HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 03 - Z21-05 Ferguson PlaceZ21-05
FERGUSON PLACE
PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN NOTIFICATION AREA
SUPPORT
OPPOSITION:
CONCERN
1 LETTER
5 LETTERS
1 LETTER
PROPERTY OWNER NOT WITHIN 200 FOOT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
OPPOSITION:
2 LETTERS
2 LETTERS
NOT A RESIDENT OF GRAPEVINE
OPPOSITION: 5 LETTERS
�:
:: m::
�:'
r.::
File #: Z21-05
FERGUSON PLACE
WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM
ON MONDAY, AUGUST 16, 2021
Procedure to Respond:
As Ca- °Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I
�nurove`;)(orotest) and/or (have the following commantgl
Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision:
Cook � 73 fA y l r3
Signature: (Phone No.) 2yr%�� yF
Printed Name of Signee: f'FF_ra�Y') Title: /jam 6�
Telephone: (817)410-3155
Direct questions and snail responses to:
Planning Technician
Department of Development Services _
City of Grapevine
P.O. Box 95104
Grapevine, Texas 76099 1 A u 1 j c 9 1
File #: Z21-05
FERGUSON PLACE
WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM
ON MONDAY, AUGUST 16, 2021
Procedure to Respond:
As (a Pro r within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I
(approv (protest) nd/or (have the following comments)
4yaA C
lc� BIZ �
Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision:
k�! 4arjV�- I I2a�C�- A0Ya-kkKA^,-
3133 B 4 H, %VOXVJw JUoq,�-
Signature: (Phone No.)
Printed Name of Signee:-��C�Glh1�►�� AI1(a4VK- Title:
Telephone: (817)410-3155
Direct questions and mail responses to:
Planning Technician
Department of Development Services
City of Grapevine
P.O. Box 95104
Grapevine, Texas 76099
AL:a 16 2021
File #: Z21-05
FERGUSON PLACE
WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM
ON MONDAY, AUGUST 16, 2021
Procedure to Respond:
As (a Propertner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I
(approv (protest) ndlo a fol owing commen s
�I2cS2 S-e.e_ �� c(.�e� vwrol �o c •�
Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision:
ari .5 a, a4• J �ti In.�a-ll
133fr l-gseff
Signature
No.) J-/-7 c e�F 31 74
Printed Name of Signee: J o,,tk-, w-,-1( L ari>st �" �" 0 Title: S
Telephone: (817)410-3155
Direct questions and mail responses to:
Planning Technician
Department of Development Services -
City of Grapevine
P.O. Box 95104
AUK 1 3 2021
Grapevine, Texas 76099
File #: Z21-05
Ferguson Place
To whom it may concern,
My wife and I (property owners within 200 feet of the subject tract) are protesting the
proposed Ferguson Place development. We have serious reservations about the city approving
a change in lot size from R20 to R7.5.
The farm property already sits on the edge of a flowage easement controlled by the Army Corps
of Engineers. Adding a significant amount of concrete to the habitable land is going to have a
negative effect on drainage that will be felt by the surrounding properties.
As a homeowner for almost three years at this property, I can confirm the land in this back
pocket of Grapevine takes on significant water during heavy rains and flooding. Keeping the lots
R20 would, at the very least, reduce the amount of hardscape and ease the potential for
additional run-off and flooding throughout the year.
We're also concerned how the addition of 29 homes will increase noise and light pollution, as
well as the flow of traffic at all hours of the day. Even with a new entrance to the neighborhood
off Lonesome Dove Road, a secondary entrance off Gravel Road — essentially a one -lane farm
road — is going to create an uptick in car traffic on a road that isn't equipped for additional cars
during work and school hours. Retaining larger lot sizes would keep the noise increase to a
minimum and reduce the potential for vehicle congestion.
We realize a development will eventually be placed on the farmland, but I'd urge the Council to
consider how cramming homes on minimum 7,500 square foot lots will alter the area for
existing Grapevine residents.
