Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 04 - 717 East Worth Street
Z24-07/PD24-06/HL24-01.4 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER ERICA MAROHNIC, PLANNING SERVICES DIRECTOR MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 15, 2024 SUBJECT: PLANNING SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Z24-07, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PD24-07, AND HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION HL24-01; 717 EAST WORTH STREET APPLICANT: Neal Cooper PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: The subject property is located at 717 East Worth Street and is proposed to be platted as Block 109, Lots 12A and 13A, College Heights Addition. The site contains approximately 17,712 square feet 0.407 acre) and has approximately 129 feet of frontage along East Worth Street. REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE, PLANNDED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, AND HISTORICAL LANDMARK COMMENTS: The applicant requests a zone change to rezone 0.407 acre from “R-MF-2”, Multifamily District to “R-7.5”, Single-Family District to construct two single-family lots and a planned development overlay to deviate from but not limited to minimum lot width and front yard setback requirements from Section 15 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, No. 82-73. The applicant is also requesting that the subject site be designated as a Historical Landmark sub-district. The subject property was originally platted in 1921 as two separate lots. The existing apartment complex was later developed in 1963 over the internal lot line of the two lots. The applicant intends to adjust the internal lot line to more evenly divide the two lots and to demolish the existing multi-family apartment complex to build two single-family lots, each measuring approximately 0.203 acres. CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Z24-07/PD24-06/Hl24-01.4 2 Planned Development Overlay: The applicant is seeking approval of a planned development overlay to deviate from the required minimum lot width of 65-feet and 30-foot required front yard setback. The proposed lots will have a width of 64.73 feet and have a 25-foot front yard setback. The proposed 25-foot front yard setback will be consistent with the existing setback along the north 500 and 600 blocks of East Worth Street. The lots will meet all other requirements in Section 15, “R-7.5”, Single Family District. SECTION REGULATION PROPOSED DEVIATION +/- 15, R-7.5 Front Yard Setback 30-feet Front Yard Setback 25-feet -5 feet 15, R-7.5 Lot Width 65-feet Lot Width 64.73-feet -0.27 feet Historic preservation staff is working with a design consultant, Architexas, to create a pattern book that represents the main architectural styles found in the historic township. This pattern book will be used to regulate the improvement, expansion, and infill residential development, replacing the current standards in Appendix G. The proposed changes may require more flexibility within the "R-7.5", "R-12.5", and "R-20", Single-family Districts in terms of lot size, dimensions, and primary and secondary building setbacks to align with the goals of the historic district. Historic Landmark Sub-district: The property is situated in the College Heights Addition within the boundary of the Grapevine Historic Township. The College Heights Addition, established in the 1920s, holds historical significance as part of the early development and expansion of the town in the mid-20th century. PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned “R-MF-2”, Multi-family District and is developed as the Ticknor Terrace Apartments. HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject property was zoned “R-3”, Multi-family Dwelling District prior to the 1984 City- wide Rezoning at which time the subject site was rezoned to “R-MF-2”, Multi-family District. On June 26, 2024, the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) approved certificate of appropriateness CA24-31 to demolish the existing one-story apartment building, courtyard, and driveway, and redevelop the property into two single-family residential lots with the following conditions: CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Z24-07/PD24-06/Hl24-01.4 3 1. HL24-01 is approved by the HPC, 2. A zone change and replat is approved by City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission, and 3. A permit is issued by the Building Services department, and the proposed dwellings follow the historic design guidelines. On June 26, 2024, the HPC approved HL24-01 to designate the subject property a Historic Landmark sub-district. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: “R-MF-2”, Multi-family District – Ticknor Terrace Apartments SOUTH: "R-7.5”, Single-Family District – Grapevine Faith Christian School EAST: "R-12.5”, Single-Family District – D.E. Box Addition; Single-Family Residential lots WEST: “R-MF-2”, Multi-family District – Ticknor Terrace Apartments AIRPORT IMPACT: The subject tract is located within “Zone A” Zone of Minimal Effect as defined on the Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs” Map. Few activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in “Zone A” except for sound sensitive activities such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The applicant’s proposal is an appropriate use in this noise zone. MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: Map 2: Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Master Plan designates the subject property as (RL) Residential Low Intensity. The applicant’s proposal is compliant with the Master Plan. THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION: The City of Grapevine’s Thoroughfare Plan does not designate East Worth Street. ng CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 12 105 107 6 109 ETEXASST 13 5 12R12 R 6 1 2 3 A 4 76 76 12 13 R11109 10119 21 21 R U T H S T 13R 1516 FAITHCHRIST I A N SCHOO L ADDN13568F 76 FAITHCHRIST I A N SCHOO L ADDN13568F 105 107 109 R-12.5 R-7.5 R-MF-2 Z24-07/ PD24-06/ HL24-01; 717 East Worth Street 0 50 100 150 200 Feet Date Prepared: 10/1/2024 This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department. Various official and unofficial sources were used to gather this information. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data, however, no guarantee is given or implied as to the accuracy of said data. SUBJECT PROPERTY CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 A Future With A Past June 27, 2024 Neal Cooper Tin Barn LLC 404 East Wall Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 RE: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT #HL24-01 717 EAST WORTH STREET, LOTS 12 & 13 GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 This letter confirms on June 26, 2023 the Historic Preservation Commission approved HL24-01 Historic Landmark Sub -district for property listed as: 717 East Worth Street, legally described as Block 109, Lots 12 & 13, City of Grapevine, Texas. Final approval and the ordinance associated with this District must be received from City Council. You will be notified of this public hearing at a later date. A copy of the Historic Preservation Commission meeting minutes will be available after the Chairman has signed the approved minutes at the next scheduled meeting. If you need a copy for your records, please contact me at 817-410-3197 after the next regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission. Thank you, z r-, David Klempin Historic Preservation Officer Enclosures cc: Erica Marohnic, Director of Planning Services Plans Reviewers Building Clerks HL File wdk THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE HISTORIC PRESERVATION • 636 South Main Street • Grapevine, Texas 76051 Phone 817/410-3556 - Fax 817/410-3038 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 MEMO TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION V FROM: DAVID KLEMPIN, HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, ERICA MAROHNIC, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SERVICES LARRY GRAY, BUILDING OFFICIAL MEETING DATE: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 26, 2024 SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK OVERLAY #HL24-01 1963 TICKNER RENATAL APARTMENT BUILDING 717 EAST WORTH STREET GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 MAGNOLIA PROJECTS, LTD, OWNER NEAL COOPER, TIN BARN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, APPLICANT RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission approve the proposed Historic Landmark Subdistrict overlay to the Grapevine Historic Preservation Ordinance 91-73 Appendix G — Grapevine Code of Ordinances), as amended for following property addressed as: 717 East Worth Street, legally described as Block 109, Lots 12 & 13, College Heights Addition, City of Grapevine. BACKGROUND: On May 31, 2024, Neal Cooper of Tin Barn Construction Company submitted #HL24-01 for a Historic Landmark Overlay application for the property at 717 East Worth Street. The property is located within the College Heights Addition and is within the boundary of the Grapevine Historic Township. The property contains the Tickner Apartment building which was built in 1963 on a slab on grade foundation, containing eight apartments surrounding a central courtyard. The building has a hip and gable roof with wide roof overhangs and is clad in red veneer brick. The building has driveway access from the rear with an asphalt paved roadway. The building is currently deteriorated and the apartment units are not habitable. The building does not lend itself to being adapted to serve as a single family residential structure. The applicant is requesting to demolish the building and in its place has proposed a two lot development plan to allow for the construction of two period -style homes to follow Design Guidelines established for the property. The alley access way would be incorporated into the length of the two lots, allowing for detached garages at the rear of the lots and accessed from the front of the property from East Worth Street. Staff recommends approval of the Historic Overlay #HL24-01 to record the history of the property and to allow the Historic Preservation Commission to have input in the future development of the property. A set of the proposed Design Guidelines for the property are attached. O:\Historic Preservation Commission\CAs\2024 HL\HL24-01.4.doc 717 East Worth Street.doc June 18, 2024 (2:35PM) CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 CITY OF GRAPEVINE HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT APPLICATION APPLICANTS/AGENT NAME , COMPANY NAME ADDRESS 4 z)+ 1 kAt-/- ST CITY/STATE/ZIP WORK PHONE 2A '-49s--4-,ro-2-- FAX NUMBER 2. APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN SUBJECT PROPERTY AA, .7 %Z L-- 0-1 0 0 n PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME /"(, ADDRESS 9-4-4 t}z,J T CITY/STATE/ZIP .P J;'i , %/ WORK PHONE 63517- 917-61)4 3 FAX NUMBER ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OR HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 7/7 , '1e 1n- ;. 1— l7G%l t- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT(S) %Z 41-3 BLOCK Z ADDITION /-e,:ir /GAS SIZE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY : % _ ACRES leZotD SQUARE FEET METES & BOUNDS MUST BE DESCRIBED ON 8 1/2" X 11" SHEET PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION-/'%Z PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY — r4mll-4 OAZCUTORMSIAPPHIST www. grapevinetexas.com 1/ 24 1 0 ?024 1 QM-/ k"CEIVED JUN 10 2024 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 7. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACING A HISTORICAL LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF WILL DETERMINE THE AGENDA FOR EACH OF THE PUBLIC HEARING DATES. BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE AGENDA YOUR APPLICATION MAY BE RESCHEDULED TO A LATER DATE. APPLICANT (PRINT) APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER (PRINT) OWNER SIGNATURE OWNER (PRINT) OWNER SIGNATURE The State of O:\ZCU\FORMS\APPHIST www.grapevinetexas.com JUG,. 