Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 01 - Z11-01 PD11-01 Grapevine Texan Apartments
r U ITEM# d a TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR PV MEETING DATE: MARCH 15, 2011 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Z11 -01 AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD11 -01, GRAPEVINE TEXAN APARTMENTS ;s I I r + f -- ti- 7 Gra evi pne j Lake CO* oze O Ra ` � I I r I I i I I.H. Northwe a`, gy � p° X. s DFw 3: Hatt- Johasan y3 Airport W I. L� r Grade Rd. ., I REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE, COMMENTS: APPLICANT: The Miles Foundation PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: The subject property is located at 401 Boyd Drive and is proposed to be platted as Lot 2R, Block 1, W.R. Boyd Center Addition. The addition contains 12.35 acres and has approximately 885 feet of frontage along Turner Road and 436 feet of frontage along Boyd Drive. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AND The applicant is requesting a zone change to rezone 12.35 acres from "CC" Community Commercial District to "R -MF -2" Multifamily District for the development of a 313 unit apartment complex. The applicant is also requesting a planned development overlay to include but not be limited to deviation from density, front yard setback, building height, landscaping, building length and off - street parking. This request was tabled at the February 15 public hearing to give the applicant an opportunity to revise the request and reduce the number of specific variances from the established ordinance particularly relative to the square footage of the one bedroom apartments proposed. The applicant originally proposed to develop a 319 unit complex that required a planned development overlay with ten specific variances to the zoning ordinance relative to: 0:IZOUIZ11 -01.41 & PD11 -01.41 1 March 10, 2011 (12:35PM) • Density • Recreational open space • Minimum square footage for one bedroom apartments • Front yard setback • Parking • Building height • Design requirement relative to building length • Landscaping • Building separation • Design requirement relative to proximity of parking to buildings The request has been revised and redesigned with the end result being the reduction in the amount requested or elimination of several of the variance requests. In total, 313 units are being requested (319 were request in the original submittal) and all structures will continue to be three stories in height with both attached (127 spaces —same for both requests) and detached garage (17 spaces --same for both requests) parking as well as surface parking for the tenants. The main access to the complex will be from Boyd Drive; a secondary point of access is also proposed off of Turner Road. All access into the complex is controlled, gated access. The proposed apartment mix now consists of the following: • 181 one bedroom units, ranging from 751 square feet to 1,010 square feet. The previous request established 187 one bedroom units ranged from 701 to 1,010 square feet with 32 apartments less than 750 square feet. All of the one bedroom apartments now exceed the 750 square foot minimum requirement. • 117 two bedroom units ranging from 1,070 square feet to 1,229 square feet. The previous request established 114 two bedroom units with the same square footage range. • 15 three bedroom units, all which are 1,455 square feet in size. The previous request established 18 three bedroom units with the same unit size. • Average square footage for all units in the revised complex is 968 square feet—the previous design was 963 square feet. The following is a brief summary of those areas within the zoning ordinance in which the project will be noncompliant and the planned development overlay will be used to accommodate the request: Density: maximum allowed under the conditions set forth in the request is 20 units per acre; requested density is 25.4 units per acre. The previous submittal had a density of 25.9 units per acre. Front yard setback: minimum front yard setback by ordinance is 40 feet; requested front yard setback established along Boyd Drive is 15 feet. This has remained the same. WZCU\Z11 -01.41 & PD11 -01.41 2 March 10, 2011 (12:35PM) • Building height: maximum allowed is two stories not to exceed 35 feet; applicant proposed three stories not to exceed 39 feet. This has remained the same. • Design requirements relative to the length of buildings: ordinance requires a maximum length of any building shall not exceed 200 feet; several building in the original request ranged from 220 to 240 feet in length. The proposed buildings have some elevations that will not exceed 225 feet • No building shall be closer than 15 feet to the edge of any off - street parking or vehicle use area; applicant proposes elimination of this requirement. This has remained the same as the original request • Landscaping requirements: ordinance requires a minimum of fifty percent of the landscaping be placed in the required front yard; due to the reduced depth of the front yard the applicant proposes placing fourteen percent of the landscaping in the front yard area. This has remained the same as the original request. • Parking: minimum required parking is established at 2.5 spaces per dwelling unit; applicant proposes 2 spaces per unit. This has remained the same as the original request The applicant added more recreational open space at the northwest corner of the site and reversed the orientation of building number four such that the courtyard area is open to the west rather that the previous layout that had it open to the east. Slight modifications were made to the lengths of several of the buildings to reduce the size and separation distance between structures. As a result of these changes, three variance requests were completely eliminated from the revised request. • Recreational open space. The minimum allowed is 250 square feet per dwelling unit; the previous request provided 201 square feet per dwelling unit. The addition of more recreational open space near the northwest corner of the site along with the reduction in the number of units brought this area into compliance. • Minimum square footage allowed for a one bedroom unit is 750 square feet; the applicant previously proposed 32 units that would have been 701 square feet in size. The floor plans have been revised and this request has been eliminated • Building separation. Minimum separation between two structures is 20 feet or the height of building whichever is greater, minimum separation when two structures are arranged face -to -face or back -to- -back is 50 feet; the applicant had proposed 20 feet separation and 50 feet face -to -face or back -to -back separation. Slight modification to the building design has resulted in minimum separation equal to or greater than the building height: Relative to parking the ordinance requires 2.5 spaces per unit which would result in 783 spaces, the applicant proposes two spaces per unit and has provided 626 spaces. PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned "CC" Community Commercial District and is vacant. 0:1ZCU\Z11 -01.41 & PQ11 -01.41 3 Marcy[ 10, 2011 (12:35PM) HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject and surrounding property was zoned "C -2" Community Business District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning when the property was rezoned to "CC" Community Commercial District. The subject property has remained vacant since that time. A conditional use permit (CU98 -67) was approved by Council at the February 16, 1999 meeting and allowed for the development of a personal care facility on the subject site butwas never developed. Two conditional use permits (CU97 -07 and CU97 -69) were considered and approved by Council in February 1997 and January 1998 on the subject site to the west for a boat and recreational vehicle storage facility but was never constructed. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "R -MF -2" Multifamily District — Montelena Apartments SOUTH: "HC" Highway Commercial District— vacant property, Mad Duck Cyclery EAST: "CC" Community Commercial District —vacant, Gaylord remote parking site WEST: "CC" Community Commercial District —Hill School, Shell convenience store gasoline sales AIRPORT IMPACT: The subject tract is located within "Zone A" zone of minimal effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas /Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. Few activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in Zone A, except for sound sensitive activities such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The applicant's proposal is an appropriate use in this noise zone. MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Commercial Land Use. The applicant's proposal is not in compliance with the Master Plan. THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION: Neither Turner Road or Boyd Drive are designated thoroughfares as shown on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. /rs 0:IZCU%Zl1.01.41 & PD11 -01.41 4 MarCh 10, 2011 (12:35PM) Ln O w Z3 41 07 N Y O C y al 47 w Cr t N E > L +, L +� Q m 4 i 0 w N a c OD 1 al � O Y .Q Q — 3 .3 41 � y aT+ bn +un ob C a L -0 +0, u (U m o a1 V 3 o ru ° v X al vi to � O CL N L O " � p to m ,O 41 p O tB O Q a! Q m a) GR O L p 3 0 Q Wis S v w fD U a L .p i+ cu Q cu U ca d r w u Y + s s O c— cc tWlS u 4v- 7; N i W 1 a O r1 Ln 4-1 +n cn 41 L � CL m to W ay � as• -12 > aOc aii Y c N i N "0 W '. �0 O d. UM "M y m 3 -�s ° 3 0 m s i m a o � s c-0 +' m a — co o— L N m — o ' o s N@ w m Q a N N u c 41 N R d di Y Q} u f6 00 c m v ° xs tw O %n a *' aJ N Q c p Qj E L L ++ p O 3 {� N d mc t Y C, 5. _ X QQ1 .x '�' i••� 41 c 41 C (a t M U +� 7 i CC 4- Z Z 7 4- 4- t O 'u a� d Q O s N +T+ T C ++ cc 7 .c 3 O ya to a7 � +� p V Q ,C 'ii ro LO y 4- L O Ln N u M CL W m +, O ca N 0 d ° -c `° 0 U cu p Q) i O 0 0 N fa c O 'C3 N �"' N 3 W Z �, it •i {..1 a� L C ar Q L '� m N N s O R m Y ++ ra ou ++ V s �i m l7 o s `" + o cc x Y 3 T cn 3° s v n o - Q. cc o a 4; c Ln o ; ; -+o 41 -0 � p aa a) V d m V o W ° W = � ++ 0 co � L-0 N C Q i-+ N .41 m N Q 0 � 3 +�+ bo m — a w En C (D 0 _ O a3 t Y a4 LiU +, ++ O S .3 E O in O cu w p c p a] O +M,,, ++ N u Q FlI N O W LA L ++ by by E a! _ =V y._ i�{i N OD c_ O c � W 3 u p ' a X O O 1 T O y Q Q N CL N L ` v � O c c v u 41 N W X N Q x y� u -6 - L ai a a cu mo ro to Z m ca t4 O N Z O m v� m E. r! cvi W N N N N N N [V 111 Ln s 29 Xt 7 R -75 t6 G � 5 3 R -75 F GU 2' 2 3 ,R rg R3.5 rye, M VVJJ C t't , 2 5 !RRii 6 15R` 1712�p��7ss�� 1 - 3 R -�'0 B 19 10 .1582 aR `4��y5� 14516® R -T! ! P�g6 1 z 3 � C B B 15 1+ 14 4 R_MF_I DOVE LOOP 3 9 18 i 4 is >a 1 s ..a z O $. a 71 (� R -Mf- 2 ss 1� Se.�Ci 30 22 19 00 ;,' ZX6 18.798Q il` � 17.476 31 35 3a '—' 32 31 ,A O 0 1 111 300 R�5:0 ,R 15 i,� iR 30F 538 � 1A� 18198 ii �q y��y TR 300 13A 8 yyyY 2 .ZS ihC .'� 30 4 4A 3 5 a I tA56O t 4 TR TR III TR 3M 30 4ASS59 B s -36. TR 3" Is° M is die 4�4II�pp UzzRl 9 .742@ . ... . . . _ 3 +A ictl Ae @ �' 72,428 R 7A >Q�s ' 2686 3 .fig 2 c 3p3ti3 65_ 2 x 2 TR 2382 36AC 2 AMC e ]tom® 3R 4 s 5 s 6- i �t6 T e i s sa3� 9 1 0 1 ,417 2 p $ G pg4 R 7R, BSO� P °.[O .AM 6➢ �1 1.47T� 7547 3s," �i16 2 �+ ,R 7+ co 49st a i 493 TR4a ° 4 diy� 7S4 ®1 G7" + �: rssl [ aoF TSF61L6 r ��Q� !'1'05 1R7 �♦ 3 [R TR TR O ' w� TR OL 11E 1R 41 42 44A ��� � 7 T�'_ a , i 9 rc$ s, s1E, O.4 1$ M z 9 4. s a T s !r. NPT 4R n Tx 10 .r . t x 1 x 3 4 s e T s t x 3 1 �°` IA OR tR_ 3 -4 5 6 7Ha 7R 3 1'. . 5 6a7T TR. e70121N38, -•.�q S 1 2 m T 1tt Taa 1 4 rs is 14 19 ,x n ,9 9 B s 4 6 26$ as 05 { 5 8 4 5 6 T I 6 10 11 ]3{ 5 I fij a., 3A Ta8 X81 TRSxB .za Ac " a• c wa m s��c - TR 87A '� A Q tg 2 pG TR 32 S 4 5 3 7 8 SAC AC AG� A a 5 8 1R ! 5 8 7 g 10 rE +�= + .lee sA 1�'ss i RRr E � Z 01 & PD1 1 01 1, i - 4ao16 Grapevine Texan Apartments PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION CITY OFGRAPEVINE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Applicant Name: 07 11!4 - -- -- -- ------- Applicant Address: Zpo City/State/Zip k Phone No. L Fax No. Email Address Applicant's interest in subject property I UA'RC*,- PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Mobile Phone Street Address of subject property V Legal Description: Lot Block Addition Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11 sheet Size of subject property: acres square footage --- --------- Present zoning classification Requested zoning district F)94 CLIP Present use of property Proposed use of property' /4,44iFu4il TS The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that Would allow the proposed use is Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning PART I PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner Prop Owner Add re: City/State/Zip Phone No. Ada rm�li4t Zic gilri )kA44-m �. lb,rk All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public heating at the descration of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public heating. Public hearings will not be tabled. J6, Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process- ] have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ..... .. . ..... . Print Applicant's Name Applicant's Signature The State of County of Before me (notary) rta on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath nofrd or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day oll, A-D- ---------------- FT JULIE HOLLOWAY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES A JamiY28,2(Ill Print Property Owner's Name Property Owner's Signature The State of F County of .................. Before me (notary) • 4 on this day personally appeared (applicant) 0 known to me (or proved to me on the oath of �car r other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day A.D. jD_0 40,.