Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 07 - CU12-31, HL12-05 Lazy Bones
ITEM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGERi ...... SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SER S DIRECTOR MEETING DATE: AUGUST 21, 2012 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION CU12-31 HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT HL12-05, LAZY BONES RESTAURANT ii ----------- -- t�` ;- APPLICANT: Adam Baker r Grapevine y� r7°yeRa Lake i PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: I`� I I.H.I835 The subject property is located at 120 East Worth "°"h Street and is platted as Lots 1 Al-1 B, Block 32, City _! I Pti� y���d of Grapevine. The addition contains 0.383 acres and «s I has approximately 110 feet of frontage along East DFW Worth Street and 152 feet of frontage along Jenkins Hall-Johnson Airport i Street. a L� c I T----� o I Glade Rd. H G O REQUESTED CONDITIONAL USE, HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to amend the previously approved site plan of CU88-05 (Ord. 88-31)to allow the possession, storage, retail sale and on-premise consumption of alcoholic beverages(beer, wine and mixed beverages) in conjunction with a restaurant. The a licant is also requesting a Historic Landmark Subdistrict designation for Lazy Bones restaurant. In April 2012 a structure fire occurred on the subject site. The building has been demolished due to the level of damage sustained during the fire. The Historic Preservation Commission at their May 23, 2012 meeting approved a Certificate of Appropriateness along with conditions on the subject site for the demolition of the fire damaged structure. The conditions included establishing a Historic Overlay on the subject site, installing an O:2CUICU12-31.4&HL12-05 August 16.2012(9:49AM) area on the west wall of the new structure with the original brick scored siding, a historical plaque explaining the area, and a requirement to return to the Historic Preservation Commission for approval for any proposed doors and windows. The Historic Preservation Commission at their August 15, 2012 meeting adopted the preservation criteria for the subject property addressing such issues as the setbacks, driveways, parking, exterior finishes and other architectural embellishments to preserve the historic integrity of the property. With this request the applicant proposes to construct a new 6,439 square foot restaurant (Lazy Bones). The new structure will be approximately 3,074 square foot larger than the previous building. No outside speakers or outside dining is associated with this request. Total seating proposed for the restaurant will accommodate 180 patrons. A total of 60 parking spaces are required for the restaurant. On-site the applicant proposes providing nine parking spaces. The applicant's parking plan illustrates, in addition to the on-site parking, three public parking lots located at the northeast corner of South Main Street and Franklin Street, the northwest corner of Jenkins Street and East Worth Street, and a lot accessed from East Texas Street or Jenkins Street providing a total of 169 parking spaces. On August 8, 2012 the owner submitted an application for historic landmark designation for the property at 116 (120) East Worth Street. The property is located at the south east corner of East Worth Street and Jenkins Street in the College Heights National Register Historic District. This site has been a commercial property site since 1917 (95 years). The lot is one block east of the Main Street Historic District also listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The original site plan can be seen on 1935 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map. The original building was constructed in 1917 and was the local retail office of Wm. Cameron &Company that was organized in 1867 and headquartered in Waco, Texas. By 1899, Wm. Cameron & Company had retail lumber yards in nearly all the major cities in Texas and employed 3,000 men in the state. While this building appeared to be brick, it was actually a wood frame building covered with a "brick look" composite siding. This unusual building with a vaguely Georgian appearance served as the office building for the lumber company. The main entrance was located in the center of the north gabled wall. Above the entrance was a semi-circular window, centered in the gable. An overhanging roof projected two feet beyond the walls with two foot cornice returns. Storefront windows were located to the left and right of the doorway. Two lumber storage sheds flanked the original office building on the east and west. Original clerestory windows punctuated the side walls of the building. PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The subject property is currently zoned "CBD" Central Business District and was formerly developed as a restaurant until a recent fire necessitated demolition of the structure. 0:IZCLIICUI2-31.4&HL12-05 2 August 16,2012(9:49AM) HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject property and properties to the north, south and west were rezoned from "C-2" Community Business District to "CBD" Central Business District during the 1984 City Rezoning and with the exception of the subject site and the parking lot to the north are developed as commercial uses. Conditional Use Request CU88-05 (Ord.88-31) was approved by Council at the April 19, 1988 meeting which allowed for on-premise consumption of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine and mixed drinks) in conjunction with a restaurant on the subject site. The site to the east was rezoned from "C-2" Community Business District to Specific Use Permit for the possession, storage, retail sale, and on- premise consumption of alcoholic beverages incidental to the operation of a restaurant in accordance with the approved site plan (Ordinance 80-69). The site to the east was rezoned from the Specific Use Permit in the 1984 City Rezoning to Central Business District. Conditional Use Permit CU89-20 (Ordinance 90-10)allowed for the sale, storage and on-premise consumption of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine and mixed drinks only). Zone Change Request Z97-14 and Conditional Use Request CU97-31 were considered at Council's July 1, 1997 meeting to allow for a .44 acre lot immediately to the rear of the site to the east zoned "R-7.5" Single Family District, to be utilized for parking for the existing restaurant and to allow for outside dining at the front(north)and along the west side of the restaurant. The zone