We'd also like the Council to ensure the non -developable land adjacent to the proposed
development be turned into a nature habitat that makes Grapevine proud. It's one of the last
remaining habitats for the deer, coyotes and other wildlife that call Lake Grapevine home.
Regards,
Larissa and Jonathan Wall
Susan Batte
From: LuAnn Chapman <hallsdrystorage@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 9:58 AM
To: Susan Batte
Subject: Lonesome Dove project
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE USE CAUTION BEFORE CLICKING LINKS
AND/OR OPENING ATTACHMENTS ***
We have been notified that a zoning change has been requested on property located near our storage facility.
Although we are not against development in the area, that number of homes would cause additional traffic
congestion, increased drainage issues and adversely affect the property values.
We would request that the Zoning change be denied. Thank you for your time.
LuAnn Chapman Gatts, Director
Hall's Dry Storage, Inc
2585 Lonesome Dove Rd.
Grapevine, TX 76051
214-808-2168
File #: Z21-05
FERGUSON PLACE
WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM
ON MONDAY, AUGUST 16, 2021
Procedure to Respond:
As Pro ert O ner within 200 feet c
( protest) nd/or (have the fo
subject tract for ( n), I
ng comments)
We
lI' ve pn ( ran e.
lmr—row)
s` fy et q w
- ftpm toe- Z'Mn '-h qv e,tim gnd
i` h {
G�(✓ve 1� pry, eat
wi
�'�✓ems f y
i�► t p c U"' lP d� r�c��ey7�l
Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision:
8j a deo y sib S 6►nve1 C-'� V- 7x �Eo92
Signature: r �`` (Phone No.) 6 4 2 J 8
Printed Name of Sigi gee: a (-u.v (lerl Title:
Telephone: (817)410-3155
Direct questions and mail responses to:
Planning Technician
Department of Development Services
City of Grapevine
P.O. Box 95104
Grapevine, Texas 76099
File #: Z21-05
FERGUSON PLACE
WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM
ON MONDAY, AUGUST 16, 2021
Procedure to Respond:
As (a Prope r within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), 1
�ppsew) rotest) ,Jnd/or (have the following comments)
D�3
Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision:
01-
Signature:
VAOeL
No. �4 q-q01-3O'M�
Printed Nara of Signee: Hr-- t� y ,H q Title:
Telephone: (817)410-3155
Direct questions and mail responses to:
Planning Technician
Department of Development Services
City of Grapevine
P.O. Box 95104
Grapevine, Texas 76099
File #: Z21-05
FERGUSON PLACE
WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM
ON MONDAY, AUGUST 16, 2021
Procedure to Respond:
As (a Property Owner within ect tract) or (an interested citizen), I
(approve) (protest) and/o -have the following commen
Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision:
Signature:
Printed Name of Signee: _ Title: _el
l ,
Telephone: (817)410-3155
Direct questions and mail responses to:
Planning Technician
Department of Development Services
City of Grapevine
P.O. Box 95104
Grapevine; Texas 76099
August 14, 2021
TO.
GRAPEVINE P&Z
FROM:
LAMAR AND PATTI CLARK
3338 Van Zandt Ct.
Lot 11 in Cannon Homestead
SUBJECT:
File # Z21-05
Ferguson Place
Comments
We built our home 18+- years ago. When we bought the lot, I was aware of the 572 Core elevation
designation, but Patti claims she was never aware and always assumed that only one home would be
built behind us. The acreage partial where the proposed Witt Court is to be located was to be one home
which was constructed soon after ours. Mr. Ferguson retained most of the large timber on the entire
tract that is the subject of this zone change. We never imagined that the large home that Mr. Ferguson
built would ever be removed and thus we assumed that the view of his timbered property would be our
back yard view.
Mr. Maykus has provided us with the preliminary site plan which has the cul de sac named Witt Court
coming to the back yard lines of lots 10 and 11 of Cannon Homestead. Lot 12 on Witt Court is
immediately behind our home lot. The building pad for this lot 12 shows to be 10' behind our property
line and would face perpendicular to our home/lot, thus our view from the rear of our home will change
from tree canopies to the left side of the newly constructed home 10 feet from our rear fence.
