Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 08 - HL16-05 503 East Worth StreetTO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION nN— FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER J. SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR MEETING DATE: JUNE 21, 2016 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT HL16-05 APPLICANT: Neil & Lorie Payne PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: The subject property is located at 503 East Worth Street and platted as Lots 1, 2 and W Y2 of 3, Block 108, College Heights Addition. REQUESTED HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a Historic Landmark Subdistrict designation for property located at 503 East Worth Street and platted as Lots 1 2 and W Y2 of 3 Block 108 College Heights Addition as the C J Wall House. The Historic Preservation Commission, at their January 27, 2016 meeting adopted the preservation criteria for the subject property, CA16-41 was approved April 14, 2016 to replace two windows and paint the exterior of the residence. This Bungalow style home was built in 1908 by the prolific Grapevine builders Frank and Charles Estill for the C. J. Wall family. The horizontal design of the house and such detailing as the "wings" on the tapering porch columns and the cresting on the roof, lend an air of brisk modernity to the house. The house features a front porch spanning the width of the house which faces south, with two large picture windows flanking the front door. A H L 16-05.4 breezeway attaching the garage to the house was added later. This house is listed as a Contributing Property on the College Heights Historic District listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Two pioneer Grapevine families were joined on Nov. 8, 1906, when Beulah Estill married Clifford Jenkins Wall. They had both been born in Grapevine and were both graduates from Grapevine College. Cliff, son of Zachary Taylor and Virginia A. Wall, had always lived on the corner of Main Street and East Franklin. Beulah was the fourth child of Charles C. and Eleanor Thomas Estill. Cliff and Beulah lived in the home on Main Street until they built a new house in 1908. The new home was on the corner of Worth and Dooley and seemed so far from town that Cliff bought a bicycle to get to and from the drugstore he owned until he sold the store to John Spinks in 1920 and went to work in Farmers National Bank. Their children were Mary Virginia Wall Simmons; Gordon (who died at age 1); Josephine Wall Wright; and James Estill Wall. Their childhood was always spent with `outsiders' in their home. They lived near the Grapevine Public School, so they boarded a teacher or two. Mary Virginia married Hugh Simmons and remained in the Grapevine area; the Simmons were in the dairy business. Mary Virginia graduated from SMU and was a teacher in the Birdville ISD. She was a great community leader and Grapevine historian. Cliff was the brother of long-time Grapevine Mayor B. R. Wall. Their father, Zachary Taylor Wall, was a charter member of the Texas State Pharmaceutical Association founded in Dallas in 1879 to improve the quality of drugs and pharmaceutical services in the state. PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned "R-7.5" Single Family Residential and is currently used as a residential structure. The subject property and the surrounding properties to the north, south, east, and west were zoned "R-1" Single Family District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. --• 0 • 1 • , NORTH: "R-7.5" Single Family Residential — residential structures SOUTH: "R-7.5" Single Family Residential — residential structures EAST: "R-7.5" Single Family Residential — residential structures WEST: "R-7.5" Single Family Residential — residential structures HL16-05.4 2 The subject tract is located within "Zone A" Zone of Minimal Effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" Map. Few activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in "Zone A" except for sound sensitive activities such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The applicant's proposal is an appropriate use in this noise zone. The Master Plan designates the subject property as a "RL" Residential Low Density land use. The applicant's proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan. /sb HL16-05.4 3 U Q LO N s 8 gB Feet 0 50 100 150 200 N �T s a s s w�E s Date Prepared: 6/7/2016 9 Worth E 0 n 1 1i2 4 5 '6 7 PP This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department, Various official and unofficial sources were used to gather this information. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data. however, no guarantee is given or implied as to the accuracy of said data. 1 Exhibit F CITY OF GRAPEVINE HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT APPLICATION APPLICANT/AGENT NAME COMPANY NAME ADDRESS r4 CITY/STATE/ZIP6 A)-(.. -061 WORK PHONE �03 FAX NUMBER APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN SUBJECT PROPERTY -I-) w n 3. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME ADDRESS C I TY/STATE/ZI P WORK PHONE I )ZY 7qb)5 FAX NUMBER 4. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 50!)C_ 4--) 60 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT BLOCK ADDITION SIZE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY-..... --ACRES _SQUARE FEET METES & BOUNDS MUST BE DESCRIBED ON 8 1/2" X 11 SHEET 5. PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION 6. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY J I I 1v fib "yl)n 7. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACING A HISTORICAL LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 0AZCU\F0RMS\APPHlST 10/14 www.ci.grapevineAxus r Exhibit F THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF WILL DETERMINE THE AGENDA FOR EACH OF THE r. PUBLIC HEARING DATES. BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE AGENDA YOUR APPLICATION MAY BE RESCHEDULED TO A LATER DATE. APPLICANT APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER PRINT OWNER SIGNATURE O:\ZCU\FORMS\APPHIST 10/14 www.dgrapevineAx.us The State of County of Exhibit F user re Rme �tv,­ —1— � IV . % V on this day personally appeared known to a (or roved t me on the oath of or through (description of identity card or other document) to be the person whose nam is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under m hand and seal of office this y day of , A. D. SEALFS KATHERINE HUNTER Commission # 128850251 Notary Signature My Commission Expires January 16, 2020 The State of County of Before me on this day personally appeared known to me (or proved to me on the oath of or through (description of identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D. SEAL Notary Signature O:\ZCU\FORMSWPPHIST 10/ 14 www.dgrapevine.tx.us HL16-05 iWai i *I qjjjj 0 �WIRIP EILelorAdreloldel.-TY, R 1. Name Historic C. J. Wall House And/or common Lorie and Neil Payne House 2. Location Address 503 E. Worth St. land survey Esther Moore Location/neighborhood College Heights block/lot 108 – lots 1, 2 and W Y2of 3 tract size 3. Current zoning -- Al Single Familv Category Ownership Status Present Use — district — public x occupied agriculture museum x building(s) x private unoccupied commer- park cial structure work in pro- education _x residence gress site Accessible Entertain- Religious ment yes: re- govern- scientific stricted ment x yes: un- industrial transporta- - restr. tion — no military other 5. Ownership Current owner: Albert Neil and Lorie L. Payne phone: Address: 503 E. Worth St, Grapevine, TX 76051 6. Form Preparation Name & title David Klempin, Hist. Pres. Officer organization: HPP Division – Grapevine CVB Contact: Sallie Andrews, Consultant 817-410-3197 7. Representation on Existing Surveys _1 x Tarrant County Historic Re- sources other X National Register of Historic Places Recorded Texas Historic Landmark Texas Archaeological Landmark for office use only 8. Date Survey Veri- Yes No Rec'd: fied: 9. Field Chk By date: 10. Nomination Archaeological Site Structure District Structure & Site HL16-05 11. Historic Ownershi original owner Clifford Jenkins Wall and Beulah Estill Wall significant later owner(s) D. E. Austin (Main Street pharmacy owner) owned the W % of lot 3 12. Construction Dates Original 1908 alterations/additions 13. Architect original construction Frank and Charles Estill, Builders alterations/additions 14. Site Features natural urban design X 15. Physical Description Condition Check One: Excellent x deteriorat- ed Check One: Unaltered x Original site _ Good _ Ruins — altered _ Moved (date:_) X Fair — unexposed Describe present and original (if known) physical appearance; include style(s) of architecture, current condition and relationship to surrounding fabric (structures, objects, etc.). Elaborate on pertinent materials used and style(s) of architectural detailing, embellishments and site details. C. J. Wall House, c. 1913 1 Bungalow style built in 1908 by the prolific Grapevine builders Frank and Charles Estill. The horizontal design and such detailing as the "wings" on the tapering porch columns and the cresting on the roof lend an air of brisk modernity to the house. The house features a front porch spanning the width which faces south, with two large picture windows flanking the front door. A breezeway attaching the garage to the house was added later. This house is listed as a Contributing Property on the College Heights Historic District listed on the National Register of Historic Places. C. J. Wall House, c. 2002 0Q:��F'i ( Historical Significance Statement of historical and cultural significance. Include: cultural influences, special events and important personages, influences on neighborhood, on the city, etc. Two pioneer Grapevine families were joined on Nov. 8, 1906, when Beulah Estill married Clifford Jenkins Wall. They had both been born in Grapevine and were both graduates from Grapevine College. Cliff, son of Zachary Taylor and Virginia A. Wall, had always lived on the corner of Main Street and East Franklin. Beulah was the fourth child of Charles C. and Eleanor Thomas Estill. Cliff and Beulah lied in the home on Main Street until they built a new house in 1908. The new home was on the corner of Worth and Dooley and seemed so far from town that Cliff bought a bicycle to get to and from the drugstore he owned until he sold the store to John Spinks in 1920 and went to work in Farmers National Bank. Their children were Mary Virginia Wall Simmons; Gordon (who died at age 1); Josephine