Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOMA2013-0892g M L t L✓'oy e Gw?M')Z.. 1EY-O.; - Uo'3 MAR 15 201 �r � � DATE OF ISSUANCEAPR 2 2 2013 C ��` �-/�,� PERMIT #. . N C� C f D BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PLEASE PRINT JOB ADDRESS: -"� 5.0 n (it � ',->. (°` 11S SUITE # 3 y" LOT: BLOCK: SUBDIVISION: BUILDING CONTRACTOR (company name): & G l Con S AuL -fua-% SQJ J( C_-1P J � CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS: I` ff�� -C) - 6P c 10 0 5 -7 % ' 7t,t$5 CITY /STATE /ZIP: v� �-��' � PH: # 21 Lf S 0'1 41'-Fax # g %1' z 3' Zt IS- PROPERTY OWNER: SM e- CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS: -LZ; jj5 ceK tat., i 'i 7-0 .0 CITY /STATE /ZIP: "1�-� s' PHONE NUMBER: PROJECT VALUE: $ l (o I O s 0,- FIRE SPRINKLERED? YES ✓ NO DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE DONE: USE OF BUILDING OR STRUCTURE: NAME OF BUSINESS: * *Total Square Footage under roof: 0A ?bo (S - Square Footage of alteration /addition: -2—,(,e 5 �. I hereby certify that plans have been reviewed and the building will be inspected by a certified energy code inspector in accordance with State Law. Plan review and inspection documentation shall be made available to the Building Department (required for new buildings, alterations and additions) ❑ I hereby certify that plans have been submitted to the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation for Accessibility Review. Control Number: (Not required for 1 & 2 family dwellings) hereby certify that an asbestos survey has been conducted for this structure in accordance with the regulatory requirements of the Texas Department of Health. (REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITIONS, ADDITIONS AND OR ALTERATION TO COMMERCIAL AND PUBLIC BUILDINGS) I hereby certify that the foregoing is correct to the best of my knowledge and all work will be performed according to the documents approved by the Building Department and in compliance with the City Of Grapevine Ordinance regulating construction. It is understood that the issuance of this permit does not grant or authorize any violation of any code or ordinance of the City Of evine. I FURTHERMORE UNDERSTAND THAT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT REVIEWED FOR HANDICAPPED CCE SIBILITY BY THE CITY, AND THAT THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL /OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING SUCH APPOVAC FROM THE APPROPRIATE STATE AND OR FEDERAL AGENCY(S). PRINT NAME: btt�� ` rr -6, On, SIGNATURE PH #: 0-11t 50)" o FAX #: EMAIL: � CHECK BOX IF PREFERRED TO BE CONTACTED BY E -MAIL THE FOLLOWING IS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT Construction Type: Permit Valuation: $ Setbacks Approval to Issue Occupancy Group: Fire Sprinkler: YES NO Front: Electrical Division: Building Depth: Left: Plumbing Zoning: C_c— Building Width: Rear: Mechanica Occupancy Load: Right: Plan Review Approval: Date: ,j Building Permit Fee: Site Plan Approval: Date: Plan Review Fee: Fire Department: Date: Lot Drainage Fee: Public Works Department: Date: Sewer Availability Rate: Health Department: Date: Water Availability Rate: Approved for Permit: Date: l Total Fees: Lot Drainage Submitted: Approved: Total Amount Due: G _ MECHANICAL, CITY OF GRAPEVINE ELECTRICALX PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION (PI GAQI= PRIKIT\ FUEL GAS PERMIT # ~ 1� BLDG. PERMIT # r DATE: E , MAY 1 2 v /3 JOB ADDRESS: -� S ITE DESCRIPTION OF WORK: ON -T- PROPERTY OWNER: NTRACTING CO AVY: ADDRESS: ADDRESS-. CITY /STATE /ZIP: C TY / STATE /ZIP: e- c-) r PHONE NUMBER: PHONE NU E TYPE OF OCCUPANCY BUILDING AREA SQ FT PERMIT FEES AMOUNT DUE EACH TRADE I. R -3 1- 749 $ 33.25 SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX 750— 1,199 $ 49.88 TOWNHOUSE, 1,200- 1,500 $ 63.18 NEW CONSTRUCTION & 1,501- 1,750 $ 76.48 ADDITIONS (PER UNIT) 1,751- 2,000 $ 83.13 2,001 - 2,250 $ 89.78 TOTAL SQ.FOOT UNDER 2,251 - 3,000 $ 96.43 ROOF 3,001 - 3,500 $ 103.08 3,501 - 4,000 $ 109.73 $ 4,001 + $ 120.37 EACH TRADE II. A, E, I, R -1 1 - 500 $ 37.00 HOTELS, APARTMENTS, 501 — 100,000 $ 17.50 +.035 PER DRINKING /DINING, 100,001 — 500,000 $ 3,500.00 +.03 SQUARE EDUCATIONAL, ASSEMBLY, 500,001 + $15,000.00 +.02 FOOT $ INSTITUTIONAL alo t'}� EACH TRADE III. B, F, H, M, S, U 1- 500 $ 37.00 OFFICE, RETAIL, WHOLESALE, 501- 50,000 $ 32.00 +.01 PER GARAGES, FACTORIES, 50,001- 100,000 $ 182.00+ .007 SQUARE WORKSHOPS, SERVICE 100,001+ $ 582.00+.003 FOOT $ STATIONS, WAREHOUSE CONTRACT EACH TRADE IV. ANY OCCUPANCY GROUP VALUATION OF WORK FINISH -OUTS, SHELL COMPLETIONS, 0- 500 $ 37.00 ALTERATIONS OR 501- 1,500 $ 45.00 STAND ALONE PERMITS 1,501- 3,000 $ 57.00 3,001- 5,000 $ 72.00 CONTRACT VALUATION OF WORK: 5,001- 50,000 50,001- 100,000 $ 27.00+.009 $ 127.00+ .007 PER l en S $ �` 100,001- 500,000 500,001+ $ 327.00+ .005 TVALUATI DOLLAR $ 1,327.00+.003 ON $ V. MISCELLANEOUS EACH TRADE � I IRRIGATION SYSTEMS $ 37.00 MOBILE HOME SERVICE $ 37.00 TEMPORARY POLE SERVICE $ 37.00 SWIMMING POOLS $ 37.00 SIGN ELECTRIC $ 37.00 $ OAFORMSMS APPLICATIONS - FEES \MEP APPLICATION 4- 11.doc 113 As PLAN SUBMITTAL: WHEN PLANS ARE REQUIRED BY CODES, ORDINANCES, OR AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THREE (3) SETS OF PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN HARD COPY FORMAT. ENGINEER SEALED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED AS REQUIRED BY CODES, ORDINANCES OR WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES: • INSPECTIONS OUTSIDE NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS (2HR MINIMUM ) ............................ ...................$42.00 /HOUR* • REINSPECTION FEES ................................................................................... ............................... $42.00 • PERMITS FOR WHICH NO FEE IS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED ............................ ............................... $37.00 • INSPECTIONS FOR WHICH NO FEE IS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED (1/2 HOUR MINIMUM) .. ....................$42.00 /HOUR • ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW REQUIRED BY CHANGES, ADDITIONS, OR REVISIONS TO APPROVEDPLANS .................................................................... ............................... ....................$42.00 /HOUR • BUILDING PERMIT FEES FOR THE GRAPEVINE - COLLEYVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT SHALL BE 25% OF THE FEES ESTABLISHED IN THIS TABLE • FOR USE OF OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS FOR PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTIONS, OR BOTH......... ACTUAL COSTS ** I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND ALL WORK WILL BE PERFORMED ACCORDING TO THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE CODES REGULATING CONSTRUCTION. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT GRANT OR AUTHORIZE ANY VIOLATION OF ANY CODE OR ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT ALL WORK THAT IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH ANY FEDERAL, STATE, AND / OR LOCAL LAW REGARDING ENERGY CONSERVATION WILL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THOSE LAWS, A AT VERIFICATION OF ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY UPON REQUEST. 11"R i Cam(- §(3NATuRE OF CON RACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT PRINTED NAME (OR HOMEOWNER FOR HOMEOWNERS PERMITS) PHONE #: 1 � t?� l EMAIL: � �, *OR THE TOTAL HOURLY COST TO THE JURISDICTION WHICHEVER IS GREATER. * *ACTUAL COSTS INCLUDE ADMINISTRATIVE AND OVERHEAD COSTS. CITY OF GRAPEVINE, BUILDING INSPECTIONS, P. O. BOX 95104, GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 18171 �,�uvi ncvro��. iwv �r�o, c/V 1, rlUI O /Vtl, I Ifuy. 4/l I WFORMSMS APPLICATIONS • FEES \MEP APPLICATION 4- 11.doc - CITY OF GRAPEVINE lMECHANICAL ELECTRICAL PLUMBING ` °< FUEL GAS PERMIT APPLICATION (PLEASE PRINT) PERMIT# J, JJ� BLDG. PERMIT# i N n DATE:+ZZ- APR 2 JOB ADDRESS: ��� e Q s .� SUITE # DESCRIPTION OF WORK: V� PROPERTY OWNER: G CONTRACTING COMPANY: ADDRESS: ADDRESS: 0, CITY /STATE /ZIP: CITY /STATE /ZIP: PHONE NUMBER: PHONE NUMBER: n TYPE OF OCCUPANCY BUILDING AREA (SO FT PERMIT FEES AMOUNT DUE EACH TRADE I. R -3 1— 749 $ 33.25 SINGLE FAMILY,. DUPLEX 750— 1,199 $ 49.88 TOWNHOUSE, 1,200— 1,500 $ 63.18 NEW CONSTRUCTION & 1,501— 1,750 $ 76.48 ADDITIONS (PER UNIT) 1,751— 2,000 $ 83.13 2,001 — 2,250 $ 89.78 TOTAL SQ.FOOT UNDER 2,251— 3,000 $ 96.43 ROOF 3,001— 3,500 $ 103.08 3,501 — 4,000 $ 109.73 $ 4,001 + $ 120.37 EACH TRADE II. A, E, I, R -1 1 — 500 $ 37.00 HOTELS, APARTMENTS, 501 — 100,000 $ 17.50 +.035 PER DRINKING /DINING, 100,001 — 500,000 $ 3,500.00 +.03 SQUARE EDUCATIONAL, ASSEMBLY, 500,001 + $15,000.00 +.02 FOOT $ INSTITUTIONAL EACH TRADE III. B, F, H, M,S,U 1— 500 $ 37.00 OFFICE, RETAIL, WHOLESALE, 501— 50,000 $ 32.00+.01 PER 1 GARAGES, FACTORIES, 50,001— 100,000 $ 182.00+ .007 SQUARE WORKSHOPS, SERVICE 100,001+ $ 582.00+.003 FOOT $ STATIONS, WAREHOUSE CONTRACT EACH TRADE IV. ANY OCCUPANCY GROUP VALUATION OF WORK FINISH —OUTS, SHELL COMPLETIONS, 0— 500 $ 37.00 ALTERATIONS OR 501— 1,500 $ 45.00 STAND ALONE PERMITS 1,501— 3,000 $ 57.00 CONTRACT VALUATION OF WORK: 3,001— 5,000 5,001— 50,000 $ 72.00 $ 27.00+.009 C C7� C 50,001— 100,000 $ 127.00+ .007 PER $ o� 100,001— 500,000 500,001+ $ 327.00+ .005 DOLLAR $ 1,327.00 +.003 TVALUATI ON $ V. MISCELLANEOUS EACH TRADE ry�� (� IRRIGATION SYSTEMS $ 37.00 MOBILE HOME SERVICE $ 37.00 TEMPORARY POLE SERVICE $ 37.00 SWIMMING POOLS $ 37.00 SIGN ELECTRIC $ 37.00 $ O: \FORMS \DS APPLICATIONS - FEES \MEP APPLICATION 4.11.doc ?013 fi) I- w v_l PLAN SUBMITTAL: WHEN PLANS ARE REQUIRED BY CODES, ORDINANCES, OR AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THREE (3) SETS OF PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN HARD COPY FORMAT. ENGINEER SEALED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED AS REQUIRED BY CODES, ORDINANCES OR WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES: INSPECTIONS OUTSIDE NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS (2HR MINIMUM ) ............................ ...................