HomeMy WebLinkAboutSU2016-03GRAI d VINE
X A S CITY OF GRAPEVINE
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
WIRELESS FACILITY SITING
Form "B"
PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of applicant/ agent:
applicant: Verizon Wireless / authorized agent: Haley Peck with Crown Castle
Street address of applicant/ agent. -
600 E. John Carpenter Fwy. #300
City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent:
Irving, TX 75062
Telephone number of applicant/ agent:
Fax number of applicant / agent:
972-374-4281
972-374-4270
Email address of applicant/ agent Mobile phone number of applicant/ agent
Applicant's interest in subject property:
leasing space from existing cell tower (monopole) located on property
PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION
Street address of subject property 525 Industrial Blvd., Grapevine, TX 76051
Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x I I " sheet)
Lot 3 Block Addition Grapevine Industrial Park
Size of subject property
1.45 Acres 63,162 Square footage
Present zoning classification:
Proposed use of the property:
Light Industrial
Addition of new carrier, Verizon Wireless, to existing monopole on property.
Give aeneral description of the proposed use or uses for the proposed development
Addition of (6) new antennas at 60 on existing monopole. No increase in tower height. Expansion of compound with new
area of 15'x 16'. Addition of (2) new equipment cabinets of (1) generator in new area.
Zoning ordinance provision requiring a special use:
Section 49.B.1 (Communication Uses)
PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name of current property owner.- LT2 Properties LLC (Tim Lancaster)
Street address of property owner. -
4100 Heritage Ave. #105
City / State / Zip Code of property owner
Grapevine, TX 76051
Telephone number of property owner., _7
q
Fax num
number b r of property owner,
Fe
❑ Attach a final plat, or replat, of the approved subdivision by city council showing property boundary lines, dimensions, easements,
roadways, rail lines, and public rights -of way crossing and adjacent to the tract (1 blueline copy)
❑ if a master development plan is required, attach a statement showing the proposed use substantially conforms to the master
development plan.
* Submit a site plan showing all information required by Section 47.E., Site Plan review requirements (see attached requirements),
l Provide all required information demonstrating compliance with all conditions imposed on any conditional use, site plan zoning, or
special use zoning.
;I All site plans must conform to the approved concept plan. Any changes to a site plan, approved with a conditional use or a special
use, can only be approved by city council through the public.hearing process.
PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE FILING OF A FINAL SITE PLAN
Print Applicant's Nam Applicant's Signature:
The State Of
County Of 1. q i
Lrts
Before Me \!� t j 9 t ti on this day personally appearedy i^.vi'
(notary)
plicant)
known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed.
(Seal) �xx day of A.D. �f
,a`a;^: JILL WILKES
sr°•' �a Notary Public, State of Texas
My Commission Expires
February 03, 2014
No ry in And For State Of Texas
Print Property Owners Name Property Owner's Signature
The State Of
County Of
Before Me ,_ _ .' - on this day personally appeared
(notary)
(property owner)
known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the puroose�s and cons =derat nn :herein exprr;ssed.
(Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of.._; A.D
M7RCCA L G1?ZEK Notary in And For State Of exasv
MISSion Expires
mber 2, 20 t 7
SUILO-03
APPLICATIONS FOR ZONING/LAND USEBUILDING PERMITS
TO: City of Grapevine
200 S. Main St., Grapevine, TX 76051
RE: 525 Industrial Blvd., Grapevine, TX 76051 / APN 05689570
BU #840235 (cell tower)
I/We, the owner(s) of the above described real property, authorize CCATT LLC (Crown
Castle) to act as an agent on my/our behalf for the purpose of performing all and every act that is
required, necessary or appropriate to prepare, sign, submit, file and present on my/our behalf
building, permitting, zoning aid/or land use applications to obtain land use changes, special
exceptions, zoning variances, zoning permits, conditional use permits, special use permits,
administrative permits, construction permits, operation permits, building permits, and other
approvals or permits related to the above described real property.
The undersigned hereby certifies to being the fee owner(s) of the real property described
above and that to the best of my/our knowledge the information contained within this
authorization i true and correct.
LTL ����-�.�
(Signature)
(Print name)
7 %%
Date
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of
County of
On _ t . before me,
personally a peared K sem,, v o proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the
person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity, and that by his/her/their signature on
the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
ti REBECCA L FITZEK
Signator Seal) ` MY Commission Expires jNa
December 2, 2017 i `, �in ��y �;
6
�ll
SU16-03
PLATTING VERIFICATION
This verification statement must be signed prior
To the submittal of this special use application
It has been determined that the property described below does require platting
or replatting and the applicant has been instructed on this procedure.
It has been determined that the property described below is currently platted or
does not require platting or replatting at this time.
Address of subject property 525 Industrial Blvd., Grapevine, TX 76051
Legal description of subject property
Public rks er)artment
Grapevine Industrial Park, Lot 3
Date
This form must be signed by the public works department and submitted along with a
completed application to the planning and zoning department
L
SLJLILO--03
OVERALL TOWER SITE
0.02 ACRES (880 SQUARE FEET)
OUT OF LOT 3
FIRST SECTION OF GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK
T. EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 474
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
Being 0.02 acres (880 square feet) of land, out of Lot 3, First Section of Grapevine Industrial Park, recorded under
Volume 388-140, Page 84 Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas (P.R. T.C.T.), conveyed to LT2 Properties, LLC,
by deed recorded under County Clerk's File Number (C.F.) D210182070 Official Public Records of Tarrant County,
Texas (O.P.R. T.C.T.), said 0.02 acre tract lying in the T. Easter Survey, Abstract 474 and being more particularly
described by metes and bounds as follows;
COMMENCING at a found 1/2 inch iron rod in the east right-of-way (R.O.W.) of Industrial Drive, Public R.O.W.
varies, marking the northwest of Lot 4, First Section, Grapevine Industrial Park, recorded under Volume 388-140,
Page 1684 Map Records of Tarrant County, Texas (MR. T.C.T.), also being the southwest comer of said Lot 3;
THENCE North 00049'03" West, along said east R.O.W., a distance of 76.45 feet to a point for corner, marking the
southwest comer of a Access & Utility Easement;
THENCE North 00°49'03" West, along said east R.O.W., a distance of 20.00 feet to a point for comer, marking the
northwest corner of said Easement;
THENCE North 89'10'57" East, a distance of 210.50 feet to an internal corner of said Easement;
THENCE North 00°44'45" West, a distance of 18.43 feet to a point for comer, marking the most easterly northwest
comer of said Easement, also being a point in the south line of an Overall Tower Site and the POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE South 89°15'15" West, passing at distance of 20.00 feet to a set 5/8 inch iron rod with cap and continuing
for a total distance of 35.00 feet to a set "X" in concrete, marking the southwest corner of the herein described tract;
THENCE North 00°44'45" West, a distance of 16.00 feet to a set 5/8 inch iron rod with cap, marking the northwest
corner of the herein described tract;
THENCE North 89015115" East, passing at a distance of 15.00 feet to a a set 5/8 inch iron rod with cap and
continuing for a total distance of 55.00 feet to a set 5/8 inch iron rod with cap, marking the northeast corner of the
herein described tract;
THENCE South 00°44'45" East, a distance of 16.00 feet to a set "X" in concrete, marking the southeast corner of
the herein described tract;
THENCE South 8915115" West, a distance of 20.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING containing a computed
0.02 acres (880 square feet) of land.
SU16-03
VERIZON
WIRELESS
JUNE 22, 2016
525 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD
LOT 3, GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK
For verification purposes please email a PDF of the revised plans by
Thursday, June 30th to atriplett@__grapevinetexas.gov. It is important
that each sheet must be legible on an 11" x17" sheet. Please verify
that all labeling is legible at the reduced size. Please do not
0:S•.Iit•1
• Please label the Overall Site Plan as the dimensional control site plan and
include the dimensions of the overall site which match the existing plat. In
addition to a numeric scale please provide a graphic scale. Within the
signature block please include the following: case name and case number
– SLI 16-03.
• Please provide site calculation to include the following: total building area,
total impervious area (includes building and paving), total open space.
Please place the chart on sheet 1 of 5, the dimensional control site plan.
• Please add the following note to each sheet:
Special Use Permit SU16-03 is a request to amend the previously
approve site plan SU02-01 (ord. 2002-22) to allow the collocation
of a wireless facility, specifically to expand the ground lease and
allow an additional wireless carrier on an existing monopole.
• Please add the zoning of the subject site and the adjacent zoning to the
dimensional control site plan as follows: subject site—Light Industrial `LI",
north—"LI" Light Industrial, south—"LI" Light Industrial and east—"LI" Light
Industrial.
• Final revisions must be legible on an 11" x17" sheet. Please verify all text
and labels are legible on the 11" x 17" sheet.
For verification purposes please email a PDF of the revised plans by
Thursday, June 30th to atri Ip ett(cr�_grapevinetexas.gov. It is important
that each sheet must be legible on an 11" x17" sheet. Please verifv
that all labeling is legible at the reduced size. Please do not
nn
a
The above comments must be reflected in the final submittal for the
next available joint public hearing. Please submit the revised
documents to the Department of Development Services at 200 South Main
Street.
The revised submittal shall include:
One (1) Mylar (uncolored) of each sheet (minimum size 22" x 34")
thirty (30) reduced sorted (collated sets) copies at 11" x 17" three hole
punched, stapled and z -folded (fold the right edge to the left edge
and then fold the right edge in half to form a z -fold).
If you have any questions please contact Albert L. Triplett, Jr. at (817) 410-3155.
SU16-03 JUNE 30, 2016
VERIZON 525 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD
WIRELESS'' LOT 3, GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK
VERIZON WIRELESS
For verification purposes please email a PDF of the revised plans to
atriplett(a)-grapevinetexas.gov. It is important that each sheet must
reauested
ease ve
a
• Please add the address of 525 Industrial Boulevard to the signature block
and the case name is not required to be the same as the case number. In
lieu of SU16-03 please add a case name to the signature block if one is
desired. The case number of SU16-03 is correct.
