The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWS Item 01 - NCTCOG Staff PresentationGJ K ►TEM # -I -- MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROGER NELSON, CITY MANAGER )V MEETING DATE: JANUARY 6, 2004 SUBJECT: WORKSHOP — NCTCOG STAFF PRESENTATION Mr. Dan Kessler, Assistant Director of Transportation for the North Central Texas Council of Governments, will make a presentation to the City Council on Growth Projections and Demographic Projections for the Metroplex. The presentation is planned for approximately 30 minutes with an additional 30 minutes available for questions. JLH/jsl 0:\agenda\1-6-04\Dove Rd Street Light Agmt December 30, 2003 (10:34AM) Regional Transportation Update Presentation to Grapevine City Council January 6, 2004 Dan Kessler - Assistant Director of Transportation North Central Texas Council of Governments s i f*4 4 1# # Y i 4# 4++i*t �# T i*4 4 4# 4 4++# i 4*+i � 4 4* *4*4 i 4* *� 4 1*+�4 # f+*1+t4+4 i# 4i'#4�� i�4�4'+#,'�!! f�*;�++*4*i fi*fi*i 4*# 4 44,�#�*�i♦4�# f f f'� F f� 1'� # f 44 4'#++#'#'i�4` Presentation Overview Metropolitan Transportation Plan Regional Rail Corridor Study and Ongoing Regional Transit Initiative Transportation Funding Strategies Dallas -Fort Worth Metropolitan Area Regional Perspective Ninth Largest Metropolitan Area in the U.S. Ranked Second in Population Growth Between 1990-2000 - Adding Over 1 Million Persons Larger than 27 States in Population Larger than 16 States in Land Area Represent Over 34 Percent of the State's Economy Five Million Persons in Year 2000 Growing to Nearly 9 Million Persons by the Year 2030 a Metropolitan Transportation Plan Represents Blueprint for the Continued Construction of a Multimodal Transportation System Responds to Adopted Goals Mobility Quality of Life Environment Identifies Policies, Programs, and Projects for Continued Development Guides Expenditures of Federal and State Funds DRAFT I r rle I ; II 1 Teas Motor :peedxay , 1 , I 1 I � I r - cote. e.a ' t - unl.n a not racille 1 I Trinity R.W—y I � � Expr..a I ' I T u.l.. I fi` ►idaG r l 1N 1 cm i Oeal.Mlan I I wore A. _ cl Mobility 2025: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan, 2004 U pd ate i� Rail System r _ Legend J Future Light Rail Existing Light Rail NFuture Regional Rail ' Existing Regional Rail NFuture Rail Special Events Future Intercity Rail - Existing Intercity Rail f - f North Crosstown Corridor Study' '`---T -------- - ------:r'Possible Eastern Terminus -- ---. �-• as Roadway M Existing Rail Corridors a 6..* I Corridor specific design and operational characteristics for the Rail System will be determined through ongoing 'f protect development 1 New facility locations indicate transportation needs and do pis-- not represent specific alignments. o... 1 All existing railroad rightsof-way should be monitored for potential future transportation corridors. Refined rail forecasts arc necessary to determine technology 1 and alignment in Future Rail corridors. V4 i Institutional structure being reviewed for the region. The need for additional rail capacity within the Dallas CBD. Fort Worth CBD, DFW International Airport. and other intermodal centerswill be monitored. NORTH CROSSTOWN CORRIDOR STUDY AREA Ata minimum, evaluate the engineering feasibility and MIT environmental implications of: rail along the KCS Ilneand the Burlington Northern line, Including the feasibility of an alternative connection Pis JI along S.H.190: rail along the full Cotton Belt Corridor, from Parker Road to North Central Texas DFWAlrpart and Council of Governments rail along the Cotton Bolt Corrldor from DFWAlrport with an Transportation eastern transition to light rail along LEU Freeway at an = - Addison Intermodal Center. DRAFT Mobility 2025: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan, 2004 Update Bicycle and Pedestrian System Legend F7 Bicycle -Pedestrian Transportation Districts Within all rail corridors all existing and planned stations are bicycle and pedestrian districts Recommended Veloweb Routes Candidate Veloweb Routes Area Roads Fort Worth CBD Dallas CBD New facility locations indicate transportation needs and do not represtent specific alignments. All Veloweb routes should be targeted for right of way preservation. North Cental Texas Council of Governments r Transportation Department DRAFT Mobility 2025: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan, 2004 Update Freeway /Tollway System Legend Improve Existing Freeway/Tollway New Staged Freeway New Staged Tollway New Staged Parkway Upgrade to Parkway Preserve ROW Truck Lane Demonstration Corridor Roadways Dallas CBD Fort Worth CBD Corridor specific design and operational characteristics for the FreewaylTolhvay system will be determined through ongoing project development. Additional and irrprovedfreowayRollway interchanges and service roads should be considered on all freewayltollway facilities in order to accommodate a balance between mobility and access needs. Operational strategies to manage the flow of traffic should be considered in corridors where additional freeway or tollway lanes are being proposed. All freewayltollvray corridors require additional study for capacity. geometric. and safety irrproverrants related to truck operations. Newfacility, locations indicate transportation needs and do not represent specific alignments. North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation 4!11 o 0 DRAFT Mobility 2025: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan, 2004 Update HOV and Managed Facility System Legend Reversible Managed HOVAntegrated Tollway Two -Way Roadways Corridor specific design and operational characteristics for the HOV and managed lane recommendations, such as occupancy requirements and rovercibiity, will be determined through ongoing project development. Arrows represent the direction of travel during the morning peak period but do not represent specific design recommendations. Direction of trevol is reversed during the afternoon peak period. All HOV and tollway facilities will be rranagod for mobility efficiency. Operational strategies to mange the flow of traffic should be considored in corridors where additional freeway or tollway lanes are being proposed. Right-of-way preservation should be encouraged in all treswayrtollway corridors to accommodate potential future HOV facilities. New facility locations indicate transportation needs and do not roprosord spocific alignments. North Central Texas N Council of Governments li Transportation �{ A 4 To Hillsboro nobility 2025: 'he Metropolitan 'ransportation Plan, 1004 Update "oods Movement :orridors Technology )eployment ystem Components Speed Detection/ITS • • Dynamic Message Signs (Potential/Existing Sites) Truck Stop/NAFTA Kiosk (Potential Sites) All freeway/tollway corridors require additional study for capacity, geometric and safety improvements related to truck operations. I. H. 35 ENV routes extend to Hillsboro with additional dynamic message signs and truck stops/ NAFTA kiosks ITS coordinated through TxDOT Transportation Management Centers North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation EMOBILITY 11 Mobility 2025: The Metropolitan Transportation 2004 Update PI -an Corridors Requiring Furt Evaluation Corridor Requiring Further Evaluation Before Placeholder Included in the Plan Legend Year 2025 Freeway Network Other Highways County Boundary Metropolitan Planning Area Boundary Fort worth CBD ME Dallas CBD Nath Central Texas IIV-7 Council of Governments Transportation UPDATED. November 93, 2003 2X4 �PCp t MOBILITY 2025 - 2004 UPDATE ........ Financial Constraint Summary (Millions, 2004 $) Metropolitan Transportation System Traditional Revenue Initiative Mobility System Components Cost Revenue Program Needs Not Met Roadway Infrastructure $5,699 $5,699 $0 - Transit Operations $85398 $81398 $0 - Congestion Mitigation Strategies $1,925 $1,925 $0 - Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities & $966 $966 $0 Transportation Enhancements Rail and Bus Transit System $8,875 $5,888 $2,987 - HOV and Managed Facilities $1,448 $15448 $0 - Freeway and Toll Road System $11,925 $9,935 $1,990 $175230 Regional Arterial and Local $5,811 $5,811 $0 $37316 Thoroughfare System TOTAL $45,047 $40,070 $4,977 $20,546 DRAFT Mobility 