The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBBA1998-0018BLDG . Btr ARL, REQUEST DEVELOPMENT SERVICES No. CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS LOT 3 BLf k ADD: DRI ID HILLS ISSUED TO GORDON MOLLER ON THIS DATE OWNER OR AGENT GOPTEN M4ELLER ACTION AUTHORIZED AT 3432 W I1W, ER('Y'RE'EIN TR ACTION AUTHORIZED FEN%'�E VAR. IN FRO N IIUD ❑ PLAN REVIEW RECEIPT ONLY; NO WORK AUTHORIZED ❑ PERMIT ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICATION ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE. This permit shall expire if work is not commenced within 180 days of issuance or if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days. .90 TOTAL FEEG. RC� BOARD �NAME (PRINTED) COMPANY NAME . G4RDGN MOLLER 24 HOUR INSPECTION NUMBER 3432 WIN',:`ERGREEN TERR . METRO (817) 410-3010 GRAFEIVINE, Tip 76051 CUT-OFF TIMES: 7:30 A.M. - A.M. INSPECTION 30-2924HM 416— .433WK 12:30 P.M. - P.M. INSPECTION The issuance or granting of this permit and/or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of the codes and ordinances of the City of Grapevine. The issuance of a permit based on plans, specifications, and other data shall not prevent the Building Department from thereafter requiring the correction of errors in said plans, specifications, and other data or requiring corrections of the construction itself. FILE IMP ��,VlI�1G- -r _ A Future With A Past November 10, 1998 Gordon Moller 3432 Wintergreen Terrace Grapevine, Texas 76051 RE: BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #BBA98-18 3432 WINTERGREEN TERRACE Dear Mr. Moller, On November 9, 1998, the Building Board of Appeals approved BBA98-18, for 3432 Wintergreen Terrace. The request was from the Grapevine Code of Ordinances as follows: Section 7-127, Corner Lots, allowing a solid six (6) foot high fence within the required and established front yard as shown on the plot plan. A copy of the minutes will be available after they have been approved at the next regular Building Board of Appeals meeting. If you need a copy for your records, please contact Gerrie Anderson at 817-410-3158. T ank you, 4 1 t S ott illiams ilding Official SW/ga 0:1BBA19818-5 THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES P.O. Box 95104 9 Grapevine, Texas 76099 • Phone Metro 817/410-3154 z SURVEY PLAT JIMMY W. POGUE. INC. This is to certify that I have, this date, made a careful and ..curate survey on the grannd of property located ai No. 343 ///// Flu T R A[Ein Tf16/Z flair GOUN7N It's, IAA No. No. / _ _ Cuy Block No. t,(A a. a o. _ - _ - __e ., rea•• a,r.�T�s, according rothe fkAL,.therr�,t reaavdrd in Volume Ream1._.SLtlPliedrL_ C,xrrtv,kw, 10 230 --'- - t` i 6/ OI ' ry-� O � N NOTE: THE EASEMENT RECORDED IN VOL 6687 PG. 92. D. R. T.C. T. DOES NOT, TO THE BEST OF NY XROWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AFFECT THIS PROPERTY. , NOTE: THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THE AIRPORT ZONING'ORDINANCE NO, 71-100 - P.F.COROED IN VOL_ 7349 PG. 1106 D.R.T_C.T. yy' IRe i i 2-4,7 = A [Iv N i za.s y'+LLJ . . ml • s A +pp L1- 4 A TR T/F w` ry) IJALL v ��. Y, q 343z t!l/NTEiP6?E'EAl TEA'AAc�' ( r. as �. 4 1-e •tA s sr O IT Fes- 7m rw AA'' w,1GG J 3� ST i t /2.7 tl,3 Iv- 0/ �Rlrtf NOTE: PER THE NATIONAL INSURANCE PROGRAM, COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 48439CO215 H, THIS PROPERTY IS IN ZONE X (AREAS DETER- MINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 500 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN). WINTERGREEN TERRACE X d " 03 4/ /TtFEA•laKd OfAAVNO /sT fe AY�p�y JIMMY' ..wY'�'Y� N i `� _ < � ter, � �,7A+//•�C� �r�;.� .i2" v��ji p : TMe plc arrton r n Rve rtpnxninion or,M pmpenY, u dummlpee n. nn iM /rouM.ury y, �� , r ar, t /� r/�} '(/�J //ff�� .oae;mnndnn.nru;e pnpnnr M�n.umeH.raar w.vm, an.