• Please seal the sheets and add the dimensions of the site based on the
plat (please see the email attachment).
• Please revise the street type from Drive to Boulevard.
• Within the site calculations chart please include the area of the subject site
based upon the dimensions found on the plat.
• The previous ground lease approval was 40 feet by 15 feet. Please use
the text below in lieu of "ground compound."
• Please add the following note to each sheet:
Special Use Permit SU16-03 is a request to amend the previously
approve site plan SU02-01 (ord. 2002-22) to allow the collocation
of a wireless facility, specifically to expand the ground lease and
allow an additional wireless carrier on an existing monopole.
For verification purposes please email a PDF of the revised plans to
atriplettCa)_grapevinetexas.gov. It is important that each sheet must
1•1>Fn
size.
FelviTLA
at
The above comments must be reflected in the final submittal for the
next available joint public hearing. Please submit the revised
documents to the Department of Development Services at 200 South Main
Street.
The revised submittal shall include:
One (1) Mylar (uncolored) of each sheet (minimum size 22" x 34")
thirty (30) reduced sorted (collated sets) copies at 11" x 17" three hole
punched, stapled and z -folded (fold the right edge to the left edge
and then fold the right edge in half to form a z -fold).
If you have any questions please contact Albert L. Triplett, Jr. at (817) 410-3155.
Albert Triplett
From:
Bryan K. Parker
Sent:
Friday, June 10, 2016 3:49 PM
To:
Albert Triplett
Cc:
Randie Frisinger
Subject:
TRC CU16-16 CU16-17 SU 16-03
Fire Department comments for TRC:
CU16-16 Plans reflect Cotton Patch on Main St. the address and plans appear to be wrong.
CU16-17 Grapevine Springs- No measurements of fire lane access or fire lanes are reflected on plans.
No comments for monument sign.
SU16-03 Verizon Wireless- no fire code issues or comments for antenna additions.
Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions regarding the TRC comments.
Kind regards,
r
Bryan K. Parker I Asst. Fire Marshal 1817.410.3520 1 bparker@grapevinetexas.gov
This message may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately then delete it - you should not copy or use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any other person.
Internet communications are not secure. You should scan this message and any attachments for viruses. Under no
circumstances do we accept liability for any loss or damage that may result from your receipt of this message or any
attachments.
Albert Triplett
From: Peck, Haley < >
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 1:50 PM
To: Albert Triplett
Subject: RE: SU16-03
Hi Albert,
I have received the email/comments.
Thank you,
HALEY PECK
Real Estate Specialist I West Area
T: (972) 374-4281 (
CASTLECROWN
IFF -
600 E. John Carpenter Ewy., Suite 300, Irving, TX 75062
CrownCastle.com
From: Albert Triplett[mailto:atriplett@grapevinetexas.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 6:41 PM
To: Peck, Haley <
Subject: Re: SU16-03
Ms. Peck,
attached are the staff comments for SU16-03. Please acknowledge your receipt of this
email and attachment. Please feel free to contact me if you have any
questions. Thank you.
Albert L. Triplett Jr.
Planner II
City of Grapevine
200 S. Main Street
Grapevine TX 76051
817.410.3155
This email may contain confidential or privileged material. Use or disclosure of it by anyone other than the
recipient is unauthorized. If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this email.
1
July 1, 2016
Ms. Christine Lopez
Fort Worth Star Telegram
P.O. Box 1870
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
RE: Grapevine Account # CIT 25
Dear Ms. Lopez,
VIA FACSIMILE
817-390-7361
817-390-7520
Please find enclosed the following for publication on Sunday, July 3, 2016, in the Northeast
Edition of the Neighborhood Extra Section of the Fort Worth Star Telegram. (One time
only)
Item Meeting Date
Notice of Public Hearing July 19, 2016
Z16-03 Shady Brook Addition
Notice of Public Hearing July 19, 2016
SU16-03 — Verizon Wireless
As always, your assistance is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions please
contact me at (817) 410-3155.
Sincerely,
Albert L. Triplett, Jr.
Planner 11
DEVEJ.,OPNIENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The City of Grapevine - P.O. Box 95104 ® Grapevine, Texas 76099 - (817) 410-3154
Fax (817) 410-3018 0 www.grapevinetexas.gov
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
On Tuesday evening, July 19, 2016 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 2nd Floor,
200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, the City Council and Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Grapevine will hold a public hearing to consider the following
items:
Z16-03 - Shady Brook Addition — submitted by Avondale Development for property
located at 993 Shady Brook Drive. The applicant is requesting to rezone 4 acres from "R-
MF -2" Multifamily District and 7.7 acres from "PRD -12" Planned Residential Medium
Density District to "R-5.0"Zero-Lot-Line District for the development of 52 residential lots
and one home owners' association lot. The property is owned by Frank Monaco.
SU16-03 — Verizon Wireless — submitted by Crown Castle for property located at 525
Industrial Boulevard and platted as Lot 3, Grapevine Industrial Park. The applicant is
requesting a special use permit to amend the previously approved site plan, specifically to
expand the ground lease and allow an additional wireless carrier on an existing monopole.
The property is zoned "LI" Light Industrial District and is owned by LT2 Properties LLC.
After all parties have been given an opportunity to speak, the public hearing will be closed
and the Commission and the City Council will deliberate the pending matters. Please
contact Development Services Department concerning any questions, 200 S Main Street,
Grapevine, Texas 76051 or PO Box 95104, Grapevine, Texas 76099, 817-410-3155. A
copy of the site plan for all the above referenced requests is on file with the Development
Services Department.
K
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
TIME
07/01/20I6 10:45
NAME
INSPECTIONS
FAX
8174103012
TEL
8174103165
SER.#
000F9N919388
DATEJIME
07/01 10:44
FAX NO./NAME
8173907361
DURATION
00:00:24
PAGE(S)
03
RESULT
OK
MODE
STANDARD
ECM
808 Throckmorton St.
FORT WORTH, TX 76102
(817)390-7761
Federal Tax ID 26-2674582
Bill To:
CITY OF GRAPEVINE SECRETARY
PO BOX 95104
GRAPEVINE, TX 76099-9704
Attn: ACCOUNTS . PAY.
Customer ID:
CIT25
Invoice Number:
338136711
Invoice Date:
7/3/2016
Terms:
Net due in 21 days
Due Date:
7/31/2016
PO Number:
Order Number:
33813671
Sales Rep:
047
Description:
CITY OF GRAPEVI
Publication Date:
7/3/2016
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS On I3580 1 49 49 LINE $19.20 $940.90
Sales Discount1 j') ($837.12)
Misc Fee ® 1 ! /r
$10.00
N t Amor®L r 113.78
DEBORAH JEAN BAYIOR
Notary Public, State of Texas
My Commission Expires
County of Tarrant `'tif,,;;�,;;++� 00tober 29, 2019
Before me, a Notary Public in andforsaidCounty and State, this day personaffy appeared Christy Holland; Bids &Legal Coordinator
for the Star-Tefegram, pubCished by the Star - Telegram, Inc. at Fort Worth, in Tarrant County, TeXas : and who after being duty sworn,
did depose and say that the attached clipping of advertisement was published in the above named paper on the fisted dates:
BIDS & LP ALS DEPT. Star -Telegram. (1 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORNTO BEFORE ME,
THIS DAY OF JULY ra 2016
SBned
NOT31.7Z}'PUBLIC kL_ ktCA QN1_1
Thank You For Your Payment
Remit To: Star -Telegram Customer ID: CIT25
P.O. BOX 901051 Customer Name: CITY OF GRAPEVINE SECR
FORT WORTH, TX 76101-2051 Invoice Number: 338136711
Invoice Amount: $113.78
PO Number:
Amount Enclosed: $
MEL PROPERTIES LTD
501 INDUSTRIAL BLVD
GRAPEVINE
76051
501 I f � � � NEVI �N �t"� ` "1'
NDUSTRIAL BLVD GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK Lot 1R 1A
STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS INC
1801 WATERS RIDGE DR
LEWISVILLE
75057
500 INDUSTRIAL BLVD
GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK Lot 8A 1 %
LT2 PROPERTIES LLC
4100 HERITAGE AVE STE 105
GRAPEVINE
76051
529 INDUSTRIAL BLVD
GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK Lot 3'�
BARUKEI EL 11 LTD
531 INDUSTRIAL BLVD
GRAPEVINE
76051
531 INDUSTRIAL BLVD
/
GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK Lot 4R 1
LP INDUSTRIAL LLC
4100 HERITAGE AVE STE 105
GRAPEVINE
76051
541 INDUSTRIAL BLVD
GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK Lot 4R,/
ESS PRISA TX LP
MRF GRAPEVINE LLC
2795 E COTTONWOOD PKWY
1156 BOWMAN RD STE
SALT LAKE CITY
84121
2045 W STATE 114 HWY
STORGUARD NO 1 ADDITION Block A Lot 1A f
VAN CLEVE INVESTMENTS INC
200
635 FRITZ DR STE 105
MOUNT PLEASANT
COPPELL
29464
75019
2059 W STATE 114 HWY
STORGUARD NO 1 ADDITION Block A Lot 2R1
2079 W STATE 114 HWY
VAN CLEVE ADDITION Block 1 Lot 1 A,/
M
51
TRIAL BLVD
SU16_03_070516_104955AM_b1343561.xls
BARUKEI EL II LTD
531 INDUSTRIAL BLVD
GRAPEVINE
76051
ESS PRISA TX LP
2795 E COTTONWOOD PKWY
SALT LAKE CITY
84121
LP INDUSTRIAL LLC
4100 HERITAGE AVE STE 105
GRAPEVINE
76051
LT2 PROPERTIES LLC
4100 HERITAGE AVE STE 105
GRAPEVINE
76051
MEL PROPERTIES LTD
501 INDUSTRIAL BLVD
GRAPEVINE
76051
MRF GRAPEVINE LLC
1156 BOWMAN RD STE 200
MOUNT PLEASANT
29464
STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS INC
1801 WATERS RIDGE DR
LEWISVILLE
75057
VAN CLEVE INVESTMENTS INC
635 FRITZ DR STE 105
COPPELL
75019
SU16 03 070516 104955AM Labels - Count: 9
Page 1
VERIZON WIRELESS
Because you are a property owner within 200 feet of the subject tract of land as
shown by the last City -approved tax rolls, you received this notice. If you cannot or
do not wish to attend the hearing, the attached form is provided for your
convenience. If owners of more than 20% of the property within 200 feet of the
subject tract object to the case, a 3/4 vote of the City Council is required to approve
the request.
