Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-01-16STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, met in regular session on this the 16th day of January 1979, with the following members present to -wit: Ted Ware Chairman Bob Stewart Member Robert Sands Member Dwayne Rogers Member Harlen Joyce Member Jerry Burgess Member constituting a quorum with J. R. Baddaker, City Engineer in attendance. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Ted Ware. ZONING APPLICATION NO. Z78-26 The first order of business was for the Planning and Zoning Commission to reconsider Zoning Application No. Z78-26 sub- mitted by Mr. Bob Smith. A Public Hearing was held on December 19, 1978, and the proposal was tabled at that time. A motion was made by Member Robert Sands to deny the application and the motion was seconded by Member Dwayne Rogers. It prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Ware, Stewart, Sands, Rogers, Joyce, and Burgess Nays: None ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS The next order of business was for the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider amending the zoning ordinance concern- ing parking requirements in Multi -Family Dwelling Districts. Various other cities' parking ratio requirements were presented and discussion followed. The minimum driving lanes, parking stall lengths and widths were then discussed. The City Staff presented 25 feet minimum driving lane widths for 460 to 900 parking and 15 feet widths for 00 to 450 parking. Discussion followed. Mr. Sands made a motion that the parking ratio in Multi -Family Dwelling Districts be changed to 22 spaces per unit or 1 space for each 400 square feet of floor area, which- ever is greater. Included in the motion was that 00 to 450 parking driving lanes be a minimum of 18 feet wide and 25 feet minimum on 450 - 900 and that parking spaces be 9'X20' and striped. Mr. Rogers seconded the motion, and it prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Ware, Stewart, Sands, Rogers, Joyce, and Burgess Nays: None The next order of business was for the Planning and -Zoning Commission to consider amending the zoning ordinance for mini- mum lot widths and measurements of front building setbacks on cul-de-sacs. Several Board of Adjustment cases were cited by the City Staff concerning violations by developers. The City Staff recommended that two (2) points be established on the side property lines, 30 feet behind the front property pins, the cord connecting these points would be the front set- back line. The minimum lot width to be 65 feet at the setback line. Discussion followed. Mr. Rogers made a motion that the City Staff's recommendation be adopted. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion and it prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Ware, Stewart, Sands, Rogers, Joyce, and Burgess Nays: None The next order of business was for the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider amending the zoning ordinance relative to sign height restrictions. The City Staff recommended that the Airport height restrictions should apply on limited access highways. Discussion followed as to areas where height restric- tions would apply.; maximum sign height permitted by Airport restrictions and possibility of bringing individual applica- tions before the City Council. Mr. Sands made a motion to table this item until February 20, 1979. Dr. Burgess seconded the motion and it prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Ware, Stewart, Sands, Rogers, Joyce, and Burgess Nays: None REPLAT - CANTERBURY VILLAGE The next order of business was for the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider the Replat of Canterbury Village, closing Camelot Drive. The Commission considered future development of the Pickering Property to the north, the residents in Reed Addition and Canterbury Village, the Corp of Engineer's land to the east and the general circulation in this area. Mr. Sands made a motion to table this item. Mr. Rogers seconded the motion and it prevailed by the follow- ing vote: Ayes: Ware, Stewart, Sands, Rogers, Joyce, and Burgess Nays: None a 0GIN0191 Mr. Sands made a motion that the meeting be adjourned. The motion was seconded by Mr. Stewart and all present voted aye. t_�, PASSED AND APPROVED on this the 20 day of44- _J, IC4 ecA, 1979. City Secretary