Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 03 - Oak Hill
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER ERICA MAROHNIC, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SERVICES MEETING DATE: JULY 18, 2023 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Z23-01 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission accept the applicants' request to table zone change application Z23-01 to the August 15, 2023 meeting, and take any other necessary action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The applicants, Mr. Josh Born and Mr. Jake Born, have submitted a zone change application to rezone 5.750 acres from "PCD", Planned Commerce Development District to "R-5.0", Zero -Lot -Line District for the development of 21 single-family detached residential lots. The applicants' are asking to postpone consideration of the request to the August 15, 2023 meeting in order to adequately address the questions and concerns raised by neighbors of the subject site. Please see the attached letter. /at Z23-01; CP23-01.41 July 18, 2023 To: City of Grapevine From: 360 Land Partners, LLC Subject: Request to table Z23-01/CP23-01; Oak Hill to the August 15, 2023 meeting To Whom It May Concern: 360 Land Partners (Josh and Jake Born) are requesting to table Z23-01/CP23-01; Oak Hill to the August 15, 2023, public hearing. The extra time is needed to adequately address the questions and concerns we received from the neighbors yesterday. Thank you, Josh Born Z23-01; Oak Hill Correspondence from Residence Letters of Protest: 26 Letter of General Comments: 1 Total: 27 rILC ? /-Z,3-U"1/ l.9-°L.3-U1: OAK HILL Wrfi �� MENTS GUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON OND 17.2023. Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) o (an interested citizen) (approve) (protest) and/or (have the following comments) k w�(( -v'e-zs c P&, ©u'-►' ate , rao6d a-� 1 -E -er 3 Co D CQ CAS S V'NL - ll� c04 �1 uE-�e ✓ u?G� �c�.. s a-� �fn t�f zc� !f y- a� �rea�c ►'�� ?�'�i c- , f �� vvt�e v esaj -e Ua-j ues . Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: I CLLt' �- - UAa C (-eQ o n v�c- t I Signature : (Phone No.) qt& ''S-z4-3 -C 4- 4- �o Printed Name of Signee: 0`- Title Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Wrect questions and mail responses to: Plannino Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 % vt e-twvLei,- JUL 17 2023 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL JUIL 17, 208 WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Despond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest) and/or (have the following comments) IUVY1vViCr1 lere �i4Sed Colnyl�etrs7uy�� oSLj /s Sf1,71e r�i►ot V 6'es'vPh1ia.l /v&. 1) Nafupal ody-Ai��e rvvo- hill �(f-AnAd Sao loi - 3/32- amol e� s 6elweeo l o'h 32-33. Taw C"Cevt"Cd ac c"'T ckzifl-c'�'e 7�7 C1fS 2) F4g 5d0G41 py'eje�lw a-T oe-,lc *eP; ZeAri- Nees 6t� /96SY(lle c,�, Spear-dfv x, -/-%e bry-cle r o ' S&- e h� Glc �e9 -re,i 1 ` / / ` ASS =Z; S`T 1/\C 8yrJyC Q f alto/ 0CC ter/� WOO � �%✓eSCDr!/� so � fT'P�'S� C'r/I. Si30,�-33 .3) �f efin- ej,JMyice of Soy7-iec,S/ S.-de Sy 0o4'%Pvm /,00rg/- /2e, Vc %oY S 32-- e- v<c1 33 r-5 a Cu I -de -Sc<C - j vh t\ t w„ze cC_ot5 32--33 Gv`d tSY��juv c�vo4►►-.eye Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: vp 7/o 5go e A-e lf7v\c u'04' ;Avid rurno ne,�kbv�-G�ccxd p�l+�i1/ >� uck" c od< Fe. M; ►�J Tv St ( -NV5 .a- 4sa �Gr-cnck ,--rvS+ees) y&Zs `�re��� 1 Ya l S� ov�� fir; J ,-C 0,45: , block 3 Loi 3Z Signature : rl/ (Phone No.) (0K2-777-062- Printed Name of Signee: 2'y�n�a5 F 44aA ccck, Title: ) rvs}ee / res" det" y) here is u lo•i o•c ht�1 wcy Vlo,-5e WO( Gle al,vr'('/ a- ec SI�P� c� CPS��e�1�3 Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Vvff 40 S ecc�rAj /Atw►�y ®erect questions and mail responses to: fedvice Kvcse r-V Planning Technician new JVve ll1s, S s � `'�S�4 Planning Services ►'e�L�1 ve41c", � rdIcr City of Grapevine �� c1 a �% WO �d ta P.O. Box 95104 C resi�leN s. The 1-\6LSr Grapevine, Texas 76099 �S V1 bt- c{ S Av ro-s `M dc�y �V�r P W�e �, 4 1- SIet�-p. WC pr-efeY- Ae S('.1'T vO b LJ 0 V-Y-e rS (; l a-V-e 4L\4- -10 deVe(0P fDcvfe T& Cou iA be beer tc �cvie rr-r`C`IIy. e4T 6C- Yv�il�clRvl C� +rc. ¢rrc a� loss v4 4gees +o pceseyA`e 0� 1��t -For CM iv�vo�vr�. FILE. #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL r WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12_PM 0�1 MOIUDAY, JULY 17, 2023, Procedure to Respond: i a Property ner r (an interested citizen), I (approve) (pr an o (have the following comments) See attached comments/concerns I have. I am a homeowner within 200 feet of the subject tract. Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: Doug Hancock 4625 Trevor TrI, Grapevine, TX 76051 Signature Printed Name Phone No.) Doug Hancock Title: owner Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine JJL 17 20 P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 JUL 17 2023 Drainage. t am concerned about disrupting the drainage of the property,,, Th,ere is a creek at the south end of the property that must be managed/ directed somewhere. During a strong storm, water flows down the property lines at the north end behind Stone Bridge Oaks, Block 3, Lots 31 and 32 and continuing to a large drainage pipe between Stone Bridge Oaks, Block 3, Lots 32 and 33. We are unsure who is responsible for maintaining the drainage pipe between Lots 32 and 33. For this reason, believe it is critical that there be maintained significant area at the north end of the property in question that is not of impervious material to allow water to flow and soak in to the land, such as a cul-de-sac with large lots or a large buffer area at the edge of a commercial development. A drainage engineering study should be mandated to determine how best to manage the creek and how best to direct and connect storm drainage with the existing pipe system between Stone Bridge Oaks, Block 3, Lots 32 and 33. Trees. I am concerned about the removal and destruction of the many beautiful trees on the property in question. Trees should be preserved wherever possible according to the City of Grapevine tree preservation ordinances, especially at the edges of the proposed development to provide visual buffer between existing neighborhoods and the new proposed development. The City of Grapevine should consider the strength of the developer's funding commitments including ability to obtain contingency funding if development exceeds budgets as we do not want the trees destroyed and the the land left open and idle because the developer ran out of money and cannot complete the building project. Part of what