Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 01 - Z11-01 PD11-01 Grapevine Texan Apartments { 1ITEM 2P a 1 4 ,1 a TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR PV MEETING DATE: MARCH 15, 2011 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Z11-01 AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD11-01, GRAPEVINE TEXAN APARTMENTS ; s I I r + Grapevine� Lake CO* APPLICANT: The Miles Foundation I ` I i r I i i 1 I.H.1635 PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: Northwe i The subject property is located at 401 Boyd Drive and is proposed to be platted as Lot 2R, Block 1, W.R. Boyd Center Addition. The addition contains Hatt-Johnson sy3@O Alp-�5 12.35 acres and has approximately 885 feet of ___ frontage along Turner Road and 436 feet of frontage I r � L T along Boyd Drive. Grade Rd. F c REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a zone change to rezone 12.35 acres from "CC" Community Commercial District to "R-MF-2" Multifamily District for the development of a 313 unit apartment complex. The applicant is also requesting a planned development overlay to include but not be limited to deviation from density, front yard setback, building height, landscaping, building length and off-street parking. This request was tabled at the February 15 public hearing to give the applicant an opportunity to revise the request and reduce the number of specific variances from the established ordinance particularly relative to the square footage of the one bedroom apartments proposed. The applicant originally proposed to develop a 319 unit complex that required a planned development overlay with ten specific variances to the zoning ordinance relative to: 0:IZOUIZI1-01.41&PD11-01.41 1 March 10,2011(12:35PM) • Density • Recreational open space • Minimum square footage for one bedroom apartments • Front yard setback • Parking • Building height • Design requirement relative to building length • Landscaping • Building separation .• Design requirement relative to proximity of parking to buildings The request has been revised and redesigned with the end result being the reduction in the amount requested or elimination of several of the variance requests. In total, 313 units are being requested (319 were request in the original submittal) and all structures will continue to be three stories in height with both attached (127 spaces—same for both requests)and detached garage (17 spaces--same for both requests) parking as well as surface parking for the tenants. The main access to the complex will be from Boyd Drive; a secondary point of access is also proposed off of Turner Road. All access into the complex is controlled, gated access. The proposed apartment mix now consists of the following: • 181 one bedroom units, ranging from 751 square feet to 1,010 square feet. The previous request established 187 one bedroom units ranged from 701 to 1,010 square feet with 32 apartments less than 750 square feet. All of the one bedroom apartments now exceed the 750 square foot minimum requirement. • 117 two bedroom units ranging from 1,070 square feet to 1,229 square feet. The previous request established 114 two bedroom units with the same square footage range. • 15 three bedroom units, all which are 1,455 square feet in size. The previous request established 18 three bedroom units with the same unit size. • Average square footage for all units in the revised complex is 968 square feet—the previous design was 963 square feet. The following is a brief summary of those areas within the zoning ordinance in which the project will be noncompliant and the planned development overlay will be used to accommodate the request: • Density: maximum allowed under the conditions set forth in the request is 20 units per acre; requested density is 25.4 units per acre. The previous submittal had a density of 25.9 units per acre. • Front yard setback: minimum front yard setback by ordinance is 40 feet; requested front yard setback established along Boyd Drive is 15 feet. This has remained the same. WZCU\Z11-01.41&PD11-01.41 2 March 10,2011 (12:35PM) • Building height: maximum allowed is two stories not to exceed 35 feet; applicant proposed three stories not to exceed 39 feet. This has remained the same. • Design requirements relative to the length of buildings: ordinance requires a maximum length of any building shall not exceed 200 feet; several building in the original request ranged from 220 to 240 feet in length. The proposed buildings have some elevations that will not exceed 225 feet • No building shall be closer than 15 feet to the edge of any off-street parking or vehicle use area; applicant proposes elimination of this requirement. This has remained the same as the original request • Landscaping requirements: ordinance requires a minimum of fifty percent of the landscaping be placed in the required front yard; due to the reduced depth of the front yard the applicant proposes placing fourteen percent of the landscaping in the front yard area. This has remained the same as the original request. • Parking: minimum required parking is established at 2.5 spaces per dwelling unit; applicant proposes 2 spaces per unit. This has remained the same as the original request The applicant added more recreational open space at the northwest corner of the site and reversed the orientation of building number four such that the courtyard area is open to the west rather that the previous layout that had it open to the east. Slight modifications were made to the lengths of several of the buildings to reduce the size and separation distance between structures. As a result of these changes, three variance requests were completely eliminated from the revised request. • Recreational open space. The minimum allowed is 250 square feet per dwelling unit; the previous request provided 201 square feet per dwelling unit. The addition of more recreational open space near the northwest corner of the site along with the reduction in the number of units brought this area into compliance. • Minimum square footage allowed for a one bedroom unit is 750 square feet; the applicant previously proposed 32 units that would have been 701 square feet in size. The floor plans have been revised and this request has been eliminated • Building separation. Minimum separation between two structures is 20 feet or the height of building whichever is greater, minimum separation when two structures are arranged face-to-face or back-to--back is 50 feet;the applicant had proposed 20 feet separation and 50 feet face-to-face or back-to-back separation. Slight modification to the building design has resulted in minimum separation equal to or greater than the building height: Relative to parking the ordinance requires 2.5 spaces per unit which would result in 783 spaces; the applicant proposes two spaces per unit and has provided 626 spaces. PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned "CC" Community Commercial District and is vacant. 0:1ZCU\Z11-01.41&PQ11-01.41 3 March 10,2011(12:35PM) HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject and surrounding property was zoned "C-2" Community Business District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning when the property was rezoned to"CC"Community Commercial District. The subject property has remained vacant since that time. A conditional use permit(CU98-67)was approved by Council at the February 16, 1999 meeting and allowed for the development of a personal care facility on the subject site butwas never developed. Two conditional use permits (CU97-07 and CU97-69)were considered and approved by Council in February 1997 and January 1998 on the subject site to the west for a boat and recreational vehicle storage facility but was never constructed. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "R-MF-2" Multifamily District—Montelena Apartments SOUTH: "HC" Highway Commercial District—vacant property, Mad Duck Cyclery EAST: "CC" Community Commercial District—vacant, Gaylord remote parking site WEST: "CC"Community Commercial District—Hill School, Shell convenience store gasoline sales AIRPORT IMPACT: The subject tract is located within "Zone A" zone of minimal effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. Few activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in Zone A, except for sound sensitive activities such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The applicant's proposal is an appropriate use in this noise zone. MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Commercial Land Use. The applicant's proposal is not in compliance with the Master Plan. THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION: Neither Turner Road or Boyd Drive are designated thoroughfares as shown on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. /rs O:IZCU%ZI I.01.41&PD11-01.41 4 March 10,2011(12:35PM) Z3 rq O wN 41 07 Y O c a= al to 47 w Cr t N L +, v 4- Q m t'" i wa w 0 c cu OD O 1 al � 4- .Q Q 3 ob a .3 41 � y aT+ bn ti; +un C L -0 V (U t6 a1 O 3 O (g [B O X al vi to N CL O CL N L O ,O "0 to m O U +' 3 c 3 tc s O ~ Q a! p m a) GR O p — 41 L W t± v tU 3 s cD O p U S L Q ca a .p cuU cu d r N u Y LU + s s O c — cc O r1 Ln vn 41 L � a m to W ay � as• � > aOc aii Y c N i N "0 W '. �0 O a m UM "M "M y m 3 -�s ° 3 0 p � s i c -0 m a +� m a — co s o — L N — o ' o m s N@ w 0 m Q Qj 41 N N c 41 a R d N u 00 N ++ u G3 cF = N Y tw 3 %n a " aJ N Q c p L L -0 � ++ 3 41 � � � � : � o ,� > 5 Y CL 41 41 s s O o i CC 4- Z Z 7 4- +, •w tl-- a� d N O s Q T C ++ 3 O s mcc �' Y to aj 3 - v Q Y CS ro y L un N u CL M W m +, LO O 0 O ca N 4W a-+ m s a) c O aJ c O 0 O O Cca0 U cu p � y L O O �, N fa O N d .O N :F., 3 'E W ar Z .r m s -P a� c L p L m 0 a?l ++ p OA aci o 7 N t c t 5 l7 �, o s 3 v o u' O cc x Y 3 T to � � � s � ao � - Q. o a 4; c Ln o ;; -o as a 41 -0 � 4- m W W +°� +,++ O � a) V 6! V (o Q N 41 m = p ro _ - a w C c a) p a3 s L c +� s tr6 y0.. M a) 5 iU p y wc m E o +',., °c° in m o � cu �' a o o +, ra uLnO m +J E v _ - „4 c m c c c c Q W 3 u p ' a X O O 1 T O y Q Q NCL Nto L ` v � O c c cf9i u N X N 41 W Q x cu y � u -6 ..CZ mo L a a CA U ro D y m LfV s 3 3 i c O "6 a+ c �[— t]0 C] w F- s U tv Z a] Q@ f4 O N Z m Ci tf1 fY1 e-I F_ ! W N [_V N N N N [V 111 Ln s 29 Xt R77..5 t6 LUCGU- R-75- � 5 B R-75 F GU 2' 2 3 ,R 1g R 3.5 rye, M VVJJ C t't , 2 5t7j2s�� 1 - 3 R-5'0 B 19 19 15R2 aR �p5� t4516® R-T!! P �g6 1 z 3 � C B B 15 1+ 14 4 R_MF_I DOVE LOOP B 9 1B i 4 15 m 1 s ..a z O $. a 1T (� R-Mf-2 ss +s �{{° 90 22 a 19 00 ;,j ZX6 18.111aQ I` 1TAT6� 31 35 3a '—' 32 31 ,A O 0 1 111�., R�5:0 1R 15 ;19 iR 30F .5u� � 1A� � 18198� �i 1to 3A 8 yyyY 2 .ZS ihC .'� 90 4 4A 3 5 a I tA56O t 4 TR TR III � 30 4ASS59 B s -aB. TR 3" Is° M s48 4�4II�pp zzRl 9 .742 @ `j{ It . .. . . . _ U 3 +A ictl R 1A > Q�s ' 2686 3 .fig 2 c 3p3ti3 65_ 2 2 2 TR 26Bz 36AC 2 AMC 9 ]tom® at 4 s s s 6- 7 B 2111, �1 1A 0 1-41 p s $ i �t6 T e G p@Q R 1R1 BSO� P°.[O .AMC �1 1.47T� 154T 3s," �i16 2 �+ TR 7+ �p a34i ��[� c o 4981 a 2 498 TR4s ° 4 diy�t� 1S4® 1 Gr" 1 rssf [ aoF TSF51L6 r ��Q � TR TR TR O ,R7 ' w� TR OL 1R. 1R n 44A 6 �1I p`�qs + a , 7 5fl s, s1E1 O.4 1$ M z 9 4. s a T s !r. NPTw. $o s 4R SR TR 10 ;& '� _ 4 u- c t x 1 x 3 4 5 B 7 6 t 2 9 � Z �� IA OR j 1R_ 3-4 5 6 7a6 1R 3 4.5 6a7T ` TR. 970121N981-•.� q S t 2 1d T 1tt Taa 1 3 4 rs ,s 14 19 12 n 19 9 B s 4 6 2C as 05 { 5 8 4 5 6 T I g 18 11 ]3{ 5 I � fi7 24 3A Tab i B yit, 81 IR.za Acs'R�,c -sr-� A Q tg 2 S 4 5 6 7 9 pG SAC TR 82 ACAG � A a 5 8 1R ! 9 e 7 g 10 7E 'm 1 r"56 1 N PT 6 Z 01 & PD11 01 1, 0-40016 Grapevine Texan Apartments Zgs � �. "EVE v S �5T E X A S CITY OFGRAPEVINE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION PART 1.APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Name: J1 ,�I 1 kur� q e.. !>ti{ �t�4�7�y. G•"�.I.-r,i/r3 .Prd!jrcci�1. . ... .- t .-4-----..------- Applicant Address: 4;4e- City/State2ip .*Mk 2L _ _.. '7�,- - _.._. _.- _... _ _ ._...__ ------- Phone No. A�.L f� Fax No. Email Address Mobile Phone to a�j e_-fir'—/g4er -`mmcv Applicant's interest in subject property PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property 1r t u Legal Description: Lot Block P Addition Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 112"x 11"sheet Size of subject property: acres /2.3� square footage Present zoning classification Requested zoning district F)94F2 Gi.P ' Present use of property Proposed use of property /4,44iFu4i 7 The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that would allow the proposed use is Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner _At Ada IICQQIi4t ..ic . �l�l�r� �'r 3k�•. '`�Y°� ��J _.m_- Prop Owner Address City/State/zipR. 704rj Phone No. `�+fp. Uc7 xIIZ. Fax No. . JAN � tE All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the descretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda,your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. J6, Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process- ]have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal PART 4.SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ' f_ aa . _..... . . Print Applicant's Name Applicant's Signature The State of County of Before me(notary)rIa on this day personally appeared (applicant) .r known to me(or proved to me on the oath nofrd or other document)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal)Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D. . ........... .. ---------------- = Pam= JUL�E HOLLOWAY '' i= MY COMMISSION EXPIRES �V January 28,2Ci 1 - - _--No and For State of Print Property Owner's Name Property Owner's Signature The State of County of Before me(notary) • on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me(or proved to me on the&�f�car r other document)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal)Given under my hand and sea[of office this day of , ,A.D. ream. JUU HOLLOWAY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Aa _ January 2$,2(3it - 'l Ix .4� Notary In and For State of Lg JAN �ZOi1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ZL All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when riled and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date - Signature of Property Owner Date Fnp � . JAN 4 Z011 By - Ci OVERALL METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION BEING a acre tract of land situated in the A.F. Leonard Survey, Abstract No. 946, City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, and being all of Lot 1R, Block 1, W.R. Boyd Center, an addition to the City of Grapevine as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5478, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas (PRTCT), all of Lot 2, Block 1, W_R. Boyd Center, an addition to the City of Grapevine as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3473 (PRTCT), and all of Lots 3R and 5, W.R. Boyd Center, an addition to the City of Grapevine as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5851 (PRTCT), and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a capped iron rod found at the north end of a corner clip at the intersection of the south line of Turner Road (60' Public Right-of-Way) and the west fine of Boyd Drive (90' Public Right-of-Way) and also being the most northeast corner of said Lot 'I R; THENCE South 45026'18" East along said corner clip, for a distance of 28.31 feet to a capped iron rod found for corner; THENCE South 00020'48" East along said west line of Boyd Drive and the east line of said Lot 1 R and the east line of said Lot 5, for a distance of 903.03 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with plastic cap stamped "SPIARSENG" set for corner; THENCE South 44°33'42" West, along the corner clip of said Boyd Road and East Northwest Highway, for a distance of 28.33 feet to the North Right-of-Way line of said East Northwest Highway, a 1/2 inch iron rod with plastic cap stamped "SPIARSENG" set for corner; THENCE South 89028'12" West, along the north line of said East Northwest Highway and the south line of said lot 5 for a distance of 269.36 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with plastic cap stamped "SPIARSENG" set for corner; THENCE North 00°31'48" West, along the common line of said Lot 5 and Lot 4 for a distance of 222.88 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found for corner; THENCE South 89°28'1.2" West, along the common line between said Lot 4 and Lot 1 R for a distance of 135.00 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found for corner; THENCE, South 00031'48" East, along the common line of said Lot 4 and Lot 3R, for a distance of 222.88 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found for corner in the north line of said East Northwest Highway; THENCE, South 89028'12" Vilest, along the north line of said East Northwest Highway and the south Fine of said Lots 3R and Lot 2 for a distance of 480.94 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found for corner; rJAN 4.2011 GRAPEVINE yT E x A S CITY OFGRAPEVINE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1.APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Name: G cki . r C! 4 � 7� �`1 ..._... 1'._ -f� Applicant Address: ZOO ! la.d G fc City/Sta ql ql Email Address Mobile Phone toJts � �mm _o_ _...___. __-- -_-_._ _---------------___ __ Applicant's interest in subjectproperty PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property 40 k e, Legal Description: Lot Z12- Block Addition d(if2 � 6.1 _.. . ;_- 1------.1............ Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8.1/2"x 11"sheet Size of subject property: acres f2_js`J square footage __w_. r_� �c _..___ _ __.___ __._.- _. ...... Present zoning classification GL Proposed use of propertyl�fi`{ 1 Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from: a 1 "Z. PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner r /��r. .4fi-. :4c.. 4 1417,j 1%,sue6m L? vt��f LDS t Prop Owner Address City/State/Zip Phone No. o' 6: D x112 Fax No. °fn:• 6 � Submit a letter describing the proposed planned development use and note the request on the site plan document Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. �[ in the same letter,describe whether the proposed overlay will,or will not cause substantial harm to the value,use,or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood, Also, describe how the proposed overlay use will add to the value, use or 4 e in the neighborhood: {� The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47,Site Plan Requirements. t �f JAN 4 2011 By- �— — - S�`� t t. •� y All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda,your application may be scheduled to a later date. 10 All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings maybe continued to the next public hearing- Public hearings will not be tabled. Ord Any changes to a site plan(no matter how minor or major)approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. 1 have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4.SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY -41 Irv- ��� Print Applicant's Name Appfcanf's gnature The State of County of Before me(notary) on this day personally appeared (applicant) Ai. ._._ known to me(or proved to me on the oath of cara or other document)to be the.person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D. ��Y°" JULIE HOLLOWAY * MY COMMISSION EXPIRES _.. _ ....................__.._....-.__ ary 2B 2!}11 `��"� Not In and For State off7X_ ---------- a,%-,f 6sA Print Property Owner's Name Pro.perty Owners Signature The State of County of Before me(notary) on this day personally appeared(applicant) 4144 _ - known to me(or proved to me on fhe oath of card other document)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal)Given under my hand and seal of office this} day of A.D. �} JULIE HOLLOWAY J MYCOMM€SSIONBORES s = January 28,20I1 Notary n d For State of � (Y) JAN 42011 i3y ACKNOWLEDGEMENT � All Conditional Use and.Special Use Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or a special use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. i have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or special use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date Signature of Property Owner Date N 424 2011 By A PARKING NEEDS STUDY FOR A PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT IN GRAPEVINE, TEXAS Prepared for: Spiars Engineering, Inc. 765 Custer Road Suite 100 Plano,Texas 75075 On Behalf of: 909 Lake Carolyn Parkway LB Suite 960 Irving,Texas 75039 441 l Prepared by: OeShaz0 Group Engineers i Planners 400 South Houston Street Suite 330• Union Station Dallas,Texas 75202 Phone 214/748-6740 Fax 214/748-7037 March 3,2011 DESHAZO#11006 i Executive Summary The services of DESHAZO were retained by JLB Partners, L.P. to assess the parking needs for a multifamily residential development in the Grapevine,Texas. The study summarizes the parking requirements of several similar communities in the Dallas-Fort Worth area as well as some nationally accepted parking demand data and is intended to provide a basis for determining an appropriate ratio of parking space in relation to the number of bedrooms, number of units or floor area of the proposed complex. The analysis shows that, in the eight DFW area cities studied, the average parking requirement for the proposed development would be 592 spaces (which equals 1.89/unit or 1.29/bedroom). The proposed parking supply of 645 spaces(which equals 2.06/unit or 1.40/bedroom)exceeds these requirements by more than 9%. In addition, the proposed supply has been shown to exceed the nationally observed average (based on data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers)by 72%. DESHAZO, therefore, supports the proposed parking supply of 645 spaces and believes that it represents a more than adequate number of parking spaces for the proposed development scenario. DeShazo Group Traffic.Transportation Planning.Parking.Design. Technical Memorandum To: Mr. Britton Church 1LB Realty LLC From: De5hazo Group, Inc. Date: March 3, 2011 Re: Parking Needs Study for a Proposed Multifamily Development in Grapevine,Texas DESHAZO Project No.11W6 INTRODUCTION The services of DESHAZO were retained by JLB Partners, L.P.to assess the parking needs for a multifamily residential development in the Grapevine,Texas. The study summarizes the parking requirements of several similar communities in the Dallas-Fort Worth area as well as some nationally accepted parking demand data and is intended to provide a basis for determining an appropriate ratio of parking space in relation to the number of bedrooms, number of units or floor area of the proposed complex. The proposed multifamily development, located in the southwest quadrant of the Turner Road/Boyd Drive intersection, will include 1-, 2-and 3-bedroom units with the unit type distribution shown in Table 1. A total of 313 units and 460 bedrooms is planned. Table Z Proposed Development Scenario Unit Type #Units = #Bedrooms 1 Bedroom 181 = 181 bedrooms 2 Bedrooms 117 = 234 bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 15 = 45 bedrooms Total 313 = 460 bedrooms PARKING STUDY Dallas Area Parking Requirements DESHAZO has researched a number of municipalities to determine a 'typical' parking requirement in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. These cities were selected at random and range in size from large metropolitan areas to smaller suburbs. In addition, they represent all portions of the metroplex geographically. 400 South Houstm Street,Suite 330 Dallas,Texas 75202 PO 214.748.6740 F.214.748.7037 www.deshazogroup.coxn Table 2 summarizes the code-based requirements of each of the cities selected and shows that while most codes focus on the number and type of units,the independent variables utilized also include the area of each unit,the amount of common area and building height. However, because the composition of single- and multiple-bedroom units changes from one complex to the next, basing the required parking supply on the total number of bedrooms is considered to provide a more accurate determination of parking demand since the typical per unit basis does not consider the likely variation of single- and multiple-bedroom composition. Table 3, therefore, summarizes these same criteria, but on a per bedroom basis. Table 4 applies these standards to the proposed development scenario. Exhibit 1 summarizes the same information graphically. Table 4 also calculates the resulting per unit and per bedroom parking requirements for each city, offers a `typical' requirement and relates all of these requirements back to the proposed parking supply. In all of the cities, it is found that the proposed supply exceeds the calculated requirement. Published Parking Data Published parking demand data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) is calculated in parking spaces per dwelling unit(information on the number of bedrooms per unit is not available). Table 5 provides a comparison of published multifamily parking demand data from the ITE Parking Generation manual (3`d Edition). Table 5 Excerpts from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Parking.Generation,3rd Edition (2004) No.Of Average Peak Parking Land Use Day Studies Location/Area Demand Rate Low/Mid-Rise Apartment Weekday 19 Suburban 1.20 vehicles per (ITE Land Use Code:221) Dwelling Unit Weekday 12 Urban 1.60 vehicles per Dwelling Unit Saturday 7 _ Urban 1.02 vehicles per Dwelling Unit As Table 5 shows, the national average suburban parking demand rate (the category most similar to that of the proposed development) is 1.2 spaces per unit. This rate is also far below the proposed rate of 2.06 spaces per unit. CONCLUSION This analysis shows that the proposed parking supply of 645 spaces exceeds the requirements of all of the eight cities studied. The 645-space supply will exceed the average parking demand of these eight cities by more than 9%. In addition,the proposed supply has been shown to exceed the nationally observed average (ITE) by 72%. DESHAZO, therefore, supports the proposed parking supply of 645 spaces (2.06 per unit/1.40 per bedroom)and believes that it represents a more than adequate number of parking spaces. END c ro r 0 E 0 a� U Ill N o N o o v o v o y o y fi �C 2 Q 'a. vl Q 2 Q T I? O cc a� ro 41 ro `w m ai Y W L al ro j N m co , a1 M al m 0 .fi.. p m O O o O m 0 y Q Q Qin N 0 N ram+ Q Q C- CL Q ^� - ( ro N 3 m 7 m ro -Z V �F+ CL f cl Q 60 N N N N N m � o 41 L m N CL CLa' o CL ` a Q- N ~~ m m W Y N Y a1 a+ a/ 7 O Cl) o-' .o a u.. o _ y L O G5 v� N in Ln ro a C .-I N 63 W L �+ 4) O W N r Q n n a a Q 3 N m " m um c N a a O N N N N N L C.7 .fi s a d N O CLo CLM Cl Y C M a m m m aroi 403 a Q n n a Q L ti N N N N N d M G1 3 0 � � � � � o �, � � o v3 � o � � � o � s. aQN E. QQ.N E QQN E QQN E Qa"' E u a as E m av ab E m v m E SuE a o i E a o u E ❑ o -aO ro .'^a aQ sa o u Ea CL o u E 6- o pa QO Q o pu. a CLOp O m ^- w -0o p °aCL V m yU aH Q as I/1 ro ro 0 CD CD O O O � Ifl CLil} ty l2 Q T Q I S ❑. fz- ro y Z5 m s a`l m ai m s ar m * aI m x O fi czv Y CL Y CL CL am Y U 73 U — 7 U , V 3 V — (� C CL 0 p Q p pZn O LL V) y lL V) t? CL CL CL N N y Q N Cl? 7Qj U O m V IS um o o E u Q E Y ai Q o L- m O r0 V� !7- Q 4_ V N N N 7 a Q lj Q al ro n Q h Z, i7' T fi C fi ai E E E E ro ro V O O O � r.. (a O #� m ca m O ra m m „y N N m v 3 Y Y L m upi m o m L m L m R �5 w t E! Z d a v = Q ro Q m Q m a m Q m +' w o a o w o w o w o 3 u u U V U avLLi nLn � a�n a�n avwi N N `a cL+�+ a E Q E a E ° E nui o O w 0 w 0 U E � w O N O �, o U O m 0 N m n m y 'O o a v y-'a a a W CL ma' s n w L V Q� .Q m m a L M QEE QE QE w o O w Q O w 0 Q p u tl V O U O ro 0 v � m -o n-o 'n a a'w .-1 LI1 e-I W r v � � L t a E o- E Q1 E E E cr p o N o a o w o o I o w o u o u 0 m o t aw o, w ,45 mo„-ato ka c� Na NQ na na IL cL � E QE N' E E w O w O w a V O 4 0 m a v fA a n Qa Qm v v a o n N W }I N � V V O c `i O O `y O N O e4 O m A!1 O vI O in E L acL E o- Q� E QcL E aQ� E QaN E Q c4i E n o °' E a o E a o Q E n o a u E u o r p w U m a 00 w u m a 00 m a O w U m a o L r/i O N O N N o m a N N R 0 LL LL ..-I N a u. �--I N cL LL ri N Q N IA a L N 00 O a �/1 Q# Q iF Ifl Q a Q iF lf1 p. E E E E 0 m Q u o Q w o a w o Q v o Q w o IV w m 2 w m d w m 2 w m 2 w m o` G u — U u -� u au w -o ut -a mow mow a o mow a 0 N LL LL p o' E cL E � E o f Q E o o v o v o U O O V O U O m 0 mp_U m "a m f] mp_"w �- , N A u Ui U� i v 7+ V N o 0 0 0 O O w `a iu m a-oi v 00 m m U N M + 3 N � 2 � c k f « � # « z S » E , m o73 © 2 / enm $ k CL 2 � < « 7 7 2 m r » § Nr 00 n � 2 � - � � C § « m w m « m k 2 a m z © o q u qm N § 4 @ Ln ƒ © E � o E Cr § fLn � ka E z m w > u qm � � - c 2 b e : - � k 4) § Ui o L U _ $ 0 E R « Ch Ch « § \ � . z N 22 ❑ 2 77 ` m m / ® \ . } + § % q $ § \ \ E E r R k \ u 2» \ &■ o ' � a w 2 \ 2 ot � k m « 20 a j ck ` cc ) a Q o W) oa Y a °1 � 3 V � C L(f n .� CL V a � bo cr Gi L L c O W CL [po .. - .. a Ev bb C L Ln a LM LM •Y Y LL ® d r rr �l L s2 [6 NO .. .. '�, DA .Y L Q b O O O O C? b O O O C7 O O b O 1� 1p Ln M fV a--I ORDINANCE NO. � & AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE �Q COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING ZONING CHANGE Z11-01 ON ATRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE A.F. LEONARD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 946, DESCRIBED AS BEING A TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "CC' COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO "R-MF-2" MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT REGULATIONS; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE, AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH AN OFFENSE OCCURS OR CONTINUES; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, applications were made to amend the Official Zoning Map, City of Grapevine, Texas by making applications for same with the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these requested changes should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation; water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine,Texas did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested change should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same,the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, the effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, Water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among ot her things the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings, encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity forthe zoning change, that the public demands it,that the public interest clearly requires the amendment; that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which. existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the change in zoning lessens the congestion in the streets;helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population;facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this change in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that a change in zoning classification for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large; the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BYTHE CITY COUNCIL.OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City of Grapevine Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, be, and the same is hereby ORD. NO. 2 amended and changed by Zoning Application Z11-01 to rezone the following described property to-wit: being a 12.352 acre tract of land out of the A.F. Leonard Surrey,Abstract No. 946, Tarrant County, Texas (401 Boyd Drive) more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof, which was previously zoned "CC" Community Commercial District Regulations is hereby changed to "R-MF-2" Multifamily District Regulations, all in accordance with Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, as amended. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the herein change in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets;to secure safety from fire; panic, flood. and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population.; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation,water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements,and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine,Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and.provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. ORD. NO. 3 Section S. That the fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 15th day of March, 2011. APPROVED: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ORD. NO. 4 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ISSUING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 41 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE, BY GRANTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD11-01 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 313 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX TO INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO DEVIATION FROM DENSITY, FRONT YARD SETBACK, HEIGHT; LANDSCAPING, BUILDING LENGTH AND PARKING ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MXP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE Zb NG ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING T;O SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC OtERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS p,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a planned development Overlay by making applications for same with the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements,,conditions and prerequisites h'a\­(Jng been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites hailing been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing Called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring'"public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent proper,y from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary Lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation,,V, ater, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City.Council of the City of Grapevine,Texas,did considerthe following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets.; the fire. hazards, panics and other..dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same; the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the. effect on the o.Vercrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration Of population, the effect on the transportation,water, sewerage,schools, parks and other public facilities;and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 49 of Ordinance No.82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHERE/�IS,the City Council further considered among other things the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to Conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this:City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine.,Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this planned development overlay, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property With reference tothe classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the planned development overlay lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of;'population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council,of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this planned development overlay and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity`to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this planned development overlay for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the ORD. NO. 2 public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine,Texas, and helps promote the general health; safety and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BYTHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a planned development overlay in accordance with,Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine; Texas, same being also known as Appendix"D"of the City Code, by granting Planned Development Overlay PD11-01 to allow for the development of a 313 unit apartment complex to include but not be limited to deviation from density,,front yard setback, height;': landscaping; building length and parking in the "R-MF-2 Multifamily District Regulations within the following described property: Lot 2R, Block 1, W. R. Boyd Addition (401 Boyd Drive) all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No.82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit"A", and all other conditions;'restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2,., That the City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein conditional use permit. Section 3: That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described°shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of GrapeVi'ne zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4,. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose .of promoting health, safety, 'morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future;to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safelyfrom fire, panic, floOd. and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population;facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation,water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks.and other public requirements, and.to make adequate provisions forthe normal business,commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular.iases and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. ORD. NO. 3 Section 6: That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7: That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00)and a separate offense shall be deemed committed uponeach day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8 That the fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas,are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general Welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the Immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall became effective frol'1'l and after th6 date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so Ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 15th day of March, 2011. APPROVED: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ORD. NO. 4 GRAPEVINE TEXAN NORTHWEST CORNER OF BOYD DRIVE AND EAST NW HIGHWAY GRAPEVINE, TEXAS w a W w <J + a x U C7 Z Z O N z CITY OF GRAPEVINE ' PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION MARCH 15, 2011 w O JLB P A R T N E R S GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT x March 8, 2011 City of Grapevine 200 South Main Street Grapevine,Texas 76051 RE: Grapevine Texan Multifamily Development Dear City Council and Planning Commission Members, First of all we would like to thank you for the constructive feedback we received at your February 15tn joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting as it relates to this development. We have spent the ensuing time working on our development plans and we look forward to sharing the changes that we have made at your meeting on the 151h of March. During your February meeting, the majority of the discussion about this request centered on the amount of, and type of variances that we had requested from the R-MF2 zoning district. To address this, we have reduced the number of variances from ten to seven, and we have spent more time preparing the rationale and reasoning to support the remaining variance requests we have proposed. With regard to the variance requests that have been removed, they are specifically: 1. We are no longer asking for a reduction in the minimum square footage required for one bedroom units; 2. The site plan now fully complies with the amount of Active Recreational Open Space required in the R-MF2 district; and 3. We are no longer asking for a reduction in the minimum building separations required between structures While we would have loved to remove all of the variance requests, we are still proposing seven. Of those, all but two of the remaining requests are related to the uniqueness of the proposed building design and our intention of providing a higher end resident experience than we believe is possible if we followed the R-MF2 district standards to the letter. We hope to provide some of that reasoning both in this letter and in particular during our public presentation by using not just this project's design as an example, but also our Terrawood project located in Grapevine which was rezoned and built under Planned Development standards similar to those we are proposing here. As for the two "non-site plan" related variances, they address proposals which provide for an increase in the number of units allowed for the site. This allows for an ideal size community while optimizing the best current design principles for livability and efficiency in land use. Even with the requested increase the community is still on the smaller side of other low rise multifamily developments within the City of Grapevine The average low rise multi-family development that has been built in Grapevine over the last ten years is 409 units. This proposal at 313 units is almost 25%smaller than that ten year average. Page 2 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT We have structured this informational packet in the following manner: 1. Property and Application Summary; 2. Introduction to the Design Intent including Graphics; 3. Development Summary and R-MF2 Variance Request Detail; and 4. Closing We look forward to discussing our request with you next Tuesday and thank you again for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Paul R.Johnston JLB Partners Page 3 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY AND APPLICATION SUMMARY Location The site is located at the northwest corner of Boyd Drive and E. NW Hwy in Grapevine,Texas Site Acreage 12.35 acres of land Northern Tract to be rezoned—12.35 acres (Tract 1) Southern Tract to remain CC—6.6 acres (Tract 2) Requested Zoning To rezone the northern 12.35 acre tract (Tract 1) from Community Commercial District to R-MF-2 with a PD Overlay and Conditional Use Permit MONTELENA WILDWOOD CREEK APARTMENTS I APARTMENTS 1 MISCELLANEOUS COMMERCIAL USES GRAPEVINE STATION ` Below is a breakdown of the adjacent uses: Northern Boundary- Montelena and Wildwood Creek Apartments and Grapevine Fire Station Eastern Boundary—Gaylord overflow parking lot and vacant land Southern Boundary—Mad Duck Bike Shop and miscellaneous commercial uses across NW HWY Western Boundary—Shell Gas Station, Storage Facility and The Hill School Page14 )LB GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT DESIGN INTENT _- JLB Partners is requesting a planned development overlay district in order to create a community that implements the best current design principles in the multi-family industry. Historically, suburban garden apartment communities have been developed using "breezeway" style structures which are basically straight buildings with open breezeways and exposed stairwells. The buildings are then normally surrounded on three to four sides with surface parking spaces and community open space is located in one courtyard with a pool located next to a leasing center. Our request is for an "internal corridor" style development which consists of buildings shaped in "C" and "L" patterns. These types of buildings allow the stairwells to be hidden and integrated into the buildings and more importantly allow us to create larger and more impactful courtyards for amenities by placing them inside of the C or L shapes. Terrawood is a project that reflects this design approach and is located within Grapevine to the north of Grapevine Mills Mall. Developed and built by JLB in 2009-2010, the project is a good reference to see the impact that the C and L shaped buildings allow particularly in the courtyards as seen in the following photographs. ic via i 0� Page 5 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT POPE- WWI Y \ Y The end result of using these building types is larger, more amenitized courtyards that are more like resorts than apartments. Other amenities provided at Terrawood and planned for this project include: • Private one and two space garages integrated into the buildings • Clubhouse with internet cafe, designer serving kitchen,TV lounge and game area • Fully equipped wellness center with high end cardio machines with integrated IPOD docking stations and TVs, free weights, and individual strength training machines • Community conference/meeting room • Resort style saltwater swimming pool and fountain in courtyards • Multi-leveled controlled building access • Architecturally compatible carport parking The quality of the development is consistent throughout the clubhouse area and the units which include granite countertops, real wood floors, and maple cabinetry to name just a few items. Page 6 LB r . • _ - � f 1 E 11 r + � C � GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT a� !