HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 04 - SU16-03 Verizon WirelessTO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER
SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR
MEETING DATE: JULY 19, 2016
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF SPECIAL
USE APPLICATION SU16-03 VERIZON WIRELESS
r,
'
Grapevine!
Lake1/ APPLICANT: Crown Castle
I �oe I
> PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE:
I
s y ' I. H. 1635
°"°""West The subject property is located at 525 Industrial
i
Boulevard and is platted as Lot 3, Grapevine
Industrial Park. The addition contains 1.45 acres
Dand has approximately 243 feet of frontage along
S FW 3 1
Hall -Johnson ti�so Airport
CL Industrial Boulevard.
I
REQUESTED SPECIAL USE AND COMMENTS:
The applicant is requesting a special use permit to amend the previously approved site
plan of SU02-01 (Ord. 2002-22) to allow the collocation of a wireless facility, specifically to
expand the ground lease and allow an additional wireless carrier on an existing monopole
With this request the applicant intends to expand an existing lease area 240 square feet
(from 600 square feet to 840 square feet), add ground equipment and an antenna array on
an existing monopole. The subject property is zoned "LI" Light Industrial District and is
developed with three office/warehouse buildings and cellular communications equipment.
A 75 foot monopole is located approximately 175 feet east of Industrial Boulevard within
the parking lot of the development. The applicant intends to add ground equipment
including a nine foot in height canopy to cover a generator and equipment cabinets
mounted on a concrete slab. The ground equipment will support an antenna array of six
R:\Agenda\2016\2016-07-19\SU16-03.4.doc July 13, 2016 (10:12AM)
antenna located at the 60 foot point on the monopole. The proposed expanded
equipment/lease area is located west of the existing ground equipment and monopole. A
six foot in height chain link fence is proposed around the perimeter of the 840 square foot
lease site. The expanded lease area will require the reduction of two existing parking
spaces. Required parking for the existing office/warehouse/manufacturing use is 25
parking spaces and 40 spaces are provided.
PRESENT ZONING AND USE:
The property is currently zoned "LI" Light Industrial District and developed with three
office/warehouses which are occupied by industrial and warehouse users and the cellular
communications monopole and equipment area.
HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA:
The subject property and immediate area is zoned "LI" Light Industrial District. Buildings "A"
and "B," located on the northern half of the subject tract, were developed before 1984
under the previous Zoning Ordinance and are considered non -conforming. Building "C," a
12,000 square foot office/warehouse development on the southern portion, was approved
via case SP95-29 in April 1996.
Three Special Use Permit requests for the property have been considered by the Planning
and Zoning Commission and City Council in the past. A 100 foot high monopole proposed
by Nextel was approved in this location in June 1995, via case SU95-02 (Ord. 95-46).
However, the Special Use Permit expired one year later as development of the tower had
not commenced. In February 1997, the City Council denied case SU96-12 for the same
Nextel 100 foot high monopole, recommending collocation on facilities at Baylor Medical
Center. In December, 2001, City Council denied without prejudice a proposal for this same
75 -foot Cingular Wireless monopole via case SU01-08, stating that more information and
analysis regarding alternative sites in the proposed service area would be required.
Special Use Permit SU02-01 (Ord. 2002-22) was approved by the City Council at the
February 19, 2002 meeting to allow for a 75 foot high monopole and an equipment shelter.
South of the subject site Conditional Use Permit CU16-08 (Ord. 2016-030) was approved
by the City Council on June 21, 2016 to allow for the manufacture, possession, storage,
sale and on -premises consumption of alcoholic spirits in conjunction with a distillery.
SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE:
NORTH: "LI," Light Industrial District—Dunbar Armored Trucks, GT Products
SOUTH: "Ll," Light Industrial District—Astra Tools Co. and Impact Designs
EAST: "LI," Light Industrial District – Caliber Collision
R:\Agenda\2016\2016-07-19\S U 16-03.4.doc
July 13, 2016 (10:12AM)
WEST: "LI," Light Industrial District — Four Seasons
The subject tract is located within "Zone B" Middle Zone of Effect as defined on the
Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. In Zone B,
the following uses may be considered only if sound treatment is included in building design:
multi family apartments, motels, office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, personal and
business services. Single family residential and sound sensitive uses such as schools and
churches should avoid this zone. The applicant's proposal is an appropriate use in this
noise zone.
MASTER PLAN APPLICATION:
The Master Plan designates the subject property as Industrial land use. The applicant's
proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan.
Industrial Boulevard is not designated on the City of Grapevine Thoroughfare Plan.
/at
O: \ZC U\2016\S U1 6-03\SU 16-03.4. doc
3
July 11, 2016 (5:04PM)
WIN-, !Wnw' k"�NA` IM"Uh!
)GRA2 q Vf % A S
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
SPECIAL USE APPLICATION
WIRELESS FACILITY SITING
Form "A„
PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of applicant/ agent:/company/contact
applicant: Verizon Wireless / authorized agent: Haley Peck with Crown Castle
Street address of applicant/ agent:
600 E. John Carpenter Fwy. #300
City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent:
Irving, TX 75062
Telephone number of applicant / agent: Fax number of applicant/ agent:
972-374-4281 972-374-4270
Email address of applicant/ agent Mobile phone number of applicant / agent
Applicant's interest in subject property:
leasing space from existing cell tower (monopole) located on property
PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION
Street address of subject property
525 Industrial Blvd., Grapevine, TX 76051
Legal description of subject property (metes &bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11 "sheet)
Lot 3 Block Addition Grapevine Industrial Park
Size of subject property
1.45 ,acres 63,162
Square footage
Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property:
Light Industrial Addition of new carrier, Verizon Wireless, to existing monopole on property.
Minimum / maximum district size for special use request:
N/A
ordinance provision requiring a special use:
csvrtinn 49.8.1 f('nmmunication Uses)
PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name of current property owner.
LT2 Properties LLC (Tim Lancaster)
address of property owner:
4100 Heritage Ave. #105
CitylStatelZip Code of property owner.
Grapevine, TX 76051
Telephone number of property owner. p Fax number of property owner:
q) ]` �7� ® '60
D[,JFP 2
Ll I
i
Submit a letter describing the proposed special use and note the request on the site plan document
W In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and special requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular special use by
applicable district regulations (example: buffer yards, distance between users)
Q In the same letter, describe whether the proposed special use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of
other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed special use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property
in the neighborhood.
;. Application of site plan approval (Section 47, see attached Form `B').
ja The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements.
@ All conditional use and special use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearin
at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date.
,E9 All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the
next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled.
Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or special use permit can only be approved by
city council through the public hearing process.
I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or special use permit and acknowledge
that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal.
Cjkt2U---14E11-11f2k
Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's nature:
The State Of d"
County Of 4-C
Before Me % �>i �, on this day personally appeared �c
(notary)
(applicant)
known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed.
(Seal) Given day of l A.D1 r;
_ ..._� , .
JILL W ""
Notary Pubtic, State of Texas
' M Commission Expires
P
y p'
February 03, 2019
o An For State -Texas
L'I'Z d,Fj'�e t -
Print Property Owners /dame: Property Owner's Signature:
The State Of_!y
County Of
Before Me ` on this day personally appeared
(notary) (property owner)
known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed.
Vi day of _, A. D. �.
REBECCA L FITZEK
May Commission Expires
s. s
December 2, 2017 Notary In And For State Of Texas
All Conditional Use and Special Use Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and
will be placed on the agenda forpublic hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size
of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date.
All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry.
Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be
tabled.
Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or
a special use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process.
Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall
have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an
agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of
four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said
application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application,
along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration.
Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City
Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period.
I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for
conditional use or special use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this
application have been met at the time of submittal.
®ate: ig—/t 7 // 0
June 3, 2016
City of Grapevine
Planning and Zoning Department
200 S. Main St.
Grapevine, TX 76051
To Whom It May Concern:
Crown Castle
600 East John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 300
Irving, TX 75062
As you may be aware, on February 22, 2012, Congress enacted "collocation -by -right" legislation
preempting delays in the process of zoning the collocation of transmission equipment on existing wireless
communications facilities ("Section 6409(a)").' Section 6409(a) mandates that local governments must
approve any eligible facilities request for the modification of an existing wireless tower or base station
that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. More recently,
the Federal Communications Commission (the "FCC") adoptedru les to implement and enforce the
provisions of Section 6409(a).2 Under the FCC's rules, if a local government fails to issue a decision
within 60 days on an application submitted pursuant to Section 6409(a), the application is deemed
granted.3
Enclosed herein please find the application materials required for zoning approval of the modification to
the wireless tower located at 525 Industrial Blvd., Grapevine, TX 76051. Please note that: (i) the
modification involves the collocation of new transmission equipment; and (ii) such modification will not
substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower. As such, it is an "eligible facilities request"
as defined in the FCC's rules, and City of Grapevine must therefore approve this request within 60 days.