makes Northeast Tarrant County special are the natural wooded areas and we must work to maintain the native trees and make sure the development is completed, including landscaping, in a timely manner, to minimize visual scars to our urban forests. Noise. I am concerned about construction and highway noise and request that the City of Grapevine require provisions that will reduce the noise pollution for existing neighborhoods during the construction process. Further, the continued growth of DFW has an increasing number of cars on Highway 360 that cause an increasing amount of noise around the clock. The increasing highway noise will have a detrimental effect on the residents of the proposed Oak Hill development and a detrimental effect on the existing neighborhoods of Stone Bridge Oaks and Glade Hill. Certain property owners have successfully obtained property value appraisal reductions due to excessive highway noise. I request the City of Grapevine mandate extra steps be evaluated to minimize the impact of highway noise on residents. Noise that seems acceptable during the daytime is much more noticeable at night and detrimental to the health and welfare of the residents due to its negative impact on sleep. For certain property owners, even daytime noise now makes it difficult to enjoy being outside. Further, to minimize noise of traffic entering and exiting the proposed Oak Hill development, the entrance from Highway 360 should be at the south east side of the property to provide a buffer between existing neighborhoods and the proposed new road connecting to the highway access road. Physical Buffer Area. The subject property is very close to certain properties in existing neighborhoods. We understand that when Glade Hill was platted, the City of Grapevine mandated a 70 foot buffer between existing properties in Stone Bridge Oaks, Block 3, Lots 15-20 and the new Glade Hill development. We request that a similar minimum 70 foot buffer be mandated between existing properties and new properties and that trees be preserved in the buffer area between properties. An adequate buffer will preserve quality of life and value of property for existing property owners bordering the new proposed development and enhance the same for owners of new properties in the proposed Oak Hill development. JUL 17 2023 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDA Y, JUL Y 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: Owner within 200 feet of the sub'ect tractor (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest) nd/or (have the o ow ng comments) 11 Stt' a JUL 17 2023 Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: zsaLf "Ili L.aAv-.. i��faG�v,i�P� iY Signature : (Phone No. )_ 57q. 202. Printed Name of Signee: Title: bk Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 1)LRFK & A11iiI i ' I',GI is 33 1 Hit I 6RAP� L I ! Glade Hill Opposition of Construction and Development 'JUL 17 2023 Dear Respected Grapevine City Counsil, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed zoning change that would allow the construction of residential, commercial, or city structures within 200 feet of our beloved neighborhood, Glade Hill in Grapevine, TX. As a property owner, real estate agent, and a concerned member of this community, I firmly believe that this zoning change poses significant risks and will have detrimental effects on the quality of life in our neighborhood. Glade Hill has long been cherished as a peaceful and family -oriented residential area, characterized by its serene environment, well -maintained properties, and close-knit community. The proposed zoning change threatens to disrupt this harmony by introducing incompatible land uses that could result in increased noise levels, traffic congestion, and a loss of privacy for residents. Moreover, the introduction of commercial or city structures in close proximity to our neighborhood could significantly impact its aesthetic appeal and diminish property values. Additionally, the proposed zoning change fails to consider the potential strain on existing infrastructure and services. Our neighborhood infrastructure, including roads, utilities, and schools, is already optimized to accommodate the current residential needs. Introducing additional structures in such close proximity without adequate infrastructure upgrades could lead to overburdened facilities and a decline in the overall livability of the area. It is crucial to prioritize the preservation and protection of established neighborhoods like Glade Hill. While growth and development are essential for any community, it should not come at the expense of the well- being and interests of existing residents. We believe that responsible and sustainable development should be encouraged, but it should be done in a manner that respects the character and integrity of our neighborhood. I respectfully request that you reconsider the proposed zoning change and carefully evaluate the potential consequences it may have on Glade Hill and its residents. It is imperative to engage in open and inclusive dialogue with the community to ensure that any future developments align with the tong -term vision and values of Grapevine. I appreciate your attention to this matter and hope that you will give serious consideration to our concerns. I kindly request that you keep me informed of any updates or decisions regarding this zoning change proposal. Thank you for your understanding and commitment to preserving the unique charm and tranquility of Glade Hill. Sincerely, Glade Hill Residents Best regards, 1 L T� 12 , 2U23 C' Derek and Ashley Ingle Derek5250@gmail.com 574-514-1878 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As a ert Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract or (an interested citizen), I (apt protest nd/or ave the followrin comment jm'e'5 AJ i le.� u 70' ekcu-s;¢,4 -tee Gam-&, W 11, AA lkc"t4 'IbA e 5�u. 4 aA-,y Aa,-O Ae�PP >'o C 1 �` Pto�� 5� j�e to -s �1�-�- ��3c L T� lon elf �� � % p a�e.,nn �, ` ke +tee es k d sly P ro,w`-ke a. A4vt7 l sa"-%Q 6,,McA 41- 14w3b0 a►-=& lr Sow �, 1,. no4e, "A..(SysTS 54L.,,,0 6ee PeArmt. n (1 14�1, eres6`ov1, ra�vr�-�yS �S 3*w+t�r � P--T-1�,.�- �,�-Q —4 t`nc�� (sr� rtAn X Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: I he.ddo re My ���Swk AA),-A�i ► Sato b�1� C�e>✓IC Lam. ��a,P�J►we ,�.4' 7�Jt I12�f Signature : (Phone No.) a Iy `793-7,2b5 Printed Name of Signee: TIge.cbvm Ak- Title: 1uA_ JUL 19 2023 Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDA Y, JUL Y 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As o erty Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) protest nd/or (have the following comments) I _ I I .