Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 02 - Z04-08 & HL04-02 West Wall Street OfficesCG ITEM O Nz&. Z,3 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: ROGER NELSON, CITY MANAGER , H.T. HARDY DIRECTOR OF DEVEL O MENT SERVICES Pv � MEETING DATE: AUGUST 17, 2004 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Z04-08, AND HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT HL04-02 APPLICANT: Derek DeGuire PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: The subject property is located at 313 West Wall Street and is platted as Lots 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition. The addition contains 0.73 acres and has approximately 171 feet of frontage along West Wall Street. REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE/HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a zone change to rezone 0.73 acres from "CN" Neighborhood Commercial District to "PO" Professional Office District for proposed office development The applicant is also requesting designation as a Historic Landmark Subdistrict The applicant proposes to develop two, single story office structures comprising some 2,100 and 2,700 square feet. The Historic Preservation Commission at their July 28, 2004 meeting approved a Certification of Appropriateness for the demolition of an existing non- contributing, non -conforming structure on the site. The Commission also approved a Historic Landmark Subdistrict designation request that establishes design criteria for the subject site. See the attached criteria. OAZCU204-08.4 and HL04-02 1 August 10, 2004 (8:17AM) PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned "CN" Neighborhood Commercial District that has a non- contributing, non -conforming residential structure located upon it. HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject property was zoned both "C-1" Community Business District and "R-2" Two Family District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. The properties to the east and west were both zoned "R-2" Two Family District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. The properties to the north and south were zoned "R-1" Single Family District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "HC" Highway Commercial District—various office uses SOUTH: "R-TH" Townhouse District—City of Grapevine Housing EAST: "CN" Neighborhood Commercial District—nonconforming single family structure WEST: "CN" Neighborhood Commercial District—Starr Place AIRPORT IMPACT: This site is not located within any of the noise zones as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Low Intensity Commercial Land Use. The applicant's proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan. THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION: The Thoroughfare Plan designates West Wall Street as Type E*, Collector, with 65 -feet of right-of-way developed as four lanes with travel lane width of 11 -feet. /rs OAZCU204-08.4 and HL04-02 2 August 10, 2004 (8:17AM) 0 1 inch equals 200 feet 4_i 4 1 16��" Fi pe�\\aEL 11'\-j.. TR 10L 3,416 AC 2A •@ 1 OR G app\jAG I IB SE . A PCJ ��a CBD 2 Ap23 S� �R 1 R CENT z O Q5 IA 25 @ °AHC Cj11� Z A w w z TR4 1 .1\N "';ii . 2 14 (� 13R R P` .688 @ 10R B moT' 1 c�`i �5,00a� pp 28 AC raaa GRpP SSp� 1 ' �6 05a Q B 13R 1R ,ON 230 �a •,�25 Z� IA 003 $VS\N 2R :! NORTHWEST HWY W NORTHWEST HWY 600 ' ' 3� HC 300 ,� PRCZ 0 HC .003 @ 2 n 1A 'CHC a. HC 14 Ao23° S HC�6 1 HC fr M Z Hcy is 91�, IHC R 1 12A 0 2.041 AC 2.394 AC `�� 14A1 13 T'P 1 1 uR� i HC 14A1B gSPPG C—GE 1.720 @ GENS OPS 14A1A 12E 12C 126 CBD --^--- _ `�aRs®0`• 4 TR 4� 1 1 ) Z _ ALL S 0 1 inch equals 200 feet 4_i TR 10L 3,416 AC 2A •@ CBD •,• 10 •� "';ii . W TEXAS ST •� •,�25 :! ME a. � fr M TRIOK 0 2.041 AC GU •1 0, TR 101 .684 AC R-75 JIWAM 0 1 inch equals 200 feet 4_i rATI-3 M410 ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Per ............. Company Name ffi_ADJS(3NQJ�AL, LGIAIL LT. Address 4ni A wvfom gQA D City ofm M State _1K Zip "102-1 Phone # W/291- 8595 —Fax #— 9171551- 02100 2. —Applicant's interest in subject property-li - 3. Property owner(s) name. _Japg fnsw Address Iin Empr()Ij Blvd. City _3DW-Wave State 15X zip 7600 Phone ## 817 x-81– X616 Fax # 4. Address of subject property 313 W. wall skpp-, Legal Description: Lot 9-P, 1 1 Block – I Addition_5qH1;?5 AMTROK Size of subject property $' — acres 6.36.01 square foot Metes & Bounds must be described on 8 V2 ' ' x 11" sheet 5. Present Zoning Classification 6. Present Use of Property kg4d&ce, - I 7. Requested Zoning District flok�(X Qj a &-_ 8. The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that would allow the proposed use is ED 9. Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning 4, Od0 10. Describe the proposed usd Fn� --flke- All Zone Change Requests are assumed to be complete when riled and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your 0AZ=APP-ZN 2 S/99 vvwwxi,grapevine.mus Per application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public he4ring. Public hearings will not be tabled. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. 11. Signature to authorize a zone change request and place a zone change request sign on the subject property. Applicant (print): Applicant signatu Owner (print): Owner signature: 0:\ZCU\APP-ZN :3 5/99 www. ci.grapevine,mus Per... The State of County of Before me on this day personally appeared known to me (or proved to me on the oath of or through (description of identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the -purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A. D._ SEAL Notary Signature The State of County of Before me —iM&- on this day personally appeared %A -A, c known to me (or provedo me on the oath of orthrough D&OA ts i if-R-ft'5f (description of identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. *k Qven ur)der my hand and seal of office this day of A A try Signature I Ao ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 0:\ZCUNAPP-ZN 4 5/99 www.d.grapevine.tx.us Per ............. All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may bd continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. /N A Signature of Applicant Date: (I- 1� Signature of Owner Date: Platting Verification L 0:\ZCU\APP-ZN 5 5199 www.d.grapevine.tx.us Design Guidelines 313 West Wall Street Historic Landmark Subdistrict Grapevine, Texas Grapevine Township Revitalization Project, Inc. City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Grapevine, Texas 76051 July 16, 2004 Table of Contents I. SITE ■ Setbacks Driveways, ■ Parking Lots • Service and Mechanical Areas ■ Fences • Preservation ■ Exterior Finishes ■ Windows {fl. EMBELLISHMENTS ■ Awnings -Canopies ■ Exterior Lighting IV. NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ■ Infill ■ Additions to Historic Buildings V. EXISTING NON-CONTRIBUTING BUILDINGS • Minor changes • Major alterations ■ Demolitions ■ Building replacement Page 2 \\CHDN\VOL1\DATA\COMMDEV\Historic Preservation Commission\Design Guidelines\W Wall St HL District 04\guidelines 313 W Wall Street.doc Preface The 313 West Wall Street Historic Landmark Subdistrict is established to retain the historic integrity and cultural history of this important portion of West Wall Street. Period of Significance The period of significance for the district is 1882-1956, the years documented with the county as being the construction dates for property within the district. Allowing a property to authentically tell the story of its own period and time, while reinforcing the historical period of significance with necessary preservation,, rehabilitation and restoration, is the goal of the historic landmark designation. The preservation of original architectural features, especially windows, doors, porch and siding, is preferred, rather than "modernization" or "updating" of older features, or imposing a false "historical look" on newer features. The repair of original materials, rather than their replacement can best preserve the historic character of the property. If non -original materials are replaced, then care should be taken to install original (in-kind) materials. Repair and restoration is often more cost effective than replacement, conserves energy and reduces the amount of trash added to landfills. New construction (additions or rehabilitation) to an existing home should reflect the character of the home during its period of significance. Massing, roof shapes, porch configurations and materials that reflect the architectural character of the home during its historic period should be preserved. The design of any new architectural features shall have key elements of the primary historic style already existing in the home and shall be clearly compatible with and complementary to its adjacent features. Any exterior modifications to buildings and properties within the Historic Landmark Subdistrict are required to conform to the City of Grapevine's preservation ordinances governing these buildings and properties and with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings. The Historic Preservation Commission handbook "Design Guidelines for Historic Commercial and Residential Properties" (adopted November 2003), explains the preservation ordinances and design criteria that has been adopted by the City of Grapevine. The handbook's guidelines should be used by those planning new construction or additions to historic properties in the 313 West Wall Street Historic Landmark Subdistrict. M9 Retain the historic relationships between buildings, landscaping features and open space. Avoid rearranging the site by moving or removing buildings and site features, such as walks, drives and fences, that help define the residence's historic value. Building setbacks should be consistent with adjacent buildings or with the style of the building. Setbacks are an important ingredient in creating