HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 2004-016 RESOLUTION NO. 2004-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, AMENDING RESOLUTION 87-34,
RESOLUTION 91-02, RESOLUTION 94-12 AND
RESOLUTION 99-17 RELATIVE TO MINIMUM WAGE RATES
FOR STREET, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas on September 1, 1987
approved Resolution No. 87-34 adopting wage rates for street, drainage and utility
construction projects within the corporate limits of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City has previously amended Resolution 87-34 by adopting
Resolution No. 91-02 on January 15, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the City has previously amended Resolution 91-02 by adopting
Resolution No. 94-12 on April 5, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the City has previously amended Resolution 94-12 by adopting
Resolution No. 99-17 on April 6, 1999; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend said resolutions in order to update
the prevailing wage rates.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS:
Section 1. That resolution No. 87-34, adopted by the City Council on September
1, 1987, amended by Resolution 91-02 adopted by the City Council on January 15, 1991,
amended by Resolution No. 94-12 adopted by the City Council on April 5, 1994, and
amended by Resolution No. 99-17 adopted by the City Council on April 6, 1999, is hereby
amended by amending Section 1, relative to wage rates for streets, drainage and utility
construction projects as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein for
all purposes.
Section 2. That from and after the date of passage of this resolution, the
"Prevailing Wage Rate for Highway Construction Projects, General Decision
No. TX 20030045, dated June 13, 2003, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" shall be utilized.
Section 3. That all matters stated in the preamble are true and correct and are
incorporated herein as if copied in their entirety.
Section 4. That this resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 6th day of April, 2004.
APPROVED:
Ted R. Ware
Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST:
Lin a Huff
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
I
John F. Boyle, Jr.
City Attorney
RES. NO. 2004-16 2
WAIS Document Retrieval Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT A
A �
GENERAL DECISION: TX20030045 TX45 EXHIBIT. TO ii
' ' a'y/'
Date: June 13, 2003 " / of
General Decision Number: TX20030045
Superseded General Decision No. TX020045
State: TEXAS
Construction Type:
HEAVY
HIGHWAY
County(ies) :
COLLIN GRAYSON ROCKWALL
DALLAS JOHNSON TARRANT
DENTON KAUFMAN WICHITA
ELLIS PARKER
HEAVY AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN WICHITA COUNTY ONLY.
HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ONLY FOR REMAINING COUNTIES
Modification Number Publication Date
0 06/13/2003
COUNTY(ies) :
COLLIN GRAYSON ROCKWALL
DALLAS JOHNSON TARRANT
DENTON KAUFMAN WICHITA
ELLIS PARKER
SUTX2043A 03/26/1998
Rates Fringes
AIR TOOL OPERATOR $ 9.00
ASPHALT RAKER 9.55
ASPHALT SHOVELER 8. 80
BATCHING PLANT WEIGHER 11. 51
CARPENTER 10.30
CONCRETE FINISHER-PAVING 10.50
CONCRETE FINISHER-STRUCTURES 9. 83
CONCRETE RUBBER 8. 84
ELECTRICIAN 15.37
FLAGGER 7.55
FORM BUILDER-STRUCTURES 9.82
FORM LINER-PAVING & CURB 9. 00
FORM SETTER-PAVING & CURB 9.24
FORM SETTER-STRUCTURES 9.09
LABORER-COMMON 7.32
LABORER-UTILITY 8.94
MECHANIC 12.68
OILER 10. 17
SERVICER 9.41
PAINTER-STRUCTURES 11.00
PIPE LAYER 8. 98
BLASTER 11.50
ASPHALT DISTRIBUTOR OPERATOR 10.29
ASPHALT PAVING MACHINE 10 .30
BROOM OR SWEEPER OPERATOR 8.72
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=Davis-Bacon&docid=TX2003... 3/12/2004
WAIS Document Retrieval Page 2 of 3
BULLDOZER 10.74
CONCRETE CURING MACHINE 9.25 EXHIBIT-Li... TO / -4''4)9°
CONCRETE FINISHING MACHINE 11.13 Pogo ..s2 of
CONCRETE PAVING JOINT MACHINE 10.42
CONCRETE PAVING JOINT SEALER 9. 00
CONCRETE PAVING SAW 10.39
CONCRETE PAVING SPREADER 10.50
SLIPFORM MACHINE OPERATOR 9.92
CRANE, CLAMSHELL, BACKHOE,
DERRICK, DRAGLINE, SHOVEL 11.04
FOUNDATION DRILL OPERATOR
CRAWLER MOUNTED 10.00
FOUNDATION DRILL OPERATOR
TRUCK MOUNTED 11.83
FRONT END LOADER 9.96
MILLING MACHINE OPERATOR 8.62
MIXER 10.30
MOTOR GRADER OPERATOR
FINE GRADE 11.97
MOTOR GRADE OPERATOR 10.96
PAVEMENT MARKING MACHINE 7.32
ROLLER, STEEL WHEEL PLANT-MIX
PAVEMENTS 9.06
ROLLER, STEEL WHEEL OTHER
FLATWHEEL OR TAMPING 8.59
ROLLER, PNEUMATIC, SELF-PROPELLED 8.48
SCRAPER 9.63
TRACTOR-CRAWLER TYPE 10.58
TRACTOR-PNEUMATIC 9.15
TRAVELING MIXER 8.83
WAGON-DRILL, BORING MACHINE 12.00
REINFORCING STEEL SETTER PAVING 13 .21
REINFORCING STEEL SETTER
STRUCTURES 13 .31
STEEL WORKER-STRUCTURAL 14.80
SPREADER BOX OPERATOR 10.00
WORK ZONE BARRICADE 7.32
TRUCK DRIVER-SINGLE AXLE
LIGHT 8.965
TRUCK DRIVER-SINGLE AXLE
HEAVY 9. 02
TRUCK DRIVER-TANDEM AXLE
SEMI TRAILER 8.77
TRUCK DRIVER-LOWBOY/FLOAT 10.44
TRUCK DRIVER-TRANSIT MIX 9.47
TRUCK DRIVER-WINCH 9.00
VIBRATOR OPERATOR-HAND TYPE 7.32
WELDER 11.57
Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within
the scope of the classifications listed may be added after
award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses
(29 CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii) ) .
In the listing above, the "SU" designation means that rates
listed under that identifier do not reflect collectively
bargained wage and fringe benefit rates. Other designations
indicate unions whose rates have been determined to be
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=D avis-Bacon&docid=TX2003... 3/12/2004
WAIS Document Retrieval Page 3 of 3
prevailing. EXHIBIT—L. TO 4
Pow .... ._ of .. .._._
WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS
1. ) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can
be:
* an existing published wage determination
* a survey underlying a wage determination
* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a
position on a wage determination matter
* a conformance (additional classification and rate)
ruling
On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests
for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour
Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted
because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the
Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial
contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2. )
and 3 . ) should be followed.
With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal
process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch
of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:
Branch of Construction Wage Determinations
Wage and Hour Division
U. S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20210
2 .) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an
interested party (those affected by the action) can request
review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator
(See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7) . Write to:
Wage and Hour Administrator
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20210
The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the
interested party's position and by any information (wage payment
data, project description, area practice material, etc. ) that the
requestor considers relevant to the issue.
3 . ) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an
interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review
Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board) . Write to:
Administrative Review Board
U. S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20210
4 .) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.
END OF GENERAL DECISION
http://frweb gate.acces s.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=Davis-Bacon&doci d=TX2003... 3/12/2004