HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 03 - HL05-04 420 East Wall Streetcc MM 3 a2 t
Pfz� z
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, ACTING CITY MANAGER
H.T. HARDY, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MEETING DATE:
SUBJECT:
;'------------`
Grapevine
Lake
ooze R'I.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2005
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF
HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT HL05-04
i.
r r
i
APPLICANT: Craig and George Hurst
PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE:
The subject property is located at 420 East Wall
Street and is platted as Lot 5R, Block 1, G.E. Hurst
Addition. The addition contains approximately
17,000 square feet and has approximately 80 feet of
frontage along East Wall Street.
REQUESTED HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT AND COMMENTS:
The applicant is requesting a Historic Landmark Subdistrict designation for the property
addressed at 420 East Wall Street and platted as Lot 5R, Block 1, G.E. Hurst Addition, to
be known as the 420 East Wall Street Subdistrict.
The Historic Preservation Commission at their May 25, 2005 meeting adopted the
preservation criteria for the 420 East Wall Street Subdistrict. Preservation criteria for this
proposed district addressing such issues as setbacks, driveways, parking, exterior finishes
and other architectural embellishments were established by the Historic Preservation
Commission to preserve the historic integrity of the property. See the attached preservation
criteria.
This request was tabled at the August 16, 2005 meeting to give the owners time to meet
with Staff to further discuss the implications of the historic overlay on the property and to
0:\ZCU\HL05-04.42 1 September 13, 2005 (9:52AM)
clarify the procedures in which the preservation criteria was established. The following is
a brief overview of events relative to the establishment of the historic overlay for 420 East
Wall Street:
• May 25: The Historic Preservation Commission approved, with conditions, the
request for Certificate of Appropriateness (CA) for demolition, CA#05-38, of the
existing duplex with the condition that the Commission approve Historic Landmark
Subdistrict HL 05-04.
At the same meeting the Commission approved the proposed Historic Landmark
Subdistrict overlay. This HL application was submitted by Craig E. Hurst and
George A. Hurst, the property owners, and Norman Barfield, the buyer. However,
only Craig and George Hurst signed the application.
• July 27: The Historic Preservation Commission approved, with conditions, CA#05-
52, plans for construction of a new house at 420 East Wall Street. The conditions
were that the five windows on the front of the house and the kitchen window on the
east side of the house, those six windows visible from the street, be wood clad
windows.
The applicant was not pleased with the Commission's decision. Through their
attorney, Jon Michael Franks, the Barfields contacted Burl Gilliam, HPC Chairman,
and Bruno Rumbelow, Acting City Manager, stating that staffs comments during the
meeting regarding wood windows were not consistent with the Design Guidelines.
The applicant asked Bruno Rumbelow to have the Historic Landmark Subdistrict
recommendation tabled on the City Council's agenda.
August 31: At Bruno's recommendation, at the August 31 meeting under old
business, the staff spoke to the Historic Preservation Commissioners clarifying the
wording of the Design Guidelines. Staff clarified that while wood windows are not
specifically required by the Design Guidelines, the Commissioners are charged to
make appropriate decisions based on the adjacent and nearby historic properties.
It is the opinion of staff that wood windows would be the appropriate selection
based on the adjacent historic homes (Deacon, Forbes, Millican and Hurst). Burl
Gilliam asked each Commissioner if he or she felt that the clarification would bring
forth any change in their decision of July 27. Only one Commissioner voted that the
clarification might change his decision; all others confirmed their original vote.
• September 7: Marcia Barfield contacted Bruno Rumbelow on September 7th
and
said they were ready to move forward with the project but had a couple issues.
Bruno asked Sallie Andrews to write a letter to the Barfields expressing staffs
pleasure in working with them on the project and reviewing the CA procedures.
• September 8: Marcia Barfield called Sallie Andrews on September 8th
and stated
that they did not want their house to be a Landmarked property, Sallie explained
0:\ZCU\HL05-04.42 2 September 14, 2005 (3:58PM)
that if a demolition was to take place, that the Historic Overlay would be required.
Sallie also explained that no historic marker would have to be placed on the house –
but it would still be considered a Landmarked property.
September 9: Marcia Barfield contacted Bruno Rumbelow on September 9th
to ask
for another meeting with staff regarding their concerns about the project and
procedures.
The property is currently zoned "R-7.5" Single Family District. A non-contributing structure
has been approved for demolition by the Historic Preservation Commission at the May 25,
2005 meeting.
