HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 06 - HL16-03 622 East Wall StreetTO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER
J. SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR
MEETING DATE: JUNE 21, 2016
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF
HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT HL16-03
Grapevine
��, APPLICANT: Copper Street Homes
I Qo� I
\—I a Ra
I I
I ,
'sY �yi ' I.H. 1635
Northw i PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE:
The subject property
1
Street and platted as
I -Johnson sy�� AirportW ; Heights Addition.
a I
'm
m Glade Rd.
is located at 622 East Wall
Lot 6, Block 101, College
REQUESTED HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT AND COMMENTS:
The applicant is requesting a Historic Landmark Subdistrict designation for property located
at 622 East Wall Street and platted as Lot 6 Block 101 College Heights Addition
The Historic Preservation Commission, at their March 23, 2016, applicant/owner Neal
Cooper of Copper Street Homes submitted an application for Historic Landmark
designation, #HL16-03, for property located at 622 East Wall Street in the College Heights
Addition and approved CA16-33 to allow the construction of a new residential structure
(see attached).
The original owner of this lot was John Staples Estill, member of one of the distinguished
founding families of Grapevine. John Estill was the son of Charles C. Estill, lumber
company owner and prominent home and school builder of the late 1800s and early 1900s.
In 1919, John S. Estill was Treasurer of the Grapevine Producing Company which
anticipated drilling a successful oil well in town. Many of Grapevine's citizens invested in
the Grapevine Producing Company which issued stock certificates. One of these stock
certificates as well as a panoramic picture of the well site with the investors gathered
around awaiting the time the well would come in are on display in the Grapevine Historical
Museum. The well was a dry hole, but the significance of the photograph provides a
wealth of information regarding local history and is one of the museum's finest treasures.
The third owner of this lot was A. J. "Nabby" Thompson. Nabby was the son of Samuel
and Phoebe Thompson and the brother of local Grapevine character, Cotton Thompson.
Nabby's given name was Andrew Jackson Thompson; Cotton's given name was Henry
Dorris Thompson (named for Grapevine physician, Dr. Tom Dorris). Another brother was
Hubert Lipscomb Thompson, also named for another Grapevine citizen. In October 1942,
Nabby married Buelah Harston. They resided at the corner of Wall and Wood Street.
Nabby was well known in the area as a collector of "antiques."
PRESENT ZONING AND USE:
The property is currently zoned "R-7.5" Single Family Residential and is currently vacant.
HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA:
The subject property and the surrounding properties to the north, south, east, and west
were zoned "R-1" Single Family District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning.
SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE:
NORTH:
"R-5.0"
Zero Lot Line — currently vacant
SOUTH:
"R-7.5"
Single Family Residential — residential structures
EAST:
"R-7.5"
Single Family Residential — residential structures
WEST:
"R-7.5"
Single Family Residential — residential structures
AIRPORT IMPACT:
The subject tract is located within "Zone A" Zone of Minimal Effect as defined on the
"Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" Map. Few
activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in "Zone A" except for sound sensitive activities
such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The applicant's proposal
is an appropriate use in this noise zone.
MASTER PLAN APPLICATION:
The Master Plan designates the subject property as a "RL" Residential Low Density land
use. The applicant's proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan.
-L. fL --o'3
Exhibit F
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT APPLICATION
1 APPLICANT/AGENT NAME
COMPANY NAME 25 -
ADDRESS -413 X
CITY/STATE/ZIP cf�'A-Pejjl
WORK PHONE 21-4 r--4-50 -2- FAX NUMBER
2. APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN SUBJECT PROPERTY_ k) AJC --4--
3. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME...
ADDRESS
CITY/STATE/ZIP
WORK PHONE 2 (4 4? -4s02_ FAX NUMBER
4. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT___,(o
BLOCK --,ADDITION
SIZE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY�,!�V.ACRES �-r<_�SQUARE FEET
METES & BOUNDS MUST BE DESCRIBED ON 8 1/2" X 11 SHEET
5. PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION
6. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY UA -%1A„-
7. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONEi, CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACING A HISTORICAL
LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT REQUEST:SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
0AZWFORMAPPHIST
1/13
www.ci.grapev4neAxus
'
F
RESCHEDULED TO A LATER DATE.
APPLICANT (PRINT)
APPLICANT SIGNATURE
OWNER (PRINT)
--- --- ' '-T | 1/13
uo /
Exhibit
4,e,.oj
The State of
County of ,'eAt7-
"."v,AI
® on this aay personally appeared
known t me (or proved to me on the oath of
or throng a.P r lPf� s (description of
identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument
and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein
expressed.
Given under my hand and seal of office this ` day of 12 Jl- , A.D. 10 16
'".
MARY BUSH �.. i
Notary ID it 128801395 Notary ignature
my Commission Expires1
5 December 9, 2019
`Ql,PE Oh'P
The State of
County of
Before me on this day personally appeared
known to me (or proved to me on the oath of
or through (description of
identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument
and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein
expressed.
Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D.
SEAL
Notary Signature
O:\ZCU\FORMS\APPHIST 1/13
www.d. grapevAnelK. us
•
HL16-03
Grapevine Township Revitalization Project, Inc.
City of Grapevine
636 South Main Street
Grapevine, Texas 76051
I. SITE
1
- . • ^ * 0 1=1
■ Setbacks
■ Driveways, Parking Lots
■ Service and Mechanical Areas
■ Fences
■ Preservation
■ Exterior Finishes
■ Windows
• Awnings -Canopies
■ Exterior Lighting
• Infill
■ Additions to Historic Buildings
Page 2
Preface
Lot at 622 East Wall Street
(Metal Clad Storage Building is visible to the rear left corner of the lot)
The original owner of this lot was John Staples Estill, member of one of the
distinguished founding families of Grapevine. John Estill was the son of Charles C.
Estill, lumber company owner and prominent home and school builder of the late
1800s and early 1900s. In 1919, John S. Estill was Treasurer of the Grapevine
Producing Company which anticipated drilling a successful oil well in town. Many of
Grapevine's citizens invested in the Grapevine Producing Company which issued
stock certificates. One of these stock certificates as well as a panoramic picture of
the well site with the investors gathered around awaiting the time the well would
come in are on display in the Grapevine Historical Museum. The well was a dry
hole, but the significance of the photograph provides a wealth of information as
regards local history and is one of the museum's finest treasurers.
The third owner of this lot was A. J. "Nabby" Thompson. Nabby was the son of
Samuel and Phoebe Thompson and the brother of local Grapevine character,
Cotton Thompson. Nabby's given name was Andrew Jackson Thompson; Cotton's
given name was Henry Dorris Thompson (named for Grapevine physician, Dr. Tom
Dorris). Another brother was Hubert Lipscomb Thompson, also named for another
Grapevine citizen. In October 1942, Nabby married Buelah Harston. They resided
at the corner of Wall and Wood Street. Nabby was well known in the area as a
collector of "antiques."
Page 3
Side view of Metal Clad Storage Building at Rear of Lot
622 East Wall Street
I dill!
-- c1111
--
622 East Wall Street
The storage building is approximately 12' x 12' and served as storage unit
for the house at 626 East Wall Street.
Page 4
90
Retain the historic relationships between buildings, landscaping features and open
space. Avoid rearranging the site by moving or removing buildings and site
features, such as walks, drives and fences, that help define the residence's historic
value.
Building setbacks should be consistent with adjacent buildings or with the style of
the building. Setbacks are an important ingredient in creating an attractive
streetscape. Buildings should be set back to a line that is consistent with their
neighbors and land use. For example, a residential setback should retain the
setback of adjacent and nearby structures, with landscaping along the street right-
of-way.
Residential buildings with a commercial use in residential areas should be set back
in a manner consistent with setbacks of neighboring or similar residential structures.
Maintain building orientation pattern, with the front facade facing the street.
Maintain spacing patterns between buildings.
DRIVEWAYS, PARKING LOTS AND VACANT SITES
Driveways should be located perpendicular to the street; no circular drives shall be
allowed (unless proven with historic documentation) in front or corner side yard, so
that the character of the landscaped yard can be reinforced.
New parking lots for commercial uses should not be located adjacent to sidewalks in
the district.
Off-street parking lots should not be allowed to interrupt the continuity of
landscaped front or corner side yards. This is important to both the preservation of
historic character, and to the strengthening of the residential district.
Screen existing parking lots from streets and pedestrian areas in the Historic
District. Existing parking lots located adjacent to streets and sidewalks may be
screened to the height of car hoods. This will provide a certain level of continuity of
the building fagade line; it will screen unsightly views; and it will provide a level of
security by allowing views to and from the sidewalk.
Historically, fences around historic houses defined yards and the boundary around
property and gardens. Wood picket fences, wood rail fences and barbed wire or
decorative wire fences were the common fence types in Grapevine. Traditionally,
Page 5
picket fences surrounded the front of the house while rail and wire fences
surrounded the agricultural portions of the property. Maintain historic fences.
New fences. Simple wood picket fences, wood and wire and wrought iron fences
are appropriate. Avoid chain-link fences, privacy fences and concrete block fences
for the street sides of property. Wood privacy fences may be allowed when installed
in the rear yard and behind the front fagade of a property. Utilitarian/privacy fences
should not be installed in front of a historic building or beyond the line of the front
fagade of a historic building.
Replacing fences. If replacement is required due to deterioration, remove only
those portions of historic fences that are damaged beyond repair and replace in-
kind, matching the original in material, design and placement. If replacement is
necessary for non -historic fences, or new fences are proposed, locate and design
the fence in such a way that will compliment the historic boundary of the property
without concealing the historic character of the property.