an attractive streetscape. Page 3 \\CHDN\VOL1\DATA\COMMDEV\Historic Preservation Commission\Design Guidelines\W Wall St HL District 04\guidelines 313 W Wall Street.doc Buildings should be set back to a line that is consistent with their neighbors and land use. For example, a residential setback should retain the setback of adjacent and nearby structures, with landscaping along the street right-of-way. Residential buildings with a commercial use in residential areas shall be set back in a manner consistent with setbacks of adjacent or neighboring residential structures. Maintain building orientation pattern, with the front facade facing the street. Maintain spacing patterns between buildings. DRIVEWAYS, PARKING LOTS AND VACANT SITES Driveways should be located perpendicular to the street; no circular drives shall be allowed (unless proven with historic documentation) in front or corner side yard, so that the- character of the landscaped yard can be reinforced. New parking lots for commercial uses should not be located adjacent to sidewalks in the district. Off-street parking lots should not be allowed to interrupt the continuity of landscaped front or corner side yards. This is important to both the preserving of the historic character, and to the strengthening of the residential district. Screen existing parking lots from streets and pedestrian areas in the Historic Landmark Subdistrict. Existing parking lots located adjacent to streets and sidewalks should be screened to the height of car hoods. This will provide a certain level of continuity of the building fagade line; it will screen unsightly views; and it will provide a level of security by allowing views to and from the sidewalk. FENCES Historically, fences around houses defined yards and the boundary around property and gardens. Wood picket fences, wood rail fences and barbed wire or decorative wire fences were the common fence types in Grapevine. Traditionally, picket fences surrounded the front of the house while rail and wire fences surrounded the agricultural portions of the property. Maintain historic fences. New fences. Simple wood picket fences, wood and wire and wrought iron fences are appropriate. Avoid chain-link fences, privacy fences and concrete block fences for the street sides of property. Wood privacy fences may be allowed when installed in the rear yard and behind the front fagade of a property. Utilitarian/privacy fences should not be installed in front of a historic building or beyond the line of the front fagade of a historic building. Replacing fences. If replacement is required due to deterioration, remove only those portions of historic fences that are damaged beyond repair and replace in-kind, matching the original in material, design and placement. If replacement is necessary for non-historic fences, or new fences are proposed, locate and design the fence in such a way that will Page 4 \\CHDN\VOL1\DATA\COMMDEV\Historic Preservation Commission\Design Guidelines\W Wall St HL District 04\guidelines 313 W Wall Street.doc compliment the historic boundary of the property without concealing the historic character of the property. Service and mechanical areas and equipment should be screened from the street and other pedestrian areas. All garbage and equipment storage areas should be screened from the street. Mechanical equipment, including satellite dishes, shall not be located in front or corner side yards or should be set back from the edges of roofs, and screened so that they are not visible to pedestrians and do not detract from the historic character of buildings. Preserve, stabilize, and restore original building form, ornament and materials. Any missing or severely deteriorated elements may be replaced with replicas of the original. Ensure that roof, window, porch and cornice treatments are preserved or when preservation is not possible, duplicate the original building element. When rehabilitating, remove non -historic alterations. Often, "modern" renovations conceal the original facade details. If not, the original style may be recreated through the use of historic photographs. Where replication of original elements is not possible, a new design consistent with the original style of the building may be used. Reconstruction of building elements should reflect the size, scale, material and level of detail of the original design. Preserve older renovations that have achieved historic significance. Older structures or _ additions may have, at some time, been renovated with such care and skill that the renovation itself is worthy of preservation. Usually, such renovations may date from before 1940. Original wood finishes should be maintained and painted or, when necessary, replaced in kind. Modern synthetic siding materials such as vinyl or metal bear little resemblance to historic siding materials. The application of such modern synthetic materials often involves the removal of original