The subject property and the properties to the south, east, and west were zoned "R-1"
Single Family District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. The property to the north was zoned
"C-2" Community Business District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning.
SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE:
NORTH: "HC" Highway Commercial District—commercial property; former
location for Grapevine Kawasaki
SOUTH: "R-7.5" Single Family Residential District—single family property
EAST: "R-7.5" Single Family Residential District—single family property
WEST: "R-7.5" Single Family Residential District—single family property
M.AZA, 00i Z -Val T..
I
The subject tract is located within "Zone A" Zone of Minimal Effect as defined on the
"Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" Map. Few
activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in "Zone A" except for sound sensitive activities
such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The applicant's proposal
is an appropriate use in this noise zone.
MASTER PLAN APPLICATION:
The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Residential Low Density land use.
The applicant's proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan.
/rs
0AZCU\HL05-04.42 3 September 13, 2005 (9:52AM)
CO
��M'
L1,1
2
P�sffi y 7� 6e
2 i
5 �
TR 4981 A
TR R 49H 4 H3OT 4TRR49 9 42m H2 1 29
AG 4
rad®PpllAo
�
1R1
3.188
�z
2
p3
�a s5��3
sr°pp�o 1
HC
TR wv
TR 49B1 Bz TR TR 48
4V Im 2 4A
sv� 44 r'
TR TR TR 44 A
41 42 44A 43 44C f ~
21i w Ni.205 311 .m. uP�� 1 1"'� 1 418
PC Gw"
flo
601
2
8.50 @ �`✓
E NORTHWEST
i
,® 1
TR28D6A .23
520
1.53
TFC-
p�F
26 I
HfD L
TR 26D8
4 6 6 7 E8GRAPEVINE
��.`tsv���t+ mow•..♦209
�...`.`�t�...♦IR
TEXASS
TR 61
PT
O
5 -DE
r •
r:
�
i.
+,...v.'N
628
5 -DE
.28 AC
•
AC
S PT
307
1 inch equals 200 feet
84
02 I INS
II
HL05-04
420 East Wall Street
�mm
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT APPLICATION
I APPLICANT/AGENT NAME Craig Hurst and George Hurst
COMPANY NAME
ADDRESS 420 East Wall Street
CITY/STATE/ZIP Grapevine, Texas 76051
WORK PHONE 817410-3197 FAX NUMBER 817 410-3125
2. APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN SUBJECT PROPERTY. Owner
3. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME Craig Hurst and George Hurst
ADDRESS 420 East Wall Street
CITY/STATE/ZIP Gral2evine, Texas 76051
WORK PHONE 817 917-0928 FAX NUMBER
1
4. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION
420 East Wall Street
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 5R, BLOCK. I -,ADDITION G.E. Hurst Addition
•
ACRES MW (6,90 SQUARE FEET
METES & BOUNDS MUST BE DESCRIBED ON 8 1/2" X 11" SHEET
5. PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION R-7.5
6. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Residential
0AZCU\F0RMS\APPHlST 2 1/99
www.ci.grapevine.tx.us
SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACING A HISTORICAL
LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF WILL DETERMINE THE AGENDA FOR EACH OF THE
PUBLIC HEARING DATES. BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE AGENDA, YOUR APPLICATION MAY BE
RESCHEDULED TO A LATER DATE.
ammumi
APPLICANT SIGNATURE
OWNER (PRINT)
OWNER SIGNATURE
State of
0AZCU\F0RMS\APPHlST 3 1/99
www.ci.grapevine.tx.us
,ounty of
Before me on this day r)ersonallv aDDeared
kDown-Ao--me-dor proved to me on the oath of
or through , L. L- - (description of
identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument
and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein
expressed.
Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A. D.
SEn*
.n CHARLY BERRY NOTARY PUBLIC -TEXAS
My COMMISSION EXPIRES
JULY 17, 2007
The State of
ounty of
-Notary Sigr'ature
Before me on this day personally appeared
known to me (or proved to me on the oath of
or through (description of
identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument
and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein
expressed.
Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D.
SEAL
Notary Signature
0AZCU1F0RMS\APPH1ST 4 1/99
www.ci.grapevineAx.us
1. Name "420 East Wall Street"
Historic Hurst Residence
And/or common
2. Location
Address 420 East Wall St. land survev
Location/neighborhood block/lot Blk. 1, Iot 5R, G.E. Hurst Addition tract size 12,600 S.f.