� I i I - 4 Y. N �t 1 f The same level of finish out is planned for this new, proposed development. Page 8 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Grapevine Texan Development will be a Class-A, luxury, three story, multi-family community consisting of 313 units. The community will have a 4,500 square foot leasing and amenity area with a professional grade fitness center, resident's entertainment lounge, internet cafe, community kitchen, _= and conference room. The community will also provide a resort style, saltwater pool and multiple courtyard areas. There will be ten specifically designed one, two and three bedroom floor plans ranging in size from 751 square feet to 1,455 square feet. Exterior Elevations The Grapevine Texan community will implement an architectural style that brings aspects of the surrounding uses into the elevation. By using a blend of stone, stucco, cementitious siding, and wood trim accents the community will complement the apartments to the north while continuing to bring the architectural design of the Gaylord, Great Wolf Lodge and Grapevine Station. = 0 D Page 9 •'v GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT Site Plan As can be seen on the below Site Plan, the project is characterized by two large, integrated courtyards. The eastern courtyard is by all standards extremely large and contains the bulk of the outdoor amenities while serving as the centerpiece of the community. The western courtyard, while smaller, allows for a more passive experience in a heavily landscape environment. The C shaped building located at the southern portion of the site plan has also been "flipped" since our original submittal in order to open up to the buildings to the west. As can be seen, there is a tremendous amount of open, green space in the plan which is centered in the middle of the site with the parking on the perimeter and in the enclosed garages. TURNER ROAD p � Q L r t _ � w r I _ - o ro 9 GRAPEVINE TEXAN GRAPEVINE TEXAS 71 o zo <o eo " Page 11 JLB GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT Interior Specifications Our interior finish out is driven by the need to provide the design and quality that you would find in custom homes. The proposed finish out for this project is similar to Terrawood and includes: Kitchen Area • Granite counter tops with backsplash • Oversized kitchen island with pendant lighting • Custom Finished Wood Cabinetry • Cabinetry with built-in features • Track Lighting in kitchen/dining Bedroom and Baths • Custom cabinetry • Tile tub and shower surrounds i • Spacious Walk in Closets • Linen Closets (some incorporated in the closet) • Ceramic tile in baths Miscellaneous Details • Private balconies • Fenced in lawn area for courtyard units • Wood plank flooring throughout entry, kitchen, living and dining areas • Custom color accent walls • Full Size Washer and Dryer connections • Built-in Desk with Granite Top _ Page 12 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT DETAIL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND AMENDMENT REQUESTS Like most standard multi-family zoning districts, the current R-MF2 ordinance is not currently written in such a way to accommodate for this unique design style and the site planning that it requires. It is not uncommon for this type of project to have to go through a Planned Development (PD) process in order to be developed. Once approved, we have seen this product type be extremely well received in the market, including in Grapevine where Terrawood has consistently received the highest rents of any of its competitors with the exception of 925 Main which is a high density project which includes a structured parking deck. As with all PD's, this PD request contains requested amendments to a standard zoning district. Below are detailed descriptions of the deviations we are requesting from the R-MF2 zoning district. ■ Section 22 M.3 -Design Requirements—Maximum Building Length of 225 feet Due to the design implemented on this site we are requesting a variance to allow for the maximum building length to be 225 feet for two of the buildings we are proposing. This request is a reduction from our original request which was for a minimum of 250 feet for the majority of the buildings and was made possible after we redesigned a number of the buildings to meet the minimum requirement of 200 ft. We were not however able to redesign all of the buildings. We have highlighted below the two buildings that we are requesting a maximum building length of 225 feet ' for and as you can see a reduction in the building length would have a negative impact on the width of the courtyard areas. By allowing the additional 25 feet we are able to create courtyard areas with proper scale and dimensions. TURNER ROAD I t 15 - 1 — 3 N '`J > GRAPEVINE TEXAN 6 — �— GRAPEVINE TEXAS Iq o zo<o Page 13 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT ■ Section 22 G - Area Regulations — 15 Foot Front Yard Setback and Auxiliary Parking Structures in Setback We are requesting a fifteen foot front yard setback as opposed to the standard 40 feet along Boyd Drive, but it's important for us to state that this is not so that we can put a building closer to the road. Our buildings are actually set back 90 feet from Boyd. What we are really proposing is the ability to park in the front yard. With the large amount of parking that we are providing, pushing the parking out of the front yard would require us to park adjacent to or within the courtyards of the buildings which would ruin the intent of the highly amenitized courtyards. ■ Section 53 1.3.b - Landscape Requirements - Not less than 14% of the landscaping required on the site will be located within the front yard setback In all non-residential zoning districts, the current zoning ordinance requires that a minimum of twenty (20) percent of the total site area shall ---- _ - be devoted to landscaping with not less than fifty (50) percent of the that landscaping being located in the required front yard. The way that the R- - U MF2 ordinance is written, the only front yard for this project is located along Boyd Drive so that is where 50% of the landscaping is required to be provided. This frontage just happens to also be by far the smallest frontage that we have making it almost impossible to provide that much landscaping along such a small frontage. What we have designed in order _to mitigate this is a substantially larger amount of landscaping throughout the entire project. While the ordinance requires 20% of the site to be landscaped, in our design over 50%of the site is landscaped. Also in order r,l to, enhance the landscaping along Boyd, have designed a landscaping plan that is far more stringent than the required code. The rendering below depicts the proposed plan for this area. In addition to the increased landscape plant coverage we have designed the street trees to be 4" caliper trees instead of the required 3" caliper trees. Other considerations include an oversized eight foot sidewalk that will extend around our entire property and wrap the remaining Miles Foundation land and continue s o along the NW Hwy frontage. This will link this site to the bike trail located m one block to the north. �Il� II WdLL !'-O'WOLK 'EDAY BOYD DRIVE Page 14 JLB GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT ■ Section 22 M.5-Design Requirements—Building to Travel Way The R-MF2 ordinance says that no building shall be located closer than fifteen (15) feet to the edge of an off-street parking, vehicular use or storage area. As mentioned earlier, this project proposes to provide private, enclosed one and two car garages within the buildings. Obviously, there must be a driveway to reach the garage spaces and this request is to clarify that the parking and drives located behind the garages does not conflict with this design requirement. We also have located a number of the buildings along the travel ways to create a boulevard feel which encourages interaction amongst the residents. ■ Section 56 C.1 - Parking Variance Adequate parking is critical for a multifamily development. Towards that, we commissioned a third- party parking study by DeShazo, Tang and Associates, Inc., which determined that the average == requirement for the proposed development should be 592 parking spaces or 1.89 spaces per unit. We are requesting a variance to allow for two (2) spaces per unit for a total of 626 parking spaces. This is still a higher ratio of parking spaces per unit than the surrounding cities as shown below: Parking Requirements Per City _:- 700 626 626 626 626 630 603 603 -a 600 ---- 544 , Cr ) 500 47&.. V) v u m -= C. 400 — - --- - to C : Y. L 300 -- - ---- - - --- -- --- -- -_ __- a 0 -- i 200 ---- --- - -- ------- E Z 100 0 - T Ft.Worth Irving Dallas Southlake Plano Richardson Mesquite Grapevine Carrollton Texan Comparison Cities ■ Section 22 1.1 — Building Height —The maximum height of any building will be three stories not to exceed 39 feet in height, which is only four feet higher than is allowed in the R-MF2 District. This also allows us to provide nine foot ceilings as opposed to eight on all floors which is demanded by our targeted tenant profile who is seeking a custom home finish out level. ■ Section 22 F.1 -Density Increase—313 units or 25.4 units per acre This request allows for an ideal size community while optimizing the best current design principles for livability and efficiency in land use. Even with the requested increase the community is still on the smaller side of other low rise multifamily developments within the City of Grapevine . The Page 1 15 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT average low rise multi-family development built in Grapevine over the last ten years is 409 units. This proposal at 313 units is almost 25%smaller than that ten year average. Low Rise Apartment Community Sizes-Since 2000 700 ---._---._-- _-. __. ------ --._.- _- --------- ------.— --- 600 600 -- - - ------ -- - - - - - --- - --- 500 --- ----.-_.----- ---- --. _- - -- ----- - -_. _.... _. -- --490 .-- --- CA 400 392 Y- p 344 348 313 300 291 7 Z 200 - --- -- - -- 100 ---- - 0 Terrawood Grapevine Texan Wildwood Creek Mustang Ridge Cross Creek Marquis at Silver Verde Riverwalk Oaks Apartment Communities CLOSING In closing, we feel that this multi-family design style is the ideal use for this site. By thoughtfully land planning the overall site we were able to leave prime commercial land along the NW Hwy corridor with appropriate depths while creating an efficient sized tract for an internal corridor style, multi-family development with large and highly amenitized courtyards. The amendments requested to the R-MF2 District were limited to as few as possible without severely affecting our intended site plan and design, and as stated before, it is the design of this product type that is driving these requests. Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to answering any questions that you may have. JLB Page 16 _ r 1, 7 r ....,..may .. -.A. ,ram-. �• • j .Y- I.r .�,� TI •fir � � a � P i 1 "' � a ' r~ ,t tt�•._-��*sly .i �.• �w ad-ti _ - ..-. .r�,.-.'fir/" n� 3-• ~ ETA`_ wa • ' .. I rrai val t N� . M AN AR Y aw 1 a IL i TURNER ROAD I - ' - - - - - I � • } nI. T i i -r GRAPEVINE TEXAN GRAPEVINE TEXAS JAL 1111tK 1111T �.i y_ b I '`tea�� _ ' ' r "l.�A �"• ...� r y — .. b— r +:41 T �Y i - 7 q - " IL • ��tom. � ._ �s 11 II I� � � � ,- .� ' t — mor �� -� Soweut Ex.Cone. - _ Pvm t.@ Const. - 3 - - - Long.Butt Jalnt m TURNER ROAD Per City of I S stonaard� �. (so Public R.o.wJ 545m2698"E Details E�8��•'t�5' ----- - � -.- 3 Flma 3 FTm � \oo - 20'Side Yard Setb k -_ --29 __ i p I__ - - e1B�0 `�'109� - ., � 8• 'A �3 Prop. �i �� _ 36' 0 $ItC ^... e B 0 Si Setbsck � Con, t,, S;P 72� _ 7p I Prep.8'Woter '� - _- Q rn Prof Vt/Masonry _- _ \ P `� �. 04 �f I /]rI 'v) Detention Screening To 21 RCP --- 18'RCt' ' `-Carport �- roposed 24'Frelone 25 B' WY - a fig•q�p - .� `o 'I -O_ Uz Pond Match Buioin9 iU 9 25.0 (T)p-) -w- Prop. - ) 25.0• 5R \�til SR k I¢ ta' . 4 SP iE Ia. too' Prof. III ! a B'o " o. P o• Building No. 3 W t E mt ddI No. 2 _ I 40 0 20 40 80 go' 29s JFlf Bu ng ! 910 carp rt Vicinity Ma ( I �� 6�i� F.F 616.6 (7m) �FF 61�.1_ y-_ � _. 1 -- (Typ.) xP _� i- � _I s Proposed 24'Froione v [_'.- ---�� I I - --'- ---' -.-- _�- ___- 4Bs' J _'- __'.... ` �II 10-.. �Flum. � linch= 40ft. P.P.B'Water2B'.__ - r wo;r- prw 2i - Site Data Summary Table a - Prop Zo i ft-MF2 _ Prop 10 70 Builds No. m tkavi - -__ /PD Ov fl y m o�a I I - 'wet E.mt � �9 � e .- W.R.BOYD R ADDIiION �- i � I i f�BB:a _ to a use Mau F Iv I o] fls (T°) - F _61� - LO7 LOCK i -_-_ m - s y I mt Arca = , 35 536,068 sl o It __-_, _ -. t� 1L_.._12- 1 35 CR OF LA I-= - B mngA listHpprl_- -__-_- o3,- TIIIl p _ B la ®z I", f 2 ND �" ii I - --. _B m a3-_ Ma1r74 i5f--- _ /'� g911:<, m ��' '4gy Prop.tOziD J = V &f 2T,8 (---_-_ --- t � Water EsmL I - �' Bu Id gb 215]3 f_ __I 153,M(TYP I o t d,dd Gas 400 f--- FlI m - ssfi @ -. -- Q TOTALJi f fltd P I&T 25}0' iga 11Y -__ E-_ 10 \\ I' A SP �' q f2Bed - ! U f3Betl oom IS TOTAL U 16_3- mts 14C 15.9- R.qP._O_` Pkasg6N-bo__ --_ 2 p/626 I it o �5it3 g _- R56 C ds d m Prop.21.3 4�pFlrelmle.p _- - --_-_ _ -__-) i _-- _ -�, o I SandaNsurfxe Park nB 235 I '0 I �- 6' P ki 98 117 n 2Y RCP 24' CP a•4CP - 4'R .6 61.0' I Att h dC. g P,k g 127, 18 RCP 78 RCP --- m A ! D to hedG g P rk g 1] -__-I I ___.• I�,_ _ .. -_-f- BUlldi=-No. --_ i4 i I 2s0' ( A sibl Co ded Park ing O B¢ syo _._._. -___-- e P _�_ - _._- F.F.�615.3 '+ •J 0.ttessible Attached GaraB P rk g _ 2 101k sslble Detached Garafl P,kl _ i.__ _ P(.P.10 10' S5 y I _ TOTAL P,klng 626 _ 78'RCP f ate m. Z ;, - Building o. 4 _ (T,p)Es , t - x _ •dd H � Lana=m Area _ -- F.F-=618.0 - ."Ii ;' _r ry95 Siaroe Requred In,..r4ndscape Area 2058M Isf _E.- I^ _ -;-j' r __ v. _�-�_ _J_I -- ,a r�...� __. -- _ 2 S [floc lad -- _ o Prvi 6 .ALL -1 __.. 2 .'- soon. I �.� n ! poP ded 2L460 f - �� -i_ -. _ 4 - -- P opo.ed a24' R q-1_etl OPV 5�-a -_ 107 QB f_ Sp 178742 f - _ 20 r$1 m ( I y Prop,e'watia_ -.-- 'F I m I M rcentag-rta dsmPe l F ontvam fIm __ � I -fH' e ) + ._- .F __- y 1 8 B• I 3 - ed sf [p to 3535/1 f - q I O / 16.4 k y)4y 6 iCO. Prop - i A­f.thcr ImpennousAma - ---25LA51.sf surface 405,028 sf _ -I mrpmrt 589"28'72'W 29110• I ImPereioassurfacaeaaease 7s.z7%';II!I r `O I-_�� F- •i (TYP') -- - - -- a _ `------ e _ 6 t59 F'F � W.R.BOYDCENiERADDI110N i Proposed unit Mix _ 616.E -_I_ Dramage LOT 1R1.BLOCK 1 Easement 3.306 A irlm Bm UNIT TYPE s0/Fr Gummy iixNR -AsDR _ l Al 7BliB 751 z7 Bs% -_) I _-� ---_ , --,--- $)I --- B (141,19CRES OF LAND 9.773 SQUARE FEET) A2 iB/7B 767 43 13.7% m Carport -1 I I O -- -_---' a`g3 f` I A9 1B/1B 774 21 63% LOT T _ __-___ _ (yp) --_I I I -_- -_.,ry d' W.R.BOTD 5CENTU? .'^F`!I AA tB/iB 774 38 12.1% . II(�/JJ CAB PA,T.C''51151 �„Jtl A5 7BMB 896 31 89% m Building No. 6 n, } 7.p} rap' t I P8 iB/1B 1010 21 67% 9 I I I - t-�-� F.F.=61H. __- + } - Bi 2B2B 1,070 52 1&6% F.F.=_616.3_ TaI,) w 1I __. 0'�.+ 82 282 1,134 24 7.7% 4! B3 2Br 8 7229 41 13.7% 37.38% la _ Y I C7 3B2B 1,455 15 4.8% 4.79% TOTAUAVG 968 313 illllYe 100% I --} 1+)I I66'7 roam,sr«,.- '➢ 21.1' rap. 0 ^ i Iran -�- is'RCP Proposed 24' P LAN N E D D E V E L 00�M E N T S i T E P L A N Fence --_ - n 'W er -- _ o m Pray.8'water -•'- 750 Flrela a Prop.6 i B B n I I y at 18'RC tb k W.R. BOYD CENTER ADDITION y I {�„ -i&f 115. 2 B 1 8 0'Side�'ar c _ }0_ I >.. 1f}Ilrrr - -}8 1- , .q - - g T ' I- Lots 2R, Block 1 t8¢ 3'Flume 3'Flume - I I 3'Flume taB 3'Flume IQO' - -1/2•aR5 CASE NAME: Grapevine Texan Apartments I I 0 o p V 589m28'12 z'qRS (.'Port twining CASE NUMBER: Z71-Ot @ PDi1-Oi 1 12.35 ACRES "W 614.86' g w Fence Typ.) Wall LOCATION: 401 W.R.Boyd Cents,AdditionR. lck t. I w.a sit situated in the « Nd� w.R BOW CENTER ADDmoN MAYOR SECRETARY Ali I A.F. LEONARD SURVEY - ABSTRACT 946 F; Prop.10' LOT 3R1,BLOCK 1 ZONING CHANGE RFOLIEs'T: wz=oo Drmnoga 3.306 ACRES OF LAND zone afros t zn-01 to a to DATE, -_ I GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS Eooemant change ragau�eae toques . _ o o (144,101.412 SQUARE FEET) rezone 12.35 from CC' Community o. O: LOT 3R Co -111 District.to R MF-2' Multifamily I Developer Owners/Applicants s m C W.R.BOYD CENTER Diatrict for the development of a 313a unit PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION I JLB Partners LP The Miles Foundation, Inc. & a¢ CAB.A.SLD.5851 LOT 4 p.rtra o plax. Pionnetl development vedoy Miles Production LP raE ¢ ViR.BOYD CENTER PD,i-01 is a request to intlude but not be ! 909 Lake Carolyn Pkwy., Suite 960 P.R.7.C.7. y yqr 9. 200 Highland Circle ' o Notes:'- CAB.A,SLD.5857 limited to deviation from densit• front d Irvin Texas 75039 i. Handicap Parking Is Provided In setback.building height,building length,front yard CHAIRMAN P ( ) Argyle, Texas 76226 o P.R.T.C.7. Telephone 214 271-8460 Accordance w/ADA Standards. Iondseapingm building proximity to site parking 2.No Floodplain Exists On The Site. and off-.treat parking relative to the developmentil Contact: Britton Church 3. All The Requirements Of The Grapevine th.c.mpt.x. DATE: Soil Erosion Control Ordinance Shall Be SHEET.1 OF 10 ! Met During The Period Of Construction. Tt, a.o- Engineer/Surveyor APPROVAL DOES NOl AUTHORIZE 4. All On-Site Electrical Conductors mmorl�- ! Spfars Engineering, Inc. ANY WORK IN CONFECT CNTH ES. t Associated With New Construction Shall the purpose f thisSite Plan ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. 765 Custer Rd., Suite 100 l Be Located Underground. is to treat L t And Easements Plano, Texas 75075 _ 5.Site Plan Is For Informational Purposes for an Apart t Complex. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Telephone (972) 422-0077 Only. it Is Not A Construction Document. I I ( Contact: Kevin Wier �� t Scale 1"=40' March 2011 R E V 18 I O N S NO ITEM DATE CMU WALL CAP B,UNIT BRZWY C,UNIT COMP.SHINGLES OVER OM" WALL W/ PLYWOOD DECK OVER MANUF.STONE STAIR FOG/-ATV 4 —STEEL STRUCTURE VENEER 5:,2 SL STUCCO 4'STUCCO TRIM ATE-FIBER CEMENT E TL.'TUBULAR FRAME ' V ' 0 UBE STEEL s y' IN �2 SHINGLES WO COLUMN _ COMPOSITION REF.OWNBR'SE �• 1` —-y_ --v4�iti 4� MEDIAN ROOF HT. N H CONSULTANT i I I I NT 6665 P FIBER CEMENT 9TF O F SEA FASCIA ROOF 5 HIS, _ CARPORT SECTION ( 1 TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS B u s FIBER CEMENT —METAL RAIL -- SIDING 3RD F.F- STUCCO COMPOSITION __ }- SHINGLES - --- O FIBER CEMENT T' __ _ FASCIA _ _ _ _ I - 2ND F. 1. -_— F. 1 _ COMP.SPIMGLE3 - - ROOF BRG I 2"WOOD TRIM TUBE SIDINGCEMENT - f STEEL - MANUF. COLUMN _ - - STONE VENEER ' REF.OWNER'S MANUF.STONE CONSULTANT VENEER FIN F FUR 1ST F.F. yr) co STEEL GARAGE. DOORS W/WD. TRIM W �W CARPORT ELEVATION 3 5-CAR GARAGE FRONT ELEVATION 2 WEST END ELEVATION BUILDING 2 w A3 UNIT BRZWY A2 UNIT AS UNIT REC/LEASING W/TWO STORY VOLUME AS UNIT/REC/LEASING®FIRST FLOOR Al UNIT 1 p (4y (53 UNIT 0 THIRD FLOOR) —17 '�• z v COMPOSITION SHINGLES i � � ,2 DECARATIVE 14 WOOD BRACKET rr' I I I I 'I ' v/I i I I I i I MEDIAN ROOF HT. ii1 I - - FIBER CEMENT iLi(.s T FASCIA - i I i � i I ROOF BRHG. FIBER CEMENT SIDING i 3RD or, W Ro - ® ® a- o= _ 9 _ m 6'STUCCO TRIM m w r� METAL RAIL M J < 2ND F.F. q coo v --y 00 , MANUF. ®® STONE VENEER ,ST FF. F o c STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF n REC/ LEASING FRONT ELEVATION BUILDING 1 Y.`« gY CASE NAM CASE: Gr pevine Taxan Apartments E NUMBER: Z11-01&PD11-OI LOCATION: 401 Boyd Dr.; Lot 2R,Block 1. W.R.Boyd Center Addition 'E yC MAYOR SECRETARY �[� _ — ARCHON CORPORATION c e ]�( DATE: _ ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS CARLISLE STREET aDPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SUITE 130 - D 31 KEY PLAN d2 75204 214/526-0/626-0731 CHAIRMAN m DATE__—..-- 2 MAR„ E` DATE: _—__ {2 _ SHEET: 2 of 10 R PROJECT.L.J_OO"I.23 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE mE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH m ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES �y �t $ SHE �G_.ET_ OF "IO n wr •. ■Y ■ ■ Y_Y■rrrr■rm■rlp^.gym ■t`■,I"1 ■n O 11■, 1 1 n ''' �� p'�� nnm■m' p ■n,mn'nINS �,i i�d eir'i'ne�'I��=,iri'�iO'nn�iin��1■■' n' n1 m'ni ' un �i I■' a'yl'Amm1��1 ,u■= ■iin' ' i■mm�u 'i ®�I m u■ ��'„n1 n� n■ ■ini'lin �n n■.... ram■ ''u �w�iii ainum■ ' �' ■ui uiiili �� 1 u mIII ■m o '� "®��ilii�' mi'� ■■■�i� ■ii n■■i i u i ■ ■ I , �rn� i:�■i'ru�' 'i ��'�iu�iii'mu■'�iu 'i'=i�jn�■u■nuLi,�iI i I •ire• r r �, � ,•' a .■i�.1ii■'�'iu>"±■ mm'�I �'�n'�mmn nI1�'��'n�}nn,■1�I ' 1 ' 1u,iiilii,mr �, �i' ' '■m::. n l., '}r .. '■nir .�' �1„ ' �ir� 1� '1, ■,1i■i1.. 'ti Ma ■■ill■■'ll -��U ' ■r.•V Ir 11' n�^" AnO' �1 only ,,, ■ �u nin'■na .n■■mm■ ■ ai ' y j "!'• •� '` r5'� ,, i wi��,�■'�iu,uii�i 1�niN I ■nr% 1nm "i■IW.n i i ,uI' 5�■,.��unwm�i A■�_;II,�IYr'1®� I■I��'i���� ■' '"�nti'i iio i�i .. H'�i�,���li ■.. ■4r 1���/'•/T�/�� nnn'r-nf�i'' 'iIgE''� � ui �" °.iiiii„}■�i'�umn�i■imnuu■• ■iiii�n■ ■oiui■unn■,��ti� iu■ �' ' I'll �i�' �liil,u._ 1� IIIIIgloo ��� �1111�1111_ �Illl� 11�11 - _ . - n.�. nni� ■ ►I� �in� _ __, irni� IN IN ran _ _ i slilirl.Alnlll I;19ulil{I101l114 �� IIIII I I ��� IIIIII IIIII � IIIIII IIIIII u � �� , i _� �= I ..... II!!!!RIII!!!!!!IIIIIIIIIIIII I!i_.Ila!i!!1111111111111 � I(„all�l�lilll IIIIII® - ^ -. .. �1111111111811111!IIIIIII illllllamiiliullimli!) 11!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ililllllllllllll!IIIIIIIII! it c : , �� nor _ _�: _ �—Z _ _ , � —�.= ,, :� IIII IIIII IIII � �11�1: IIII-� �� II ��1 1 ll tilll � llll�. Illl — ill � III _ Inn�l . � rani nni� inn�l_ =1.1.1= 1_�F.Ih_I - 1 . Ln nl•.� nl. nl. -• I■ I''• ■I� I,n _.. is Ivnlll❑r I, 111 - I � ItI,1,IlY�urrrrl...... l - '� � 7 �1 �_ � :I � u _� f .,.���•lL.III:II,1 -��� ■�� L..••�•rr,•. � � �`�7 _� IIIIII IIIIII - � _ IIIIII IIIIIII � v--'- �---, -: �����I ������ IIIIII IIIIII �• I ,' �� rrr■rllllr■rrllllilllllll_- r �n. ....- I!rlr,rrllrrr,lrrilllllllllll� � _ _, _� Illr,rrrllllrr,lrllillllllllll 111111rr,r,r!!I„rrrllll;l,l � � illllllllllllllllllllllllll 1111161►IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 9.��.� {�� .�, .��IIIIIIIIIIIIII►IIIIIIIII �IIIIIIIIII!il�!IIIII!!I� �._� - +'--.:'R '�'�r._.Sf� �•r. � �'-��:__ '�'�`F`IE���� " 1 � - ��� s . �� r,_ .�iJir/�: : - ��- ■j.���'-_-,' � � F�:�F "F-'� '•�„` � �—fit-'.� -. _ .•.yrt. Y,u.■r■■Ya■■n.■� .■���r'.�i.. c, �. ,F. __ � .. -.. -e' er � Rii!9. .-. � 1. _ j .. I _ _ - __ __ _^_rv..v..�"�� �.ria'-Ufa '.si�.rr i�a'���S. riN:�.--��r_'�'_�,..F �;' �'+t .■,�1,��'■ r_.�r_91L���!. I ...� -: ,.. 4!J�Y11 ,9q_,�A1 'IC_��.Yi . 1 ���:� Y {_:itij■ -■'�yi��i�.E-�,E �� 16■ _�_. '- "rr .r _I. _ - � c �_.'ri Ili"I •� � r-• �"'�'-�-'��7""" � _ �.�Er■57:r � �'", - � � , �-_ 1 i�irw� '�i��i ,a -`+11,:,,���r�=-�uiY � _' _III �� ■ - r �I�I� �I�I�I• .r I�i� p.� �G�"j I�I� LI I.I. _r I!•i�l� ,�i�i� �= I1 �I i�i 71. I�.I�� ���.� .�� Il►�I I��I�I Iril'���I�il►�I �i�I I I\ �����II � � . i — _ h I�II�II_I �i� ff i � I ■1 III/�I�I�. �� /�1�\I mY r��t r��"�o�'�.a G I' 3■■, II i . 5�%•'R n, r �'�„i 5r°:4Pai�' i'1''iimlii°i,1'ini,Munilm■m�il�iiiitSiri'il�r�':■Iii'�■� _� ,auno a1 1 i '�nli n n nm'mnnl n p �'n rn.. uiP� airr 1�, i" n r 1■ � ,� ,, ! i�iinl�:s�}I ■■ nI■nnum,� �i,r eiemnih..._ ni nii, n u n, ji. � i 1, l �'=i- i�I� 'rii'n'n��ii'n�i�ii�ii�i�'� �iii""' a ni n'n 'Imismiu'Oiui' ■inliii�ini'ii�i� �s 'uiui�or"�:■iul�si■�1 i�{',�'�i' ■fi7'u'I a,riPinu�i,l'�■■fin ' .p,,'.O,'� ■ i 1 ' i1•iill n ,� ii�in��r „Y,nn�Yi��p■un'��n�uS n". 11 ��p fill iul'�1■.n 'p'���p�Imm�nmunmtmo■.�ni'u■'nu■�'■=il oll milli �■m,n. i ' i,nl1P:.�p'n■1 'n� ' P.1 �1 131 ■ ,■,n�t■u■nl�n� i.V,�1nl im,Iuumn'n����,.�'�n iY� .tom ' ' �Anll'�i ■oral■'N�'i/ ■1,1■n■1'�nn"I�m'i�n■1'Iy nrl■'NS[min nlnu'�pn_ _.r■1i�n IiV'•n�■m'n'� � �nlpn_V_Li■�', ■ ,} 11! ! �! ■��,■ 'n.W nnuon Ium I m m,m ram ■.(iju.al � 'n p�imnu'■fin'pI mnammummn-��:;MAI .,�pn■�l�Wnp ' mnnnm 1 mn. .'' ■�I' 1 ■Si■�iui:5� Zno'n„n,nl::evu■u�■n n='�iu �ilnnnl -::r(fm '�■1, 'un' nain�l■"■i'nnun'nemr.a i`nlmml luum■mn'}■o4=�Snnn,nu■�'i'�i1 n'�m..,...-..m'n'n:•ar■iiinnnms'n�up�j�l�''I�)rfii�'r'iS'�Ti�fii =1 ■�'°u'Ii 1 . ■'n■p' u r•- 1 ••■n�'p■ulmn::,�uun�lm,1■vnnnn•9 bu■' �" nu'un'xuu,l m�■��f■niu_ _ar■fO,ciiuii%1pMl�iuiriliii■oioiii�iw:annnnnpunmmnii 1 ■�u�'����'1'1 ' �R . en'o■ram,n==i=1:iy5iu..!I�uuinliu■nnu®'�u ',o�,0iini�ii,u�n,n'„■�o■■ �®iiiliii�ui�' wo■m6oi�elmsm__ - '�'��■11„�,q■'�• aunuanmr:v■un■uunu_'nt5n■■wrrnp�■ _ IIIII 111� l�l�n �111= �lll � 11_ =IIII 11 = Ills IIII—_ �I �� � Illllljjlj illlljll�. ..........:'III— IIII- llllilll ..-. :. III�1 �I� _nl■ ��� IIIII_ IIII --- (11�_�I��;— — II,•..,•iIL_.,JI: uuiiliilfilliil111 Ilrlll: II II•,a•IIIII! IYIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Illllliuliiiiiiiiiiiiiilll IIIIIIIIIIIBuI • -� : .,1111111111111 -. �� • .. r 4-,�..' S - '--� __ _�- � ,..-_ —__ __ _� ��1' �1�.,_ �S�r���`�. �.?.�t■!,� ���!�:!{tom cl • - IIII. in ..� .. ,1R ,•, iiiii� liiiii liiiii •, �� �+�..�*`�; ;. . ,, ,�� ..k � � ., x �.;. Innnlllnnnl-� IIIIIIIIIIIIIII,•� -��I!IIII!!IIII)IIII IIII 4 i . t IIII IIIIII 1 __i '. t n�nirtm�{,��I _ � ti ;m•�rst~ I - . .•� a�'trrw•-t�"�t .- `ter �{-- r .'� �•I!,mlluml)unull:;r �-- ,-_1 III Id III!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�.-�. . _ 7 ��..{��:...!`.■,hh .��, >.{�,t�.{r�'.��__ .__ �i... . . _ .-. . �I!I!II!I _. . . .�,_�_ ■�_ ■ .. 1 - . •— . ••!i ! ,II �.����_ _ � -� _II ..III, _ -.�■,. - � - — - �/►_-- �� � �.. �� .. -...�-,:- -�---'- ��.�-. �� ,r-n_-; -_,r-^ _ _r �-�Y'•s ��"�•_. :-�f-■�7-,"I�r I. .f I�rl�r -?tom � -.,�!•7-- --�� ir♦'+tr��rr_ rr.�R tw_r.�y.. r .■�.... .■1.. .n. .q. .r: n• ntiar.n■... .-�_,..r_. ._,.. . , ,.,'.�1� ._.., ■ynr■■ r ,.�. - yr � I_ - �rR ■.�� i�.'�iy ■ --_.- --_ -..� .__, ..r 4_..Lr! - - _t- ±-+ -+ _ ,' u �u, ......,< ...,..Y_ , .a mrw� . r c-,r��=._ �.`■...�� ■s-},,.,,., :... ?r..•r - -- ��'� r .�-- w,�■ _ _.r u�^ -'.� � �Yt.� ,I_:_r � ♦ �. ,� .r!„ �iYi;_� _ .k__. - r1�:1 p... k.'�. - • .��...■:7 �1 ,r.. �.... :♦J�. � ... .-: i■N' .. � t-� "l R( P�t■� - �■ ^+1r � r.,�� .r•11 I c� _ ��•!�y� ;� ^■ri .. y �r' _4t�����r i. � d� ,�' �•.+ �1 � l 'i'■■!•-y �■-_.r�i l{�`•�1. a■ ►� ►.■i_ trr-. .� ,��—•__,� .� . -c_.M�!I ��.-.��1i I�I�'�+ =t��._'(�{._��...J►;.',_ �.1� s�..�,k�f�1L.,�:{`.�', t�:�'�?�':�• '- .• �. __ ..i l � r?'�' . -..w .. .. ._, .._',. -�■� �t1,-.. III�E -.7 1 � Icy, - �� u�i !� _ ir.^ -�•1 ;1 �.. =`i_ • _„■��- -�■'I.� �` r. in�r �--' - w'-c n■� .�_�,F%�:1��'.�: �T,F .'►-r.- r_ IIII _ . ._ .IIII �� II ll�. _�.�_ I �Il ll e— —�IIII �.� ,� ... ,�,�.1•�� ._ �. .^� ._ . ,�. _... _ ■i 1ji ■i_,.."!■u ■iS� I- �a- .I �11�•�a -� - r _I■.,l_IA1A. _I� r�lr,_ �sl rj �r� .��.s.•7. l'3�� /rr��:�'�� �, •.r1.� I•II.1• l��� t 'I�'.■ �4��= �`.�" �Wit_. -�� 1..�, �'��+�•{III.1!'I. ■+yr r� � � �; r� .��'.�i�����::�— _r ,. ...■ � v■'�t`�.. -. I`r_ - ' =' ., """Lt{ _._:1 ��iri'S� �■..1,..3. ,. � �{'..�.■'t ., ,.�:�'� ' •�r-- IIIII IIIII �ll�lllll .- _ .IIIII . ..! ..,� .R IIII_■..��n_ _,■. � ,_,� .. r. .. �_ IIIII _ ,. .> -_� .� _�_ - _ _ _ .� q�•,•i�?�. �. 1 _ ♦ ♦ /... w �'.,i� •rr..- ,./..: r•,. ■. ■■_ ♦ ♦,.1., 1 \..�� W .L. L I �1. �, - ,F ,1 .�■!r- rl. :+■■�1 :� >a:R�.ir _ . t �,- �� _ _ ��. �r��p�rr,� al , A.�►� 7 r. t`�P ,�■■ > .. .�II�I►�I.. � N„� �.. I /1 1.- . ... . , . - � ��i►•/, �� -.,�. � �� r�, mot' ,w.._-� �- ►•� ttt�l'�_'-_I�I�__��.,,_�-..®�_ - -_,,.s..�.�!.L��fi9'!=1��..�.r�l.�,,�,��_�R�_..!IT �t1-,.a .1--�..�•,..r?��`ili�1:!!■Y��".�*"� f�'�i.� ►�.h...lr'�r7�.w .-.:,:Y�riiF'.'!i�'11'�'.Yi�i■j�ii�:����r:�1..I•..��� arJ•.■�I���I �r'>� � �1�.� IIIII f TRA7�aLE ; W z H VISIBILITY TRIANGL TURNER ROAD -- — -- — — — — — ---- -- -- --- — ww .roo P___ tLn- TRASH! SCfL PLAN) I l PERIMETER LANDSCAPE"TRE —__� m•�� i t !� Q "�' EASFrmr I V a PARK- n s Vicinity Map I eaaQmtr INTERIOR LANDSCAPE THE .ElkDRAMeDe ryA�vmur I, ' 0 SCREEN LEGEND O LEGEND } t i.... .... .... ..... .... .... �J� _ ® INTERIOR LANDSCAPE TREE e I MEDIUM TO LARGE TREE(3'CALIPER MIN) N'gpF o f,(E4P „ 1 Q OPERIMETER LANDSCAPE TREE Ofa7AMEtytA1--'� GRgp� I }— 0 MEDIUM t0 LARGE TREE!3' MJ CALIPER H STEEL FENCE - COVER ~" � OCQ ALONG BOYD DRIVE!4'CALIPER MIW !REF"DETAIL A) O PERIM SMALLETER TREE(IEDSCAPE GALIPER MIME REVISIONS 0 ALONG BOYD DRIVE ONLY I ( ------- OPEN SPACE TREE IUM TO LARGE TREE!3'CALIPER MIW ALL TREE!3 CALIPER MMJ -'— OPEN SPACE TREE 61BIL1 g T .O •"'' qIANSL Y iYTm �� �? MITIGATION TREE j `"' Y Y ® -•L O MEDIUM TO LARGE TREE!3'CALIPER MIW C. WAS 5HRI18 ,}t= m — ® _ SPACE _ MITIGTION TREE 0 SMALL TREE(Y CALIPER MMJ LANE SCAPE ARE 0 0 0>e,sox o- o LARGElSCREEN SHRUB 15 GALLON MMJ J SHRUB """' ALONG BOYD DRIVE l5 GALLON MMJ - 09K8'tY W 9i. O W ACCENT SHRUB 15 GALLON MIW F— ® (� ALONG BOYD DRIVE W Z W `®��.( 1-I .<•11 'ti3;" W.R.BOYD CENTER ADDITION z Z ( LOT iRi,BLOCK i i / 5��1 �—� 3.306 ACRES OF LAND LAJ °•`�""' I ='. i xt�ro DIUARF SHRUB(3 GALLON MIW ITIGATION _ 61•0'ORNAMENTAL Q ! STEEL. i ® ALONG BOYD DRIVE GALLON MIN.)GROUND COVER(4'POT MIN) d W I b" CREF.DETAIL:AJ Q INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA m 0 IN 0 I � I p \\I EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (MITIGATION REQUIRED) CEDAR PERB'7ETER LANDSCAPE GREEN SHR70 ' (•�10'DRAPIK�E/DB9M � T �yi �Et9ETE1li[TPJ -- o 0 0 0 0 0 o LANDSCAPE SUBMITTAL PLAN —.-. o 0 0 0 -mot ova SCALE w ........... .. .... ... .... .. .. ........ ... .... .... .. .. . ... GRAPEVINE TEXAN a e9Ke,z w LOT 2R BLOCK I 1^ = ao'—o' NW� J W.R.ai z I W.R.BOYD CENTER ADDITION b'-m` BOYID CENTER ADDITION ORNAMENTAL ✓2�t ACRES o LOT 3RI.BLOCK i STEEL FENCE 1 RE& L3< 3.306 ACRES OF LAND 00 DETAIL:A) n. I SITUATED IN DATE GRAPEVINE,TARRAM CpMI',TEXAS z U���nM PRe�� 03 MARCH 2011 1 a¢ I ( Jos Lake CarokM Parkway 1424 GN—Ille o'_ Sulte%m Sulte 200 _U o Irvinngg�Tma.15035 Dallas,Tex 15231 N ( I I m 21I-848m C214)981-3mim TITLE LOT 3R LOT 4 LOT 5 cn W.R.BOYD CENTER W.R.BOYD CENTER W.R.BOYD CENTER LANDSCAPE D o I CAB A,SLO.5851 x� I ( CAB.A,SLD.5851 I ChB.A,SLD.5851 I"= p P.R.T.C.T. P.R.T.C.T. P.R.T.C.T. SCAT®, 1 �•4V'V PLAN o m z o m I I ( SHEET 20 40 80 120 4 of 10 �oo I i i i TAIBULATION CHART MAINTENANCE C7 H � � TOTAL SITE AREA(1235 ACRES) 53BO65 SF THE OWNERTENANT AND THEIR AGENT,IF ANY SHALL JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPING.ALL REQUIRED Q U N INTERIOR LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A NEAT AND ORDERLY MANNER AT ALL a'. TIMES.THIS SHALL INCLUDE MOWING,EDGING,PRA W.,FERTILIZING,WATERING, O W " INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA REWIRED(10%1 20583 SF WEEDING,AND OTHER SUCH ACTIVITIES COMMON TO THE MAINTENANCE OF R! 205)326 SF x 10%=20PS3 SF LANDSCAPING.LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF TRASH,LITTER 4'x6' -O.O.C.— H INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED(10%) 21,400 SF WEEDS AND OTHER SUCH MATERIAL OR PLANTS NOT A PART OF THE LANDSCAPING. ~ ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A H �HEALTHY AND GROWING 2'-O. IER`''�DOLTSh AI Q INTERIOR LANDSCAPE TREES REQUIRED(1/400 SF) 54 GGNDI7ION AS 15 APPROPRIATE FOR THE SEASON OF THE YEAR PLANT MATERIALS 2NIO'BOLTED INTO 21,400 SF 1400 Sr=535 TREES WHICH DIE SHALL BE REPLACED WITH PLANT MATERIAL OF SIMILAR VARIETY AND SIZE. NOTCHED POST INTERIOR LANDSCAPE TREES PROVIDED 54 _- _ `r 2 z b COLLAR-MITER JOINTS PERIMETER LANDSCAPE 2x4 COLLAR-MITER JOINTS BOYD DRIVE(151) 2x6 CAP ' PERIMETER TREES REQUIRED(1/50 LF) 9 TREE PROTECTION 464.14 LF/50 LF=928 TREES 2x4 TRAM m v PERIMETER TREES PROVIDED(9 LARGE,B SMALL) 22 / DURINCs ANY CANSTR1CTION OR LAND DEVELOPMENT,THE DEVELOPER SHALL CLEARLY MARK ALL PROTECTED TREES TO BE MAINTAINED AND MAY BE REQUIRED TO ERECT AND - TURJER ROAR(10')PERIMETER TREES MAINTAIN PROTECTIVE BARKERS AROUND ALL SUCH TREES OR GROUPS OF TREES.THE 88526 LF/50 LF==11.1T.1�D(1/50 LF) 18 TREES DEVELOPER SHALL NOT ALLOW THE MOVEMENT OF EOIIPMENi OR THE STORAGE OF (3)2.4 STRINGERS m PERIMETER TREES PROVIDED i8 EQUIPMENT,MATERIALS,AND DEBRIS OR FILL TO BE PLACED WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF ANY PROTECTED TREE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT,THE 8'xe"iY€I.LIS POST EAST PERIMETER(10') DEVELOPER SHALL NOT ALLOW THE CLEANING OF EQUIPMENT OR MATERIAL UNDER THE 5PA T I;PER PLAN PERIMETER TREES REQUIRED(ll50 LF) 4 CANOPY OF ANY PROTECTED TREE OR TREES TO REMAIN NEITHER SHALL THE DEVELOPER izb BOARD >7�C 204.48 LF/50 LF.4.1 TREES ALLOW THE pISF'05AL OF ANY WASTE MATERIAL SUCH AS,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,PAINT,OIL, Q * a s} PERIMETER TREES PROVIDED 4 SOLVENTS,ASPHALT,CONCRETE,MORTAR ETC,UNDER THE CANOPY OF ANY 1292MC7E11 WATERPROO 666E TREE OR TREE. \ v e- 9rF OF t�+ SLOPE CONCRETE - uiFST PERIMETER(10'1 NO ATTACHMENT OR WIRES OF ANY KIND,OTHER THAN THOSE OF A PROTECTIVE NATURE, PERIMETER TREES RELalIR D(1/50 LF) B Ift'EXPANSION JOINT 6602 LF/50 LF=82 TREES SHALL BE ATTACHED TO ANY PROTECTED IEEE. ...,,. a � W/RExIeLE SEALANT _ PERIMETER TREES PROVIDED 13 CONCRETE EOUIPI'1ENT SLAB SOUTH PERIMETER(10'1 " ti PERIMETER TREES REQUIRED(1/50 LF) 18 �?�T ETE NOTES � SIDE viEW FRONT VIEUJ 905.