HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 06 - CU21-19 809 South Dooley Street0- CA21-19
TRINSIC RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN NOTIFICATION AREA
SUPPORT: 0 LETTERS
OPPOSITION: 4 LETTERS
PROPERTY OWNER NOT WITHIN 200 FOOT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
OPPOSITION: 1 LETTER
3D W 3
�:4DJ 5R 17 4 la0�
- colle e 5 P 9512
6 N�SG1
22R1 2R, O S� 0Pu s5
1R3 2 3 ` 7 a 339
1.80 @ 2R2 :7
00 8 i
3
4 1 4B
Iin
ON1R1 --- :::::::.•.....::: R�S�
1.354 q::::::: c c! N OQ�.
1� --- .. :: - SGNy68F
3 - :::: 9�A . - �3
0410
213.397
1.468 ---
. ...................
--
... .................
:TFi2D2: RED
i2
G 9
O�
N%V ON
PO
a4a — -- --- —
.0784 @
Y
2 6
6A 6 B 1 I
OS ��w`,j No```
�`e `
N`
7A 7B
l
Feet
0 100 200 300 400
— CU21-19
VINE:
Si N
-T E X A SVIP�
w�e 4.58
e
This date has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department. Various official and unofficial sources were
Date Prepared: 8/17/2021 used to gather this information Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this date, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy of said data.
a
File #: CU21-19
809 SOUTH DOOLEY STREET
WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5PM
ON MONDAY, AUGUST 16, 2021
Procedure to Respond:
As (a Py$pex�O r within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I
(approve (protest) nd/or (have the following comments)
Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision:
Signature:
neNo.)_ 91Z-414 -3M
Printed Name of Signee: �ICJKQ-L',et IkA7— --Title:{—
Telephone: (817)410-3155
Direct questions and mail responses to:
Planning Technician
Department of Development Services
City of Grapevine
P.O. Box 95104
Grapevine, Texas 76099
yin � nnni
L. U L 1
Friday, August 13, 2021
Dear City Council Members,
As a longtime resident of Grapevine, and in particular a resident of Dooley Court, I wish to express my unequivocal
displeasure with the possible rezoning of 809 S. Dooley St., and neighboring parcels, from Light Industrial to
Residential - Multi -Family. This rezoning effort is in preparation for a planned development by the Trinsic Residentia
Group. This new apartment complex is to be 4 stories tall and contain 254 Units and would be placed on the
opposite side of the TEXRail tracks from our homes. The residents of Dooley Court find this completely
unacceptable.
Myself, and the other residents of Dooley Court, have endured one development after another behind our
neighborhood, all in the name of city progress, and we will support no more of it. Starting with the outright lies of the
TEXRail operational hours, which went from 06:00 — 20:00(initially communicated to residents) to 04:00 -
02:00(After construction was started). Then the construction of the rail system with its associated noise and dust. Tc
the month long, all hours, train hom safety testing. The incessant crossing bells and associated flashing lights have
ruined our use of our patio and back yard. The latest progress project, 12' wide bike and walking path, resulted in
the complete loss of the old growth tree line behind our homes. While the city did plant a row of trees, over half of
them suffered irreparable damage from this year's freeze. This has left us with a nearly complete loss of privacy,
and any sound abatement the old tree line offered. Not to mention the death of much of our landscaping that was
designed around exposure to limited sun. It will take over a decade for these new trees to provide any privacy
equivalent to the old growth tress we had before the trail development. And now we are supposed to tolerate a 4
story apartment complex behind us, whose residents will have a clear view into our yards, and bedrooms. Not only
do we take issue with the privacy concerns, but the expected increase in car traffic on Dooley Street. We have
already seen a marked increase in traffic with the completion of the AMLI Grapevine apartment development on
Dallas Road. Adding 250 apartment/townhome units in the vicinity will only exacerbate the issue. Then there is the
noise issue. Having a 4-story brick facade on the opposite side of the railroad will act as one huge reflector of train
noise; Compounding a problem we are still trying to remediate.
When the rezoning application comes before the board, I hope you will take into consideration our position on the
matter and deny approval.
Respectfully,
Vielka-Lee Heitz
Residents, 508 Dooley Court, Grap ine, TX
File #: CU21-19
809 SOUTH DOOLEY STREET
WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM
ON MONDAY, AUGUST 16, 2021
Procedure to Respond:
As (a Prope er within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I
(approve (protest) nd/or (have the following comments)
Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision:
'0k1�L-. fL,(ff� (�
Signature: l/ `�,-t - (Phone No.)