3. Current zoning
"R-7.5" Single Family District
4. Classification
Category
_ district
_ building(s)
structure
x site
Ownership
public
x private
Accessible
yes: restricted
yes: unrestr.
no
Status
x occupied
_ unoccupied
x work in progress
Present Use
_ agriculture
commercial
_ education
_ Entertainment
_ government
_ industrial
military
5. Ownership
Current owner. Craig Hurst and George Hurst phone: 817 410-3197
Address: 1823 Forestdale Dr city: Grapevine state: Texas zip: 76051
_ museum
park
residence
_ Religious
_ scientific
_ transportation
_ other
6. Form Preparation
Name & title David Klemin, HP Officer Organization: Grapevine Township Revitalization Project, Inc.
Contact: David Klemvin phone: 817 410-3197
7. Representation on Existing Surveys
Tarrant County Historic Resources
other
_ National Register of Historic Places
_ Recorded Texas Historic Landmark
Texas Archaeological Landmark
for office use only
8. Date Rec'd: Survey Verified: Yes No
9. Field Chk date:
By:
10. Nomination
Archaeological Structure District
x Site Structure & Site
11. Historic Ownership
original owner George Hurst
later owner(s) Same
12. Construction Dates N/A
Original
alterations /additions
13. Architect N/A
construction
alterations/ additions
14. Site Features
Natural
urban
Condition Check One: Check One:
— excellent x deteriorated — Unaltered Original site x
good ruins — altered _ Moved (date: )
_ fair _ unexposed
Describe present and original (if known) physical appearance; include styles) of architecture, current condition and relationship to
surrounding fabric (structure., objects, etc.). Elaborate on pertinent materials used and style(r) of architectural detailing, embel-
lishments and site details
This residential duplex, according to county tax records, was constructed in 1950 by local builder George E. Hurst Jr for
his family. It is representative of Grapevine's typically smaller middle class housing found throughout the city from the
period shortly after World War Il. It is built in the popular minimal traditional ranch style of the early 1950's. The gable
roof pitch is a shallow 4'/z to 12. The design of the exterior is asymetrical with projecting gabled pavillions offset to the
left on the front elevation. Decorative wood posts support the porch roof and wood railings adorn the porch. The win-
dows are made of wood.
Staff review of the duplex is that it is not of architectural significance. A recent property survey reveiled that the house
is located approximately 4 feet from the side property line on the north making it non -conforming to current zoning that
requires 6 feet from side property lines. The duplex is in poor condition but could be rehabilitated.
A buyer, has signed a letter of intent with the owners Craig Hurst and George Hurst to purchase the property with plans
to demolish the existing duplex and to replace it with a new period -style house. The buyer has submitted documentation
of existing conditions, proposed costs for renovation and has addressed re -use of the structure.
Evidence has been submitted indicating that renovating the duplex to serve as a family home is not feasible and would
pose a hardship for the buyer. The new structure will be designed to be compatible with the character of Grapevine's
historic housing. Staff will bring the proposed design to the commission as a separate Certificate of Appropriateness
once the plans are deemed compatible.
420 East Wail Street
Rear Elevation
16. Historical Significance
Statement of historical and cultural significance. Include. cultural influences, special events and important personages, influencer on
neighborhood, on the city, etc.
The significance of the property has to do with its association with the Hurst family. Research by staff on the
history of the property revealed that the land was once part of a 40 acre tract owned by the Hurst family. In the
1940's Block 1 of the Mrs. G. E. Hurst addition was subdivided into eight lots. Lot 5R became the building site
for the duplex. George E. Hurst Jr., a local builder, constructed it for his family to live in.
The Hurst family resided there until they moved out of Grapevine in 1958. The duplex has served as rental
property since that time. George and Craig Hurst, sons of G. E. Hurst Jr., inherited the property when their
mother died in 2000. They lived in the duplex during their early childhood years.
17. Bibliography
Tarrant Countv Clerk's Office. Deed Records.
Tarrant County Historical Commission. Union Title and Trust Company, Fort Worth and Tarrant County Abstract
Company Collection
Young, Chanes, H. Grapevine Arra History, Dallas, Texas, Taylor Publishing Co., 1979
18. Attachments
_ District or Site map Additional descriptive material
x Site Plan Footnotes
x photos (historic & current) Other (
19. Designation Merit
A. Character, interest or value as part of
the development, heritage or cultural
characteristics of the City of Grape-
vine, State of Texas of the United
States.
