The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBBA25-003611ADDRESS 428 E Wall St. Grapevine, TX 76051 LEGAL G E Hurst Subdivision Blk n/a Lot 6r PERMIT HOLDER Noah Hill Jama Custom Outdoor Li ving (214) 603-9417 OWNERS •Dana Hicks INFORMATION FIELDS DESCRIPTION OF WORK BEING PERFORMED XX **APPLICANT NAME (Individual)Noah Hill **APPLICANT PHONE NUMBER 2146039414 * APPLICATION STATUS Denied READ AND SIGN November 18, 2025 Signature Date City of Grapevine PO Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 817) 410-3166 Board of Appeals {BBA} Project # 25-003611 Project Description: BBA25-03 - FENCE, Section 7-127 & 7- 128 Fences, Front Yard & Reverse Frontage Lot to allow a 6' Wrought Iron Fence within the required & established front yard & Side Yard. [10/13/25 TABLED, 11/10/25 DENIED] Issued on: 11/18/2025 at 8:59 AM MYGOV.US 25-003611, 11/18/2025 at 8:59 AM Issued by: Connie Cook Page 1/2 City of Grapevine Board of Appeals {BBA} Project # 25-003611 NOTICES NOTES MYGOV.US 25-003611, 11/18/2025 at 8:59 AM Issued by: Connie Cook Page 2/2 11 ''1' 1111 11i I IF11111 I �� iii�lj 111�; ;i iiii 3MUBWOURAMR—K. — .=--I - ARM The following request was for the Grapevine Code of Ordinance s, Chapter 7, Article 11 Section 7-127 Fen 7'Zon in the required a thirty-six (36) inches in height, with less than 50 percent through vision in the req ired aii established front yard area. and Section 7-128, Reverse frontage corner lot prohibit construction of fence within ti to the side property line or at a height greater than eight feet. The Board denied the request to allow a six-foot (6') wrought iron fence along the sic 11 area of a reverse frontage corner lot in R-7.5 zoning district. A copy of the minutes will be available after they have been approved at the next regular Building Board of Appeals meeting. If you need a copy for your records, please contact Connie Cook at 817-410-3158. Larry Gray Building Official Building Services Department The City of Grapevine * P.O. Box 95104 * Grapevine, Texas 760 (817) 410-3165 * (817) 410-3166 www.grapevinetexas.gov I November 18, 2025 Joanne Washburn 428 E Wall Street Grapevine, TX 76051 RE: BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #BBA25-03, 428 E. Wall Street Joanne Washburn: On November 10, 2025, the Building Board of Appeals denied Building Board of Appeals Case BBA25-03 for 428 E Wall Street, platted as Lot 6r, G.E. Hurst Subdivision: The following request was for the Grapevine Code of Ordinances, Chapter 7, Article IV: Section 7-127, Fences, Front yard requirements prohibit the erection of a fence exceeding thirty-six (36) inches in height, with less than 50 percent through vision in the required and established front yard area. and Section 7-128, Reverse frontage corner lot prohibit construction of fence within the required side yard area that is adjacent to a front yard area at a distance closer than 15 feet to the side property line or at a height greater than eight feet. The Board denied the request to allow a six-foot (6’) wrought iron fence along the side property line adjacent to the street with 50% through vision within the established front yard area of a reverse frontage corner lot in R-7.5 zoning district. A copy of the minutes will be available after they have been approved at the next regular Building Board of Appeals meeting. If you need a copy for your records, please contact Connie Cook at 817-410-3158. Thank you, Larry Gray Building Official Building Services Department The City of Grapevine  P.O. Box 95104  Grapevine, Texas 76099  (817) 410-3165  (817) 410-3166 www.grapevinetexas.gov 6:00 p.m. Briefing Session – Planning and Zoning Commission Conference Room 6:15 p.m. Public Hearing – City Council Chambers The Building Board of Appeals for the City of Grapevine, Texas, met on Monday evening, May 12, 2025, at 6:00 P.M. in the Planning and Zoning Conference Room, 2nd Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, for a Briefing Session with the following members present to wit: Joe Lipscomb Chairman Jerrold Sklar Vice-Chairman Shea Kirkman Member Becky St. John Member Dave Custable Member David Hallberg Member Sergio Harris Alternate Constituting a quorum. Also, present was City Council Representative Chris Coy and the following City Staff: Larry Gray Building Official Connie Cook Building Services Assistant CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Joe Lipscomb called the Briefing Session of the Building Board of Appeals to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. 1. Roll Call BRIEFING SESSION: – Planning and Zoning Commission Conference Room. 2. Building Board of Appeals to conduct a briefing session to discuss items scheduled to be heard in the May 12, 2025, public hearing. Building Official, Larry Gray briefed the Building Board of Appeals regarding the item scheduled to be heard in the regular public hearing. ADJOURNMENT OF BRIEFING SESSION With no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 6:16 P.M. CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES MONDAY, MAY 12, 2025 GRAPEVINE CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 200 SOUTH MAIN STREET GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 2 PUBLIC HEARING: -- City Council Chambers. Chairman Joe Lipscomb called the Public Hearing of the Building Board of Appeals to order at approximately 6:20 P.M. 3. Roll Call CITIZEN COMMENTS 4. There was no one wishing to speak during citizen comments. NEW BUSINESS 5. Building Board of Appeals to conduct a public hearing relative to Case BBA25-01, submitted by property owners Leland and Chrissy Pennington for property located at 2910 Parr Lane, legally platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Faithful and True Addition. The request was to Grapevine Code of Ordinances Chapter 7, Article IV Fences. Section 7-127, Fences, Front Yard Requirements, requires fences constructed in a required or established front yard to be 36 inches or less in height, and have at least 50 percent through vision, and on properties zoned R-20 Single Family