The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMP24-01 Response Packet MP24-01 FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS PROPERTY OWNER CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED: SUPPORT: 8 OPPOSITION: 33 NEUTRAL: 3 SUPPORT a F � FA1, .asr+ rio-rxY:, 1 A ewt;rn S r..rE ,,,,,sr a„a,r¢;n ru,r ,..4ri��-.r es•ri: $ t„r r.: �.'a'.c np drys �. c .,r�r<„ tJEMAAP: ', .ntm�� ,�rt4;re. �kF+t� a .1A S�u... aft :, � Yr:N. r r � : : � ..:. LATER THAN . ,fin ON . RECEIVED THIS OFFICE NO Ptv4 r ..: fi ' t'anY t>n'ux;,.wYN Nti,vYh 1 rvt)A"tm.:KkP r'it fis dYn rrk YnR NY+YYx: M0NDA,,)�,,,,, N0VE&4[.3ER tu�k=, tNtius'Sfi OWk.w'26 e�; ar<N •,fiNR'nY�.+A S�',X;aixriVaw W;3Y*«4t�'aM�arNak��kea�'0'�,HP�tiu.'mds:'ebYnn�kibWRIMA ' Z :wst ) nd/or :4WrofiW;Xt)rA:Yii�;Vh'e';ki�f,a krXza}naa Y<kkRK�:a?+?AW"§ X{u Procedure to R rim* At,; ( a Propertly Owner of the sub ect tract) or ' ' ( an ).. rote . - a ( have the following comments ) 4Y:J+iM,� amp§Printed Property Owner Name and Address , or Lot, Block and Yi&Aritk4,b1% h xr>3,uuvar7,ardNar�N'�A! "#%N,t,kW'+Y/HYPh44 t�,M1dlW�u0.'�a.hiaYttaC�C�kkiAakYtvNt�sM''tt`mrYArv'mt� k Subdivision . Signature ( Phone No . ) ::. < Printed r:.. f t T*t1etEmaiL plann*lng@grapev*lnetexas.gov fl, and emad responses to,* Direct questions, mat Telephone: (817) 410,w3155 a Planning and Zoning Commission Department of Planning Services City of Grapevine 200 S . Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 -01 . Please visit t r https ://b1' t . 1y/Grapev1ne ra We have a : t NIP24 - 01 ", FU 'T' t,,,,,JRE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM Ot'%J A,40NDA k/[:�MBER 1.L.,2025. Procedure to R ;!,::* ond 0 rl 01 izen , approve rotest ) and/or As ( a Pro ert Owner of the subject tract) or an Oterested c t P J ( hzive the following comments) Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision . or Signature ( Phone No . ) MEN Title-. Printed Name of Signee. fl, and ern i Direct questions, mai a* 1 responses to, Telephone,* (817) 410**3155 Email : plan ni ng@grapev*l netexas,,gov Planning and Zoning Commission Department of Planning Services City of Grapevine 200 S, Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 .01 . Please visit https ,",�/`/"b*lt. ly/"�`%%Grapevine FLUM We have a webpage dedicated to MP24 MP24-01; FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 17,2025. Procedure to,Respond: As (a Property Owner of the subject tract) or(an interested citizen), I (protest) and/or (have the following comments) Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision- Signature Phone No,)_�-Isfl Printed :5'�me of S nee: kl*� Title: �00-00-�cy N % $ Direct questions, mail, and email responses to: Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Email: planning@grapevinetexas.gov Planning and Zoning Commission Department of Planning Services City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 We have a webpage dedicated to MP24-01. Please visit https-.Hbit.ly/Grapevine-FLUM MP24-01� FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BYTHIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM ON MONDAY NOVEMBE-R 17,-2025. Procedurt12_Rjap211!t As (a Property Owner of the subject tract)or(an interested citizen , I (approve) and/or (have the following comments) (."ro Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivisiom __6RCA �A.4= — 7t>p W I', tot*41. rr Signature —(Phone No.)_j&7— Printed Name of Signee- Direct questions, mail, and email responses to: Telephone: (817) 410-3156 Email: planning@grapevinetexas.gov Planning and Zoning Commission Department of Planning Services City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 We have a we.bpage dedicated to MP24-01, Please visit htips://bit,ly/Grapevinell-IFLUM MP24-01- FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM,ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2025. procedure to Res on A((a Property Owner of the subject1jF-Act) or(an interested citizen), I (approve (protest)and/or .................. Printed Property Owner Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: Avi Signature a _____________,.