HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-04-050912020=
LWWAI M M COX0 4*4 0
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met
in a special workshop session, Tuesday, April 5, 1983, at 6:30 P.M. in
the Conference Chambers of City Hall, 413 Main Street. The following
members of the Commission were present, to wit:
Sharron Spencer
Chairman
Harlen Joyce
Member
Ann Glynn
Member
Tom Powers
Member
Klee Hawkins
Member
Gerald Norman
Member
constituting a quorum, with Vice Chairman Ron Cook absent, and the
following City Staff, to wit:
John Boyle City Attorney
J.R. Baddaker, P.E. Director of Public Works
Steve Richardson City Planner
Joy Welch Secretary
Chairman Spencer called the meting to order, explaining the procedures
and purposes of the meting.
The purpose of the workshop session was to allow the Commission to
discuss and review proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance, 70-10.
Mr. Richardson distributed copies of the list he had prepared which was
formulated at previous meetings by Commissioners who had requested that
such a list be made available for their review. Areas in need of
revision were addressed in zoning categories, R-1, R-3, C-1, C-2, I-1,
and 1-2 as follows:
"R-1": Minimum floor area;
"R-3": landscaping requirements; masonry requirements; sideyard
requirements (Sec.7-302...Where a building is erected or structurally
altered for dwelling purposes...; maximum density requirements (20
units/acre); buildable area (nothing, including a permanent parking area
shall be built in the floodpronearea); site plan review;
"C-1": landscaping requirements; masonry requirements; mechanical
equipment no nearer than 120 feet to any residentially zoned district;
screened garbage storage on a concrete pad no nearer than 30 feet to a
residentially zoned district; screening for parking- (1) Ord. 70-10 = 3
feet (p.1960), (2) Ord. 82-73 = 6 feet (p.2152);
"C-2": same as "C-1";
"I -l": landscaping requirements; mechanical equipment no nearer
than 120 feet to any residentially zoned district; provisions for the
parking of automobiles provided that such provisions within 60 feet of a
residentially zoned district shall be separated from said lot by a blind
fence or a wall at least 6 feet high; rear yard - 30 feet; screened
garbage storage on a concrete pad no nearer than 30 feet to a
residentially zoned district; outside storage, provided that such
storage shall be completely encompassed by a blind fence or wall at
least 7 feet high and provided that materials stored shall be stacked no
higher than 1 foot below the top of the fence or wall; surfacing of
storage areas; height requirement of ML; permitted uses;
P&Z Special Workshop Minutes
4-5-83
Page 2
"1-219: permitted uses.
The general consensus was that there no additions to the list were
needed at this time; however, a recommendation was made, in addressing
the R-3 category, to correct "site plan review" to read "site plan
approval", and the Mr. Richardson agreed to make this correction. There
was a short discussion relative to the rough draft of the "Sign
Ordinance". The consensus of Comissioners was to direct the City Staff
to set a public hearing date for hearing the proposed ordinance
revision for 70-10.
Mr. Richardson distributed a clipping from a publication on judicial
decisions relative to zoning, ie. Mobile Homes. There was a brief
discussion, after which City Attorney, John Boyle discussed at length
alternative methods for dealing with the most prevalent zoning problems,
followed by a question and answer session.
At approximately 7:30 PM, Klee Hawkins made a motion to adjourn the
meeting. The motion was seconded by Harlen Joyce and prevailed by the
following vote:
Ayes: Spencer, Joyce, Glynn, Powers, Hawkins and Norman
Nays: None
Absent: Cook
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE? DAY O/1 1983.
Chairman
RIM&W
Secretgy
The Planning and Zoning ConiTtission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met
in Regular Session, Tuesday, April 5, 1983, at 7:30 P.M. in the Civic
Center, 411 Main Street. The following members of the Con -mission were
present, to wit:
Sharron Spencer Chairman
Ron Cook Vice Chairman
Harlen Joyce Member
Tom Powers Member
Klee Hawkins Member
Gerald Norman Member
constituting a quorum, with Member Mrs. Ann Glynn having resigned prior
to the meting, relevant to husband, Mr.Jim Glynn's, election and
subsequent assumption of the Place 3, City Council position this same
evening. The following City Staff were present, to wit:
J.R. Baddaker Director of Public Works
Steve Richardson City Planner
Doug Eberhart Engineer
Joy Welch Secretary
Chairman Spencer called the meting to order at approximately 8:45 P.M.,
following the Joint Public Hearing in the Council Chambers, 413 Main
Street, and advised those present of the procedures and purposes of the
meeting.