The proposed modification complies with all federal, state, and local zoning and permitting
requirements. It is our expectation that this application will be processed without any undue delay and
in a manner consistent with the newly enacted federal legislation. Thank you in advance for your
anticipated cooperation.
Sincerely,
P'12— '14k
Haley Peck
Real Estate Specialist
Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, Pub. L. No. 112-96, § 6409 (2012)
2 Acceleration of Broadband Deployment by Improving Wireless Facility Siting Policies, 80 Fed. Reg. 1238-01 (Jan
2015)(to be codified at 47 C.F.R. 1 and 17) (the "FCC Infrastructure Order")
3 See FCC Infrastructure Order at para. 115.
The Foundation for a Wireless World.
CrownCastle.com
8,
CCCROW
CASTLi
June 3, 2016
City of Grapevine
Planning and Zoning Department
200 S. Main St.
Grapevine, TX 76051
RE: Project Description
To Whom It May Concern:
Crown Castle
600 East John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 300
Irving, TX 75062
Verizon Wireless is proposing to collocate on the existing wireless communications tower (monopole) located at
525 Industrial Blvd., Grapevine, TX 76051. The existing tower is 70'-6" tall and is currently being occupied by one
other carrier, AT&T. Verizon Wireless is proposing to install (6) antennas at the 6o' level, below AT&T's existing
antennas. No additional height increase for the tower is required. Verizon Wireless is also proposing the
installation of a new 1o' x 15' concrete pad within Crown Castle's lease area for the location of their ground
equipment. Verizon Wireless will be installing (1) generator and (2) equipment cabinets. The cabinets will be
placed under a new canopy and the area will be enclosed by chain link fence.
The proposed collocation of Verizon Wireless on this existing cell tower will not cause substantial harm to the
value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. The cell tower is pre-existing on the property
without any issues. Verizon Wireless is proposing their antennas to be located below the existing antennas, so
there will only be a very minimal aesthetic change to the look of the tower. It will not cause any changes to the
surrounding area. The proposed ground equipment is the minimal amount needed so that Verizon Wireless's site
is able to function and will be unobtrusive.
The proposed collocation of Verizon Wireless on this existing cell tower will add to the value, use, or enjoyment of
other property in the neighborhood. Adding a site for Verizon Wireless at this location will increase their coverage
to the surrounding area without the need for the installation of a new tower. Collocation is favored and
encouraged by the City of Grapevine and presently, there is only one carrier on this tower. The proposal would
enhance the site by allowing another carrier to locate by the least intrusive means.
Thank you in advance for your review and consideration of this application. We look forward to working with the
City of Grapevine on this and future wireless communications efforts.
Sincerely,
Haley Peck 4�
Real Estate Specialist
The Foundation for a Wireless World.
CrownCastle.com
Su (to, 0 a
Exhibit 2.03.1— Section 6409(a) Eligible facility request for modification that does not substantially
change the physical dimensions of an existing tower or base station
Section 6409(a) applies to this project as it meets the applicable requirements as set forth in FCC Rules,
47 CFR 1.40001 Wireless Facility Modifications (FCC Rules).
(1) The project is an "eligible facility" as a "tower" as defined in FCC Rules. The tower is a monopole
that was built for the sole purpose of supporting Commission-licensed/authorized antennas and
their associated facilities. It currently (and only) supports AT&T as a carrier. The tower was
originally approved by City of Grapevine for Cingular Wireless (later acquired by AT&T) through
SUP #SU02-01 on 2/19/2002.
(2) The tower to be modified as the Project meets the definition of "existing" in FCC Rules, as it has
been reviewed and approved through the City of Grapevine SUP process. It was approved by
SUP #SU02-01 on 2/19/2002. Copies of previous approvals are attached. There were no City
required conditions besides conformance to the approved site plans.
(3) The "site" of the tower to be modified by the Project is a 55' x 16' space leased by Crown Castle
from the Property Owner, LT2 Properties LLC. Verizon Wireless will then lease a 15' x 16' portion
of the site from Crown Castle for placement of their equipment. Please see the zoning drawings
for a map and location/boundaries.
(4) Does not apply, not located in public ROW
(5) The request to modify is a "collocation" as defined in FCC Rules, as Verizon Wireless is proposing
to install their antennas and other equipment on the existing monopole, that is an eligible
support structure (as described above). The purpose of Verizon Wireless's installation is
transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for communications purposes.
(6) The modification Project does not include or require replacement in the form of "hardening" of
the tower.
(7) The requested modification of the tower to be modified by the Project does not "substantially
change the physical dimensions" of the existing tower. as those terms are defined in FCC rules,
specifically:
a. There is no increase in tower height proposed. Verizon Wireless's antennas will be
installed below the existing antennas.
b. There is no increase in the width and/or protrusions of appurtenances and/or
transmission equipment from the tower to be modified. The proposed antennas will
protrude no further from the tower than the existing antennas, which is approximately
3.3'.
C
I
Verizon Wireless does propose an increase in transmission equipment/cabinets on the
ground of the site of the tower to be modified, but it will not be more than the standard
number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved and will not exceed four
cabinets. They are proposing two equipment cabinets and one generator.
There will be no proposed excavations or deployment outside the current site. Verizon
Wireless's proposed ground equipment will be installed within Crown Castle's lease
area. The current site is defined as the leasehold or other grope
P=,
Exhibit 4.01— Existing zoning regulations or other City requirements at the Project site and requested
variances/waivers
4.01.1: The applicable City of Grapevine Zoning Ordinance section is 49.6.1— Special Use Permits,
Authorized Special Uses, Communication Uses. The Project is subject to review and approval of a SUP. A
monopole is one of the antenna support structure types listed to be regulated and governed by this
section. One accessory equipment building is allowed per antenna support structure. There is already
one shelter at the site and no new shelter or building is proposed. There are no proposed commercial
signs, flags, lights and attachments other than those required for communications operations or
structural stability. The Project is in full compliance with the existing zoning regulations or other City
requirements. There were no previously required conditions of prior permits at the Project site, besides
conformance to the approved site plans. This SUP is needed for changes to the site plan. This is a
qualified Section 6409(a) application.
4.01.2: There were no previously required City conditions from prior permits, besides conformance to
the approved site plans. The proposed changes to the previously approved site plans are allowed by the
"substantial change" thresholds identified in FCC Rules and explained above. The Project is in full
compliance with the existing zoning regulations or other City requirements.
.S '✓ � � E_ is : ��
TERMS USED IN THIS APPLICATION.•
"Applicant" —This is the person or entity that will actually utilize the Project, with the permit in the
Applicant's name.
"Applicant's Agent" -- Applicant's Agent is the agent for the Applicant in connection with this
application and is authorized to sign and submit the application on the Applicant's behalf.
"FCC 2009 Declaratory Ruling" --- Federal Communication Commission Order, In the Matter of
Petition for Declaratory Ruling to Clarify Provisions of Section 332(c) (7) (B), 24 FCC Rcd 13994
(2009).'
"FCC 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order"-- Federal Communication Commission Order, In the
Matter of Acceleration of Broadband Deployment by Improving Wireless Facilities Siting Policies, WT
Docket No. 13-238, _ FCC Rcd (Adopted Oct. 17, 2014, Released Oct. 27, 2014) [For Effective
dates see end note, but for Section 6409 (a) rules, no earlier than April 8, 2015]. Interpretation of
Section § 6409(a) (47 U.S.C. § 1455(a)."
"FCC Rules" —FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 Wireless Facility Modifications, et al.
"Property Owner" -- Is the underlying owner of the property on which the Project is located.
"Project" -- For purposes of this application, the new site or modification/addition to an existing
wireless facilities site will be termed the "Project".
"Section 322 (c) (7)" —Federal law, 47 U.S.C. § 332 (c) (7).
"Section 6409 (a)" —Federal law, 47 U.S.C. § 1455(a) (Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief
Act of 2013).
1.01.1: Full Legal Name of Applicant: Including full name of individuals, corporate name, LLC, LLP,
as applicable.):
1.01.2: Principal Applicant Contact Name
Title: Project Manager
Firm Name (If applicable):
Address: 11710 FM 2661
City: Tyler
Tel: 817-770-2101 Ext
Work Fax: 817-394-1210
Ashley Fowler
Verizon Wireless
State: TX Zip: 75709
(Optional) Mobile Tel:
Email Address: ashley.fowler@cabass.net
(Optional) Website:
1.01.3: If applicable, Applicant's Agent Name: Haley Peck
Title: Real Estate Specialist
Firm Name: Crown Castle
Address: 600 E. John Carpenter Fwy. #300
City: Irving State: TX Zip: 75062
Tel: 972-374-4281 Ext:
Work Fax: 972-374-4270
(Optional) Mobile Tel:
Email Address: haley.peck@crowncastle.com
(Optional) Website:
M
1.02.1: If the underlying owner of the property on which the Project is located ("Property Owner") is
not the same as the Applicant, please include information on the Property Owner's name, company or
firm, title, address, email and telephone number. included on application
1.02.2: If the underlying Property Owner is not the same as the Applicant and does not sign the
application acknowledging its consent to file the Application for the Project, please attach a letter of
agency appointing the Applicant, or the Applicant's representative or Applicant's Agent, as applicable,
as the agent for the Property Owner in connection with this Application and as being fully authorized
to sign the Application on the Property Owner's behalf acknowledging the Property Owner's consent
to file the Application for the Project. Property owner has signed application
Designate this as "Exhibit 1.02.2, Property Owner's Letter of Agency".
1.02.3: If the Project is located in the public right-of-way, describe in detail the governmental authority
and/or statutory authority, or other legal authority that granted the Applicant the privilege to use the
rights-of-way for a wireless facility. Not located in public ROW
Designate this as "Exhibit 1.02.3, Permission to use ROW for wireless facility".
1.02.4: If the Project is located in the public right-of-way, and will be placed in infrastructure not
owned or controlled by the Applicant, such as an existing wireless antenna support tower or utility
pole, street light pole, or traffic signal pole, describe in detail the legal basis for the use of that
infrastructure, providing copies of pole attachment or other agreements with the owner of the
infrastructure. Not located in public ROW
Designate this as "Exhibit 1.02.4, Permission to use ROW infrastructure".
1.03.1: If the Applicant is an individual, they must sign their full name on the cover page to the
Application, representing that: 1.) they have read and understand the Application and; 2.1 to the best
of their knowledge the answers and information submitted with the Application are true and correct.
Application has been signed
1.03.2: If the Applicant is not an individual, an Applicant's in-house representative must sign their full
name on the cover page to the Application, representing that: 1.) they have the authority to act for the
business entity of the Applicant; 2.) they have read and understand the Application; and 3.) to the
best of their knowledge the answers and information submitted with the Application are true and
correct.
1.03.3:lf neither the Applicant nor the Applicant's in-house representative signs the application form,
please attach a letter of agency appointing the above named Applicant's Agent as the agent for the
Applicant in connection with this application and as being fully authorized to sign and submit the
application on the Applicant's behalf. The Applicant's Agent must sign their full name on the cover
page to the Application, representing that: 1.) they have the authority to act for the business entity of
the Applicant; 2.) they have read and understand the Application; and 3.) to the best of their
knowledge the answers and information submitted with the Application are true and correct.
Designate this as "Exhibit 1.03.3: Applicant's Letter of Agency." p i1
/20
iu f r ;
���
0 • - • . 1 •
The type of wireless facility Project determines the review time under federal law for the City to act in
deciding to grant or deny a permit. The three possible City review periods, depending on type of
project, are:
150 days is the default, but rebuttable presumptive time for the City to review and act on all
new wireless facility sites and projects that do not qualify as either a Section 322 (c) (7)
"collocation" on an existing tower or a Section 6409 (a) modification to an "eligible" existing
tower or existing base station.
® 90 days is the default, but rebuttable presumptive time for the City to review and act on a
Section 322 (c) (7) "collocation" on an existing tower, when supported by complete
documentation submitted with the application.
® 60 days is the time allowed for the City to review and act on a Section 6409 (a) "eligible
facilities request" for modification of an existing tower or existing base station, when supported
by complete documentation submitted with the application.
Both a Section 322 (c) (7) "collocation" on an existing tower and a Section 6409 (a)
modification to eligible an existing tower or existing base station have detailed restrictions to qualify. If
the Applicant is asserting that the Project qualifies for either of those two types of projects, complete
the below questions, and provide the requested information in full to avoid a delay in you application's
review for incompleteness.
The City review times start when the application is filed, but can be tolled (not counted) if the
application is incomplete. Section 332 (c) (7) presumptive times are rebuttal by the City, and the City
does not waive, but reserves its right to rebut those times as not reasonable under the
circumstances."' All of the City review times may be extended by the Applicant, with mutual, written
agreement."
30 day review for completeness of the application for purposes of the City review period:
If the City determines the application is incomplete it will provide written notice to the Applicant
within 30 days of filing of the application that the application is incomplete, detailing the
missing information and citing where that information was required. The remaining time for the
City to review the application does not start again until the supplemental information has been
provided to the City in full.
For the maps and drawings required, the following standards apply it the City's determination
of completeness. The size of each submitted map, drawing, Project elevation renderings and/or
photographs and photo simulations must be no smaller than 11" by 8.5." Each must use the same
streets names and legends.
L1-01: the Application is for a project that does not qualifyeither Section322 (c) (7) "collocation" on an existing tower or a - .-0• "eligible
modification to an existing towerThe City will _
ty-presume that the
RE
Application's Project is neither a collocation project qualified under Section 322 (c) (7) nor is it an
"eligible facility" request for modification under Section 6409 (a), unless the Applicant clearly asserts
that it is, providing the below requested information in Section 2.02 or Section 2.03, as applicable, in
full and in complete detail.
If the above presumption is correct, please check here indicating yes, and go to
Section 3.
If the above presumption is not correct, complete Section 2.02 or Section 2.03, as applicable.
2.02: 47 U.S.C. § Section 332 (c) (7) collocation project: If the Applicant asserts that this Project is
eligible and fully qualifies as a 47 U.S.C. § 332 (c) (7) collocation project request as defined in FCC
2009 Declaratory Ruling," attach a detailed written statement describing the reasons upon which the
applicant believes that that the Project is eligible for 47 U.S.C. § 332 (c) (7) collocation treatment, to
include at a minimum complete answers to the below questions in 2.02.1 below:
2.02.1: Detailed engineer sealed drawings of the measurements described below:
(1) Detailed information on the existing tower where the collocation is to be placed, to include but
not be limited to copies of the initial application and permit, and any subsequent modification
applications and permits, even if denied.
(2) Detailed information on the existing tower where the collocation is to be placed as to whether
the mounting of the proposed antenna on the tower increases the existing height of the tower
by more than 10%, or by the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the
nearest existing antenna not to exceed twenty feet, whichever is greater? Explain in detail.
Please provide detailed engineer sealed drawings of these measurements.
(3) Detailed information on the existing tower where the collocation is to be placed as to whether
the mounting of the proposed antenna involve adding an appurtenance to the body of the
tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than twenty feet, or more than the
width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater? Explain in
detail. Please provide detailed engineer sealed drawings of these measurements.
(4) If the mounting of the proposed antenna exceeds the size limits set forth in (2) (height) and/or
(3) (width/protrusions), is it asserted it was necessary to either avoid interference with existing
antennas or to shelter the antenna from inclement weather or to connect the antenna to the
tower via cable? Explain in detail. Please provide detailed engineer sealed drawings of
supporting these asserted claims.
(5) Detailed information on the existing tower where the collocation is to be placed as to whether
the mounting of the proposed antenna involve the installation of more than the standard
number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved, not to exceed four, or more
than one new equipment shelter? Explain in detail. Please provide detailed engineer sealed
drawings of these measurements.
(6) Detailed information on the existing tower where the collocation is to be placed as to whether
the mounting of the proposed antenna involve excavation outside the current tower site,
defined as the current boundaries of the leased or owned property surrounding the tower and
any access or utility easements currently related to the site, including any physical, wireline,
interconnections to other locations, noting existing wireli ertions. d new ones?
Explain in detail. Please provide detailed engineer sealed dra is qt IF �e�bments.
J" < I 22
1
(7) Please include a detailed map depicting the sites' boundary of the property owned or leased
for purposes of the tower Project, and the location of the tower Project within that boundary,
and depicting the tower Project as it is at the time of the application, and after the requested
collocation, in both an overhead format, and in elevations from each side. Please provide
detailed engineer sealed drawings of this depiction.
Designate this attachment as "Exhibit 2.02.1, Section 332 (c) (7), Eligible Collocation Project"
Go to Section 3.
2.03: Section 6409'(a) eligible facilities request for modification: If the Applicant asserts that this
Project is an eligible facility request for modification under Section 6409 (a) as it does not
"substantially change the physical dimensions" of an existing tower or base station, as those terms
are defined in FCC 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order and FCC Rules, please attach a detailed
written statement describing the basis of the assertion that Section 6409 (a) applies to this Project
and why it meets the applicable requirements as set for in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 Wireless
Facility Modifications, et al, to include complete answers to the questions in 2.03.1 below:
2.03.1. Provide detailed information and detailed engineer sealed drawings of the measurements
described to answer the questions below, at a minimum providing documentation or information to the
extent reasonably related to the request for modification to allow the City to determine whether the
request for modification meets the detailed requirements set for in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001
Wireless Facility Modifications, et al:
(1) Is the Project an "eligible facility" as a either a "tower" or a "base station" as defined in FCC
Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 (b) (1) and (9)? Explain in detail.