- . /' I Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: R14(XIAI WIllck aIadC_ Ad Signature : Printed Name of Signee: 'JUL 17 2023 Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 M ! / V I dds FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM/ ON MIONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Owner within 200 feet of the subject r (have the o comments 0 an interested citizen), I (approve) M;ta' �0 (' ka-A or Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: bawn awnS ec Ke 3Ha 14� 11 C�re-e, Lanef -oe 1�05l Signature: (Phone No. 8 i % " 9 /Li" (0� Printed Name of Signee: L)C4t,L)n 'B(f_CT 1 -er Title: 1`t01fi1 �(,(�n-tom Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 JUL 17 2023 FILE #fiZ23-01/ CP23-01: f' OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: opinojr2a!v!e 00 feet of the sub ect tract or (an interested citizen), I,(a�fvv+s)'protest ollowing comments) A-cAV E c 2�l Fc y C�--�ry S i w C') i iy fN L-t L 141eL��' Awc-Ljl-'L- l � Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: QE 1 cyZ %4 gN r>LC�y - R A t✓t_ & S VISA,eJ -i�-&f'CtJG4� Signature : Rx-�\o 14 (Phone No. Printed Name of Signee: ?&TGUL ri t5t�S�t' (—�' Title: _ kk1-- 'JUL 17 2023 Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 Zero -Lot -Line District Objections — Pete Hendley-Hall & Susan Batchelor — 322 Hill Creek Ln, Glade Hill Traffic & Safety Concerns • 21 additional houses with a proposed exit onto the SH 360 FIR SB will increase traffic and safety issues given the proximity to the Glade Hill entrance and exit off SH 360 FIR SB. • The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours. Categories Environmental Concerns JUL 17 2023 • Pertaining to the management, regulation, and protection of native plants listed as state threatened or endangered, what study has been conducted to confirm that there are no endangered or threatened plants within the proposed development area given that this area has been a natural greenbelt habitat for decades? • The proposed development site has a significant gradient going down to the rear of the Glade Hill development. What restrictions and safety protocols will be deployed to: o Ensure there are no landslides? o Protect proposed homeowners' dwellings from subsidence? • There is a natural brook at the rear of the Glade Hill development that should be preserved. • With the leveling of the home pads and roads within the development there will be an impact on the natural drainage specifically on the south end backing onto the Glade Hill Development. • There will be an adverse effect on noise levels from HW 360. The current greenbelt environment acts as a natural buffer in reducing such noise. As the green belt is removed, noise will significantly increase. Wildlife • Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat for owls, a variety of birds (including hawks, cardinals, finches, Hummingbirds, etc.) foxes, rabbits, squirrels, coyotes, amongst others. Given the variety of wildlife in situ, what studies have been conducted by Texas Parks & Wildlife Department (TPWD) Wildlife Habitat Assessment (WHAB) Program to assist project developers in identifying, evaluating, and addressing potential impacts to natural resources of the proposed development area? • Local wildlife has already been significantly impacted by the development of The Preserve and The Marlowe apartment complexes on the SH 360 FIR NB with some wildlife having to migrate to the proposed development area. They will be forced along with the incumbent wildlife to relocate, which given that the existing habitat is bounded on all sides by housing developments, offices, and significant roads, endangers the wildlife migration. • Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact on the local wildlife habitat. Financial Current properties that back onto the proposed development paid a pad premium for backing onto greenbelt. The baseline property tax calculated and subsequent yearly increases will be based on a false baseline as the property pads will be less valuable. As such, property tax for the land must be reduced in the event of the development moving forward. • Overall property values will decrease with the impacts described above will adversely affect the property desirability, and therefore the financial value. Again, property tax must be adjusted downwards to reflect reality. Development • Proposed development does not follow existing precedent for a buffer between development. Precedent was established when Glade Hill was developed following representation from the Stone Bridge Oaks community for a 70' buffer between the development. The is no 70' buffer between proposed development and Glade Hill or Stone Bridge Oaks. • The is only one entrance and exit to the development. If that entrance/exit is blocked, In the event of an emergency, how will emergency response teams enter the development? • The lot lines for plots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 and extend past the drainage easement into the 100 year fully developed water surface elevation, and the drainage / water sanctuary sewer & landscape easement. Plot lines should not extend past the drainage easement. • Some plots do not meet the code for zero plot size, for example lot 14. • There are multiple trees that meet the requirements for tree preservation. I do not see how they would be maintained under the preservation requirements based on the proposed development plan. JUL 17 2023 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest) and/or (have the following comments) A .-1 L _ r % r\ % I H S- - I Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: 3 2E f 'l II is Signature : Phone No.) SVXS 2-3 t -" d Printed Name of Signee: C61t5 Gd'� Title: 'JUL 17 2D23 Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (rotes and/or (have the following comments) • dy-et f VOL lut ® PVop-tV*4 Wif( d -reasC- a,5a upah?'noisc 4v&7 31o0,�.t1h� ��S « pv0 with bascd won value of- yt"'fo / hotwu all Lcz-y ✓ ® (/ed aAd Ow yGv could seat hwt,J M 6 ACk- OA 0"- B�l� n� Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: aid"y' ()["Ji I (21adf, M'' 11 — g�n tea r rn r70 1 /a 1 I D -TV '44 .In I Signature . (Phone No.)q'-e?d Z-9� Printed Name of Signee: ,Lf �L /.