%, JULIE HOLLOWAY ISSION EXPIRES I. I I'll A - -,. JULIE HOLLOWAY My COMMISSION EXPIRES Jan q 28t2oll jantimy 28 2011 :j "n ....... Z I , �� t o;R- Notary and For State of —TV It JAN .42011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT L All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when riled and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date Signature of Property Date ��� JAN 4 20ti -C)f OVERALL METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION BEING a acre tract of land situated in the A.F. Leonard Survey, Abstract No. 946, City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, and being all of Lot 1R, Block 1, W.R. Boyd Center, an addition to the City of Grapevine as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5478, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas (PRTCT), all of Lot 2, Block 1, W_R. Boyd Center, an addition to the City of Grapevine as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 3473 (PRTCT), and all of Lots 3R and 5, W.R. Boyd Center, an addition to the City of Grapevine as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5851 (PRTCT), and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a capped iron rod found at the north end of a corner clip at the intersection of the south line of Turner Road (60' Public Right -of -Way) and the west fine of Boyd Drive (90' Public Right -of -Way) and also being the most northeast corner of said Lot 'I R; THENCE South 45 026'18" East along said corner clip, for a distance of 28.31 feet to a capped iron rod found for corner; THENCE South 00 020'48" East along said west line of Boyd Drive and the east line of said Lot 1 R and the east line of said Lot 5, for a distance of 903.03 feet to a 112 inch iron rod with plastic cap stamped "SPIARSENG" set for corner; THENCE South 44 °33'42" West, along the corner clip of said Boyd Road and East Northwest Highway, for a distance of 28.33 feet to the North Right -of -Way line of said East Northwest Highway, a 112 inch iron rod with plastic cap stamped "SPIARSENG" set for corner; THENCE South 89 °28'12" West, along the north line of said East Northwest Highway and the south line of said lot 5 for a distance of 269.36 feet to a 112 inch iron rod with plastic cap stamped "SPIARSENG" set for corner; THENCE North 00 031'48" West, along the common line of said Lot 5 and Lot 4 for a distance of 222.88 feet to a 112" iron rod found for corner; THENCE South 89 028'1.2" West, along the common line between said Lot 4 and Lot 1 R for a distance of 135.00 feet to a 112" iron rod found for corner; THENCE, South 00 031'48" East, along the common line of said Lot 4 and Lot 3R, for a distance of 222.88 feet to a 112" iron rod found for corner in the north line of said East Northwest Highway; THENCE, South 89 °28'12" West along the north line of said East North t Highway feet to a V es and the south Fine of said Lots 3R and Lot 2 for a distance of 480.94 112" iron pin found for corner; yT >�x CITY OFGRAPEVINE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Name: c cki , ,, r1fj 4 La 7� �`1..._..- 1'._ -f� Applicant Address: zoo ! !a*t ct G fc City /State/Zip 1r 7/7- 74 2-4 Phone No. 9 Lpqj4vq x f1Z Fax No. Email Address Mobile Phone ,�z�. X33 �, - Applicant's interest in subject property PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property 0 e, ` -c��J Legal Description: Lot Z12- Block Addition F fZ .. ......... . Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8.112" x 11" sheet Size of subject property: acres F 2_ js` square footage Present zoning classification GL Proposed use of property I-A . . . 14141`4 , Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from: a M Z- PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner 17h 9,1v fib. 4c- 3 A76 Prop Owner Address 7.�0 City /State/Zip /�,• jc 1 7b22 Phone No. 0' 6: qgvo X112 Fax No. 1,4d LD Submit a letter describing the proposed planned development use and note the request on the site plan document Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. in the same letter, describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood, Also, describe how the proposed overlay use will add to the value, use or in the neighborhood. The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. pl JAN 42011 ��� S� `� t t. •� y All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. 10 All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings maybe continued to the next public hearing_ Public hearings will not be tabled. Ord Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. 1 have read and understand alt the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY��� Irv- Print Applicant's Name Appfcanf's gnature The State of County of Before me (notary) on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of ca or or other document) to be the .person whose name Is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D. ,• ""V p•'"o e JUL 'E HOLLOWAY P. *: -1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES -• , �:� January 28, 2011 R17rd'160".-dP7 .L_'P f 6sAJ Print Property Owner's Name Property Owners Signature The State of County of Before me (notary) on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on fhe oath of card other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Seal Given under m hand and seal of office this day of A.D. 3 ................. (Seal) Y JULIE HOLLOWAY MY COMM €SSION BORESS Ja=r y28,2011 2091 _. Notary n d For State o nua f (�C�nCF I�l JAN 42011 1 � ACKNOWLEDGEMENT � All Conditional Use and Special Use Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or a special use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. i have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or special use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date Signature of Property Owner Date 0 �{ (� JAN 42011 U A PARKING NEEDS STUDY FOR A PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT IN GRAPEVINE, TEXAS Prepared for: Spiars Engineering, Inc. 765 Custer Road Suite 100 Plano, Texas 75075 On Behalf of: JL. B Prepared by: OeShaz0 Group Engineers i Planners 400 South Houston Street Suite 330 • Union Station Dallas, Texas 75202 Phone 214/748 -6740 Fax 214/748 -7037 March 3, 2011 DESHAZO #11006 Executive summary The services of DESHAZO were retained by JLB Partners, L.P. to assess the parking needs for a multifamily residential development in the Grapevine, Texas. The study summarizes the parking requirements of several similar communities in the Dallas -Fort Worth area as well as some nationally accepted parking demand data and is intended to provide a basis for determining an appropriate ratio of parking space in relation to the number of bedrooms, number of units or floor area of the proposed complex. The analysis shows that, in the eight DFW area cities studied, the average parking requirement for the proposed development would be 592 spaces (which equals 1.89 /unit or 1.29 /bedroom). The proposed parking supply of 645 spaces (which equals 2.06 1unit or 1.40 1bedroom) exceeds these requirements by more than 9 %. in addition, the proposed supply has been shown to exceed the nationally observed average (based on data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers) by 72 %. DESHAZO, therefore, supports the proposed parking supply of 645 spaces and believes that it represents a more than adequate number of parking spaces for the proposed development scenario. DeShazo Group Traffic. Transportation Planning. Parking. Design. Technical Memorandum To: Mr. Britton Church 1LB Realty LLC From: De5hazo Group, Inc. Date: March 3, 2011 Re: Parking Needs Study for a Proposed Multifamily Development in Grapevine, Texas DESHAZO Project No. 11006 INTRODUCTION The services of DESHAZO were retained by JLB Partners, L.P.to assess the parking needs for a multifamily residential development in the Grapevine, Texas. The study summarizes the parking requirements of several similar communities in the Dallas -Fort Worth area as well as some nationally accepted parking demand data and is intended to provide a basis for determining an appropriate ratio of parking space in relation to the number of bedrooms, number of units or floor area of the proposed complex. The proposed multifamily development, located in the southwest quadrant of the Turner Road /Boyd Drive intersection, will include 1 -, 2- and 3- bedroom units with the unit type distribution shown in Table 1. A total of 313 units and 460 bedrooms is planned. Table Z Proposed Development Scenario Unit Type # Units = # Bedrooms 1 Bedroom 181 = 181 bedrooms 2 Bedrooms 117 = 234 bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 15 = 45 bedrooms Total 313 = 460 bedrooms PARKING STUDY Dallas Area Parking Requirements DESHAZO has researched a number of municipalities to determine a 'typical' parking requirement in the Dallas -Fort Worth area. These cities were selected at random and range in size from large metropolitan areas to smaller suburbs. In addition, they represent all portions of the metroplex geographically. South Houstm Street, Suite 330 Dallas, Texas 75202 PO 214.748.6740 F. 214.748.7037 www.deshazogroup.coxn Table 2 summarizes the code -based requirements of each of the cities selected and shows that while most codes focus on the number and type of units, the independent variables utilized also include the area of each unit, the amount of common area and building height. However, because the composition of single- and multiple- bedroom units changes from one complex to the next, basing the required parking supply on the total number of bedrooms is considered to provide a more accurate determination of parking demand since the typical per unit basis does not consider the likely variation of single- and multiple- bedroom composition. Table 3, therefore, summarizes these same criteria, but on a per bedroom basis. Table 4 applies these standards to the proposed development scenario. Exhibit 1 summarizes the same information graphically. Table 4 also calculates the resulting per unit and per bedroom parking requirements for each city, offers a `typical' requirement and relates all of these requirements back to the proposed parking supply. In all of the cities, it is found that the proposed supply exceeds the calculated requirement. Published Parking Data Published parking demand data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) is calculated in parking spaces per dwelling unit (information on the number of bedrooms per unit is not available). Table 5 provides a comparison of published multifamily parking demand data from the ITE Parking Generation manual (3`a Edition). Table 5 Excerpts from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Parking. Generation, 3rd Edition (2004) Land Use Day No. Of Location /Area Average Peak Parking Studies Demand Rate Low /Mid -Rise Apartment Weekday 19 Suburban 1.20 vehicles per (!7E Land Use Code: 221 ) Dwelling Unit Weekday 12 Urban 1.00 vehicles per _ Dwelling Unit Saturday 7 Urban 1.02 vehicles per Dwelling Unit As Table 5 shows, the national average suburban parking demand rate (the category most similar to that of the proposed development) is 1.2 spaces per unit. This rate is also far below the proposed rate of 2.06 spaces per unit. CONCLUSION This analysis shows that the proposed parking supply of 645 spaces exceeds the requirements of all of the eight cities studied. The 645 -space supply will exceed the average parking demand of these eight cities by more than 9 %. in addition, the proposed supply has been shown to exceed the nationally observed average (ITE) by 72 %. DESHAZO, therefore, supports the proposed parking supply of 645 spaces (2.06 per unit /1.40 per bedroom) and believes that it represents a more than adequate number of parking spaces. END c ro r 0 E 0 a� U Ill N fi O C w y m 0 ,tS] Q1 fi .z H m L a N .ql Cl) CID V y w 3 ro C b v w rom m ,43 O M � O ro u1 y U z+ y � ro O fi 1~ ro O O O C w O 00 ro h � 2]' Q � � ro a1 y m z1 O. y T O O N O N O y O O y Y v2 Q to tl. to Q i2 Q eft s? E cc Q1 m 41 m Ul dl y (P m y. L ¢1 0 j N m, N �`o al m u m a 3 m o `o O m o m o m p {n a LL ...i CL " to LL Q LL Q- LL V � rte+ Q Q C- d OT Q a- v m - :t U � v U 3 m i m 7 m m 3 ^� �F+ u t11 Q Of a Q N N N N N L cn C 3 Q N O- Q �-' M 7 ~~ m N N— Q N Y N a+ N fi/ O H Q. m e u c m e m Q° E n y m Q y, Q o L cx v1 ill un N N �' L crW O n a W N CL a Q` N t m� m� m� m� m� O a a O N N N N N V a. G1 Q W n N Iz N Q 4 Cl N Al- Af y �_ u E m 3 a a n n a Q N N N N N N °� N "°_ N y G CL Q N i. `a E m CL o. N E E m CL Q E v E ro Q Q v v E �- p- 3 u E a o v v u E sa o v v u E Q o v u E Q u E a o W aQ + U h u m O c a y Q Qv ro O O v Q O m O m U m Q O ❑ -D a n " -o Q LL � .� a n O i co a a LL . Q� CD C3 ® vi Q il} Q to Q T Q 12 V) v�vs .0 rL .0 am - •E CL m! Vim:.. -c l0 Q1 m V 73 Q1 m U— 7 y N U y M V 3 v ,� V CL Q LL Q � CL L N L N C Q N W V1 N m v di N m d O C. Q d G1 70 Q y Cl? 6 R m u u u E o E u Q i d m m 7 o m+ Qi o Q N O VI Q Q a- U +' y V V N N N 7 Q y N 3 Q y c ro r 0 E 0 a� U Ill N fi O C w y m 0 ,tS] Q1 fi .z H m L a N .ql Cl) CID V y w 3 ro C b v w rom m ,43 O M � O ro u1 y U z+ y � ro O fi 1~ ro O O O C w O 00 ro h � 2]' Q � � ro a1 y m z1 O. y T U � .v E E Y o °o 0 0 a a m iw m o_ m m cO V � N c ro r 0 E 0 a� U Ill N fi O C w y m 0 ,tS] Q1 fi .z H m L a N .ql Cl) CID V y w 3 ro C b v w rom m ,43 O M � O ro u1 y U z+ y � ro O fi 1~ ro O O O C w O 00 ro h � 2]' Q � � ro a1 y m z1 O. y 0 Q AV W L Q. 4 O` N L Q. W V L Q LL AL ^W^ �L r Ol Y R t 3 O N O th w y� L girl 0.' V 0. a C co 3' 0 LL m To D C 0 O u 7+ O O p In ro p 111 m L2 m ro m Q1 12 dl w i5 v d , Qro d 0 Qm u p Qm V p o.ro u p Qm u p d vLLi A v; Q N N QL', N d VLL1 Q- E a E Q E N °' E � E a E ° E o f `a ° E Q1 E o Qj O m N O u o u °o 0 mn a m45 n� °a a ao N �m N N n s n a N N o w ry lnp w N d Q, E Q Q E E a d E M Q E y u E °1Q o °� 71 cL u E a o u E °1Q o a d d Q O u p y Q v tl - O V O y 0 u 0 O m 0 m -o n -� m a` Q -[7 o '^ ro O �u CL Q.s �' a v 7+ v � aE o- E CL E ° E d o a °o u °o w o u o m m o m CL u mQ aj Q n O Q 9 O A a V Q- E a E Q E N °' E � E N O dl O V O V O m o m 0 m -`o Q N m -o Q Gl m n Q N v o N Gl N v 9 N Q n A fl N N l{1 V a ry N? N O o w ry `i O O N N `y O 1 N O N d Q, E Q Q E E a d E M Q E o n E u E °1Q o °� u E a o y u E a o u E °1Q o a u E u o m 0 u m m O Q, u m m O y U m m O O '� m �° O d, Q M o u .n m p C- o �, N m p 45 Q a w -0 m O O - m O o '^ ro O CL CL a N ul Q # Ifl p_ # Ifl Q a ul a # p u`, m E a, m E ai m E a, m E a, m E Q� o Q O dv o Qv O CLa o 0 0 1II o ©-a O o u U O u -� O v Q o-0 u w v Q O M uw "a Q O-0 Q N C m LL LL dE CL aE QE v uo o W 0 N o O o u 0 u o m 0 m 0 CL m a` Q9 CL u CL n Ui N Ln A Cl) V 7+ V � O 0 O O p O w O it m 0 v m O_ m m m U 3 N m + N L Q Y L � T u a � M o 01 M E o E o o � r6 Q m l0 d Q Di O M cn N a E d Z N Ln Z n P'� a `^ O 7 m N N Ln o M 73 Ln all a E ao a u p M ❑ N rl O � ¢ Un o m Z M N m Z (D � M 61 PIS ei ri H +8+ L to A O d M N a-I C. O I- tw N CT Q 0 N N m Z O 4w 'Q L a O CL a m u Z w m m N m Z U) a � u' E •Cr m `n N V Z I.L .� L a ° y 7 Z 00 N � 4)_ W U �. en a - Z N N Z LL L O �+ r. 0 Z m N m Z R V L Q Y L � T u a � M o 01 M E o E o o � L _ 4 ag O M N rl Y m � L Q Y L a � M o 01 M O � H L O M N rl Y Ln n P'� rl N 7 m N N Ln o M •y Ln all a E ao a p M N rl O � a egfn Un o L ° C � M 61 PIS ei ri +8+ L to A d M N a-I m� L tp O O U w y m U (6 h m i a o m� L tp O O U w y m U (6 h m i ■ V a.