Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 10 - HL01-07 Dunn-Barton House Pt� /2- TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: ROGER NELSON, CITY MANAGER/ H.T. HARDY, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEETING DATE: JANUARY 15, 2002 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT APPLICATION HL01-07 L I -------------- Grapevine Lake APPLICANT: Grapevine Historic Preservation � `' r i Aa. Commission I � I �s yA I.H.1635 9 North t _r 1 PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: I The subject property is located at 624 South Dooley ' Sy Airport x Hall-Johnson �s Street; and legally described as Lots 3 and 4B, Block t--- 0 23, Original Town of Grapevine. The site contains F Glade Rd. — c —I _� approximately 0.65 acres and has 160 feet of frontage along South Dooley Street. REQUESTED HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT AND COMMENTS: The Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission is recommending that the Dunn-Barton House located at 624 South Dooley Street: and legally described as Lots 3 and 4B Block 23, Oriainal Town of Grapevine, be designated as a Historic Landmark Subdistrict At their November 28, 2001 public hearing, the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission recommended that the subject property be designated a Historic Landmark Subdistrict. Preservation criteria for this proposed district addressing such issues as setbacks, driveways, parking, exterior finishes, and other architectural embellishments have been established by the Commission. See the attached preservation criteria. 0:/ZCU/HL01-07.4 1 January 8, 2002 (1:31PM) PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned "R-7.5" Single Family District and contains an unoccupied single-story, }g ry, wood-framed structure. HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: a i The subject site and the property immediately to the north, east and west was zoned "R-3" Multiple Family District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. The property located to the south of the site was zoned 1-1" Limited Industrial prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. The eastern part of the property located to the south was rezoned in 1991 to "GU" Governmental Use District (Z91-10, Ord. No. 91-80) SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "R-7.5" Single Family District and "GV", Grapevine Vintage District— single family residences and La Buena Vida Vineyards. SOUTH: "LI" Light Industrial District and "GU", Governmental Use District— St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad and the Heritage Center a, EAST: "R-7.5" Single Family District— vacant WEST: "GV" Grapevine Vintage District— La Buena Vida Vineyards. AIRPORT IMPACT: The subject tract is located within "Zone A" Zone of Minimal Effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" Map. Few activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in "Zone A" except for sound sensitive activities such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The applicant's proposal is an appropriate use in this noise zone. MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as Low Intensity Commercial. The proposed Historic Landmark Subdistrict designation acts as an overlay to add extra protection to the existing structures and insure that future buildings will be a cohesive addition to the neighborhood. 01MUML01-07.4 2 December 27, 2001 (12:05PM) THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION: The Thoroughfare Plan designates Dooley Street a Type E, Collector with a minimum 75- foot right-of-way developed as four lanes. /ca 0:/ZCU/HL01-07.4 3 December 27, 2001 (12:05PM) 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 5S PT S PT sP7 a 5 2 ry -- — -- - - --- --- a�9B W E 112 Q W - E W E PT P PT PT PT PT PT 7 1._—� 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 8 11 10 10 9Ab 8 8 FRANKLIN ST 66-0 7_-14 - - _. --- — - N o' WPT a VYP(, W E W A�� 2A �I 2c 1R1 = a EPT a EPt� PT 6 d 1 2 3 6 1 2 3 � 2R1 w 3 w 3 4 w 5 5 (� � 1 2 ec U) �m p -az _ 4A - --- - -- — - 1 A 4 TR 2N 8 1 3C• e -- - 2 - - - -- °�' 28 pp B. TR 20 -- z�8-25. PO 3A 3B 3a '4 '� 6 3 Site 41) 2M 5 4 12 ©. Restricted S;T; _6_ Rl-s7*5 . 22 R I . TR 2K 4A 5D ' 5B 5C . . .. . . . 2' .25 Ac - TR 2J1 4 '� 48 � 1 -12 � TR 2J2.r _ -- 27 Ac 2� CU 4-29. O TR , LI C C G. TR 2J3 2.53 Acpl�: z9o-o9 SA � � 3 .48 Ac Z87-1 CU87-06 4 -10 � TR 65 _ -05 7'5944 Ac G", � 1 Q �6&_ Q O x � r Cj D'� ��NOV" 3.039 @ g �L 0 3g6 1 TR 35 �gz4 0 CU96-09 IQw 2 _ TR TR _ s E DALLAS RD 2D2 2D2A sa rn zan RD 1A HL01 - 07 1 » _ 200 ' e BI,II'1.�1 Barton 11ouse NI Ell POPE e ® R s ° ® 1911,911fae 1. Name Historic Dunn-Barton House And/or common 2. Location Address 624 S.Dooley Street land survey William Dooley Survey Location/neighborhood Original Town block/lot Blk 23,Lot 3 &4B tract size.65 acres 3. Current zoning R 7.5,Single Family Residential 4. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use _ district _ public _ occupied _ agriculture _ museum x building(s) x private x unoccupied — commercial _ park structure work in progress education x Residence (va- cant) _ site Accessible _ Entertainment _ Religious x yes:restricted _ government _ scientific _ yes:unrestr. _ industrial _ transportation no _ military _ other 5. Ownership Current owner: Rose M.Toon phone: Address: 4527 Bluffview Blvd city: Dallas state: Texas zip: 75209 6. Form Preparation Name&title: Susan Kline,consultant organization: Grapevine Township Revitalization Project,Inc. Contact: Hugo Gardea phone: 817/410-3197 7. Representation on Existing Surveys x Tarrant County Historic Resources x National Register of Historic Places Recorded Texas Historic Landmark other Multiple Property Nomination Form Texas Archaeological Landmark for office use only 8. Date Rec'd: I • (C•O 1 Survey Verified: X Yes No 9, Field Chk date: By: 10. Nomination _ Archaeological _ Structure _ District Site Structure&Site 11. Historic Ownership original owner Unknown,possibly JC&JW Dunn or OR Barton significant later owners : 12. Construction Dates original: c. 1890-1904 alterations/additions: unknown 13. Architect original construction: unknown alterations/additions: unknown 14. Site Features natural: urban design: Sparsely developed area of early residential neighborhood 15. Physical Description Condition Check One: Check One: excellent _ deteriorated _ Unaltered x Original site _ good _ ruins x altered _ Moved(date: ) x fair _ unexposed — _ poor _ Descry pent and original(f knoun)pk ya c appearancp,include style(s)of amkhgctum,ammt mndition ara'rekimuhip to m* su7�I:V,07ding fabric(structures,objects,etc.). Ela mate on piminew materials used and styles)of archi�al detailing,m7lel- lubmeits and site details. The Dunn-Barton House at 624 S. Dooley is an example of a simple folk housing form that differs slightly from others of its kind. From the front or east elevation, it appears to be a simple L-plan house but a view of the south elevation indicates that it is actually a reverse F-plan house. The Barton House is a 1-story,wood-sided house with a cross gable roof covered with composition shin- gles. The facade features a gabled bay on the right half of the building. Below the gable ends is a full- width pent roof. Below the pent roof are paired double hung wood windows. To the left of the bay is a hipped roof porch supported by three spindled wood columns. A photo from the Tarrant County Historic Resources Survey(1990)indicates that this porch was screened at one time but the screening has been re- moved. Underneath the porch are two entrances, one of the south wall of the gable bay and one on the east wall. The doors are glazed wood panel. To the left on the east-facing door is one double hung wood win- dow. The south elevation has two gabled bays. The right gable bay features a full-width pent roof. Below that are paired double hung wood windows. The left gable bay features two paired hung windows at the attic level. The first floor features a second entrance. This portion of the house may be an early addition. The space between the two gables has been infilled with a ribbon of four double hung wood windows. The rear of the building is largely unadorned and has two window openings. The north elevation features a project- ing gable bay on the west half. This gable has a door at the attic level with a stairway leading to the con- verted attic space. Left of the gable bay near the northeast corner is a single double hung wood window. At the southwest corner of the lot is a side gabled,wood framed garage with exposed rafter tails. Tax rec- ords indicate that a garage was constructed in 1934 but it is not known if this is the same building. A wood stockade fence surrounds portions of the yard. The house is located in a sparsely developed area of a his- toric residential district. 16.Historical Significance Statm�of hutonaand cultural sagnzfuv7a_, Indude cultural influences,spacial ewzls and inV0MZ zt persona,influaurs on netgbbo on the city,etc. The early history of the Barton House is not clear. The records of the Tarrant Appraisal District date the house to 1890 and the records of the Tax Assessor's Office date the house at 1903. The architectural style of the house would be consistent with either date but deed records tend to support the latter date. However,this date may be too early as well. The earliest deed records,although hard to read,suggest that the property was sold by E.N.Hudgins to J.C. Dunn and J.W.Dunn in 1876 for$50.00. E.N.Hudgins(1814-1901)was an early Grapevine pioneer and foun- der of the town's Methodist Church, John C.Dunn,Jr.had arrived in Grapevine in 1856 with his wife and chil- dren, including his son Joseph William Dunn. In 1904,Fannie Estill and Nancy Dunn sold the property to O.R. Barton for$250. Nancy Dunn was the wife of Irenius Plato Dunn,who was the son of John C. Dunn, Jr. Fan- nie Estill was Nancy Dunn's aunt. Perhaps the house was located on the property at that time or was con- structed shortly afterward. In 1929, O.R.Barton sold the property to L.A.Barton. L.A. Barton sold the property to Ruth Lee Barton in 1934. Ruth Lee Barton married Walter Behr and in 1942 the pair sold the