ZONING APPLICATION Z83-11 - CHRIS BROOKS, DVM
The first item for consideration by the Commission for the purpose of
making a recommendation to the City Council was Zoning Application
Z83-11 submitted by Dr. Chris Brooks.
In the earlier public hearing session, Mr. Baddaker explained that the
application was to rezone .5 acres, the location of which being Lot 1,
and part of Lots 2-4, Block 1, of the W. C. Lucas Addition from the
present "S -P" Specific Use for a grass sales and landscaping business to
the proposed "S -P" Site Plan for the construction and operation of a
veterinary hospital with animals being kept overnight during periods of
treatment and not to be a kennel and further providing for the operation
of a landscaping and grass sales establishment. He further informed
those present that the Master Plan's recommended use is for commercial
purposes.
Mr. Baddaker then introduced Mr. Lou Hillman, a local realtor, who
advised those present and indicated on the site plan, the proposed
location of the veterinary clinic, the landscaping -grass sales location,
and the proposed strip -shopping area, all of which, he said, would be
compatible with the requested commercial zoning category.
Commission Member Harlen Joyce and Chairman Spencer questioned Mr.
Hillman relative to a large number of vehicles consistently being parked
on the grass sales property. There was a lengthy discussion, during
which Dr. Brooks expressed a desire to eliminate the request for the
landscaping -grass sales business from the site plan. City Attorney
Boyle and Mayor Tate advised Mr. Brooks and his associates that it would
be necessary to revise the site plan before the final portion of the
Council Meeting following the Planning and Zoning Com-nission
consideration and their subsequent recommendation to the Council.
P&Z Regular Meeting
4-19-83
Page 2
Mr. Jessie Woods, a neighboring property owner, spoke in favor of the
zoning change for the purpose of the veterinary clinic; however, Mr.
Woods suggested that the applicant should clarify, in writing, that
there would be no outdoor kennels, outdoor runs or any outdoor housing
of animals. Dr. Brooks concurred with Mr. Woods, indicating that it was
never his intention to permit any of the uses objected to by Mr. Woods.
Four letters were received prior to the meting from neighboring
property owners Lois Buckner, Mike Ross, and Doil Dalton, all in favor
of the request for replat.
In the Commission portion of the meting, there was a lengthy discussion
relative to traffic problems possibly being created by the location of
the drive on the site plan. It was the general consensus of the
Commission and City Staff Members, Mr. Eberhart and Mr. Richardson that
the drive should be moved. Specifically, Vice Chairman Cook indicated
that the same "no right turn" situation would possibly result as had the
car wash business on Northwest Highway even though there would not likely
be a comparable amount of traffic generated by the veterinary business.
The Commission advised the applicant to agree to table Zoning
Application Z83-11 to allow sufficient time to revise the site -plan and
to incorporate the following Commission suggestion: to move the clinic
as far to the westerly edge of the site plan, further from Lucas, to
enable drives to be further apart while providing room for more
parking spaces, which, would permit adequate spaces should there be
future expansion. In response to Dr. Brooks' question relative to front
and side yard requirements for this district, Mr. Richardson advised
that the front setback should be 25 feet, but no side yard would be
required if no openings or windows existed in the sides of the building.
The applicant indicated that he did not wish to table the request for
rezoning at the present time.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Spencer called for a motion.
Member Joyce made a motion to deny the request. The motion failed for
lack of a second. Following further discussion, Member Joyce again
moved to deny the request. Vice Chairman Cook seconded the motion which
resulted in the following tie vote:
Ayes: Spencer, Cook and Joyce
Nays: Powers, Hawkins and Norman
Chairman Spencer advised those present that a tie vote constitutes a
denial according to City Attorney Boyle.
The next item for consideration by the Commission was the Replat of Lot
2, Block 1 of Rolling Hills Lane Addition for the purpose of making a
recommendation to the City Council.
