Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 03 - Oak Hill
TO- HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM- BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER ERICA MAROHNIC, PLANNING SERVICES DIRECTOR MEETING DATE- AUGUST 15, 2023 SUBJECT- PLANNING SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Z23-01 I , - ----------- - � ' 2— APPLICANT- 360 Land Partners, LLC- Josh and Grapevine Lake Jacob Born r I Novo l F I.H.1635 PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE- `m Northwest � l od5 Pt� N The subject property is located at 4700 State � �? Highway 360 and proposed to be platted as Block 1, Lots 1-21, Oak Hill. The site contains approximately sy i Airport x 5.750 acres and has approximately 861.56 feet of Hall-Johnson Aso a frontage along State Highway 360. I L1 T----� o L J ;� ' Glade Rd. O REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE AND COMMENTS- The applicant is requesting to rezone 5.750 acres from "PCD", Planned Commerce Development District to "R-5.0", Zero-Lot-Line District for the development of 21 single- family detached residential lots. On July 18, 20237 City Council tabled zoning application Z23-01 to the August 15, 2023 meeting to allow the applicant additional time to meet with neighboring property owners to discuss the applicant's intent. It is the applicants' intent to develop the subject 5.750-acre site into a residential subdivision with a new public right-of-way providing access from State Highway 360. The subject site is at the west side of State Highway 360, approximately 1,018 feet north of Glade Road and the city limits line adjacent to the City of Euless. The applicants' concept plan and zoning exhibit illustrates the viability of a single-family residential subdivision relative to building coverage and placement, impervious lot coverage and off-street parking requirements on the subject site. Z23-01.4 and CP23-01.4 1 PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned "PCD", Planned Commerce Development District and is undeveloped. HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject property and surrounding properties were zoned 1-1", Light Industrial District prior to the 1984 city-wide rezoning. • On September 17, 2006, City Council approved zone change request Z2002-06 was for the property to the north and west from the "PCD", Planned Commerce Development District to "R-MF-1", Multifamily District for a 124-unit condominium project that was deed-restricted to no more than six units per acre. The project did not move forward. The property's zoning was subsequently changed through multiple zone change and planned development overlay requests for a townhome development in 2006 to a "R-5.0," Zero-Lot-Line District for 66 single-family detached lots in 2010 with zone change request Z2010-02 and planned development overlay request PD2010-04; developed as Stone Bridge Oaks. • On November 20, 20127 City Council approved zone change request Z2012-13 for the property to the south from "PCD", Planned Commerce Development District to "R-5.0,"Zero-Lot-Line District to develop 69 single-family detached residential lots. • On July 18, 20237 City Council tabled zone change request Z2023-01 to the August 15, 2023 meeting. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "R-5.0," Zero-Lot-Line District — Stone Bridge Oaks subdivision SOUTH: "R-5.0," Zero-Lot-Line District — Glade Hill subdivision EAST: "PCD", Planned Commerce Development District — State Highway 360 right-of-way WEST: "R-5.0," Zero-Lot-Line District — Stone Bridge Oaks subdivision AIRPORT IMPACT: The subject property is not located within any of the noise zones as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. Z23-01.4 and CP23-01.4 2 MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: Map 2: Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Master Plan designates the subject site as (LC) Commercial Low Intensity land use. The applicant's request is not compliant with the Master Plan. THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION: State Highway 360 is not designated on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. /em Z23-01.4 and CP23-01.4 3 l \. 5 6 \ 2_ 17 \ 1 i, r 11 17 34 18 18 \ i ' 19 33 2 21 0 10 \ 1 _ - 32 may` { 31 SUBJECT 47. i ---__-- \ 30 PROPERTY v� \ 1 24 3 QO`\ 32 23 29 trkp 'A \\ 22 28 o � 4 27 0 2, � � f QQ QQ y 5 _ 20 _C 26 TF 2B4 �� O 6 39 19_ 25 7 18- 24 8 17 23~ QO 9 16 22 18 _ ` 15 11 14 13 20 \\ / 12 ---- 1Al 2A1 3A1 4A1 5A1 6A1 7A1 Al 9A1 19 - z - RA1 T 10A1 2 13 16 - - COMMOV 12A1 l 18 14 < 15� AREA 1A1 2A1 3A1 4A1 5A1 6A1 7A1 3A1 8A1 9A1 10A1 11A1 2A1 3Al 4A1 15Al ` t 1Al Feet 0 90 180 270 360 Z23-011 CP23-01 ; Oak Hill �� V1 N 4700 State Highway 360 :p $ w�E e This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine ITIGIS department Various official and unofficial sources were Date Prepared: 7/5/2023 used to gather this information.Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data,however,no guarantee is given or implied as to the accuracy of said data. a N APPLICATIONZONE CHANGE Current or if unplatted, proposed subdivisionrasa area of parcel (to nearest tenth of -n!6- Street fmntage &distancenearest cross streetDescribe tProposed � ll Proposed r trtrr FutureLand Use Designation Ali Zone Change Requests are assumed to be complete ted and *411 be placed on the agenda r public hearing at Me discretionthe sizef the agenda, your application f to a later date. N public hearings will be opened and testimony given by app1t t Interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continuedto the next publichearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept f v zone change request can tapproved City Council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand f of the requirementss set forth by the application for zoning change request and acknowledget all requirements of this applicationv t at the time of submittal. Owner Name Compan tre _ `4 StateZip d n `t Projectr tt (check represent the application myself-, OR 0 1 hereby designate (name of project representative)to act in the capacity y agent for submittal, processing, representation, and/or presentation of this request. The designated t shall be the principal contactperson 0 RECEIVED Planning Services a nt 200 S.Main Street Grapevine,TX 76051 ',4 . w APPLICATIONZONE CHANGE CHECKLISTResidential for responding to all requests for information for resolving issues of concern relative t this request. I hereby certify that I am the property owner oft roperty and further certify that the information provided on this v l t application is true and correct. I have selectedv l I type and representation of my own volitiont at,. e request of the Cityf Grapevine. Propertyr� SignatureDate STATE F: COUNTY OFF Notarylrnm BEFORE ME, a 1 , on this day personally appeared (ptirited property owneesrr the above signed, , under oath, stated the following, l hereby certify t I am the propertyr for the purposesf this application; that all information submitted herein is true correct." SUB CRIBDED AND SWORN TO beforethis the day of PUBLIC—��NOTARY in and for t t �offexas -Zon.o ]AN 0 3 RECEIVED Planningi t 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, TX 7 7. ! rp, r4 2fw�s ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION CHECKLIST *V11 Project Representative Information fete if designated by owner) o Engineer o Purchaser o Tenant o Preparer u Other(specify)....... Name Company Address l to _ Zip Code Email Applicant's t STATE OF: COUNTY OF.* BEFORE , a NotaryPublic, on this day personallyappeared (printed property ownersthe above signed, who, under oath, stated the f ll i � "l hereby certify that I am the applicant for the purposes of this li tl that all information submi r ire is true and SUBSCRIBDED AND SWORN TO for , this the day of NOTARYLI in and for the tt of Texas RECEIVED P J -ion -010 Planningt 200 S. Main Street*Grapevine,TX 76051 # 817.4%3155htt s 1,1 Jy/'.rapo ine iian m ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST -Residential It has been deteffnined that the propertydescribed i require r replatfing and the applicant has been instructed on thisprocedure. It has been determinedthat the propertydescribed Its is currently plattedr does not require platting or replatting at this i Address of subject property—LI Legal description of subject property OA ell Public rt n t RECEIVED 5 Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 17. 1 .31 CONCEPT PLAN APPLICATION APPLICANTIAGENT NAMEw COMPANY NAME ADDRESS %Q I1 STATE ZIP L EMAIL. a APPLICANT'S T IN SUBJECT PROPERTY . ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER(S)NAME CAI —STATE 4 ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 41y a�a, .:A.e .a. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:LOT—BLOCK—ADDITION SIZE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY _., ACRESI METES & BOUNDS MUST BE DESCRIBED " " SHEET . PRESENT ZONINGI ICE TI PRESENT r REQUESTEDING DISTRICT ;(.__ THE APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS THE MASTER FLAN DESIGNATION N AND THE MOST RESTRICTIVE ZONE THAT WOULD ALLOWTHE PROPOSED USE I PLATTING VERIFICATION THIS VERIFICATION STATEMENT MUST BE SIGNED PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF THIS CONCEPT PLAN APPLICATION It has been determined that the property described below does require platting or replatting and the applicant has been instructed on this procedure, It has been determined that the property described below is currently platted or does not require platting or replatting at this time. ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY JCCI LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY aiv�vtk�,, Pre-t .2--boi 3 �2,o 2 2- ............ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DATE THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND SUBMITTED ALONG WITH A COMPLETED APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. SECTION ".C. RECEIVED 1A IN" 13 3 2 f,12' 9. MINIMUM/MAXIMUM DISTRICT SIZE FOR REQUESTED ZONING 10. DESCRIBE THE PROPOSED USE 11. THE CONCEPT PLAN SUBMISSION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 45, CONTENTS OF A CONCEPT PLAN, SECTION 45.C. lEE9919-E99N9fRJ-ftM ALL SUBSEQUENT SITE PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTED. THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF WILL DETERMINE THE AGENDA FOR EACH OF THE PU13LIC HEARING DATES. BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE AGENDA, YOUR APPLICATION MAY BE RESCHEDULED TO A LATER DATE. 12. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A FINAL CONCEPT PLAN. APPLICANT(PRINT) APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER(PRINT) LLC OWNER SIGNAT RECEIVED JAN 0 3 2,(,)? f The State of fir Tomma-M7- this day personally appeared r1r provedto me on the oath of r through (description f identity r r other docu ent)to be the personname is subscribed to the foregoing instrument o to me that he executedthe same for the purposes and consideration therein r .. Given under my hand and seal ofo this f SEAL NhNotary pub ic,State of Texas ` q^ z mn),Expires 0 - 4-2026 Notary ID 13308270.5 The State of County of _ Before this day personally appeared kWo-wntor proved to me on the oathf r through (description f identity cardr other t to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein r . Given under my hand and seat of office this____ day of K D. SEAL Notary Signature Z23-01; Oak Hill Correspondence from Residence Letters of Protest: 26 Letter of General Comments: 1 Letter of Support: 1 Total: 28 ic ►������������■M�i� OWN 10 ��r.���♦jam_ OR=ME�_ • O 1 Ut] '1�V��■■1 �� ���������1■_ • IN it ♦ INNNERVE KN4 MEN., noun ������i�►i►4rl���'•♦v1`♦v♦�`IWI IMAN �L�1►�♦v♦�►4♦V��•'♦♦�� � Feet 1 it 160 240 320 Z23-01/CP23-01 ; Oak Hill Protest Map f Property • • rs ofthe subject This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department.Various official and unofficial sources were •.te Prep. e• 7/17/2023 used to gather this information.Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data,however,no guarantee is Concerning the project case # Z23-01/cP23-01;Oak Hill Dear Sirs: My wife and I have lived in the Stone Bridge Oaks community for over 11 years. Our community borders the proposed Oak Hill development. We are in favor of the rezoning of this property to a residential single family community. We feel that this is a great option for this vacant property. Sincerely, P�Q, & /V41t� Bill & Debby Kruse 4709 Trevor Trail Grapevine, TX. 76051 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL JUL 17 2023 WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest)and/or have the following comments) ZZ CUmvtievtjS rtre Au-ecf C'� ut�clers v���v P�Pa_5 rs-5") gGiwtrrl, �n�, e�,{ram /ifs. Ti ►� Afafu Val od ral!�z e rvt,�f /i,, S& f ols- 313Z a ne/ e,!y/ es- �e h rrec, 44t CouceyytCe-� c4c,-T loGvw7 {D /Ofs 31- 2) PLapt sde�Co'' r"rrferw os a4c "rees c{s ;UsrA(t C'h Cssr,ec-(z4f y 1r^ Ae bo de r W S50. f rrAr a P"amclah l Se f4 d-c �efiwe<r .?S-27 51letAe P rr���c ax k ah OA Alr1l y'es-e rtee Sam e b-ee5- e 5904-33. 3) f(-efrv^ e)"C6V'Ce "-L� S©y7 &'C-f S-1-de So mor-Aeym aerif he,e '- e v�, 70 5R.0 �Y S 3Z e-vtJ 33 (5 a Cu f-d e -5qc -v vn i�,d mi ze +kvccr e 4e rr' o.� (r,0 ;4v%d avvo � C�Yd.lhc r o � � L-Ot5 3Z-33 ay.� cs���-{, �/orar �e . ne��kboc-1 .�!a(OWKAII/ Klel� �z33 Wt V - j vp1 i e%rV1*bVS arm Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: �0 &low dra-1 H(Av)('0d< Fa►v+d,, I Yu s;� Ubcw5 � Mi�:ek -lav-cock ?+rv3f`ces,) q&ZS `1�re���r 1 ray I S4-oNe 6Y� ��,t Cis 610Ck 3 , Lc� 3Z Signature �� '� (Phone No.) 2 -777-�W Printed Name of Signee: ! 14\6-S F +Aa`"CcJr, Title: )rv.Oec reydet4- y) 17 ere 13 u 1,24 o-F h1��wcy We refer Ae s{�+�r 0o,'5e will Pey aliver� � � Ce{�ec�' S1 eeP �� �PSclevf� Telephone: (817)410-3155 cj,vo b u f err �a wFr"40 5! eel',{ P Dir IAWI! � 0 carers- �a. �.