Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 07 - HL12-01 South Dooley Street I r-�7-,f 07 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER J. SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2012 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT HL12-01 r I r , --I L Grapevine 5� APPLICANT,,, David & Gayle Dyke, Jr. Lake 1 I Ra I i 1�_ I I I.H.1635 "°rth'" PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: I tea y 1 The subject property is located at 527 South Dooley Street and legally described as Lots 5 & S 6' of 6, Hall-Johnson ,,� RlDFW a Block 117, College Heights Addition and Tract 2M, I ; Abstract 1029 Esther Moore Survey. Glade Rd. m` �I H e O 3 REQUESTED HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a Historic Landmark Subdistrict designation for property located at 527 South Dooley Street and legally described as Lots 5 & S 6' of 6 Block 117 College Heights Addition and Tract 2M, Abstract 1029 Esther Moore Survey. The Historic Preservation Commission, at their January 25, 2012 meeting, adopted the preservation criteria for the subject property addressing such issues as setbacks, driveways, parking, exterior finishes and other architectural embellishments to preserve the historic integrity of the property. William Floyd Deacon was the eldest son of William Douglas and Edna Deacon. William Douglas Deacon,together with Kirby Buckner, established the feed mill that became B&D HL12.01.4 1 June 11,2012(10:21AM) Mills, an important industry in Grapevine. William Floyd Deacon (1910-1995)grew up on the family farm near Euless (the house was later moved to 204 S. Dooley Street c. 2002 when the family donated the building to the City of Grapevine). He attended college at North Texas State in Denton where he majored in Business. It was there that he met Helen Kent (1907-2000). Helen received a degree in Home Economics from North Texas State and taught school until the two were married in 1932 in her hometown of Corsicana, Texas. Because of the Depression,they both could not teach so Mrs. Deacon quit her job. Mr. Deacon coached football for eight years in Graham, Texas before returning to Grapevine and joining his father in the milling business. The William Floyd and Helen Deacon House is significant for its association with a figure important to the political and commercial life of Grapevine. It is also an excellent local example of a Colonial Revival style house built in Grapevine in the years just before the beginning of World War II. The style was not commonly built in the town after 1935 and like those that were built during this period, the Deacon House is a side-gabled version. Another example of a late version can be found just to the north at 513 S. Dooley, built in 1941 by the Wm Cameron & Company Lumber Yard. PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned "R-7.5" Single Family District and is currently used as a residential structure. HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject property and the surrounding properties to the north, south, east, and west were zoned "R-1" Single Family District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "R-7.5" Single Family Residential - residential structures :SOUTH: "R-7.5" Single Family Residential - residential structures EAST: "R-7.5" Single Family Residential - residential structures WEST: "R-7.5" Single Family Residential - residential structures AIRPORT IMPACT: The subject tract is located within "Zone A" Zone of Minimal Effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" Map. Few activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in "Zone A"except for sound sensitive activities such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters.The applicant's proposal HL12.01.4 2 June 11,2012(10:21AM) is/is not an appropriate use in this noise zone. MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as a "RU Residential Low Density. The applicant's proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan. 18b HL12,01.4 3 June 11,2012(10:21AM) KAI C.ANNO 7 3 1.953@ PRIVAT goo I 3 ,GRW P E r r s HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT APPLICATION 15TeA.e. 10 a tAM 1 0 y0 � >�>v � u )rte PART 1.APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Name: D.David Dyke, Jr. Applicant Address: 527 South Dooley Street City/State/Zip Grapevine,TX 76051 Phone No. 817.251.0124 Fax No. Email Address Mobile Phone Applicant's interest in subject property PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property 527 South Dooley Street Legal Description: Lot 5&Sf Block F117 Addition Moore,Esther Survey Legal description of subject property (metes& bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet) Size of subject property: acres .39 square footage Present zoning classification Present use of property Private residence Proposed use of property Private residence PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner Dyke,D David Jr Etx Gayle A Prop Owner Address 1527 South Dooley Street City/State/Zip Grapevine,TX 76051 Phone No. 817.251.0124 Fax No. ❑ The Development Services staff will determine the agenda for each of the public hearing dates. Based on the size of the agenda,your application may be rescheduled to a later date PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE FILING OF AN APPLICATION AND PLACING A HISTORICAL LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name Applican gn' tW4 The State of e X,q s County of Before me(notary) 14 13"a1, on this day personally appeared (applicant) Dyge- known to me(or proved to me on the oath of card or other document)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal)Given under my hand and seal of office this day of t- A.D. 2f iV, Y x° MARY BUSH My Commission Expires November is,201s Notary In and For State of TEXAS D David Dyke,Jr, � Print Property Owner's Name Property is � ature The State of TEXAS County of TARIiANT Before me(notary) Mary Bush on this day personally appeared (applicant) Dav' Qyke;Jr. known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office thisFT day of June A.D. 2012 Y Ar MARY BUSH My Comrrfisaion Egslres November 18,201s Notary In and For State of TEXAS ..,.