7 Pin f I 1 /24 RECEIVED JUN 10 2024 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 County of la , u- Before me ov c on this day personally appeared known to me (or proved to me on the oath of or through 17 1 — (description of identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this JQ12-- day of [a_ , A.D. SEAL DEBORAH S WOO PUBG NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Signature STATE OF TEXAS P q OF P MY COMM. EXP. 06/01/26 NOTARY ID 1123844-9 The State of County of Before me ? on this day personally appeared t r known to me (or proved to me on the oath of or through c S.lp r L--r`description of identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this WS9LGASONSEAeofTexas"3- 202419-8 0:\ZCU\FORMS\APPHIST www.grapevinetexas.com rl +h day of Ji kr\e. , A.D. Notary Signature rfD 0? !' i r. I JUN 10 2024 1/ 24 RECEIVED JUN 10 2024 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 MAD Tarrant Appraisal District Account: 00564176 Address: 717 E WORTH ST 100 Location 32056'16.5"N 97°04'11.6"W Water Damage 717 E Worth St, Grapevine, TX 76051 Directions Restoration PDQ of... 9 View larger map i E Texas 5t t E Texas St 19 E Worth St n Grapevine Faith - The Cottage at 19 Elementary / JHCampusGrapevineFaith 9 Cha Cro: 919 Cannot E Walnut st X Joint Use Park 0 Playground Go gle F Map data ©2024 Google Report a map error This map, content, and location of property is provided by Google Services. RECEIVED JUN 0 3 2024 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Address: 717 E WORTH ST A+H L- Z4-d City: GRAPEVINE Georeference: 7670-109-12 Subdivision: COLLEGE HEIGHTS ADDITION-GRPVN Neighborhood Code: APT-Grapevine/Southlake Latitude: 32.9379123263 Longitude:- 97.0698833235 TAD Map: 2132-460 MAPSCO: TAR-028J 11 Property Data Legal Description: COLLEGE HEIGHTS ADDITION-GRPVN Block 109 Lot 12 & 13 Jurisdictions: CITY OF GRAPEVINE (011) TARRANT COUNTY (220) TARRANT COUNTY HOSPITAL (224) TARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE (225) GRAPEVINE- COLLEYVILLE ISD (906) State Code: BC Year Built: 1963 Personal Property Account: Agent: SOUTHLAND PROPERTY TAX CONSULTANTS INC (00344) Site Number: 80308996 Site Name: TICKNOR TERRACE APTS Site Class: APTIndMtr - Apartment- Individual Meter Parcels: 6 Primary Building Name: 717 E WORTH ST / 00564176 Primary Building Type: Multi -Family Gross Building Area"": 9,138 Net Leasable Area'++: 9,138 Percent Complete: 100% Land SgftA: 0 Land Acres*: 0.0000 Pool: N Notice Sent Date: 5/1/2024 Notice Value: $1,319,436 RECEIVED JUN 0 31014 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Protest Deadline Date: 5/31/2024 Rounded. This represents one of a hierarchy of possible values ranked in the following order: Recorded, Computed, System, Calculated. Property Documents Documents 2024 Documents Value Notice 2024-05-01 2023 Documents Owner Information Current Owner: MAGNOLIA PROJECTS LTD Primary Owner Address: 844 E WALNUT ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051-6102 Deed Date: 12/29/1995 Deed Volume: 0012273 Deed Page: 0002112 Instrument: 00122730002112 Previous Owners: Name TICKNOR TALMADGE Date 12/31/1900 Instrument RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2024 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Ar M 7 Elm CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 107 I 107 10 ' 11 10 13R 109 112109 A 12 13 Zoning # H L24-01 and # CA24-31Parcels 0 25 50 100 r= 3 Grapevine City Limits Feet Road Centerlines 717 East Worth Street Historic Landmark 5/31/2024 1 inch = 60 feet subdistricts RECEIVED JUN 0 3 2024 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 gyp H_ irtl 1• Ad L2 4-g' vf b I g = 8 & c 4 m at„ RECEIVED JUN 0 3 2024 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 jk 4 L_:j q-c) I Q: CO CIO II Z) Oil 90P3172"E I.- g 14 a: It Dx n4&Or ol WOOD STREET wllwj CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 k 4L Z " m U) MRS ui CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 u7 t r,, k•- q yi • M sr IL t M tc' 10 ga L 3 A Cw It 1j ' i I i . - a.. Y ' i < • vIvIFFLL yy it aa.{ s..oG I' . .ii .ae iVI .A ".- YIr Y T" J.. . ;C+.,...r..6 r, ii CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 1. 14 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 GRAPEVINE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION FORM 1. Name Historic 1963 Tickner Rental Apartment Building And/or common 2. Location Address 717 East Worth Street land survev Citv of Location/neighborhood Block 109, lots 12 & 13, College Heights Addition tract size 18,200 sq. ft. 3. Current zoning Multi -family 4. Classification Category district x building(s) structure site Ownership public x private Accessible x yes: restricted yes: unrestr. no Status occupied x unoccupied work in progress Present Use Agriculture x commercial Education Entertainment government Industrial Military museum park x residence Religious scientific transportation other 5. Ownership Current owner: Magnolia Projects, LTD, Bill Tickner phone: 817 917-6163 Address: 844 East Walnut St. city: Grapevine state: TX zip: 76051 6. Form Preparation Name & title David Klempin organization: City of Grapevine — Historic Preservation Officer Contact: t>hone: 817-410-3197 7. Representation on Existing Surveys Tarrant County Historic Resources other 8. Date Rec'd: 9. Field Chk date: National Register of Historic Places Recorded Texas Historic Landmark Texas Archaeological Landmark for office use only Survey Verified: Yes By: 10. Nomination Archaeological _ Structure _ District Site Structure & Site CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 11. Historic Ownership original owner Talmadge Tickner significant later owners Bill Tickner 12. Construction Dates 1963 alterations/ additions 13. 'architect original construction Unknown alterations/ additions 14. Site Features natural urban Condition Check One: Check One: excellent _ Deteriorated _ Unaltered x Original site good _ Ruins _ altered _ Moved (date: ) x fair Unexposed Describe present and original (if known) physical appearance; include sole(s) of architecture, current condition and relationship to surrounding fabric (structures, objects, etc.). Elaborate on pertinent materials used and style(s) of architectural detailing, embel- lishments and site details. c.• College Height Addition -1921 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Front view 1 I I 1— 11 f H89'357fi'F/ ( 15'ALLEYRO.W) N PO'31'23'w49Is ; r-fAr s<r o01/ N88'5876'E 125.19' i li K LOT 12A 13 u i BLOCK lot CK lot ITS AMTION PG.188 i6i E i i : 1 1ppI.T 1- I 7pi 8( (W'EFA <iiFi I 4 EAST WORTH STREET (PER PLAT- WORTH A1 ENUE) 50-R o.w( Building Site Plan - Lots 12 & 13 View of the side of the building View of the west side of the building CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 The apartment building 717 East Worth Street was built in 1963 and is located on the combined lots 12 & 13 of the 1921 College Heights Addition to the City of Grapevine. The College Heights Addition is a generally cohesive grouping of residential houses, garages, small barns and other outbuildings, originally set in a semi - rural landscape, representing the early twentieth century residential history of Grapevine. The Post -War minimal traditional style one-story apartment building is symmetrical in design with apartment units arranged around a large central courtyard.. The hip and gabled roof creates a smooth appearance to the street and the surrounding homes and buildings of the