�l Title: 'JUL 17 2D23 Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine �3 P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: ffsa P perry Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or an interested citizen , I (approve) test) and/or (have the following comments); Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: by-fAb D�Z \lL if Signature : v '' (Phone No. `'[ � a - Up 0 T' Printed Na a of Si ee: A- ►ti( `Y Sh Title: aCb Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 JUL 17 2023 FILE #z23-01r CP23-01: OAK HILL. WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO EATER THAN 12 pm- ON MONDAY JULY 17 2023. Procedure to Respond: ope O �or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest andlor (have the follovsln� comments) Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: Signature : (Phone No. 1, 67so Printed Name of Signee./A �&;7 '� 1f Title: Telephone: (817) 410-3156 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE: #Z23-01/CP23-01 I OAK HILL 1 Attachment From Anne Benvenuto I PROTEST at this time until a detailed plan can be provided showing the intention of the developers are shown in DETAIL related to the property and especially to the property borders as follows: 1. A guarantee that the existing HOA property tree line will not be cut down intentionally or accidently, and a system be put in place to pro -actively ensure any accidental tree cutting does not occur. 2. The trees on the new development property directly adjacent to the HOA tree line will remain with a respectable degree to be discussed/agree with the two HOAs to preserve privacy, noise control, appearance and property values of all communities. 3. That the developer is also aggregable to working with the 2 existing communities regarding both the preservation of any negative impact to the trees, as well for the mutual privacy, including construction of any privacy walls. One of the reasons I purchased in the COG was due to the abundance and beauty of trees in Grapevine, and my understanding that the COG has a "tree preservation policy" which I understand is still in effect. Moreover, a major reason I purchased my specific lot of property was because of the trees behind my unit. And it was with my understanding that the 360 facing property was zoned COMMERICIAL so that any eventual build on the 360 facing property would limit activity, noise privacy concerns during evenings and weekends. The re -zoning would change this. Thank You Anne Benvenuto 4669 Taylor Lane, Grapevine, TX 76051 anne@AnneBenvenuto.com 917.680.5471 JUL 17 2023 - FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDA Y, JUL Y 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest) and/or (have the following comments) / N i t �M W;�` MCI M/ tA" Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: NlC4kt.,f5 i�D L-L&T' Z Le6LIT Lcs� L = t//apt 7' 740sY- Signature: (Phone No.) QAS � 3--2d:) K. o Printed Name of Signee: & Title: Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01 OP2. -01, OAK HILL. WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BVTHIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17,2023. Procedure to Res o�nd. kS& ;1, , e a 4 'thin 200 teet ofe subject tractPor (an interested citizen), I (approve) !T!!stnd/or (have the following comments, I formally PROTEST the rezoning efforts. The greenbelt is paramount to the uniqueness of the existing pL communities the wildlife_, enervation of native veg itatio n /trees, and noice control 1— The builinq of 21 homes will negatives impact all of these areas, and the overall adverse impact can't even begin to be calculated. In the event rezoning is approved, there MUST be guarentees by the developer, with oversight, that every mature tree that can be preserved IS preserved, with substantial financial penaties if not aheard to. I also believe it is in the best interest of all parties involved that we come to a mutual agreement about noise/privacy buffers to minimize the inevitable reduction in propery values for those that back up to the greenbelt. Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or t.ot, Block and Subdivision: David & June McIntire, 4707 Taylor Ln, Grapevine, TX 76051 - SBO 214.683.6482 Signature _(Phone No,)'-- ' David McIntire Home Owner Telephone. (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mall responses to, Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas "(16099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY. JULY 1 Z 2023. Procedure to Respond: *�e���� eor (an interested atizen), I (approve)(pnd/or(havfollowing comments) ,8j A PIUP4/7Y dW/✓1flt w/ N ZDd F/=,E"T OF Till_' SUBJ}rCT � L07�/`-t2-�OA� ff/�L /''OR%I�.� fJ�Lt•O�t//w/6 /'��fONSr' J• No/s,E', 4,444 t464 ME S ug 115ar M 97 ~gyms /s ft P9926 .t�A'i�� � 1RF E ew,* ; i7400— 10 9-- wl� � ,,srRoy ��vy L,4R 6f a Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: NE. Y 1 , Signature :A C s"d (Phone No.) 1/7r291- f7$6 Printed Name of Signee: �'C� f�(/�(l�"f�J- G 5Pj rye: ®w woe Telephone: (817) 410-3155 JUL 17 2023 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-011 CP23-01, OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMEN't S MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MOhQA AY , jyL Y 17, 2023, Pro224ure to Respond: 3*;a;nio�ra�vet �eo lowing C�nnlme�nts) �� or (an interested citizen), I (approve) I am protesting the rezoning of the greenbelt behind S130. I was misinformed by my realtor that this area would never be developed, and it is the major reason I chose to buy my home. The greenbelt not only provides beauty, but also provides homes to our wonderfull native texas wildlife, substantial noise control from 360 and privacy ... all of which will be lost with a new subdivision. Plus, there will likely couple years of perpetual construction and eyer�thir�negative thatopAA[gnq with it. However, if therezoningis approved, I hope the City Coun-cel will makesure that every tree that can be preserved is maintained and that we can, agree on a subtantial buffer to maintain as much of the greenbelt_ as Dos i t% Printed Property owner Flame ano Address, or Lot. Block and Subdivision: Vic Mignogna fl 1 2Ta I ane, Grapevine TX 76051 -_Stone Bridge Oaks Signature: 37 7'/ Phone No n a Printed Name of Signee� is Mi nqgr�_ 1*itie Home owner I elephone: (817) 410-3156 Wrect questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #1.23-01/ CP23-01, OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMEN'FS MUSTBE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER I HAN 12 PM ON MONDA Y UL , J Y 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: feet of the subject tract)Jr (an interested citizen), I (approve) arid/or (have the I wish to express strop opposition to this request. The plat is incomplete according to Grapevine Standards of Design. No drainage, street arrangement, or lot line dimensions. Please delay the Public Input Mtng until we can see a proper plat. Otherwise, Please and so many 20" diameter trees, which adds value to our properties. Also a natural spring would be wiped out effecting SBO Lots 20-22 and Glade Hills lot W-W. On November 20, 2012, the Cit Council_!P&Z approved as -@_gTpen-!2arrier between Taylor Lane homes and contrast development (tract 1A1) as common area due similar complaints. I ask for a 50' greebelt barrier bordering all of SBO properties affected by developmentthis proposed -----' given the approval of one in 2012. Thank you. Printed Property Owner ame and Address or I ot, Block and Sub iviston: Sandra Rice, 4727 Taylor Ln, Grapevine, TX 76051 Signature --(Phone No Printed Name of Signee - __S@_n4 Title. Telephone: (817) 410-3166 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P 0. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 , 817-271-3460 Home Owner WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MIONDAY. JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: Asa ro erty Owne within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) protes an or ave the following comments) 0WX .Shw rct lrp )dmr�le Sos,,, ohe CaD'��t���`�9 ji��'- -00-ocz/ GMd ®rde✓,�07 ..T,Bt� Latsda,al,�24 lade Ae.'yleys i•Qt, Rif 30VI, hairier, is Was aA ISSue i ^ DI:4 WAer '25vf rC16t Aeve/a ✓t�'eArt i &TV7 Y ►i`�h f e 0 i ► -baAk i; uvas a Pp,'d ye- d 6 � tie. -vrat- pq ''a yl or LA.,"ed a,'5 a (1,6jon M n Agli i COP IT .e- o� Peo1%Wt MJ41 `�-f Js!' ues�is ire ✓el o Printed Property Owner ame and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: as 0,() �D4 A,� ) k Signature : 1)0 a4w"'� (Phone Printed Name of Signee: JO f d ! /" 8 Gt,01) Title: JUL 17 2o23 Telephone: (517) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician f' 3 Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 ,4 Gi Proposes! Comments to P&Z for form 1 message Sandra Rice <sanwrites1@gmail.com> To: is lit <cbcmason@gmail.com>, Gary Pearson <gpaussie@verizon.net> & lit <cbcrnason@gmail.com> Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 11:14 AM Hi Carol and Garry, I am assuming this development request will go through, so here are some comments to possibly mitigate it. My main concem is that the plat is incomplete according to CoG Standards of Design, so how can the P&Z accept it? There are no drainage, street arrangement, utility, home or lot line dimensions shown. We can't see the circulation of traffic through the subdivision, nor how it will affect SBO or Glade Hills. I urge you to put off the public hearing meeting for the proposed rezoning. IF that is not possible, please disapprove this incomplete request. I protest this development as shown on the Notice plat. Wildlife habitat will be destroyed, as well as many old - growth trees at least twenty inches in diameter. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. This habitat and should be investigated for endangered species by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Also, there is a water source natural spring at the south end bordering SBO lots 20,21, 22 and Glade Hills lots 1A1, 2A1, 3A1, 4A1, etc. that would be wiped out without protection of a green barrier. This was an issue in November 20, 2012 when Contrast Development requested to build a subdivision behind some of our homes on Taylor Lane. The full City Council approved the request ONLY if the green barrier was approved on Tract 1Al, designated on the plat as 'Common Area'. I hope you will consider the same type of greenbelt again. if this request should be approved, I ask for a SW buffer zone bordering all SBO properties affected by this development, given the prior approval of one in 2012. JUL 17 2023 LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, LP Tuesday, November 20, 2012 Mr. Ron Stombaugh Planning and Development Manager City of Grapevine JUL 17 2023 200 South Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 '' !! T ..� RE: Application to change Zoning from Commercial to Single family at the INW Corner of Glade Road and Hwy 360 Dear Mr. Stombaugh: I am sorry I am not available to be present at the P&Z and City Council meeting this evening, but I would like this letter presented to both P&Z and City Council members as part of their consideration of the above mentioned zoning case. I represent the ownership of the vacant lots at Stone Bridge Oaks, as Ufestyle Grapevine 360 I.P. Yesterday evening, Monday, November 19'', the Stone Bridge Oaks HOA and Lifestyle Grapevine 360 LP (Developer for SBO's), had a meeting with the development team requesting a zoning change on the commercial property at the NW Corner of Glade Road and Hwy 360. Although they did meet with us, this meeting was done at the final hour, giving us no opportunity to provide any input into the design of the site plan. To put it mildly, everyone was very unhappy with the layout that was presented by the development team. Although we had written letters in favor of the proposed multi -family project that was presented to us in the recent past, we cannot support this project for the following reasons: 1. There is an area on their plan which borders our property, and it is a natural drainage area with many beautiful mature trees. This area has been made into a huge residential lot, which makes no sense at all, and negatively Impacts our lots that back onto this area. 2_ There is no significant open space provided in the entire layout. I have not seen a subdivision with less creativity or less concern with the natural terrain and existing mature trees. There are many specimen trees on this site, and It appears that there has been no attempt whatsoever to save any tree to add to the overall beauty of this development. Compare this to our SBO's community, in which literally IWs of trees were saved. It is obvious that the developer took a 50x120 lot stamp and went around this site to see just how to maximize the number of lots, and not concern themselves with the liveability of this site. Where will someone walk their dog on this site? Or go to meet with other neighbors? The argument by the developer is that the City discouraged "sliver" open spaces, but they misled everyone because I don't believe the City would discourage having thoughtful open spaces added into this site plan. 9603 White Rock Trail, Suite 204 Dallas, Texas 75238 LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360.. LP 3. There is no provision for a significant landscape buffer where residential lots back directly onto HWY 360. The developer may install a masonry fence, but that alone will not be sufficient buffering for these homes. The feeling amongst homeowners present at our meeting last night is consistent with