property to G.H. McPherson. In 1959, Ethel McPherson(a widow),Alma McPherson Wilt and her husband C.C.Wilt,Otis and Marie McPher- son,Lumas and Clara McPherson, and Dovie McPherson Crawford sold the property to Cecil H. Ford. Cecil and Mema Ford sold it Rose Toon in 1962. The Barton House is a good local example of a common folk housing type with a slight variation. It appears to be an L-plan house but the presence of a rear gable gives the structure a reverse F-plan. This rear gable may be an early addition to the property. The simple design of the house features little ornamentation with the excep- tion of the spindled porch columns and the full-width pent roof across the gable bay. This form of folk housing was popular during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. In addition,the Barton House and its associated garage are significant as contributing resources in the Original Town Residential Historic District which was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1998. The house also was featured in the Tarrant County Historic Resources Survey Selected Tarrant County Communities (published in 1990). 17. Bibliography "Original Town Residential Historic District,Grapevine,Texas." National Register of Historic Places Nomination, 1998. Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, 1935. Tarrant County,Texas, Offices of the County Clerk and Tax Assessor,Tax and Deed Records. Tarrant County Historic Resources Survey,Selazal Tarrant County Cavnunihi s,Fort Worth:Historic Preservation Council for Tarrant County,Texas, 1990. Young,Charles,H. GrapeubwArea History. Dallas,Texas,Taylor Publishing Co., 1979. 18. Attachments x District or Site map Additional descriptive material x Site Plan (Tarrant Co.Tax Record) Footnotes x Photos $isteiie&current) x Other(Sanborn Fire Insurance Map) t c 19. Designation Merit n: tt A. Character,interest or value as part of x G Identification as the work of an archi- the development,heritage or cultural test or master builder whose individual characteristics of the City of Grape- work has influenced the development vine,State of Texas of the United of the city. States. B. Location as the site of a significant H Embodiment of elements of architec- historical event. tural design,detail,materials or craftsmanship which represent a sig- nificant architectural innovation. C. Identification with a person or persons I Relationship to other distinctive who significantly contributed to the buildings, sites or areas which are eli- culture and development of the city. gible for preservation according to a plan based on historic,cultural or ar- chitectural motif. D. Exemplification of the cultural,eco- J Unique location of singular physical nomic,social or historical heritage of characteristics representing an estab- the city lished and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood,community or the city. E. Portrayal of the environment of a K Archaeological value in that it has group of people in an era of history produced or can be expected to pro- characterized by a distinctive archi- duce data affecting theories of historic tectural style. or prehistoric value. F. Embodiment of distinguishing char- x L Value as an aspect of community sen- acteristics of an architectural type or timent or public pride. specimen. 20. Recommendation The Grapevine Township Revitalization Program re- % G quests the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commis- ur iIl Biam,Chairman sion to deem this nominated landmark meritorious of Grape ire Historic Preservation Commission designation as outlined in Chapter 39,City of Grape- vine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Hugo jG <a,Arc tect Further,the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commis- Histo'Irva ' fficer sion endorses the Preservation Criteria,policy recom- mendations and landmark boundary as presented by the City of Grapevine Development Services Depart- Tommy Hardy,Directo ment. Development Services qepartment 21. Historical Marker The Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission and the Grapevine Historical Society have a cooperative marker pro- gram for properties that are officially(individually or located within) designated Historic Landmark Sub-districts. Please indicate if you are interested in obtaining one or both markers for your property. There is no fee for either of the mark- ers,however,the Grapevine Historical Society will only fund two (2) of the medallion and text plaque(second option), per year,on a first come,first serve basis. Check One: ❑ Yes,I am interested in obtaining a bronze Historic Landmark Plaque for my property from the Historic Preservation Commission. I understand there is no fee for this plaque. ❑ No,I am not interested in obtaining a marker for my property. ------------------------------------------------------------- ❑ Yes,I am interested in obtaining a bronze Historic Marker(medallion and text plaque) for my property from the Grapevine Historical Society. Below for office use only V'pl R'IG� P II III' i III '�� id i.the Miff IM y Y 1998 ❑ Historic Preservation