decorative elements such as cornice, corner boards, brackets, window and door trim, etc. New synthetic siding shall not be installed. Removal of existing such materials is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish Page 5 \\CHDN\VOL1\DATA\COMMDEV\Historic Preservation Commission\Design Guidelines= Wall St HL District 04\guidelines 313 W Wall Street.doc Twe rj##� Original asbestos siding should be maintained and painted, or when necessary, replaced with synthetic siding to match the existing asbestos siding. The removal of asbestos siding over existing wood siding is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish and appearance. Original masonry surfaces should be maintained and not be painted, unless severe deterioration of the brick or stone can be shown to require painting. If the color or texture of replacement brick or stone cannot be matched with existing, painting may be an appropriate treatment. Paint colors should be complementary to each other and the overall character of the house. When possible, research the original paint color and finishes of the building's historic period; the right colors respect the historic building. The Historic Preservation Commission shall adopt, as necessary, a paint palefte(s) appropriate to the district's character, which may be proposed and approved through the Minor Exterior Alteration application process. Any colors proposed outside the adopted palette may be reviewed by the Commission in the regular Certificate of Appropriateness process. NTHZ�•� Original window framing and lites (panes of glass) configurations should be preserved and maintained or replaced in kind. When replacement is necessary, do so within existing historic opening. Replacement of non -original windows should consider the use of historically appropriate wood windows. Use same sash size to avoid filling in or enlarging the original opening. Clear or very slightly tinted window glass may be used. No reflective or heavily tinted glass may be used. Should the owner wish to install security bars, they should be installed on the interior of windows and doors. Storm windows. The use of interior storm windows is encouraged. Storm windows are available which can be installed on the interior of windows. This helps to preserve the exterior historic character of the building. Should storm windows need to be installed on the exterior of the historic windows, storm windows constructed of wood and configured to match the historic sashes (i.e. one over one sashes) are recommended. If metal storm windows are installed, paint to blend with surrounding elements. \\CHDN\VOL1\DATA\COMMDEV\Historic Preservation Commission\Design Guidelines\W Wall St HL District 04\guidelines 313 W Wall Street.doc New awnings and canopies should not be installed above windows or doors. Lighting is an important element in residential areas. Fixtures should be consistent with the historic character of the house. Appropriate incandescent light fixtures to the style of the district should be used. Avoid exposed lighting of any kind unless part of a historic fixture. The Secretary of the Interior's guidelines for new buildings in historic districts encourage similarity of form and materials, but not actual replication. New construction proposals and the rehabilitation of non -historic buildings will be reviewed based on these Criteria. Judgement will be based on the compatibility of the design within the context of the property's adjacent and nearby historic buildings. The design of new buildings should have key elements of the building's historic period of significance including massing, scale, fenestration and materials. Infill buildings should not be absolute reproductions. Only when a previously demolished historic Grapevine building can be accurately replicated may a reproduction be considered. Infill buildings between historic buildings should be similar in setback, roof form, cornice line and materials, to one of the adjacent buildings. Relate height of new building to the heights of adjacent structures. Avoid new buildings that tower over existing ones. Horizontal wood siding (either novelty, tongue and groove, shiplap or equivalent) and brick are appropriate exterior building finishes for the historic house. Fake brick or stone or gravel aggregate materials shall never be used. I_11I111111C•];! &1 116M.TUMat c • Additions to historic buildings should replicate the style of the main building if possible; otherwise they should adhere to the general style with simplified details. As a minimum, new additions should reflect the massing, roof shape, bay spacing, cornice lines and building materials of the primary structure. All new wood or metal materials should have a painted finish except on some 20"' century Page 7 \\CHDN\VOL1\DATA\COMMDEV\Historic Preservation Commission\Design Guidelines\W Wall St HL District 04\guidelines 313 W Wall Street.doc buildings where the use of