We acknowledge that the current zoning is R-20 and that the land can be developed for that use. We
are just disappointed that the view we "assumed" would remain will now be much less timbered and
streets and rooftops will be our view.
I have visited with Mr. Maykus, and he has proposed that lot 12 of Witt Court will be deed restricted to a
one-story structure with no windows facing our lot/home. He has also offered to install trees in our
bark yard and modify our irrigation to accommodate growth to create some site barrier to the proposed
development.
Consideration should be given by the City and Mr. Maykus to maximize the legacy tree canopy on the
proposed site. We hope care is given to protect the remaining trees to maximize the chance of survival.
Another concern is that headlights from traffic flow going south on Witt Court will be directly facing lots
10 and 11 in Cannon Homestead as the cul de sac edge adjoins these two lots. Could the cul de sac be
shortened to allow for a bit of green belt (trees remaining) between the end of the cul de sac and the
Cannon Homestead lot lines? Hopefully Mr. Maykus and the City can address some type of
protection/light barrier for this also.
SUMMARY OF CONCERNS/DISAPPOINTMENTS:
➢ Lot sizes in the proposed subdivision are smaller than Cannon Homestead
➢ Our existing home value will no longer possess the current premium for the tree canopy view
➢ Our canopy view changes to house wall and rooftop 10 feet from our fence
➢ Establishing trees in our yard will take a multi -year growth to create barrier
➢ Vehicle traffic lights to our rear yard
➢ Increased noise level compared to now
➢ Assurance that water drainage will not be impaired
Lamar Clark
2
uvoa 3100 3m3s3nni
w1 a�a
'1Orr ''d'3ors v
20[Z 3_B" c" '81'O 26L2 30f6 Y 'SY3 L6L2 3mis Y '�0 BfOB 30f6 Y 'BV7
LIL1153 MOO SILY1S3 3&00 S31�1O 3M0 XOO�00V H3WV J 150 M 3AOO MOS31W
3XOSMOI 0 3SYXd 31WSM B 3SYXd 31g53+.O1 tl 35YNd ty�pl0 T-a-I !Ol
t a30ie cc LBi t xwie tc LBi 1 mov zE wi
W
ul go! SON
I 52
-
sd:d
�.. o�,j gig 9s$
L
0
r
N tN
Z r--.q
Lo
m
U
V
? es
51,
M
oil'_-
N�
HA L: 4=
N®
0
c
August 16, 2021
City of Grapevine,
My name is Jason Gregg, I have lived at 1620 N Gravel Circle for roughly 32 years. In that time, I
have witnessed the exponential growth in the Grapevine/Southlake area. Specifically, two
neighborhoods close in proximity, Lonesome Dove Estates and Cannon Homestead which were
both developed by Kosse Maykus. These two communities have stood the test of time and
continue to this day. Because of this, my wife Lauren and I are in full support of the proposed
neighborhood Ferguson Place. We think it would be a great addition and add to the charm of
our area!
Thank you,
Jason & Lauren Gregg
(817)676-3545
PROPERTY OWNER NOT WITH
THE 200 FOOT OF SUBJECT
PROPERTY
August 16, 21
City f Grapevine
Attn: Planning Department
I am Lloyd Gabreath and I live at 1618 Gravel Circle North and
have since November 1990. I have seen this areas growth with
Lonesome Dove Estates and Cannon Homestead which were
developed by Kosse ivlaykus. The community and our services
have improved and stood the test of time, therefore my family
and I fully support the proposed neighborhood Ferguson Place.
Respectfully,
Lloyd and Drusilla Galbreath
PROPERTY OWNER NOT WITH
THE 200 FOOT OF SUBJECT
PROPERTY
Susan Batte
From:
ROBERT FRYE <rf6540@aol.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, August 17, 2021 12:47 PM
To:
Susan Batte
Subject:
FergusonPlace
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE USE CAUTION BEFORE CLICKING LINKS AND/OR OPENING
ATTACHMENTS ***
Please do not change the density of this land to 1/4 acre lots. They do not fit the community and will over tax the
schools and roads.
