WALL ASSEMBLY #3 BEYOND FLOOR ASSEMBLY #1 2 A-510 — WALL ASSEMBLY #3 3 A-510 WALL ASSEMBLY #4 WALL ASSEMBLY #3 BEYOND FLOOR ASSEMBLY #1 A-510 WALL ASSEMBLY #3 3 WALL ASSEMBLY #4 A-510 WALL ASSEMBLY #3 BEYOND FLOOR ASSEMBLY #1 A=510 — WALL ASSEMBLY #3 3 A-510 WALL ASSEMBLY�WALL ASSEMBLY #44 WALL ASSEMBLY #3 BEYOND 0 co ROOFTRUSS BEARING 44' — LEVEL 4 T.O.D. co35' m - cV v . b� LEVEL 3 T.O.D. 23 - 1 I cV v , m LEVEL 2 T.O.D. "' i v 00 ` N 2 LEVEL 1 _ -III-- 111� ll1 I I1 I I1 11= Wall SPrtinn n1 Baywest Stars and Stripes Multifamily gff BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED SITE PLAN — REQUIRED TREE COVERAGE • TOTAL REQUIRED TREES: (66) NON —VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE (6) STREET TREES — STARS AND STRIPES WAY (9) STREET TREES — FM 2499 (81) TOTAL SITE TREES REQ. (57,259 SF OR 12.5% OF TOTAL SITE AREA) • TOTAL PROPOSED TREES: (212) TREES (149,863 SF OR 33% OF TOTAL SITE AREA) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS 131 TREES OR 20.5% OF SITE AREA ABOVE COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT 10 �F Lt �...................... a r ........................................ ............................ ................................................. ....... ,�...r..................,. ..... GENERAL STANDARDS — PART D: LANDSCAPING, FENCING AND SCREENING — A. SITE LANDSCAPING — r . ' I I ......e.. e.......... ............................. Baywest Stars and Stripes Multifamily t7" _ BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT EM ®No" r i a Ito lI.MMMfff 7M11111 ,. • 5 � e t�•' • s��t!'�ni^ k�i�' . �, .., t• � °#�.{. °F•_. �,.+ �:*��.�'�.t.� h - rl'',f�i Y.'�w�r!'$��s'� ";�Qd��'�. A...,. •. f -.. .. k 3 S Aig ADA rw ., sa lot wt fix• �,� - _ ®. '� c u k� AW ja� t s i }llrrTTSFSF�� ,* -k Aft WA + rwr. ■ Q Y >'a Nor. 11 F ,yy . . �" _ _. <�;.r� ,��•�;^�~ ~ *fit+ � �`' : ..a''+".r� 1 �_;�,'"'' ryr *9 �6w � • , � .� . _ • � y lr Y'l + f too# -, ` N :�� , _rfifr R +C i - ^i � Y, �a �Y •` �. t:f "„� „ice �_ 3...� r-. •a ' f ` .l ��� �'�' r°4 r+$• -.� � :.� ,,I� it T ��. ���+. � y..�.." ~ 'y - cr, T Y , a r r •W e ' jj l i` • .•,,�r l �f �P � l �4�'.4 ram^ _ _ y � F a • t ON 1A AAW tx.r��■s� I v I&I STARS AND STRIPES WAY DEVELOPMENT PLAN GRAPEVINE, TEXAS CU20-26 gff BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT MAY 18, 2021 9ff 6 1 SITE HISTORY BADEVELOPMENT YWEST Owned since 2006 Outparcel land pads have been for sale, lease, or build -to -suit since 2006 with no takers LA Fitness vacated 2+years ago We have reached out to all gyms and there is no interest The existing building is highly specialized with a pool and two levels OUR VISION 9ff BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT To create a project which compliments adjacent uses and promotes community Enhance linkage and walkability so existing and future retail and businesses can thrive Use the highest quality materials and architectural language consistent with Grapevine standards Ultimately create a higher and better use for the community 475 units in two separate buildings, each with their own garage n} '�' %. ��`"� .,,�•^ . � � . t•,,.. � � �; -, ( ice' tir i:: 1.700 M INE MILD IUOFt1 DISTRiE f Yam' ,dam __ OV RAPEVINE MILLS BLVD- , iI%k �` f 7MARLd STARS AND STRIPES WAY AREA OF REQUEST U-1 ui 61 1 ti .K . 1Tiiv ram__ p AlLZ S PROMOTING THE LIV LAY LIFESTYLE OF,Dl 'ADDITIONAL CRITICAI: ROMOTE EXISTING AN BUSINESSES IL job% STARS AND STRIPES WAY 4W4 ,r:: **.. . r 10 • SY+l �1[ yu i - ,.� - ��i ^, - /Ian/f} r.., `� a a. t • AFI- a zt- wo r �1► 4 Lag fd 11 • � +tiro '�� !�'4� _ o, R • , •pa r� �• r �� r•s 1 a J. 4 aulJOKINI PROPORTIONAL MASSING gff I BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT I rel I Fil I I rd FimTffmil 01 z iT Fil 12 1 Oki ri � f lAv 0 • I Maki � Ali 1 i jilts 90101 alk M I kviii I I*, .` Fri —"i r ' __ - _ i• ��� "*ham . v C r . e iil�� MM ►.,.r � � s 16 EXISTING V. PROPOSED TREES - BAY`"EST EXISTING TREES: (56) TREES (39,586 SF OR 8% OF TOTAL SITE AREA) CURRENT DEVELOPMENT IS 22 TREES OR 4% OF SITE AREA SHORT OF COMPLIANCE PROPOSED TREES: (212) TREES (149,863 SF OR 33% OF TOTAL SITE AREA) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS 131 TREES OR 20*5% OF SITE AREA ABOVE COMPLIANCE .......... ........................ ............ I I .... I'...... .... I - ..... ...... ......... .................. .......... ................................... ........ L L L L L dir Air L L L 'r Apr" j Ato 0 ...................................... 4 .........l ......... W ...... ,p ANEW& - �A IriR 6 lot i BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT m r77 let ............ ...... ........... ......................... ...... No 11 BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT mu m 11 ARN .......... ........ .......... ............. ...... ....................... .. ................. ............ .......... . . ........... . 19 KEY PLAN PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 2 :° SHADE STRUCTURE W/ SEATING ' CORRIDOR PLAZA FITNESS LAWN t= , { ACTIVITY LAWN LEASING PLAZA W/ TABLE SEATING SHELTERED WALKWAY CONNECTION 8 DROP OFF / SEATING 9 VEHICLE COURT 10� LEASING OFFICE ENTRY PUBLIC CORRIDOR ENLARGEMENT PLAN 20 PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE E-LOUNGE (FROM A SIMILAR OFF PROJECT) BAYWESI DEVELOPMENT I PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE E-LOUNGE r. (FROM A SIMILAR GFF PROJECT) ask - b 'p w1 i r I 4 le' Aldr A"" Al gff —fly r +p • a ,.,...... � J to ` GRAPEVINE . : MILLS BLVD uppoRT FROM ADJAC NT t r _.; "THE WNERS AN BUSINESSES . SLEEP ,,•.. SHACKS EXPERTS r cr, RETAIL BAKER WALLIS ; STARS AND STRIPES vv h j i FUTURE • . * Q BILLINGSLEY ' DEVELOPMENT ARE r. s �= REQUEST`' • GRAPEVINE ,� cn • MILLS`--= at ••' MALL z �. + u •,,' (SUPPORTIVE LETTER FROM ti j e !1P HERB SIMON, FOUNDER OF�' rR.. ,• SIMON PROPERTIES) !U CRACKER t- ..: ,..,. a- ..- z- _ ` Q BARREL .� :. , 't41 L.L. . • � s kk i._ A An E & WAR IN TEXAS � `,'•' ` w",•�► �� ` �-�` t r I'AYWEST DEVELOPMENT 't�1 �` ` % ! , . 9ff BT USE EXISTING BUILDING? AYWES DEVELOPMENT M A KKE TV I EW Occupancy, absorption drop as more big box retailers close Occupancy Under Construction Completions 92.4% 2,290,429 SF () 326,609 SF F*rel H�Ioficai Net Absorption and 10cwpaw.-i Role Net Absorption WSO Occupancy (%) 5 95 3 93 2 91 0 39 (2) 87 (-1) R; 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 � Annual Net Absorption — Occupancy Source: CBR E Research, 0 12021 A. � .Net Absorption (408,029) SF gff a BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT OR X1 �_ Lm t •w r YA 4l"', a 7.77 - all, *Wwii 11 \1.4 ..r•�a all, *Wwii 11 \1.4 ..r•�a DISCLAIMER: RENDERING ON THIS SHEET MAY NOT REPRESENT THE MOST CURRENT DESIGN STARS & STRIPES BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE SHEET. OF_ APPROVAL DOES NOTAUT-10-ANY wORM IN COWMT W1TH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C .y 7 Q 0 W t H00 2LL 0 LL CIII - OC a� 0 20% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT Lu In Y � O o_ m c �>< 06 > a � c > mCL 0� 0 ao N V i No. Date Revision tE� A c'i. WAYA;Ff��a Drawn qg,),By Reviewer Reviewed sT,q OF .+i1P � 01101/F COVER SHEET Project No. 19185.01 Date 2020-12-07 G-000 0 Copyright 2019 - [IMF TARIF - NO. BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 88'13'29' W 1.57' L2 N 07'07'18' E 90.23' L3 N 05.30'18' E 69.37' L4 N 56*55'17* E 65.69' L5 N 01' 12' 17' E 13.40' 15' _ Fiq f CAE \ \ \ Gg ANSLCCi SsJFS,L7T S 84'29' 0 62 37. CURVE TABLE NO. RADIUS I DELTA I ARC I CH. BEARING I CHORD Cl 5707.58' 1 00'OS'58' 9.95' 1 N 00'20'38' W 9.95' TW'vol BLUESKVSURVEYING OWNER a MAPPING. CORPORATION LCG GRAPEVINE II, LP 1015MIDWAYROAD 2 HENRY ADAMS, SUITE 450 DALLAS, TEXAS 7522994103 PHONE. 42t4)-46 0 GNTA FRANSISCO, N MANAGFAX )214) 358-4600 CONTACT: BILL POLAND, MANAGER DRPETREE@BLUESKYSURVEYING.COM PHONE: (415) 552-7760 TI3PLS REGISTRAPON No. 10105700 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY (VMNBLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY) TRACT A FUTURE R.O.W. GRAPEVINE VINEYARD ADDITION 25' UTIL h DRAINAGE ESMT CABINET A, SLIDE 8466 CAB •A• SL 8466 I D.1620 ACRES TO STATE OF TEXAS I � lCCpo212227980 0 25' 50' too' GRAPHIC SCALE: f'=50' LEGEND CAB. CABINET SL. SLIDE .X•FND •X• CUT FOUND IN CONCRETE ..X• SET •X• CUT SET IN CONCRETE PG. PAGE O.R.T.C.T. DEED RECORDS TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS P.R.T.C.T. PLAT RECORDS TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS O.P.R.T.C.T. OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS EASEMENT TO BE ABANONED BY THIS PLAT i PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION. DATE APPROVED: CHAIRMAN., SECRETARY' GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL" DATE APPROVED: MAYOR' CITY SECRETARY." THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT IS TO COMBINE LOTS 2R-A, SR, AND 6R INTO ONE LOT, AND TO ABANDON EXISTING EASEMENTS, AND DEDICATE NEW EASEMENTS. 11 REPLA T OF LOT 5R1, BLOCK A GRAPVEVINE VINEYARDS 10.5311 ACRES OF LAND BEING A REPLAT OF LOTS 2R—A, 5R, & 6R, BLOCK A GRAPEVINE VINEYARDS JAMES GIBSON SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 586 & 587 CITY OF GRAPEVINE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS NOVEMBER Z, 2020 THIS PLAT FILED IN CABINET ___, SLIDE , DATE PAGE 1 OF 2 OWNER'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT WHEREAS, WE, LCG GRAPEVINE 11, LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ARE THE OWNERS OF ALL THAT CERTAIN LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE JAMES GIBSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 586 AND 587 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS KNOWN AS LOTS 2R-A, 5R, AND 6R, IN BLOCK A OF AMENDED REPLAT OF GRAPEVINE VINEYARDS, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED UNDER COUNTY CLERK'S FILE NO. D209187245, OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. TOGETHER WITH RATIFICATION AND CONFIRMATION OF PUT FILED 11/18/2009, RECORDED UNDER COUNTY CLERK'S FILE NO. D209303137, OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. BEGINNING AT A 5/8' IRON ROD FOUND FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5R, AND BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT iR-A, BLOCK A OF SAID GRAPEVINE VINEYARDS ADDITION, AND BEING ON THE EAST UNE OF TRACT A, FUTURE R.O.W. OF GRAPEVINE VINEYARD ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, AS RECORDED IN CABINET A. SLIDE 8466, IN THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS: THENCE NORTH 0602'18' WEST AND FOLLOWING ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID LOT 5R AND SAID TRACT A, PASSING AT A DISTANCE OF 132.28 FEET THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID LOT 5R AND LOT 6R OF BLOCK A OF SAID GRAPEVINE VINEYARDS, AND CONTINUING ALONG FOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 209.79 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD SET FOR CORNER; THENCE NORTH 01'46'57' EAST AND CONTINUING ALONG THE COMMON UNE OF SAID LOT 6R AND SAID TRACT A FOR A DISTANCE OF 191.87 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD SET FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A 0.1620 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DEDICATED TO THE STATE OF TEXAS PER DEED RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK'S FILE NUMBER D212227980 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6R; THENCE SOUTH 88'13'29' EAST AND FOLLOWING ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6R AND SAID 0.1620 ACRE TRACT, PASSING AT A DISTANCE OF 1.57 FEET A 5/8' IRON ROD SET FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3R1, BLOCK A OF SAID GRAPEVINE VINEYARDS, AND CONTINUING ALONG THE COMMON UNE OF SAID LOTS BR AND 3R1 FOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 214.08 FEET TO AN 'X' CUT FOUND FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6R, AND ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3R1, AND ALSO BEING A POINT ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5R; THENCE NORTH 01'46'31' EAST AND FOLLOWING ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID LOTS 5R & 3R1, PASSING AT A DISTANCE OF 73.50 FEET AN 'X' CUT FOUND FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5R, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AFORESAID LOT 2R-A, AND CONTINUING ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID LOTS 3R1 & 2R-A, PASSING AT A DISTANCE OF 254.50 FEET AN 'X' CUT FOUND FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3R1, AND ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT AM, BLOCK A OF SAID GRAPEVINE VINEYARDS, AND CONTINUING ALONG THE COMMON UNE OF SAID LOTS 4R1 & 2R-A FOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 556.98 FEET TO AN 'X' CUT FOUND FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4R1, AND ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2R-A. AND ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF STARS & STRIPES WAY (AN 80-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY): THENCE SOUTH 88*12*33' EAST AND FOLLOWING ALONG THE COMMON UNE OF SAID LOT 2R-A AND THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID STARS & STRIPES WAY FOR A DISTANCE OF 300.34 FEET TO AN 'X' CUT IN CONCRETE FOUND FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2R-A, AND BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO CROW BILUNGSLEY AIRPORT #1, LTD. PER DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 7143, PAGE 600 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBUC RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE SOUTH 00'30'35' WEST AND AND DEPARTING THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID STARS & STRIPES WAY AND FOLLOWING ALONG THE COMMON UNE OF SAID LOT 2R-A AND SAID CROW BILUNGSLEY AIRPORT i1, LTD. TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 97.87 FEET TO A 1/2' IRON ROD FOUND FOR C RNER; THENCE NORTH 89'01'35' EAST AND FOLLOWING ALONG THE COMMON UNE OF SAID LOT 2R-A AND SAID CROW BILUNGSLEY AIRPORT #1, LTD. TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 107.17 FEET TO A 1/2' IRON ROD FOUND FOR CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 00'49'22' EAST AND CONTINUING ALONG THE COMMON UNE OF SAID LOT 2R-A AND SAID CROW BILUNGSLEY AIRPORT /1, LTD. TRACT, PASSING AT A DISTANCE OF 391.05 FEET A 5/8' IRON ROD SET FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2R-A AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF AFORESAID LOT 5R, AND CONTINUING FOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 608.94 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD FOUND FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5R, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A 45-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION FOR STATE HIGHWAY NO. 121 ACCESS ROAD (A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY) RECORDED UNDER INSTRUMENT NUMBER D209187245 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, THENCE SOUTH 42'21'52' WEST AND FOLLOWING ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID LOT 5R AND SAID 45-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION FOR A DISTANCE OF 454.18 FEET TO A 5.8'IRON ROD FOUND FOR THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID LOT 5R AND AFORESND LOT 1R-A; THENCE NORTH 4757'21' WEST AND FOLLOWING ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAD LOT 5R AND SAID LOT 1R-A FOR A DISTANCE OF 145.54 FEET TO A PK NAIL FOUND FOR CORNER; THENCE NORTH 88'12'50' WEST AND CONTINUING ALONG THE COMMON UNE OF SAID LOT 5R AND SAID LOT 1R-A FOR A DISTANCE OF 178.86 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD FOUND FOR CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 84'29'50' WEST AND CONTINUING ALONG THE COMMON UNE OF SAID LOT 5R AND SAID LOT 1R-A FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 10.5311 ACRES (458,734 SQUARE FEET) OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. BLUE SKY SURVEYING 8 MAPPING, CORPORATION 11015 MIDWAY ROAD DALLAS, TEXAS 75229 PHONE: (214)358-4500 FAX: (214) 3,%4600 DRPETREE@BLU ESKYSURVEYING.COM TBPLS REGISTRATION No. 10105700 OWNER LCG GRAPEVINE II, LP 2 HENRY ADAMS, SUITE 450 SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94103 CONTACT: BILL POLAND, MANAGER PHONE: (415) 552-7760 NOW THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE, LCG GRAPEVINE 11, LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BEING THE OWNERS OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY, DO HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAT AS LOT 5R1, BLOCK A OF GRAPEVINE VINEYARDS, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBUC USE FOREVER THE RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON. THE EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE HEREBY RESERVED FOR THE PURPOSES AS INDICATED. THE UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE OPEN FOR ALL CITY OR FRANCHISED PUBLIC UnuIlES FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE THE MAINTENANCE OF PAVING ON THE EASEMENTS ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. NO BUILDINGS OR AUXILIARY STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED, RECONSTRUCTED, OR PLACED UPON, OVER, OR ACROSS THE EASEMENTS AS SHOWN. SAID EASEMENT BEING HEREBY RESERVED FOR THE MUTUAL USE AND ACCOMMODATION OF ALL PUBLIC UTIUTIES USING, OR DESIRING TO USE SAME. ANY CITY OR FRANCHISED UTILITY SHALL HAVE THE FULL RIGHT TO REMOVE AND KEEP REMOVED ALL OR PARTS OF ANY FENCES, TREES, SHRUBS, OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS OR GROWTHS WHICH IN ANY WAY ENDANGER OR INTERFERE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OR EFFICIENCY OF ITS RESPECTIVE SYSTEM ON THE EASEMENTS AND ALL CITY OR FRANCHISED U11UTlES SHALL AT ALL TIMES HAVE THE FULL RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS TO AND FROM AND UPON SAID EASEMENTS FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTING, RECONSTRUCTING, INSPECTING, PATROLLING, MAINTAINING, AND ADDING TO OR REMOVING ALL OR PARTS OF ITS RESPECTIVE SYSTEM WITHOUT THE NECESSITY AT ANY TIME OF PROCURING THE PERMISSION OF ANYONE. I HAVE REVIEWED THE CRYS FINDINGS CONCERNING DEDICATIONS AND I DO AGREE THAT THE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. THIS PLAT APPROVED SUBJECT TO ALL PLATTING ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS, AND RESOLUTIONS OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS. WITNESS MY HAND THIS THE DAY OF 2020. LCG GRAPEVINE 11, LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY: GRAPEVINE It GP, LLC, A TEXAS UMITED LIABIUTY COMPANY, ITS GENERAL PARTNER BY: B.P.M.P. FAMILY PARTNERS, LLC, A CAUFORNIA UMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BY: BILL R. POLAND, MANAGER STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, A NOTARY PUBUC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED BILL R. POLAND, KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATIONS THEREIN EXPRESSED. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, DAY OF 2020. NOTARY PUBUC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS FLOOD NOTE AVIGATION RELEASE: THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT J WHEREAS, TRIG AURA GRAPEVINE, LL.C., HEREINAFTER CALLED THE 'OWNER' OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER (WHETHER ONE OR MORE), IS THE OWNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING SAID PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE SUM OF ONE AND 00/100 ($1.00) DOLLAR AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, THE RECEIPT AND SUFFICIENCY OF WHICH IS HEREBY FULLY ACKNOWLEDGED AND CONFESSED, OWNER DOES HEREBY WANE, RELEASE, REMISE AND QUITCLAIM TOT HE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOARD, THE CITIES OF DAUAS, TEXAS AND FORT WORTH, TEXAS, THEIR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, HEREINAFTER CALLED 'CITIES', FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC AND ITS AGENCIES, ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF ANY KIND TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY THAT OWNER MAY SUFFER BY REASON OF THE PASSAGE AND FUGHT OF ALL AIRCRAFT IN THE AIR SPACE ABOVE OWNER'S PROPERTY ABOVE THE HEIGHT RESTRICTION AS PRESENTLY ESTABUSHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 73-50 FOR THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, KNOW AS THE AIRPORT ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, TO AN INFINITE HEIGHT ABOVE SAME, WHETHER SUCH DAMAGE SHALL ORIGINATE FROM NOISE, VIBRATION, FUMES, DUST, FUEL AND LUBRICANT PARTICLES, AND ALL OTHER EFFECTS THAT MAY BE CAUSED BY THE AIRCRAFT, LANDING AT, OR TAKING OFF FROM, OR OPERATING AT OR ON THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT RELEASE THE OWNERS OR OPERATORS OF AIRCRAFT FROM LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO PERSON OR PROPERTY CAUSED BY FALUNG AIRCRAFT OR FALUNG PHYSICAL OBJECTS FROM AIRCRAFT, EXCEPT AS STATED HEREIN WITH RESPECT TO NOISE, FUMES, DUST, FUEL, AND LUBRICANT PARTICLES. IT IS AGREED THAT THIS RELEASE SHALL BE BINDING UPON SAID OWNER AND HIS HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST TO SAID PROPERTY; AND IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT THIS INSTRUMENT SHALL BE A COVENANT RUNNING WITH THE LAND, AND SHALL BE RECORDED IN THE DEED RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OR COUNTIES IN WHICH THE PROPERTY IS SITUATED. EXECUTED AT THIS _ DAY OF 2020. LCG GRAPEVINE II, I.P. A DELAWARE UMITED PARTNERSHIP BY: GRAPEVINE It GP, LLC, A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ITS GENERAL PARTNER BY: B.P.M.P. FAMILY PARTNERS, LLC, A CALIFORNIA UMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BY: BILL R. POLAND, MANAGER STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, A NOTARY PUBUC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED BILL R. POLAND, KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATIONS THEREIN EXPRESSED. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, DAY OF 2020. PUBUC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) - NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NRP) - FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) - FOR THE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS - MAP NO. 48439CO110K, MAP REVISED, SEPTEMBER 25, 2009, THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON LIES IN ZONE 'X' (OTHER AREAS). ZONE -X-(OTHER AREAS) IS DEFINED AS 'AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOOPLAIN'. THIS FLOOD STATEMENT DOES NOT IMPLY THAT THE PROPERTY AND/OR THE STRUCTURE THEREON WILL BE FREE FROM FLOODING OR FLOOD DAMAGE. ON RARE OCCASIONS, GREATER FLOODS CAN AND WILL OCCUR AND FLOOD HEIGHTS MAY BE INCREASED BY MAN-MADE DR NATURAL CAUSES. THIS FLOOD STATEMENT SHALL NOT CREATE UABIUTY ON THE PART OF THE SURVEYOR. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT I, DAVID PETREE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, THAT I PREPARED THIS PLAT FROM AN ACTUAL ON THE GROUND SURVEY OF THE LAND AS DESCRIBED AND THAT THE CORNER MONUMENTS SHOWN THEREON WERE PROPERLY PLACED UNDER MY PERSONAL SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE. DAVID PETREE REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 1890 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, A NOTARY PUBUC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED DAVID PETREE, KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATIONS THEREIN EXPRESSED. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, DAY OF 2020. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION.- DATE APPROVED: CHAIRMAN: SECRETARY., GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL DATE APPROVED: MAYOR: CITY SECRETARY., THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT IS TO COMBINE LOTS 211-A, SR, AND 6R INTO ONE LOT, AND TO ABANDON EXISTING EASEMENTS, AND DEDICATE NEW EASEMENTS. REPLA T OF LOT 5R1, BLOCK A GRAPVEVINE VINEYARDS 10.5311 ACRES OF LAND BEING A REPLAT OF LOTS 2R-A, 5R, & 6R, BLOCK A GRAPEVINE VINEYARDS JAMES GIBSON SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 586 & 587 CITY OF GRAPEVINE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS NOVEMBER 2, 2020 THIS PLAT FILED IN CABINET SLIDE DATE PAGE 2 OF 2 May 10, 2021 Mr. Ron Stombaugh City of Grapevine Planning and Zoning 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 RE: Stars and Stripes Multifamily Development Our property is located between Stars and Stripes Way, Grapevine Mills Parkway and the frontage road of Highway 121. The approximate acreage of 10.5 acres of land has a vacant LA Fitness gym and several undeveloped out parcels. The existing building is a very specialized use, being a fitness facility with an indoor pool and two floors. There is no market in the current or past retail market for the property. The purpose of the attached submission is to support the development of a pedestrian oriented, urban environment that takes advantage of success of recent projects adjacent that sit in the multifamily district; this development will promote existing and future businesses in the immediate area. The proposed project will consist of two 4 story wrap style apartment buildings that define the edges of an amenitized pedestrian promenade. This promenade promotes outdoor activities to support a healthy lifestyle for residents of this community and beyond. The project is centrally located around existing retail and residential uses; this location is well suited to provide walkable connections to these surrounding properties to promote pedestrian activity within the immediate area. We feel we have a tremendous opportunity to take an outdated, highly specialized building that is unresponsive to the current market and re -imagine it to a vibrant extension of an already successful area. We have an opportunity to re -invest in Grapevine and promote the high standards of multifamily that make it such a desirable destination. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, *r- -4, 4�w� e Owner January 19, 2021 Mr. Ron Stombaugh Grapevine Development Services 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 Dear Mr. Stombaugh, This letter is to inform you that Bay West's submittal for The Stars and Stripes Way development is the product of extensive review by me in collaboration with Robin McCaffrey. This process started with an early review of the site and its surrounding sites and continued through development of the site plan as well as architectural design. The Site Plan Review process was guided by 3 primary objectives of Grapevine's Multi -Family Ordinance, namely: 1. Creation of Community 2. Setting in place key linkages that will make this and neighboring properties ultimately linked by a pedestrian system, bringing residential and future commercial development together in an interactive fabric. 3. Establishing an internal legibility through the creation of a major pedestrian ROW around which the project is organized. Robin and I feel that the final site plan achieves these important objectives and complies with the MF Standards regarding site plan design. Upon agreement regarding the site plan, Robin and I worked extensively with Bay West on architectural design. The architectural Design Review Process was guided by 4 primary objectives of Grapevine's Multi -Family Ordinance, namely: 1. Craftsmanship, materials, and construction details 2. Relief and expression of form 3. Connection to the ground plane and pedestrian way 4. Material change execution. Again, Robin and I feel that the final building design achieves these important objectives and complies with the MF Standards Building design. Dallas I Austin I San Antonio 1907 Marilla St. 2900 S. Congress Ave. 417 81" Street www.architexas.com Second Floor Suite 200 San Antonio, Texas 78215 Dallas, Texas 75201 Austin, Texas 78704 p 214.748.4561 p 512.444.4220 p 210.998.2422 f rchiiteXas C,kE« I E i CUASLR Therefore, Robin and I affirm that The Stars and Stripes Way development complies with the standards of the Multi -Family Ordinance. Sincerely, 3wj� Craig Melde Sr. Principal Jason Fedors From: Lucy Billingsley<LBillingsley@Billingsleyco.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 11:02 AM To: rons@grapevinetexas.gov Subject: Bay West Group Letter of Support Ron, On behalf of Billingsley Company, I want to send this letter of support for the zoning case brought forth to you by Bill Poland and the Bay West Group. We believe they are using the quality of materials and design to create a development that will bode well for the Mills Mall neighborhood. We look forward to adding more people and creating a greater sense of neighborhood and their development will do just that. Thank you for your considerations. Lucy Billingsley Billingsley Company 11722 Routh Street, Suite 770 1 Dallas, TX 75201 1 Direct 214-270-2222 www,billincislevco.com I Ibillin sq ley@billingsleyco.com CommunitiesCOMPA NY We Partner In Creating Life -Enhancing 1 Bryon Wolf Subject: RE: Grapevine Tx- Development From: Timothy Casey <timocaseyemail.com> Date: Saturday, March 6, 2021 at 10:04 AM To: Matt Gingery <matt cx baywestdeveiopment.com> Subject: Re: Grapevine Tx- Development Matt, Thanks for sharing the design of your proposed development near our empty FedEx Office building at 2305 E. Grapevine Mills Circle. As I mentioned on the phone, I think there is a lot more room for high density residential development in the area and the additional residents can only benefit the retail properties in and around the mall. From what I can see I am in full support of your project moving forward. Best, Tim Casey 1 B" WEST GROUP `,U!TF 4,5a S 4 F RAMC s,'O, CALIFORNIA 9/1103 416 l 66", .-77t:)0 FAX 4 i ) (5)t;,'t Y /60 BILL R. POLAND €IRE;SH)E_Ni February 22, 2021 Dear City Council and Mayor Tate, Herb Simon joined his brother Mel to form one of the largest retail shopping center developer owners in the world, now called Simon Property Group, the owner of Grapevine Mills. Per the attached letter, Herb has been kind enough to endorse me and a subsidiary company of Bay West Group. As you can see in his letter, he is the owner of the Reno Aces, a minor league baseball team plus the stadium, and he also owns the NBA Indiana Pacers. He is kindly acting independently of the standing policy of Simon Property Group which prohibits letters of this kind from the company, as described in the general manager's email below. He is Chairman Emeritus of SPG, but also worth saying that Herb is a delightful person. Kindly let me know if you have any questions. All the best, Bill Poland January 28, 2421 Mayor William Tate City Council Members of Grapevine City of Grapevine Dear Mayor Tate and Councilmembers, On behalf of the Reno Aces, we are collaborating with Mr. Poland and Pacific Development on a multi -family project in Downtown Reno, Nevada and we can attest to their credibility. Additionally, we are fully aware of the proposed development of the 475-unit multifamily project in Grapevine. I understand its location directly across Grapevine Mills Parkway on the land where the LA Fitness Center has been vacant nearly 2 years, plus the adjacent vacant pad parcels. I am delighted to issue this statement of support for the proposed project, and know it will have a positive impact on the surrounding area. regards, Simon _4.` , rv' t From: <6Szyrr asz� sir_ion.com> Date: Monday, September 28, 2020 at 6:13 AM To: Matt Gingery <Matl2ba westdevelopm(rtcom> I ......... Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: contact info Hi Matt, your plan looks interesting. Unfortunately, our company policies prohibit me from providing any letter. Good luck with the project. Joe Szymaszek, CSM, CRX General Manager Grapevine Mills 10* SIM101"f 3000 Grapevine Mills Parkway Grapevine, TX, 76051 USA T 972.538.5901 C 214-980-8276 iMKMA � irnon.cc SIMON.COM The preceding email message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, proprietary, privileged or constitute non-public information. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is prohibited. Grapevine Pavilion Investment Ltd. 5665 Arapaho Road, Management Office Dallas, Texas 75248 (310)903-2257 I am the owner of the adjacent retail buildings located at 3100 & 3300 Grapevine Mills Parkway,directly next tothe vacant LAFitness and adjacent undeveloped parcels. The vacant status ofthe LAFitness building does not bode well for the retail tenants inmyproperty nor the surrounding area. | have reviewed the site plan provided byBay West. | believe the proposed project isathoughtful and well -designed project. |twill complement the Wallis and Baker apartments across Stars and Stripe Way. But most importantly, it will hopefully add foot traff ic and vibrancy for all of our existing and future businesses and retail tenants inthe area. | would like the voting bodies toconsider mysupport for approval. March 16, 2021 Grapevine City Council City Hall 200 S Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 Dear Council Members, I am the owner of a retail pad located at 2505 E Grapevine Mills Circle. My tenant is Daylight Golf. I understand that Bay West Development is submitting a plan for 475 apartment units across Grapevine Mills Parkway from my property. I have reviewed their proposed development and believe it would be an appropriate and timely addition to the area. The neighboring retailers and landowners will appreciate the increase in patrons and foot traffic created by higher residential density. In addition, Bay West's development may encourage other projects that would be beneficial to the overall economic health of the community. I fully support Bay West's efforts in this process. Resnectfuliv, 250 VVest Main St., S uite 101 Wood land, CA 95695 Phone: (530) 668-1000 Fax: (530) 666-5574 www.towerinv.com July 23, 2020 To Whom It May Concern, We are aware that the owners of the vacant LA Fitness building located at 3200 Grapevine Mills Parkway and, adjacent to our property (2700 Grapevine Mills Parkway), are filing a formal application to entitle and develop approximately 500 residential apartment units. This letter is to hereby issue a statement of support of the project and we believe it will have a positive impact on the surrounding area. Sincerely Mark Kilkenny Tower Investments, LLC 250 W. Main St, Suite 101 Woodland, CA 95695 46WALKER 1201 Elm St #4000 CONSULTANTS Dallas, TX75270 281.280.0068 walkerconsultants.com January 20, 2021 Matt Gingery Bay West Development 1725 S. Bascom Ave Suite 1050 Campbell CA 95008 Re: Stars & Stripes Parking Analysis Grapevine, TX Dear Matt: Walker Consultants is please to submit this parking analysis for the proposed Stars & Stripes residential project in the City of Grapevine. The proposed project consists of 475 dwelling units and is proposing to provide approximately 1.6 dedicated residential parking spaces per unit which his less than the 2.0 spaces per unit required based on the minimum off-street parking requirements contained in the City's Zoning Ordinance. This analysis has been prepared to answer the following question: • Is the requested reduction in parking supply supported by parking industry best practices and standards and comparable multi -family development parking data? The key findings from Walker's analysis of parking needs associated with the Stars & Stripes project are as follows: Based on the City's off-street parking requirements, the project is required to provide 950 parking spaces. The project proposes to provide 757 spaces in two parking structures (dedicated supply of 1.60 spaces per unit), and 102 surface parking spaces that are shared with adjacent uses such as the existing Cracker Barrel Restaurant, for a total potential supply of 859 parking spaces (1.81 spaces per unit). Based on nationally recognized recommend parking standards and multifamily parking requirements in other Dallas -Fort Worth -area cities, the project would be required to provide between 570 and 963 parking spaces. Based on the key findings highlighted above and the data presented in this analysis, Walker has determined that the project's request for a reduction in parking requirements is justified and consistent with multi -family parking trends and the latest research and publications in the parking industry. 