District with a lot size in excess of 50,000 square feet may be a maximum of 48 inches in height, and have at least 50 percent through vision. Building Official, Larry Gray explained that Staff had recommended the Building Board of Appeals deny the applicant’s request for approval of a six-foot (6’) welded iron fence along the front property line with more than 50% through vision within the required and established front yard with 7-foot and 8-foot masonry columns and a 7’ X 19’-7” electric gate with ten-foot (10’) masonry columns, on a lot zoned R-20. Properties in an R-20 zoning allow for fences in the required established front yard area to be a maximum four-feet (4’) high with 50% through vision. He stated that Staff did not determine a special condition existed for this property, as the ordinance could be reasonably complied with. He further explained that the applicant desired to utilize the established front yard area for livestock and a 48” tall fence did not provide adequate protection for the animals and the public. With no questions for the Building Official, Larry Gray, Chrissy Pennington of 2910 Parr Lane, Grapevine, Texas, addressed the Board; she explained to the Board their vision for the property. She explained that while in the process of applying for a fence permit, they were made aware of the height restrictions prohibiting a six-foot (6’) fence in the established front yard, a six-foot (6’) fence provided a secure and safe environment for the livestock as well as the community, she stated that by not being able to utilize the established front yard it reduced livestock coverage for the land by 25%. She requested favorable consideration of her request and offered to answer any questions of the Board. 3 Shea Kirkman asked what height was the being installed on the backside permitter of the property. Mr. Pennington stated that an eight-foot (8’) fence would be constructed on the rear and side yards. Becky St. John asked what the intention of the pond be used for. Mr. Pennington stated that it would be for aesthetics as well as being stocked for fishing. With no further questions for Mr. and Mrs. Pennington and no additional speakers, Jerrold Sklar made a motion to close the public hearing. Becky St. John seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Becky St. John made a motion that a special condition existed. Specifically, a body of water being close to the front of the property as well as protection of livestock and the public. Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, Kirkman, St. John, Custable, Hallberg, Harris Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None Becky St. John made a motion to approve the variance to Section 7-127, Fences, Front Yard Requirements, allowing the construction of a six-foot (6’) welded iron fence along the front property line with more than 50% through vision within the required and established front yard with 7-foot and 8-foot masonry columns and a 7’ X 19’-7” electric gate with ten-foot (10’) masonry columns. Shea Kirkman seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, Kirkman, St. John, Custable, Hallberg, Harris Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 6. Building Board of Appeals to conduct a public hearing relative to Case BBA25-02, submitted by property owners Amy and Grant Kirchhoff for property located at 324 Ruth Street, legally platted as Lot 4, Block 6, D.E. Box Addition The request was to Grapevine Code of Ordinances Chapter 7, Article IV Fences. Section 7-127, Fences, Front Yard Requirements, requires fences constructed in a required or established front yard to be 36 inches or less in height, and have at least 50 percent through vision. Fences in a required or established front yard on properties zoned R-20 single family district with a lot size in excess of 50,000 square feet may be a maximum of 48 inches in height. Section 7-128. Reverse frontage corner lot requirements. On all reverse frontage corner lots it shall be unlawful to construct a fence within the required side yard area that is adjacent to a front yard area at a distance closer than 15 feet to the side property line or at a height greater than eight feet. 4 Building Official, Larry Gray explained that Staff recommended the Building Board of Appeals deny the applicant’s request for approval of a four-foot (4’) wood picket fence along the side property line adjacent to the street with 50% through vision within the established front yard area of a reverse frontage corner lot in an R12.5 zoning district. He stated that Staff did not determine a special condition existed for this property. He explained that this property was a reverse frontage lot, the front yard requirements were applied to this property because a side yard fence would not be allowable in any section of the zoning ordinance. He stated that by allowing the side yard to be recognized as a front yard this would allow the homeowner a three-foot (3’) fence with 50% through vision. With no questions for the Building Official, Larry Gray, Amy and Grant Kirchhoff of 324 Ruth Street, Grapevine, Texas, addressed the Board; she explained to the Board that a previous six-foot (6’) fence had been in the side yard prior to the property remodel and had assumed that reinstalling a fence would not be an issue. She stated they did not want this side of the house to have the appearance of a front yard due to safety, further explaining the issues with the vacant property behind their home and the high traffic area with vehicles and pedestrians from Faith Christian School. She went on to request that the 50% through vision be reduced to 2 ½ inch through vision to accommodate her dogs. She requested favorable consideration of their request and offered to answer any questions of the Board. Becky St. John asked Mr. Gray about the 50% see through vision being reduced, he stated that he had not been aware of this on the request. Mrs. Kirchoff stated that it was on the submittal. Dave Custable asked Mr. Gray if the fence had been grandfathered in would repairs been