College Heights Addition. The building was constructed on a slab foundation, with wood stud construction, exterior brick veneer, wood siding and trim and vertical wood siding in the gable ends of the building. The windows on the front of the building are single hung win- dows with black wood shutters. The windows on the rest of the building are aluminum configured slider win- dow units. Both the original and current roofing material is asphalt shingles. Inside the building there are three basic apartment unit plan designs: Unit A is a small one bedroom; Unite B is a slightly larger one bedroom and Unit C is a two bedroom unit. The courtyard is surrounded on three sides by a covered loggia walkway leading to each unit. A wood door opens directly from the covered loggia into the liv- ing room of each apartment with the kitchen and dining area beyond. A small hallway connects the living area to the hall bath and to the bedrooms. There are small closets in the hall and each bedroom. The interior finish- es include manufactured flooring, wood baseboards and trim and wood interior doors. Some apartments have nylon carpeting. CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 s j Interior ofliving, dining and kitchen a Interior of typical bathroom 3 Interior of typical bedroom with exposed overhead air duct Historical Significance Statement of historical and cultural significance. Include: cultural influences, pedal events and important personages, influences on neigh borbood, on the city, etc. A BZA Zoining case in 1961 allowed for the lots to be combined and the apartment building to be constructed at 717 East Worth Street. The Tickner Family operated the building continuously for many years. They built the building next door at 715 East Worth Street in 1967 and additional apartment buildings on Walnut Street, sever- al blocks southeast of the building. The apartment building has housed many local Grapevine residents through the years. More recently, structural problems with the foundation on the east side of the building, including separation of the exterior brick veneer and wood siding from the rest of the building and major sewer plumbing issues led to the building being vacant for an extended period of time. The building is in a deteriorated condition. Proposed plans are for the property to be rezoned back to two, single family zoned lots, lot 12 and 13, and for the construction of two period -style homes following Design Guidelines established for the property. CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 16. Bibliography 17. Attachments District or Site map Additional descriptive material Site Plan Footnotes x Photos (historic & current) Other ( CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Designation Merit A. Character, interest or value as part of x the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City of Grape- vine, State of Texas of the United States. B. Location as the site of a significant historical event. C. Identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the city. D. Exemplification of the cultural, eco- nomic, social or historical heritage of the city E. Portrayal of the environment of a group of people in an era of history characterized by a distinctive architec- tural style. F. Embodiment of distinguishing charac- teristics of an architectural type or specimen. G. Identification as the work of an archi- tect or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the city. H. Embodiment of elements of architec- tural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent a sig- nificant architectural innovation. I. Relationship to other distinctive build- x ings, sites or areas which are eligible for preservation according to a plan based on historic, cultural or architec- tural motif. J. Unique location of singular physical characteristics representing an estab- lished and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, community or the city. K. Archaeological value in that it has produced or can be expected to pro- duce data affecting theories of historic or prehistoric value. L. Value as an aspect of community sen- timent or public pride. Recommendation The Grapevine Township Revitalization Program re- quests the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commis- Sean S air sion to deem this nominated landmark meritorious of a vine Historic reservation C missi designation as outlined in Chapter 39, City of Grape- vine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. David Klempin Further the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commis- Historic Preservation Officer sion endorses the Preservation Criteria, policy recom- mendations and landmark boundary as presented by the City of Grapevine Development Services Depart- ment. Erica Marohnic, Director Planning Department CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Historical Marker The Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission and the Grapevine Historical Society have a cooperative marker pro- gram for properties that are officially (individually or located within) designated Historic Landmark Sub -districts. Please indicate if you are interested in obtaining one or both markers for your property. There is no fee for either of the mark- ers, however, the Grapevine Historical Society will only fund two (2) of the medallion and text plaque (second option), per year, on a first come, first serve basis. Check One: p Yes, I am interested in obtaining a bronze Historic Landmark Plaque for my property from the Historic Preservation Commission. I understand there is no fee for this plaque. p No, I am not interested in obtaining a marker for my property. p Yes, I am interested in obtaining a bronze Historic Marker (medallion and text plaque) for my property from the Grapevine Historical Society. Below for office use only M Historic Preservation Commission's Historic Landmark Plaque. IN Historic Preservation Commission's Historic District Plaque. Grapevine Historical Society's Historic Landmark Marker. CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Design Guidelines 717 East Worth Street Block 109, Lot 12 & 13 College Heights Addition Grapevine, Texas Grapevine Township Revitalization Project, Inc. City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Grapevine, Texas 76051 June 26, 2024 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Table of Contents PREFACE I. SITE Setbacks Driveways, Parking Lots Service and Mechanical Areas Fences II. BUILDING FABRIC Preservation Exterior Finishes Windows