$42.00 /HOUR" REINSPECTIONFEES ................................................................................... ............................... $42.00 PERMITS FOR WHICH NO FEE IS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED ............................ ............................... $37.00 INSPECTIONS FOR WHICH NO FEE IS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED (1/2 HOUR MINIMUM ) ......................$42.00 /HOUR • ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW REQUIRED BY CHANGES, ADDITIONS, OR REVISIONS TO APPROVEDPLANS .................................................................... ............................... ....................$42.00 /HOUR • BUILDING PERMIT FEES FOR THE GRAPEVINE- COLLEYVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT SHALL BE 25% OF THE FEES ESTABLISHED IN THIS TABLE FOR USE OF OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS FOR PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTIONS, OR BOTH......... ACTUAL COSTS'- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND ALL WORK WILL BE PERFORMED ACCORDING TO THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE CODES REGULATING CONSTRUCTION. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT GRANT OR AUTHORIZE ANY VIOLATION OF ANY CODE OR ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT ALL WORK THAT IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH ANY FEDERAL, STATE, AND / OR LOCAL LAW REGARDING ENERGY CONSERVATION WILL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THOSE LAWS, AND THAT VERIFICATION OF ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY UPON REQUEST. F CON CTOR ORIZED AGENT P T D NAM (OR HOMEOWNER FO OWNERS PERMITS) PHONE #: M �j ` `" EMAIL: *OR THE TOTAL HOURLY COST TO THE JURISDICTION WHICHEVER IS GREATER. * *ACTUAL COSTS INCLUDE ADMINISTRATIVE AND OVERHEAD COSTS. CITY OF GRAPEVINE, BUILDING INSPECTIONS, P. O. BOX 95104, GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 (817) 410 -316 6/21/01 REVISED: 10/01, 5/06, 2/07, 7/07, 8109, 11/09, 4111 O: \FORMS \DS APPLICATIONS - FEES \MEP APPLICATION 4- 11.doc CITY OF GRAPEVINE PWS 1Q#r 2200013 WATER CUSTOMER SERVICE INSPECTION CERTIFICATION DATE: y ` Y l�- BUILDING !b ��'�� ADDRESS: SWIMMING POOL �/ =�(i�� 4 IRRIGATION PERMIT #: 1�.� �� I PLUMBING I hereby certify that I have inspected the water supply system at the above referenced address. To the best of my knowledge, the materials and methods used in the installation of this system comply with the plumbing code adopted by the City of Grapevine. Plumbing code is located in Chapter 7, Article VIII, (Ordinance number 92 -17), and Chapter 7, Article V, (Ordinance number 01 -93). In addition, to the best of my knowledge, no cross connection exists at this address at the time of inspection. SIGNATURE OF INSPLCtOR LIC 7SE NUMBER TITLE INSPECTOR DATE OAforms \waterservinsp, 0501 08/03 v -"`- CITY OF GRAPEVINE MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL PLUMBING FUEL GAS PERMIT APPLICATION PERMIT / � p � 0 BLDG. PERMIT# UITE # JOB ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF WOR J "' r�l. ✓ J N �lNs.7 PROPERTY OWNER: E: W rJ'"IY 4 ri6{. 'G'��„'1�✓' �Ll✓ CO C NG CO ANY ADDRESS:�- D CITY /STATE /ZIP: CITY1 � . 7� PHONE NUMBER: PHONE NUMB TYPE OF OCCUPANCY BUILDING AREA SQ FT) PERMIT FEES AMOUNT DUE L R -3 SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE, NEW CONSTRUCTION & ADDITIONS (PER UNIT) TOTAL SQ.FOOT UNDER ROOF 1 - 749 750- 1,199 1,200- 1,500 1,501- 1,750 1,751 - 2,000 2,001 - 2,250 2,251 - 3,000 3,001- 3,500 3,501 - 4,000 4,001 + $ 33.25 $ 49.88 $ 63.18 $ 76.48 $ 83.13 $ 89.78 $ 96.43 $ 103.08 $ 109.73 $ 120.37 II. A, E, I, R -1 HOTELS, APARTMENTS, 1 - 500 $ 37.00 501 - 100,000 $ 17.50 +.035 PER DRINKING /DINING, 100,001 - 500,000 $ 3,500.00 +.03 SQUARE EDUCATIONAL, ASSEMBLY, 500,001 + $15,000.00 +.02 FOOT $ INSTITUTIONAL III. B, F, H, M,S,U OFFICE, RETAIL, WHOLESALE, GARAGES, FACTORIES, WORKSHOPS, SERVICE STATIONS, WAREHOUSE IV. ANY OCCUPANCY GROUP FINISH -OUTS, SHELL COMPLETIONS, ALTERATIONS OR STAND ALONE PERMITS CONTRACT VALUATION OF WORK: $ %5 V 'd© V. MISCELLANEOUS IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MOBILE HOME SERVICE TEMPORARY POLE SERVICE SWIMMING POOLS SIGN ELECTRIC 1 - 500 501- 50,000 50,001- 100,000 100,001+ VALUATION OF WORK 0- 500 501- 1,500 1,501- 3,000 3,001- .5,000 5,001- 50,000 50,001 - 100,000 100,001- 500,000 500.001+ OVORMSMS APPLICATIONS - FEESWEP APPLICATION 4 -11.d. $ 37.00 $ 32.00+ .01 PER $ 182.00+.007 SQUARE $ 582.00+.003 J FOOT $ 37.00 $ 45.00 $ 57.00 $ 72.00 $ 27.00+.009 $ 127.00+.007 PER $ 327.00+ .005 DOLLAR $ 1,327.00+.003 IVALUATION $ 37.00 $ 37.00 $ 37.00 $ 37.00 $ 37.00 I-- U/, $ o'b' � E( PLAN SUBMITTAL: WHEN PLANS ARE REQUIRED BY CODES, ORDINANCES, OR AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THREE (3) SETS OF PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN HARD COPY FORMAT. ENGINEER SEALED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED AS REQUIRED BY CODES, ORDINANCES OR WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES: • INSPECTIONS OUTSIDE NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS (2HR MINIMUM ) ....... ........................................ $42.00 /HOUR* • REINSPECTION FEES ................................................................................... ............................... $42.00 • PERMITS FOR WHICH NO FEE IS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED ............................ ............................... $37.00 • INSPECTIONS FOR WHICH NO FEE IS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED (1/2 HOUR MINIMUM) ..... ................. $42.001HOUR • ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW REQUIRED BY CHANGES, ADDITIONS, OR REVISIONS TO APPROVEDPLANS ............................................................... ............................... ....................,....$42.00 /HOUR • BUILDING PERMIT FEES FOR THE GRAPEVINE- COLLEYVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT SHALL BE 25% OF THE FEES ESTABLISHED IN THIS TABLE • FOR USE OF OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS FOR PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTIONS, OR BOTH......... ACTUAL COSTS" I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND ALL WORK WILL BE PERFORMED ACCORDING TO THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE CODES REGULATING CONSTRUCTION. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT GRANT OR AUTHORIZE ANY VIOLATION OF ANY CODE OR ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT ALL WORK THAT IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH ANY FEDERAL, STATE, AND 1 OR LOCAL REGARDING ENERGY CONSERVATION WILL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THOSE LAWS, AND PlAT YERIFICATION OF FNERGY CODE�COMPLIANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY UPON REQUEST. OWNER FOR HOMEOWNERS L AGENT PRINTED NAME *OR THE TOTAL HOURLY COST TO THE JURISDICTION WHICHEVER IS GREATER. "ACTUAL COSTS INCLUDE ADMINISTRATIVE AND OVERHEAD COSTS. CITY OF GRAPEVINE, BUILDING INSI OAFORMSIOS APPLICATIONS - FEESIMEP APPLICATION 4.1 t.doc 95104, (817) 410 -3165 lJ 2009 IECC COMcheck Software Version 3.8.2 Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Section 1: Project Information Project Type: New Construction Project Title: Snap On Tools Construction Site: 3500 William D Tate Ave. Suite #300 Grapevine, TX 76051 Owner /Agent: Designer /Contractor: Rick Quade Richmond Service Inc. 100 Vinson St. Arlington, TX 76010 (817) 261 -2038 Section 2: Interior Lighting and Power Calculation A B C D Area Category Floor Area Allowed Allowed Watts (ft2) Watts / ft2 (B x C) Office 2656 1 2656 Total Allowed Wafts = 2656 Section 3: Interior Lighting Fixture Schedule A B C D E Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast Lamps/ # of Fixture (C X D) Fixture Fixtures Watt. X4`012 $s9: , .. Linear Fluorescent 1: Type R: 2X4 / 48" T8 32W / Electronic 3 16 95 1520 Linear Fluorescent 2: Type B: 2X2 / 48" T8 32W (Super T8) / Electronic 2 13 54 702 Compact Fluorescent 1: Type C: Down light / Triple 4 -pin 32W / Electronic 1 12 35 420 Total Proposed Watts = 2642 Section 4: Requirements Checklist Lighting Wattage: E] 1. Total proposed watts must be less than or equal to total allowed watts. Allowed Watts Proposed Watts Complies 2656 2642 YES Controls, Switching, and Wiring: L] 2. Daylight zones under skylights more than 15 feet from the perimeter have lighting controls separate from daylight zones adjacent to vertical fenestration. Cj 3. Daylight zones have individual lighting controls independent from that of the general area lighting. Exceptions: Contiguous daylight zones spanning no more than two orientations are allowed to be controlled by a single controlling device. Daylight spaces enclosed by walls or ceiling height partitions and containing two or fewer light fixtures are not required to have a separate switch for general area lighting. L:] 4. Independent controls for each space (switch /occupancy sensor). Project Title: Snap On Tools Report date: 03/15113 Data filename: Untitled.ock Page 1 of 2 MAC 15 2013 Exceptions: p Areas designated as security or emergency areas that must be continuously illuminated. E] Lighting in stairways or corridors that are elements of the means of egress. O 5. Master switch at entry to hotel/motel guest room. L3 6. Individual dwelling units separately metered. L] 7. Medical task lighting or art/history display lighting claimed to be exempt from compliance has a control device independent of the control of the nonexempt lighting. ❑ 8. Each space required to have a manual control also allows for reducing the connected lighting load by at least 50 percent by either controlling all luminaires, dual switching of alternate rows of luminaires, alternate luminaires, or alternate lamps, switching the middle lamp luminaires independently of other lamps, or switching each luminaire or each lamp. Exceptions: ❑ Only one luminaire in space. p An occupant- sensing device controls the area. ❑ The area is a corridor, storeroom, restroom, public lobby or sleeping unit. p Areas that use less than 0.6 Watts /sq.ft. Ij 9. Automatic lighting shutoff control in buildings larger than 5,000 sq.ft. Exceptions: EJ Sleeping units, patient pre areas; and spaces where automatic shutoff would endanger safety or security. 