unpainted aluminum or steel was part of the original design and should be maintained. A new addition should, if at all possible, be located at the rear of the historic building. If this is not possible, the addition may be added to the side if it is recessed at least 18 inches from the historic building facade or a connection is used to separate old from new. New vertical additions should be set back from primary facades so as not to be readily apparent from the facing street. When reproducing elements that were originally part of a historic building they should be replicated when evidence of the actual detail has been documented by photographs, drawings, or remaining physical evidence. If no evidence exists, elements typical of the architectural style may be used. Historic photographs can provide information on the original elements of the building. An application for a Certificate of Appropriateness will be required for changes to existing non-contributing structures within the District. Non-contributing structures are those which do not represent the period of significance of the 313 West Wall Street Historic Landmark Subdistrict. The period of significance for the District is 1882-1956. The City of Grapevine Historic Preservation Staff may approve minor alterations to non-contributing structures. Major alterations, demolition or replacement of structures shall undergo the review process of the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission. Replacement buildings shall follow the criteria of the City of Grapevine's "Design Guidelines for Historic Commercial and Residential Properties" and reflect the period significance of 1882-1956. Page 8 \\CHDN\VOL1\DATA\COMMDEV\Historic Preservation Commission\Design Guidelines\W Wall St HL District 04\guidelines 313 W Wall Street.doc -�� 0 ---c 9 0 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING ZONING CHANGE Z04-08 ON A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE WM. DOOLEY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 422, DESCRIBED AS BEING A TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "CN" NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO "PO" PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT REGULATIONS; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE, AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH AN OFFENSE OCCURS OR CONTINUES; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, applications were made to amend the Official Zoning Map, City of Grapevine, Texas by making applications for same with the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these requested changes should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested change should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, the effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings, encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning change, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the change in zoning lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this change in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that a change in zoning classification for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: ORD. NO. 2 Section 1. That the City of Grapevine Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended and changed by Zoning Application Z04-08 to rezone the following described property to -wit: being a 0.73 acre tract of land out of the Wm. Dooley Survey, Abstract No. 422, Tarrant County, Texas (313 West Wall Street; Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition), which was previously zoned "CN" Neighborhood Commercial District Regulations is hereby changed to "PO" Professional Office District Regulations, all in accordance with Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, as amended. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the herein change in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. ORD. NO. 3 Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 17th day of August, 2004. ATTEST: ORD. NO. 4 011 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS DESIGNATING HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT HL04-02 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 39 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, DESIGNATING LOT 2, BLOCK 1, .SATHRE ADDITION OF THE WM. DOOLEY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 422, AND MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, IN A DISTRICT ZONED "PO" PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE 313 WEST WALL STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE, AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH AN OFFENSE OCCURS OR CONTINUES; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, applications were made to amend the Official Zoning Map, City of Grapevine, Texas by making applications for same with the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these