change application was approved however, the conditional use application specifically relative to the outside dining on the patio area to the west was denied. The Site Plan Review Committee at their August 29, 2001 meeting approved a small modification to the existing site plan for the site to the east (CU01-43) to accommodate upgrades to the kitchen area. The Site Plan Review Committee at their April 24, 2002 meeting approved a conditional use permit (CU02-06) which amended the exterior elevations to the existing restaurant on the site to the east and the interior seating area but with no increase in seating. The Site Plan Review Committee at their December 17, 2003 meeting approved a conditional use permit (CU03-49) that simply reconsidered the previous amendments associated with CU02-06 that had expired with no action taken. No other changes were proposed. At the September 6, 2011 meeting City Council approved CU11-20 (Ord. 2011-44)to allow outside dining in conjunction with a restaurant on the site to the east. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "CBD" Central Business District—public parking lot SOUTH: "CBD" Central Business District—commercial property EAST: "CBD" Central Business District—Esparza's Restaurant WEST: "CBD" Central Business District—commercial property AIRPORT IMPACT: WZWCU12-31.4&HL12-05 3 August 16,2012(9:49AM) The subject tract is located within "Zone A" zone of i i effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. Few activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in Zone A, except for sound sensitive activities such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The applicant's proposal is an appropriate use in this noise zone. MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Central Business District land use. The applicant's proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan. THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION: The Thoroughfare Plan does not designate East Worth Street or Jenkins Street as a local thoroughfare. /at 0:IZCLACU12-31.4&HL12-06 4 August 16,2012(9:49AM) TR 1 t E .30 AC TR 52 ai 1 AC a _ .� • E ® i f le R i - � L-" i , „ NOW TR 61 :I � a •i' .I .1: 37 AC I II/i'F1`I VA rigk' WAMMAVA 2R 3 �i W"WAWA %. . romm;IWOW /� FWAMMW yO Al CBD .. .4 Ord •Pup, i- P p 1 inch �f • I 4 200 feet C T)`4 � .� ��� rte. iiw,r9 ��„ � �d � u �'. IL f d TIONAL USE APPLICATION ° l "A" PARTIL APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Name: mr-r,� —&ke,(- Applicant Address: eaL)09 2,Jar P` W City/State/Zip r]� � r! ( 7&017 Phone No. aI( ?r .� 4�S� Fax No. Email Address ! Mobile Phone Applicant's interest in subject property 59 PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property j , a©,-4-k Legal Description: Lot Block F-37- Addition Legal description of subject property (metes&bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet Size of subject property: acres F39 square footage Present zoning classification 6-61> Proposed use of property 71-155:T-AV a.A,4-r Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner j&_ kj er S± � Prop Owner Address City/State/Zip Phone No. �1�� � Y0�13 Fax No. ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ❑ In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan,and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular oonditional use by applicable district regulations(example:buffer yard4 distance between users) ❑ In the same letter,describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use,or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also,describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Application of site plan approval(Section 47,see attached Form"B"). 13 The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. iw firr wrrumunat use ono conurnonat uae ap,nca oiis Prr 3ssumea to be comps&f 3 Wilen 1080 FIA .vll be plated cra 09 vpwida nw o[;Nie(rearing at the discretion of the staff Based oti the sk'e Of the ac,-nda,your application may up schaduled to s later date. Q All aubl c hearings will be opened and testimony gives j by applicants snd intere&eri,^,iii.?Enry. Public sae~rugs may t&coiWnued :c inn n•3xi public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabirod 4.., Any chgnges to a site pin(no matter how mina or major)approved wAh c conditional use or' us L-4rmii car only bc:approved by city council through the public hearing process. El l have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for nonditional use or conditional use pamut and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal PART 4. SIGi~!ATURE TO ^,UTHOR,,IZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A COHt ;HOWAt_USE REQUEST T SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name Applicant's Signature The State of TEkAS County of `T Before me (notary) on this day personally appeared (applicant) 4A M 115t— known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this 2G� day of � A.D. •N° T.GLOVER MY COMMISSION EXPIRES February 22,2014 Notary In and For State of /X�2 F-/U Le r- , Print Property Owner's Name Property Owner's Signature The State of AS County of I ` AaA a-- Before me(notary) -'�tA r—.4 on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me(or proved to me on the oath of card or other document)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Sea[) Given under my hand and seal of office this 2 T day of , A.D. ZDIZ •+ ., T.GLOVER gMY COMMISSION EXPIRES ' ` Fekn 22,2014 Notary In and For State of S ---- R a i AM Condiffonal Use and Speck'" s e Applioddons are i"s.Sunterf to bg cornp.leto whwi flkdand%fill Lie rr aced or., ribs noon de ?r: , ub ir, heerirrri at the dis clZ4601a of the staff Based Q;I the size Of the e ertde, y0 "a ppliCad m ky eschedifiedi c a isaer data. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or a special use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required riling fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or special use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date Signature of Property Owner Date Aj �� E.