Printed Name of Si nee: Title:
Telephone: (817)410-3155
Direct questions and mail responses to:
Planning Technician
Department of Development Services
City of Grapevine
P.O. Box 95104
Grapevine, Texas 76099
AUG ? 2021
Susan Batte
From: Teresa Ross <teresa.ross@me.com>
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 2:17 PM
To: Susan Batte; Chris Coy; Darlene Freed; Jennifer Hibbs; Leon Leal; Duff O'Dell; Sharron
Rogers; Bruno Rumbelow; Paul Slechta; Ron Stombaugh; William D. Tate; Albert Triplett
Subject: City Counsel and Zoning members- Zoning of 809 S Dooley Street
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE USE CAUTION BEFORE CLICKING LINKS
AND/OR OPENING ATTACHMENTS ***
Friday, August 13, 2021
Dear City Council Members,
As a longtime resident of Grapevine, and in particular a resident of Dooley Court, I wish to express
my unequivocal displeasure with the possible rezoning of 809 S. Dooley St., and neighboring
parcels, from Light Industrial to Residential - Multi -Family. This rezoning
effort is in preparation for a planned development by the Trinsic
Residential Group. This new apartment complex is to be 4 stories tall and
contain 254 living units, 471 proposed additional parking spaces and
would be placed on the opposite side of the TEXRail tracks from our
homes. The residents of Dooley Court find this completely unacceptable.
Myself, and the other residents of Dooley Court, have endured one development after another
behind our neighborhood, all in the name of city progress, and we will support no more of it.
Starting with the outright lies of the TEXRail operational hours, which went from 06:00 —
20:00(initially communicated to residents) to 04:00 - 02:00(After construction was started). Then
the construction of the rail system with its associated noise and dust. To the month long, all hours,
train horn safety testing. The incessant crossing bells and associated flashing lights have ruined our
use of our patio and back yard. The latest progress project, 12' wide bike and walking path, resulted
in the complete loss of the old growth tree line behind our homes. While the city did plant a row of
trees, over half of them suffered irreparable damage from this year's freeze. This has left us with a
nearly complete loss of privacy, and any sound abatement the old tree line offered. Not to mention
the death of much of our landscaping that was designed around exposure to limited sun. It will take
over a decade for these new trees to provide any privacy equivalent to the old growth tress we had
before the trail development.
Now we are supposed to tolerate a 4 story apartment complex behind us, whose residents will have
a clear view into our yards, and bedrooms — my master bedroom is on the 2nd floor on the back
of my house — this development, if allowed at ANY NUMBER OF FLOORS/HEIGHT
- would be a huge and unacceptable invasion of privacy.
Not only do we take issue with the privacy concerns, but the expected increase in car traffic on
Dooley Street. We have already seen a marked increase in traffic with the completion of the AMLI
Grapevine apartment development on Dallas Road. Adding 254 apartment/townhome units in the
vicinity will only exacerbate the issue. Then there is the noise issue. Having a 4-story brick facade
on the opposite side of the railroad will act as one huge reflector of train noise, compounding a
problem we are still trying to remediate.
When the rezoning application comes before the board, I hope you will take into consideration our
position on the matter and deny approval.
Respectfully,
Teresa M. Ross
Resident, 512 Dooley Court, Grapevine, TX
teresa.rosskme.com
File #: CU21-19
809 SOUTH DOOLEY STREET
WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5PM
ON MONDAY, AUGUST 16, 2021
Procedure to Respond:
As (a Pro er within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I
(appro ) (protest) nd/or (have the following comments)
Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision:
Da,*u and Andre.au 0-end-edrL 50+)odeu Court
Signature:
Phone No.) - i 4- 114 - 20- 7
Printed Name of Signee: Ll�p,he,� V1 Title:
Telephone: (817)410-3155
Direct questions and mail responses to:
Planning Technician
Department of Development Services
City of Grapevine
P.O. Box 95104
Grapevine, Texas 76099 A ) 21v';
Friday, August 13, 2021
Dear City Council Members,
As a longtime resident of Grapevine, and in particular a resident of Dooley Court, I wish to express my unequivocal
displeasure with the possible rezoning of 809 S. Dooley St., and neighboring parcels, from Light Industrial to
Residential - Multi -Family. This rezoning effort is in preparation for a planned development by the Trinsic Residentia
Group. This new apartment complex is to be 4 stories tall and contain 254 Units and would be placed on the
opposite side of the TEXRail tracks from our homes. The residents of Dooley Court find this completely
unacceptable.
Myself, and the other residents of Dooley Court, have endured one development after another behind our
neighborhood, all in the name of city progress, and we will support no more of it. Starting with the outright lies of the
TEXRail operational hours, which went from 06:00 — 20:00(initially communicated to residents) to 04:00 -
02:00(After construction was started). Then the construction of the rail system with its associated noise and dust. Tc
the month long, all hours, train horn safety testing. The incessant crossing bells and associated flashing lights have
ruined our use of our patio and back yard. The latest progress project, 12' wide bike and walking path, resulted in
the complete loss of the old growth tree line behind our homes. While the city did plant a row of trees, over half of
them suffered irreparable damage from this year's freeze. This has left us with a nearly complete loss of privacy,
and any sound abatement the old tree line offered. Not to mention the death of much of our landscaping that was
designed around exposure to limited sun. It will take over a decade for these new trees to provide any privacy
equivalent to the old growth tress we had before the trail development. And now we are supposed to tolerate a 4
story apartment complex behind us, whose residents will have a clear view into our yards, and bedrooms. Not only
do we take issue with the privacy concerns, but the expected increase in car traffic on Dooley Street. We have
already seen a marked increase in traffic with the completion of the AMLI Grapevine apartment development on
Dallas Road. Adding 250 apartment/townhome units in the vicinity will only exacerbate the issue. Then there is the
noise issue. Having a 4-story brick facade on the opposite side of the railroad will act as one huge reflector of train
noise; Compounding a problem we are still trying to remediate.
When the rezoning application comes before the board, I hope you will take into consideration our position on the
matter and deny approval.
Respectfully,
Darn and Andrea Wendeln
Residents, 504 Dooley Court, Grapevine, TX
Susan Batte
From:
Greg Brown <gbrown@algvacations.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, June 9, 2021 6:56 PM
To:
Ron Stombaugh; Albert Triplett; Susan Batte; William D. Tate; Paul Slechta; Sharron
Rogers; Leon Leal; Darlene Freed; Chris Coy; Duff O'Dell; Bruno Rumbelow; Jennifer
Hibbs
Cc:
Greghome (gregenglishbrown@verizon.net)
Subject:
Letter to City Counsel and Zoning members concerning Trinsic Residential Group on
Dooley Street
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE USE CAUTION BEFORE CLICKING LINKS
AND/OR OPENING ATTACHMENTS * * *
Dear Major, City Council and Zoning Team
As a longtime (18 years+) resident of Grapevine, and in particular a resident of Dooley Court, I
wish to express my displeasure with the possible rezoning of 809 S Dooley Street, and
neighboring parcels, from Light Industrial to Residential - Multi -Family. This rezoning effort is in
preparation for a planned development by the Trinsic Residential Group. This new apartment
complex is to be 4 stories tall and contain 254 Units and would be placed on the opposite side
of the TEXRail tracks from our homes. We find this completely unacceptable.
My family, and the other residents of Dooley Court, have endured one development after
another behind our neighborhood, all in the name of city progress, and we will support no
more of it.
Starting with the outright lies of the TEXRail operational hours, which went from 06:00 —
20:00(initially communicated to residents) to 04:00 - 02:00(After construction was started).
Then the construction of the rail system with its associated noise and dust. To the month long,
all hours, train horn safety testing. The incessant crossing bells and associated flashing lights
now detract from our patio and back yard. The latest progress project, a 12' wide bike and
walking path, resulted in the complete loss of the old growth tree line behind our homes. While
the city did plant a row of trees, over half of them suffered irreparable damage from this year's
freeze. This has left us with a nearly complete loss of privacy, and any sound abatement the old
tree line offered.
It will take over a decade for these new trees to provide any privacy equivalent to the old
growth tress we had before the trail development. And now we are supposed to tolerate a 4
story apartment complex behind us, whose residents will have a clear view into our yards, and
bedrooms. Not only do we take issue with the privacy concerns, but the expected increase in
car traffic on Dooley Street. We have already seen a marked increase in traffic with the
completion of the AMLI Grapevine apartment development on Dallas Road. Adding 250
apartment/townhome units in the vicinity will only exacerbate the issue.
Then there is the noise issue. Having a 4 story brick facade on the opposite side of the railroad
will act as one huge reflector of train noise. Compounding a problem we are still trying to
remediate.
When the rezoning application comes before the board, I hope you will take into consideration
our position on the matter and not approve it.
Respectfully,
Greg Brown
528 Dooley Court
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney -client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. This communication is the
property of one or more of the companies under common control and ownership within the Apple Leisure
Group. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
e-mail, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.
PROPERTY OWNER NOT WITH
THE 200 FOOT OF SUBJECT
PROPERTY