The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-03-06STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, met in Workshop Session, Monday, March 6, 1984, in the Conference Room, 307 West Dallas Road, with the following persons present, to wit: Sharron Spencer Chairman Ron Cook Vice Chairman Harlen Joyce Member Tom Powers Member Gerald Norman Member Shane Wilbanks Member Richard Atkins Member constituting a quorum, with no absences and the following City Staff, to wit: J.R. Baddaker H.T. (Tommy)Hardy Steve Richardson Joy Welch CALL TO ORDER Director of Public Works Building Official City Planner Secretary Chairman Spencer called the meeting to order at 7 PM and explained the procedures and purposes of the meeting. OLD BUSINESS - WORKSHOP The Commission was to conduct a workshop and review session relative to the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and take any necessary action relative thereto. LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT The following changes were recommended in the "LI" Light Industrial District: On page 1, the Purpose paragraph ........within an enclosed building ... was added. Also on page 1, A. Permitted Uses - 1. the word previous was corrected to read "previously." There were no other changes recommended in this section. HCO - HOTEL CORPORATE OFFICE The following changes were recommended in the "HCO" Hotel Corporated Office District: Page 4, (final page) H. Buffer Area Regulations - ten (10) acres should be amended to five (5) acres, and seventy -five (75) feet should be amended to fifty (50) feet. There were no further changes in the HCO District. NO CORRECTIONS OR CHANGES WERE RECOMMENDED FOR THE "CBD" CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT SITE PLAN DISTRICT The following changes were recommended in the Site Plan District: P &Z Minutes 3 -6 -84 Page 2 There was a lengthy discussion relative to this district. Mr. Hardy questioned the Commission and a lengthy deliberation ensued; however few changes were made to the most recently revised draft copy (2/21/84). On Page 10, E -2, the word approaches was misspelled with a recommendation made to correct such, and G between each "that period ", the words "one year" were added. (in two places). CONCEPT PLANS The following changes were recommended for the Concept Plans: Page 1, the Purpose paragraph -that through properties should be deleted to read: "The Concept Plan is intended to provide the Planning and Zoning commission and the City Council with the information and data that is necessary to assess the merits of requests for rezoning. Page 1, B. When Required should read as follows: " A Concept Plan shall be submitted in connection with all requests for rezoning. Page 1, C. Content of Concept Plan - 1. "phone number" should be added 2. "phone number" should be added 3. Should read as follows: " The names and addresses and phone numbers of all professional consultants advising the applicant with respect to the proposed rezoning;" 4. Should read as follows: "The legal description and general location of subject property." 6. Should read as follows: " The map of the property proposed to be rezoned showing the general location of the principal vehicular circulation system and access from existing streets and roads, the general location, respective size of all useable open space and common open space and the general location of residential and non residential land uses. 7. Should be deleted and Site Plan #C -6 should be added, reading as follows: "The Comprehensive Land Use recommendation for the property." 12. Following the word "dimensions" add words "and north arrow" and following the word "crossing" add and / "or ". 13. Delete the words "significant rock out - croppings" 14. Change 500 feet to 200 feet, and question Tony Wiles as to reasoning for the 500 feet originally. 15. Should be "proposed use or uses and general development of the subject property. 16. Should be as "sP" 12/10 (i), Page 6 as follows: "Computation of proposed number of dwelling units and the total acreage for residential use and the appropriate square footage of building, by type, for non - residential use. D. REASONS FOR DENYING SITE PLANS - Site plans must conform to the concept plan submitted with the zoning application and should be worded as below: Effect of Concept Plan - Should read as follows: " All subsequent site plans shall conform to the Concept Plan submitted with the zoning application. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION AND /OR REPORTS There was some discussion relative to the Sign Ordinance. Mr. Hardy advised that a correction should be made in "limitation: as in appendix A which is allowable districts. The general consensus was to speak to Mr. Smith in this regard. P &Z Minutes 3 -6 -84 Page 3 Ue1 -BreIiicW1Ia1 0-9 There being no further business to come before the Commission this evening, Commissioner Gerald Norman made a motion to adjourn, with a second from Harlem Joyce and the prevailing vote as follows: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Powers, Norman, Wilbanks & Atkins Nays: None PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMIS ION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE _,2 ZL/d DAY OF LWrat,z, , 1984. —1 .' ATTEST: