Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ Item 09 - MinutesITEM 0 P & Z Workshop Minutes November 15, 2000 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Workshop on this the 15th day of November, 2000, in the City Manager's Conference Room, 200 South Main Street, 2nd Floor, Grapevine, Texas with the following members present -to -wit: Larry Oliver Sharron Spencer Chris Coy Cathy Martin Kevin Busbee Danette Murray B J Nicholson Rob Undersander Bill Bimmermen Chairman Council Representative Member Member Member Member Member 1 st Alternate 2nd Alternate constituting a quorum, Herb Fry absent, and the following City Staff: H. T. (Tommy) Hardy Scott Williams Dan Truex Ron Stombaugh Cindy Jackson Stephen Kindrick Pamela Huntress CALL TO ORDER Director of Development Services Building Official Economic Development Specialist Planner II Planner II Planner II Planning Secretary Chairman Larry Oliver called the Workshop to order at 4:10 p.m. A. ITEMS ESTABLISHED AT THE JUNE 14, 2000 JOINT CITY COUNCIL First for the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider were the items established at the June 14, 2000 Joint City Council. The items were as follows: 1. The impacts of certain land uses abutting residential districts; 2. The lack of specific lighting standards; 3. The location/aesthetics of loading docks; 4. The distribution of landscaping within Planned Commercial Centers; 5. The visibility of landscaping on a site; Wk111500 P & Z Workshop Minutes November 15, 2000 6. Limits on signage; 7. Noise enforcement; 8. Accessory uses abutting residential districts; 9. Limitations on the number of gas station/convenience stores at the intersection of two streets; 10. Floodplain development; 11. Tree preservation within easements and floodplains; 12. Methods of measuring building height/stories; 13. Screening of adjacent uses located at different elevations; and 14. The upkeep of older homes. ITEM 1: IMPACT OF UNDEVELOPED LAND ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed not only the need for a clear definition of "undeveloped land' but also the importance of not segregating North Grapevine from South Grapevine when amending the ordinances. It was agreed to have the 600 -foot rule apply throughout the city on property that is unplatted and zoned "CC" Community Commercial District. No action was taken by the Commission. ITEM 2: LACK OF SPECIFIC LIGHTING STANDARDS: Staff is proposing an amendment to Section 55 of the Zoning Ordinance to regulate the placement, orientation, distribution patterns and fixture types of outdoor lighting. These standards include: • The establishment of minimum screening for the reduction of bulb glare; • Design criteria for commercial and industrial districts; • The reduction of light intensity at ground level of all property lines; and methods of enforcement of the proposed lighting standards. Wk111500 1. The Commission agreed upon the following revisions: 2. Remove "GU" Government Uses from those uses exempt from the new lighting standards and replace with athletic fields owned by the City or School District as well as outdoor commercial amusements such as golf courses, batting cages, and privately owned athletic fields. 3. To continue with discussion of accent lighting relative to architectural features. 4. Upward lighting with regard to architectural accent lighting was discussed but no determination was made. 5. To apply these changes to new conditional use requests for a period of one year. E P & Z Workshop Minutes November 15, 2000 ITEM 3: Loading Dock Visibility and Location Within the past year, several requests for freight forwarding facilities have come before the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission. A problem common among these requests is the design and placement of the loading dock doors with respect to the street. Due to the location and visibility of the remaining industrial sites within the city, regulations regarding dock door visibility have become necessary. Staff has developed design standards for loading dock doors that address the location, and screening of such doors. They include: • The screening of all dock doors from major and minor thoroughfares; • Prohibiting the location of dock doors such that they would directly face the street; and • Requiring the screening of dock doors from the street. After discussion, it was determined to continue improving upon the design standards with a focus on wall location i.e. "wing walls" to provide adequate screening. No action was taken. ITEM 4: Landscape Requirements within Planned Commercial Centers The Zoning Ordinance, as written, allows for the landscaping requirements of a Planned Commercial Center (PCC) to be distributed unequally throughout a center's lots. More specifically, as long as the entire center met the landscaping requirements, the developer/land lord had complied with the intent of the ordinance. Several Planned Commercial Centers were not planned according to this requirement which resulted in the use of an entire lot for landscaped open space just to meet the minimum requirements. To prevent this from happening to future Planned Commercial Centers, staff is recommending that the Planned Commercial Center provisions within the Zoning Ordinance be amended to require each lot within the Planned Commercial Center to meet the open space/landscaping requirements of the zoning ordinance. The Planning and Zoning Commission agreed upon requiring a conceptional "master landscape plan" to be submitted with each Planned Commercial Center Conditional Use application. ITEM 5: Landscape Visibility Wkl 11500 3 P & Z Workshop Minutes November 15, 2000 Members of the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission have expressed concerns regarding the visibility of required landscaping on a site. In the past, some projects have placed required landscaping in the rear of the site or in areas that are not visible from the street. Currently a ten -foot landscape buffer is required at the rear of all sites, with the exception of those lots that abut airport property. Modifying the landscape ordinance to eliminate the ten foot buffer requirement, except when a non- residential use abuts a residential use, will eliminate the need to place required landscaping in the rear of the property and force the placement of the landscaping into more visible locations on the site. The Planning and Zoning Commission agreed to eliminate the requirement for a ten foot landscaping strip between parking area(s) and rear property line when property line abuts another parking area to create an incentive to place landscaping in more visible areas. The Commission also agreed that should the landscaping be provided at the rear of the property, this landscaping would not be used to meet the open space requirement. ITEM 6: Signs The rapid development of the City has raised the issue of sign height and location. The Council and Commission have expressed concerns about the number, type and height of signs. Several different remedies have been suggested: • Create a sign overlay district; • Restrict pole signs to certain thoroughfares; and • Require a comprehensive sign program (CSP) for multi -tenant buildings to be reviewed by the Site Plan Review Committee (renamed the Performance Review Committee.) The comprehensive sign program would regulate the size, shape and placement of the signs. • At the work session, the Mayor indicated there might be some areas of the city in which more signs are required. There was discussion regarding allowing all monument signs to be a matter - of -right and requiring a Conditional Use permit for all pole sign requests. The Planning and Zoning Commission decided to table this item to another workshop for the appropriate revisions. No action was taken. ITEM 7: Noise LTITNEW11#1 M P & Z Workshop Minutes November 15, 2000 The methods of measurement and enforcement of the noise performance standards within the City have not been sufficient. Amending the location of noise measurement to include the option of measuring the noise/vibration at the closest lot line if the distance from the source of origin is less than 25 feet will enable stricter enforcement of the noise/vibration performance standards. Additionally, changing the ordinance to allow enforcement at the staff level rather than by Council, enables staff to enforce the ordinance in a much more timely and efficient manner. The Commission determined no further changes would be necessary and no action was taken. ITEM 8: ACCESSORY USES Both the City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission have expressed concerns regarding the location of accessory uses concerning residential districts. The Planning and Zoning Commission determined no action was necessary at this time. ITEM 9: CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATIONS In the past year, the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission have heard numerous requests for conditional use permits for gas stations with convenience stores. The applicants usually request to be sited on corners located at high profile intersections. Because of the proliferation of these types of requests, the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission have questioned whether this type of use is the "highest and best use" for such high profile intersections. Limiting the number of gas station/convenience stores allowed at major intersections could address these types of concerns. Staff was recommending Section 24.C.5 of the Zoning Ordinance to be amended to restrict the number of gasoline service stations to two facilities per major/minor thoroughfare intersection, as shown in Exhibit No. 8. The Planning and Zoning Commission felt the Conditional Use permit process adequately addressed the issue of convenience store location, and agreed no changes to Section 24.C.5 to be made at this time. Wkl 11500 5 P & Z Workshop Minutes November 15, 2000 fK ITEM 10: FLOOD PLAIN DEVELOPMENT There was discussion in the workshop concerning the possibility of restricting development within the flood plain areas to preserve trees. Owners of property within flood plain areas are entitled to develop land within existing legal parameters. The prohibition of development in the flood plain could be considered a "taking" for which the City could be financially liable. Numerous court cases have established that cities cannot restrict the development of flood plain areas simply to protect it from development. Owners of flood plain property must be given the ability to reclaim the land under City and FEMA regulations, which would result in considerable clearing of trees in most cases. Staff does not recommend any changes relative to the flood plain. The Planning and Zoning Commission determined that this situation had been resolved. No action was taken. ITEM 11: Tree Preservation within Easements and Flood Plains The Council and Commission expressed concerns regarding tree cutting within easements and flood plains. On February 15, 2000, Section 52.1-1 of the Zoning Ordinance was amended with regard to tree removal within easements. Before that date, tree removal was allowed within drainage easements as a matter of right. The ordinance was amended to require the approval of the Public Works staff before the removal of trees in these areas. Specifically, the Public Works Department must find that the proposed tree removal is necessary to ensure proper construction or maintenance of the drainage easement. The Planning and Zoning Commission determined that this situation had been resolved. No action was taken. ITEM 12: Methods of Measuring Building Height/Stories This issue has been brought about by the construction of two office projects adjacent to single family residential districts. The concern is the construction of basements that, due to the topography of the site, can appear to be a two- story building even though the Zoning Ordinance specified that development adjacent to single family districts must be no taller than one story. Using the definition of the building code for basements, a basement could be Wk111500 C.1 P & Z Workshop Minutes November 15, 2000 constructed with fifty percent of the basement located above ground. This issue was recently resolved with the approval of a revision of the Zoning Ordinance on July 18, 2000, which redefined a "story" to one floor. The Planning and Zoning Commission determined that this situation had been resolved. No action was taken. ITEM 13: Screening Between Adjacent Uses Located on Different Elevations or Grades. In the past there have been difficulties with providing appropriate screening when the site to be screened is located on a different elevation or grade than the adjacent site. Staff recommends Section 50.C.1 and Section 50.C.3 of the Zoning Ordinance be amended to require the measurement of required screening be taken at the nearest property or building setback line, whichever has the highest grade, as shown in Exhibit No. 9. The Planning and Zoning Commission tabled Item 13: Screening of adjacent uses located at different elevations, to be discussed at a future workshop. ITEM 14: The Upkeep of Older Homes The Building Official has drafted building code amendments that would adopt the 2000 International Property Maintenance code as minimum housing standards for the City of Grapevine. The City Attorney is presently reviewing the proposed amendments and they should be brought before the City Council soon for adoption. There was no action to be taken by the Planning and Zoning Commission with this item. ITEM A. AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 58.A. WHICH WOULD ESTABLISH REGULATION OF OFF-SITE PARKING Next for the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider was the amendments to section 58.A Establish Regulation of Off -Site Parking. Staff received direction from Councilperson Sharron Spencer and Planning and Zoning Commissioner Larry Oliver concerning a pending issue, which came about as a result of the Albertson's Wkl 11500 7 P & Z Workshop Minutes November 15, 2000 conditional use request on Pool Road and Ira E. Woods Avenue approximately one year ago. The specific issues that were brought about in that request was the transfer of parking from one zoning district to another and the transfer of parking from a more intensive zoning district to a less intensive zoning district. These issues were again addressed at the October 26, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop. The direction of the Planning and Zoning Commission was to establish two regulations for off-site parking. First, shared parking with a conditional use request must include the area of the off-site shared parking as part of the conditional use request. This will be accomplished with language established in the new second paragraph of Section 58.A. The second directive focused on the transfer of parking from a higher intensive district to a less intensive district—if this is proposed, it will only by allowed if the permitted or conditional use is allowed in both districts. This language is contained in the third paragraph of Section 58.A. A. The off-street parking facilities required for the uses mentioned in this ordinance, and other similar uses shall be on the same lot or parcel of land as the structure they are intended to serve, or upon a lot or parcel of land within three hundred (300) feet of the lot or tract of land upon which the structure they are intended to serve is located and shall be exclusive of landscaping requirements. All parking and loading areas related to a Conditional or Special Use located on the same lot or parcel of land they are intended to serve or within 300 feet of the lot or parcel of land they are intended to serve must be located within the boundaries established by the Site Plan associated with the Conditional or Special Use Permit. No required off-street parking or loading for a permitted or conditional use shall be located on a lot or parcel of land that does not allow the permitted or conditional use. ITEM C: REPORT FROM STAFF REGARDING DEMOGRAPHICS OF GRAPEVINE Next on the agenda was a report regarding demographics from the Economic Development Specialist, Dan Truex. Due to time restraints, this item was tabled until the following workshop. 9 i Wk111500 8 P & Z Workshop Minutes November 15, 2000 With no further business to discuss, Cathy Martin moved, with a second by Chris Coy, to adjourn the meeting at 6:25 p.m. and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Coy, Martin, Busbee, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ON THIS THE 16th DAY OF JANUARY, 2001. ATTEST: SECRETARY Wk1 11500 9 P & Z BRIEFING SESSION NOVEMBER 21, 2000 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Special Briefing Session on this the 21ST day of November, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. in the Planning and Zoning Conference Room, 200 South Main Street, 2nd Floor, Grapevine, Texas with the following members present -to -wit: Larry Oliver Chairman Herb Fry Vice Chairman Chris Coy Member Cathy Martin Member Danette Murray Member B. J. Nicholson Member Rob Undersander 1St Alternate Bill Bimmerman, Jr. 2"d Alternate constituting a quorum, Kevin Busbee absent, and the following City Staff: H.T. (Tommy) Hardy Cindy Jackson Scott Dyer Cristin Turner Pam Huntress Director of Development Services Planner Sr. Civil Engineer Civil Engineer Planning Secretary Chairman Oliver called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. ITEM 1. BRIEFING SESSION Chairman Oliver announced the Planning and Zoning Commission would conduct a briefing session relative to the following cases: Z00-15 Lakeview Estates C000-55 Baylor Medical Center C000-59 Northfield Distribution C000-63 Kit Campbell MP00-03 Master Plan Update C000-45 Audi BS 112100 Ajw�=�= 191TI q & I -.I:q :WA W -J'114 to discuss development issues. After a brief discussion, Chairman Oliver adjourned the meeting at 7:25 p.m. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ON THIS THE 16th DAY OF JANUARY, 2001. ATTEST: SECRETARY NOTE: Planning and Zoning Commission continued with the Joint Public Hearing BS1 12100 2 0.14 146 w9wWAT011re- NOVEMBER 21, 2000 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Joint Public Hearing with the City Council, on this the 21" day of November, 2000, in the City Council Chambers, 200 South Main Street, 2nd Floor, Grapevine, Texas with the following members present -to -wit: Larry Oliver Chairman Herb Fry Vice -Chairman Chris Coy Member Cathy Martin Member Danette Murray Member B. J. Nicholson Member Rob Undersander 1St Alternate Bill Bimmerman, Jr. 2nd Alternate constituting a quorum, Kevin Busbee absent, and the following City Stat H. T. (Tommy) Hardy Cindy Jackson Scott Dyer Cristin Turner Pamela Huntress CALL TO ORDER Director of Development Services Planner Sr. Civil Engineer Civil Engineer Planning Secretary Mayor Tate called the joint meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. and Chairman Larry Oliver called the Planning and Zoning Commission deliberation session to order at 8:22 p.m. INVOCATION Planning and Zoning Commissioner Cathy Martin delivered the Invocation. ZONE CHANGE REQUEST Z00-15 LAKEVIEW ESTATES First for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Zone Change Request Z00-15 submitted by Richard Ritz Jr., RLA, for property located at 1: 1:1 VA 91011 H & all 0.14 Y 6 sw FOW M � ILI 1301 Ta: I & 1 1.1 .01 :VA south east corner of Midway Drive and Burney Road, Tracts 1, & 1 B, Abst. 455; Tracts I C, 1C2 & 1C1A, Abst. 254; and Tracts 1137, 113713, & 1131, Abst. 981. The applicant was requesting to rezone 22.868 acres from "R-20" Single Family Residential District to "R-5.0" Zero Lot Line District for the