The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAM2006-07November 3, 2006 Ms. Janice Gregory Fort Worth Star Telegram VIA FACSIMILE P.O. Box 1870 817-390-7520 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 RE: Grapevine Account # CIT 25 Dear Ms. Gregory, Please find enclosed the following for publication on Sunday, November 5, 2006, in the Northeast Edition of the Neighborhood Extra Section of the Fort Worth Star Telegram. (One time only) Item Meeting Date Notice of Public Hearing CU06-49 - Bone Daddy's November 21, 2006 Notice of Public Hearing CU06-52 Grapevine Mills Retail November 21, 2006 Notice of Public Hearing Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance November 21, 2006 As always, your assistance is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions please contact me at (817) 410-3155. Sincerely, Ron Stombaugh, Development Manager ,?7 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT The City of Grapevine • P O Box 95104 • Grapevine, Texas 76099 • (817) 410-3154 Fax (817) 410-3018 • www.ci.grapevine.tx.us CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS On Tuesday evening, November 21, 2006 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine will hold a public hearing to consider the following items: Case Number/Name: CU06-49 Bone Daddy's Applicant: Dan Holzschuh Location: 1720 William D Tate Avenue, Lot 1, Block 1, Bone Daddy's Addition Proposal: The applicant is requesting to amend the previously approved site plan, specifically to allow a 40 -foot pole sign and a monument sign. The property is owned by DFW International Airport. A copy of the site plan is on file at the Department of Development Services. Case Number/Name: CU06-52 - Grapevine Mills Retail Applicant: O'Brien & Associates Location: 2805 East Grapevine Mills Circle, Lot AR1, Block 2, Grapevine Mills Addition Phase 1 Current Zoning: "CC" Community Commercial Proposal: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to amend the previously approved site plan for a planned commercial center in excess of 1,000,000 square foot of leaseable area, specifically for the development of a retail building. The property is owned by Green Street Properties. A copy of the site plan is on file at the Department of Development Services. AMENDMENTS TO COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE 82-73 The City Council and the Commission will consider amendments and changes to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, No. 82-73, same being Appendix D of the Code of Ordinances as follows: Section 12, Definitions relative to Flag Lots, and Section 49, Special Use Permits relative to Flag Lots, and any other additions, deletions, or changes to various sections, articles and provisions contained in said Ordinance No. 82-73. After all parties have been given an opportunity to speak, the public hearing will be closed and the Commission and the City Council will deliberate the pending matters. Please contact the Department of Development Services concerning any questions, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, 76051 or P.O. Box 95104, Grapevine, Texas, 76099, 817- 410-3155. HP OfficeJet K Series K80 - Personal Printer/Fax/Copier/Scanner Last Transaction Log for DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 8174103018 Nov 03 2006 12:09pm Date Duration 4os Result 1:04 3 OK Time Typ& Identification Nov 3 12:08pm Fax Sent 98173907520 Star -Telegram 400 W. 7TH STREET FORT WORTH, TX 76102 (817)390-7761 Federal Tax ID 22-3148254 Bill To: CITY OF GRAPEVINE SECRETARY PO BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099-9704 CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS On THE STATE OF TEXAS County of Tarrant Before me, a Notary; Public in and for said for the Star -Telegram, published by the St( depose and say that the attached clippir LEGAL DEPT. STAR TELEGRAM (817) 390-7320 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME, TF - Applicant: Dan echuh location: 1720 D Tate Avenu 1, Block 1, Daddy's Addit;c Proposal: The cant is request amend the prei approved site specifically to 40 -foot pole sic a monument sig property is owr DFW Intern: Airport. Acopy site plan is on the Departme Development as. Thank You For Your Payment ---------------- Remit To: Star -Telegram P.O. BOX 901051 FORT WORTH, TX 71 ad or se pn in 82 a Customer ID: CIT25 Invoice Number: 276940121 Invoice Date: 11/5/06 Terms: Net due in 21 days Due Date: 11/30/06 PO Number: Order Number: 27694012 Sales Rep: 073 Description: CITY OF GRAPEVI Publication Date: 11/5/06 1 99 99 LINE $3.23 $319.77 Net Amount: $319.77 Cr CHRiSTY L. HOLLAND �} *' *= i; MY COMMISSION EXPIRES l - �"apevine ul ,day per Wally appeared Lisa Wesselman, Bid and legal Coordinator -O'Brien, i, ;t Worth, arrant County, xas; and who, after being duly sworn, did 2sos Ea 't w s p Ii hed in the abo named paper on the listed dates: BIDS & 3 Mies k _ i n p p Ri Btock� �iAllis !Atl„ � ,. The Customer ID: CIT25 Customer Name: CITY OF GRAPEVINE SECR Invoice Number: 276940121 Invoice Amount: $319.77 PO Number: Amount Enclosed: FROM:MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS B. • • MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 21, 2006 SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AM06-07— AMENDMENT TO SECTION 12, DEFINITIONS RELATIVE TO FLAG LOTS RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission relative to flag lots and take any necessary action. BACKGROUND: This past year the zoning ordinance has been amended twice relative to flag lots. It was first amended in November, 2005 to require flag lots in residential districts to be considered and approved by Council through the Special Use permitting process. Controversy surrounding a special use request for a residential flag lot on Worthington Drive led to a second amendment to the zoning ordinance in June, 2006 which more closely defined flag lots and prohibited them in all single family residential districts. Council directed the Planning and Zoning Commission to further review and consider the concept of flag lots and make any recommendations relative to their use and establish new guidelines if necessary. A review of other cities throughout the U.S. reveals a great deal of ambiguity concerning flag lots—some cities allow them carte blanche with virtually no guidelines; others prohibit them entirely. Some cities limit the length of the flag either in absolute terms or as a percentage of the overall length of the lot. Some establish a minimum frontage width or require the lot to meet the minimum width requirement at the setback line. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a workshop in July to further consider the use of flag lots in the City; Staff was directed that the current definition prohibiting flag lots in residential zoning districts was acceptable. Should any unusual hardship arise, the current wording in the zoning ordinance would allow flag lots in residential districts to be considered by the Board of Zoning Adjustment. /rs 0AZCU1AM06-07A 1 November 16, 2006 (11:13AM) MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER 0— SCOTT WILJ-IAMS, ACTING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 21, 2006 SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AM06-07— AMENDMENT TO SECTION 12, DEFINITIONS AND SECTION 49, SPECIAL USE PERMITS RELATIVE TO FLAG LOTS RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission consider the withdrawal of Amendments to Section 12, Definitions and Section 49, Special Use Permits relative to flag lots and take any necessary action. I mon"Cei 1 5 At its July, 2006 workshop, the Planning and Zoning Commission directed staff to continue the prohibition of flag lots in residential districts. As the current wording in the zoning ordinance accomplished the direction provided by the Planning and Zoning Commission, no changes to the text are necessary. For this reason, staff requests that this item be withdrawn. 0AWMAM06-07.41 November 14, 2006 (4:11 PM)