SERVICE AND MECHANICAL AREAS
Service and mechanical areas and equipment should be screened from the street
and other pedestrian areas.
All garbage and equipment storage areas should be screened from the street.
Mechanical equipment, including satellite dishes, shall not be located in front or
corner side yards or should be set back from the edges of roofs, and screened so
that they are not visible to pedestrians and do not detract from the historic character
of buildings.
PRESERVATION
Preserve, stabilize, and restore original building form, ornament and materials.
Any missing or severely deteriorated elements may be replaced with replicas of the
original. Ensure that roof, window, porch and cornice treatments are preserved, or
when preservation is not possible duplicate the original building element.
When rehabilitating, remove non -historic alterations.
Often, "modern" renovations conceal the original facade details. If not, the original
style may be recreated through the use of historic photographs.
Where replication of original elements is not possible, a new design consistent with
the original style of the building may be used.
Reconstruction of building elements should reflect the size, scale, material and level
Page 6
of detail of the original design.
Preserve older renovations that have achieved historic significance. Older
structures or additions may have, at some time, been renovated with such care and
skill that the renovation itself is worthy of preservation. Usually, such renovations
may date from before 1940.
EXTERIOR FINISHES
Original wood finishes should be maintained and painted or, when necessary,
replaced in kind. Modern synthetic siding materials such as vinyl or metal bear little
resemblance to historic siding materials. The application of such modern synthetic
materials often involves the removal of original decorative elements such as
cornice, corner boards, brackets, window and door trim, etc. New synthetic siding
shall not be installed; removal of existing such materials is not required, but strongly
encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish and appearance.
Original asbestos siding should be maintained and painted, or when necessary,
replaced with synthetic siding to match the existing asbestos siding. The removal of
asbestos siding over existing wood siding is not required, but strongly encouraged,
to restore historic patina, finish and appearance.
Original masonry surfaces should be maintained and not be painted, unless severe
deterioration of the brick or stone can be shown to require painting. If the color or
texture of replacement brick or stone cannot be matched with existing, painting may
be an appropriate treatment.
Paint colors should be complimentary to each other and the overall character of the
house. When possible, research the original paint color and finishes of the
building's historic period; the right colors respect the historic building.
The Historic Preservation Commission shall adopt, as necessary, a paint palette(s)
appropriate to the district's character, which may be proposed and approved
through the Minor Exterior Alteration application process. Any colors proposed
outside the adopted palette may be reviewed by the Commission in the regular
Certificate of Appropriateness process.
WINDOWS
Original window framing and lites (panes of glass) configurations should be
preserved and maintained or replaced in kind.
When replacement is necessary, do so within existing historic opening.
Replacement of non -original windows should consider the use of historically
appropriate wood windows. Use same sash size to avoid filling in or enlarging the
original opening. Clear or very slightly tinted window glass may be used. No
reflective or heavily tinted glass shall be used.
Page 7
Should the owner wish to install security bars, they should be installed on the
interior of windows and doors.
Storm windows. The use of interior storm windows is encouraged. Storm windows
are available which can be installed on the interior of windows. This helps to
preserve the exterior historic character of the building.
Should storm windows need to be installed on the exterior of the historic windows,
storm windows constructed of wood and configured to match the historic sashes
(i.e. one over one sashes) are recommended.
If metal storm windows are installed, paint to blend with surrounding elements.
New awnings and canopies should not be installed above windows or doors.
Lighting is an important element in residential areas. Fixtures should be consistent
with the historic character of the house.
Appropriate incandescent light fixtures to the style of the district should be used.
Avoid exposed lighting of any kind unless part of a historic fixture.
The Secretary of the Interior's guidelines for new buildings in historic districts
encourage similarity of form and materials, but not actual replication. New
construction proposals and the rehabilitation of non -historic buildings will be
reviewed based on these Criteria. Judgement will be based on the compatibility of
the design within the context of the property's adjacent and nearby historic
buildings.
The design of new buildings should have key elements of the building's historic
period of significance including massing, scale, fenestration and materials.
Infill buildings should not be absolute reproductions, and appear as clearly
contemporary. Only when a previously demolished historic Grapevine building can
be accurately replicated may a reproduction be considered.
Infill buildings between historic buildings should be similar in setback, roof form,
cornice line and materials, to one of the adjacent buildings. Relate height of new
Page 8
building to the heights of adjacent structures. Avoid new buildings that tower over
existing ones.
Horizontal wood siding (novelty, tongue and groove, shiplap or equivalent) and brick
are appropriate exterior building finishes for the historic house. Fake brick or stone
or gravel aggregate materials shall never be used.
ADDITIONS TO HISTORIC BUILDINGS
Additions to historic buildings should replicate the style of the main building if
possible; otherwise they should adhere to the general style with simplified details.
As a minimum, new additions should reflect the massing, roof shape, bay spacing,
cornice lines and building materials of the primary structure.
All new wood or metal materials should have a painted finish except on some 20th
century buildings where the use of unpainted aluminum or steel was part of the
original design and should be maintained.
