HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 06 - Analysis for The RecMEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER
MEETING DATE: AUGUST 6, 2024
SUBJECT: PERFORMANCE AND UTILIZATION ANALYSIS FOR THE REC -
PHASE 2
RECOMMENDATION: City Council to consider beginning Phase 2 of the performance and
utilization analysis for The REC with Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture for
the Parks and Recreation Department.
FUNDING SOURCE: Funds are available in the Capital Projects - Recreation Fund for an
amount not to exceed $15,000; Capital Projects - Park Open Spaces
Fund for an amount not to exceed $83,000 and Special Revenue Fund
(Senior Activity Center) for an amount not to exceed $50,000.
BACKGROUND: Per the direction of the City Council from the July 16 City Council meeting,
the Parks and Recreation (PARD) team worked with BRS to reduce the
timeline for Phase 2 from 31 weeks to 27 weeks and has set an October 2
deadline for light renovations and short-term deliverables to include
solutions to fitness room pinch points.
The REC of Grapevine, which opened in April 2015, has enjoyed nine
successful years of operation. Recently, PARD enlisted BRS Architecture
to carry out a Performance and Utilization Analysis (PUA) of the facility. In
the course of this analysis, BRS Architecture assessed various aspects
including operations, program offerings, room usage, potential building
updates, and strategies for membership retention. Based on current and
future trends, BRS provided recommendations to ensure The REC
remains relevant and continues to be a valuable asset to the community.
PARD is now seeking approval to begin Phase 2 of the PUA which will
explore the opportunities and constraints of building expansion and/or
renovation of The REC of Grapevine to address the objectives identified in
Phase 1 of the Performance and Utilization Analysis. The REC has seen
tremendous success since opening the 108,000-square-foot facility in
2015.
Membership participation is one of the highest in the nation, exceeding
what was anticipated and creating pressure in areas such as adult fitness,
classrooms, senior services, and support spaces. To address this
challenge, BRS will work with a multidisciplinary consulting team of
engineers and specialists to identify architectural and engineering
solutions to alleviate specific programmatic pinch points and incorporate
national trends and best practices based on operational goals.
This procurement will be made in accordance with Local Government
Code Chapter 252, Subchapter B, § 252. 022. General Exemptions (a)
(4), personal, professional or planning services.
Staff recommends approval
TK/TM
WORK PLAN
GPRD I Grapevine Parks & Recreation Dept. BRS Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture
31-Jul-24
I
Participant
OF GRAPEVI NE
Key:
BLU I Blundall & Associates KL&A Structural Engineers
RECREATION I EDUCATION I COMMUNITY
TBG I The Ballard Group BAi BAi Acoustic Consulting
Activity/Timeline
Scope Description (Tasks & Products)
Participants Duration
PM
Proiect Management
27 weeks
• Invoicing and Project Budget Management, Meeting Coordination, Travel Coordination
0.1
Pre-Workshoo #1 Meetina Preparation (August 2024)
BRS 1 week
• Prepare Kick-off meeting presentation slide show
1.0
Proiect Team: Pre -Workshop #1 Meetina with Executive Team (—August 14 2024)
GPRD 1 day
Video Conference Call
• Team Introduction
BRS
Confirm
• Time frame for work plan
Confirm
• Outcome / recommendations of Phase 1 Performance and Utilization Analysis
Confirm
• Dates for Workshops, Meetings and Presentations
Confirm
• Phase 2 project communications protocol
Confirm
• Identify stakeholders, steering committees, interest groups, etc.