Sandra Frye
2120 Steeplewood
Sent from my Whone
pr0� C�
SLL b
Susan Batte
From: P. P. <pamels59@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 1:46 PM
To: Susan Batte
Cc: William D. Tate; Paul Slechta; Sharron Rogers; Leon Leal; Darlene Freed; Chris Coy; Duff
O'Dell
Subject: Question for P&Z Meeting 8/17/21
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE USE CAUTION BEFORE CLICKING LINKS AND/OR OPENING
ATTACHMENTS ***
Good Afternoon Ms. Batte,
I am Pam Parkhill and live at 3420 Ballard Drive, Grapevine 76092.
My question is for the council tomorrow night, in regards to Maykus Homes' Ferguson Place off of Lonesome Dove and
South Gravel Circle.
I watched his presentation to the Southlake committee and am very happy to see a quality development come into
these properties.
My big concern and question is, how will traffic be managed on Lonesome Dove at Dove Road? It doesn't look like you
can have a traffic circle there due to the homes. Lonesome Dove is heavily traveled as it is, especially when
Meadowmere Road is closed due to flooding. The heavy traffic at rush hours, weekend events at Meadowmere Park or
when 114 is backed up will make it impossible to turn left onto Dove from Lonesome Dove. At least a 3-way stop would
be of help.
Please address these concerns at the meeting on August 17th.
Thank you,
Pam Parkhill
pamels59@gmail.com
VRDP� RTC owivr NdT
1
Susan Batte
From: Christy McNew <cmcnew@briggsfreeman.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 1:10 PM
To: Susan Batte
Subject: City council mtg tonight
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE USE CAUTION BEFORE CLICKING LINKS
AND/OR OPENING ATTACHMENTS ***
Good afternoon,
I would like to provide my comment as a CISD parent regarding the vote tonight. I hope the council would
adhere to researching the already overcrowded CISD school system and keep the lots as they are zoned- 1/2
acre lots. If the developer wanted to develop on 1 /4 acres, he has the ability and capability to buy those
properties already zoned in other areas. With 29 homes that would be built, you would have anywhere from 60+
kids added to an already crowded school system. The only reason the developer wants to change the zoning is to
pad his pockets, It in no way benefits the subdivision to allow more homes than what would be allowed as It is
zoned. Developers need to realize zoning is set as a precedent for a reason in cities, to keep the homes at a limit
and subdivisions at a limit for cohesive living in a space. If zoning keeps getting changed, what would be the
purpose of zoning for residential- It is set at s time for a city to maintain green space on lots owned by
homeowners, not to overcrowd. I adamantly oppose the rezoning and would hope the council would oppose It
as well and keep It zoned as the previous council members had It set. Let's learn from those before us and
follow their guidance. Thank you very much.
Thanks, Christy McNew
https://www.trec.texas. gov/sites/default/files/pdf-forms/CN%201-2.pdf
Texas law requires all license holders to provide the Information About Brokerage Services form to prospective clients
Christy McNew
Global Real Estate Advisor
CONCERNED CITIZEN THAT DOES NOT
Briggs Freeman Sotheby's International Realty OWN PROPERTY WITHIN
950 E State Hwy 114 1 Suite 105 1 Southlake, TX 76092 GRAPEVINE
t 817.801.3030 1 c 817.689.5764
cmcnew(cDbriggsfreeman.com
briggsfreeman.com
Briggs Sotheby's
Freeman I INURNATIONAt REALTY
oo0
Susan Batte
From: Stephanie Stewart <stephanie.r.stewart@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 12:36 PM
To: Susan Batte
Subject: Ferguson Place
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE USE CAUTION BEFORE CLICKING LINKS
AND/OR OPENING ATTACHMENTS ***
Hi Susan,
I am a Southlake resident with children at Johnson Elementary School. It has come to my attention that a
developer would like to develop a plot of land that is in Grapevine, but within the JES school boundaries. My
understanding is that the lots will be (on average) less than 10,000 square feet.
I am opposed to this development.