Purpose of Request:
The public hearing is to consider an application submitted by Crown Castle for property
located at 525 Industrial Boulevard and platted as Lot 3, Grapevine Industrial Park. The
applicant is requesting a special use permit to amend the previously approved site plan,
specifically to expand the ground lease and allow an additional wireless carrier on an
existing monopole. The property is zoned "LI" Light Industrial District and is owned by LT2
Properties LLC. A copy of the site plan is on file with the Department of Development
Services.
Hearing Procedure:
When: 7:30 PM, TUESDAY, JULY 19, 2016
What: JOINT PUBLIC HEARING GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL
& PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Location: PUBLIC HEARING: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2nd FLOOR
COMMISSION'S DELIBERATION SESSION, 2nd FLOOR
200 S. MAIN STREET, GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
Applicant and Other Speakers' Presentation.
Public Input, Neighborhood Associations, Property Owners Within 200 feet, Interested
Citizenry.
Questions from City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission for Applicants, City
Staff and Guests Present.
File #: SU 16-03
VERIZON WIRELESS
WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5PM
ON MONDAY, JULY 18, 2016
rev
As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I
(approve) (protest) and/or (have the following comments)
Print Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision:
Signature: (Phone No.)
Telephone: (817)410-3155 Fax: (817)410-3018
Direct questions and mail responses to:
Planning Technician
Department of Development Services
City of Grapevine
P.O. Box 95104
Grapevine, Texas 76099
TO:
FROM:
MEETING DATE
SUBJECT
r--1
I
HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER WP—
SCOTT
WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR
JULY 19, 2016
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF SPECIAL
USE APPLICATION SU16-03 VERIZON WIRELESS
APPLICANT: Crown Castle
The subject property is located at 525 Industrial
Boulevard and is platted as Lot 3, Grapevine
Industrial Park. The addition contains 1.45 acres
and has approximately 243 feet of frontage along
Industrial Boulevard.
REQUESTED SPECIAL USE AND COMMENTS:
The applicant is requesting a special use permit to amend the previously approved site
plan of SU02-01 (Ord. 2002-22) to allow the collocation of a wireless facility, specifically to
expand the ground lease and allow an additional wireless carrier on an existing monopole
With this request the applicant intends to expand an existing lease area 240 square feet
(from 600 square feet to 840 square feet), add ground equipment and an antenna array on
an existing monopole. The subject property is zoned "LI" Light Industrial District and is
developed with three office/warehouse buildings and cellular communications equipment.
A 75 foot monopole is located approximately 175 feet east of Industrial Boulevard within
the parking lot of the development. The applicant intends to add ground equipment
including a nine foot in height canopy to cover a generator and equipment cabinets
mounted on a concrete slab. The ground equipment will support an antenna array of six
R:\Agenda\2016\2016-07-MSU16-03.4.doc July 13, 2016 (10:12AM)
antenna located at the 60 foot point on the monopole. The proposed expanded
equipment/lease area is located west of the existing ground equipment and monopole. A
six foot in height chain link fence is proposed around the perimeter of the 840 square foot
lease site. The expanded lease area will require the reduction of two existing parking
spaces. Required parking for the existing office/warehouse/manufacturing use is 25
parking spaces and 40 spaces are provided.
PRESENT ZONING AND USE:
The property is currently zoned "LI" Light Industrial District and developed with three
office/warehouses which are occupied by industrial and warehouse users and the cellular
communications monopole and equipment area.
HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA:
The subject property and immediate area is zoned "LI" Light Industrial District. Buildings "A"
and "B," located on the northern half of the subject tract, were developed before 1984
under the previous Zoning Ordinance and are considered non -conforming. Building "C," a
12,000 square foot office/warehouse development on the southern portion, was approved
via case SP95-29 in April 1996.
Three Special Use Permit requests for the property have been considered by the Planning
and Zoning Commission and City Council in the past. A 100 foot high monopole proposed
by Nextel was approved in this location in June 1995, via case SU95-02 (Ord. 95-46).
However, the Special Use Permit expired one year later as development of the tower had
not commenced. In February 1997, the City Council denied case SU96-12 for the same
Nextel 100 foot high monopole, recommending collocation on facilities at Baylor Medical
Center. In December, 2001, City Council denied without prejudice a proposal for this same
75 -foot Cingular Wireless monopole via case SU01-08, stating that more information and
analysis regarding alternative sites in the proposed service area would be required.
Special Use Permit SU02-01 (Ord. 2002-22) was approved by the City Council at the
February 19, 2002 meeting to allow for a 75 foot high monopole and an equipment shelter.
South of the subject site Conditional Use Permit CU16-08 (Ord. 2016-030) was approved
by the City Council on June 21, 2016 to allow for the manufacture, possession, storage,
sale and on -premises consumption of alcoholic spirits in conjunction with a distillery.
SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE:
NORTH: "LI," Light Industrial District—Dunbar Armored Trucks, GT Products
SOUTH: "LI," Light Industrial District—Astra Tools Co. and Impact Designs
EAST: "LI," Light Industrial District – Caliber Collision
R:\Agenda\2016\2016-07-19\S U 16-03.4. doc
July 13, 2016 (10:12AM)
WEST: "LI," Light Industrial District — Four Seasons
The subject tract is located within "Zone B" Middle Zone of Effect as defined on the
Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. In Zone B,
the following uses may be considered only if sound treatment is included in building design:
multi family apartments, motels, office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, personal and
business services. Single family residential and sound sensitive uses such as schools and
churches should avoid this zone. The applicant's proposal is an appropriate use in this
noise zone.
MASTER PLAN APPLICATION:
The Master Plan designates the subject property as Industrial land use. The applicant's
proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan.
THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION:
Industrial Boulevard is not designated on the City of Grapevine Thoroughfare Plan.
/at
O:\ZC U\2016\S U 16-03\S U 16-03.4. doc
3
July 11, 2016 (5:04PM)
August 8, 2016
Haley Peck
Crown Castle
600 E John Carpenter Frwy #300
Irving, TX 75062
RE: GRAPEVINE FILE #SU16-03
To Whom It May Be Concerned:
This letter is to verify that your request for a special use permit located at 525 Industrial Boulevard
to amend the previously approved site plan of SU02-01 (Ord. 02-22) to allow the collocation of a
wireless facility, specifically to expand the ground lease and allow an additional wireless carrier on
an existing monopole was approved by the City Council on July 19, 2016. A copy of the approved
site plan and ordinance are enclosed.
On July 19, 2016, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the City Council approve
the request as stated above.
Any changes to a site plan approved with a conditional use ora special use (no matterhow
minor or major) can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process.
No Special Use Permit shall be valid for a period longer than one (1) year from the date on which
the City Council grants the Special Use, unless within such one (1) year period: (1) a Building
Permit is obtained and the erection or alteration of a structure is started, or (2) an Occupancy
Permit is obtained and a use commenced.
The City Council may grant one additional extension not exceeding one (1) year, upon written
application, without notice or hearing. No additional extension shall be granted without complying
with the notice and hearing requirements for an initial application for a Special Use Permit.
Please do not hesitate to contact us if we may be of further assistance (817)410-3155.
Sincerely,
Al
Susan Batte
Planning Technician
+ SVP
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPi%RTMENT
The City of Grapevine - P.O. Box 95104 r Grapevine, Texas 76099 e (817) 410-3154
Fax (817) 410-3018 @ www.grapevinetexas.gov
June 3, 2016
City of Grapevine
Planning and Zoning Department
200 S. Main St.
Grapevine, TX 76051
To Whom It May Concern:
Crown Castle
600 East John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 300
Irving, TX 75062
As you may be aware, on February 22, 2012, Congress enacted "collocation -by -right" legislation
preempting delays in the process of zoning the collocation of transmission equipment on existing wireless
communications facilities ("Section 6409(a)").1 Section 6409(a) mandates that local governments must
approve any eligible facilities request for the modification of an existing wireless tower or base station
that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. More recently,
the Federal Communications Commission (the "FCC") adopted rules to implement and enforce the
provisions of Section 6409(a).2 Under the FCC's rules, if a local government fails to issue a decision
within 60 days on an application submitted pursuant to Section 6409(a), the application is deemed
granted.3
Enclosed herein please find the application materials required for zoning approval of the modification to
the wireless tower located at 525 Industrial Blvd., Grapevine, TX 76051. Please note that: (i) the
modification involves the collocation of new transmission equipment; and (ii) such modification will not
substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower. As such, it is an "eligible facilities request"
as defined in the FCC's rules, and City of Grapevine must therefore approve this request within 60 days.
The proposed. modification complies with all federal, state, and local zoning and permitting
requirements. It is our expectation that this application will be processed without any undue delay and
in a manner consistent with the newly enacted federal legislation. Thank you in advance for your
anticipated cooperation.
Sincerely,
Haley Peck
Real Estate Specialist
' Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, Pub. L. No. 112-96, § 6409 (2012)
2 Acceleration of Broadband Deployment by Improving Wireless Facility Siting Policies, 80 Fed. Reg. 1238-01 (Jan. 8,
2015)(to be codified at 47 C.F.R. 1 and 17) (the "FCC Infrastructure Order")
s See FCC Infrastructure Order at para. 115.