10. Photocell /astronomical time switch on exterior lights. Exceptions: Lighting intended for 24 hour use. ❑ 11.Tandem wired one -lamp and three -lamp ballasted luminaires (No single -lamp ballasts). Exceptions: p Electronic high - frequency ballasts; Luminaires on emergency circuits or with no available pair. intee+i+t#rUgWing PlliaSES: three, A Lw— ..— .......__�. —e c n�. .', .... Section 5: Compliance Statement Compliance Statement The proposed lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed lighting system has been designed to meet the 2009 IECC uirements in COMcheck Version 3.8.2 and to comply with the atory requirements in the Requirements Checklist. Name - Tide ignature VD./ Project Title: Snap On Tools Report date: 03/15/13 Data filename: Untitled.cck Page 2 of 2 ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT WESTERN OAKS CENTRE 3500 WILLIAM D. TATE AVENUE, SUITE 300 GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 Prepared For: Mr. Bret Messer SCM Real Estate Services 255 N. Center Street, Suite 200 Arlington, Texas 76011 Prepared By: Resource Environmental Consulting, Inc. 1431 Greenway Drive, Suite 800 Irving, Texas 75038 (972) 385 -4535 Phone (972) 385 -7161 Facsimile March 5, 2013 REC Project No.: 13145 MAR 15 2013 ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT CONDUCTED ON: WESTERN OAKS CENTRE 3500 WILLIAM D. TATE AVENUE, SUITE 300 GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 CONDUCTED FOR: MR. BRET MESSER SCM REAL ESTATE SERVICES 255 N. CENTER STREET, SUITE 200 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 ISSUE DATE: MARCH 5, 2013 Dyana M. Lee President Signature TDSHS Licensed Asbestos Consultant (No. 10 -5341) PREPARED BY: Resource Environmental Consulting, Inc. 1431 Greenway Drive, Suite 800 Irving, Texas 75038 (972) 3854535 Phone (972) 385 -7161 Facsimile TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................. ............................... 1 2.0 OBJECTIVES ..................................... ............................... 1 2.1 Scope of Work ........................... ............................... 1 2.2 Limitations of Study ...................... ............................... 1 3.0 ASBESTOS REGULATIONS ........................ ............................... 2 4.0 SUITE DESCRIPTION ............................. ............................... 2 5.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION PROCEDURES .............. ............................... 2 6.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS METHODS .............. ............................... 3 7.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS ........................... ............................... 3 8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......... ............................... 4 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A LIMITATIONS APPENDIX B CONSULTANT LICENSES APPENDIX C LABORATORY REPORT & LICENSE ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT WESTERN OAKS CENTRE 3500 WILLIAM D. TATE AVENUE, SUITE 300 GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 1.0 INTRODUCTION On March 1, 2013, Resource Environmental Consulting, Inc. (REC) conducted an asbestos survey of the office suite #300 located at 3500 William D. Tate Avenue in Grapevine, Texas. The asbestos survey was conducted by Ms. Lee is a Texas Department of State Health Services ( TDSHS) licensed Asbestos Consultant (License No. 10- 5341). Twenty -four (24) samples of suspected asbestos - containing materials (ACM) were collected at the facility and submitted to a TDSHS licensed laboratory for analysis. The following sections discuss the sample collection procedures, laboratory analysis methods, analytical results and recommendations. 2.0 OBJECTIVES REC's scope of work and limitations for conducting the asbestos survey are discussed in the following sections. 2.1 Scone of Work The objective of the asbestos survey was to identify and collect bulk samples of suspected ACM at the subject site for laboratory analysis of asbestos content. The survey was limited to visible and accessible materials. No exterior building materials were sampled and destructive sampling techniques for collection of suspected ACM in inaccessible locations (such as wall cavities) was not conducted. The scope of work was conducted in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations at the time of the survey. 