+ E L Cr Lf q� if 3 n to L as c Y L Rf i a V R Q. n rF �i a O CL O i b O n M a v m C. In N Q1 1.11 w O Y a a L rr a NO .Y L m a DA L a Q O O O O O b O lbp Lan M r4 0 Qj 3 ti! 2 n a 0 s U a O C ca CL t LLO LL W N [T3 n J-+ n L u ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING ZONING CHANGE Z11 -01 ON ATRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE A.F. LEONARD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 946, DESCRIBED AS BEING A TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "CC' COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO "R -MF -2" MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT REGULATIONS; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000:00) FOR EACH OFFENSE, AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH AN OFFENSE OCCURS OR CONTINUES; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE G � WHEREAS, applications were made to amend the Official Zoning Map, City of Grapevine, Texas by making applications for same with the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these requested changes should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off - street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation; water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested change should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, the effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, Water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among ot her things the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings, encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity forthe zoning change, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment; that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which. existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the change in zoning lessens the congestion in the streets; helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this change in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that a change in zoning classification for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large; the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BYTHE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City of Grapevine Ordinance No. 82 -73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, be, and the same is hereby ORD. NO. 2 amended and changed by Zoning Application Z11 -01 to rezone the following described property to -wit: being a 12.352 acre tract of land out of the A.F. Leonard Survey, Abstract No. 946, Tarrant County, Texas (401 Boyd Drive) more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and made a part hereof, which was previously zoned "CC" Community Commercial District Regulations is hereby changed to "R -MF -2" Multifamily District Regulations, all in accordance with Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82 -73, as amended. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the herein change in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire; panic, flood. and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population.; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. ORD. NO. 3 Section S. That the fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 15th day of March, 2011. APPROVED: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ORD. NO. 4 �p P► -off ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ISSUING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 41 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82 -73, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE, BY GRANTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD11 -01 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 313 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX TO INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO DEVIATION FROM DENSITY, FRONT YARD SETBACK, HEIGHT; LANDSCAPING, BUILDING LENGTH AND PARKING ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82 -73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MXP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE Zb NG ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING T;O SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC OtERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS p,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS an application was made requesting issuance of a planned development overlay by making applications for same with the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements,, conditions and prerequisites h'a\(Jng been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites hailing been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing Called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring '"public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent praperi from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary Lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off - street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off - street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, ,V, titer, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City.Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, did considerthe following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets.; the fire. hazards, panics and other.. dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same; the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the o.Vercrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration Of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 49 of Ordinance No. 82 -73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHERE/�IS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to Conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this :City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine., Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this planned development overlay, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property With reference tothe classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the planned development overlay lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of;'population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools; parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council, of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this planned development overlay and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity`to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this planned development overlay for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the ORD. NO. 2 public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health; safety and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BYTHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a planned development overlay in accordance with ,Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82 -73, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine; Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code, by granting Planned Development Overlay PD11 -01 to allow for the development of a 313 unit apartment complex to include but not be limited to deviation from density,,front yard setback, height;': landscaping; building length and parking in the "R -MF -2 Multifamily District Regulations within the following described property: Lot 2R, Block 1, W R. Boyd Addition (401 Boyd Drive) all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82 -73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A ", and all other conditions;' restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2,:, That the City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein conditional use permit. Section 3: That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described °shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4,. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, 'morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safelyfrom fire, panic, floOd. and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks. and other public requirements, and. to make adequate provisions forthe normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular.iases and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. ORD. NO. 3 Section 6: That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed uponeach day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8 That the fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general Welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the Immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective frol'1'l and after th6 date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so Ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 15th day of March, 2011. APPROVED: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ORD. NO. 4 GRAPEVINE TEXAN NORTHWEST CORNER OF BOYD DRIVE AND EAST NW HIGHWAY GRAPEVINE, TEXAS r —r--, .. ,;:��.�+�? � . �� � i j�,. .� 121:���'�,St. � � L� � -'� � ,� � � � *...,,�.:�i .Ga:!�jf lNl��ijliMi� '� .���i ; -�.��: � ,_ .. :����;����.�,�_:.- i -�„�- �...' . — - i ,I i �'. I. " ��+,��;lii j+� -_ ___ } '� � F . � � _ � � l � I ? '� :i � � � � r t r i � ' + � ;,�8.�..� ` '* w �_ . "i� y S ~y��M r ___ _* I 1 _ . .. � �,7L'' r �:'s jy�� ` "�-.� ,� � �� � .yew�'_ '� Cl . �T�, -�- r '. w .�..._ ��` ��q,,^,. � � �Ifa 3G�"C'r'� w 5/ r.` .U' Q � � . • ��I�IY�«�a+s.-- ^.��"k��' f � ' � �+,���.��y, `-R/ ,4�.s: -....._ �~ 2 f�� i���`F,J�' _- ��,,r?yx ~ .. � 1 � ,_- � . . U `ti������ ..T��1". � . S+ �yrt� 7. � .,� �R���'r•'�e ,�..> .� � ,�'. T' ,tia- ' - i . , �,�'d'�t. rW't . .y it .� ' . . . • ' , ?.- x, v, ; ,� � . _ �..,��. ._. .. � � W ' �.:.y . }s x;l.'�C;.;.�r+:�..r,+�r� v.p�_iG- i'�=. y ,,�:b" ��,`r"t �r7 - � �i�.as��'��~ z . _ Z O N "' CITY OF GRAPEVINE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION MaRCH 15, 2011 � } � , GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT March 8, 2011 City of Grapevine 200 South Main Street Grapevine,Texas 76051 RE: Grapevine Texan Multifamily Development Dear City Council and Planning Commission Members, First of all we would like to thank you for the constructive feedback we received at your February 15tn joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting as it relates to this development. We have spent the ensuing time working on our development plans and we look forward to sharing the changes that we have made at your meeting on the 15`h of March. During your February meeting, the majority of the discussion about this request centered on the amount of, and type of variances that we had requested from the R-MF2 zoning district. To address this, we have reduced the number of variances from ten to seven, and we have spent more time preparing the rationale and reasoning to support the remaining variance requests we have proposed. With regard to the variance requests that have been removed, they are specifically: 1. We are no longer asking for a reduction in the minimum square footage required for one bedroom units; 2. The site plan now fully complies with the amount of Active Recreational Open Space required in the R-MF2 district; and 3. We are no longer asking for a reduction in the minimum building separations required between structures While we would have loved to remove all of the variance requests, we are still proposing seven. Of those, all but two of the remaining requests are related to the uniqueness of the proposed building design and our intention of providing a higher end resident experience than we believe is possible if we followed the R-MF2 district standards to the letter. We hope to provide some of that reasoning both in this letter and in particular during our public presentation by using not just this project's design as an example, but also our Terrawood project located in Grapevine which was rezoned and built under Planned Development standards similar to those we are proposing here. As for the two "non-site plan" related variances, they address proposals which provide for an increase in the number of units allowed for the site. This allows for an ideal size community while optimizing the best current design principles for livability and efficiency in land use. Even with the requested increase the community is still on the smaller side of other low rise multifamily developments within the City of Grapevine The average low rise multi-family development that has been built in Grapevine over the last ten years is 409 units. This proposal at 313 units is almost 25% smaller than that ten year average. Page � 2 � , ar ,�, < < GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVEIOPMENT . We have structured this informational packet in the following manner: 1. Property and Application Summary; 2. Introduction to the Design Intent including Graphics; 3. Development Summary and R-MF2 Variance Request Detail; and 4. Closing We look forward to discussing our request with you next Tuesday and thank you again for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Paul R. Johnston JLB Partners i' �. , � 3 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY AND APPLICATION SUMMARY Location The site is located at the northwest corner of Boyd Drive and E. NW Hwy in Grapevine, Texas Site Acrea�e 12.35 acres of land Northern Tract to be rezoned —12.35 acres (Tract 1) Southern Tract to remain CC—6.6 acres (Tract 2) Requested Zonin� To rezone the northern 12.35 acre tract (Tract 1) from Community Commercial District to R-MF-2 with a PD Overlay and Conditional Use Permit �'� t� �>> � 1.. ,� �,. M -F- . ,�� a�.. . �" , ; i ,� � " �A _���! .. Y� ik�, , �o-4 j;� _ MONTELENA �:� . ': � ' WILDWOOD CREEK !: , ,�:z , ,`� APARTMENTS � �� _��. APARTMENTS �� , < :�' ;+- - � �� t=��r #���''��:- ' ��- - �.��. - � _ - �,��:�� �:��:�����. _ -`� .� _� - , *,. .*� �' � 'j � '�, �+ � . ; �. �-:�:. � ,,;�. � . �,. �,.,� s , , . � ; � , ,, �v�1 ^� R �i�, � . ..,,. ,y : ; : ` t � . t� � t �� `' ; "'Y'„1± ! ' 1 1 t t � 9!"i� :� �� �� , � . ...'�"M'� ,��' ��� ���y � F. .� �t_ '�\,L,�,��!— ' Y - {�,. '�' - � �' +. �„��., �. � � .. +o �j � •� ' `�� ,;�'�`� MISCEI..LANEOUS COMMERC�I�A� usEs ` GRAPEVINE �� a". � � ,. :r STATION � t �—,,�, �b14,"� .i�`�`'r���+���=�;��+�,.�.o.