I� �;J
The Foundation for a Wireless World.
CrownCastle.com`
June 3, 2016
City of Grapevine
Planning and Zoning Department
200 S. Main St.
Grapevine, TX 76051
RE: Project Description
To Whom It May Concern:
SutG •o 3
Crown Castle
600 East John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 300
Irving, TX 75062
Verizon Wireless is proposing to collocate on the existing wireless communications tower (monopole) located at
525 Industrial Blvd., Grapevine, TX 76051. The existing tower is 70'-6" tall and is currently being occupied by one
other carrier, AT&T. Verizon Wireless is proposing to install (6) antennas at the 6o' level, below AT&T's existing
antennas. No additional height increase for the tower is required. Verizon Wireless is also proposing the
installation of a new lo' x 15' concrete pad within Crown Castle's lease area for the location of their ground
equipment. Verizon Wireless will be installing (1) generator and (2) equipment cabinets. The cabinets will be
placed under a new canopy and the area will be enclosed by chain link fence.
The proposed collocation of Verizon Wireless on this existing cell tower will not cause substantial harm to the
value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. The cell tower is pre-existing on the property
without any issues. Verizon Wireless is proposing their antennas to be located below the existing antennas, so
there will only be a very minimal aesthetic change to the look of the tower. It will not cause any changes to the
surrounding area. The proposed ground equipment is the minimal amount needed so that Verizon Wireless's site
is able to function and will be unobtrusive.
The proposed collocation of Verizon Wireless on this existing cell tower will add to the value, use, or enjoyment of
other property in the neighborhood. Adding a site for Verizon Wireless at this location will increase their coverage
to the surrounding area without the need for the installation of a new tower. Collocation is favored and
encouraged by the City of Grapevine and presently, there is only one carrier on this tower. The proposal would
enhance the site by allowing another carrier to locate by the least intrusive means.
Thank you in advance for your review and consideration of this application. We look forward to working with the
City of Grapevine on this and future wireless communications efforts.
Sincerely,
r
Haley Peck U
Real Estate Specialist
The Foundation for a Wireless World.
CrownCastle.com
Sui�•os
Exhibit 2.03.1— Section 6409(a) Eligible facility request for modification that does not substantially
change the physical dimensions of an existing tower or base station
Section 6409(a) applies to this project as it meets the applicable requirements as set forth in FCC Rules,
47 CFR 1.40001 Wireless Facility Modifications (FCC Rules).
(1) The project is an "eligible facility" as a "tower" as defined in FCC Rules. The tower is a monopole
that was built for the sole purpose of supporting Commission-licensed/authorized antennas and
their associated facilities. It currently (and only) supports AT&T as a carrier. The tower was
originally approved by City of Grapevine for Cingular Wireless (later acquired by AT&T) through
SUP #SU02-01 on 2/19/2002.
(2) The tower to be modified as the Project meets the definition of "existing" in FCC Rules, as it has
been reviewed and approved through the City of Grapevine SUP process. It was approved by
SUP #SU02-01 on 2/19/2002. Copies of previous approvals are attached. There were no City
required conditions besides conformance to the approved site plans.
(3) The "site" of the tower to be modified by the Project is a 55'x 16' space leased by Crown Castle
from the Property Owner, LT2 Properties LLC. Verizon Wireless will then lease a 15'x 16' portion
of the site from Crown Castle for placement of their equipment. Please see the zoning drawings
for a map and location/boundaries.
(4) Does not apply, not located in public ROW
(5) The request to modify is a "collocation" as defined in FCC Rules, as Verizon Wireless is proposing
to install their antennas and other equipment on the existing monopole, that is an eligible
support structure (as described above). The purpose of Verizon Wireless's installation is
transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for communications purposes.
(6) The modification Project does not include or require replacement in the form of "hardening" of
the tower.
(7) The requested modification of the tower to be modified by the Project does not "substantially
change the physical dimensions" of the existing tower, as those terms are defined in FCC rules,
specifically:
a. There is no increase in tower height proposed. Verizon Wireless's antennas will be
installed below the existing antennas.
b. There is no increase in the width and/or protrusions of appurtenances and/or
transmission equipment from the tower to be modified. The proposed antennas will
protrude no further from the tower than the existing antennas, which is approximately
3.3'.
C. Verizon Wireless does propose an increase in transmission equipment/cabinets on the
ground of the site of the tower to be modified, but it will not be more than the standard
number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved and will not exceed four
cabinets. They are proposing two equipment cabinets and one generator.
d. There will be no proposed excavations or deployment outside the current site. Verizon
Wireless's proposed ground equipment will be installed within Crown Castle's lease
area. The current site is defined as the leasehold or other propert i 4e,
�F���I�
V
Exhibit 4.01— Existing zoning regulations or other City requirements at the Project site and requested
variances/waivers
4.01.1: The applicable City of Grapevine Zoning Ordinance section is 49.8.1—Special Use Permits,
Authorized Special Uses, Communication Uses. The Project is subject to review and approval of a SUP. A
monopole is one of the antenna support structure types listed to be regulated and governed by this
section. One accessory equipment building is allowed per antenna support structure. There is already
one shelter at the site and no new shelter or building is proposed. There are no proposed commercial
signs, flags, lights and attachments other than those required for communications operations or
structural stability. The Project is in full compliance with the existing zoning regulations or other City
requirements. There were no previously required conditions of prior permits at the Project site, besides
conformance to the approved site plans. This SUP is needed for changes to the site plan. This is a
qualified Section 6409(a) application.
4.01.2: There were no previously required City conditions from prior permits, besides conformance to
the approved site plans. The proposed changes to the previously approved site plans are allowed by the
"substantial change" thresholds identified in FCC Rules and explained above. The Project is in full
compliance with the existing zoning regulations or other City requirements.
Y
TERMS USED IN THIS APPLICATION:
"Applicant" —This is the person or entity that will actually utilize the Project, with the permit in the
Applicant's name.
"Applicant's Agent" -- Applicant's Agent is the agent for the Applicant in connection with this
application and is authorized to sign and submit the application on the Applicant's behalf.
"FCC 2009 Declaratory Ruling" --- Federal Communication Commission Order, In the Matter of
Petition for Declaratory Ruling to Clarify Provisions of Section 332(c) (7) (B), 24 FCC Rcd 13994
(2009).'
"FCC 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order"-- Federal Communication Commission Order, In the
Matter of Acceleration of Broadband Deployment by Improving Wireless Facilities Siting Policies, WT
Docket No. 93-238, _ FCC Rcd (Adopted Oct. 17, 2014, Released Oct. 27, 2014) [For Effective
dates see end note, but for Section 6409 (a) rules, no earlier than April 8, 2015]. Interpretation of
Section § 6409(a) (47 U.S.C. § 1455(a)."
"FCC Rules" —FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 Wireless Facility Modifications, et al.
"Property Owner" -- Is the underlying owner of the property on which the Project is located.
"Project" -- For purposes of this application, the new site or modification/addition to an existing
wireless facilities site will be termed the "Project".
"Section 322 (c) (7)" —Federal law, 47 U.S.C. § 332 (c) (7).
"Section 6409 (a)" —Federal law, 47 U.S.C. § 1455(a) (Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief
Act of 2013).
iFLIK11M.
li
1 �•• • •
1.01.1: Full Legal Name of Applicant: Including full name of individuals, corporate name, LLC, LLP,
as applicable.) -
01 .2:
pplicable.):
01.2: Principal Applicant Contact Name: Ashley Fowler
Title: Project Manager
Firm Name (If applicable): Verizon Wireless
Address: 11710 FM 2661
City: Tyler State: TX lip: 75709
Tel: 817-770-2101 Ext:
Work Fax: 817-394-1210
(Optional) Mobile Tel:
Email Address: ashley.fowler cabass.net
(Optional) Website:
1.01.3: If applicable, Applicant's Agent Name: Haley Peck
Title: Real Estate Specialist
Firm Name: Crown Castle
Address: 600 E. John Carpenter Fwy. #300
City: Irving State: TX Zip: 75062
Tel: 972-374-4281 Ext:
Work Fax: 972-374-4270
(Optional) Mobile Tel:
Email Address: haley.peck crowncastle.com
(Optional) Website:
LiIL 19
1.02.1: If the underlying owner of the property on which the Project is located ("Property Owner") is
not the same as the Applicant, please include information on the Property Owner's name, company or
firm, title, address, email and telephone number. included on application
1.02.2: If the underlying Property Owner is not the same as the Applicant and does not sign the
application acknowledging its consent to file the Application for the Project, please attach a letter of
agency appointing the Applicant, or the Applicant's representative or Applicant's Agent, as applicable,
as the agent for the Property Owner in connection with this Application and as being fully authorized
to sign the Application on the Property Owner's behalf acknowledging the Property Owner's consent
to file the Application for the Project. Property owner has signed application
Designate this as "Exhibit 1.02.2, Property Owner's Letter of Agency".
1.02.3: If the Project is located in the public right-of-way, describe in detail the governmental authority
and/or statutory authority, or other legal authority that granted the Applicant the privilege to use the
rights-of-way for a wireless facility. Not located in public ROW
Designate this as "Exhibit 1.02.3, Permission to use ROW for wireless facility".
1.02.4: If the Project is located in the public right-of-way, and will be placed in infrastructure not
owned or controlled by the Applicant, such as an existing wireless antenna support tower or utility
pole, street light pole, or traffic signal pole, describe in detail the legal basis for the use of that
infrastructure, providing copies of pole attachment or other agreements with the owner of the
infrastructure. Not located in public ROW
Designate this as "Exhibit 1.02.4, Permission to use ROW infrastructure".
1.03: Representations on submitting the Application:
1.03.1: If the Applicant is an individual, they must sign their full name on the cover page to the
Application, representing that: 1.) they have read and understand the Application and; 2.) to the best
of their knowledge the answers and information submitted with the Application are true and correct.