allowed, he stated that the fence would have been considered an existing non- conforming fence and if repairs were less than 50% of the fence, it would have been allowed to be repaird. Becky St. John asked if there were any traffic counts for this area, Mr. Gray stated that Public Works would possibly have this information. Becky St. John announced that one (1) letter of approval had been received. With no further questions for Mr. and Mrs. Kirchoff and no additional speakers, Jerrold Sklar made a motion to close the public hearing. Becky St. John seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, Kirkman, St. John, Custable, Hallberg, Harris Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None Shea Kirkman made a motion that a special condition existed. Specifically, the adjacent proximity of the school facility, the multi-family area and on-street parking. Becky St. John seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 5 Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, Kirkman, St. John, Custable, Hallberg, Harris Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None Jerrold Sklar made a motion to approve the variance to Section 7-127, Fences, Front Yard Requirements, and Section 7-128, Reverse frontage corner lot requirements. allowing the construction of a four-foot (4’) wood picket fence along the side property line adjacent to the street with spacing at 2 ½ inch through vision within the established front yard area of a reverse frontage corner lot in an R-12.5 zoning district. David Hallberg seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, Kirkman, St. John, Custable, Hallberg, Harris Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 7. Building Board of Appeals to consider the minutes of October 14, 2024, meeting and take any necessary action. Next the Building Board of Appeals to consider the minutes of the October 14, 2024, meeting. Becky St. John made a motion to accept the minutes of October 14, 2024, Dinner/Workshop, and Public Hearing with the correction to the date of the meeting. Jerrold Sklar seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, Kirkman, St. John, Custable, Hallberg, Harris Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None ADJOURNMENT With no further discussion, Dave Custable made a motion to adjourn. Becky St. Johnn seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, Kirkman, St. John, Custable, Hallberg, Harris Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None The meeting was adjourned at approximately 6:59 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025. APPROVED: 6 CHAIRMAN SECRETARY CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES MONDAY, OCTOBER 13,2025 GRAPEVINE CITY ALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 200 SOUTH MAIN STREET GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 6:00 p.m. Briefing Session — Planning and Zoning Commission Conference koom 6:15 p.m. Public Hearip2_:ICity Council Chambers The Building Board of Appeals for the City of Grapevine, Texas, met on Monday evening, October 13, 2025, at 6:00 P.M. in the Planning and Zoning Conference Room, 2nd Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, for a Briefing Session with the Joe Lipscomb Jerrold Sklar Shea Kirkman Becky St. John Dave Custable 161 61,11191 W A Member Member Member Member Alternate Constituting a quorum with Shea Kirkman absent. Also, present was City Council Representative Sean Shope, and the following City Staff: Larry Gray Building Official Arnoldo Ramirez Assistant Building Official Alex Crowley Assistant City Attorney Connie Cook Building Services Assistant Chairman Joe Lipscomb called the Briefing Session of the Building Board of Appeals to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. SUMMONSES 11011W� I I I I i ff 2. Building Board of Appeals to conduct a briefing session to discuss items scheduled to be heard in the October 13, 2025, public hearing. Building Official, Larry Gray briefed the Building Board of Appeals regarding the item scheduled to be heard in the regular public hearing Ili", I I pill I� III III Chairman Joe Lipscomb called the Public Hearing of the Building Board of Appeals to order at approximately 6:15 P.M. Connie Cook administered the Oath of Office to re -appointed Members, Jerrold Sklar, Becky St. John, and Sergio Harris. For office of Chairman, Jerrold Sklar nominated Joe Lipscomb. Becky St. John seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Sklar, St.John, Custable, Harris Nays: one Abstain: Lipscomb Absent: Kirkman For office of Vice -Chairman, Joe Lipscomb nominated Jerrold Sklar. Becky St. John r.econded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, St.John, Custable, Harris Nays: one Abstain: Sklar Absent: Kirkman 4!' !;I r i 7. Building Board of Appeals to conduct a public hearing relative to Case BBA25-03, submitted by property owner Joanne Washburn for property located at 428 E Wall Street legally platted as Lot 6r, G.E. Hurst Subdivision. The request was to Grapevine Code of Ordinances Chapter 7, Article IV Fences. Q Section 7-127, Fences, Front Yard Requirements, requires fences constructed in a required or established front yard to be 36 inches or less in height, and have at least 50 percent through vision. Section 7-128. Reverse frontage corner lot requirements. On all reverse I frontage corner lots it shall be unlawful to construct a fence within the required side yard area that is adjacent to a front yard area at a distance closer than 15 feet to the side property line or at a height greater than zight feet. Building Official, Larry Gray explained that Staff had recommended the Building Board of Appeals deny the applicant's request for approval of a four -foot (4) wood picket fence along the front and side property line adjacent to the street with 50% through vision within the established front yard area of a reverse frontage corner lot in R-7.5 zoning district. He stated that Staff did not determine a special condition existed for this property, as the ordinance could be reasonably complied