� HISTORIC it CT APPLICATI PART 1.APPLIGA Applicant Name: Adam Baker Baker Simpson Holdings Applicant Address: 2109 River Ridge Road City/Stat 0p Arlington,TX 76017 Phone No. 214.236.0982 Fax No. Email Address Mobile Phone 817.375.9102 Applicant's interest in subject property Owner PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property 116(170)East Worth Street Legal Description: Lot 1A1-1i Block F32 Addition Grapevine,City of Lot 1A1-1 B Block 32 Grapevine,City of Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8112'x 11"sheet) Size of subject property: acres 3813 square footage 3,772 Present zoning classlficatlon Present use of property Faroe Demolition of Restaurant(Bar Proposed use of property Restaurant(Bar PART 3.PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner Baker Simpson Holdings LLC Prop Owner Address 2109 River Ridge Road City/Statamp Arlington,TX 76017-2757 Phone No. 2141MOM Fax No. J� 1, -a O The Devak p pent Swvlc+es staff wN determwe the agenda for each of the pubito hearing data& Based on the ako of the agenda,yow appko&n may be rasdmWLftd td a later data PART 4.SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE FILING OF AN APPLICATION AND PLACING A HISTORICAL LANI)MARK SUBDISTRICT REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Adam Baker,Texas D.L.No Print Applicanre Name Applicant's Signature The State of ITexas County of arrant Before me(notary) Mary Bush,Notary on this day personally appeared(applicant) Adam Baker known to me(or proved to me on the oath of card or other document)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing Instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. —7(Seal)Given under my hand and seal of office this 14th day of August ,A.D. 2012 -------------- MARY t]M Is NovwMw 13,2M6 1] 1 MY 0"nbs Notary In and For State of exas Adam Baker,Texas D.L.No: a Print Property Owner's Name Properly Owner's Signature The State of "as County of arrant Before me(notary) Mary Bush,rotary on this day personally appeared(applicant) Adam Baker known to me(or proved to me on the oath of card or other document)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing Instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal)Given under my hand and seal of office this 14th day of August ,A.D. 2012 1(94 MAM BUSH Iovannber A 4 ii N A:� otary In and For of axes Tarrant Appraisal District Real Estate 08/07/2012 '�(� Account Number: 01091603 Georeference: 16060-32-1A1 Ba' Property Location: 116 E Worth St,Grapevine Owner Information:Bakker Simpson Holdings LLC 2109 River Ridge Rd Arlington Tx 76017-2757 6 Prior Owners Legal Description: Grapevine,City of Bik 32 Lots IAMB Taxing Jurisdictions: 011 City of Grapevine 220 Tarrant County 224 Tarrant County Hospital Dist 225 Tarrant County College Dist 906 Grapevine-Colleyville ISD This Information Is imanded for reference only and is subject to change.it may not accurately rafted the carnpiete status of the account an actually carded In TAUS database. Proposed Values for Tax Year 2012 Land Im r 2012 Total tt Market Value $99,660 $367,043 $466,703 Appraised Value t $99,660 $367,043 $466,703 Approximate fte ttt 3,772 Land Acres 0.3813 Land S Ft 16,610 t Appraised value may be less than market value due to slete-mandated liffaMWa on value Igcfeases tt A zero value indicates that the properly record has not yet been completed for the indicated tax year tttRounded 5-Year Value Histo Tax Year XMIXT Appraised Land Appralsed Impr Appraleed Total Market Land I Market knpr Market Total 2011 000 $991 $213,536 $313,196 $99, 5213,536 5313,1% 2010 000 $99, $213,536 $313,196 $99, $213,536 $313,196 2009 000 $99, $213,536 $313,196 $99, 5213,536 5313,196 2008 000 5991 $213,536 5313,1913 $99, $213,53 5313,196 2007 000 574,745 $215,1961 $289,931 S74,74q 5215,18 5289,931 2012 Notice Sent: 04/30/2012 Protest Deadline: 05/31/2012 Protest Scheduled Exemptions:None Property Data Deed Date: 02/01/2007 Class:076 Instrument:D207049342 State Code: F1 Commercial Garage Bays: 00 Year Built: 1915 Central Air: Central Heat: TAD Map: 2126 460 Pool:N MAPSCO: 0287 Agent: 00670 United Paramount Tax Group Inc Design Guidelines Cameron Lumber Building 116 (120) East Worth Street Grapevine, Texas Grapevine Township Revitalization Project, Inc. City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Grapevine, Texas 76051 August 15, 2012 Table of Contents PREFACE I. SITE • Setbacks • Driveways, Parking Lots • Service and Mechanical Areas • Fences II. BUILDING FABRIC Preservation ■ Exterior Finishes ■ Windows IIIII„ EMBELLISHMENTS • Awnings-Canopies • Exterior Lighting IV, NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ■ Infill ■ Additions to Historic Buildings Page 2 Preface a v—uv. ,,, I Y Wm.rmmn�v'Y,M1V,luwmmw�yr 11, a� Cameron Lumber Building 116(120) East Worth Street, photo 2002 Lot 32 Blocks 1-A and 1-B are located at the southeast corner of East Worth Street and Jenkins Street in the College Heights National Register Historic District that was designated in 1996. This site has been a commercial property site since 1917. The lot is one block east of the Main Street Historic District also listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The original site plan can be seen on 1935 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map. This unusual building with a vaguely Georgian appearance served as the office building for the lumber company. The main entrance was located in the center of the north gabled wall.Above the entrance was a semi-circular window, centered in the gable.An overhanging roof projected two feet beyond the walls with two foot cornice returns. Storefront windows were located to the left and right of the doorway. Two lumber storage sheds flanked the original office building on the east and west. Original clerestory windows punctuated the side walls of the building (see below). a�Jl, ri ,, „v Photo from Tarrant County Historic Resources Survey, published 1990. Page 3 Later, this building was added on to along the east side. The original building design was duplicated and enlarged to form a new addition.A central covered passage way was added between the old and new structures enabling customers to enter either portion of the building. In 2000 the building was known as Ravioli's Restaurant. A fire destroyed the Wm. Cameron&Company buildings in April 2012 creating a public safety hazard. The building was demolished shortly after the fire occurred with the requirement that the property be landmarked and new construction would replace the historic building that had occupied the site for over 95 years. The building destroyed by fire was 3,772 sq.ft. The building lot is 16,610 sq.ft. Block 32, Lots 1-A and 1-B were sold in 1917 by C. C. Estill,whose office was on Main Street and who was also in the lumber and construction business, to Wm. Cameron &Company for a new lumber company site. This building, constructed ca. 1917,was the local retail office of Wm. Cameron&Company,that was organized in 1867 and headquartered in Waco, Texas. By 1899, Wm. Cameron &Company had