Application has been signed
1.03.2: If the Applicant is not an individual, an Applicant's in-house representative must sign their full
name on the cover page to the Application, representing that: 1.) they have the authority to act for the
business entity of the Applicant; 2.) they have read and understand the Application; and 3.) to the
best of their knowledge the answers and information submitted with the Application are true and
correct.
1.03.3:If neither the Applicant nor the Applicant's in-house representative signs the application form,
please attach a letter of agency appointing the above named Applicant's Agent as the agent for the
Applicant in connection with this application and as being fully authorized to sign and submit the
application on the Applicant's behalf. The Applicant's Agent must sign their full name on the cover
page to the Application, representing that: 1.) they have the authority to act for the business entity of
the Applicant; 2.) they have read and understand the Application; and 3.) to the best of their
knowledge the answers and information submitted with the Application are true and correct.
-
Designate this as "Exhibit 1.03.3: Applicant's Letter of Agency." �b
1;,i(G 20
1
The type of wireless facility Project determines the review time under federal law for the City to act in
deciding to grant or deny a permit. The three possible City review periods, depending on type of
project, are:
• 150 days is the default, but rebuttable presumptive time for the City to review and act on all
new wireless facility sites and projects that do not qualify as either a Section 322 (c) (7)
"collocation" on an existing tower or a Section 6409 (a) modification to an "eligible" existing
tower or existing base station.
• 90 days is the default, but rebuttable presumptive time for the City to review and act on a
Section 322 (c) (7) "collocation" on an existing tower, when supported by complete
documentation submitted with the application.
® 60 days is the time allowed for the City to review and act on a Section 6409 (a) "eligible
facilities request" for modification of an existing tower or existing base station, when supported
by complete documentation submitted with the application.
Both a Section 322 (c) (7) "collocation" on an existing tower and a Section 6409 (a)
modification to eligible an existing tower or existing base station have detailed restrictions to qualify. If
the Applicant is asserting that the Project qualifies for either of those two types of projects, complete
the below questions, and provide the requested information in full to avoid a delay in you application's
review for incompleteness.
The City review times start when the application is filed, but can be tolled (not counted) if the
application is incomplete. Section 332 (c) (7) presumptive times are rebuttal by the City, and the City
does not waive, but reserves its right to rebut those times as not reasonable under the
circumstances."' All of the City review times may be extended by the Applicant, with mutual, written
agreement.'
30 day review for completeness of the application for purposes of the City review period:
If the City determines the application is incomplete it will provide written notice to the Applicant
within 30 days of filing of the application that the application is incomplete, detailing the
missing information and citing where that information was required. The remaining time for the
City to review the application does not start again until the supplemental information has been
provided to the City in full.
For the maps and drawings required, the following standards apply in the City's determination
of completeness. The size of each submitted map, drawing, Project elevation renderings and/or
photographs and photo simulations must be no smaller than 11" by 8.5." Each must use the same
streets names and legends.
providePlease following information
2.01: Presumption that the Application is for a project that does not qualify as either a Section
322 (c) (7) "collocation" on an existing tower or a Section 6409 (a) "eligible facility"
modification to an existing tower or base station: The City will D resume that the
is 21
JUI V ,,,
Application's Project is neither a collocation project qualified under Section 322 (c) (7) nor is it an
"eligible facility" request for modification under Section 6409 (a), unless the Applicant clearly asserts
that it is, providing the below requested information in Section 2.02 or Section 2.03, as applicable, in
full and in complete detail.
If the above presumption is correct, please check here indicating yes, and go to
Section 3.
If the above presumption is not correct, complete Section 2.02 or Section 2.03, as applicable.
2.02: 47 U.S.C. § Section 332 (c) (7) collocation project: if the Applicant asserts that this Project is
eligible and fully qualifies as a 47 U.S.C. § 332 (c) (7) collocation project request as defined in FCC
2009 Declaratory Ruling," attach a detailed written statement describing the reasons upon which the
applicant believes that that the Project is eligible for 47 U.S.C. § 332 (c) (7) collocation treatment, to
include at a minimum complete answers to the below questions in 2.02.1 below:
2.02.1: Detailed engineer sealed drawings of the measurements described below:
(1) Detailed information on the existing tower where the collocation is to be placed, to include but
not be limited to copies of the initial application and permit, and any subsequent modification
applications and permits, even if denied.
(2) Detailed information on the existing tower where the collocation is to be placed as to whether
the mounting of the proposed antenna on the tower increases the existing height of the tower
by more than 10%, or by the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the
nearest existing antenna not to exceed twenty feet, whichever is greater? Explain in detail.
Please provide detailed engineer sealed drawings of these measurements.
(3) Detailed information on the existing tower where the collocation is to be placed as to whether
the mounting of the proposed antenna involve adding an appurtenance to the body of the
tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than twenty feet, or more than the
width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater? Explain in
detail. Please provide detailed engineer sealed drawings of these measurements.
(4) if the mounting of the proposed antenna exceeds the size limits set forth in (2) (height) and/or
(3) (width/protrusions), is it asserted it was necessary to either avoid interference with existing
antennas or to shelter the antenna from inclement weather or to connect the antenna to the
tower via cable? Explain in detail. Please provide detailed engineer sealed drawings of
supporting these asserted claims.
(5) Detailed information on the existing tower where the collocation is to be placed as to whether
the mounting of the proposed antenna involve the installation of more than the standard
number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved, not to exceed four, or more
than one new equipment shelter? Explain in detail. Please provide detailed engineer sealed
drawings of these measurements.
(6) Detailed information on the existing tower where the collocation is to be placed as to whether
the mounting of the proposed antenna involve excavation outside the current tower site,
defined as the current boundaries of the leased or owned property surrounding the tower and
any access or utility easements currently related to the site, including any physical, wireline,
interconnections to other locations, noting existing wireliectiora.,_.w d new ones?
Explain in detail. Please provide detailed engineer sealed drat' e0spments.
22
i
(7) Please include a detailed map depicting the sites' boundary of the property owned or leased
for purposes of the tower Project, and the location of the tower Project within that boundary,
and depicting the tower Project as it is at the time of the application, and after the requested
collocation, in both an overhead format, and in elevations from each side. Please provide
detailed engineer sealed drawings of this depiction.
Designate this attachment as "Exhibit 2.02.1, Section 332 (c) (7), Eligible Collocation Project"
Go to Section 3.
2.03. Section 6409 (a) eligible facilities request for modification: If the Applicant asserts that this
Project is an eligible facility request for modification under Section 6409 (a) as it does not
"substantially change the physical dimensions" of an existing tower or base station, as those terms
are defined in FCC 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order and FCC Rules, please attach a detailed
written statement describing the basis of the assertion that Section 6409 (a) applies to this Project
and why it meets the applicable requirements as set for in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 Wireless
Facility Modifications, et al, to include complete answers to the questions in 2.03.1 below:
2.03.1. Provide detailed information and detailed engineer sealed drawings of the measurements
described to answer the questions below, at a minimum providing documentation or information to the
extent reasonably related to the request for modification to allow the City to determine whether the
request for modification meets the detailed requirements set for in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001
Wireless Facility Modifications, et al:
(1) Is the Project an "eligible facility" as a either a "tower' or a "base station" as defined in FCC
Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 (b) (1) and (9)? Explain in detail.
(2) Provide detailed information on how the tower or base station to be modified as the Project
meets the definition of "existing" in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 (b) (5). Include with this
explanation copies of the initial application and permit of the tower or base station, and any
subsequent modification applications and permits, even if denied, and of any City required
conditions placed on the initial or subsequent permits, such as, but not limited to, safety,
setbacks, fencing, landscaping, and concealment or stealth requirements.
(3) Provide detailed information and documents on the "site" of the tower or base station to be
modified by the Project as "site" is defined in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 (b) (6), to allow
the City to determine the "site" for purposes of compliance with Section 6409 (a) eligibility.
Please include a detailed map depicting the sites' boundary of the property owned or leased
for purposes of the Project, and the location of the Project within that boundary, and depicting
the tower or base station as it is at the time of the application, and after the requested
modifications, in both an overhead format, and in elevations from each side.
(4) If the Project is located in the public right-of-way, describe by providing maps and drawings to
fully depict the area asserted to be in proximity to the structure and to other transmission
equipment already deployed on the ground, to include the location of the tower or base station
and transmission equipment already deployed on the ground within that proximity area,
depicting the tower or base station as it is at the time of the application, and after the
requested modification, in both an overhead format, and in elevations from each side. Include
the basis of the assertion as to the area in proximity to the eligible structure.v" Explain in full
detail to include maps and drawings to allow the City to daairae -tlae site # urposes of
compliance with Section 6409 (a) eligibility.
23
I
S, Gtft0003
(5) Is the request to modify a "collocation", as defined in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 (b) (2),
or a removal or replacement of "transmission equipment", as defined in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R.
§ 1.40001 (b) (8)? Explain in detail.
(6) To the extent the modification Project includes replacement in the form of "hardening" of the
tower or base station, please provide analysis by a licensed engineer as to why this hardening
is necessary for an eligible Section 6409 (a) collocation, replacement, or removal of
transmission equipment, and percentage of the structure that is being replaced."
(7) Provide detailed information on how the requested modification of the tower or base station to
be modified by the Project does not "substantially change the physical dimensions" of the
existing tower or base station, as those terms are defined in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001
(b). Explain in detail, specifically, including detailed licensed engineer sealed drawings, on how
the requested modification of the tower or base station Project is to be modified, to include:
a. Increases in the height of the tower or base station to be modified;
b. Increases in the width and/or protrusions of appurtenances and/or transmission
equipment from the tower or base station to be modified;
c. Increases in the transmission equipment/cabinets on the ground of the site of the tower
or base station to be modified;
d. Detail on any excavations and deployment outside the current site including any
physical, wireline, interconnections to other locations, noting existing wireline
connections and new ones.
e. How the requested modification of the tower or base station does not defeat any
previously required concealment (stealth) conditions from prior permits;
f. How the requested modification of the tower or base station complies with any other
previously required City conditions from prior permits, other than those allowed by the
"substantial change" thresholds identified in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001(b)(7)(i)-
(iv).