Commission's ❑ Historic Preservation Commission's Historic Landmark Plaque. Historic District Plaque. i TII L ED AND GRADY KEELING HOUSE uith the ent-n-at the end III j .riginai construction and -hitertu-1 I utvitased The Grapevine Sun in 1897. The I I ❑ Grapevine Historical Society's Historic Landmark Marker. f 3C F IRZM 4B 7 2 2A B 2 TR 20 4C 3A 3B 4 6 3 3D E 4D TR 2M 5 4 ti ST t, 2RI ry TR 2J1 5B 5C 1R3 2 TR 2J2 2 2 ,,�. TR 2J TR 2J3 l 5A ° 3 4 4A � i 1 TR 34 'v 1R ' r G) J O 1 TR 35 p i f TR TR 2D2A Design Guidelines The Dunn-Barton House 624 S. Dooley Street Grapevine, Texas Grapevine Township Revitalization Project, Inc. City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Grapevine, Texas 76051 May 16, 2001 ". Table of Contents 4 PREFACE t I. SITE ■ Setbacks • Driveways, Parking Lots • Service and Mechanical Areas ■ Fences 11. BUILDING FABRIC • Preservation ■ Exterior Finishes • Windows III. EMBELLISHMENTS ■ Awnings-Canopies • Exterior Lighting IV. NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION • Infill ■ Additions to Historic Buildings Page 2 Preface The early history of the Dunn-Barton House is not clear. The records of the Tarrant Appraisal District date the house to 1890 and the records of the Tax Assessor's Office date the house at 1903. The architectural style of the house would be consistent with either date but deed records tend to support the latter date. However, this date may be too early as well. The earliest deed records, although hard to read, suggest that the property was sold by E.N. Hudgins to J.C. Dunn and J.W. Dunn in 1876 for$50.00. E.N. Hudgins (1814-1901)was an early Grapevine pioneer and founder of the town's Methodist Church. John C. Dunn, Jr. had arrived in Grapevine in 1856 with his wife and children, including his son Joseph William Dunn. In 1904, Fannie Estill and Nancy Dunn sold the property to O.R. Barton for$250. Nancy Dunn was the wife of Irenius Plato Dunn,who was the son of John C. Dunn, Jr. Fannie Estill was Nancy Dunn's aunt. Perhaps the house was located on the property at that time or was constructed shortly afterward. u, yr t a 624 Dooley Street In 1929, O.R. Barton sold the property to L.A. Barton. L.A. Barton sold the property to Ruth Lee Barton in 1934. Ruth Lee Barton married Walter Behr and in 1942 the pair sold the property to G.H. McPherson. In 1959, Ethel McPherson (a widow), Alma McPherson Wilt and her husband C.C. Wilt, Otis and Marie McPherson, Lumas and Clara McPherson, and Dovie Page 3 McPherson Crawford sold the property h>Cecil H, Ford. Cecil and K4*ma Ford sold dRose Toonin1802. The Dunn-Barton House is a good local example of a common folk housing type with a slight variation. /t appears toboonL-p}an house but the presence nfa rear gable gives the structure e reverse F'p|an. This rear gable may bean early addition to the property. The simple design of the house features little ornamentation with the exception of the spindled porch columns and the full-width pent roof across the gable bay. This form of folk housing was popular during the late 18th and early 20thcenturies. In addition. thoDunn'Barton House and its associated garage are significant as contributing resources in the Original Town Residential Historic District which was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1998. The house also was featured in the Tarrant County Historic Resources Survey Selected Tarrant County Communities(published in 1990). The Dunn-Barton House at 624 S. Dooley is an example of a simple folk housing form that differs slightly from others of its kind. From the front or east elevation, it appears to be a simple L-plan house but o view of the south elevation indicates that it is actually o reverse F-p|anhouse. The Dunn-Barton House is a 1-story, wood-sided house with a cross gable roof covered with composition shingles, The facade features a gabled bay on the right half ofthe building. Below the gable ends ise full-width pent roof. Below the pent roof are paired double hung wood windows. To the left of the bay iaa hipped roof porch supported by three spindled wood columns. A photo from the Tarrant County Historic Resources Survey (1990) indicates that this porch was screened at one time but the screening has been removed. Underneath the porch are two entrances, one of the south wall nfthe gable bay and one nn the east wall. The doors are glazed wood panel. To the left onthe east-facing door is one double hung wood window. The south elevation has two gabled bays. The right gable bay features a full-width pent roof. Below that are paired double hung wood windows. The left gable bay features two paired hung windows at the attic level. The first floor features a second entrance, This portion of the house may bean early addition. The space between the two gables has been infi||ed with a ribbon of four double hung wood windows. The rear of the building io largely unadorned and has two window openings. The north elevation features e projecting gable bay on the west half, This gable has e door at the attic level with a stairway leading to the converted attic space. Left of the gable