¢ ect questions and mail responses to: v'e 4 `� rec�vcc poise Planning Technician 4o deVe1op f'-oPe�+��°° new dwelln5-' Suve4 Planning Services T14- COL) 1� be 6e ev^ fe yr ve wee 145- 4c,�P� - City of Grapevine C5u`�CdW�e �ed�a a�l we ve P.O. Box 95104 ()f YesiAelafs, the r`oL'sr Grapevine, Texas 76099 T� is not- aS abvrovS -)\,\ {'I-cost �e wYS"J''v( 6w- L;'�v, Uwe USU d rcAi v`/ ey, ro,, 'f fl c av\a loss of - ref-s cjl ;v,va11fd. FILE#Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As ped ner within 200 feet of the subject tract or (an interested citizen), l (approve) j (protest)end/or(have the fa7fa wng comments)) JUL 17 2023 Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: Ci� 7Y �&OSj- Signature : (Phone No.) O •ZOZ. Printed Name of Signee: A�Iuj-iI' Title: kqgA[4�R Telephone: (817)410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 DEREl .33 chum Glade Hill Opposition of Construction and Development 'JUG 17 2023 Dear Respected Grapevine City Counsil, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed zoning change that would allow the construction of residential,commercial,or city structures within 200 feet of our beloved neighborhood, Glade Hill in Grapevine,TX.As a property owner, real estate agent,and a concerned member of this community, I firmly believe that this zoning change poses significant risks and will have detrimental effects on the quality of life in our neighborhood. Glade Hill has long been cherished as a peaceful and family-oriented residential area,characterized by its serene environment,well-maintained properties,and close-knit community.The proposed zoning change threatens to disrupt this harmony by introducing incompatible land uses that could result in increased noise levels,traffic congestion,and a loss of privacy for residents. Moreover,the introduction of commercial or city structures in close proximity to our neighborhood could significantly impact its aesthetic appeal and diminish property values. Additionally,the proposed zoning change fails to consider the potential strain on existing infrastructure and services.Our neighborhood infrastructure, including roads, utilities,and schools, is already optimized to accommodate the current residential needs. Introducing additional structures in such close proximity without adequate infrastructure upgrades could lead to overburdened facilities and a decline in the overall livability of the area. It is crucial to prioritize the preservation and protection of established neighborhoods like Glade Hill. White growth and development are essential for any community,it should not come at the expense of the well- being and interests of existing residents.We believe that responsible and sustainable development should be encouraged,but it should be done in a manner that respects the character and integrity of our neighborhood. I respectfully request that you reconsider the proposed zoning change and carefully evaluate the potential consequences it may have on Glade Hitt and its residents.it is imperative to engage in open and inclusive dialogue with the community to ensure that any future developments align with the long-term vision and values of Grapevine. FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY. JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As a'P �er( Owner within 200 feet of the sub'ect tract or(an interested citizen), I (appomm) protest r ave the followin comment kz p-V Eo5,W de�J �,�P AA-eilT Jm,1-5 A -,-4- i n{-�, ct 70' -fat- uIVY A� A,e-�Pp >to P.W-' ePQ' m-%-SL2 at V,4v(`7L1 se� YR 4-r K+w360 a d' ",u� 5©u WA", y►o ise cc\, y5is .�,1�1'os6vA v�A-G\5 vlru�uar�r p��� ( �-�. �`�c,�c4 �r 1'ta►n"'n Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: 'I he.edo I•� +'� Wu���� � n�,y ��yswk v�4�� Signature (Phone No.) 11 793-7o20J Printed Name of Signee: -F1AC,0bof*'9- Ak- �`` 'r' Title: mp- 'JUL 17 2Q23 Telephone: (817)410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: Aerty Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) protest nd/or(have the following comments) &i,,, 6L� �� af i�� I-))94&kd bil o o�be , ip 6-il- MI-C vrr)4�L ws-a-, -opyi-y- / ' h �A C- 1� �o �r'� 1� -�� •v rc� Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: &,: 0 GI� , k & ��qfo l +L TX 76�6r7-7 Signature : (Phone No.) 2-3 3 3 Printed Name of Signee: KTTS Title: a kY')'\6-GW 'JUL 17 2023 Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: A ' operty Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract an interested citizen), I (approve) protesf and/or(have the o comments . 2 or L�- 1 2 r Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: JUL 17 2023 .�Q,(-rj bawc) SecKec 3 q a N- i 11 Gre,e.k La n e - e �o I Signature LLr (Phone No.)_ O� 7 �J (0 Printed Name of Signee: bC.tl, n 'BccKer Title: 1 rnO -.L r yae'r Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: A rty Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or(an interested citizen), I (approve) protest nd/or(have the following comments) LadM� dwl(� T�iis erezk%-b-e (� jI.P-P& A Ave- fiy PIC dj Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: &ASIJT01�/1 Ml k G-7 IM& A I/ -3Hill WiL WAIL., 66L&-4 ed-57 Signature : (Phone No.) � c Q Printed Name of Sig nee: Title: O W-rP—UIf 2/Y 'JUL 17 2023 Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDA Y. JUL Y 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: A ' operty Owner within 200 feet of�thesubject tract an interested citizen), I (approve) prote and/or(have the o cots t Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: JUL 17 2023 3 a R i 11 Cre- k' Lu ) e a: t o e- -7 �05l Signature : (Phone No.)_ Printed Name of Signee: UCtI, n h(�c 'er Title: Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: operty Ow �00 feet of the sub'ect tract or (an interested citizen),rotest n or ave the ing comments) rAyE SkACAJ-r rpm. (�9Tc-c.-rroNQ G) ri t c- -- V EvZ�c';'?PA Ci u� 1 Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: Signature ( ) Phone No. Printed Name of Signee: � � � �L' — u -L Title; 'JUL 17 2023 Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 Zero-Lot-Line District Objections—Pete Hendley-Hall &Susan Batchelor—322 Hill Creek Ln, Glade Hill Traffic&Safety Concerns • 21 additional houses with a proposed exit onto the SH 360 FR SB will increase traffic and safety issues given the proximity to the Glade Hill entrance and exit off SH 360 FR SB. • The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours. Categories Environmental Concerns JUL 17 �0? • Pertaining to the management, regulation, and protection of native plants listed as state threatened or endangered, what study has been conducted to confirm that there are no endangered or threatened plants within the proposed development area given that this area has been a natural greenbelt habitat for decades? • The proposed development site has a significant gradient going down to the rear of the Glade Hill development. What restrictions and safety protocols will be deployed to: o Ensure there are no landslides? o Protect proposed homeowners' dwellings from subsidence? • There is a natural brook at the rear of the Glade Hill development that should be preserved. • With the leveling of the home pads and roads within the development there will be an impact on the natural drainage specifically on the south end backing onto the Glade Hill Development. • There will be an adverse effect on noise levels from HW 360. The current greenbelt environment acts as a natural buffer in reducing such noise. As the green belt is removed, noise will significantly increase. Wildlife • Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat for owls, a variety of birds (including hawks, cardinals,finches, Hummingbirds, etc.) foxes, rabbits, squirrels, coyotes, amongst others. Given the variety of wildlife in situ, what studies have been conducted by Texas Parks& Wildlife Department(TPWD)Wildlife Habitat Assessment (WHAB) Program to assist project developers in identifying, evaluating, and addressing potential impacts to natural resources of the proposed development area? • Local wildlife has already been significantly impacted by the development of The Preserve and The Marlowe apartment complexes on the SH 360 FR NB with some wildlife having to migrate to the proposed development area.They will be forced along with the incumbent wildlife to relocate,which given that the existing habitat is bounded on all sides by housing developments, offices, and significant roads, endangers the wildlife migration. • Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact on the local wildlife habitat. Financial • Current properties that back onto the proposed development paid a pad premium for backing onto greenbelt. The baseline property tax calculated and subsequent yearly increases will be based on a false baseline as the property pads will be less valuable. As such, property tax for the land must be reduced in the event of the development moving forward. • Overall property values will decrease with the impacts described above will adversely affect the property desirability, and therefore the financial value. Again, property tax must be adjusted downwards to reflect reality. Development • Proposed development does not follow existing precedent for a buffer between development. Precedent was established when Glade Hill was developed following representation from the Stone Bridge Oaks community for a 70' buffer between the development. The is no 70' buffer between proposed development and Glade Hill or Stone Bridge Oaks. • The is only one entrance and exit to the development. If that entrance/exit is blocked, In the event of an emergency, how will emergency response teams enter the development? • The lot lines for plots 1, 2, 3,4, 5, and 6 and extend past the drainage easement into the 100 year fully developed water surface elevation, and the drainage/water sanctuary sewer& landscape easement. Plot lines should not extend past the drainage easement. • Some plots do not meet the code for zero plot size, for example lot 14. • There are multiple trees that meet the requirements for tree preservation. I do not see how they would be maintained under the preservation requirements based on the proposed development plan. Jul 17 2023 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest) and/or(have the following comments) CA r r l 60nM yLv\. Cum fi `I-� Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: 3 2� U�m Signature : (Phone No.) r712-3 Printed Name of Signee: � 1Q,Y�eS &1-66N-k Title: 'JUL 17 202� Telephone: (817)410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY JULY 17. 2023. Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest} and/or(have the following comments) Ja,5 �� ?'n � ers� lrr3&ac4ohia, also •n ® A ttja�q -- Pu vtm- -batscd k^ l - At 1"e- rj o vd cod 94 ycv C?"Id S" hwq m► ace. a4- or-c� W-Q. Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: dam � I! Signature (Phone No.)oe.� Printed Name of Signee:� :� L bkA 46 Title: ®wX4*'- �Jll1 1 2023 Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17. 2023. Procedure to Respond: As a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) orl aan interested citizen , I (approve) (protest)and/or(have the following comments) 4 - 8L Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: 1�s sa V-06,14-APA Lane, f G'u- "e V- ri bb5l Signature : (Phone No.) �L4 G) • p p �-' &64e: ( t rf�Sh 0jA,0 Title: � oSL� I A, _tUL 17 2023 Telephone: (817)410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 I FILE #7-23-011 CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MOND,A Y, JUL Y 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: �roape O fr� i a fJh ul�j ci-xLac)or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (RratdJor(have the following comments) r a n e -41 -;VC o4 07e ✓s Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Mock and Subdivision: 7 Signature : — ... ..... (Phone No. Printed Name of S gnee:� Tine: Olc,/iA�L Telephone: (817)410-3156 Direct questions and mail responses to. Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE: #Z23-01/CP23-01 I OAK HILL 1 Attachment From Anne Benvenuto PROTEST at this time until a detailed plan can be provided showing the intention of the developers are shown in DETAIL related to the property and especially to the property borders as follows: 1. A guarantee that the existing HOA property tree line will not be cut down intentionally or accidently, and a system be put in place to pro-actively ensure any accidental tree cutting does not occur. 2. The trees on the new development property directly adjacent to the HOA tree line will remain with a respectable degree to be discussed/agree with the two HOAs to preserve privacy, noise control, appearance and property values of all communities. 3. That the developer is also aggregable to working with the 2 existing communities regarding both the preservation of any negative impact to the trees, as well for the mutual privacy, including construction of any privacy walls. One of the reasons I purchased in the COG was due to the abundance and beauty of trees in Grapevine, and my understanding that the COG has a "tree preservation policy' which I understand is still in effect. Moreover, a major reason I purchased my specific lot of property was because of the trees behind my unit. And it was with my understanding that the 360 facing property was zoned COMMERICIAL so that any eventual build on the 360 facing property would limit activity, noise privacy concerns durin The re-zoning would change this. Thank You Anne Benvenuto 4669 Taylor Lane, Grapevine, TX 76051 anne[DAnneBenvenuto.com 917.680.5471 JUL 17 2023 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY JULY 17 2023. Procedure to Respond: As La.Froperty Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or ( protest and/or(have the following comments) '�/ Ap?=/L , E/V V r rZUvK tYi�a4�t. 55C.1� E NJ`,, 7l3�rt_ A utk,F-Ur " a S S G,,c (3I R4d_S 0 n C1 We L-.d !i fe., c, u v-iv e ht+1 Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision. Signature : (Phone No.) Printed Name of Sig nee: :: Title: Pt1 JUL 17 2023 Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician CZ02 L Y 1nr Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 ril.t pus-U"(1 trF'L3-Ul: OAK HILL W OMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON OND 17. 2023. Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) (an interested citizen), (approve) (protest)and/or(have the following comments) c (!t Si ©u-.v- aye(.ter JAL o �G�vdL - 3Czo a-ate 6 v ,tk. r aAs o &&*%-pe,,As P-ka roa J- vuoC5-e Gei�s�-dam VQLj_X `lZ-XC- i C , - �ee-L ` o,4 y ec el- Q E kt wL e U6Q u.e s . Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: 6V'c� DAkS , c��apQ�� 7�0 �-� Signature K (Phone No.) �OCo '� 3 -O 14-4- Printed Name of Signee: K, AULCU Title: �U Nt 0W I/Le-(r Telephone: (817)410-3156 JUL 17 2023 Direct questions and mall responses to: Planning Techn,cpn Planning Services City of Grapevine P.Q. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or(an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest)and/or(have the Tfillolving comments) Y 1 ' Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block apd Subdivision: W y t! t 4-wv —k-,4711 { Signature : (Phone No.) 17 Z-3 ?