The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1979-10-02STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevines Texas met in Regular Session on the 2nd day of October, 1979 with the following persons present to -wit: Dwayne Rogers Harlen Joyce Sharron Spencer Ron Cook Robert Sands R.O. "Bob" Stewart ,.Jerry Burgess Chairman - Member_ �y - Member - Member - Member Me r !/ ' constituting a quor-Lm. with J. R. Ba.ddaker, City Engineer and Bobbie Phillippe, Acting Secretary also in attendance. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Dwayne Rogers called the meeting to order. OLD BUSINESS ZONING APPLICATION Z79-27 (HAND) The first order of business was for the Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z79-27 and make a recommendation to the City Council. The item was tabled at the meeting held on September 18, 1979. Member Bob Stewart made a motion to approve the application with screening fences and increasing the parking lot. The motion was seconded by Dwayne Rogers and failed by the j following vote: Ayes: Stewart, Rogers Nays: Joyce, Spencer, Cook, Sands, Burgess After further discussion Harlen Joyce made a motion to deny the application on the basis that it was not justified because of lack of products for a. convenience store. The motion was seconded by Member Robert Sands and passed by the following vote: Ayes :Joyce, Spencer, Sands, Burgess Nays :Stewart, Rogers Abstained:Cook NEW BUSINESS ZONING APPLICATION Z79-31 The next order of business was for the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z79-31 submitted by Jerry Pittman and David Harris to change the zoning of the property at the Southwest corner of South Main and Nash Streets; Tracts 8, 9 and 10, from `°R-1" Single Family Dwelling to "C-2" Community Business District. Planning & Zoning Commission to then make a recommendation to the City Council. Commissioner Ron Cook made a motion to recommend approval of the proposed zoning. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Harlen Joyce and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Rogers, Joyce, Stewart, Sands, Spencer, Burgess anc Cook Nays: None -pauoz fqjuasaad pupl uo sqTu-n 00179 go qu@uidOTOAap @Llq qTuuad TTTm STU -aaou aad sqTun OT) UO@qXTS JO KITSUap a2-eaaAP UP qP padoTaAap lTquasaad ST SaaOu aaaLjq-1qUaAaS -pedOTaAaP fou q-nq squamlaudu aog PaLISTT aTqqTT P quqsa fTqu@saad puPT go SaaOP 0017 aaAO ST OaaLIJ su Tqoris sn paqaTiqSTP P@qUaaUa2 UOTqPUIaOJUI @qj go aulos -asn go @dfq siqq �UTUaaOUOO UOTq*e*UlaOJUI 90 TvaP IvOa2 V PaqVaaUO2 OAPLI OM 'qZ)TaqST(l OuOZ XT-fult-d-TITnN @qq 2uivaaouoo uoTssnosTp 7qoTiui PUP SUOISSOS '-'IaOM TPaaAaS aaqjV NOIIVoiqdjv DNINOZHU IDINILSIG RNOZ �rIIWVJ-IlrIflN ONIMONOD NOISSDUM ONINOZ '9 ONINNVrId RHI NO-dd qIDNflOO 2UID 01 NOIIVGNHNWODHN IJV'aG :U@IqTam su TTOUnOD 'qTD Dqq 01 uoTqupuauuooaj aLIq qTuiqns off. uoTqoui P apum qaPmajS aauoissimmoo 'OqPTjdojddu aq --'�-,AOM TTOUnOD �ITO aqq qjTM dOLIS->IaOm P qPLlq UOTUTdo go snsuaz)uoo aqq sum qT 'UOTssnoSTP aaOUI aaqjV '.KqTo aLIJ UTqjTM sqTun quaLuqaPdv aog aouTd P �UTPTAo*ad go �qTssaoau age.SuTuaa*z)uo;D UOTqPPUaURU000a qjUap JO UOTSSnOSTP alllOS SUM alaqj ',KqTo O-qq X -q paqUTqTUT SUM 2UTUOZ UMOG p JT POMOTTOJ aq pTnoLls