Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ Item 12 - Minutes-r*-'& Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 18,2006 ADJOURNMENT After a brief discussion, Chairman Oliver adjourned the meeting at 7:36 p.m. MIM91 SiMM1011 F.'J a =TOM "D ATTEST: SAWTITIM NOTE: Planning and Zoning Commission continued with the Joint Public Hearing 041806 K P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 18, 2006 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Joint Public Hearing with the City Council, on this the 18th day of April, 2006, in the City Council Chambers, 200 South Main Street, 2nd Floor, Grapevine, Texas with the following members present -to -wit: Larry Oliver Chairman Chris Coy Member Danette Murray Member B J Wilson Member Becky St. John Member Rob Undersander Member Andrea Roy Alternate Mark Lowery Alternate constituting a quorum with Herb Fry absent, and the following City Staff: Scott Williams Acting Development Services Director Ron Stombaugh Development Manager Scott Dyer Manager of Engineering Albert Triplett Planner II Susan Batte Administrative Secretary CALL TO ORDER Mayor Tate called the joint meeting to order at 7:39 p.m. and Chairman Oliver called the Planning and Zoning Commission deliberation session to order at 9:20 p.m. INVOCATION Councilmember Ted Ware delivered the Invocation. JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS First for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was amendments to Section 41, "PD" Planned Development Overlay. Since it's adoption April 19, 2005 varying degrees of concern have surrounded the planned development concept relative to its appropriateness, intent, and application. Given the few remaining unique vacant tracts of land left to develop in the City the possibility exists that as this property develops, a planned development overlay will be a 041806 3 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 18, 2006 "? part of the process. The same holds true for existing developed property that evolves and redevelops. Based on a worksession held with the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 28, 2006, Staff has incorporated the comments and suggestions from that meeting into a new document. In particular, a statement has been added to the "Purpose" section relative to the objective of a planned development overlay and the "Application" section was amended adding direct and specific information pertaining to the requirements necessary for filing a planned development overlay. A definition of "redevelopment" has been provided, an additional statement added to the "Period of Validity" section, the masonry requirements have been reinstated and lastly a section has been added requiring compliance with all Subdivision Regulations and Construction Standards. A suggestion was made to revisit the "Purpose" clause at a later time, some of the language seems to be redundant. With no further questions, guests to speak, nor letters or petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commissioner's deliberation session. Chris Coy moved to approve zoning ordinance amendment AM06-03. B J Wilson seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Coy, Murray, Wilson, St John, Undersander and Roy Nays: None STONE BRIDGE OAKS Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Zone Change Request Z06-03 and Planned Development Overlay PD06-06 submitted by Laurie Gillespie for property located at 4600 State Highway 360 and proposed to be platted as Lots 1-16, Block 1, Lots 1-8, Block 2, Lots 1-11, Block 3, Lots 1-18, Block 4, Lots 1-8 Block 5, Lots 1-18 Block 6, Lots 1-20, Block 7, Lots 1-22, Block 8, Lots 1-8 Block 9, Lots 1-9, Block 10, Lot 1, Block 11, Lot 1, Block 12, Lot 1, Block 13, Lot 1, Block 14, Lot 1, Block 15, Lot 1, Block 16, Stone Bridge Oaks. The applicant was requesting to rezone approximately 23.577 acres from "R -MF -1" Multifamily District to "R-TH" Townhouse District and a planned development overlay to include but not limited to deviation from lot width relative to front entry garage access, building coverage, front, rear and side yard setbacks, buffer area and building separation. Ms. Laurie Gillespie, the applicant, requested favorable consideration of the application. She presented a complete overview of the proposed development. Discussion ensued regarding tree protection during construction, street width, parking along the street, parking on site, sidewalks, deed restrictions. M P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 18 ,2006 Ms. Melissa Clause, a Grapevine resident, spoke regarding preserving the natural landscape, widening of Euless -Grapevine Road and animal relocation. With no further questions, guests to speak, three letters of support and three letters of protest, the public hearing was continued. CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST CU06-06 AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD 06-04 FAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request CU06-06 and Planned Development Overlay Request PD06-04 submitted by Dr. Ed Smith for property located at 729 East Dallas Road and proposed to be platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Faith Christian School Addition. The applicant was requesting a conditional use permit to allow for a non-profit educational institution in the "Ll" Light Industrial District and a planned development overlay to exceed the height requirement for ball -field light standards. Dr. Ed Smith, the applicant, requested favorable consideration of the application. Dr. Smith stated that the lights for the athletic field would be used for football games only. Mr. Dwight Ticknor, Mr. Bill Deacon, Mr. Mark Connell and Mr. Gary Hazelwood, all Grapevine residents, spoke in support of the new development. With no further questions, guests to speak, 16 letters in support, one petition with 38 signatures in support and two letters in protest, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session, Chris Coy moved to approve conditional use request CU06-06. B J Wilson seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Coy, Murray, Wilson, St John, Undersander and Roy Nays: None In the Commission's deliberation session, B J Wilson moved to approve planned development overlay request PD06-04. Danette Murray seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Coy, Murray, Wilson, St John, Undersander and Roy Nays: None FINAL PLAT APPLICATION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, FAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 1, Block 1, Faith Christian School, submitted by Dr. Ed Smith for property located north of Dallas Road 041806 5 and west of Dawn Lane. The applicant was final platting 9.688 acres for the development of an upper education building and sports facility. In the Commission's deliberation session Danette Murray moved to approve the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 1, Block 1, Faith Christian School, Chris Coy seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Coy, Murray, Wilson, St John, Undersander and Roy Nays: None • • • � - • 1. �: • Next for the Commission to consider was Conditional Use Request CU06-08 submitted by BGO Architects, Inc. for property located at 1301 William D. Tate Avenue and platted as Lot 4, Block 1, Hayley Addition. The applicant was requesting a conditional use permit to amend the previously approved site plan of CU05-04 (Ord. 05-10) for a planned commercial center, specifically to allow the possession, storage, retail sale and on -premise consumption of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine and mixed beverages) in conjunction with a restaurant. Mr. Philip Morley, representing the applicant, was available for questions and requested favorable consideration of the application. Mr. Morley stated that parking lot repair would take place in phase one of the construction. Discussion was also held regarding that William D. Tate Avenue sign, the applicant and staff will look into solutions to redesign the turning lane and island. With no further questions, guests to speak, nor letters or petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commissioner's deliberation session, Chris Coy moved to approve conditional use request CU06-08, Ron Undersander seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Coy, Murray, Wilson, St John, Undersander and Roy Nays: None ADDITION Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lots 6 & 7, Block 1, SH 26/Pool Road Addition, submitted by Huntington Corporation for property located at 2260 Pool Road. The applicant was final platting 1.427 acres to plat the two existing buildings into two lots. In the Commission's deliberation session Danette Murray moved to approve the M HEARING APRIL006 Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lots 6 & 7, Block 1, SH 26/Pool Road, B J Wilson seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Coy, Murray, Wilson, St John, Undersander and Roy Nays: None END OF PUBLIC HEARING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was the Statement of Findings and Preliminary Plat Application of Stone Bridge Oaks, submitted by Schatz Consulting Engineers, Inc. for property located between State Highway 360 and Euless -Grapevine Road. The applicant was preliminary platting 23.577 acres for the development of 138 residential lots, 5 green space lots and one private access lot. In the Commission's deliberation session Chris Coy moved to deny the Statement of Findings and Preliminary Plat Application of Stone Bridge Oaks, Danette Murray seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Coy, Murray, Wilson, St John, Undersander and Roy Nays: None FINAL PLAT APPLICATION OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Stone Bridge Oaks, submitted by Schatz Consulting Engineers, Inc. for property located between State Highway 360 and Euless -Grapevine Road. The applicant was final platting 23.577 acres for the development of 138 residential lots, 5 green space lots and one private access lot. In the Commission's deliberation session Chris Coy moved to deny the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Stone Bridge Oaks, Danette Murray seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Coy, Murray, Wilson, St John, Undersander and Roy Nays: None PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION OF LOT 1,BLOCK 1. THE OFFICES AT GRAPEVINE 360 Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was the Statement of Findings and Preliminary Plat Application of Lot 1, Block 1, The Offices at Grapevine 360, submitted by Poynter Scifres Companies for property located 041806 VA �10i mit 1111 �. on the west side of State Highway 360 and south of the Southern Baptist Convention Addition. The applicant was preliminary platting 2.206 acres for the development of a commercial building. In the Commission's deliberation session Becky St John moved to approve the Statement of Findings and Preliminary Plat Application of Lot 1, Block 1, The Offices at Grapevine 360, Danette Murray seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Coy, Murray, Wilson, St John, Undersander and Roy Nays: None _,. Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 1, Block 1, The Offices at Grapevine 360, submitted by Poynter Scifres Companies for property located on the west side of State Highway 360 and south of the Southern Baptist Convention Addition. The applicant was final platting 2.206 acres for the development of a commercial building. In the Commission's deliberation session Becky St John moved to approve the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 1, Block 1, The Offices at Grapevine 360, Danette Murray seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Coy, Murray, Wilson, St John, Undersander and Roy Nays: None CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES Next for the Commission to consider were the Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of the March 21, 2006 Commission meeting. Rob Undersander moved to approve the Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of March 21, 2006 as written, Chris Coy seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Coy, Murray, Wilson, St John and Undersander Nays: None Abstain: Roy ADJOURNMENT With no further business to discuss, Danette Murray moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:50 p.m., Chris Coy seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 041806 P HEARING APRIL: 00 Ayes: Oliver, Coy, Murray, Wilson, St John, Undersander and Roy Nays: None PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF MAY 2006. SECRETARY 041806 9