2.2 Limitations of Stud REC has endeavored to perform the asbestos survey of the site using generally accepted practices and in a manner consistent with the level of care exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either expressed or implied. The asbestos survey of the site included a visual inspection and bulk sample collection of all observed suspect ACM. Regardless of the thoroughness of our survey, it is possible that some materials containing asbestos were inaccessible at the time of the survey. If any material is discovered that was inaccessible at the time of the survey, that material should be sampled and analyzed for asbestos content before being disturbed. This Asbestos Survey Report was prepared for SCM Real Estate Services and is intended for their express purposes only. This report should not be relied upon or made use of by any parties other than SCM Real Estate Services. The findings of this report are representative of conditions encountered at the subject property on the date of this evaluation and may not represent conditions at a later date. SCM Real Estate Services March 5, 2013 REC Project No.: 13145 Page 2 Additional limitations are presented in Appendix A. 3.0 ASBESTOS REGULATIONS The Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAC Title 25, Part 1, Chapter 295.31- 295.73) was established as a means of control and minimization of exposure to airborne asbestos fibers in all public buildings. The regulations require that a minimum of three (3) samples of all interior suspect asbestos - containing building materials be collected for laboratory analysis to confirm or rebut the presence of asbestos prior to any renovation or demolition activity. The EPA National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M) apply to the owner or operator of a demolition or renovation activity and is applicable to all public buildings and structures, including both interior and exterior building materials. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (29 CFR 1926.1101) applies to all construction work where an employee maybe occupationally exposed to asbestos. These regulations are applicable in any type of public building or structure. This regulation is known as the OSHA worker protection rules for asbestos and requires all employers to have their employees trained in asbestos hazards and medically monitored for asbestos exposure. The entity which governs the state asbestos program is the following: Texas Department of State Health Services Asbestos Programs Branch 8407 Wall Street Austin, Texas 78754 (512) 834 -6787 4.0 SUITE DESCRIPTION The subject suite is approximately 16,000 ft. The suite is finished with sheetrock walls and has no finished flooring or ceiling materials. The pipes and HVAC ducts are fiberglass wrapped. The space was unoccupied at the time of the survey. 5.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION PROCEDURES The suite was surveyed to determine the presence, location, and condition of ACM. The areas inspected during the survey were generally limited to the accessible portions of the suite. A minimum of three (3) samples were collected of suspect building materials, as required by the Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules. SCM Real Estate Services March 5, 2013 REC Project No.: 13145 Page 3 The number and location of samples collected was based on the type of material, the manner application, and the homogeneity of the ACM (similarity of color, texture, and type). A discrete sample of each suspect ACM was obtained and placed into an individual sample container. The sample location was noted on the field survey form and assigned an individual laboratory identification number. This number was affixed to the sample container as the sample was collected. A copy of the asbestos consultant agency and inspector's license is included in Appendix B. 6.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS METHODS The suspected ACM samples were analyzed for asbestos content by Steve Moody Micro Services, Inc. of Farmers Branch, Texas, a TDSHS licensed Asbestos Laboratory (License No. 30- 0084). The samples were analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), in conjunction with dispersion staining techniques as outlined in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method (600/R- 93/116). The bulk asbestos laboratory analysis report provided the percentage of asbestos, asbestos type, and identification of other non- asbestos fibers and associated percentages. The laboratory report and license is presented in Appendix C. 7.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Bulk samples of materials that analytical test results indicate are greater than 1 % asbestos are considered by regulatory standards to be ACM. A summary of the laboratory results of the sampled suspect asbestos - containing materials are discussed below: Homogeneous Sample Numbers Material Description /Location )Friable/ Non- Friable Asbestos Content 1,2,3 2' x 4' suspended ceiling tile Friable None Detected 4,5,6 cove base mastic Non - Friable None Detected 7,8,9 ceramic floor tile mortar Non - Friable None Detected 10,11,12 yellow carpet mastic Non - Friable None Detected 13,14,15 white HVAC mastic Non - Friable None Detected 16,17,18 sheetrock wall texture /joint compound; northwest area Non - Friable None Detected 19,20,21 sheetrock wall texture /joint compound; northeast area Non - Friable None Detected 22,23,24 sheetrock wall texture /joint compound; south end Non- Friable None Detected SCM Real Estate Services March 5, 2013 REC Project No.: 13145 Page 4 8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS On March 1, 2013, REC President, Ms. Dyana M. Lee, a TDSHS Licensed Asbestos Consultant (No. 10- 5341) conducted an asbestos survey of the office suite #300 located at 3500 William D. Tate Avenue in Grapevine, Texas. The survey meets the requirement of the Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules prior to renovations in the suite. The survey did not identify any asbestos - containing materials, therefore no further action is required prior to renovation activities in the suite. A copy of this survey should be presented to the City of Grapevine for issuance of a renovation permit. APPENDIX A LIMITATIONS RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC. ASBESTOS SURVEY LIMITATIONS Resource Environmental Consulting, Inc. (REC) has performed our professional services using the degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised by qualified professionals performing the same type of asbestos survey services at the same time under similar conditions in the same or similar locality. REC warrants that its services are of good quality and in conformance with applicable state and federal regulations at the time of the survey. The standard of care and warranty are in lieu of all other standards and warranties either expressed or implied. The observations described in this report were made under the conditions stated therein. The conclusions presented in the report were based solely upon the services described therein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of described services. 3. In the event that Client obtains information on suspected asbestos containing materials (ACM) at the site not contained in this report, such information shall be brought to RFC's attention forthwith. REC will evaluate such information and, on the basis of this evaluation, may modify the conclusions stated in this report. Observations were made of the structures on the site as indicated within the report. Where access to portions of the structures on the site was limited, since destructive sampling procedures were not employed, REC renders no opinion as to the presence of suspected ACM in that portion of the structures. 5. As noted within the text of the report, independent quantitative laboratory testing of bulk samples for asbestos content was performed as part of the site survey. The analyses have been conducted by an outside laboratory, therefore, REC has relied upon the data provided and has not conducted an independent evaluation of the reliability of these data. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based in part upon the results of the laboratory testing and are contingent upon their validity. The test results have been reviewed and interpretations made in the report. Should additional testing of suspected ACM become available in the future, these data should be reviewed by REC and the conclusions and recommendations presented herein modified accordingly. APPENDIX B CONSULTANT LICENSES V) W U O coo fry vti LS Z' ti 4.0 1A W5 �4j > 4 toll LLI I 20clCD tr) 011 z � 10 4 LLJ —i co I w LL z z 0 z a ui w ui LL Texas Department of State Health Services Asbestos Individual Consultant DYANA M LEE License No. 105341 Control No. 96271 Expiration Date: 112812014 APPENDIX C LABORATORY REPORT & LICENSE PLM Summary Report Steve Moody Micro Services, LLC NVLAP Lab Code 102056 -0 2051 Valley View Lane TDSHS License No. 30 -0084 Farmers Branch, TX 75234 Phone: (972) 241 -8460 Client : Resource Environmental Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: 1313-02377 Project : 3500 William D. Tate, Suite 300, Grapevine Report Date : 03/04/2013 Project # : 13145 Sample Date: 3/1/2013 Identification: Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method: Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 / R -93 / 116 Page 1 of 2 On 3/2/2013, twenty four (24) bulk material samples were submitted by Dyana Lee of Resource Environmental Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content 1 2'x 4' Suspended Ceiling Tile None Detected - Acoustic Tile 2 2'x 4' Suspended Ceiling Tile None Detected - Acoustic Tile 3 2'x 4' Suspended Ceiling Tile None Detected - Acoustic Tile 4 Cove Base Mastic None Detected - Cream Mastic 5 Cove Base Mastic None Detected - Cream Mastic 6 Cove Base Mastic None Detected - Cream Mastic 7 Ceramic Tile Mortar None Detected - Mortar 8 Ceramic Tile Mortar None Detected - Mortar 9 Ceramic Tile Mortar None Detected - Mortar 10 Mastic (Yellow, Carpet) None Detected - Yellow Mastic 11 Mastic (Yellow, Carpet) None Detected - Yellow Mastic 12 Mastic (Yellow, Carpet) None Detected - Yellow Mastic 13 HVAC Duct Mastic (White) None Detected - White Mastic 14 HVAC Duct Mastic (White) None Detected - White Mastic 15 HVAC Duct Mastic (White) None Detected - White Mastic 16 Sheetrock Wall Texture / Joint Compound, Northwest None Detected - Joint Compound Corner Suite None Detected - Texture 17 Sheetrock Wall Texture / Joint Compound, Northwest None Detected - Drywall Material Corner Suite None Detected - Texture / Joint Cmpd 18 Sheetrock Wall Texture / Joint Compound, Northwest