�:< ..n ...a,ypn orlwiidinP.ne JIMMY W. POGUE PRESIDENT ��(J� ,� 1 % /i"�,� I'y�•w'( imv�«•'ammnur....eo•n..R imv�nv.m.maMlna W'unniM ewM...,.arn,. v�p•nr..<.artrmr REGISTF.RF.D PROFESSIONrIL f.AND "?i•,p< - Y 711�1' t v 1\ `J p.,p,nrwwma man.e.,nakawe.rna mx m.e;w..<.<r,n.,M...aa tnr�„.,;ra urv.r.w.or. SURVEYOR NO. 1722 `w�' ''•ri'` ll.."+✓✓iiJJ ......na.re v�••..n<�<..nwn�.�<nu.n.. mn-gqeu�rw+aw•ew,v.- �'%� ITIERE ARE NO ENCROaCHHENTa OR PROTRU91UNa JIMMY W. POGUE. INC. 41aB�s�-v- ;�� 3310 MARVIN D.LOVE FREEWAI• s, ,, a A.ta r.!•i1dL+/ DALLAS. TEXAS 75224 ,f..,;• or-3-S-9d� aa;.r.rpanW.urawrrvaY M. rr nwarwwr ..q.nr '• ti rMr p.,,n. VI•e.nhpnailMvdrNP aarvnnn<N^.IM PHONE (2141371-17666 'r F: t .-�.a nr ar.r w. Py... t.aw ma•. ra. ra rrMeaen. n_,y �aY.�3i.�� raw r. __by.trz_ «•Tw m...ear n*n�<rywnav rq�•tr. LA CITY OF GRAPEVINE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICANT NAME: (-1;, 0Iflo0/V 1'2o6L�R ADDRESS: 3 Y 3 Z wJw PHONE NO: HOME 545,5 Z F Z OFFICE W 6 I y,Yg PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: /*')I r ADDRESS: PHONE NO: HOME OFFICE ADDRESS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION NNfOF PROPERTY FOR WHICH APPEAL IS REQUESTED:. 7 2- t✓..-"''rl,�t`<3'nek4u lF—doC1 ✓Q2- , 4ul divc.R S /17vi`' A Ir- C2, 0 P7 SPECIFIC NATURE OF APPEAL: rL m 5 F See f �v,�o Oyl %rz'f'!D ,9�t/,O r]� cr//jro QiJ rL 7- ®�C'i /✓/�S�T/ � BU�ZD ,�- S�E T1��/ tiF ��9�4� IPi,€'f1®�RT`r' �,�-rrVC,L�f�-. WfIjZH w®vL STATE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE APPEAL AND EXPLAIN HOW A HARDSHIP WOULD BE CREATED IF THE APPEAL IS NOT GRANTED. EXPLAIN HOW YOUR SITUATION IS PECULIAR TO THE CIRCUMSTANCES CONTEMPLATED BY THE ORDINANCE AND ATTACH DRAWINGS NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. (YOU DO NOT NEED TO ATTACH THE SAME DRAWINGS AS ATTACHED TO YOUR APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT AS THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WILL PROVIDE THE BOARD WITH THOSE RECORDS). APPLICANTS ARE REQUESTED TO ATTEND MEETING 6foRa').V, �wG 4e� APPLICANT (Print or Type) OWNER (Print or Type) APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S SIGNATURE MEMORANDUM MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEETING DATE BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFFICIAL/11� BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #BBA98-18 GORDON MOLLER, 3432 WINTERGREEN TERRACE MONDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 1998 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Building Board of Appeals approve the request to City of Grapevine Code of Ordinances, Chapter 7, Article IV, Fences, Section 7-127 for property addressed as 3432 Wintergreen Terrace, platted as Lot 6, Block 1, Druid Hills, Grapevine, Texas as follows: Section 7-127, Corner Lots, prohibits the erection of a fence in the required or established front yard of a corner lot, except along the interior lot line, and not exceeding thirty-six (36) inches in height and 50% through vision. The request is to allow a solid six (6) foot high fence within the required and established front yard as shown on the plot plan. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Mr. and Mrs. Gordon Moller. The potential violation was discovered by Staff upon the review of a permit application. The fence will not be built beyond the originally platted required twenty-five (25) foot front building line. Because the home is built well behind the building line, the greatest violation will be the fence encroaching into the established front yard.. Staff does not feel that this violates the intent of the ordinance, as the fence will not actually surround the house; eliminating i any fortress -like effect. 1A , m to tat " GU "'"' ■. in at. is "1 IBM i r v 1■1e, 111 ■ ^ � GU R 7.5 j 1 p sit ! • }a • a a , , at i - ' • • a■ TWELVE OAKS LN " K - - - - - � rwavE aalc5 �N _ � a �• Ty• i a i i 3111 48 • 1 a 6 T C ■ a 4 1 a 1 ! 