HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP2012-11G �` 1VE
T E X A S
UlfF CITY OF GRAPEVINE
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of applicant: agent/company/contact
Kira Bauman/MetroPCS
Street address of applicant/ agent.
2300 Springmere Dr Arlington, TX 76012 / 6513 Windcrest Suite 100 Plano, TX 75074
City / State /Zip Code of applicant / agent:
Telephone number of applicant/ agent: Fax number of applicant /agent:
817/821-5545 / 469-241-3674
Email address of applicanUagent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent
817/821-55451469-241-3674
Applicant's interest in subject property:
Addition of microwave antennas to existing installation
PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION
Street address of subject property
655 Park Av
Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11 "sheet)
i
Size of subject grope y
Acres 8S Square footage
Present zon�ing classification:
AP,
Give a general description of the proposed use or uses for the proposed development:
Addition of microwave antennas to improve network performance and call handling at site and thru network.
PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name of current property owner:
q
'c.t tom@ c- i.! �'t (Q14 -
Street address of property owner::"
City / State /Zip Code of property owner:
,91- -16,10—
Telephone number of property owner:
n
Fax number of property owner:
❑ Attach a final plat or replat, of the approved subdivision by city council showing property boundary lines, dimensions, easements,
roadways, rail lines, and public rights -of way crossing and adjacent to the tract (1 blueline copy)
❑ Submit a site plan showing all information required by Section 47.E., Site Plan review requirements (see attached requirements).
❑ All site plans must conform to the approved concept plan. Any changes to a site plan, approved with a conditional use or a special use,
can onj be a roved a cit council through the public hearin process.
SP��-II
PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE FILING OF A FINAL SITE PLAN
_Kira Bauman'�-T &t4'6�.
Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature:
The State Of ' &Y tk
County Of I "_
Before Meon this day personally appeared _ t
(notary) (applicant)
known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed.
(Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D.
vn,
�ti�P1'P4BQ WILLIAM RUFUS BAUMAN
Notary Public, State of Texas
N•', My Commission Expires
July 07, 2015 Notary In And For State Of Texas
,11111IN
d 09 —X 4-4
Print Property Owner's Name: P operty Owner's Signature
The State Of I
County Of _
Before Me on this day personally appeared •)A'(1 o.Z S
(notary) (property owner)
known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed.
d o se i f oice this _ day of
WILLIAM RUFUS BAUMAN
Notary Public, State of Texas
My Commission Expires
July 07, 2015
A.D.
Notary In And For State Of Texas
D - H
ILLUMINATION PLAN
An illumination plan to include a site photometric (including illuminated signs) and all fixture
details shall be submitted as part of the site plan review process. Applications will not be
accepted without this requirement.
I hereby acknowledge that an illumination plan has been included as a part of this submittal.
Applicant Signature
Date: XjUh ;),
Property Owner Signature X
Date: t
2
PLATTING VERIFICATION
This verification statement must be signed prior
To the submittal of this application
It has been determined that the property described below does require platting
or replatting and the applicant has been instructed on this procedure.
_ It has been determined that the property described below is currently platted or
does not require platting or replatting at this time.
Address of subject property &55 aA
Legal description of subject property
Public Works Department
Date
G -G
H
This form must be signed by the public works department and submitted along with a
completed application to the planning and zoning department
5
SP12-11 AUGUST 16, 2012
655 PARK BOULEVARD
METRO PCS
WOODLAKE APARTMENTS ADDITION
METRO PCS MPCS388 — 655 PARK BOULEVARD
Title sheet
1. Please add Case Number SP12-11 to all sheets.
Overall site plan
2. Please provide an overall site plan with Park Boulevard and the
approximate location of the existing apartments shown and labeled.
Site plan
3. Please confirm the dimensions of the lease area. The lease area
approved by Special Use Permit SU06-08 (Ord. 2006-90) is 9' x 9.75'.
A larger lease area requires public hearing approval.
4. Please verify the height of the transmission tower. Previously the height
of the tower was 95 -feet vs. the height shown as 94 -feet.
5. Please provide a graphic scale.
Elevation and antenna orientation
6. Please show the security fence in conjunction with the transmission tower.
7. Please provide a graphic scale.
8. Please confirm the mounting hardware as shown on the antenna
orientation is correct.
9. For verification purposes please email a PDF of the final site plan to
atriplett@grapevinetexas.gov prior to producing the final copies.
The above comments must be reflected in the revised submittal,
which upon review, can be administratively approved. Please submit
the revised documents to the Department of Development Services at 200
South Main Street.
The revised submittal shall include:
four (4) folded blackline copies of each sheet, (minimum size 22" x 34")
If you have any questions please contact Albert L. Triplett, Jr. at (817) 410-3155.
EXHIBIT A (continued)
METROPCS PREMISES
Spa -Il
BEING a tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 458, City of Grapevine, Tarrant
County, Texas, also being situated in The Woodlake Apartments, an addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant
County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Volume 388-156, Page 44, Plat Records,
Tarrant County, Texas, being situated in that certain Easement granted to Brazos Electric Power Cooperative,
Inc. by Volume 6967, Page 670, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being out of and a portion of that
certain tract of land conveyed to Woodlake Associates, Limited by General Warranty Deed dated March 7,
1988, and recorded in Volume 9254, Page 525, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more
particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
COMMENCING at a 112" iron rod found for the northeast corner of said Woodlake Apartments, same being the
southeast corner of Winding Creek Estates Section I, an addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County,
Texas, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Volume 388-191, Page 35, Plat Records, Tarrant
County, Texas, and being on the west right-of-way line of Park Boulevard (100' right-of-way);
THENCE along the west right-of-way line of Park Boulevard and along a curve to the left
having a radius of 1510.08 feet, an arc distance of 227.20 feet, through a central angle of 08 degrees 37 minutes
14 seconds, and whose chord bears South 10 degrees 11 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 226.99 feet to a
Point;
THENCE through the interior of said Woodlake Apartments the following two (2) courses:
1. South 89 degrees 49 minutes 50 seconds West, a distance of 391.20 feet to a Point;
2. North 01 degrees 21 minutes 51 seconds East, a distance of 31.28 feet to a chiseled "x" set in concrete for
the POINT OF BEGINNING hereof;
THENCE continuing through the interior of said Woodlake Apartments the following four (4) courses:
1. North 88 degrees 27 minutes I I seconds West, a distance of 9.00 feet to a chiseled "x" set in concrete;
2. North 01 degrees 21 minutes 51 seconds East, a distance of 9.75 feet to a chiseled "x" set in concrete;
3. South 88 degrees 27 minutes I i seconds East, a distance of 9.00 feet to a chiseled "x" set in concrete;
4. South 01 degrees 21 minutes 51 seconds West, a distance of 9.75 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING
hereof and containing 0.0020 acres or 88 square feet of land, more or less.
EXHIBIT A (continued)
15' ACCESS EASEMENT
BEING a tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 458, City of Grapevine, Tarrant
County, Texas, also being situated in The Woodlake Apartments, an addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant
County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Volume 388-156, Page 44, Plat Records,
Tarrant County, Texas, being situated in that certain Easement granted to Brazos Electric Power Cooperative,
Inc. by Volume 6967, Page 670, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being out of and a portion of that
certain tract of land conveyed to Woodlake Associates, Limited by General Warranty Deed dated March 7,
1988, and recorded in Volume 9254, Page 525, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more
particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
COMMENCING at a 1/2" iron rod found for the northeast comer of said Woodlake Apartments, same being the
southeast corner of Winding Creek Estates Section I, an addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County,
Texas, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Volume 388-191, Page 35, Plat Records, Tarrant
County, Texas, and being on the west right-of-way line of Park Boulevard (100' right-of-way);
THENCE along the west right-of-way line of Park Boulevard and along a curve to the left having a radius of
1510.08 feet, an are distance of 374.12 feet, through a central angle of 14 degrees I I minutes 42 seconds, and
whose chord bears South 07 degrees 24 minutes 24 seconds West, a distance of 373.16 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING hereof;
THENCE continuing along the west right-of-way line of Park Boulevard the following two (2) courses:
1. Along a curve to the left having a radius of 1510.08 feet, an arc distance of 7.02 feet, through a central
angle of 00 degrees 15 minutes 58 seconds, and whose chord bears South 00 degrees 10 minutes 34 seconds
West, a distance of 7.02 feet to a Point;
2. South 00 degrees 14 minutes 04 seconds East, a distance of 8.00 feet to a Point;
THENCE through the interior of said Woodlake Apartments the following eleven (11) courses:
1. North 87 degrees 40 minutes 57 seconds West, a distance of 89.34 feet to a Point;
2. Along a curve to the right having a radius of 42.50 feet, an arc distance of 66.22 feet, through a central
angle of 89 degrees 16 minutes 01 seconds, and whose chord bears North 43 degrees 02 minutes 57 seconds
West, a distance of 59.72 feet to a Point;
3, North 01 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East, a distance of 114.05 feet to a Point;
4. South 89 degrees 49 minutes 50 seconds West, a distance of 256.40 feet to a Point;
5. North 01 degrees 21 minutes 51 seconds East, a distance of 41.03 feet to a Point;
6. South 88 degrees 27 minutes 1 I seconds East, a distance of 15.00 feet to a Point;
7. South 01 degrees 21 minutes 51 seconds West, a distance of 25.57 feet to a Point;
8. North 89 degrees 49 minutes 50 seconds East, a distance of 256.46 feet to a Point;
9. South 01 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds West, a distance of 129.52 feet to a Point; - -
10. Along a curve to the left having a radius of 27.50 feet, an arc distance of 42.85 feet, through a central angle
of 89 degrees 16 minutes 01 seconds, and whose chord bears South 43 degrees 02 minutes 57 seconds East,
a distance of 38.64 feet to a Point;
I], South 87 degrees 40 minutes 57 seconds East, a distance of 88.72 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING
hereof and containing 0.1911 acres or 8326 square feet of land, more or less.
MICROWAVE
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF AN
EXISTING ONCOR
TRANSMISSION POLE
DOUBLE CIRCUIT TANGENT
TRANSMISSION POLE
TO SUPPORT ADDITIONAL ANTENNA LOADS
SUBJECT: STRESS ANALYSIS (MONOPOLE)
CUSTOMER/UTILITY: METROPCS / ONCOR
SITE NO.: MPCS388, POLE I.D. NO. 1319
SITE NAME: PARKANINDING CREEK
POLE HEIGHT: 95-0"
STAR STRUCTURES DESIGN NO. 12-049
DATE: APRIL 2012
0
..... IAIV
KHA
650***
Prepared by:
Kamran Khadivar, P.E.
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF AN
EXISTING ONCOR
TRANSMISSION POLE
DOUBLE CIRCUIT
TRANSMISSION POLE
TO SUPPORT ADDITIONAL ANTENNA LOADS
SITE NO.: MPSC388
POLE NO.: 13/9
HEIGHT: 95'-0" (ABOVE GROUND)
SITE NAME: PARK/WINDING CREEK
STAR STRUCTURES DESIGN NO. 12-049
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ................................................................ I
ANALYSIS........................................................................ 2
RESULTS.......................................................................... 3
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS .................................. 4
STANDARD ENGINEERING CONDITIONS ........................... ATTACHED
POLE DESIGN PROFILE ................................................... ATTACHED
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM ................................ ATTACHED
LOADS & LOAD CALCULATIONS .......................................... ATTACHED
COMPUTER OUTPUT .......................................................... ATTACHED
MetroPCS MPCS388lStructure ID 1319 Page 1
Per authorization from Michelle Sherwood -Smith (MetroPCS), Star Structures, Inc.
provided summary of structural analysis results to investigate and make recommendations
for the existing TXU structure no. T682 based on the proposed changed conditions.
The structural analysis was performed on the existing 95'-0" double circuit tangent
transmission monopole to determine the effects of adding (1) 1' MW dish and (2) radios
above the existing low profile antenna support assembly at elevation 90'-3" (±) above
ground.