A new addition should, if at all possible, be located at the rear of the historic
building. If this is not possible, the addition may be added to the side if it is
recessed at least 18 inches from the historic building facade ora connection is used
to separate old from new.
New vertical additions should be set back from primary facades so as not to be
readily apparent from the facing street.
When reproducing elements that were originally part of a historic building they
should be replicated when evidence of the actual detail has been documented by
photographs, drawings, or remaining physical evidence. If no evidence exists,
elements typical of the architectural style may be used. Historic photographs can
provide information on the original elements of the building.
Page 9
N W Ag 1 wn I w "1 0 0
02,11 IMA 10 Mot IN] 0 1
11. Name
Historic John S. Estill - Lot
And/or common
12. Location
Address 622 E. Wall Street land survey Esther Moore
Location/neighborhoodblock/lot Block 101 – Lot 6 tract size 940 Sq. Ft.
3. Current zonina
4. Classification
Category Ownership
district public
building(s) X private
structure
X site Accessible
yes: re-
stricted
X yes: un-
restr.
no
Status Present Use
—occupied agriculture museum
X unoccupied commer- park
cial
work in pro-
gress
education X residence
Entertain-
ment
govern-
ment
industrial
military
5. Ownership
Current owner:. Edna Margaret Murray phone:
Address: 1711 Signet Drive Euless TX 76040-4006
6. Form Preparation
Name & title David Klempin/Sallie Andrews
organization: HPP – Grapevine CVB
Contact: David Klempin, Hist. Pres. Officer 817-410-3197
scientific
transporta-
tion
other
I
17. Representation on Existing Surveys 1
Tarrant County Historic Re-
sources
other
for office use only
National Register of Historic
Places
Recorded Texas Historic
Landmark
Texas Archaeological
Landmark
8. Date Survey Yes No
Rec'd: Verified:
9. Field Chk By
date:
10. Nomination
Archaeological Structure District
Site Structure & Site
101
1 11. Historic Ownership
original owner John S. Estill
swificant later owner(s) A. J. "Nabby" Thompson
12.ConstructionDates
Original
alterations/additions
13. Architect
original construction
alterations/additions
14. Site Features
natural
urban design
15. Physical Description Metal Clad Storage Building 12'x 12' in size
Condition Check One: Check One:
excellent deteriorat- Unaltered Original site
ed
good ruins altered Moved (date:_)
X fair unexposed
Describe present and original (if known) physical appearance, include style(s) of archi-
tecture, current condition and relationship to surrounding fabric (structures, objects,
etc.). Elaborate on pertinent materials used and style(s) of architectural detailing, em-
bellishments and site details.
The lot has a stand of yellow and white irises along the front street line. Several native
trees punctuate the east side and rear yard. A small metal clad storage building is lo-
cated in the southeast corner of the rear of the lot. See pictures attached.
HL16-03
View • Metal Clad Storage Building from Estill Street at Rear of Lot
622 East Wall Street
The storage building is approximately 12'x 12' and served as storage unit for the house
at 626 East Wall Street.
HL16-03
16. Historical Significance
Statement of historical and cultural significance. Include: cultural influences, special
events and important personages, influences on neighborhood, on the city, etc.
The original owner of this lot was John Staples Estill, member of one of the distin-
guished founding families of Grapevine. In 1919, John S. Estill was Treasurer of the
Grapevine Producing Company which anticipated drilling a successful oil well in town.
Many of Grapevine's citizens invested in the Grapevine Producing Company which is-
sued stock certificates. One of these stock certificates as well as a panoramic picture of
the well site with the investors gathered around awaiting the time the well would come in
are on display in the Grapevine Historical Museum. The well was a dry hole, but the
significance of the photograph provides a wealth of information as regards local history
and is one of the museum's finest treasurers. John Estill was the son of Charles C. Es-
till, lumber company owner and prominent home and school builder of the late 1800s
and early 1900s.
The third owner of this lot was A. J. "Nabby" Thompson. Nabby was the son of Samuel
and Phoebe Thompson and the brother of local Grapevine character, Cotton Thomp-
son. Nabby's given name was Andrew Jackson Thompson; Cotton's given name was
Henry Dorris Thompson (named for Grapevine physician, Dr. Tom Dorris). Another
brother was Hubert Lipscomb Thompson, also named for another Grapevine citizen. In
October 1942, Nabby married Buelah Harston. They resided at the corner of Wall and
Wood Street. Nabby was well known in the area as a collector of "antiques."
Grapevine Areaa, book, 1979, Charles • • Editor.•tax cards •
current TAD records.
18. Attachments
District or Site map
_ Site Plan
X Photos (historic & current)
Additional descriptive mate-
rial
Footnotes
_ Other ( )
IMI
nation Merit
A Character, interest or value
as part of the development,
heritage or cultural charac-
teristics of the City of
Grapevine, State of Texas
of the United States.