1 1 �� '• a mill,- - - ! 7 « • n n as i a i 4 um 14 N ,xao� OR a1 ■ at 15,1111 is is + GL.ENISIF'�Glft N .w w 12" - F . 1r1« ' at i at 1«I } 1 4 1 J1�' • O�Fji1{ave ass = R0 a BBA98-18 'p GORDON MOLLER J---s o. �rLg5 1do a ,� v >a , J-7 id!t i s r I *m !LU 1 u » +• ,• ,1 , BLUEBERRY•LN. ■ R 20 v rM a W a o• n / - _ DR 5 ui —�15 — r-- nit u ! a . f I } 1 • 1CD ,, �1 G �D1 • 4LU ,- • r 14 � C 9DD 1■ z � - , 4 ,as ,• 1 • T • a ••• -r--J• t°Lx Cf ' BARBERRY RD. as a ' a • u ■ 1 _ a � Lq` T 2 �1�C'Fpw SE$1 v«a i�j+ W r'I„ n ST IlowI vi, Imitate, vs 1v� I v>_ 1� • 0 0 1� all v ■ROLLING HILLS LN. } - RoucILLS Hua _ �_ _ ; in r - S HIGHLAND mEA00*S OR i - - - " rJ van• sal■ ■ _ '! n � • ' •, • u ` ,■ } �qu I n I v s lal aw v ■at v me ina■ate, v an t 1 I + um 'Not 10 eca� i'ataoo• mot. pa,�a.� etibe'+c , „ . , T zm d SW is vmm to be cansu d a *0 'Offw iZ-ftiW me''°i° wznl °" City VW■ate ee=&md to iu me L*p■dmmt pr M E M O R A N D U M Gordon & Kathy Moller 3432 Wintergreen Terrace Phone: 817-488-2924/Fax: 817-416-1488 Grapevine, TX 76051 TO: CITY OF GRAPEVINE DATE: 10/7/98 BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS SUBJECT: FENCE CONSTRUCTION PLAN VARIANCE PAGE(S): 4 + Enclosures 1. We hereby request authorization to build a privacy fence on our residence property as shown on the attached plat. This fence will be 6' high and made out of high quality wood grain colored fiberglass pickets, which are not subject to significant degrading or discoloration. We earlier submitted this proposal, however it was rejected because the fence plan on the east side of the property had a section which was located closer to the eastern boundary of the property than the front of our home structure. Therefore we request an associated variance based on the reasons explained herein in both summary and detailed form. 2. We request reconsideration and approval of the variance for our fence plan for the following reasons (Summary): It eliminates the need for us to remove any trees, saving both money and preserving the benefits the trees provide. It provides us a bit more secure enclosed space on our property for family use, which is quite important to us. The additional fencing will not have an adverse affect on the attractiveness of our property or its value. None of the 6 adjacent neighbors to our property have any objections whatsoever to our proposed fence layout. The variance section of the fence will have no adverse affect on traffic visibility or safety at the Wintergreen Terrace and Barberry intersection. 3. We request reconsideration and approval of the variance for our fence plan for the following reasons (Details): The southeast side of our property (where the section of the fence in question is located) is quite heavily wooded with a significant number of very large oak trees. The proposed fence plan was designed to allow us to install the fence in a manner that would bypass all the trees, and therefore would preclude the need to remove any of them. If we were to take the fence design parallel to the front of the house from the front edge of the house or slightly behind it in accordance with the existing requirements, it would intersect a large number of these oak trees (and/or their immediately adjacent root structure), and thus probably necessitate cutting and removal of a number of these large trees, their stumps, and larger roots. This would require the removal of at least two and perhaps as many as five very large, mature trees. A number of labeled photographs are included with this submission (see Enclosure 3) to show the locations of some of these trees and the proposed location of the fence (stakes, rope, and string border). We strongly wish to avoid this and keep all the existing trees intact for the following reasons: These trees not only add value