bay near the northeast corner ina single double hung wood window. AJ the southwest corner of the lot ioe side gabled, wood framed garage with exposed rafter tai|a Tax records indicate that e garage was constructed in1A34 but itis not known if this ia the oorn- - building. A wood stockade fence surrounds portions of the yard. The house is located in - sparsely developed area of historic residential district. The proposed Period of Significance for this property is 1890-1904, the years documented with the County as being the construction dates. Allowing this property to authentically tell its own story of its period and time, while reinforcing the historical period of significance with necessary preaervation rehabilitation and restoration, is the goal of the historic landmark designation. The preuervaUono' original architectural featunes, especially windows, doora, porch and siding' is pnofornod. rather than '^ oderni�etion"nr^updating''ofo|derfeatures. urimpoaingoha|oe^histohca| |ook"onnevver features. ' rn The repair of original materials, rather than their replacement can best preserve the historic character of the property. If non-original materials are replaced, then care should be taken to install original (in- kind) materials. Repair and restoration is often more cost effective than rep|aoement, conserves energy and reduces the amount of trash added tolandfills. Page New construction (additions or rehabilitation)to the home should reflect the character of the home during its period of significance. Constructed for residential use, it's massing, roof shapes, porch configurations and materials that reflect the architectural character of the home during its historic period should be preserved. The design of any new architectural features shall have key elements of a primary historic style already existing in the home and shall be clearly compatible with and complimentary to its adjacent features. SITE Retain the historic relationships between buildings, landscaping features and open space. Avoid rearranging the site by moving or removing buildings and site features, such as walks, drives and fences, that help define the residence's historic value. SETBACKS Building setbacks should be consistent with adjacent buildings or with the style of the building. Setbacks are an important ingredient in creating an attractive streetscape. Buildings should be set back to a line that is consistent with their neighbors and land use. For example, a residential setback should retain the setback of adjacent and nearby structures,with landscaping along the street right-of-way. Residential buildings with a commercial use in residential areas should be set back in a manner consistent with setbacks of neighboring or similar residential structures. Maintain building orientation pattern, with the front facade facing the street. Maintain spacing patterns between buildings. DRIVEWAYS, PARKING LOTS AND VACANT SITES Driveways should be located perpendicular to the street; no circular drives shall be allowed (unless proven with historic documentation) in front or corner side yard, so that the character of the landscaped yard can be reinforced. New parking lots for commercial uses should not be located adjacent to sidewalks in the district. Off-street parking lots should not be allowed to interrupt the continuity of landscaped front or corner side yards. This is important to both the preservation of historic character, and to the strengthening of the residential district. Screen existing parking lots from streets and pedestrian areas in the Historic District. Existing parking lots located adjacent to streets and sidewalks may be screened to the height of car hoods. This will provide a certain level of continuity of the building fagade line; it will screen unsightly views; and it will provide a level of security by allowing views to and from the sidewalk. FENCES Historically, fences around historic houses defined yards and the boundary around property and gardens. Wood picket fences, wood rail fences and barbed wire or decorative wire fences were the Page 5 common fence types inGrapevine. Traditionally, picket fences surrounded the front of the house while rail and wire fences surrounded the agricultural portions of the property. Maintain historic fences. New fences. Simple wood picket fences, wood and wire and wrought iron fences are appropriate. Avoid chain-link fences, privacy fences and concrete block fences for the street sides of property. Wood privacy fences may be allowed when installed in the rear yard and behind the front fagade of aproperty. Utilitarian/privacy fences should not be installed in front of a historic building or beyond the line of the frontfayade of historic building. Replacing fences. If replacement is required due to deterionation, remove only those portions of historic fences that are damaged beyond repair and replace in-kind, matching the original in material, design and placement. If replacement is necessary for non-historic fences, or new fences are proposed, locate and design the fence in such a way that will compliment the historic