�µ_ GRAPEVINE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION FORM 1. Name Historic William Floyd and Helen Deacon House And/or common 2. Location Address 527 S. Dooley Street land survey Esther Moore Location/neighborhood A 1029 Tr 2M tract size .193 acres 3. Current zoning R7.5 4. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use _district _public x occupied _agriculture ,museum X building(s) X private unoccupied _commercial _park structure _work in progress education X residence site Accessible _entertainment _religious X yes: restricted government scientific —yes: unrestr. _industrial _transportation _no _military _other(vacant) 5. Ownership Current owner: David D. Jr. and Gayle A. Dyke phone: Address: 527 S. Dooley St. city: Grapevine state: Texas zip: 76051-5456 6. Form Preparation Name & title Susan Kline, consultant organization: Grapevine Twnsp Revitalization Proj. Contact: David Klem in hone: 817/410-3197 7. Representation on Existing Surveys _Tarrant County Historic Resources National Register of Historic Places Recorded Texas Historic Landmark .other _Texas Archaeological Landmark for office use only 8. Date Recd: Survey Verified: Yes No 9. Field Chk date: 8y: 10. Nomination Archaeological Structure District Site Structure&Site 11. Historic Ownership original owner William Floyd and Helen Deacon significant later owner(s) 12. Construction Dates original c. 1940 alterations/additions c. 1951-52 13. Architect original construction alteration sladditions 14. Site Features natural urban design: tract in an unplatted portion of the E. Moore Survey 15. Physical Description Condition Check One: Check One: _x—excellent deteriorated unaltered X Original site good ruins altered Moved (date:_) _fair unexposed Describe present and original(if known)physical appearance; include style(s) of architecture, current condition and relationship to surrounding fabric(structures, objects, etc.). Elaborate on pertinent materials used and style(s) of architectural detailing, embellishments and site details. Located on the east side of South Dooley Street, the William Floyd and Helen Deacon House is an example of a 1 '/2 -story, side-gabled, wood-framed Colonial Revival style single family dwelling. The main block of the house has a symmetrical composition with a centered entrance accented with a door surround featuring a broken pediment. Flanking the entrance on either side are two 616 double hung wood windows, each flanked by shutters, a common characteristic of this style of house. The roof is covered with asphalt shingles and has two front-gabled dormers with 313 double hung wood windows, another common feature of this style. Extending from the south elevation is a 1-story, flat-roofed wing. This was originally a screened- in porch that was enclosed c. 1951-52. The roof is surrounded by a wood balustrade and serves as a balcony that is accessible from the southwest bedroom on the second story(original attic) level. When the house was originally completed, it had three bedrooms downstairs and an unfinished attic. At the same time that the screened-in porch was enclosed, the attic was finished out and structural changes were made downstairs. A fireplace was taken out of the east wall of the living room and a faux fireplace was placed on the south wall. One of the smaller bedrooms downstairs became cart of the living room and a hallway. Three bedrooms were added on the attic level. A concre--e sidewalk runs parallel to the street with a concrete sidewalk running perpendicular to is and accet�sing the front entrance. Several large deciduous trees grace the front lawn. 16. Historical Significance Statement of historical and cultural significance. Include: cultural influences, special events and important personages, influences on neighborhood, on the city, etc. William Floyd Deacon was the eldest son of William Douglas and Edna Deacon. William Douglas Deacon, together with Kirby Buckner, established the feed mill that became B & D Mills, an important industry in Grapevine. Prominently placed on Main Street at the intersection of Highway 121, the facility remains an important landmark on the south edge of Grapevine's central business district. From 1939 to 1973, the business was solely owned by the Deacon family. William Floyd Deacon (1910-1995) grew up on the family farm near Euless (the house was later moved to 204 S. Dooley Street c. 2002 when the family donated the building to the City of Grapevine). He attended college at North Texas State in Denton where he majored in Business. it was there that he met Helen Kent (1907-2000). Helen received a degree in Home Economics from North Texas State and taught school until the two were married in 1932 in her hometown of Corsicana, Texas. Because of the Depression, they both could not teach so Mrs. Deacon quit her job. Mr. Deacon coached football for eight years in Graham, Texas before returning to Grapevine and joining his father in the milling business. On August 27, 1938, R. Lee and Clara Treatt sold a portion of the E. Moore Survey measuring 70 feet by 120 feet to Mr. Deacon. It was on that plot of ground that Mr. and Mrs. Deacon constructed a Colonial Revival style house in c. 1940. Mrs. Deacon received the plans for the house from her sister who was living in Mississippi. It was at this house that they raised their two children, Judy Deacon Jacobs and Bill Deacon. William Floyd Deacon served as mayor of Grapevine from 1947-1948. During his tenure, the town's sewer system was repaired. This was a project