— l If' Printed Name of Signee: V�, L,, ® 1 IVc y' Title: 'JUL 17 Telephone: (817)410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY IT 2023. Procedure to Respond: a Pro a caner wi�follo�wing of the subject tract r (an interested citizen), I (approve) (proles nd/or(have the comments) Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: r"01[ay� � vek Lp, &I- ao e, Signature : (Phone No.) a l 7" —� 3 0 7r - Printed Name of Sig nee: Title: e1 k U14J 14 t'- Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 Glade Hill Residents submitting Protest to Case Z23-01/023-01 Homeowner Address Phone 200 ft Lau eodore & Myungsuk Waldrip 326 Hill Creek Ln 214-783-7205 Yes Melanie Gleich 1330 Hill Creek Ln 214-802-9959 s Patricia and Barry Macy 4805 Trevor Trl 806-543-0446 No Kelli Frazier 4804 Taylor Ln 817-938-7231 No Steve & Patty Hensel 4720 Taylor Ln 817-454-7033 *et- Bill Behrens 4620 Trevor Tri 972-567-1116 Yes Garry Pearson 4724 Taylor Ln 817-366-0073 No William & Patricia Oliver 14719 Taylor Ln 817-233-3175 Yes 20/24 Homes 200ft Protesting - 83% Well over 20% for 75% City Council Vote e Eric Maurer&Colleen Friday 338 Hill Creek Lane Gr com/ermaurer@gmail.com 214-533-8972 July 15,2023 Grapevine Texas City Council 200 South Main Street 7 Z' Grapevine,TX 76051 Subject:Opposition to the rezoning of land and plans for Oak Hill community Dear Members of the Grapevine Texas City Council, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed rezoning of land and the development plans for the Oak Hill community.As a concerned resident of this beautiful city, I believe it is essential to consider the long-term impact such a decision may have on our community and its residents. First and foremost,one of the major reasons for our opposition is the detrimental effect this development will have on property values. Many residents, including myself, have invested in properties that back up to the proposed Oak Hill community,specifically for the purpose of having greenspace and obstructing the view of Highway 360. We all paid a premium, upwards of$35,000 for the lots that back up to the greenspace.The removal of this greenspace will undoubtedly lead to a significant reduction in property values for these homes and,consequently,affect the entire community and neighboring areas. This potential decline in property values is a significant concern for homeowners who have worked hard to establish their residences and create a peaceful living environment. Furthermore,there are serious concerns regarding proper drainage in the Oak Hill area, particularly since it backs up to the creek.The potential impact on drainage systems needs to be thoroughly assessed to prevent any future flooding or water-related issues that could affect both existing and new properties. This was proven to be an issue in the past and this cannot be overlooked in this decision on whether this land is suitable for development and that it will not disrupt or harm the existing homes nearby. Another critical aspect to consider is the preservation of wildlife and natural habitats.The proposed development will displace various wildlife species currently residing in the woods,forcing them into the surrounding community.This disruption not only threatens the natural balance of the ecosystem but also raises concerns about the potential conflict between residents and wildlife. It is our duty to protect these habitats and the diverse wildlife that calls them home. Additionally,the construction process itself will bring considerable noise and disturbance to the area for several years,while ruining the value of our neighborhood.The destruction of large trees,which provide valuable noise protection,shade,and aesthetic value to Glade Hill and Stone Bridge Oaks,will be a significant loss to our community.These trees have long been cherished by residents and serve as a crucial element in maintaining a peaceful and harmonious living environment. It is essential to consider the long-term consequences of removing such vital features that contribute to the quality of life for residents and what make living in Grapevine appealing. JUL 17 2023 Furthermore,it is important for the City of Grapevine to uphold its tree preservation standards.The current plan for the Oak Hill community,as it is written,shows every square inch being developed with zero lot lines.This approach disregards the aesthetic value of the area and fails to consider the importance of preserving existing trees and green spaces. It is crucial to maintain the character and charm that drew residents to this community in the first place. It is also important to note that we,as residents, have not been given adequate time or information regarding the plans for the Oak Hill community.The lack of transparency and opportunity for meaningful community engagement is deeply concerning. Decisions of this magnitude should be made with the input and collaboration of the affected residents.We were given less than one week's notice on this action, and were not told that not only would the council rule on the rezoning, but also on approving the plans themselves.This information was found out by asking questions,but not clearly stated to all residents and those affected.We urge the Grapevine Texas City Council to provide ample time for public consultation and ensure that residents are well-informed about the proposed development. In light of the aforementioned concerns, I kindly urge the Grapevine Texas City Council to reconsider the rezoning of land and the plans for the Oak Hill community.We must prioritize the preservation of property values,the protection of natural habitats,the adherence to tree preservation standards,and the overall aesthetic appeal of our community. I respectfully request that you take into account the valid concerns raised by residents and taxpayers by exploring alternative solutions that would ensure sustainable and responsible development while preserving the unique characteristics that make Grapevine such a wonderful place to live. 2 1 P a g x Thank you for your time and consideration. I trust that you will give due diligence to the concerns presented by the community, and I hope that you will make a decision that reflects the best interests of Grapevine and its residents. Sincerely, Eric Maurer and Colleen Frifiay [JUL 1 '17 3 1 Page, s' FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01 f OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17. 2023. Procedure to Respond: ert Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract r (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest) 'nd/or(have the following comments) ®(� — � nr� -� - 1,t -L�`h- �1L�e_�!L��c �. (,e���c�c GI✓ cL a5r LF o0 -LT) Ottti Ile, � 1rinted Property wner Name na d�dre-silCo�'Loloc a d Ku"iv Signature : (Phone No.) 61L. Printed Name of Signee: u ES Title: fippt-Eb1k)0j1((- Telephone: (817) 410-3155 JUL 17 2023 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 • FILE #Z23-011 CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM QN 1t 4NCtAY.JULY 17 204 Procedure to Respond: A (a Property Owner w` tha-s� edtrac#)'fir(an interested citizen), l (approve) (pro est an o (have t,e following comtrsents) '''; See attached comments/concerns I have. I am a homeowner within 200 feet of the subject tract. Printed Property Owner Dame and Address, or Lot, Stock and Subdivision: Doug Hancock 4625 Trevor Trl, Grapevine, TX 76051 Signature ; (Phone No.) Printed Name a Signee. Doug Hancock -1;�,�.owner Telephone: (817)410-31 SS Dlr+eot gwwd ins and malt responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine JUL 17 2923 P.Q. Box 96104 Grapevine,Texas 76099 JUL 17 2023 Drainage. I am concerned about disrupting the drainage of the property. There is a creek at the south end of the property that must be managed/directed somewhere. During a strong storm, water flows down the property lines at the north end behind Stone Bridge Oaks, Block 3, Lots 31 and 32 and continuing to a large drainage pipe between Stone Bridge Oaks, Block 3, Lots 32 and 33. We are unsure who is responsible for maintaining the drainage pipe between Lots 32 and 33. For this reason, believe it is critical that there be maintained significant area at the north end of the property in question that is not of impervious material to allow water to flow and soak in to the land, such as a cul-de-sac with large lots or a large buffer area at the edge of a commercial development. A drainage engineering study should be mandated to determine how best to manage the creek and how best to direct and connect storm drainage with the existing pipe system between Stone Bridge Oaks, Block 3, Lots 32 and 33. Trees. I am concerned about the removal and destruction of the many beautiful trees on the property in question. Trees should be preserved wherever possible according to the City of Grapevine tree preservation ordinances, especially at the edges of the proposed development to,provide visual buffer between existing neighborhoods and the new proposed development. The City of Grapevine should consider the strength of the developer's funding commitments including ability to obtain contingency funding if development exceeds budgets as we do not want the trees destroyed and the the land left open and idle because the developer ran out of money and cannot complete the building project. Part of what makes Northeast Tarrant County special are the natural wooded areas and we must work to maintain the native trees and make sure the development is completed, including landscaping, in a timely manner, to minimize visual scars to our urban forests. Noise. I am concerned about construction and highway noise and request that the City of Grapevine require provisions that will reduce the noise pollution for existing neighborhoods during the construction process. Further, the continued growth of DFW has an increasing number of cars on Highway 360 that cause an increasing amount of noise around the clock. The increasing highway noise will have a detrimental effect on the residents of the proposed Oak Hill development and a detrimental effect on the existing neighborhoods of Stone Bridge Oaks and Glade Hill. Certain property owners have successfully obtained property value appraisal reductions due to excessive highway noise. I request the City of Grapevine mandate extra steps be evaluated to minimize the impact of highway noise on residents. Noise that seems acceptable during the daytime is much more noticeable at night and detrimental to the health and welfare of the residents due to its negative impact on sleep. For certain property owners, even daytime noise now makes it difficult to enjoy being outside. Further, to minimize noise of traffic entering and exiting the proposed Oak Hill development, the entrance from Highway 360 should be at the south east side of the property to provide a buffer between existing neighborhoods and the proposed new road connecting to the highway access road. r Physical Buffer Area. The subject property is very close to certain properties in existing neighborhoods. We understand that when Glade Hill was platted, the City of Grapevine mandated a 70 foot buffer between existing properties in Stone Bridge Oaks, Block 3, Lots 15-20 and the new Glade Hill development. We request that a similar minimum 70 foot buffer be mandated between existing properties and new properties and that trees be preserved in the buffer area between properties. An adequate buffer will preserve quality of life and value of property for existing property owners bordering the new proposed development and enhance the same for owners of new properties in the proposed Oak Hill development. JUL 17 2023 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: groates �aa�nd/�or(ha�vethe in 200 feet of the sub'ect tract) r (an interested citizen), I (approve) following comments) -�`,dA$,C &Ey-G--A- , o "T] a C U M"E tj t Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: W I L L.(A ►'v1 )� , 3 % H R-%F nl s Lf to at, o , 2LEvD i R /4 t c_ G R0PuvIn!cs ,-1 7c -71z $" Signature : ��"`-�"�""`1 - (�Ll � W (Phone No.)_S 6Z I Printed Name of Sig nee: 1 A K f6S C[-4 A CrJ5 w Title: o k3 &J LrA, Telephone: (817)410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician JUL 17 2M Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE#Z23-01/CP23-01: OAK HILL COMMENTS from a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract. I protest and have the following comments: My concerns are as follows: 1. The plot of land in question is forested and provides a sound barrier between 360 and the access road and our neighborhood. Has any type of wall/sound abatement structure been proposed to reduce the noise once the land is cleared? Can a green buffer area be extended to 50 feet to help protect our existing homes. Lack of a good buffer will impact our community and quality of life, and could well affect property values. 2. When Glade Hill was built there were drainage issues that arose between Stone Bridge Oaks and Glade Hills. Has a drainage plan been reviewed and approved by the City? What remedies are available to us if problems do arise? 