27-001171.00 stars&stripes parking analysis 20210120.docx WALKER CONSULTANTS ABOUT WALKER CONSULTANTS Matt Gingery January 20, 2021 Page 2 Established in 1965, Walker Consultants is a global consulting firm with over 300 employees specializing in parking design, parking and mobility planning, and structural restoration. Shared Parking, (both the 2nd Edition, 2005 and this year's 3rd Edition) published by the Urban Land Institute and International Council of Shopping Centers, and the National Parking Association's Recommended Zoning Ordinance Provisions are widely recognized in the parking planning industry for determining the recommended number of parking spaces for projects. Walker's Mary Smith was the principal author of both publications, with support on Shared Parking from the consultant on this analysis, Jeff Weckstein, who leads the Shared Parking research and practice for Walker in the Western Region. Walker has prepared hundreds of studies for new developments throughout Texas and the West. Table 1 summarizes the Stars and Stripes land use details and minimum parking requirements based on Section 56.C.1 of the City of Grapevine's Zoning Code. Table 1: Stars & Stripes Land Use Summary & Minimum Parking Requirement Studio 32 32 2 spaces per unit 64 1-bedroom 239 239 2 spaces per unit 478 2-bedroom 178 356 2 spaces per unit 356 3-bedroom 26 78 2 spaces per unit 52 Guest Parking 475 Included in Above Total 475 705 950 Source: Walker Consultants, 2021. As shown in Table 1, the proposed project is required to provide 950 parking spaces based on the City's minimum parking requirements. The Stars & Stripes site plan is included as Attachment A to this report. The project plans to provide a total of 859 parking spaces, which includes 757 dedicated parking spaces in two structures wrapped by the development and 102 off-street surface parking spaces intended to serve residential guests, adjacent land uses such as the Cracker Barrel restaurant and any additional resident parking needs. The proposed total supply of 859 parking spaces is 91 fewer (10% fewer) than the minimum required, and excluding the shared surface parking spaces, the 757 dedicated residential spaces are 20% fewer than the minimum required. The parking at Stars and Stripes will not be assigned to individual units on a space by space basis, rather it will function as an open pool of parking with any open space available to any resident. Matt Gingery WALKER January 20, 2021 CONSULTANTS Page NATIONAL AND LOCAL RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARDS The City of Grapevine's minimum off-street parking requirements for multifamily dwelling units is similar to some surrounding/nearby communities but is higher than parking supply ratios endorsed by leading publications in the parking field and higher than in several nearby communities that have lowered multi -family parking requirements. The Urban Land Institute released the 3rd Edition of Shared Parking, which includes base parking supply ratios endorsed by the leading thinkers and organizations within the parking industry, including the National Parking Association (NPA) and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), in 2020. Table 2, on the next page, summarizes ULI's recommended parking ratios, the minimum parking requirements for multi -family developments in several nearby jurisdictions, and the calculation of what the Stars & Stripes project would be required to provide based on these standards and requirements. The ULI base ratio utilized is the recommended base ratio from the 3rd Edition of Shared Parking. The Shared Parking publication recommends starting with suburban base ratios and adjusting car ownership percentages to reflect and model urban developments. In Table 2, no adjustments for vehicle ownership were assumed, and hence no reductions from the recommended base ratios were taken in the calculation. The table demonstrates that based on national parking standards and parking requirements in the nearby cities, the proposed Stars & Stripes project would be required to provide between 570 and 963 parking spaces. The proposed 757 dedicated and 859 total spaces exceeds the requirements based on ULI recommended parking ratios and 6 of the 10 surveyed cities nearby. Matt Gingery WALKER January 20, 2021 CONSULTANTS Page Table 2: National and Local Jurisdiction Parking Standards Studio 0.85 27.2 Studio 1.5 48 1-bedroom 0.9 215.1 1-bedroom 1.5 358.5 2-bedroom 1.65 293.7 2-bedroom 2 356 3-bedroom 2.5 65 3-bedroom 2.5 65 Guest Parking 0.15 71.25 Guest Parking Incl. Above Total 672.25 Total 762.5 Studio 1 32 Studio 2 64 1-bedroom 1 239 1-bedroom 2 478 2-bedroom 1 178 2-bedroom 2 356 3-bedroom 1 26 3-bedroom 2 52 Guest Parking 0.2 95 Guest Parking Incl. Above Total 570 Total 950 Studio 1 32 Studio 2 64 1-bedroom 1 239 1-bedroom 2 478 2-bedroom 1.5 267 2-bedroom 2 356 3-bedroom 2 52 3-bedroom 2.5 65 Guest Parking Incl. Above Guest Parking Incl. Above Total 590 Total 963 Two spaces for each 1000 square feet of One space for each 500 square feet of dwelling unit floor area within the 941 dwelling unit floor area within the building 941 building site. site. Studio 2 64 Studio 1 32 1-bedroom 2 478 1-bedroom 1 239 2-bedroom 2 356 2-bedroom 2 356 3-bedroom 2 52 3-bedroom 3 78 Guest Parking Incl. Above Guest Parking Incl. Above Total 760-9506 Total 705 Sources: 1 = Shared Parking, 3rd Edition, Urban Land Institute, 2020 2 = Colleyville Land Development Code 3 = Keller Unified Development Code 8.07.G.42 4 = Lewisville Land Development Regulations 5 = Flower Mound Land Development Regulations 6 = Flower Mound code allows for a 20% reduction from requirements without submission of parking study. 7 = Bedford Zoning Code 8 = Euless Code of Ordinances 9 = Coppell Code of Ordinances 10 = Southlake Land Development Code 11 = Dallas Zoning Ordinance, Fort Worth Zoning Ordinance Matt Gingery WALKER January 20, 2021 CONSULTANTS Pages Walker gathered available parking supply data for several multi -family developments in the City of Grapevine. The properties for which Walker found or estimated information are similar product types to the proposed Stars & Stripes project in that they are all multi -story multi -family developments served by a multi -level parking structure. The developments and relevant information are provided in the table below. Table 3: Summary of Residential Development Parking Supply Data Sources: Walker Consultants, 2021. * = parking supply estimated based on parking structure footprint/floorplate visible in aerial imagery. Current plans forthe Stars & Stripes project show 757 parking spaces dedicated to the 475 dwelling units, a parking supply ratio of 1.60 spaces per dwelling unit. The parking supply ratio is higher than at the adjacent Wallis and Baker development, which was recently completed. Aurora Four44 and ALMI Grapevine are located near the Grapevine Trinity Metro station, which provides rail service to Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport, with connecting service to the DART Orange Line, making these projects transit -oriented developments with lower parking ratios. Additionally, the Stars & Stripes project will have access to 102 surface parking spaces that are intended for the joint use of the adjacent restaurants (Cracker Barrel and Fuzzy's Taco Shop) and Stars & Stripes residents and visitors. Since residential parking demand typically peaks overnight, when restaurants are closed, functionally the Stars & Stripes will have access to 859 parking spaces during its peak period of parking demand. The joint use of the surface parking spaces is efficient and a best practice in the parking industry. Based on the data presented in this analysis, Walker has determined that the Stars & Stripes project's proposed dedicated off-street parking supply of 1.60 spaces per unit, and total potential supply of 1.81 spaces per unit is more than adequate to serve the potential parking needs of the development. The request for a reduction in parking requirements is justified and consistent with parking industry standards and best practices for multi- family parking supplies. Matt Gingery WALKER January 20, 2021 CONSULTANTS Page Sincerely, WALKER CONSULTANTS James Brooks, PE Jeff Weckstein Project Manager Parking Consultant Enclosures: Stars & Stripes Site Plan Matt Gingery 46WALKER January 20, 2021 CONSULTANTS Pagel Attachment A Stars & Stripes Site Plan W v- gff ARCHITECTS W L >O - > O LL a� 2,448 5,184 0 32,508 0 26,130 1,436 9,779 3,690 7,336 10,584 27,168 41,395 35,528 5,112 0 1,406 12,160 6,820 5,523 213,917 6,396 0 0 262,708 81.43% fd 13% 3.8% 0.0% 20.2% O.0% 14.1% 0.9% 5.2% 1.9% 38% 5.6% 11.3% 16.4% 5.6% 1,9% 0.0% 0.5% 3.8% 1.9% 1.4% Avg. AOL 1,OOa SF %PROV %DES. BPROV 4DES • 1.00 1.00 213 212 20% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT BUILDING 1 PROJECT DATA WT � � r O LO O d LD N X- C 0) gfF ARCHITECTS 06 T 0j C Q 00 O O N 9,792 0 2,880 49,140 3,320 0 0 33,782 7,200 6,419 7,056 50,940 42,372 0 0 15,780 11,248 16,720 0 0 256,649 6,3% 0 0 1335,584 81.33% WA 5.1% 0.0% 1.5% 24.8% 1.5% 0,0% 0.0% 14.5% 3.1% 2.7% 3.1% 17.2% 13.7% 0.0% 1::::,) .0% 4.6% 3.1% 4.2% 0.0% 0.0"' AvA, Apt. 980 SF PARKING A TIONS %PROV %DES. 0PROV 8DE5 1.00 1.00 262 262 No. Date Revision BUILDING 2 PROJECT DATA IIR Author i'L 0' CASE NAME' STARS AND STRIPES WAY Drawn By CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ X : 11 ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS �T'• �Qg1,;h? PARKWAY 01101r9 MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PROJECT DATA CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET'. OF _ Project No. 19185.01 APPRWAL DOES NOTAUTIOPIZE ANYNARK IN O0NFUOTvA7NANY000ESORORDINANOES. Date 2020-12-07 DEPARTMENTS OEVELO-ENr SERVICES G-002 0 Copyright 2019 STARS AND STRIPES NORTH 08/1A/20 El JNR7YPF (Old ES/ stuwopnnS Iam4ow r4Fr4 :.smAoorA.ur.n laerxoPN uwn (Old 86/tl/ C3 (O(d QJ Toml Onitr Apex. NSF lemin9 01/Ice Fesldmo4l I AmeMry BSF Apax. Ner EJjhiency _ � E2 E3 (Old E2-AlT3) (Old El) Al (SM38R) AZ (OLD AS) A3 AO A3•ALT7 (OLD A2J A6 '(OlDABi I, A6 A6-ALTI B1 (Old BIj B2 83 (OW B3J (OW BS) B8 85 (OW BS/ (OId BI/ BS-ALTI (OM B4•ALT 3) C3 AFEA (Sfj 612 Fbor i 1 Flood 1 Fbor 3 1 648 720 _ 2 0 � 2 0 2 0 756 7 _ 12 12 830 0 D 0 871 6 8 8 71H B89 2 2 0 3 90D 917 1 2 1 2 882 3 1,132 l,ll7 1,290 !,2]B I,3L5 1,486. 1,SM 1,705 t.e41 n i 98 55 55 (NKBeIc SF1 48,539 NSF 6396 NSF (NK Garvpej 65,677 73 91% 8394Y'� 83.74% 6 3 9 3 1 0 1 0 I 2 I I 55,726 _ 65,677 0 3 1 2 3 6 9 '. 3 1 0 0 2 55,126 f fi5,677 Floors 1 2 0 12 0 8 0 3 1 2 3 6 9 3 7 ' 0 0 2 1 1 55 55,126 0 65,57] 83.94^3, 4 8 0 43 0 30 2 11 4 8 12 24 35 12 4 0 1 8 4 3 Z13 IBR /ENCIES ---__. 51664%..._ 110 5200% � li _.. 110 IBR 35.68% 38.00% 76 81 3BR 7.04% 5.00% I 15 SO STARS AND STRIPES SOUTH OB(1A/� SruvDUNIn L+EowpM wu14 x.rwxooA. ururs iaF»oPrApw25 _ _ - DNIf7YPE El (OldE2) E2 (Old E1•ALT 1) F3 (OldEl) Al A2 (OLD AS) I A3 A3-ALT3 A4 (O1DA1) AS /OLDAd) q6 AbALT7 BI (OM82J 82 (O1d 93/ B3 (OAL 85) BO (Old B1J BS (Old B4J BS-ALTI (OW H4•ALTI/ Cl Q (O/d B6/O) tl (Old Qj 7evl thrin � APart NSF r�lnp Ogtce Bes(dartlnl amen(N � ! 6'SF gport Net Egroenry AREA (SF/ 61S 6/8 720 796 8?0 871 718 HH9 900 917 B81 1,132 I,I]) 1,294 1a78 1,319 I,M6 3,.510 I,705 1,841 pyKedc SF7 NSF NSF (NlC fiarvpr) 1 4 0 1 17 1 0 0 8 2 1 2 9 9 0 0 3 2 2 0 0 61 59,021 6,3% ''.. ]8,8% 74.81% Hoor 2 4 0 1 16 1 0 0 10 2 2 2 12 9 0 0 3 2 3 0 0 67 65,876 '. 78.8% 83.50% Floor; 4 0 1 16 1 0 0 10 2 2 2 12 9 0 0 3 2 3 0 0 67 65,876 78,8% 83.50% 4 4 0 3 lfi 1 0 0 10 2 2 2 12 9 0 0 3 2 3 0 0 67 '. 65,876 0 78,896 83.50% 16 0 4 65 a 0 0 38 8 7 B d5 36 0 0 12 8 IS 0 0 262 000000000000�0000®00®0 EFFICIENCIES 7.63% 8.00% 20 21 1HR BR 49.62% 38.55% 60.00% 37.00% 330 101 131 97 8R 4.20% 5.00% 11 13 STARS & STRIPES PROJECT DIRECTORY OWNER BAYWEST DEVELOPMENT 1725 S. BASCOM AVENUE, SUITE 1050 CAMPBELL, CA TEL 408.781.0561 CONTACT. MATT GINGERY EMAIL: MATTCBAYWESTDEVELOPMENT.COM CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S DIRECT CONSULTANT) LANOEV ENGINEERS 1801 BATEWAY BLVD. SUITE 101 RICHARDSON. TX TEL 972.385.2272 CONTACT: LAWRENCE CATES EMAIL: LCATES®LANDEV.COM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT (OWNER'S DIRECT CONSULTANT) GFF ARCHITECTS 2808 FAIRMOUNT STREET DALLAS, TX 75201 TEL 214.303.1500 CONTACT. BRAD SMITH EMAIL: BRAD.SMITH@GFF.CCM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER (OWNER'S DIRECT CONSULTANT) XXXX COMPANY XXXX XXXX STREET CITY, STATE TEL XXX.XXXXXXX CONTACT: JOHN DOE EMAIL. JOHN.DOE@COMPANV.COM ARCHITECT GFF ARCHITECTS 2808 FAIRMOUNT STREET DALLAS. TX 75201 TEL 214.303.1500 CONTACT. JOHNATHAN WOOD EMAIL. JOHNATHAN.WOOD@GFF.COM MEP ENGINEER (OWNER'S DIRECT CONSULTANT) XXXX COMPANY XXXX XXXX STREET CITY, STATE TEL XXX.XXX.XXXX CONTACT. JOHN DOE EMAIL: JOHN.DOE@COMPANY.COM INTERIOR DESIGNER (OWNER'S DIRECT CONSULTANT) XXXX COMPANY XXXX XXXX STREET CITY, STATE TEL XXX.XXX.XXXX CONTACT: JOHN DOE EMAIL: JOHN.DOE000MPANY.COM INDEX OF DRAWINGS SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE SHEET ISSUE DATE REV # REV DATE -192 Unn d 011-21 1-GENERAL D2 PROJECTDATA 2020-12-07 10 INDEX SHEET 2021-04-29 2-CIVIL -1 of 6 MASTER SITE PLAN ZD20-11-12 -206 SITE PLAN 2020-11-12 -0 of 6 PRELIMINARY GRADING 8 POST DRAINAGE AREA MAP 2020-11-12 4 of 6 WATER 3 SANITARY SER PLAN 2020-11-12 -5 of 6 EXISTING CONDITIONS DRAINAGE AREA MAP 2020-11-12 -6 of 6 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY M20-11-12 3-LANDSCAPE L-100 OVER ALL SITE PLAN 2020-10-05 -10i SITE ENLARGEMENT PLAN 2020-10-05 -102 SITE ENLARGEMENT PLAN 2020.10-05 -103 SITE ENLARGEMENT PLAN 2020-10-05 -104 SITE ENLARGEMENT PLAN 202D-10-05 -705 RENDERED PLAN 2020.10-05 -106 PERSPECTIVES 2020-10-05 5-ARCHITECTURAL SITE 5-000 VICINITY SITE PLAN 2023-12-07 5-001 ARCHITECTURAL OVERALL SITE PLAN 2021-04-29 5-010 ZONING SITE PLAN 2020-12-07 8-ARCHITECTURAL -111 LEVEL 1 - BUILDING 1 - FLOOR PLAN 2020-12-07 -112 LEVEL 2- BUILDING I -FLOOR PLAN 2020A2-07 -113 LEVEL 3- BUILDING I -FLOOR PLAN 2020-12-07 -114 LEVEL 4- BUILDING I -FLOOR PLAN 2020-12-07 -116 BUILDING 1 - ROOF PLAN 2020-12-07 -121 LEVELI-BUILDING 2-FLOOR PLAN 2020-12-07 -122 LEVEL 2- BUILDING 2- FLOOR PLAN 2020-12-07 Am LEVEL 3-BUILDING 2-FLOOR PLAN 2020-12-07 -124 LEVEL 4-BUILDING 2-FLOOR PLAN 2020-12-07 -125 BUILDING 2-ROOF PLAN 2020-12-07 -190 RENDERINGS 2020-12-07 -191 RENDERINGS 2020.12-07 -200 OVERALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS 2020.12-07 -201 OVERALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS 2020-12-07 -202 OVERALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS 2020.12-07 -203 OVERALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS 2021-04-29 -204 ELEVATION DESIGN STANDARDS 2020-12-07 .iW OVERALL BUILDING SECTIONS 2020-12-07 JOt OVERALL BUILDING SECTIONS 2020-12-07 S00 PLAN DETAILS 2020.12-07 S10 SECTION DETAILS 2020.12-07 4301 UNITS 2020.12-07 -002 UNITS 2020-12-07 603 UNITS 2020-12-07 A04 UNITS 2020-12-07 -905 UNITS 2020-12-07 606 UNITS 2020-12-07 -907 UNITS 2020-12-07 -0OB UNITS 2020-12-07 -909 UNITS 2020-12-07 4910 UNITS 2020-12-07 4111 UNITS 2020.12-07 -912 UNITS 2020-12-07 -913 UNITS 2020-12-07 -914 UNITS 2020-12-07 INDEX OF DRAWINGS SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE SHEET ISSUE I C .y Q V W H� >o _LL O LL Q f0 m 0 20% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT V/ Wca 0 a(0 ti H a06 - C N a) > ,N�^^^L C) V O a` O N /wr co No. Date Revision Drawn Wn By Reviewer 1t1T'• TB¢g�,tP gj•OF ov01re Revlewea INDEX SHEET Project No. 19185.01 Date 2021-04-29 G-010 0 Copyright 2019 C v \ \EXISDNG PARKING ••• BOUNDARY LINE TABLE — NO. BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 89'13'29" L2 N 01.12'17" E 13.40' 5i1A SXN EXISTING BUILDING 1 1 STORY LOT 1 R-A, BLOCK A 1.6284 AC 26' 1 11II 18, W hW I S.GS' J1 N�R1E5) ;B• 2'R FlRE 10' SODwI.Y l h PARKING STRUCTURE � 420 SPACES 35'R J55'R EXIST. .. IR15N . .... _.._..._ .. .. DRIVE CONTAINERS SOUTH BUILDING 262 UNITS COURT YARD 0. y — BOUNDARY CURVE TABLE q NO. I RADIUS I DELTA I ARC I CH. BEARING CHORD ` 0900 y Ll 5707.58' 00`05'58" 9.95' N 00'20'38" W 9.95' �r � ec,R _ _ — ,� � 26' FIRE LANE 35'R s S P �p +'10" -- cl n o e �r Ansorree aELtr• Nnr•4s•4R'r ssr.u• A16e.Fa•rt'c 6asr'( 6Dl•80.4g. �671T• MDf'4TI.rE /erss• T •GL 5 LOT 31R1, BLOCK A LOT 4R1, BLOCK A 4t 1.2049 AC 1.3699 AC CD CD © [[}bbRR EXISTING BLDG 2 ® (D O ® ® EXISTING BLDG 3 © 1 STORY 1 STORY W L T � ,R IRIIND9ER -� EXIST. LANE 25' FIRE LOGINI•I EXIST. DRIVE DRIVE p1480• T ,WLM• sr•4rsr'w—•+ a b .