�. � . . f' T�. �:_C �� Below is a breakdown of the adjacent uses: Northern Boundary- Montelena and Wildwood Creek Apartments and Grapevine Fire Station Eastern Boundary—Gaylord overflow parking lot and vacant land Southern Boundary—Mad Duck Bike Shop and miscellaneous commercial uses across NW HWY Western Boundary—Shell Gas Station, Storage Facility and The Hill School i � � � � , - - Pag � � 4 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT . DESIGN INTENT JLB Partners is requesting a planned development overlay district in order to create a community that implements the best current design principles in the multi-family industry. Historically, suburban garden apartment communities have been developed using "breezeway" style structures which are basically straight buildings with open breezeways and exposed stairwells. The buildings are then normally surrounded on three to four sides with surface parking spaces and community open space is located in one courtyard with a pool located next to a leasing center. Our request is for an "internal corridor" style development which consists of buildings shaped in "C" and "L" patterns. These types of buildings allow the stairwells to be hidden and integrated into the buildings and more importantly allow us to create larger and more impactful courtyards for amenities by placing them inside of the C or L shapes. Terrawood is a project that reflects this design approach and is located within Grapevine to the north of Grapevine Mills Mall. Developed and built by JLB in 2009-2010, the project is a good reference to see the impact that the C and L shaped buildings allow particularly in the courtyards as seen in the following photographs. � �` � �': � � =--.� � � . � �' � �"' � - n� �C. - �� �����a � - ';��� '" � _ i � [1� � " - �:__ '�� ao: r . _�� � ■■ iil�� ��� �� � ' � �;� / - �t '' s. ��,�''.��' - "^, � 4 _, � ��' ' �� � ' � '� l �� �1� � ���' y' , . � �, � x , . � � :-. . , -- -��...r . . _ ,� � __ . ; .. � �� �+ - � y# � . k ,, __ _— . `'�• _, . . �{! _ t-- _� . .� � .,r � _ _..f _ �..-i _.. r �y''-�'g� r '��y " �. ��.',+a� :s��. � � � . �,. �t c� r �y�"" ,�`'§�b+'�.-�.�- . F - .�'r y��• �b.�f�,�' .�...��;�-4x�b s � l � �s`� �y� r :� � , ,- —- � ����= � �� ,����� ��. �,�� _.� . � . . . . �� _1�} .a;* � � .��4 �;,:,�.�p y �l a`ef jJ,lJj; ��" + � �_ - ,_ ,..r r ' I� r� .)���'�1~� �f ^,._ „M .�'. 'r ':u - .' , . ., � ^ '" ��, . .� ,' r � 5 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT � -'-� ,, - . _. � � L , �1�� �� � - - . �,�._._. r,--�, � � "�� _ _ `''�"'��J _ � �`l _ �� �'. 1"''""T- � °r y.� _- - � 7��, z� , �.____�_. �_�-. �1,�E 9� 7a �� , ., ���: ; �� � �� , � -- ,�„� _ ( d, , � _-�- __._�. �=� , � �- ���' �-�-i, ��� '', �.�-������ ��►'�.� � „ �ir�����- ,t �i•��, =i:. K...i: - j, ,�I ?�1' _ ,�•- � ,r �'*"'"�,�:.{ ���:�� ,`y�.}�� y,�j -- ':: y' a r �i+ � �f _ � � 'G�i .I��,' �,� � � ' � n - I� � � ' � - �� � � �p� �: ,� , ` � � ..� � �-.�, ,� �i`j /��a�_!�'�,+,f ���Vv>>.T� i'/11 � v'� ��"-. � y�j� ��.I Mc��',�1,�1 i. �.+..r�.u.- - R ! �,-.`4•rr11�. �J' fl�•��' ''a`�. '—.• x� . •l�l�" .__----._ ���c''��Jl�11�1!!1l11� .�t�. Y_ ��� _ � �_' � .r i ...~�� .�"" a".�.� '��` ' ��.. �. ~� �`r I i �,, t r , r i ��S � � '4,�'� '�. �.... '�' •. ���;,. �s �-. �r r ..J�-��-'.yV/� , �"� '�•,. �� ��� � �- F _..r .. :_-. -='� ._ ,. vt.\- - . � `tiz-�- . _��-��,.�.P._ - "' � f The end result of using these building types is larger, more amenitized courtyards that are more like resorts than apartments. Other amenities provided at Terrawood and planned for this project include: • Private one and two space garages integrated into the buildings • Clubhouse with internet cafe, designer serving kitchen,TV lounge and game area • Fully equipped wellness center with high end cardio machines with integrated IPOD docking stations and TVs, free weights, and individual strength training machines • Community conference/meeting room • Resort style saltwater swimming pool and fountain in courtyards • Multi-leveled controlled building access • Architecturally compatible carport parking The quality of the development is consistent throughout the clubhouse area and the units which include granite countertops, real wood floors, and maple cabinetry to name just a few items. . _ � Page � 6 �� �z , �., : : . GRAPEVIIVE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT , � �"�,� "'! , .. . �4 ';� _ �:- .. .. � _ w � f � � � '�� � � • � ' I � r '. r w ��' 1^ �� ' { � ` :"�"��._ .,..�. ' x"� . _' ` � �r ' ��� �C `"`� + � � �,.., . t ` _ ��� � � �'.� a.� .� � 3 i f ._ :..�: ,. ,� - .. .- . ` '�"5. - � ��� ,�r Y�`'�"'�";�` :�• . � �`'.< , , k � I . - T . . . R ..-V �f `` �+r ,4 f '� ``� � +�,y . 1 ^� ..�['� � _��� - ^.y�' y .� �,�,� _ �_ � � , �, ,� . � 2 - t �� ;� � *� '�J -�...: _ �, a• :���I � � i _ . •_ J� �-._J��� I _ _ ! � „ �_a �• _ � � t� � � � �-v S, � _ - , + i _ ..�._ k �� � , _� ; , � . �:- _ ..,�,r �_ �``-.i�.'y - --i - � ` -- . ?�`� �, .� ; __ +N _ yyJ� �aJF'� . � � ��� .�;� .. ti^�: � �� I � GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT C - �I � I . �I 'I � =�+- � � � "v�} � I �' �, - � � ; � " � - . I , , ! � � �:� - � �„: ,l 1 I' r�.-' � �� �� � I �� ��.�.� � � � � - � ��v��� r ��4� .� q', � � 'h� - _� .. . � +. �`1..,;} � . . - _ , -► �. r• .. _. ,i ..s�;� .:... � y , . .. ' . _ ,_��,,,� �Tyy� 'f . ;..�p.�_ . % �. ..-- ' • , �i-- � ' . f � r- X _ � � •' �r . . � .t'.. . _ � .} ' °� r f .�„ . , .i _ , a _„� ... � ' .. !__ -, ..�� �_ �. � ._' .. __... ___.._._ .. ... ...__,.._ , _.�.. - .._. . ....-_i.,: . �.. -?�.�� _�.-.- The same level of finish out is planned for this new, proposed development. i � �1 f; C' I 8 � r . .- r GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT . PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Grapevine Texan Development will be a Class-A, luxury, three story, multi-family community consisting of 313 units. The community will have a 4,500 square foot leasing and amenity area with a professional grade fitness center, resident's entertainment lounge, internet cafe, community kitchen, and conference room. The community will also provide a resort style, saltwater pool and multiple courtyard areas. There will be ten specifically designed one, two and three bedroom floor plans ranging in size from 751 square feet to 1,455 square feet. Exterior Elevations The Grapevine Texan community will implement an architectural style that brings aspects of the surrounding uses into the elevation. By using a blend of stone, stucco, cementitious siding, and wood trim accents the community will complement the apartments to the north while continuing to bring the architectural design of the Gaylord, Great Wolf Lodge and Grapevine Station. . .►- . _ ;, +,`� s y � ' ��;xk .. '" � `' y�, �.-L�y4 t���(l��f����b����S���f a �� � -; ` j ify4 y�". + -�` M/S�/'IT x -.!K 1.�� -� �:_t'.`���i�1L�l�E��S#'_': ��%-:.._, �. .— '. ���.-. . - _ '��1�Sr � ��. � I I . I � � i � , ` ������ -..,- _ :: _ _ ' � _.. _ _ _ � _ - � ��� _ � . ; � ` t � � � _ ':.�t -�`�' � � �t• � 1 � � . ^ ''. , " � - '.. --�.-.-- > .- ..� , . � �{.: ,�.. - . I, ,��_�„� _ . . �1.7'. y /. F ""� ` :.. ,� . . .. ��.� ...-ar.r.�.r� ' �;�, �._ _ � �..�{.� . x`� �- :� J f� � . ` , t. i,�e�, �,c�, ��`i'�'`� ' ` #tY , , ,. T, .� � '� � - e ' „7_: /�. ., E . . � _ . . �°-' � "� � `h 'i 7S �h '� ` \� � ,f,f ,� �X �'`.��Y� . . /k y, � 1�:. � ��`;�.'"�`�-��-�'�: �i� �,��'' � b "'�"' �.,.>.} '�' i �S,r�.'� ,�c�[ f R � � , '`�i+r _:S�F.. �- r _. _ �-- � ; 7�� � � �A�r _. �- a.�.��w�t3,.�: p� ,`�P��` . _ . �,. � '.,tk�.: - � ,� f 1 ,��+y.,.� � t� .:*tl�`M�i r r 5�5�. ::/''.�r, ���' ,,,. , ,� �`�� '� r^'; 1 `,�'�i y : t�C r��i '.�'» �.w�� x y;. fi t Y�.-. 1� �� . �T � � 3 ); .` ry � .. �t�..,�. ��.. sayC ��urv �i.� .� W.) . . �� � ���-+ {b�:-%� Y .:.r �k`S���i�`aEzyJ+�`�4��=�.�i�t�:�a.1°..� vr,^�31-'� + ;. ,'4 r:'ai�°k�M��' ._7w���� �r � . .��.. ._ . ��S.i�'!.!� � � � 9 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT ��s" , � �"rK� v �� ;,��x cN, ,,1a M'��'� �: � � � � : �'� r� �,�7h R.�'�S « '� � . t �� �^ � , _ _. .;i'' � +�x�.��,�i�1�rs= ;-4c� - _ _ � ._. '� ►� 1► ��'w �� ~ r � � f r, 1 � ' !i � -_ .,� ,� . � , '�"'p� ',� , . � � z-:�.� . , � I:.p��, - �- _ � �� � `� ' � # . � � . � ���. • a��� F�� } " . �_7�, �y,�,� V e ` ` ` � , °♦ >^.Po,•!�� -�.rf,,�C.._ . � � .i • ' � ti.: ...�i-� . Q :..�. . , � � '-� L`i',�(1` 9��.t",.�`�lL�� �h, �` �r]•� t _ . ,. -- - --�— �t. _ ..r... f44 � ,»-��.4� +�i,r' r .,..., . . ,. »� -- - '��itF. ,�-�".,.�,� '� �� ����'�:.+��,�_-.�.�_.�-_,�k;t , ��..�� �;_� a��_ fi,: . ��;��_ _�,. � 3 n. �'?!K- � - � � � �� � �n' .� , .� `r � s ���- � � � .�� ���� � � ��� � � _ � � �� . � � , � ��.� �� �., _ � `� � . � � . . � ,tli�� Cf� � II .. � ,i ' y ' � T� '',� :. � _y��'. , _, �''��i �� � _� �� �� �,� �. �i� � , f " ,; . � = ;� '�' ��"�:�,, (''_�`, 1 �'�'.ay;� F ��. "�� �'� � �r K r q�lt' I�tp.r � �� � ',� ., .'�F , ' �.�,,tr ' _ ;y� /.. . ��t ���j� p f � t',. � .. r � , '�� ri`_ _��Y.'J�'�� ���� U�". .y _ �,���; .r. _-♦ ��" '�' ...n. ,.,:a�t _ � _�a•'�"xja�..!".,�lYt;^. t-:�'�k'Is •.�- C��,���A - _., :�_�- ��`-�P.-1,&�:�.X a�.�r.,<� �.�...u,..� ......'3'... ,-%`��_• _� t�, ___ . L[ � r�. _ � �' . .a �- .. �' age � 10 �. T ; GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT , Site Plan As can be seen on the below Site Plan, the project is characterized by two large, integrated courtyards. The eastern courtyard is by all standards extremely large and contains the bulk of the outdoor amenities while serving as the centerpiece of the community. The western courtyard, while smaller, allows for a more passive experience in a heavily landscape environment. The C shaped building located at the southern portion of the site plan has also been "flipped" since our original submittal in order to open up to the buildings to the west. As can be seen, there is a tremendous amount of open, green space in the plan which is centered in the middle of the site with the parking on the perimeter and in the enclosed garages. , TURNER ROAD k �. � .:.�- '` . " ' _' - �� ` '_ " I � i��, � r `� i_ f' . . I � , . -' - . . � I I -';' '-�� - " - u'ti`=-�'-- ��.�j , , ; _T�.�____--`7.� ?y , .'... .__.�-{� � ��. --��- - iu . � � ,t\� ,:� � - _V�_ -- ' � � .�. ` � � . . � . -. � � � �,�, � � � �. F , � �. ,, � < < �, , � � � � ` , � � � � � i �i �, � �� - � . . , ._ �''C� �` � � i �-� � �,;�� - � � � � ,- �,� . � i � � : � I , ; - . � , _�.� +� _:, _ - ,, �� � , - �-- - - �� ��,�� ,y , �, � � ' / ` ' '' � '� °' i�r', "�� L �,I I �`. ` ,j , . , ; �, ` ; ' '� ) ,� _ �_ . , �-� „`� j ,�i� . ! I` ] �.� r �..1 � ui _ ���' r- �,,�� ���_� i ; - , . ., ; -- _ _ � -_�- ,; ,, ��., , i �, , � _ �� �( - - - - �� - � �� -� _ «� . � � �� ;� , �. : j � �\- - - �_. -:3- � - �� ; �� �� � '� � � '� - - , � ; , �� � �S�� �� _�, , �- �� - ���� ������ GRAPEVINE TEXAN i - - - ' �ri � ' ' ; �"� � k��� GRAPEVINE TEXAS , �.t - � �` - � �� - � � ; � � �oa�o � �; -� �� � . �� ��. �, . .. . ; ' ;; - � 11 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT Interior Specifications Our interior finish out is driven by the need to provide the design and quality that you would find in custom homes. The proposed finish out for this project is similar to Terrawood and includes: Kitchen Area • Granite counter tops with backsplash • Oversized kitchen island with pendant lighting • Custom Finished Wood Cabinetry • Cabinetry with built-in features • Track Lighting in kitchen/dining Bedroom and Baths • Custom cabinetry • Tile tub and shower surrounds • Spacious Walk in Closets • Linen Closets (some incorporated in the closet) • Ceramic tile in baths Miscellaneous Details • Private balconies • Fenced in lawn area for courtyard units • Wood plank flooring throughout entry, kitchen, living and dining areas • Custom color accent walls • Full Size Washer and Dryer connections • Built-in Desk with Granite Top Page � 12 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT , DETAIL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND AMENDMENT REQUESTS Like most standard multi-family zoning districts, the current R-MF2 ordinance is not currently written in such a way to accommodate for this unique design style and the site planning that it requires. It is not uncommon for this type of project to have to go through a Planned Development (PD) process in order to be developed. Once approved, we have seen this product type be extremely well received in the market, including in Grapevine where Terrawood has consistently received the highest rents of any of its competitors with the exception of 925 Main which is a high density project which includes a structured parking deck. As with all PD's, this PD request contains requested amendments to a standard zoning district. Below are detailed descriptions of the deviations we are requesting from the R-MF2 zoning district. ■ Section 22 M.3 - Design Requirements— Maximum Building Length of 225 feet Due to the design implemented on this site we are requesting a variance to allow for the maximum building length to be 225 feet for two of the buildings we are proposing. This request is a reduction from our original request which was for a minimum of 250 feet for the majority of the buildings and was made possible after we redesigned a number of the buildings to meet the minimum � requirement of 200 ft. We were not however able to redesign all of the buildings. We have highlighted below the two buildings that we are requesting a maximum building length of 225 feet ' for and as you can see a reduction in the building length would have a negative impact on the width of the courtyard areas. By allowing the additional 25 feet we are able to create courtyard areas with proper scale and dimensions. Tu�nER ROAp �, I 1�.=z 1'__..��_— '_— :�� "__ ..—T— . ��.]j� a �� �� 1��_' ' i, �i �a�-, ��.j �. �� _. e ( I � i I �� `� �.°' ' ���`� ' ,�� a , � - ; �� .� � � � � : � � . ,� --1, � _. -- _ j i 1 y� �� ;_; y� ( ` - �' '�� ! ; ;�'�� ���`��,.� ��� r� '� � �� ,s, :�, �— — ��' � �rr ,:� �j � . �,r` / �' `J�q`� �'j� t�� '"i'G � 4i I, ��i _r z ' c� A) I ;B� � ,.. I ���' �� �� � � `' i `, ; � :� _ �� � � i , , , j '� � _� _ �r , �� , �- _ . :� �, k`����� � - � — % ` i, 3 .�._ =�� � y7 � —i_ � �' )� � _7�� -a�- - � _ � � � ��� y' i\ i �,\ � ( V i' Iq i �� �;� � � 1 � �;��� � �`� 7 � ,� � 'i �'�� l. �� � � �� ��� ����' �, � ��� GRAPEVINE TEXAN �;� , �� - _, � 6� � � GRAPEVINE TEXAS . ,` a _ /�, .�I � ^ � �'� . .J �. // _ l� _...�l I'' - _l 0 :0 SO AO `i � �r _ � 13 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT ■ Section 22 G - Area Regulations — 15 Foot Front Yard Setback and Auxiliary Parking Structures in Setback We are requesting a fifteen foot front yard setback as opposed to the standard 40 feet along Boyd Drive, but it's important for us to state that this is not so that we can put a building closer to the road. Our buildings are actually set back 90 feet from Boyd. What we are really proposing is the ability to park in the front yard. With the large amount of parking that we are providing, pushing the parking out of the front yard would require us to park adjacent to or within the courtyards of the buildings which would ruin the intent of the highly amenitized courtyards. ■ Section 53 1.3.b - Landscape Requirements - Not less than 14% of the landscaping required on the site will be located within the front yard setback In all non-residential zoning districts, the current zoning ordinance requires that a minimum of twenty (20) percent of the total site area shall �� � be devoted to landscaping with not less than fifty (50) percent of the that i landscaping being located in the required front yard. The way that the R- �—� ' � , MF2 ordinance is written, the only front yard for this project is located ' along Boyd Drive so that is where 50% of the landscaping is required to be � provided. This frontage just happens to also be by far the smallest a `- � �,,._ frontage that we have making it almost impossible to provide that much l�, ' `�� landscaping along such a small frontage. What we have designed in order ��kt _ �4 . �,,�W to mitigate this is a substantially larger amount of landscaping throughout '��� f ��=- the entire project. While the ordinance requires 20% of the site to be I�� �� A — landscaped, in our design over 50%of the site is landscaped. Also in order �.