and beauty to our property, but are enjoyed by a number of neighbors all of whose property faces this open section of our lot, as well as by others who drive or walk by. Adding complete tree removal costs would add significantly to the cost of our fencing project, as we have been quoted $1100 per tree for such complete removal, stump grinding, etc. For these cost estimation purposes we so far only solicited a single quote, which is available upon request. Even with the proposed design, there would be a large number of trees located on the property outside the fence perimeter, in addition to those behind it, thereby maintaining a pleasant appearance to the neighborhood and all passersby (see Enclosure 3). Given that a deviation from a layout that is even with the front of our home structure is needed, it is our desire to include the marginally larger amount of our property in our fenced area so as to provide maximum secure play area (protected from traffic on Barberry and Wintergreen Terrace streets) for our 3 children, as well as a larger area for our pets. However, there will still be a substantial property area (belonging to us) between the roads and city property and our proposed fence. The east side dimension of our property is quite long at 230 feet. The proposed fence design will not create an unnatural appearance to the front of the home property as the area of fence proposed to be somewhat eastward of the front of the home structure is quite far to the south of the home, and the angled design will allow a very pleasant presentation of the home structure from a wide viewing angle. In fact, from the front center of the house at the entryway, the forward angle to the outermost section of the proposed fence layout is not more than 15 degrees (see Enclosure 2). Our property slopes substantially from the high southeast end (area of fence in question, near the intersection of Barberry and Wintergreen Terrace) to the low northwest end. With the fence in its current location, drivers or pedestrians on those streets can quite easily see down into our backyard and pool area. By moving 2 the fence higher to the desired area as shown in the proposed layout, we can reduce the visibility into our backyard and increase our privacy. There is a substantial slope and height differential which exists between the south and north sides of our property along with a large retaining wall (shown as a two section wall on the plat, since changed to a single section 5' - 6' pave stone wall), which effectively cuts the property into two very distinct sections from an appearance prospective. The ground level in the southeast area (requested variance area) of the property is probably 10' - 12' above the ground level of the house. Therefore any fence design for this area appears to passersby more like simple fencing around a separate lot, such as for horse boarding, etc. In fact, even with no fence installed, or with it just up to the front of the house, no one on Barberry or even the neighbors across Barberry can easily see that such a fence would protrude in front of the home, because from most angles the front of the home is almost invisible as it well below on the slope of the hill, is blocked by all the trees, and is behind a 6 foot retaining wall at the base of the slope. Several photos showing this topography are included (see Enclosure 3). We recently erected stakes and rope to mark the requested variance area, as well presented plat drawings highlighting our proposed fence design, to show all our neighbors who live adjacent to us or across either Wintergreen Terrace or Barberry from our lot what we desire to do (see Enclosure 3). We informed them that a variance was required for us to do this. We have shown them sample materials of the exact type and color to be used as well. Every one of these neighbors