retail lumber yards in nearly all the major cities in Texas and employed 3,000 men in the state. While this building appeared to be brick, it was actually a wood frame building covered with a"brick look"composite siding. Cameron Homes were built in Texas during the late 1930s through the 1960s. Known as economy homes, they offered working class citizens the opportunity to own their own modern homes at an affordable price. Cameron Homes were built to exact specifications set by Wm. Cameron &Company, and all plans and specifications met the Federal Housing Administration and the Veteran's Administration requirements for quality materials and workmanship. Cameron Homes were sold on "Easy To Own"plans known as ETOs. The main requirement to quality for an ETO was that the purchaser owned his own lot outright and used it for collateral. The Cameron Company carried the loan on the ETO plan. Home prices were presented in either all-lumber or brick veneer designs,with prices ranging accordingly beginning at$2,070.20 for the shell house. Monthly payments as low as$15.14 per month plus taxes and insurance were routinely advertised in The Grapevine Sun. Page 4 SITE Retain the historic relationships between buildings, landscaping features and open space. Avoid rearranging the site by moving or removing buildings and site features such as walks, drives and fences,that help define the residence's historic value. SETBACKS Building setbacks should be consistent with adjacent buildings or with the style of the building. Setbacks are an important ingredient in creating an attractive streetscape. Buildings should be set back to a line that is consistent with their neighbors and land use. For example, a residential setback should retain the setback of adjacent and nearby structures,with landscaping along the street right-of-way. Residential buildings with a commercial use in residential areas should be set back in a manner consistent with setbacks of neighboring or similar residential structures. Maintain building orientation pattern,with the front facade facing the street. Maintain spacing patterns between buildings. DRIVEWAYS, PARKING LOTS AND VACANT SITES Driveways should be located perpendicular to the street; no circular drives shall be allowed (unless proven with historic documentation) in front or corner side yard, so that the character of the landscaped yard can be reinforced. New parking lots for commercial uses should not be located adjacent to sidewalks in the district. Off-street parking lots should not be allowed to interrupt the continuity of landscaped front or comer side yards. This is important to both the preservation of historic character,and to the strengthening of the residential district. Screen existing parking lots from streets and pedestrian areas in the Historic District. Existing parking lots located adjacent to streets and sidewalks may be screened to the height of car hoods.This will provide a certain level of continuity of the building fagade line;itwill screen unsightlyviews;and itwill provide a level of security by allowing views to and from the sidewalk. FENCES Historically, fences around historic houses defined yards and the boundary around property and gardens. Wood picket fences,wood rail fences and barbed wire or decorative wire fences were the common fence types in Grapevine. Traditionally, picket fences surrounded the front of the house while rail and wire fences surrounded the agricultural portions of the property. Maintain historic fences. New fences. Simple wood picket fences,wood and wire and wrought iron fences are appropriate. Avoid chain-link fences, privacy fences and concrete block fences for the street sides of property. Wood privacy fences may be allowed when installed in the rear yard and behind the front fagade of a property. Utilitarian/privacy fences should not be installed in front of a historic building or beyond the line of the front fagade of a historic building. Page 5 Replacing fences. If replacement is required due to deterioration, remove only those portions of historic fences that are damaged beyond repair and replace in-kind,matching the original in material, design and placement. If replacement is necessary for non-historic fences, or new fences are proposed,locate and design the fence in such a way that will compliment the historic boundary of the property without concealing the historic character of the property. SERVICE AND MECHANICAL AREAS Service and mechanical areas and equipment should be screened from the street and other pedestrian areas. All garbage and equipment storage areas should be screened from the street. Mechanical equipment, including satellite dishes,shall not be located in front or corner side yards or should be set back from the edges of roofs, and screened so that they are not visible to pedestrians and do not detract from the historic character of buildings. BUILDING FABRIC PRESERVATION Preserve, stabilize, and restore original building form, ornament and materials. Any missing or severely deteriorated elements may be replaced with replicas of the original. Ensure that roof,window, porch and cornice treatments are preserved,or when preservation is not possible duplicate the original building element. When rehabilitating, remove non-historic alterations. Often, "modern"renovations conceal the original facade details. If not, the original style may be recreated through the use of historic photographs. Where replication of original elements is not possible,a new design consistent with the original style of the building may be used. Reconstruction of building elements should reflect the size, scale, material and level of detail of the original design. Preserve older renovations that have achieved historic significance. Older structures or additions may have, at some time, been renovated with such care and skill that the renovation itself is worthy of preservation. Usually, such renovations may date from before 1940. EXTERIOR FINISHES Original wood finishes should be maintained and painted or, when necessary, replaced in kind. Modern synthetic siding materials such as vinyl or metal bear little resemblance to historic siding materials. The application of such modern synthetic materials often involves the removal of original decorative elements such as cornice, corner boards, brackets, window and door trim, etc. New synthetic siding shall not be installed;removal of existing such materials is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina,finish and appearance. Page 6 Original asbestos siding should