B. Location as the site of a significant
historical event.
C. Identification with a person or persons
who significantly contributed to the
culture and development of the city.
D. Exemplification of the cultural, eco-
nomic, social or historical heritage of
the city
E. Portrayal of the environment of a
group of people in an era of history
characterized by a distinctive archi-
tectural style.
F. Embodiment of distinguishing char-
acteristics of an architectural type or
specimen.
20. Recommendation
The Grapevine Township Revitalization Program re-
quests the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commis-
sion to deem this nominated landmark meritorious of
designation as outlined in Chapter 39, City of Grape-
vine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
Further, the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commis-
sion endorses the Preservation Criteria, policy recom-
mendations and landmark boundary as presented by
the City of Grapevine Development Services Depart-
ment.
G. Identification as the work of an archi-
tect or master builder whose individual
work has influenced the development
of the city.
H. Embodiment of elements of architec-
tural design, detail, materials or
craftsmanship which represent a sig-
nificant architectural innovation.
I. Relationship to other distinctive x
buildings, sites or areas which are eli-
gible for preservation according to a
plan based on historic, cultural or ar-
chitectural motif
x J. Unique location of singular physical
characteristics representing an estab-
lished and familiar visual feature of a
neighborhood, community or the city.
K Archaeological value in that it has
produced or can be expected to pro-
duce data affecting theories of historic
or prehistoric value.
L. Value as an aspect of community sen-
timent or public pride.
Burl Gilliam, Chair
Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission
David Klempin,
Historic Preservation Officer
Tommy Hardy, Director
Development Services Department
21. Historical Marker
The Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission and the Grapevine Historical Society have a cooperative marker pro-
gram for properties that are officially (individually or located within) designated Historic Landmark Sub -districts. Please
indicate if you are interested in obtaining one or both markers for your property. There is no fee for either of the mark-
ers, however, the Grapevine Historical Society will only fund two (2) of the medallion and text plaque (second option),
per year, on a first come, first serve basis.
Check One:
❑ Yes, I am interested in obtaining a bronze Historic Landmark Plaque for my property
from the Historic Preservation Commission. I understand there is no fee for this plaque.
❑ No, I am not interested in obtaining a marker for my property.
❑ Yes, I am interested in obtaining a bronze Historic Marker (medallion and text plaque) for
my property from the Grapevine Historical Society.
Below for office use only
❑ Historic Preservation Commission's
Historic Landmark Plaque.
❑ Historic Preservation Commission's
Historic District Plaque.
❑ Grapevine Historical Society's
Historic Landmark Marker.
0 Historic Landmark Marker, ❑ Historic District Marker, CI Historic Landmark Marker, ❑ Historic District Marker,
existing GHS marker. existing GHS marker. new GHS marker. new GHS marker.
Desiqn Guidelines
420 East Wail Street
Historic Landmark Subdistrict
Grapevine, Texas
Grapevine Township Revitalization Project, Inc.
City of Grapevine
200 S. Main
Grapevine, Texas 76051
May 25, 2005
Table of Contents
1. SITE
■ Setbacks Driveways,
■ Parking Lots
■ Service and Mechanical Areas
■ Fences
MIIIIE� Ma
• Preservation
■ Exterior Finishes
■ Windows
111. EMBELLISHMENTS
■ Awnings -Canopies
■ Exterior Lighting
IV. NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
■ Infill
• Additions to Historic Buildings
V. EXISTING NON-CONTRIBUTING BUILDINGS
• Minor changes
• Major alterations
• Demolitions
• Building replacement
Page 2
0AHistoric Preservation CornmissionDesign Guidelines for HUMguidelines 420 E Wall StreeLdoc
Preface
The 420 East Wall Street Historic Landmark Subdistrict is established to retain the historic
integrity and cultural history of this important portion of East Wall Street.
Period of Significance
The period of significance for the district is 1882-1956, the years documented with the
county as being the construction dates for property within the historic Township. Allowing a
property to authentically tell the story of its own period and time, while reinforcing the
historical period of significance with necessary preservation, rehabilitation and restoration,
is the goal of the historic landmark designation. The preservation of original architectural
features, especially windows, doors, porch and siding, is preferred, rather than
"modernization" or "updating" of older features, or imposing a false "historical look" on
newer features.