(Phone No.)Ji Printed Name of Signee: Title: k Direct questions, mail, and email responses to: Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Email: planning@grapevinetexas.gov Planning and Zoning Commission Department of Planning Services City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 We have a webpage dedicated to MP24-01. Please visit https�//bit,ly/Grapevir,�e—FLtJM OPPOSITION 1 Ashlee Mosley From:Kent Collins <> Sent:Monday, November 17, 2025 1:56 PM To:Planning Services Cc:Amy Collins Subject:Opposition to change in Master Plan, Future Land Use, Crestwood Hollow *** EXTERNAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE USE CAUTION BEFORE CLICKING LINKS AND/OR OPENING ATTACHMENTS *** Good afternoon, my name is Kent Collins and I reside at 4412 Timber Crest Court in Grapevine, located in the Crestwood Hollow subdivision with my wife, Amy. We have lived in Grapevine for 28 years and raised our daughters here. We received a notice of a public hearing to be held on November 18th regarding a change in the future land use designation for our subdivision, and specifically my property. This would amend the master plan from a residential low intensity designation to residential medium intensity designation. Although our subdivision is built out and the likelihood of my property being redeveloped to a more intense layout or use is very small, I am concerned any time a change is planned to potentially increase density in a residential area. The lot sizes in our subdivision fit the low intensity residential designation, which I am sure was considered when our subdivision was approved by the City. Knowing that the city owns Pleasant Glade pool and the school district owns property adjacent to our subdivision, I am concerned that this change could impact property adjacent to our subdivision if those properties were ever sold to a developer. This change, while not amending the zoning for our property, would pave the way for a change in zoning in the future if proposed. I do not understand why the city would propose this change in future land use unless it was requested by someone other than residents. If it is a map cleanup exercise, that is unnecessary and could have future unwanted consequences. For these reasons, I am strongly opposed to the requested change to the future land use designation from low density residential to medium density residential for my property. Thank you for your consideration. Kent Collins 4412 Timber Crest Ct. Grapevine, TX 76051 817.707.5813 1 Ashlee Mosley From:Christian Schmidt @ AERISTO <> Sent:Monday, November 17, 2025 2:04 PM To:planning@grapevine.gov Cc:Albert Triplett; Ashlee Mosley; Ulli Schmidt @ AERISTO; Alexander Schmidt @ AERISTO Subject:800 S. Dooley Street - Proposed Future Land Use Designation - Request for Reclassification *** EXTERNAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE USE CAUTION BEFORE CLICKING LINKS AND/OR OPENING ATTACHMENTS *** Good afternoon, In reference to the City of Grapevine's Case Number/Name: MP24-01 Future Land Use Designation we are herewith submitting our request as follows: As landowner of the property located at 800 S. Dooley in Grapevine Texas, we would like to formally express our desire to be listed as “TD-H” Transit District High Intensity rather than “TD-M” Transit District Medium Intensity. The property at 800 S. Dooley has the light Rail to the North, TD-H to the West (site of the former Sun Belt Rental Facility, Dooley street to the East which includes part of the Cotton Belt Trail with a high recreational traffic count and , as well as the AMLI Apartments to the South which also carries the TD-H land use designation. As the redevelopment of this area continues our opinion is that our property will be interconnected with all the expansion along Dallas and should be designated the same as a majority of the adjacent properties. We look forward to the favorable consideration of our request and to be included with City Staff's discussions before such a plan is implemented. Sincerely Christian Schmidt President STIERLI REAL ESTATE HOLDING, LLC P.O.Box 1088 Grapevine, TX 76099 Mobile Phone: (817) 915 4610 2 For the Leaseholder: Christian Schmidt Founder & CEO ISO 9001:2015, AS 9120B ISO 14001:2015 Environmental Standard 2550 N. Great Southwest Parkway Grand Prairie, Texas 75050, USA U.S. Toll-Free: 1-800-736-6201 Phone: +1 (817) 624-8400 Fax: +1 (817) 624-9520 www.aeristo.com Dear Grapevine Planning Commission, We are a small nonprofit organization that has been at our location in Grapevine for almost 30 years. From our building, we operate one of the largest porcelain museums in the world. While we have no intention of selling at present, no one knows what the future holds. To make our building a single-family home, a buyer would have to gut the inside. There is no kitchen; there are no bedrooms; there is no backyard, rather a parking lot for 7 cars. The need for those renovations would have an adverse eƯect on the price should we ever need to sell. But you probably don’t care that much about that. Here is what you should care about: Location. We are located directly east of the City owned parking lot at the corner of Main and Franklin Steets. You want a business in that position, not a private residence, and here is why. On a daily basis, I have to clean trash from the parking lot. After advocating for a trash can, it has gotten better, sometimes I can skip a day or two, but clean-up is still