the points above, and for these reasons, we are requesting that this project be rejected by both P&Z and Town Council as presented. it is obvious to everyone that the developer is only looking for maximizing the number of lots on the site, and not toward how someone will successfully live at this property. Thank you for your consideration. We greatly appreciate it. If you require any additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me at 214-794-5366 or a hon renadierhomes.com . Yours truly, Anthony R. Natale Manager Lifestyle Grapevine 360 LP JUL 17 2023 9603 white Roctc Trail, SUlte 204 Dallas, Texas 75238 Points for Grapevine Council Meeting We should have a list of asks in case the proposal passes, including: Asking for a green buffer zone of at least 50' between us and new homes © Showing the exact placement of trees to replace the large trees and thick forest that will be cut down for the subdivision. We'd life them to be at the edge of buffer zone Drainage plan and replacement water for the natural spring on property. Since the noise level will rise due to the removal of the nature barrier: We request SB®-funded service or installed ANSI Noise bevel Teter to monitor decibel levels according to Grapevine Code Section 55, 3A (2-5) Levels must be and environmental noise from acoustic pollution is regulated in Grapevine "to JUL 17 2023 provide comfort and peace to residents" Pre -Construction and During Construction: From the outset, We want onsite city Public Works supervision for the Deal estate Developer, assuring they will deliver measurable solutions to control noise, and also dust, debris, light pollution and adherence to environmental work standards. Developer will adhere to CoG construction hours (Any work prior to 8:00 a.m. or after 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday and between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on Saturday, Sunday and holidays) QUESTIONS TO ASK AT MEETING: [WE SHOULD COMPARE THE PLAT WITH ALL CITY STANDARDS OF DESIGN] Want assurances from city and developer that all future watershed, sewer and lot drainage plans will have no potential detrimental impacts on our communities whatsoever. WILL THEY BUILD SEPARATE will utilities (electrical, telephone, cable) service and transmission linesbe placed Underground? (OUR PREFERENCE) If above ground, how will our buffer trees be affected. Design, Item 2. Street Systems, 2.3. Secure a realtor assessment of loss of property value on Taylor Lane due to loss of back forest and/or zero lot line homes to be built. EXCAVATION/ CONSTRUCTION -mill not harm trees in green buffer as to kill adjacent trees. JUL 17 2023 Points for Grapevine Council Meeting We should have a list of asks in case the proposal passes, including: Asking for a green buffer zone of at least 50' between us and new homes Showing the exact placement of trees to replace the large trees and thick forest that will be cut down for the subdivision. We'd like them to be at the edge of buffer zone Drainage plan and replacement water for the natural spring on property. Since the noise level will rise due to the removal of the nature barrier: We request SBO-funded service or installed ANSI Noise Level Meter to monitor decibel levels according to Grapevine Code Section 55, 3A (2-5) Levels must be and environmental noise from acoustic pollution is regulated in Grapevine "to provide comfort and peace to residents" Pre -Construction and During Construction: From the outset, We want onsite city Public Works supervision for the Real estate Developer, assuring they will deliver measurable solutions to control noise, and also dust, debris, light pollution and adherence to environmental work standards. Developer will adhere to CoG construction hours (Any work prior to 8:00 a.m. or after 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday and between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on Saturday, Sunday and holidays) QUESTIONS TO ASK AT MEETING: [WE SHOULD COMPARE THE PLAT WITH ALL CITY STANDARDS OF DESIGN] Want assurances from city and developer that all future watershed, sewer and lot drainage plans will have no potential detrimental impacts on our communities whatsoever. WILL THEY BUILD SEPARATE STORM DRAINS? Will utilities (electrical, telephone, cable) service and transmission linesbe placed Underground? (OUR PREFERENCE) If above ground, how will our buffer trees be affected. Street Arrangement / The street arrangements shall conform with the intent of the thoroughfare plan as adopted by the city. Adequate collector streets shall be provided for the circulation of traffic throughout the subdivision. Does this plat conform to city standards of Horizontal Curve Limitations? Article I, Standards of Design, Item 2, Street Systems, 2.3. Secure a realtor assessment of loss of property value on Taylor Lane due to loss of back forest and/or zero lot line homes to be built. EXCAVATION/ CONSTRUCTION —Will not harm trees in green buffer as to kill adjacent trees. JUL 17 2023 Reasons for Asking for Greent uffar bcWveen neue deve0opment and SBO/G de His Save the natural spring on the south side of plat between the Olivers and joneses. (Verify this with urban forester) Save the historic, large trees along property on both subdivisions due to natural noise barrier for future traffic along 360 Possible loss of property values due to loss of green barrier behind homes (Verify this with a realtor) JUL 17 Z073 FILE ##Z23-01 / CP23-01: ` OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As_JaZroperty Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or ( protest and/or (have the following comments) 4oS5. a,--, l3 rzds 4rnd We`d / -��. Gu vVePA+ly Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: -/-,Ay4.vri /l 93 Title: ®� Printed Name of Signee: JUL 17 2023 Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician £ZOZ L T int Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest) and/or (have the TfIlowing comments) ��` ► �1: o Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block apd Subdivision: bl)6 [i La- P", -Y] eta" 0/1 4'711 r�,6v-- i (o� Signature : No.)4 17--1-3 7s—" Printed Name of Signee: v b1 - �'� ®� 1 ��1 Title: ZA)Nz JUL 17 2o23 Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: owner within 200 feet of the su (have the following commen (an interested citizen), I (approve) JUL 17 2023 Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: �3 Ili 1I Ct ie G �� &rbi)��P& I A 7 & aj-/ )��^ t/ Signature: (Phone No.) r 3 3 6p 'o/ 7d- Printed Name of Signee: up,, �'t'�� Gt 1 Title: a Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 Glade