The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWS Item 01 - Lake GrapevineMEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF HE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROGER NELSON, CITY MANAGER MEETING DATE: MAY 18, 2004 SUBJECT: REVIEW OF THE PRELIMINARY FIVE-YEAR PLAN FOR THE CORP OF ENGINEERS PROPERTY AT LAKE GRAPEVINE Since March staff has been working to put together a plan for the Corps property that incorporates the Council's directives for the development of the leased park lands. The first issue is to make sure that the Corps lands will be self-sufficient and not require the use of general tax revenues. The second directive was given on February 17th and that was to go slowly in the development of the property with particular attention paid to the existing revenue streams. The Feasibility Study completed by Carter -Burgess provided us with a framework of what could be effective developments around the lake. The proposed five-year plan incorporates several of the items outlined in the study. There are three types of improvements in the proposed five-year plan. The first are City owned and operated improvements that generate revenues for the support of the rest of the system. The second are upgrades to amenities paid for, with one exception, from the revenues from the City's operations on the Corps property. The final category is concessionaire improvements with the City receiving a percentage of gross receipts from the operation. The Feasibility Study broke the entire lease area into distinct park areas, and the description of the five-year plan will also follow this model. The proposed five-year plan also takes into account the longer term needs of the system than just the operations over the next five years. The budgetary side of the plan includes funding for capital replacements. There are currently more than 140 picnic shelters in the newly leased area. Those shelters need repair and repainting and the tables and elevated cookers need replacement from time to time. The replacement and repair of these items, as well as fences, roads, signs and other amenities in the parks are included in the budget presented with the five-year plan. The plan also includes a longer term look than just the first five years of the City's lease. Years six through nine are included for informational purposes as the lease with the Corps will be a long term commitment for the City. No action is expected or warranted for years six through nine. The next steps, once the Council approves the preliminary five-year plan, is to take the plan to the public for comment. The Convention Center is already reserved in June for a public meeting for comments and questions. A thirty -day written comment period will remain open following that meeting. During this time the plan will also be provided to the Corps of Engineers for any comments they might have. It is anticipated that there will be at least one additional sub -committee meeting following the public comment period and the final five-year plan will then be submitted to the Council in late August or early May 13, 2004 (3:57PM) September for approval as well as approval of the permanent lease with the Corps. It is worth noting that even if the Corps approves the general plan as presented, the Corps will also have to approve the development plan for each park individually when the time comes to actually build the improvements. None of the improvements proposed in the five-year plan impact areas classified as environmentally sensitive, which should make the process much simpler. The Council Corps Sub -Committee has reviewed the plan and its budget and recommends taking the plan as presented forward through the public comment process. May 13, 2004 (3:57PM) Five Year',i- Budget YEAR ONE Capital New Debt Current New Operations Maintenance Construction Service Revenues Revenues Net Meadowmere 32,044 6,244 26,130 (12,158) Meadowmere Addition 2,143 - 140,800 12,278 10,135 Lakeview 21,028 3,257 6,971 (17,314) McPherson Slough 13,451 3,546 7,384 (9,614) Oak Grove 28,423 5,434 43,887 10,029 Acorn Woods 8,379 3,034 - (11,412) Silver Lake 184,933 6,244 197,435 6,258 Silver Lake Addition 15,885 502 757,162 - 47,483 31,096 Katies Wood 13,039 3,557 100,000 30,924 14,327 Fairway Drive - - TOTALS 319,325 31,820 997,962 - 312,730 59,761 21,346 YEAR TWO Capital New Debt Current New Operations Maintenance Construction Service Revenues Revenues Meadowmere 32,685 6,244 26,130 (12,799) Meadowmere Addition 2,063 80 38,385 36,242 Lakeview 21,448 3,257 6,971 (17,735) McPherson Slough 13,720 3,546 7,384 (9,883) Oak Grove 28,992 5,434 75,000 43,887 9,461 Acorn Woods 8,546 3,034 - (11,580) Silver Lake 188,632 6,244 197,435 2,559 Silver Lake Addition 64,543 1,004 - 189,931 124,385 Katies Wood 13,300 3,557 30,924 14,066 Fairway Drive - - TOTALS 373,929 32,401 75,000 - 312,730 228,316 134,715 Five Yeari - Budget YEAR THREE Capital New Debt Current New Operations Maintenance Construction Service Revenues Revenues Meadowmere 33,338 6,244 26,130 (13,453) Meadowmere Addition 2,104 80 12,656 - 38,385 23,544 Lakeview 21,877 3,257 6,971 (18,164) McPherson Slough 13,995 3,546 7,384 (10,157) Oak Grove 29,571 5,434 43,887 