III. EMBELLISHMENTS Awnings -Canopies Exterior Lighting IV. NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Infill Additions to Historic Buildings Page 2 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Preface IMMOMeee.aNINE U 6 t w'O.C' 7 rf { . TVFNV.E n 1 11 1 r•,yi11P+ atlltp- A 1lI a-.MONROAAAN College Height Addition -1921 Front View of Apartment Building on Lot 12 & 13, College Heights Addition Page 3 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Floor Plan of One Story Apartment Building showing detail of Unit A, Band C The apartment building 717 East Worth Street was built in 1963 and is located on the combined lots 12 & 13 of the 1921 College Heights addition to the City of Grapevine. The College Heights addition is a generally cohesive grouping of residential houses, garages, small barns and other outbuildings, originally set in a semi -rural landscape, representing the early twentieth century residential history of Grapevine. The Post -War minimal traditional style one-story apartment building is symmetrical in design with apartment units arranged around a large central courtyard.. The hip and gabled roof creates a smooth appearance to the street and the surrounding homes and buildings of the College Heights addition. The building was constructed on a slab foundation, with wood stud construction, exterior brick veneer, wood siding and trim and vertical wood siding in the gable ends of the building. The windows on the front of the building are single hung windows with black wood shutters. The windows on the rest of the building are aluminum configured slider window units. Both the original and current roofing material is asphalt shingles. Inside the building there are three basic apartment unit plan designs: Unit A is a small one bedroom; Unite B is a slightly larger one bedroom and Unit C is a two bedroom unit. The courtyard is surrounded on three sides by a covered loggia walkway leading to each unit. A wood door opens directly from the covered loggia into the living room of each apartment with the kitchen and dining area beyond. A small hallway connects the living area to the hall bath and to the bedrooms. There are small closets in the hall and each bedroom. The interior finishes include manufactured flooring, wood baseboards and trim and wood interior doors. Some apartments have nylon carpeting. Historical Significance Statement of historical and cultural significance. Include.• cultural influences, .special events and important personages, influences on neighborhood, on the city, etc. A BZa Zoining case in 1961 allowed for the lots to be combined and the apartment building to be constructed at 717 East Worth Street. The Tickner Family operated the building continuously for many years. They built the building next door at 715 East Worth Street in 1967 and additional apartment buildings on Walnut Street, several blocks southeast of the building. The apartment building has housed many local Grapevine residents through the years. More recently, structural problems with the foundation on the east side of the building, including separation of the exterior brick veneer and wood siding from the rest of the building and major sewer plumbing issues led to the building being vacant for an extended period of time. The building is in a deteriorated condition. Proposed plans are for the property to be rezoned back to two, single family zoned lots, lot 12 and 13, and for the construction of two period -style homes following Design Guidelines established for the property. Page 4 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 SITE Retain the historic relationships between buildings, landscaping features and open space. Avoid rearranging the site by moving or removing buildings and site features, such as walks, drives and fences, that help define the residence's historic value. SETBACKS Building setbacks should be consistent with adjacent buildings or with the style of the building. Setbacks are an important ingredient in creating an attractive streetscape. Buildings should be set back to a line that is consistent with their neighbors and land use. For example, a residential setback should retain the setback of adjacent and nearby structures, with landscaping along the street right-of-way. Residential buildings with a commercial use in residential areas should be set back in a manner consistent with setbacks of neighboring or similar residential structures. Maintain building orientation pattern, with the front facade facing the street. Maintain spacing patterns between buildings. DRIVEWAYS, PARKING LOTS AND VACANT SITES Driveways should be located perpendicular to the street; no circular drives shall be allowed (unless proven with historic documentation) in front or corner side yard, so that the character of the landscaped yard can be reinforced. New parking lots for commercial uses should not be located adjacent to sidewalks in the district. Off-street parking lots should not be allowed to interrupt the continuity of landscaped front or corner side yards. This is important to both the preservation of historic character, and to the strengthening of the residential district. Screen existing parking lots from streets and pedestrian areas in the Historic District. Existing parking lots located adjacent to streets and sidewalks may be screened to the height of car hoods. This will provide a certain level of continuity of the building facade line; it will screen unsightly views; and it will provide a level of security by allowing views to and from the sidewalk. FENCES Historically, fences around historic houses defined yards and the boundary around property and gardens. Wood picket fences, wood rail fences and barbed wire or decorative wire fences were the common fence types in Grapevine. Traditionally, picket fences surrounded the front of the house while rail and wire fences surrounded the agricultural portions of the property. Maintain historic fences. New fences. Simple wood picket fences, wood and wire and wrought iron fences are appropriate. Avoid chain -link fences, privacy fences and concrete block fences for the street sides of property. Wood privacy fences may be allowed when installed in the rear yard and behind the front facade of a property. Utilitarian/privacy fences should not be installed in front of a historic building or beyond the line of the front facade of a historic building. Page 5 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Replacing fences. If replacement is required due to deterioration, remove only those portions of