(2) Provide detailed information on how the tower or base station to be modified as the Project
meets the definition of "existing" in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 (b) (5). Include with this
explanation copies of the initial application and permit of the tower or base station, and any
subsequent modification applications and permits, even if denied, and of any City required
conditions placed on the initial or subsequent permits, such as, but not limited to, safety,
setbacks, fencing, landscaping, and concealment or stealth requirements.
(3) Provide detailed information and documents on the "site" of the tower or base station to be
modified by the Project as "site" is defined in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 (b) (6), to allow
the City to determine the "site" for purposes of compliance with Section 6409 (a) eligibility.
Please include a detailed map depicting the sites' boundary of the property owned or leased
for purposes of the Project, and the location of the Project within that boundary, and depicting
the tower or base station as it is at the time of the application, and after the requested
modifications, in both an overhead format, and in elevations from each side.
(4) If the Project is located in the public right-of-way, describe by providing maps and drawings to
fully depict the area asserted to be in proximity to the structure and to other transmission
equipment already deployed on the ground, to include the location of the tower or base station
and transmission equipment already deployed on the ground within that proximity area,
depicting the tower or base station as it is at the time of the application, and after the
requested modification, in both an overhead format, and in elevations from each side. Include
the basis of the assertion as to the area in proximity to the eligible structure.v" Explain in full
detail to include maps and drawings to allow the City to d „mine -the." ' urposes of
compliance with Section 6409 (a) eligibility. D rfl)
23
(5) Is the request to modify a "collocation", as defined in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 (b) (2),
or a removal or replacement of "transmission equipment", as defined in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R.
§ 1.40001 (b) (8)? Explain in detail.
(6) To the extent the modification Project includes replacement in the form of "hardening" of the
tower or base station, please provide analysis by a licensed engineer as to why this hardening
is necessary for an eligible Section 6409 (a) collocation, replacement, or removal of
transmission equipment, and percentage of the structure that is being replaced.v"
(7) Provide detailed information on how the requested modification of the tower or base station to
be modified by the Project does not "substantially change the physical dimensions" of the
existing tower or base station, as those terms are defined in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001
(b). Explain in detail, specifically, including detailed licensed engineer sealed drawings, on how
the requested modification of the tower or base station Project is to be modified, to include:
a. Increases in the height of the tower or base station to be modified;
b. Increases in the width and/or protrusions of appurtenances and/or transmission
equipment from the tower or base station to be modified;
c. Increases in the transmission equipment/cabinets on the ground of the site of the tower
or base station to be modified;
d. Detail on any excavations and deployment outside the current site including any
physical, wireline, interconnections to other locations, noting existing wireline
connections and new ones.
e. How the requested modification of the tower or base station does not defeat any
previously required concealment (stealth) conditions from prior permits;
f. How the requested modification of the tower or base station complies with any other
previously required City conditions from prior permits, other than those allowed by the
"substantial change" thresholds identified in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001(b)(7)(i)-
(iv).
What constitutes a "substantial change" are detailed in the definition in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. §
1.40001 (b) (8), including how each item listed above is measured (i.e., height, width, protrusions
of appurtenances, number of cabinets). Please provide all documents and information to the
extent reasonably related to the request for modification to allow the City to determine whether the
request for modification meets the detailed requirements set for in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. §
1.40001 Wireless Facility Modifications, of al.
Designate this attachment as "Exhibit 2.03.1, Section 6409(a) Eligible facility request for modification
that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of an existing tower or base station"
Go to Section 3.
SECTION 3.00: GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
3.01: Project Street or other Physical Address designation used to
locate: 525 Industrial Blvd., Grapevine, TX 76051
3.01.1: Project Description: Collocation of Verizon Wireless to existing cell tower.
To the extent not answered in detail in Section 2 above, please pror1c
t .01.2 and
3.01.2 or 3.01.3 and 3.01.4, as applicable:
24
F I
3.01.1 Detailed map depicting the boundary of the property owned or leased for purposes of
the Project, and the location of the proposed Project within that boundary including street
names, addresses of buildings or residences in at least 300 yards of proximity to that area
including any physical, wireline, interconnections to other locations, noting existing wireline
connections and new ones. zoning drawings provided
3.01.2 Detailed to scale drawings depicting the existing wireless facilities structure as it is at
the time of the application, as applicable, and as the Project will be after the requested
modification, in both an overhead format, and in elevations from each side including any
physical, wireline, interconnections to other locations, noting existing wireline connections and
new ones. zoning drawings provided
3.01.3 If the Project is located in the public right-of-way, describe the location by providing
maps to depict the area with 200 feet of the Project, including street names, addresses of
buildings or residences and the area asserted to be in proximity to the Project, to include the
location of the Project structure within that area, including any physical, wireline,
interconnections to other locations, noting existing wireline connections and new ones.
3.01.4 Detailed to scale drawings depicting the existing wireless facilities structure as it is at
the time of the application, as applicable, and as the Project will be after completion, in both an
overhead format, and in elevations from each side including any physical, wireline,
interconnections to other locations, noting existing wireline connections and new ones.
Maps and drawings are to be prepared and sealed by a licensed Texas professions Engineer.
Designate the maps and drawings as "Exhibit 3.01.1, Project description, maps and
drawings."
3.02: Requested photo/elevation renderings to be submitted with the Application: (Not
applicable fora fully qualified Section 6409 (a) eligible facility's request to modify.) NSA
3.02.1: Project Elevation Renderings and/or Photographs and Photo Simulations.
(1) To the extent not provided in other responses, where the Project as proposed by the
Applicant can be seen at ground level from the street, or from the 1st floor within or on
buildings within 500 feet of the Project provide four elevation renderings and/or
photographs and/or photo simulations of the Project, including its tower, base station,
antennas, antenna concealment/stealth coverings, equipment cabinets, back-up
generations, and lights, as applicable.
(2) A map detail showing each location where that elevation renderings and/or photographs
and/or photo simulations were taken, together with the Project site, and the direction to the
site from each elevation renderings and/or photographs and/or photo simulations must be
included.
The Applicant should submit elevation renderings and/or photographs and/or photo simulations
as set out above, and may be requested by the City to provide additional elevation renderings
and/or photographs and/or photo simulations to allow the Cit to visualize the Project as
completed. ' D
25
By their submittal with the application, Applicant represents that the elevation renderings
and/or photographs and/or photo simulations are accurate and reliable representations of the
current project site and the proposed Project to be constructed or modified, and that the
Applicant is fully aware that the City will rely on all of the elevation renderings and/or
photographs and/or photo simulations provided when it considers granting or denying the
Application for this Project.
Designate as "Exhibit 3.02.1, Project elevation renderings and/or photographs and
photo simulations."
REQUESTED.
4.01.1; Provide information on the existing zoning regulations or other City land use and/or safety
code requirements at the Project site that may be applicable to the Project.
4.01.1: If the Project is not in full compliance with the existing zoning regulations or other City
requirements or conditions of prior permits at the Project site provide detail as to how it is non-
compliant, and if a variance and/or waiver is requested by the Applicant for each instance of non-
compliance, and why the variance/waiver is requested, except for qualified Section 6409 (a)
Applicants. NSA
4.01.2: For qualified Section 6409 (a) Applicants, to the extent not answered above in Section 2.03.1
(7) f. above, provide details if the Project complies with any other previously required City conditions
from prior permits, and/or existing zoning regulations or other City requirements at the Project site
other than those allowed by the "substantial change" thresholds identified in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. §
1.40001(b)(7)(i)-(iv), and if not, and if a variance and/or waiver is requested by the Applicant for each
instance on non-compliance, and why the variance/waiver is requested.
Designate this as "Exhibit 4.01, Existing zoning regulations or other City requirements at the
Project site and requested variances/waivers."
SE :TION 5.00: PROJECT USE AND PURPOSE (,Not applicable for a fully qualifies' Section 6409 (a)
eligible facility's request to modify.) NSA
5.01: Principal Use of the Project: (One or more, as applicable)
If for private use, such as an amateur radio, describe generally in a written statement.
If for broadcast radio, broadcast TV, or satellite connectivity for data or cable television,
describe generally in a written statement.
If for commercial public cellular telephone, to include, but not limited to a network for "personal
wireless services" as defined in Section 322 (c) (7) (C), or a network for "commercial mobile
service" , as defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332 (d), Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio, Specialized
Mobile Radio, Microwave, PCS telephone, Small Cell, or a Distributed Antenna System (DAS),
describe generally in a written statement.
If for other uses, (e.g., Wi-Max or Wi-Fi), describe generally in a written statement.
5.02: If applicable, indicate whether the purpose of the Project is:
e)
26
_ Adding commercial cellular network without adding significant new radio frequency coverage area
to a network for "personal wireless services", as defined in Section 322 (c) (7) (C) and/or to a network
for "commercial mobile service", as defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332 (d).
_ Providing significant new radio frequency coverage in an area not already served by radio
frequency coverage to a network for "personal wireless services", as defined in Section 322 (c) (7) (C)
and/or to a network for "commercial mobile service", as defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332 (d).
_ Increasing the existing radio frequency signal level in an area with existing radio frequency
coverage to a network for "personal wireless services", as defined in Section 322 (c) (7) (C) and/or to
a network for "commercial mobile service", as defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332 (d).
Intended to close or reduce an asserted "significant gap" in a wireless telecommunications
cellular network, including to a network for "personal wireless services", as defined in Section 322 (c)
(7) (C) and/or to a network for "commercial mobile service", as defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332 (d).
_ Other. Attach a written statement fully describing all portions or elements of the "Other' dominant
purpose of this Project.
Designate this exhibit as "Exhibit 5.02, Other purpose of this Project."
SECTION 6.00 "SIGNIFICANT GAP" QUESTIONS IF APPLICABLE: (Not applicable for a fully
qualified Section 6409 (a) eligible facility's request to modify.) NSA
6.01: Is this Project intended to close or reduce an asserted "significant gap" in a wireless
telecommunications network, to include a network for "personal wireless services", as defined in
Section 322 (c) (7) (C) and/or for "commercial mobile service", as defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332 (d)
(sometimes referred to collectively as "cellular network")? If the answer is yes, attach a written
statement, signed and sealed by an engineer licensed in Texas, including his or her designated
primary area of engineering practice, and if it is not electrical engineering, then include a copy of his
or her Supplementary Experience Record (SER) as filed with the Texas Board of Professional
Engineers, Rule 133.97 (j), and explaining why he or she is competent without a designated primary
area in the engineering branch area of electrical engineering concerning Radio Frequency (RF)
engineering analysis. In such written statement provide full details describing the following:
(1) Geographic boundary of the claimed significant gap area, attaching a street -level map
showing that geographic boundary of the claimed significant gap.
(2) Describe the size of the claimed significant gap area in square miles; and
(3) Set out and explain the definition of and/or what constitutes a "significant gap" as used
by Applicant in this Project.
(4) If the term or of what constitutes a significant gap as set out above is different than the
term significant gap is used or applied by the wireless industry generally, if known,
and/or the FCC, if known, explain the differences and the reasons for the differences.
(5) Where the Applicant has relied on external data sources to factually support the claimed
significant gap area, identifying those sources and:
27
a. Whether the claimed significant gap affects a significant number of commuters
on particular roadways, and if so, name each roadway, and include addresses by
blocks, and how affected; and
b. Describe the number of potential cellular network users in the claimed significant
gap area; and
c. Describe the number of potential cellular network users in the claimed significant
gap area who may be affected by the claimed significant gap; and
d. Describe whether the proposed Project is needed to improve weak signals in a
cellular network or to fill a complete void in coverage in a cellular network, and
provide Radio Frequency (RF) engineering analysis proof of either; and
e. If the claimed significant gap covers roads on which the cellular network users
lack roaming capabilities, identify such roads by name and block address within
the claimed significant gap area and provide road use information about each
such road; and
f. If one or more "drive tests" was conducted within the claimed significant gap
area, discuss in detail the methodology of how the test(s) were conducted,
including details about the test equipment by manufacture, model numbers and
years in service, if more than 2 years, and calibration maintenance records, if
applicable, and location of the test equipment, including any antennas in or on
the test vehicle. Provide the objective data collected during the drive test in
standard portable spreadsheet format; and
g. If the claimed significant gap affects a retail commercial district, show the
boundaries of the district on the map; and
h. If the claimed significant gap poses a public safety risk, describe in detail the
claimed risk, and the basis for this claim, including any correspondence (email or
in writing) from or to the public, if any; and to or from any public safety officials
(fire, police, others), if any, concerning or relating to this claimed public safety
risk; and
(6) If the claimed significant gap is based in whole or in part on factors related to switching
center capacity; dropped calls; failed hand-offs; interference from or to other cell sites;
site hopping; degraded cellular radio frequency signals; and/or any failure to meet any
carrier transmission goal or percentage goal, attach at least the most recent twelve
months of historical data by month documenting at least:
a. The results or numerical data of each claimed metric and range of each
parameter;
b. the wireless carrier's numerical and percentage requirements for each such
claimed perimeter;
c. the total number of calls attempted for each month both successfully and
unsuccessfully completed;
d. the total number of calls that were not completed including failed originations;
failed hand-offs; and non -normal call terminations; and (5) for every such claimed
parameter that is not categorized by way of number or percentage, provide the
data in the way kept by the carrier.
D �6�)
� 8 7ty
S
f�
28
Designate this exhibit as "Exhibit 6.01, Basis of "significant gap" closing as a purpose of this
Project."
6.02: Alternative Candidate sites to close the significant gap, if applicable (Not applicable for a
fully qualified Section 6409 (a) eligible facility's request to modify.) N/A'
6.02.1: Did the Applicant, or anyone working on behalf of the Applicant, secured or attempted to
secure any leases or lease -options or similar formal or informal agreements in connection with this
Project for any sites other than the proposed Project site? If yes, please provide the physical address
of each such other location(s), and provide a narrative with technical explanation, to include a Radio
Frequency (RF) engineering analysis, as to why each such other site was not used as the project site,
including identifying and discussing all alternative sites considered to close the significant gap.
6.02.2: Are there any sites in lieu of the site proposed by Applicant that could either close the
significant gap claimed or reduce the significant gap to be less than significant, with less impact on
the community as compared with a single site? If yes, please provide the physical address of each
such other location(s), and provide a narrative with technical explanation to include a Radio
Frequency (RF) engineering analysis, as to why each such other site was not used as the project site,
including identifying and discussing all alternative sites considered to close the significant gap. If the
answer is no, please explain in narrative format the basis for that answer.
6.02.3: If there were no alternative sites were reviewed by the Applicant, or anyone working on behalf
of the Applicant, please answer why in technical detail to include a Radio Frequency (RF) engineering
analysis. .
Designate these Responses to 6.02.1 to 6.02.3 as "Exhibit 6.02, Alternative Candidate site to
close the significant gap information".
6.02.4: If the City required the Applicant to designate one or more sites as alternative sites to the
proposed site for the Project, would that requirement "unreasonably" discriminate against the
Applicant from among providers of functionally equivalent services, or prohibit or have the effect of
prohibiting the provision of "personal wireless services", as defined in Section 322 (c) (7) (C) and/or
"commercial mobile service", as defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332 (d)? If the Applicant's response asserts
that either unreasonable discrimination or a prohibition or effective prohibition would occur, explain in
detail in narrative form the technical, to include a Radio Frequency (RF) engineering analysis, why it
would do so.
Designate this Response as "Exhibit 6.02.4, City requirement of the Applicant to designate
alternative sites to the proposed site for the Project will prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting
the Applicant from providing any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service".
6.03: Proposed site, as the one and only one location to close the significant gap, if applicable
(Not applicable for a fully qualified Section 6409 (a) eligible facility's request to modify.) NSA
6.03.1: Does the Applicant considered the proposed site as the one and only one location within or
outside of the City that can close the significant gap? If yes, provide a technically detailed explanation
supported by comprehensive radio frequency data and other necessary information fully describing
why the proposed site is the one and only one location within or outside of the City that can possibly
close the significant gap to include a Radio Frequency (RF) engineering analysis.
1. ;TIM
29
Designate this Response as "Exhibit 6.03.1, Proposed site as the one and only one location to
close the significant gap information".
6.03.2.: If the City denied the application at the site proposed for the Project, would that denial
"unreasonably" discriminate against the Applicant from among providers of functionally equivalent
services, or prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of "personal wireless services", as
defined in Section 322 (c) (7) (C) and/or "commercial mobile service", as defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332
(d)? If the Applicant's response asserts that either unreasonable discrimination or a prohibition or
effective prohibition would occur, explain in detail in narrative form the technical, and other reasons
why it would do so to include a Radio Frequency (RF) engineering analysis.
Designate this Response as "Exhibit 6.03.2, City denial of this Project at this site will prohibit or
have the effect of prohibiting the Applicant from providing any interstate or intrastate
telecommunications service".
6.04: Least intrusive means to close the significant gap, if applicable (Not applicable for a fully
qualified Section 6409 (a) eligible facility's request to modify.) NSA'
6.04.1: Is the proposed Project the least intrusive means to close the significant gap claimed and
described above? If yes, attach a written statement describing at a minimum, why this project is the
least intrusive means to close the significant gap claimed, to include a Radio Frequency (RF)
engineering analysis and other information you relied on in reaching your affirmative determination in
above.