8,881 Acorn Woods 8,717 3,034 - (11,751) Silver Lake 192,404 6,244 197,435 (1,214) Silver Lake Addition 65,834 1,004 68,337 - 189,931 54,757 Katies Wood 13,566 3,557 8,989 30,924 4,811 Fairway Drive TOTALS 381,408 32,401 - 89,982 312,730 228,316 37,255 YEAR FOUR Capital New Debt Current New Operations Maintenance Construction Service Revenues Revenues Meadowmere 34,005 6,244 26,130 (14,120) Meadowmere Addition 2,147 80 12,656 - 38,385 23,502 Lakeview 22,315 3,257 6,971 (18,601) McPherson Slough 14,274 3,546 7,384 (10,437) Oak Grove 30,163 5,434 43,887 8,290 Acorn Woods 8,891 3,034 - (11,925) Silver Lake 196,253 6,244 197,435 (5,062) Silver Lake Addition 67,151 1,004 68,337 - 189,931 53,440 Katies Wood 13,838 3,557 8,989 30,924 4,540 Fairway Drive TOTALS 389,036 32,401 - 89,982 312,730 228,316 29,627 Assumptions: Operational expenditures grow at 2% per year. Capital maintenance rates remain contant as these are capital replacement costs that are their own fund. Revenues are static with the exception of 5% rate increases in Year Five and Year Eight. Fund Balance Requirement modeled after the requirements placed on all other funds of two months' expenditures. Oak Grove restroom is not a vault toilet, significant savings expected with existing plumbing. Years Six through Nine simply extend the model on through the next four years. Anticipate a new restroom at McPherson Slough in Year Seven and at Acorn Woods in Year Nine. Five YeaBudget r YEAR FIVE Capital New Debt Current New Operations Maintenance Construction Service Revenues Revenues Meadowmere 34,685 6,244 27,436 (13,493) Meadowmere Addition 2,189 80 12,656 - 40,304 25,378 Lakeview 22,761 3,257 100,000 7,319 (18,699) McPherson Slough 14,560 3,546 7,753 (10,354) Oak Grove 30,766 5,434 46,081 9,881 Acorn Woods 9,069 3,034 - (12,103) Silver Lake 200,178 6,244 207,307 885 Silver Lake Addition 68,494 1,004 68,337 - 199,428 61,594 Katies Wood 14,114 3,557 8,989 32,470 5,809 Fairway Drive TOTAL 396,817 32,401 100,000 89,982 328,366 239,732 48,898 Fund Balance Operations and New Debt Revenues- Beginning Ending Requirement Over (Under) Maintenance Construction Service Revenues Expenditures Fund Balance Fund Balance 16% of Exp Requirement Year One 351,145 997,962 - 372,490 21,346 - 21,346 56,183 (34,838) Year Two 406,331 75,000 - 541,046 59,715 21,346 81,061 65,013 16,048 Year Three 413,809 - 89,982 541,046 37,255 81,061 118,316 80,607 37,709 Year Four 421,437 - 89,982 541,046 29,627 118,316 147,942 81,827 66,115 Year Five 429,218 100,000 89,982 568,098 (51,102) 147,942 96,840 83,072 13,768 Year Six 437,802 - 89,982 568,098 40,314 96,840 137,154 84,446 52,709 Year Seven 446,558 100,000 89,982 568,098 (68,442) 137,154 68,712 85,847 (17,135) Year Eight 455,490 - 89,982 596,503 51,031 68,712 119,743 87,276 32,468 Year Nine 464,599 100,000 89,982 596,503 (58,078) 119,743 61,665 88,733 (27,068) Assumptions: Operational expenditures grow at 2% per year. Capital maintenance rates remain contant as these are capital replacement costs that are their own fund. Revenues are static with the exception of 5% rate increases in Year Five and Year Eight. Fund Balance Requirement modeled after the requirements placed on all other funds of two months' expenditures. Oak Grove restroom is not a vault toilet, significant savings expected with existing plumbing. Years Six through Nine simply extend the model on through the next four years. Anticipate a new restroom at McPherson Slough in Year Seven and at Acorn Woods in Year Nine. Paved Roadway (miles) 10.6 Picnic Tables (steel) 30 Picnic Tables (concrete) 116 Picnic Table Shelters 142 Drinking Fountains 13 Elevated Cookers 133 Security Lights 16 Playgrounds w/Equipment 5 Restrooms 8 Volleyball Courts (sand) 2 Basketball Goals 1 Group Pavilion 2 Pavilion Tables (steel) 29 Horseshoe Pit 1 Boat Ramps 10 Courtesy Docks 9 Pipe Rail Fencing (mile) 7.9 Guard Post/Cable (mile) 1.8 Signs (traffic) 112 Signs (parks) 98 Fishing Dock 1 Sanitary Dump Stations 2 Laundry Building 1 Electricity (less DD Light) - Honor vault (pay station) 10 Lantern Hangers 54 Fire Rings 64 Total Acres 122.8 Facility Acres 39.7 Open Field Acres 83.1 Cabins 0 Paved Trail (miles) 3.6 Small Pavilion 1 RV Pad 53 Chemicals 122.8 Litter Pick-up 122.8 Fish Cleaning Station 1 Trails (miles) 0 Gate Attendants TOTAL FOR PARK Expen�:-��` Totals Regular 94 Regular 41 25.00 per cleaning 0 Maintenace Unit Annual Operating Unit Annual Minor Unit Major Unit Replacement Unit Cost Type Frequency Costs Type Frequency Repair Type Repair Type Cost Type 1,500 per mile 8 40,092.00 Annual cost 5.50 linearfoot 5.50 If w/shelter w/shelter 5.00 per cleaning 710 50.00 3,550.00 w/shelter 75.00 10.50 monthly 12 150.00 each 1,000.00 each 15.00 per cleaning 658 250.00 per pumping 12 100.00 each 500.00 each 75,000.00 each 50.00 annual 8 20.00 annual 8 50.00 per cleaning 250.00 each 500.00 each 75,000.00 each w/shelter 50.00 per pit 8 6 250.00 per pumping 4 10.00 per cleaning 364 100.00 monthly 29.00 per mow/acre 94 26.00 per mow/acre 41 25.00 per cleaning 0 130.00 per mile 2 20.00 per cleaning 104 5.00 per cleaning 60 90.00 per app/acre 14 2.00 per acre 747 5.00 per cleaning 96 0 40,092.00 Annual cost 65.00 section 350.00 section 