historic fences that are damaged beyond repair and replace in -kind, matching the original in material, design and placement. If replacement is necessary for non -historic fences, or new fences are proposed, locate and design the fence in such a way that will compliment the historic boundary of the property without concealing the historic character of the property. SERVICE AND MECHANICAL AREAS Service and mechanical areas and equipment should be screened from the street and other pedestrian areas. All garbage and equipment storage areas should be screened from the street. Mechanical equipment, including satellite dishes, shall not be located in front or corner side yards or should be set back from the edges of roofs, and screened so that they are not visible to pedestrians and do not detract from the historic character of buildings. BUILDING FABRIC PRESERVATION Preserve, stabilize, and restore original building form, ornament and materials Any missing or severely deteriorated elements may be replaced with replicas of the original. Ensure that roof, window, porch and cornice treatments are preserved, or when preservation is not possible duplicate the original building element. When rehabilitating, remove non -historic alterations. Often, "modern" renovations conceal the original facade details. If not, the original style may be recreated through the use of historic photographs. Where replication of original elements is not possible, a new design consistent with the original style of the building may be used. Reconstruction of building elements should reflect the size, scale, material and level of detail of the original design. Preserve older renovations that have achieved historic significance. Older structures or additions may have, at some time, been renovated with such care and skill that the renovation itself is worthy of preservation. Usually, such renovations may date from before 1940. EXTERIOR FINISHES Original wood finishes should be maintained and painted or, when necessary, replaced in kind. Modern synthetic siding materials such as vinyl or metal bear little resemblance to historic siding materials. The application of such modern synthetic materials often involves the removal of original decorative elements such as cornice, corner boards, brackets, window and door trim, etc. New synthetic siding shall not be installed; removal of existing such materials is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish and appearance. Original asbestos siding should be maintained and painted, or when necessary, replaced with synthetic siding to match the existing asbestos siding. The removal of asbestos siding over existing Page 6 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 wood siding is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish and appearance. Original masonry surfaces should be maintained and not be painted, unless severe deterioration of the brick or stone can be shown to require painting. If the color or texture of replacement brick or stone cannot be matched with existing, painting may be an appropriate treatment. Paint colors should be complimentary to each other and the overall character of the house. When possible, research the original paint color and finishes of the building's historic period; the right colors respect the historic building. The Historic Preservation Commission shall adopt, as necessary, a paint palette(s) appropriate to the district's character, which may be proposed and approved through the Minor Exterior Alteration application process. Any colors proposed outside the adopted palette may be reviewed by the Commission in the regular Certificate of Appropriateness process. WINDOWS Original window framing and lites (panes of glass) configurations should be preserved and maintained or replaced in kind. When replacement is necessary, do so within existing historic opening. Replacement of non -original windows should consider the use of historically appropriate wood windows. Use same sash size to avoid filling in or enlarging the original opening. Clear or very slightly tinted window glass may be used. No reflective or heavily tinted glass shall be used. Should the owner wish to install security bars, they should be installed on the interior of windows and doors. Storm windows. The use of interior storm windows is encouraged. Storm windows are available which can be installed on the interior of windows. This helps to preserve the exterior historic character of the building. Should storm windows need to be installed on the exterior of the historic windows, storm windows constructed of wood and configured to match the historic sashes (i.e. one over one sashes) are recommended. If metal storm windows are installed, paint to blend with surrounding elements. EMBELLISHMENTS AWNINGS -CANOPIES New awnings and canopies should not be installed above windows or doors. EXTERIOR LIGHTING Lighting is an important element in residential areas. Fixtures should be consistent with the historic character of the house. Page 7 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Appropriate incandescent light fixtures to the style of the district should be used. Avoid exposed lighting of any kind unless part of a historic fixture. NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION INFILL The Secretary of the Interior's guidelines for new buildings in historic districts encourage similarity of form and materials, but not actual replication. New construction proposals and the rehabilitation of non -historic buildings will be reviewed based on these Criteria. Judgement will be based on the compatibility of the design within the context of the property's adjacent and nearby historic buildings. The design of new buildings should have key elements of the building's historic period of significance including massing, scale, fenestration and materials. Infill buildings should not be absolute reproductions, and appear as clearly contemporary. Only when a previously demolished historic Grapevine building can be accurately replicated may a reproduction be considered. Infill buildings between historic buildings should be similar in setback, roof form, cornice line and materials, to one of the adjacent buildings. Relate height of new building to the heights of adjacent structures. Avoid new buildings that tower over existing ones. Horizontal wood siding (novelty, tongue and groove, shiplap or equivalent) and brick are appropriate exterior building finishes for the historic house. Fake brick or stone or gravel aggregate materials shall never be