Designate this Response as "Exhibit 6.04, Proposed Project as the least intrusive means to
close the significant gap information".
6.04.2: If the City required the Applicant to have a less intrusive Project, to include a reduction in
height and/or width, or to have concealment or stealth requirements, would those requirements would
any of those requirements "unreasonably" discriminate against the Applicant from among providers of
functionally equivalent services, or prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of "personal
wireless services", as defined in Section 322 (c) (7) (C) and/or "commercial mobile service", as
defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332 (d)? If the Applicant's response asserts that either unreasonable
discrimination or a prohibition or effective prohibition would occur, explain in detail in narrative form
the technical, and other reasons why it would do so to include a Radio Frequency (RF) engineering
analysis.
Designate this Response as "Exhibit 6.04.2, City requirement of the Applicant to have a less
intrusive Project, to include a reduction in height and/or width, or to have concealment or
stealth requirement, will prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the Applicant from providing
any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service".
7.01: If the Project is to be physically interconnected by new wireline "back haul" on, over or under
public rights-of-way, please proved the following, as applicable: NIA
�: 30
(1) Identify by physical street address of the public rights-of-way, and the managing jurisdiction of
the public -rights-of-way (City, County, or State).
(2) Technical detail of the proposed method of the physical wireline interconnection, including, but
not limited to: overhead, underground, conduits, leased capacity of others, noting existing
wireline connections and new ones.
(3) Detailed maps and drawings depicting the connections between the proposed Project site and
the other sites where they are to be on, over or under public rights-of-way, noting existing
wireline connections and new ones.
(4) Detailed information as to the Applicant's governmental grant of authority to use such public—
rights-of-way for this purpose of physically interconnecting the Project to any other site or sites
by the name of the approving governmental authority, including related documents (e.g.,
ordinances, franchise, agreements, license or permits), and/or applicable statutes by citation or
other means of granting the Applicant (or others) the privilege to place private facilities in the
public rights-of-way for private use to connect wireless facilities' sites.
Designate this as "Exhibit7.01, Wireline/backhaul interconnections in the Public Rights -of -Way
Information."
SECTION 8.00: LEASE ALLOWANCE OF ADDITIONAL WIRELESS FACILITIES AND/OR
PROVIDERS: (Optional response, at Applicant's sole discretion.) N/A
8.01: To the extent not confidential, will the Proposed Site be available for use by other wireless
providers?
8.02: To the extent not confidential, does the lease agreement require written consent from the
landowner/landlord to allow other wireless providers and/or additional wireless facilities?
8.03: To the extent not confidential, does the lease agreement have any limitations as to:
(1) size-- length, width, height, weight of facilities on the tower, or limitations as to the exact
placement of the wireless antenna array and/or its "footprint"; or
(2) any limitations of any other any additional wireless facilities to be placed on the tower by
applicant or other wireless providers on the site at ground level or on the tower?
'FCC 2009 Declaratory Ruling is downloadable at: hftps:Happs.fcc.gov/edocs public/Query do?mode=advance&rpt=cond
" FCC 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order is downloadable at: http://www.fcc.gov/document/wireless-infrastructure-report-
and-order.
Effective dates of the FCC 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order.•
April 8, 2015: Section 6409 (a) rules are effective April 8, 2015 (90 days after the Jan. 8, 2015 publication in the Federal
Register (FR). 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order, ¶ 242), except to the extent Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
approval is required, 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order, 1286.
Sections requiring OMB approval are to be effective sometime after Jan. 20, 2015, but no earlier than April 8,
2015: The FCC determined the following portions of the Section 6409 (a) ta+rre� a proval
before they are effective: 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.40001 (c) (3) (i) [detailed city d n o 11 mental
I U, f� G? ° J I �� 31
information to toll the 60 days "shot clock" due to 30 day notice of incompleteness]; 1.40001(c) (3) (iii) [City 10
day review of supplemental information, and subsequent request to submit information to further toll the "shot
clock"]; and 1.40001 (c) (4) [60 day failure to act "deemed granted"].
The link to the FCC's OMB approval request is: FR Notice. OMB action on this will be some time after Jan. 20,
2015, when comments are due. Until the OMB acts and the FCC publishes a notice of that OMB approval, those
parts of the FCC Rules are not effective. 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order, ¶ 289. See FR also Jan. 8, 2015, at
page 1238, hftp://www.qpo.gov/fdsys/pkq/FR-2015-01-08/pdf/2014-28897.pdf
Feb. 9, 2015: The balance of the Order on NHPA, NEPA and clarification of FCC 2009 Declaratory Ruling and Section
332 (c) (7) are effective 30 days from FR publication. 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order, % 289, or Feb. 9, 2015. See FR
also Jan. 8, 2015, at page 1238.
See 2009 Declaratory Order ¶ ¶ 32 and 42, and FN 99; FCC 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order, ¶ 216.
'v 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001(c).
2009 Declaratory Ruling, ¶ 46. A Section 332 (c) (7) "collocation" project is one that does not "substantial increase in the
size of a tower". 2009 Declaratory Ruling, footnote 146 states that a "substantial increase in the size of a tower' occurs
when:(1) [t]he mounting of the proposed antenna on the tower would increase the existing height of the tower by more
than 10%, or by the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to
exceed twenty feet, whichever is greater, except that the mounting of the proposed antenna may exceed the size limits
set forth in this paragraph if necessary to avoid interference with existing antennas; or (2) [t]he mounting of the proposed
antenna would involve the installation of more than the standard number of new equipment cabinets for the technology
involved, not to exceed four, or more than one new equipment shelter; or (3) [t]he mounting of the proposed antenna
would involve adding an appurtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than
twenty feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater, except
that the mounting of the proposed antenna may exceed the size limits set forth in this paragraph if necessary to shelter
the antenna from inclement weather or to connect the antenna to the tower via cable; or (4) [t]he mounting of the
proposed antenna would involve excavation outside the current tower site, defined as the current boundaries of the leased
or owned property surrounding the tower and any access or utility easements currently related to the site."
A 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 (b) (6).
V" FCC 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order, ¶ 180-81. Replacement may be of "transmission equipment", and may include
hardening of the structure as a whole "where such hardening is necessary for a covered collocation, replacement, or
removal of transmission equipment, but does not include replacement of the underlying structure."
E32
AN ORDINANCE ISSUING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 49 OF ORDINANCE
NO. 82-73, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS SAME BEING ALSO
KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE BY
GRANTING SPECIAL USE PERMIT SU16-03 TO AMEND
THE SITE PLAN SU02-01 APPROVED BY ORDINANCE NO.
2002-022 AS AMENDED, TO EXPAND THE GROUND LEASE
AND ALLOW AN ADDITIONAL WIRELESS CARRIER ON AN
EXISTING MONOPOLE IN A DISTRICT ZONED "LI" LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS UNDER CITY OF
GRAPEVINE ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 ALL IN ACCORDANCE
WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION
47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER
CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS
IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING
MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING
TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC
INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND
THE ISSUANCE OF THIS SPECIAL USE PERMIT;
PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF
TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a special use permit
by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of
Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of
Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been
complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine,
Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been
complied with; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing
called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to
whether this requested special use permit should be granted or denied: safety of the
motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding
the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent
property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the
vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the
neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control
and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to
be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking
facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces,
and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on
the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the
overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the
transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing
called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas did consider the following factors
in making a determination as to whether this requested special use permit should be
granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and
other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the
promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on
the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on
the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 49 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been
satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of
the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to
conserve the value of buildings, encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout
this city; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is
a public necessity for the granting of this special use permit, that the public demands it,
that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not
unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved propertywith reference to
the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that the
special use permit lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,
panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of
population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,
parks and other public requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that
there is a necessity and need for this special use permit and has also found and
determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and
in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally
classified; and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this special use permit for the particular
piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large,
the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety,
and welfare of this community.
Ordinance No. 2
NOW, •' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCILOF •;
...
Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a special use permit in accordance
with Section 49 of Ordinance No. 82-73, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code, by
granting Special Use Permit SU16-03 to amend the previously approved site plan of SU02-
01 (Ordinance No. 2002-022) as amended, to expand the ground lease and allow an
additional wireless carrier (Verizon Wireless) in a district zoned "LI" Light Industrial District,
under City of Grapevine Ordinance No. 82 -73 within the following described property: Lot
3, Grapevine Industrial Park (525 Industrial Boulevard), all in accordance with a site plan
approved pursuant to Section 49 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part
hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein,
including, but not limited to, the following: None.
Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map
of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the herein special use permit.
Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein
above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of
Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of
Grapevine, Texas.
Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have
been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting
health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been
designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated
to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from
fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent
overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate
provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other
public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial
needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable
consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability
for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging
the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. .
Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of
Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said
ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct
conflict with the provisions of this ordinance.
Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be
severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of
Ordinance No. 3
land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity
of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein.
Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to
exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed
committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues.
Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of
Grapevine, Texas are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace
and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an
emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety
and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective
from and after the date of its passage, and it is accordingly so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE on this the 19th day of July, 2016.
NUM 0
ATTEST:
Ordinance No. 4
IYV �C:
SPECIAL USE PERMIT SU16-03 IS A REQUEST TO
AMEND THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVE SITE PLAN
SU02-01 (ord. 2002-22) TO ALLOW THE
COLLOCATION OF A WIRELESS FACILITY, SPECIFICALLY
TO EXPAND THE GROUND LEASE AND ALLOW AN
ADDITIONAL WIRELESS CARRIER ON AN EXISTING
MONOPOLE_
I
669.67
T�-
�i (�
669.3 ]
M
a\. 1 669.84
CALLED LOT 1 8t 2
FIRST SECTION OF GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK
VOL. 388-140, PG. 84 D.R. T.C.T
GEM TECH, INC.
(NO RECORDING FOUND)
(TAXID#09285075)
N 89.49' E 260.00'
METAL BUILDING (1)
(5,034 S.F.±)
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
(NORTH)
METAL BUILDING (2)
(3,794 S.F.±)
(E) VERIZON 15'-0" X 16'-0"
5' UTILITY EASEMENT LEASE AREA.
�I 669.71 0.02 ACRES
Q------�( X(878 S.F.)
669.412 65F8.1 41 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
oui A 67�p�28
i I
w I
L'0 U Q' LIGHT INDUSTRIAL L�_____ i ! 551 -0" !
JJ U z ,I (WEST) 669.78 668.71 6�7 33 ---'--1Of -j-
:30 'r
-7-- - - - - - r - - - -- - - - N -
CL
--rte Te
to I I $ �I 668.35
Z
g I67p.85
X
% 1 I 668.97 667.25
LOCATION ON REPLACED
_ ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
SITE BENCHMARK � _I
(ELEV- 670.80) i�
669.52
_XF TABLE
NO. BEARING LENGTH
Ll
N 00-49'03' W
20.00
L2'
L3
N8 - 9 '10'57" E
N W44'45" 45 W
210.50
18.43
I
L4
_
N 89 1515' EE
20.00
LS
S 00.44'45" E
38.40
L6
S 89.10'57" W
230.48
L7
S89 -15'15"W
40.00
L8
N 00-44-45- W
I 16.00
L9
N 69 15'15" E
40.00
L10
I S 00.44'45" E
( 16.00
Lll
I S 89'15'15" W
1 15.00
112
N 00 44 45" W
I 1600
113
1515", E
3500
L14
-N.89
111 S OW44'45" E
16.00
L15
N 00 49 03 W
500
L16
N 89-15-48" E
-
175.54 -ill
L17
' 500"44'12E�
5,00-
L18 .~S
89.15'48" VI
175.54
ZONING EXHIBIT
671.50! . "' i ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT
/i>� I 1
0.11 ACES
(4,978 S.F.)
67 .48 METAL BUILDING (3)
!. 1 668.97 ' i ! (11,843 S.F.±)
CALLED LOT 3
i
FIRST SECTION OF GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK
c' VOL. 388-140, PG. 84 D.R. T.C.T
a I LT2 PROPERTIES, LLC
G.F. D210182070 O.P.R. T.C.T
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
;.R. (SOUTH)
L4
L S 89'49' W 260.00'
1 '1 �ti--FN1; 1/2" !.R_ r� LOT 4R
LOT 4RI j
M (All TRACTS; LOT
FIRST SECTION OF
GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK
VOL. 388-140, PG. 1684 M.R. T.C.T
DIMENSIONAL CONTROL SITE PLAN
_ __..
t /FULL SIZE PLOT: SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
J HALF SIZE PLOT: SCALE: 3/64" = 1'-0"
0 478776' 32'
SITE CALCULATIONS CHART
GROUND LEASE AREA = 825 SF
BUILDING (1) - 5,034 SF
BUILDING (2) = 3,794 SF
BUILDING (3) = 11,843 SF
TOTAL BUILDING AREA = 20,671 SF
TOTAL LOT AREA = 63,180 SF
TOTAL OPEN SPACE = 42.509
i
i
1
I
664199 X
FND. 5,I i -R.
I
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
(EAST)
i
NORTH
APPROVAL OF THE ZONING CASE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EXHIBIT SHALL NOT
IMPLY APPROVAL OF ANY ASSOCIATED STUDY, PLAT, OR PLAN,
APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SHOWN HEREON', OR THE INITIATION OF
THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
AND/OR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ON STUDIES, PLATS OR PLANS RELATING TO
DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS AN ACTION
SEPARATE FROM ACTION TAKEN ON THIS ZONING CASE.
PARKING ANALYSIS
TOTAL # OF PARKING SPACE PROVIDED = 40
TOTAL BUILDING AREA
11,843 SF + 5,034 SF + 3794 SF =
(3) BUILDING = 20,671 SF
INDUSTRIAL - LIGHT
(LIGHT MANUFACTURING)
MANUFACTURING
1 PARKING SPACES PER 1,000 SQ. FT. OF FLOOR
21 SPACES REQUIRED
ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE REQUIRED
1 PER 1 TO 25 =
1 ACCESSIBLE REQUIRED
(E) ONE WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
(E) 70'-6" MONOPOLE, (N) 10'-0"X15'-0"
CONCRETE PAD WITH EOUIPMENT IN (E)
LEASE AREA, INSTALL (6) (N) ANTENNAS
AT 60' AGL.
' LIGHTING LEVEL WON'T EXCEED 5.0 FOOT CANDLES I
AT PROPERTY LINE
LAND OWNER
VICINITY MAP
LT2 PROPERTIES LLC
4100 HERITAGE AVE 1105
`-
a
GRAPEVINE,TX. 76051-5716 R019
e
w
CONTACT: T RA LANCASTER
PHONE: 817-358-8600
SITE INFORMATION
¢
JURISDICTION: CITY OF GRAPEVINE
OCCUPANCY: UNMANNED
s
y¢ 5 r,
ZONING: SF -9
2T¢
TOWER OWNER / PETITIONER
g
CROWN CASTLE
600 E JOHN CARPENTER iYYr
a
IRM, TX 75062
CONTACT: KELLI WALSH
PHONE 512-652-2107
CONSULTANT
ENGINEERING
ALLPRO CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
9221 LYNDON B. JOHNSON FREEWAY
SUITE 204
DALLAS, TX 75243
OFFICE: 972-231-8893
FAX: 866-364-8375
CONTACT: JOA M. GEORGE P.E.
SURVEY
TOWN & COUNTRY SURVEYORS, LLC
25307 NORTH FREEWAY, SUITE 100
THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380
PHONE 281-465-8730
APPLICANT
VERIZON WIRELESS
1301 SOLANA BLVD
BLDG 2 SUITE #2400
WESTLAKE, TX 76262
PHONE: (817) 961-2572
ACGI NO: 16-1590
DRAWN BY: J. STATSER
CHECKED BY: JG
A 05 05/16 FOR REVIEW
B OSJ13/I6 FOR REVIEW
0 05/31/16 FOR FINAL
1 06/27/16 FOR REVIEW
2 0105/16 FOR REVIEW
13107/07/16 FOR FINAL
CONSULTING GROUP, INC. -_--_
9221 Lyndon B Johnw Fwy
SLRe 204. Dallas, TX 75243
PNaoe: 972-231-8893
Fac 866-364-8375 '..
registration - 8242
•� ���
OF ' kglp
IO;1 i O' TTAGKAL GEORGE
91793 w .
Pl
■
YLOR PARKWAY I
525 INDUSTRIAL BLVD.
GRAPEVINE, TX 76051
SHEET NUMBER
1 of 4
NOTE:
1'SPECIAL USE PERMIT SU16-03 IS A REQUEST TO
AMEND THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVE SITE PLAN
SU02-01 (ord. 2002-22) TO ALLOW THE
COLLOCATION OF A WIRELESS FACILITY, SPECIFICALLY
TO EXPAND THE GROUND LEASE AND ALLOW AN
ADDITIONAL WIRELESS CARRIER ON AN EXISTING
I—_ —
NORTH
55'-0" (E) LEASE AREA
(E) H -FRAME
40'-0" (E) FENCED AREA
(E) 70'-6"
MONOPOLE
X _---
(E) AT&T
SHELTER
5'-4"
(E) 20'-0° WIDE ACCESS—,
/UTILITY EASEMENT
ENLARGED SITE PLAN (EXISTING)
FULL SIZE PLOT: SCALE; 1/4" = 1'-0"
HALF SIZE PLOT: SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
mmew
0 1' 2' 4' 8'
(N) VERIZON
UTILITY H -FRAME
k
(N) VERIZON 12'-0" WIDE
DOUBLE SWING GATE,
12'-0"
1'-6" GATE
(N) 6'--0" HIGH
CHAIN LINK FENCE
NORTH
55'-0" (E) LEASE AREA
(N) LIGHTS TO BE MOUNTED
UNDER CANOPY
(N) VERIZON RBA -72
OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT
CABINET
(N) VERIZON FUTURE
RBA -72 OUTDOOR
EQUIPMENT CABINET
(N) VERIZON (2)
ELECTROMAGNETICALLY
GALVANIZED EMT
CONDUIT
—x >
(N) VERIZON 10'-0"X 15'-0"
OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CONCRETE
SLAB.