The repair of original materials, rather than their replacement can best preserve the historic
character of the property. If non -original materials are replaced, then care should be taken
to install original (in-kind) materials. Repair and restoration is often more cost effective
than replacement, conserves energy and reduces the amount of trash added to landfills.
New construction (additions or rehabilitation) to an existing home should reflect the
character of the home during its period of significance. Massing, roof shapes, porch
configurations and materials that reflect the architectural character of the home during its
historic period should be preserved. The design of any new architectural features shall
have key elements of the primary historic style already existing in the home and shall be
clearly compatible with and complementary to its adjacent features.
Any exterior modifications to buildings and properties within the Historic Landmark
Subdistrict are required to conform to the City of Grapevine's preservation ordinances
governing these buildings and properties and with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards
for the Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings. The Historic Preservation Commission handbook
"Design Guidelines for Historic Commercial and Residential Properties" (adopted
November 2003), explains the preservation ordinances and design criteria that has been
adopted by the City of Grapevine. The handbook's guidelines should be used by those
planning new construction or additions to historic properties in the 420 East Wall Street
Historic Landmark Subdistrict.
SITE
Retain the historic relationships between buildings, landscaping features and open space.
Avoid rearranging the site by moving or removing buildings and site features, such as
walks, drives and fences, that help define the residence's historic value.
SETBACKS
Building setbacks should be consistent with adjacent buildings or with the style of the
Page 3
0AHistoric Preservation CommissionlDesign Guidelines for HL's)guidelines 420 E Wall Street.doc
building. Setbacks are an important ingredient in creating an attractive streetscape.
Buildings should be set back to a line that is consistent with their neighbors and land use.
For example, a residential setback should retain the setback of adjacent and nearby
structures, with landscaping along the street right-of-way.
Residential buildings with a commercial use in residential areas shall be set back in a
manner consistent with setbacks of adjacent or neighboring residential structures.
Maintain building orientation pattern, with the front facade facing the street. Maintain
spacing patterns between buildings.
DRIVEWAYS, PARKING LOTS AND VACANT SITES
Driveways should be located perpendicular to the street; no circular drives shall be allowed
(unless proven with historic documentation) in front or corner side yard, so that the
character of the landscaped yard can be reinforced.
New parking lots for commercial uses should not be located adjacent to sidewalks in the
district.
Off-street parking lots should not be allowed to interrupt the continuity of landscaped front
or corner side yards. This is important to both the preserving of the historic character, and
to the strengthening of the residential district.
Screen existing parking lots from streets and pedestrian areas in the Historic Landmark
Subdistrict. Existing parking lots located adjacent to streets and sidewalks should be
screened to the height of car hoods. This will provide a certain level of continuity of the
building facade line; it will screen unsightly views; and it will provide a level of security by
allowing views to and from the sidewalk.
FENCES
Historically, fences around houses defined yards and the boundary around property and
gardens. Wood picket fences, wood rail fences and barbed wire or decorative wire fences
were the common fence types in Grapevine. Traditionally, picket fences surrounded the
front of the house while rail and wire fences surrounded the agricultural portions of the
property. Maintain historic fences.
New fences. Simple wood picket fences, wood and wire and wrought iron fences are
appropriate. Avoid chain-link fences, privacy fences and concrete block fences for the
street sides of property. Wood privacy fences may be allowed when installed in the rear
yard and behind the front facade of a property. Utilitarian/privacy fences should not be
installed in front of a historic building or beyond the line of the front facade of a historic
building.
Replacing fences. If replacement is required due to deterioration, remove only those
portions of historic fences that are damaged beyond repair and replace in-kind, matching
the original in material, design and placement. If replacement is necessary for non -historic
Page 4
O:Wistoric Preservation commissionDesign Guidelines for HL'Mguidelines 420 E Wall Streetdoc
fences, or new fences are proposed, locate and design the fence in such a way that will
compliment the historic boundary of the property without concealing the historic character
of the property.
Service and mechanical areas and equipment should be screened from the street and
other pedestrian areas.
All garbage and equipment storage areas should be screened from the street.
Mechanical equipment, including satellite dishes, shall not be located in front or comer side
yards or should be set back from the edges of roofs, and screened so that they are not
visible to pedestrians and do not detract from the historic character of buildings.
1-11114QI k,[e33�
Preserve, stabilize, and restore original building form, ornament and materials.