-�-�:: to, enhance the landsca in alon Bo d have desi ned a landsca in lan ��� r � p g g Y , g p� g p �, that is far more stringent than the required code. The rendering below �;�;�a, __ _ �� i depicts the proposed plan for this area. In addition to the increased �� �-� ` ' landscape plant coverage we have designed the street trees to be 4" ] ,,, �', '7 1 caliper trees instead of the required 3" caliper trees. Other considerations ._ j_-_- � include an oversized eight foot sidewalk that will extend around our entire �" ��' � �� � property and wrap the remaining Miles Foundation land and continue i r� along the NW Hwy frontage. This will link this site to the bike trail located �.tj� � a�i one block to the north. � _ � �', j...,.,yj. i,�tF� /f `.r4�:. -t���•`� ,�,�� " --- � -�+�reE.00� ,�, �{�.�_�; ti;, � � :�,M ,:. ��: �,-�. � . �: �•. a�- — �.�._�k„� � E�.:�:s�_.=,..� — >' ,�� __ ; �r�— � ��,� ��__,�_ o'a ety_ 'F , e a JUK �'FD'av FJJ�.i�R�.�_ ��' �� ge � 14 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT . ■ Section 22 M.5-Design Requirements—Building to Travel Way - The R-MF2 ordinance says that no building shall be located closer than fifteen (15) feet to the edge of an off-street parking, vehicular use or storage area. As mentioned earlier, this project proposes to provide private, enclosed one and two car garages within the buildings. Obviously, there must be a driveway to reach the garage spaces and this request is to clarify that the parking and drives located behind the garages does not conflict with this design requirement. We also have located a number of the buildings along the travel ways to create a boulevard feel which encourages interaction amongst the residents. ■ Section 56 C.1 - Parking Variance Adequate parking is critical for a multifamily development. Towards that, we commissioned a third- party parking study by DeShazo, Tang and Associates, Inc., which determined that the average requirement for the proposed development should be 592 parking spaces or 1.89 spaces per unit. We are requesting a variance to allow for two (2) spaces per unit for a total of 626 parking spaces. This is still a higher ratio of parking spaces per unit than the surrounding cities as shown below: Parking Requirements Per City ��o I� 626 626 626 626 630 • 603 603 -a 600 I .__ .. . _ ._ . _.__.. - - �- -- - -- . i 544 , .� � � 500 .._�--fi7Cr—�— -- --.._-- ----- - ._—. - . N u fl. aoo -- ----- _-- N oA c Y i300 ----__ ---- - . ..—_.. ._ .—.__— ._ _.. ---- —_ __. � a � 0 � zoo — —_ _ — -- -- -- — ---- _ — — v � E � i Zioo ' -- _ _ _--- — -- _ . _. ___ -- o - . _ _ _ _ __,_ _ .. __ Ft.Worth Irving Dallas Southlake Plano Richardson Mesquite Grapevme Carrollton Texan Comparison Cities ■ Section 22 1.1 — Building Height — The maximum height of any building will be three stories not to exceed 39 feet in height, which is only four feet higher than is allowed in the R-MF2 District. This also allows us to provide nine foot ceilings as opposed to eight on all floors which is demanded by our targeted tenant profile who is seeking a custom home finish out level. ■ Section 22 F.1 -Density Increase—313 units or 25.4 units per acre This request allows for an ideal size commuriity while optimizing the best current design principles for livability and efficiency in land use. Even with the requested increase the community is still on the smaller side of other low rise multifamily developments within the City of Grapevine . The � ' �� '�� � 15 GRAPEVINE TEXAN DEVELOPMENT average low rise multi-family development built in Grapevine over the last ten years is 409 units. This proposal at 313 units is almost 25% smaller than that ten year average. Low Rise Apartment Community Sizes-Since 2000 �oo __ _ —- --_ -- 600 600 �'.. ---- — ---- ---- ---- �- 500 ���., ------ ----- — - --------- -------�--480-.__ .._ . � � 392 � 400 �—.—_.------------------ --------- -- � � p 344 348 � 313 � 300 ..- 291 7 Z zoo � - — � � --- — _ ioo ��� -- __ o ' -- -— —-. � Terrawood Grapevine Texan Wildwood Creek Mustang Ridge Cross Creek Marquis at Silver Verde Riverwalk Oaks Apartment Communities CLOSING In closing, we feel that this multi-family design style is the ideal use for this site. By thoughtfully land planning the overall site we were able to leave prime commercial land along the NW Hwy corridor with appropriate depths while creating an efficient sized tract for an internal corridor style, multi-family development with large and highly amenitized courtyards. The amendments requested to the R-MF2 District were limited to as few as possible without severely affecting our intended site plan and design, and as stated before, it is the design of this product type that is driving these requests. Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to answering any questions that you may have. � � � � ' ;i �; e � 16 � � � . _ < _ GRAPEVINE TEXAN APARTMENTS NORTHWEST CORNER OF BOYD DRIVE AND EAST NW HIGHWAY GRAPEVINE, TEXAS CITY OF GRAPEVINE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION MARCH 15, 2011 •l b 1111 EMMM'M- F ' i law b t • _ .- ��. .. � fur! 41 AILAL IMAMj too- S.—t Ex. Can.. k - -_ _. _ _ - —. _ ___ __. _-._ _ - - 1 --- - - Pvmt. & can't. 3 - 1 l Long. Butt J.Int 'TURNER ROAD _ 4 Per City of $i Grapevine Stondord� (60' Public R.O.W.) - -- m Details I 150 \y 20'SideYardSetb o _ Prop. Tr h -Sq 721 y➢ 1 F j -!� �' �' Compactor .tea Prcp. 8 Water o �) Detent'on srcr.e ; gyTo 21 RCP --- 18' R ' `-Ca rt �- Proposed 24' Frelone - —3, 25.0' m'r 4- - a _ -- -- / -- _ �I —o— 4 I � P nd Match Buiidin9 iU 9 25.0 (TYP.) -.e- Prop. -+� r3 _- - 6' RCP 04 S_ 4 s2 _ 2s.o' I 4' 6. / } s z1 s - - „,mae,, x==•" _ :- ,: Ta^�, spa<d �` I ! i qg � � I I L i --- N<, 7.0' m -.: _-1-I�(�_ - la. ` tap' )• F-1B • s '! 4 Plop- 10'x10 B uidmq No 2 f y I 9to' 40 0 20 40 80 I —� o. P Bu(Iding No. 3 W t E t ,P IIIBo' 6 zss JFlt F.F 616.6 (Tm) 1 F F 61 �.1 ( (yv.)rt v1C111ity Map �- i-I 1__� _ _,_ - _I �- _ s Proposed 24' Flroiane v C_':-.._._� _ -_�__ - .__- _ _--i _-_'-- 481 J�.. jI jI I I e �} 1 inch = 40ft. P.P. IF Water -..-. J 1 tD 'Flum �a u�N Prop. pi ""r0°`°' s _ 9 I - Site Data SummaEy Table g _ EL o Prop to tD' Buiid n No. , _-- -- - �`Wet E _- ��° l W.R. DM KAPLOCK PMON — J memo- _ 9 �._ > 1 35 CR OF LA 12_ -- m �� SS i } �-- -- I � uo' � ^ t` s ARE-F€E ND I I � -30 �... - lfis sp^ tv) I it P-p. 10'x10 O (Typ) Prap. IBo' 2sd s 164 tar _ \CI p - ( I ° - F_ ountobl. �� ---- -N --.. - (N 3I. i _ Curb _ - Pr Fed 4�irelana 6 I . i f �i _ t9�2-_ 2 _- "s Buildin No. 1 -0 a'R 6R .6 =I B,_B i I t l.0 Y RCP 18' RCP '-- an �, Ce• 18 RCP 24• CP I I 25,0' tQ I I I ( �^y I e/ ti9" Bs �- _ �6' III I, v �f- I _. ._ - - - q,: 75.8 a Prap. 1o'xto' ss s O Lir- - I � I 2 Sib' 18' RCP f _ __ r _ F- ate m W Z - Building No. 4 k _ (ram) Ee �' ( I ! --_-. - su _-_ a 1��. F.F.=618.0 - o l=1 —r y -I leap' d I I m �— 3 ro9" stt pee �7' r = - __ 16.3 o Prop 6 _ _� __ a .� -- _spa=, I i�t7q' g _.-�-�FlroPanatlu24• �_ ( 1 m 240' r4l I yt I 16.4sT - -- g• I 3 I I I i I___I • `°p N n m e �; qy € r oRs orpnrt 589128112W - 291.10' A� I General Sit D to Prop Zo i g - - ft-MF2 /PD Dv day - ta dUse _ Mult tot Area __ ]23S i 936,069 s1 B Id g2 22,139 - B,ildi.q I 3499110 _ ..i1di,yi S _ _ zunf — Bu Id gfi 215c1 , D t ch dGa g 4063 f TOTAL 153577 _ - - e Id q[ ge IsM --- poflltedraorn_ ]81 q f2Bed g f3Betl I9 - TOTAIUn is 32 P kl gDa PP dPAeftb __ 2p/ t S d N 5 rf P rk g 235 _ Cgy..d5 d Be P ki g _ 98 _ T d P rk g 129 _ Alt Iu,d Ge g P rk g D to h d G g Amessible Standard Prki g- h bl Co_ dP k g Ao,mlbleAttatetMar g P rk g 0. slbl D rhed Gang P M _ TOTAL,k g 626 - _ i lad p pre R,W.d ln.r U,,bcape All, 20 S8i f t d rla d p P d,d _ 21,400 R q i ,d Op Sp oe _ iLn QB f. _"... Op Sp P d d 11. 2 f P entag- fla d P I F [Y l 19Y� f ImperWo Are euiltlingf -[p _ to _ _ _ _ ___ 353571 f ____ _ Areas of [h p A 251,453 sf __ r.tal Imce i s d 4os,ozg L:f Impervious Surface Coveage _ 792]%% p F.= 'ml o - (Tw') I I - 10' F/I I 6 t59 6i6.6 1 W.R.BOYD CENTER ADDMON Dra,na9e Proposed unit Mix 1 1BD0' ' ` �- s5R g5R — f $ --- B LOT IRI. BLOCKI Easement 3.306 ACRES OF LAND (141,199.773 SQUARE FEET) hmaBm Carport (TW.) t - _ I I I ----..� 0LOT ____-__ - -BOlT16CENTER _.7 g 9 - _ N O CAH. A. Its. 5851 R. P.MT. P I I I Building No. F.F.-616.3_ 6 -,_ � } •u3 _ F .F. =618. ___v -TTr-• IU tii 9.4' 15;t I ry v r ate, sr«,. — "➢ 21.1' rap. ti� c - ( li �P1.1.. P LAN N E D D E V E L 00 �M E N T S i T E P L A N IranFence �oI _ Prap. 8' Wata -�- -__ - 75B _ 18' RCP _ d 24' n ' Water -- rea a _� Prop. 6 at 9 0 _ RB n l I - }0 _ I I I W.R. BOYD CENTER ADDITION 18' RC 9 % Lots 2R, Block 1 Flume - w I 3 Flume 3' Flum 74B 3' Flume IQO' - -1/2- efts O p1/Y efts e" [olning > m Fence (.'part ryp.) won614.86 LR ` WR. BOYD CENTER ADDmoN LOT 3R1, BLOCK 1 70NIN(^• CHANOE RFOLIE$T: - w z z o o - Drainage Easement 3.306 ACRES OF LAND Zone change rea...t 2/1-01 's a req... t to ACC' _ o o (144,101.412 SQUARE FEET) rezone a y 12.35 era from Communit i m u LOT 3R W.R. BOYD CENTER Commercial District to R-MF-2' Multifamily District for the development of a 313 unit ' o E Nntea: 0 U � g i. Handicap Parking Is Provided In Accordance w/ ADA Standards. 2. No Floodplain Exists On The Site. I All The Ren uramanfa of Th. Crnnnvine CAB. A. SLD. 5851 LOT 4apartment complex. Pionnetl development oveday P.R. T.C.T. W.R. BOYD CENTER PDII-01 is a request to Im I,de but not be CAB. A, SLD. 5851 P.R.T.C.T. limited to deviation from density, front yard ,tba&. building height, building length, front yard building proximity to site parking and off-street parking relative to the development of the complex. ., th..p mpl WRLPDSF - the p rpose f this Site Plan 1 to create a Lot Md Easements tp,._ tot an Apartment 1 12.35 ACRES E sit w situated in the Ali I A.F. LEONARD SURVEY — ABSTRACT 946 -=i GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS III I Developer Owners/Applicants li JLB Partners LP The Miles Foundation, Inc. & 909 Lake Carolyn Pkwy., Suite 960 Miles Production LP Irving, Texas 75039 200 Highland Circle Telephone (214) 271-8480 Argyle, Texas 76226 Contact: Britton Church I ! Engineer/Surveyor ammo-, I Spfars Engineering, Inc. 765 Custer Rd., Suite 1 00 ShfMt r Plano, Texas 75075 Telephone (972) 422-0077 Contact: Kevin Wier �� / 1 ( Scale 1"=40' March 2011 at R E V I S I O N S NO ITEM DATE COMP. SHINGLES OVER PLYWOOD DECK OVER 4 —STEEL STRUCTURE E:12 SL TUBE STEEL s 1 COLUMN E REF. OWNER'S CONSULTANT /!►CARPORT V SH GLES <N )WNERS LTANT CMU WALL CAP B1 UNIT BRZWY C1 UNIT CMU WALL W/ MANUP. STONE STAIR FOG/ -ATV VENEER 1 STUCCO 4' STUCCO TRIM /—GATE -FIBER CEMENT / ON STL. 'TUBULAR FRAME /1 TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS 1/9' . T-0 5-CAR GARAGE FRONT ELEVATION DOORS W/ WD. TRIM n WEST END ELEVATION BUILDING 2 A3 UNIT BRZWY A2 UNIT AS UNIT REC/ LEASING W/ TWO STORY VOLUME AS UNIT/ REC/ LEASING ® FIRST PLOOR A2 UNIT 1 (53 UNIT 0 THIRD FLOOR) �I7 METAL ROOF n REC/ LEASING FRONT ELEVATION BUILDING 1 aD KEY PLAN 9j 1ST CASE NAME: 0,.P.,Ar. Ta..r Apart—rts'. CASE NUMBER: Z11-01 & PD11-Oi LOCATION: 401 Boyd Dr.; Lot 2R, Block 1. W.R. Boyd Center Addiil— MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN SHEET: 2 OF 10 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT IMTH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ARCHON CORPORATION ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS 2929 CARLISLE STREET SUITE 130 - DALLAS, TX 75204 214/526-0731 DATE 2 MAR 11 PROJECT.L.J_O_O'f .23 SHEET_--L.OF 10 3 EE -0' ORNAMENTAL- MEL FENCE (REF. DETAIL: A) LEGEND E ® INTERIOR LANDSCAPE TREE MEDIUM TO LARGE TREE l3' CALIPER MIN) LANDSCAPE TREE p0PERIMETER MEDUM TO LARGE TREE (3' CALIPER MN) ALONG BOYD DRIVE (4' CALIPER MINJ PERIMETER LANDSCAPE TREE O SMALL TREE (3' CALIPER MN.) ALONG BOYD DRIVE ONLY 0 OPEN SPACE TREE MEDIUM TO LARGE TREE (3' CALIPER MIN) OPEN SPACE TREE SMALL TREE (3' CALIPER MNJ /�-��\ 0 MITIGATION TREE �/ MEDIUM i0 LARGE TREE (3' CALIPER MINJ MITIGATION TREE O SMALL TREE (3' CALIPER MNJ O LARGE/SCREEN SHRUB (5 GALLON MIND ALONG BOYD DRIVE (5 GALLON MNJ ACCENT SHRUB (5 GALLON MIN) ALONG BOYD DRIVE ODOM DWARF SHRJB (3 GALLON MIN) ®GROUND COVER (4' POT MN) ALONG BOYD DRIVE (I GALLON MN.) INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA / 0 \\i EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (MITIGATION REQUIRED) 6 CEDAR LANDSCAPE SUBMITTAL PLAN GRAPEVINE TEXAN LOT 2R, BLOCK I W.R. BOYID CENTER ADDITION 1235 ACRES SITUATED N GRAPEVINE, TARRANt COMM, TEXAS SPARED FOR: Pt�PARID BY: JLB REALTY, LP ENVIRO DESIGN WS Lake CarokM Parkwg 1424 Gr—Ille Sulte %0 Sidle 200 irvinngg Texae'i5039 Dallas, Texae 15231 (2W) 2TI-8480 (214) 98T-3010 w K i I P.R.T.C.T. I P.R.T.C. T. �nn� ( v„U.P.R. T.C.T..,o�i Iw = Nnr'V AW o m ( �4V Jcm a ao i 0 20 YV 80 120 TAEUULATION CHART MAINTENANCE TOTAL SITE AREA (1235 ACRES) 53BO65 SF THE OWNER TENANT AND THEIR AGENT, IF ANY SHALL JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY FFESPON51BLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL LAND5CAPNG. ALL REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED N A NEAT AND ORDERLY MANNER AT ALL TIMES. THIS SHALL INCLUDE MOWING, EDGING, PRNIYs, FERTILIZING, WATERING, INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED (10 %1 20,583 BE WEEDING, AND OTHER SUCH ACTIVITIES COMMON TO THE MAINTENANCE OF 205g26 EF x 10% = 20,583 SF LANDSCAPING. LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF TRASH, LITTER 4'x6• - ¢• o.G. — INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED (10%) 21,400 SF WEEDS AND OTHER SUCH MATERIAL OR PLANTS NOT A PART OF THE LANDSCAPING. COUNTERSINK DOLTS ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A HEALTHY AND GROWING 2-'O, INTERIOR LANDSCAPE TREES REQUIRED (1/400 SF) 54 CONDITION AS 15 APPROPRIATE FOR THE SEASON OF THE YEAR PLANT MATERIALS 2NIO' BOLTED INTO 21,400 SF 1400 Sr = 535 TREES TREES 54 WHICH DIE SHALL BE REPLACED WITH PLANT MATERIAL OF SIMILAR VARIETY AND SIZE. NOTCHED POST NTERIOR LANDSCAPE PROVIDED `r 2 x 6 COLLAR - MITER JOINTS PERIMETER LANDSCAPE �— 2x4 COLLAR - MITER JOINTS BDYD DRIVE (15') PERIMETER TREES REQUIRED (1/50 LF) 9 TREE PROTECTION 464.14 LF / 50 LF = SIB TREES PERIMETER TREES PROVIDED (9 LARGE, 13 SMALL) 22 DURING ANY CONSTRUCTION OR LAND DEVELOPMENT, THE DEVELOPER SHALL CLEARLY TURNER ROAD 001) MARK ALL PROTECTED TREES TO BE MAINTAINED AND MAY BE REQUIRED TO ERECT AND PERIMETER TREES REQUIRED (1/50 LF) 15 MAINTAIN PROTECTIVE BARRIERS AROUND ALL SUCH TREES OR GROUPS OF TREES. THE 88526 LF / 50 LF = Ill TREES DEVELOPER SHALL NOT ALLOW THE MOVEMENT OF ECSIIPMENT OR THE STORAGE OF PERIMETER TREES PROVIDED i8 EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, AND DEBRIS OR FILL TO BE PLACED WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF ANY PROTECTED TREE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT, THE EAST PERIMETER (10') DEVELOPER SHALL NOT ALLOW THE CLEANING OF EQUIPMENT OR MATERIAL UNDER THE PERIMETER TREES REQUIRED (I/50 LF) 4 CANOPY OF ANY PROTECTED TREE OR TREES TO REMAIN. NEITHER SHALL THE DEVELOPER 204.48 LF / 50 LF . 