Wall Wright; and James Estill Wall. Their childhood was always spent with `outsiders' in their home. They lived near the Grapevine Public School, so they boarded a teacher or two. Evenings were spent with piano music, reading and card games. Josephine and her family moved to Beaumont where she was a teacher; James was a WWII fighter pilot in P51 fighter planes over China - Burma -India. He was shot down in 1944 and became a prisoner of the Japanese until the war was over. Mary Virginia married Hugh Simmons and remained in the Grapevine area; the Simmons were in the dairy business. Mary Virginia graduated from SMU and was a teacher in the Birdville ISD. She was a great community leader and Grapevine historian. Cliff was the brother of long-time Grapevine Mayor B. R. Wall. Their father, Zachary Taylor Wall, was a charter member of the Texas State Pharmaceutical Association founded in Dallas in 1879 to improve the quality of drugs and phar- maceutical services in the state. C. J. Wall House in Background, photo 1910 HL16-05 Corner of Porch on left, C. J. Wall House, photo 1910 1i &1 0.11 Mo =T, Grapevine Area History book; Tarrant County Historical Resources Survey book. 17.Attachments X District or Site map Site Plan x Photos (historic & current) Additional descriptive mate- rial Footnotes Other 1 Desiqnation Merit A. Character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural charac- teristics of the City of Grapevine, State of Texas of the United States. B. Location as the site of a significant historical event. x G. Identification as the work of x an architect or master builder whose individual work has influenced the de- velopment of the city. C. Identification with a person x or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the city. D. Exemplification of the cul- x tural, economic, social or historical heritage of the city E. Portrayal of the environment of a group of people in an era of history characterized by a distinctive architectural style. F. Embodiment of distinguish- x ing characteristics of an ar- chitectural type or speci- men. H. Embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent a signifi- cant architectural innova- tion. Relationship to other dis- x tinctive buildings, sites or areas which are eligible for preservation according to a plan based on historic, cul- tural or architectural motif. J. Unique location of singular physical characteristics rep- resenting an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, community or the city. K. Archaeological value in that it has produced or can be expected to produce data affecting theories of historic or prehistoric value. L. Value as an aspect of x community sentiment or public pride. Recommendation The Grapevine Township Revitalization Program requests the Grapevine Histor- ic Preservation Commission to deem this nominated landmark meritorious of designation as outlined in Chapter 39, City of Grapevine Comprehensive Zon- ing Ordinance. Further, the Grapevine Historic Preser- vation Commission endorses the Preservation Criteria, policy recommen- dations and landmark boundary as pre- sented by the City of Grapevine Devel- opment Services Department. Burl Gilliam, Chair Grapevine Historic Preservation Commis- sion David Klempin Historic Preservation Officer Scott Williams, Director Development Services Department Historical Marker The Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission and the Grapevine Historical Society have a cooperative marker program for properties that are officially (individually or lo- cated within) designated Historic Landmark Sub -districts. Please indicate if you are in- terested in obtaining one or both markers for your property. There is no fee for either of the markers, however, the Grapevine Historical Society will only fund two (2) of the me- dallion and text plaque (second option), per year, on a first come, first serve basis. Check One: o Yes, I am interested in obtaining a bronze Historic Landmark Plaque for my property from the Historic Preservation Commission. I understand there is no fee for this plaque. o No, I am not interested in obtaining a marker for my property. o Yes, I am interested in obtaining a bronze Historic Marker (medallion and text plaque) for my property from the Grapevine Historical Society. Below for office use only 1 Ile lhedin., Ihiine i� Iacal(•d in the ('olligc tiU ecl ! lig Wi ie Uiw ii I. dc6i,nand h� file S Clapoiul Ilisiolix• Pr("el'alion(buttai"I'M. 1998 o Historic Preservation Commission's o Historic Preservation Commission's Historic Landmark Plaque. Historic District Plaque. HL16-05 o Grapevine Historical Society's Historic Landmark Marker. ,1'0,11 wa 11 (D] I o Historic Landmark o Historic District o Historic Landmark o Historic District Marker, existing Marker, existing Marker, new GHS Marker, new GHS marker. GHS marker. marker. GHS marker. House 503 East Worth Grapevine, Grapevine Township Revitalization Project, Inc. City of Grapevine 636 South Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 .6 1 PREFACE I. SITE ■ Setbacks ■ Driveways, Parking Lots ■ Service and Mechanical Areas ■ Fences ■ Preservation ■ Exterior Finishes ■ Windows ■ Awnings -Canopies ■ Exterior Lighting Infill Additions to Historic Buildings Page 2 C. J. Wall House Bungalow style built in 1908 by the prolific Grapevine builders Frank and Charles Estill. The horizontal design and such detailing as the "wings" on the tapering porch columns and the cresting on the roof lend an air of brisk modernity to the house. The house features a front porch spanning the width which faces south, with two large picture windows flanking the front door. A breezeway attaching the garage to the house was added later. Page 3 This house is listed as a Contributing Property on the College Heights Historic District listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Two pioneer Grapevine families were joined on Nov. 8, 1906, when Beulah Estill married Clifford Jenkins Wall. They had both been born in Grapevine and were both graduates from Grapevine College. Cliff, son of Zachary Taylor and Virginia A. Wall, had always lived on the corner of Main Street and East Franklin. Beulah was the fourth child of Charles C. and Eleanor Thomas Estill. Cliff and Beulah lied in the home on Main Street until they built a new house in 1908. The new home was on the corner of Worth and Dooley and seemed so far from town that Cliff bought a bicycle to get to and from the drugstore he owned until he sold the store to John Spinks in 1920 and went to work in Farmers National Bank. Their children were Mary Virginia Wall Simmons; Gordon (who died at age 1); Josephine Wall Wright; and James Estill Wall. Their childhood was always spent with `outsiders' in their home. They lived near the Grapevine Public School, so they boarded a teacher or two. Evenings were spent with piano music, reading and card games. Josephine and her family moved to Beaumont where she was a teacher; James was a WWII fighter pilot in P51 fighter planes over China -Burma -India. He was shot down in 1944 and became a prisoner of the Japanese until the war was over. Mary Virginia married Hugh Simmons and remained in the Grapevine area; the Simmons were in the dairy business. Mary Virginia graduated from SMU and was a teacher in the Birdville ISD. She was a great community leader and Grapevine historian. Cliff was the brother of long-time Grapevine Mayor B. R. Wall. Their father, Zachary Taylor Wall, was a charter member of the Texas State Pharmaceutical Association founded in Dallas in 1879 to improve the quality of drugs and pharmaceutical services in the state. C. J. Wall House in Background, photo 1910 Page 4 Corner of Porch on left, C. J. Wall House, photo 1910 wo Retain the historic relationships between buildings, landscaping features and open space. Avoid rearranging the site by moving or removing buildings and site features, such as walks, drives and fences, which help define the residence's historic value. Building setbacks should be consistent with adjacent buildings or with the style of the building. Setbacks are an important ingredient in creating an attractive streetscape. Buildings should be set back to a line that is consistent with their neighbors and land use. For example, a residential setback should retain the setback of adjacent and nearby structures, with landscaping along the street right-of-way. Residential buildings with a commercial use in residential areas should be set back in a manner consistent with setbacks of neighboring or similar residential structures. Maintain building orientation pattern, with the front facade facing the street. Maintain spacing patterns between buildings. DRIVEWAYS, PARKING LOTS AND VACANT SITES Driveways should be located perpendicular to the street; no circular drives shall be allowed (unless proven with historic documentation) in front or corner side yard, so that the character of the landscaped yard can be reinforced. New parking lots for commercial uses should not be located adjacent to sidewalks in the district. Off-street parking lots should not be allowed to interrupt the continuity of landscaped front or corner side yards. This is important to both the preservation of historic character, and to the strengthening of the residential district. Screen existing parking lots from streets and pedestrian areas in the Historic District. Page 5 Existing parking lots located adjacent to streets and sidewalks may be screened to the height of car hoods. This will provide a certain level of continuity of the building fagade line; it will screen unsightly views; and it will provide a level of security by allowing views to and from the sidewalk. IJ4,01 Historically, fences around historic houses defined yards and the boundary around property and gardens. Wood picket fences, wood rail fences and barbed wire or decorative wire fences were the common fence types in Grapevine. Traditionally, picket fences surrounded the front of the house while rail and wire fences surrounded the agricultural portions of the property. Maintain historic fences. New fences. Simple wood picket fences, wood and wire and wrought iron fences are appropriate. Avoid chain-link fences, privacy fences and concrete block fences for the street sides of property. Wood privacy fences may be allowed when installed in the rear yard and behind the front fagade of a property. Utilitarian/privacy fences should not be installed in front of a historic building or beyond the line of the front fagade of a historic building. Replacing fences. If replacement is required due to deterioration, remove only those portions of historic fences that are damaged beyond repair and replace in-kind, matching the original in material, design and placement. If replacement is necessary for non -historic fences, or new fences are proposed, locate and design the fence in such a way that will compliment the historic boundary of the property without concealing the historic character of the property. I D MECHANICAL AREAS Service and mechanical areas and equipment should be screened from the street and other pedestrian areas. All garbage and equipment storage areas should be screened from the street. Mechanical equipment, including satellite dishes, shall not be located in front or corner side yards or should be set back from the edges of roofs, and screened so that they are not visible to pedestrians and do not detract from the historic character of buildings. 1-:011111Z ,.. Preserve, stabilize, and restore original building form, ornament and materials. Any missing or severely deteriorated elements may be replaced with replicas of the original. Ensure that roof, window, porch and cornice treatments are preserved, or when preservation is not possible duplicate the original building element. Page 6 When rehabilitating, remove non -historic alterations Often, "modern" renovations conceal the original facade details. If not, the original style may be recreated through the use of historic photographs. Where replication of original elements is not possible, a new design consistent with the original style of the building may be used. Reconstruction of building elements should reflect the size, scale, material and level of detail of the original design. Preserve older renovations that have achieved historic significance. Older structures or additions may have, at some time, been renovated with such care and skill that the renovation itself is worthy of preservation. Usually, such renovations may date from before 1940. EXTERIOR FINISHES Original wood finishes should be maintained and painted or, when necessary, replaced in kind. Modern synthetic siding materials such as vinyl or metal bear little resemblance to historic siding materials. The application of such modern synthetic materials often involves the removal of original decorative elements such as cornice, corner boards, brackets, window and door trim, etc. New synthetic siding shall not be installed; removal of existing such materials is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish and appearance. Original asbestos siding should be maintained and painted, or when necessary, replaced with synthetic siding to match the existing asbestos siding. The removal of asbestos siding over existing wood siding is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish and appearance. Original masonry surfaces should be maintained and not be painted, unless severe deterioration of the brick or stone can be shown to require painting. If the color or texture of replacement brick or stone cannot be matched with existing, painting may be an appropriate treatment. Paint colors should be complimentary to each other and the overall character of the house. When possible, research the original paint color and finishes of the building's historic period; the right colors respect the historic building. The Historic Preservation Commission shall adopt, as necessary, a paint palette(s) appropriate to the district's character, which may be proposed and approved through the Minor Exterior Alteration application process. Any colors proposed outside the adopted palette may be reviewed by the Commission in the regular Certificate of Appropriateness process. Page 7 Original window framing and liter (panes of glass) configurations should be preserved and maintained or replaced in kind. When replacement is necessary, do so within existing historic opening. Replacement of non -original windows should consider the use of historically appropriate wood windows. Use same sash size to avoid filling in or enlarging the original opening. Clear or very slightly tinted window glass may be used. No reflective or heavily tinted glass shall be used. Should the owner wish to install security bars, they should be installed on the interior of windows and doors. Storm windows. The use of interior storm windows is encouraged. Storm windows are available which can be installed on the interior of windows. This helps to preserve the exterior historic character of the building. Should storm windows need to be installed on the exterior of the historic windows, storm windows constructed of wood and configured to match the historic sashes (i.e. one over one sashes) are recommended. If metal storm windows are installed, paint to blend with surrounding elements. •: New awnings and canopies should not be installed above windows or doors. Lighting is an important element in residential areas. Fixtures should be consistent with the historic character of the house. Appropriate incandescent light fixtures to the style of the district should be used. Avoid exposed lighting of any kind unless part of a historic fixture. r • • The Secretary of the Interior's guidelines for new buildings in historic districts encourage similarity of form and materials, but not actual replication. New construction proposals and the rehabilitation of non -historic buildings will be reviewed based on these Criteria. Judgement will be based on the compatibility of the design within the context of the property's adjacent and nearby historic buildings. Page 8 The design of new buildings should have key elements of the building's historic period of significance including massing, scale, fenestration and materials. Infill buildings should not be absolute reproductions, and appear as clearly contemporary. Only when a previously demolished historic Grapevine building can be accurately replicated may a reproduction be considered. Infill buildings between historic buildings should be similar in setback, roof form, cornice line and materials, to one of the adjacent buildings. Relate height of new building to the heights of adjacent structures. Avoid new buildings that tower over existing ones. Horizontal wood siding (novelty, tongue and groove, shiplap or equivalent) and brick are appropriate exterior building finishes for the historic house. Fake brick or stone or gravel aggregate materials shall never be used. Additions to historic buildings should replicate the style of the main building if possible; otherwise they should adhere to the general style with simplified details. As a minimum, new additions should reflect the massing, roof shape, bay spacing, cornice lines and building materials of the primary structure. All new wood or metal materials should have a painted finish except on some 20th century buildings where the use of unpainted aluminum or steel was part of the original design and should be maintained. A new addition should, if at all possible, be located at the rear of the historic building. If this is not possible, the addition may be added to the side if it is recessed at least 18 inches from the historic building facade or a connection is used to separate old from new. New vertical additions should be set back from primary facades so as not to be readily apparent from the facing street. When reproducing elements that were originally part of a historic building they should be replicated when evidence of the actual detail has been documented by photographs, drawings, or remaining physical evidence. If no evidence exists, elements typical of the architectural style may be used. Historic photographs can provide information on the original elements of the building. Page 9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, DESIGNATING A HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTICT HL16-05 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 39 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 (APPENDIX "D" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES), DESIGNATING THE AREA LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1, 2 AND Y/2 3, BLOCK 108, COLLEGE HEIGHTS ADDITION OF THE ARCHIBALD LEONARD SURVEY AND MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, IN A DISTRICT ZONED "R-7.5" SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE C J WALL HOUSE HISTORIC DISTRICT PRESERVATION CRITERIA; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made by the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission requesting a historic landmark subdistrict designation by making application for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested historic landmark subdistrict designation should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 39 of Appendix "D" of the Code of Ordinances have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered, among other things, the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this historic landmark subdistrict, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the historic landmark subdistrict designation lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this historic landmark subdistrict designation and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that historic landmark subdistrict designation for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby designate a historic landmark subdistrict (HL16-05) in accordance with Section 39 of Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, in a district zoned "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations within the following described property: 503 East Worth Street and platted as Lots 1, 2 and Y2 3, Block 108, College Heights Addition of the Archibald Leonard Survey, more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of hereof; and, in addition thereto, the adoption of the C J Wall Historic District Preservation Guidelines as conditions, regulations and safeguards in connection with the said historic landmark subdistrict, a copy of said criteria being attached hereto and labeled Exhibit "B". Ordinance No. 2 Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the "H" zoning designation. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. That the fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. Ordinance No. 3 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 21st day of June, 2016. William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Tara Brooks City Secretary FTAI John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney Ordinance No. 4