used. ADDITIONS TO HISTORIC BUILDINGS Additions to historic buildings should replicate the style of the main building if possible; otherwise they should adhere to the general style with simplified details. As a minimum, new additions should reflect the massing, roof shape, bay spacing, cornice lines and building materials of the primary structure. All new wood or metal materials should have a painted finish except on some 20' h century buildings where the use of unpainted aluminum or steel was part of the original design and should be maintained. A new addition should, if at all possible, be located at the rear of the historic building. If this is not possible, the addition may be added to the side if it is recessed at least 18 inches from the historic building facade or a connection is used to separate old from new. New vertical additions should be set back from primary facades so as not to be readily apparent from the facing street. When reproducing elements that were originally part of a historic building they should be replicated when evidence of the actual detail has been documented by photographs, drawings, or remaining physical evidence. If no evidence exists, elements typical of the architectural style may be used. Historic photographs can provide information on the original elements of the building. Page 8 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-094 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS GRANTING ZONING CHANGE Z24-07 PROPOSED TO BE PLATTED AS BLOCK 109, LOTS 12A AND 13A, COLLEGE HEIGHTS ADDITION, DESCRIBED AS BEING A TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (717 EAST WORTH STREET) MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM R-MF-2”, MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT TO “R-7.5”, SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICT; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, applications were made to amend the Official Zoning Map, City of Grapevine, Texas by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these requested changes should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas did consider the following factors CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Ordinance No. 2024-094 2 Z24-07 in making a determination as to whether this requested change should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, the effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings, encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning change, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the change in zoning lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this change in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that a change in zoning classification for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City of Grapevine Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended and changed by Zoning Application Z24-07 to rezone the following described property to-wit: being a 0.407 acre proposed to be platted as Block 109, Lots 12A and 13A, College Heights Addition, Tarrant County, Texas (717 East Worth Street), more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof, which was previously zoned “R-MF-2”, Multifamily District is hereby changed to “R-7.5”, Single-Family District, all in accordance with Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, as amended. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the herein change in zoning. CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Ordinance No. 2024-094 3 Z24-07 Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 15th day of October 2024. CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Ordinance No. 2024-094 4 Z24-07 APPROVED: William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Matthew C.G. Boyle City Attorney CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-095 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ISSUING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD24-06 TO DEVIATE FROM MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AND FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, 717 EAST WORTH STREET) ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a planned development overlay by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Ordinance No. 2024-095 2 PD24-06 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this planned development overlay, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the planned development overlay lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this planned development overlay and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this planned development overlay for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Ordinance No. 2024-095 3 PD24-06 Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a planned development overlay in accordance with Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code, by granting Planned Development Overlay PD24-06 to deviate from minimum lot width and front yard setback requirements in Section 15, Subsection G, Area Regulations within the following described property, Block 109, Lots 12A and 13A, College Heights Addition (717 East Worth Street), all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein planned development overlay. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safely from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Ordinance No. 2024-095 4 PD24-06 Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. That this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 15th day of October, 2024. APPROVED: William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Matthew C.G. Boyle City Attorney CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Ordinance No. 2024-096 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, DESIGNATING A HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT HL24-01 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 39 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 (APPENDIX D” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES), DESIGNATING THE AREA LEGALLY PLATTED AS BLOCK 109, LOTS 12A AND 13A, COLLEGE HEIGHTS ADDITION (717 EAST WORTH STREET) AND MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, IN A DISTRICT ZONED “R-7.5”, SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICT REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE 717 EAST WORTH STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT PRESERVATION CRITERIA; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE, AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH AN OFFENSE OCCURS OR CONTINUES; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made by the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission requesting a historic landmark subdistrict designation by making application for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested historic landmark subdistrict designation should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Ordinance No. 2024-096 2 HL24-01 off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 39 of Appendix “D” of the Code of Ordinances have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered, among other things, the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this historic landmark subdistrict, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the historic landmark subdistrict designation lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this historic landmark subdistrict designation and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that historic landmark subdistrict designation for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby designate a historic landmark subdistrict HL22-05 in accordance with Section 39 of Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas same being also known as Appendix “D” of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, in a district zoned “R-7.5”, Single-Family District Regulations within the following described property: 717 East Worth Street and platted as Block 109, Lots 12A and 13A, College Heights Addition, more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and made a part of hereof; and, in addition thereto, the adoption of the 717 East Worth Street Historic District Preservation Guidelines as conditions, regulations and safeguards in connection with the said historic landmark subdistrict, a copy of said criteria being attached hereto and labeled Exhibit “B”. CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Ordinance No. 2024-096 3 HL24-01 Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the “H” zoning designation. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. That the fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 Ordinance No. 2024-096 4 HL24-01 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 15th day of October 2024. APPROVED: William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Matthew C.G. Boyle City Attorney CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 A002 Survey Printed: 9/24/24 Ma g n o l i a P r o j e c t s L i m i t e d 71 7 E . W o r t h S t . G r a p e v i n e T X 76 0 5 1 Drawings and Specifications as instruments of service are and shall remain the property of the Buchanan Design Studio. This plan is to be used only for the lot and subdivision indicated on this plan, except by agreement in writing and appropriate compensation to Buchanan Design Studio. The General Contractor is responsible for confirming and correlating dimensions at the job site. Buchanan Design Studio will not be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the project. Any reproduction is strictly prohibited. © Buchanan Design Studio © Copyright 2024 Buchanan Design Studio 311 S. Oak St. RoanokeTX 76262 817-674-7020 www.buchanandesignstudio.com Revisions 8' - 0 " 30 ' - 1 1 1 / 4 " 45 ' - 0 " 43'-0" 14 ' - 0 " 44 ' - 1 0 " 12'-6"14'-0" 21'-0" 22 ' - 0 " 36'-9" 1 7 ' - 6 3 / 8 " 52 ' - 0 " RI G H T O F W A Y 63.66'63.66' 13 7 . 9 0 ' 13 7 . 9 8 ' 13 8 . 0 6 ' 64.73'64.73' LOT 12A, BLOCK 109 8,854 SQ. FT. OR 0.203 ACRE LOT 13A, BLOCK 109 8,858 SQ. FT. OR 0.203 ACRE EAST WORTH ST.E 6' BUILD LINE 6' BUILD LINE 25' REAR BUILDING LINE 25' REAR BUILDING LINE 6' S I D E Y A R D 6' S I D E Y A R D 6' S I D E Y A R D 6' S I D E Y A R D 25' FRONT BUILDING LINE 25' FRONT BUILDING LINE 2 CAR GARAGE 2 CAR GARAGE N S W CASE NAME: 717 EAST WORTH ST. CASE NUMBER: Z24-07/PD24-06 LOCATION: 717 EAST WORTH ST. MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: _________________________________ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISION CHAIRMAN DATE: _________________________________ SHEET: ____OF ____ APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 2 3 THE PURPOSE OF Z24-07/PD24-06 IS TO REZONE 0.407 ACRE FROM "R-MF-2" MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT TO "R-7.5", SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT TO CONSTRUCT TWO SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY IS TO DEVIATE FROM BUT NOT LIMITED TO MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AND FRONT YARD SET BACK REQUIREMENTS. SITE PLAN for 717 EAST WORTH ST. LOTS 12A,13A - BLOCK 109, COLLEGE HEIGHTS ADDITION E. MOORE SURVEY ABSTRACT NO.1029 CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 17,712 SQ. FT. OR 0.407 ACRE ZONE: "R-7.5/PD" SINGLE FAMILY LINE DISTRICT DATE OF PREPARATION: SEPTEMBER 2024 Site Plan Data Summary Table Item Required Provided General Site data Zoning (from zoning map)R-7.5 R-7.5 Land Use (from Zoning Ordinance; include all applicable uses)Single Family Single Family Total Lot Area (square feet and acres)7,500 SQ FT First Floor-Building Footprint Area (square feet) Total Building Area (square feet)MIN. 1,200 SQ FT Building Height (feet/# stories) house/accessory building 35-feet/2 Stories Floor Area Ratio (Ratio x.xx:1)0.40 or 40%0.36 Impervious Area Building Footprint Area (square feet)1200 SQFT min Area of Sidewalks, Pavement & other Impervious Flatwork (square feet)SQFT/60% Other Impervious Area SQFT/SQFT 0 Total Open Space (square feet and percentage)3542 SQFT/40% MIN 3928 SQFT/44% Total Impervious Area (square feet and percentage)5314 SQFT/ 60 MAX 4928 SQFT/56% Area Regulations Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Lot Width Lot Depth Distance Between Buildings Second Floor-Building Footprint Area (square feet) Accessory Structure N/A 30 FT/50% Landscaped min. 25 FT min. 6 FT min. 65 FT min. 100 FT min. 10 FT min. 25 FT 6 FT 64.73 FT 138 FT 25 FT 1935 3148 31'-6" 17 FT 1780 8,856 SQ FT 0 4066 3148 SCALE: 1" = 10' 1 Site Plan A002 0 5'10'20' CASE NUMBER: Z24-07/PD24-06 NAME: 717 EAST WORTH STREET ADDRESS: 717 EAST WORTH STREET CURRENT/PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 12A & 13A, BLOCK 109, COLLEGE HEIGHTS ADDITION SECTION REGULATION PROPOSED DEVIATION EXPLANATION 15 15 FRONT YARD SETBACK 30-FEET LOT WIDTH 65-FEET LOT WIDTH 64.73-FEET FRONT YARD SETBACK 25-FEET TO ALIGN WITH 500 AND 600 BLOCKS OF NORTH SIDE OF EAST WORHT ST. LOT WIDTH ERRORS DUE TO ORIGINAL SURVEYING CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12 CC ITEM #4, 29, 30, & 31 PZ ITEM #4, 10, 11, & 12