- 10' SOf11IYR � I V0NITY MAP N.T.S. 0 25' 50' 100, 1"=50' SG, G w G p h © 6 1. IN E CURRENT ZONING G OF LOTS 1R, 2R-At, k AR, BLOOM LOT 2RNAl COMMERCIAL. A, GRAPEVINE VINE'IARDS ADDITION, 5 C-C, COMMUNITY 10.5311 AC T 2. CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST FOR A SECTION 25.C.25 - MASTER SITEITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS FOR EL USES ALLOWED MTMN SECTION 22, R-Lc WLT -DEVE OPYEM y DISTRICT. W3. PARKING AND DRIVE AREAS TO BE PAVED MTH MINIMUM 5• IL CONCRETE PAVEMENT. COURT YARD FENCE FENCENCE LL3 0 � � i 3 4. REFER TO BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND SIGN DETAILS. I SA I� 5. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AND OTHER ON IMPROVEMENTS. Nm W `e r -SITE UIOSCAPE �� N 6. PROVIDE SOIL EROSION CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE MTN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE SO I EROSION AMID SEDIMENTATION ORDINANCE NORTH BUILDING (SECTION 47.E.1.U.18). 213 UNITS S 7. DISABLED PARADING TO BE DESOLATED N ACCORDANCE MTH I CONFANERS HA CHAPTER 23, SECTION 26-54 THROUGH 23-M OF THE CODE OF ORDNANCES. LEI(RASH 1 , ` ' I ( coN S. ALL REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION W. SIGN REGULATIONS WILL BE PARKING STRUCTURE 4 .59 MET. _ 341 SPACES 9. ALL ONSITE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS SHALL BE LOCATED � — ` �. DNDERGROSECURITYI sccua FENCE- j i 1 � I I—, EXIST. lo' SREIWA O,R CC DRIVE 26' FIRE LANE �35W . - 20R I f 1 I Si N00873,f' L ILd7• _ 6.91' 68.11' { i g (VARIES) $d EXIST. DRIVE THE SEAL APPEARING ON THIS DOCUMENT WAS AUTHORIZED BY �Eje-R LAWRENCE A. CATES, P.E. 41838 ( $ ON 4/27/2021 r0• snEWUM _J y � tE OF aTf �l PROJECT DATA LOT LAND AREA (S.F.) LAND AREA (ACRES) BUILDING AREA (S.F.) OCCUPANCY BUILDING HMS T PARKING REQUIRED PARKING PROVIDED BUILDING COVERAGE OPEN SPACE (S.F.) % OPEN SPACE (S.F.) IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (S.F.) % IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (S.F.) LOT 1R—A 70,944 1.6284 10,101 RESTAURANT 23-0" 81 83 14.2% 20.637 29.09% 50,307 70.91% LOT 3R1 43,561 1.2049 (4) 9,340 RETAIL/RESTAURANT 30-0" (5) 75 (5) 60 19.9% 8.325 19.11% 35,236 80.89% LOT 4R1 59.502 1.3699 9,990 RETAIL/RESTAURANT 30'-0" 54 71 16.7% 11.089 18.64% 48,413 81.36% LOT 2R-Al 458.734 10.5311 174.661 (1) MULTI -FAMILY 46'-7' (2) 950 3) 868 38.0% 129,299 27.18% 329.435 71.82% GRAND TOTAL 632.741 14.7343 203.456 950 975 32.1% 169 350 26.77% 463.391 73,23% TOTAL COMMERCIAL PARKING 212 214 TOTAL MULTI —FAMILY PARKING 2 950 2 868 (1) UNITS PER BUILDING SOUTH BUILDING — 262 UNITS NORTH BUILDING — 213 UNITS (2) REQUIRED PARKING 0 2 SPACES/UNIT. (3) INCLUDES 761 STALLS IN GARAGES & 107 SURFACE STALLS (4) INCLUDES 636 SF PATIO (REF CU12-26) (5) 15 SPACES PROVIDED TO LOT 3R1 FROM LOT 4R1 TO ACCOMMODATE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF SPACES (REF CU12-26) 81 TIC FUTURE MUTUALILAWRENCE i e A /pppy!'w 1106µ• TO Pt ACCESS A. CATES✓ 0qry, CRON BILLINGSLEY AIRPORT /1, VOL. 7143. PG. 600 LTD 41838 --0, lrl'R` � O.P.R.T.C.T. 1 ff t CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY OWNER ARCHITECT CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ LCG GRAPEVINE II, LP OFF ARCHITECT ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS A MA K C/O BAY WEST DEVELOPMENT 2808 FAIRMOUNT STREET. SUITE 300 PARKWAY 2 HENRY ADAMS STREET, SUITE 2M-33 DAUAS, TEXAS 75201 MASTER SITE PLAN SAN FRANCISCO. CAUFORNIA 94103 CONTACT: DRAKE JOHNSON CONTACT: MATT GINGERY DRAKE.JOHNSONOGFF.COM MAYOR SECRETARY LFATT08AYWESTDEVELOPMENT.COM (214) 303-1500 DATe. STARS AND STRIPES WAY (408) 690-4938 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION LOTS 1R—A, 2R—Al, 3R1 & 4R1, GRAPEVINE VINEYARDS OFF LANDSCAPE SUITE 300 THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 2808 FAIRMOUNT STREET, DALLAS. TEXAS CHAIRMAN DATE : Landev Engineers, Inc.I TXEng F-4387 CONTACT: BRLAN MOOR BRIAN.MOOREOGFF.COM F.COM LLANDEV 1801 Gateway Blvd, Ste 101, Richardson, TX 75080 (214) 303-1500 SHEET :1 OFSO 972.385.22721 LandevEngineem.com APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY PARK IN DESIGNry DRAWN DATE I SCALE I NOTES I FILE NO. CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. LANDEV I.WDEV 11.12.2020 1'=50' 1 BLUE SKY 1 1 Or f DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES L SITE PL DAL SITE PLAN 4" 10' CONCRETE SIDEWALK 5" REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT 6' REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT THE SEAL APPEARING ON THIS DOCUMENT WAS AUTHORIZED BY LAWRENCE A. CATES, P.E. 41838 ON 412712021 in~PS•` I e %LAWRENCE A CATESO P 41838.. ..e 0 25' 50' 100, 1" =50' - BOUNDARY LINE TABLE - NO. BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 89-13.29" W 1.57' L2 N 01' 12' 1 i E 13.40' - BOUNDARY CURVE TABLE NO. RADIUS I DELTA I ARC CH. BEARING ICHORD L1 5707.58' 00-05.58" 9.95- N 01720'38" W 19.95, EXIST. T. DRIVE E dug vj W. N EXIST. DRIVE NOTES' 1.ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CM OF GRAPEVINE EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE SHALL BE MET DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. 2.SRE LIGHTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE ORDINANCE. 3.PARKING FOR DISABLED PERSONS SHOULD BE DESIGNATED ACCORDING TO CHAPTER 23. SECTION 23-64 THROUGH 23-69 OF THE CODE ORDINANCES. 4.ALL REFUSE STORAGE AREAS (DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES BEHIND BUILDINGS) SHALL BE SCREENED N ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 50.b.3 (SECTION 47.I.1.8.22). 5- REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 60. SIGN REGULATIONS, WILL BE MET. BALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL EDUIPMNT SHALL BE DESIGNED, INSTALLED AND OPERATED TO MINIMIZE NOSE IMPACT ON SURROUNDING PROPERTY AND SIWy BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW. 7. TYPICAL PARKING SPACE DIMENSION S BALL REDUIREMENTS OF SECTION 25. "CC" COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT SHALL BE MET. 9.ALL REQUREMENTS OF SECTION 53. LANDSCAPING REGULATIONS SHALL BE MET. (MALL REDUIREMENTS OF SECTION M. DFF-STREET PARKING REOIIREMENIS SHWl BE MET. 11.THS PROPERTY S CURRENTLY ZONED 'CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. 12.THE CURRENT LAND USE DESIGMTON AS CONTAINED IN THE EXIST. COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN S COMMERCIAL 7. DRIVE 11COND111014A USE REQUEST CU-20_ 6 A REDUEST TO SPECIFCALLV ALLOY THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO MULTI -FAMILY BUILDINGS WITH ATTACHED PARKING STRUCTURES. 14.ALL ONS9E ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS SHALL BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND. 15. SOLID WASTE 3 RECYCLNG SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED BY CITY OF GRAPEVINE OWNER RAPEVINE II, LP REST DEVELOPMENT 5 STREET, SUITE 2M-33 :O, CALIFORNIA 94103 CONTACT: MATT GINGERY MATTOBAYWESTDEVELOPMENT.COM (408) 680-4938 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OFF LANDSCAPE 2808 FAIRMOUNT STREET, SURE 300 DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 CONTACT: BRIAN MOORE BRIAN.MOOREOGFF.COM (214) 303-1500 ARCHITECT OFF ARCHITECT 2808 FAIRMOUNT STREET, SUITE 300 DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 CONTACT: DRAKE JOHNSON ORAKE.JOHNSONOGFF.COM (214) 303-1500 VICINITY MAP N.T.S. SITE DATA SITE LOCATION SOUTHEAST CORNER OF GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY AND STARS AND STRIPES WAY CURRENT ZONING CC LOT AREA (LOT 2R-1 A) 458,734 SF PROPOSED MULTI -FAMILY (10.5310 ACRES) BUILDING AREA (LOT 2R-IA) 578.292 SF SOUTH BUILDING-262 UNITS 315.584 SF NORTH BUILDING-213 UNITS 262.708 SF OPEN SPACE (LOT 2R-lA) 129.299 SF IMPERVIOUS AREA 329,435 SF TOTAL 458,734 SF APPROXIMATE BUILDING HEIGHTS BUILDING NUMBER BUILDING TYPE HEIGHT SOUTH MULTI -FAMILY 46,-1' 4 STORY NORTH MULTI -FAMILY 46W" 4STORY PARKING DATA SUMMARY LOT 2R-Al TOTAL REQUIRED 489 @ 1.6/UNIT 783 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED BUILDING NUMBER PARKING REQUIRED PARKING AVAILABLE SOUTH NORTH 262 UNITS @ 1 6/(INITS - 419 213 UNITS @ 1.6/UNITS - 341 - - GARAGE SOUTH GARAGE NORTH 420 341 SURFACE PARKING 107 PARKING TOTAL 868 UNIT MATRIX SOUTH BUILDING -AVERAGE UNIT 981 SF UNIT MIX # OF UNITS % OF TOTAL UNITS EFFICIENCIES 20 7,63% 1 BEDROOM 129 49.24% 2 BEDROOM 102 38 93 3 BEDROOM 11 5,00% TOTAL 262 NORTH BUILDING -AVERAGE UNIT 1.001 SF UNIT MIX # OF UNITS % OF TOTAL UNITS EFFICIENCIES 12 5.63% 1BEDROOM 110 52.00% 2 BEDROOM 76 38,00% 3 BEDROOM 15 7.04% TOTAL 213 LEGEND ErvORe O m CIM LEO'A' SET CHISELED 'RO FOUND 0 O+UL IROx R00 SET (SIZE AS x0rE0) CIA IRON ROD SET ( E A N ED) WERNFAD UPtltt PEE W/ OUT sm.SEVER�AANROL,ANNEE WATER 4ANNOIE 0- SAx. S'M1, CU- OUT NORTH 8 O � GES VyEKTrEEp c+ C�ON1i1GL VKYE O.V. WATER VKVE GRAPEVINELEMILLS Osr. S5WY�I�NiAA �% s ELECRCBO% D 2® RIGHT-OF-WAY) Ou STREET SIGN O%+. CARLE -ER ol SIGN CD TAUTAu SPRINKLER CRAPNIC SCAM- 1'=40' SEOIbER PAD CF LIGNT POLE TREE TRACT A - - .. .. ,...... :..CABRJET'A, SLIDE'8466 I I - O ... . , , -'+* N Dr•.e•sr E L I ss].oD• .rm m ..` b Ai�_- 77.51' -uT 191 B7' . (- 02. - ` � ___ 0 1 152.5 — sDs- E_: r - � ICI { I I -' 1— �.,', LOT 5R f�f � BLOCK A I qq I z z T _ 1 S$ I 1-_ I_ 1 L0 _ � -q � - • I I l s N 01-46- 1' E — 5M.81' f _ t_ ` I - veutY Nr _�— 5 01 IQ 31. W - -+ I Q `- - -,. . ----- xn I (- "� oz Iroiwl4j_`_1-_. - _-- _ i — ( Y3' umm FASEN \ ,) . EM t0' UTAM FASEYCM -o o I $E ¢y • eRY iX � . -., . INSr/DNBIen15. INAIDZWIenaS - I 1. go � f I -^� 11 t YS t -C1� It I -�� uT I \ WHOM- 4 , I� T ' � `. ,�! • `. ^ tee' # ` , - � ,.__ _ ' I ' p ❑ t.; _ - � - _�y—. _ �` — { \ ,r.� . \�` � � � , " ,' � 1� I I f ,E•oAK - .._- -- - rvD,x n'b I `�Y. ?�Z"y „ per' IKsr/bzpe,en.s `» N1RElAKE ANO 1812. TASEMnn 1 I ! 1s' FA3EMENr. 5P, IKsrNzps+ena� j r y ' \` �� '� ;• ' {� ) - Bay - I.: e5.2' e6.5• _- '. Il y, ✓1 . 3 6 n 4.860 AC. a z4 LOT 5R I `�` " I - z.o• ONE STORY rILTWALI BUILDING 2'0• ' a ,w, jq w \` �%a` BLOCK A _ m ''L. FF £L£v -sat. n•.'',o z ti ,nn"6y666 5 [ GRAPEVINE VINEYARDS _ 4.388 AC. +?�\ INST#D2O9187245 AND — PKE LOT 2R—A #D2O93O3137 1 _ BLOCK A O.P.R.T.C.T. _ urlozos ena g INST D2O91872 SAAND r t / '1�► �� �D2O93O3137� O.P.R.T.C.T. �r s ocao w - E LCG GRAPEVINE II, LP zo L o UTILITY `. . ], .,• IRAfiV LASELIERT 2.0• pp : XA �6 •7 •• � `.` \ // �� xspozoalenae xsr DxaFiWSEME'p WST�j0209303140 5x, ese4 J. . p �� � SRE IIERCMOMRNFI 4 �f 4 a Q 4i (qy S I 5 URR U8724 NT ]a 6 e p 60.2 'S yw r` ,... Nsrlozoslmz4s: �' M1.__ _ � ��O ' ' � `a, Nsr�DiDLEf7SENKSMRJ ki ti-�'0 -----R6T/p2D.tenU- NSr/Oz091anu --- 0 `' -- --' - 44 ----- -------- ---------' - --i+•- - - --- -- _ r I =r _ X."' ? ( —•� ,y f I- y, - - __ __� '�eLoti'•. dCn - - - .f91.6S' -X 'x:SN�-'- tIII, UTXDYFwsEErENr vnRE cEx ---- nas -- - -_�-- __ T1 bwsw ,enai S 0?224 E 67A6B' 10' �S EA�� 1 - SJD---- __ ,Ab SURVEY PLAT TO ALL PARTIES W WRESTED IN PREMISES SURVEYED. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE, THIS DATE, MADE A CAREFUL AND ACCURATE SURVEY ON THE GROUND OF FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY. BIM ALL THAT CERTAIN LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS KNOWN AS LOT 2R-A AND LOT 5R IN BLOCK A OF AMENDED REPLAT OF GRAPEVNE VINEYARDS. AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED UNDER COUNTY CLERK'S FILE No. D209187245, OF THE PUT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. TOGETHER WITH RATIFICATION AND CONFIRMATION OF PLAT FILED 11/18/2009, RECORDED UNDER COUNTY CLERK'S FILE NO. D209303137, OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. FLOOD NOTE ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) - NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFP) - FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) - FOR THE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS - MAP NO. 48439CO 11 OK. MAP REVISED, SEPTEMBER 25. 2009, THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON UES IN ZONE •X (OTHER AREAS). ZONE 'X(OTHER AREAS) IS DEFINED AS -AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2x ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOOPLARf. THIS FLOOD STATEMENT DOES NOT IMPLY THAT THE PROPERTY AND/OR THE STRUCTURE THEREON WILL BE FREE FROM FLOODING OR FLOOD DAMAGE ON RARE OCCASIONS. GREATER FLOODS CAN AND WILL OCCUR AND FLOOD HEIGHTS MAY BE INCREASED BY MAN-MADE OR NATURAL CAUSES. THIS FLOOD STATEMENT SWILL NOT CREATE LABILITY ON THE PART OF THE SURVEYOR. BENCHMARKS SITE BENCHMARK NO. 1 - TOP OF THE CENTER OF A STORM SEWER MANHOLE LID LOCATED IN THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STARS & STRIPES WAY (AN 80' RIGHT-OF-WAY), SAID POINT ALSO BEING APPROX. 23 FEET FROM THE MOST NORTHERLY NORTHEAST CORNER OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. ELEVATION - 529.24' CERIF1GTgN THEPLAT HEREON IS A TRUE CORRECT AN RAT REPRESENTATION EC 0 ALMA E THIS THE PROPERTY T DETERMINED BY SURVEY. MADE E THE GROUND. THIS DATE, SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS THAT IRECORD. THE ONES AND DIMENSIONS OF ANBED PROPERTY BEING INDICATED NDIDI CATED BY THE PUT; THE SIZE, LOCATION AND TYPE OF BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS ARE AS SHOWN, ALL IMPROVEMENTS BEING ERHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPERTY, SET BACK CE F THE PROPERTY LINES THE DISTANCES INDICATED AND THAT THE DISTANCE FROM THE NEAREST INTERSECTING STREET OR ROAD IS AS SHOWN ON SPEAT. THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS. CONFLICTS OR PROTRUSIONS,. E EXCEPT AS SHOWN. PRELIMINARY / FOR REIVEW DAVID LAND PETREE--------- ERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 1890 CASE NAME. STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20 ADDRESS. 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY OATS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE. SHEET. 3 OF 50 REVISED O)/03/)020 - ADp1IDNAL REND INI'D SHEET 3 OF 6 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY STARS AND STRIPES WAY LOT 2R-A AND LOT 5R GRAPEVINE VINEYARDS CITY OF ORAFEV11K TARRMff COUNTY. TEX" ELUi S 5UR\'F!wG E,SI(y 8 VAMPING. ORPoRATION DATE: MAY20, 2020 t F0'5 VIMAYROAD SCALE 1-40' O IAS 'EX 219 HGNE Z 35&i500 ar+ URPETREECBLUESKYSURVEYING.COM -AM. ':2i!!35B-tfi00 +'+ TSPLS REGISTRATION No. 10105700 GRAPEVINE MILLS PK - - - _ 1 1 (VARIABLE ynDTR RCxt-of-w'Ay) \ ` O55 539 �� ,qq 0,07 AC. .. ` 05 4 05 3 C Ad717T/1'�r 028 AC, D.06 AC. / Ems------- ----_--�- - - - - - - - ..... �'��'"� JV.f /.'%�, OS6 539 539 11D170Lt'N' rsd m ` AVr4rfTE iC34 _.. 0.09 1001, - I R 121 AC. _ ( I , /r �i I�' DA • I • n " r DA' 111 146 AC. I ' rT i DA 11 I _- ................-I--T ---" -- _ - -- 21 44 - --- Ac 7 J 0.40 AC - DA4 - DA2 _ tA6 0.41 AC. _ --� 0.22AC. 31 AC.� 11 -_I� 0.59AC. -I-� - a»m �: a •m- - ] /kl �IIII I III III A / 0.72 AC. I I 14pqIQ �' 0.74 A'000, J' / DA 17 ' I�..J - a" ✓A vA I�y3' ` \ I I '�\ \ \ __0.55 AC. - / - DA3 �� �.II T -_I-- ` _ - 0.59 AC. q� �®�a2`�i / r j \ \\ DA 19 059 \ 0.36 AC. 0.06 AC. \ ® S � \ eel /40j�O�O O110 '7 • � 0 1 532 I - OS 1 0.71 AC. p I . \ J AIOP91• " axw 1\ I 11 �� yy� \�•\� / 1015 1027 AG I 0.08 ' OS1 \\ Ifty "ftft 411, `11011 ` I 8 r �Z 0 25' 50• 100, 1' =50, LEGEND: -� AREA DRAINAGE FLOW DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY DA22 2 DRAINAGE AREA DESIGNATION INDIVIDUAL ACREAGE - EXISTING MAJOR CONTOURS - PRE DRAINAGE EXISTING MINOR CONTOURS AREA CALCULATIONS: AREANo. C 1100 A Q100 DAl 0.8 7.56 0.48 2.90 DA2 0.8 7.56 0,22 L33 DA3 0.9 7.56 0.59 157 DA4 0.8 7.56 0.44 2.66 DA5 0.8 156 1.46 8.83 DA6 0.8 7,56 0.31 L87 DA7 0.8 7.56 0.89 5.38 DAB 0.8 7.56 0.28 1.69 DA9 0.8 7.56 0.55 3.33 DA10 0.8 7.56 0.59 3.57 DA11 0.8 7956 0.29 L75 DA12 0.8 7.56 0.72 4.35 DA13 0.8 7.56 0.41 148 DA14 0.3 T56 0,18 0.41 DA15 0.3 Z56 1.09 2.47 DA16 0.8 7.56 0.22 1.33 DA 17 0.3 7.56 0.21 0.48 DA18 0.3 7.56 0.4 0.91 DA 19 0.3 7.56 0.36 0.92 DA20 0.3 7.56 0.51 L16 DA21 0.8 7.56 0.67 4.05 DA22 0.2 7.56 0.36 0.54 DA23 0.8 7.56 0.4 2.42 DA24 0.8 7.56 0.74 4A8 051 as T56 0.86 5.20 OS2 0.3 7.56 0.09 0.20 OS3 0.8 7.56 0.06 0.36 OS4 0.8 7.56 0.28 L69 OS5 0.8 7.56 0.07 OA2 056 0.3 7.56 0.21 0.48 057 0.3 7.56 0.24 0.54 OS8 0.3 7.56 0.02 0.05 OS9 0.3 7.56 0.09 0.20 Oslo 0.3 756 0.11 0.25 OS11 0.3 T56 0.33 0.75 OS12 0.3 1 7.56 1 0.28 O.fi4 OS13 0.3 156 115 2.61 0514 0.3 7.56 127 2.88 OSSS 0.3 7.56 0.08 0.18 0516 0.3 7.56 0.71 1.61 OS17 0.3 Z56 0.53 1.20 CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20- ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY THE SEAL APPEARING ON THIS DOCUMENT WAS AUTHORIZED BY LAWRENCE A. CA TES, P.E. 418J8 ON 412712021 MAYOR SECRETARY DATE. p<E ❑F r��q/// PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ne e/A 0 CHAIRMAN %LAWRENCE A CATESO DATE: 41838 4� AI&&Gt-�"�� SHEET: 4 OF 50 o APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORUEANYWORKIN CONFLICT VNTH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENTOF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EXISTING CONDITIONS DRAINAGE AREA MAP STARS AND STRIPES WAY LOT 2R-Al, GRAPEVINE VINEYARDS THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS LumDEy Landev Engineers, Inc. IT:Eng F-4387 1801 Gateway BMd, Ste 101, Richardson, TX 75080 ,m.