that had been deferred for years on account of the Depression and then World War II. He was also active in the initial planning for Grapevine Lake. Mr Deacon remained active in civic affairs, later serving on the school board. He was also active in the First Methodist Church. In 1965, he served on the Charter Commission that drafted a Home Rule Charter. An election resulting in the adoption of the home rule charter was held in November 1965. Mrs. Deacon was active in the '36 Club, a self-study club that met in members' homes. Like most members, she served as president of the group. She taught Sunday School at the First Methodist Church and was a Girl Scout Leader. The Deacons moved from the house on Dooley to 105 Cross Street in 1965. The house was sold to Bert H. and Anna Starr that same year. The Starrs owned the home until 1970 when it was purchased by Alfred and Margaret Heim. The Heims in turn owned it until selling it to the current owners, David D. Jr. and Gayle A. Dyke, in 1998. The William Floyd and Helen Deacon House is significant for its association with a figure important to the political and commercial life of Grapevine. It is also an excellent local example of a Colonial Revival style house built in Grapevine in the years just before the beginning of World War 11. The style was not commonly built in the town after 1935 and like those that were built during this period, the Deacon House is a side-gabled version. Another example of a late version can be found just to the north at 513 S. Dooley, built in 1941 by the Wm Cameron & Company Lumber Yard. 17. Biblio raph Jacobs, Judy Deacon. Telephone interview with Susan Kline, February 21, 2008, McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1995. Solamillo, Stan. "Historic and Architectural Resources of Grapevine, Texas." National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form, 1997. Tarrant County, Texas. Offices of the County Clerk and Tax Assessor. Deed and tax records. Young, Charles H. Grapevine Area History, Dallas, Texas, Taylor Publishing Co., 1979. 18. Attachments District or Site map Additional descriptive material X Site Plan Footnotes X Photos (historic & current) X Other(deed and tax records) Designation Merit x A. Character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City of Grapevine, State of Texas of the United States. B. Location as the site of a significant historical event. x C. Identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the city. D. Exemplification of the cultural, economic, social or historical heritage of the city. ry E. Portrayal of the environment of a group of people in an era of history characterized by a distinctive architectural style. x F. Embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type or specimen. G. Identification as the work of an architect or master builder whose individual work has T influenced the development of the city. _H, Embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent a significant architectural innovation. ®I. Relationship to other distinctive buildings, sites or areas which are eligible for preservation according to a plan based on historic, cultural or architectural motif. J. Unique location of singular physical characteristics representing an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, community or the city. K. Archaeological value in that it has produced or can be expected to produce data affecting theories of historic or prehistoric value. L. Value as an aspect of community sentiment or public pride. Recommendation The Grapevine Township Revitalization Program requests the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission to deem this nominated landmark meritorious of designation as outlined in Chapter 39, City of Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Further,the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission endorses the Design Guidelines, policy recommendations and landmark boundary as presented by the City of Grapevine Development Services Department. (,ice Burl Gilliam, Chair David Klempi' n Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission Historic Preservation Officer Development Services Department idopi, � Y lYs,o ", Design Guidelines William Floyd and Helen Deacon House 527 S. Dooley Street Grapevine, Texas Grapevine Township Revitalization Project, Inc. City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Grapevine, Texas 75051 January 25, 2012 1 Table of Contents PREFACE I. SITE • Setbacks • Driveways, Parking Lots • Service and Mechanical Areas ■ Fences 11. BUILDING FABRIC • Preservation • Exterior Finishes • Windows Ill. EMBELLISHMENTS • Awnings-Canopies • Exterior Lighting IV: NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ■ Infill ■ Additions to Historic Buildings 2 Preface William Floyd Deacon was the eldest son of William Douglas and Edna Deacon. William Douglas Deacon, together with Kirby Buckner, established the feed mill that became B & D Mills, an important industry in Grapevine. Prominently placed on Main Street at the intersection of Highway 121, the facility remains an important landmark on the south edge of Grapevine's central business district. From 1939 to 1973, the business was solely owned by the Deacon family. William Floyd Deacon (1910-1995) grew up on the family farm near Euless (the house was later moved to 204 S. Dooley Street c. 2002 when the family donated the building to the City of Grapevine). He attended college at North Texas State in Denton where he majored in Business. It was there that he met Helen Kent (1907- 2000). Helen received a degree in Home Economics from North Texas State and taught school until the two were married in 1932 in her hometown of Corsicana, Texas. Because of the Depression, they both could not teach so Mrs. Deacon quit her job. Mr. Deacon coached football for eight years in