be maintained and painted, or when necessary, replaced with synthetic siding to match the existing asbestos siding. The removal of asbestos siding over existing wood siding is not required,but strongly encouraged,to restore historic patina,finish and appearance. Original masonry surfaces should be maintained and not be painted, unless severe deterioration of the brick or stone can be shown to require painting. If the color or texture of replacement brick or stone cannot be matched with existing, painting may be an appropriate treatment. Paint colors should be complimentary to each other and the overall character of the house. When possible,research the original paint color and finishes of the building's historic period;the right colors respect the historic building. The Historic Preservation Commission shall adopt, as necessary, a paint palette(s)appropriate to the district's character,which may be proposed and approved through the Minor Exterior Alteration application process. Any colors proposed outside the adopted palette may be reviewed by the Commission in the regular Certificate of Appropriateness process. WINDOWS Original window framing and lites (panes of glass)configurations should be preserved and maintained or replaced in kind. When replacement is necessary,do so within existing historic opening. Replacement of non-original windows should consider the use of historically appropriate wood windows. Use same sash size to avoid filling in or enlarging the original opening. Clear or very slightly tinted window glass may be used. No reflective or heavily tinted glass shall be used. Should the owner wish to install security bars, they should be installed on the interior of windows and doors. Storm windows. The use of interior storm windows is encouraged. Storm windows are available which can be installed on the interior of windows. This helps to preserve the exterior historic character of the building. Should storm windows need to be installed on the exterior of the historic windows, storm windows constructed of wood and configured to match the historic sashes(i.e. one over one sashes)are recommended. If metal storm windows are installed, paint to blend with surrounding elements. EMBELLISHMENTS AWNINGS-CANOPIES New awnings and canopies should not be installed above windows or doors. EXTERIOR LIGHTING Lighting is an important element in residential areas. Fixtures should be consistent with the Page 7 historic character of the house. Appropriate incandescent light fixtures to the style of the district should be used. Avoid exposed lighting of any kind unless part of a historic fixture. NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION INFILL The Secretary of the Interior's guidelines for new buildings in historic districts encourage similarity of form and materials, but not actual replication. New construction proposals and the rehabilitation of non-historic buildings will be reviewed based on these Criteria. Judgement will be based on the compatibility of the design within the context of the property's adjacent and nearby historic buildings. The design of new buildings should have key elements of the building's historic period of significance including massing, scale, fenestration and materials. Infill buildings should not be absolute reproductions, and appear as clearly contemporary. Only when a previously demolished historic Grapevine building can be accurately replicated may a reproduction be considered. Infill buildings between historic buildings should be similar in setback, roof form, cornice line and materials, to one of the adjacent buildings. Relate height of new building to the heights of adjacent structures. Avoid new buildings that tower over existing ones. Horizontal wood siding (either novelty, tongue and groove, shiplap or equivalent) and brick are appropriate exterior building finishes for the historic house. Fake brick or stone or gravel aggregate materials shall never be used. ADDITIONS TO HISTORIC BUILDINGS Additions to historic buildings should replicate the style of the main building if possible; otherwise they should adhere to the general style with simplified details. As a minimum, new additions should reflect the massing, roof shape, bay spacing, cornice lines and building materials of the primary structure. All new wood or metal materials should have a painted finish except on some 2¢ury buildings where the use of unpainted aluminum or steel was part of the original design and should be maintained. A new addition should, if at all possible, be located at the rear of the historic building. If this is not possible, the addition may be added to the side if it is recessed at least 18 inches from the historic building facade or a connection is used to separate old from new. New vertical additions should be set back from primary facades so as not to be readily apparent from the facing street. Page 8 When reproducing elements that were originally part of a historic building they should be replicated when evidence of the actual detail has been documented by photographs, drawings, or remaining physical evidence. If no evidence exists, elements typical of the architectural style may be used. Historic photographs can provide information on the original elements of the building. Page 9 GRAPEVINE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION FORM 1. Name 116 (120)East Worth Street,Block 32,Lot 1 A and 1-B Historic Cameron Lumber Company Building And/or Lazy Bones Restaurant 2. Location Address 116 (120)East Worth Street Location/neighborhood College Heights National Register Historic District block/lot Block 32,Lot 1-A and 1-B tract size 3. Current zoning 4. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district _ public _ occupied — agriculture _ museum — building(s) X private _ unoccupied X commercial park structure X work in progress education residence X Site Accessible _ Entertainment Religious yes:restricted government scientific yes:unrestr. — industrial — transportation no milita ry other 5. Ownership Current owner: Baker Simpson Holdings LLC phone: Address: 2109 River Ridge Road city: Arlington state: Texas zip:76017 6. Form Preparation Name&title Sallie Andrews,HPP Consultant organization: Historic Preservation Commission Contact.Grapevine CVB–636 S.Main St. phone:817 410-3197 7. Representation on Existing Surveys X Tarrant County Historic Resources X National Register of Historic Places ...................... Recorded Texas Historic Landmark X Other 1935 Sanbom Fire Insurance Map Texas Archaeological Landmark for office use only 8. Date Rec'd: Survey Verified: Yes No 9. Field Chk date: By: 10. Nomination Archaeological _ Structure _ District Site X Structure&Site 11. Historic Ownership original owner C.C.Estill who sold the site to Wm.Cameron&Co. (lumber company) significant later owner(s): a church,cabinet shop,children's clothing store,various restaurants 12. Construction Dates Original ca. 1917 alterations/additions 13. Architect 2riginal construction The siding,which appears to be brick,is actually pressed wood. It is a highly unusual use of the material which has not been manufactured since about 1956.[1] Note from Tarrant Co.Historic Resources Survey alterations/additions 14. Site Features Comer commercial property located one block east of Main Street(National Register Listed)and facing on East Worth Street. 'This property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places as a part of the College Heights Residential District. 15. Physical Description–Current Structures Condition Check One: Check One: excellent _ deteriorated _ Unaltered X Original site Good — ruins X altered _ Moved(date:_) Fair _ unexposed Describe present and original(if known)physical appearance;include styles)of architecture,current condition and relationship to sum'omnding fabnc(stmdures,objects,etc.). Elaborate on pertinent materials used and styles)of arrhitectural detailing embel- lishments and site details. 11 qi_ q m/ II N II I 1 f II III ��M I .t I I I Wm.Cameron&Company,Inc.,office building c. 1917 Ravioli's Restaurant–photographed in 2002 Lot 32 Blocks 1-A and 1-B are located at the southeast corner of East Worth Street and Jenkins Street in the College Heights National Register Historic District that was designated in 1996. This site has been a commer- cial property site since 1917. The lot is one block east of the Main Street Historic District also listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The original site plan can be seen on 1935 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map(see below). 25 '.. � r w yy craws, This unusual building with a vaguely Georgian appearance served as the office building for the lumber com- pany. The main entrance was located in the center of the north gabled wall.Above the entrance was a semi- circular window,centered in the gable.An overhanging roof projected two feet beyond the walls with two foot cornice returns.Storefront windows were located to the left and right of the doorway.Two lumber storage sheds flanked the original office building on the east and west. Original clerestory windows punctuated the side walls of the building(see below). ff/a h Photo from Tarrant County Historic Resources Survey,published 1990. Later,this building was added on to along the east side.The original building design was duplicated and enlarged to form a new addition.A central covered passage way was added between the old and new structures enabling customers to enter either portion of the building.In 2000 the building was known as Ravioli's Restau- rant.. A fire destroyed the Wm.Cameron&Company buildings in April 2012 creating a public safety hazard. The building was demolished shortly after the fire occurred with the requirement that the property be landmarked and new construction would replace the historic building that had occupied the site for over 95 years. The building destroyed by fire was 3,772 sq.ft. The building lot is 16,610 sq.ft. 16. Historical Significance Statement of historical and cultural signifacame. Include: cultural influences,special et9entr and important personage,influences on neighborhood,on the city,etc. Block 32,Lots 1-A and 1-B were sold in 1917 by C.C.Estill,whose office was on Main Street and who was also in the lumber and construction business,to Wm. Cameron&Company for a new lumber company site. This building,constructed ca. 1917,was the local retail office of Wm.Cameron&Company,that was organized in 1867 and headquartered in Waco,Texas. By 1899,Wm.Cameron&Company had retail lumber yards in nearly all the major cities in Texas and employed 3,000 men in the state. While this building appeared to be brick,it was actually a wood frame building covered with a"brick look"composite sidling. Cameron Homes were built in Texas during the late 1930s through the 1960s. Known as economy homes,they offered working class citizens the opportunity to own their own modem homes at an affordable price. Cameron Homes were built to exact specifications set by Win.Cameron&Company,and all plans and specifications met the Federal Housing Administration and the Veteran's Administration requirements for quality materials and workmanship. Cameron Homes were sold on"Easy To Own"plans known as ETOs. The main requirement to quality for an ETO was that the purchaser owned his own lot outright and used it for collateral. The Cameron Company carried the loan on the ETO plan. Home prices were presented in either all-lumber or brick veneer designs,with prices ranging accordingly beginning at$2,070.20 for the shell house. Monthly payments as low as$15.14 per month plus taxes and insurance were routinely advertised in The Grapevine Sun. �t2Q PRODUCTS installed in the ""TEXAN" MODEL ROME DOOLEY STREET SEE THE EFFICIENT IDEAL KITCHEN r r: .v muslamnos Ass sslx Are 600mlG A6tryp WMAUMM tom woes zoo slavw6 IlallC An IDEALStepZavinq Iatdlsn sows Tho wbtaat onssmbla co.b*1. -Iles of lisps,adds extra hours of stalled almq one or Mara v WI& Cab- 191binsre,and multiplies housekeeping last grouplag can bo sdoonficany pleasure.The MEAL Kitchen of Your onto and to psavfd'a: 913 a food ear choice is made up of cahinels mud- Idgwaollan rand preparation tom, (Z) other utility twits In vumY sizes.You a eirlk oast'*ark wne,937 a 000klnq can salad w+d combine them to At and amving ,10 that all. "lag. MY sirs sold shape of kitchen so as ..'ate soad equl n t we alw s to give every dsehed oanvonWv,*e handy whoro oad when ed. jAdj Y F - 1i9EAL r1:LEn 1G'EAC bD.771tULrSL'CAhAN'.C7'sv f°ism=ari, 1 t1 to r h l y*u'r vdazrir d. adnia q,_f"u DEAL 1110111210 1111t1 Ill._y am*8ofw V—tl,trz," il h..N W'd 1u31, ECrl1 be mnx a grsa@ d. heot, 7anmr sdg.n CO., 111,,I,a All harm rsaax>t �vea M'olm pimllafnfitl�uw�xmnxt amfl kr}uac+d ti:d AQl.Tina ryuc3i17 rh' Ire Inv saelelm,Estra th. way and rare.. haul3a'. udj-A his r,hr•iv:ea. F'lj- rCr—S-^1-4 wear ktitw'd'4+a�Bouoarclg.. Tara.'f t�el�t Gaw Pd. wdI dslighm rou.6 1—d folds felaa dre • ...