Hill Residents submitting Protest to Case Z23-01/023-01 Homeowner Address Phone 200 ft Lauren Jones 350 Hill Creek Ln 214-770-1616 Yes Eric Maurer & Colleen Friday 338 Hill Creek Ln 214-914-1724 Yes Garry & Dawn Becker 342 Hill Creek Ln 817-914-6106 Yes Derek & Ashley Ingle 334 Hill Creek Ln 574-202-4124 Yes Pete Hendley Hall 322 Hill Creek Ln 817-781-3446 Yes Charles Gordon 325 Hill Creek Ln 817-657-8231 PI:g Olen & Aaron White 346 Hill Creek Ln 423-956-6334 Yes Theodore & Myungsuk Waldrip 326 Hill Creek Ln 214-783-7205 Yes Melanie Gleich 330 Hill Creek Ln 214-802-9959 Yes Stone Bridge Oaks submitting Protest to Case Z23-01/CP23-01 Homeowner Address Phone 200 ft Carol Mason 4677 Taylor Ln 972-880-7192 Yes Nick and Barbara Colletti 4644 Taylor Ln 515-423-2060 Yes David & June McIntire 4707 Taylor Ln 214-683-6482 Yes Kenneth and Sharyn Spinks 4655 Taylor Ln 817-291-4786 Yes Sandra Rice 4727 Taylor Ln 817-271-3460 Yes Doug Hancock 4625 Trevor Trl Yes Catherine Foshage 4622 Kaitlyn Ln 214-415-0627 No Vic Mignogna 4711 Taylor Ln 713-917-3897 Yes Anne Benvenuto 4669 Taylor Ln 917-680-5471 Yes Jeffrey Luchey 4708 Taylor Ln 214-213-1193 Yes Patricia and Barry Macy 4805 Trevor Trl 806-543-0446 No Kelli Frazier 4804 Taylor Ln 817-938-7231 No Steve & Patty Hensel Steve 4720 Taylor Ln 817-454-7033 *es - Behrens 4620 Trevor Trl 972-567-1116 Yes Garry Pearson 4724 Taylor Ln 817-366-0073 No _] William & Patricia Oliver 4719 Taylor Ln 817-233-3175 Yes 20/24 Homes 200ft Protesting - 83% Well over 20% for 75% City Council Vote Eric Maurer & Colleen Friday 338 Hill Creek Lane Grapevine, TX 76051 colleenfriday@yahoo.com/ermaurer@gmail.com 214-533-8972 July 15, 2023 Grapevine Texas City Council 200 South Main Street IjUL 17 ZW3 Grapevine, TX 76051 Subject: Opposition to the rezoning of land and plans for Oak Hill community Dear Members of the Grapevine Texas City Council, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed rezoning of land and the development plans for the Oak Hill community. As a concerned resident of this beautiful city, I believe it is essential to consider the long-term impact such a decision may have on our community and its residents. First and foremost, one of the major reasons for our opposition is the detrimental effect this development will have on property values. Many residents, including myself, have invested in properties that back up to the proposed Oak Hill community, specifically for the purpose of having greenspace and obstructing the view of Highway 360. We all paid a premium, upwards of $35,000 for the lots that back up to the greenspace. The removal of this greenspace will undoubtedly lead to a significant reduction in property values for these homes and, consequently, affect the entire community and neighboring areas. This potential decline in property values is a significant concern for homeowners who have worked hard to establish their residences and create a peaceful living environment. Furthermore, there are serious concerns regarding proper drainage in the Oak Hill area, particularly since it backs up to the creek. The potential impact on drainage systems needs to be thoroughly assessed to prevent any future flooding or water -related issues that could affect both existing and new properties. This was proven to be an issue in the past and this cannot be overlooked in this decision on whether this land is suitable for development and that it will not disrupt or harm the existing homes nearby. Another critical aspect to consider is the preservation of wildlife and natural habitats. The proposed development will displace various wildlife species currently residing in the woods, forcing them into the surrounding community. This disruption not only threatens the natural balance of the ecosystem but also raises concerns about the potential conflict between residents and wildlife. It is our duty to protect these habitats and the diverse wildlife that calls them home. Additionally, the construction process itself will bring considerable noise and disturbance to the area for several years, while ruining the value of our neighborhood. The destruction of large trees, which provide valuable noise protection, shade, and aesthetic value to Glade Hill and Stone Bridge Oaks, will be a significant loss to our community. These trees have long been cherished by residents and serve as a crucial element in maintaining a peaceful and harmonious living environment. It is essential to consider the long-term consequences of removing such vital features that contribute to the quality of life for residents and what make living in Grapevine appealing. JUL 17 2023 Furthermore, it is important for the City of Grapevine to uphold its tree preservation standards. The current plan for the Oak Hill community, as it is written, shows every square inch being developed with zero lot lines. This approach disregards the aesthetic value of the area and fails to consider the importance of preserving existing trees and green spaces. It is crucial to maintain the character and charm that drew residents to this community in the first place. It is also important to note that we, as residents, have not been given adequate time or information regarding the plans for the Oak Hill community. The lack of transparency and opportunity for meaningful community engagement is deeply concerning. Decisions of this magnitude should be made with the input and collaboration of the affected residents. We were given less than one week's notice on this action, and were not told that not only would the council rule on the rezoning, but also on approving the plans themselves. This information was found out by asking questions, but not clearly stated to all residents and those affected. We urge the Grapevine Texas City Council to provide ample time for public consultation and ensure that residents are well-informed about the proposed development. In light of the aforementioned concerns, I kindly urge the Grapevine Texas City Council to reconsider the rezoning of land and the plans for the Oak Hill community. We must prioritize the preservation of property values, the protection of natural habitats, the adherence to tree preservation standards, and the overall aesthetic appeal of our community. I respectfully request that you take into account the valid concerns raised by residents and taxpayers by exploring alternative solutions that would ensure sustainable and responsible development while preserving the unique characteristics that make Grapevine such a wonderful place to live. 2 1 P a g e Thank you for your time and consideration. I trust that you will give due diligence to the concerns presented by the community, and I hope that you will make a decision that reflects the best interests of Grapevine and its residents. Sincerely, Eric Maurer and Colleen Fr' ay IIUL 1 '7 3 1 P a g e FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: A ert Owner with�following�commentsf the subject tract (protest nd/or (have the r (an interested citizen), I (approve) &�u s -011 WIND Oil Ll "+t e ttL---a.) Jbm (2-'s, G t"OE 14KC. t_ '!XLr3 D1 V 151 nAj Signature ��2' (Phone No.) 716 -A, (k Printed Name of Signee: I-PV-9126 --Jt)13Title: f}-EtwA-3e(4 Telephone: (817) 410-3155 JUL 17 2023 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 f?