%LF/50 LF=18.1 G PER PERIMETER TREES PROVIDED IS EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED pNRA. L ALL WOOD TO BE ROUGH 4 BEE CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT 6.COORDINATE PLACEMENT OF cER'B CUT WESTERN RED CEDAR PL N FOR POST LOCATIONS. WLbD FOOTS WITH MASONRY SCR2EEN PARKING LOT s VEHICULAR USE SCREEN(30'HT.SHRUB) PROVIDED TREE TYPE TREE SIZE LS 2.STAN WITH 2 COATS OF 5.TOP OF FENCE TO BE LEVEL WALL.ATTACH BEAMS TO BUILDws REVISIONS OLTMPIC BTAH SUBMIT 6.INSTALL 4'z4'FENCE SUPPORT A9 REWIRED, OPEN SPACE ELM b° GO-OR SAMPLES TO OIMER POSTS BETWEEN TRELLIS POSTS 4 INSTALLATION OF TRELLIS PORTION ELM 6" SECTION 3.ALL HARDWARE TO BE AS REQUIRED(MAX.6'-O'OC) OF DETAIL MAY BE CMITTED AS ELM e" HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED. 1 PROVIDE 3'•0'ACCESS GATE, DIRECTED BY OWER VERIFY THERE TOTAL OPEN SPACE REQUIRED(205t) 101.620 5F CEDAR 10" /'�/°� /y ®® ��`�i�1 pt A� '�'p �i 538,140 OF x 20%=101,628 SF CEDAR B" POOL EQUIPMENT 1 SCREEN AND D TRELLIS FROM ADJACENT RESIDENT AREA TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED(33%) 118,142 5F _ CEDAR I" CEDAR __ 6" -- 1/2".1'-D° VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE(38%) 205026 SF CEDAR 6" CEDAR e" _ CEDAR 6" NON-VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE TREES REQUIRED(1/3,000 SF) 69 _ CEDAR 6" 205526 5F 13000 EF-68.6I TREES CEDAR 6" NON-VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE TREES PROVIDED 69 CEDAR N4" CEDAR 6" CEDAR 6" TREE MITIGATION CEDAR b" CEDAR 6" ' MITIGATION TREES REQUIRED(121 INCHES) 43 CEDAR _ 6" 121 INCHES/3"CALIPER TREE=423 TREES CEDAR 6" MITIGATION TREES PROVIDED 43 30-MEDIUM TO LARGE TRESS(3"CALIPER MIND 13-SMALL TREES(3"CALIPER MIN) LANDSCAPE NOTES L ADDITIONAL PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE INSTALLED ON-SITE BY CUNER M ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS.MATERIAL SHOWN ON THIS PLAN 15 TO MEET MINIMUM CITY OF GRAPEVINE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. n'N 2.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY OWNER IN HEALTHY AND GROWING CONDITION, J Q AND REPLACED WITH PLANT MATERIAL OF SIMILAR VARIETY AND SIZE IF DAMAGED,DESTROYED TOP OF PENCE TO BE LEVEL-STEP AT X OR REMOVED. 3.LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF TRASH,LITTER WEEDS AND OTHER MATERIALS AGCgm�ATE�E HHAIr.1O I— OR PLANTS NOT A PART OF THE LANDSCAPING 4.AN UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC POP-UP TYPE LIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED TO 2-6Q 67EEL TOP RAIL W WATER ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS,INCLUDING PJGWT-OF-WAY AREAS. ADJUSTMENTS TO SYSTEM Z Li WILL LIMIT OVERSPRAY ONTO ADJACENT ROADWAYS AND CONSERVE WATER TO THE GREATEST I—Z EXTENT POSSIBLE d 5.ALL LANDSCPAE AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY RAISED SIX NCH CONCRETE CURBS. 10.6Q STEM NOTES. ' Q W PAVEMENT SHALL NOT BE PLACED CLOSER THAN FIVE FEEL'FROM A TREE TRAY UNLESS INTERMEDIATE (/ I.PANT FENCE WITH ONE COAT SPECIFYING A STAFF APPROVED ROOT BARRIER RAIL O'ZINC CHROMATE AND TWO Q b.ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED,INSTALLED AND MANTAINED 50 AS NOT COATS HIGH GLC58 NDU5TRIAL m TO OBSTRUCT VIEW OF MOTORISTS BETWEEN THE STREET AID THE ACCESS DRIVES. 2'8Q STEEL POST 9 ENAMEL PANT.COLOR TO BE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SHALL ALWAYS REMAIN UNOBSTRUCTED. 6'-O.Oc.MAXIMUM SELECTED BY 01I11M J 1.ALL PERMEABLE SURFACES NOT OCCUPIED BY TREES,SHRUBS,PLANTING BEDS,SIGNS AND (EQUAL POST SPACING 2.MMORCINY.x AND FOOTING a �C OTHER PERMITTED ITEMS OR FIXTURES SHALL BE BERMUDA,ST.AUGUSTINE,OR BUFFALO GRASS BETWEEN FIXED POINTS) DETAILS FOR FENCE POSTS BY LAM AREAS. 3.PROVIDE -6-NEM ACCESS 3.PROVDE EAG ACCESS GATE WHERE SHOWN ON PLAN HC PLANT PALETTE SY LOOK ELF RE ASLATCH GANDEOOKING �R SELF LATCHING AND LOOKING J.B(1 STEEL PIC.NOT6 EE N v 9 b'O.C. 4 4 ENSU RE SURE 1fNE bz5 CLEAR ePACE ON MEDIUM TO LARGE TREE-3"caliper minimum,spacing as shown FULL SIDE OF GATES. Live Oak(Quercus virginlana),Cedar Elm(Udnus aasalrolla),Stumard 5.PENCEANCHOR 5YST01 ON TOP Red Oak(Ouerous sFumarcill),Bur Oak(Auer—,meaoearpa),Bald OF RETAINING WALL AS SPECIFIED cypress(Taxodiun distid„m),Scuumrn M gwlia(Magnolia grandiflora), BY ENGINEER, Pecan(Carya III1noensl6l,Chinese Pletachlo(Platacla chlnemis),Eater X Red Cedar(Junipers virgtntana),Leyland Cypress(Cupressociparis leylandl). SMALL TREE-3"caliper minimum,epeclrlg es stoup 2'OaSTEEL BOTTOM It 1 11 11 11 11 11 L= FINISH GRADE SCALE Yaupon Holly(Ilex vomltorla),Desert Willow(Chilopele Ilneerk),Mexican Pius PAL - a (Prove mexlcans),Redbud(Cerds caraderew N.T.S. 9 LARGE/SCREEN SHRUB-5 gallon minimum(30"height minimum),Von center CONCRETE DESIGN - Dwarf Burford Holy(ilex cornuta'Burfordil'Nana'),Cleyera(Ternstroemia gymmntFera), STRUCTURAL-pv D�� Compact Elaeagrua(Elasagmrs waroptylla'Ebberjl'),Nardira(Nandim dor.tica), Vu x Wf Nellie R.Steven's Holly(Ilex x'Nellie R Stevens'),Dwarf Wax Myrtle(Myrica pusilla), DATE E a Variegated Ptivet(Liguatrun lucldum'vartegata9,Abeila(Abella grandflora), Tara,Sage(LeucopNlum frtes—'Compactun'),Sea Green Juniper Ourlperus ORNAMENTAL STEEL PERIMETER FENCE A 03 MARCH 2O11 iv chinen,is'Sea Great,Blue Point Juniper f,Antperus ditnensis'Bkle Point'), Loropetalun(Loropetalum cMnense) 3/4'.i'•O' I o DWARF SHRUB-3 gallon minimum,Ton renter o Dwarf Yaupon Holly!ilex vomitorla Nana'),Dwarf Indian Hawthorn(Raphiolepts MI-), N TITLE Carlasa Holly(Ilex corruta'Carlssa'),Compact Nand"(Nardina domeatica'Compacta'), c"N Ari"Waterer Spirea lSplraea x bumuida'Antony Waterer'),Barberry(Berberis FENCE o\ th berglU,Red Yucca(Hespereiee pervlNore),Juniper(Juliperus ep),DwarF Abelta ELEVATIONS o (Abella grandiflora'Edward Goucher2 E GROUNDCOVER-4"pot mtnlmum,r2"to 15"on center z o Asian Jasmine(Tract sloepermun aslaticum),Liriope Wrlops muscarl),Mondo SHEET Grass(Ophlopogon Japonicum),Purple Winteraeaper(Euonymus rortuWei m° 'Coloratus J Honeysuckle(Lonloera Japonica'Atropurpurea'),Juniper U..a (Juniperus ap),Engltsh Ivy(Had—hslx). 5 OF 10 F w 5— 40 20 40 BO $ —e,o ?`s TURNER ROAD 1 inch 40ft. O' Public R.O.W. MiaR- � atch Ex. Gra 4� '18"E � Wr•, w , F 0 U M l Him i ,+9 615 616 I e I I �� as 6 w SMliding o. 3 1 ew Bs.y a ' t _ s' F 616.6 ��.� - � _� .� _ __. I -_I // i •��~ � \ I \ _ I II AF , a2 / / - ^'3 om'� if I / Butlld ng No. m 0 -675y _. / / ad - / 1I w.�eomce B ADDITION 4 m a L- L- 2 i L _ I / t22 u.as l t/ / (538,068.0 Qua LET) 1=- \ ' I—- I 1 This pion is released review the 0 ,s w � RES 0 LAND- O �� -_.1 urposa of Interimravfew and 4 -- - 1 pricingunder th authority of O KEVINS.VAER,P.E.91219 l Date:M l It 6 not tobe Used far construction. ,2.2 �_,�s ,a os \>� \ � I I ! � fn 616 I F Gt] p s / _ .. --7- \ lM tah E I Grade I1 Ts _- ' s „e /j p , 9 No. 1 BuF F.'615.3 -��- -�- �i - -- Z � u p- ,u ""-O e f � i Bung �o. 4 ,e _ � — -- _ 1 � vv TA Ll s , / — F.- p U a oil �\_/... LF-- 617-ffu] \rw15.z o r 16fa si r h�i Bw I.s \ Prop. G Ve T Drain tw Is.z rn ts.z d`s I v W.K,DOYD CENTER ADDITION Rw 1sT BW 1so 0 LOT iKI.DLOCK 1 I Issue Dates: e 8.306 ACRES OF LAND � \\ (141,199.773 SQUARIA FEET) II 1 March 2011 W.R.BOYDSCENIER \ I CAB.A.61D.5851 \ F.F. 618. I F.F. 616 .___-�" ,S, _ air I-„�t 1-�.- .�._- —__ R-�'.. W \\ V 1 1 . s� IT_—r L LEGEND$^Ile 0 4ao Proposed Spot Elevation / 616 IOWD, >/ \\ \\ \\ 1 / II =n _,,,I I - ssD Proposed Contour N- Existing Contour _ p / �- - I \ . � tw fao II 1.7TIN 17.5 • ��� \ \ \ I c soo Existing Spot Elevation `" 7W 120 / I I I \ Be 15S BW 17.5�I t �I ,W 70J \ \ 1 I CASE NAME:Grapevine Texon Apartment. • i° eW 19.5 1 \ CASE NUM — Direction Of Flow 8W 11.5 I 1 I , LOCATION:B401 Boyd Dr.;Lot o 2R,lBlock 1, 1 2"CIR9 l + tso ' ue 1/2•CIRB \ \ \ I W.R. .R Boyd Center Addition ,ate t TEN 145 a I Lai -... ._B�. MAYOR SECRETARY Iml / 6t7 / st8 / 1 CITY GPI MONUMENTA2: 613 674 fits / 616 61B-,g 620 \ 6.0'ALUMINUM R00 N17H CAP SET 0.4'BELOW ACCESS COVER. ACCESS COVER IS W,K.DOYD CE E R ADDITION Prop.Grade/To Drain ! \ \ I °A�' STAMPED.'CITY OF GRAPEVINE MON.Y. MONUMENT IS LOCATED APPROX.250 a / FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF DOVE RI,AND HOOD LN.AT THE Scale: 1"=40' LOT 3 BLOCK i / / / I PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ENTRANCE TO DOVE PARK PARKING LOT. a o / 3.306 ACES OF LAND z / / _ l ETEVARON=627.32 Drawn By. BLM (144,701.44412 SQUARE FEET) ! / / _ m'o u o ( / / / ! ! / ( LOT 3R CHAIRMAN CITY GPS MONUMENT IP. Checked By. KSW VV R.BOYD CENTER/ LOT 4 12'ALUMINUM ROD VAIN CAP SET 0.6-BELOW ACCESS COVER. ACCESS COVER IS z<¢ / CAB.A,STD.5857 13 / ! / / I W.R.ROYD CENTER DAIS: STAMPED,'dTY OF GRAPEVNNE,NO.7. MONUMENT IS LOCATED AT THE HEATHER / P.R.T.C.T. ) 851 STARON OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS AT THE GRAPEVINE LIKE HEADQUARTERS SHEET. 6 OF 10 ON FAIRWAY DRIVE(110 FAIRWAY DR.) Sheet / APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ELEVATION-58676 / /! ! { / / ANY WORK IN CONFLICT VATH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. TEMPORARY BENCHMARK: of 10 NTOMCTION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FR ROAD ANDN.GOONEY STREET ON EAT 4 TT CUT SET ON TOP OF DAB INLET APPROX V SOUTH N.D IOOLEY STREET. SEE No.10-104 ELEVATION-597.07 10-104 Grading Plan U F ITs�. J� � x4 40 0 20 40 80 a � x w I I _ III TURNER ROAD TUR / o�_- � � i inch= 4Dft. W (( GAS I( (60 Public R O.W.) _ z I I I MARKER I I - — --__ oL6 i8"E / �- IT U Prop.10. -- rT�-- �- aF: R�.` Q ,� N (~ Curb Inlet - -- - --- - <C a'RCP c rt mlat C m meat lam meat o Prof.Detention Pond - --- - -.- `•�---__-_ - T__. -- ----_ -._ ---- ---_-. -_-.-- ---- A '* -__-_ __--- - __- - L � RCP J w 21'RCP 78'RCP - ------- --- op. 78'RCP / P P.4x4' \ I Curb Inlet i 'storm M-hdl ow ._ ao�"tMaaR o P al Buifd ng No. 3 Build ng Nip. 2 I tow n s ' , F 616. Curb' rI5,Cu let ra - Ul iij 11.11 OI f Building No. F.F.=61—5.8�-.- { T' n W.R.BOYD CE ADDITION - >. - 8 r 18'RCP IIII�a I � This Ian is released for the t Curt I p se.osB.o EsQuo EEr �l f -�1 I ---�I I Pr n' I purpose of Interim review and lO \---- --�-' I R t r� pricing under the authority of .� ) O O I cp I KEVIN S.IMER,RE 91219 Date:March 2ofi Well m I '� --- .'_- --"- __- for construction. lrj I I O 4,,,g 1 _ J� to to c - 15.9C __ _____._ 111 I •'...A, t..i - I a m8•e' , Inlet z-Gr_o-in Pro �t C Not Prop.to rCP18 RCP-_ 18-RCP-__ m I I t 7-/ B ddn,g No i LWE"'I ZF-F- - I p � - __ � - Bwidin o. 4 ' - - - -_-Ci I� �I � � � ��_1 -P- II • - - Maw F-t N Prop.70' - 616.3 -�_ v.- - •- r.-r,� \ I P.P.r 1. 0 I� a i. _- -� Curb Inlet curt met E.- r� I I ZF, H � \f- 16.4 -- � i I fw �ly � a/ 1/27 ORS Prop. — III i II. E l� F= - -- sa9a2812'v✓_z�.�o Wye Inlet 15.9 10 Dramoge J` I -- W.R.BOYD CENTER ADDITION Eesemant 01 I-y- - LOT 1Ri,BLOCK I Issue Dates: III __ - __ I(` 3.306 ACRES OF LAND Moran eon 4�_- I I -_-,_ — _ �� _..- tN (141,199.773 SQUARE FEET) Ing Bull No. 6 'd __.. __ t III -F. .-616. L.. a J--; yl,'1—��� - .�_._.� ---` All storm sewer pipe 18"diameter and larger shall be Class III RCP or approved o F.F. 618. equal. All storm sewer pipe 1 diameter and smaller shall be SDR-35 PVC, C,ADS - I I N-12 pipe,or approved equal. e N Oil RCP 18'RCP Pro 5 CASE NAME:Grapevine Texan Apartments y Curb bt ( Curb Inlet CASE NUMBER: Zii-01 @ PDii-07 LOCATION: 401 Boyd Dr.; Lot 2R,Block 1, Prop.Retaining Wail ,/2,aRS W.R.Boyd Canter Addition /z aas S89'2892"W 614.86' op 10' rb Inlet MAYOR SECRETARY b rap.a'x4' ' DATE: CITY GPS MONUMENT J1 Wye lMet W,R,BOYD CENTER ADDITION 6.V ALUMINUM ROD NTH CAP SET 0.4'BELOW ACCESS COVER. ACCESS COVER IS 10'Drainage STAMPED,'CRY OF GRAPEVINE,MON.2'. MONUMENT IS LOCATED APPROX.250 Easement LOT 8R1,BLOCK 1 PANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF DOVE RD.AND HOOD LN.AT THE Scale: 1"=40 3.306 ACRES OF LAND ENTRANCE TO DOVE PARK PARKING LOT. (144,101.412 SQUARE FEET) ELEVATION a 627.32 Drawn By. FILM CHAIRMAN CITY GPS MONUMENT P. Checked By. KSW DATE: 12'ALUMINUM ROD WITH CAP SET 0.6'BELOW ACCESS COVER. ACCESS COVER IS STAMPED.'Ctt OF GRAPEVINE,No.7'. MONUMENT IS LOCATED AT THE WEATHER SHEET: 7 OF 10 STATION OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS DFQ AT THE GRAPEVINE LAKE HEADQUARTERS Sheet ON FAIRWAY GIVE(710 FAIRWAY DR) APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ELEVATION=585.76 ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. TEMPORARY BENCHMARK: of 10 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Q CUT SET ON TOP OF CURB INLET APPROX.30'SOUTH OF INTERSECTION OF u o oLOT 4 rr.ixrc TURNER ROAD AND N.DOOLEY STREET ON EAST SIDE OF N.DOOLEY STREET. BE[No.10-104 nun r ELEVATION=597.01 10-104 Drainage Plan s rrnn ��hh ) V! V r z F� 40 0 20 40 80 19 1 Inch= 4Oft. W 2 nett to a Remove&Dispose Ex. � � qqq H 1B•RCP Receae 1a'Curb Inlet k 3 k rW.t e o " K I( C n t M d f d 10 1 R c d Curb Inlet I I e iaa -- `.1 E 8 S &Replace E. e I TURNER ROAD- .R Can.Punt Par I //,� (60' Public R O.W.) 2 42"ROP "" (I 42-RCP Standard Detala -t.- --•^ _ tPi=-A`Ee->^'-'.-1- -_.--- _ '°" ` comsat to Ex. I 787 RCP -i \- Remove Sawat,Remova &Disposed E. &RePII Ex {I'_ 24'RCP Cent.f P"L Per Ci Q Connt to Ex. fy o Grapevine Standvrd Deta0a " 9 16"RCPec Uw - I- II 1his plan i9 released tar the pure — I puryosa of interim review and pricing under the authority of KERN S.WER,PE 91219 I I, Dote:March 2011 ,I It is not to be used for construction. t�l L Xw C7 H a � z z _ � C) aH Q Z�i1:4 �D H v 0 w W wU w w I IY Z � H � a w z Ex 2•1 72"l RCP U O m } Rxi_:��I LYi Q ' I Prop.Sky R &Repl0c N�Talep oh a Riau W "'� I Storm Manhole --- Ex.Street Slgo ---.- _ w TURNER ROAD &1- Pa \� w (60' Public R.O.W.) StlwdoMDet tl Issue Do I _ 545"2618"E - March zott to &R -21 G..Pplace Ex. J/ \ I r / Cint.Per ---- -_- / City f Gra (7- w Standard Derails - } 1 �0t All storm sewer pipe 18"diameter and 36"R -� larger shall be Class III RCP or approved a W equal. All storm sewer pipe 15"diameter { and smaller shall be SDR-35 PVC, ADS N-12 pipe,or approved equal. 0 , II a ' CASE NAME:Grapevine Texan Apartments CASE NUMBER: Z11 01&PD11-01 l� LOCATION:W 1 Boyyd Cenlaot 2R,hack 1, I 3 MAYOR SECRETARY CITY GPS MONUMENT& DATE: 6.0'ALUM INDo ROD WITH CAP SET 0.4'BELOW ACCESS COVER. ACCESS COVER 6 STAMPED,"CITY OF GRAPEVINE,MON.2•. MONUMENT IS LOCATED APPROX.250 FEET NOR OF THE INTERSECTION OF DOVE R0.AND H006 tH.AT THE Seale: 1"=40' I PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ENTRANCE TO DOVE PARK PARKING LOT. (�( m ELEVATION-627.32 Drawn By. BLM CHAIRMAN CITY GPS MONUMENT#7: Checked By. KSW till�� 1Y ALUMINUM ROD WIN CAP SET O C BELOW ACCESS COVER. ACCESS COVER IS DATE: STAMPED,•G17 OF GRAPEWVE N0.7•. MONUMENT IS LOCAIFD AT THE WEATHER i SHEET: 8 OF 10 STATION OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS AT THE GRAPEVINE LAKE HEADQUARTERS Sheet ON FAIRWAY DRIVE(110 FAIRWAY DR.) APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ELEVATION=585.76 ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. TEMPORARY BENCHMARK: OF 1O DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES •O•CUT SET ON TOP OF CURB INLET APPROX.30'SWTH OF INTERSECTION OF TURNER ROAD AND N.DOOtEY STREET ON EAST SIDE OF N.DOOLEY STREET. gEi No.10-1O4 ELEVATION-597.07 10-104 Drainage Plan- fsite Y Conn.to Ex So I,Remove Wat W/r.8' k Replace Ea. " T Sleeve City Pvmt.m n I 1 , oPP�9 City of e a IL » e -_ sa Conn.to � Standard D i Os a a(s) e ----Ex.SS MIT [..C'.r \` o \ -T-..- // r� / Prof 10'x10. \\\ f I I.�k RePiace E. $:.Im I P Prop.�.Meta e m, a TLpf2.NEfZ ROAD ,-ate x L Coast 4' Cenc PwnL Pa g GAS ` ri.I I (60' Public R Q.W.) (TV.)E Die MH s e l City of Grapeuiw `o e EIARKER 2 I I l \ �,` I / _ - - _ 645 `f$uE -_I-Slane rd Dotal. - :, (� canal.4' '— / -�� / co't 4•� Pmp. _� _ -V �- �aR ' - _ _ s T Dio.MH / DI..MH - - Comb'no' F L / f Doable = FH I _ ___. / 1 / Oetecla Ch d -'�_ \ ru X _ 8'Watts _ \ o? emow 40 0 20 40 SO Z w ! m / / / ( =.� - Y k Replace Ex.ro k Disposed 6 LF ` / 7.5 6 \ nr Cono.Pont Per Ex.8'SS and ! -i / wore,Esmt. / O1 `•" - I City f era ahe 1 inch= 40ft. / -I, ^ P and C 4'Die,, �- � _sta eam Detnaa a coon to E.. =ng6 1�N6.o6. 3/ �B.-_Iding No. 2 JFH u F F=8 t II .II I - 1 r Cont.4. `�.�;� - _--i`.. —.-_�_ ---__ ,_ - It: 1 i / P .s'Waco / DI.MIT / Ul I I•— I n��^ /11 i P ,o ,D• I g^T5 ,` 5.7 -� n.4 !o _��—/ -°"Can't 4'op. B ildln No./ 1 TlerE t_4 J 1F.F. 615/8� _ .sc' \ `a. �ea_MH L� a W.R.BOW CE N 6' LOT 2R OC ss� 2.3 _ACRE 0 l l ( P (.,M35-5.33 5 R 7fII9 Ion ie released far Dle �� P o� w• Z Ca - purpose of interim review and -- -' s'yrtr. _- - ,icing under the authority of o I I I I KENN S.8162,P.E.91219 vm m / / / _ ! I `' t / Prov.io'x10' O \ - 1 I Y 2 coon.'a Ex. 0` I / -�- f / Water Esmt \ Prop 10'x10' - I Water W/8 x6' , El_- / �� ! / --/ t tT») / AV Wale,Esmt T �Toppny ae<re Data.Moron eon / �� -L - I 1 \\\ 1 -V _ �l -.1 __ It is not to 6e used / 3 J / 1 _ _ (T ) Q far Construction. > - _ �� _�F_ ] _ - _ e �I ( F e Las_ 1 I (`-�-, I Prop S.