Graham, Texas before returning to Grapevine and joining his father in the milling business. On August 27, 1938, R. Lee and Clara Treatt sold a portion of the E. Moore Survey measuring 70 feet by 120 feet to Mr. Deacon. It was on that plot of ground that Mr. and Mrs. Deacon constructed a Colonial Revival style house in c. 1940. Mrs. Deacon received the plans for the house from her sister who was living in Mississippi. It was at this house that they raised their two children, Judy Deacon Jacobs and Bill Deacon. William Floyd Deacon served as mayor of Grapevine from 1947-1948. During his tenure, the town's sewer system was repaired. This was a project that had been deferred for years on account of the Depression and then World War II. He was also active in the initial planning for Grapevine Lake. Mr. Deacon remained active in civic affairs, later serving on the school board. He was also active in the First Methodist Church. In 1965, he served on the Charter Commission that drafted a Home Rule Charter. An election resulting in the adoption of the home rule charter was held in November 1965. Mrs. Deacon was active in the `36 Club, a self-study club that met in members' homes. Like most members, she served as president of the group. She taught Sunday School at the First Methodist Church and was a Girl Scout Leader. The Deacons moved from the house on Dooley to 105 Cross Street in 1965. The house was sold to Bert H. and Anna Starr that same year. The Starrs owned the home until 1970 when it was purchased by Alfred and Margaret Heim. The Heims in turn owned it until selling it to the current owners, David D. Jr. and Gayle A. Dyke, in 1998. The William Floyd and Helen Deacon House is significant for its association with a 3 i figure important to the political and commercial life of Grapevine. It is also an excellent local example of a Colonial Revival style house built in Grapevine in the years just before the beginning of World War 11. The style was not commonly built in the town after 1935 and like those that were built during this period, the Deacon House is a side-gabled version. Another example of a late version can be found just to the north at 513 S. Dooley, built in 1941 by the Wm Cameron & Company Lumber Yard. — Arlo d v . w A riu pJ w F i Noo v< 527 South Dooley Street Located on the east side of South Dooley Street, the William Floyd and Helen Deacon House is an example of a 1 '/2 -story, side-gabled, wood-framed Colonial Revival style single family dwelling. The main block of the house has a symmetrical composition with a centered entrance accented with a door surround featuring a broken pediment. Flanking the entrance on either side are two 616 double hung wood windows, each flanked by shutters, a common characteristic of this style of house. The roof is covered with asphalt shingles and has two front-gabled dormers with 313 double hung wood windows, another common feature of this style. 4 Extending from the south elevation is a 1-story, flat-roofed wing. 'this was originally a screened-in porch that was enclosed c. 1951-52. The roof is surrounded by a wood balustrade and serves as a balcony that is accessible from the southwest bedroom on the second story (original attic) level. When the house was originally completed, it had three bedrooms downstairs and an unfinished attic. At the same time that the screened-in porch was enclosed, the attic was finished out and structural changes were made downstairs. A fireplace was taken out of the east wail of the living room and a faux fireplace was placed on the south wall, One of the smaller bedrooms downstairs became part of the living room and a hallway. Three bedrooms were added on the attic level. A concrete sidewalk runs parallel to the street with a concrete sidewalk running perpendicular to it and accessing the front entrance. Several large deciduous trees grace the front lawn. SITE Retain the historic relationships between buildings, landscaping features and open space. Avoid rearranging the site by moving or removing buildings and site features, such as walks, drives and fences,that help define the residence's historic value. SETBACKS Building setbacks should be consistent with adjacent buildings or with the style of the building. Setbacks are an important ingredient in creating an attractive streetscape. Buildings should be set back to a line that is consistent with their neighbors and land use. For example, a residential setback should retain the setback of adjacent and nearby structures, with landscaping along the street right- of-way. Residential buildings with a commercial use in residential areas should be set back in a manner consistent with setbacks of neighboring or similar residential structures. Maintain building orientation pattern, with the front facade facing the street. Maintain spacing patterns between buildings. DRIVEWAYS, PARKING LOTS AND VACANT SITES Driveways should be located perpendicular to the street; no circular drives shall be allowed (unless proven with historic documentation) in front or corner side yard, so that the character of the landscaped yard can be reinforced. New parking lots for commercial uses should not be located adjacent to sidewalks in the district. 