requested changes should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested change should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, the effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings, encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning change, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the change in zoning lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this change in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that a change in zoning classification for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby designate a historic landmark subdistrict (HL04-02) in accordance with Section 39 of Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas same being also known ORD. NO. - 2 as Appendix "D" of the City Code in a district zoned "PO" Professional Office District Regulations within the following described property: 313 West Wall Street, specifically described as Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition, of the Wm. Dooley Survey, Abstract No. 422, and in addition thereto, the adoption of the 313 West Wall Street District Design Guidelines as conditions, regulations and safeguards in connection with the said historic landmark subdistrict, a copy of said criteria being attached hereto and labeled Exhibit "A". Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the "HL" zoning designation. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace ORD. NO. 3 and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 17th day of August, 2004. ATTEST: ORD. NO. 4 CENTERLINE 313 W. WALL STREET le� /1" 2 5'- 0' ------ - 41 -IIS------_- _ 1 10' UTILITY ESMT. r + r----------- ----------46'-10' (7) MAX Eu"AMa COVERAGE (6106) 6603 61. (11%) 46'-10* 1 25' FRONT BUILDINGS LINE -------------- �— 10'L 46'-10' I ( PORCH 1 L 31il: iNj [-ZN 1TY. W4L•L• :::::: ; + 1 : - :PACK: i:iF"-tHTIN6: - : C -N r1) TOTAL r4°l9tYI" AFMA ) flM6 6F. (61%) 1 P76CL"AT"T QT. PW.l. OF"m II r � (E) KJXR AWA RATIO I 1 1 i PORCH I + cp 1 LOW INTENSITY W, PACK LIGHT I =I _=3 I 1 LtI) C�NCRETE WALK< i + f + IP + AT 9' = 45' S9 59'46'E 171. ----- - ----DEDICATED FOR R.O.W. L ' 11_4" 10' UTILITY E5MT. -- ---------------- c�v 0 70'-8' -------- MONUMENT SIGN — 25' FRONT BUILDINGS LINE — — u u u 1 ' LOW INTENSITY WALL 1 PACK LIGHTING � I m �LIz ' PORCH (� ' Cl) PO H I z t - I r 111 In + Ila Iw C CRET WATK (Q + CESLO 2 EACH = 21' (31,6-1601 5P.) 1 DUMPSTER PAD AND 6` HIGH 10' BUIERY SCREENING WALLS E — A C NP`CRETE ® ( 5' UTILITY ESMT. 1 _J N89D50'59'W 23.06' i 1 f1R1 REF. LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 I I FOR SCREENINGS i 1 4 SPACES ( I 0' Lv AT V EACH = 45' 0' FT 25' 0' I1'-0' 36'-0' 4'- I, - t I 8 45'-0' 'r4'-10" `V I L. 54'-0' 61-101-01 + Co 5P CES AT 9' EACH = 54'-0* 0 6 3 (� 10 BUFFERYARD L--------------------- ' 5' UTILITY ESMT. 589D44'53'W Per ®«4e®....... _—_ VICINITY MAP a Bus WNnmwsst HWy Vernon C) k z m a N -1 wweusc LOCATION OF SITE - ETexas 3 1 0 OS M I 313 W WALL STAEEi. GftAPEVMf, i% SITE DATA VARY CHART tlullDlq, euLD"4 -1 IAT 7 (1) LOT &M �t 31*3601 SF. (7) MAX Eu"AMa COVERAGE (6106) 6603 61. (11%) UJI1 o 1 !U PARKM] REOu"RD Pll mmictW' CHILE (1/3")e ' 21 (6) PAR(M PINAVYIDW TYP. 631-0' 74 (i C -N r1) TOTAL r4°l9tYI" AFMA ) flM6 6F. (61%) (6) PROP WD Tay.*" P76CL"AT"T QT. PW.l. OF"m (E) KJXR AWA RATIO -----...-- I �C1 P•O (u oMe"B4r LAND u6E C -N I I I@ MINOR am4ce (3) CMN 4PpAu"CK (NLAAHD66,-ACFNW 17,4310 6P. 04) TOf 9MLANa A Eu0.DTU MORC [") NCs ROf I Per ®«4e®....... _—_ VICINITY MAP a Bus WNnmwsst HWy Vernon C) k z m a N -1 wweusc LOCATION OF SITE - ETexas 3 1 0 OS M I 313 W WALL STAEEi. GftAPEVMf, i% SITE DATA VARY CHART tlullDlq, euLD"4 -1 IAT 7 (1) LOT &M 31*3601 SF. (7) MAX Eu"AMa COVERAGE (6106) 6603 61. (11%) [31 HWIT7 OP234 6PA(Z637n106f. (LA4MCA M .NRn A) os) !U PARKM] REOu"RD Pll mmictW' CHILE (1/3")e 21 (6) PAR(M PINAVYIDW 74 (6) 0ARRNT 7aNl`4 C -N r1) TOTAL r4°l9tYI" AFMA ) flM6 6F. (61%) (6) PROP WD Tay.*" P76CL"AT"T QT. PW.l. OF"m (E) KJXR AWA RATIO -----...-- r1e) 7a" or PROPaem P•O (u oMe"B4r LAND u6E C -N (f77 PRCPoe® LAID WE MINOR am4ce (3) CMN 4PpAu"CK (NLAAHD66,-ACFNW 17,4310 6P. 04) TOf 9MLANa A Eu0.DTU MORC [") NCs ROf 7,'3oµ jy 30510 (0) MAX eUILDHS WRW 7 6TORMO.310 PT. fl6) EIAER 6TR1P AD3AOEW to IR61POMAL 110' OIMH:RrAI® YV rA9w.,RQI 6FREe 7IT. rtrt 1Er* f. —I- 31,V4 -z: TED 40e;i �b —TED — Irbl c4m7mclioN 9' EACH fo3' 0' i I I 1 5 I TE FLAN I 1 10 BUFFERYARD j J -i Q) SCALE: V= 10'0" 5' UTILITY ESMT. I LOT 2 BLOCK 1 148.-13' -�--------- SATHRE ADDITION NORTH REF. LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR SCREENING GRAPEVINE, TEXAS --�— GWt16 .tlE 6TEv�t6a1 JLL !?ERALD 9LVD. �6 � � TDtM 16o6T ARRMiECT. K UW*ff 4 AMOCIATE6, W- 6101'"EDT N � ROAO IaF6T, TEXAO T6oD4 RAM Ory( (sn)�ss-6666 M MR130MUM 601 I. VLNiLC)OD ROAD 14R6T, %064 (en) 7eo-ev&-04 oe 6Wt&rOR =-n.n N ♦ R"al6T ib RMTLM .T3A AOR6 (3).A16A Vl Rw+c+) tan)aow)om car�cut D)enacT• To r0. • rxawawoHN, ante o)silucl' nR OFICE CfrLpTfR. U)aen w A RMpT To YTAeLlW I�RaMMdul pllC♦6 I;AJE NAME: GU?? -'I? CASE NUMBER: Professional Office LOCATION: 313 W. Wall Street Lot 2. Block 1 Sathre Addition MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET. 7 OF 7 ',. APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES, DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 5 1 TE FLAN CASE NUMBER.