100.00 each 4.70 sq foot 2.50 per foot 2.50 per foot 40.00 40.00 200.00 each 40.00 60.00 4.70 sq foot Cost 18,732.00 2,970.00 86,810.00 600.00 900.75 2,016.00 2,150.00 29,840.00 100.00 20.00 652.50 50.00 542.08 1,188.00 440.00 380.00 3,600.00 2,110.00 50,250.60 200.00 108.00 192.00 15,201.80 14,999.40 338.00 2,080.00 4,531.50 22,104.00 29,296.20 120.00 40,092.00 332,614.83 Meadowmere Park — The Feasibility Study called for RV camping, boat rentals, a swimming beach, fishing pier, meeting facility, concession building and a tower swing. One of the keys to the uses in the Carter -Burgess plan was the ability to rent boats to individuals on a hourly basis. That portion of the plan is still unresolved due to the Corps of Engineers' study on the lake's capacity. Adding more boats from a rental facility may be tied back to eliminating parking spaces at existing boat ramps and/or leasing docks from Marina's International. While recreational uses such as boat rentals are great amenities for the lake properties, the cost of mitigation through acquiring existing slips from Marinas International or closing parking spaces at boat ramps is not justified. The proposed plan is an immediate use of the existing facilities with minimal capital expenditures. The proposal is to allow dry RV camping in the open area on the existing parking lot as well as primitive camping north of the restroom/shower facility. Additional signs, a sanitary dump station and a new restroom/shower facility are programmed. The total capital costs are $140,800. Annual revenues are projected at $41,850 with annual operating costs of $2,143. For revenues, we project a 180 day season for both the 20 dry RV sites and 25 tent camping sites. The RV charge is $13 per night with occupancy rates of 45%. The tent camping site model anticipates an $11 per night fee and 35% occupancy. The current operations at Meadowmere Park are not self-sustaining. Operations and maintenance costs project out to $38,288 annually against revenues of $26,130. When debt service and operation and maintenance costs are put into the model, as well the revenues from the new camping sites in the park, Meadowmere becomes self- sustaining. The balance of Meadowmere Park was already under the City's operating budget and is not included in the larger budget for the lake parks for that reason. May 14, 2004 (8:OOAM) } Meado ere 0 Regular Regular Maintenace Unit Annual Operating Unit Annual Minor Unit Major Unit Replacement Unit Meadowmere Count Cost Type Frequency Costs Type Frequency Repair Type Repair Type Cost Type Cost Paved Roadway (miles) 1.3 1,500 per mile 1 - 5.50 linear foot 5.50 If 2,676.00 Picnic Tables (steel) 0 w/shelter 450.00 each 29250 Picnic Tables (concrete) 13 w/shelter Picnic Table Shelters 13 5.00 per cleaning 57 50.00 3,705.00 Drinking Fountains 1 1,500.00 150.00 Elevated Cookers 13 w/shelter 75.00 97.50 Security Lights 7 10.50 monthly 12 882.00 Playgrounds w/Equipment 1 150.00 each 1,000.00 each 350.00 Vault Toilets (Restrooms) 1 15.00 per cleaning 57 250.00 per pumping 12 100.00 each 500.00 each 75,000.00 each 3,965.00 Volleyball Courts (sand) 0 50.00 annual 1 - Basketball Goals 0 20.00 annual 1 - Group Pavilion 0 50.00 per cleaning 250.00 each 500.00 each 75,000.00 each Pavilion Tables (steel) 0 w/shelter 450.00 each - Horseshoe Pit 0 50.00 per pit 1 Boat Ramps 1 cleaning Witter Courtesy Docks 1 cleaning w/litter Pipe Rail Fencing (mile) 2.3 65.00 section 350.00 section 2.50 per foot 161.92 Guard Post/Cable (mile) 0.5 2.50 per foot 330.00 Signs (traffic) 16 40.00 64.00 Signs (parks) 12 40.00 48.00 Fishing Dock 0 Sanitary Dump Stations 0 Laundry Building 0 10.00 per cleaning 91 100.00 monthly Electricity (less DD Ught) 3,841.08 Honor vault (pay station) 1 200.00 each 20.00 Lantern Hangers 0 40.00 - Fire Rings 0 60.00 - Totai Acres 19.5 Facility Acres 7.9 29.00 per mow/acre 10 2,291.00 Open Field Acres 11.6 26.00 per mow/acre 7 2,111.20 Cabins 0 25.00 per cleaning - Paved Trail (miles) 1 130.00 per mile 130.00 Small Pavilion 0 20.00 per cleaning - RV Pad 0 5.00 per cleaning 12 100.00 each 4.70 sq foot 4.70 sq foot - Chemicals 19.5 90.00 per app/acre 2 3,510.00 Utter Pick-up 19.5 2.00 per acre 57 2,223.00 Fish Cleaning Station 0 5.00 per cleaning - Gate Attendants 11,440.00 Annual cost 11,440.00 TOTAL FOR PARK 38.28820 0 Meadowr amping Regular Regular Maintenace Unit Annual Operating Unit Annual Minor Unit Major Unit Replacement Unit Maintenance Capital Meadowmere Camping Count Cost Type Frequency Costs Type Frequency Repair Type Repair Type Cost Type Cost Cost Paved Roadway (miles) 0 - Picnic Tables (steel) 0 Picnic Tables (concrete) 0 Picnic Table Shelters 0 Drinking Fountains 0 Elevated Cookers 0 Security Lights 0 Playgrounds w/Equipment 0 Restroom (new) 0 130,000.00 Volleyball Courts (sand) 0 Basketball Goals 0 Group Pavilion 0 Pavilion Tables (steel) 0 - Horseshoe Pit 0 Boat Ramps 0 Courtesy Docks 0 Pipe Rail Fencing (mile) 0 Guard Post/Cable (mile) 0 - Signs (traffic) 10 40.00 40.00 400.00 Signs (parks) 10 40.00 40.00 400.00 Fishing Dock 0 Sanitary Dump Stations 1 450.00 per pumping 4 1,800.00 10,000.00 Laundry Building 0 - Electricity (less DD Light) Honor vault (pay station) 0 - Lantern Hangers 