In the earlier public hearing session, Mr. Baddaker advised those
present that the replat proposes to split Lot 2 into two, one-half acre
lots and that the plat conform to all subdivision and "R-1" zoning
requirements. Mr. Baddaker, then gave a brief history of the subject
Pool Road property, advising that no deed restrictions had been recorded
and he further advised that one petition having 16 signatures had been
received from area property owners, though not adjoining owners.
P&Z Regular Meeting
4-19-83
Page 3
During this portion of the meeting, affidavits from two Rolling Hills
residents were received expressing approval of the requested replat.
Mr. Baddaker introduced the applicant, Mr. C. L. Madden, who in answer
to questions from. Mayor Tate and Chairman Spencer, indicated that there
were residents on the subject lots and that his home was situated on Lot
2 A -R. Mr. Madden also advised that every lot behind his property was
one-half (2) acre in size. City Attorney Boyle advised that the only
legal recourse available to objecting property owners to constitute a
basis for denial of the request for replat would be deed restrictions.
In this instance, deed restrictions were not located and no adjoining
property owners had signed the petition requesting replat denial.
The City Secretary read into the record a letter from. Zeta Crews who
expressed disapproval of the zoning change request. Those present to
request denial of the replat were J. T. Davis of 3122 Rolling Hills
Lane, Jack Billington of 3407 Rolling Hills Lane, an adjacent property
owner to the east of the applicant's property, David Briggs of 3412
Rolling Hills Lane, Ronnie Clark, 3218 Rolling Hills Lane, located
across the street and to the north, Cathy Cooper of 3526 Rolling Hills
Lane, Bob Burrus of 3131 Rolling Hills Lane, located at the dead end of
the street and Maria Hill of 3309 Rolling Hills Lane.
In the Commission's portion of the meting, this item was postponed
until last, in order to move the meting to the Conference Room to
confer with the City Attorney relative to this item.
Klee Hawkins made a motion to adjourn the meeting in the Civic Center
for the purpose of readjourning in the Conference Room, 413 Main, Tom
Powers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Powers, Hawkins and Norman
Nays: None
Chairman Spencer, then, called the meting to order in the Conference
Room, 413 Main Street.
After, having head the other agenda items, the Commission held a short
discussion relative to the merits of this case, considering those
presentations during the public hearing session, after which Chairman
Spencer called for a motion.
Vice Chairman Cook made a motion to recommend approval of the replat as
submitted, and it was seconded by Klee Hawkins with the prevailing vote
as follows:
Ayes: Cook, Powers, Hawkins, and Norman
Nays: Spencer and Joyce
P&Z Regular Meeting
4-19-83
Page 4
The next item for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission
was the replat of a portion of Lot 4, Ruth Wall Addition for the purpose
of making a recommendation to the City Council.
In the earlier public hearing session, Mr. Baddaker explained that this
proposed replat is immediately west of the car wash located on the east
end of Northwest Highway, presently zoned "C-2", and that it meets City
requirements.
Mr. Baddaker, then introduced Mr. and Mrs. Arthur White, the applicants.
Questions from the Planning and Zoning Commission and Council pertained
to the intended use of the building proposed. Mr. White advised that it
would be used for a car cleaning facility. The City Secretary reported
that there were no letters or petitions, and there were none in the
audience to speak relative to this replat.
In the Commission portion of the meting, there was no discussion;
therefore, Chairman Spencer called for a motion. Harlen Joyce made a
motion to recommend that the City Council approve the replat as
submitted. Tom Powers seconded the motion which prevailed by the
following vote:
Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Powers, Hawkins and Norman
Nays: None
REPTIAT OF A PORTION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 51, OF THE ORIGINAL TOWN OF
GRAPEVINE
The next item for consideration by the Commission was the replat of a
portion of Lot 1, Block 51, of the Original Town of Grapevine, for the
purpose of making a recommendation to the City Council.
In the earlier public hearing session, Mr. Baddaker advised that this
replat is located east of the Police Department and Library building at
Church and West Dallas Road. He further advised that it is presently
zoned "C-2". There was some discussion relative to the planned use of
the property and the availability of a sewer easement. Mr. Baddaker
introduced the applicant, who, in answer to questions advised that there
were plans for Lots 1-R and 3-R, but the owners wanted to retain the
present zoning on Lot 1-R.
The City Secretary advised that no letters or petitions were received.
In the later Commission meeting, after a short discussion relative to a
sewer line easement, Gerald Norman made a motion to recommend that the
City Council approve the replat as submitted. Harlen Joyce seconded the
motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Powers, Hawkins and Norman
Nays: None
The next item for consideration by the Ccmission for the purpose of
making a recommendation to the City Council was the final plat of the
D -EW Airfreight Center Addition.
P&Z Minutes
4-19-83
Page 5
Mr. Baddaker discussed this final plat which he advised fronts on Spur
382 and contains approximately 9.4 acres. The property is presently
zoned "I-1" and "C-2", and is immediately south of the Ryder Truck
Rental facility, and the utility easements are available. He further
advised that the proposed use of the property is for air freight ware-
houses, and a zone change will be required on the portion of the plat
that is shown being recorded in Volume 57-18, Page 617 of the Tarrant
County Deed Records, if this property is to be developed as proposed.
Mr. Baddaker described a possible modification to the Thoroughfare Plan
should this final plat be approved. He advised that the City Staff
would recommend that the plat be approved as submitted.
Chairman Spencer asked if signalization was planned for a future date,
to which Mr. Baddaker advised that at the present time there is not, but
it would be appropriate.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Spencer called for a motion.
Tom Powers made the motion to recommend that the City Council approve
the final plat as submitted. Harlen Joyce seconded the motion which
prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Powers, Hawkins and Norman
Nays: None
FRIffiffiff U-1 i T11 Uri -a-, I "if
At this point in the meting, there was a motion to adjourn by Gerald
Norman, and Harlen Joyce seconded the motion which prevailed by the fol-
lowing vote:
Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Powers, Hawkins and Powers
Nays: None
10 N B4 Ian NNIM OWWW"ill LOW)
Having realized an oversight on agenda items, the meeting was reconvened
at approximately 9:50 P.M. in the Conference Room to consider a
recommendation to the City Council relative to the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance 70-10 and Ordinance 82-73.
Tom Powers made a motion to table any consideration of this agenda item
for rescheduling at a special meeting. Vice Chairman Cook seconded the
motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Powers, Hawkins, and Norman
Nays: None
FAN"WINTFr-Wil-ITU 1_2 N611
Harlen Joyce, then made a motion to readjourn the meeting at
approximately 10 P.M. Vice Chairman Cook seconded the motion which
prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Powers, Hawkins and Norman
Nays: None
P&Z Minutes
4-19-83
Page 5
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING C07SSION OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ON THIS THE DAY OF 1983.
SecretYm
#�r I
v
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met
in Special Session, Tuesday, April 5, 1983, at 7:35 P.M. in the Confer-
ence room of City Hall, 413 Main Street. The following members of the
Commission were present, to wit:
Sharron Spencer
Chairman
Harlen Joyce
Member
Arm Glynn
Member
Tom Powers
Member
Klee Hawkins
Member
Gerald Norman
Member
constituting a quorum, with Vice Chairman Ron Cook absent, and the
following City Staff:
J.R. Baddaker Director of Public Works
Steve Richardson City Planner
Doug Eberhart Engineer
Joy Welch Secretary
Chairman Spencer called the meting to order, explaining the procedures
and purposes of the meeting.
The first item for consideration by the Commission for the purpose of
making a recommendation to the City Council was Zoning Application
Z83-10 submitted by Robert L. Taylor.
In the earlier public hearing, Mr. Baddaker explained that the
application was to rezone a present "R-1" (Single Family) and "R-2"(TWo
Family) area to "P.O."(Professional Office). At the March 15 meting of
the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission, Mr. Taylor's
request for a "C -C" Zoning was denied by the Council on a recommendation
by the Commission with advice to Mr. Taylor that a more appropriate
zoning for use as an office would be "P.O." Mr. Baddaker introduced
Mr. Taylor who advised that he appreciated the opportunity to re -apply
for the zoning change. He further advised that since he had previously
explained his request in detail, that he would dispense with any further
explanation, but would be happy to answer any questions. Council Member
Breken asked if there would be adequate parking facilities. Mr. Taylor
advised that there would be six (6) off-site parking spaces. Mayor
Pro -Tem Ware advised that six (6) spaces are adequate. The City
Secretary advised that one letter expressing approval had been received
from John Stevenson. There was no further discussion in the public
hearing session.