Consider
• Outcome(s)for Phase 2 Performance and Utilization Analysis —Architectural Improvements
Consider
• Expectations for Deliverables
Consider
• Discuss Operational considerations & Cost Recovery Goals for the facility
Consider
• Discuss Total Project Budget
Consider
• Financing Details
Work Period #A - Data Collection
GPRD 3 weeks
• Create meeting minutes and distribute
BRS
• Collect and review all existing data available including: data/results from previous
Performance Analysis (phase 1), previous facility -related reports, existing facility drawings and
specifications
r
Prepare a prioritized list of Light Renovation Options and assign a Probale Cost range to each
item (order of magnitude)
Prepare a prioritized list of Heavy Renovation/Expansion Options and assign a Probale Cost
range to each item (order of magnitude)
JJ
• Begin analyzing the information and develop initial considerations regarding options
2
• Conduct an initial code review to understand constraints re: planning & building code
�C
• Internal Coordination
• Prepare committee workshop presentation slide show
1.2 - Trip 1
Committee Workshop #1 (—September 4.20241
GPRD 1 day
Day 1 Morning
Consider
• Project goals and objectives
BRS
Consider
• Discuss program / budget/ schedule, as needed
Consider
• Prioritized list of Light Renovation Options and review probable cost range (order of
Consider
• Prioritized list of Heavy Renovation/Expansion Options and review probable cost range (order
of magnitude)
Consider
• Areas in the existing building that are under utilized
Consider
• Identify known building/site limitations
Consider
• Discuss funding options
Day 1 Afternoon
Tour Existing Building with Staff & Committee
Consider Tour and evaluate existing faciliy and site and document potential opportunities and/or limitations
1.8
Follow -Up with Executive Team #1.3
GPRD 1 day
Video Conference Call
Confirm
• Re -Cap of Committee input
BRS
Confirm
• Discuss program / budget/ schedule, as needed
Confirm
• Adjust prioritized program spaces list for consideration, as needed
Consider
• Re -Balance project status with high-level operational goals, as needed
®BARKER
AINKEA
SEACAT
ARCRITECTRRE
Activity/ Timeline Scope Description (Tasks & Products)
Work Period #B - Option Develooment & Site Analvsis
• Create meeting minutes and distribute
• Consultant Coordination
• Analyse the prioritized list of Light Renovation Options and create a narrative/sketches on the
process to implement over time/in the future
• Provide refined Opinion of Probable Cost Estimate range for Light Renovation Items
• Develop building programming models/phasing options for Heavy Renovation/Addition (up to 3
• Develop relationship diagrams phasing options for Heavy Renovation/Addition (up to 3
• Develop site testfit (bubble diagram) for each option (up to 3 options)
• Review each option for code/life safety implications
• Review each option for site access/parking and site constraints/limitations
• Review each option for Structural implications/viability
• Review each option for Mechanical implications/viability
• Prepare cost/benefit (pros/cons) analysis of each option
• Create preliminary project budget model spreadsheet and total project cost estimate for
• Internal Coordination
• Prepare committee workshop presentation slide show
2.1 - Trip 2
Staff Workshop #2 (—October 2. 2024)
Day 1 Morning Commit
• Present a final prioritized list of Light Renovation Options with narrative/sketches and
Probable Cost Estimate Range
Consider
• Present preferred building programming models/phasing options (up to 3 options)
• Present relationship diagrams/phasing options for Heavy Renovation/Addition (up to 3 options)
Consider
and discuss the structural and mechanical implications/opportunities/limitations
• Areas in the existing building that are underutilized, discuss resonable industry metrics in
Consider
which to measure performance/utilization
Consider
• Present site test fit (bubble diagram) for each option (up to 3 options) and discuss site
Consider
• Discuss preliminary project budget and construction costs (target)
Confirm
• Discuss funding options
Confirm
• Discuss preferred options to refine further (up to 2)
Day 1 Evening
3.0
Work Period #C - Option Refinement
• Create meeting minutes and distribute
• Consultant Coordination
• Refine preferred relationship diagrams phasing options for Heavy Renovation/Addition and
produce floor plan options (up to 2)
• Refine preferred site plan diagrams (up to 2)
• Review both options for Structural implications/viability
• Review both options for Mechanical implications/viability
• Review both options for Acoustical implications/viability (as required)
• Refinement of project model spreadsheet and total project cost estimate for construction
• Internal Coordination
• Prepare committee workshop presentation slide show
3.1
Follow-Uo with Executive Team 3.1
Video Conference Call
Workshop #3