saanpaooad IPLIM PUP '2UTUOZ UMOG aLIq P@qPTqTUT �qTo Oqq jT fqTo aqq Xq paaanouT aq PTnOm IPLII saTqTTTqvTT Pup SUOTqPOTJTmva TP2@T o7qq 2UTUaODUOO iaUaOqqV �JTD aqq IUOaj UOTuido Tp�aT v Isanbaa oq spm uoiuido go snsuaouoo aqj -spoap U-Ileja@O SUTUOZ UMO(I JO X I T .TTqTssod aqq 2uTuaaouoo uoissnosTp aTqpaapTsuoo spm aaaql -sqsanbai 2uiuoz aaning TTV 2u'uaaDuOO TTounoo XITD ol UoTjUPUaMMoO@j P aaPTSUOD off. sum SSaUTsnq go aapao qxau aqj ONINOZ NMOG @UON S'KuN ssa2anq pup qavmaqs 'spups '->IooD 'aaouads 'aoXor 'saa2ou :sz)xv :aeon 2uTMOTTOJ aTqq Kq POTTVAOad qT pup UoTqoul OLIJ PapUo3as spuVS qaoqo-d a@uoissTuuoD 'quTdaa aq: DAOaddv 01 UOTqOM P appm aaouads uoaapqs aauoissTmmoo -s2uTpTTnq x@Tdnp oma go uoiqonaqsuoo aqq aOj @PTAOad ol s@uTT qOT 2UTSTA@a JO asodand @Llq aoj uTqsnV pup anu@AV UTT')Iuva a go quvapupnb qsamijqnos Oqq uT PaIPOOT 9 Pup 1 '9 slot "7TT ')iDOTq 90 qvTdaa P a@pTsuoo off. uoTssTuTmoo SuTuOZ � ?uTuuvTd Oqq aOJ spm ssauTsnq go aapao qx@U aqj SIHOIHH aOHqqOD JO lVqdn �ooD uTpqsq-V ss@2anq laoXor S.KvN spuuS 'iapmaqS 'aaouadS 'saa2ou SOXV :DqOA 2uTMOTTOJ aqq fCq PaTTVAOad pup qavmaqS qoq aauoissT=oD fq papUO3as sum UOTIOW aLIJ *2UTUO2 aqq go TPAOaddv PuaLmooaa oq uoiqom P appm jaouadS uoaapqs aauoissimoo TzounoO IqTO aqq Oq UOTquPUaUUOOaa V @-)Ivul OSTV Oq UOTSSTURUOD 2UTUOZ 19 2UTUUUTJ aapun paliTuuad su sasn a@Llqo pup aaoqs aDU@lUaAUOO P JO uoTquaado aqq ol TvjuapTouT (fTuo aaaq) Sa2Pa@Aaq OTTOLTOOTP go uoTIdmnsuoo asTuiaad ggo pup aTvs TTPqOa 102paoqs aTqq aoj .qTuuacl asfl z)Tg-To@dS ,(IS,, 0:1 JOT-TqST(I SS@UTsnq �:jTunuuoo UIOJJ UOTqTP Tq go jaud 2 PV aavqS aqq 90 OT PUP 6 S-�100 UTaq pup 17# UOTITPPV XumaJVS 90 PUVT 90 q3vaq P go uoTqaod P 2UTaq Xqjadoad ailq go 2uTuoz aqq a2upqo Oq UOTqeaodaoo PuuTtlqnoS aqj Xq paaqTtuqns Z£-6LZ UOTqUOTTddV BuTuoZ a@pTsuoo oq 2uTuOZ 29 2uluuuTd aqq aO9 sum ssauTsnq go aapao jxau agj U-6LZ NOIJVDI'IJJV ONINOZ We also looked into the tax revenue generated by apartments versus single family. In general, the apartment developments generated more tax revenue per developed acre. However, an exact figure is difficult to arrive at due to the differences in the type of development. With the City policy for attracting new industry and business developments, it is necessary to provide living space of all types including single family, multi -family, townhomes, etc. The present "R-3" Zone District provides for a very intensive land use possibility. The new parking requirements will tend to limit the densities between 18 to 20 units per acre. After considering the land use intensities permitted in this district, we would recommend that on all future _R-3" rezoning requests the following items be considered before a decision is made to approve the proposal: A. Proximity and access to major streets. B. The viability of existing single family areas should be maintained. C. The availability of City Utilities or necessity for extensions. D. Master Plan designations. There are some areas that are questionable as to meeting certain portions of this criteria and we will periodically make recommendations concerning master plan changes and possible down zoning of certain areas. Z70-2 57 acres (undeveloped) PD for Multi -Family Pickering Property on Kimbell