HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-02-05STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, met
in Workshop Session at 7 :00 PM on Monday, February 5, 1984, in the Con-
ference Room of the Police /Library Building, 307 West Dallas Road, with
the following persons present, to wit:
Sharron Spencer
Chairman
Ron Cook
Vice Chairman
Harlen Joyce
Member
Shane Wilbanks
Member
Richard Atkins
Member
constituting a quorum, with Members Tom Powers and Gerald Norman absent
and the following City Staff, to wit:
James L. Hancock
J.R. Baddaker
H.T. (Tommy) Hardy
Stephen C. Richardson
Joy Welch
CALL TO ORDER
City Manager
Director of Public Works
Building Official
City Planner
Secretary
Chairman Spencer called the meeting to order at 7 PM.
NEW BUSINESS - WORKSHOP
The Planning and Zoning Commission was to conduct a workshop and review
session relative to the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance and zoning map and take any necessary action relative thereto.
Chairman Spencer advised those present that the Commission would be
formulating a recommendation on the districts not previously discussed
as well as recommending changes to the proposed zoning map.
The following are recommendations suggested by the Commission to be
incorporated in a revised zoning ordinance:
1. To retain the "CN" Commercial Neighborhood District, eliminate the
"LB" Limited Business designation and combine it with "CN ".
2. To combine "CW" Commercial Warehouse and "C -OU" Commercial Outdoor
to become the new "HC" Highway Commercial District.
3. To keep the "HCO" Hotel Corporate Office; members questioned some
of the uses.
4. To keep the "ML" Light Industrial District which includes more
detailed lot sizes, height restrictions and building coverages.
5. To eliminate the IPAR and add "LI(ML)" and "MG" General Industrial.
6. To retain the "CBD" Central Business District
7. To retain the "PID" Planned Industrial Development District
8. It was the general consensus of members present to eliminate the
"PCD" Planned Commercial District.
9. All members agreed that the "GU" category for governmental uses
would be preferred rather than having such uses interspersed
through the other districts.
10. Agreement to retain the DFW District
P &Z Minutes
2 -6 -84
Page 2
11. Would like to adopt the "FP" Flood Plain Overlay District
There was further discussion relative to a district needed specifically
for parking lots other than those to serve particular businesses. Mr.
Hancock noted that at one time there had been such a provision in the
City Ordinances.
Chairman Spencer and Vice Chairman Cook then telephoned Mr. Wiles and
then advised other members of that discussion as follows:
1. .5 = 2 acre
2. We should keep track of those items moved from the Master Develop-
ment Plan Section into the Site Plan Section
3. Height of single - family homes should be no more than 30 feet; in
apartment districts, the height specification should read so many
stories, not to exceed so many feet.
4. A question needing clarification which arose during a workshop
meeting relative to the "PUD" District was Mr. Wiles proposal
relative to 25 acres of usable land(would this be with or without
streets, all in one tract ?).
5. The Chairman discussed the mathematics of the percentage versus the
number of acres: 60 %- Single Family; loo -open space; 12 %- duplex
townhome, etc.; 18 %- apartments. This would average 12 units per
acre and be a substitute for the "PRD -6" District.
It was the general consensus of the Commissioners present to use the
"PRD -6" District and at some point in time limit the number of units per
acre to 16 in the high density areas rather than 20, and keep the
masonry requirements existing or require a higher percentage of masonry
than is now required at 80 %. The general consensus was to adopt the 16
for high density and require 80% masonry.
The following was discussed relative to the "PRD -12" District:
The general consensus of the Commissioners was to recommend that this
district have a maximum density of 16 units per acre.
Some suggestions relative to the zoning map were as follows:
There appears to be no "LB" Limited Business on the map; this was
questioned.
The PD -Q at Dove and Dove needs to be designated "C -N ";
On the Master Plan, the tract adjoining the apartments at the corner of
Dove and Park which is zoned single family could possibly benefit from a
duplex /townhome zoning to buffer the single - family neighborhood;
To retain the Lucas property designation as "PRD -6 ";
The Keith Cecil project should become "MF -2" with 16 units per acre;
District 22 on the map should be "PRD -12 ".
Number 22 should be "R -7.5" and retain island for church;
There were other notations made as to changes to be made to the zoning
map.
The following suggestions for change were made for the "CBD" Central
Business District.
P &Z Minutes
2 -6 -84
Page 3
Under Permitted Uses: (1) eliminate food and grocery; (2) delete the
words "and similar uses" from the end of the sentence; (5) delete
funeral homes; (9) delete feed and farm supply; (12) delete libraries
but retain museum; (13) delete banks and financial institutions; (14)
delete religious and educational facilities; (15) delete movie theaters
and entertainment halls;
Under Accessory Uses: (3) delete signs.
C. Under Conditional Uses (2) Check with Marlin Smith on "SP" for
masonry.
MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION AND /OR REPORTS
Members were reminded of the planned dinner /workshop meeting to be held
in the Conference Room of City Hall, Wednesday, February 8, 1984, at
6:30 PM.
Firox e ff ►lul0►H
At approximately 11 PM, Chairman Spencer declared the meeting adjourned.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE DAY OF -_,� � , 1984.
F.M2001TAMIN
1
ATTEST: