Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD 2015-030ORDINANCE NO. 2015-030 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, DESIGNATING A HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT HL15-01 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 39 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 (APPENDIX "D" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES), DESIGNATING THE AREA LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 7, BLOCK 110, COLLEGE HEIGHTS OF THE ARCHIBALD LEONARD SURVEY AND MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, IN A DISTRICT ZONED "R-7.5" SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE 526 EAST WORTH STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT PRESERVATION CRITERIA; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made by the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission requesting a historic landmark subdistrict designation by making application for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested historic landmark subdistrict designation should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 39 of Appendix "D" of the Code of Ordinances have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered, among other things, the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this historic landmark subdistrict, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the historic landmark subdistrict designation lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this historic landmark subdistrict designation and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that historic landmark subdistrict designation for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby designate a historic landmark subdistrict (HL15-01) in accordance with Section 39 of Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, in a district zoned "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations within the following described property: 526 East Worth Street, specifically platted as Lot 7, Block 110, College Heights Addition of the Archibald Leonard Survey, more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of hereof; and, in addition thereto, the adoption of the 526 East Worth Street Historic District Preservation Guidelines as conditions, regulations and safeguards in connection with the said historic landmark subdistrict, a copy of said criteria being attached hereto and labeled Exhibit "B". ORD. NO. 2015-030 2 Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the "H" zoning designation. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. That the fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 16th day of June, 2015. ORD. NO. 2015-030 3 William Q` Tata Mayor Tara Brooks City Secretary City Attorney ORD. NO. 2815-030 � 0 WIN EXHIBIT "A" TO ORD. NO. 2015-030 Page 1 of 6 1. Name Historic 526 E. Worth Street And/or common 2. Location Address 526 E. Worth Street land survey Location/neighborhood College Heights block/lot Block 110, Lot 7 tract size 3. Current zoning R 7.5 Single Family Residential 4. Classification Category Ownership _ district _ public building(s) _ private structure _ Accessible _Site building _ yes: restricted yes: unrestr. _ no Status — Occupied — unoccupied _ work in progress Present Use — agriculture _ commercial _ education _ Entertainment _ government — industrial — military _ museum _ park _ residence Religious _ scientific _ transportation X Other --Vacant 5. Ownership Current owner: Marty Watkins phone: Address: 514 East Texas Street city: Grapevine state: Texas zip: 76051 6. Form Preparation Name & title: Sallie Andrews, consultant organization: HPP Department. Contact: David Klempin phone: 817/410-3197 7. Representation on Existing Surveys x Tarrant Countv Historic Resources other Multiple Property Nomination Form 8. Date Rec'd: 9. Field Chk date: 10. Nomination Archaeological Site National Register of Historic Places _ Recorded Texas Historic Landmark Texas Archaeological Landmark for office use only Survey Verified: Yes No By: Structure District Structure & Site EXHIBIT "A" TO ORD. NO. 2015-030 Page 2 of 6 11. Historic Ownership original owner Austin, D.E. (Druggist - owner of land); conveyed to V. M. Washam (First Fire significant later owner(s): W. E. (Ed) and Grady Wood Keeling (owners of The Grapevine Sun newspaper); Claudia Andrew Millican Perlick (owner of land and imt)rovementsl 12. Construction Dates alterations /additions: construction: alterations /additions: 14. Site Features natural: urban design: Unoccupied/vacant Lot located at the southwest corner of E. Worth and Austin streets in a nei hborhood platted in 1907 15. Physical Description Condition Check One: Check One: excellent _ deteriorated _ Unaltered _ Original site — good _ ruins _ altered _ Moved (date: ) _ fair _ unexposed _ — poor Describe present and original (if known) pbysical appearance; include styles) of architecture, current condition and relationship to surrounding fabric (structures objects, etc.). Elaborate on pertinent materials used and sole(s) of architectural detailing embel- lisbments and site details. Lot 7 is vacant (526 E. Worth Street). Corner Lot 8 features the Claudia Andrews Millican Perlick House located at 530 E. Worth Street. The one-story wood framed Bungalow has a rectangular shape with a projecting porch. The fa- cade features a large front gable with a lower projecting front gabled porch on the left. The porch gable is supported by two poles which are probably not original to the house. Other Bungalow features found on this house include the triangular brackets at the ends of the gables and under its peak, as well as the exposed rafter tails under the eaves on the side elevations. The windows and doors are surrounded by wood trim with a simple crown molding. Most of the windows have a 4/1 vertical light pattern. The east elevation has a variety of windows, which include paired 4/1, triplet 4/1 set in a bay, and paired awning with four vertical lights. The west elevation has paired 4/1 windows, an awning window, and triplet 4/1 windows. The rear elevation has a lower front gabled porch on the west end that has been enclosed. Tri- angular brackets, like those on the front of the house, are found on this gable. One wall of the enclosed porch has been covered with asphalt siding that resembles bricks. To the east of this area is a ribbon of four windows; the left two are 4/1 and the right two are 1/1. A shed roofed porch of fiberglass and wood has been attached to the enclosed porch and covers a wood deck. The house has been altered over time. These alterations include the covering of the original sid- ing with asbestos shingles. The current wood porch deck, railing, and supports are not original to the house. The wall under the front porch has been covered with nonoriginal wood paneling. The window to the right of the porch has been replaced with a metal 1/1 unit. According to the 1935 Sanborn Map, the rear porch was enclosed sometime after that date. The current rear porch is a later addition. The 1935 Sanborn Map also reveals that there used to be a detached wood framed garage behind the house (on Lot 7). This garage has been removed. A metal sided shed on a concrete slab was erected to the west of the house and later removed. EXHIBIT "A" TO ORD. NO. 2015-030 Page 3 of 6 16. Historical Significance Statement of histoszcal and cultural significance. Include. cultural influences, special events and important personages, influences on neighborhood, on the city, etc. The College Heights Addition, including Block 110 - Lot 7 (vacant) - now 526 E. Worth Street, was originally platted in 1907 by Dalton E. Austin. Mr. Austin was born on the Grape Vine Prairie on July 2, 1878. His parents were Rhodes and Willie Ella (Betty) Austin who arrived in Grapevine on Christ- mas Day 1870 in a wagon train of 14 wagons from Georgia. Rhodes was a blacksmith; the family settled in the White's Chapel area. D.E. grew up and married Maude Wilson; they had no children. They owned and operated the D. E. Austin Drugstore at 424 S. Main Street in Grapevine for many years. In the back of his drugstore was the office of Dr. E. C. Bechtol. In November 1940, Mr. Austin sold his drugstore to Erman Tate and Roy Chambers who established City Drug Store. In 1907, Mr. Austin sold Lots 7 and 8 to V. M. Washam. That same year, Mr. Washam was elected Chief of the Fire Department which he organized with 13 volunteers. On March 17, 1908, the follow- ing slate of volunteer firemen was presented to the Mayor and Aldermen: V. M. Washam, Chief; D. E. Austin, O. P. Turnage, Earl Yates, John Starr, F. T. Estill, B. H. Yancy, John Lemmons, Will May, M. M. Dye, Paul Gibbs and John Pence. The early volunteer fire department became known as The Bucket Brigade. The landmarked Claudia Andrews Millican Perlick House located next door on Lot 8 at 530 E. Worth Street is situated on a corner lot at the intersection of East Worth and Austin streets in the College Heights Addition to the City of Grapevine. The corner property was comprised of Lot 7 and Lot 8 with the house being situated on Lot 8. After Mr. Washam purchased the property in 1907, it was sold three times in 1912 with the last Grantee being W.E. and Grady Wood Keeling. The Keelings, own- ers of The Grapevine Sun newspaper, probably bought this property for investment purposes as they had a house of their own constructed at 529 E. Worth Street that same year. The Keelings owned the property until 1917 when they sold it to J.B. and Carrie Mills for $500. The Mills sold the property to Claudia Andrews in 1919 for $2,150. The substantial jump in the value of the property between 1917 and 1919 strongly suggests that the house was constructed during this time. Records of the Tarrant County Tax Assessor's Office confirm this and indicate that the house was constructed in 1917. When the Mills sold the house, the deed record indicates that the buyer, Claudia Andrews, was a widow. When her heirs sold the property in 1970, the deed recorded her name as Claudia Millican Perlick, meaning that she had married two more times after purchasing the house. Grapevine Area History has one reference to her under the name of Mrs. J.L. Millican. Her daughter, Ola Millican Lu- cas, owned the house for a short while after her death. Claudia Andrews Millican Perlick's name is used to identify this house because of her lengthy ownership. The Claudia Andrews Millican Perlick House is typical of the modest Bungalow style houses con- structed in Grapevine during the early part of the twentieth century. Constructed in 1917, the house retains several hallmarks of the style. These include the rectangular massing with a prominent front gable and lower gabled porch. Other Bungalow features found on this house include the triangular brackets under the gables and exposed rafter tails. The multiple light windows, in this example, 4/1 vertical lights, are another common feature of the style. A small garage was located on Lot 7. It was replaced with a metal building in more recent years which has now been removed. In February 2015, Lot 7 is vacant. 17. Bibliography Young, Charles, Ed. Grapevine Area History. Grapevine Historical Society, Taylor Publishing Company. Dallas. 1991 Tarrant County, Texas. Office of the County Clerk. Tax and Deed Records. 18. Attachments EXHIBIT "A" TO ORD. NO. 2015-030 Page 4of6 — District or Site map Additional descriptive material — Site Plan (Tarrant Co. Tax Record) Footnotes _ Photos (h sterie & current) Other 19. Designation Merit A. Character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City of Grape- vine, State of Texas of the United States. B. Location as the site of a significant historical event. EXHIBIT "A" TO ORD. NO. 2015-030 Page 5 of 6 Y G. Identification as the work of an archi- tect or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the city. C. Identification with a person or persons X who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the city. D. Exemplification of the cultural, eco- nomic, social or historical heritage of the city E. Portrayal of the environment of a group of people in an era of history characterized by a distinctive architec- tural style. F. Embodiment of distinguishing charac- teristics of an architectural type or specimen. 20. Recommendation H. Embodiment of elements of architec- tural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent a sig- nificant architectural innovation. I. Relationship to other distinctive build- ings, sites or areas which are eligible for preservation according to a plan based on historic, cultural or architec- tural motif. J. Unique location of singular physical characteristics representing an estab- lished and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, community or the city. K. Archaeological value in that it has produced or can be expected to pro- duce data affecting theories of historic or prehistoric value. L. Value as an aspect of community sen- timent or public pride. The Grapevine Township Revitalization Program re- quests the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commis- Burl Gilliam, Chairman sion to deem this nominated landmark meritorious of Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission designation as outlined in Chapter 39, City of Grape- vine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. David Klempin, Further, the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commis- Historic Preservation Officer sion endorses the Preservation Criteria, policy recom- mendations and landmark boundary as presented by the City of Grapevine Development Services Depart- Scott Williams, Director ment. Development Services Department EXHIBIT "A" TO ORD. NO. 2015-030 Page 6of6 21. Historical Marker The Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission and the Grapevine Historical Society have a cooperative marker pro- gram for properties that are officially (individually or located within) designated Historic Landmark Sub -districts. Please indicate if you are interested in obtaining one or both markers for your property. There is no fee for either of the mark- ers, however, the Grapevine Historical Society will only fund two (2) of the medallion and text plaque (second option), per year, on a first come, first serve basis. Check One: ❑ Yes, I am interested in obtaining a bronze Historic Landmark Plaque for my property from the Historic Preservation Commission. I understand there is no fee for this plaque. ❑ No, I am not interested in obtaining a marker for my property. ❑ Yes, I am interested in obtaining a bronze Historic Marker (medallion and text plaque) for my property from the Grapevine Historical Society. Below for office use only [_ Historic Preservation Commission's Historic Landmark Plaque. ❑ Historic Preservation Commission's Historic District Plaque. ❑ Grapevine Historical Society's Historic Landmark Marker. EXHIBIT "B" TO ORD. NO. 2015-030 Page 1 of 8 Desiqn Guidelines 526 East Worth Street Grapevine, Texas Grapevine Township Revitalization Project, Inc. City of Grapevine 636 S. Main Grapevine, Texas 76051 February 25, 2015 Page 1 EXHIBIT "B" TO ORD. NO. 2015-030 Page 2 of 8 WS -40 I. SITE • Setbacks ■ Driveways, Parking Lots ■ Service and Mechanical Areas ■ Fences II. BUILDING FABRIC ■ Preservation • Exterior Finishes ■ Windows III. EMBELLISHMENTS • Awnings -Canopies ■ Exterior Lighting IV. NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION • Infill ■ Additions to Historic Buildings EXHIBIT "B" TO ORD. NO. 2015-030 Page 3 of 8 The College Heights Addition, including Block 110 - Lot 7 (vacant) - now 526 E. Worth Street, was originally platted in 1907 by Dalton E. Austin. Mr. Austin was born on the Grape Vine Prairie on July 2, 1878. His parents were Rhodes and Willie Ella (Betty) Austin who arrived in Grapevine on Christmas Day 1870 in a wagon train of 14 wagons from Georgia. Rhodes was a blacksmith; the family settled in the White's Chapel area. D.E. grew up and married Maude Wilson; they had no children. They owned and operated the D. E. Austin Drugstore at 424 S. Main Street in Grapevine for many years. In the back of his drugstore was the office of Dr. E. C. Bechtol. In November 1940, Mr. Austin sold his drugstore to Erman Tate and Roy Chambers who established City Drug Store. In 1907, Mr. Austin sold Lots 7 and 8 to V. M. Washam. That same year, Mr. Washam was elected Chief of the Fire Department which he organized with 13 volunteers. On March 17, 1908, the following slate of volunteer firemen was presented to the Mayor and Aldermen: V. M. Washam, Chief; D. E. Austin, O. P. Turnage, Earl Yates, John Starr, F. T. Estill, B. H. Yancy, John Lemmons, Will May, M. M. Dye, Paul Gibbs and John Pence. The early volunteer fire department became known as The Bucket Brigade. The landmarked Claudia Andrews Millican Perlick House located next door on Lot 8 at 530 E. Worth Street is situated on a corner lot at the intersection of East Worth and Austin streets in the College Heights Addition to the City of Grapevine. The i corner property is comprised of Lot 7 and Lot 8 with the house being situated on Lot 8. After Mr. Washam purchased the property in 1907, it was sold three times in 1912 with the last Grantee being W.E. and Grady Wood Keeling. The Keelings, owners of The Grapevine Sun newspaper, probably bought this property for investment purposes as they had a house of their own constructed at 529 E. Worth Street that same year. The Keelings owned the property until 1917 when they sold it to J.B. and Carrie Mills for $500. The Mills sold the property to Claudia Andrews in 1919 for $2,150. The substantial jump in the value of the property between 1917 and 1919 strongly suggests that the house was constructed during this time. Records of the Tarrant County Tax Assessor's Office confirm this and indicate that the house was constructed in 1917. When the Mills sold the house, the deed record indicates that the buyer, Claudia Andrews, was a widow. When her heirs sold the property in 1970, the deed recorded her name as Claudia Millican Perlick, meaning that she had married two more times after purchasing the house. Grapevine Area History has one reference to her under the name of Mrs. J.L. Millican. Her daughter, Ola Millican Lucas, owned the house for a short while after her death. Claudia Andrews Millican Perlick's name is used to identify this house because of her lengthy ownership. The Claudia Andrews Millican Perlick House is typical of the modest Bungalow style houses constructed in Grapevine during the early part of the twentieth century. x Constructed in 1917, the house retains several hallmarks of the style. These include the rectangular massing with a prominent front gable and lower gabled EXHIBIT "B" TO ORD. NO. 2015-030 Page 4 of 8 porch. Other Bungalow features found on this house include the triangular brackets under the gables and exposed rafter tails. The multiple light windows, in this example, 4/1 vertical lights, are another common feature of the style. A small garage was located on Lot 7. It was replaced with a metal building which has now been removed. In February 2015, Lot 7 is vacant. MA Retain the historic relationships between buildings, landscaping features and open space. Avoid rearranging the site by moving or removing buildings and site features, such as walks, drives and fences, that help define the residence's historic value. Building setbacks should be consistent with adjacent buildings or with the style of the building. Setbacks are an important ingredient in creating an attractive streetscape. Buildings should be set back to a line that is consistent with their neighbors and land use. For example, a residential setback should retain the setback of adjacent and nearby structures, with landscaping along the street right- of-way. Residential buildings with a commercial use in residential areas