0 - Fire Rings 0 - - Total Acres (existing) 0 Facility Acres 0 - Open Field Acres 0 - Cabins 0 - Paved Trail (miles) 0 - Small Pavilion 0 - _ Primitive Camping 25 RV Sites (existing parking) 25 Chemicals 0 _ Litter Pick-up 0 _ Police Impact (SL calls mo) 0.59 37.17 cost of one hr 12 months 263.16 Electrical Service Gate Attendants TOTAL FOR PARK 2,143.16 140,800 Camping Revenues 25 dry RV camping sites, 180 day season, 45% occupancy, $13 a day 38,385.00 30 primitive camping sites, 180 day season, 35% occupancy, $11 a day Debt Service 11,686.40 Net before Debt Svc 36,241.84 Net after Debt Svc 24,555.44 Lakeview Park — The Feasibility Study for this site included an exhibition pavilion, art trail and view sheds for bird watching. Furthermore, the study recommended that the facility be a joint partnership with a non-profit entity. The budget for the site included $340,000 in capital costs and anticipated $75,800 in concession revenues above the current revenues generated by the day use facility and boat ramps. Because of the long lead time and complexity involved in the development of the facility as well as the tenuous nature of the concession revenues, the proposal for Lakeview Park does not include the development of the components in the Feasibility Study. The five-year plan does anticipate the construction of a sewered restroom in year five. The operating revenues from Lakeview Park are not self-sustaining, however, there are revenues of $6,971 from the boat ramp which equals 28.7% of the operations and maintenance costs of the park. May 13, 2004 (3:57PM) - C CY) 0 co t, co (D v CL G� to R, n phj C14 C14 L) LY L) u 8 8 m m m m a) 4) (1) 4) (D cx CL ca (1) vCD 0 o0 (D000 0 C) CD )no 0 a 0o 0000 in tq q q 000 E Q) 0 too ui 6 00 In fl- C. CD to CN C14 0 a v v 000 C> q er u 0 Ct C� v m L) LO W 5 0 m tu m L) C, cc a U� q R q C) 1- 0 cz CL a) LO C) C. 0 C, C> C� C> U') ct U.) U') 5 (D m C) O C, a R R q q 0 q 0 q r 0. (D . C> 0 C. in LO to - LO C> C14 cli ca =3 CD C < LL cm CL E CL 0 �E C. E cm CD C, U� q 0 0 C) C) r V) a) CC 0C�L 0 CN :" U co CO — -W r- AC14 N 04 0 N rcr < P U - 0)c tm cn 0- C 0 1p ca CU c m G G c 0 c C a E = u 0 M :3 U CL .2 EEZEZZ ca cu u E 0 W U) m 3 CL 3 caro m CL C. C. C.M.C.C.Q. m 0. CL 0. CL u m 0 C> C> 0 a 0 0 C) R q R R q q Lq 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 O. 0000000000 U') LOU0 0 C) oi (6 L6 C5 6 ANN C� ui C; O U'j CN LO LO CN N N C13 N C) m r r r ci 6 of ui of E .2L m 40) E E c c cm Lu 0) 41 -b , 0C.0 (D - W to 0 cn a 0 0 0 'O m0 "R 7. o J4 2M 8 u -,3' -,,� 0 Z,-, C -C 0 m - E :2 c CL CM CL m U. :n,s2== >g M M E IE i� >, o :3 m C) M x c m 'a) 0 C2 0 m CD > E C �i U. #A CL -8 LL v 7E c -- CL E C > 9 ro.'c road CL CL. CL Of -M 'i k CLOO(n L ti) -9 -9 _ L ou 0 c5e. Horseshoe Trails Park — While this park was included in the Feasibility Study, it was already a part of our park system as we held a license for the trail. The Study did not recommend any changes to the park and none are anticipated in the five-year plan. Because it was already existent as a part of our parks system, it is not included in our budget considerations. May 13, 2004 (3:57PM) McPherson Slouqh — The final Feasibility Study for this property included a fishing pier and boat ramp courtesy dock with a total capital cost of $75,000. The improvements are not included in the five-year plan, however, upgrading the restrooms is anticipated in the second year of the longer term look beyond the five-year plan. McPherson Slough is not self-supporting, but the revenues from the park do offset 43% of the operations and maintenance costs. May 13, 2004 (3:57PM) 88 888888 0) c; '9 . (q 9 Cq eq IV C4 (d 0 E 0 O C, O T CO 't r- 04 m rl � b M rn E E u U, STc Or, Im .c co 'm tm 0) "a -6 c va 3. M CU CL M 0 .2 R S S u = = ar- C 0 0 - S? --p 2 R a. S? • E E u a u u m m u E a a u= , m m I - I I L- I I � c c w (D 4) .(D no CL (D - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m w CL CL CL a CL CL CL a C6 m CL a CL 08 0 C) 0 q q q C� q C) q 0 0 a 0 0 C) 0 0 C) C� C!qRqqqqqqq ai cr 0 — 0 C) 0 CD 0 a a 0 C, 0 0 w Ui 9 00 00 to Iq 00 000 r Eto 0 a to CO a 04 N C) 0 c, o o v U0 0 in c, t-- a Lo ct -T to U to to —8 5 0 u a CD cn, CD CD O. to R q R rl� m 0. ui 0 CD a v CD c, 0 CL to C) U) tCDo M'. D ca m m cu C) O cCL 0 C> a C. LO C> U') LO to cq to cq N ca =1 C C CT< U-. 0 E 0 O C, O T CO 't r- 04 m rl � b M rn E E u U, STc Or, Im .c co 'm tm 0) "a -6 c va 3. M CU CL M 0 .2 R S S u = = ar- C 0 0 - S? --p 2 R a. S? • E E u a u u m m u E a a u= , m m I - I I L- I I � c c w (D 4) .