4.1 TREES ALLOW THE DISPOSAL OF ANY WASTE MATERIAL SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PANT, OIL, PERIMETER TREES PROVIDED 4 SOLVENTS, ASPHALT, CONCRETE, MORTAR ETC, UNDER THE CANOPY OF ANY 1292=ED TREE OR TREE. uIFST PERIMETER (10'1 PERIMETER TREES REQUIRED (1/50 LF) B NO ATTACHMENT OR WIRES OF ANY KIND, OTHER THAN THOSE OF A PROTECTIVE NATURE, 6602 LF / 50 LF - 132 TREES SHALL BE ATTACHED TO ANY PROTECTED TREE. PERIMETER TREES PROVIDED B SOUTH PERIMETER (10'1 PERIMETER TREES REQUIRED (1/50 LF) 18 WE.% LP / 50 LF - 18.1 PERIMETER TREES PROVIDED 18 EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED PARKING LOT a VEHICULAR USE SCREEN (30' HT. SHRUB) PROVIDED TREE TYPE TREE SIZE OPEN SPACE TOTAL OPEN SPACE REQUIRED (20%) 101. 28 SF 538,140 5F x 20% = 101,628 W TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED (33%) 118,142 5F VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE (38%) 205026 SF NON -VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE TREES REQUIRED (1/3000 SF) 69 205526 SF / 30W EF - 68.6I TREES NON -VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE TREES PROVIDED 69 TREE MITIGATION MITIGATION TREES REQUIRED (121 INCHES) 43 121 INCHES / 3" CALIPER TREE = 423 TREES MITIGATION TREES PROVIDED 43 30 - MEDIUM TO LARGE TRESS (3" CALIPER MIND 13 - SMALL TREES (3"CALIPER MIN) LANDSCAPE NOTES L ADDITIONAL PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE INSTALLED ON -SITE BY CWNER N ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS. MATERIAL SHOWN ON THIS PLAN 15 TO MEET MINIMUM CITY OF GRAPEVINE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE REMIREMENTS. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY OWNER N A HEALTHY AND GROWING CONDITION, AND REPLACED WITH PLANT MATERIAL OF SIMILAR VARIETY MID SIZE IF DAMAGED, DESTROYED OR REMOVED. 3. LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF TRASH, LITTER WEEDS AND OTHER MATERIALS OR PLANTS NOT A PART OF THE LAIDSCAPIKS, 4. AN UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC POP-UP TYPE LIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED TO WATER ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS, INCLUDING RNGHT-OF-WAY AREAS. ADJUSTMENTS TO SYSTEM WILL LIMIT OVERSPRAY ONTO ADJACENT ROADWAYS AND CONSERVE WATER TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE 5. ALL LANDSCPPE AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY RAISED SIX NCH CONCRETE CURBS. PAVEMENT SHALL NOT BE PLACED CLOSER THAN FIVE FEET FROM A TREE TRAY UNLESS SPECIFYING A STAFF APPROVED ROOT BARRIER 6. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRICTED, INSTALLED AND MANINTANED 50 AS NOT TO OBSTRUCT VIEW OF MOTORISTS BETWEEN THE STREET AND THE ACCESS DRIVES. VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SHALL ALWAYS REMAIN UNOBSTRUCTED. 1. ALL PERMEABLE SURFACES NOT OCCUPIED BY TREES, SHRUBS, PLANTING BEDS, SIGNS AND OTHER PERMITTED ITEMS OR FIXTURES SHALL BE BERMUDA, ST. AU GUSTINE, OR BUFFALO GRA86 LAM AREAS. PLANT PALETTE MEDIUM TO LARGE TREE - 3" caliper minimum, spacing as shown Live Oak (Quercus virginlana), Cedar Elm (Ulmus aasslfolla), %umard Red Oak (GUuerous sFumarcill), Bur Oak (Quercus macrocarpa), Bald Cypreae (Taxodiun dlsUdun), South.. Magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora), Pecan (Carga Illincerisle), Chinese Pletachlo (Platacla chlnersls), Eastern Red Cedar (Junipers virgtntana), Leyland Cypress (Cupressoc,,paris leylandl). SMALL TREE - 3" caliper minimum, -pacing as aF— Yaupon Holly (Ilex vomitorla), Desert Willow (Chilopeis Ilnearle), Mexican Plum a (Prove mexicam),, Redbud (Cards canadensia) 9 LARGE/SCREEN SHRUB - 5 gallon minimum (30" height minimum), Von center Dwarf Burford Holy (Ilex cornuta 'BurfordiT 'Nana'), Cleyara (Ternstroemia gymnantrera), Compact Elaeagrus (Elaeagnu, macropNI]a 'Ebberjl'), Nandira (Nandim domestics), x Nellie R. 6tever'a Holly (Ilex x'Nellie R. Stevens'), Dwarf Wax Myrtle (Myrica pusilla), E E Variegated Privet (Ligustrum lucid. 'Vartegata9, At-Ila (Abella grardiflora), iaxae Sage (Leuc PNIIum rut--'Compactu v,, Sea Green Juniper ourlperus N chi_!. 'Sea Greg, Blue Point Juniper (Gre,Antperus chineral. ' Blue Point'), i Lorapetalun (t—opetalum cMnense) I o DWARF SHRUB - 3 gallon minimum, Ton renter o Dwarf Yaupon Holly (ilex vomitorla Nana'), Dwarf Indian Hawthorn (Raphiolepts MI-), 'Compacta'), I Carlssa Holly (Ilex corruta 'Carissa'), Compact Nand" (Nardina domeatica 'Anthony c " S 0 Ari" IUaterer Spirea (Spimasi x bumuida Waterer'), Barberry (Berberis u \ tRurbergll), Red Yucca (Hespereiee pervitlore), Juniper (Juliperus apJ, Dwarf Abelta o (Abella grandl(lora ' Edward Goucher7. E GROUNDCOVER - 4" pot m(nlmum, D" to 15" on center 1 o Asian Jasmine (Track slospe rm aslaticum), Liriope Wrlope muscarl), Mondo m Grass (Ophlopogon Japonioxn), Purple Winteroreaper (Euonymus forturei ° 'Coloratus J Honeysuckle (Lonicera Japonica 'Atropurpurea'), Juniper w- (Juniperus ap), English Ivy (Had— hsllx). TOP OF PEKE TO BE LEVEL - STEP AT POST MODULE AS REOWIRED TO ACCOMMODATE GRADE CHANGE. 2- BQ STEEL TOP RAIL i In- SQ STEEL — INTERMEDIATE RAIL Y SQ STEEL POST 9 6' - O. OL MAXIIlM (EQUAL POST SPACING BETWEEN FIXED POINTS) o .o ' Sa STEEL PIQ<TS 9 6' O.C. 2' SQ STEEL BOTTOM PAL �RETE FOOTNG - STRUCTURAL DESIGN _ BY ENGINEER C I. PANT FENCE WITH ONE COAT OF ZNC CHROMATE AND TWO COATS HIGH GLOSS INDUSTRIAL MNAF.L PANT. COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY OIhER 2. MMORCINNS AND FOOTING DETAILS FOR FENCE POSTS BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 3. PROVIDE V-6- ACCESS GATE WHERE SHOWN Oh! PLAN. HC 5x5 CLEAR SPACE ON OF GATES. NCROR SYSTEM ON TOP W. WALL AS SPECIFIED A)��� L STEEL PERIMETER FENCE 3/4' . r-O• (3) 2.4 STRINGERS 8'x8' TRELLIS POST - SPACIY,a PER PLAN 1.6 BOARD WATERPROGF BASE SLOPE C0NO2ETE M' EXPANS104 JONT W/ FLEXIBLE SEALANT CONCRETE ECUIPVEtNT SLAB ccNrREtE FooTING PER NOTES SIDE v1EW I I FRONT viEW STRUCTURAL L ALL WOOD TO BE IOW(! 4 BEE CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT s. COORDNATE PLACEMENT OF ENGIEERS CUT WESTERN RED CEDAR PLAN FOR POST LOCATIONS. WOOD FOOTS WITH MASONRY SOWER DETAILS 2. STAN WITH 2 COATS OF 5. TOP OF FENCE TO BE LEVEL WALL- ATTACH BEAMS TO BUILDNG OLYMPIC STAR SUBMIT 6. INSTALL 4'x4' FENCE SUPPORT A9 REQUIRED, COLOR SAMPLES TO OWNER FOOTS BETWEEN TRELLIS POSTS 4 INSTALLATION OF TRELLIS PORTION SECTION 3,ALL HARDWARE TO BE HOT -DIPPED GALVANIZED. AS REQUIRED (MAX 6'-O' OC) "L PPKiVIIDE V-Op' ACCESS GATE, OF DETAIL MAY BE OMITTED AS DIRECTED BY OWNER VERIFY THERE pt POOL E\,d�IP1YlElY AlVi� ARE NO VIEWS INTO 11DAREA IEN FROM ADJACENT EQUI TIALIAL WITS. 1 �7`fREE'tl 1 (-IELLi47 ",, , r.O. Tw 0:0 I aw z / ! Mac / BW O55 IW / BW H it, b� IN al, a D6.3 Ss I 40 0 20 40 BO Q� 1 inch = 40ft. 3' E _o a This pion is released for the ose purpof Interim review and pricing Under the authority of KEVIN S. VAER, P.E. 91219 Date: March 2011 It is not to be used for construction. a z E,x�H 0.i �0W� z Z tv rx a: W�[y U �®� z zHH¢ 'O�U� w H a Issue Dates: March 2011 LEGEND 45.D Proposed Spot Elevation 550 Proposed Contour —sas Existing Contour _ Existing Spot Elevation`-�" rte xc=,as oo 1 Direction Of Flow CITY CPS MONUMENT @2: "W ALUMINUM ROD WITH CAP SET 0.4' BELOW ACCESS COVER. ACCESS COVER IS STAMPED. 'CITY of GRAPEVINE. MON. Y. MONUMENT IS LOCATED APPROX. 250 Scale: 1"=40' FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF DOVE RD. AND HOOD LN. AT THE ENTRANCE TO DOVE PARK PARKING LOT. Drawn By. BLM ELEVATION = 627.32 Checked By. KSW CITY OPS MONUMENT IP. 12' ALUMINUM ROD WIN CAP SET 0.6' BELOW ACCESS COVER. ACCESS COVIIR IS Sheet STAMPED, 'CITY Or GRAPEVINE, NO. 7. MONUMENT IS LOCATED AT THE HEATHER STATION OF THE CORPS OF ENMEERS AT THE GRAPEVINE LAKE HEADQUARTERS ON FAIRWAY DRIVE (110 FAIRWAY DR.) ELEVATION - 585.76 TEMPORARY BENCHMARK: of 10 'Q CUT SET ON TOP OF DAB INLET APPROX. 30 SOUTH OF INTERSECTION OF ES TURNER ROAD AND N. DOOIEY STREET ON EAST SDE OF N. DOOLEY STREET. SEI No. 10-104 ELEVATION - 597.07 10-104 Grading Plan A,,, a„ b N 2 u W / 40 0 20 40 80 "-i / i inch = 40ft. F" C! ,a This plan is released far the purpose of Interim review and pricing under the authority of KEVIN S. WEER, RE 91219 Date: March 2011 It is not to be used for construction. a M z wxWW a U ; 0cC) Q wU C) d WVz z W0U� w a H a Issue Dates: March 2011 All storm sewer pipe 18" diameter and larger shall be Class III RCP or approved equal. All storm sewer pipe 15" diameter and smaller shall be SDR-35 PVC, ADS N-12 pipe, or approved equal. CITY GPS MONUMENT J1 6.6 ALUMINUM ROD NTH CAP SET 0.4' BELOW ACCESS COVER. ACCESS COVER IS STAMPED, 'CITY OF GRAPEVINE, MON. 2'. MONUMENT IS LOCATED APPROX. 250 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF DOVE RD. AND HOOD LN. AT THE Scale: 1"=40' ENTRANCE TO DOVE PARK PARKING LOT. ELEVATION a 627.32 Drawn By. FILM CRY GPS MONUMENT /7: Checked By. KSW 12' ALUMINUM ROD WITH CAP SET 0.6' BELOW ACCESS COVER ACCESS COVER IS STAMPED. 'Ott OF GRAPEVINE, N0. 7'. MONUMENT IS LOCATED AT THE WEATHER STATION OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS AT THE GRAPEVINE LANE HEADQUARTERS Sheet 7 ON FAIRWAY DRIVE (110 FAIRWAY DR) ELEVATION - 585.76 TEMPORARY BENCHMARK: of 10 U CUT SET ON TOP OF CURB INLET APPROX. 30' SOUTH OF INTERSECTION OF TURNER ROAD AND N. DOOLEY STREET ON EAST SIDE OF N. DOOLEY STREET. l3EI No. 10-104 ELEVATION - 597.07 10-104 Drainage Plan f9 I I i ecl e() as m I I —'-- l. Remove & Rep & Replace E. I I Cann Per I Gty DPedne StandardandG,.P Details —I r Connect to E. 787 RCP p(/r✓�J I �-- I 51 I � I t� nI —t to Ex. Remove & Dispose Ex. . u RCP Recess 10' Curb Inlet & i U k� - Cat RcdCurbInlet TURNER ROAD W i ^ (60' Public R.O.W.) 2 I) " 42" ROP "" I RCP U — Remove Sawat Remova & Disposed E. Rep Ex. f-" 24' RCP Canc. Pvmt Per Q Connect to E. City of Grapevine standard Demas 18" RCP 9 Uw CASE NAME: Grapevine Texan Apartments CASE NUMBER: Z11-01 & P011-01 LOCATION: 401 Boyd Dr.; Lot 2R, Block 1, W.R. Boyd Center Addition MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 8 OF 10 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES w,......�L.�■ AQ on is released far the e of Interim review and under the outhedty of S. WER, PE 91219 March 2011 of to be used Z to a I-NxZW d H Z Z ��aH Q ZNia�D H UO W�wU w [- -1 O I -I O ZF,Hd x WOUQ Z Issue Dotes: March 2011 All storm sewer pipe 18" diameter and larger shall be Class III RCP or approved equal. All storm sewer pipe 15" diameter and smaller shall be SDR-35 PVC, ADS N-12 pipe, or approved equal. CITY GPS MONUMENT & 6.0' AILMINUM ROD W TH CAP SET 0.4' BELOW ACCESS COVER. ACCESS COVER IS STAMPED, "CITY OF GRAPEVINE, MON. 2. MONUMENT IS LOCATED APPROX. 250 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF DOVE RD. AND HOOD LA. AT THE Seale: 1"=40' ENTRANCE TO DOVE PARK PARKING LOT. ELEVATION a 627.32 Drawn By. BLM CITY GPS MONUMENT #7: Checked By. KSW If ALUMINUM ROD WIN CAP SET Ob' BELOW ACCESS COVER. ACCESS COVER IS STAMPED.IS LOCATED AT THE WEATHER OF THE CORPD. 'CITY OF GRAPEVINE NO. 7". MONUMGRAPEVINE STATOR OF ENGINEERS AT THE APEVINE LAKE HEADQUARTERS Sheet ON FAIRWAY DRIVE (110 FAIRWAY DR.) ELEVATION = 585.76 TEMPORARY BENCHMARK: of 10 "Q OUT SET ON TOP OF CURB INLET APPROX. 30' SOUTH OF INTERSECTION OF TURNER ROAD AND N. DOOLEY STREET ON EAST SIDE OF N. DOOLEY STREET. 6Ei No. 10-104 EUEVAn0N - 597.07 10-104 Drou,oge PI Conn. to Ex. Sa I, Remove Water W/ 6'x8' & Replace Ex. " T S,eeve Conc. P-t. Per r e ns WPm9 \ Stmidad Wt.fl. /I. Saw t, Remove f l I �& Repiaae Eve m g,• I Prop. k. Mates m TURNER ROAD � Donat 4' � ; / � W R m Dw MIT 1 Cent Pxnl Pa h g GAS (80' Public R.Q.W.)L .. 6(Typ.) q{ e l CItY of Crapeuiie a MARKER 1 /� stood rd Demos _ _ - (� C.O. 4' -- / - �� / Cmst 4'� Pmp. -� - ,r ' - _ -� �- �38 T � 0 Di.. MIT / D(a. MH -_-- - C-binot ! F L / Meta & 0 Wi = FH I _ _ _. / 1 i Detects Ch d -T-.may-PmP. X -=�_ - ��e' wola -� 40 0 2D 40 80 e & ftepla e Ex.ro & O'sposad 6 r � Prop. 10'x10' \ \ 7.5 6 \\r Cona Pwnt Per Ex. 8' SS and Wotcr Eemt. / O1 "" 1 City f Gm avhe 1 inch = 40 ft. 1 - -I Y o P Cons' 4' Dio. MN _Standam Detoas and coon to E.. -- / IIII o /moo - " JFN Bu ld ng No. 3 e e \ 9 rti/ m f \ B Idin No. 2 l I - ti * L \aF -616,8-F F.=81 .1 \ .WaCon tMIT - / 1 / P 8'fa / 4' � �' I 1 I Prop.,ox,D` I u B Tdn No/5 ! 5.7 -f n.4 I I W er E ml ( � ( / � \ % __ L-Da. MIT 615/8 6— / I F.F. T � w.R. Bum cE N LOT 2R, 65 III 1 38,065. 33 5 R FE Thts pion is released for the / 25��� �0 �- I I (I purpose of interim review and z a ( r ! pricing under the authority of o�� j r ! ^� 1I vm /' / I I // / ( Sa.•. f II / ProP. toxlo � __ -_ \ I � � _ 1 = I �I coon. to Eve. KENN S. WFR, P.E. 91219 / / I Water Esmt. \ 1 I / / _ \ p. _-_ '. - (ti Water W D'xB' Pro 10'x, 0' i �N' iapp'ng Sleeve Morah 2011 un,a I IIII i (/ r-- J _ \ __`� \ (T te? Esmt. l -- -.1 _ _ Reis not to be used � I hn _-/- for construction. o / -� us k= - _ \ O ` \ F° 1 1 _ 01 i - rL7 0 i It 16.3 I• =� fL.N1C.�✓1 ;1—. 1REsmow _- I ( & N.P' nL Pa IH F.-- e Y a P Nam— / Pmp 10'x10' �s 1 (TYI'") S V A - {� I l m 1 11 1 1 ad Demos P.P. la. MoUx cra � iii -I / / Dia. MH 11O I FH I Mwntoble Cae6 _7���[� P r i I I,IiI / _`� k�f{T- 1 \ �\ \ - PmP III �- l = -- \ euild'n No. 1 ` ! \ I,i lu is etDovae \ B SS \ \ Curet. 4''i I 1� H Do. MIT Dst«ter enadr I I W ( r Building o. 4 _. a �� I F.F--s1b.o I Prop. t0'xt0' Vr _� // � _—/ 616.3 / _ _ � - cX A— p. 10'x10' V 1 _. [� ��-I �i Wamr Esmt T - \ water E-L I (Tm')FH FIT 516.4!LEGEND > 0 U ti'+ ; V A C .11 Pro used Water R" E 1 I / __-- / - _ 13.9 •2 ! F.F.