Lots of this size will add a lot of families on a small area of land, all of which feed directly into an overcrowded
elementary school. The school does not have the capacity for these children.
Secondly, we also live on the north side of Southlake. The only way to access the proposed development is by
Dove. Dove and the surrounding streets cannot accommodate the additional cars that would come with so many
houses being developed on a small area of land.
I highly encourage you to veto the proposal as is and only approve if the lot sizes are significantly increased
(which therefore reduces the strain on our schools and roads).
Best regards,
Stephanie Stewart
1210 Ashmoore Court
Southlake, Texas 76092
CONCERNED CITIZEN THAT DOES NOT
OWN PROPERTY WITHIN GRAPEVINE
Susan Batte
From:
Jeannie Hubert <jeannie@huberts.us>
Sent:
Tuesday, August 17, 2021 1:06 PM
To:
Susan Batte
Cc:
Jeannie Hubert
Subject:
Opposition to lot size for Ferguson Place Development
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE USE CAUTION BEFORE CLICKING LINKS AND/OR OPENING
ATTACHMENTS ***
Hello. I wanted to send in my opposition to anything less than at lease 1/2 acre lots for the proposed Maykus home
development for Ferguson Place. There are zoning laws for a reason and we do not need to deviate from them in order
to appease a developer.
Please vote no for anything less than 1/2 acre lots.
Thank you.
Jeannie Hubert
972-898-9996 cell
CONCERNED CITIZEN THAT DOES NOT
OWN PROPERTY WITHIN GRAPEVINE
Susan Batte
From: Todd Harris <Todd@tartansales.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 3:55 PM
To: Susan Batte
Subject: Ferguson Place Development-
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE USE CAUTION BEFORE CLICKING LINKS
AND/OR OPENING ATTACHMENTS ***
Susan,
Please list me as a no vote for high density. We are already over-whelmed with too many changes. My wife has to sit
for almost an hour to simply pick up our daughter from school now. It wasn't this way only a couple years ago, but we
have so much development and ALL was due to these continued changes.
I know you are in Grapevine formally, but these are SL schools and we are getting crushed by over -development and
zoning changes. The roads are not designed for it. if anything happens, we sit in long lines to simply get to the light and
exit the area.
1005 Quail Run Road
Southlake, Texas
(214) 507-0435 phone
I do not know of anyone in our neighborhood for this continued change to allow things not allowed when we invested in
our homes and developed our lives here. It is not fair to us and the notice provisions are pretty poor during a summer
when many people are out or so busy with figuring out new school guidelines or work requirements- they can barely
have a moment. The only people for this are the developer and possibly the city trying to profit by changing the rules
with no real reason than profit.
Please let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks,
Todd Harris
214-638-1685 x101 Dallas
479-254-8500 Arkansas
525 W. Bethel Road
Coppell TX 75019 (Dallas area)
902B South Walton Blvd. Suite 25
Bentonville, AR 72712
CONCERNED CITIZEN THAT DOES NOT
OWN PROPERTY WITHIN GRAPEVINE
http://www.tartansales.com
twitter@tartansales
http://www.linkedin.com/in/tartantoddharris
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain privileged and confidential information for the sole use of the
intended recipients(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
Susan Batte
From: Sarah Steele <steelebiegel@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 3:50 PM
To: Susan Batte
Subject: Ferguson Place Development
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE USE CAUTION BEFORE CLICKING LINKS AND/OR OPENING
ATTACHMENTS ***
Hello Susan,
I understand comments were due to you yesterday — apologies. This has just been brought to my attention that there is
a request for a zoning change for the 13.673 acre parcel currently zoned R-20 north of Dove Road. I understand the
developer wants to change the lot size from .5 acre to .25.
This is really unfortunate, because this request for zoning change would be against the existing zoning laws. My
neighbors bought in this area knowing that there were existing zoning laws.
I live in Southlake, and the reversal of this decision will affect my children as our elementary school is ALREADY over
crowded.
Sincerely,
Sarah Biegel
CONCERNED CITIZEN THAT DOES NOT
OWN PROPERTY WITHIN GRAPEVINE