multiple times a week. On a good day, it is just paper goods—bags, cups, cigarette butts. There are days, I also get to pick up dirty diapers, condoms, and tampons. The crew that comes on Thursday to “clean” the parking lot only takes a blower and blows everything o Ư—usually in my direction or onto the street. A homeowner will be calling you to complain regularly. As business owner recognizes how important visitors are to Grapevine and the need to keep the City clean, and just buys another pair of grabbers every few months. When people ask where we are located, and can’t picture a street name, I ask them if they have ever been to a festival in Grapevine. We are directly behind where the Main Street Stage is set up for every festival. When the bands take the stage, the noise is so loud things shake on the walls—not a comfort given what is in our business---and you cannot talk with someone next to you. A family would not be able to watch TV or have a child take a nap. As a business, we are closed for prime evening events when most people are home, so it doesn’t matter. You want that buƯer. As CCOT grows and the City hosts other events, that lot is often shut down and used for other purposes. The lights, noise and trash associated with those events would cause a homeowner to complain and put their house on the market…eventually at a lower price as people figure out the problem with the location. A business owner is either going to be closed for the worst of it or be fine with it because they want to see Grapevine grow. Looking at the map, the Low Intensity Commercial area buƯers all of the east side of Main Street except for the block of Franklin. Those parcels are currently zoned as Low Intensity Commercial. With the heavy public use of the parking lot, I think you should keep that buƯer on Franklin to be consistent with the rest of the area and leave them unchanged. 1 Ashlee Mosley From:Mike Bucek <> Sent:Sunday, November 16, 2025 7:55 AM To:Planning Services Cc:Wayne Paul Frank Subject:Letter and Photographs for consideration by the Mayor, Councilpersons & Commissioners of the City of Grapevine relating to MP24-01; Future Land Use Map Amendments concerning 1017 William D. Tate Ave (Office Building and Parking Lot owned by Wayne Paul ... Attachments:image0.jpeg; image1.jpeg; image2.jpeg; image3.jpeg; image4.jpeg *** EXTERNAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE USE CAUTION BEFORE CLICKING LINKS AND/OR OPENING ATTACHMENTS *** November 16, 2025 Email: planning@grapevinetexas.gov Planning and Zoning Commission Department of Planning Services City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 Dear Mayor, Councilpersons and Commissioners: Thank you for providing my client, Wayne Paul Frank, with the Notice of Public Hearing regarding MP24- 01; Future Land Use Map Amendments (Notice). I had some difficulty getting the 2 links mentioned in such Notice to open and Albert Triplett of your Planning Staff was most helpful arranging for me to access the current Land Use Map and the proposed Future Land Use Map Amendments by another source. Our firm has represented cities and townships and understand that errors do occur on planning projects when aerials are used as a basis for composing maps rather than on-site viewing of the effected properties. It is my hope that the constraints of time and costs associated with mapping Comprehensive Master Plans has resulted in the error effecting my client’s property (Office Building and Parking Lot) at 1017 Williams D. Tate Ave and that this email could be used as a basis to correct such plan. My client understands the need to update the location of Transit Corridors but our property is outside the Transit Districts being revised. The existing Comprehensive Plan correctly reflects our Office Building as Commercial (CO) and there is no reason for changing this designation. The Proposed Plan reflects the Parking Lot serving our Office Building as Residential Low Intensity (RL). We understand the need to protect residential settings from commercial intrusion, but our Parking Lot has existed in its current location for more than 40 years in a subdivision of basically the same age. We don’t think any homes ever existed on our parking lot. Most of the homes in our area have wood or vinyl siding with limited brick facades and our Office Building has a brick façade so it would remain viable longer than the housing in the subdivision adjoining it. With William D. Tate Ave. on our West perimeter already consisting of four lanes, it is doubtful that our office building that fronts on W. Nash Street would ever be removed and will always be in need of the parking lot East of our Office Building. If the building were removed, the lot would be too small for any useful development without the parking lot