What constitutes a "substantial change" are detailed in the definition in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. §
1.40001 (b) (8), including how each item listed above is measured (i.e., height, width, protrusions
of appurtenances, number of cabinets). Please provide all documents and information to the
extent reasonably related to the request for modification to allow the City to determine whether the
request for modification meets the detailed requirements set for in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. §
1.40001 Wireless Facility Modifications, et al.
Designate this attachment as "Exhibit 2.03.1, Section 6409(a) Eligible facility request for modification
that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of an existing tower or base station"
Go to Section 3.
SECTION 3.00: GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
3.01: Project Street or other Physical Address designation used to
locate: 525 industrial Blvd., Grapevine, TX 76051
3.01.1: Project Description: Collocation of Verizon Wireless to existing cell tower.
To the extent not answered in detail in Section 2 above, please
3.01.2 or 3.01.3 and 3.01.4, as applicable:
i o
m
n "
' st
?i k
3.01.1 Detailed map depicting the boundary of the property owned or leased for purposes of
the Project, and the location of the proposed Project within that boundary including street
names, addresses of buildings or residences in at least 300 yards of proximity to that area
including any physical, wireline, interconnections to other locations, noting existing wireline
connections and new ones. zoning drawings provided
3.01.2 Detailed to scale drawings depicting the existing wireless facilities structure as it is at
the time of the application, as applicable, and as the Project will be after the requested
modification, in both an overhead format, and in elevations from each side including any
physical, wireline, interconnections to other locations, noting existing wireline connections and
new ones. zoning drawings provided
3.01.3 If the Project is located in the public right-of-way, describe the location by providing
maps to depict the area with 200 feet of the Project, including street names, addresses of
buildings or residences and the area asserted to be in proximity to the Project, to include the
location of the Project structure within that area, including any physical, wireline,
interconnections to other locations, noting existing wireline connections and new ones.
3.01.4 Detailed to scale drawings depicting the existing wireless facilities structure as it is at
the time of the application, as applicable, and as the Project will be after completion, in both an
overhead format, and in elevations from each side including any physical, wireline,
interconnections to other locations, noting existing wireline connections and new ones.
Maps and drawings are to be prepared and sealed by a licensed Texas professions Engineer.
Designate the maps and drawings as "Exhibit 3.01.1, Project description, maps and
drawings."
3.02: Requested photo/elevation renderings to be submitted with the Application: (Not
applicable for a fully qualified Section 6409 (a) eligible facility's request to modify.) N/A
3.02.1: Project Elevation Renderings and/or Photographs and Photo Simulations.
(1) To the extent not provided in other responses, where the Project as proposed by the
Applicant can be seen at ground level from the street, or from the 1st floor within or on
buildings within 500 feet of the Project provide four elevation renderings and/or
photographs and/or photo simulations of the Project, including its tower, base station,
antennas, antenna concealment/stealth coverings, equipment cabinets, back-up
generations, and lights, as applicable.
(2) A map detail showing each location where that elevation renderings and/or photographs
and/or photo simulations were taken, together with the Project site, and the direction to the
site from each elevation renderings and/or photographs and/or photo simulations must be
included.
The Applicant should submit elevation renderings and/or photographs and/or photo simulations
as set out above, and may be requested by the City to provide additional elevation renderings
and/or photographs and/or photo simulations to allow the Cit to visualize the Project as
completed. � � � � � nn
I!
t V 25
l
By their submittal with the application, Applicant represents that the elevation renderings
and/or photographs and/or photo simulations are accurate and reliable representations of the
current project site and the proposed Project to be constructed or modified, and that the
Applicant is fully aware that the City will rely on all of the elevation renderings and/or
photographs and/or photo simulations provided when it considers granting or denying the
Application for this Project.
Designate as "Exhibit 3.02.1, Project elevation renderings and/or photographs and
photo simulations."
REQUESTED.
4.011: Provide information on the existing zoning regulations or other City land use and/or safety
code requirements at the Project site that may be applicable to the Project.
4.01.1: If the Project is not in full compliance with the existing zoning regulations or other City
requirements or conditions of prior permits at the Project site provide detail as to how it is non-
compliant, and if a variance and/or waiver is requested by the Applicant for each instance of non-
compliance, and why the variance/waiver is requested, except for qualified Section 6409 (a)
Applicants. NSA
4.01.2: For qualified Section 6409 (a) Applicants, to the extent not answered above in Section 2.03.1
(7) f. above, provide details if the Project complies with any other previously required City conditions
from prior permits, and/or existing zoning regulations or other City requirements at the Project site
other than those allowed by the "substantial change" thresholds identified in FCC Rules, 47 C.F.R. §
1.40001(b)(7)(i)-(iv), and if not, and if a variance and/or waiver is requested by the Applicant for each
instance on non-compliance, and why the variance/waiver is requested.
Designate this as "Exhibit 4.01, Existing zoning regulations or other City requirements at the
Project site and requested variances/waivers."
SE;:TIOR 5.00: PROJECT USE AND PURPOSE (Not applicable for a fully qualified Section 6409 (a)
eligible facility's request to modify.) N/A
5.01: Principal Use of the Project: (One or more, as applicable)
If for private use, such as an amateur radio, describe generally in a written statement.
If for broadcast radio, broadcast TV, or satellite connectivity for data or cable television,
describe generally in a written statement.
If for commercial public cellular telephone, to include, but not limited to a network for "personal
wireless services" as defined in Section 322 (c) (7) (C), or a network for "commercial mobile
service" , as defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332 (d), Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio, Specialized
Mobile Radio, Microwave, PCS telephone, Small Cell, or a Distributed Antenna System (DAS),
describe generally in a written statement.
If for other uses, (e.g., Wi-Max or Wi-Fi), describe generally in a written statement.
5.02: If applicable, indicate whether the purpose of the Project is: ( qr sr le)
26
_ Adding commercial cellular network without adding significant new radio frequency coverage area
to a network for "personal wireless services", as defined in Section 322 (c) (7) (C) and/or to a network
for "commercial mobile service", as defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332 (d).
_ Providing significant new radio frequency coverage in an area not already served by radio
frequency coverage to a network for "personal wireless services", as defined in Section 322 (c) (7) (C)
and/or to a network for "commercial mobile service", as defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332 (d).
_ Increasing the existing radio frequency signal level in an area with existing radio frequency
coverage to a network for "personal wireless services", as defined in Section 322 (c) (7) (C) and/or to
a network for "commercial mobile service", as defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332 (d).
Intended to close or reduce an asserted "significant gap" in a wireless telecommunications
cellular network, including to a network for "personal wireless services", as defined in Section 322 (c)
(7) (C) and/or to a network for "commercial mobile service", as defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332 (d).
_ Other. Attach a written statement fully describing all portions or elements of the "Other" dominant
purpose of this Project.
Designate this exhibit as "Exhibit 5.02, Other purpose of this Project."
SECTION 6.00 "SIGNIFICANT GAP" QUESTIONS, IF APPLICABLE: (Not applicable for a fully
qualified Section 6409 (a) eligible facility's request to modify.) N/A
6.01: Is this Project intended to close or reduce an asserted "significant gap" in a wireless
telecommunications network, to include a network for "personal wireless services", as defined in
Section 322 (c) (7) (C) and/or for "commercial mobile service", as defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332 (d)
(sometimes referred to collectively as "cellular network")? If the answer is yes, attach a written
statement, signed and sealed by an engineer licensed in Texas, including his or her designated
primary area of engineering practice, and if it is not electrical engineering, then include a copy of his
or her Supplementary Experience Record (SER) as filed with the Texas Board of Professional
Engineers, Rule 133.97 (j), and explaining why he or she is competent without a designated primary
area in the englneering branch area of electrical engineering concerning Radio Frequency (RF)
engineering analysis. In such written statement provide full details describing the following:
(1) Geographic boundary of the claimed significant gap area, attaching a street -level map
showing that geographic boundary of the claimed significant gap.
(2) Describe the size of the claimed significant gap area in square miles; and
(3) Set out and explain the definition of and/or what constitutes a "significant gap" as used
by Applicant in this Project.
(4) If the term or of what constitutes a significant gap as set out above is different than the
term significant gap is used or applied by the wireless industry generally, if known,
and/or the FCC, if known, explain the differences and the reasons for the differences.
(5) Where the Applicant has relied on external data sources to factually support the claimed
significant gap area, identifying those sources and:
�7�® 27
a. Whether the claimed significant gap affects a significant number of commuters
on particular roadways, and if so, name each roadway, and include addresses by
blocks, and how affected; and
b. Describe the number of potential cellular network users in the claimed significant
gap area; and
c. Describe the number of potential cellular network users in the claimed significant
gap area who may be affected by the claimed significant gap; and
d. Describe whether the proposed Project is needed to improve weak signals in a
cellular network or to fill a complete void in coverage in a cellular network, and
provide Radio Frequency (RF) engineering analysis proof of either; and
e. If the claimed significant gap covers roads on which the cellular network users
lack roaming capabilities, identify such roads by name and block address within
the claimed significant gap area and provide road use information about each
such road; and
f. If one or more "drive tests" was conducted within the claimed significant gap
area, discuss in detail the methodology of how the test(s) were conducted,
including details about the test equipment by manufacture, model numbers and
years in service, if more than 2 years, and calibration maintenance records, if
applicable, and location of the test equipment, including any antennas in or on
the test vehicle. Provide the objective data collected during the drive test in
standard portable spreadsheet format; and
g. If the claimed significant gap affects a retail commercial district, show the
boundaries of the district on the map; and
h. If the claimed significant gap poses a public safety risk, describe in detail the
claimed risk, and the basis for this claim, including any correspondence (email or
in writing) from or to the public, if any; and to or from any public safety officials
(fire, police, others), if any, concerning or relating to this claimed public safety
risk; and
(6) If the claimed significant gap is based in whole or in part on factors related to switching
center capacity; dropped calls; failed hand-offs; interference from or to other cell sites;
site hopping; degraded cellular radio frequency signals; and/or any failure to meet any
carrier transmission goal or percentage goal, attach at least the most recent twelve
months of historical data by month documenting at least:
a. The results or numerical data of each claimed metric and range of each
parameter;
b. the wireless carrier's numerical and percentage requirements for each such
claimed perimeter;
c. the total number of calls attempted for each month both successfully and
unsuccessfully completed;
d. the total number of calls that were not completed including failed originations;
failed hand-offs; and non -normal call terminations; and (5) for every such claimed
parameter that is not categorized by way of number or percentage, provide the
data in the way kept by the carrier.