-I,Remove t II Roploce Ex. a ID1 I , , Dan,.Pm,L Pm watts E'm1. City of GmpWne \ \ ) standora Detoa' m 1 �1` _�- a / �\ (II I 1 I IPay.la.Moto I/ Do.MIT I`° i FH i Mwatabla am AI -_c1z� L � { 1 c 1 � !IIII n--- % (-\f - - �a - ! �•� I �I I I�Pn-1. I (I � H Prep. z a _ .... luitDss s goublBuild'n 1 i I I aQ Deteata am,TI W Di..MIT F.F.= p 3. Building o. a \v \\ �TS j 1 IV I -. j N�i z / - �_FF-sIbOD -_ .._�� 616.3N.P.1D'x,o' \ _ / -i- a A— P 1a'xto' 1(ll I �y Q l / / 6 Wlr. \ wale,Ean, / / / l -� \ water E_�,t. I (Typ.) / / F IF NI (I � I zh � I I / _ I _�( 6. I Ia I Y I!' :�•/ �6T _ \ \ , 1� i LEGEND W U 1 - I I O \! / �'+ ; Q';•a*• ( 1 2'a s \ I I p Pro osed Water F.F.- • V� Existing Water Proposed Sanit ary SewerWotar E'mt. W.K.aoYD ceNrERADDmoN , LOTRLKIProw Eamt Ivn t3.306 ACRES OF LAND 1 ' 1 Existing Sanitary Sewer Issue Dates: --- y March 2017 W4.Serv. / ( I c II) 1\ `1/4 R```EET II '\, �� I N07E a $ Lor s Contractor Shall Verify Coordinates N \ wR.eoro CENha 1 1 ' I Prior To Construction And I - /`--- Bull No. 6 ! �1 1 ; CAB.P R:�GL 5�7 It 1 - I -' Fli l 1 I (I Of An Engineer Immediately FF 618--- Of Any Discrepancy. T� / ( \ i 1 Canat 4' ( ,` NOTE I ( s ( \ ar'iomn;.ins storcwdls Mail owe dry standpipes c x I I 3o I Prov.to'x1o' -_- i I I FH F 1 W tar Ee t N V —i-- Una Ary o nd utmtia'. /'"�� ( I I Contact Appropriate \\ In. companlee 4s Hre. P .e'Watts 1 I /''� o , 1 / A 0�. � t BOD DIG TESS ro 1 _ \ , CASE NAME Grope` Texan Apartments OC I CASE NUMBER:Zit-01-Ot @ PDt1-01 OC LOCATION: 401 Boyd Dr.:Lot 2R,81=k 1• I i I b / W.R.Bogy Canter Addition 1/r ens / \ \ cJba,GB'12"W^•�i'14'.8G" V \ \ I NO O J z W t r Esmt / / / / J \ \ MAYOR SECRETARY TYP _ / / _ � CITY GPS MONUMENT J2• w P,a)10 / W.R BOYD CEWTER ADDITION / / -- — DATE: 8.0'ALUMINUM ROD NTH CAP SET 0.4'BELOW ACCESS COVER. ACCESS COVER IS I �� STAMPED."CITY OF GRAPEVINE.MON.2'. MONUMENT IS LOCATED APPROX.250 Oro,na9n / LOT 3 1,BLOCK i / / / ! \ ( FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF DOVE RD.AND HOOD UL AT THE Scale: 1"=40• Easement / / , __ _ I PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 3.306 ACRES OF LAND / _ _ —� ENTRANCE TO DOVE PARK PARKING LOT. (144.101.412 SQUARE FEET} ELEVATION=627.32 Drawn By. BLM J =m a z Jo I j / ! l J l LOT 3R / F` - CHAIRMAN CITY GPS MONUMENT P. Checked By KSW W.R.BOYO CENTER I LOT 4 12'ALUMINUM ROD VAIN CAP SET 0.6'BELOW ACCESS COVER. ACCESS COVER IS ¢¢¢ / CAD.A.SLD.5851 d / / ! J ! W.R.BOYD CENTER STAMPED.'CITY OF GRAPEVINE.NO.7. MONUMENT IS LOCATED AT THE WEATHER ( P.R.T.C.T. GATE: ' /~ / �1 ONSTATIONFAIR A ME E(110 OF ENGINEERS AT THE GRAPEVINE TAKE HEADQUARTERS Sheet P.R.T.C.T. HEET: 9 OF 10 ON FAIRWAY DRIVE RPS FAIRWAY DR) APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ELEVATION=585.76 ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH TEMPORARY BENCHMARK: Of 10 ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. •L-r CUT SET ON TOP OF WHO INLET APPROX.3O SOUTH OF INTERSECTION OF __ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TURNER ROAD AND N.ODOLEY STREET ON EAST SIDE OF N.DOOLEY STREET. ��--- - / / J ! SEI No.10-104 ELEVATION=597.07 10-iQ4 Utility Plan i 0 Btu I 40 0 20 40 80 I_ ` �_ ((�" 1 inch= 40fL _ _a TE—{ I � a - _ E- �� ,2•aR5 589°2892'w�291.10' �I -- � R ADD ON—.__ TE I - ACR OF LAN — R K 1—� — [ �� � � LOt1Rt; L 'K1 / t000' I ( ,osa o0 9u RE FEET) 3.306 ACRES F`LAND a _ 3 -_-_ Land U ul Fam ly I (747,199 773 QU RE FEU ing: ro sed MF 2 W/PO Ovc Icy '� _ —Za rid U mi Site s m ar Q I am a (�- -'� __-."l_/� I �� \ Proposed 12,800 Sq.Ft. r ` Bolding __...0 k^ a LU Prop sad 13,800 tSq.Ft. _ - \ ' Buld ng _ / \ ViciniN�Map l O I _ Proposed 24 Fpela e ° = cLo' r ,/2-oas - -. __-.° ass W.R BOYD CENTER ADDITION r C.C.HALL JR.,MACK JAMESON, �E'- S«aye TRUMAN BURNETT,PAUL L MOOR ` 3.306 ACRES OF LAND / t ' ' AND JOHN M.MCKINNEY, \ _{. Lam' s�21 1¢� f.Propp�Dsdd2k IfeldD ,� \ 1Ln,II •aJJiVJ(144,101.412 SQUARE FEET) DBA CINCO INVESTMENT GROUP Land U V coot VOL.7095,PG.2166 Zoning: C C mer'cai -----'- a I ° Proposed �/� Proposed 000 Sq.FL S �`> " I 17,000 Sq.Ft \P Bolding \ 9 7 4,900,Sge Ft. 13 _..._... /Buldin9\ -` r / \ LOT 4 ` -- ,0ao' W.R.BOYD CENT R 2 / \ _ ----_-_ _ irw r. CAB R.T.C.T.S 1 ((C\AVI 7 y C 57 F 4 t y ' apo 24 Firethne g _ I o" General Site Data_ 12 15 15 i - rod Use ng :: - -- 1 9R P°� - - land Use Retail --. ,900pSq F'4. ? -.___ Lot Area __ - 66 saes Baldn � '< r Buildmg Area - --63400 sf E�d 4 6 6 6 Prop oosed P rk ng Rau. 1sp/200 sf w z 7 4 5 f t3 ( Standard Surtace Parking 3V w Proposed Proposed Drive Drive i6 Entranc 8 Entrance 11 ss.M.I-I.n --_ _ .._._. -__- E t g D.ive _ G-°--.7Pls��-2eV421W- ^�--2G9:a�C -" CONCEPT P L A N _-589—W�2"W-480.9A _—_ entrance - -- - 5W W 42"W 28.33 F Lots 1R1, & 3R1, Block 1 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY (IOUrublicKO.W.) 6.612 ACRES W.R. BOYD CENTER ADDITION CASE NAME Grapevine Te Apartments CASE NUMBER: Z11-01 do%PD71-Ot - LOCATION: 01 ooyya coni°t2 auolock t' situated in the A.F. LEONARD SURVEY — ABSTRACT 946 MAYOR SECRETARY GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS DATE: Developer Owners/Applicants PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JLB Partners, L.P. The Miles Foundation, Inc. & 909 Lake Carolyn Pkwy., Suite 960 Miles Production, Inc. Irving, Texas 75039 200 Highland Circle CHAIRMAN Telephone (214) 271-8450 Argyle, Texas 76226 Contact: Britton Church DATE: SHEET: Tn OF 10 Enoinesr/Surve)or APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE Spiars Engineering,WITH Inc. @t ANY WORK IN CONFLICT TH 765 Custer Rd., Suite 100 ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. Piano, Texas 75075 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Telephone (972) 422-0077 -- Contact: Kevin Vier of 10 Scale 1"=40' March 2011 MEMO TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER MEETING DATE: MARCH 15, 2011 SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (TABLED FROM 2/15/11) LOTS 1 R1, 2R & 3R1, BLOCK 1, W.R. BOYD CENTER ADDITION (BEING A REPLAT OF LOTS 1R, 2, 3R AND 5, BLOCK 1, W.R. BOYD CENTER ADDITION) PLAT APPLICATION FILING DATE....................................................... February 8, 2011 APPLICANT...............................................................Mr. Grant Coates, Miles Production REASON FOR APPLICATION ...........Platting site to an apartment complex PROPERTY LOCATION..................................".......................751 E. Northwest Highway SITEACREAGE ......................................................:--.---...............................---......:.-::.,18.9 ZONING................:..... CC Corr7mun,y Commercial &� R-MF-2 M Iti-family NUMBER OF LOTS ............................ ........."....... ...:........:............ .........:..: .. 3 lots PREVIOUSPLATTING.... ................................................................................ ..March..2000 CONCEPTPLAN.................................................................• .....................---.--.--- No SITEPLAN ........................................................................................... PD 11-01-1 Z11--01 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT.................................................... ................. No AVIGATIONRELEASE......:.........................................................................................Yes PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED......................................................................... .......Yes O:IAGEN DA12011\03-15-111WRBoyd.d oc PLAT INFORMATION SHEET FINAL PLAT APPLICATION LOTS 1R1, 2R & 3R1, BLOCK 1, W.R. BOYD CENTER ADDITION I. GENERAL: • The applicant, Mr. Grant Coates, is platting this 18.9 acre site to build an apartment complex on Lot 2R. Lots 1 R1 and 3R1 are for future development. The address is 751 E. Northwest Highway. II. STREET SYSTEM: • The development has access Northwest Highway, Boyd Drive and Turner Road • abutting roads are on the City Thoroughfare Plan: are not on the City Thoroughfare Plan: ❑ Periphery Street Fees are due as follows: Type of Roadway Cost 1 LF Length Cost Major Arterial(A) $ 234.57 LF ❑.Major Arterial (B) $ 178.351 LF Minor Arterial (C) $ 203.061 LF ❑ Minor Arterial (D) $ 170.33 /tl= ❑ Collector (E) $ 170.331 LF .❑ Collector (F) , $ 150.98 / LF ❑'S id`ewalk $ 25.00 / LF ❑Curb & Gutter $ 10.00 / LF ® Periphery Street Fees are not due. Ill. STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: • The existing stormwater runoff flows north into Turner Road. • The developer will be required to design for onsite as well as offsite drainage in accordance with the requirements of the City of Grapevine's Code of Ordinances. o:IAG ENnA12011\03-15-111WRBoyd.doc IV. WATER SYSTEM: ® The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ❑ The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development. Additional off site water system improvements will be necessary to serve the site. V. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: ® The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ❑ The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development- VI, MISCELLANEOUS: ❑ Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are not required for: ® Wafter and Wastewater Impaet;Fees;are due prioi'to the issuance of building permits. ❑ Single Family'Residential. .(,$,2,7781 Lot) Multifamily ( $ 1,291 / Unit) ❑ Hotel ( $ 47,631 1 Acre) ❑ Corporate Office ( $ 22,0231 Acre). ❑ Government ( $ 7,688 /Acre) ® Commercial / Industrial ( $ 6,3521 Acre) ® Open Space Fees are not required for ❑ Open Space Fees are required for . ❑ R-5.0, Zero Lot District ( $ 1,416.00/ Lot) ❑ R-7.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,146.00 / Lot) ❑ R-12.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,071.001 Lot) ❑ R-20.0, Single Family District ( $ 807.00/ Lot) 0AAGEN€A\2011103-15-111WRBoyd.doc ❑ Public Hearing Only ❑ Variances were required on the following items: ❑ Front building line ❑ Rear building line ❑ Lot width & depth ❑ Max. Impervious Area ❑ The following items associated with this plat are not in accordance with the current subdivision standards: ❑ 50' ROW dedication not met: Developer is proposing to dedicate variable width private access easements throughout the development. The access easements will be owned and maintained by a Home Owners Association (HOA). ❑ Length of cul-de-sac street exceeds the 600-foot limit: VI I. STATEMENT OF FINDINGS: A. The City has determined that the right of-way and easements required to be dedicated for "streets, utilities, drainage,. access,, sidewalks and other municipal needs and services are consist6nt With the City`s ordinances and master plan, are reasonable and are connected to the proposed project in the following manner: ❑ The right-of-way provides for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. The onsite utility easements provide for a utility network to serve the development of this site. ® The onsite drainage easements provide for a drainage network to serve the development of this site. ® The onsite access easements provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. O:IAG E N DA1201110 3-15"-111w R Boyd.d oc B. The City further finds that the required dedication is related both in nature and extent to the impact of the proposed development as follows: ❑ The right-of-way is necessary to provide for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. ® The onsite utility easements are necessary to provide for a utility system to serve this development and connect to existing utilities on surrounding property. ® The onsite drainage easements are necessary to provide for storm drainage improvements to serve the development of the site. The onsite access easements are necessary to provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements are necessary to provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. All of the ded icatibns benefit.the development to at least the extent of the impact-'of such`orb the development, Vlll. RECOMMENDATION: The members of the City Council and The Planning & Zoning Commission consider the following motion- "Move that the City Council: (Planning and Zoning Commission) approve the Statement of Findings and the Final Plat of Lots 1R1, 2R and 3R1, Block 1, W.R. Boyd Center Addition". OAAGBN DA12011\03-15-111W RBoyd.doc 3 APPLICATION FOR PLATTING CITY OF GRAPEVINE,;TEXAS TYPE OF PLAT: KPreliminary Final Replat Amendment PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Name of Addition: 11"•R• CX144rv— Number of Lots: 3— Gross Acreage: Proposed Zoning: R-MFZ PD G UP t Location of Addition: vAweS,� P-wwiw Pa D,,' W PROPERTY OWNER: Name: Riles 014 1 Address: Zbo City. Arl k- State: tip: �-70—U Phone:� xt Fax: Signature- Email: oa+c5 ' iMi ics��h_J APPLICANT: Name: S.�E kS 6wNE Contact: Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: ] Fax: ame:S L.,5, Contact: Vr4,h 5,.w,UC Address: bS p i• k 100 City: Pt4,4b State: ` Zip: -TSo-f'S Phone: ( Fax: ( ]` �-'4,22-400 1Y Email: th ,wtc.+� f2jk4 � ,wn ,Covi ****** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application Received: 1 ! By: I . L13 PhyAh-k,0,-' Fee Amount: $ Checumber: 04jrmter oat appfim6on a � TURNER ROAD Poi for — t VA 2:'DRAIGE&r, -� - (60' P bli .W R.O .) �OQ111f11tIQ 2 CAB.A.stD'3<;T[1W m'.2s'wale Site PR iG E (LOT 2 J fey Th Pot) N >—ees r P-� _ _ „/ /_-- — _' / 1� 25 BUILD G UNE am/1 A' �.A SLD-5478 —�J y�{ __ t0 UiL i ESMi �` I j' P.Rt.0 T. i// CnB.A SLO Sa 78 / / t P/i.l 4I,R_T.C-T E semen!se 1 r/ Y,,/ lO.t O'worn Vt (By m�Plot) 50 0 25 50 100 '�I-- ---------/�-aalnaq. I Ea=<r.,<nt f I 2D'OR.AGE er uTwn ESMT. Vicinity Map -ram Easement (By Thrs Pop 1 y,. A.SLD.5478 Nn (By Thrs Prat) ( ✓ , %�� P.R.T.C.T. I inch= 50fL 1 1 CL j ✓J 1 I 10'Drainage C/ ( I DETENTION NOTE Ea ini.tMal (/f 1 I In the event that a detention facility is necessary for the owner to meet the I I AB A,BUD, E5MT. / ( , (By ) CAB.A,Sto.547e Citp's Drainage Requirements, the detention facility shall be maintained by the PR.T.C.T. owner in compliance with aller federal, state and local regulations and to the 1 10'.10'wate I I i specifications of the ine of record. 1 1 V/t Easement �r'T eng 1 1 i 10.10 Wert« / ✓ (By This Plat) LJ , 1 Easement t/ {/ 20'BUILDING ONE Any retaining wall or other conhnement structure shall be maintained by the I (By This Plop r� CAB.A SLID 5478 owner m compliance with all tederoi, state and local regulations and to the 10,00'Wolr/�LJ i" 1 1 Easement 1 ( P.RTC.I. SpECIflCati00S of the engineer of record. / 1 (By This Plat) (�/ C B UA LIADCSa78 ; , (ADorWoned BY This Plot ji r P.R.BOBr. }y:�� In the event the owner fails to maintain the detention facility, retmmng wall or (/I LJ j j (/ pT7Ti ����f i i , �t I other confinement structure in accordance with applicable federal, state and local 1 I 20'DRAINAGE A UTILITY ESMT. (f//L I I laws or regulations, and after receiving notice from the City of Grapevine of said i I CAB,A.SLD.5478 /lI LL jf T���j/ 711/ r violation or violationsmlet and foiling or correct said violations or to commence and +0'unuTr ESMT. ,1 I i Y1G /�L.L zL ` .