� io) FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As Pro e er�the 200 feet of the sub'ect tract) r (an interested citizen), I (approve) rotest and/or (haveollowing comments) - s � � �c-� o aY) -T::>a&1T . Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: `f Loa, o J 2LryDn,- —It- A j G ilaPL-fv1nlVi X %ID (0S') 9 -7-Z - Signature : ��`*�"^- (? (Phone No.) S 6� 1 1 Printed Name of Signee: Title: o—i AJ LFA, Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician y € JUL 1 % 2023 Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL COMMENTS from a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract. I protest and have the following comments: My concerns are as follows: The plot of land in question is forested and provides a sound barrier between 360 and the access road and our neighborhood. Has any type of wall/sound abatement structure been proposed to reduce the noise once the land is cleared? Can a green buffer area be extended to 50 feet to help protect our existing homes. Lack of a good buffer will impact our community and quality of life, and could well affect property values. 2. When Glade Hill was built there were drainage issues that arose between Stone Bridge Oaks and Glade Hills. Has a drainage plan been reviewed and approved by the City? What remedies are available to us if problems do arise? 3. There are many old growth trees in the Oak Hill plot. Will these be protected? Will new trees be planted to replace those that are removed? When Glade Hills was built, an agreement was reached that designated protected trees along the buffer zone. Sadly, a number of these older trees were cut down in error by the builder. These were replaced eventually, but with new growth. What safeguards will be in place to ensure that any protected trees will be preserved? Thank you. William H. Behrens III 4620 Trevor Trail, Grapevine TX 76051-8434 972-567-1116 William H. Behrens III JUL 17 2023 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL W OMMENTS DUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON OND 17 2023. Procedure to Respond: As a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or an interested citize) I (approve) rotest nd/or (have the following comments) ks� . " 6 �91Y - a A - Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Bloat and Subdivision: q '.4o — Tre v ocz -T rw, d"t Y i �bY' fi e v , A `e Signature : ICE/fi (Phone No.)_ &6 -5 V 3 Printed Name of Signee: as YYy /T_ / 1 q, e y Title: V r6Pps' a 1- Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDA Y. JUL Y 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: o erty Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or ( interested citi n), I (approve) rotest d/or (have the following comments) k.;t %,J �- 'kCZ> G C1 CAC-r_-5*a:1 `�L WVqZsL_*) Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: Signature : Phone No.) S 1 "7 310-C:)�'Z3 Printed Name of Signee:Title Telephon6 (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 S,-3p'Z>A 'JUL 17 2D23 COMMENTS FROM AN INTERESTED CITIZEN, and President of Stone Bridge Oaks Owner's Association I wish to address the joint meeting of Grapevine City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission Concerns expressed by our homeowner members: Insufficient and inadequate notice received as to the zoning change and plat - Although compliance with notice regulations may have been met, the zoning application was filed on January 3, 2023, and no information was provided to SBOOA members until, July 10, 2023. No information or communication regarding the property has been provided by the developer. The public notice of zoning change is not dated for mailing so how is compliance verified? How has planning staff confirmed that all property owners within 200' of the subject property have been notified? Some residents on the west side of Taylor Lane have not been notified, however they may be within the 200' limit. There has been no notification of plat approval. Application for plat approval were not received by the city until July 12, 2023, and not made available to the public until July 15. Overall, while the letter of public notice regulations and requirements may have been met, certainly the spirit of such notifications and information communication to interested parties has not. The trees on the property provide a noise and nuisance for traffic on Highway 360. This will be lost should the development proceed. Has the Planning department obtained any survey of the property to determine the number and location of protected trees? Has the City Council required a Tree Preservation Permit? Is a drainage plan on file and available? If the property is leveled for building, whether increasing or decreasing height, what are the remedies if any for adverse drainage effects on Stone Bridge Oaks property. There is a water/ creek feature on the south end of the property? What is the status? Will it be an open drain? JUL 17 2023 The plat and plan does not appear to comply with the zoning requirements R-5.0", Zero -Lot -Line, in that fully one third of the lots, (7 of 21), indicate front width of less than 50'. We respectfully request that all decisions regarding this property are tabled at this time, all homeowner questions are answered, and more detailed and comprehensive information provided by the City and the developer. Gare 4724 Taylor Lane 817-366-0073 President, Stone Bridge Oaks Owners' Association JUL 17 2023 FILE 3.016 G "" OM MICE , kT RECZK'U Y TH[S OFF O TiF-R TKAN oww Wi0en 20D feet Of tm Wke-M or (gn c> r~ t d -z(-, 0- i (app I itf --,,, F PKnOd .� Tdep • u (817) 4 f,, -S t ft PUMMM %can ofty of ompevme P-OiDOX96104 T FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As ert Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) rotest) 'nd/or (have the following comments)` A Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: Signature : Printed Name of Signee: ne No. ` Title: Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099