(D no CL - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m w CL CL CL a CL CL CL a C6 m CL a CL 08 0 C) 0 q q q C� q C) q 0 0 a 0 0 C) 0 0 C) C� C!qRqqqqqqq LO 0 0 C. 0 LO N LO U') 0 — 0) to to C� CD V) CD N W) CD N 04 CN Cl C14 C) m Na 0 to IT N (D to E E 8 am E E .2 :n E ru o cri L, L.0 0 0 U) tA OQ) 0 o 0 S o .0 = C -X le L, M m 'o us -, (D Z:3 c co .9 - U ,4 E (OD - < O OE- LL 0 M s? o .0 LL :3 W c � , :2 M m m m 0 m LL 03 9 OL ca E� U CL� Cc CL (D 0) (n 01 3 -9 P- 2 0 0- t L U) CL a. � OL R Oak Grove Park (Sand Bass Point) — The Feasibility Study recommended upgrading the Trawick Pavilion and building another large pavilion on the site. Also recommended was a restroom/concession building. The capital improvement costs totaled $400,000 with additional City and concession revenues of $49,750. The proposed five-year plan calls for upgrading the existing restroom in year two, paid for out of operating revenues from the entire lake parks system. The current restroom is between the baseball fields and Trawick Pavilion. While it is not a vault toilet, it is also not up to the standards we try to maintain in our parks nor does it meet ADA requirements. The existence of plumbing to the site reduces the capital costs to approximately $75,000. The Sand Bass portion of Oak Grove Park is self-sustaining with revenues over expenditures even after the debt service for the restroom renovation is taken into account. The multiple boat ramps and Trawick Pavilion are the revenue sources for the park. The balance of Oak Grove Park has been under lease to the City for many years and is an integral part of our parks system. Since it is already included in our annual budget for the Parks Department, it is not included in the budget for the lake parks system. May 13, 2004 (3:57PM) O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O OO O 000000 LC)O N O O O N O 1--000 r0 OO O O OO 00 O ;gym.,..,• O (0,2O OW O'0OO NO N(D 6) t- O O Id) N R LO cD <L•(Og V O N (D r co <t 7 64ON co N (D O r ty r U hM n co ND V rNr N 0 0 (C) 1-t W Cl) It N N LD tD to M Cl) c 1 ~ C L L L —0-0 0 _ ca a`6) ami ami a a t4 N N NO O O O O O LOO O O 00 O O O O O O O Ln Ln 00 000 0 Ems, Loo) LO O Otj C C NCV 00 000 V' �Y V• (D U O V d• N .90 LO Lf) cx N r v ry O •� n C U O w LO .ro tM O O O p O h LO O O O LL Q C Ln Ln M N 'C L L L C O >, �- @ co (U6 U U N N N (U!) O p•co 00 O p O O '` tM Ln O LO LO O O N —V r r (0 C O N C O O Q N LL c w O rr U i N E 3 E rn O o C �cN Ln o 0 0 0 0 0 o o U r O Vr co Mrr CO ^ r O NM t6 C :3Q) n N C=$C O' d LL O O) 01 G) 0 m m CL - C (D(UO co C U C) C Ncu cc 0: u='a v E E v v rom N d C C N a 3 3 n 3 n m m a 3 Q tU E E N N N N N d N N N N n n. n n. a. n. n n n n. n NO N O OC) O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO C) M NNLO NSU r NM NMCli a) co C NCD 'IT MN CO Or r r—Nr NN WQh NN000 NOOr- tnN r.n r r r r 0 Cl) co U C ? d N p• C :EZUN y w LM.O ° EE -)ro o c0 e rn >, w W to N O p T` R a _q-N (a rn R to d 0 100 m CD m :03°o �N 0(D °—°'ao (D o v� �_ N � E ° a) o �) �Q E o nm d OO L .a .fl U J C > O N 0-0 N (0 (If -O E@ t6 III N O E L L N O p CO V O N N >, O (` L4 p N U (t6 > N C N N 0 O OO �. O O E- F-•' i•- C N O O .O .� CL C N t4 .- .�' N= O N t6 d ..«.. �' aT >`, �. • V > d N c0 U LO U LL I- d 'O U ' N E Y O O) 0 Y O N C C C �' _C 'D Of 'a N N C .LQ. 'O v p d d C .0 ¢ C C a U N d N > C> U N— N O> q1 O D U U •C N N N O t0 > O O 7 N C L U C C N O fl• O� ✓T N N N� O f4 2 R U LU d> LO N tU L= O o LZ t4 > E> v_) f` F- 0 6. d n. dp W (n a.w co (D d S co CO) d(D()(n U-U)J Lu To- Il F- LL 0Ua cr)x (J ---)-j 'LL 0 Acorn Woods — The Feasibility Study called for the rehabilitation of the restrooms at this site. The proposed five-year plan does not include this project in the first five years, but the restroom is included in the fourth year in the look at the four years following the five- year plan. The site will need to be watched closely following the opening of Dove Loop to determine the traffic and use patterns. While seldom used before the extension of Dove Loop, this pattern may change with Acorn Woods enjoying closer access to the new road. There are no revenues associated with the operations of Acorn Woods. May 13, 2004 (3:57PM) 8s 0 ry , og g 8888 twp 'r 8 8-, .p h 7 K O O � rte• U7 N N ,(J fry. � � to .N• fJ M N t CCCVVV r r i� t"i N sY LV M M r r <tr NNcco Y Y N m ro C C C 0 CI 33mmmmaEm0 0 o d o u m:- E E.2 E 2ro ? ro ro U E dQ%mOmQim naaaanaanfl. 0000000000 00o000o0oo N NNcoNNNN�c+O> r Y rOrYrrO0Y0000000 Nrc010000 0004MCDO c0 CD CD r r Y O O r r O r Y y w E t:E10a°� c rn0 N^� ` 0 m � •� O a C E (D o• aa :? E D H 0 Y 8s'S n�i ��C H H y E --o N 0� �^� m I' �caee; y.. Uro a._ymny L '" tiy�y gcy� O sp=y yjua Ev i..crn �� Ep CL N a Q�a nU'� arc s ro au y4c Qmy� ro y c :_ y �•E y O 3 a tro ►1° F% 0 $ . flro o F- E 'h - 00 u° g 4�,; `d� �E ro 'c_f m u ro am Wit` m .' 0 E� c mea >•�•�,� �; Lcc1- aaan u� »c�n�xg acv kMto� x�tit°�i cin cn v tip 2 2 C R C T L E L L L cco O. O y O a a a a E w O aroi aroi af°i CD cn O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 c o o p y 4i O O 0 LO IO 00 opo (, E Ln �O C =3 G a n b OIOO NNvvO 0 C5 C5 O d• C C v 0 v to N C mto C Ci C cc •c4 v •C ro LO _ _ d� ti ti o.33a IU aroron3a a m„ a o0aa 0 0 C y to LO � NtOO N Or Q r .-IOO U CD O C T O O ~ cu �.- C cUV co /U9 0 CT = 0 O Q (n y LQ o a .m W 0 Ln0 0CR LLO 0 0 O OO 0 Qui O IO IO M a r • y C C1 = _O U U H cu m N y to d 0 d O CD 0 O O C O o O CLO a0 O O CD Lc N co p Y (D C 7 tU C � c a Q U- <tr NNcco Y Y N m ro C C C 0 CI 33mmmmaEm0 0 o d o u m:- E E.2 E 2ro ? ro ro U E dQ%mOmQim naaaanaanfl. 0000000000 00o000o0oo N NNcoNNNN�c+O> r Y rOrYrrO0Y0000000 Nrc010000 0004MCDO c0 CD CD r r Y O O r r O r Y y w E t:E10a°� c rn0 N^� ` 0 m � •� O a C E (D o• aa :? E D H 0 Y 8s'S n�i ��C H H y E --o N 0� �^� m I' �caee; y.. Uro a._ymny L '" tiy�y gcy� O sp=y yjua Ev i..crn �� Ep CL N a Q�a nU'� arc s ro au y4c Qmy� ro y c :_ y �•E y O 3 a tro ►1° F% 0 $ . flro o F- E 'h - 00 u° g 4�,; `d� �E ro 'c_f m u ro am Wit` m .' 