After a brief discussion during the Corm -fission meeting, Member Powers
made the motion to recommend approval of Zoning request Z83-10 as
submitted. Ann Glynn seconded the motion which prevailed by the
following vote:
Ayes: Spencer, Joyce, Glynn, Powers, Hawkins and Norman
Nays: None
Absent: Cook
The next item for consideration by the Commission for the purpose of
making a recommendation to the City Council was the final plat of the
Autumn Hills Addition.
P&Z Minutes
4-5-83
Page 2
At the meeting of March 29, a recommendation for approval of the final
plat of Autumn Hills was tabled to permit engineers time to correct a
drafting error on the plat for Lots 11 and 12. Mr. Baddaker advised
that this had been accomplished to reflect the 7,500 square foot minimum
lot size as required by the zoning ordinance, and Mr. Baddaker further
advised that he foresaw no problems associated with provision of
utilities for the area and that modifications to the drainage flume
would need to be made, but this area would be monitored to prevent any
drainage problems. member Joyce questioned Mr. Baddaker as to future
plans for an additional through street since there is only two outlets
shown to be available. Following a brief discussion, Harlen Joyce made
a motion to recommend that the Council approve the Final Plat of Autumn
Hills, and Gerald Norman seconded the motion which prevailed by the
following vote:
Ayes: Spencer, Joyce, Glynn, Powers, Hawkins and Norman
Nays: None
Absent: Cook
REVISED PLAT • THE CREEKWOOD WEST, PHASE II ADDITION
The next item for consideration by the Commission for the purpose of
making a recommendation to the City Council was the final plat of the
Creekwood West, Phase II Addition.
Mr. Baddaker advised that the original plat had been approved by the
Council at the meeting of March 15, however, since that time Mr.
Grantland had requested that one lot in Block 4 of this addition be
eliminated. Chairman Spencer questioned Mr. Baddaker about the actual
paved area in the 25 foot alley easement. Mr. Baddaker advised that 20
feet would be paved, adequate area for two cars to pass.
There being no further discussion, Gerald Norman made a motion to
recommend that the Council approve the plat as submitted. The motion
was duly seconded by Harlen Joyce, and prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Spencer, Joyce, Glynn, Powers, Hawkins and Norman
Nays: None
Absent: Cook
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF MARCH 29, 1983
The next item for consideration by the Commission was the Minutes of the
March 29 Meeting.
The Chairman called for corrections or additions. There were none, and
Klee Hawkins made a motion to approve the minutes as written. The
motion was seconded by Harlen Joyce, and prevailed by the following
vote:
Ayes: spencer, Joyce, Glynn, Powers, Hawkins and Norman
Nays: None
Absent: Cook
ME. PATTI HOFF
The next item for the Commission to hear was relative to plans for a
proposed property development
in the southeast portion of the city.
Chairman Spencer introduced Ms. Patti Hoff who, in turn introduced Mr.
Clyde Hueppelsheuser, and distributed literature describing the planned
"Bear run" development.
P&Z Minutes
4-5-83
Page 3
Mr. Hueppelsheuser outlined plans for the development, after which
Commissioners questioned him on items relative to location, access, etc.
Mr. Hueppelsheuser stressed the three planned phases of the development
and that "quality" would be maintained through out each phase. The
estimated time required for completion of all three phases would be
eight (8) years. Structures would be single family -attached with a "0"
lot line. Streets built by the developer would be 50 feet with 30 feet
of pavement and would be built by code standards. The zoning requested
would most likely be "PUD". ColTmissioners questioned the size of the
cul -d -sacs, and it was determined that they met fire code requirements.
Mr. Hueppelsheuser repeatedly stressed that these condominiums would
attract those who enjoyed a country setting with acccmuodations for
horses and tennis facilities.
There was further short discussion relative to the plans for "Bear Run."
There being no further business to come before the Commission, at
approximately 9:00 P.M., Commissioner Klee Hawkins made a motion to
adjourn, and Harlen Joyce seconded the motion which prevailed by the
following vote:
Ayes: Spencer, Joyce, Glynn, Powers, Hawkins and Norman
Nays: None
Absent: Cook
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS TBE,,,-/ DAY OF 19
APPROVED:
CHAIRMAN
SEC RETARY,17-