2025: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan, 2004 Update 1999 Congestion Levels Legend Areas of Moderate 0 Peak -Period Congestion Areas of Severe Peak -Period Congestion Annual Cost of Congestion = $5.3 Billion VQBIL Ii North Central Tums N is *_ Council of Governments Transportation DRAFT Mobility 2025: The Metropolitan Tra nsportat ion Plan, 2004 Update 2025 Congestion Levels Legend Areas of Moderate Peak -Period Congestion Areas of Severe Peak -Period Congestion Annual Cost of Congestion = $11.8 Billion North Central Texas N Council of Governments Transportation i REGIONAL RAIL CORRIDOR STUDY RAIL CORRIDORS Northeast: E3: Dallas Area Rapid Transit: PlandAllen/McKinney Ed: Burlington Northern Santa Fe: Carrollton/rhe Colony/Frisco Southeast: ES: Burlington Northern Santa Fe: Duncanville/CedarHill/Midlothian Eli: Burlington Northern Santa Fe: Dallas/Lancaster/RedOak/Waxahachie Central: E-1: Trinity Railway Express: Dallas County line/Downtown Dallas W3: Trinity Railway Express: Fort Worth/Tarrantcounty line W-1: Union Pacific Mainline: Fort Worth/Dallas (includes Dorothy Spur) Wd: Burlington Northern Santa Fe: Fort Worth/Crowley/Burleson/Joshua/Cleburne W-2: Fort Worth & Western/Cotton Belt: Southwest Fort WortNTarrantcounty line E-2: Union Pacific: CarrdltonlDenton LEGEND "Rail Corridors Under Study Mobility 2025 Update - Passenger Rail v- Roadway Railroads E = East/URS Corporation W= West/Carter-Burgess, Inc. Map Revised: Match 18, 2003 10, N-th Cr t-1 T. Council of Govemmontr, Transportation Regional Rail Corridor Study taus Modal Considerations Rail Circulator Regional Rail Light Rail Intercity Rail Local Bus Feeder Bus/Circulator Express Bus/Park and Ride/HOV Demand Response Elderly Persons w/ Disabilities 11 Regional Transit Initiative Plan of Action Move Foward on Transit Summit Recommendations Create Transit Corridor Working Groups (1-7) Identify Funding Options (8) Focus on Alternative Institutional Structures (9) Develop Needed Legislative Platform (10) Incorporate Public Outreach Strategy Public Outreach Strategy MPO and Transportation Authorities Transit Summit, March 21, 2002 Transit Challenge, August 15, 2003 Task Force Meetings / Public Meetings Mid -Year Review, Spring 2004 Transit Summit, Summer 2004 North Texas Legislative Conference, Summer 2004 I Legislative Proposal, Fall 2004 sat v i �MMOW mire �a WNW. 1 I A ■ ■ ■■ .. �� _a v Regional Transportation Council Revenue Partnership Strategies 1. TxDOT Category 2 - Formula Funds 2. Prioritization of UTP Projects 3. Commission Strategic Priority Funds 4. RTC STP-MM/CMAQ Funds 5. Toll Road and Local Bond Funds 6. Commission Toll Road Substitution 7. Texas Mobility Fund/Ogden Bonds 8. Texas Metropolitan Mobility Plans TxDOT Category 2 Funding Allocation Metropolitan Area Austin Corpus Christi EI Paso Dallas -Fort Worth Hidalgo County Houston -Galveston Lubbock San Antonio Percent of Total 9% 4% 5% 36% 4% 29% 2% 11% t�O+ Regional Transportation Council Revenue Partnership Strategies 1. TxDOT Category 2 - Formula Funds 2. Prioritization of UTP Projects 3. Commission Strategic Priority Funds 4. RTC STP-MM/CMAQ Funds 5. Toll Road and Local Bond Funds 6. Commission Toll Road Substitution 7. Texas Mobility Fund/Ogden Bonds 8. Texas Metropolitan Mobility Plans Enhanced Partnership Program Ten -Year Program Staging Coni Project Type Candidate Roadway Projects FY 2002 Partnership Program Projects Candidate HOV Projects Candidate Roadway 8 Managed Lane Projects Legend Year 2025 Freeway Network Other Highways ------ County Boundary Metropolitan Planning Area Boundary Fort Worth CBD M Dallas CBD • Complete funding for the Interstate Highway 35 NAFTA Corridor Technology Deployment Program. North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Grapevine Area RTC Representatives Glen Whitley, Tarrant County Commissioner - RTC Chair Pedro Aguirre, Board Member D/FW Airport Maribel Chavez P.E., TxDOT Fort Worth District Engineer Bill Hale P.E., TxDOT Dallas District Engineer Margaret Keliher, Dallas County Judge Jack Miller, Board Member North Texas Tollway Authority Carl Tyson, Mayor Pro Tem City of Euless Cynthia White, Denton County Commissioner