purpose of developing 96 single family lots. Dave McMahan, representing Four Peaks Development, was present to answer questions and request favorable consideration of the request. The following citizens each spoke in protest of the request: Ray Sloan —Southlake resident Chris Miller — Southlake resident Jane Fichler — Grapevine resident Mike Cowen — Grapevine resident LaDonna Boatwright — Grapevine resident Aubrey Wilson — Grapevine resident With no further questions, 3 letters of protest, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session, there was discussion regarding the surrounding property owners, adjoining zoning districts, and highest and best use of the property. Cathy Martin moved, with a second by B. J. Nicholson, to deny Zone Change Request Z00-15, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST CU00-55 BAYLOR MEDICAL CENTER Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request C000-55 submitted by Charles B. Turner for property located at 1600 West College Street and platted as Lots 1 & 2, Baylor Medical Center Addition. The applicant was requesting a conditional use permit to amend the previously approved site plan of CU98-37 (Ord 99-05) specifically, to allow the conversion of a previously approved four-story addition to a five -story addition and the conversion of a previously approved one- story addition to a two-story addition. Charles Turner, the applicant, was present to request favorable consideration of the request. With no guests to speak, no letters, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. 112100 2 In the Commission's deliberation session, Chris Coy moved, with a second by Herb Fry, to approve Conditional Use Request C000-55, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST CU00-59 NORTHFIELD DISTRIBUTION Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request C000-59 submitted by Steven Wright of Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. for property located at 512 East Dallas Road, Suite 100 and platted as Lot 1, Block A, Northfield Distribution Center Addition. The applicant was requesting a conditional use permit to amend the previously approved site plan of C000-36 (Ord. 00-73) specifically, to allow for outside storage. The applicant, Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. was proposing an approximate 3,600 square foot area to the rear of their lease space to be utilized for outside storage of plumbing related supplies which would be screened from public view with a six foot screening fence of either wood or masonry. Rick Medena, representing Seefried Properties, was present to answer questions and request favorable consideration of the request. With one letter of concern and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commissioner's deliberation session, there was concern expressed regarding the screening as well as the proposed outside storage area. Cathy Martin moved, with a second by Herb Fry, to deny Conditional Use Request C000-59, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Fry, Coy, Martin, and Nicholson Nays: Oliver, Murray, and Undersander CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST C000-63 KIT CAMPBELL Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request C000-63 submitted by Kit Campbell for property located at 617 East Dallas Road and platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Pioneer Addition. The applicant was requesting a conditional use permit to amend the previously approved site plan of CU98-61 (Ord. 99-07) specifically, to allow for vehicle and equipment sales, service, leasing, and outside storage. 112100 3 Kit Campbell was present to answer questions and request favorable consideration of the request. With no letters or petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commissioner's deliberation session, Chris Coy moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to approve Conditional Use Request CU00-63, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None MASTER LAND USE MAP UPDATE MP00-03 Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was the Master Land Use Map Update MP00-03. This update would amend the Official City of Grapevine Future Land Use Map 11 from "GU" Governmental Use District to a Residential Low Density District relative to the existing Grapevine Middle School Property. The Grapevine Colleyville Independent School District (GCISD) staff contacted the City regarding the status of the Land Use Designation for the existing Grapevine Middle School. The current designation of the school property is Governmental Use. GCISD staff requested the Planning and Zoning Commission discuss appropriate alternatives to the current designation. The amendment to the Official City of Grapevine Future Land Use Map 11 would change the land use designation of this property from Governmental Use to Residential Low Density. Under the current Governmental Use classification, the property may be zoned "GU" Govermental Use District. The change to a Residential Low Density classification allows the property to be zoned "R-20" Single Family District, "R-12.5" Single Family District, "R-7.5" Single Family District, and "R-5.0" Zero Lot Line District. With one letter of protest, no speakers, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commissioner's deliberation session, Herb Fry moved, with a second by Cathy Martin, to approve the Master Land Use Map Update MP00-03, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Fry, Coy, Martin, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None Abstain: Oliver and Murray FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1 R. BLOCK 1, MILLS RUN ADDITION 112100 4 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 21, 2000 Next for the Commission to consider was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 1, Block 1, Mills Run Addition submitted by Mac McWilliams of Carson- Salcedo-McWilliams for property located at 3701 Grapevine Mills Parkway. The applicant was requesting to final plat 35.47 acres to allocate land for a park from Jackson Addition. The property is zoned "R -MF -2" Multi -Family District and is owned by Mrah 11, LP. With no guests to speak, no letters, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commissioners deliberation session, B. J. Nicholson moved, with a second by Cathy Martin, to approve the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 1R, Block 1, Mills Run Addition and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1R, BLOCK 1, JACKSON ADDITION Next for the Commission to consider was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 