= Existing Water 616.6 ! r--- ProP. 10'x10• wo / - tor EsmProposed Sanitary t. \ , i Pro Sewer R. v (TYP.) W.BOYD CENTER ADvmoN ( P(Op P Draboga LOTIRL BLO�K1 Easement \3.306 ACRES OF LAND ----- -- Existing Sanitary Sewer Issue Dates: ---- y March 2011 6' W4. Serv. ! , / L _ 1p I\ \ 1/4 R \I`EET 11 I\I �� I NOTE o $ \ LOT o Contractor Shall Verify Coordinates -� N \ C eoro DFNRER 1 1 ' I prior To Construction And Buildm No. 6 ! 1 -1 FF 618.b s t \ 1\ CAB.P R: �GL5�1 1\ 1 ( --ti FH l 1 I (, Notify Engineer Immediately �_ ! tt (-`i- �--i- -- �-- -- '-r-� m I Of Any Discrepancy. 11 T10 I ConsL 'r ( ; - NOTE / C I Db. MH I x , ( I ! s I \ All banding stemelts shall horn dry stanaplpa, m I ! 10 I Prop. 10'x10• i I I FIT F 1 w tar Est 1 CAUTION - Underground tmttes. ) \ � ( i I Contact Appropriate (T3P \\ I UUIRY Companlee 4b H- _-W.- ( _ ••�•- - // __ I �•'� PAor To EzcawNon. J -- W. ee' water - =7 �..-__j -r ,. P . a' water \ 1 \ -.__�_ 1 I 1 eoo DIG TESS� " / I r I Ft! "I l \I j 1 1 1 1 ens / 989°2812Y! 614.86' rProe. 10'10. / / Wortr EL ? amP"P. \ \ 10• /� W.R. BOYD CE/MR ADDITION a Dromogs / LOT 3�1.BLOCK I E w Easement j 3.306 A RES OF LAND (144.101.412 SQUARE FEET) LOT 3R W.R. BOYD CENTER LOT 4 CAB. A. SLD. 5851 o /16 W.R. BOYD CENTER 3 > o / / l / / P.R. T.C.T. / 851 P.R.T.C.T. APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY GPS MONUMENT J2• 6.0' ALUMINUM ROD WITH CAP SET 0.4' BELOW ACCESS COVER. ACCESS COVER IS STAMPED. 'CITY OF GRAPEVINE, MON. 2'. MONUMENT IS LOCATED APPROX. 250 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF DOVE RD. AND HOOD LN. AT THE Scale: 1"=40' ENTRANCE TO DOVE PARK PARKING LOT. ELEVATION = 627.32 Drawn By. BLM CITY GPS MONUMENT P. Checked By KSW 12' ALUMINUM ROD WITH CAP SET 0.6' BELOW ACCESS COVER. ACCESS COVER IS STAMPED, 'CITY OF GRAPEVINE. NO. 7. MONUMENT IS LOCATED AT THE WEATHER STATION OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS AT THE GRAPEVINE LAKE HEADQUARTERS Sheet ON FAIRWAY DRIVE (110 FAIRWAY DR-) ELEVATION = 585.76 TEMPORARY BENCHMARK: Of 10 'Er CUT SET ON TOP OF WHO INLET APPROX. 30' SOUTH OF INTERSECTION OF TURNER ROAD AND N. DOOLEY STREET ON EAST SIDE OF N. DOOLEY STREET. SEI No. 10-104 ELEVATION = 597.07 10-104 Utility Plan C.C. HALL JR., MACK JAMESON, s TRUMAN BURNETT, PAUL L MOORE AND JOT M. MCKINNEY, DBA CINCO INVESTMENT GROUP VOL. 7095, PG. 2166 D.R.T.C.T. EAST NORTHY&ST HIGHWAY (IOU Pumir K.O.W.) CASE NAME Grapevine Texan Apartments CASE NUMBER: Zit-01 & PD11-01 LOCATION: 401 Boyd Dr.; Lot 7R, Block i. W.R. Boyd Center Addition MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 10 OF 10 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ,n 61.0' B-B 1� Imo' sta�se loco' 1ro,bum 40 0 20 40 80 1 inch = 40 fL =0c I ViciniN� Map General Site Data_ — Prop. Zoning -- --CC—_- — LandUse Lot Area 6.6 saes Building Area _ 63,40D s_f_ Propoosed Parking Ratio _ 1sp/20Dsf _ Required Parking __ __._.__.____.___ 317 Standard Surface Parking ____._ 317 CONCEPT P L A N W 4ZW 28.33 O F Lots 1R1, & 3R1, Block 1 6.612 ACRES W.R. BOYD CENTER ADDITION situated in the A.F. LEONARD SURVEY — ABSTRACT 946 GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS Developer Owners/Applicants JLB Partners, L.P. The Miles Foundation, Inc. & 909 Lake Carolyn Pkwy., Suite 960 Miles Production, Inc. Irving, Texas 75039 200 Highland Circle Telephone (214) 271-8450 Argyle, Texas 76226 Contact: Britton Church Enoineer/Surveyor Spiars Engineering, Inc. 765 Custer Rd., Suite 100 aumt Piano, Texas 75075 10 Telephone (972) 422-0077 Contact: Kevin Vier of 10 Scale 1"=40' March 2011 MEMO TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER MEETING DATE: MARCH 15, 2011 SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (TABLED FROM 2115111) LOTS 1 R1, 2R & 3R1, BLOCK 1, W.R. BOYD CENTER ADDITION (BEING A REPLAT OF LOTS 1R, 2, 3R AND 5, BLOCK 1, W. R. BOYD CENTER ADDITION) PLAT APPLICATION FILING DATE........ ................ ............................... February 8, 2011 APPLICANT ................................... ............................Mr. Grant Coates, Miles Production REASON FOR APPLICATION.... . .......................... Platting site to an apartment complex PROPERTY LOCATION .................................. ... .... .................751 E. Northwest Highway SITEACREAGE ............ ..............:..........................:--.---................... ............--- ......:.- ::.A8.9 ,y ComrcM-2 Mi'Iti- family ZONING ......._.......:..... CCormunm& 3 NUMBER OF LOTS : ...................................... .........:..................... .........:..:.. lots PREVIOUS PLATTING ......... ............................... .- ......--.......... ............I.....March..2000 CONCEPTPLAN ................................... ............................ . .• .....................--- . - -. - -- No SITE PLAN ................................................... ............................ . .. PD 11-01; Z11-01 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT ....................... ............................. ................. No AVIGATIONRELEASE ......:.................................................. ....................... .. . . . . .. ........Yes PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED ............................................... .......................... .......Yes O:IAGEN DA12011 \03- 15-111WRBoyd.d oc PLAT INFORMATION SHEET FINAL PLAT APPLICATION LOTS 1R1, 2R & 3R1, BLOCK 1, W.R. BOYD CENTER ADDITION I. GENERAL: • The applicant, Mr. Grant Coates, is platting this 18.9 acre site to build an apartment complex on Lot 2R. Lots 1 R1 and 3R1 are for future development. The address is 751 E. Northwest Highway. II. STREET SYSTEM: • The development has access Northwest Highway, Boyd Drive and Turner Road abutting roads are on the City Thoroughfare Plan: are not on the City Thoroughfare Plan: ❑ Periphery Street Fees are due as follows: Type of Roadway Cost 1 LF Length ❑ Major Arterial (A) ❑. Major Arterial (B) ❑ 'Mirior Arterial (C) ❑ M.inor Arterial (D) ❑ Collector (E) ❑ Collector (F) ❑S=idewalk ❑Curb & Gutter $ 234.571 LF $ 178:351 LF $203 06 -1 LF $ 170.33 / LF $ 170.33 / LF $ 150.98 / LF $ 25.00 / LF $ 10.001 LF ® Periphery Street Fees are not due. Ill. STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Cost • The existing stormwater runoff flows north into Turner Road. • The developer will be required to design for onsite as well as offsite drainage in accordance with the requirements of the City of Grapevine's Code of Ordinances. o:IAG ENnA12011\03- 15- 111WRBoyd.doc IV V VI. WATER SYSTEM: ® The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ❑ The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development. Additional off site water system improvements will be necessary to serve the site. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: ® The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ❑ The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development- MISCELLANEOUS: ❑ Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are not required for: Wafter and Wastewater Impaet;Fees;are due pho' i,to the issuance of building permits.. ❑ Single Family 'Residential..($ 2,7781 Lot) Multifamily { $ 1,291 / Unit) ❑ Hotel ( $ 47,631 1 Acre) ❑ Corporate Office ( $ 22,0231 Acre). ❑ Government ( $ 7,6881 Acre) ® Commercial / Industrial ( $ 6,3521 Acre) ® Open Space Fees are not required for ❑ Open Space Fees are required for. ❑ R -5.0, Zero Lot District ( $ 1,416.001 Lot) ❑ R -7.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,146.001 Lot) ❑ R -12.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,071.001 Lot) ❑ R -20.0, Single Family District ($ 807.00/Lot) 0AAGEN €7/•112011103- 15 -111W R Boyd. doc 2; ❑ Public Hearing Only ❑ Variances were required on the following items: ❑ Front building line ❑ Rear building line ❑ Lot width & depth ❑ Max. Impervious Area ❑ The following items associated with this plat are not in accordance with the current subdivision standards: ❑ 50' ROW dedication not met: Developer is proposing to dedicate variable width private access easements throughout the development. The access easements will be owned and maintained by a Home Owners Association (HOA). ❑ Length of cul -de -sac street exceeds the 600 -foot limit: VII. STATEMENT OF FINDINGS: A. The City has determined that the right- of -way and easements required to be dedicated for "streets, utilities, drainage,. access,, sidewalks and other municipal needs and services are consist6nt With the City's ordinances and master plan, are. reasonable and are connected to the proposed project in the following manner: ❑ The right -of -way provides for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. The onsite utility easements provide for a utility network to serve the development of this site. ® The onsite drainage easements provide for a drainage network to serve the development of this site. ® The onsite access easements provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. O:IAGENDA12011103 -15" -1 MRBoyd.doc B. The City further finds that the required dedication is related both in nature and extent to the impact of the proposed development as follows: ❑ The right -of -way is necessary to provide for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. ® The onsite utility easements are necessary to provide for a utility system to serve this development and connect to existing utilities on surrounding property. ® The onsite drainage easements are necessary to provide for storm drainage improvements to serve the development of the site. The onsite access easements are necessary to provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements are necessary to provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. All of the ded ications benefit.the development to at least the extent of the impact'of such orb the development, Vlll. RECOMMENDATION: The members of the City Council and The Planning & Zoning Commission consider the following motion- "Move that the City Council: (Planning and Zoning Commission) approve the Statement of Findings and the Final Plat of Lots 1R1, 2R and 3R1, Block 1, W.R. Boyd Center Addition ". OAAGBN DA 12011103- 15 -111W RBoyd.doc APPLICATION FOR PLATTING CITY OF GRAPEVINE,; TEXAS TYPE OF PLAT: KPreliminary Final Replat Amendment PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Name of Addition: W. R• 6�144rv— Number of Lots: 3— Gross Acreage: Proposed Zoning: R -MFZ � PD j UP Location of Addition: NIYA"Sk- PROPERTY OWNER: Name: Riles Vn,4k& ah,. I-„3? -. Address: �2co t1�at State: TY, tip: -70-U Signature- APPLICANT: Contact: 411-av►#- 014 1 City: Lk �c Phone: ]'A Fax: Email: _° Name: (>- aE kS 6wNE Contact: Address: State: Zip: Signature: City: Phone: ] Fax: Email: SURVEYOR: Name: S L4.,5, Contact: Vr4,h 5,.W"uc Address: X p i • k 100 City: Pt4l4b State: iii` I Zip: -So15 Phone:( k* FOR OFF Application Received: I ILA ! j Fee Amount: $� 04jrmter oat appfim6on Fax: ( ) `TL'421- -oa ~tY Email: 10' UTILITY ESMT. vat. 388-50PG, 90 PR.T.ET WR SOTO CENTER LOT 1. SLOCK e vat_ P.RT.G3PAEC.. PG 29 T. 25DRA.INAGE & UTIL'v ESMT CAB. A, SED "I" Ia.25 Wala ll ml (t0i 2 ONt r) (6, (By This Plot) _ ram---------- _...,,,� Easement I 1 I I I 1 (By This Plat) 1 I = I I 1O 0rwnage nt By W ( I I (By This Plat) ( 3 1 10'.l0' vat« i Easement I far This Plot) -1 10.10' /�L J I 1 t Easement Ea 1 (By This Plat) LJ I I 1 I i I i I I i I i I i 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I i I I 1 1 I I I I i I I 1 1 i i I I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 10'00' water Easement 1 (By The Mot) 1 I I 10'.10' Water Easement r LJ ( I I I (By This Rot) 1 I L. 10' UnL W ESMT. CAB. A, SLD. 3473 10' UTILITY ESMT. PAJ.C,T. CAB. A STD. 3473 P.R.T.CT. TURNER ROAD (60' Public R.O.W.) N 89'281r2R E BM26 Z11Z- �- ,—�— % �_L%LTG%', 25 B11uG UtIF.— -- -- CAD.A SID78—�LLL,,.JV P.Rt.CT. III 10UTLTYESMi- CAB. ,R 1C.i a78 10' Croint 10.10' Water Ea � Easement (By This Plot) emir P (By Thrs lot) DRAINAGE & URLITY ESMT. CAB. A. STD. 5478 P.R. T. C. T, WR BOYD CENiEK ADDITION 12.35 ACRES OF LAND (538,068.000 SQUARE FEET) Land Use: Multi -Family Proposed Zoning: R-MF-2 W/PD Overlay r-i fLJ leap' water J// Easement (By This Plat) Woo' Water Easement (By This Mat) LJ 5' UTILITY E! AB. A, AD P.R. T.C. T. 10'.10' Wolm (By T Ir' (BY ,his Plat) LJ 10'.30' water Easement (By This plat) 10'00' Water Easement (By Tnle Plat) 1 u to' Orairgge- Eosement (By This mt) — 1Z'T s�Vs7 ffl IL R w LAHN — %ZZ'll/Z'O1lD 25' Access P� Easement (Byy Thfs Plat) I r L Gi I I — 17 UTILITY ESMT A589 W - 614.W CAB. A StA 5478 CAB. A. SLD. 5851 PRT.0 T. �As, r� ��ARe 4G 24 25' ACCESS ESMT. -� (Hatched Portion To Se Th'a Pbt)I s7. NN G Abandoned BY CAB. A STD. 5478 I--- �r�w e0 PAJC.T.to' I CA UTILITY ESMT. CAB. A STD. 5478- I I I CAB. A SLO. SBSt P. R.T.C. T. I C.C. HALL JR, MAN ,UMESON, � V/ I 1 1RUMAN A BDUNE NEii, PML Y - _ AND T. ULNNEy.Y, OBA CNCO RlE51MENT CROUP-FJV>i9-f.(IrtIGT"^r FJG7L{7- if NTL ]ORS, PG 2188 _ b,,T.cr, A ✓ 25' BUILDING LINE __ 4- / 25' BURDI LINE— CAS. A, L$�. f851 I CABTSLO. 5855851 10' DRAINAf# ESMT PAJ.C.T. ' W.K. WM CENnX ADD1ilON 10' DRAINAGE ESMT. PRT,GT. � � � (Halcnso Parlbn To 8 I CAB. A STD. W51 (Abandoned BY This Plot) Abandoned By This Mot) (Abandoned By This Pbl) i N PRTCT I I CAB. A. STD. 5851 1 "' I e 3.306 ACRES OF LAND I I P.R. 20' BUIING UNE T.C.T. (144,101.412 SQUARE FEET) LD CAB. A SLD. 5B51 OT a III DM CENTER ADDit10N Lard Use: Vacant P.R.T.CJ. WR. BOYD rEN1ER o �rI zoning: c-eanmerkal I aandoned B This Plat) �� I as. A sD. sa51 I tOTiK1 BLOCIC7 i L.T RR P.RT.Gv 3.306 ACRES OF LAND`a �l C W R BOM [ENTEF W ICl f : I CA`A, s .z, �� (141,199.773 SQUARE FEET) um 1 ZZ P.P..T.CT. a; 4(_'a, Land Use: Commerical a I m I r . Zoning: C-Commerical y ID. MAtx lyIESON, PAtIL L MOORL 25' ACCESS & DRAINAGE ESMT, y. LOT R /1 r��/•. CHaI=d Potion To Be y e k EG TALUl AND'E"NAN 0. BURNETT ,Ii'//J ((//1` I Abondonetl BY Z. Pit, ^ I ( f° �^ CA., 8,ai51a 515Rt W.R. YOL 1a28 PG Ills S. 5851 _ PR.TS.T. e. i,' CAB. A I y D.R.TGT. / P.R. T.C.T.9.t I---------'-- 0 20' WATER LINE ESMT. I :S / 25 ACCESS , DRAINAGE ESM vCl. 7055, D. 478 / //////TT I CAB. A. STD. 5851 � �...-------------------CAB . A. STD. 5478 / 25' BUILDING LINE +,' [ / GLP.R.T.C.T. Z _ 10' UTILITY ESMT ------------P.R.T.C.T.--_i y� -6--------\,I CAB. A SLD. 5478 3CAB0 A2 S T $ 10' DTIOTY ESMT, CAB. A, STD. 3473 - J(' P.R T.C.T. P.R.T C.T CAB. 0. STD. 3473 I ', T.GT. (Abandoned By This Mat) _.