5 Off-street parking lots should not be allowed to interrupt the continuity of landscaped front or corner side yards. This is important to both the preservation of historic character, and to the strengthening of the residential district. Screen existing parking lots from streets and pedestrian areas in the Historic District. Existing parking lots located adjacent to streets and sidewalks may be screened to the height of car hoods. This will provide a certain level of continuity of the building fagade line; it will screen unsightly views; and it will provide a level of security by allowing views to and from the sidewalk. FENCES Historically, fences around historic houses defined yards and the boundary around property and gardens. Wood picket fences,wood rail fences and barbed wire or decorative wire fences were the common fence types in Grapevine. Traditionally, picket fences surrounded the front of the house while rail and wire fences surrounded the agricultural portions of the property. Maintain historic fences. New fences. Simple wood picket fences, wood and wire and wrought iron fences are appropriate. Avoid chain-link fences, privacy fences and concrete block fences for the street sides of property. Wood privacy fences may be allowed when installed in the rear yard and behind the front fagade of a property. Utilitarian/privacy fences should not be installed in front of a historic building or beyond the line of the front fagade of a historic building. Replacing fences. If replacement is required due to deterioration, remove only those portions of historic fences that are damaged beyond repair and replace in- kind, matching the original in material, design and placement. If replacement is necessary for non-historic fences, or new fences are proposed, locate and design the fence in such a way that will compliment the historic boundary of the property without concealing the historic character of the property. SERVICE AND MECHANICAL AREAS Service and mechanical areas and equipment should be screened from the street and other pedestrian areas. All garbage and equipment storage areas should be screened from the street. Mechanical equipment, including satellite dishes, shall not be located in front or corner side yards or should be set back from the edges of roofs, and screened so that they are not visible to pedestrians and do not detract from the historic character of buildings. 6 BUILDING FABRIC 'RESERVATION i Preserve, stabilize, and restore original building form, ornament and materials. Any missing or severely deteriorated elements may be replaced with replicas of the original. Ensure that roof, window, porch and cornice treatments are preserved, or when preservation is not possible duplicate the original building element. When rehabilitating, remove non-historic alterations. Often, "modern" renovations conceal the original facade details. If not, the original style may be recreated through the use of historic photographs. Where replication of original elements is not possible,a new design consistent with the original style of the building may be used. Reconstruction of building elements should reflect the size, scale, material and level of detail of the original design. Preserve older renovations that have achieved historic significance. Older structures or additions may have, at some time, been renovated with such care and skill that the renovation itself is worthy of preservation. Usually, such renovations may date from before 1940. EXTERIOR FINISHES Original wood finishes should be maintained and painted or, when necessary, replaced in kind. Modern synthetic siding materials such as vinyl or metal bear little resemblance to historic siding materials. The application of such modern synthetic materials often involves the removal of original decorative elements such as cornice, corner boards, brackets, window and door trim, etc. New synthetic siding shall not be installed; removal of existing such materials is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish and appearance. Original asbestos siding should be maintained and painted, or when necessary, replaced with synthetic siding to match the existing asbestos siding. The removal of asbestos siding over existing wood siding is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish and appearance. Original masonry surfaces should be maintained and not be painted, unless severe deterioration of the brick or stone can be shown to require painting. If the color or texture of replacement brick or stone cannot be matched with existing, painting may be an appropriate treatment. Paint colors should be complimentary to each other and the overall character of the 7 r% house. When possible, research the original paint color and finishes of the building's historic period; the right colors respect the historic building. The Historic Preservation Commission shall adopt, as necessary, a paint palette(s) appropriate to the district's character, which may be proposed and approved through the Minor Exterior Alteration application process. Any colors proposed outside the adopted palette may be reviewed by the Commission in the regular Certificate of Appropriateness process. WINDOWS Original window framing and lites (panes of glass) configurations should be preserved and maintained or replaced in kind. When replacement is necessary, do so within existing historic opening. Replacement of non-original windows should consider the use of historically appropriate wood windows. Use same sash size to avoid filling in or enlarging the original opening. Clear or very slightly tinted window glass may be used. No reflective or heavily tinted glass shall be used. Should the owner wish to install security bars, they should be installed on the interior of windows and doors. Storm windows. The use of interior storm windows is encouraged. Storm windows are available which can be installed on the interior of windows. This helps to preserve the exterior historic character of the building. Should storm windows need to be installed on the exterior of the historic windows, storm windows constructed of wood and configured to match the historic sashes (i.e. one over one sashes) are recommended. If metal storm windows are installed, paint to blend with surrounding elements. EMBELLISHMENTS AWNINGS-CANOPIES New awnings and canopies should not be installed above windows or doors. EXTERIOR LIGHTING Lighting is an important element in residential areas. Fixtures should be consistent with the historic