B Location as the site of a
significant historical event.
C Identification with a person
or persons who significantly
contributed to the culture
and development of the city.
X G. Identification as the work of
an architect or master
builder whose individual
work has influenced the de-
velopment of the city.
D Exemplification of the cul- X
tural, economic, social or
historical heritage of the city
H. Embodiment of elements of
architectural design, detail,
materials or craftsmanship
which represent a signifi-
cant architectural innova-
tion.
I. Relationship to other dis-
tinctive buildings, sites or
areas which are eligible for
preservation according to a
plan based on historic, cul-
tural or architectural motif.
J. Unique location of singular
physical characteristics rep-
resenting an established
and familiar visual feature of
a neighborhood, community
or the city.
E Portrayal of the environment K. Archaeological value in that
of a group of people in an it has produced or can be
era of history characterized expected to produce data
by a distinctive architectural affecting theories of historic
style. or prehistoric value.
F Embodiment of distinguish- L. Value as an aspect of
ing characteristics of an ar- community sentiment or
chitectural type or speci- public pride.
men.
HL16-03
Recommendation
The Grapevine Township Revitalization
Program requests the Grapevine Historic
Preservation Commission to deem this
nominated landmark meritorious of desig-
nation as outlined in Chapter 39, City of
Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordi-
nance.
Further, the Grapevine Historic Preserva-
tion Commission endorses the Preserva-
tion Criteria, policy recommendations and
landmark boundary as presented by the
City of Grapevine Development Services
Department.
Burl Gilliam, Chair
Grapevine Historic Preservation Commis-
sion
David Klempin
Historic Preservation Officer
Scott Williams, Director
Development Services Department
H L 16-03
Historical Marker
The Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission and the Grapevine Historical Society
have a cooperative marker program for properties that are officially (individually or lo-
cated within) designated Historic Landmark Sub -districts. Please indicate if you are in-
terested in obtaining one or both markers for your property. There is no fee for either of
the markers, however, the Grapevine Historical Society will only fund two (2) of the me-
dallion and text plaque (second option), per year, on a first come, first serve basis.
Check One:
o Yes, I am interested in
Landmark Plaque for m
Preservation Commission
for this plaque.
obtaining a bronze Historic
property from the Historic
I understand there is no fee
o No, I am not interested in obtaining a marker for my
property.
o Yes, I am interested in obtaining a bronze Historic
Marker (medallion and text plaque) for my property
from the Grapevine Historical Society.
Below for office use only
o Historic Preservation Commission's o Historic Preservation Commission's
Historic Landmark Plaque. Historic District Plaque.
HL16-03
0 Historic
Landmark Marker,
existing GHS marker
0 Grapevine Historical Society's
Historic Landmark Marker.
0 Historic Dis-
trict Marker, existing
GHS marker.
L %d;)11i
.,IIIill[(
0 Historic
Landmark Marker,
new GHS marker.
0 Historic Dis-
trict Marker, new
GHS marker.
14CA14�, -33
50.00'
OHE OHEOHE — OHE -- ONE — 9 f
CA C M.!t OHE
F.I R C F.LR FIR. S 90000,
e
I
I
x
Lot 5 W Lot 6
OI
O
0
0
!I
1 0
Ian
I
1
� RE4IDENCA
626 E. Wall
Street
1
34.6'
t
Lot 7
20.0' N
IE100.U�! OHE ---H • OfiE �-'rONE•.--
S.I.R.
i
I
e
0 1,I2,4';h
m � 9.8'
!2 J• N a
BUILDP12.5'
I N .xO
n ONSLAB
tl
32,5'
o
I
I
8902525"W 100.01'
(38.5' ROW)
ESTILL STREET
o E-
FI.R.C— y2" Irm Rod W/ "5310" Cap.
5 -re Z k"i SZo
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Being Lots 6 and 7, Block 101 of College Heights Addition, an addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas,
according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Volume 310, Page 13, of the Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas.
0 E -
a �
FLOOD NOTE: It is my opinion that the property, desedixd hereon is cot within the 100 -year
d � 72
j
F.I.R.w. sours
i F—.LR_.C. F.LRC.�y
S8Y25'25'E
80'
F,LR, t%m_corrmr
O Q
v
W
0'00'00"W
a`
tta
I
N9 '
dnrawlW r Was-busch
nadnaa maws °vans axm moedso. nr ear
nwd °"° "p' "k "h " " a
(L Ill
j G.F. No. 117002301
P OVIDEN E
ti
'
N90"00'00"W
Survey
r�hur Surveying Co,
A220
UK
50.00'
dy!
N90"00'00'W
Z
50.00'
ta_
oo�
!I
1 0
Ian
I
1
� RE4IDENCA
626 E. Wall
Street
1
34.6'
t
Lot 7
20.0' N
IE100.U�! OHE ---H • OfiE �-'rONE•.--
S.I.R.
i
I
e
0 1,I2,4';h
m � 9.8'
!2 J• N a
BUILDP12.5'
I N .xO
n ONSLAB
tl
32,5'
o
I
I
8902525"W 100.01'
(38.5' ROW)
ESTILL STREET
o E-
FI.R.C— y2" Irm Rod W/ "5310" Cap.