0 E� c mea >•�•�,� �; Lcc1- aaan u� »c�n�xg acv kMto� x�tit°�i cin cn v tip C C C CL E T O. O y O E a E O O O p t4 w y UO O O O 0 O O� p N CLO O Y cD m � 0 C =3 G a Q LL C C Tco C Ci C cc •c4 v •C ro _ _ N y o.33a 3 aroron3a a m„ a o0aa 0 0 C y to LO � NtOO N Or Q7 r .-IOO U � m <tr NNcco Y Y N m ro C C C 0 CI 33mmmmaEm0 0 o d o u m:- E E.2 E 2ro ? ro ro U E dQ%mOmQim naaaanaanfl. 0000000000 00o000o0oo N NNcoNNNN�c+O> r Y rOrYrrO0Y0000000 Nrc010000 0004MCDO c0 CD CD r r Y O O r r O r Y y w E t:E10a°� c rn0 N^� ` 0 m � •� O a C E (D o• aa :? E D H 0 Y 8s'S n�i ��C H H y E --o N 0� �^� m I' �caee; y.. Uro a._ymny L '" tiy�y gcy� O sp=y yjua Ev i..crn �� Ep CL N a Q�a nU'� arc s ro au y4c Qmy� ro y c :_ y �•E y O 3 a tro ►1° F% 0 $ . flro o F- E 'h - 00 u° g 4�,; `d� �E ro 'c_f m u ro am Wit` m .' 0 E� c mea >•�•�,� �; Lcc1- aaan u� »c�n�xg acv kMto� x�tit°�i cin cn v tip ., Silver Lake Campground — The Feasibility Study called for ten cabin sites, ten combo RWcourtesy dock sites, upgrading the electrical service, new restrooms, a camp store, swimming beach, playground upgrades, new pavilion and other improvements totaling $1,350,000. Many of these recommendations are included in the proposed five-year. The most pressing need is the upgrade from 30 amp to 50 amp electrical service and is in the plan. The proposed plan also includes the addition of the five cabins, a net addition of 13 RV pads with the conversion of ten to combo RV sites, a small pavilion and new restrooms. The proposed capital cost is $757,162 with additional operating costs of $65,547. These costs are offset by $189,931 in new revenues. The net revenues, after debt service and operating costs are taken out, are $124,384. The revenue calculations for the cabins assume each cabin will rent for $80 a night with an annual occupancy rate of 40%. The season for the cabins is assumed to be year round. The ten combo RV pads are expected to rent for $30 a night with a year round occupancy rate of 63%. Because the combo sites are part of an existing recreational use at the lake, we expect the ability to secure permission for these courtesy docks to be greatly improved in comparison to the boat rental issues at Meadowmere. For the rest of the park, the upgraded electrical service is projected to allow a $4 a night increase in rates to $20 a night. No anticipated changes are expected to the current occupancy rate of 63% for the balance of the park. Silver Lake is self sufficient and its revenues in excess of expenses provide the City with the majority of the funds necessary to subsidize the rest of the parks in the lake system. Because of the size of the return on this investment, the improvements at Silver Lake are the top priority in the five-year plan. May 13, 2004 (3:57PM) _ l8�i 88�N388p8O8 p$ f�$88 88Hp8c8p8 �� S�i$�8 8� � yj {.�.�- B8tu. WN'f to �A � t0 to U�fD� 8�a�ONO� �p}c.�gy � � �pj �•r'}�eyh .l'�}�N} �., CV Ili vOOOOQQOQO 00 QOcoMQooQo QQ�••e0e}• -,:fa QOcoco0 r MNONMNrNr r -LO NNQOIN�rNr x117 fDMMtO 1: C'ir C N a E C Q1 N t C D s a Y t 4) c o d o N m0 n d m m N r a cn c a m o m0. �_� ro� g n ti oar �s y�yi >o� H �'c O in (L (L >>mo m acain14l 9 -ii�6- U. oci �a Luz) c�� m c ro m v o d m N o SS S SSS$ S$8 E `li gn COD NNvCD N v ti a a� 0. C o S C cuco m y C7 N Ui O O O p N to O O O Lo Q c to Ui co D> C T L L C _ _ F m m com c d 0 d a) cc p cc O O O O O 00 O •O O p p CL tOA Up70 N 00 m C 7 N C 7 C tT d � m d C a N p J m c m E Q. E y do m N t O o O o o# c O _C E o O O o p o c � m a U NN ( c D9 y N U r NO O r r r V m n ON O N N M r N C C C: d m U. 3 3 3 EE Emm m m m 3 3 c`oico`i�, 0cm m c d C c °> ci °"° ai c c `° °i, c c 3 •. •� E ni m ai . v 3 3 m m m fl m = F- N d C N E,=n�� N ai N Q7 m 3 ai ca d O O ai N 0 a V ) EE0EvTiromu 0 3 3 a 3 �cc`�Larcacm�n'U o �5 3'a v v a.n. man°'n cco cca no o o an 0 0 ooSS o 00 0 00000 0 o$00000Nm 7 C N •-� LO �U')N U) LO[) pp to Or NNNMN�0) gi c U v 'R m vOOOOQQOQO 00 QOcoMQooQo QQ�••e0e}• -,:fa QOcoco0 r MNONMNrNr r -LO NNQOIN�rNr x117 fDMMtO 1: C'ir C N a E C Q1 N t C D s a Y t 4) c o d o N m0 n d m m N r a cn c a m o m0. �_� ro� g n ti oar �s y�yi >o� H �'c O in (L (L >>mo m acain14l 9 -ii�6- U. oci �a Luz) c�� 00 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0o 00 O 0 o O o 0 0 LO o.0 o0 0 0 0 00 cNvm 0 om 0 N CO v a ca o U U o O o ro L6 oO tD o0 � o C oro C 0 o ri N M N O O O 0 0 0 00 O 000 r r N00 O 00 Ci 00 "l:00 O O O 0000 co co Oc00 000 N-7 (0 0 N N OED O C1400 (D r 00 co r (O -It r W0 00'IT 'M r M r (O O U r "OV O N N h UO V <7• -t CO (U ON O ca 0 00 m(0 O N (ry m It 0 M r W d• c- .- N .- eF <2 (0 O N ( N C a L LL L O O +a0 �O O p T U U U U L `m p O U @ @ ca @ m aI a`I a a a@i y o 00 0 0 00 UOO O O oo 0000 0 0 0 Ino O o00 0 0 0 o or (> (00 O O 00 OO Up o O O dt OOU m aI p OUC0 Iq C OV O O O N U CL @ (0 o (n o r� Cl)C0 a m Z z 6 aI o c o p U - C a) Q1 m N O - N cc (O O O O O N • Q (O O OO O t` O (00 (NO Cl) N a C p Z) F cUD m N U L U N N a) N N C.n O 00 O O 0 0 O O o O 0 0 U 0 O O O 4) T O l0 to (0 0 O N V r c C O N C C Q) C � � Q N LL J N;Q > L _ p @ O C O m 0 C O T C CTI f6 tN uuaau n OUO O oO oE M o o O O Ua- ca NO O_��- Thi V'NNN V' T O O- N co TV' t0'O m N M N 9 C O (9 m O Q M LL O O �I CO N Vi H} O) O O) C C C m U U Q) m N p) •C N 'N @ 'C •C •C G C C C a) @ @ .CC •C N C r0 _ O N =F- a � aI o m m@ aI Ln ti v c c ° o 0 0 o a p �: o E E v E v@@ SIE o E E p N 3 0. 