3. There are many old growth trees in the Oak Hill plot. Will these be protected? Will new trees be planted to replace those that are removed? When Glade Hills was built, an agreement was reached that designated protected trees along the buffer zone. Sadly, a number of these older trees were cut down in error by the builder. These were replaced eventually, but with new growth. What safeguards will be in place to ensure that any protected trees will be preserved? Thank you. William H. Behrens III 4620 Trevor Trail, Grapevine TX 76051-8434 4)'� — l'/ , Q' 972-567-1116 William H. Behrens III JUL 17 2023 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: o erty Owner within 200 feet of the subject Tract}.or( interested citi n), I (approve) rotest d/or(have the following comments) U Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: G Lor l c-- ,.w rzr Signature : — (Phone No.) 1 bL,%-.sto 7� Printed Name of Signee: r Title: Telephone: (817)410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 JUL 17 COMMENTS FROM AN INTERESTED CITIZEN,and President of Stone Bridge Oaks Owner's Association I wish to address the joint meeting of Grapevine City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission Concerns expressed by our homeowner members: Insufficient and inadequate notice received as to the zoning change and plat Although compliance with notice regulations may have been met,the zoning application as filed on January 3,2023,and no information was provided to SBOOA members until July 10, 2023. No information or communication regarding the property has been provided by the developer. The public notice of zoning change is not dated for mailing so how is compliance verified? How has planning staff confirmed that all property owners within 200'of the subject property have been notified? Some residents on the west side of Taylor Lane have not been notified,however they may be within the 200' limit. There has been no notification of plat approval. Application for plat approval were not received by the city until July 12,2023, and not made available to the public until July 15. Overall,while the letter of public notice regulations and requirements may have been met,certainly the spirit of such notifications and information communication to interested parties has not. The trees on the property provide a noise and nuisance for traffic on Highway 360. This will be lost should the development proceed. Has the Planning department obtained any survey of the property to determine the number and location of protected trees? Has the City Council required a Tree Preservation Permit? Is a drainage plan on file and available? If the property is leveled for building,whether increasing or decreasing height, what are the remedies if any for adverse drainage effects on Stone Bridge Oaks property. There is a water/creek feature on the south end of the property? What is the status? Will it be an open drain? JUL 17 2D23 The plat and plan does not appear to comply with the zoning requirements R-5.0".Zero-Lot-Line, in that fully one third of the lots, (7 of 21), indicate front width of less than 50'. We respectfully request that all decisions regarding this property are tabled at this time, all homeowner questions are answered,and more detailed and comprehensive information provided by the City and the developer. Gar 4724 Taylor Lane 817-366-0073 President, Stone Bridge Oaks Owners'Association JUL 17 2023 FILE #Z23-01/ C P23-01: OAK HILL W OMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON OND 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As a P operty Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or an interested citize ), I (approve) rotest nd/or(have the following comments) o� P 10 VT Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, BIoc;K and Subdivision. o - 'ire v �� r�,, lr*-Q C� � Ae Signature _(Phone No.)_ d0 Printed Name of Signee: ea Y ry A_ y Title: �r��psfi d ►� Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 --Immm Omp— - W FILE xZ23-01� CP23-01- OAK HILL P' S*—dure t4 R *dNn M' feet of t )or(.srt#ftf"tedVUZS►), (approve) RMW PropmV Owoojr hem or Lot Block S r+um: Name at ft f e ., +_ TRW. Telephone, i 41 #SS Difect qwstions sod M&:11 ses TO r- -,es OtY 04 Grepevtne PA 6W 95104 Gre ` .Tom' g FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY, JULY 17. 2023. Procedure to Respond: As (a�ertyOwner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) protest)and/or(have the following comments) Ite 1-otaO' 4� y - 1, Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: r• �} Signature :_ _ J-- (Phone No. Printed Name of Signee: 4 _ r Title: Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/ CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDA Y JUL Y 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest)and/or(have the following comments) (k-a a— r Q141 mod- 10( Alc Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: L6 A � 74 GSl Signature : (Phone No.) 6 Printed Name of Signee: S Title: Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE 7..23-011 CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST SE RECI=IVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 1Z U tit A L A&Y f 7 _ ftmdurces cnd: hin 2QC� feet Q e sub ect tract or(an interested citizen), I(approvo) (prro st ndior hhitve the following commentasl I formally PROTEST the rezoning efforts. The greenbelt is paramount to the uniqueness of the existing communities, the wildlife preservation of native yftgitation/trees, and noise control The builin of 21 homes will negatively impact all of these areas, and the overall adverse impact can't even begin to be calculated. In the event rezoning is approved, there MUST be guarentees by the developer, with oversight, that every mature tree that can be preserved IS preserved, with substantial financial penaties if not aheard to. I also believe it is in the best interest of all parties involved that we come to a mutual agreement about noise/privacy buffers to minimize the inevitable reduction in propery values for those that back up to the greenbelt. Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision. David & June McIntire, 4707 Taylor Ln, Grapevine, TX 76051 - SBO ' Sign ature 214.683.6482 _ (Phone o.)�� . Printed Nam Sinee: David McIntire _ - Title: ^y Home Owner Telephone: 817)410- 155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE #Z23-01/CP23-01: OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY. JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: n 200 feet of the subject trams)°or(an interested ctbzen), I (approve) �(p*5�onft��(Whmav=ewth'tfollowing comments) own w iiy Zod T�,ET'01=Tom= saBs �T �r L,v7��--t2-�OAS ff/�6 /�o/t J?A�finLlofv/web 1'��4SaN,�' 1. /Vo/f,E'. GGF.,�rt/il/6 Ttl� S vg1��r TiZtt� w�i� Uyc� s.��v No/sa Avi' hl!61l�!W 36 A vl 2• �0> !-/NA'��1�„_ Y "T fJ/Z�I�S oAe2 ZW Sy ELT'4NL4,r W!L G ,OEZ&R '' ±f�X 14A 6 f a -� ¢. G•�S� mF I//-Lya of O w mg/m". Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: N&11t E a 6 6s- ?6oS`/ Signature : (Phone No.)_9/7-2!/— Printed Name of Signee: f C /�I,Y_� G sPJlyks True: OW t° Telephone: (817)410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 PILE Z2 -0°1/ CP2 - 31 OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MUSTBE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY,t ,P_— 9 7',,29023 r SWIM t lies r_t -' A roW. t wner within 200 feet of the subject tract) r(an interested citizen), I (approve) rotnt and/Tar(halve they following comments I wish to express stron og pposition to this request. The plat is incomplete according to Grapevine Standards of Design. No drainage, street arrangement, or lot line dimensions. Please delay the Public Input Mtng until we can see a properplat. -Otherwisepllease disap2low,lbla bcamplelp-fe4uesU am:alsn..pxofesiing.ou.wildlife labitaUoss__ and so many 20"- r trees, which adds value to ouroperties. Also�a natural �diameter ��. rp_-' spring would be wiped out effecting SBO Lots 20-22 and Glade Hills lot 1A1-6A1. On November 20, 2012, the Cit Council & P8_ Z approved as agreen barrier between Taylor Lane homes and contrast development (tract 1A1) as common area due similar complaints. I ask for a 50' greebelt barrier bordering all of SBO properties affected by this proposed development given the approval of one in 2012. Thank you. Printed Property Owner Marne and Address or I ot, Block and Subdivision Sandra Rice, 4727 Taylor Ln, Grapevine, TX 76051 Signature —_(Phone No 817-271-3460 Printed glare of Sign". _San Home Owner I elephone. (817)410-3165 Direct questions and mail responses to, Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P,Q. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 FILE#Z23-01/0P23-01 OAK HILL WRITTEN COMMENTS MU I" BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 QN MQNDA Y UL Y 17, 2023. , J cnft. A,s�- P �iec property Owner within 200 feet W, the subiect tract or(an interested citizen). I tapprove) ;' --------------------------- (proteisl'2 ari�-; or �eve ow no comments} 1 :1 ' :-F-Wa—veft I am protesting the rezoning of the greenbelt behind SBO. I was.misinfoEmed by my realtor that this area would never be develqpf�q, and it is.the major reason I chose to buy my home. The greenbelt not 2aly prcvidf)s.b ut , but'Also r9yides _p homes to our wonderful) native texas wildlife, substantial noise control from 360, and privacy...all of which will be lost with a new subdivision. Plus, there will couple years of perpetual construction and..evi ► hiqq negative that goes along with it. . _ However, if the rezoning is improved, I hope the City ggunqel Wi_llmpk sure that every tree that can be preserved is maintained and that we can Agi� _ee on a . subtantial buffer to maintain as much ofthe greenbelt-q§-p--g5-ajbLe-.—. Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or L ot, Block and Subdivision, Vic Mignogna • 4711 Talqp�ne, Grapevine TX 76051 - Stone Bridge Oaks Signature : -713 T/ _ I (Phone No ) U,77j,?"!2� Printed Name of Signee is Mi naqa Title. Homeowner Telephone. (817)410-3165 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P O. Box g5iO4 Grapevine, Texas 76099 WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 12 PM ON MONDAY. JULY 17, 2023. Procedure to Respond: As a ro erty Owne within 200 feet of the subject tract) or(an interested citizen), I (approve) p)rotLes an or ave the following comments) / 6G�'t t c5 0 'f,Dtri�le{. j�T f �a e f/�r�"'%�n�6yl7n_.�T r r1nc,4"er16r0f,s Shs�ctZrd . ��af�sf �aseo� an h e l i mi�Pa/ 1n fv -il'oie 6w-Mratiofs 46 4h-,6e ;&m:k l• _l hMe 41&4 mina �attaq e a4finQ� r��r�.�tri a . �ri t�T Ec►n�o� �d merry `�,nr�? t�V e.5�au fct f'p�s:do�.,f-he L�'Dn irutc1�9 �mr�Q-�'- laoczj &J�`/6 �e 2hd erde✓��p S,3v La isda,al, lade •'b/leys (ir, gW-11 3 0., 4,41 etc, tiFh -F zv�u 1 d h e /zJ a2f n/D ec fiom "g- ' A �"�e� ,�lf i�ri8l'. 7h)d tvas an JsSu e i A �d)2 Sher Cbn��t l�evelep•�e�» � � a&gofe Mi 1l . E h "? --k" 1l f_Q ;!4 LtAnn� I a'2"YQ "fhfG f�42ue154 �l/l,j�, W-Jh� t-,e e n 4bAu t,:w 6tV S Ct ppr0 ve d 6� �� I-r-aef-Dj7 -� �vyyv� L, . � n 1-t e A')o (D.F' rye er{7"t ctc 1 p 7-F n r u e v-f o rb V, 4 -ask P a-fpe of oa! 41 '*A'is Je✓et o P end Printed Property Owner(dame and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: as o 4 4D4 A4, 13 1 k 3 S e Qa Signature (Phone No.) ya2.: gZ), 7l Printed Name of Signee: Oct re) /"F a-on Title: Z( n or .JUL 17 2023 Telephone: (817)410-3156 Direct questions and mall responses to: Planning Technician Planning Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 Gmf bcmason@gmail.com> Proposed Comments to P&Z for form 1 message Sandra Ri co►n> at 11:14AM on@gmail.com>, Gary Pearson <gpaussie@vedzon.net> Hi Carol and Garry, I am assuming this development request will go through, so here are some comments to possibly mitigate it. My main concern is that the plat is incomplete according to CoG Standards of Design, so how can the P&Z accept it?There are no drainage, street arrangement, utility, home or lot line dimensions shown. We can't see the circulation of traffic through the subdivision, nor how it will affect SBO or Glade Hills. 1 urge you to part off the public hearing meeting for the proposed rezoning. 9 that is not possible,please disapprove this incomplete request. I protest this development as shown on the Notice plat.Wildlife habitat will be destroyed, as well as many old- growth trees at least twenty inches in diameter.Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. This habitat and should be investigated for endangered species by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Also, there is a water source natural spring at the south end bordering SBO lots 20,21, 22 and Glade Hills lots W, 2A1, 3A1, 4A1, etc. that would be wiped out without protection of a green barrier.This was an issue in November 20, 2012 when Contrast Development requested to build a subdivision behind some of our homes on Taylor Lane. The full City Council approved the request ONLY if the green barrier was approved on Tract 1A1, designated on the plat as 'Common Area'. I hope you will consider the same type of greenbelt again. If this request should be approved, !ask for a 50'buffer zone bordering all SBO properties affected by this development,given the prior approval of one in 2012. JUL 17 2023 LIFESTYLE GRA►PEViNE 360, LP Tuesday,November 20,2012 Mr.Ron Stombaugh Planning and Development Manager City of Grapevine JUL 17 2023 200 South Main Street Grapevine,Texas 76051 RE:Application to change Zoning from Commercial to Single family at the NW Corner of Glade Road and Hwy 360 Dear Mr.Stombaugh: I am sorry I am not available to be present at the P&Z and City Council meeting this evening,but I would like this letter presented to both P&Z and City Council members as part of their consideration of the above mentioned zoning case.I represent the ownership of the vacant lots at Stone Bridge Oaks,as Lifestyle Grapevine 360 LP. Yesterday evening,Monday,November 19'',the Stone Bridge Oaks HOA and Lifestyle Grapevine 360 LP (Developer for SBO's),had a meeting with the development team requesting a zoning change on the commercial property at the NW Corner of Glade Road and Hwy 360.Although they did meet with us, this meeting was done at the final hour,giving us no opportunity to provide any input into the design of the site plan.To put it mildly,everyone was very unhappy with the layout that was presented by the development team.Although we had written letters in favor of the proposed multi-family project that was presented to us in the recent past,we cannot support this project for the fallowing reasons: 1. There is an area on their plan which borders our property,and it is a natural drainage area with many beautiful mature trees.This area has been made into a huge residential lot,which makes no sense at all,and negatively impacts our lots that back unto this area. 2. There is no significant open space provided in the entire layout. i have not seen a subdivision with less creativity or less concern with the natural terrain and existing mature trees.There are many specimen trees on this site,and it appears that there has been no attempt whatsoever to save any tree to add to the overall beauty of this development.Compare this to our S80's community,In which literally IWs of trees were saved.it is obvious that the developer took a 50x220 lot stamp and went around this site to see just how to maximize the number of lots,and not concern themselves with the liveability of this site.Where will someone walk their dog on this site?Or go to meet with other neighbors?The argument by the developer is that the City discouraged"sliver"open spaces,but they misled everyone because I don't believe the City would discourage having thoughtful open spaces added into this site plan. 9603 White Rock Trail,Suite 204 Dallas,Texas 75238 LIFESTYLE GRAKVINE 360, LP 3. There is no provision for a significant landscape Duffer where residential tots back directly onto HWY 360.The developer may Install a masonry fence,but that alone will not be sufficient buffering for these homes. The feeling amongst homeowners present at our meeting last night is consistent with the points above, and for these reasons,we are requesting that this project be rejected by both PW and Town Council as presented.it is obvious to everyone that the developer is only looking for maximizing the number of lots on the site,and not toward how someone will successfully live at this