Rd. Maximum 20 unit per acre - 3 story #2 Z72-11 52.067 (Undeveloped) PD for Multi -Family acres on Dove Loop - Unit Count not available #3 Z78-8 10.123 (undeveloped) R-3 Southeast corner acres of Dover Road and Park Blvd. Unit Count not available. #4 Z78-24 8.434 (undeveloped) R-3 Dove Road on South - acres side Autumn Drive Unit count not available. #5 Z78-25 25.54 (undeveloped) R-3 Tract I and Trace ## acres out of the Thomas Easter Sur. 16 units per acre - Park Blvd., SE of Park -- Place. #6 Z73-29 35.163 (undeveloped) 35.163 out of the B.B. acres Johnson Survey. Unit count not available. Lucas North of Meadowbrook. I i7ZZ Pg aAOG qlaON S081 09 doqTTTH NOT £T qjaoM g /TL OZT qnuTPM Q009 ZT qlaom g 90/ i7£ Llq-lOM *H TZ'7 Z'7 Z ag 2u-eqsnN gTqZ '717 ag 2upqsnN 508Z 9TZ --ig 2uuqsnN g£OC 9 'IS lDTOOG TT'7 hag Tag PUTT 17 squauiqaPdV dojTTTH Sulav qq-Toy 0OL-aa0j, aOMj0Tj, @3V -T -Taj, aOMj0Tj squauiq-TvdV ussaquoo Z S, -quo ulmil T s--'IL-0 uTMs squamq-TudV OOPTJ TVuOlSa-d squaulqavdV s,uospTg fazmoj SqTun go - ON aMIAaJV'd0 JO 7,1ID alll NI S"MrIcINOD INRWUUVdV SOJOV OT*£t SDaOV t'7/*£P7 ,�qjadoad £-U padoTOAag Sqaadoad pauoZ £-,d pedOTaAapUfl :02paaop go slvqoq paqvullqss zQ 2upqsnx go qjaON Egi7T# �S auPTdS E -2j (padoTaAOpun) s@aOv L6' ZZ 9-M ST# -,vmq2-Eq 2uoTp dTaqs pup uoiqTppp xog TOOlqDs 2uTqqTMO XmH mm oq qsVR qoaaqs qqTuls -PPOaTTva Off. llqaON 'IS TTvM ulOaJ 2uTuOZ xDOTq E --a (p@dOT@AapUn saaov SL qnoqv) (padOT@A@p saaov SZ qnoqv) + SaJOU OOT qaaaqS TTPM PD POOmssOG E -U (padOTaADpun) 8T9# KS a@qsOd V sDa0v 09*£ 8T9# �S aOqsOd V saa0v T6-£ 8T911 XS .zap sod V CGE qOT sOaOv 9'76-T @uvq POOH PD uOJvmm'D sasnoqumol E -U 0 --'IOOTq JO UOTqaod v q q'V 'OOTq U01:1 -Tppv -�Jjvj PoomoaoLls (padOTaAap) + saa0v 8T auTTaaquiTj 2UOTP qsVH S;Dqpqsa 3100a0 �vo-£-u E6CT# paaqdaLIS 2uuqsnN q poor -aT2uul 30 JauaOO MS C -U *�S OuuTdS TZT 90 'S TOOTAOS -q2TH Oq PU TOOd £-U '�S a0--VOC *H -apTS -N @AOG IV zg uumqnv-qouaq aaO -e ST'TZJO ono s0-TOV 9T*9T '£-U 090T# uvqVN *1 (padOTaAap) (padOT@AapUn) (padOTaAapu-n) saa0v 60-9£ saaov 8T.gT saaov £gz-g£ saaov gT - 91 (squatujavdv qT-u-n OOC padOTaA@P) SaJOP Z6'i7T'O (sasnoqumol qTun OOT padOTaAapun) saToe eg-ol-q (sasnoilumol jTu-n 99 padOTaAapun) s0 -10V TT -L -P TOOLPs 0:1 quz)z)L-CPL- uZ POOH PuV 'P'd DAOg 2uOTV TVqOq saaOP 09 9T-T/Z '7T# SZ-OLZ '7Z-OLZ ET# t-gtz ZT# OT-UZ TT# 17T-TLZ OT# Z-Z/Z 6# '7£-M 8# Over all total units 4080 May 11, 1979 To: Bill Eisen,Asst. City Manager FROM: Cecil Burks SUBJECT: Comparison of tax revenues from multi -family and single family sources. Unfortunately the two types of properties do not lend themselves well to the comparison analysis, due to their obvious physical and locational differences. The multi -family properties by nature tend to be of strictly commercial vintage with income producing capabilities being of primary concern. Also of prime concern would be the physical attractiveness and acceptable location to generate the income. On the other hand appeal of the single family residence is predomin.antly,individualistic. Location is of importance, with neighborhood amenities and attributes being of prime concern to the prospective purchaser. For the above reasons a comparison between the two types is