boundary of the property without concealing the historic character of the property. SERVICE AND MECHANICAL AREAS Service and mechanical areas and equipment should be screened from the street and other pedestrian areas. ^ All garbage and equipment storage areas should be screened from the street. Mechanical equipment, including satellite dishes, shall not be located in front or corner side yards or should be set back from the edges of roofs, and screened so that they are not visible to pedestrians and do not detract from the historic character ofbuildings. BUILDING FABRIC PRESERVATION Preserve, atobi|ize, and restore original building form, ornament and materials. Any missing or severely deteriorated elements may be replaced with replicas of the original. Ensure that roof,window, porch and cornice treatments are preserved, or when preservation is not possible duplicate the original building element. When rehabilitating, remove non-historic alterations. Often, "rnodern" renovations conceal the original facade details. }f not, the original style may be recreated through the use nfhistoric photographs. Where replication of original elements is not possible, a new design consistent with the original style nf the building may beused. Reconstruction of building elements should reflect the size, scale, material and level of detail of the original design. Preserve older renovations that have achieved historic significance. Older structures oradditions -�' may have, at some time, been renovated with such care and skill that the renovation itself is worthy 0fpreservation. Usually, such renovations may date from before 1940. Page EXTERIOR FINISHES Original wood finishes should be maintained and painted or, when necessary, replaced in kind. Modern synthetic siding materials such as vinyl or metal bear little resemblance to historic siding materials. The application of such modern synthetic materials often involves the removal of original decorative elements such as cornice, corner boards, brackets, window and door trim, etc. New synthetic siding shall not be installed; removal of existing such materials is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish and appearance. Original asbestos siding should be maintained and painted, or when necessary, replaced with synthetic siding to match the existing asbestos siding. The removal of asbestos siding over existing wood siding is not required, but strongly encouraged,to restore historic patina,finish and appearance. Original masonry surfaces should be maintained and not be painted, unless severe deterioration of the brick or stone can be shown to require painting. If the color or texture of replacement brick or stone cannot be matched with existing, painting may be an appropriate treatment. Paint colors should be complimentary to each other and the overall character of the house. When possible, research the original paint color and finishes of the building's historic period; the right colors respect the historic building. The Historic Preservation Commission shall adopt, as necessary, a paint palette(s) appropriate to the district's character, which may be proposed and approved through the Minor Exterior Alteration application process. Any colors proposed outside the adopted palette may be reviewed by the Commission in the regular Certificate of Appropriateness process. WINDOWS Original window framing and lites (panes of glass)configurations should be preserved and maintained or replaced in kind. When replacement is necessary, do so within existing historic opening. Replacement of non-original windows should consider the use of historically appropriate wood windows. Use same sash size to avoid filling in or enlarging the original opening. Clear or very slightly tinted window glass may be used. No reflective or heavily tinted glass shall be used. Should the owner wish to install security bars, they should be installed on the interior of windows and doors. Storm windows. The use of interior storm windows is encouraged. Storm windows are available which can be installed on the interior of windows. This helps to preserve the exterior historic character of the building. Should storm windows need to be installed on the exterior of the historic windows, storm windows constructed of wood and configured to match the historic sashes (i.e. one over one sashes) are recommended. If metal storm windows are installed, paint to blend with surrounding elements. Page 7 EMBELLISHMENTS AWNINGS-CANOPIES New awnings and canopies should not be installed above windows or doors. 