with. He explained that the intention for the four -foot (4') fence was to meet the pool barrier requirements set forth in the building code. Becky St. John asked Larry Gray how far fencing had to be away from the pool or did the design of the pool dictate the terms of distance such as decking. Mr. Gray stated that typically three feet (3') on all areas around the pool deck would be required, or in cases where a raised wall had been constructed, handholds were required with no three-foot (3') climb out area. Ordinance required that swimming pools be set back six feet (6) from a side yard property line. Street, Grapevine, Texas, addressed the Board; she stated that there were some misconceptions as to what had been requested. She explained that she had not requested a four -foot (4') fence all the way around her property, she had not requested fencing for the front yard, she was requesting to increase the height of the rear yard fence to a six-foot (6') wood fence and relocate the fence to the side yard property line. She explained her concerns regarding privacy and safety to the Board. Larry Gray asked Assistant City Attorney Alex Crowley if there was an option to table the case until a corrected site plan could be provided. Mr. Crowley stated that if the information provided in the packet was not correct, then yes, the case would be a continuance of the Public Hearing rather than tabled. Joe Lipscomb asked Ms. Washburn to clarify exactly how she was modifying her application. She approached the Board and presented the site plan and explained to the Board what she had proposed. Contractor, Noah Hill with Jama Custom Outdoor Living approached the Board to assist in clarification of the applicant's request. Discussion was held regarding the discrepancies in the request and what was being proposed during the meeting. The Board explained that they could not proceed with the proposed request as presented and suggested the case be continued at the next BBA meeting. 0 Jerrold Sklar made a recommendation for a continuance of BBA25-03 allowing staff and applicant time to clarify the discrepancies in what had been requested. With no further questions for Ms. Washburn and no additional speakers, Dave Custable made a motion for a continuance of the Public Hearing to the November 10, 2025, meeting. Sergio Harris seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, St.John, Custable, Harris Nays: one Abstain: one Absent: Kirkman 8. Building Board of Appeals to consider the minutes of May 12, 2025, meeting and take any necessary action. Next the Building Board of Appeals to consider the minutes of the May 12, 2025, meeting. Dave Custable made a motion to accept the minutes of May 12, 2025, Briefing and Public Hearing. Becky St. John seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, St.John, Custable, Harris Nays: one Abstain: one Absent: Kirkman With no further discussion, Becky St. John made a motion to adjourn. Sergio Harris seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, St.John, Custable, Harris Nays: one Abstain: one Absent: Kirkman M. 102 JO 502 W a CHAIRMAN E SECRETARY 6:00 p.m. Briefing Session – Planning and Zoning Commission Conference Room 6:15 p.m. Public Hearing – City Council Chambers CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m. – Planning and Zoning Conference Room 1. Roll Call BRIEFING SESSION 2. Building Board of Appeals to conduct a briefing session to discuss items scheduled to be heard in the November 10, 2025, public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING: 6:15 p.m. – City Council Chambers 3. Call to Order 4. Roll Call CITIZEN COMMENTS 5. Any person who is not scheduled on the agenda may address the Commission under Citizen Comments or on any other agenda item by completing a Citizen Appearance Request form with the staff. A member of the public may address the Commission regarding an item on the agenda either before or during the Commission’s consideration of the item, upon being recognized by the Chairman or upon the consent of the Commission. In accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, the Commission is restricted in discussing or taking action during Citizen Comments. OLD BUSINESS 6. Building Board of Appeals to conduct a public hearing relative to Case BBA25- 03. NEW BUSINESS 7. Building Board of Appeals to consider the 2026 Meeting Agenda Schedule and take any necessary action. CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING AGENDA MONDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2025 GRAPEVINE CITY HALL, SECOND FLOOR 200 SOUTH MAIN STREET GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 8. Building Board of Appeals to consider the minutes of the October 11, 2025, meeting and take any necessary action. In accordance with the Open Meetings Law, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551, 1 hereby certify that the above agenda was posted • the official bulletin boards at Grapevine City Hall, 200 • Main Street and on the City's website on November 4, 2025, by 5:00 p.m. 1-4 GRAY BUILDING OFFICIAL If you plan to attend this public hearing and you have a disability that requires special arrangements at the meeting, please contact the office of Building Services t (817) • at least 24 hours in advance. Reasonable accommodations will be made to assist your needs. Building Services Department The City of Grapevine * P.O. Box 95104 * Grapevine, Texas 76099 * (817) 410-3158 www.grapevinetexas.gov C:\BBA\Cases\BBA25-03 MEMORANDUM BUILDING SERVICES MEMO TO: BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM: LARRY GRAY, BUILDING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #BBA25-03 JOANNE WASHBURN 428 E WALL STREET MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 2025 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Building Board of Appeals Deny the request to City of Grapevine Code of Ordinances, Chapter 7, Article IV, Fences, Section 7-127 and 7-128 for property addressed as 428 E Wall Street, platted as Lot 6r, G.E. Hurst Subdivision, Grapevine, Texas as follows: Section 7-127, Fences, Front Yard Requirements, requires fences constructed in a required or established front yard to be 36 inches or less in height, and have at least 50 percent through vision. Section 7-128. Reverse frontage corner lot requirements. On all reverse frontage corner lots it shall be unlawful to construct a fence within the required side yard area that is adjacent to a front yard area at a distance closer than 15 feet to the side property line or at a height greater than eight feet. The applicant is requesting to construct a six-foot (6’) wrought iron fence along the side property line adjacent to the street with 50% through vision within the established front yard area of a reverse frontage corner lot in R-7.5 zoning district. SPECIAL CONDITION: There is no special condition for this request. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This application was submitted by Noah Hill with Jama Custom Outdoor Living on behalf of homeowner, Joanne Washburn. CITY OF GRAPEVINE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION 1. APPLICANT: NAME: 0 ADDRESS: ® r 6x 57q I CITY/STATE: ZIP:. -7 HOME: WORK: MOBILE: E-MAIL: c- 0 2. PROPERTY OWNER(St ADDRESS: f- f CITYITTE: r —zip: z HOME- WORK: MOBILE: -5-1 "t E- MAIL: 3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION jW13JECT PROPERTY): STREET ADDRESS, LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: fflgase affach Sunt2y ADDRESS: LOT: BLOCK: SUB -DIVISION: 4. SPECIFIC NATURE OF APPEAL: IF NECESSARY, USE A SEPARATE SHEET] r *%-- d( r c® rc- aci t7 prvlc_ r TW— a- C_ ra rg I) rOveded 1%+ e— eg- Aropl-41 le"t- E 5. STATE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE APPEAL AND EXPLAIN HOW A HARDSHIP WOULD BE CREATED IF THE APPEAL IS NOT GRANTED. EXPLAIN HOWYOUR SITUATION IS PECULIAR TO THE CIRCUMSTANCES CONTEMPLATED BY THE ORDINANCE AND ATTACH DRAWINGS NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. (YOU DO NOT NEED TO ATTACH THE SAME DRAWINGS AS ATTACHED TO YOURAPPLICATION FORA BUILDING PERMITASTHE BUILDING OFFICIAL WILL PROVIDE THE BOARD WITH THOSE RECORDS). fice %oj APPLICANT (PRINT) N o--k 4:11 Z APPLICANT SIGNATURE Z7 OWNER (PRINT) OWNER SIGNATURE Wqqmfi• ' w. N4IM3I 0) 3A capik 'y" w'53saw r lo? 141R15105 sf I 1 RA 7004@rok, u, 1gl 2 w". i0ocor 95' Z) SUBJECT PROPERTY 10( 1 2 3 4 5 6 T A S k2A 7R5R0.540 @ Wv E ESTILL 3 .. .. ....... 8 R 1 R 2i J 5R2 6 . ...... . 4R3 A, ya o 2Ra' 32 2A 1 R 56ST 2A 3A do, 11 Feet 0 50 100 150 200 BBA25-03; 428 E Wall Street 4- l!", W This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine ITIG IS department. Varmus primal and unofficial sources were Date Prepared: 9/19/2025 used to gather this information. Every effort was made to an..re the accuracy fth,. data however, no qn—ril- is given or implied as to the accuracy of said data. 11 ;111IIIIIIIIiiIIIIIIIIIIiiIII! I I I I M Iff I I I! r-9PW-W far. -HE "M03MMIM II;I I EZE building and the side line of the lot, and extending through from the street or the front line to the rear line of the lot. Any lot line not a rear line or a front line shall be deemed a side line. EMMM M it shall be unlawful for any person to erect or have erected a fence or any part of a fence of rfars M a ralWPA - llIIIalli kj M,', 111IN! IN F21 I Ili I 1) Applicant's name and address, and in addition, if the applicant represents a firm or corporation, the name and address of the supervisor or foreman of said firm or 4) Type of fence construction. 1 of 4 4/30/2025, 8:47 AM RMGERH 6) Plat showing lot on which fence is proposed to be erected, location of adjoining or adjacent lots, and with heavy black lines outline the location of proposed fence. Sec. 7-123. - Same —Fee. BROWN! I ORRION IM313312011HEIM No fence, guy wires, braces or any post of such fence shall be constructed upon or caused to protrude over property that the city or the general public has dominion and control over, owns, or has an easement over, under, around or through, except upon utility easements which are permitted to be fenced. mummm 7i r fflrf• MEMM rlmmi ec. -, 127. Fi yai d requiremeii'. a) Comer lots: It shall be unlawful to erect a fence in the required front yard building setback area or the established front yard area, whichever area is greater in depth, on any cor I I I I I I ii I I III I 2 of 4 4/30/2025, 8:47 AM 1) |tshall beunlawful toerect afence, hedge orvines over 36inches inheight indlerequ/red front yard area or the established front yard area, whichever area is greater in depth, on any interior lot. Fences in a required or established front yard on properties zoned R-20 single family district with o lot size in excess of5O,O0O square feet may be a rnaxinnunn of 2) It shall be unlawful to erect a fence, hedge or vines in the required front yard area or th't established front yard area, whichever area is greater in depth, on any interior lot that WiM 4) For the purpose of this section, " established front yard area" shall mean an open, unoccupied space onalot facing astneet and extending across the front mfalot between the side yard lines and extending from the abutting street to a principal building or structure. The phrase "required front yard" shall have the meaning ascribed toitinthe Grapevine Zoning Ordinance No. 82'73. NUMEERram Sec. 7 28. Reverse fronta,,W cornet lots requirernentn. On all reverse frontage corner lots it shall be unlawful to construct a fence within the required side yard area that is adjacent to a front yard area at a distance closer than 15 feet to the side property line or 111 maim ff-ims mmm ISTIMIUMN c) it shall be unlawful to construct a chain link fence in the reauired front yard area with the d) |norder toallow ingress and egress for fire department personnel and fire department equipment, there shall be at least one gate or opening with a minimum width of three feet in each fence that is adjacent to or running parallel to any public alley, drainage easement or utility easement, except that this provision shall not apply to utility easements that the city has allowed to be completely fenced