� -(/4/ i substantially complete the necessary work within thirty(30) days of receipt of T 1' �^ said written notice, the City, solely at its discretion, may undertake the necessary v0L.388-50.RG 90 I i / t0'.30'Watt Y `'3 corrections and require the owner to pay the reasonable costs incurred by the %i 1 I -f Easem4nt i1Lo City including the recovery of itsreasonable attorneys fees. The owner does Fi IS This Plat) i Q¢ hereby relieve, release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Grapevine. its 1 I agenaction., servants, officers and employees for any claim, cause of actn, lawsuit, damoges, personal injuries, death or property damage arising out of or in i n ^:Injunction with the ownership and maintenonce of the detention facility. The owner shall be required to notify any purchaser of Lots 1R1, 2R & 3R1, 81ock 1 �{ I WR 5M CENTMA WN m of the requirements of any detention facility located thereon '2.BLO 1 { w1OT team'SLON e I I 1 12.35 ACRES OF LAND i r ( Ft cta0 uN No AaL 38 1.2.M zs ' I There is no FEMA floodploin on this site per FIRM Panel 48439CO105K dated 9/25/2009. P.0.LC.T. 1 1 (538,068.000 SQUARE FEET) Land Us Multi-Family la'.1O'water _ I I Proposed Zoning: R-MF-2 W/PD Over)a Y r-i Easement t4i (By Thls Plat) LEGEND_ L{ I I Y 1a.to water J 1 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: ..,^t 1 1 Easement I.R.END FOUND F. IRON ROD FOUND late ApprowxL o (BY This Plat) to Orairgge I.R.S. IRON ROD SET LR IR ROD t7g1RgO: (By 7W.Plat) ./ CC D.RT.0 Swat"T. DEED RECORDS TARR COUNTY TEYJS 1 ( I J /•' C P.kTC.i. MAT RECORDS TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS ES . ElIz on' 502812'W 29110' 1" GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL { I 1 t Date Apia—& � I I P I 1 _ Mara' I 1�'.10'�Wale > � t E en t i 'l./_' L MZl�� ���i_��� / 6 Oily Secretary 1 j (By ma Mot) / f r I 1 eam.1�D'�wate // LJ ( I (By This Rat)1 t Told Platted Area: 825.984.72 Sq.Ft./1&962 Acres 1 I u ({E� 3 Net Platted Area: 825.984.72 Sq.Ft./1&962 Acres Z; 1 I 4T1 Ea Ae nt I R.O.W.Ot Dedication: O Sq.Ft./0 Ages I I E y This t Dedication: 21,716 Sq.Ft./0.499 Ades / (By This Plat) 1 1 fI}( n 1 1 WOO,water i t7 1 1 10'uA,SL ESMT. Easement I CAB.A,SLD.}47} +0'UTILITY ESMT. j�// (By This Mat) I - S H E E T 1 O F 2 PAJ.CT. CAB-PA,SLD.3473 ff"ll 25'ACCESS ESMT. 1 P.R.T.C.T. 1 / LJ 100 �Z27`E (Ha'c .I ''on Ta Bel , FEB ZQ�� FINAL PLAT OF 4 f✓G Abandoned SL.5 78 1 � � CAB.ARTDT5478 — 1 R1, 2R, & 3R1, BLOCK 1 17 UTILITY ESMT. 10'UTIEM EA1T. CAB.A.STD.5478 CAB.A STD.5478 I W.R. B YD CENTER ADDITION LJ CAB.A.9D.5851 CAB,A STD.585t i By PAT.C.T. RILTC.T, I C.C.NAl1 A-MAaX,UYF50N.1RiWAN _ ' I 18.900 ACRES aO PURNI ET.PAUL L YOOR[ _ AND.pNN LL YNNEY, - 1 i'iE URA_0 7095,PGp1+8L8A0UP OR.T.CT. �A;$ ✓ 25'BUILDING ONE being a Replat of c��i 25'BU D LINE— ——— Lots 1 R, 2, 3R, & 5, Block 1 ' W.�. p (t 10'DRAs1AGE ESMT. CAB A SED 5851 I 10'DRAINArt ESMT. n,,wd By I,.. i R _ _ CAB. F- aP.RTCT I I �AbaOAABe�PeTh5858a') (Aber do ed By T s Pbp W We Re BOYD CENTER ADDITION LAf 3R1r BLOt�.iPJLT.CT. CAbo d <a By ins Pm') C P.R.T.C.T. 3.306 ACRES OF LAND I I 1<� (144.101.412 SQUARE FEET) 20'BUILDING LINE I=z oU1 situated in the CAB,a s D 5B51 OT a W R 90YD LENTER ADDit10N Lard Use: Vacant T. wR.BOLD CENTER 1 z� I �E�• zoning: c-c«nm<ka I (Ahanaaned B,This Mat) o A SBS, I LOTiR1.N=I cal A.F. LEONARD SURVEY ABSTRACT 946 LOT aR aL �- P.0.T.aT. ,9,q 3.306 ACRES OF LAND 1 I C WRB�M[ENTsl W GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS Q, Z I 141,199.773 SQUARE FEEL) 1 vim 1 { cAs ,sLO.sest ( :h p�' ( Land Use: Commerical '`W' I ' P.P.TCT (+� no I d1 I k no zoning: c-canmeriaw i Developer Owners/Aeallaant Ja 25'ACCESS h DRAINAGE ESMT mom' .t' LaT S D.uAa a4AtEsoN,PAUI L uoaRE. �1 �•, (Hatched Port on To Be �u ry CR.8AY0 CENTER I JLB Partners, LP. The Mlles Foundation, Inc. de EC.7A..AND TR�A1AN 0.BURNIF" ��'% I Abandoned By Ths Pbp � ( �-a ^� As. ...sar I 1 909 Lake Carolyn Pkwy., Suite 960 Mlles Production, LP Y vu.1o289.T. tli9 Y/ CAB A SLD.5851 y I DR.T.cr. Y/1 it P.R.T..T. I PRTS T. IrWng, Texas 75039 200 Highland Circle t y------' I ------20'WATER LINE E51AT. i PROPOSED 2 ty Is Z� Tele hone 214 271-8480 Af e, Texas 76226 !// .// / a I ACCESS A. DRAINAGE ESM vOt.7055,PG.2004 J 20'BUILDING LINE Subject Proper! a Zoned P 9� Fr/ ////////T////7/7j ///�/T CAB A,SLD.585f - AB.A,SLD.5478 / �,g �h' Contact: Britton Church 25'BUILDING LINE + [�////�GL'L -- P.R.T.C.T.T.C.T. �... 10'VIIUTY ESMT___�______3RTCT.---� LD.5851 R-MF-2 W D Overlay& J// A,5 $ CAB A,SLD 3473 '4 '-- _ __-- —CAB A,SLID.5478 k10.62 E (Abandoned by This Plol C-Commerical. 10'Unun ESMT, / CAB.A.SM.58 P.RTCT. PRTCT CAB.A.ILD 3473 y —_ ---- _ R_ _ Pl1RP OF AT { PR.TC T. (Abandoned By Ths Map -_- _ __ \_� The P�OfaThis r— osa riot Pat / 4�UIUDING 6To De"dic�Md Abandon.Easements.-- ���oINPC• EE�ine ir/Surveyor — — — 25'BUILDING ONE JW 2..8s 12'W^�269.56 Spiars En ineerin Inc. e2W-48024 CAB.A SLD.5851 LINE Basis Of Bearings Is Derived From Using Engineering. L9+ P.R.T.C.T. A S� rl eA}Zw The WDS GPS Network. 765 Custer Rd., Sidle 100 (Abandoned By This Rat) P.R T.Cf. Piano, Texas 75075 - (Abandoned By This Plat) ZIB33 tlaling a Telep Contact: KevinKeWn72 2Wle�77 Selling any Potion of this EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY addltiat by metes and bision ;, o Notation of City Subdivision (100' Public R.O.W.) admance and State platting Scale /'=50' February 2011 stotutas.and Is s.bj..t to fines h.olifioates and withholding err utilities and buddinging This Plat Filed In Instrument Date OWNER'S DEDICATION ANGATION RELEASE METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION STATE OF TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT COUNTY OF TARRANT BEING a acre tract of land situated in the A.F. Leonard Survey,Abstract No. 946. City of Grapevine, Torrent County, Texas, and being all of Lot 1R, Brock i, W.R. Boyd NOW, THEREFORE,KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: WHEREAS, Miles Production,LP and The Mlles Foundation Inc. (_ Center, an addition to the City of Grapevine as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5478. Plat hereinafter called'Owners'.is the owners of that certain parcels of land situated in the City Records, Tarrant County, Texas (PRTCT), oil of Lot 2, Block 1, W.R. Boyd Center, an That Miles Production, LP and The Miles Foundation Inc., acting by and through their of Grapevine,Tarrant County.Texas,being said property as described as shown an this Plot. addition to the City of Grapevine as recorded in Cabinet A Slide 3473 (PRTCI), and duly authorized agents, does hereby adopt this plat, designating the herein described all of Lots 3R and 5, W.R. Boyd Center, an addition to the City of Gmpevine ors property as Lots 1Ri,2R,and 3R1.Block 1,W.R.BOYD CENTER ADDITION.an addition NOW THEREFORE,in consideration of the sum of ONE AND 00/100(E1.00)DOLLAR and recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 5851 (PRTCT), and being more particularly described as to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, and does hereby dedicate, to the other good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby public use for fellows: ever the right—of—woy and easements shown hereon. The eosements fully acknowledged and confessed.Owner does herebyy waive,release,remise and shown hereon are hereby reserved fa the purposes as Indicated. The utility easements quitclaim to the City of Grapevine,Torrant County,Texas, the Dodos—Fort Worth BEGINNING at a capped iron rod found at the north end of a comer clip at the shall be open for ail City or franchised public utilities far each particular use. The International Airport Board,the City of Dallas.Texas and Fort Worth,Texas, their intersection of the south line of Tumer Road (60' Public Right—of—Way) and the west maintenance of paving on the easements is the responsibility of the property owner.No successors and assigns,hereinafter called Cities".For the use and benefit of the line of Boyd Delve (90' Public fight—of—Way) and also being the most northeast buildings or auxiliary structures shall be constructed, reconstructed or placed upon. public and its agencies,any and all claims for damages of any kind of persons or comer of said Lot 1R; over or across the easements shown. Said easements being hereby reserved for the property that Owner may suffer by reason of the passage and flight of di aircraft in mutual use and accommodotlon of all public utilities using or desiring to use some. the air space above Owners property above the height restriction as presently THENCE South 4526'18'East along said comer clip,for a distance of 28.31 feet to a Any City or franchised utility shad have the full right to remove and keep removed all established by Ordinance No.73-50 far the City of Grapevine,known as the Airport capped iron rod found for comer, or way of my er ce.interfere shrubs, s, or other construction,Improvements or growths or etfidene of is Zoning Ordnance of the Dollos—Fort Worth International Airport. to an infinite height w y y g Y above same,whether such damage shall originate from noise, vibration, fumes.dust. THENCE South 00'20'48'East along said west line of Boyd Drive and the east Fine of respective system an the Casements. and of City or franchised utilities shad at all fuel and lubricant particles,and di other effects that may be caused by the operation on9 oY times have the full rights of Ingress and egress to or from the said easements fa the of aircraft,landing at or taking off from,or operating at or an the Dallas—Fort Worth said Lot 1R and the east line of said Lot 5,for a distance of 903.03 feet to a 1/2 purpose of constructing,reconstructing. Inspecting,patrolling,maintaining and adding to International Airport inch iron rod with plastic cap stomped SPURSENG*set for comer, or removing ad or parts of its respective systems without the necessity at any time of procuring the permission of anyone. I have reviewed the Cftys fndings concerning This Instrument does not release the owners or operators of aircraft from liability far THENCE South 4C334r West, along the comer clip of said Boyd Road and East dedications and 1 do agree that the statements are true and correct damage to person or property caused by falling aircraft or falling physical objects from Northwest Highway, for a distance of 2&W feet to the North Right—of—Way line of aircraft,except as stated herein with respect to noise,fumes,dust,fuel,and lubricant _ said East Northwest Highway, a 1/2 inch iron rod with plastic cap stamped This plat approved subject to all platting ordinances,rules,regulations,and resolutions particles SPIARSENG'set for comer, of the aty of Grapevine,Texas. It Is agreed that this Release shall be binding upon said owner and his heirs and THENCE South 89'28'12'West,along the north line of said East Northwest Highway and WTNESS,my hand this the_day of 2011. aseWs.and successors in interest to said property, and it is further agreed that this the mouth Rim of said lot 5 for a distance of 2ti9.38 feet to a 1/2 Inch iron rod instrument shad be a covenant running with the land,and shall be recorded in the Deed Retards of the countyorcounties in which the property is situated with plastic cap stamped SPWRSENG'set for comer; THENCE forth 00'31'48'Weet along the common fine of said Lot 5 and Lot 4 for a Owner: Miles Production,LP EXECUTED at .Texas,this_day of .2011. distance of 927 feet to a 1/2'iron rod found far comer, THENCE South 89'28'12'West,along the common fine between said Lot 4 and Lot 1R By. Owner: Miles Production,LP t for a distance of 135.00 feet to a 1/r Iran rod found for comer, Names By. THENCE, South 003148'CwL along the common fine of said Lot 4 end Lot 3R, for Title: a distance of 222M feet to a 1/2'ion rod found for comer in the north fine of Nemec said East Northwest Highway. Title: THENCE, South 89'28'12'West along the north Grier of said East Northwest Highway and the south line of said Lots 3R and Lot 2 for a distance of 460.94 feet to a STATE OF TEXAS 1/r iron pin found for comer; COUNTY OF TARRANT THENCE North 00'21148'Nest along the west dine of said Lot 2, for a distance of BEFORE ME,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for The State of Texas.an this day STATE OF TEXAS 943.08 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with plastic cap stomped SPIARSENG* set for personally appeared known to me to be the person and officer COUNTY OF TARRANT comer in the south line of said Turner Rood' whose name is subscribed to the foregoing Instrument,and acknowledge to me that he executed the same for the purposes and considerations therein expressed and In the BEFORE ME,the undersigned.a Notary Public In and to The State of Texas,an this day capacity therein stated. personally appeared known to me to be the person and officer 3 THENCE North 89'28'12'East along said south line of Turner Road, for a distance of cep Y whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledge to me that he 885.25 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 823.277 square feet cr 18JK1 executed the same for the purposes and considerations therein expressed and In the acres of land. OVr74 UNDER MY HANG AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the_day of 2011. — capacity erein stated.HA GIVEN UNDER MY ND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of 2011. Notary Public,State of Texas f Notary Public,State of Texas f 4 � WIRIESS,my hand this the_cloy of 2011. WITNESS,my hand this the_day of 2011. Owmx: The Miles Foundation Inc., By. Owner. The Mies Foundation Inc, Name: By. Title. Nomc Title: BEFORE ME,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for The State of Texas,an this day persowlly appeared known to me to be the person and officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledge to me that he BEFORE ME, the undersigned,a Notary Public in and far The State of Texas,an this day executed the sane far the purposes and considerations therein expressed and In the capacity therein stated. wh"nPersonally appeared known to me to be the person and officer S H E E T 2 O F 2 whose inane is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledge to me that he GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the_day of . 2011. executed the some far the purposes and tonsideraUans therein expressed and In the FINAL PLAT OF capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of ,2011. LOT 1 R1, 2R, & 3R1, BLOCK 1 SURVEYOR'S CERMFiCAIE Notary Public,State of Texas W.R.- B O YD CENTER ADDITION is 1, Darren K Brown,a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, hereby certify that I have performed an actual and accurate survey of the Notary Public,State of Texas 18.900 ACRES land,and that the toner monuments shown thereon were properly placed under my personal supervision in accordance with the platting rules < OF T u and regulations of the Town of Prosper,Texas ,�P�a� r9ro-19 being a Repiat of EFOR RENEW PURPOSES O&Y OAR"K.BRO%N Lots 1 R, 2, 3R, & 5, Block 1 RDomen K.egistration No 5252 �9tio5252 . W.R. B OYD CENTER ADDITION SU >i STATE OF TEXAS situated in the €�. couNrY OF oaJxl A.F. LEONARD SURVEY — ABSTRACT 946 .R BEFORE ME,the undersigned authority,a Notary Public In and far the GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS F State of Taxes,an this day personally appeared Darren K.Brown,known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing Developer Owners/ADDlicant Instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same fa the purposes and considerations therein expressed and in the capacity JLB Partners, L.P. The Miles Foundation, Inc. & a therein stated 909 Loke Carolyn Pkwy., Suite 960 Miles Production, LP a Irving. Texas 75039 200 Highland Circle GIVEN under my hand and seat of office,this the_doy of Telephone (214) 271-8480 Argyle, Texas 76226 2010. Ccntoct: Britton Church Notary Public In and far Spre�M�Engineering. Inc. the Stale of Texas 765 Custer Rd., Suite 100 Piano. Texas 75075 ki My Commission Expires: - Telephone (972) 422-0077 Contact: Kevin Wrier Scale 1`-50' February 2011 This Plat Fled In Instrument > Date