3 am m a3 N a) Q)a3 a) @ a) a) m @ a) a 0 aaaaanaaaacNl 0 O 00� U O 0 0000 0000000oaot- OONO000Noo.-• r(NU LO NNN �N(O0N(O �M N CU (n.o 0 0 0 o w o 0 0 o m (n m o N o m N m N r cV , , , r , r r 0 O O ro ro 0 v D n o o o _ C o E aI c m o O N N o r. a m aI Ea�o� n 5 .E o •- m° c ° `� c > cr L7J ' L @ O U) -0 Cc:CL -101,5° c d3 N N f�N N o Ep oCU w @ 0-0 0 _u° a mmmmmaO� m a a nC @ w . >2 LL vo p ( E BD •QUp`csm-08Q @- p° G C C C_ d O Cl) U •C @ (D @ O �@ oCa @ 'LL a@F O p>7U) O .6 d CEFn. pw(na�>maxm 9 UO. Unn0 W SJil. LL0Ua0 In CL - d Qa> „ Katies Woods Park — The Feasibility Study called for upgrading the existing facilities at Katies Woods and expanding the parking. The cost of the improvements was $375,000 against no new revenues. The proposed five-year plan calls for replacing the existing vault restrooms with flush toilets in year one. The restrooms at Katies Woods represent the single most frequent complaint that staff has received for all of the parks in the newly leased areas. The cost of the restroom is estimated at $100,000 and it is recommended that this improvement be included in the package that includes Silver Lake Campground and Meadowmere. Overall, Katies Woods is self sufficient based upon the strength of boat ramp fees. The fees are sufficient to support the initial debt service for the restroom improvements. May 13, 2004 (3:57PM) AV $888 CO CO LO O Lo r N C4 r - L) O C) 0 E E 'U E -6 -0 ca ca u E 0. CL CL CL M CL CL M M CL 0000000000 , Oqq0qqQOQO M 6 6 6 6 6 6 N6 6 C-4 N N Cl) CN (n M NCONCO'lt r NN 6 C5 N 6 vi cli (6 td E E W IM c 0 0 :D = c M cu 's 0 t 0, 12 (D U) CD a) C4 a) t! r 0 - W q. r- M 0 0 CD :t� CO M -E 6 CL ol 2 w g 8 (9 :E c 0 — — E 0-0 < C� C'M 25 o :5 z 25 = >g§ d! I'E � � = 0 — c 't;� w M M a M E o g's; ) '120) LL CL �.L — CL L) cr c E (D c C m M C OL 0 CL 0) > c To C �2 C'L rL C, a. a CaL >-d mm (D am I U) 2 2 cc m m 0) cu tSto 4) a) a) M CL CD C� C) 0 0 C) s C) C) C� 0 . U') C� q 0 q q R C) cNi C� c, a C� 0 0 C) C) In 0 IT to O Cv CN to It') r- .0 0 0 ca ca L) m L) a) 0 4) 4) CD CD a C) CR rl-� CD C) C) 0 Ul CL LO LO Cl) O m to 4) a) tu 03 a) U) 0cu CD 0 0 CD c CD CR R q . q q C� 0 C) 40 C) Lo U') to 0 CN O Lo r N C4 r - L) O C) 0 E E 'U E -6 -0 ca ca u E 0. CL CL CL M CL CL M M CL 0000000000 , Oqq0qqQOQO M 6 6 6 6 6 6 N6 6 C-4 N N Cl) CN (n M NCONCO'lt r NN 6 C5 N 6 vi cli (6 td E E W IM c 0 0 :D = c M cu 's 0 t 0, 12 (D U) CD a) C4 a) t! r 0 - W q. r- M 0 0 CD :t� CO M -E 6 CL ol 2 w g 8 (9 :E c 0 — — E 0-0 < C� C'M 25 o :5 z 25 = >g§ d! I'E � � = 0 — c 't;� w M M a M E o g's; ) '120) LL CL �.L — CL L) cr c E (D c C m M C OL 0 CL 0) > c To C �2 C'L rL C, a. a CaL >-d mm (D am I U) Fairway Drive — The property on either side of Fairway Drive, fronting Highway 26, is strategically located between the Gaylord Texan and Grapevine Mills Mall. While the budget does not anticipate any revenues at this time from the property, there are several sub -lease possibilities that the City can pursue. In the last year two individuals interested in building indoor soccer facilities surrounded by additional soccer fields have approached us about this site. Another group has approached us about the use of the site for a similar facility, only the sport involved is basketball. There has also been interest from a groups that would like to build a white water rafting facility on the site. Staff has also visited with the operators of a putting facility, not miniature golf, but a putting school type of development that could potentially locate on this site. In short, there are many recreational uses that could be developed on this site that could further support the lake parks system through sub -lease revenues. The proposed five-year plan includes this site as a potential recreational use built by others. It is staff's recommendation that this area be considered for recreational development through an RFP process. May 13, 2004 (3.57PM) . Rockledge Park — Rockledge is included in the Feasibility Study as a site not leased from the Corps of Engineers. There is no change in that status to report and the site is not included in the five-year plan. May 13, 2004 (3:57PM) Five -Year Development Plan Lake Grapevine Corps of Engineers Property City of Grapevine Lease 2004-2005 PRELIMINARY Meadowmere Park • Replace existing restroom and shower facility adjacent to recreation area with upgraded facility. The current facility is a vault toilet, the plan would call for a restroom and shower facility that is tied in to the sanitary sewer system. The new facility would comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. • Designate 25 sites to the north and east of the current restroom and shower facility as primitive camping sites. • Designate 20 sites in the parking lot for dry RV camping. • Installation of a sanitary dump station for the dry RV camping sites. The sanitary dump station would be tied in to the sanitary sewer system. Lakeview Park No changes planned for this area. Horseshoe Trail No changes planned for this area. McPherson Slough No changes planned for this area. Sand Bass Point (Oak Grove) No changes planned for this area. Acorn Woods No changes planned for this area. ... 