Any missing or severely deteriorated elements may be replaced with replicas of the
original. Ensure that roof, window, porch and cornice treatments are preserved or when
preservation is not possible, duplicate the original building element.
When rehabilitating, remove non -historic alterations.
Often, "modern" renovations conceal the original facade details. If not, the original style
may be recreated through the use of historic photographs.
Where replication of original elements is not possible, a new design consistent with the
original style of the building may be used.
Reconstruction of building elements should reflect the size, scale, material and level of
detail of the original design.
Preserve older renovations that have achieved historic significance. Older structures or
additions may have, at some time, been renovated with such care and skill that the
renovation itself is worthy of preservation. Usually, such renovations may date from before
1940.
EXTERIOR FINISHES
Original wood finishes should be maintained and painted or, when necessary, replaced in
kind. Modern synthetic siding materials such as vinyl or metal bear little resemblance to
historic siding materials. The application of such modem synthetic materials often involves
the removal of original decorative elements such as cornice, comer boards, brackets,
window and door trim, etc. New synthetic siding shall not be installed. Removal of existing
Page 5
0AHistoric Preservation Commission0esign Guidelines for HI_'s�guidelines 420 E Wall Street.doc
such materials is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish
and appearance.
Original asbestos siding should be maintained and painted, or when necessary, replaced
with synthetic siding to match the existing asbestos siding. The removal of asbestos siding
over existing wood siding is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic
patina, finish and appearance.
Original masonry surfaces should be maintained and not be painted, unless severe
deterioration of the brick or stone can be shown to require painting. If the color or texture
of replacement brick or stone cannot be matched with existing, painting may be an
appropriate treatment.
Paint colors should be complementary to each other and the overall character of the
house. When possible, research the original paint color and finishes of the building's
historic period; the right colors respect the historic building.
The Historic Preservation Commission shall adopt, as necessary, a paint palette(s)
appropriate to the district's character, which may be proposed and approved through the
Minor Exterior Alteration application process. Any colors proposed outside the adopted
palette may be reviewed by the Commission in the regular Certificate of Appropriateness
process.
WINDOWS
Original window framing and lites (panes of glass) configurations should be preserved and
maintained or replaced in kind.
When replacement is necessary, do so within existing historic opening. Replacement of
non -original windows should consider the use of historically appropriate wood windows.
Use same sash size to avoid filling in or enlarging the original opening. Clear or very
slightly tinted window glass may be used. No reflective or heavily tinted glass may be used.
Should the owner wish to install security bars, they should be installed on the interior of
windows and doors.
Storm windows. The use of interior storm windows is encouraged. Storm windows are
available which can be installed on the interior of windows. This helps to preserve the
exterior historic character of the building.
Should storm windows need to be installed on the exterior of the historic windows, storm
windows constructed of wood and configured to match the historic sashes (i.e. one over
one sashes) are recommended.
If metal storm windows are installed, paint to blend with surrounding elements.
Page 6
O:Wistoric Preservation Commission0esign Guidelines for HL's\guidelines 420 E Wall Street.doc
1-4
AWNINGS -CANOPIES
New awnings and canopies should not be installed above windows or doors.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Lighting is an important element in residential areas. Fixtures should be consistent with the
historic character of the house.
Appropriate incandescent light fixtures to the style of the district should be used.
Avoid exposed lighting of any kind unless part of a historic fixture.
NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
The Secretary of the Interior's guidelines for new buildings in historic districts encourage
similarity of form and materials, but not actual replication. New construction proposals and
the rehabilitation of non -historic buildings will be reviewed based on these Criteria.
Judgement will be based on the compatibility of the design within the context of the
property's adjacent and nearby historic buildings.
The design of new buildings should have key elements of the building's historic period of
significance including massing, scale, fenestration and materials.
Infill buildings should not be absolute reproductions. Only when a previously demolished
historic Grapevine building can be accurately replicated may a reproduction be considered.
Infill buildings between historic buildings should be similar in setback, roof form, cornice
line and materials, to one of the adjacent buildings. Relate height of new building to the
heights of adjacent structures. Avoid new buildings that tower over existing ones.
Horizontal wood siding (either novelty, tongue and groove, shiplap or equivalent) and brick
are appropriate exterior building finishes for the historic house. Fake brick or stone or
gravel aggregate materials shall never be used.