should be set back in a manner consistent with setbacks of neighboring or similar residential structures. Maintain building orientation pattern, with the front facade facing the street. Maintain spacing patterns between buildings. DRIVEWAYS, PARKING LOTS AND VACANT SITES Driveways should be located perpendicular to the street; no circular drives shall be allowed (unless proven with historic documentation) in front or corner side yard, so that the character of the landscaped yard can be reinforced. New parking lots for commercial uses should not be located adjacent to sidewalks in the district. Off-street parking lots should not be allowed to interrupt the continuity of landscaped front or corner side yards. This is important to both the preservation of historic character, and to the strengthening of the residential district. Screen existing parking lots from streets and pedestrian areas in the Historic District. Existing parking lots located adjacent to streets and sidewalks may be screened to the height of car hoods. This will provide a certain level of continuity of the building fagade line; it will screen unsightly views; and it will provide a level of security by allowing views to and from the sidewalk. EXHIBIT "B" TO ORD. NO. 2015-030 Page 5 of 8 Historically, fences around historic houses defined yards and the boundary around property and gardens. Wood picket fences, wood rail fences and barbed wire or decorative wire fences were the common fence types in Grapevine. Traditionally, picket fences surrounded the front of the house while rail and wire fences surrounded the agricultural portions of the property. Maintain historic fences. New fences. Simple wood picket fences, wood and wire and wrought iron fences are appropriate. Avoid chain-link fences, privacy fences and concrete block fences for the street sides of property. Wood privacy fences may be allowed when installed in the rear yard and behind the front fagade of a property. Utilitarian/privacy fences should not be installed in front of a historic building or beyond the line of the front fagade of a historic building. Replacing fences. If replacement is required due to deterioration, remove only those portions of historic fences that are damaged beyond repair and replace in- kind, matching the original in material, design and placement. If replacement is necessary for non -historic fences, or new fences are proposed, locate and design the fence in such a way that will compliment the historic boundary of the property without concealing the historic character of the property. SERVICE AND MECHANICAL AREAS Service and mechanical areas and equipment should be screened from the street and other pedestrian areas. All garbage and equipment storage areas should be screened from the street. Mechanical equipment, including satellite dishes, shall not be located in front or corner side yards or should be set back from the edges of roofs, and screened so that they are not visible to pedestrians and do not detract from the historic character of buildings. PRESERVATION Preserve, stabilize, and restore original building form, ornament and materials. Any missing or severely deteriorated elements may be replaced with replicas of the original. Ensure that roof, window, porch and cornice treatments are preserved, or when preservation is not possible duplicate the original building element. When rehabilitating, remove non -historic alterations. Often, "modern" renovations conceal the original facade details. If not, the original style may be recreated through the use of historic photographs. EXHIBIT "B" TO ORD. NO. 2015-030 Page 6 of 8 Where replication of original elements is not possible, a new design consistent with the original style of the building may be used. Reconstruction of building elements should reflect the size, scale, material and level of detail of the original design. Preserve older renovations that have achieved historic significance. Older structures or additions may have, at some time, been renovated with such care and skill that the renovation itself is worthy of preservation. Usually, such renovations may date from before 1940. Original wood finishes should be maintained and painted or, when necessary, replaced in kind. Modern synthetic siding materials such as vinyl or metal bear little resemblance to historic siding materials. The application of such modern synthetic materials often involves the removal of original decorative elements such as cornice, corner boards, brackets, window and door trim, etc. New synthetic siding shall not be installed; removal of existing such materials is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish and appearance. Original asbestos siding should be maintained and painted, or when necessary, replaced with synthetic siding to match the existing asbestos siding. The removal of asbestos siding over existing wood siding is not required, but strongly encouraged, i to restore historic patina, finish and appearance. Original masonry surfaces should be maintained and not be painted, unless severe deterioration of the brick or stone can be shown to require painting. If the color or texture of replacement brick or stone cannot be matched with existing, painting may be an appropriate treatment. Paint colors should be complimentary to each other and the overall character of the house. When possible, research the original paint color and finishes of the building's historic period; the right colors respect the historic building. The Historic Preservation Commission shall adopt, as necessary, a paint palette(s) appropriate to the district's character, which may be proposed and approved through the Minor Exterior Alteration application process. Any colors proposed outside the adopted palette may be reviewed by the Commission in the regular Certificate of Appropriateness process. rr • Original window framing and lites (panes of glass) configurations should be preserved and maintained or replaced in kind. When replacement is necessary, do so within existing historic opening. Replacement of non -original windows should consider the use of historically EXHIBIT "B" TO ORD. NO. 2015-030 Page 7 of 8 appropriate wood windows. Use same sash size to avoid filling in or enlarging the original opening. Clear or very slightly tinted window glass may be used. No reflective or heavily tinted glass shall be used. Should the owner wish to install security bars, they should be installed on the interior of windows and doors. Storm windows. The use of interior storm windows is encouraged. Storm windows are available which can be installed on the interior of windows. This helps to preserve the exterior historic character of the building. Should storm windows need to be installed on the exterior of the historic windows, storm windows constructed of wood and configured to match the historic sashes (i.e. one over one sashes) are recommended. If metal storm windows are installed, paint to blend with surrounding elements. New awnings and canopies should not be installed above windows or doors. Lighting is an important element in residential areas. Fixtures should be consistent with the historic character of the house. Appropriate incandescent light fixtures to the style of the district should be used. Avoid exposed lighting of any kind unless part of a historic fixture. •RM The Secretary of the Interior's guidelines for new buildings in historic districts encourage similarity of form and materials, but not actual replication. New construction proposals and the rehabilitation of non -historic buildings will be reviewed based on these Criteria. Judgement will be based on the compatibility of the design within the context of the property's adjacent and nearby historic buildings. The design of new buildings should have key elements of the building's historic period of significance including massing, scale, fenestration and materials. Infill buildings should not be absolute reproductions, and appear as clearly contemporary. Only when a previously demolished historic Grapevine building can EXHIBIT "B" TO ORD. NO. 2015-030 Page 8 of 8 •- accur9t- -• -r •• jv• •- • �- -r Infill buildings between historic buildings should be similar in setback, roof form, cornice line and materials, to one of the adjacent buildings. Relate height of new building to the heights of adjacent structures. Avoid new buildings that tower over existing ones. Horizontal wood siding (either novelty, tongue and groove, shiplap or equivalent) and brick are appropriate exterior building finishes for the historic house. Fake brick or stone or gravel aggregate materials shall never be used. ADDITIONS TO HISTORIC BUILDINGS Additions to historic buildings should replicate the style of the main building if possible; otherwise they should adhere to the general style with simplified details. As a minimum, new additions should reflect the massing, roof shape, bay spacing, cornice lines and building materials of the primary structure. All new wood or metal materials should have a painted finish except on some 20th century buildings where the use of unpainted aluminum or steel was part of the original design and should be maintained. A new addition should, if at all possible, be located at the rear of the historic building. If this is not possible, the addition may be added to the side if it is recessed at least 18 inches from the historic building facade or a connection is used to separate old from new. New vertical additions should be set back from primary facades so as not to be readily apparent from the facing street. When reproducing elements that were originally part of a historic building they should be replicated when evidence of the actual detail has been documented by photographs, drawings, or remaining physical evidence. If no evidence exists, elements typical of the architectural style may be used. Historic photographs can provide information on the original elements of the building.