in. Upon completion of installation, the building official shall be called upon for inspection. A certificate of acceptance will then beissued ure rejectionslip indicating the defects insame. All fences constructed under the provisions of this article shall be maintained as to comply with the requirements of this article TOM 4of4 4D0/2035 8: 47/0M FOR CITY OF GRAPEVINE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS 1. Determine whether a Special Condition exists A. The application form asks whether applicant to list the special conditions for each requested appeal. THE BURDEN IS ON THE APPLICANT, NOT THE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS, TO PROVE THERE IS A SPECIAL CONDITION. A. If a special condition does not exist, the case is to be denied by a motion to deny. 1. I make a motion that no special condition exists. I move to deny the request. special condition does exist, a motion is in order to consider approving the special condition(s). The motion should list the special conditions that would warrant approving the variance or special exception. 1. 1 make a motion that the Board does hereby find that a speci condition(s) exists and the special condition(s) is (list). i a. Special conditions might include hills, valleys, creeks, power poles, elevation and irregular lot or tract shape. C. If the Board does find that special conditions exist, a motion is in order to consider approving the appeal. The motion should list the specific variance(s) or alternates being approved. The Board can reduce the amount of the applicant's variance or special request. 1. 1 make a motion that the Board does hereby approve, (partial approve or deny) the appeal to: i a. AhyAy§_y§tjqq#9p and subsection numbers of the code or ordinance and describe the sveccs of the variance. The section, and subsection numbers and the amount of variance are-;-i-w-iivS'- -stated in the memo. 0:BBA1Ru1es0fProcedureNMoflon Practice 09/26101 Revised 8/19/08 OUTLINE OF BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING PROCEDURE Public meeting, but NOT a Public Hearing; n-blic and applicants mag attend but may not participate unless asked a specific question A clarification. New business - Building Official will present the case. Board membe should use this opportunity to make sure they are clear on the specifics the case. Asking questions at this point will help to make the pub, hearing more efficient. Board members should not use this briefin session to deliberate for or against the case. 11BuildingOfficialwillpresentmiscellaneousreports. WAVM, New business Chairman will open Public Hearing. Building Official will present the case. Board members may ask Building Official questions. Applicant will give presentation; Board may ask applicant questions. Any other interested party may speak and be questioned. im Chairman closes Public Hearing. Board deliberation Motion to find (or not find) a Special Condition ("I move that in BBA case -_, that a Special Condition exists, specifically that or ("I move that in BBA case 25- 5 no Special Condition exists".) If Staff feels that the case warrants approval, Staff will always list a Special Condition for you to use. However, you are NOT obligated to use the Special Condition proposed by Staff. Vote If the Board finds no Special Condition, the case is automatically denied. If the Board finds a Special Condition exists, a motion must then be made to approve the case: ("I move that in BBA case 25- the request for be approved".) Vote Consideration of Minutes (vote required for approval). Meeting adjourned 0ABBA90utHneMee1ingProcedure 211/06 o- URICr, OVERHEAD •ru WOODFENCEONEQUIPMENTELECTRICIRONFENCECHAINLINK EDGE OFGRAVELWIDETYPICAL STONE TWOSTORY-1 FRAME1 BBA25-03 428EWALLSTREET DOUBLE SWING VEHICULAR GATE TO MATCH DECORATIVE IRON FENCE oT 20' LINE Or EXISTING DMVE 19, 6 ,HT. STANDARD UECORATIVE IRON FENCE WATER METER I N, ELECT OWN DECORATIVEIRONPOSTS 4' oroi DECORATIVEIRONPICKETS inFENCEEXHIBIT: ', = 1'-O°° r BUILDING LINE PROPERTY LINE t i DOUBLE SWING VEHICULAR GATE TO MATCH DECORATIVE IRON FENCE r` ij j LINE OF EXISTING DRIVE 20 10 o 15'-4" alumom Iwomw 0 16 32 48 GRAPHIC SCALE: 1/16" = V-0" TO SCALE WHEN PRINTED AT 18" x 24" DESIGN SUBJECT TO LOCAL CODES sm 4 qy oc o" amsm oze ® ysW iN ,- c paogw mmgismo 0 3 age w q 9 Cl== mm A u E; z=o°ms ageTopa € i Am HM s 428 E. WALLSTREETa2gay®Q = _} Y > m Qo b o H a EAR o ai2sb m xR9 GRAPEVINE TEXASqg>gAz€A°$ ogA np 6 "_ ate om W bm 9. m,_ mm f B428 EWALLSTREET m October 30, 2025 2:44 PM 2026 CITY OF GRAPEVINE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING AGENDA SCHEDULE FILING DEADLINE First Monday of the Month MEETING DATES December 08, 2025 January 12, 2026 January 12, 2026 February 9, 2026 February 9, 2026 March 9, 2026 March 9, 2026 April 13, 2026 April 13, 2026 May 11, 2026 May 11, 2026 June 8, 2026 June 8, 2026 July 13, 2026 July 13, 2026 August 10, 2026 August 10, 2026 September 21, 2026 3rd Monday, BZA on 14th due to Holiday on 7th September 14, 2026 October 12, 2026 October 12, 2026 November 9, 2026 November 9, 2026 December 14, 2026 December 14, 2026 January 11, 2027 THE BUILDING SERVICES STAFF WILL DETERMINE THE AGENDA FOR EACH OF THE PUBLIC HEARING DATES. BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE AGENDA, YOUR APPLICATION MAY BE RESCHEDULED TO A LATER DATE. 6:00 p.m. Briefing Session – Planning and Zoning Commission Conference Room 6:15 p.m. Public Hearing – City Council Chambers The Building Board of Appeals for the City of Grapevine, Texas, met on Monday evening, October 13, 2025, at 6:00 P.M. in the Planning and Zoning Conference Room, 2nd Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, for a Briefing Session with the following members present to wit: Joe Lipscomb Chairman Jerrold Sklar Vice-Chairman Shea Kirkman Member Becky St. John Member Dave Custable Member David Hallberg Member Sergio Harris Alternate Constituting a quorum with Shea Kirkman absent. Also, present was City Council Representative Sean Shope, and the following City Staff: Larry Gray Building Official Arnoldo Ramirez Assistant Building Official Alex Crowley Assistant City Attorney Connie Cook Building Services Assistant CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Joe Lipscomb called the Briefing Session of the Building Board of Appeals to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. 