1, Block 1, Jackson Addition submitted by Mac McWilliams of Carson- Salcedo-McWilliams for property located at 3701 Grapevine Mills Parkway. The applicant was requesting to final plat 42.25 acres to allocate land for a park from Mills Run Addition. The property is zoned "R -MF -2" Multi Family District and is owned by Mrah 11, LP. With no guests to speak, no letters, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commissioners deliberation session, B. J. Nicholson moved, with a second by Cathy Martin, to approve the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 1 R, Block 1, Jackson Addition and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST CU00-45 AUDI Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request C000-45 submitted by Christopher M. Jones for property located at 2501 William D. Tate Avenue and proposed to be platted as Lot 2, Block 1, Vette Addition. The applicant was requesting a conditional use permit to establish an automotive dealership with sales and service of new and used vehicles, a forty -ft. pole sign, two twenty - ft. pole signs and an on-site car wash. 112100 5 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 21, 2000 This application was tabled at the October 17th, 2000 public hearing to give the applicant the opportunity to address the concerns of the Planning and Zoning Commission with regard to the front setbacks, signage and tree preservation. The concerns expressed by the Commission were: Revising the front setback to address the 90 -ft. of future right-of-way required by TXDOT for the realignment of the 121/114 highway corridor; Reducing the number of on-site signs to one monument sign; and Depicting the amount of trees to be preserved along the eastern portion of the site. In the Commission's deliberation session Cathy Martin moved, with a second by Chris Coy, to approve Conditional Use Request CU00-45, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None Next for the Commission to consider was the Statement of Findings and Preliminary Plat Application of Lots 1-2, Block 1, Rockbridge Addition submitted by Daniel and Lisa Goodwin for property located east of Heritage Avenue and west of Los Robles Drive. The applicant was requesting a preliminary plat of 5.217 acres for a proposed single family residence. The property is zoned "R-20" Single Family District and is owned by Daniel and Lisa Goodwin. In the Commissioner's deliberation session, B. J. Nicholson moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to approve the Statement of Findings and Preliminary Plat Application of Lots 1-2, Block 1, Rockbridge Addition, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1. BLOCK 1. ROCKBRIDGE ADDITION Next for the Commission to consider was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 1, Block 1, Rockbridge Addition submitted by Daniel and Lisa Goodwin for property located east of Heritage Avenue and west of Los Robles Drive. The applicant was requesting a final plat of 5.217 acres for a proposed single family residence. The property is zoned "R-20" Single Family District and is owned by Daniel and Lisa Goodwin. In the Commissioner's deliberation session, B. J. Nicholson moved, with a second by 112100 6 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 21, 2000 Danette Murray, to approve the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 1, Block 1, Rockbridge Addition, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None FINAL PLAT OF LOT 3 BLOCK 2 WESTPORT BUSINESS PARK Next for the Commission to consider was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 3, Block 2, Westport Business Park submitted by Dirk Kappel of Pacheko Koch Consulting Engineers for property located south of Westport Parkway and east of Stone Myers Parkway. The applicant was requesting a final plat of 15.385 acres for the proposed development of office warehouse facilities. The property is zoned "LI" Light Industrial District and is owned by Westport Ventures, LP. In the Commissioner's deliberation session, B. J. Nicholson moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to approve the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 3, Block 2, Westport Business Park and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None FINAL PLAT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, VETTE ADDITION Next for the Commission to consider was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 2, Block 1, Vette Addition submitted by Shea Kirkman of Goodwin & Marshall, Inc. for property located southeast of State Highway 121 and west of Stone Meyers Parkway. The applicant was final platting 58.603 acres for a commercial development. The property is zoned "CC" and is owned by Herman Smith & Company, Ltd. In the Commissioner's deliberation session, B. J. Nicholson moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to approve the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 2, Block 1, Vette Addition and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES Next for the Commission to consider were the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of October 17, 2000. 112100 7 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 21, 2000 Cathy Martin moved, with a second by Herb Fry, to approve the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of October 17, 2000, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None Next for the Commission to consider were the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting of October 26, 2000. Chris Coy moved, with a second by Herb Fry, to approve the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting of October 26, 2000, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None Abstain: Martin Next for the Commission to consider were the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of November 7, 2000. Chris Coy moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to approve the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of November 7, 2000, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None UNK PIRMIgNal With no further business to discuss, Cathy Martin moved, with a second by B J Nicholson, to adjourn the meeting at 9:40 p.m., which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ON THIS THE 16 th DAY OF JANUARY, 2001. rAJ W W : 112100 8 m FTAN�11*1 SECRETARY 112100 CHAIRMAN NOVEMBER 21, 2000 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Special Briefing Session on this the 19th day of December, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. in the Planning and Zoning Conference Room, 200 South