FLR.W.— hi Iron Rod W/ "Word" Cop,
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Being Lots 6 and 7, Block 101 of College Heights Addition, an addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas,
according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Volume 310, Page 13, of the Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas.
0 E -
a �
FLOOD NOTE: It is my opinion that the property, desedixd hereon is cot within the 100 -year
yellow cap shmped'Arthur Surveying tC�ompany', NI found iron rods aro 112" diameter unless
O �
Otherwise -led. �••`• st - ({ eet L post) - OHE - (Overhead power)
p
berein property situated within Zone "X" (Unshaded).
I Date. 03-I1-2016
O Q
SURVEYORSCERnrlcAnoN:
The msnir ed does Iprtby sentry Out rhis wtw� vy
mIrmy wa uka a ea erm. p aMr re•ur
an:axdw.aaond.,c"�nn.aadtae,eh.narmy
kwwiWge, Ncearc no.u�b4 dn<rtparcKe,mMina,
,nen. i- am.awndvyl�aea"nso,ass sh—s,
¢Sbaara'emd�vir "rtsF�.9�
OF
.��••,
�p;'�t T ..
ASC No. 1603118
o Q
rrqq
tta
Client Providence Title
iidl
dnrawlW r Was-busch
nadnaa maws °vans axm moedso. nr ear
nwd °"° "p' "k "h " " a
(L Ill
j G.F. No. 117002301
P OVIDEN E
ti
7_i ;- ..r..-._ .
a
Survey
r�hur Surveying Co,
A220
UK
d09w.Sowh,a•81W,Sn.Izo
dy!
land Surveyor°
Z
aaahhke, T%ifA92
II7.251.1250
ta_
oo�
El. 8t., Is 200-I— Wile, TX 15051
�a
ra, 9li.sst.392o
td.
Ph.9n.22J.9a39-TFRNa 100a3a0p
aAnrt:oeloweam EshbinhMl9ad
FESSIONAL
LANDSURVEYOR
i.1.R.
w
ca
FI.R.C— y2" Irm Rod W/ "5310" Cap.
FLR.W.— hi Iron Rod W/ "Word" Cop,
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Being Lots 6 and 7, Block 101 of College Heights Addition, an addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas,
according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Volume 310, Page 13, of the Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas.
LEGEND -C.M- Controlling Monument; F.I.R.- Found Iron Rod; F.I.P.- Found Iron pipe;
F.C.P.= Fence Comer Post. OHE=Ovchud £lectrie. S.I.R.- Set Iron Rods tit" diameterwilh
FLOOD NOTE: It is my opinion that the property, desedixd hereon is cot within the 100 -year
yellow cap shmped'Arthur Surveying tC�ompany', NI found iron rods aro 112" diameter unless
flood zone arra according to the Federal Finageney Management Agency Flood Insurance Rat<
Marjo
Community-Panel No. 480599 0105 K presort Etfeedve Date ofma teMs. 25, 2009,
Sep
Otherwise -led. �••`• st - ({ eet L post) - OHE - (Overhead power)
p
berein property situated within Zone "X" (Unshaded).
I Date. 03-I1-2016
SURVEYORSCERnrlcAnoN:
The msnir ed does Iprtby sentry Out rhis wtw� vy
mIrmy wa uka a ea erm. p aMr re•ur
an:axdw.aaond.,c"�nn.aadtae,eh.narmy
kwwiWge, Ncearc no.u�b4 dn<rtparcKe,mMina,
,nen. i- am.awndvyl�aea"nso,ass sh—s,
¢Sbaara'emd�vir "rtsF�.9�
OF
.��••,
�p;'�t T ..
ASC No. 1603118
DrawtLCllk G.C./F.H.W.
Client Providence Title
iidl
dnrawlW r Was-busch
nadnaa maws °vans axm moedso. nr ear
nwd °"° "p' "k "h " " a
{.................:...
F.H. WESTPHALI
'•a 5832
�9y�FESS)v y02
j G.F. No. 117002301
P OVIDEN E
ti
7_i ;- ..r..-._ .
Survey
r�hur Surveying Co,
A220
S6R
d09w.Sowh,a•81W,Sn.Izo
land Surveyor°
aaahhke, T%ifA92
II7.251.1250
626 E. Wall Street
El. 8t., Is 200-I— Wile, TX 15051
�GISTEREDP
ra, 9li.sst.392o
Grapevine,Texas
Ph.9n.22J.9a39-TFRNa 100a3a0p
aAnrt:oeloweam EshbinhMl9ad
FESSIONAL
LANDSURVEYOR
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
°
DEVELOPMENTDATE �2-1 By
dOMWEXT OF
CONTACT KKDING
, PERMIT INFORMATION
-
ESTILL STREET
N 89°2S2 SO.W'
' I '
Ocrona�xmu
CONC. I 1
sme evd�an
aaaaensi o.wn
b 1
DRIVE � �y I
YoranR
to 1 -
mk q+nk na
I� I to 1 N
N 1 (V
2Y RW
a°.cbnao Naaiderial
mt¢s N^Yhk ere
BUILDING 22'_10"1
I
omwnx:aanua
_---
_ _6_,1
,
T-
tv pocNlnitteb
.tncM Nmm. any
I
ropmdctimkseb+y
YRhatlMd. 11ic pan b
aau�ad W°abt
1 i
I ,
,
ane subdaklon
i�aka on raa Maa
U oe�e
�
I -6'
abe b °m�;ue
swommu
1 STORY
NEW ODNSTRU MON I o
HOUSELn
S to I Gj
-go
Ivi
y
0
co
0)
37'-0"
a) fn N
Ui c
N
-69 _6
t1>
CL 04 co
--� ----- --�
4 "
�, M
FRO
U CC
GUIDING IN*
19-1"
Revision
P1 W SIDE
WALK
l�
S 90°WWW E 50.00'
622 WALL STREET
Scale:
SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1"-20'
3.26.16
LOT 6 BLOCK 101
COLLEGE HEIGHTS ADDITION
Site Plan
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
Site
1.1
BUILDERIFRAMER TO VERIFY ALL ROUGH
OPENINGS
OF APPLIANCES & FIREPLACES
PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS.
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
CITY OF GWEVINE
RELEASE®
PURSUTO LSci 3
DATE 2 � QY�L
NT OF
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
CONTACT BUILDM WSPECTIONS
FOR P MIF TION
SQUARE FOOTAGE NOTES
OUTSIDE OF FRAME
S.F.
FIRST FLOOR
2077 Sq. FT.
TOTAL LIVING
2077 SQ. FT.
A-2
GARAGE
416 SO. FT.
FRONT PORCH
21 SQ. FT.
ACK PATIO
95 SO. FT.
2609 S.F.
M.
QCopyryM 2015
SmeB�tlwsai
BMNeilal OeQgn
YeallrtlNY[
The Wanb tle
Such ofRmm
0.1r.aA fth.
Design, byft am
Raarvea Ma+a
Desipnr arW aey rce
ismer Nan amlmaeeae
ev Wen PON 6 d.o AV*
2goaucaon b Pe
eraMT TMs e
m se aeed r«eela
anis:ws.l.w,a
aarexee m+tws Wan
.Wy
ft u.eonrpaaw
.Im a ym:uwe.
P
If)
y O
0) O
O
X
(1)
CD F—
Co = C
(>>0
OQN N
CD
IN
Revision
Stale:
awasmoxwwm
3.26.16
mo
Fbor Plan
A-2
c
w
......... . ... --- .. _ ._ _ _
i-� ..__._ � aji
i
o -h,is
ie�f#�iT
�6e a'z g
l
r j
i
Z
LU I
:•e3 r ®.` :i = :5
i
ft ✓
_i
t rr is i
_ .._
E
CERTFICTE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Cffy OF GRAPEVINE
REL €D
MT2-q
t "TE �„ BYE
ENT OF
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
rtzzaql
s�
Rru«wr owgn
TMs pNn b nt
pM1pary W5
eith— RaWatW
rese«ea brut
Dstyrar.ndury uC
oma nun a).d. A u
piull'prohiwYetl. Nry
eeprod.&bkt/
pmhmitd T'ft TDY pWnb
tW«.e r«man
aM �ub6uptn
Inmramaone+spuzn
ony. U. w
it b pmNtlbmdDMt
N O
N �
O N
Z X
to to c
Q N c`0
UcNoCp3
Revision
Scala:
3.26.16
MENIM
First Floor ElecMcd
Pten
E-1
d
•
PAN
0, X;•z M73 -
BY
DATE!,� NT OF
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
CONMT s"NG WSPECTIONS
FOR PERMIT INFORMATION
FOR
EM -
�..m
� Buch,
R.W." Dtn
Deslpeie
z dby-
n we
.mer ow�e�eri Mr
MhW� Trevhay.eeez.pb
ca
x
8.
z
0
Wig
(D
CL
CL Cj
0
0
-
cz 0U
Revision
0N10
-F— 0
G 0 GG
scala:
moommmommm
3.26.16
Roof n=
pl-
A-4R
KtAK tLEVATION
sw:W.1.w
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
REL JEp
K"'SUo 1 — 33
DATE 2 b Bvc
OF
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
9WNt .1 •. •
pc%,�gvsq+s
seen evunn�,
aaaenga Dago
rnsranos
Tn�e d+n v e,e
noway orscm
aud�xgn Raikntlei
Oesipn N tlWs are
n+n'�edM ee
OeNgnrab wry'sa
.Zlypn�OlYd Mj n eu0v¢
ctr"ctly
npnbcden 0 c6ily
be w
.m .d.genu
b etl /.or0e bt
W eub6cuion
ggkabd on tlda Obn
aHy. Uce en bry o0er
r
to
N O
N to
E
O
S K
d
(n c
0 N l`0
OcNo0
Revision
Scale:
summommom
3.26.16
Elevations
A-5
6z
snve�•.ra _ - -
ocePnybzm/s
S—
FtMW& lDecipn
wa4nw .w
i PWkN
PreMMof Stat
BuManeAResld —
Deslpn Ai - ere
e ia—bI tls!