„��;•; 972.385.22721 LandevEngineem.com DESIGN DRAWN I ATE I NOTES LANDEV LANDEV 11.Diz zozo SCALE BLUE SKY FILE N0. :0-211.00 1 4 OF 6 GRAPEVINE MILLS PKWY NAftaE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY) 0.19 NO ('Jy'a3"f 33>IA' _ I'i7'73 E 782.38' r e� ; - ttl� ; tltt� � Itt� ' IB' SD- Ost 1 _._ .. 0.28 LOT 3R1, BLOCK A I 05s LOT 4R11 BLOCK A `y \ 4� Al � � ■ 1.47 ` 305�1 1 _ I 0.48 Ap _. !■ 1 l 2.9 - 0.17 O ' 1 1 EXISTING BLDG 2 ? Ii I' EXISTING 1 1 1 1 STORY BLDG 3 ;: `I .._ ! a ❑ ' - r 1 STORY 1 1 ` T 1 EXISTING Bt BUILDING i 399.1 i STORY LOT IR-A, BLOCK A t" 5• G FF= 531.35 Ct -- 0.08 I 0.43 0.48 01 j 1�-•,R..�-- m..._.- _ .,� 2.60 18• SO ♦ 1 7.27 T FF= 534.10Ae • • ;n ' PARA7NCSTRUCTURE ++ Tiiii (IIi���II1 Ae 1 A7 I 1 T 12 C4 0; P 1 - 7IS L26 {{ LO.. � R-A1 1 _ NORTH BUILDING 1 N \ SOUTH BUILDING 1 � � I Ae ��1� � I ilf( I f lI Off A4 I j� 1 050 064 �� 3.02 3.87 1 �' le SD 11) i PARKING STRUCTURE � 1.57 I +(, 1 III I FF= 534.33 1 '7� - r - I FF= 534. /O 1 ?� A6 \ H 0.34 b g4 2. 0.27 Jr SD_ 0.27 -14• � ( t.63 1.63 '....,..,. ,-. HEADWALL Ex/SONG D6CIiARGE "'�_ ENSRNG - .-'��ro BE RE4IOYED I GENERAL NOTES 1. EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND DESIGN CRITERIA ARE SHOWN ON SHEET 5 OF 6 AND THIS SHEET. 2. PROPOSED STORM DRAIN EXTENSIONS OF THOSE SYSTEMS ARE SHOWN WITH THEIR PRELIMINARY SIZE AND LOCATION ON THIS PLAN. FINAL LOCATIONS WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE ENGINEERING DESIGN PLANS. PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREAS REPRESENT THE GRADING PROPOSED FOR THE NEW DEVELOPMENT, 3 N W Ic N �Z 0 25' 50' 100, 1•=50' LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR --45 -- PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIVIDE (POST -DEVELOPMENT) At DRAINAGE BASIN 0.48 AREA (ACRES) K2.B7 0100 (CFS) ® EXISTING STORM PROPOSED STORM DIRECTION OF FLOW Area C CA liw Qi. DA 9 la , I—- fiNhr, lrfcl Al 0,48 0.80 0.38 7.56 2,90 A2 0,69 0.80 0.55 7.56 4.17 A3 1.59 0.80 1.27 7.56 9,62 A4 0.64 0.80 0.51 7.56 3,87 A5 0.27 0.80 0.22 7.56 1.63 A6 0.34 0,80 0.27 7.56 2.D6 A7 1,26 0.80 1.01 7,56 7.62 A8 0.54 0.80 0,43 7.56 3,27 B1 0.66 0.80 0.53 7.56 3.99 B2 0.09 0.80 0.07 7,56 0.54 B3 0.50 0.80 0.40 7.56 3.02 34 0.27 0.80 0.22 7.56 163 B5 0.64 0,80 0.51 7,56 3.87 Ct 043 0.80 0.34 T56 2-60 C2 0.11 0.80 0.09 7.56 0.67 C3 0.26 0,80 0.21 7,56 1,57 C4 1.26 0.80 1.01 7.56 7.62 CS am 0.80 0.06 7.56 048 D1 0.21 0,80 0.17 T56 1.27 E 0.19 0.80 0.15 7.56 1A5 OS 1 0.28 0.80 0.22 756 169 OS2 1.47 0.80 1.18 7.56 869 OS3 0.56 0.60 0.45 7.56 3.39 THE SEAL APPEARING ON THIS DOCUMENT WAS AUTHORIZED BY LAWRENCE A. CATES, P.E. 41838 ON 412712021 ae ��ay nQ�P`� DT 7��9t 11 ie AO %LAWRENCE A. CATES. 1,,1;41638� 'veo of - cL� ti E sT i n.. 1:0E. CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20- ADDRESS.3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY KEV.A MARKS PRELIMINARY GRADING A POST DRAINAGE AREA MAP MAYOR SECRETARY STARS AND STRIPES WAY DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION LOT 2R-Al, GRAPEVINE VINEYARDS CHAIRMAN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS Landev Engineers, Inc. I TzEng F-4387 DATE: LLANDEV 1801 Gateway Blvd, Ste 101, Richardson, TX 75080 SHEET: 5 OF SO 972.385.2272 1 LandevEngineem.com APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY MRR IN DESIGN DRAWNDATE I SCALE NOTES I FILE N0. tAHDEV LANOEv I1.12.2020 I•=30' BLUE SKY 20POST00 °A MA- 5 OF 6 CONFLICT IMTH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I I GRAPEVINE MILLS PKWY (VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY) I I I � LOT 1R—A, BLOCK A EY (X%ICREtE tl MKYEM yL4 ro MH RIM- FL- 52211.6767 —`z—Aum- 0 25' 50' 100' LEGEND TREE TREE TO - REMOVED -- -- EXIST. CONTOUR -Ap PROP. CONTOUR Ex $- EXIST. SANITARY SEWER UNE $°- EXIST. SANITARY SEWER 1NNHOLE �•i1a PROP. SANITARY SEWER UNE PROP. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXIST. WATER LINE EXIST. RRE HYDRANT EXIST. WATER VALVE PROP. WATER UNE PROP. TIRE NYORANT PROP, WATER VALVE EXIST, STORM GRAIN PIPE STORY DRAIN PIPE GENERAL NOTES 1. EXISTING WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MAINS ARE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AND ARE ADEQUATE TO SERVE THIS DEVELOPMENT. FINAL DEMANDS AND CAPACITY WILL BE DETERMINED WITH ENGINEERING DESIGN PLANS. 2. PROPOSED WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MAINS AND SERVICES ARE SHOWN IN THEIR PRELIMINARY SIZE AND LOCATION ON THIS PLAN. FINAL LOCATIONS WILL BE SHOWN IN THE ENGINEERING DESIGN PLANS. 3. FRANCHISE UTILITIES (ELECTRIC, GAS AND COMMUNICATION) WILL BE COORDINATED WITH EACH FRANCHISE COMPANY DURING THE DESIGN PHASE. THE SEAL APPEARING ON THIS DOCUMENT WAS AUTHORIZED BY L4WRENCE A. C4TES, P.E. 41838 ON 412712021 OF T"III +y�11 Jam@, -jfo!ZSPtE � v11 `f7 /LAWRENCE A. CATESO ...... �..........41838.i I WJ � IRRIGATION NOTES • IRRIGATION INSTALLATION TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY THE CONTRACTOR / SUBCONTRACTOR • ALL LAWN SURFACES TO BE FULLY IRRIGATED WITH 100% HEAD TO HEAD COVERAGE. NO ROTOR SPRAY HEADS ARE TO BE USED • ALL TREES TO BE IRRIGATED WITH MIN. (2) BUBBLERS. . ALL PLANTER BEDS TO BE IRRIGATED VIA DRIP IRRIGATION. • SLEEVES TO BE PROVIDED AS NEEDED TO CONNECT IRRIGATION LINES TO ANY PLANTED MEDIANS OR OTHER LANDSCAPE AREAS SEPARATED BY PAVEMENT PRIOR TO PAVEMENT INSTALLATION. • NO IRRIGATION SPRAY IS TO BE DIRECTED ONTO WALKWAYS OR OTHER PAVEMENT. • ALL IRRIGATION LINES SHALL BE LEAK -TESTED PRIOR TO BURIAL. • SPRINKLER HEADS TO BE INSTALLED ONLY AFTER SYSTEM HAS BEEN COMPLETELY FLUSHED. . ALL IRRIGATION AND RELATED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING (BUT NOT LIMITED TO) PIPING, VALVES, CONTROLLERS,BACKFLOW PREVENTER(S),THRUST BLOCKS, CONTROL WIRE, VALVE BOXES. SPRINKLER HEADS, RISERS, ETC. TO BE INSTALLED ACCORDING T MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. -'AS-BUILT'DRAWINGS FOR ALL IRRIGATION PLUMBING AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ACCURATELY MAINTAINED DURING INSTALLATION AND PROVIDED TO OWNER AT TIME OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE. • IRRIGATION MUST FOLLOW ALL TCEQ 30 TAC 344 REGULATIONS. GRAPEVINE MILLS STARSa STRIPES PLAN NORTH LANDSCAPE TABULATION INTERIOR VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE MIN. 10%OF GROSS PARKING AREA TO BE LANDSCAPE AREA; (1) 3" CAL. TREE PER 400 SOFT OF REQ. LANDSCAPE AREA; (1) ISLAND PER 12 SPACES; MIN. (1) TREE PER ISLAND. GROSS PARKING AREA: 29,293 SOFT REQUIRED PROVIDED 2,930 SOFT 3,002 SOFT LANDSCAPE AREA (8) TREES (14) TREES 3" CAL. TREE / 400 SQFT (6) ISLANDS (8) ISLANDS 70 TOTAL SPACES NON -VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE MIN.15% OF TOTAL SITE AREA TO BE DEVOTED TO FEATURE LANDSCAPING; 50% OF THE REQUIRED TO BE LOCATED IN THE FRONT YARD; (1) Y CAL. TREE PER 2500 SQFT OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA. TOTAL SITE AREA: 458,734 SOFT REQUIRED PROVIDED 68,810 SQFT 147,935 SOFT LANDSCAPE AREA (28) TREES (37) TREES 3" CAL. TREE / 2500 SOFT PERIMETER (1) 3' CAL. TREE PER 50 LF. ALONG FRONTAGE STARS AND STRIPES WAY FRONTAGE: 300 LF REQUIRED PROVIDED (6) TREES (8) TREES MULTI -FAMILY OPEN SPACE MIN. 250 SQFT OF USABLE OPEN SPACE PER BUILDING UNIT; OVERHEAD TREE CANOPY TO COVER 60% OF LANDSCAPE AREA IN THE CENTRAL CORRIDOR. TOTAL UNITS: 475 TOTAL LS AREA: 16,064 SOFT (16,064 x 60%) / 900 SOFT PER TREE REQUIRED PROVIDED (11)TREES (11)TREES 60% OVERHEAD CANOPY 118,750 SOFT 147,935 SOFT 475 UNITS x 250 SOFT PLAN NORTH Style: 1°=60'-0" 0 30 60 120 Feet VICINITY MAP Scale: 1" = 1000'-0" CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNNG ANO ZONING COMMMIGN DATE: SHEET: OF APFNU'11- WTAurvumZEANYWONIIWCONRJLTWPHANY COOES OR ORONANCES, pEPASiMEM oEVELOFMENTSEwILES W Q a— /w O V/1 � Q O LL aco co 4 V J W QLo co 0 U) I'- zwX ~ U) rn � W N (n Z LL W w LL La- Q I­_rrrnn V No, Date Revision DJM.BPW DTew. XXX Approved THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION. MARK S. BOIA&ES TEXAS LIC N0: 2767 OVERALL SITE PLAN Project No. 19185.00 Date 12/07/2020 L-100 I ._..—..—.._..— i I i I l 1 � j i DOGWASTESTATION a "25'BUILDING SETBACK 1 PROPERTY LINE (TYP) ~ - '-^•'' i..... I:'-'. ,••' LARGE CANOPY TREE r ,-I ORNAMENTALTREE MEDIUM CANOPY TREE 1 DOG WASTE STATION DECOMPOSED GRANITE 1 DOG (WASTE ZONE �l L W� I 1 • I LAYERED PLANTING IN 1 -- COMPLIANCEWITH SECTION 22 D.A.2 tr WALL L II 1 EXISTING SIGNAGEi • 1.• •T• ''I DOG WASTE STATION I\` I : (JIhwi i 11 PROPERTY LINE (TYP) 25'BUILDING SETBACK ORNAMENTALTREE ------ DOG WASTE STATION DECO 'A I :;I !' _— MPOSED GRANITE -- DOG WASTE ZONE e (V b : C) T : r— J J LLI ; W W: W �w • ui W: W W : LLJ U : V) W ; W Z : Z _Jl: _J zi au 1111111111110 -= LARGE CANOPY TREE ✓g, MEDIUM CANOPY TREE f \ C _- S4 ORNAMENTALTREE PROPERTY LINE&\/1�/1��'� -� sm PLAN NORTH style: l•=20'-0' 0 10 20 00 Feel GRAPEVINE MILLS STARSAs'"S RAN NORTH LEGEND VICINITY MAP Scale: ,•=,000'-0" O LARGE CANOPY TREE CEDAR ELM H 50'-60' W 40'-50' BURR OAK H 50'-60 W 40'-50' LIVE OAK H 40,-80' W 60-100' CHINAQUAPIN OAK H 40-60, W 50'-60' MEDIUM CANOPY TREE TEXAS RED OAK H 30-35' W 20-30' WESTERN SOAPBERRY H 30'-40, W 25'-35' LACEY OAK H 20'-35W 15'-20' BIGTOOTH MAPLE H 40'-50' W 25-35' T ORNAMENTAL TREE O CHITALPANTAIL H 20'-35' W 20'-35' CRAPE MYRTLE H 15'-25' W 6'-15' TEXAS REDBUD H 15'-20' W 15'-20' CONCRETE PAVING BRUSHED CONCRETE PAVING DECOMPOSED GRANITE ® MIXED PLANTING MEDIUM EVERGREEN GROUNDCOVER LAWN DOG WASTE STATION PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PLANTING DESCRIPTION:: A. MIXED PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 12" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (10) #5 CONTAINER SHRUBS; (10) #3 CONTAINER SHRUBS PER 100 SQ.FT. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. B. MEDIUM EVERGREEN PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 12" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (6) #7 CONTAINER SHRUBS PER 100 SQ.FT.. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. C. SEASONAL COLOR PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 8" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (100) 4" POT SEASONAL COLOR PLANTS PER 100 SQ.FT. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. C. GROUNDCOVER PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 8" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH: PLANT (45) #1 CONTAINER GROUNDCOVER PLANTS PER 100 SQ.FT. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. D. LAWN AREA - PROVIDE MIN. 6" TOPSOIL COMPOST MIX WITH BERMUDA TIF 419 SOLID SOD. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20._ ADDRESS: 32DO GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY OATS' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMSSKIN DATE: SHEET:_OF_ APRrwu WES NOT AU,HOM ANl NVRR IN CONRICT (MIN AYV WOES OR OR.-Ce. oEPAR,M[Nr of orvB.DPMRnsER.r,Es 0 wr ^ Q Lp 0U~ Z W X Q a H 06 "tUz N x W W LL U) d Q Q C C� I Dab R-mm DJM.BPW Drawn xxx AVOTVved THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING. OR CONSTRUCTION - MARKS. BOWLES TEXAS LIC NO'. 2767 SITE ENLARGEMENT PLAN Project No. 19185.00 Date 12/07/2020 L-101 ■ e.• - - ■ - - ____ ____________a ■ _ ■. i `.■ ,'. DOG WA: PROPER - „CROSS WALK CONNECTION BEYOND PROJECT COMPLIES TO DISTRICT • MEDIUM CANOPY _ ■ __ yt„ SPECIFIC STANDARDS 2 TREE PROPERTY LINE (TYPI I a '• i -',�' _ _ — _ ✓ ✓ y r — 1 ........a .ORNAMENTAL ■ _7;. ..=ry 25 BUILDING SETBACK .i TREE ■ _ - r ? - ''.. a w. F I '�- PLANTER WALL FITNESS WALL FIG- 1 TDATEGATE FITNESS LAWN —J, --- --W w w LU r • � '-.u- z. —— — j U - W w �t w W, (n LU, z • 26'FIRE LANE m was• e.�--c�_o, mmHg W015 2- 90" � I I I �'• � � I ft"v =-- I }IN Ccy) --fi ` S— J � J MEDIUM CANOPY TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE 1 W W I ._ `l U) U ,,� W W W - _W ( U) (— 't *� Z Z _ SEAT WALLCAFE • T T SEATING y y SEATING i U U— i� _ I \ GRAPEVINE MILLS sTARsasrmPEs R PLAN NORTH VICINITY MAP LEGEND O LARGE CANOPY TREE CEDAR ELM H 50.60' W 40-50' BURR OAK H 50'-60' W 40-50' LIVE OAK H 40'-80' W 60-100' CHINAQUAPIN OAK H 40'-60' W 50'-60' MEDIUM CANOPY TREE TEXAS RED OAK H 30'-35' W 20'-30 WESTERN SOAPBERRY H 30'-40' W 25'-35 LACEY OAK H 20'-35' W 15'-20 BIGTOOTH MAPLE H 40'-50' W 25'-35' ORNAMENTALTREE O CENTALA H 20'-35' W 20'-35' CRAPE MYRTLE H 15'-25' W 6-15' TEXAS REDBUD H 15'-20' W 15'-20' CONCRETE PAVING BRUSHED CONCRETE PAVING DECOMPOSED GRANITE ® MIXED PLANTING MEDIUM EVERGREEN GROUNDCOVER LAWN DOG WASTE STATION —�.�—..—..— PROPERTY LINE ------- BUILDING SETBACK PLANTING DESCRIPTION:: A. MIXED PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 12" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (10) #5 CONTAINER SHRUBS; (10) #3 CONTAINER SHRUBS PER 100 SQ.FT. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. B. MEDIUM EVERGREEN PLANTING AREA -EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 12" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (6) #7 CONTAINER SHRUBS PER ]DO SQ.FT.. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. C. SEASONAL COLOR PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 8" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (100) 4" POT SEASONAL COLOR PLANTS PER 100 SQ.FT. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. C. GROUNDCOVER PLANTING AREA -EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 8" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (45) #1 CONTAINER GROUNDCOVER PLANTS PER 100 SQ.FT. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. D. LAWN AREA -PROVIDE MIN. 6"TOPSOIL COMPOST MIX WITH BERMUDA TIF 419 SOLID SOD. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CASENAME: STARSI PLAN NORTH 0 10 20 40 Feet CASE NUMBER: CU20._ ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE RANNNG AND ZONING CDMNBSIDN DATE'. SHEET: —OF_ APPH VP100E5NJTAMgRIff ANYWOHNNCONFLICTW1iMAW LOGES OR ONCNN.C5. Dsa.ANtMtvrDF DEUELDR.Exrsmvr,Es W Q L0 a- (0 0U~ Z W X 06 et U) z LL�w tY Q //0�r'� v— LJ V J THIS DOCUMENT IS NOTFOR REGULATORY DJMBPW APPROVAL, D,— PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION. xxx Aopr.e4 MARK S. BOWLES TEXAS LIC NO: 2767 SITE ENLARGEMENT PLAN Project No. 19185.00 Date 12/07/2020 L-102 ♦ \ . `\ ♦\ \ \ ` \ DOG WASTE STATION \ \ ORNAMENTAL TREE ` \ .•♦' \ 25'BUILDING SETBACK ..... \ 3 PROPERTY LINE(TYR) \\ \ pp� \ \ \ " 5, ;'i \ \ \ \ NJ nv v - \ i \ \Q 1 \N DECOMPOSED GRANITE DOGWASTEZONE 3,.. \ ♦ \ ` 7� DOG WASTE STATION ...�.�.�.♦♦.,,a `\\ \ I I I ( I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I ( ( I N c'M— O O r T— I 1 J 1J� W W- I I I I I I V) ui LLI W ui flT cf)c/) W W Z Z J J U U UlAl 2 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L-103 j ��nmuununu �.�nnn1. . ' Y ya x ........................MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L-104 .... ry r GRAPEVINE MILLS RS A STRIPES PLAN NORTH VICINITY MAP LEGEND Sazle,"_ -0. O LARGE CANOPY TREE CEDAR ELM H 50'-60' W 40'-50' BURR OAK H 50'-60 W 40 -50' LIVE OAK H 40'-80 W 60-100' CHINAQUAPIN OAK H 40'-60' W 50'-60' MEDIUM CANOPY TREE TEXAS RED OAK H 30'-35' W 20'-30' WESTERN SOAPBERRY H 30'-40' W 25'-35' LACEY OAK H 20'-35 W 15 -20' BIGTOOTH MAPLE H 40'-50 W 25 -35' ORNAMENTAL TREE O CHITALPA H 20-35' W 20'-35' CRAPE MYRTLE H 15'-25' W 6 -15 TEXAS REDBUD H 15'-20 W 15-20' CONCRETE PAVING BRUSHED CONCRETE PAVING DECOMPOSED GRANITE ® MIXED PLANTING MEDIUM EVERGREEN GROUNDCOVER LAWN {®} DOG WASTE STATION PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PLANTING DESCRIPTION:: A. MIXED PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 12" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (10) #5 CONTAINER SHRUBS; (10) #3 CONTAINER SHRUBS PER 100 SQ.FT. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. B. MEDIUM EVERGREEN PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 12" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (6) #7 CONTAINER SHRUBS PER 100 SQ.FT.. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. C. SEASONAL COLOR PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 8" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (100) 4" POT SEASONAL COLOR PLANTS PER 100 SQ.Ff. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. C. GROUNDCOVER PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 8" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (45) #1 CONTAINER GROUNDCOVER PLANTS PER 100 SQ.FT. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. D. LAWN AREA - PROVIDE MIN. 6" TOPSOIL COMPOST MIX WITH BERMUDA TIF 419 SOLID SOD. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. PLAN NORTH 0 10 20 40 Feet CASE NAME'. STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ ADDRESS. 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATi'. n:,s�ccH:coxry urcKK Iwsll.�.mv DATE SHEET: OF_ AP1101AL DOES NOT nUtIIORRE urv1- N CCN— MTIIANI WOE, OR OROI�ANCES. X—TNENT OF OEVEEOPNENT SENCES U) W >Q Lo > CO (Y U) ~ Z Lu X U) M E ~ W 06 N�z LLU)w Q of V No. Date Revision THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT FOR REGULATORY DJM BPW APPROVAL, �— PERMITTING. OR CONSTRUCTION. XXX App—d MARK S. BOWLES TEXAS LIC NO 2767 SITE ENLARGEMENT PLAN Project No. 19185.00 Date 12/0712020 L-103 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L-103 m map GHAPENNE MILLS STM 6STRPES PLAN NORTH T LEGEND VICINITY MAP Scale: ," = 1000'-0" • LARGE CANOPY TREE CEDAR ELM H 50'-60' W 40'-50' BURR OAK H 50'-60' W 40'-50' LIVE OAK H 40'-80' W 60-100, CHINAOUAPIN OAK H 40'-60' W 50'-60' MEDIUM CANOPY TREE TEXAS RED OAK H 30'-35' W 20'-30' WESTERN SOAPBERRY H 30'-40' W 25'-35' LACEY OAK H 20'-35' W 15'-20' BIGTOOTH MAPLE H 40'-50' W 25'-35' ORNAMENTALTREE a CHITALPA H 20'-35' W 20'-35' CRAPE MYRTLE H 15'-25' W 6'-15' TEXAS REDBUD H 15'-20' W 15-20' CONCRETE PAVING a BRUSHED CONCRETE PAVING DECOMPOSED GRANITE ® MIXED PLANTING MEDIUM EVERGREEN GROUNDCOVER LAWN DOG WASTE STATION ---.-- PROPERTY LINE - BUILDING SETBACK PLANTING DESCRIPTION:: A. MIXED PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 12" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (10) #5 CONTAINER SHRUBS; (10) #3 CONTAINER SHRUBS PER 100 SQ.FT. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. B. MEDIUM EVERGREEN PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 12" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (6) #7 CONTAINER SHRUBS PER 100 SQ.FT.. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. C. SEASONAL COLOR PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE 8" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (100) 4" POT SEASONAL COLOR PLANTS PER 100 SQ.FT. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. C. GROUNDCOVER PLANTING AREA - EXCAVATE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE B" OF PLANTING MIX AND 3" OF HARDWOOD MULCH; PLANT (45) #1 CONTAINER GROUNDCOVER PLANTS PER 100 SQ.FT. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. D. LAWN AREA -PROVIDE MIN. 6" TOPSOIL COMPOST MIX WITH BERMUDA TIF 419 SOLID SOD. PROVIDE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. PUAN NORTH Scale'. 1"=20'41" 0 10 20 40 Feet CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU24_ ADDRESS: 32OD GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE. P ANNNG AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE. SHEET:_OF_ APPPCVALCCESNpTAUTKKWREANYNCgNW 0— CCCESORCRCNAVCES. eEPAAR4NT OF aEVELOFME TEEPVICES C VJ LLJ Qa- > Lr) /��// 1.1_ > (D 0 co~ z LL] ~ rn LU W N C/) z LL U) w I..I_ Q THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT FOR REGULATORY OJM.BPW APPROVAL, TDm n PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION. XXX Approved MARK S. BOWLES TEXAS LIC NO. 2767 SITE ENLARGEMENT PLAN Project No. 19185.00 Date 12/07/202O L-104 ------------ V 1 VEHICLE COURT 4 OPEN LAWN 7 FITNESS LAWN 10 POOL COURTYARD `ACTIVE' 2 DRIVE COURT DROPOFF 5 LEASING PLAZA 8 CROSSWALK 11 QUIET COURTYARD 3 TRELLIS WALKWAY CONNECTION 6 PUBLIC PLAZA 9 POOL COURTYARD `PASSIVE' 12 ACCESS FROM STARS AND STRIPES 13 SPINE FIRE LANE 14 FM 2499 SCREEN BERMS PLAN NORTH sale: r•=so'-0•• 0 20 30 90 Feel GRAPEVINE MRLS STAR36 STRIPES PLAN NORTH VICINITY MAP Scale. P' = 1000•-0, CASE NAME'. STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER. CU20-_ ADDRESS. 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY WE PIANNING AND ZONNG COMMISSnN CHAIRMAN DATE. SHEET:_OF_ APPR W AL ooES NOT A— AV KW N CIXIFXT tMrx Al COOES OR o—N-. REPARTME OEVFIORAENT SERJICES IZ QW U-) 3: ry (81 0 U z Lu X ~ U) �S rn O W N U) Z LuLU)W a� � U) U No. Dam Revision THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT FOR REGULATORY DJMBPVV APPROVAL. Dr— PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION. xxx Approved MARK S. BOVM-ES TEXAS LIC NO 2767 RENDERED PLAN Project No. 19185.00 Date 12/07/2020 L-105 LARGE TREE LARGE TREE SMALLTREE SMALLTREE 01- EXISTING TREE CANOPY 02- PROPOSED TREE CANOPY PAN NORTH Scale: 1"=80'-0" 0 40 80 160 Feet PLAN NORTH Style: 1" = 80'-0" 0 40 80 160 Feet GRAPEVNE MILLS ST� &STR%5 '11N NCRTM VICINITY MAP Scale: 1' = 1000'-0" CASE NAME STAR$ AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20�_ ADDRESS. 32DO GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE. RIANNWG ANO ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE'. SHEET OF_ —Wk DOrS NOT AMIOPoIf ANY WOIIXINC@FGCTWRH AW woes oR DRtWANCEs. IEPARTIAEMOF Cf4ELOMENr9WCES W N Q Q- V= r to ° 00 LL z- Q AT `° 0 VJ ^w I..L - Q Lp C) CD Z Lu ♦� vJ 06 ME~ NZ cn 2�w Q a- Q� No. Oat. Revision DJM,BPW Drawn XXX Approved THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL. PERMITTING.OR CONSTRUCTION. MARK S. BOV LES TEXAS LIC NO. 2767 CANOPY PLAN Project No. 19185.00 Date 12/07/2620 L-106 k -0 {� Ys • �r :1 e. Ire r � e �! P PROPOSED PUBLIC SPACES i =`F ir AL 1 t 01- PUBLIC SPACES DIAGRAM � � f 6 J, `E Nam. � /• � _ PUBLIC SPACES PROVIDED BY BILLINGSLEY r r POTENTIAL NEW � SPINE'" r � ✓%`'; PUBLIC SPACES r i PLAN NORTH Style . r' = tnow" 0 50 100 200 Feat GRAPEVINE MILLS STARS a SMIEES PLAN NORTH VICINITY MAP S.I. 1" = 1000'-0" CASE NAME. STARS AND REHIRES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20- ADDRESS 32DO GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE DATE. SHEET:_OF_ APPR.lA.DOEs -Au 111 1.1.1 iNcoNE1-11ANY w CODES as ORDWNCES DEPARTMENT Or D-LO"ENT SERNICES VJ W a Q 3: (Cc, 0 rA ~ Z Lu X (n 0—) 06 't U) Z LL � W LL LL CL Q U) NO. Date Revision DJM, BPW Drawn XXX Approved THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING. OR CONSTRUCTION. MARK S. BOWLES TEXAS LIC NO 2767 PUBLIC SPACES PLAN Project No. 19185.00 Date 12/07/2020 L-107 CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER'. CU20._ ADDRESS: 1200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE -NNING ANO ZONING COMMISSION DATE'. SHEET' OF 1-0-oafs NOT <u� —ANY �XORK IN CONn RTH r�Nr CCafS OR DRMI.ANCES. oEvaRTUENTor oICITLOCM_NTS .Ll U) w Q L, �C) ry o�~ U) 0)G~ 06 Nc~nz Cn �w LL a �� THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT FOR REGULATORY DJM.DPW APPROVAL, Drawn PERMITTING, OR CONSTRUCTION. xxx Appro,ed MARK S. BOWLES TEXAS LIC NO. 2767 PERSPECTIVES Project No. 19185.00 Date 12/07/2020 L-108 r • • •'`> �" . GRAPEVINE * f7 it r e• MILLS / MALL 1/4 MILE WALKi +',,��• • r•"won&- �.f rA q® GRAPEVINE MILLS BLVD i • "THE SHACKS" ! T AlUl G^ • SLEEP i EXPERTS °• IN Q) LA-Z-BOY �' • • " ■Ile 5- tj 'f ' ® BAKER LLa f 'ASHLEY... ,ar `: Er { EE go HOMESTORE �i WALLIS STARS AND STRIPES WAY `*googol • • ® I" ■ G } iS+ ARS ® fl FUTURES Q j• = y •'_ # DEVELOPMENT G #Jf rANU OPPORTUNITY (/ �• � • wL�l I c c r f 1 �r ,� k STRIPES; � ,� .`p/ 4 ' PMENTi 1 • ss®• 9 'OPPORTUNITY �sd `� ■111 i /! I "••, x 'POSH PEDI SPA+ DAAN SUSHI BISTRO I t" � �• ` � I I .� / - .. �-.-,'--�,. •' � `�'� i .. •' CHUCK E. CHEESE ,, `i�'s'iTi... "♦ / �. i a G L ?� ' `.. r f . „ e -® • ps .�e C>HAIR KING e f-ciaZYMELS *„ f,j"v,.t • •r *'} • �" f T• ♦ • r> # CORRAL 40 st F 'G.F yi1 p M3. s13. LOVE &WAR IN TEXAS. 7 97/ • j : G O C G G 1/4 MILE O $ - _ : • • • WALK Q -r " mass PEDESTRIAN O PATHS PUBLIC = ACTIVITY NODE CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ ADDRESS. 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY * s� DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE PLAN NCRTH SHEET OF APP-DOESNOTAU-OPo ANTWOPo(IN CONFUOT WITH ANT LODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES c C a 0- 0 o LL V- Q to � N 0 • 20% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT LU 0- -o dQD c H 06 c m a '^ a m vJ 6 12 LL O CD Qo Iss— No. Date Revision THIS DO T IS F NOTRE E0Cyij. Author AP NF. - L, g: Drawn By PE IBfl, o Approver O S•••., 20891: •••:Q� Revle a ARC R DES VICINITY SITE PLAN 3roject No. 19185.01 Date 2020-12-07 AS-000 © Copyright 2019 V♦ ~ a N V- — _ — I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —FIRE LANE — — — — — — — — — — — \ \ \ \ y W t x LL cj — r W a F-7— I I I I I I I GARAGE ENTRY EXIT I I'- � — _ _ _ _ _ _ ——---h 402' 6' LIGHTWELL PARKING GARAGE 4 STORY MULTIFAMILY POOL COURTYARD _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1-71 POOL COURTYAR PEDESTRIAN ! SPINE - - ' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ \ \ \ \ \ \ I 364'-Cr LIGHTWELL PARKING GARAGE LIGHTWELL 4STORY MULTIFAMILY \ VICINITY MAP \ v800'_0n \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Fa'iT / / i // z f LU 1 a I lD Q o 20% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT f^ V, f6 U-) ii 0- c) c 06CIL (1) to CI CDU` O N v, FIRE LANE I I I I I I I I I I I I I J FIRE LANE L_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No. Date Revision _ Author a;•, g:� Drawn By �z O Approver 5 RevleweE S)q :,SP Jyc OF 01/0119 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY CASE NAME. STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER. CU20-_ ADDRESS 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY DATE: MAYOR SECRETARY ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL OVERALL SITE PLAN r =ao_o„ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN OVERALL SITE PLAN DATE- PLAN NORTH SHEET: OF_ ARPR GOES WT AUi1gPoZEANYVAPorIN Project No. 19185.01 --- crvrtm ANy cones oR ORaNANCEs. C or�uc DEPMTMENLOF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Date 2021-0429 AS-001 © Copyright 2019 �OPEN SPACE (NON -VEHICULAR) RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE M�!MM, FIRE LANE VEHICULAR CIRCULATION SEC.22-RMF PROPOSED SEC.22-RMF PROPOSED SEC.22-RMF PROPOSED SEC.22-RMF PROPOSED HEIGHT 35' MAX. 55' MAX. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA (75% MAX.) (75 % MAX.) NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS: 474 NUMBER OF BEDROOMS - 761 NUMBER OF STORIES 2 MAX. 4 TOTAL OPEN SPACE (20% MIN.) 160,523 SF. (34.9%) EFFICIENCIES 600 - 749 SF (15% MAX.) 32 (7%) PARKING SPACES (2 / UNIT) 803- (1.6 / UNIT) TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE (50% MAX.) 204,180 SF. (44.5%) RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE PER UNIT 250 SF. MIN 264 SF. 1-BEDROOM 755 - 899 SF -- 241 BUILDING SEPARATIONS - TOTAL LOT AREA 2 AC. MIN. 10.53 AC. (458,713 SF.) TOTAL PAVED AREA 2-BEDROOM 900 - 999 SF - 178 BUILDING 1 -- 3 FLOOR AREA RATIO - 1.78 : 1 NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS/AC. 20 MAX. 54.1 3-BEDROOM 1,000 SF + - 23 BUILDING 2 -- 4 = f. /yv S 00° 30' 35" W - 97.87' m i CONNECTION �' ' — m "GARAGE TO PUBLIC ix EGRESS \� -4'x--c;cx�r�it is icn� n�e� ZONING SITE PLAN ,"=Q. S 00° 49' 22" E - 674.69' m FIRELANE - n - 62 PARKING SPACES ARE DEED RESTRICTED TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTY r� r 2j �4 a , '1O PARKING GARAGE PROPOSED 4-STORY MULTIFAMILY BUILDING VICINITY MAP 1" = 800'-0" \ n TO PUBLIC R.O.W. 7 / NNECTION TO PRIVATE j DRIVE / / Ra . /o S 01 ° 46 31' W - 666.94' yl -.� wrzo u Pu •u� L� �c ,nnu aciPnun EXISTING 24' WIDE FIRE LANE EASEMENT /////////////////////// CONNECTION WIDENED TO 26' PRIVATE m '.DRIVE�� n 0. SIDE YARD SETBACK 1f n N 25 Z � A Z W 62 SURFACE PARKING CONNECTION io a SPACES DEED' ' ITO PRIVATE 'u RESTRICTED TO DRIVE fTj �'" NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, J FIRE LANE 2 = A S CONNECTION 'TO PUBLIC" - % R.O.W. NO1°46'67"E-191.8T ' F GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY N 84' 39' 60" W - 37.62' PLAN NORTH (:D CASE NAME' STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER. CU20- ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: OF — APPROVAL DOES NOT A ----. IN CCI UCT W ANy CODES CR OR—WES. DEPAF—EN— DEVEL-1,TSERVK:ES C N Q W O xUL O LL 0 N Q f0 t0 0 20% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT V/ W/�� = T- L O rD Cn C 0) C t6 Q O QO v I No. Date Revision a.;,:v 7T YIAYA;`.F� Author r:•- 0;'1 0-nBy R ,ieer wedyrq 20@91. - Qy TE OFt 0110119 ZONING SITE PLAN Project No. 19185.01 Date 2020-12-07 AS-010 © Copyright 2019 C a W r H 0 0 0 LL e) f6 V , w/� IL Y � M Lo - D- CD (' /^W i Z C C Q d t6 Q O QM F— V i No. Date Revision Author 0'. Drawn By Approver ' a Reviewed sTq •.?o§�?;}P rE DF 0110,119 LEVEL 1 - BUILDING 1 - FLOOR PLAN Project No. 19185.01 Date 2020-12-07 A-111 0 Copyright 2019 221' -0" 70' - 6 12 SO'- 7" E1 xxxx -... C3 Cl F xxxx xxxx zzzx - A6 xxxx I I UP STAIR 6 STAIR 5 uP DN. zzzx xxxx oN — — — — g A9-ALT xxxx 32 Al Al B2 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx-' A -ago A6 - _ A4 xxxx t` xxxx A6 ALT Ewa: xxxx 2 � I 82 A4 62 uP ON xxxx xxxx xxxx - 5.70% 64 81 - RAMP UP TAIR - xxxx xxxx / xxxx _ I 2 A3 A3 AJ20 - X%x% XXXX 2 HOUR \ N / I A5 FIRE WALL Bi m xxxx I r m A3 2HOUR qgr_ ; _ FIRE WALL .- xxxx - zzzx � / '- Al A-320 5 PP A-320 I I I I I I a AJ20 A6 ;xzt 62 A4 62 - - xxzx tx xxxx C2 } xxxx V V VEL 2 - BUILDING 1 - = 2D'-0" I 1 j Al / \ xxxx ir I A3 I \ xxxx / B3 ? X u R3 Xxxxl 1 Al RASH 1 / Xxxx RAMP UP LIE \ LID I 63 I xxxx uP STAIR 1 UN XXxX LIGRT WELL I Al Al 1 B2 _ xxxx 82 A1'. _. _.. xxxx xx xxxx At 82 Al - xxxx Fax - -xx xxxx - xxxx I _ I 2 HOUR FIRE WALL UP y oN STAIR 2 STAIR 3 ON up:: B3 Bt xxxx I xxxx Inn]_ E2 -E2 I zzzxI xxzx 134'-1 112" 3A2'.1 12 -- I PLAN NORTH I 208'-0" VICINITY MAP 1" = 800'-0" CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ ADDRESS. 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE'. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET'. OF _ APPROVAL ODES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY W RK IN C015LICT v— ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENTOF OEVELOPMENTSERVICES No. Date Revision QFA ARC Author c'�s'ripT'viaryF rFn 0—n BY 4.Q O•� Approver sZ••.• ' ,•Q Reviewed Tq Ar' %f OF 011019 LEVEL 2 — BUILDING 1 — FLOOR PLAN Project No. 19185.01 Date 2020-12-07 A-112 0 Copyright 2019 r_. 221'-0" 70'-612" 50'-7" I 87•-0" 60'-a" E1 X C3 ® C1 L _ Cl xxxx- i m n xxXxx j x - _ U} uu DN. art STAIR 6 �� O STAIR 5 r xxxx DN UP _ _ — f I. A-ALT -= Al xxxx , _iJA _� _ B2 xxxx Al Al � x qx- 218 A4 A320 - A6-ALT �— 82 t_l'XXxx 1 - A4 XXI 82 -- xx xx UP N 1 RAMP UP . TAIR _ 84 xxxx _ xxxx i z na2D - ^A3- - xxxx - -'`. 2HOUR FIRE WALL .' \ u' \ A5... xxxx A3 2 HOUR \ n ` xxxx FIRE WALL % Al `ev 3 } Bl - // /� / Si XXXx I A320 XXXX I 1 \ I Al A3 A3zD XXxx A3 ... xxxx r-a�, / B1 _--' l A3 ..xxxx A3 xxxx / - 81 xxxxAl i SH 1 — _ xxxx i 5.78°b .. A6-ALT K-EL RAMP UP � XXXX B2 A4 822 -xxxx .. xxxx _ xxxx- - - \ B3 xxxx C2 UPX _ DTAX LIGHi WELL XXXX. 4 At ..XXXX' - At 'xxxx � A / xxxx.. _.. __ Xx x 'J Al A -320 B2 Al Al 82 FXXXX7 xxxx ! :, xxxx - �-zxxx I XXXX - 2 HOUR FIRE WALL - UP DN uuuuuu ----- ---- - STAIR 2 STAIR 3 DN UP xxxx XXXX uuuuuu - -. 63 61 xxxx I xxxx I - xIXIxx �, - E2 xxxx 134'-1 1YT' 74'-0' 74'-0" 208' - D' 342' -1 12" 01LEVEL 3 - BUILUINU 1 - rLUUK FLAN 1" = 20'-0' I I II I I I I II I I II III I I I I I I I I I I I I II I II I II I I II I I I I I PLAN NORTH (D VICINITY MAP 1" = 800'-0" CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER. CU20- ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE; PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SHEET: OF_ APPRWAL DOES NOT AURIORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFECT WT01 ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTF£NTOF DEVELOPMENTSERVICES W t d 0 CID N cl 41 ZC N � C a � � 0� O O N a cl' Vi No. Date Revision .� AR. ci';�WAY,y�rtr� Author t}r By .y Ri dper sl9 F %f OF 01I01/9 LEVEL 3 - BUILDING 1 - FLOOR PLAN Project No. 19185.01 Date 2020-12-07 A-113 C Copyright 2019 221'-D' 70'-61?' 50'-7' I I I I Et C3 Cl Cl xxxx - xxxx I ;xxxx � ---. -As._m... � xxxx I _ I .__t xAxzR 6 STAI 5 xxxx - C g DN DN Ll I A6•A LT XxXx Al -- 1 A6 2 ' xx X Al xxxx At xxxx B2 I xxxx A-320 xXXx A4 ` I� xxxx A6-ALT .. EV rl I :xxxx xxxx \ � - B2 A4 62 xxxx xxxx xxxx ----- I B'4 B1 xxxx RAMP UP TAIR xxxx X%XX - 2 - A3 XXxx A3 xxxx \ I A3zo 131 2 HOUR 1 n / I Al FIRE WALL \ 4 / Xx%x I 2 HOUR FIRE WALL 3 61 v A-320 XXYX I - 5 Aazo A3 B1 xxxx xxxx I A3 xxxx B1 - xxxx: - A6-ALT xxxx B2 A4 Xxxx Lxxxx C2 XXx L 4 A 32o - -- - -- Al Al Al xxxx xxxx xxx; 2 HOUR FIRE WALL I 134'-1 112" LEVEL 4 - BUILDING 1 - FLOOR PLAN A3� xXXX / Al - xxxx I 1 I Al A3 xxxx / 1 _ B3 / I xxxx A3 xxxx/ A1. RASH 1 xxxx xxxx � 5.789s RAMP UP B2 LEV. - I xxxx B3 um STAIR 1 %%XX LxXHT WELL 62 Al xxxx B2 Al Al xxxx xxxx... XXXX - XXX xxxx � I I ON STAIR 2 STAIR 3 oN 81 xxxx xxxx i 3 Q E2 xxxx �x2x I 20a'-0" 342'-1 1l2' PLAN NORTH VICINITY MAP 1.1 = 800'-0" CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE. SHEET. OF_ APPROVAL DOES NOTAUMORIZE ANY WORIr IN COWMTMOIH ANY COPES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENTOF DEVELOPMEWSEWICES c C in O d 0 — W O L O LL 0— CCU) Q li3 N 0 VJ Lu I� r Y D_r- - 0 cn u � Q � Zcm (I)C I- (L) C/ / A/ 00 O N LL co /Q V No. Date Revision AR WAYH/J�C' Author Drawn By Approver RePi—d Te of 0110119 LEVEL 4 - BUILDING 1 - FLOOR PLAN Project No. 19185.01 Date 2020-12-07 A-114 ® Copyright 2019 PLAN NORTH (D VICINITY MAP 1" = 800'-0" CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBERCU20- ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE SHEET: OF_ APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY 41roRK IN CONFLICT NQTH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENTOF DEV W MENTSEWCES ��•rWAY,y�lF Author; �`�•�'' By D06 rawn :Z Approver sl........ y0 ..... R.vie dg 01101m, BUILDING 1 ROOF PLAN Project No. 19185.01 Date 2020-12-07 A-116 m Copyright 2019 460'-0" C Y � (A 3 a .