(N) VERIZON KOHLER#
30KW KD12504TM
GENERATOR (ON EQUIP.
PAD) 40'-0"
(E) 20'-0" WIDE ACCESS
/UTILITY EASEMENT
I
ENLARGED SITE PLAN (PROPOSED)
2 FULL SIZE PLOT: SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
HALF SIZE PLOT: SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
l7' 2' 4' 8'
5'-4"
CASE NAME: VERIZON WIRELESS
CASE NUMBER: SU16-03
LOCATION: 525 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD I'
MAYOR SECRETARY
DATE:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CHAIRMAN
DATE:
SHEET:OF:
APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK
IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODE OR
ORDINANCES
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ACGI N0; 16-1590
DRAWN BY: JDRAWN J. STATSE�
CHECKED BY: JG
A 05/05/16 FOR REVIEW
B 05/t3/i6 FOR REVIEW _
0 OS 31 i6 FOR FINAL
7 06/27/16 FOR REVIEW
2 07/05/16 FOR REVIEW
3 07/07/16 FOR FINAL
ALLPRO
CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
9221 Lyndon B Johnson Fwy
Suite 204, Dallas, TX 75243
Phone: 972-231-8893
fax: 866-364-8375
www.allproc9i,com
registration no. 8242
0F.Ai
r *..... ..... ,.........
/
r dOJI MOTTACKAL GEORIt
GE
d..•..�...•917J3 .� r� o°
•
525 INDUSTRIAL BLVD.
GRAPEVINE, TX 76051
SHEET NUMBER
2of4
(E) OTHERS ANTENNA CENTERLINE lk
ELEV. 74'-0' AGL
740.0' AMSL
TOP OF TOWER
ELEV. 70'-6" AGL
736.5' AMSL 710
(9) (N) RRHs
(3 PER SECTOR)
(3 SECTORS TOTAL)
(SEE SHEET 3,4/
A-5 FOR DETAIL)
_ _ (N) VERIZON ANTENNA CENTERLINE
ELEV. 60'-0' AGL
7 726.0' AMSL
`-(N) VERIZON ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON NEW
(2) (N) OVPs- PLATFORM MOUNT AT 60'-0" ON (E) 70'-6"
(UP TOP) TOWER, (TYP OF 2 ANTENNAS PER SECTOR)
(SEE SHEET 1/
A-5 FOR DETAIL.)
(E) 70'-6" MONOPOLE
(E) SHELTER BEYOND
(N) LESSEE'S
CANOPY OVER CONC.
PAD
/-(N) LESSEE'S 10'-0"
X 15'-0"CONC. PAD
WITH EQUIPMENT
I I
LL
io
NORTH TOWER ELEVATION
"
FULL SIZE PLOT: SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0
HALF SIZE PLOT: SCALE: 1/8" = V-0"
0 1' 2' 4 8'
(9
(3 PE
CIAL USE PERMIT SU16-03 IS A REQUEST TO
=ND THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVE SITE PLAN
)2-01 (ord. 2002-22) TO ALLOW THE
.LOCATION OF A WIRELESS FACILITY, SPECIFICALLY
EXPAND THE GROUND LEASE AND ALLOW AN
)ITIONAL WIRELESS CARRIER ON AN EXISTING
(TOTAL UP TOP)
ACGI NO: 16-1590
DRAWN BY: J. STATSER
CHECKED BY: J�
A 05/05/16 FOR REVIEW
B 05/13/16 FOR REVIEW
0 05/31/16 FOR FINAL
i 06/27/16 FOR REVIEW
BETA 2 07/05/16 FOR REVIEW
SECTOR B
100' AZ 3 07/07/16 FOR FINAL
CASE NAME: VERIZON WIRELESS
CASE NUMBER: SU16-03
LOCATION: 525 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD
MAYOR SECRETARY
DATE:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CHAIRMAN
DATE:
SHEET: -OF:
APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK
IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODE OR
ORDINANCES
ANTENNA LAYOUT (PROPOSED
FULL SIZE PLOT: SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
HALF SIZE PLOT: SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
0 6" i' 2'
ALLPRO
CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
9221 Lyndon B Johnson Fwy
Suite 204, Dallas, TX 75243
Phone: 972-231-8893
Fax: 866-364-8375
www.allproegi—
registration no. 8242
OF
T�_qs �I,I
OJI N10TTACKAL GEORGE
91793 w�
Eoio�SSG�
CROWN BU#
840235
BAYLOR PARKWAY I
525 INDUSTRIAL BLVD.
GRAPEVINE, TX 76051
SHEET NUMBER
3of4
i
0
METAL R(
DECK,
GENERAL NO1
ROOF DI
SPECIFICAT
8" CHANNEL,
SEE FRAMING
PLAN
4" STD. PIPE
COLUMN GALV
(TYP. OF 4)
Cor
FOUN
r ^... � .
t\L� FULL SIZE PLOT: SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
HALF SIZE PLOT: SCALE: 3/8" = l'-0"
0 6' V 2'
AL ROOF
K, SEE
ERAL NOTES,
)F DECK
CIFICATION
8' CHANNEL,
SEE FRAMING
PLAN
4" STD. PIPE
COLUMN GALV
(TYP. OF 4)
ETE
ATION
CANOPY SECTION
FULL SIZE PLOT: SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
HALF SIZE PLOT SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
0 6" V 2'
LIGHTING LEVEL WON'T EXCEED 5.0 FOOT CANDLES AT
PROPERTY LINE
c
I
ur
CANOPY IS DESIGNED FOR ULTIMATE WIND SPEED =
140 MPH. EXPOSURE = "C NOTIFY ALLPRO
CONSULTING GROUP, INC. FOR A REDESIGN IF WIND
SPEED IS DIFFERENT THAN NOTED.
o
v
OPENING FOR GENERATOR
I — — — — — — — — — — — — —
_o
r
L---------------�
BASE PLATE, SEE DETAIL
5/SE-3
4" STD. PIPE
COLUMN (TYP. OF 4)
----------
L ---------------J
OUTLINE OF CONCRETE
I
SLAB
o
I
0
(N) LIGHTS TO BE
0
MOUNTED UNDER CANOPY
I
001
8„ 8„
10'-0"
CIAL USE PERMIT SU16-03 IS A REQUEST TO
NO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVE SITE PLAN
2-01 (ord. 2002-22) TO ALLOW THE
LOCATION OF A WIRELESS FACILITY, SPECIFICALLY
EXPAND THE GROUND LEASE AND ALLOW AN
ITIONAL WIRELESS CARRIER ON AN EXISTING
CANOPY BASE PLAN
�� FULL SIZE PLOT: SCALE: 3/4" = i'-0"
HALF SIZE PLOT: SCALE: 3/8" = V-0"
0 6" 1' 2'
CASE NAME: VERIZON WIRELESS
CASE NUMBER: SU16-03
LOCATION: 525 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD
MAYOR -SECRETARY
DATE:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CHAIRMAN
DATE:
SHEET:—OF:
APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK
IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODE OR
ORDINANCES
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SER`dCES
ACGI NO: 16-1590
DRAWN BY: J. STATSER
CHECKED BY: JG
A 25&5/16 FOR REVIEW
B OS 13 16 FOR REVIEW _
0 05 31/16 FOR FINAL
1 06/27/16 FOR REVIEW
2 07/05/16 FOR REVIEW
3 07/07/16 FOR FINAL
0,0
ALLPRO
CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
9221 Lyndon 8 Johnson Fwy
Suite 204, Dallas, T% 75243
Phone: 972-231-8893
Fax: 866-364-8375
www.dip—gi—nn
registration no. 8242
OFr4 a'a4
... ......... *.:
lOJI MOTTACKAL GEORGE
.......................1793 .
CROWN BU#
840235
REMIT" " N
525 INDUSTRIAL BLVD.
GRAPEVINE, TX 76051
SHEET NUMBER
4of4