The vertical loads due to the weight of antennas, platform, coax and transmission lines
and the shear loads due to the wind at the antennas, mounts, coax and transmission lines
are transferred to the existing pole at various elevations along the height of the pole.
The antenna loads and data were supplied by MetroPCS and the transmission line loads,
data specifications and drawings were supplied by Star Structures.
MPCS388
MetroPCS MPCS388/Structure ID 13/9 Page 2
The existing Steel Monopole was analyzed using a comprehensive program entitled "PLS
pole" and hand calculations. Please find the attached "General Description of the
Program".
Based on the stress analysis performed, the structure was analyzed in accordance with the
latest relevant revision of ANSI/ASCE 10-90, "ASCE standard for transmission
structures" and the TXU loading specifications.
The pole computer model was based on the existing TXU design drawing No. 83-289.
The existing pole was analyzed using the following data:
Antenna:
One (1) 1' MW dish (Proposed)
Two (2) Radios (Proposed)
Six (6) HBX-6516DS-R2M (Existing)
Coax Line:
Two (2) 3/8" cables (Proposed)
Twelve (12) 7/8" coax (Existing)
Platform:
One (1) 10' low profile platform at 90'-3" (#) (Existing)
Supporting pipe:
One (1) 3"x10'-0" (t) supporting pipe to support (1) microwave dish and
(1) antenna
Shield Wire:
(1) 3/8" EHS Steel
Bundle Conductors:
(3) 1033 ACSR "Curlew" & (3) 795 ACSR "Drake"
MetroPCS MPCS388/Structure ID 13/9 Page 3
The above data was used for all loading cases. Description of the load cases as follows:
Loading Conditions:
Load TU Heavy Loading
Case 40 mph wind
1 1" radial ice
Tension Angle = 0 deg
Wind Span = 500 ft
Load TU Extreme wind
Case 85 mph wind
2 No radial ice
Tension Angle = 0 deg
Wind Span = 500 ft
Overload Capacity Factors:
Vertical = 1.5
Wind = 1.5
Wire Tension at Angles = 1.5
Weight Span = 600 ft
Overload Capacity Factors:
Vertical = 1.5
Wind = 1.25
Wire Tension at Angles = 1.5
Weight Span = 600 ft
The transmission pole wire loads are calculated and can be found in the load calculation
Section of this report.
Results:
The existing TXU Electric 95'-0" self support transmission Monopole has the capacity
to safely support the existing and proposed changed condition (Proposed dishes,
existing antennas, coaxes & platform) as shown under the analysis section of this report,
for all load cases considered. The actual loads in the members are within allowable.
MetroPCS WCS388/Structure ID 13/9 Page 4
Foundation:
Foundation design loads were not provided. Foundation analysis is not in the scope of
this report.
Conclusions & Recommendations:
Based on the stress analysis performed, the existing structure is in conformance with
the ONCOR Electric Delivery Requirements and ASCE standards for the loading
considered under the criteria listed and referenced in the report section.
The existing 95'-0" tangent transmission monopole, while loaded with the associated
antennas and platform with the proposed changed condition complies with all the loading
specifications which were previously discussed and will support the additional load.
Please note that since the structure is near its maximum support capacity, no changes to
the configuration should be considered without performing a new proper evaluation.
Submitted by:
Star Structures, Inc.
Kamran Khadivar, P.E.
Prepared by:
I
r
..........................
KAMRAN KHADIVAR
a,-,,& r, I 1 F 0 10-
TTJFf
ENGINEERING SERVICES ON EXISTING STRUCTURES BY
STAR STRUCTURES, INC.
All engineering services are performed on the basis that the information used is current
and correct. This information may consist of, but is not necessary limited, to:
Information supplied by the client regarding the structure itself, the antenna
and feed line loading on the structure and its components, or other relevant
information.
Information from fields and/or drawings in the possession of Star Structures,
Inc. or generated by field inspections or measurements of the structure.
It is the responsibility of the client to ensure that the information provided to Star
Structures, Inc. and used in the performance of our engineering services is correct and
complete. In the absence of information to the contrary, we assume that all structures
were constructed in accordance with the drawings and specifications and are in an un -
corroded condition and have no deteriorated; and we, therefore, assume that their
capacity has not significantly changed from the "as new" conditions.
All services will be performed to the codes specified by the client, and we do not
imply to meet any other codes or requirements unless explicitly agreed in writing. If
wind and ice loads or other relevant parameters are to be different from the minimum
values recommended by the codes, the client shall specify the exact requirement. In
the absence of information to the contrary, all work will be performed in accordance
with the latest relevant revision of ANSUASCE 10-90 or ANSI/EIA-222
Client hereby agrees and acknowledges that Star Structures, Inc. shall have no
liability whatsoever to client or to others for any work or services performed by
any persons other than Star Structures, Inc. in connection with the
implementation of any structural changes or modifications recommended by
Star Structures, inc. including but not limited to any services rendered for client
or for others by riggers, erectors or other subcontractors. Client acknowledges
and agrees that any riggers, erectors, or subcontractors retained or employed by
customer shall be solely responsible to client and to others for the quality of
work performed by them and that Star Structures, Inc. shall have no liability or
responsibility whatsoever as a result of any negligence or breach of contract by
any such rigger, erector or subcontractor.
All services performed, results obtained, and recommendations made in accordance
with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. Star Structures, Inc. is
not responsible for the conclusions, opinions and recommendations made by others
based on upon the information we supply.