- , CASE NAME: ?mm CASE ADDRESS: 313 W. WALL STREET LOT 2 BLOCK I, SATHRE ADDITION PREPARER: MARkoHT 4 ASSOC, INC. SHEET I OF I WALL ST�EET 89D59'4b'E 1"if.sa4' RMUDA 50a ALL ¢ATIFF FOR R.O.W i I PORCH I I I ' a:1: I I I I I I I ( i z ......... ........................................ PO CI -I PO CI -i I z �) r Q 00 Q�A w (W foo 10 1 O SOD ALL AREAS DUMPSTER PAD _ Ov* I �j �' AND b' HIGH MASO 10' tZ;Q�i�%,G>>Rp SCREENING W LL5 ____ �--� r5' UTILITY ESMT. I 9D50'S9'U1 23.Ob' CSXCedar elm 3" -Ca (-f0)Dwarf Burford hall L AIC coon" SUBA= W AL a OWlOe'O IlPIlwQtATIM x ALL RJNT "All"L& TO w *saw awo.TOOK & GDInRACTOR POW0»wd tCII TLN 11111" . Q' ALL Riff 141TMMAL WM PIK.t! = *=W"*M A ALL COMAMR OIeOeH Pl.elt101b NAN tR1.L, FiQ�0610 iepOT Mill OO'f'L176Y MIOATAOMM CdfAOMI. R ALL R.A1ft0 MO.L ROUfi®.Mp tRLLT O#AIG1iD. ALL 1P� MON "PIMA" TO OT it10Mt. K CON""=" A PLAM OW L MT111'IMlO® 77AN1oWIC>a OCi05>iL7 OT ALL R..0& A10 L. 4 1 M4NTMLT1TAP0, M AILAY 11M M49 MIN Rift M41®6iL RIR QTY 1TAgrom 0 AT ALL lftl�MlCM TO Oa AS O N2 04 S N M ALL W ,11,1111D&4% RAM aiN 1707 M Qfn.N®N r�CO. Mi! $1117 aftm 1111600C "W am A AN LL7CA7 ALOIiI • � ORAL Olai V10L,LAOMi 710Itt RiRetl pRA6Y >a OQA1MCtpt 1!N'Q»MI,>t PQC L.00.LTIOM OT ALL 1IntITd 13 ra+aa ro Ite'w�p N!. WTAH NAnRAL 8KJM a' P1..MR. ALL MX 01l.K.T TO M-rNWAL OT IL miMtittlp I'1e01.7� M A GOIlelwt A/o Imr tMlgO 1108 1b Rw'Oew. O01fIfeAGTOIe M YMe►1' RMOR TO RMCW R NWA" ww" MTYlI LAW AOD R.Mrt►tl ML74 t R Ob �COY.i�t10HA RL0 ALL COlOMM Q10O1K iL NOTALL evaAt tiLIIOQT tae �QW.T MR N071UCila» Qi ALL Mfa►a00YlMYrai MOO MTN A e1.OP°tt p A.1 ae WlMIR w M!M All tiMlOtl tDT Myo• M Yrsel d r»SN1b eerAl I I ♦ I i I -WM M1w MWAP ! NAOealeaMw NN CRi'Q ' �'sM9»ICrR &M s n I - .IL wd�ti� i1M MMN.t?M tKi1W ODM�./,O eeM AW IID Aaa Or»Olt or~ a" w Common Name OON»m I10 OWALLM K A Wit" {AC♦1Ip rrre, T= Comments - Nploom LAOOCAP010 FlIOI�l1N K OM& a! »a. - 41FAM /Alptl. LM AICA. M9I f. Mrrx go. Woo Ilex cornuta 'Dwarf Burford' Dwarf Burford holly �.r�u�wnn te�oN�eercw 3' 0C -WMNIO,OIe Pinus eldarica No=TI "I�itriNlrr. FARCM r * 0R na. , Nt»YOR,I1ew IT0 C®D _ nt r1re.le Iry w1u emN�t IML r lic r r..•.,.e L.Iavrr..I.A 3' -Cal ITOVfOD PA1rau Lon IID roar rou IMMen r LODrQIWl Ae®.L 5 Rea�DM> tlllYli AMOWL IID AQLIC�77I►'eFa1I4MktlL Cedar elm - LAIDOCAY7 AM" OOWAN irew irwal B t B WM AMAld p P Quercus macrocarpa .YgLL�Y61r PO DrCvIR�A:e't�x L.rON,.MNOLAOrGMW M11WIf T4F. 3' -Cal -1,1eb10» . 0171er� l�Atm N IIIOPFrMIrOLLM 3 L AIC coon" SUBA= W AL a OWlOe'O IlPIlwQtATIM x ALL RJNT "All"L& TO w *saw awo.TOOK & GDInRACTOR POW0»wd tCII TLN 11111" . Q' ALL Riff 141TMMAL WM PIK.t! = *=W"*M A ALL COMAMR OIeOeH Pl.elt101b NAN tR1.L, FiQ�0610 iepOT Mill OO'f'L176Y MIOATAOMM CdfAOMI. R ALL R.A1ft0 MO.L ROUfi®.Mp tRLLT O#AIG1iD. ALL 1P� MON "PIMA" TO OT it10Mt. K CON""=" A PLAM OW L MT111'IMlO® 77AN1oWIC>a OCi05>iL7 OT ALL R..0& A10 L. 4 1 M4NTMLT1TAP0, M AILAY 11M M49 MIN Rift M41®6iL RIR QTY 1TAgrom 0 AT ALL lftl�MlCM TO Oa AS O N2 04 S N M ALL W ,11,1111D&4% RAM aiN 1707 M Qfn.N®N r�CO. Mi! $1117 aftm 1111600C "W am A AN LL7CA7 ALOIiI • � ORAL Olai V10L,LAOMi 710Itt RiRetl pRA6Y >a OQA1MCtpt 1!N'Q»MI,>t PQC L.00.LTIOM OT ALL 1IntITd 13 ra+aa ro Ite'w�p N!. WTAH NAnRAL 8KJM a' P1..MR. ALL MX 01l.K.T TO M-rNWAL OT IL miMtittlp I'1e01.7� M A GOIlelwt A/o Imr tMlgO 1108 1b Rw'Oew. O01fIfeAGTOIe M YMe►1' RMOR TO RMCW R NWA" ww" MTYlI LAW AOD R.Mrt►tl ML74 t R Ob �COY.i�t10HA RL0 ALL COlOMM Q10O1K iL NOTALL evaAt tiLIIOQT tae �QW.T MR N071UCila» Qi ALL Mfa►a00YlMYrai MOO MTN A e1.OP°tt p A.1 ae WlMIR w M!M All tiMlOtl tDT Myo• M Yrsel d r»SN1b eerAl I I ♦ I i I PLANT L15T n I Scientfffc Name Common Name Planting Size Comments '10 Ilex cornuta 'Dwarf Burford' Dwarf Burford holly 5-Gal/14' Ht 3' 0C I Pinus eldarica Eiderica pine 3' -Cal B Z B 5 Ulmue craesffolla Cedar elm 3' -Cal B t B 3 Quercus macrocarpa Bur oak 3' -Cal B < B 3 Pfetacla chinenele Chineee pletache 3' -Cal B t B ANED5CAFE F SCALE: 1"=10'0" i LOT 2, BLOCK i% 5ATNRE ADDITION GRAPEVINE, TEXAS NORTH 4 a �1 CASE NAME: CU??-?? CASE NUMBER: Professional Office LOCATION: 313 W. Wall Street Lot 2, Block 1 Sathre Addition MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 2 OF 7 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CASE NUMBER GU77-77 CASE NAME: 777777777777 CASE ADDRESS: 313 W. WALL STREET LOT 2, BLOCK 1, SATHRE ADDITION PREPARER: MUWRIGHT A ASSOC, INC. SHEET 2 OF I e wuc+v rva VEST ELEVATION BUILDING "1 1/4••I'0' EAST ELEVATIQK-' BUILDING 01 114,-,,m* ASE NUMBER: Professional Office DCATION: 313 W. Wall Street Lot 2, Block 1 Sathre Addition MAYOR SECRETARY TATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN )ATE: SHEET: 3 OF 7 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORI IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. _�.....