1. Roll Call BRIEFING SESSION: – Planning and Zoning Commission Conference Room. 2. Building Board of Appeals to conduct a briefing session to discuss items scheduled to be heard in the October 13, 2025, public hearing. Building Official, Larry Gray briefed the Building Board of Appeals regarding the item scheduled to be heard in the regular public hearing. CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES MONDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2025 GRAPEVINE CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 200 SOUTH MAIN STREET GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 2 ADJOURNMENT OF BRIEFING SESSION With no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 6:12 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: -- City Council Chambers. Chairman Joe Lipscomb called the Public Hearing of the Building Board of Appeals to order at approximately 6:15 P.M. 3. Roll Call 4. Oath of Office Connie Cook administered the Oath of Office to re-appointed Members, Jerrold Sklar, Becky St. John, and Sergio Harris. 5. Election of Officers For office of Chairman, Jerrold Sklar nominated Joe Lipscomb. Becky St. John seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Sklar, St.John, Custable, Harris Nays: None Abstain: Lipscomb Absent: Kirkman Joe Lipscomb was re-elected as Chairman. For office of Vice-Chairman, Joe Lipscomb nominated Jerrold Sklar. Becky St. John seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, St.John, Custable, Harris Nays: None Abstain: Sklar Absent: Kirkman Jerrold Sklar was re-elected as Vice-Chairman. CITIZEN COMMENTS 6. There was no one wishing to speak during citizen comments. NEW BUSINESS 7. Building Board of Appeals to conduct a public hearing relative to Case BBA25-03, submitted by property owner Joanne Washburn for property located at 428 E Wall Street legally platted as Lot 6r, G.E. Hurst Subdivision. The request was to Grapevine Code of Ordinances Chapter 7, Article IV Fences. 3 Section 7-127, Fences, Front Yard Requirements, requires fences constructed in a required or established front yard to be 36 inches or less in height, and have at least 50 percent through vision. Section 7-128. Reverse frontage corner lot requirements. On all reverse frontage corner lots it shall be unlawful to construct a fence within the required side yard area that is adjacent to a front yard area at a distance closer than 15 feet to the side property line or at a height greater than eight feet. Building Official, Larry Gray explained that Staff had recommended the Building Board of Appeals deny the applicant’s request for approval of a four-foot (4’) wood picket fence along the front and side property line adjacent to the street with 50% through vision within the established front yard area of a reverse frontage corner lot in R-7.5 zoning district. He stated that Staff did not determine a special condition existed for this property, as the ordinance could be reasonably complied with. He explained that the intention for the four-foot (4’) fence was to meet the pool barrier requirements set forth in the building code. Becky St. John asked Larry Gray how far fencing had to be away from the pool or did the design of the pool dictate the terms of distance such as decking. Mr. Gray stated that typically three feet (3’) on all areas around the pool deck would be required, or in cases where a raised wall had been constructed, handholds were required with no three-foot (3’) climb out area. Ordinance required that swimming pools be set back six feet (6’) from a side yard property line. With no questions for the Building Official, Larry Gray, Joanne Washburn of 428 E Wall Street, Grapevine, Texas, addressed the Board; she stated that there were some misconceptions as to what had been requested. She explained that she had not requested a four-foot (4’) fence all the way around her property, she had not requested fencing for the front yard, she was requesting to increase the height of the rear yard fence to a six-foot (6’) wood fence and relocate the fence to the side yard property line. She explained her concerns regarding privacy and safety to the Board. Larry Gray asked Assistant City Attorney Alex Crowley if there was an option to table the case until a corrected site plan could be provided. Mr. Crowley stated that if the information provided in the packet was not correct, then yes, the case would be a continuance of the Public Hearing rather than tabled. Joe Lipscomb asked Ms. Washburn to clarify exactly how she was modifying her application. She approached the Board and presented the site plan and explained to the Board what she had proposed. Contractor, Noah Hill with Jama Custom Outdoor Living approached the Board to assist in clarification of the applicant’s request. Discussion was held regarding the discrepancies in the request and what was being proposed during the meeting. The Board explained that they could not proceed with the proposed request as presented and suggested the case be continued at the next BBA meeting. 