F:ng 0 4 : I el : :j at] 4
STAR STRUCTURES POLE DESIGN
DESIGN 12-049 PROFILE
MPCS388
(1) PROPOSED V DISH AND (2) RADIOS
WITH (2) 3l8" CABLES
MOUNTED ON PIPE MOUNT
(6) EXISTING HBX-6516DS-R2M ANTENNAS
ON THE EXISTING PLATFORM AT 901-3"(±)
I :j af*]�
W& &
OM-4-
'� ALUMINUM EMERGENCY STRUCTURES
PLS -POLE is a computer program for the analysis and design of transmission, distribution or substation
structures made of concrete, steel or wood poles. These structures include single poles, multi -poles and
frames. It can also handle emergency structures made of modular latticed masts. PLS -POLE is a
completely integrated program with menu -based input, linearor nonlinear analysis capability, and with easy
to interpret text and graphics summaries of your analysis and design results. The graphics module
displays deflected shapes that can be color -coded to show the percent of capacity used by each
component. The capabilities of PLS -POLE as well as its analysis and design assumptions are fully
described in the User's Manual. The manual and demo files are available upon request.
Summary of features
* Runs under MS -WINDOWS (Version 98, 11 XP or newer - minimum 32 MB of RAM)
* Specialized program for the analysis and design of transmission, distribution and substation
structures which include concrete, steel or wood poles
• Structures are made of standard components that are available in libraries. You can easily
create your own libraries or get them from a manufacturer
. Structure models are built interactively using interactive menus or graphical commands
• Automatic generation of underlying finite element model of structure
* Wood poles can be selected from ANSI 0.5 Standard
* Steel poles can have standard circular, 4-, 6-, 8-, 12-, 16- or 18- sided, regular or elliptical cross
sections (flat -to -flat or tip -to -tip orientations) or any custom design shape
* Optimum design of tubular steel shaft
• Steel and concrete poles can be selected from standard sizes available from manufacturers
• Optimum selection of pole from available family
* Automatic calculation of dead and wind loads according to a wide variety of world standards (ASCE,
NESC, iEC, CENELEC, etc.)
* Capability to specify pole ground line rotations
* Guys are easily handled (modeled as exact cable elements in nonlinear analysis)
* Automatic distribution of loads in 2 -part suspension insulators (v -strings, horizontal vees, etc.)
* Design checks for ASCE, EIA or other requirements
* Detects buckling by nonlinear analysis
* Convenient design summaries
* Automatic determination of allowable wind and weight spans
* Automatic determination of interaction diagrams between allowable wind and weight spans
• Automatic tracking of part numbers and costs
* Detailed User's Manual with examples
" US or SI (metric) units
* Output tables and text strings can be customized, i.e. translated into different languages
" Powerful graphics module (stress usages shown in different colors)
* Graphical selection of joints and components allows graphical editing and checking
* Poles can be shown as lines, wire frames or can be rendered as 3-d polygon surfaces
* CAD design drawings or actual photos can be tied to structure model
• Can link directly to line design program PLS-CADD
* Automatic generation of structure files for PLS-CADD
918 University Bay Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA
/ Tel: (608) 238 - 2171 Fax: (608) 238 - 9241
E-mail: info@powline.com
S r s r E M S, I N C- Web site: http://www.powline.com
M
Im
• t i i
{
Site ID DFW388 I _ Antenna Configuration
StructureType TXU Monopole Antenna shared with CDMA ` No
Latitude 32.94689 Longitude -97.10078 � MIMO/SIMO: �51MO
New Parts Inventory
Site ID I DFW388
Structure Type I TXU Monopole
New Antenna Totals per Site
Antenna Model_ _ HBX-6516DS-R2M
New Antenna Total Count 1 6
ading on "Power ounV
Site No.: MPCS388
Pole No.: 13/9
MetroPCS / TXU Electric
95-0", Type "Monopole"
Star Structures Design No. 12-049
Platform: Stand-off mount
Area = 6 ft2
Weight = 500 Ib
Area w/ Ice = 9 ft2
Weight w/ Ice = 1000 Ib
Elevation = 90.3 ft
a 2:
Area (each) = ft2
Weight = Ib
Area w/ Ice = ft2
Weight w/ Ice = Ib
Quantity =
Load Case: Case #1 - TU Heavy Loading
Wind 4.1 psf
Ice 1 inches
Wind OLF = 1.5
Vertical OLF = 1.5
Antenna 1: (6) HBX-6516DS-R2M
Area (each) = 2.32 ft2
Weight = 9.9 Ib
Area w/ Ice = 3.15 ft2
Weight w/ Ice = 52 Ib
Quantity = 6
Antenna 3: (1) V dish