LLD S
Llr: 51 28
Designate this exhibit as "Exhibit 6.01, Basis of "significant gap" closing as a purpose of this
Project."
6.02: Alternative Candidate sites to close the significant gap, if applicable (Not applicable for a
fully qualified Section 6409 (a) eligible facility's request to modify.) NIA-
6.02.1: Did the Applicant, or anyone working on behalf of the Applicant, secured or attempted to
secure any leases or lease -options or similar formal or informal agreements in connection with this
Project for any sites other than the proposed Project site? If yes, please provide the physical address
of each such other location(s), and provide a narrative with technical explanation, to include a Radio
Frequency (RF) engineering analysis, as to why each such other site was not used as the project site,
including identifying and discussing all alternative sites considered to close the significant gap.
6.02.2: Are there any sites in lieu of the site proposed by Applicant that could either close the
significant gap claimed or reduce the significant gap to be less than significant, with less impact on
the community as compared with a single site? If yes, please provide the physical address of each
such other location(s), and provide a narrative with technical explanation to include a Radio
Frequency (RF) engineering analysis, as to why each such other site was not used as the project site,
including identifying and discussing all alternative sites considered to close the significant gap. If the
answer is no, please explain in narrative format the basis for that answer.
6.02.3: If there were no alternative sites were reviewed by the Applicant, or anyone working on behalf
of the Applicant, please answer why in technical detail to include a Radio Frequency (RF) engineering
analysis. .
Designate these Responses to 6.02.1 to 6.02.3 as "Exhibit 6.02, Alternative Candidate site to
close the significant gap information".
6.02.4: If the City required the Applicant to designate one or more sites as alternative sites to the
proposed site for the Project, would that requirement "unreasonably" discriminate against the
Applicant from among providers of functionally equivalent services, or prohibit or have the effect of
prohibiting the provision of "personal wireless services", as defined in Section 322 (c) (7) (C) and/or
"commercial mobile service", as defined in 47 D. S.C. § 332 (d)? if the Applicant's response asserts
that either unreasonable discrimination or a prohibition or effective prohibition would occur, explain in
detail in narrative form the technical, to include a Radio Frequency (RF) engineering analysis, why it
would do so.
Designate this Response as "Exhibit 6.02.4, City requirement of the Applicant to designate
alternative sites to the proposed site for the Project will prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting
the Applicant from providing any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service".
6.03: Proposed site, as the one and only one location to close the significant gap, if applicable
(Not applicable for a fully qualified Section 6409 (a) eligible facility's request to modify.) N/A
6.03.1: Does the Applicant considered the proposed site as the one and only one location within or
outside of the City that can close the significant gap? If yes, provide a technically detailed explanation
supported by comprehensive radio frequency data and other necessary information fully describing
why the proposed site is the one and only one location within or outside of the City that can possibly
close the significant gap to include a Radio Frequency (RF) engineering analysis.
Designate this Response as "Exhibit 6.03.1, Proposed site as the one and only one location to
close the significant gap information".
6.03.2.: If the City denied the application at the site proposed for the Project, would that denial
"unreasonably" discriminate against the Applicant from among providers of functionally equivalent
services, or prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of "personal wireless services", as
defined in Section 322 (c) (7) (C) and/or "commercial mobile service", as defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332
(d)? If the Applicant's response asserts that either unreasonable discrimination or a prohibition or
effective prohibition would occur, explain in detail in narrative form the technical, and other reasons
why it would do so to include a Radio Frequency (RF) engineering analysis.
Designate this Response as "Exhibit 6.03.2, City denial of this Project at this site will prohibit or
have the effect of prohibiting the Applicant from providing any interstate or intrastate
telecommunications service".
6.04: Least intrusive means to close the significant gap, if applicable (Not applicable for a fully
qualified Section 6409 (a) eligible facility's request to modify.) N/A
6.04.1; Is the proposed Project the least intrusive means to close the significant gap claimed and
described above? If yes, attach a written statement describing at a minimum, why this project is the
least intrusive means to close the significant gap claimed, to include a Radio Frequency (RF)
engineering analysis and other information you relied on in reaching your affirmative determination in
above.
Designate this Response as "Exhibit 6.04, Proposed Project as the least intrusive means to
close the significant gap information".
6.04.2: If the City required the Applicant to have a less intrusive Project, to include a reduction in
height and/or width, or to have concealment or stealth requirements, would those requirements would
any of those requirements "unreasonably" discriminate against the Applicant from among providers of
functionally equivalent services, or prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of "personal
wireless services", as defined in Section 322 (c) (7) (C) and/or "commercial mobile service", as
defined in 47 U. S.C. § 332 (d)? If the Applicant's response asserts that either unreasonable
discrimination or a prohibition or effective prohibition would occur, explain in detail in narrative form
the technical, and other reasons why it would do so to include a Radio Frequency (RF) engineering
analysis.
Designate this Response as "Exhibit 6.04.2, City requirement of the Applicant to have a less
intrusive Project, to include a reduction in height and/or width, or to have concealment or
stealth requirement, will prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the Applicant from providing
any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service".
ROOM
Ego 19116111: •
7.01: If the Project is to be physically interconnected by new wireline "back haul" on, over or under
public rights-of-way, please proved the following, as applicable: N/A:,
30
(1) Identify by physical street address of the public rights-of-way, and the managing jurisdiction of
the public -rights-of-way (City, County, or State).
(2) Technical detail of the proposed method of the physical wireline interconnection, including, but
not limited to: overhead, underground, conduits, leased capacity of others, noting existing
wireline connections and new ones.
(3) Detailed maps and drawings depicting the connections between the proposed Project site and
the other sites where they are to be on, over or under public rights-of-way, noting existing
wireline connections and new ones.
(4) Detailed information as to the Applicant's governmental grant of authority to use such public—
rights-of-way for this purpose of physically interconnecting the Project to any other site or sites
by the name of the approving governmental authority, including related documents (e.g.,
ordinances, franchise, agreements, license or permits), and/or applicable statutes by citation or
other means of granting the Applicant (or others) the privilege to place private facilities in the
public rights-of-way for private use to connect wireless facilities' sites.
Designate this as "Exhibit7.01, Wireline/backhaul interconnections in the Public Rights -of -Way
Information."
SECTION 8.00: LEASE ALLOWANCE OF ADDITIONAL WIRELESS FACILITIES AND/OR
PROVIDERS: (Optional response, at Applicant's sole discretion.) N/A
8.01: To the extent not confidential, will the Proposed Site be available for use by other wireless
providers?
8.02: To the extent not confidential, does the lease agreement require written consent from the
landowner/landlord to allow other wireless providers and/or additional wireless facilities?
8.03: To the extent not confidential, does the lease agreement have any limitations as to:
(1) size- length, width, height, weight of facilities on the tower, or limitations as to the exact
placement of the wireless antenna array and/or its "footprint"; or
(2) any limitations of any other any additional wireless facilities to be placed on the tower by
applicant or other wireless providers on the site at ground level or on the tower?
'FCC 2009 Declaratory Ruling is downloadable at: hftps://apps.fcc-gov/edocs public/Query do?mode=advance&rpt=cond
" FCC 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order is downloadable at: http://www.fcc.gov/document/wireless-infrastructure-report-
and-order.
Effective dates of the FCC 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order. -
April 8, 2015: Section 6409 (a) rules are effective April 8, 2015 (90 days after the Jan. 8, 2015 publication in the Federal
Register (FR). 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order, ¶ 242), except to the extent Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
approval is required, 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order, ¶ 286.
Sections requiring OMB approval are to be effective sometime after Jan. 20, 2015, but no earlier than April 8,
2015: The FCC determined the following portions of the Section 6409 (a) -Pe +ra..-0 a proval
before they are effective: 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.40001 (c) (3) (i) [detailed city d n gear mental
G ,z !IIIA 31
information to toll the 60 days "shot clock" due to 30 day notice of incompleteness]; 1.40001 (c) (3) (iii) [City 10
day review of supplemental information, and subsequent request to submit information to further toll the "shot
clock"]; and 1.40001 (c) (4) [60 day failure to act "deemed granted"].
The link to the FCC's OMB approval request is: FR Notice. OMB action on this will be some time after Jan. 20,
2015, when comments are due. Until the OMB acts and the FCC publishes a notice of that OMB approval, those
parts of the FCC Rules are not effective. 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order, ¶ 289. See FR also Jan. 8, 2015, at
page 1238, hftp://www.qpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-01-08/pdf/2014-28897.pdf
Feb. 9, 2015: The balance of the Order on NHPA, NEPA and clarification of FCC 2009 Declaratory Ruling and Section
332 (c) (7) are effective 30 days from FR publication. 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order, % 289, or Feb. 9, 2015. See FR
also Jan. 8, 2015, at page 1238.
"' See 2009 Declaratory Order ¶ 32 and 42, and FN 99; FCC 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order, 1216.