Main Street, 2nd Floor, Grapevine, Texas with the following members present -to -wit: Larry Oliver Chairman Herb Fry Vice Chairman Chris Coy Member Cathy Martin Member Kevin Busbee Member Danette Murray Member B. J. Nicholson Member Rob Undersander 1St Alternate Bill Bimmerman, Jr. 2nd Alternate constituting a quorum, absent, and the following City Staff: H.T. (Tommy) Hardy Ron Stombaugh Scott Dyer Suja Joseph Ramana Chinnakotla Pam Huntress Director of Development Services Planner Sr. Civil Engineer Grad. Civil Engineer Traffic Engineer Planning Secretary Chairman Oliver called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. ITEM 1. BRIEFING SESSION Chairman Oliver announced the Planning and Zoning Commission would conduct a briefing session relative to the following cases: , CU00-48 Hillwood Development C000-62 & S000-18 First United Methodist Church C000-64 Autonation C000-65 Regency Center C000-66 & Z00-16 SH26 & Pool Road Addition BS121900 CUOO-67 CUOO-68 CUOO-53 to discuss development issues. • 9 • M P & Z BRIEFING SESSION DECEMBER 19, 2000 Steak n Shake Kinko's Elliott's After a brief discussion, Chairman Oliver adjourned the meeting at 7:25 p.m. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ON THIS THE 16th DAY OF JANUARY, 2001. ATTEST: SECRETARY NOTE: Planning and Zoning Commission continued with the Joint Public Hearing BS121900 6 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the Hearing with the City Council, on this the 19 Chambers, 200 South Main Street, 2nd Floor, present -to -wit: Larry Oliver Herb Fry Chris Coy Cathy Martin Kevin Busbee Danette Murray B. J. Nicholson Rob Undersander Bill Bimmerman, Jr. • see City of Grapevine, Texas met in Joint Public day of December, 2000, in the City Council Grapevine, Texas with the following members Chairman Vice -Chairman Member Member Member Member Member 1 st Alternate 2nd Alternate constituting a quorum, and the following City Staff: H. T. (Tommy) Hardy Ron Stambaugh Scott Dyer Suja Joseph Ramana Chinnakotla Pamela Huntress Director of Development Services Planner Sr. Civil Engineer Grad. Civil Engineer Traffic Engineer Planning Secretary Mayor Tate called the joint meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. and Chairman Larry Oliver called the Planning and Zoning Commission deliberation session to order at 8:22 p.m. Planning and Zoning Commissioner Chris Coy delivered the Invocation. JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS 121900 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 19, 2000 CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST CU00-48 HILLWOOD DEVELOPMENT Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request C000-48 Hillwood Development submitted Gary Frederick for property located at 625 Westport Parkway and platted as Lot 2, Block 2, Westport Business Park. The applicant was requesting a conditional use permit to amend the approved site plan of C000-06 (Ordinance 00-16) for the possession, storage, retail sale, and off -premise consumption of alcoholic beverages (beer and wine only) and prepared food delivery in conjunction with an internet-sales only grocery warehouse, specifically to modify site screening. The applicant was proposing to eliminate the eight -foot concrete, screening wall, which was to be painted to match the front fagade of the building, and replace it with chain-link fencing to improve visibility if occupied by multiple tenants. Gary Fredrick, representing Hillwood Development, was present to answer questions and request favorable consideration of the request. With no guests to speak, one letter of protest, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. Ar In the Commission's deliberation session, there was discussion regarding the considerable changes of site plan since it's original approval. Chris Coy moved, with a second by B. J. Nicholson, to deny CU00-48, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Busbee, Martin, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST C000-62 — FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request CU00-62 submitted by Jones C. McConnell, Jr. for property located at 422 Church Street and platted as Lot 1, Block 3, First United Methodist Church Addition. The applicant was requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow for off site parking within 300 feet of the primary use in accordance with Section 20.C.5 of the City of Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Mike Sutton and Jones McConnell, representing the applicant, were present to answer questions and request favorable consideration of the request. Minnie Lee Lancaster, a citizen, spoke in favor of the request. With no guests to speak, two letters of concern, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. 121900 2 a.wAffel MLIGE ��Nllejlkvjlml In the Commission's deliberation session, Cathy Martin moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to approve Conditional Use Request C000-62, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Busbee, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None SPECIAL USE REQUEST S000-18 — FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Special Use Request SU00-18 submitted by Jones C. McConnell, Jr. for property located at 422 Church Street and platted as Lot 1R, Block 1, First United Methodist Church Addition. The applicant is requesting approval of a special use permit to allow a church to exceed the maximum height regulation established for the "R-TH" Townhouse District in accordance with Section 49.13.14, specifically to allow a maximum height to exceed the established maximum height of 35 feet by 105 feet to allow a maximum building height of 140 feet. With no guests to speak, no letters, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session, Chris Coy moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to approve Special Use Request S000-18, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Busbee, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None FINAL PLAT LOT 1R, BLOCK 1 AND LOT 1, BLOCK 3, FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF GRAPEVINE ADDITION Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 1 R, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 3, First United Methodist Church of Grapevine Addition submitted by First United Methodist Church of Grapevine Addition. The applicant was final platting 9.4704 acres at the northwest corner of College Street and Church Street for the proposed expansion of the church facility. The property is zoned "R-TH" Townhouse District and is owned by the First United