property. Thank you for your consideration.We greatly appreciate it. If you require any additional Information,please don't hesitate to contact me at 214-794-5366 or anttbonvRgrenad"erhomes.com. Yours truly, Anthony R.Natale Manager Lifestyle Grapevine 364 LP JUL 17 2023 9603 White stock Trait,Suite 204 Dallas,Texas 7S238 Points for Grapevine Council Meeting We should have a list of asks in case the proposal passes, including: • Asking for a green buffer zone of at least 50' between us and new homes • Showing the exact placement of trees to replace the large trees and thick forest that will be cut down for the subdivision. We'd like them to be at the edge of buffer zone • Drainage plan and replacement water for the natural spring on property. • Since the noise level will rise due to the removal of the nature barrier: We request SBO-funded service or installed ANSI Noise Level Meter to monitor decibel levels according to Grapevine Code Section 55, 3A(2-5) Levels must be and environmental noise from acoustic pollution is regulated in Grapevine "to JUL 17 2023 provide comfort and peace to residents" • Pre-Construction and During Construction: From the outset, We want onsite city Public Works supervision for the Real estate Developer, assuring they will deliver measurable solutions to control noise, and also dust, debris, light pollution and adherence to environmental work standards. • Developer will adhere to CoG construction hours (Any work prior to 8:00 a.m.or after 5:00 p.m.on Monday through Friday and between 7:00 a.m.and 7:00 p.m.on Saturday,Sunday and holidays) QUESTIONS TO ASK AT MEETING: [WE SHOULD COMPARE THE PLAT WITH ALL CITY STANDARDS OF DESIGN] • Want assurances from city and developer that all future watershed, sewer and lot drainage plans will have no potential detrimental impacts on our communities whatsoever. WILL THEY BUILD SEPARATE STORM DRAINS? • Will utilities(electrical, telephone, cable) service and transmission linesbe placed Underground? (OUR PREFERENCE) If above ground, how will our buffer trees be affected. DesiM Item 2,Street Systems,2.3. Secure a realtor assessment of loss of property value on Taylor Lane due to loss of back forest and/or zero lot line homes to be built. EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION—Will not harm trees in green buffer as to kill adjacent trees. JUL 17 2023 Points for Grapevine Council Meeting We should have a list of asks in case the proposal passes, including: Asking for a green buffer zone of at least 50'between us and new homes Showing the exact placement of trees to replace the large trees and thick forest that will be cut down for the subdivision.We'd like them to be at the edge of buffer zone Drainage plan and replacement water for the natural spring on property. Since the noise level will rise due to the removal of the nature barrier: We request SBO-funded service or installed ANSI Noise Level Meter to monitor decibel levels according to Grapevine Code Section 55, 3A(2-5) Levels must be and environmental noise from acoustic pollution is regulated in Grapevine "to provide comfort and peace to residents" Pre-Construction and During Construction: From the outset, We want onsite city Public Works supervision for the Real estate Developer, assuring they will deliver measurable solutions to control noise, and also dust, debris, light pollution and adherence to environmental work standards. Developer will adhere to CoG construction hours (Any work prior to 8:00 a.m. or after 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday and between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on Saturday, Sunday and holidays) QUESTIONS TO ASK AT MEETING: [WE SHOULD COMPARE THE PLAT WITH ALL CITY STANDARDS OF DESIGN] Want assurances from city and developer that all future watershed,sewer and lot drainage plans will have no potential detrimental impacts on our communities whatsoever. WILL THEY BUILD SEPARATE STORM DRAINS? Will utilities(electrical,telephone,cable)service and transmission linesbe placed Underground?(OUR PREFERENCE) If above ground, how will our buffer trees be affected. Street Arrangement/The street arrangements shall conform with the intent of the thoroughfare plan as adopted by the city.Adequate collector streets shall be provided for the circulation of traffic throughout the subdivision. Does this plat conform to city standards of Horizontal Curve Limitations?Article I, Standards of Design, Item 2, Street Systems, 2.3. Secure a realtor assessment of loss of property value on Taylor Lane due to loss of back forest and/or zero lot line homes to be built. EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION—Will not harm trees in green buffer as to kill adjacent trees. JUL 17 20 Reasons for Asking for Green Buffer between new development and SBO/Glade Hills Save the natural spring on the south side of plat between the Olivers and Joneses. (Verify this with urban forester) Save the historic, large trees along property on both subdivisions due to natural noise barrier for future traffic along 360 Possible loss of property values due to loss of green barrier behind homes(Verify this with a realtor) JUL 17 20Z3 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-038 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS GRANTING ZONING CHANGE Z23- 01 FOR BLOCK 1, LOTS 1-21, OAK HILL ADDITION, BEING SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (4700 STATE HIGHWAY 360) MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "PCD", PLANNED COMMERCE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO "R-5.0"7 ZERO-LOT-LINE DISTRICT; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, applications were made to amend the Official Zoning Map, City of Grapevine, Texas by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these requested changes should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested change should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, the effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings, encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning change, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the change in zoning lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this change in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that a change in zoning classification for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City of Grapevine Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended and changed by Zoning Application Z23-01 to rezone the following described property to-wit: being 5.750 acre tract platted as Block 1, Lots 1-21, Oak Hill Addition, Tarrant County, Texas (4700 State Highway 360), more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof, which was previously zoned "PCD", Planned Commerce Development District is hereby changed to "R-5.0", Zero-Lot-Line District, all in accordance with Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, as amended. Ordinance No. 2023-038 2 Z23-01 Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the herein change in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. Ordinance No. 2023-038 3 Z23-01 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 15th day of August, 2023. APPROVED: William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Matthew C.G. Boyle City Attorney Ordinance No. 2023-038 4 Z23-01 MEMO TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER MEETING DATE AUGUST 15, 2023 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION LOTS 1-21, BLOCK 1, OAK HILL PLAT APPLICATION FILING DATE..........................................................August 8, 2023 APPLICANT ..............................................................Josh Born, 360 Land Partners, LLC REASON FOR APPLICATION ................................................Preliminary platting 21 lots PROPERTY LOCATION ............................................................4700 State Highway 360 ACREAGE.................................................................................................................. 5.75 ZONING .........................................................Existing: PCD; Planned Commerce District Proposed: R-5.0, Single Family Residential District NUMBEROF LOTS ...................................................................................................... 21 PREVIOUS PLATTING .................................................................................................No CONCEPTPLAN ..........................................................................................................No SITEPLAN.............................................................................................................Z23-01 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT..................................................................................Yes AVIGATION RELEASE ...............................................................................................Yes PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED ....................................................................................No C:\Users\tbrooks\Downloads\Agenda Memo 216011.doc PLAT INFORMATION SHEET PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION LOTS 1-21, BLOCK 1, OAK HILL I. GENERAL: • The applicant, Josh Born is preliminary platting 5.75 acres into 21 single family residential lots. The property is proposed to rezone from Planned Commerce Development District and to R-5.0 single family residential. Property is located at 4700 State Highway 360. II. STREET SYSTEM: • The development has access to public access easement to State Highway 360 • Abutting road: ❑ is on the City Thoroughfare Plan- ® are not on the City Thoroughfare Plan- ® Cul-de-sac exceeding 600 feet allowed by the Director of Public Works and Fire Marshal. ❑ Curb, gutter and sidewalk exist across the frontage of this lot. ❑ Periphery Street Fees are due as follows: Type of Roadway Cost / LF Length Cost ❑ Major Arterial (A) $ 234.57 / LF ❑ Major Arterial (B) $ 178.35 / LF ❑ Minor Arterial (C) $ 203.06 / LF ❑ Minor Arterial (D) $ 170.33 / LF ❑ Collector (E) $ 170.33 / LF ❑ Collector (F) $ 150.98 / LF ❑ Sidewalk $ 25.00 / LF ❑ Curb & Gutter $ 15.00 / LF ® Periphery Street Fees are not due: III. STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: • The site drains east and southeast to the drainage system in State Highway 360 and the drainage system along the southern property line of development. C:\Users\tbrooks\Downloads\Agenda Memo 216011.doc • The developer will be required to design for onsite as well as offsite drainage in accordance with the requirements of the City of Grapevine's Code of Ordinances. IV. WATER SYSTEM: ❑ The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ® The existing water supply system bordering the subject site along State Highway 360 is not adequate to serve the development. Additional off site water system improvements will be necessary to loop water service to serve the site. V. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM- ® The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ❑ The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development. Owner has submitted construction plans to extend sanitary sewer to this property. VI. MISCELLANEOUS: ❑ Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are not required for- ® Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits for: Lots 1-21, Block 1, Oak Hill ® Single Family Residential ( $ 2,388/ Lot) ❑ Multifamily ( $ 1,049/ Unit) ❑ Hotel ( $ 43,606/Acre) ❑ Corporate Office ( $ 20,572/Acre) ❑ Government ( $ 4,426/Acre) ❑ Commercial / Industrial ( $ 5,670/Acre) ❑ Open Space Fees are not required for- ® Open Space Fees are due prior to the preconstruction meeting for public infrastructure improvements for: Lots 1-21, Block 1, Oak Hill ® R-5.0, R-TH, Zero Lot District ( $ 1,416.00 / Lot) ❑ R-7.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,146.00 / Lot) C:\Users\tbrooks\Downloads\Agenda Memo 216011.doc ❑ R-12.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,071.00 / Lot) ❑ R-20.0, Single Family District ( $ 807.00 / Lot) ❑ Public Hearing Only ❑ Variances were required on the following items: ❑ Front & Rear building lines ❑ Allowing a setback of 3 feet for the rear property line for an accessory building ❑ Lot width & depth; ❑ Max. Impervious Area ❑ Landscaping Regulations, allowing no landscape buffer between the edge of the parking area and the adjacent property line. ❑ The following items associated with this plat are not in accordance with the current subdivision standards: ❑ 50' ROW dedication not met: ❑ Length of cul-de-sac street exceeds the 600-foot limit: ❑ Driveway Spacing not met. VII. STATEMENT OF FINDINGS: A. The City has determined that the right-of-way and easements required to be dedicated for streets, utilities, drainage, access, sidewalks and other municipal needs and services are consistent with the City's ordinances and master plan, are reasonable and are connected to the proposed project in the following manner- ® The right-of-way provides for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. ® The onsite utility easements provide for a utility network to serve the development of this site. ® The onsite drainage easements provide for a drainage network to serve the development of this site. ❑ The onsite access easements provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. C:\Users\tbrooks\Downloads\Agenda Memo 216011.doc ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. B. The City further finds that the required dedication is related both in nature and extent to the impact of the proposed development as follows- ® The right-of-way is necessary to provide for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. ® The onsite utility easements are necessary to provide for a utility system to serve this development and connect to existing utilities on surrounding property. ® The onsite drainage easements are necessary to provide for storm drainage improvements to serve the development of the site. ❑ The onsite access easements are necessary to provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements are necessary to provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. ® All of the dedications benefit the development to at least the extent of the impact of such on the development. VIII. RECOMMENDATION: The members of the City Council and The Planning & Zoning Commission consider the following motion: "Move that the City Council (Planning and Zoning Commission) approve the Statement of Findings and the Preliminary Plat of Lots 1-21, Block 1, Oak Hill" C:\Users\tbrooks\Downloads\Agenda Memo 216011.doc MEMO TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER MEETING DATE AUGUST 15, 2023 SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT APPLICATION LOTS 1-21, BLOCK 1, OAK HILL PLAT APPLICATION FILING DATE..........................................................August 8, 2023 APPLICANT ..............................................................Josh Born, 360 Land Partners, LLC REASON FOR APPLICATION ..........................................................Final platting 21 lots PROPERTY LOCATION ............................................................4700 State Highway 360 ACREAGE.................................................................................................................. 