-1•-6.. 6. B �- I � N ' s..w:.No:,w�PEs w.. W E1 `�- - 1 LEASING /CLUB - r I xxxx A6-ALT -AB-ALT . A6 - - 85 I xxxx I C1 _ xxxx E1 Fxxxx -MT] XXXx A 1 Al � 0 xxxx -. I zHouR xxxx vxxx FIRE WALL LL - _ I STAIRS xxxx - � - FIRE RISER - , xxxx ,- �' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -U B2 t 82,., _. NE - - Al m -i Al _ Al I xxxx B2 FITNESS B2 m xxxx xxxx a 'xi xxx -xxxx xxxx VICINITY MAP @ o E1 - xxxx _: o At E Ixx x o III II III III III III xxxx - i —III III=III III-1 xxxx • III III II III III III A4 II III_III III —III III=1 Al xxxx A, - TAIR III III III III III III xxxx XXxx —xxxx II=III=III=1I=1I=III=1 �7 II III III —III 73'-91/2" —III —III t l 111=1 I I —I I I=1 I 1=1 I I=1 B 1 � 11—III III-111 III I11 _ _ II=III III=III III=1 xxx xxxx A42 HOUR B5 81 _ Bz III= III III _ FIRE WALL xxxx xxxx—III=III III=11I III=1 LU I_I I_I I_I 2HOUR - - E3 FIRE WALL 11 I-11 I I I 1 1 I I III-1 r __ — — �_. xxxx Al T�� 1111—III I_I III xxxx F— D_ O —I xI—I I-1 1=11 w I 11-1 1 1 111=1 11—I 11=1 3 Al Al III=1 1-1 —1 —1 1=111 u "X L xxxx B2 I—III—III—III=111— AS s / xxxx 1. xxxx III —III-- = /� lt�L X m F- c xxxx / II III=11I A' xxxx / / Im Q Q- N Q — STAIR 2 / xxxx I �; — _ _-.� - - fII VN/ A5 10'-011/16".... / -. ... ii xxxx / O Al xxxx / B1 xxxx j 4 1. ! E32 / xxx Al / / _ t _ xx xxxx� �� / / ��r//�� Al xxxx Bis, xxxx B2 STD 3. _ t T IIR xxxx A2 / EW / - 85-ALT At B2 xxxx xxxx xxxx - RASH 2 A4 / xxxx xxxx No. Date Revision BS Al 81 B1 B1 Bt 0 %xx xxxx I xxxx xxxx xxxx_xxxx _A-6 / / -- , �_ J / / CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ Author '• a'' �2'x Dawn By Z•24 O� t1I •q _ x - '- ADDRESS. 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY Approver RevieweA / 2 HOUR / / - 01/015 FIREWALL / / / / DATE. MAYOR SECRETARY LEVEL 1 - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BUILDING 2 - / FLOOR PLAN - - - � / CHAIRMAN DATE'. PLAN NORTH 21 -O 26'-11" 71'-01R" 149'-0" SHEET: OF APPROVAL DDES NOTAUTgRIIE ANY WORN IN Project No. 19185.01 46D-p Date 2021-04-29 COHFUCTVATH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. LEVEL 1 - BUILDING 2 - FLOOR PLAN A-121 DEPAR—TOF DEVELOPMENTSERVICES 1�� = 2D'_D" 0 Copyright 2019 460'-0" B -6 I Et zxx_ x E1 AS Clxzx A xxxz AS-ALT Ax j - B� xxzx ClC1 xxzx E1 xxzx xxzx zxxx CJ -. 0 --- %l(1(X Al _ Al -- I 2 HOUR -. xxx% Xxxx FIRE WALL - _I TAIR 5 MMgM Fw7x Ell- B2 62_ _ B2 B1 A4 B2 �, Al x J zxxx Al Al zxxx I mx I xxzx_ xxxii xxxz^ 1 xxzx I %xxx ', zxxx --- EJ Al - zxxx A4 zxxx !. -. Et \ t H zxxx Bt 5.44% `xxxx -- —RAMP A4 / i xxzx DOWN i / Al Al I i \ zxxx - TAIR I zxxx n 81 I 1 ' zxxx A4 I i L_ _ A4 xXx e I 03 %XXX 2 HOUR -_ B5 61 62 ,Q a l FIRE WALL zxxx xxzx zxxx f - 2 HOUR E3 FIRE WALL A4 -. Al s, xxzx e — xxxz Xxxx / 3 -_ 85-A LT � � ! I 1 - � _... Al , xxxz] - i xAialx B2 � I 1 � / A5 zxxx xxzxI A4 LXSX R xxxz ST AIR 2 zxxx - I 1 A 1 - I I 1 AS zxxx / 10'-011116' I 1 - •_0•a - xxxz Bi 62 Al Xxxx LEV zxxx / xxx I 1 / I 1 B1 / 81 :. xxzx _xxzx B2 STAIR 3 TAIR A XxXx A2 / zxxx zxxx xx xxxz - I / 135-ALT xxxx..L. E Al zxxx ! B2 xxzx - RASH 2 A4 ' XXXX , xxxz / c _ Its— B5 Al B1 B1 Bt Bt A4 zxxx A4 xxxz - . .:. ® xxzx 0 XxXX / / 2 HouR FIRE WALL / 149'-T 460' - 0" VEL 2 - BUILDING 2 - FLOOR PLAN = 20'-0" PLAN NORTH VICINITY MAP 1" = 800'-0" CASE NAME. STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER. C1.20-_ ADDRESS. 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE. SHEET: OF APPROVAL WES NOT ADTIIOPIZE ANY— IN CONFLICT WITHAM' LODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARIMENTOF DEVELOWENTSERVICES No. Date Revision 3; ;LWAY,yF :FCA Author Drown By ��Z 0� Approver Reviewed rE OFF 0110V9 LEVEL 2 - BUILDING 2 - FLOOR PLAN Project No. 19185.01 Date 2021-04-29 A-122 0 Copyright 2019 460' 0" Q N � E1 F %-Lu xxxx E1 FF 2 HOUR _ I 1 xxxx - A6-ALT 'A6---)WT A6 B5 V- G1 C1 uxxxx Et xxXK: F xxxx XxxX O xxxx xxxx xxxx - FIRE WALL xxxx Al Al 1I%X I Xxu�7(% :: .� L L STAIR 5 - __ rtnnnnn xxxx 1xzxz Al ..�� x xt x Bt xxxx At xxxx - w B1 B2 B2 B2 xxxx z xx B2 x��x f0 Xxxx xxxx - — VICINITY MAP o lip = 800'-0" Al E �A4 xxxx .xxxx _ -__ Bt 5.44%-J xxxx RAMP -- - DOWN . Al xxxx Al - TAIR zxxx xxxx ' xxxx - 4- it rl 11 - A4 zxxx A4 1 '� xxxx 2 HOUR -_ — T B5 B1 62 r I \ FIRE WALL ui xxxx I xxxx xxxx _ _ I J I 1 A 2HOUR Y� T i E3 FIRE WALL IjO o 1 A4 L—L__'At m ' xxxx I xxxx, l rrs n p r ao 65-ALT f I f V� — xaux B2 I 1 A5 xxxx Q x € xxxx .. x xxxx STAIR 2 .. - A4 - - zxxx C C c w xxxx - Al Z > . - - - xxxx a)> L I a 0- I .-•... 1 _.-, (6 zxxx IT-0 11n6° 11 0 xxxx B1 / �n/ 0O B1 xxxx / y� xxxx I 1 B2 - xxxx LEV Al I 1 xx xxxx / H a B1 / Xxxx / 61 .:.i xxxx- -- - B2 -- STAIR 3 TAIR xx''iDc xxxx xxxx A2 %I xxx B2 B5-ALT At zxxx RASH 2' A4 / Xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ' - / 0 <I - -- - No. Date Revision -- _ A4 A4 65 xxxx 85 Al 61 B1 81 61 xi xi xxx I xxxx xxxx Xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx - XX%� / SQCr,• F.n Author %• �� o:� / 0—n By r: CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY -- - -- — - - CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ iq ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS 2 HOUR PARKWAY Approver Sr•9 1'EOF FIRE WALL / 01101,9 / DATE. MAYOR SECRETARY LEVEL 3 - / PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BUILDING 2 - / FLOOR PLAN CHAIRMAN DATE'. PLAN NORTH 311'-0" 149'-0" SHEET: OF_ 460'-0" Project No. 19185.01 APPROVAL DOES NOTAUThpRRE ANY N9RK IN OONftICTWHHANy CODESORORDINANCES. Date 2021-04-29 OEPARTMENTOF DEVELOPMENTSERVICES 1 LEVEL 3 -BUILDING 2 -FLOOR PLAN A-123 © Copyright 2019 aso -a' ca fA 1",_ a I P N V El IA6 W xxxx xxxx -. ".._ Cl xxxx L-� I C1 I.. Xxxx L A8-A LT - xxxx El xxxx Al A6-ALT A6 XBxx - : xxxx I xxxx Al w .T L O - xxxx .xxxx w .,... _-_ z HOUR FIRE WALL - _ _ _ _ S - _ - - - - - - - - - - - STAIR 5 xxxx A ; LL Bl B2 B2 �s 62 _ Bt A4 82 f0 m m xxxx xxxz Al x><x>< Al xxxx xxxx � -. � xxxx xxxx �� .� -Al _ xxx% xxxx - VICINITY MAP _ Q o ._ 111 = 800'-0" f xxxz Et xxxx Bl ',. xxxx 5.44% `RAMP DOWN -Al A4 - i. XXXX _ Al T_AIR xxxx " ' xxxx xxxx 1 \ I \ Y 1 %Kx % 2 HOUR B1 A4 xl xxx x - . e , n �I _ B5 _ xxxx Bl 82 %%XX XXXXXX - ii I 1 C - - FIRE WALL - uj � r v I t z I o \ o \ I m a \ yy i %X%X - E3 �. x�x o 2 HOUR FIRE WALL T Y _Al%X%J ao BS-AxzLT zx `.. Axxtt 82 xxxx I \ 3 A4 I xxxx Al xxxx A 21 xxxx Al N� Q C 0) C1 STAIR xxxx I \\ A5 Al / / ffrn1 V ,-:... 10'-011/16" I \ ._0,. %XXx XXX%I CD 81 xxxx a \\ B2 -. - xxxx z xV Al _xxxxJ' I� I \ / 81 xxxx STAIR 3 xxxx I 61 I xxxx \ \ 3TAIR I xxxx - - 82 t XXXx -- A2 1 xxxx / / / / / E I 81 / M-ALT Al xxxx RASH A4 xxxx -r / / o ' v _- - U ✓ --I / tv - No. Date Revision _ 35 xxxx Al 81 B1 xxxx xxxz xxxz - 81 xxxx B1 0 A4 A4 xxxx xxxx B5 '._xxxx_._ / / Author s:?' —� CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY Dawn By :y 0� 2 HOUR III / CASE NUMBER: CU20 _ ADDRESS: 32DO GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY Approver S'j:'• 2U�9�; �}P Rev,,weA OF FIRE WALL / / MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: 01/0lm LEVEL 4 - / PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BUILDING 2 - FLOOR PLAN / CHAIRMAN DATE'. / 149' -T PLAN NORTH SHEET: OF- APPRWAL DOES NOTAUTFpRDi ANY VgRR IN Project No. 19185.01 CONFLICTWITHANVLODESORORDINANCES. Date 2021-04-29 l LEVEL 4 -BUILDING 2 -FLOOR PLAN OEPARTMENTOF DEVELOPMENTSERVICES /� A-124 © Copyright 2019 .r -,A pt� w MEE f. . M L, SE � s !' + � : r' „ � • �i aP: .�. �M�+i' 4�;� t � *,+`'4r � �1£;',$i t �'� x w � Yww�r s *461, �LL 1 9 � ` is � �f �I � .-,,; •' All Noon E ..�. Nib �■ itME �. long OW rp pp 44 r a. £ Fi _... % � :#,y, \, .fs+ .g: w+ � -, i,Ti sty' 9F �+d Q f4�/� ��i� y�+a•.MM ._ �`t' t 1 PW • ".•w^mow+. a"+wr.•r.®` * r. �. .. 1NOW .A + � y •1 t � �7 � f 7�1 t` i 1 • 0 35'-0' -- �IEVEId-- _ �23 f0 a LEVEL 3 . i IEVEl2 GR'r OUND LEVEL BUILDING 1 1 WEST FACADE li.I II LEVEL4 F 23'-10' /� LEVEL 3 EVEL 2 0'47 F.F. - GROUND LEVEL BUILDING 1 1 EAST FACADE Sim 1 3 A-320 IEVEl4 +23-'$'— t— b -LEVEL3 •LEVEL 2 �[ 'f GROUND LEVEL BUILDING 1 1 SOUTH FACADE m 3 LV AJ20 NS-9- S•VEL4 Z3' _ a LEVEL 3 L YLEVEL 2 ' NTR V/EXI GROUND LEVEL BUILDING 1 1 NORTH FACADEr4nIIn�uII-] III J u VICINITY MAP 1" = 800'-0" PERCENT MASONRY REQUIRED: — PERCENT MASONRY PROVIDED 1 71% CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE — WORN IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORdNANCES. DEPARTI.IENTOF DEVELOWENTSERVICES CDC 7 Q 0 W r H0 20 0 rA aw N Lu Ci T r6 i - U7 a)F a) — - Z a).E ,c aQ (D v) CD 0 CD O N v / No. Date Revision Author Drawn By 2.2, 0� Approver h Reviewed S�q JEOFF1;.�Y' '�F � D1/Ni199 OVERALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS Project No. 19185.01 Date 2020-12-07 A-200 © Copyright 2019 S LEVEL A 5 J, � +23'-,,I LEVEL 3 t2'47' /..0'-0' F.F. GROUND LEVEL S LEVEL4 a 3 LEV� o j. +t7A3' �LEVEL2 J. O'-0' F.F- - GROUND LEVEL +35'-0' LEVEL 4 5 23'-10- c LEVEL3..._.. _. v 9.1ra• LEVEL2 F.F. S_ GROUNDLEVEL LEVEL 4 -- 3 LEVEL 3 ir v LEVEL 2 N GROUND LEVEL BUILDING 1 1 MAIN COURTYARD - EAST FACADE t BUILDING 1 1 MAIN COURTYARD - WEST FACADE BUILDING 1 1 MAIN COURTYARD -NORTH FACAD BUILDING 1 1 MAIN COURTYARD - SOUTH FACADE VICINITY MAP 1" = 800'-0" PERCENT MASONRY REGUIRED'. 70% PERCENT MASONRY PROVIDED 1 71% CASE NAME. STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ ADDRESS. 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE'. PLANNING AND ZONING COMRIISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET'. OF_ APPRWAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORN IN GONFNCT WOiH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENTOF DEVELOPM—SEWCES C tll 7 Q V- W r H0 _LL 0 LL V W N Q @ t0 0 UI Lu 0/� . > � (tS Y � w ti c G x Z c a� Qm CL co O C� 0 o LL (14 Q cl) F-- No. Date Revision ARCHij c :: WnYA;d':FCa Author Drawn By nz Oi* Approver ,pT,_ g1 +>P ReOe tl 0110159 OVERALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS Project No. 19185.01 Date 2020-12-07 A-201 LEV�- Eli - 1:1 LEVY ELy s GROUND LEVEL BUILDING 2 I WEST FACADE ►f I IIl I 35'-0" �IEVEl4 a 5 23 10' L'�' EVEL 3- - a12'A' LEVEL 50GROU'I F.F. ND LEVEL 014 Sa35'-0' LEVEL4 f 23'-10' c _._ LEVEL 3 S S LEVEL 2 �0'-0'FF. GROUND LEVEL BUILDING 2 1 SOUTH FACADE LEVEl4 f a23'-10' IEVEL3 LEVEL ;LEVEL 2 _. ;.0'-0' F.F._ GROUND LEVEL BUILDING 2 1 NORTH FACADE VICINITY MAP 1" = 800'-0" PERCENT MASONRY REQUIRED: 70% PERCENT MASONRY PROVIDED: 71% CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ ADDRESS. 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET OF APPRWAL DOES NOT ANMORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFUOTNITHAM! CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEI-I-ENTCF DEVELOP WSEWICES W a. i /w� 0 z> a �0 V i T (6 d � N U7 c_ N C x a3 - CD0 0 N No. Date Revision .ti� �Cyi o:• WAY '•.lF Ci. �i �L•LP�+ Au thor tii o• Y !9' Approver s�.• •1..+may R-i d 4>f OF 01/01199 OVERALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS Project No. 19185.01 Date 2020-12-07 A-202 S LEVEL4 �LEVEL3 '� s2'A" LEVEL 2 GROUND LEVEL P—W-0 LEVEL4 5 12'A' LEVEL 2 0'-0'FF, ' GROUND LEVEL JET -ME"I. VICINITY MAP 1" = 800'-0" PERCENT MASONRY REQUIRED 70% PERCENT MASONRY PROVIDED' 71% LEVEL4 LEVEL 3 +12'A^ CASE NAMESTARS AND STRIPES WAY _ LEVEL2 CASE NUMBER'. CU20-_ ADDRESS. 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY -GROUND LEVEL MAYOR SECRETARY BUILDING 2 1 MAIN COURTYARD - NORTH FACADE DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE'. SHEET'. OF APPROVALDOESNOT ADTF MANYWORNIN CONFLICT WI1N ANT CODES aA ORpINANCES. DEPARThffNrO DEVELOPMENTSERVICES No. Date Revision Author; Drawn By �:� Oi* ApproverOF y Reered �TgTE.c+P 01IO1)9 OVERALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS Project No. 19185.01 Date 2021-04-29 A-203 © Copyright 2019 Rpm 1" = 20'-0" LEVEL 5 5. BEARING _ qq LEVEL 4 T.O.D. 35'-W LEVEL 3 T.O.D. 23'-1 LEVEL 2 T.O.D. 12 g- LEVEL 1 PLAN NORTH (D CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE. SHEET: OF _ APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONI-T WITH ANY LODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPART.ENTOF DEVE-IENTSERVICES cn c .N Q � V — W r H00 =r 0 tL Cj - Q 0 • V i ^W Yi T N (4 r d O ww N (D � Q � Q) Z C 0) > CL CL Q r0 V/ 600 O O N (Y) Q /F- V No. Date Revision ..........y.. F:F[+ Drawn By raw Y Approver s••.• I 'P Rsvie d rq %E OF 01/01/99 OVERALL BUILDING SECTIONS Project No. 19185.01 Date 2020-12-07 A-300 0 Copyright 2019 V� N N ~ a V- W = � LL VY. N VICINITY MAP a o 1" = 800'-0" • LEVELS VJ 5518" ^W - - - - - - - - ROOF T_O.P. _$ N ' - LEVEL4T.O.D. N 3 m LEVEL3T.O.D. �a- CD /� V/ V) Q0 LEVEL 2 T. T.O..D. x Ztr LEVEL � � > .S a N > I- - - - 0„ IZ N II —III III —III —III —III III—III—III—III—III=III—III—III—III—III—III III —III —III II III III —III —III —III —III —III —III III —III III —III III —III —III III —III —III —II —Ili _ III —III III III III —III III —III —III— 03 Ci (E DWELLING DWELLING POOL DWELLING DWELLING PUBLIC cn O 0 UNITS UNITS COURTYARD UNITS LIGHTWELL GARAGE LIGHTWELL UNITS COURTYARD O CV ORRIDOR CORRIDOR ORRIDOR a� 1 BUILDING 2 SECTION 1" = 20'-0"NZ No. Date Revision AR Author $�•. 0. CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY Drawn By �y CASE NUMBER: CU20- Approver ADDRESS' 32DO GRAPEVINE MILLS pp PARKWAY R—ewee gj.F•cli, 01,01/9 DATEMAYOR SECRETARY OVERALL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BUILDING SECTIONS CHAIRMAN DATE. SHEET. OF_ Project No. 19185.01 APPROVAL DOES NOTAURgWIE ANYNARR IN —LICTv✓r*HANrcoDE—ORNNANCES. Date 2021-04-29 DEPARTMENTOF DEVELOPMENTSERVICES A-301 © Copyright 2019 ASSEMBLIES. ROOF ASSEMBLIES' E SAFLOOR P ROOF ASSEMBLY FLOOR ASSEMBLY #1 (R-2 UNITS AND (FRAMED BALCONIES) FLOOR ASSEMBLY (BALCONIES OVER FLOOR ASSEMBLY #d(BUILDING OVER 1-HR FIRE RATED (UL P522) (U CORRIDOR) NON -RATED NON -RATED (IBC 1406.3) ACE DECK ON SLEEPERS) PASEO OR GARAGE) 1-MR FIRE RATED (UL L563) 1-HR FIRE 1-HR FIRE RATED (UL L563) 1-HR FIRE RATED (UL L563) 1. TPO MEMBRANE ROOFING 1. 1-1/2" MIN. L.W. CONCRETE, SLOPED SYSTEM 1. 3/4' GYPSUM UNDERLAYMENT TO DRAIN WITH STRUCTURE 1. COMPOSITE DECK OVER SLEEPER 1. 3/ -GYPSUM UNDERLAYMENT 2. 11C PROTECTION BOARD 2. 1/4'SOUND CONTROL MATTING 2. MEMBRANE WATERPROOFING SYSTEM 2. 1/4" SOUND CONTROL MATTING 3. 23/32"TSG PLYWOOD DECKING (ON LYATNON-CARPETED WITH DRAINAGE MAT CONT. OVER 2, TPO MEMBRANE ROOFING SYSTEM (ONLY AT HARDWOOD FLOORS) 4. WOOD TRUSS (REF. STRUCT.) FLOORS) PLYWOOD DECKING 3. TAPERED RIGID INSULATION 3. 23/32W " TSG PLYOOD DECKING S. THERMAL INSULATION (FULL 3. 23/32' TBG PLYWOOD DECKING 3. 23/32" TAG PLYWOOD DECKING 4. 23/32' TSG PLYWOOD DECKING 4. WOOD TRUSS (REF. STRUCT.) FILL PER NFPA 13. RSB MIN.) 4. WOOD TRUSS (REF. STRUCT.) 4. WOOD TRUSS PRE -SLOPED BALCONY 5. WOOD TRUSS (REF. STRUCT.) S. THERMAL INSULATION (FULL 6. 112 RESILIENT CHANNEL S. THERMAL INSULATION (FULLY FRAMING (REF. STRUCTURAL) 6. THERMAL INSULATION (FULL FILL PER FILL PER NFPA 13) FURRING FILL PER NFPA 13) S. 1/2" EXTERIOR SHEATHING NFPA 13) 8 EXTERIOR GYP. BOARD SOFFIT 7. 518'TYPE C GYP. BOARD 6. 10 RESILIENT CHANNEL 6. WEATHERPROOFING 7. 12"R ESILIENT CHANNEL FURRING FURRING 7. EXTERIOR GYP. BOARD SOFFIT 8. 5/8"TYPE C GYP. BOARD 7. 5/e' TYPE C GYP. BOARD WALL ASSEMBLIES: WALL ASSEMBLIES: TYPE 1A TYPE 5A WALL ASSEMBLY #1 WALL ASSEMBLY # WALL ASSEMBLY # WALL ASSEMBLY #4 WALL ASSEMBLY BS i-HR FIRE RATED (UL U356) 1-HR FIRE RATED (UL U356) I-HR FIRE RATED (ILL V314 OR UL U349) 1-HR FIRE RATED (ILL V314 OR UL U349) 1-HR FIRE RATED ILL V314 OR UL U349) 1. ACME -BRICK 1 MODULAR SIZE 1. 5116" LAPPED FIBER CEMENT 1. BRICK I MODULAR SIZE 1. BRICK MODULAR SIZE 1. 5/16" LAPPED FIBER CEMENT BRICK BOARD SIDING BRCK BRICK BOARD SIDING 2. AIR SPACE 2. TYVEK WEATHERPROOFING 2. AIR SPACE 2. AIR SPACE 2. 3W RAINSCREEN WOOD FURRING 3. TYVEK WEATHERPROOFING 3. 12• SHEATHING 3. TYVEK WEATHERPROOFING 3. TYVEK WEATHERPROOFING STRIPS 4. 12"SHEATHING 4. 512' METAL STUD FRAMING 4. 12"SHEATHING 4. 10 SHEATHING 3. TYVEK WEATHERPROOFING 5. 512' METAL STUD FRAMING (REF. STRUCTJ 5. 2 6 WOOD FRAMING (REF. S. 2v6 WOOD FRAMING (REF. 4. 12" SHEATHING (REF. STRUCT.) 5. THERMAL INSULATION(R-19) STRUCT.) STRUCT.) 5. Zv6 WOOD FRAMING (REF. 6. THERMAL INSLUATION(R-19) 6. S/e" TYPE X GYP. BOARD 6. THERMAL INSLUATION(R-19) 6. TH ERMAL INSLUATION(RAS) STRUCT.) 7. S8" TYPE X GYP. BOARD 7. 518" TYPE X GYP. BOARD 7. 518' TYPE X GYP. BOARD 6. THERMAL INSULATION (R-20 MIN.) 7. 518" TYPE X GYP. BOARD ROOFASSEMBLY #1 WALL ASSE�41 PRE-FABRICATED ROOF ASSSTEELCANOPYPRE-FABRIWALLASSEMBLY#4 ROOF TRUSS STEEL CAN`P ROOFTRUSS BEYOND BEARING BEARING AS10 J 7 FLOOR ASSEMBLY#" 1 WALL ASSEMBLY #b m m m P AS10 IIIIALL # ..._..... _. BEYONDASSEMBLY BEYOND FLOOR ASSEMBLY#1 AS10 (�- J PRE -FABRICATED PRE -FABRICATED LEVEL 4 T.O.D. STEEL BALCONY ( J = 4 EVEL T.O.D. STEEL BALCONY _ - - /. 