has indicated that they have no objection to our proposed fence layout whatsoever, including the portion which extends somewhat beyond the front of the home structure for which the variance is requested. In fact, our neighbors realize that since moving in to this home some 6 months ago, we have done much to improve it and make it more attractive, which benefits them as well. Such improvements include replacement of decaying railroad tie retaining walls with attractive pave stone walls, trimming up and removal of dead trees and dead tree sections, extensive new landscaping, etc. Replacement of the extremely decayed and unattractive existing fence is the next step. Attached to this document is a "statement of no objection" (Enclosure 4) signed by each of the neighbors whose homes are located adjacent to our lot. The additional fence area requested in the variance will have no adverse impact on the visibility of traffic, bikes, or pedestrians in the vicinity of the Wintergreen Terrace and Barberry intersections, and therefore no negative impact on safety. First of all, this intersection is a 3 way stop already, requiring all traffic to stop and look for other cars before proceeding. Secondly, with the farthest southeast point of our proposed fence layout located about 36 feet from nearest edge of Barberry and 43 feet from the nearest edge of Wintergreen Terrace, it is clear that the fence structure is quite far away from this 3 way stop intersection and in no way can interfere with traffic visibility or safety. A number of labeled photographs are included with this submission (see Enclosure 3) to show the relationship of the proposed fence variance layout and the Wintergreen Terrace and Barberry intersection. 3 4. Based on this information, we ask that you favorably respond to our request for a variance for our proposed fencing plan. Sincere thanks for your consideration of this matter. Gordon & Kathy Moller 3432 Wintergreen Terrace Grapevine, TX 76051 Enclosures: 1. Full size property plat, showing desired fence layout. 2. Close up property plat, showing desired fence layout, tree locations, etc. 3. Photos showing requested variance area and relation to trees, house, and Wintergreen Terrace and Barberry streets and their intersection. 4. Signed statement from all adjacent neighbors that they do not object to our proposed fence plans. rd VOL 6687 THE BEST `ECT THIS TO THE -100 D.R.T.C.T. Y Y a N R\ SURVEY PLAT JIMMY W. POGUE, INC. This Is to certify that I have, this date, made a carefui and accurate survey on Tile grllnnd of Property ltrraled JI No i431_ iil/NYER (.PE'EA/ 7F.PRArEin-r TARq-��Ov/VTi� __ 7era5 Lot No. w TmE EAST 1=C7-4 , BIl„ k No. I City Black No. of aF ORurn 8 Lcs an addnum OUT Ac rvE (' 8 KNrFyNT SVR✓f'Lr To rn,�Ra�rr„ Texas, according to the PGAL____ Iherrrd recorded in Volume , jB�__Page _ ¢�.. __. , _PLgz_ Records _._rc9lPliddr7 _.. Cuulny, ir". ErYGGoS IJR�' Z p P T'rV N Z - �� f 1 z 6/ t N zo.s n N - - -— .-\j r .S � � •I�-?rr RR Tr6 (_ WALL % III � e l.A N V lei M MIA& ) N y d ~ N 3¢3Z L////VTER6/PE�iU TE/PRAct' oSi } u w 0 y„ GQf V E dl MEMORANDUM Gordon & Kathy Moller Phone: 817-488-2924/Fax: 817-416-1488 TO: CITY OF GRAPEVINE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS SUBJECT: NEIGHBORS' APPROVAL OF PLANS 3432 Wintergreen Terrace Grapevine, TX 76051 DATE: 10/6/98 PAGE(S): 1 1. To verify that none of the Grapevine residents who live adjacent to our property object to our proposed fence construction, I have roped out the area which is proposed to be located slightly forward (eastward) of the home structure itself. I have offered to show each or our neighbors this roped area so they may assess whether they find anything objectionable about it. Based on thus showing them our plans, the following residences have agreed that they do not object to our plans: Name Address Signature &O-A) A 3V I6 1 r •- 4 �7y �e�c,v cJ �� L ,�Cd 1 t J. /1 4 04�3��a�4 2. This represents all residences adjacent to our property. 