4 EXTERIOR LIGHTING k Lighting is an important element in residential areas. Fixtures should be consistent with the historic character of the house. Appropriate incandescent light fixtures to the style of the district should be used. Avoid exposed lighting of any kind unless part of a historic fixture. NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION INFILL The Secretary of the Interior's guidelines for new buildings in historic districts encourage similarity of form and materials, but not actual replication. New construction proposals and the rehabilitation of non-historic buildings will be reviewed based on these Criteria. Judgement will be based on the compatibility of the design within the context of the property's adjacent and nearby historic buildings. The design of new buildings should have key elements of the building's historic period of significance including massing, scale, fenestration and materials. Infill buildings should not be absolute reproductions, and appear as clearly contemporary. Only when a previously demolished historic Grapevine building can be accurately replicated may a reproduction be considered. Infill buildings between historic buildings should be similar in setback, roof form, cornice line and materials, to one of the adjacent buildings. Relate height of new building to the heights of adjacent structures. Avoid new buildings that tower over existing ones. Horizontal wood siding (either novelty, tongue and groove, shiplap or equivalent) and brick are appropriate exterior building finishes for the historic house. Fake brick or stone or gravel aggregate materials shall never be used. ADDITIONS TO HISTORIC BUILDINGS Additions to historic buildings should replicate the style of the main building if possible; otherwise they should adhere to the general style with simplified details. As a minimum, new additions should reflect the massing, roof shape, bay spacing, cornice lines and building materials of the primary structure. Page 8 All new wood or metal materials should have a painted finish except on some 20`h century buildings where the use of unpainted aluminum or steel was part of the original design and should be maintained. A new addition should, if at all possible, be located at the rear of the historic building. If this is not possible, the addition may be added to the side if it is recessed at least 18 inches from the historic building facade or a connection is used to separate old from new. New vertical additions should be set back from primary facades so as not to be readily apparent from the facing street. When reproducing elements that were originally part of a historic building they should be replicated when evidence of the actual detail has been documented by photographs, drawings, or remaining physical evidence. If no evidence exists, elements typical of the architectural style may be used. Historic photographs can provide information on the original elements of the building. Page 9 L !i rr ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF j GRAPEVINE, TEXAS DESIGNATING HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT HL01-07 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 39 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, (APPENDIX "D" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES), THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, DESIGNATING LOTS 3 AND 413, BLOCK 23, ORIGINAL TOWN OF GRAPEVINE, WM. DOOLEY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 422, AND MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, IN A DISTRICT ZONED "R-7.5" SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE DUNN-BARTON HOUSE HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE, AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH AN OFFENSE OCCURS OR CONTINUES; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, applications were made to amend the Official Zoning Map, City of Grapevine, Texas by making applications for same with the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these requested changes should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent �j property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested change should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, the effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings, encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning change, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the change in zoning lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this change in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that a change in zoning classification for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby designate a historic landmark subdistrict (HL01-07) in accordance with Section 39 of Ordinance No. 82-73, being the ORD. NO. 2 Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code in a district zoned "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations within the following described property: 624 South Dooley Street, specifically described as Lots 3 and 4B, Block 23, Original Town of Grapevine, Wm. Dooley Survey, Abstract No. 422, and the adoption of the Dunn-Barton House Historic District Design Guidelines as conditions, regulations and safeguards in connection with the said historic landmark subdistrict, a copy of said criteria being attached hereto and labeled Exhibit "A". Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the "H" zoning designation. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. ORD. NO. 3 Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 15th day of January, 2002. APPROVED: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ORD. NO. 4