Area (each) =
2 ft2
Weight =
20 lb
Area w/ Ice =
2.5 ft
Weight w/ Ice =
40 Ib
Quantity = 1
Antenna 4: (2) Radios
Area (each) =
0 ft2
Weight =
10 ib
Area w/ Ice =
0 ft2
Weight w/ Ice =
20 Ib
Quantity = 2
Cables: (12) 7/8" Coax Cables Weight = 0.54 Ib/ft Wt (1" ice) = 3.12 Ib/ft
Area = 0.19 ft2/ft Area (1" ice) = 0.35 ft2/ft
>ading Condition: Case #1 - TU Heavy Loading
Wind Pressure = 4.1 psf Wind OLF = 1.5
Radial Ice Thickness = 1 inches Weight OLF = 1.5
Wind on Flat Areas = 9.84 psf (OLF Included)
Wind on Round Areas = 6.15 psf (OLF Included)
Loading at Platform Level
Transverse Loads:
Wind on Antenna 1 = 186 Ib
Wind on Antenna 2 = 0 Ib
Wind on Antenna 3 = 25 lb
Wind on Amps = 0 Ib
Wind on platform = 89 lb
Py = 299 Ib
GUMMOONNOM
Vertical Loads:
Weight of Antenna 1 =
468 Ib
Weight of Antenna 2 =
0 Ib
Weight of Antenna 3 =
60 lb
Weight of Amps =
60 lb
Weight of platform =
1500 Ib
Pz =2088 Ib
Distributed Loading on Cables
Transverse Load:
Wind Load = 2.15 Ib/ft
Vertical Load:
Weight = 58.18 Ib/ft
tiding on "PowerMount"
Site No.: MPCS388
Pole No.: 13/9
MetroPCS / TXU Electric
96-0", Type "Monopole"
Star Structures Design No. 12-049
Platform: Stand-off mount
Area = 6 ft2
Weight = 500 Ib
Area w/ Ice = 9 ft2
Weight w/ Ice = 1000 Ib
Elevation = 90.3 ft
a 2: 0
Area (each) = 0 ft2
Weight = 0 Ib
Area w/ Ice = 0 ft2
Weight w/ Ice = 0 Ib
Quantity =1 0
Load Case: Case #2 - TU Extreme Wind
Wind 18.5psf
Ice 0 inches
Wind OLF = 1.25
Vertical OLF = 1.5
Antenna 1: (6) HBX-6516DS-R2M
Area (each) = 2.32 ft2
Weight = 9.9 Ib
Area w/ Ice = 3.15 ft2
Weight w/ Ice = 52 Ib
Quantity = 6
Antenna 3: (1) V dish
Area (each) = 2 ft2
Weight = 20 lb
Area w/ Ice = 2.5 ft2
Weight w/ Ice = 40 Ib
Quantity = 1
Antenna 4: (2) Radios
Area (each) =
0 ft2
Weight =
10 Ib
Area w/ Ice =
0 ft2
Weight w/ Ice =
20 Ib
Quantity =r
2
Cables: (12) 7/8" Coax Cables Weight = 0.54 Ib/ft Wt (1" ice) = 3.12 Ib/ft
Area = 0.19 ft2/ft Area (1" ice) = 0.35 ft2/ft
)ailing Condition: Case #2 - TU Extreme Wind
Wind Pressure= 18.5 psf Wind OLF = 1.25
Radial Ice Thickness = 0 inches Weight OLF = 1.5
Wind on Flat Areas = 37.00 psf (OLF Included)
Wind on Round Areas = 23.13 psf (OLF Included)
Loading at Platform Level
Transverse Loads:
Wind on Antenna 1 =
515 lb
Wind on Antenna 2 =
0 lb
Wind on Antenna 3 =
74 lb
Wind on Amps =
0 Ib
Wind on platform = 222 lb
Py = 811 Ib
Vertical Loads:
Weight of Antenna 1 =
89 lb
Weight of Antenna 2 =
0 lb
Weight of Antenna 3 =
30 Ib
Weight of Amps =
30 Ib
Weight of platform =
750 lb
Pz = 899 Ib
Distributed Loading on Cable
Transverse Load:
Wind Load = 4.39 Ib/ft
Vertical Load:
Weight = r 9.72 Ib/ft
TXU STRUCTURE INFORMATION
MPCS388
SITE NUMBER
13/9
DRAWING NUMBER
STRUCTURE TYPE
DCSP
STRUCTURE HEIGHT
95
WIND SPAN
500
WEIGHT SPAN
600
LINE ANGLE
0°
CONDUCTOR SIZE
1033 ACSR "Curlew" & 795 ACSR "Drake"
TOTAL NO. OF CONDUCTOR
3 and 3
TOTAL NO. PER PHASE
1 and 1
TXU HEAVY COND. TENSION
TXU HIGH WIND COND. TENSION
SHIELD WIRE SIZE
3/8" EHS Steel
NUMBER OF SHIELD WIRE
1
TXU HEAVY SW TENSION
TXU HIGH WIND SW TENSION
Sent to Star on 413-2012
SUMMARY OF LOADS FROM SHIELD WIRES AND CONDUCTORS
Loading No. 1: T.U. Heavy Loading (INTACT LOADS)
STRUCTURE: MetroPCS/ONCOR
LINE ANGLE:
Star Structures Design No. 12-049
LOAD CASE: Wind Pressure (psf): 4
lee Thickness (in.):
Wind Span (ft): 500
S.W. Weight Span (ft):
600
Wind OLF: 1.5
Cond. Weight Span (ft):
950
Vertical OLF: 1.5
Tension OLF:
1.5
SHIELD WIRE:
No. of Wires:
1
TYPE: 11-97V TV' EH 9
Tension#1 (lbs):
0
Diameter (in): 10.58 Bare Wt. (I /ft}: 16.27 Tension#2 (lbs):
0
(Per Phase)
CONDUCTORS:
No. of Wires:
1
TYPE: 13 - 1033 TV79R "i" uriew"
Tension#1 (lbs):
0
Diameter (in): 1.246 Bare Wt. (lb/ft):11.331 I Tension#2 (lbs):
0
(Per Phase)
CALCULATIONS AND RESULTS:
SHIELD WIRE:
Wind Load (Ibs):
645
Transverse Load from Tension (lbs):
0
Resulting Transverse Load (lbs):
645 + 0 = Fy:
645
'5
Vertical Load:
Fz
E2014
Longitudinal Load from Tension (lbs):
Fx=
0 0
CONDUCTORS:
Wind Load (lbs):
812
Transverse Load from Tension (lbs):
0
Resulting Transverse Load (lbs):
812 + 0 = Fy=
812
Vertical Load:Fz=
3712 2
Longitudinal Load from Tension (lbs):
Fx=
0
SUMMARY OF LOADS FROM SHIELD WIRES AND CONDUCTORS
Loading No. 2: TU High Wind
STRUCTURE: MetroPCS/ONCOR
LINE ANGLE:
0
Star Structures Design No. 12-049
---T—
LOAD CASE: Wind Pressure (psf): 8.5
Ice Thickness (in.):
0
Wind Span (ft): 500
S.W. Weight Span (ft):
600
Wind OLF: 25
Cond. Weight Span (ft):
600
Vertical OLF: 1-5