Methodist Church of Grapevine. With no guests to speak, no letters, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session, Kevin Busbee moved, with a second by Cathy Martin, to approve the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 1 R, Block 1 121900 3 and Lot 1, Block 3, First United Methodist Church of Grapevine Addition and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Busbee, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST C000-64 - AUTONATION Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request C000-64 submitted by John Strautman, for property located at 701 East State Highway 114 and platted as Lot 1 R, Block 1, Autonation Ford Addition. The applicant was requesting to revise the previously approved site plan of C000-33 (Ord. No. 00-81) for an automotive dealership, specifically to extend the length of building by five -feet, add one additional service drive, modify the parking layout, add a masonry screening wall and modify the approved 40 -foot pole sign. The applicant was proposing a third service drive to the previously approved showroom/service center. The addition of this drive would extend the building an additional five -feet as well as slightly rearrange the parking areas in the front left and front right sides of the site. A masonry screening wall was proposed to screen the service area from the front of the site. The previously approved on-site signs have been modified to incorporate the new corporate sign standards. Robert Manois, representing Kimley Horn, was present to answer questions and request favorable consideration of the request. With no guests to speak, one letter of approval, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session, Herb Fry moved, with a second by B J Nicholson, to approve Conditional Use Request C000-64, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Busbee, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST C000-65 - REGENCY CENTER Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request C000-65 submitted by Ainbinder/Shannon Grapevine, L.P., for property located at 1501 West State Highway 114 and platted as Lots 2-7, Block 1, Regency Center Addition. The applicant is requesting to amend the approved site plan of CU99-67 (Ord. No. 99-177) for a planned commercial center, specifically to allow 121900 4 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 19, 2000 development of Lots 2, 3, & 7 and modify the landscape plan to incorporate off site improvements. The applicant is proposing to develop three pad sites, Lot 2, Lot 3 and Lot 7, for a total of 20,200 square feet of retail space at this time. John Levitt, representing The Civil Works Group, and Bart Duckworth, on behalf of Ainbinder/ Shannon, were present to answer questions and request favorable consideration of the request. With no guests to speak, one letter of approval, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session, there was discussion regarding landscaping issues and Cathy Martin moved, with a second by Danefte Murray, to table Conditional Use Request CU00-65 until the Planning and Zoning meeting of January 16, 2001, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Busbee, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST CU00-66 AND ZONE CHANGE REQUEST Z00-16 — SH26 & POOL ROAD ADDITION Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request C000-66 and Zone Change Request Z00-16 submitted by Jeff Williams for property located at 3725 Ira E. Woods Avenue and proposed to be platted as Lots 1R, 2R, 3R, and 4R, Block 1, SH26/Pool Road Addition. The applicant was requesting a zone change to rezone 2.586 acres from "HC" Highway Commercial District, 5.594 acres from "CN" Neighborhood Commercial District, and 3.504 acres from "PO" Professional Office District to "CC" Community Commercial District for development of a retail shopping center. The applicant was also requesting a conditional use permit to establish a planned commercial center and allow the possession, storage, retail sale and off -premise consumption of alcoholic beverages (beer and wine only) in conjunction with a grocery store and allow gasoline sales and the possession, storage, retail sale, and off -premise consumption of alcoholic beverages (beer and wine only) in conjunction with a convenience store. Tommy Pigg, representing Greenway Investment, was present to answer questions and request favorable consideration of the request. Some of the noted changes from the last submittal included: • Addition of screening berms • Considerably smaller project • No Highway Commercial District 121900 5 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 19, 2000 • Eliminating the Southern entrance onto Pool Road ® No convenience store or gas station on the hard corner • All masonry exterior to Albertson's ® Undeveloped property donated to the City The following citizens spoke in favor of the request: John Zikos Jim Tiller Don Moore Kelly Robertson Catherine Brink Tracy Honeycutt The following citizens spoke in opposition to the request: Dean Madden Richard Lamb Larry Cuss Steve Early Brink Gabriel Larry Watkins Glen Hedden There was discussion regarding future plans for State Highway 26 as well as tree preservation, and soil preservation issues. With four letters of approval, 27 letters of protest, and two petitions each with 115 names, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session, there was discussion regarding the highest and best use of the property, traffic issues arising from the request, and navigational issues of the necessary oil tanker trucks within the parking area. Herb Fry moved, with a second by Cathy Martin, to deny Zone Change Request Z00-16, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Martin, Busbee, and Murray Nays: Coy and Nicholson Cathy Martin moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to deny Conditional Use Request C000-66, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Martin, Busbee, and Murray Nays: Coy and Nicholson 121900 0.1 tole] 1641 Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lots 1R -4R and Tract A -R, Block 1, SH26/Pool Road Addition submitted by 9.5 Pool Road Partners, L. P. The applicant was final platting 22.122 acres at the southwest corner of State Highway 26 and Pool Road for a proposed development of a commercial center. The property is zoned "PO" Professional Office District and "CN" Neighborhood Commercial District and is owned by 9.5 Pool Road Partners, L. P. With no further guests to speak, no letters, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session, Danette Murray moved, with a second by Cathy Martin, to deny the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lots 1R -4R, and Tract A -R, Block 1, SH26/Pool Road Addition, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Martin, Busbee, and Murray Nays: Coy and Nicholson CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST C000-67- STEAK -N- SHAKE Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request CU00-67 submitted by Dan O'Connell for property located at 2205 East Grapevine Mills Circle and platted as Lot 4, Block 5, Grapevine Mills Addition Phase I. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to amend the previously approved site plan of C000-21 (Ord. 00-83) for a planned commercial center in excess of 1,000,000 square feet of gross leasable space specifically, to allow the development of a drive-through restaurant. Janet Briel, representing Grapevine Mills, was present to answer questions and request favorable consideration of the request. With no guests to speak, no letters, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session, Chris Coy moved, with a second by Herb Fry, to approve Conditional Use Request C000-67, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Busbee, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST C000-68 - KINKO'S 121900 7 0.1 = M MAI RK Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request CU00-68 submitted by Erik Mays for property located at 2305 East Grapevine Mills Circle and platted as Lot 4, Block 4, Grapevine Mills Addition Phase I. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to amend the previously approved site plan of C000-21 (Ord. 00-83) for a planned commercial center in excess of 1,000,000 square feet of gross leasable space specifically, to allow the development of a business service, reproduction, computer communication and conference center oriented business. Janet Briel, representing Grapevine Mills, was present to request favorable consideration of the request. With no guests to speak, no letters, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session, Herb Fry moved, with a second by B J Nicholson, to approve Conditional Use Request C000-68, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Busbee, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None END OF PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST CU00-53 - ELLIOTT'S HARDWARE Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request C000-53 submitted by Fred Held for property located at 108 West Northwest Highway and platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Elliott's Hardware Addition. The applicant was requesting to amend the previously approved site plan of CU92-07 (Ord.92-29) allowing outside storage, specifically, to place an automated teller machine in the parking lot of the site, and the addition of a three-foot monument sign. This item was tabled at the meeting of November 21, 2000. The site plan indicated that an automated teller machine (ATM) was being proposed for the front of the site along Northwest Highway. The location of the ATM will not impede the flow of traffic through the existing parking lot. This application also included a request for a three-foot monument sign to be located in the southeast corner of the site, near the intersection of Northwest Highway and North Main Street. The dimensions of the proposed sign are proposed to be three feet X eighteen feet. Fred Held, representing the applicant was present to answer questions regarding this request. 121900 8 • In the Commission's deliberation session, there was a discussion regarding the brick fagade on the proposed ATM site. The Commission expressed their concerns that no significant changes on the revised site plan. Danette Murray moved, with a second by Kevin Busbee, to approve Conditional Use Request C000-53, and the motion failed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, and Murray Nays: Martin, Coy, Fry, and Nicholson Next Cathy Martin moved, with a second by Chris Coy, to deny Conditional Use Request CU00-53, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Martin, Coy, Fry, and Nicholson Nays: Oliver, Busbee, and Murray Next for the Commission to consider was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 2, Block 2, A. F. Leonard Addition submitted by Abdul Pirani for property located at the southwest corner of Northwest Highway and Dooley Street. The applicant was final platting 0.507 acres for a proposed 20' pole sign on the property. The property is zoned "HC" Highway Commercial District and is owned by Ashraf Aziz. In the Commission's deliberation session, Kevin Busbee moved, with a second by Chris Coy, to approve the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 2, Block 2, A. F. Leonard Addition, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Busbee, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None ill 2�Illllll iiii,11itili i� 11 '111 [03 H ll� 0 1. 14 164 1 M I to 1.1 Q I Lem, 011 RX41,11 I K• -*j a mg: Wa v: V, I a] Y-33 170M Next for the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider were the amendments to Section 58, Parking, Loading, and Outside Storage Area Development Standards relative to parking requirements for properties contained within more than one zoning district. The proposed changes revise part A (an additional second and third paragraph) to read as follows: A When a platted lot or parcel of land is comprised of more than one zoning district and the required parking for uses allowed is to be located within said lot or parcel of land, a site plan and a Conditional Use Permit meeting all the requirements of Section 48 shall be required. 121900 9 0=61:4 LTI I --j MEAN wr&11111 No required off-street parking or loading for a permitted or conditional use shall be located on a lot or parcel of land that does not allow the permitted or conditional use. In the Commission's deliberation session, Chris Coy moved, with a second by B J Nicholson, to set a public hearing for Amendments to Appendix D, Section 58 Parking, Loading, And Outside Storage Area Development Standards, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Busbee, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None ADJOURNMENT With no further business to discuss, Cathy Martin moved, with a second by B J Nicholson, to adjourn the meeting at 10:55 p.m., which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Martin, Murray, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: None PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ON THIS THE 16 th DAY OF JANUARY, 2001. CHAIRMAN ATTEST: SECRETARY 121900 IK