3. Submitted for consideration. --?& , "��qL94 I�x� �'eoul v AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MONDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 9, 1998 AT 6:00 P M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2ND FLOOR 200 SOUTH MAIN STREET GRAPEVINE, TEXAS CALL TO ORDER II. NEW BUSINESS A. BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS CASE 98-18, SUBMITTED BY GORDON MOLLER FOR 3432 WINTERGREEN TERRACE AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. III. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION IV. MINUTES BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS TO CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 10, 1998 MEETING V. ADJOURNMENT IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS PUBLIC MEETING AND YOU HAVE A DISABILITY THAT REQUIRES SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS AT THE MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OFFICES AT 817/410-3158. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS WILL BE MADE TO ASSIST YOUR NEEDS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 551.001 ET SEQ. ACTS OF THE 1993 TEXAS LEGISLATURE, THE REGULAR BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1998, AT 5:00 P.M. SC TT WILLIAMS V LOPMENT SE RVICES ASSISTANT DIRECTOR/BUILDING OFFICIAL STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Building Board of Appeals for the City of Grapevine, Texas, met in regular session, Monday, November 9, 1998, at 6:00 P.M., in the Council Chambers, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas with the following members present: Joe Lipscomb Chairman Dennis Roberts Member Charles Bloomberg Member Russell Kidd Member Daniel Banse 1st Alternate constituting a quorum with Member Art Gordon absent. Also present were City Council Representative Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: Scott Williams Tim Fleming Betsy Dunham CALL TO ORDER Assistant Director/Building Official Plans Examiner/Field Coordinator Plans Examiner Chairman Joe Lipscomb called the meeting to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. NEW BUSINESS BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS CASE BBA 98-18 3432 WINTERGREEN TERRACE. GORDON MOLLER The first item of New Business for the Building Board of Appeals to consider was BBA98-18 submitted by Gordon Moller for property located at 3432 Wintergreen Terrace, platted as Lot,6, Block 1, Druid Hills. The request was to Grapevine Code of Ordinances, Section 7-127, Corner Lots, which prohibits the erection of a fence in the required or established front yard of a corner lot, except along the interior lot line, and not exceeding thirty-six (36) inches in height and 50% through vision. Mr. Williams explained that the request was to allow a solid six (6) foot high fence within the required and established front yard as shown on the plot plan. Mr. Williams explained that the potential violation was discovered by Staff upon the review of a permit application. He explained that the fence would not be built beyond the originally platted required twenty-five (25) foot front building line. He also explained that because the home was built well behind the building line, the Building Board of Appeals 11 /9/98 Ayes: Lipscomb, Roberts, Bloomberg, Kidd, Banse Nays: None Absent: Gordon The meeting was adjourned at 6:08 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDING BOARD OF AP EALS OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THE 1 �% DAY OF =e24-c.,_ , 19903 p APPROVED: d6RETARY C 4AIRMAN 3 4b u i �Ya Act- + ,� � Y •- S-.:� - 9 Aw owl 1 1 r �:.� :�� •„'r � � _ � ..' � • ��'b � � .' ...sue. - ... � _ ■ F F Uz ION oL fry