Tension OLF:
1.5
SHIELD WIRE:
No. of Wires:
I
TYPE: 11-97V 3/8" EHS
Tension#1 (lbs):
5
Diameter (in): 0.58 Bare Wt. (lb/ft): 10.273 Tension#2 (lbs):1
0
(Per Phase)
CONDUCTORS:
No. of Wires:1
TYPE: 13 - 1633 TTM "Curlew"
Tension#1 (lbs):
0
Diameter (in): 1.246 Bare Wt. (lb/ft): 11,331 Tension#2 (lbs):E
0 00
(Per Phase)
CALCULATIONS AND RESULTS:
SHIELD WIRE:
Wind Load (lbs):
559
Transverse Load from Tension (lbs):
0
Resulting Transverse Load (lbs):
Fy=
659
Vertical Load:
Fz=
246
Longitudinal Load from Tension (lbs):
Fx--[
0
CONDUCTORS:
Wind Load (lbs):
1201
Transverse Load from Tension (lbs):
0
Resulting Transverse Load (Ibs):
Fy=
1201
Vertical Load, (includes 300# for insulator):
Fz=
1498
Longitudinal Load from Tension (lbs):
Fx=
SUMMARY OF LOADS FROM SHIELD WIRES AND CONDUCTOR
Loading No. 1: T.U. Heavy Loading (INTACT LOADS)
STRUCTURE: MetroPCS/ONCOR
LINE ANGLE:
0
Star Structures Design No. 12-049
LOAD CASE: Wind Pressure (psf): 4
Ice Thickness (in.):
I
Wind Span (ft): 500
S.W. Weight Span (ft):
600
Wind OLF: 1.5
Cond. Weight Span (ft):
600
Vertical OLF: 1.5
Tension OLF:
1.5
SHIELD WIRE:
No. of Wires:
1
TYPE: 1 -SW 5787 E RS
Tension#1 (lbs):
5
Diameter (in): 0.58 Bare M, ?N/): 10.273 Tension#2 (lbs):
(Per Phase)
CONDUCTORS:
No. of Wires:1
TYPE: 1� - 795 Ai'7 9R "Drake"
Ten ion#1 (lbs):
0
EO
Diameter (in):11 .108 Fare VR. (19/—ft): 11.094 Tension#2 (lbs):
(Per Phase)
CALCULATIONS AND RESULTS:
SHIELD WIRE:
Wind Load (lbs):
645
Transverse Load from Tension (lbs):
0
Resulting Transverse Load (lbs):
645 + 0 = Fy=
645
Vertical Load:
Fz=
2014
Longitudinal Load from Tension (lbs):
Fx=
0
CONDUCTORS:
Wind Load (lbs):
777
Transverse Load from Tension (lbs):
0
Resulting Transverse Load (lbs):
777 + 0 = Fy:ff777
Vertical Load:
Fz
33"
Longitudinal Load from Tension (lbs):
Fx=
0
0
SUMMARY OF LOADS FROM SHIELD WIRES AND CONDUCTORS
Loading No. 2: TU High Wind
STRUCTURE:
MetroPCS/ONCOR
LINE ANGLE:
0
Star Structures Design No. 12-049
LOAD CASE:
Wind Pressure (psf): 18.5
Ice Thickness (in.):
0
Wind Span (ft): 500
S.W. Weight Span (ft):
960
Wind OLF: 1.25
Cond. Weight Span (ft):
600
Vertical OLF: 1.5
Tension OLF:
1.5
SHIELD WIRE:
No. of Wires:
I
TYPE:
1 -SW 3/8" EH 9
Tension#1 (lbs):
0
Diameter (in):L0.�58 Bare Wt. (lb/ft): 10.273 Tension#2 (lbs):
0
(Per Phase)
CONDUCTORS:
No. of Wires:
I
TYPE:
=795 A?' MR "Drake"
Tension#1 (lbs):
0
Diameter (in): 11.108 Bare Wt. Oh 11.094 Tension#2 (lbs):
6
(Per Phase)
CALCULATIONS AND RESULTS:
SHIELD WIRE:
Wind Load (lbs):
559
Transverse Load from Tension (lbs):
0
Resulting Transverse Load (lbs):
Fy=
559
Vertical Load:
Fz=
246
Longitudinal Load from Tension (lbs):
Fx--
CONDUCTORS:
Wind Load (lbs):
1068
Transverse Load from Tension (lbs):
0
Resulting Transverse Load (lbs):
Fy=
1068
Vertical Load, (includes 300# for insulator):
Fz=
1285
Longitudinal Load from Tension (lbs):
Fx=
Star Structures, Inc., Project "12-049"
PLS-POLE Version 9.04, 6:21:38 PM Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Undeformed geometry displayed
Displaying load vectors for Toad case: 2 ONCOR WIND
Star Structures, Inc., Project. "12-049"
PLS-POLE Version 9.04, 6:21:21 PM Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Undeformed geometry displayed
Molavina Ioad vectors for load case: 1 ONCOR HEAVY
Project Name : STAR STRUCTURES, INC. DESIGN 12-049
Project Notes: METROPCS/ ONCOR 95 FT POLE
Project File c:\pls\spole\12-049.spo
Date run 6:20:17 PM Tuesday, April 17, 2012
by PLS -POLE Version 9.04
Licensed to Star Structures, Inc.
Successfully performed nonlinear analysis
The model has 0 warnings.
Loads from file: c:\pls\spole\12-049.lca
*** Analysis Results:
Maximum element usage is 93.79% for Tubular Davit "D3" in load case "ONCOR HEAVY"
Maximum insulator usage is 6.33% for Clamp "Cl" in load case "ONCOR HEAVY"
Summary of Joint Support Reactions For All Load Cases:
Load Case Joint Long. Tran. Vert. Shear Tran. Long. Vert. Bending Found.
Label Force Force Force Force Moment Moment Moment Moment Usage
(kips) (kips) (kips) (kips) (ft -k) (ft -k) (ft -k) (ft -k) %
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ONCOR HEAVY Pole:g -0.00 -7.23 42.17 7.23 665.50 -0.00 -0.00 665.50 0.00
ONCOR WIND Pole:g -0.00 -13.05 19.89 13.05 912.39 -0.00 -0.00 912.39 0.00
Summary of Tip Deflections For All Load Cases:
Note: postive tip load results in positive rotation
Load Case Joint Long. Tran. Vert. Resultant Long. Tran. Twist
Label Defl.
Defl.
Defl.
Defl.
Rot.
Rot.