- __ I ----- - — — — — — — — — ---------------r— —� -- -- ----------- ----- ------------'---- - - - - - - r ----------------- a — — ---- -- — — — 25 SUILDNG UNE 589e 28' 1`L'W 26.9.36 SW28` 12W N 480.94 CAB. A SfD. 5851 25' BUILDING UNE P.R.T.C.T. CAB, A SLD. %51 (Abandoned By This Pbt) PR T.0 T. - (AbaMoncE By This Plot) EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY (100' Public R.O.W.) /Point Of C0"In,>�rtg p� y .7"rGJ 26IV G 28.3r 20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY ESMT. CAB A. SLD. 5478 PRTCT. 10' UTUTY ESMT. CAB. A AD, 5478 P R.T.C.T. .--20' BUILDING ONE ' CAB. & SLO. 5478 PRIC T. ('—nod By This Plat I m I ( 20' BUILDING LINE CAB. A sLD. 5851 P.R.T.0 y (Abandoned eTn+s Plot "35Y4ZW ?hen 5o 0 25 50 100 Vicinity Map 1 inch - 50fL DETENTION NOTE In the event that a detention facility is necessary for the owner to meet the City ,s Drainage Requirements, the detention facility shall be maintained by the owner in compliance with all federal, state and local regulations and to the specifications of the engineer of record. Any retaining wall or other confinement structure shall be maintained by the ompliance with all federoi, state and focal regulotions and to the specifications of the engineer of record. In the event the owner fails to maintain the detention facility, retaining wall or other confinement structure in accordance with applicable federal, state and local laws or regulations, and after receiving notice from the City of Grapevine of said violation or violations and failing to correct said violations or to commence and substantially complete the necessary work within thirty (30) days of receipt of said written notice, the City, solely at Its discretion, may undertake the necessary corrections and require the owner to pay the reasonable costs incurred by the City including the recovery of its reasonable attorneys fees. The owner does hereby relieve, release, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Grapevine. its agents, servants, officers and employees for any claim, cause of action, lawsuit, damages, personal injuries, death or property damage arising out of or in c::njunction with the ownership and maintenonce of the detention facility. The owner shall be required to notify any purchaser of Lots 1R1, 2R & 3R1, Block 1 of the requirements of any detention facility located thereon. FL 000 AIN NO There is no FEMA noodploin on this site per FIRM Panel 48439CO105K dated 9/25/2009. LEGEND FNO FOUND I.R.F. RON ROD FOUWJ I.R.S. RON ROD SET LR RON ROD D.RT.GT. DEED RECORDS WRAM COUNTY TEXAS P.RT.C.i. MAT RECORDS TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS ESMT. FASEMEM PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: Date Approved: ChIsfifififiC Secretary GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL: Date Approved: Zor. City Secretary. TotPlPatattetdedArea: 82852,59,88.7SSFFt/.18189.9262flA-0e Net 2 ares RA.W. OediwNon: O Sq. Ft./O Acres t Dedication: 21,716 Sq. Ft./O.499 Acres S H E E T 1 O F 2 9 2011I) FINAL PLAT OF 1R1, 2R, & 3R1, BLOCK 1 W.R. B YD CENTER ADDITION 18.900 ACRES being a Replat of Lots 1R, 2, 3R, & 5, Block 1 W.R. BOYD CENTER ADDITION situated in the A.F. LEONARD SURVEY — ABSTRACT 946 GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS Developer Owners/Applicant JLB Partners, LP. The Mlles Foundation, Inc. do 909 Lake Carolyn Pkwy., Suite 960 Miles Production, LP PROPOSED 20NINQ Irving, Texas 75039 200 Highland Circle Subject Pro%Subject" Is Zoned Telephone (214) 271-8480 Argyle, Texas 76226 R-MF-2 wPD Overlay & Contact: Britton Church C-Commerical. PuRPOSE OF FCATI The Purpose Of This Final Plot Is To Dedicate And Abandor. Easements. BASIS Basis Of Bearings Is Derived From Using The NOS GPS Network Selling •any potion of this addltion by metes and bounds is o Notation of City Subdivislon Ordinance and State platting statutes. and Is subje t to Rnes and withholding of utilities and building certificates. IN Enaine,r/Surveyor Spurs Engineering, Inc. 765 Custer Rd., Suite 100 Piano, Texas 75075 Telephone (972) 422-0077 Contact: Kevin Wler Scale 1'=50' February 2011 This Plat Filed In Instrument Date OWNER'S DEDICATION METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION BEING a acre tract of land situated in the A.F. Leonard Survey, Abstract No. 946. City of Grapevine, Torrent County, Texas, and being all of Lot 1R, Brock 1. W.R. Boyd Center, an addition to the City of Grapevine as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 5478. Plat Records, Torrent County, Texas (PRTCT), oil of Lot 2, Block 1. W.R. Boyd Center, an addition to the City of Grapevine as recorded in Cabinet A Slide 3473 (PRTCi), and all of Lots 3R and 5, W.R. Boyd Center, on addition to the City of Grapevine as recorded in Cabinet A Slide 5851 (PRTCT), and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a capped iron rod found at the north end of a comer clip at the Intersection of the south line of Turner Road (60' Public Right —of —Way) and the west line of Boyd Drive (90' Public fight —of —Way) and also being the most northeast comer of said Lot iR; THENCE South 4526'18* East along said comer clip, for a distance of 28.31 feet to a capped iron rod found for comer, THENCE South 00'20'48' East along said west line of Boyd Drive and the east Fine of said Lot 1R and the east line of said Lot S. for a distance of 903.03 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with plastic cap stomped SPURSENG* set for comer, THENCE South 4C334r West, along the comer clip of said Boyd Road and East Northwest Highway, for a distance of 28.33 feet to the North Right —of —Way line of said East Northwest Highway, a 1/2 inch iron rod with plastic cap stamped SPIARSENG' set for comer, THENCE South 89'28'112' West, along the north line of said East Northwest Highway and the south fine of said lot 5 fa a distance of 269-6 feet to a 1/2 Inch iron rod with plastic cap stamped 0SPIARSENG0 set for comer. THENCE forth 00'31'41r West along the common fine of said Lot 5 and Lot 4 for a distance of 927 feet to a 1/2' iron rod found for comer; THENCE South ST28'12' West, along the common fine between said Lot 4 and Lot 1R for a distance of 135.00 feet to a 1/2' icon rod found for comer, THENCE. South 00'31'4ir EwL along the common fine of said Lot 4 and Lot 3R, for a distance of 222M feet to a 1/r Iron rod found for comer in the north fine of said East Northwest Highway, THENCE, South 89'28'12' West along the north fine of said East Northwest Highway and the south line of said Lots 3R and Lot 2 for a distance of 460.94 feet to a 1/r iron pin found for comer; THENCE North 00'21148' Nest along the west fine of said Lot 2, for a distance of 943.08 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod with plastic cap stomped SPIARSENG' set for comer in the south line of said Turner Rood; THENCE North 89'28'12' East along said south line of Turner Road, for a dstance of B85.25 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 823.277 square feet a 18.90 acres of land. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, Darren K Brown, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, hereby certify that I have performed an actual and accurate survey of the land, and that the coma monuments shown thereon were properly placed under my personal supervision In accordance with the platting rules < OF I and regulations of the Town of Prosper. Texas. ,.Pt FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY DARKEN K. ERONN Darren K. Brown 're, 5252.E 0 9ti0 Registration No. 5252 SURNI'{ STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public In and far the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared Darren K. Brown, known to me nT to be the parson whose name is subscxd to the foregoing Instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same far the purposes and considerations therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN under my hand and seal of office, this the _day of . 2010. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT NOW, THEREFORE. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Miles Production, LP and The Miles Foundation Inc., acting by and through their duly authorized agents, does hereby adopt this plat, designating the herein described property as Lots 1Ri, 2R, and 3R1. Block 1, WR BOYD CENTER ADDITION. an addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, and does hereby dedicate, to the public use forever the right—of—woy and easements shown hereon. The eosements shown hereon are hereby reserved far the purposes as Indicated. The utility easements shall be open for ail City or franchised public utilities far each porticutar use. The maintenance of paving on the easements is the responsibility of the property owner. No buildings or auxiliary structures shall be constructed, reconstructed or placed upon, over or across the easements shown. Said easements being hereby reserved for the mutual use and accommodation of all public utilities using or desiring to use some. Any City or franchised utility shad have the full right to remove and keep removed all or parts of any fences, trees, shrubs, or other improvements or growths which In any way may endanger or interfere with the construction, maintenance or efficiency of its respective system on the meerlents. and all City or franchised utilities shad at all times have the full rights of Ingress and egress to or from the said easements fa the purpose of constructing, reconstructing. Inspecting• patrolling, maintaining and adding to or removing ad or parts of its respective systems without the necessity at any time of procuring the permission of anyone. I have reviewed the Cit s fndings concerning dedications and 1 do agree that the statements are true and correct This plat approved subject to all platting ordinances, rules, regulations, and resolutions of the City of Grapevine, Texas. WITNESS, my hand this the _ day of . 2011 Owner. Miles Production, LP By. Names Title: STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for The State of Texas. an this day personally appeared known to me to be the person and officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledge to me that he executed the same far the purposes and considerations therein expressed and In the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the _day of . 2011 Notary Public, State of Texas WITNESS, my hand this the _ day of . 2011. Owner. The Miles Foundation Inc., By. Nmne- Title. BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for The State of Texas, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person and officer whose name is subscrbed to the foregoing Instrument and acknowledge to me that he executed the same far the purposes and considerations therein expressed and In the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the —day of . 2011. Notary Public, State of Texas AVIGATION RELEASE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT WHEREAS, Miles Production, LP and The Miles Foundation Inc. hereinafter called 'Owners'. is the owners of that certain parcels of land situated in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County. Texas, being said property as described as shown m this Plot. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of ONE AND 00/100 (E1.00) DOLLAR and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby fully acknowledged and confessed. Owner does hereby waive, release, remise and quitclaim to the City of Grapevine, Torrent County, Texas, the Dallas —Fort Worth International Airport Board, the City of Dallas. Texas and Fort Worth, Texas, thew successors and assigns, hereinafter called "Cities". For the use and benefit of the public and its agencies, any and all claims for damages of any kind of persons or property that Owner may suffer by reason of the passage and flight of all oircraft in the air space above Owners property above the height restriction as presently established by Ordinance No. 73-50 far the City of Grapevine, known as the Airport Zoning Ordinance of the Dollos—Fort Worth International Airport. to an infinite height above same, whether such damage shall originate from noise, vibration, fumes. dust fuel and lubricant particles, and all other effects that may be caused by the operation of aircraft, lending at or taking off from, or operating at or an the Dollos—Fort Worth International Airport This Instrument does not release the owners or operators of aircraft from liability far damage to person er property caused by falling aircraft or failing physical objects from aircraft, except as stated herein with respect to noise, fumes, dust, fuel, and lubricant particles It Is agreed that this Release shall be binding upon said owner and his heirs and assigns. and successors in interest to said property, and it is further agreed that this Instrument shall be a covenant running with the lend, and shall be recorded in the Deed Records of the county or counties in which the property is situated. EXECUTED at . Texas, this _ day of . 2011. Owner. Miles Production, LP By. Noma Title: STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public In and for The State of Texas, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person and officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledge to me that he executed the same for the purposes and considerations therein expressed and In the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of , 2011 Notary Public, State of Texas WITNESS, my hand this the _ day of . 2011. Owner. The Miles Foundation Inc, By Nnm Title, BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and far The State of Texas, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person and officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledge to me that he executed the some far the purposes and considerations therein expressed and In the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of , 2011. Notary Public, State of Texas S H E E T 2 O F 2 FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1R1, 2R, & 3R1, BLOCK 1 W.R.- BOYD CENTER ADDITION 18.900 ACRES being a Replat of Lots 1 R, 2, 3R, & 5, Block 1 W.R. BOYD CENTER ADDITION situated in the A.F. LEONARD SURVEY — ABSTRACT 946 GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS Developer Owners/ADolicant JLB Partners, L.P. The Miles Foundation, Inc. do 909 Lake Carolyn Pkwy.. Suite 960 Miles Production, LP Irving. Texas 75039 200 Highland Circle Telephone (214) 271-8480 Argyle, Texas 76226 Contoct: Britton Church EnjiMeer/Su� Notary Public In and for the Stale of Texas 5piors Engineering, Inc. 765 Custer Rd., Suite 100 Piano. Texas 75075 My Commission Expires - Telephone (972) 422-0077 n Wier Scale 1`®50' February 2011 This Plat Fled In Instrument > Date