having a Commercial designation. Our Parking Lot is adjacent 2 to W. Nash St. where it turns to end up at William D. Tate Ave. The street that continues when W. Nash St. turns is Valley Vista Drive. Many homes along W. Nash and Valley Vista formerly had one car garages that have been remodeled into bedrooms or other uses. This has created a lack of parking for both residential and commercial properties in this area. Our Parking Lot has been a good neighbor to our subdivision by allowing the use of our parking lot by some guests/employees of landowners in vicinity of our Parking Lot to park on it to reduce a major problem with guests/employees parking directly on W. Nash St./Valley Vista. This has helped reduce some traffic congestion on such streets but more parking spaces are needed. The Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments should seek to solve this traffic congestion problem. The proposed RL zoning on the lots immediately adjacent to the existing Commercial properties (e.g. Our Office Building and Northwest Animal Hospital) that have access to W. Nash St. should be zoned Commercial and not RL zoning. Amending the Comprehensive Plan still allows the owner of the home at 1104 Valley Vista to continue to use such home as a residential non-conforming use but gives him/her discretion to sell their lot to Northwest Animal Hospital for additional parking to reduce traffic congestion on W. Nash/Valley Vista. In fact, I wish the City would have looked more closely at the on-street parking problem in this residential subdivision when it rejected Northwest Animal Hospital's request to rezone such adjacent lot. I’m hopeful that the attached photographs below will encourage you to correct the Future Land Use Map to reflect that my client’s Office Building keep its current designation of “Commercial Zoning” and his Parking Lot also receives the designation of “Commercial Zoning”. 1. Image0 - Parking Lot taken from 621 W. Nash St. 2. Image1 - Parking Lot looking toward 621 W. Nash St. 3. Image2 - Home at 621 W. Nash St. 4 Image3 - Home at 1104 Valley Vista (east of the Northwest Animal Clinic) 5. Image 4 - The front of our office building look north across W. Nash from the Northwest Animal Clinic We would be most appreciative if you would correct the Future Land Use Map to insure our office building and adjoining parking lot have the same zoning so that a subsequent purchaser’s use of our property would not be compromised. Sincerely yours, Michael A. Bucek State Bar No. 03285500 1017 William D. Tate Ave., Suite 110 Grapevine, TX 76051 817-319-4298 (Cellular) 817-949-2161 (Office) "" Of Counsel to The Frank Law Firm, PLLC 1 Ashlee Mosley From:Andrew Ahmad <> Sent:Sunday, November 16, 2025 7:01 PM To:Planning Services Subject:MP24-01 future land use amendment *** EXTERNAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE USE CAUTION BEFORE CLICKING LINKS AND/OR OPENING ATTACHMENTS *** Hi, I plan to submit the attached protest in person at the City of Grapevine office tomorrow (Monday November 17, 2025), but wanted to also send an email because this issue is extremely important to me as a current homeowner in the affected community. I strongly protest and object to the proposed zoning change and proposed future land use designation. The proposed change would negatively affect my property value. I expect city leaders and planners to keep the best interests of CURRENT Grapevine homeowners as the top priority. Anything less is simply unacceptable. Thank you for your attention in this matter. I will be attending the public hearing on November 18, 2025. Regards, Andrew Ahmad and Winnie Shek 4333 Crestwood Ct., Grapevine, TX 76051 1 Ashlee Mosley From:Greg Gifford <> Sent:Monday, November 17, 2025 9:56 AM To:Planning Services Subject:Colorize land use map correctly - Transit District - High Intensity Attachments:form and map.pdf; TDO - Zoning - Land Use 11172025.pdf *** EXTERNAL EMAIL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE USE CAUTION BEFORE CLICKING LINKS AND/OR OPENING ATTACHMENTS *** Good morning, Regarding : MP24-01 Future Land Use Map Amendments For site: 218 East Dallas Road 250 East Dallas Road Both should be colorized as High Intensity: Both lots – approved under TDO High Intensity by: · Grapevine Architectural Consultants – ArchiTexas · Planning Development · City Council Approved · Lands purchased · Permi1ed – (building heights, approved use types, approved materials) · Constructed · Homes purchased Proper coloriza4on on these lots ameliorates poten4al future land value disputes. Coloriza4on may be a simple typo error. The correct depic4on demonstrates that map creator/author is in-tune with actual development taking place in the Transit District. Thank you for addressing this topic. -Greg Gifford NEUTRAL