ADDITIONS TO HISTORIC BUILDINGS
Additions to historic buildings should replicate the style of the main building if possible;
otherwise they should adhere to the general style with simplified details.
As a minimum, new additions should reflect the massing, roof shape, bay spacing, cornice
lines and building materials of the primary structure.
All new wood or metal materials should have a painted finish except on some 20"' century
buildings where the use of unpainted aluminum or steel was part of the original design and
Page 7
0AHistoric Preservation CommissionlDesign Guidelines for HL's\guidelines 420 E Wall Street.doc
should be maintained.
A new addition should, if at all possible, be located at the rear of the historic building. If
this is not possible, the addition may be added to the side if it is recessed at least 18
inches from the historic building facade or a connection is used to separate old from new.
New vertical additions should be set back from primary facades so as not to be readily
apparent from the facing street.
When reproducing elements that were originally part of a historic building they should be
replicated when evidence of the actual detail has been documented by photographs,
drawings, or remaining physical evidence. If no evidence exists, elements typical of the
architectural style may be used. Historic photographs can provide information on the
original elements of the building.
I
An application for a Certificate of Appropriateness will be required for changes to existing
non-contributing structures within the District. Non-contributing structures are those which
do not represent the period of significance of the 420 East Wall Street Historic Landmark
Subdistrict. The period of significance for the District is 1882-1956. The City of Grapevine
Historic Preservation Staff may approve minor alterations to non-contributing structures.
Major alterations, demolition or replacement of structures shall undergo the review process
of the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission. Replacement buildings shall follow the
criteria of the City of Grapevine's "Design Guidelines for Historic Commercial and
Residential Properties" and reflect the period significance of 1882-1956.
Page 8
OAHistoric Preservation CornmissionDesign Guidelines for HL's\guidelines 420 E Wall Streetcloc
Pt -05-a4
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS DESIGNATING A HISTORIC
LANDMARK SUBDISTICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 39 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 (APPENDIX "D" OF
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES), DESIGNATING LOT 5R,
BLOCK 1, G. E. HURST ADDITION AND MORE
SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, IN A DISTRICT
ZONED "R-7.5" SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT REGULATIONS;
PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE 420 EAST WALL
STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING
ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;
PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY;
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS
AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE
AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A
PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE,
AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED
COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH AN
OFFENSE OCCURS OR CONTINUES; DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, an application was made by the Grapevine Historic Preservation
Commission requesting a historic landmark subdistrict designation by making application
for same with the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as
required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and
all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the
case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal
notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing
called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as
to whether this requested historic landmark subdistrict designation should be granted or
denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area
immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control,
protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements
and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established
character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic
reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the
immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this
ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking
and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking
areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on
light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other
facilities; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 39 of Appendix "D" of the Code of
Ordinances have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further considered, among other things, the character
of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view
to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land
throughout this city;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is
a public necessity for the granting of this historic landmark subdistrict, that the public
demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning
changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property
with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was
made; and does find that the historic landmark subdistrict designation lessens the
congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes
health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding
of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of
transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that
there is a necessity and need for this historic landmark subdistrict designation and has also
found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property
surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this
property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that historic landmark subdistrict
designation for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best
interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps
promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS:
Section 1. That the City does hereby designate a historic landmark subdistrict
(HL05-04) in accordance with Section 39 of Ordinance No. 82-73, being the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas same being also known
as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, in a district zoned "R-7.5" Single
Family District Regulations within the following described property: 420 West Wall Street,
specifically described as Lot 5R, Block 1, G. E. Hurst Addition, and in addition thereto, the
adoption of the 420 East Wall Street Historic District Design Guidelines as conditions,
regulations and safeguards in connection with the said historic landmark subdistrict, a copy
of said criteria being attached hereto and labeled Exhibit "A".
ORD. NO. 2
Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map
of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the "H" zoning designation.
Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein
above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of
Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City
of Grapevine, Texas.
Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have
been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting
health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been
designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated
to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from
fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent
overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate
provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other
public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial
needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable
consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability
for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging
the most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City
of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said
ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct
conflict with the provisions of this ordinance.
Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be
severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of
land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity
of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein.
Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not
to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed
committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues.
Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of
Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace
and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an
emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety
and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective
from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained.
ORD. NO. 3
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20th day of September, 2005.
ATTEST:
ORD. NO. 4