5.75 ZONING .........................................................Existing: PCD; Planned Commerce District Proposed: R-5.0, Single Family Residential District NUMBEROF LOTS ...................................................................................................... 21 PREVIOUS PLATTING .................................................................................................No CONCEPTPLAN ..........................................................................................................No SITEPLAN.............................................................................................................Z23-01 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT..................................................................................Yes AVIGATION RELEASE ...............................................................................................Yes PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED ....................................................................................No C:\Users\tbrooks\Downloads\Agenda Memo 216012.doc PLAT INFORMATION SHEET FINAL PLAT APPLICATION LOTS 1-21, BLOCK 1, OAK HILL I. GENERAL: • The applicant, Josh Born is final platting 5.75 acres into 21 single family residential lots. The property is proposed to rezone from Planned Commerce Development District and to R-5.0 single family residential. Property is located at 4700 State Highway 360. II. STREET SYSTEM: • The development has access to public access easement to State Highway 360 • Abutting road: ❑ is on the City Thoroughfare Plan- ® are not on the City Thoroughfare Plan- ® Cul-de-sac exceeding 600 feet allowed by the Director of Public Works and Fire Marshal. ❑ Curb, gutter and sidewalk exist across the frontage of this lot. ❑ Periphery Street Fees are due as follows: Type of Roadway Cost / LF Length Cost ❑ Major Arterial (A) $ 234.57 / LF ❑ Major Arterial (B) $ 178.35 / LF ❑ Minor Arterial (C) $ 203.06 / LF ❑ Minor Arterial (D) $ 170.33 / LF ❑ Collector (E) $ 170.33 / LF ❑ Collector (F) $ 150.98 / LF ❑ Sidewalk $ 25.00 / LF ❑ Curb & Gutter $ 15.00 / LF ® Periphery Street Fees are not due: III. STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: • The site drains east and southeast to the drainage system in State Highway 360 and the drainage system along the southern property line of development. C:\Users\tbrooks\Downloads\Agenda Memo 216012.doc • The developer will be required to design for onsite as well as offsite drainage in accordance with the requirements of the City of Grapevine's Code of Ordinances. IV. WATER SYSTEM: ❑ The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ® The existing water supply system bordering the subject site along State Highway 360 is not adequate to serve the development. Additional off site water system improvements will be necessary to loop water service to serve the site. V. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM- ® The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ❑ The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development. Owner has submitted construction plans to extend sanitary sewer to this property. VI. MISCELLANEOUS: ❑ Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are not required for- ® Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits for: Lots 1-21, Block 1, Oak Hill ® Single Family Residential ( $ 2,388/ Lot) ❑ Multifamily ( $ 1,049/ Unit) ❑ Hotel ( $ 43,606/Acre) ❑ Corporate Office ( $ 20,572/Acre) ❑ Government ( $ 4,426/Acre) ❑ Commercial / Industrial ( $ 5,670/Acre) ❑ Open Space Fees are not required for- ® Open Space Fees are due prior to the preconstruction meeting for public infrastructure improvements for: Lots 1-21, Block 1, Oak Hill ® R-5.0, R-TH, Zero Lot District ( $ 1,416.00 / Lot) ❑ R-7.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,146.00 / Lot) C:\Users\tbrooks\Downloads\Agenda Memo 216012.doc ❑ R-12.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,071.00 / Lot) ❑ R-20.0, Single Family District ( $ 807.00 / Lot) ❑ Public Hearing Only ❑ Variances were required on the following items: ❑ Front & Rear building lines ❑ Allowing a setback of 3 feet for the rear property line for an accessory building ❑ Lot width & depth; ❑ Max. Impervious Area ❑ Landscaping Regulations, allowing no landscape buffer between the edge of the parking area and the adjacent property line. ❑ The following items associated with this plat are not in accordance with the current subdivision standards: ❑ 50' ROW dedication not met: ❑ Length of cul-de-sac street exceeds the 600-foot limit: ❑ Driveway Spacing not met. VII. STATEMENT OF FINDINGS: A. The City has determined that the right-of-way and easements required to be dedicated for streets, utilities, drainage, access, sidewalks and other municipal needs and services are consistent with the City's ordinances and master plan, are reasonable and are connected to the proposed project in the following manner- ® The right-of-way provides for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. ® The onsite utility easements provide for a utility network to serve the development of this site. ® The onsite drainage easements provide for a drainage network to serve the development of this site. ❑ The onsite access easements provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. C:\Users\tbrooks\Downloads\Agenda Memo 216012.doc B. The City further finds that the required dedication is related both in nature and extent to the impact of the proposed development as follows- ® The right-of-way is necessary to provide for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. ® The onsite utility easements are necessary to provide for a utility system to serve this development and connect to existing utilities on surrounding property. ® The onsite drainage easements are necessary to provide for storm drainage improvements to serve the development of the site. ❑ The onsite access easements are necessary to provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements are necessary to provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. ® All of the dedications benefit the development to at least the extent of the impact of such on the development. VIII. RECOMMENDATION: The members of the City Council and The Planning & Zoning Commission consider the following motion: "Move that the City Council (Planning and Zoning Commission) approve the Statement of Findings and the Final Plat of Lots 1-21, Block 1, Oak Hill" C:\Users\tbrooks\Downloads\Agenda Memo 216012.doc : LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING, a tract of land situated in the G.W. Minter Survey, Abstract No. 1083. in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas and being all of a 5.75D acre tract,as described in Doc. No.D206375047 in the Deed Records of Tarrant County,Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING, at a 5/8 Inch Iron rod found at the southwest n t corner of said 5.750 acre tract, being In the Bost line of `. Stonebridge Oaks, on addition to the City of Grapevine, as ``-i re corded in Cob.A.Slide 12164 in the Plat Records of Tarrant o County.Texas: THENCE, North 00°31'56" West, along the west line of said 5.750 acre tract and the east line of said Stonebridge Oaks, for a distance of 713.40 feet,to a 1/2 loch iron rod found at "� '•�: ! a �, t` �� _ the northwest corner of said 5.750 acre tract and being an ell corner of said Stonebride Oaks; THENCE, North 65°00'54" East, along the north line of said 5.750 acre tract and along a south line of said Stonebridge Oaks,for a distance of 159.45 feet,to a Tx Dot Monument found at the northeast corner O acre rner of said 5,75 tr t nd ac o 0 25 50 100 fy5° ve•wr �•, being southeast corner said Stonebridge Oaks,being in the west line 3e of State Highway 60 (Variable R.O.W J; SCALE: 1" 50' LOT 16 \ \ THENCE,South 36.00'17"East,along the east line of said 5.750 \ \a, '( acre tract and along the west line of said State Highway 360, O �, for a distance of 52.00 feet,to a 5/8 inch iron rod found; •,\ \ THENCE,South 25°09'13" East, continuing along said east and LOT 15 `\ `\ west lines,for a distance of 514.38 feet,to a 5/8 inch iron rod `\ \ S. :; ''• ,\ \ \ \ found: •_ _—- .�` \.\ \ A',\ a �� :.� \`\ THENCE,South 10°04'36" East,continuing along said lines.for a x -'\ \ `\ distance of 77.57 feet.to a 5/8 inch iron rod found: PROJECT n \ '" \ '\ 4i•` - \ LOCATION THENCE,South 25°05'33"East,continuing along said lines,for a distance of 100.35 feet,to a 5/8 inch iron rod found: LOT 14, '\ THENCE,South 36°4016" East,continuing along said lines,for o �. distance of 101.66 feet,to a Tx Dot monument found: df THENCE,South 24°40'05"East,continuing along said lines,for a distance of 15.60 feet,to a 5/8 inch iron rod found at the southeast corner of said 5.750 acre tract: LOT 13 tP ' 1.OT 17 \ d THENCE,South 88°52'06" West,departing the west line of said Y 360 and along State Highway the south line of said 5.750 acre v 0- \ tract,for a distance of 510.56 feet,to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 5.750 acres or 250534.37 square feet of land. LOT 12, LOCATION MAP — ,11 N.T.S. \,• tp ,\ S.LOT 18 `\ \ y CASE NAME:OAK HILL LOT tt 4' CASE NUMBER:Z23-01 T� LOCATION:4700 STATE HIGHWAY 360 wir LOT 10 MAYOR SECRETARY \ LOT 20 t STONE RID 0 _GAB-d.SL 2164 i DATE! ZOfI D. - .0 �..' 3 L07 9 t0 O PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 71 'LOT 21 \ ` ZZ LOT 8 °:.. ' ° CHAIRMAN ` N DATE: t LOT �O m SHEET F_ APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. 17j fir, LOT t r>F �a��^CO LOT 2 \\ f� Q�� LOT 3 >0 't7y J O LOT aLA / / x `�•. LOT 5 _, / %� � .. �.. ", .., Six'•IRF .. JUL 1 3DP...vI / ) , tf•S T/ _.. , .TX DOT POINT OF BEGINNING x , - _- . - \ t1`?0 CASE NUMBER:223-01 O ZONING EXHIBIT 3, 0N —"_� vwxrcc - -- i - --s/rxe : -- S68°52 06 W -510 56' _ _ - „1 - -..__. .T. .--.._,_..,f. ._, ,T r___ ---- .-- T r.. 9 OF HILL OWNER TOOTALKACRES 5.750 BLOCK I 36 0 LAND PARTNERS,LLC. TOTAL 6 , 1 _,.` s •\ 260 BLEWNS STREET SQUARE FEET 250534.37 '1 € `I -1 g ,\ GRAPEVINE,TEXAS 76051 SITUATED IN THE ij I i GLADE HILL -.7 1 2 I �z 3 ; 4 5 DOC NO.D21404;296 a i o PREPARED BY G.MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083 I I zoNED R-s.a I isg ;,' CORWIN ENGINEERING,INC. IN THE ,. I_.._.._._._.._____ —.,,.I. i - I '° 200 W.BELMONT,SUITE E x j i i ;./7 a CITY OF GRAPEVINE j; ; i �L97z see 200 13 TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS THE PURPOSE OF THIS ZONING CHANGE REQUEST TO CHANGE MAY 2023 SCALE r'- sD' FROM ?CD" PLANNED COMMERCE DISTRICT TO "R-5.0",ZERO CORWIN JOB NO:21006 LOT LINE DISTRICT, SHEET 3 OF 6 _ 0 25 50 100 I `' SCALE 5 \ 1 \ .\ _ �t ', N; )N BEING, a tract of land situated in the G.W. Minter Survey, ,, a \ �� Abstract No. 1083, in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, _T \-,� n .. PROJECT Texas and bein all of a 5.750 acre tract as described in Doc. `\ LOCATION _ _ _ BUILDINGRLINE _ g �, W No. D206375047 in the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, .w �� HUGNEs w i i i i i and being more particularly described as follows: W \ s' v w _ \ I I I I I \`\" A'\ MON,D N N o ! W ! ! ! ! W BEGINNING, at a 5/8 inch iron rod found at the southwest y ` v - -o ! � ! ! �.! corner of said 5 750 acre tract, bein in the east line of s g \ z a v I;K W0 Stonebridge Oaks, an addition to the City of Grapevine, as ", �° Igo I Slide 64 In e a Records of Tarrant cS�10 vv i o i�� i i i i �'sr recorded in Cab. A, 121 th PI t d kCJa �, , o �m �nmt .v ; 3, ,�cI � � v,a� p". v � i i i i i County Texas iII -� : `.a.�.. ,.. ° _ 1v �i.�� A I I I 25'FRONT ( o n ,i 4.. ,'N / .>� v`, _ _ _ _ 1 �BUILOINc LirvE� L _ THENCE, North 00 3156 West, along the west line of said f` � ' ` 0 0� `� �,. � I �X 5.750 acre tract and the east line of said Stonebridge Oaks, .A I"_-�,-"-II_'-"-l1,1Il.117.��,1'.,1,.�11�,l-/1-1-"�1"",,�1J1"1",�./1�l 1-i 14,-->I�1,,1.,�-A'"'�I1'.,,.-,I.I,".II,*,�I,�,I1",�'1"1 I,1I.\1,""_,�."..'.�r,,�"I.-"'n,"�,�/,�I,""I>I�I_,-"'�-I.1,-,,1"-,""�-lj,,�,,,>1,",�I,"�,"-v1,,I,,l�`I Ij,'.�:�I�7I-I���"�I_�,I�'Il,��,1'I;%I,,I,,"l C-',�,/I 1� '1."I 1\1.-0,,?'I�"I,��,,�%II9 1',.1"P.-1'",,,,.,"�_j II'l�,1,��.I",%,l\,1,_,\,�-"��_:,?�I��-_"�,-1n",`'I 1�>,1I 1_,11,1.�11,1-.1,1,1�,11�1 1 I_"_1",1.1,I�"1,,II,1,�'I1"."�"1"'I,���"1 I"-"'),��1',1,1_I,",_,,,�,",,,"I�,_1?",,I,.",._1,1-,?,/'I-,,,_I"��,"�.",.1.'"1,,1,_,,�I 1",I,V"I II""%"'-,,_I1_�I_>1I,,"\�I'''I,1�'�I 1 I"I"-,1,�"�.,",,,I._1I,1.'I,""�'",,�'�.-"I-,I,�,�_,,I��I1 I�,.�1I,�,"�'�.-I,�"1_,\_.I.�,�,1 TTHEE "e k \ v ,. 5/6" IRE , ,, 50 for a distance of 713.40 feet, to a 1/2 inch iron rod found at \ \;� 50 acre tract and be an ell , 9 ,. GLADE RD. f d St b d 0 e nor wes corner o say n ,1l2° ik ; � LOT 16'' ` \ corner o sal one rl a aks, I , , �. ,. �,r „ _. PROPOSED STREET �\ \ A, ' � s 0 d b CE, North 65°00'54" East, alon the north line of said ... ,,, �, \ v � '' LOC MAP acre tract an along a south line of said Stone ridge �, ATION 5 75 \ N.T.S. Oaks, for a distance of 159.45 feet, to a Tx Dot Monument `t oT 15 vv vv 'v ?� vv , \ found at the northeast corner of said 5.750 acre tract and \,' `\ � `' \ , being a southeast corner of said Stonebridge Oaks, being in the ` TYPICAL DETAIL `. �\ \` `\ west line of State Highway 360 (Variable R.O.W ); m A \ , N.T.S.\ ` , v ' �, v, °_ ,, v ", THENCE, South 36° 00'17' East, along the east line of said 5.750 \;, ,'\ > �\ acre tract and along the west line of said State Highway 360, f d t f 52 00 f t 5/8 h d f v �a v �o, �, �; or a is once o eet, o a inc iron ro ound; \ `\` `\\ CE, South 25°09'13" East, continuing along said east and \ .f' THEN \ west lines, for a distance of 514.38 feet, to a 5/8 inch iron rod >%' L0T' 1a v. \ M _ E \ found c \ $ �,,>;�:�I,��."_I�I.',�""�.,IS1 I"�,',I�1.1\.'�I,l1,I'�,,,,cI1"l.�',,,I,,�-",'�II>"�.1.',��,1"I`I,_,I I',.l�"1I1:."","I,�,�-I,l,II,,";�,`.,'' "I1 1I�.. \ `\ ,.. � I `°� � �, v`� �vv CE, South 10° 04'36" East, continuing along said lines, for a _, . 1I""1Z"�.IC,��,,,.,.',,.1",I�",,",,.1,"�,,X",11.