-. '� wail oul ad Iho W.V. Four mod b. ,.. .. _- """,,. IDRllt JIt41NiSmt Witt- / DOW UNZ71 Compleuhl `ry i _ ammhLd window and luny watheo- stripped,wood pnaersa the keeled lash and All, pee.Riled Into IDEAL Frome,with clew-slTle .., tpdnq-.P rand snd bd. m in the low prior ImEALM C101K range of unmaopd wtre C&6fffiEy1 Most dews without weather ...._ .: _ stdpp1ng useful cabinet In The h*msl E1pe. cia117 useful Fa/wfher:Metwefiee Blow—,of Ike full It"of IDEAL EdN. whole spurn Is al Ag F."I,see par Tewrnfe 6efNey.ajvI f defier,er wife a premium May Ow Ith dmW deredpilre fllereI"to-IDEAL COWANT,Gepl. be s mme3 Ink* 10.Wan,Tlra1. or atlaabed 16 wafL Urm. CAMERON & CO.. ,.,, i a f ("'asneroo. 's Home of" the Month p l 4 - kN-� y,�qp fPF wu o a ff" _-_ g s BEAUTIFUL SOUTHERN COLONIAL HOME 0, Low Cost. err ly p Meets F,h#.A, Reauirernents. For Irxl 0 cheaper price by changing sped ications. ] y Payments 1.3 Many complete home plans at our oKice- As s vrill h l rig Veneer We p you Finance. $3,W3.76 E A New Plan Each Month All Lumber P m. f . Cameron & Company, Inc. GraVevine, Texas Cameron's Home of the Month i fiy�l r��a i r ,r �r�JkN�ru, GOOD HOML AT LOW COS" Plsa,;and specifications meet the Yederxi Haaaaiang° Admintistratienvo reg"Joeteents as to quality mauaatealkrsls au W " orkmanship. Th home may be built for lc,, money than the price quoted by changing the plane and speeifkationt, Detailed plans and specifications of hundreds of bva dull hens to choose fran may be x&rn at our office. We Will Welp You Finance Under F. f �;I �� a � Each Co- plete Yam Rent Ready teaMove Ca�aer® {IS maraey Into for Co., Will guy $:,`4s$48-20 rape inee,Texas Home Wm.Cameron&Company earned the loyalty of Grapevine area customers. Its"Ideal Products Co."wholesale division offered a variety of"modem"convenience products constructed of high quality Ponderosa pine which could be installed in the Cameron Home. These products,manufactured in Waco,included four models of ironing hoards which folded into the wall,a bathroom cabinet with a built-in pull-down clothes hamper,and an Ideal telephone cabinet to keep your phone"out of the way and alww,,s handy." With custom high quality"work zoned"cabinets which could be"scientifi- cally arranged,"Cameron set the standard for the modern home in Grapevine. Wm.Cameron&Company built 52 homes in one year in Grapevine during the mid 1960s according to Lloyd Graves, assistant manager from 1946 to 1986. One"Texan"model home was constructed at the corner of Main and Franklin Streets and was purchased and later moved to Jean Street.Cameron also offered a program to completely remodel and modernize existing homes. Men who worked for Wm.Cameron&Company adhered to rigorous Cameron building specifications and created a generation of builders whose craftsmanship was unmatched. Cameron's high quality homes from an earlier day continue to provide local housing. In 1954 Cameron built a new lumber yard at 701 South Main(now the Grapevine Heritage Center).Wm.Cameron& Company was purchased about that same time by the Certain-Teed Products Corporation and ceased operation as Wm. Cameron Company in Grapevine. The building on East Worth Street was subsequently used for a church,cabinet shop, children's clothing shop,and several restaurants. 17. Bibliography Tarrant County Historic Resources Survey,1987;and research done by Sallie Andrews in 1997 for interpretive marker text. 18. Attachments X District or Site map .additional descriptive material _ Site flan Footnotes X Photos(historic¤t) Other Designation Merit A. Character,interest or value as part of X G. Identification as the work of an archi- e development,heritage or cultural tect or master builder whose individual characteristics of the City of Grape- work has influenced the development vine,State of Texas of the United of the city. States. B. Location as the site of a significant H. Embodiment of elements of architec- historical event. tural design,detail,materials or craftsmanship which represent a sig- nificant architectural innovation. C. Identification with a person or persons I. Relationship to other distinctive build- who significantly contributed to the ings,sites or areas which are eligible culture and development of the city. for preservation according to a plan based on historic,cultural or architec- tural motif. D. Exemplification of the cultural,eco- J. Unique location of singular physical X nomic,social or historical heritage of characteristics representing an estab- the city lished and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood,community or the city. E. Portrayal of the environment of a K. Archaeological value in that it has group of people in an era of history produced or can be expected to pro- characterized by a distinctive architec- duce data affecting theories of historic tural style. or prehistoric value. F. Embodiment of distinguishing charac- X L. Value as an aspect of community sen- X teristics of an architectural type or timent or public pride. specimen. Recommendation The Grapevine Township Revitalization Program re- quests the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commis- Burl Gilliam,Chair sion to deem this nominated landmark meritorious of Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission designation as outlined in Chapter 39,City of Grape- vine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. David Klempin Further,the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commis- Historic Preservation Officer sion endorses the Preservation Criteria,policy recom- mendations and landmark boundary as presented by the City of Grapevine Development Services Depart- Scott Williams,Director ment. Development Services Department Historical Marker The Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission and the Grapevine Historical Society have a cooperative marker pro- gram for properties that are officially(individually or located within)designated Historic Landmark Sub-districts. Please indicate if you are interested in obtaining one or both markers for your property. There is no fee for either of the mark- ers,however,the Grapevine Historical Society will only fund two(2)of the medallion and text plaque(second option), per year,on a first come,first serve basis. Check One: o Yes,I am interested in obtaining a bronze Historic Landmark Plaque for my property from the Historic Preservation Commission. I understand there is no fee for this plaque. o No,I am not interested in obtaining a marker for my property. ------------------------------------------------------------- p Yes,I am interested in obtaining a bronze Historic Marker(medallion and text plaque)for my property from the Grapevine Historical Society. Below for office use only o Historic Preservation Commission's o Historic Preservation Commission's Historic Landmark Plaque. Historic District Plaque. rn i ilk". II o Grapevine Historical Society's Historic Landmark Marker. r 4 i I I r i 1 o Historic Landmark Marker, o Historic District Marker, o Historic Landmark Marker, o Historic District Marker, existing GHS marker. existing GHS marker. new GHS marker. new GHS marker. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ISSUING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 48 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE, BY GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CU12-31 TO AMEND THE SITE PLAN APPROVED BY ORDINANCE NO. 88-31 FOR THE POSSESSION, STORAGE, RETAIL SALE AND ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES (BEER, WINE AND MIXED BEVERAGES) IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT IN A DISTRICT ZONED "CBD" CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00)AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a conditional use permit by making applications for same with the Planning&Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine,Texas,did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air,the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS,the City Council further considered among other things the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this City; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Grapevine,Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this conditional use permit, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved propertywith reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the conditional use permit lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population,facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this conditional use permit and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this conditional use permit for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, an is in the best interest of the public at ORD. NO. 2 large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine,Texas, same being also known as Appendix"D"of the City Code, by granting Conditional Use Permit CU12-31 to amend the site plan approved by Ordinance No. 88-31 to allow the possession, storage, retail sale and on-premise consumption of alcoholic beverages (beer,wine and mixed beverages)in conjunction with a restaurant (Lazy Bones), in a district zoned "CBD" Central Business District within the following described property: Lots 1 Al and 16, Block 32, City of Grapevine Addition (120 East Worth Street) all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit"A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein conditional use permit. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future;to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safely from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation,water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business,commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine,Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. ORD. NO. 3 Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00)and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. That the fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 21st day of August, 2012. APPROVED: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ORD. NO. 4 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS DESIGNATING A HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTICT HL12-05 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 39 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 (APPENDIX"D"OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES), DESIGNATING THE AREA PLATTED AS LOTS 1A1 AND 1B, BLOCK 32, CITY OF GRAPEVINE ADDITION AND MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, IN A DISTRICT ZONED "CBD" CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE CAMERON LUMBER BUILDING HISTORIC DISTRICT PRESERVATION CRITERIA; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE, AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH AN OFFENSE OCCURS OR CONTINUES; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made by the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission requesting a historic landmark subdistrict designation by making application for same with the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested historic landmark subdistrict designation should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 39 of Appendix "D" of the Code of Ordinances have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered, among otherthings, the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this historic landmark subdistrict, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearily requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the historic landmark subdistrict designation lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this historic landmark subdistrict designation and has also found, and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that historic landmark subdistrict designation for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby designate a historic landmark subdistrict (HL12-05) in accordance with Section 39 of Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine,Texas same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, in a district zoned "CBD" Central Business District within the following described property: 120 East Worth Street, specifically described as Lots 1 Al and 1 B, Block 32, City of Grapevine Addition, more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A", attached hereto and made a part of hereof; and, in addition thereto, the adoption of the Cameron Lumber Building Historic District Preservation Guidelines as conditions, regulations and safeguards in connection with the ORD. NO. 2 said historic landmark subdistrict, a copy of said criteria being attached hereto and labeled Exhibit "B". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the "H" zoning designation. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets;to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation,water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars {$2,000.00} and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. That the fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. ORD. NO. 3 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 21st day of August, 2012. APPROVED: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ORD. NO. 4