�..�.� �no•.on�r eeovircc SHINGLES AT 12,12 SHINGLES AT 8:12 IIT PLATE_ _ — RAILING POST 9'I' PLATE 1'-O' HD.HT. NORTH ELEVATION 5UILDING *2. 114'=I'O' WEST ELEVATION BUILDING IW2 114'=1'0' RAILING POST E HT. ING 9'I' PLATE i'-0' HDA -4t. AT 1202 1I 12 SHINGLES AT 8:12 PLATE 9'1' PLATE i'-0' HDAT. 2 PL 1/4'-1'0' CASE NAME: CU??-?? CASE NUMBER: Professional Office LOCATION: 313 W. Wall Street Lot 2, Block 1 Sathre Addition MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 4 OF 7 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1....EVATION& CASE NUMBER: CU77-77 CASE NAME: 777777777777 CASE ADDRESS: 313 W. WALL STREET LOT 2, BLOCK I, SATHRE ADDITION F'REPARER MJWRIGHT 4 ASSOC—, INC. SHEET 3 OF 1 ........... . ... . ....... . WALL STRFI=T \009-GRADPLAN.dgn 8/11/2004 -12:50:48 PM SCALE T' 20' 20 CASE NAME: CU??-?? CASE NUMBER: Professional Office LOCATION: 313W. Wall Street Lot 2, Block I Sathm Addition MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET--§— OF 7 APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT KITHANYCODES OR ORDINANCES, DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Z 0 u 1--o z z " 1XI 1� L 0 cf) Lu cc z u! < 0 WZ LL11 X < U- 0 cc mOLL z 0000 LU t7 N LIJ U a. 0 0 11muff MEN SITE PLAN - CASE NUMBER: CU??-?? CASE NAME: ?77??7717??? CASE ADDRESS: 313 W. WALL STREET LOT 2, BLOCK 1, SATHRE ADDITION SHEET LPREPARER: MJWRIGHT & ASSOC., INC. SHEET , OF 7 V5 OF 7 DEVELOPED SITE DRAINAGE DATA MARK AREA (AC) C TC (MIN.) Is Ile4w (IN/HR) (IN/HR) (IN/HR) 623 B2� .. ,, : .. G28. .628„ 6 6 526 A 0.29 0.80 10 j to — :_ _._ 2.7 TO WALL ST. BAR DITCH B 0.57 0.80 10 6.7 7.8 11.6 3.1 621 - 5.3 TO WEST POINT POINT i.N�;G BEGINNING - 627 \ !!l PROPOSED BUILDING -..,. i ... .. .. ,. ...... ,_. ,..'. 629 OD .� PROPOSED BUILDING .... .. ....... .. •. } ': FF . 628.00 ;:..... , .. .. DEVELOPED SITE DRAINAGE DATA MARK AREA (AC) C TC (MIN.) Is Ile4w (IN/HR) (IN/HR) (IN/HR) OS (CFS) o)s (CFS) 01w COMMENTS (CFS) A 0.29 0.80 10 j ,..... 1.6 1.8 2.7 TO WALL ST. BAR DITCH B 0.57 0.80 DEVELOPED SITE DRAINAGE DATA MARK AREA (AC) C TC (MIN.) Is Ile4w (IN/HR) (IN/HR) (IN/HR) OS (CFS) o)s (CFS) 01w COMMENTS (CFS) A 0.29 0.80 10 6.7 7.8 11.6 1.6 1.8 2.7 TO WALL ST. BAR DITCH B 0.57 0.80 10 6.7 7.8 11.6 3.1 3.6 5.3 TO WEST ■ \009-DAMAP.dgn 8/11/2004 12:52:25 PM f -! o mSCA EzV 20' .o CASE NAME: CU?? -0? CASE NUMBER: Professional Office LOCATION: 313 W. Wali Street Lot 2, Block 1 Sethre Addiffon MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET:— OF T APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORfZEANYWORK IN CONFLICT WlTHANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERWCES Z C- ul O Q C5 co 2 < ir Q Com!} LU LL! W co_ccZ Q Lid -- Z t3 11J >U�7D- Q u - LL CC LU CC�� Z_ w �C) W Q p a j SITE PLAN CASE NUMBER: CU?? -?7 61.1 CASE NAME: ???????????? CASE ADDRESS: 313 W. WALL STREET LOT 2, BLOCK 1, SATHRE ADDITION SHEET PREPARER: MJWRIGHT &ASSOC., INC. SHEETS OF T 6 OF 7 \009-UTILPLAN.dgn 8/11/2004 12:51:41 PM ........... ............... CASE NAME: CU??-?? CASE NUMBER: Professional Office LOCATION: 313 W. Wall Street Lot 2, Block I Sathre Addition MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET' 7 OF 7 APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT MTHANYCODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES <x Ld z < Lu L2 L LL (D LL W moo c\i E�5 LU z F - z Ill SITE PLAN H CASE NUMBER: CU??-?? CASE NAME: ?77????????? CASE ADDRESS: 313 W. WALL STREET SHEET LOT 2, BLOCK 1, SATHIRE ADDITION PREPARER: MJWRIGHT &ASSOC., INC. SHEET 7 OF 7 7 OF 7 . . ......... .................... ........ .................. - . .... . ..... ... G" WATER, WALL STREET [EXIST. ... ... . .. ....... . .. ...... ----------- A" UTILIZE EXISTING "I WATER SERVICE PO,,NT OF BEGNNING FURNISH AND INSTALL: 1" WATER SERVICE L T 2 ,31,6,2 7,E: SF 7 ....... . ................ ... . ...... FURNISH AND INSTALL: 1 4' SEWER SERVICE .. ...... .. FURNISH AND INSTALL: 1 4" SEWER SERVICE ........ . ..... . .. . ........ - . ...... ...... ..... ............. . . ....... . . .......... ... ............ . ... SEWER EXIST. SANITARY \009-UTILPLAN.dgn 8/11/2004 12:51:41 PM ........... ............... CASE NAME: CU??-?? CASE NUMBER: Professional Office LOCATION: 313 W. Wall Street Lot 2, Block I Sathre Addition MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET' 7 OF 7 APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT MTHANYCODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES <x Ld z < Lu L2 L LL (D LL W moo c\i E�5 LU z F - z Ill SITE PLAN H CASE NUMBER: CU??-?? CASE NAME: ?77????????? CASE ADDRESS: 313 W. WALL STREET SHEET LOT 2, BLOCK 1, SATHIRE ADDITION PREPARER: MJWRIGHT &ASSOC., INC. SHEET 7 OF 7 7 OF 7