��,",,I1"I"���?",,,1,1.I,1"I,-1'I�I".,�,v�'l),1�J,:I"'�`,,,".1��1 I,"",,;�;-,1,"�', ,F l II�,_:.l%:I-:',::l4,""',I"�"",I"�,"�_I,,.1>,'1"",,'q"I I,,,1I'I 1",1,,"1l""1-,"I,"��1"',1�I""I�1',,l����1,i">,,",:II:"���,,,"I��1III,',Ii"�I II I,,-1,"�",I,-,�,I,I_1'? ,:',I';I,"�-"1,"�II,I���:1,""I,,_�,,\�"1"I,,1',"1""1",",I,,:,1,,,,",,'",!:��f.),""":1I I,1�rN,I.�:.I I I,,"-".,I.:�N,,�"."_I.;�",�/_.I,i.,.I,I ;,"I�",,1�_".","."�"1,�,',�,_'I�,.i,_���I,���I�'�C .,"IIIk"�,�1-1',�I��,�_,,l,"-1 1l,,,,,I,'� ,�,,,�1�,`I"�"-_,"l"1,\,',,"",",",,,l,,__I 1`",',�,I,,�_"I"1I,11�I1"�-"'-1,I"I l 1I I,,�l",I,,"1�'�,.�"".,I-.�z�"�.I,.I�".1�".�,,�".;",,.1,,,I�1,1�1�v-'1P"I���1 11`,,1,1�1�I,""I)'���-,",,,'�,�1,1.��I,,I'-,I-,.��"-,_�I,_�.,I��",�"",1,".:,�.r,_,",,�,_I.'i.I.�"..,,__I,.,-.,�,I,.�"1,.I,�,,,,1:,�,'.,,,.!I-.,',I,,.1�F"",1,�",",1":.j�",1I�',.I�I.<II�,�,�,1,"�',�'I�",,"�, 4,,"","II'f�;;'�:I,�,I,I,'1:,,,1_"/�:,I,"�"I�"I:�,�'",/".1,;i,":I:-"".,1,��")",1l.�,;",",E,"..,I":.,I,.,",.II'.�,j I:;,",�'�111"f�,":,_I�"1,,,,1,1"'0�,,,1N1�1,",'-I�I"",I'_"11".,!,1,I,_,'1-";.,�,�-(�_,'",,I�',,��,I,I�,I,,, ,-,,l."�,"" , H N I. T E I „ , Is once o ee o a 8 inc iron rod foun,, , �< ° \ 77.57 f t, t 5/ h d; "1 I�1.'"�I,I I),I1,1�.II",I,,,."""I1,I'll.I 1,k:I1,.,"-�"1",�/I���I.,1/1,�.1.1"�,1 I"I,,I""-""""1".;1"1,',1"-, II,-�"-1,�",,1,,,'""I�,','",,'1l"-1I,,,."1"`1"�,l,"i-I�,1�,,"-',,",",''"�,",I�,�I",,,"��I'"-'.;I,l,-III,,.I,I"I 1 I_",,'�."�,1,��"�1,"I.-,',""",;iII1 I"�l,,�'�,,I lI,,"""I"',�,II""1,1,,,",,,"�I,,I�1�,I,�.',"1I I"I�,, d t f LOT 13 ` ' `t°.,, (j) e for a '�1�""I1,,I,.I"�1l,1,��"",`,"1'",,,I1 1-1,";I,1 1 l I I�f 1�\,1�III'I_.,":jI`."�.I1""..1:I'1���l�I1III,�,"I'�.I"1.�I,,,.,"�I I",.l,,",I�,� 1 II1-�,\,I-,II"I��I'"",�/1,,,/�1,�"I 1"�,1,I 1I',�1'�1� ,1.�,,I,.,"" �A,".,i,"�.��1I,,,,I"11''",,0'I.1", "I.1.,:,1_L,.l1,�,1.,_��I>,I" .�,I",,"��',"�.�".",,`�",I,�:1".,",II'�",,.I,��"1""�"�""I"�,.1�1:`"O,1�I,�1 1 11,,,,1�,1",,�A I",I""" ��,1",1,',I�"I-�1,11,:",,"-"I��.�I,,"1 1""�I"1 1,1,I"",I',,1",'IkT'"�'"1"_"''�II l,1",. 'l'-,"1,11"I lIZI�V�""I",1,"l,I""""�",.l"�"."",�"_.7 I',�""1;,�I,,"",1I"�1"1",'I�-1�I�1 1,11,'�-,�1,"-,,,I1 �"`-,,1�1,,I"�'I�I�1!�II�I," ,,,PZ,".,6,:-_,�.I%,f.�,!I/ 3'11,,�,"", ' `,� CE, South 2 East, continuing along said lin s ", distance of 100 35 f a 5/8 inch iron rod fo ,LOT °�17 N z �, � ee , to und, "'" , SITE PLAN DATA SUMMARY TABLE F �, tQ t ,. p__ .., ``v © vy, E, South 36° 40'16" East, continuing along said lines, for a THENC ,, distance of 101.66 feet, to a Tx Dot monument found; ., v` v�„ c c. v a ITEM Required Proposed t \ I v v ``° Z % .w THENCE South 24°40'05" East continuin alon said lines for a GENERAL SITE DATA LOT �12` ;. I, `1, -yr� Proposed zoning R-5.0 R-5.0 9 9 `I _ ': y Land use Single Famil Single Family distance of 15.60 feet, to a 5/8 inch iron rod found at the > L southeast corner of said 5.750 acre tract; , .-,,, ,. O " It `v , ".,' Typical Total Lot Area 5,000 5,000 JP", \ \ ., , Typical First-Floor-Building Footprint Area N/A N/A ° ' � THENCE, South 88 52 06 West, departing the west line of said \ LOT"`18: `v v F `� Typical Total Building Area 1,200 MIN. 1,200 MIN. v 1y °' t State Highway 360 and along the south line of said 5.750 acre \ �; c` �� Maximum Building Height (feet/#stories) 3572 35'/2 L; T 1� , _ ?' ` tract, for a distance of 510.56 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING o `v . , _ Maximum Floor Area Ratio N/A N/A and containin 5.750 acres or 250534.37 square feet of land. " _\ v` 9 q 50'f.G.W. , A '\ d Residential Units � oT k9 vv Total * of Residences 21 21 _ ( o� \ v Minimum Lot Width 50' 50' CASE NAME OAK HILL s - LOT 1�0 � � \ `v,; Minimum Lot Depth 100, 110' CASE NUMBER CP23-01 ","�," �1 1"\"I.,,1I.'�,,\I1,,�,l'"" 0 v Minimum Front Yard Setback 25' 25' LOCATION 4700 STATE HIGHWAY 360 �`�, M s I I Po F �\y v`v Side Yard Setbacks 6' 6' \`; �,�, \ .vv Minimum Rear Yard Setback 25' 25' LOT°.,,20 vv ��, Av '•:`v Building Distance Separation 12 12 ` i y Residential Density (Units/Net Acreage) 8 3.60 : STONE BRIDGE OAKS 3 LOT 9 _ � , � V ` CAB. A, SLD. 12164 ; _ `\ MAYOR SECRETARY �1 1 111 1 I.,,1,I,kI1-I,1�1,,,�1,�\,,,,I, �,1,'_,1 II�1,,-I 1",1,,,�,\1_,_�",-��,,�"�I,i"�1\1,,,:1�_"1I":I'-IV I',,1,\\"I,1�:��'",,,�",,"":1,�,:��.,�:1::',"._�:J,,"1 7,,,""',,1",,,*1"'','1t"11nII,-,"1""AI,�..",.�",,A1�I, ZONED -R-5.0 i A vet `Im �` �9 "I ` v`v I,/1,1 I1I,�I I,,1,, ON RAMP �` LOT 21 `, ""I,"�"�I_-,_I 1,,I�I 1�,I,,��,",',,"�",("1I,�"�,I.,","1�_I I,,'1,.,11,1,,,1!,.11,,',111 ,,,',"\<,1,,,I"�l,�_"--""\1,,�",1I�_.�,_,"`",.I�,1_I./"_�1-I.1 i 1,.;�1,,"1,I ,,1.,,\�I/,I,,',"1,.,,,",".,�,.,,-",I4",,�0'%".I,I,�kI.��:\,I.�",:,.I,I.1�1I.. G ©, vv ` DATE ZI LOT 8 _. .; `;, ,,;�I)i,I"l.\,,,"1�w"1.\,�,",,"1\1��"'11�,"1I,1I.,1I�1"1-�\ ''` PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION -- I` o -° LOT,, ), v , A �; CHAIRMAN I.1"�1I"'��1"�"--,"1�1,1,.I""�,",,'","-�1 1 1',`1,,,7 1I"':",,��11�"-",".1,,I,11,�I"1 i.�"11,11/,1.,,,,1"",,,,1.,1 1,,1,�,I`.',,,"111I.�,,II�,--�1",,,,I."I,7 'I,'.,1"I"1 1,"IY.I,�".'�,''",-"�1:,-1",.�l_I,1'.,'"f,I,.lI,".,"_",,1""�,""i7".1�11".,,,.,"`,1'I"",",.:"I,.,��'.1�"1 I,1.I,�"�l,,�I,,""�I,.,Il.''I-,�I","!,."II I�,,,,�Il,I""�."j,I,"l,,e.1/,.I,`,.'",,'"I",.",�,,.�I 1',"11,"t�.,1)-1,1.1��;_.11,,�,".-�."�1,/".-�,i"1'"",.:'I,1"I�,�".:�,I1 \.'\1"1�;�:,1�".1",',,,,.,z,"�,��1,'",I�",.,jI,,,,,,""",I.;�/", �-���,,,�,I,,,I,,��I,�I 1",1�,�1I,"`I�",I,,,,�"11:I_,,,�,�,\,I,1�I1,',�I�1,,,.I,.,�,-,.,I,'I.,,1,�,,�I/.I,,,,1/1",,,,.,,,II.,"""'.,,\1�1,1,"1,�,,�:,," \ \�`, �.0 \ \ ' _tA \ ",�"�\;.�".,":"1,I.�I�",�1,'"1����"I I--.I-,"",-..I."_,�"�1",.,�"N,I:I.",I,.,�1-_.",�\,,"''1I,"".,1"\I,,,��I''1�,"�,.`\,l,",��.;,l"�%,.1,���,,".1,,.1."1,.11",,.,"1.',-,1,.,�I,-.",�""I�.".,I��,�"�,�I,�I,�k�1I",j".,",,,1�I',1" ' ' O `\ � ''r So. \4 m DATE 1 �. \: \, `% L 1 oT \ /$"1RF SHEET 2 OF 6 y , ` ; I \\ Q \ °' , \ Q , \ \\ kp APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH , , . . ,. LOT 3 `� ' ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES , \ ,, �, , O \ `, . ,,, '` �/ LOT 4 r `\\t 1y , \ i , M ,I"\,I�1,1I",1),'\I- -"I"-�,"i,1,�8�:�,\",I,",:,�I,,4 1.�1"��,.,11;'11I,,"11 1 I,,.._"��1"?1 V1,I."I1�A,,1I,,.� I,,��',-,�,�..�,11 ,�-"",,, ", 1 11;I�1".,,,1,�,I l,1�"I,,,'�,, ,","I1,�,'1I1�,/ �'1> ,'1,I I%�I,1� ,,l* I,1 ",!�I��I,I\�,", �. Q _ "` . \"I"'.,.,1�m�",. 1 1"��,I,"1,,,1� �. LOT 5 'v "., \, \ {//�) 6 f \r%,, " 1n/ r � , pGE E v�v ,_ 9 v V O R. 1 D _ " °,. '' ` `' �"'` �`v CORRENT FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION IS CO-COMMERCIAL - " 5/8 112E' 4 �. v� , ". a AP 2 LAND USE PLAN OF THE COMPREHENSIVE MASTER ,, . „W.a `, �Q , ,. �, PLAN RRNNAGE EASEMENT y• v v - '- - - ,,,,, F N` ` > ,,I,\,,I-"I,,"�'11��."".".,1"I ,",�"1',,",, 1�1I ,":%\ �,'I I�,�,,." "�,I� 1 I!",,�"1 1 ,1 I,, �,�'",",,�,\',�I,1"1,,I 1,, r ,v I�1:11,. RvlcEs, \ '\ �' '� NCLUDINGEWATER, SEWER, DRAINAGESWILL BE PROV DED E 11, I\,"1�,,I'1 11 , ,�1,I1`,�,. �, ,. F v ,: ti, , . , ,., ,, ,,, .• ,.,, TX �,: ch v ,: F 6 FOR PRELIMINARY GRADING OF THIS D OT _ ,,, . , ,, . .. , A vv � 0 POINT OFI BEGINNING , "" �� ,.., �� � � vv �� SUBJECT TRACT. --- , , ; \ ; , DRAINAGE'ESMT. -� d CAB. .SLD.12164 ,.;, ` 5/$ 1RF• "�i A, �. �. „v , �` r,.w..,,.;�. ,.. pp /'� ---------------5/8" ,R S8G7' 6V TiW -, �, _ - - - ,. - , 's ,.,..,,�.,. . .. :, .,,,,: --- --- - ... .. - r:. -•- T t.,,' , �_.T �, i T " .- �, L. I I i. t C A 01 � . � , . , , / , �'v ,. II , a PER PLANS a i ,,I I I j t. ,,.,. 1, CONC 1 , I d �, t , , ,}, w " y ' �;a..., as ;- 1 i } ` 1 ' I I �;.: I i i �' i BLOCK 1 . r :,1," ,I,I,I,," �,��,l,��"I"I,K",.1�,I. .1:'�.,1l�II1l�I.,.,I.,,,1,,�.�,,%., ��,, �",,,,�."",�,,,\ I,�I,'1,I�, I"I,',,,"'%�� ,'._,� V . ., �. ". 0 A K NIL L I ! ", � I 11 I I I. GLADE HILL I I ,w0 -. 4,"a �v :-., ,. e 2 I 3 �. 4 I 5 '�DOO. NO.,,D214040296 �. s� I ,Qo 9 ����/ � , I 1 h I ,a x , TOTAL RESIDENTAL LOTS 21 1 I I I I� �zo / ,� \ , I LZ i r _ , : , � , v 5.750 ONED R 5 Q t 1, i F, ., I I i I "' ! „-. n. ! , ! , I , o o/, ., � � . ,. a, !� „: , I , I,,;,,., :, ., .,, .,,,. ., I I ,„ ,..., ..., ,; ., I I I i I %"; E . ZON IST ICT' ' ` G 'PCD' P w sl I I I I ; . i. ; I ,' , ,'. , -\ . 360 RS, LLC.LAND PARTNE X IN CANNED COMMERCE D R ,` `" ! ! ! I ! I / , - " \, 260 BLEVINS STREET PROPOSED ZONING 'R 5.0", ZERO LOT LINE DISTRICT # i I } , I.. ' • ' ' ,' � ' � v,`, , GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 " � . - SITUATED IN THE PREP�E� BY G. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083 CORWIN ENGINEERING, INC. 200 W. BELMONT, SUITE E IN THE \ I ALLEN, TEXAS 75013 CITY OF GRAPEVINE 972-396-1200 TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS JULY 2023 SCALE 1" = 50' SHEET 2 OF 6 1 i OWNER'S CERTIFCATE AVIGATION REt EASE r 1 0 25 50 100 STATE OF TEXAS F_ e \ SCALE: 1"- 50' -` COUNTY OF TARRANT THE STATE�' TEXAS I LEGAL DESCRPTONCOUNTY OF TARRANT PROJECT WHEREAS 360 LAND PARTNERS,LLC.,Is the owner of a tract LOCATON of lad situated h the G.W.Minter Survey.Abstract No.1OB3,h j \ w oo82n.4 z Se n` _ Npss the City of Grapevine,Tarrant Coustty,Texas and being d of aWHEREAS herchafterc�d "Owmer 360 LAND T one or more),b the owner 5.750 care tract,as described in Doc.No.D206375047 h the \ sJ \ `.s 'aes Dead Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being more of that certain Parcel of land situated In the City of Grapevine, * @ particularly described as folowa: Tarrant shown on this ypbLTeXan• being s Dar �Y deaaibed m �GNNViO, at a S/8 inch 'ran rod found at the southwest 01.00)DOLLAR and other ad valuable corrkerotiom the u • " NOW THEREFORE.In consideration of ales turn of ONE AND corner of said 5.710 care tract. being In the cost line of t and confessed,Owne does hereby b ��e,release,rarYae ad ITN Stonebridge Ones, an otl68on to the City of Grapevine, a KelpSufficiency Y acknowledged s County,recor Texas. Tesaa<in m.A. Skis 12784 In the Plat Records of Tarrant quitclaim to the City of Grapevin.Tarrant County.Texas.the u.-^'"� 65 v` are er DaBoa-Forth Worth btarnatbnd Dame. Taxes and Fort Worth, Texas, tVh,* cnoee*orsc ant 5.750:E, North 00and the seat,Ins, o the rent ri of said ash,hereinafter called Cities".for the use and benefit of 5.J50 acre trxt and tie eat Mrs of said Stonebrkge Oaks. - \ \ for a dstace,of 713.40 fat,to a V2 Inch ton rod found af dam* ,.� Eo7>e erg�too Parr agencies Owner for suffer by f the northwest carrier of said 3.750 acre tract and being an d reaan of theabd fight of d aircraft netts e LOCATION MAP caner of*old Stonabrlde Oaks: above OWN o 1 property above the height restriction oe THENCE.North 65.00'54" Eat. the north ka of said presently established by Ordnance No.73-50 for the City of / g LOT us 5.750 owe treat and dong a south line of said Storsbrkige Grapevine known as the Airport 20ning Ordinance of the SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Oaks,tar a distance of 159.45 fast,to a Tx Dot Monument Delos-Fort Wort'InternotbnalAirpmrt,to an infhate height above toad at the northeast corner of add 5.750 ours treat and sane.whether such damage shd oNpinate from rafts.vibration, j •\`- KOW ALL kEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, WARREN L. being a southeast corner of add Staubridge Odes,being In the fumes,dust.fueiad lubricant p rarticles.and Bother effects that CORWN,do hereby certify that 1prepored Ub Plat and the field weal Mne of State F nroy 360 NarioWe R.O.WJ: may be caned by the opera of aircraft,landing at.or taking rots*mods a part thereof from an actual and accurate survey off from, a operatingat or on the Darts-Fort Worth of the land end that the corner mmuments shown thereon were THENCE.South 36'00'17"East, the cast Isle of odd 5.750 Mernatiorol Airport. property placed uder my personal aupervblen,h accordance acre trod and clog the want ine of said State Highest 360, \. ter ! r with the Subdivison regulations of the Town of Prosper,Texas. for a distace of 52.00 fast,to a 5/8 Inch iron rod toad: This Inatrurlant does not release the owners or operators of Lot x IQ-�O \,! , tta�q property aircraft from-ad by tYf�q damage t corn fhlurY to r wcts TFEXE South for a 2distance of 514.38 feet,to aa5/8sinch Iran rod trom aircraft,except as stated harsh with resOEW spect to nosical �hs, { fumes dust.fuel,and lubricant partiekra. r \ WARREN L.CORWN toad; DN6rq ' to 13 ! RPA.S.No.4827 and Nubs tees add R and successor* in nterest to eWd `, THENCE,South 10.04'36"Eat.continuing dung said Mrnaa,form Won odd owner t distance of 77.57 fast,to a 5/8 Inch Iran rod fend: ash. $ Lox n property:and it Is further agreed that this Instrument Nod be a i .r S • THE STATE OF TEXAS covenant nxv*V with the lad.and shd be recorded In the �\ I THENCE,South.35 fact,t Ea5 con add roes,for a distance of 100.35 fat,to a S/8 Inch tan rod►anal: b situated. county property COUNTY OF COLLN 9� Deed Records of the coon a eourntiea h vAeieh the Before me,the u drsignsd,a Notary Public in and far THENCE.South 36.40'16"East.eau said lines,for a �.\ LOT 12 _ u the State of Texas,on this day personally appeared WARREN L. distance of 101.66 fat,to a Tx Dot rut t found: EXECUTED of Texas, CORWN.known to am to be the person and officer whose name Ulu day of 2023. Is subscribed to the foregoing instrument,and odmowledgad to THENCE,South 24"40'05'East,conthuhg Bag oak hies,for o me that he executed sane for the purpose and consideration datace of 15.60 test.to a 5/8 Inch iron rod toad d the OWE` t; LOT to 4, �, 9� thrash expressed and h the capacity Herein stated. southeast corny of add 5.750 owe trout: LLb \� LOT n 1 yd 1 - Given under my had and sad of office,thffi doy THEM.South 88'52'06" Ws deporting acid O State Hlu�nway 360 and along West inethof wsdd line 750t care - n of ,2023. 360 LAND PARTNERS,I.I.C.. tract,for a detmee of 510.56 feet.to the PONT OF BEGINNING / g LOT era 4 F'/ and containing 5.750 cures or 250534.37 square feet of tend. THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT 1 8 LOT Before me NOTARY PUBLIC, an this day peroondy oppearod n , STATE OF TEXAS known to me for proved to me on the oath of or through (deaaiption of keen ty cad ar other document)to be the Persian whose none b subscribed to the foregoing STONE BRIDGE OAKS $8 LOT s Instrument and acknowledged to me Not he executed the cane CAB.h SLD.12%4 _ 8 .I �:4o-m for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. ZONED - ✓> - C ^�,'` NOW, THEREFORE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT Given 20�my had end sodot office.this doy of, A.D{ I ! 23 LOT 21 "%"'' 360 LAND PARTNERS. I.I.C.does hereby adopt this plot of OAK HILL, an addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County. #' LOT e 1 u Texas, and does Araby dedicate to the public use forever the Y 1 .