character of the house. Appropriate incandescent light fixtures to the style of the district should be used. 8 Avoid exposed lighting of any kind unless part of a historic fixture. NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION INFILL The Secretary of the Interior's guidelines for new buildings in historic districts encourage similarity of form and materials, but not actual replication. New construction proposals and the rehabilitation of non-historic buildings will be reviewed based on these Criteria. Judgement will be based on the compatibility of the design within the context of the property's adjacent and nearby historic buildings. The design of new buildings should have key elements of the building's historic period of significance including massing, scale, fenestration and materials. Infill buildings should not be absolute reproductions, and appear as clearly contemporary. Only when a previously demolished historic Grapevine building can be accurately replicated may a reproduction be considered. Infill buildings between historic buildings should be similar in setback, roof form, cornice line and materials, to one of the adjacent buildings. Relate height of new building to the heights of adjacent structures. Avoid new buildings that tower over existing ones. Horizontal wood siding (either novelty, tongue and groove, shiplap or equivalent) and brick are appropriate exterior building finishes forthe historic house. Fake brick or stone or gravel aggregate materials shall never be used. ADDITIONS TO HISTORIC BUILDINGS Additions to historic buildings should replicate the style of the main building if possible; otherwise they should adhere to the general style with simplified details. As a minimum, new additions should reflect the massing, roof shape, bay spacing, cornice lines and building materials of the primary structure. All new wood or metal materials should have a painted finish except on some 201n century buildings where the use of unpainted aluminum or steel was part of the original design and should be maintained. A new addition should, if at all possible, be located at the rear of the historic building. If this is not possible, the addition may be added to the side if it is recessed at least 18 inches from the historic building facade or a connection is used to separate old from new. New vertical additions should be set back from primary facades so as not to be 9 readily apparent from the facing street. When reproducing elements that were originally part of a historic building they should be replicated when evidence of the actual detail has been documented by photographs, drawings, or remaining physical evidence. If no evidence exists, elements typical of the architectural style may be used. Historic photographs can provide information on the original elements of the building. 10 o I ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, DESIGNATING A HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT HL12-01 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 39 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 (APPENDIX "D" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES), DESIGNATING THE AREA LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND SOUTH 6 FOOT OF 6, BLOCK 117, COLLEGE HEIGHTS ADDITION AND TRACT 2M, ESTHER MOORE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1029, AND MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, IN A DISTRICT ZONED "R-7.5" SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE, AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH AN OFFENSE OCCURS OR CONTINUES; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made by the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission requesting a historic landmark subdistrict designation by making application for same with the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested historic landmark subdistrict designation should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 39 of Appendix "D" of the Code of Ordinances have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS,the City Council further considered, among other things,the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this historic landmark subdistrict, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the historic landmark subdistrict designation lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this historic landmark subdistrict designation and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that historic landmark subdistrict designation for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby designate a historic landmark subdistrict (HL12-01) in accordance with Section 39 of Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine,Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, in a district zoned "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations within the following described property: 527 South Dooley Street and legally described as Lots 5 and south 6 foot of 6, Block 117, College Heights Addition and Tract 2M, Esther Moore Survey, Abstract No. 1029, and in addition thereto, the adoption of the Design Guidelines as conditions, regulations and safeguards in ORD. NO. 2 connection with the said historic landmark subdistrict, a copy of said criteria being attached hereto and labeled Exhibit "A". Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the "H" zoning designation. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets;to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district,and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. That the fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine,Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. ORD. NO. 3 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 19th day of June, 2012. APPROVED: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ORD. NO. 4