(in)
------------------------------------------------------------------
(in)
(in)
(in)
(deg)
(deg) (deg)
ONCOR HEAVY Pole:t 0.00
85.79
-4.59
85.91
0.00
-8.22 0.00
ONCOR WIND Pole:t 0.00
104.48
-6.57
104.68
0.00
-9.64 0.00
Tubes Summary:
Pole Tube Weight Load Case Maximum Resultant
Label
Num.
Usage
Moment
---------------------------------------------------
(lbs)
%
(ft -k)
Pole
1
1154 ONCOR WIND
93.38
220.98
Pole
2
1467 ONCOR WIND
92.77
488.52
Pole
3
2914 ONCOR WIND
83.87
912.39
*** Overall summary for all load cases - Usage = Maximum Stress / Allowable Stress
Summary of Steel Pole Usages:
Steel Pole Maximum Load Case Segment Weight
Label Usage % Number (lbs)
---------------------------------------------
Pole 93.38 ONCOR WIND 12 5534.1
Summary of Tubular Davit Usages:
Tubular Davit Maximum Load Case Segment Weight
Label Usage % Number (lbs)
-------------------------------------------------
D1 88.13 ONCOR HEAVY 1 84.1
Star Structures, Inc. - 12-049 Page 1/2
D2
66.04
ONCOR
HEAVY
1
84.1
D3
93.79
ONCOR
HEAVY
1
121.6
D4
73.97
ONCOR
HEAVY
1
121.6
D5
88.38
ONCOR
HEAVY
1
84.1
D6
67.80
ONCOR
HEAVY
1
84.1
*** Maximum Stress Summary for Each Load Case
Summary of Maximum Usages by Load Case:
Load Case Maximum Element Element
Usage % Label Type
------------------------------------------
ONCOR HEAVY 93.79 D3 Tubular Davit
ONCOR WIND 93.38 Pole Steel Pole
Summary of Steel Pole Usages by Load Case:
Load Case Maximum Steel Pole Segment
Usage % Label Number
---------------------------------------
ONCOR HEAVY 86.59 Pole 12
ONCOR WIND 93.38 Pole 12
Summary of Tubular Davit Usages by Load Case:
Load Case Maximum Tubular Davit Segment
Usage % Label Number
------------------------------------------
ONCOR HEAVY 93.79 D3 1
ONCOR WIND 40.48 D3 1
Summary of Insulator Usages:
Insulator Insulator Maximum Load case Weight
Label
-----------------------------------------------
Type
Usage %
(lbs)
Cl
Clamp
6.33
ONCOR
HEAVY
0.0
C2
Clamp
5.72
ONCOR
HEAVY
0.0
C3
Clamp
6.33
ONCOR
HEAVY
0.0
C4
Clamp
5.72
ONCOR
HEAVY
0.0
C5
Clamp
6.33
ONCOR
HEAVY
0.0
C6
Clamp
5.72
ONCOR
HEAVY
0.0
C7
Clamp
3.52
ONCOR
HEAVY
0.0
C8
Clamp
3.52
ONCOR
HEAVY
0.0
C19
Clamp
2.22
ONCOR
HEAVY
0.0
C10
Clamp
2.22
ONCOR
HEAVY
0.0
C11
Clamp
2.22
ONCOR
HEAVY
0.0
C12
Clamp
2.22
ONCOR
HEAVY
0.0
*** Weight of structure (lbs):
Weight of Tubular Davit Arms: 579.7
Weight of Steel Poles: 5534.1
Total: 6113.9
*** End of Report
Star Structures, Inc. - 12-049 Page 2/2
TITLE SHEET
SITE PLAN
ELEVATION ;,, DETAIL
SITE
APPROVED
Y
t
L DOES NOT AUTHORIZE
: I CONFLICT WITH
ANY
M� . QE OR ORDINANCES.
I
LANDLORD INFO i
TOWER OWNER: TXU ON
SITE MEQ ROANOKE - SWBELL - E LESS
TOWER ID NUMBER: 13/9
LOCATION: A 'It E, TEXAS
IT OF TOWER: d
SITE
SITE NAR
DIRECTIONS: FROM DALLAS; TAKE 1-35E NO
NORTH
PARK
BLVD AND ;r
BLVD. JUST PAST MCPHERSON.
�...+..»I � 1 dam.' �, 9.� dv .ti : t 4. � }'.. '•° r v
s ;e
`
,y( F
r bio ] C
�r e•'rd
" _...e. -...t*` !✓..�` „��i ��t �'p:'�'4p.a,,,,,e '""tai..,. `�� ('
S \r
rill, rr •!:
r. �o
1
• `� dr
tis
l
I'
i°tTA
i
,
l
'all
NORTHTO HWY 114 NORTH. PROCEED ON F;: SUBCONTRACTOR'S
ii i11i SHALL COMPLY
i M APPLICABLE
" .` A..1. AND
A4. SITE BE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF PARK
CODES AS ADOPTM:JURISDICTION fir* THE SITE
LOCATION, INCLUDING BULDING CODES, ELECTRICAL CODES AND LIGHTNING PROTECTION CODES.
THE EDITION OF THE AHJ ADOPTED CODES AND STANDARDS IN EFFECT ON THE DATE OF
CONTRACT AWARD SHALL GOVERN THE CONSTRUCTION.
SUBCONTRACTOR'S WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE FOLLOWING
AMERICAN r REQUIREMENTS
r�=
CONCRETE
v
1Yim„ f STRUCTURAL
i#� ,�fr! •a' n�. �CONCRETE
Ilk
Wit
Iii i . i. i •< A M AI
it
r
r„
l�ill4q
r! e
M. � ' IR � � � •.„: � � � ® i A ,. � ! i �I. ilk 6 �: Ai � i ;: � �_ i '
i
1 1
a � �
r.
0
3
M
1 �. �� IIRR�� • � i
w
f k•
Ab
s
Iii DESIGNED ® -
c� i1 X.