011P2004-2005 Five -Year Development Plan PRELIMINARY Page 2 Silver Lake Camp rgound • Upgrade existing 30 amp electrical service to 50 amp electrical service. • Create five sites in the existing park for self-contained cabin units. Any cabins in areas susceptible to high water disruptions will be capable of moving from that site to a holding site out of the high water area within the park. A picnic shelter, with table and elevated cooker, will accompany each cabin site. • Replace existing restroom and shower facility with one tied in to the sanitary sewer system and in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. • Convert 10 RV sites to combination RV/courtesy dock sites. • Create 13 new RV pad sites in the existing park. A picnic shelter, with table and elevated cooker, will accompany each new pad site. • Construct small reservation pavilion on the west side of the park. Katies Woods Park • Replace existing restroom facility with a facility that complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act and ties into the sanitary sewer system. Fairway Drive Area • No specific plans have been developed for this site at this time, however, the City is reserving the right to sub -lease the property to a private enterprise that would construct a recreational use on the site. , Five -Year Development Plan Lake Grapevine Corps of Engineers Property City of Grapevine Lease 2005-2006 PRELIMINARY Meadowmere Park No changes planned for this area. Lakeview Park No changes planned for this area. Horseshoe Trail No changes planned for this area. McPherson Slough No changes planned for this area. Sand Bass Point (Oak Grove) • Replace existing restroom facility south of Trawick Pavilion with a restroom that complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act. The restroom may be moved further north or east for better access from the pavilion. The ability to tie the restroom into the sanitary sewer system with a gravity flow connection will determine the final location. Acorn Woods No changes planned for this area. Silver Lake Campground No changes planned for this area. 2005-2006 Five -Year Development Plan PRELIMINARY Page 2 Katies Woods Park No changes planned for this area. Fairwav Drive Area • No specific plans have been developed for this site at this time, however, the City is reserving the right to sub -lease the property to a private enterprise that would construct a recreational use on the site. Five -Year Development Plan Lake Grapevine Corps of Engineers Property City of Grapevine Lease 2006-2007 PRELIMINARY Meadowmere Park No changes planned for this area. Lakeview Park No changes planned for this area. Horseshoe Trail No changes planned for this area. McPherson Slough No changes planned for this area. Sand Bass Point (Oak Grove) No changes planned for this area. Acorn Woods No changes planned for this area. Silver Lake Campqround No changes planned for this area. Katies Woods Park No changes planned for this area. 2006-2007 Five -Year Development Plan PRELIMINARY Page 2 Fairway Drive Area No specific plans have been developed for this site at this time, however, the City is reserving the right to sub -lease the property to a private enterprise that would construct a recreational use on the site. Five -Year Development Plan Lake Grapevine Corps of Engineers Property City of Grapevine Lease 2007-2008 PRELIMINARY Meadowmere Park No changes planned for this area. Lakeview Park No changes planned for this area. Horseshoe Trail No changes planned for this area. McPherson Slough No changes planned for this area. Sand Bass Point (Oak Grove) No changes planned for this area. Acorn Woods No changes planned for this area. Silver Lake Campground No changes planned for this area. Katies Woods Park No changes planned for this area. 2007-2008 Five -Year Development Plan PRELIMINARY gar Page 2 Fairwav Drive Area • No specific plans have been developed for this site at this time, however, the City is reserving the right to sub -lease the property to a private enterprise that would construct a recreational use on the site. Five -Year Development Plan Lake Grapevine Corps of Engineers Property City of Grapevine Lease 2008-2009 PRELIMINARY Meadowmere Park No changes planned for this area. Lakeview Park • Replace existing restroom with one that complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act and ties in to the sanitary sewer system. Horseshoe Trail No changes planned for this area. McPherson Slough No changes planned for this area. Sand Bass Point (Oak Grove) No changes planned for this area. Acorn Woods No changes planned for this area. Silver Lake Camp qround No changes planned for this area. Katies Woods Park No changes planned for this area. 2008-2009 Five -Year Development Plan PRELIMINARY Page 2 Fairway Drive Area • No specific plans have been developed for this site at this time, however, the City is reserving the right to sub -lease the property to a private enterprise that would construct a recreational use on the site.