35';; 3g WALL ASSEMBLY#3 - - WALLASSEMBLY#5 - WALLASSEMBLY# ( ( 7 BEYOND 7 FLOOR ASSEMBLY#" A-510 N A-510 - ZE WALL ASSEMBLY 05 WALL ASSEMBLY #3 B - m BEYOND 6 m FLOOR ASSEMBLY#" A-510 J PREFABRICATED PRE -FABRICATED - STEEL BALCONY LEVEL 3 T.O.D. ` ( J EVEL 3 T.O.D. STEEL BALCONY _ - 23'-10" 23'-10" WALL ASSEMBLY# --- WALL ASSEMBLY# - BEYOND 7 J 7 AS10 A-610 WALLASSEMBLY#S - ` _ FLOOR ASSE BLY8 ` - WALL ASSEMBLY#Y• FLOOR ASSEMBLY#" m BEYOND 9 - m Ad10 AS10 PRE -FABRICATED J PRE -FABRICATED STEEL BALCONY LEVEL 2 T.O.D. srEEL eALcoNv --- F J EVEL 2 T.O.D. -12» 122 777 WALL ASSEMBLY # BEYOND 7 AS10 w MBLY # ` WALL ASSEMSLV 96 - - WALL ASSEMBLY #3 BEYOND Ab10 J A510 L LEVEL 1 ---- LEVEL 1 .. .. - 01, 5 Wall Section OS 3l16" = " Wall Section 04 ROOF ASSEMBLY#" ROOF ASSEMBLY#I ROOFASSEMBLY WALL ASSEMBLY # ( b PRE-FABRK:ATED STEEL CANOPY '- b m WALL ASSEMBLY # a ROOFTRUSS -- ROOFTRUSS ROOF TRUSS BEARING BEARING BEARING 44 _a 4 .8 WALL ASSEMBLY" A510 7 ' A-510 WALL ASSEMBLY kb A310 WALL ASSEMBLY#? BEYOND ' - FLOORASSEMBLY#1 _ _ _ - 2 A-510 J m FLOOR ASSEMBLVXI FLOOR ASSEMSLV# WALLASSEMBLY# PRE-BRICATEI A-510 { 1. 2 A-510 LEVEL4T.O.D. h STEEL BALCONY LEVEL4T.O.D. - J LEVEL T.O. D. 3 35 0 r 35 0O I WALL ASSEMBLY# 35 0 A-SIO J 3 ( - WALL ASSEMBLY #4 7 A-510 A•670 WALL ASSEMBLY# WALLASSEMBLY# - WALL ASbEMBLV# WALL ASSEMBLY# - - aEVONO BEYOND m FLOOR ASSEMSLV#" m °i FLOOR ASSEMSLV #" 2 A-570 [ FLOOR ASSEMSLV #1 A-510 J LEVEL 3 T.O.D. PREFABRICATED STEEL BALCONv ` LEVEL 3 T.O.D. � �I A510 J LEVEL 3 T.O.D. 3 10" WALL ASSEMBLY # m 23 - 1� A-510 ) 3 WALL ASSEMSLV # 7 WALL ASSEMBLY # -_ AS70 _ _ WALL ASSEMSLV# _ WALL ASSEMBLY #S _ WALL ASSEMBLY# BEYOND BEYOND m FLOOR ASSEMBLY# m m FLOORASSEMBLY# 2 A-510 ( FLOORASSEMBLY#" AS10 I LEVEL 2 T2.O.D PREFABRICATED STEEL BALCONY ` LEVEL 2 T2.O. D. A-5210 I LEVEL 2 J WALL ASSEMBLY # 3 A-510 7 A510 A510 WALL ASSEMBLY # `•/ ( I _ ` WALL ASSEMBLY #6 WALL ASSEMBLY# _ WALLASSEMBLY03 BEYOND - - WALL ASSEMBLY# - 2 A-510 J 6 A-6 LEVEL_ 1� BEYOND 2 J LEVEL I� LEVEL I_ _ 77 1 1=1 I I=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I rl Wall Section 03 I_ I I I=1 11=1 11=1 n Wall Section 02 11=1 11=1 I I =1 I I -III -III -I 11=1 I I- Wall Section 01 311. = 1'-0" CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ ADDRESS. 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SHEET. OF_ APPROVAL DOES NOT AUDbRI AM'WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENTSERVICES C N F_ Q WL O ILL. a� 1Q V/ W Nab _ In '^ a UD ~ H ZC 0) � C aQ U) c) CD O O N aM V) No. Date Revision o�E ... AR�j�f N.• WAY,yr•�..F� Author Drown BY 2.Z O'� Approver 5 Revd OV01/99 WALL SECTIONS Project No. 19185.01 Date 2020-08-24 A-320 ® Copyright 2019 SEALANT 1.5" BREAV BREAK ME WEATHER 117 EXTER WOOD FR, 1.5' BREAR SEALANT 3 WIND1'-0" TO WINDOW OUTSIDE CORNER 3" = OW 5/e"GYPSUM BOARD 2.6 WOOD FRAMING THERMAL BATT INSULATION STUCCO BACKER ROD AND SEALANT FLEXIBLE FLASHING BEHIND BRICK TURNING TO SHEATING EXTERIOR SHEATHING AND WEATHER BARRIER BRICK VENEER 2 STUCCO ABUTMENT TO BRICK VENEER DETAIL WOOD FRAMING I 10 EXTERIOR SHEATHING I WEATHER RESISTANT BARRIER 5/8" GYPSUM STUCCO I BOARD BACKER ROD AND SEALANT BRICKVENEER TURNED TO CONCEAL AIR GAP F PO LY FLASHING a"MIN. ON EACH h SIDE OF CORNER AIR GAP BRICK VENEER n BRICK TO STUCCO OUTSIDE CORNER 3" = CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20- ADDRESS. 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONi, CHAIRMAN' DATE: SHEET: OF APPROVALDOESNOTAURgR1ZEANYWORKIN COlFDCTI ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPAR—NTOF—ELOPMEN SER ES No. Date Revision Orewtn Br lo Y 0� A rover y RePewea sTgC+P � OF 011011H PLAN DETAILS Project No. 19185.01 Date 2020-12-07 A-500 0 Copyright 2019 VINYL WINDOW WOOD SILL SEALANT SEAL ROUGH OPENING WITH EXPANDING FOAM SHEET METAL FLASHING - PREFINISHED TO MATCH WINDOW SEALANT SELF ADHESIVE FLASHING AT SHEATHING CORNERS BEHIND WINDOW FLANGE SELF-ADHESNE FLASHING, EXTEND MIN. 6" UP BOTH JAMBS AND 2"-3" ONTO FACE OF WALL EXTERIOR SHEATHING WEATHER BARRIER STUCCO n STUCCO WINDOW SILL 3 BRICK WINDOW HEAD Ll 3" = 1'-0" 3" = 1'-0" NOTES, 1. WOOD NAILER MUST BE INSTALLED TO MEETAPPUCABLE BUILDING CODES OR 200 LBS PER LINEAR FOOT MINIMUM IN ANY GIVEN DIRECTION. 2. ATTACH WOOD NAILERS WITH SUITABLE FASTENERS 3. THIS DETAIL SHOULD BE USED ONLY WHERE THE DECK IS SUPPORTED BY THE OUTSIDE WALL 4. ALL SHEET METAL TO BE INSTALLED PER SMACNA GUIDELINES 5. FLASHING LAPS MUST BE OFFSET FROM FIELD LAPS A MINIMUM OF 1Y' 6. IF FLASHING MUST EXTEND ABOVE 24" IN HEIGHT, FLASHING WIDTH MUST NOT EXCEED 21" AND SHALL BE ATTACHED IN SIDE LAPS AT 9' O.C. GAS KETED SS FASTENERS AT 12' O.C. PRE -FINISHED AND PRE- FORMED METAL COPING PRE -SLOPED WOOD SILL 18 GA CLEAT - SECURE AT 2"O.C. TPO MEMBRANE. FASTEN TO WALLAS REQUIRED FOR SPECIFIC ROOFING SYSTEM AND LAP OVER TOP OF WALL UNDER METAL COPING STUCCO /5 STUCCO PARAPET 2 BRICK WINDOW SILL 3" = 1'-0" 3" = 1'-D" WEATHER BARRIER EXTERIOR SHEATHING STUCCO SELF ADHESIVE FLASHING OVER FLANGE OF WINDOW SELF ADHESIVE FLASHING OVER TOP OF METAL FLASHING SHEET METAL FLASHING SEALANT 7 STU-0" 3" = CCO WINDOW HEAD /1 BRICK WINDOW HEAD WITH ACCENT COURSING 3" = 1' 1K BRICK VENEER WEATHER BARRIER EXTERIOR SHEATHING ACCENT BRICK SOLDIER COURSE SELF ADHESIVE FLASHING OVER METAL FLASHING WEEPS AT 30" O.C. METAL DRIP EDGE LOOSE LINTEL SEAL ROUGH OPENING WITH EXPANDING FOAM VINYL WINDOW, HEAD FLANGE SET IN SEALANT 3" = 1'-D" BRICK VENEER WEATHER BARRIER EXTERIOR SHEATHING SELF ADHESNE FLASHING OVER METAL FLASHING WEEPS AT 30" O.C. METAL DRIP EDGE LOOSE LINTEL SEAL ROUGH OPENING WITH EXPANDING FOAM VINYL WINDOW, HEAD FLANGE SET IN SEALANT VINYL WINDOW WOOD SILL SEAL ROUGH OPENING WITH EXPANDING FOAM SEALANT BRICK ROW LOCK WEEPS AT 24" O.0 SELF-ADHESNE FLASHING, EXTEND MIN. 6" UP BOTH JAMBS AND 2"-3" ONTO FACE OF WALL BRICK VENEER WEATHER BARRIER EXTERIOR SHEATHING "L" STRAP W/ WELDED ALL THREAD PINS HIGH IMPACT PLASTIC SETTING SHIMS IN BED OF APPROVED SILICONE SEALANT WEEP VENTS @ 36" O.C. MAX. STAINLESS STEEL FLASHING. SLOPE i BRICK COURSE TO PREVENT PONDING UNDER CASTSTONE WATER RESISTANT BARRIER TP0 MEMBRANE ON 1W DENS DECK - FASTEN TO WALLAS REGUIRED FOR SPECIFIC ROOFING SYSTEM AND LAP OVER TOP OF WALL UNDER CAST STONE COPING ACCENT COURSING TO COMPLY WITH MULTIFAMILY GUIDELINES PRIMARY ALIGNMENT OF BRICK VENEER CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20- ADORESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEETOF APPROVAL DOES NOT AMtlRJ2E ANY WORK IN CONFECT y—ANY CODES OR 0-NANCES. DEPARWENTOF DEVSI MENTSERVK:ES No. Date Revision c�, jy'WanyF :Fn Author ri;•. o'' Dawn By Approver Rev- d �q TE OF t G1/011P9_ SECTION DETAILS Project No. 19185.01 Date 2020-12-07 A-510 0 Copyright 2019 /w C Q V- W t 0 ILL I I i I I L mu P— _ — —--------- COAT II I R II I I II DESK II W/D COAT 1 w Q P n — — DESK p �I Al0 I R = r a 0 DW _ _ _ i _ _ x /r Q m C 0 0 cli M I � I DW I i I No. Date Revision �� �WAYy� FCC Author 3'-3" 14'-9" CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY 0—n BY y: CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ ADDRESS: 3200GRAPEVINE MILLS Approver Reviewed rq PARKWAY � OF —, 0110119 MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION UNITS CHAIRMAN n UNIT E1-ALT UNIT E1 DATE. SHEET. OF_ Project No. 19185.01 APPROVAL DOES NO A— A IN coNPucruvrm un coos oR oaoI—SlNANCEs. Date 2021-0429 DE—NT OF OEVELOPMENi SERVICES A-901 © Copyright 2019 J C N 7 Q I V- W H 0 0 2� 0 LL, V- I I j I R COAT II II I I II I II I I I I II II � L — r -- ——� W/D MIN w ——— r J P r r = _ I --' r r r — N r '^ VJ W /� / Y- >. I I r W/D r aaaa� t6 coLn Ink CL CD I II O j, P J L_ _— W L COAT C N i Z > s L DW _ _ II N I N > Q CL m CL C/) c� LL o I N V , I BALCONY No. Date Revision I AR Author CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY Drawn By Ot CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ +y ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS RApprover PARKWAY we 7'E OF 01/o19 MAYOR SECRETARY ITS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION UNITS CHAIRMAN 1 UNIT At 2 UNIT E2 DATE. = 1'-0" f = 1'-0" SHEET: OF_ Project No. 19185.01 APPROVAL DOES NDTAIITgRIZE ANYYgRK IN CONPucTv ANY CODES OR ORDINANOES. Date 2021-04-29 DEPA—ENTOF DEVELOPMENTSERVICES A-902 © Copyright 2019 I I I I I I I I I 4T L II II II II W/D CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTNORIZE A- IN CONPDCTWITIANYCODESOR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENTOP DEVELOPMENTSERVICES c C y Q W s �- 0 0 ILL N fg w/� Ili A a0 Q �H ZC 0) 0) > Q (6CL V/ 0 O O IV a"' No. Date Revision .t'�`Or.•W�ON�r c NF :Fn Author z o DawD By .� Approver s•.,. 'e Reviewed rq "•' � OF otrotle e111 mW Project No. 19185.01 Date 2021-04.29 A-903 © Copyright 2019 WC Q W= H0 2L. Ll V- I I N l9 I I 0 I I Fil _ IJ R P I C0AT11 II II r 7-4- 1--W----IJ I I `� �� I I m % 1 A�A Iu ___ lImlmImImIm II _ `I P R a p - - - ( COAT Vi N r- I 1 1 1 II per �v II C 0) L -I-- -� I_----- N > o I� II C Q W/D _ _ - i IfiY N DW m rl) aV + - - I I I I DESK BALCONY - --- No. Date Revision BALCONYZONE - Author s:`• o CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY Drawn By �� CASE NUMBER: CU20- ADDRESS : y PARKWAY 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS Approver sTF p0�91S'`�P we �OF Dtrot9 MAYOR SECRETARY DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION UNITS CHAIRMAN 2 UNIT A4 1 UNIT A3-ALT DATE'. 1'-01. 3/E = 1'-0" SHEET: OF_ APPROVAL DOESNO gRIZE ANYVa IN Project No. 19185.01 LONFDCT VTHA-NY CODECODES OR ORDINANCESS. Date 2021-0429 DEPARIMENTOF DEVELOPI E—E—ES A-904 0 Copyright 2019 I I C ENTRY LOCATION M VARIES, REF. O I BUILDING PLANS Q cj uj I�I L — — D 1 i I I I'' '� � O I I I I I O L I J LL II II COAT @ II II N II II II II j II II W/D r——— � II II I I II II I I i I -J 2' --- WID COAT �Fl R �'n --- l r - _ W r---- — I— —rT—l— — — ui L — — — — —J L---—I—J L—I—-— I I � r6 li� Y r i O D- O DW y, w I�P R a)c ---�-- --- - II � DESK Q � Q C, 1 I�--� r——— F--L�---� E -- A/ O L ch I I r i 1 I II LDW L_ — — J I II 1 II II II II II II II II II 12 -a- II II I II II BALCONY b II II II If No. Date Revision Ci: WAYn;�!F� Author"v DF.nB � � O CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY Y :z CASE NUMBER: CU20- : 0 ADDRESS: 32DO GRAPEVINE MILLS Approver S+T-1P PARKWAY Reviewed 9%E OF ovDi� - BALCONY ZONE MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION UNITS CHAIRMAN s R UNIT AS DATE. SHEET: OF— Project No. 19185.01 APPROVAL DOES NOTAUiHOPoZE ANY VgRK IN UNIT A6 cT—H ANv DooeS ors ORD—I CES. 2 ouPucDate 2021-0429 DEPARIR£NTOP DEVE-EWSERVICES A-905 0 Copyright 2019 = V-0" "TRY LOCATION RIES, REF. ILDING PLANS CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE. SHEET: OF_ APPRWAL DOES NOT ANiHOPoIE ANy MW IN CONFLICT WRH ANV COOE5 OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTWNTOF DEVELOPMEW SERVKES U) w Y � ao Z c ai N > ar`aa CL 0 0 0 o li N " V/ No. Date Revision Author D—n By Approver Revie a AR O eiT-, �... qj OF 01/01M UNITS Project No. 19185.01 Date 2021-04-29 A-906 © Copyright 2019 WC .N F Q W H- 0 2LL O LL 12'-0" 27'-111/2" N _ Q @ II II t � P I R — — — IF II r I I r —— �F--I---I, II I I I I I L — — — ——� �I——T——I JI II II ­ -- • HAW- I� �I Dw --- I L S ^^ N 5 1 /2 Y o 6 LC) COAT F- O_ CD �x �c Z> II DESK Q N t6 Q LL O —I CA W/D I � I -- cn I L BALCONY II p II p I II I II No. Date Revision II Qig �C AY47 f Author c�q� WlFCO� CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY Drawn By 1�� 0'0 CASE NUMBER: CU20- - :y ADDRESS: 3200GRAPEVINE MILLS Approver sT- �fi91 hQ PARKWAY Reviewed '4T f OF 011075 MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION UNITS CHAIRMAN UNIT BP DATE: 3/8 = 1-0" SHEET: OF_ Project No. 19185.01 APPRWAL ODES NOTAUTIgRIIE ANV V.VRIr IN CONFucrwirHANy CODES OR ORDINANCES. Date 2021-04-29 DEPARTAENTOF DEVE-ENr SE -ES A-907 0 Copyright 2019 /w C Q F 7 V- W t H� O _ L LL V — — — 39•-8" N I I f0 I �I COAT_ ——— I ____==—---— I II I I I I I I I I I I - �--� II I II II • I I R I I II I I II II I � I II II wio r � i i--- W II I II II -- --h ° II s 16U7) I�DESK cl C 4) .0 I� N CL 0 1 CD LLCD N N L � co V/ BALCONY No. Date Revision c3:' AF :Fri CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY Author fs'' r' Dawn By :Z CASE NUMBER: CU20- ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY : q Approver Sir-. 2m.1 ..+P Revievroo q,EOF� 01/019 MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION UNITS CHAIRMAN rl UNIT B3 _ DATE. 318" = 1.4. SHEET. OF_ APPRCVAI DOES NOTADTHORIZE ANT VuVRK IN Project No. 19185.01 Date 2021-04-29 coNPucrwi�N ANr coDEs oR oaouwNces. DEPMVENi DP ME—ENr SERV Es A-908 0 Copyright 2019 c C .N Q v- W Fr O _r O ij- C) — �Cc aCc 0 ar -3 vz' I I lmImImImImi II I — P R II — 1Uj______L _ II i�1 - -T—I I L J — ` CL ib — — — I� DW II r COD I II I L � � r I I cl CD C (1) II N DESK Q _I ^ m t6 c—- --p / I U ` O O — — L I V/ I 1 12._ I1 !/2.. 13._�, II II II II II II II II III a II II p No. Date Revision THIS DO T IS NOT F EO ARCy RE NF rF� Author AP PE CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY Dawn By CASE NUMBER: CU20- O ••: q ADDRESS: 32DO GRAPEVINE MILLS Approver s'•,• 20651 ..? PARKWAY Reviewed ARC R DES MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION UNITS CHAIRMAN UNIT 64 DATE. 3/8" = 1'-0" SHEET: OF_ AP PROVALDOESNOTAURpRREANYVA 1. Project No. 19185.01 DON UCTWTx ANYCDDESMORD—WSW. Date 2021-04-29 DEPARTME- DEVELOPMEMSEWCES A-909 0 Copynght2019 85 c 1. CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY CASE NUMBER: CU20-_ ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE. SHEET: OF_ APPRWALODESNOT A —RI ANYNgRKIN CONFECT —ANY CODES OR—NAWES. DEPARTMENTOF—ELOPMEW SEWICES V� c N Q W H00 _r O LL V- N 0 U) W T � (6 � r - 0 cl) N I— x 0 ZC c Q Q C C6 Q (� 00 O N Q� V , No. Date Revision c�. �pT�WAyt%F.TFC+ Author Drawn By �2 O3I Approver s•.co Revie eA T9 •••'%(�C.' Tf OF 011015 UNITS Project No. 19185.01 Date 2021-04-29 A-910 ® Copyright 2019 27'-4" 15'-11/2':R�] 12'-0" 5'-0" CASE NAME. STARS AND STRIPES WAY 4Z, 6" CASE NUMBER:CU20- ADDRESS: 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN n UNIT BS-A LT DATE. SHEET: OF APPROVAL DDES NOT ADRpRD£ ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY -5 OR ORDINANCES. OEPARTMENTOF DEVELOPMEWSERVICES I I I I I I I I I 1a-z 1n' - _-_ IL I I I II LII � L L �I II II o � � II II Q U �. II I O L DESK I - _ _ I I I I I T DW I I I I \I o I I I J II II /----- ------ ---�� BALCONY II II I C .N Q W H� 0 rA 0 THIS DO T IS NOT F p AgDh, RE Nt•lF� Author AP L, o.� D�awner PE R8• Approver yi •., 91. ,••'QrO Reviewee ARC R DES c UNITS Project No. 19185.01 Date 2021-0429 A-911 0 Copyright 2019 C N Q W t �00 ---, r I I = I I I N f0 II II II II II a COAT II I II I I 12 -61/2" T Lfl— — — — — J L — —--------------....___..__ 1 .........._.__---- — — _-------- O SHELVES DESK oII II SHELVES R R ELVES --t -- -- --t—- 0 F '� W CID i m Ln -- --, o CEO Dw H C W N > Qm ra 0- V/ 0 n/ o LL (V a cl' II II - II II I II II II II BALCONY II II No. Date Revision 31'-6" 12'-0" 5'-T QEO AR Author c3:sa M1%.F�a� B $"a O CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY D2wnY CASE NUMBEW ADDRESS3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS Approver w ARKOF 01/o15 UNIT C1 MAYOR SECRETARY DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION UNITS CHAIRMAN DATE', SHEET OF_ Project No. 19185.01 pPPRWpL DOES NOTpUTMORIZE pNV VARK IN COW -Tv —CODES oR ORD—WES. Date 2021-04-29 OE — OF DEVELOPMENTSE—Es A-912 0 Copyright 2019 C N Fill Q 0 — W t 56'-1 1/2" 2 O LL fA W —'�-------.._ --_ II III II SHELVES ' — — — — — — SHELVES I O �L6 P R --t—— -- —t-- r I LU I I I COAT Dw c� 0 _ r` I II DESK Mimi Mimi milmiximlim Im II '., Q C II T � C) CD 0 CD — I I OF --- Ili V i II II - BALCONY y I I I No. Date Revision rcP� �0H �` :jY1AYiyF•'•TFP CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY Author 0—n By ° CASE NUMBER: CU20- ADDRESS' 3200 GRAPEVINE MILLS PARKWAY Approver S'•. •Py Ap C Tq 'Vy'' OF UNIT C2 OV01/9 MAYOR SECRETARY DATE' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION UNITS CHAIRMAN DATE. SHEET: OF_ APPROVAL DOES NOTADTHORIZE ANY WORK IN Project No. 19185.01 Date 2021-04-29 COlFDCT VJfi11 ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENTOP DEVELO-ENTSEWMES A-913 _ - 0 Copyright 2019 i c_ ch 42'-412" 5 -' VZ, W i �— 0 0 0 I I N II II I II I�I Ij J ', II II I II '. II I II II II II W/p II IF — — — — -I It- I II II III —I— — — — J L -I — — -- — • I I I T _I I II O DESK Lu — L —_I —J— — — P -——-- -- ---t---�1 R L — L— — — — J I II r-- ire ---II o � do DW I I I C C > _ Qam ro 0- 6 � --- „ _ I. o I I cn ---IJ J 6 0 BALCONY II No. Date Revision 25'-6" 72'-D" 5'-D" ciS�pTSWAY Author CASE NAME: STARS AND STRIPES WAY Drown By CASE NUMBER. CU20- Approver ADDRESS: 32CO GRAPEVINE MILLS pp s)•• 20 PARKWAY Reviewetl q•aF 01I01 FJ MAYOR SECRETARY DATE PLANNING AND ZONING OONPAISSION UNITS UNIT C3 1 3/8" = 11-01, CHAIRMAN DATE. SHEET: OF_ Project No. 19185.01 ---NO TAUhpRIZE ANT WORI( IN COti4GTNATH ANV cones oR ORwNANCEs. Date 2021-04-29 DEPART WOF DEVELOPMENTSERVICES A-914 © Copyright 2019