.: r
CONIC. PA
C4
CLI ti
p a
li
46 0
EXISTING 5'—O"± FIDE
TEED ACCESS GATE `
n„
— aa- --- _ 1
EXISTING CONC. PAD I
EXIST. METiR PCS I I
UTILITY RACK , I
r' r
EXISTING 3 ": DE
STEEL ACCE�S GATEuli
EXISTING 7 —o"±—io"± HIGH
OINA NTALI STEEL. EE � I
DIST. METROPCS LTE I I
E UIPP ENT ABIN `. j
I � C
a a e;a a .. awe
I� �,a a•.max ® as a � ,,a�y Q
w N N 9 a a � EXIST. METROPCS BTS I EQUIPMENT
I� �pye rt o a a a a 9 9
I tidR9eH;a4
+ w o a b J s a M a a F a a
I CABINET
i N aa 3 EXIST. ama�) H
VOLTAGE M NOPOLE (iaN Na 9 9a . m w % w�98a94flEXIST. IRa C CABLEBRIDGE
ANSI IISS�I N TOWER
a w a a I
N
ip m a l 9Y 6 a u3 q Y '. K
I I
I I *—OJT - EXIST. LEASE AREA
I
FENCED AREA,
. C j
I
I I
a z — om-� — — — — -� . — �e�— -w ua®�. — — kr- ,-�- , ---+N .mare — m—.. eze-.+ — —a— a^-.. n..Ym. �.s +-.a.— -esti. — — �w— — — — — .mom.. www �-„ ,:.::: .. -..a --s, «-:— — — — — — — — wm- — m-- .--n— .— a--- — — — aa -a -- -� — ,--, ,-� r— ,�- — .-,w .a -r -.-ee n— — wpm —
PLAN
NOTEs
LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND
EXISTING EQUIPMENT
PROPOSED EQUIPMENT
FUTURE EQUIPMENT
EXIST. CABLE TRAY
NEW CACKLE TRAY
CONDUCTORS AND RACEWAY
T
E FURNISHED & INSTALLED BY
SUBCONTRACTOR
LANDLORD.DATE;
GENERAL
�
CONTRACTOR:
AT m
METROPCS RF:
DATE:.
METROPICSDATE;
METROPCSm
-
DATE.
SCALE NOTED APPLIES TO 22"X34" SHEET SIZE,IF PRINT SIZE IS llptXl7#l,,THEN ACTUAL SCALE IS
�..'>D.ONE HALF OF OSCALE NOTE: (EXAMPLE. 1/2 1 0
THIS NOTE
i iISS ALL
DRAWING
3 I
iISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION
!'
IISSUEO FOR CONSTRUCTION
L,
SITE PLAN
GRA -.VIN -41
APPROVED r r r 1R R�
SITE PLAN
MICROWAVE UPGRADE
JOB NO. SITE NO. DRAWING NUMBER REQ
DFW388DFW388—A02
�
f
i a
SITE PLAN
MICROWAVE UPGRADE
JOB NO. SITE NO. DRAWING NUMBER REQ
DFW388DFW388—A02
MICROWAVE "'.
MW INFORMATtON SHEET. REF.
2/AO3 FOR LOCATION
• EXISTING METROPCSPANEL
ANTENNAS REMAIN
0 MICROWAVE
DISH
:.
– EXIST. G/H HIGH VOLTAGE
TRANSMISSION LINES
LL
c
CABLES TO BE ROUTEDP
FACE OF TOWER FOR NEW
MICROWAVE DISH ANTENNA
—EXIST. P HIGH LTA
MONOPOLE TRANSMISSION
TOWER
l
i
ANTENNA a
VENDOR AZIMU
EXISTING ANTENNA
MODEL
ANTENNA—!
MOUNT
HEIGHT
COAX::
QUANTI IOF COAX
CONTRACTOR:
w
•
DAT
ff
AT
lf�
i
B '.
CABLES TO BE ROUTEDP
FACE OF TOWER FOR NEW
MICROWAVE DISH ANTENNA
—EXIST. P HIGH LTA
MONOPOLE TRANSMISSION
TOWER
l
it Mfllll -1144 1 1, 11 Zpitttll�*twl'
LANDLORD:
i
ANTENNA a
VENDOR AZIMU
EXISTING ANTENNA
MODEL
ANTENNA—!
MOUNT
HEIGHT
COAX::
QUANTI IOF COAX
CONTRACTOR:
DATE:
N •j > i
DAT
ff
AT
B '.
it Mfllll -1144 1 1, 11 Zpitttll�*twl'
LANDLORD:
DATE:
AL
CONTRACTOR:
DATE:
METROPICS RF:
DAT
METROPCS t
AT
METROPCSa DATE:
NEW MICROWAVE DIPH LEGEND
MICROWAVE DISH
0.3 28 HP (TRI
I T
I
MICROWAVE ISH ANTENNA
j
PROVIDE E — n
SEI IPS MOUNT FOR
IS TPa FOR 1)
FIGHT CABLE CABLE CABLE
QUANT
TITY QUANTITY QUANTITY
IGS GN 247.9" 11-00 a
NOTE.- VERIFY WITH RF PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
go
YV��,
JMUTy
ao•
EXIST. MONOPOLE
TRANSMISSION TOWER
EXISTING MICROWAVE
ISH
EXISTINGTF
MOUNT
EX IST. METROPCS
`' FL
ANTENNAS TO
urH REM
1 000
SITE PLAN
CITY OF • W
EVINE
APPROVED •i•
APPROVAL DOES N T a
ANY
WORK
ANY CODES OR GJ- D
i
I T
I
MICROWAVE ISH ANTENNA
j
PROVIDE E — n
SEI IPS MOUNT FOR
IS TPa FOR 1)
FIGHT CABLE CABLE CABLE
QUANT
TITY QUANTITY QUANTITY
IGS GN 247.9" 11-00 a
NOTE.- VERIFY WITH RF PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
go
YV��,
JMUTy
ao•
EXIST. MONOPOLE
TRANSMISSION TOWER
EXISTING MICROWAVE
ISH
EXISTINGTF
MOUNT
EX IST. METROPCS
`' FL
ANTENNAS TO
urH REM
1 000
SITE PLAN
CITY OF • W
EVINE
APPROVED •i•
APPROVAL DOES N T a
ANY
WORK
ANY CODES OR GJ- D