'° 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001(c).
v 2009 Declaratory Ruling, ¶ 46. A Section 332 (c) (7) "collocation" project is one that does not "substantial increase in the
size of a tower". 2009 Declaratory Ruling, footnote 146 states that a "substantial increase in the size of a tower" occurs
when:(1) [t]he mounting of the proposed antenna on the tower would increase the existing height of the tower by more
than 10%, or by the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to
exceed twenty feet, whichever is greater, except that the mounting of the proposed antenna may exceed the size limits
set forth in this paragraph if necessary to avoid interference with existing antennas; or (2) [t]he mounting of the proposed
antenna would involve the installation of more than the standard number of new equipment cabinets for the technology
involved, not to exceed four, or more than one new equipment shelter; or (3) [t]he mounting of the proposed antenna
would involve adding an appurtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than
twenty feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater, except
that the mounting of the proposed antenna may exceed the size limits set forth in this paragraph if necessary to shelter
the antenna from inclement weather or to connect the antenna to the tower via cable; or (4) [t]he mounting of the
proposed antenna would involve excavation outside the current tower site, defined as the current boundaries of the leased
or owned property surrounding the tower and any access or utility easements currently related to the site."
"' 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 (b) (6).
v" FCC 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Order, ¶ 180-81. Replacement may be of "transmission equipment", and may include
hardening of the structure as a whole "where such hardening is necessary for a covered collocation, replacement, or
removal of transmission equipment, but does not include replacement of the underlying structure."
""t 32
0
Lli
z
D
0
L.Ii
Lli D D� lit
m n D 0 M �Z>
n < LLJ
0
Z
Z z D 0 <
Cf) 0 0 F LLJ
< N 0
LLJ L�l
z —
Lj 0 LiJ LJ D�
LLJ > �-- < :D
L.L. LLJ > > C) >
V) m I
< zmo z 1<0
0 U , CE LLJ LLJ CD U
Lij
2
CD
Lr)
Ln
! U�q
Y.
-- a
g7,-- I-
& T -D
0
ffgg�
Kro- 10 V- 'A
Mlv�.
Z:
CD
cn CE
M
2, w cr
C) w
CD
oz:cn
quo
<
CDLA- m
quo
M (n
< ,
LI -i UJ
0a_
cl cL t 4I3
CL
0
w
CL
%ftw000l
z
.j
CL
w
CD CD
U)li If
---J-
CX)
< CD (D
L, -j
_j
10
C) CL
0
21
1-10
Ld
<
It
Cl
LLJ
III
;z n-
ou
1 7'
,
to o
> T- U
<
LL
x
ry
Z:
LLJ
CY
LJ
-I
LJLJ
Y 15
z
-t
0
0
z Ln
0111
0 C"i
fy
N
N
0
o
FY y
<
Lli 0
> C6>
Lki
3:
Of
D
7- --, 0
Lli
0-
ffgg�
Kro- 10 V- 'A
Mlv�.
Z:
CD
cn CE
M
2, w cr
C) w
CD
oz:cn
quo
<
CDLA- m
quo
M (n
< ,
LI -i UJ
0a_
cl cL t 4I3
CL
0
w
CL
%ftw000l
z
.j
CL
w
CD CD
U)li If
---J-
CX)
< CD (D
L, -j
_j
10
C) CL
0
21
1-10
Ld
<
Cl
III
<
LLJ
C)
ELI;
LAJ
LLJ
LLJ
x
Lli
Lai
0
QO
0
<
FY
Ln
LLJ
=
LLJ
LO
CN
Ln ilry
ffgg�
Kro- 10 V- 'A
Mlv�.
Z:
CD
cn CE
M
2, w cr
C) w
CD
oz:cn
quo
<
CDLA- m
quo
M (n
< ,
LI -i UJ
0a_
cl cL t 4I3
CL
0
w
CL
%ftw000l
z
.j
CL
w
CD CD
U)li If
---J-
CX)
< CD (D
L, -j
_j
10
C) CL
0
21
1-10
Ld
n P
00
LJ
--j --j
�--- 1-- 0—
CD 0
E n I
LSI
Enu i
C"�
i LL-
-*c
= L CD
<
III
<
C)
LAJ
LLJ
x
Lai
0
0
<
I
C)
LLJ
=
LLJ
CO
Ljj
Lil
75
Lj,j
ry
•Lij
L -Li
Ln
LO
x
n P
00
LJ
--j --j
�--- 1-- 0—
CD 0
E n I
LSI
Enu i
C"�
i LL-
-*c
= L CD
t
T
r"`.,LLA
C)
0
LLJ
V)
U,
LJ 3� C-)
C)
LIJ U)
EL
LLJ m LLJ M w
-j ry 0
LJLJ -j0
Lr) 0 ------- < LLJ U
L.LJ r-4
z
U) LLJ
F 6ZL9
'N
u CL
o
-am
<
<
< LLJr 0
-7" 1-- * -M
01--j2e cl
C) Ca
CD muo
W>-
ry C14 (n C3
990 ,9—,0 L P 2
< 0
CD0 in Z w I
> M
z 0 <I.-
LL -
0 2:
F
LL-
C)
<
LJ z
LLJ
0 yz
LIJ
CD,
C)
LIJ
UJ
ry
C/")
71
CD
D D LLJ
V) 0 n,
LLJ <
LLJ - j
Fn
o ry L'i
0
LjJ
n 01,
__j
0
X LL-
ry
LJ C) -:Zr
>
U->
LLJ
LLJ
-
00
r -j
r --_i
FL�
cn
z
n
LLJ
CL
:2
U. D
0
V)
LO
z
(D Z fit
-C
<
0 0-
=
u
u C/')
r)
F-
U')
C.
F-
C�
0
L-1
L
m
F
w m
uj
<
Ld
I— z
LJ z
LLJ
0 yz
LIJ
CD,
n
LJ
cn
C/")
CII -i
Cf)
LLJ <
LLJ - j
CD —<
CD
0
cr-
1
__j
0 cn,<
cn w !
0-
ry
LJ C) -:Zr
>
U->
LLJ
LLJ
-
00
r -j
r --_i
FL�
z
LLJ
LLJ Z <
-J
EL 1
U. D
LO
L!
LO
-C
ZCD
Lu
cn
=
--A-
< ry
r)
-------- ----- ------ -- -- ----
Z
0
tLZ—g6 w
UJ
to V
D
<
C)
0
-i
n
w EL
0-
W
CL
Cf)
L -J
m
=>
-D
I
0
L
m
L.Li LJLJ
Cn Ln
C-> u
LJ
LLJ
uj
<
Ld
I— z
LJ z
LLJ
0 yz
LIJ
CD,
n
LJ
cn
C/")
CII -i
i = <
LLJ <
LLJ - j
CD —<
CD
0
cr-
1
__j
0 cn,<
cn w !
0-
ry
LJ C) -:Zr
>
U->
LLJ
LLJ
-
00
r -j
r --_i
FL�
z
LLJ
LLJ Z <
-J
EL 1
U. D
L!
LO
-C
ZCD
=
CD
L.Li LJLJ
Cn Ln
C-> u
119 "0—,9
LJ
LLJ
uj
<
Ld
I— z
LJ z
LLJ
0 yz
LIJ
119 "0—,9
g
<
Ld
I— z
LJ z
LLJ
0 yz
LIJ
CD,
n
LJ
W
-F LL-
Z
C
i = <
LLJ <
LLJ - j
CD —<
< y Li LL-
(-) z 0
LLJ CD
cr-
r-v-
a-
( CLEr-
0 cn,<
cn w !
'3 C) 0 Cy 0
ry
LJ C) -:Zr
>
U->
<
119 "0—,9
g
IAJ _j
n
Ld
I— z
LJ z
L, Li
0 yz
LIJ
<
< cy
I z 0
0 C)
Lij C-)
(-n
-F LL-
Z
cn I CL
LLJ <
LLJ - j
0
< y Li LL-
(-) z 0
oo v) n
I- C)
Ljj LIJ Li 0
z <
C) <
'3 C) 0 Cy 0
< cr
119 "0—,9
All M..
My"011
I—
Ln i Ln
I
v
g
CD
L, Li
-------------
n
z =>
0 LLJ c) 0
0
z <
C) <
z
< cr
<
T LL -
C)
-
00
c)
L'i <
All M..
My"011
I—
Ln i Ln
I
v
m
LJ LLJ
C/Ij �n CN
CD CD
n
Li- = NJ C)
CD
L, Li
-------------
00
0 LLJ c) 0
cn
C) <
00
I
U)
-
00
0
00
FL�
z
LLJ
LLJ Z <
-J
EL 1
U. D
L!
LO
LL-
ZCD
m
LJ LLJ
C/Ij �n CN
CD CD
n
Li- = NJ C)
L, Li
-------------
0 LLJ c) 0
C) <
LJ
(Y C)O<
L.Lj >
0
y z
LLJ Z <
-J
EL 1
U. D
C) < 0 0
W W
< ry
r)
-------- ----- ------ -- -- ----
Z
n
5
tLZ—g6 w
UJ
to V
C)
File SU 16-03
VERIZON WIRELESSZ
n
NOTICE OF PU[
GRAPEVINE CIT'
PLANNING AND ZOI
®<
Because you are a property owner withi
shown by the last City -approved tax rolls,
do not wish to attend the hearing, t
convenience. If owners of more than 21
subject tract object to the case, a 3l4 vote
the request.
Purpose of eguet:
The public hearing is to consider an applic<
located at 525 Industrial Boulevard and plat
applicant is requesting a special use permi
k
specifically to expand the ground lease ar
existing monopole. The property is zoned "L
3'
D
Properties LLC. A copy of the site plan is,
Services.
m
Hearing Procedure:
When: 7:30 PM, TUESDAY, JULY '
-'
u�
What: JOINT PU LIC HEARING
xx
& PLANNING AND ZONING
r°
1 M
'
Location: PUBLIC HEARING: COU CI
COMMISSION'S DELIBERA
200 S. MAIN STREET, GRAI
, 'g
3.
Applicant and Other Speakers' Presentatic.
Public Input, Neighborhood Associations,
Citizenry.
Questions from City Council and Plannin
FA
Staff and Guests Present.