Desyna eMe %uce
oR Uun wll�dleellb
ceicBy poMpbed Arty
nprotlucYen s ctrctlt
. WM This W
. Ee. W tochbt
mac dsisbn
.11,..mHea ofMr
Pkn
mit. Us
hb
silo k PmAAYetl.
r
1n
y O
a�
to
t\
o m
X
(U
to c
CL d
O(3- N f`0
USC')
Revision
CrrY OF GRAPEVINE
RELEAS
• ,
4-33 ►,
DEP
.,.NT OF
►1!: •
LL -U 1 CLCV/11 RiN
SWF:%'-Pa
3.26.16
OEM
EWaVD
FRONT ELEVATION
roftktw
FRONT ELEVATION
smer sIo
CrrY OFgEGEI RELEA
OF
FRONT ELEVATION
> %Ita
m,s
TN. W..1. n
w.c.�ydsc
B.ChYa.R-Id."
(lnyn Mdghhm
avedhytle
n..i9ner W rry,m.
...V-h11W.1L Ar,
.tdctly ptohlNbd. Nq
repoActlonb..tctly
pMkibd. This i
b M wetl brdabtbt
.M.uC6Yucn
"vMic.bdon lhbpW
P
In
y O
O to
E ~
O
" X
N O
N .�
cn C_
CL N
a
OQN N
v(oc�
nummm
Revision
wAllommillmoom
Scale:
3.26.16
miam
Elavaeons
3 Elev.
OEM
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, DESIGNATING A HISTORIC
LANDMARK SUBDISTICT HL16-03 IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 39 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 (APPENDIX "D" OF
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES), DESIGNATING THE AREA
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 6, BLOCK 101, COLLEGE
HEIGHTS ADDITION OF THE ESTHER MOORE SURVEY
AND MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, IN A
DISTRICT ZONED "R-7.5" SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT
REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE
622 EAST WALL STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT
PRESERVATION CRITERIA; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF
THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE
RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE
PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE
DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN
MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED
THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00);
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, an application was made by the Grapevine Historic Preservation
Commission requesting a historic landmark subdistrict designation by making application
for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as
required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and
all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the
case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal
notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing
called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to
whether this requested historic landmark subdistrict designation should be granted or
denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area
immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control,
protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements
and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established
character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to
traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic
reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the
immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this
ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking
and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking
areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on
light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other
facilities; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 39 of Appendix "D" of the Code of
Ordinances have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further considered, among other things, the character
of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view
to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land
throughout this city;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is
a public necessity for the granting of this historic landmark subdistrict, that the public
demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning
changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property
with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was
made; and does find that the historic landmark subdistrict designation lessens the
congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes
health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding
of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of
transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that
there is a necessity and need for this historic landmark subdistrict designation and has also
found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property
surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this
property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that historic landmark subdistrict
designation for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best
interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps
promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community.
- . .
Section 1. That the City does hereby designate a historic landmark subdistrict
(HL16-03) in accordance with Section 39 of Ordinance No. 82-73, being the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas same being also known
as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, in a district zoned "R-7.5" Single
Family District Regulations within the following described property: 622 East Wall Street
and platted as Lot 6, Block 101, College Heights Addition of the Esther Moore Survey,
more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of
hereof; and, in addition thereto, the adoption of the 622 East Wall Street Historic District
Preservation Guidelines as conditions, regulations and safeguards in connection with the
said historic landmark subdistrict, a copy of said criteria being attached hereto and labeled
Exhibit "B".
Ordinance No. 2
Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning
map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the "H" zoning designation.
Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein
above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of
Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City
of Grapevine, Texas.
Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have
been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting
health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been
designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated
to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from
fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent
overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate
provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other
public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial
needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable
consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability
for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging
the most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the
City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said
ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct
conflict with the provisions of this ordinance.
Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be
severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of
land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity
of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein.
Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall
be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum
not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed
committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues.
Section 8. That the fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of
Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace
and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an
emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety
and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective
from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained.
Ordinance No. 3
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 21st day of June, 2016.
William D. Tate
Mayor
ATTEST:
Tara Brooks
City Secretary
John F. Boyle, Jr.
City Attorney
Ordinance No. 4