None Detected - Drywall Material Corner Suite None Detected - Texture / Joint Cmpd 19 Sheetrock Wall Texture / Joint Compound, Northeast None Detected - Drywall Material Corner Suite None Detected - Texture / Joint Cmpd PLM Summary Report Steve Moody Micro Services, LLC NVLAP Lab Code 102056 -0 2051 Valley View Lane TDSHS License No. 30 -0084 Farmers Branch, TX 75234 Phone: (972) 241 -8460 Client : Resource Environmental Consulting, Inc. Lab Job No.: 13B -02377 Project : 3500 William D. Tate, Suite 300, Grapevine Report Date: 03/04/2013 Project # : 13145 Sample Date: 3/1/2013 Identification : Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Test Method : Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 / R -93 / 116 Page 2 of 2 On 3/2/2013, twenty four (24) bulk material samples were submitted by Dyana Lee of Resource Environmental Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content 20 Sheetrock Wall Texture / Joint Compound, Northeast None Detected - Drywall Material Corner Suite None Detected - Texture / Joint Cmpd 21 Sheetrock Wall Texture / Joint Compound, Northeast None Detected - Drywall Material Corner Suite None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture 22 Sheetrock Wall Texture / Joint Compound, South Corner None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture 23 Sheetrock Wall Texture / Joint Compound, South Corner None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Texture / Joint Cmpd 24 Sheetrock Wall Texture / Joint Compound, South Corner None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture These samples were analyzed by layers. Quantification, unless otherwise noted, is performed by calibrated visual M7 estimate. The test report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The results 1 {� relate only to the items tested. These test results do not imply endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. (fl� Government. Accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis #10205 0 under Lab Code 102056 -0. Analyst(s): Kirsten Tye Lab Manager: Bruce Crabb Approved Signatory: Lab Director: Steve Moody Approved Signatory: — — Thank you for choosing Steve Moody Micro Services — — — — — Wil JWA# yA con nw Myd 4y }Yri > -It roll z L4 uj LL (o z 0 z a ul x LU 0 City of Grapevine Building Inspection Department Plan Review Comments P.O. Box 95104 Phone: (817) 410 -3129 Grapevine, Texas 76051 Fax: (817) 410 -3536 NAME OF PROJECT: SNAP ON TOOLS ADDRESS: 3500 WILLIAM D TATE AVE #300 PLANS EXAMINER: ALLEN HUNT NUMBER OF STORIES: 1 TOTAL SQ. FT: 2,656 ZONING: CC OCUPANCY: B OCCUPANT LOAD: 73 FIRE SPRINKLED: YES COMMENTS: EXITS REQUIRED: 2 CU: NA 1. ALL EGRESS DOORS ARE TO BE OPENABLE FROM DIRECTION OF EGRESS WITHOUT THE USE OF KEY, SPECIAL EFFORT OR KNOWLEDGE. 2. MAUNUALLY OPERATED FLUSH BOLTS OR SURFACE BOLTS ARE NOT PERMITTED. 3. PROJECT SHALL BE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE 2009 IECC. VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY BY A CERTIFIED ENERGY CODE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING FINAL APPROVAL OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 4. ALL CHANGES FROM THE CITY APPROVED PLANS WILL REQUIRE REVISED PLANS SUBMITTED AND ADDITIONAL FEES DUE. 5. COORDINATE ALL FIRE ALARM, SMOKE EVACUATION, AND / OR SPRINKLER SYSTEM PLANS, APPROVALS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE FIRE MARSHALL AND REED ENGINEERING. 6. PLANS THAT EXCEED 10 SHEETS WILL REQUIRE THAT ONE SET BE BOLTED. 7. DEMO INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. DEMO ELECTRICAL BACK TO PANEL OR LIVE J -BOX TO BE USED FOR FUTURE CIRCUITS. DEMO MECHANICAL BACK TO PLENUMS OR COMPLETELY. DEMO PLUMBING AT WALLS, FLOORS AND AT ABANDONED HORIZONTAL DRAIN BRANCH TIE IN TO LIVE HORIZONTAL DRAIN TO PREVENT DEAD ENDS FROM OCCURING IN BUILDING DRAIN SYSTEM. 8. PROVIDE ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS IN TRAINING ROOM ABOVE DOORS AS OCCUPANT LOAD EXCEEDS 50. 9. PROVIDE PLUMBING RISER AND PROVIDE TRAP PRIMERS FOR FLOOR DRAINS. PROVIDE ELECTRIC SERVICE DETAIL FOR SUITE AND PANEL SCHDULES AND LOCATIONS. PROVIDE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. IF NEW RTU's TO BE INSTALLED, AN ENGINEER TO ASSESS ROOF LOCATION PLACEMENT FOR LOAD FACTORS ON ROOF SYSTEM. Please review comments and have designers add information and make changes as Needed. Provide 3 new copies of plans; Plan size may not exceed 36 "x 36" in dimension, to city with one set bolted if over 10 pages. APPLICATION RECEIVED: 03/15/13 1ST COMMENTS: 03/18/13 REVISIONS RECEIVED: REVISIONS REVIEWED: PERMIT ISSUED: Allen Hunt - 3500 William D Tate Ave #300 Pa e 1 From: Allen Hunt To: Date: 3/28/2013 12:36 PM Subject: 3500 William D Tate Ave #300 Mr. Hamilton, I apologize for you not receiving this review comment response, we show it was sent out on the 19th. Please review the comments attached with this message and have your designer make changes /additions as needed and we will move this project along as quickly as possible. Thank You, Allen Hunt Plans Examiner / Field Coordinator City of Grapevine 817- 410 -3129