certainly one of dissimilarities. No. of Units West Wall Apartments 1207 W t Wall St. 12 Dickerson Apartments 421. College 8 Dickerson Apartments 20 E. Nash St. 10 Lavender Apartments 308 Smith St. 24 Austin St. Apartments 210 Austin St. 4 Barton St. Apartments 116 North Barton 12 Home Apartments 625 Redbud Dr. 14 Shorewood Apartments 1939 Shorewood Dr. 30 Grapevine Apartments 303 E. Northwest Hwy 10 East Wood Apartments 845 Dawn Dr. 20 Lancaster Apartments 604 Church St. 3 Wildwood Terrace Apts. 20 TOTAL 1137 Single Family Units Apartments Mobile Homes 1970 42 1971 49 5 1972 51 249 1973 110 348 1974 51 224 1975 80 24 1976 127 48 1977 216 51 1978 419 14 1979 Jan. 18 Feb. 35 12 i March 40 I COG 1978 REPORT 2425 1166 370 Plus 1979 107 12 Total 2532 1178 370 Over all total units 4080 May 11, 1979 To: Bill Eisen,Asst. City Manager FROM: Cecil Burks SUBJECT: Comparison of tax revenues from multi -family and single family sources. Unfortunately the two types of properties do not lend themselves well to the comparison analysis, due to their obvious physical and locational differences. The multi -family properties by nature tend to be of strictly commercial vintage with income producing capabilities being of primary concern. Also of prime concern would be the physical attractiveness and acceptable location to generate the income. On the other hand appeal of the single family residence is predomin.antly,individualistic. Location is of importance, with neighborhood amenities and attributes being of prime concern to the prospective purchaser. For the above reasons a comparison between the two types is certainly one of dissimilarities. '@XP POqOA quasaid TTP pup SPUPS aDUOTSSTURUOD tq papuooas sum uoTioui aTql -pauino[pu aq 2UTqaam aqq qvqq UoTjow v appLu ss@2anq aauo-ISSTMOD ,INH NMUflOf (IV OUON StL-N ssa2anq puu japmaqS 'spupS '-)I000 'aaouadS 'aotor 'saa2ou :safv :OqOA 2UTmOTT09 aqq f,q PaTTPA@ad spm pup papuooas SpUPS Jauolsslunuoo saanpaooad BUTUOZ UMOP aqq OqUT qU21SUT @UIOS apTAOad upo KauaoqqV XqTo OLIq jTqUTl UIDIT STqq @Tqvj Oq UOTqOUl V apVUl JaVM@qS a@UOISSTURUOD - fouaoqqv fqTD ailq fiq peaepuea ST UOTUTdO Tv2aT v TT un POTqpq aq PTnOLls ujaqT siqq quilq snsuaouoo atlq spm IT pup passnosTp aaam suoTquo -TJTulva lv2aT aql -sasodand KTTuluJ-TITnm aoj vaav sTqq aoj uolq -VU21saP URTd aaqsPN aqq 2uTuaaOUOO PaMOTTOJ uoissnosic -saqpqsa MOTTOq�00aq aql Oq qU@OPCPP OATaG sponq go pua L11jou aLli IV PUPT aqq go 2uTuoz umop oTqTssod v 2uTuaaouoo ITounoo KqTD aT4q off. uoTqVpuaURUo3aa V a@pTsuoO oq sum ssauTsnq go aapao qxau aqj ONINOZ MMOG £-"d OUON Sf-VN ssaSanq pup japmajS 'spupS '->I000 'aaouads 'aoXor 'saa2ou :Sof,-v :@:IOA 2UTMOTTOJ aqq Xq POTTUAaad pup uoTqoui aqq papuooas SSa2anq aOUOTSSTUMUOD Z8*ozg Xjaadoad adKI siLll aoj aaoV padoTaAaa a@d XVJ a2VJaAV 96*Z98 TO*U9 /T*99z 9+7 * '70'7 soqvqsg �aaao �po UOTITPPV aoqavH OUTTASUnS WERHOMIM6.1 UOTqTPPV aaTPTTaq ftl". . Ml tqaadoaj @dKI sTL11 aoj aaoV padOTOAO(j a0d XVJ @2V-laAV 2CP70Z sasnoqumol poomaaoqs OT' £L6 sjuaLuqjvdV tag Ta(l PuiavN 9£ *£M sau@LuqapdV aDuTd TvuOT20-d 8Z' 17Z8 squamlaudV doITTTH 'STsvq aaov padOTOAOP V UO P@qVJ@U@2 xul UlaaOTVA PP go dvoaa v ST mOT@q PASSED & APPROVED on this the of 1979. J. R. Baddaker Acting City Secretary