3.2 - Trip 3
Staff Workshoo #3 (—October 30. 20241
Day 1 Morning Confirm
• Present refined building programming models/phasing options (up to 2 options)
• Present refined floor plans/phasing options for Heavy Renovation/Addition (up to 2 options)
Confirm
and discuss the structural and mechanical implications/opportunities/limitations
• Present refined site test fit for each option (up to 2 options) and discuss site
Confirm
implications/opportunities/limitations
Confirm
• Reasonable industry metrics in which to measure performance/utilization of under utilized
Confirm
• Discuss project budget and construction costs (target)
Commit
• Discuss funding options
Confirm
• Discuss preferred option to refine further
Consider
• Schedule meeting with Council Facilities Committee
Day 1 Afternoon
Site / Buildina "As -Built" verification
Walk the facility/site to verify critical as -built conditions, and document
Day 1 Evening
Participants Duration
BRS 4 weeks
BLU
KLA
TBG
GPRD 1 day
BRS
BRS 3 weeks
KLA
TBG
BAi
GPRD
BRS
GPRD
BRS
1 day
2 day
(1 week)
®BARKER
AINKEA
SEACAT
ARCHITECTURE
Activity/ Timeline Scope Description (Tasks & Products)
Work Period #D - Refine Preferred Desian Option. Estimate #1
• Create meeting minutes and distribute
• Consultant Coordination
• Refine preferred site plan (1 option)
• Refine concept floor plan option (1 option)
• Prepare phasing options, as needed
• Review preferred option for Structural implications/viability
• Review preferred option for Mechanical implications/viability
• Review preferred option for Acoustical implications/viability (as required)
• Develop Massing options and prepare graphics
• Refinement of project model spreadsheet and total project cost estimate for construction
• Internal Coordination
• Prepare staff workshop presentation slide show
4.1
Committee Workshop #4 (—November 21. 2024)
Video Conference Call Commit
• Final Concept Floor Plan
Commit
• Final Site Plan
Confirm
• Review Project phasing options
Consider
• Findings of the Detailed Probable Cost Estimate
Consider
• Concept Building Massing
Consider
• Base Report Graphics
4.2
Follow-Uo with Executive Team 4.2
Video Conference Call
• Re -Cap of Staff workshop and discuss possible realignments
5.0
Work Period #E - Develoo Architectural Character. Draft Report
• Create meeting minutes and distribute
• Consultant Coordination
• Refine Building Massing
• Revise Floor Plans to suit buiding massing refinements
• Revise Site Plans to suit buiding massing and floor plan refinements
• Develop Architectural Character and Addition/Renovation Integration Strategies
• Internal Coordination
• Develop DRAFT Report
• Prepare staff workshop presentation slide show
5.1 - Trip 4
Staff Workshop #5 (—December 17. 2024)
Day 1 Morning Confirm
• Review DRAFT Report
Commit
• Concept Building Massing
Commit
• Project phasing options
Confirm
• Architectural Character and Addition/Renovation Integration Strategy
Confirm
• Base Report Graphics
Day 1 Evening
Facilitation of Citv Council Facilities Committee Presentation
• Presentation of: Project timeline/history, Program, Floor Plan, Site Plan, Architectural Character
and Addition/Renovation Integration Strategies, High-level Operational Impacts, and Preliminary
Total Project budget
• Collect comments, questions, and preferences
Day 2 Morning
Follow-Uo with Executive Team 5.2
Video Conference Call
• Re -Cap of Committee and City Council Input and discuss possible realignments
Work Period #F- Produce Final Feasibilitv & Conceotual Desian Reoort and Graphics
• Create meeting minutes and distribute
• Consultant Coordination
• Prepare Probable Cost Estimate '
• Update all work products based on input received in Workshop 5
• Develop FINAL Report
.1 Staff Workshop #6 (,-January 21. 20251
Video Conference Call Commit • Facilitate a Video Conference Call for review the FINAL report
6.2-Trip 5 Facilitation of Citv Council Presentation (—February 4. 20251
Eveneing TBD • Facilitate a meeting for review the FINAL report
• Update all work products based on input received in Council Presentation
Deliver Final Reoort (—February 11.20251
Participants
BRS
KLA
TBG
BAi
GPRD
BRS
GPRD
BRS
BRS
GPRD
BRS
Duration
3 weeks
1 day
1 day
4 weeks
2 days
0 week)
GPRD 1 day
BRS
BRS 4weeks
GPRD 1 week
BRS
®BARKER
AINKEA
SEACAT
ARCRITECTURE
!I I N!J! 1114 NWA4 W! I I I I I I I Nil Ell H 91
AUGUST
I�
project planning
data collection
KICKOFF
MEETING
SEPTEMBER
opts pmentl
site analysis
ORKSHO
#1&
ITE VISA
PRIORITY FACILITY
ADJUSTMENTS
OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARV MFEBRUARY
option refinement preferred option architectural character) final graphics I 19Phase 2
refinement draft report report Complete
WORKSHOP
WORKSHOP WORKSHOP
WORKSHOP
WORKSHOP NAL STUDY
#2
#3 It #4
#5
#s SLIVERED
PRIORITIZED
HEAVY RENO/ � �� ,
REVIEW
�
LIGHT RENO
EXPANSION PLAN
GRAPHICS &
OPTIONS
OPTIONS
DRAFT REPORT
DETAILED PROBABLE
0
1 1 1 • 1
� •11 0 •
COST ESTIMATE