� ON RAMP right-of-way and easements shown hereon. The eoesnents ( ( rxt i \ 1 J •�/' shown hereon ore hereby reserved for the purposes a nn irxAeated The uMy easements hind be open for d City or _ -4 UP frencAhed public utEtiss for catch particular use. The NIOTARYPUI C' �l LOT 7 i ;4,- eoa' \ \ .4 mdntenaoe of paving on the oosamanto are the rsgorsibiity /�a��y't t�- .moo., of the property owner.No buildings or am"structures Neat!! C i {t / " Wna ..�-'�t �p�'.` be constructed, recorstructW.or placed upon, over.or across FAUG V 2a23 jty�un the easemaets as Mown.Sold easement*being hereby reserved \ OI for the mutual user and accommodation of d pubk utiMUes •' fib or to are care.Any City a franchised uffiy d have �� the them right to remove and keep removed d or parts of any LOT 1 H t R fences. trace.shrubs.or otter knprovementa or growile which In 2 ,\ It maintenance,war a a igor or effidaney of stun reap with theey�tam a\ the (By LOT 6- eN.F.F.E \ "LOT s 51,L F. v t1a consonants and d City or franchised utEtbc NwC at d times MIN.F.F.E- - /' Q have the full right of ingress and*gross to and from and Won 550.94 LOT 1 eN F.F.E. 1 Vl add easements for the purpose or coatructhg,roconstructtng, 7 t MN.F.F1. 5a8.07 \ tAWt} YgpeetYq patro6p,Rahtahirq and adding 10 ar removing d ar @ LOT s sses5- parts of its respective system without the necessity d any i - time of procuring the permission of anyae MIN.FYI- a a _ -�� �. PLANNING k ZONING COMMISSION: ""' � ve-m .. 1 have reviewed the CitY'a F dedcations ad i v a ON.F.F.E- s5o.sa 4r•. r ;�� do ee that Us slate Xt. arse aide o d ca'rod. This ATE APPROVE .: 554.04 - t�\•.` �J approved subject to d platting ordnwces. rules.regulations,and D D: ... .. �. � resolution of the of Grapevine.Texas CHAIRMAN, WwNicE/wATER�� ark Kit Witness my had Nhb ape day of .2023 SECRETARY: SWTIAY�wER �`.,- "O's MwdtI Tatel Netted Area LANDSCAPE ESMT Lot SF AC AC. MO LAND PARTNERS, LLC .TX DO GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL: PONT OF'BEGINNING .=..: .� '.wA1ER Y ACE ELEv �` _rat ON.FAD. 2 12� a29D am Arc A PRO COUNTY OF TARRANT _ {Pt 3 11322 ama Olatted�a DATE AP AY =-. "'" .,, v0� STATE Or the undersigned, Not Pubic h and fa said S88 5206 W 5T6.5fi - 4 1353s a311 zulsi 4.170 MAYOR: _---_ `.. 5 23322 DS03 a.O.W.OedicAC ngne SECRETARY: \ county and etote.an this Boy on whose appeared _ 6 3332z a3Dfi SF AC known re me tI Instrument, the pKson acknowledged dome b n e thatibed to 1. 7 6149 a141 38M ass] the NOregaag Inatfanent, and aaknawkdged t0 RIB U10t let 'M 8 / 5 5555 *lie Easemen tleelouon executed the sane to the purposes and caskorations therein BLOCK 1! / -,v'v 9 5500 aim SF AC axpreesad. oa743a.735e 4o4424s i o I ! ! I GLADE HILL 7 i ! S.�ii' \\ 10 5500 DAN ism a438 mt Given 2under my hard end "of of offce,this day N4023 L' / a SSW a326 7 13 i + i 5 D00.NO.D214040296 ! 6 i I i� 9 A�,1'� i20NED R-5.0 i ;1 � g9' \` 12 55ro au6 PRELIMINARY PLAT f /' OF LOTS 1-21,BLOCK i '6 �\ 13 55M aim i . i » '�\ 14 5689 aL31 or i i I i i i i I •/ ,' \ u 20293 0.236 OAK HILL TOTAL RESM�NTAL LOTS 21 16 11937 U272 17 11624 0.267 1s 7M a162 NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF TEXAS TOTAL ACRES 5.750 5O CURVE TABLE LINE TABLE 19 am DAM � CWs►I55�t EXPIRES �rCy LAND HERS,LLC TOTAL SQUARE FEET 230534.37 p 936T a.zss EX.ZONING "PCD"PLANNED COMMERCE DISTRICT 260 euvr6 STREET PROPOSED ZONING "R-5.0' ZERO LOT LINE DISTRICT CURVE N0. T A LENGTH LINE N0. BEARING DISTANCE a 30557 a241 aRrrPREP iRED Taos: NOTE: S .TER N THE DEL A R DIUS LE GT CHDI20 BEARING CORW�ENfNEERIRNO.MO. 6.kDI'1TER SXRYEY,ABSTRACT NO.W83 - INDICATES STREET LIGHTS N nE 9. N 34.35'52' E 34.76' zoo w.saM0"T,SLATE E 1. 169.25`26' 50.00' 940.87' 98.69' S55'24'08'E N.LER'TEXAS T6at3 CRY OF GRAPEVINE 2. 47 •30'37' 300.00' 248.76' 241.70' N89.23'95'W 2. N 89.26'04' E 15.00, S7z-3u>s-mEa TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS 3. 64.40'01' 50.00' 257.73' 53.49' S69.44'08'E 3. N 64'50'47' E 27.69' 4. S 00131'56' E 51.09, -Note - Per FEMA Peel OILSK,Map Number 4843800115K,there .LLY 2023 SEA.E Tr-50' CORWN JOB •21006 Isno toad plain within boundary SHEET 10F 6 r + 0 25 50 100 OWNER'S CERTIFICATE AYIGATKkt RELEASE W.Q STATE OF TEXAS -�\ SCALE: V- 50' -�- LEGALY OF DESCRIPTION TARRANT s1aE THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY TARRANT erg PROJECT WHEREAS 360 LAID PARTNERS,LLC..Is the owner of a tract LOCATION o1 laxt situated Grapevine, In the G.W. t Co Survey,s and No.1 all of h WHEREAS. 60 L "Owner"PARTNERS. LL one a more).s the owner orxizn.45»2 ssz. n the City of Crailevie,Tarrant County,Texas ad being �of a WHEREAS.380 LAND PARTNERS,LLC, 5.750 acre tract.as described h Doc.No.D206375047 In the of flat ar cal Parcel of lead tttw a In the ape Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being more P� City of Grapevine, Tarrant Particularly descrila d as flows: dwhm m tdatp Texas, belong more particularly deserted as \ y NOW THEREFORE.in consideration of the sun of ONE AND a BEGINNING, at a 5/8 inch iron rod found at the southwest carer of sad 5.750 acre tract. leaky In the cost 6s of (81.0D)DOLLAR and other good and valuable consideration,the .1 1 ,fig• •e *y o$ r t and sufficiencyof which s hereby recorded In Ooks. m @ 1216 to the City of Aaof Tar nt �confessed.Oner does hereby �Y release,remisb recorded N Cali.h Sieb t2164 N the Plat Raeorele of tarot Y �'e, Count remiss are DdMs-Forth Worth international County,Texas: gdtd�rh to the City of Grapevine.Tarrant Comfy Texas,to THENCE, North OO.3T56" West, AIrP� Board. the Cites of \•, DMos, Texas and Fort Worth, Texas. tsIr weewon and �LOT dan9 the west tins of add, � S.T50 acre trod anal tee east frhe of said Stonebrklge Oaks. asaWss.heenefte waled `Citles".for tns use ad besfit of LOT% \ for a distance of 713.40 feet,to a V2 soh iron rod foul at the Pia sad its agencies.any and oI doffs for damages of \ •,\ the northv4ast corner of said 5,750 acre tract and belly m ei any kind to persons or p�f!��y that Owner may suffer by corner of said Sto ebride Oaks: reason of the passage ad * t of of craft N the air space LOC ATION NAP above Owner's property above the height restriction as x /< r'�\ THENCE. North 65*00'54" East, along the north line of odd presently established by Ordinance No.73-50 for the City of \ $ �\�"` SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 5.750 acre tract and doing a south bs of sold Stonebridga D Worth htase t t hfinft the Airport Zor*V dinanes of the + 4s.4., \`, \`.\ Oaks, for a distance of 159.45 feet,to a 7x Dot Monument ears whether th I o height above found at the northeast corner of sold 5.750 core tract and damage arigidte from nee,vibration, KNOW ALL YEN BY THESE PRESENTS that L WARREN L. bang o soutMest corner of said S s Oaks,leaky In the fumes.dust,fuel and lubricant partial".and ON other effects that / J CORWN,do hereby Certify that Ipepared this Plat and the field (Variable dq be cowed b the Operation notes made a prat thereof from an stud and accurate survey west Rue of State Highway 380 NoriaMe R.O.WJ: off tram, or operating at or f m aircraft, the Draw-Fort WWoorth \ h of the lad and that the corner monxnehts shown thereon were THENCE.South 36.00'17"East,along the west Me of said 5.750 htornatwnd A6rport. `\ h properly placed ceder my personal supervialm,in accordance day the west Pne of sold Stale Highway 360, ,\ I with the Sdbdivison regulations of the Town of Pr , fare frost andThis LOT u ; i 9+iati caper,Texas. for a distance of 52.OD feet,to 0 5f8 loth iron rod food: aircraft from instrument p�tyofar daleasvoge the owners of operates of + a THENCE,South 25.09'U" East,cm add east and Property caused by falling aircraft or fa or In y person or th*V along n9 physical objects west inea,for a distance of 514.38 feet,to a 5/8 Mush iron rod from aircraft,except as stated herein with respect to noise. WARREN L.CORWN foul: fumes,dust fuel,and lubricant particles, i �L R.P.L.S.No.4621 THENCE,South 10.04'36"East. d said 6es,fora it le agreed that this Release Mall be bW" sgson said owner ($ LOT o i <-�<LOT T7 6stace of 77.57 feet,to a 5/86 inch rod foul: ad No Mtrs ad assigns,ad successars fn ntanet to add 1 `; '; property;and R is further agreed tat this hetrume it Ma!be a -\. ( ! i `, 4 • THE STATE OF TEXAS THENCE.South 25.05'33"East.contaxing along said Ines,for a covenant running with to lad.and shag be recorded In the+ COUNTY OF COLLN Deed Records of the county Or cemties in rhdM the property distance of 100.35 feet,to a 5/8 loth Iran rod found; t \ SS i # I '.•�� Before rue,the undersigned,o Notary Pubic hand for THENCE.South 36.40'18"East continuing dory said 6hes.fora is rtuotetl. -...+ $ LOT 12 i $ i -1 to State of Texas,on this distance of b1.66 fast,to o Tx Dot rthantsrhent Loud: day personally appeared WARREN L. this day o at Texas, .+ CORWpi,known to ass to Da the person and officer whose nano Ude coy of 2023. j J j i It subscribed to to foregoing katrwWmt,and acknowledged to THENCE,South 24.40'05"East continuing ding sold 6ss,for o I ass that M executed soma far fM purpose sad consideratioancen OWNER: µ++ 8 ; LOT is - 7A therein expressed and In the capacity therein stated. southeast d:orTnar of add 5.750 Saxes Inch !ranrod found M the TtiLEv ++ LOT III # i ` Given under my had and sed of office.His doy THENCE.South 88'52'06" West y 0 1 ti departing the west 6s of add '�'b of ,2023. State Iigway 360 and along the south ins of said 5.750 acre 360 LARD PARTNERS,I.I.C. - t k y tract,for a distance of 510.36 tat to the PONT of BEGINNINGLOT>s 5 09,1 ad containing 5.750 acres or 250534.37 equxs feet of lad. THE STATE OF TEXAS i, 8 COUNTY OF TARRANT LOT 10 on the appeared ti ri k a t" 5 STATEBefore me PUBLIC, known to mis to proved to me on the oath of h STATE OF TEXAS i 6 i LOT 20 �,a or trough (description of identify card or other document)to 8 I g -hose norne in 1 I be to psremd t me that fs ad executed the same subscribed foregoing STONE BRIDGE OAKS ; 1 LOT 9 i j Instrument and as CAB.A SLD.12164 to f a, for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, ZONED-Br¢0 Given under m hand and seal of office, of, j LOT 2t ` '��.�- s LINE TABLE NOW, THEREFORE KNOW ALL YEN BY THESE PRESENTS. THAT A.D.2023. y this-day Sia i i ate' HILL,360 LAND n addition on toy Ns City s of Grapevine,Tarrant lot Cf OM County, ! 2Ig LOT 8 it b ii _ LINE NO. BEARING DISTANCE Y Pub Texas, and does hereby dedicate to the war forever the Js� shown f-ray and easements Mom hereon. The noses as /;'t rT Y\ r,r I. N 34.35'52' E 34.76' Y P i�(V,'FE I! `,� {d�C-, i t h6eMedTM utility easements shag be o es as }� y i C ya 2. N 89.28'04' E 15.00' Y pen for aid City or •cs_ i i ,T.o•" �• f V` 3. N 64.50'47' E 27.69' franchised pubic uti&tiae for each particular use. The NOTARY PtlBl. ..I - LOT 7 i i + VE ,om' v. 4. S 62.OS'11' E 13.42' Paving on the easements are the responsibBty. m t i v D v\ \\ off thepropperty owner. No buildings or aaBor structures shal �, -•10 5. N 81.49'08` E 24.48' Y Y shY 7AUG 10 ��� $ ! --� al�� Fa ,: iP'! 6. S 69.43'40` W 27.61' lea constructed, reeorstueted.a placed upon, over.a across � "v O yO \; �4w 7. S 69.43'40' W 26.58' the easements as shown.Sold easements"her reserved S. N 6/•20'32' E 26.58' for the mutual we ad oaorn odation of all Pubic utilities sky, + fn or desirirhg to use some. My City or franchised utility shM have •,a a the fuel right to remove and keep removed of or pats of any Lot n ; t fences. troes,drubs,or other knprovemente or growths which In LOT 2 \ 6, any soy endmgsr or Interfere with the construction. BY ! LOT 6 O + \', 1- mtenmee, or efficiency of its respective system on the r I ' LOT 3 xB of E i {OS easements ad d City or fraoNsed utkWs shall at all times _r NRi.FT-E- -b 55a.94 } O have to hull right of kyrees and ernes to and from and upon _ .J LOT 4 hat.F.F.E- \,`, W111, add somments for the purpose Ot constructing.reconstructing. 5 lx F.F.E. 548.07 V%t4A inspecting, patrolling,Malrltalenlhg and oddnq t0 or all a removing 0 f° LOT 5 548.95 \ Parts of Rs respective system without the necessity at any Lr..F.F.E• 9-^- .q•z .\,' time of procuring the pernhsalon of anyone PLANNING M ZONING COMMICSSIDW 550.43 Y4..,g I hove reviewed Me Cit s Findings coerce M.F.F.E• N" \`• y° gs rrhIry dedicotiona ad 550.94 der agree that the statements are true and correct. This plot DATE APPROVED' �pV approved subject to of plotting ordinances, rules,regulations.and Cut e11 resolutions of the City of Grapevine,Texas CHAIRMAN' �Oj! Witness my hand Ada the-day of ,2023^"'•"�lei_'.._.___ SECRETARY' sas-xen.+mot DRAINAGE/WATER",, t�0 �.._.._.._. SANTARY SEWER \ �6:'p•: 0o41 EMOWd Arse u LMDSCARE ESMT \ . Las ALAC. 360 LAND PARTNERS, LLC Orr Apo \ tP TX DOT GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL Y DEVEl \ p1 MON.FND. 3 2fia97 65935.751 PONT OF BEGINNING rAtvt ACE E1EYA \ ' 2 12179 a2fi0A.. THE STATE OF TEXAS DATE APPROVED' oxuua tPur a \\ V`. 3 71312 0.26DAG COUNTY OF TARRANT MAYOR: : _ u y sx.w�, m.ar �.s"_ •ve• $'0 4 13535 a3114.eA 56' 5 2nlW a5mauon Beige me, the udders grad, Notary Pubic h a d fa add T ____�_._ ___rF �_ _ ___ comfy and state,antis day persandly appeared SECRETARY+ 6 13322 0306AL known to me to be th!e1 person whaae oars fa anbscrbed to the fore hatrument and acknowledged to me tot he 7 6149 0.241aeai 9aIn9 a SSSS Can EAsamentDeRotion executed the wane for the purposes and considerations therein ex eased. BLOCK 9 SSpp 11126 SF AG pr 00743a.735e 464424.2 i c ! i i i GLADE HILL! 7 i + ; e�• / % �\ la S500 MIM 192A a418 at Given 2under 021 my had and seal of Office,tint day 2 i s 3 i 4 i 5 DOQ.NO.D214040296 i 8 ;I ; $ 9 ,�°: r 11 5500 aim iZONED R-5.0 i :! ,ig °4'.r; �\ 12 SSW aim i i I; i i i i i ',I b F•:i; 13 SSW aim FINAL PLAT 10 +`+ 14 5689 0.133 OF LOTS �27,BLOCK i 15 16M3 an6 OAK HILL „_.n 16 IM7U624 am7 aamn 116xa TOTAL RESIDENT& LOTS 21 NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF TEXAS TOTAL ACRES 5.750 1 i i i i i i 11 ;_- 1 IS 7W6 a161 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES TOTAL SQUARE FEET 250534.37 CURVE TABLE 20 9 T a OWNER EX.ZONING "PCD"PLANNED DISTRICT 360 LAD&P�TNERT LLC, FRWOSED ZONING -R-5.0",ZERO LOT LIE DISTRICT 21 I 1a557 U242 p2MEV4E,TEx 76051 StNATED N TW CURVE N0. DELTA RADJU LENGTH CHORD A N PREPARED BY CORWN EN68EERNG.INC. G.MINTER SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO.1083 1. 161.25'26' 50.001 140.87' 98.69' S55.24'08'E zoo W.eELIAOin.B E E N Tf CITY OF GRAPEVINE 2. 47 •30'37' 300.00' 248.76' 241.70' N89.23'15'W �99773-M6-n�is 3. 64.40'01` 50.DO' 25T.73' 53.49' S69.44°08'E TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS "Note - Per FEMA Pall 0116K,Mop Nmber 48438CO7%K,there -T eau CORWIN JOB •21006 in no food plain within boundary THIS PLAT IS FLED ON ,2023 N D•