4 Jerrold Sklar made a recommendation for a continuance of BBA25-03 allowing staff and applicant time to clarify the discrepancies in what had been requested. With no further questions for Ms. Washburn and no additional speakers, Dave Custable made a motion for a continuance of the Public Hearing to the November 10, 2025, meeting. Sergio Harris seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, St.John, Custable, Harris Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Kirkman 8. Building Board of Appeals to consider the minutes of May 12, 2025, meeting and take any necessary action. Next the Building Board of Appeals to consider the minutes of the May 12, 2025, meeting. Dave Custable made a motion to accept the minutes of May 12, 2025, Briefing and Public Hearing. Becky St. John seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, St.John, Custable, Harris Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Kirkman ADJOURNMENT With no further discussion, Becky St. John made a motion to adjourn. Sergio Harris seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, St.John, Custable, Harris Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Kirkman The meeting was adjourned at approximately 6:36 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025. APPROVED: CHAIRMAN 5 SECRETARY Grapevine, TX Code of Ordinances about:blank 1 of 4 4/30/2025, 8:47 AM Grapevine, TX Code of Ordinances about:blank 2 of 4 4/30/2025, 8:47 AM Grapevine, TX Code of Ordinances about:blank 3 of 4 4/30/2025, 8:47 AM Grapevine, TX Code of Ordinances about:blank 4 of 4 4/30/2025, 8:47 AM BOYDSTON REVOCABLE TRUST 413 TEXAS ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 CARRIE NOLAN 221 S DOOLEY ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 DANA HICKS 428 E WALL ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 DAVID G EWBANK 405 E TEXAS ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 DEARING AUTOMOTIVE 511 E WALL ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 GREGORY WEBB 1001 DEER RUN GREENSBORO, GA 30642 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 JOHN HALE 512 ESTILL ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 JON FRANKS 412 E WALL ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 KEITH HAMILTON 421 E TEXAS ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 L L WESLEY 427 E TEXAS ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 LAWRENCE LYONS 408 E WALL ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 MICHAEL GORDON 204 S DOOLEY ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 NICHOLAS KAUFMAN 205 S DOOLEY ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 NORMAN J BARFIELD 420 E WALL ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 ROBERTS FAMILY LIVING TRUST 208 S DOOLEY ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 RONNIE GRAGG 501 E WALL ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 SEUNG LEE 511 ESTILL ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 SOUTHWEST MARINE RENTALS INC 821 TWILIGHT TR GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 TERRANCE MALLORY 225 S DOOLEY ST GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 VCI PROPERTIES LTD PO BOX 151720 AUSTIN, TX 78715 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 BBAWall_091925_114350AM Labels - Label Count: 20 | Total Record Count 20 Page 1 L J STRAIT 40603 DOSSA N I ADDN 10084 QUATR O GRAND E 33264 .1 3 5 @ 1 2 1 1 104 WALL ST E TEXAS ST TR 4 9 B 1 TR 2 8 D 6 D TR 63B 1 2 6R 7R 8R 1 5R 1RA 3A 1 4 1 E NORTHWEST HWY COLLE G E HEIGHT S 7670 1 MILLICA N PLACE ADDN 26149 2 1 2A 38 ORIGIN A L TOWN O F GRAPE V I N E 16060 RAWLS & DALTO N 33660 C DO O L E Y S T WESLE Y ADDN 45732 1 3 1 6 1R 5 3A2A 534 76 100 21 E ESTILL ST A F LEONA R D 23818 2A MRS G E HURST SUBD 20840 3 4R 1 NWH QUICKF I L L 27828T.5105 @ 1 1 A F LEONA R D 23818 1R1 4R3 6 2R 1R 102 5R2 0.540 @ .7004 @ 1.03 @ COMPA R I N & GAY AD D N 7862T .9559 @HC R-7.5 Grapevine GIS BBA25-03; 428 E Wall Street 0 50 100 150 200 Feet ² Date Prepared: 9/19/2025 This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department. Various official and unofficial sources were used to gather this information. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data, however, no guarantee is given or implied as to the accuracy of said data. SUBJECT PROPERTY CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES MONDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2025 glr. GRAPEVINE CITY ALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1 200 SOUTH MAIN STREET GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 6:00 p.m. Briefing Session — Planning an Zoning Commission Conference Room 6:15 p.m. Public Hearing — City qpu,ncil Chambers The Building Board of Appeals for the City of Grapevine, Texas, met on Monday evening, November 10, 2025, at 6:00 P.M. in the Planning and Zoning Conference Room, 2nd Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, for a Briefing Session with the following members present to wit: Member Member Member Member Constituting a quorum. Also, present was City Council Representative Chris Coy and the following City Staff: Larry Gray Building Official Arnoldo Ramirez Assistant Building Official Matthew Boyle City Attorney Connie Cook Building Services Assistant 22010 Chairman Joe Lipscomb called the Briefing Session of the Building Board of Appeals to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. 1 . Roll Call BRIEFING SESSION: — Planning and Zoning Commission Conference Room. 2. Building Board of Appeals to conduct a briefing session to discuss items scheduled to be heard in the November 10, 2025, public hearing. Building Official, Larry Gray briefed the Building Board of Appeals regarding the item scheduled to be heard in the regular public hearing. l ill lill p 1 ;;1111111111111 111 11 Chairman Joe Lipscomb called the Public Hearing of the Building Board of Appeals to trder at approximately 6:15 P.M. 51111111111111111111i r 7 WN 5. Building Board of Appeals to conduct a public hearing relative to tabled case BBA25- 03, submitted by property owner Joanne Washburn for property located at 428 E Wall Street legally platted as Lot 6r, G.E. Hurst Subdivision. The request was to Grapevine Code of Ordinances Chapter 7, Article IV Fences. Section 7-127, Fences, Front Yard Requirements, requires fences constructed in a required or established front yard to be 36 inches or less in height, and have at least 50 percent through vision. Section 7-128. Reverse frontage corner lot requirements. On all rever frontage corner lots it shall be unlawful to construct a fence within It required side yard area that is adjacent to a front yard area at a distan closer than 15 feet to the side property line or at a height greater thal eightfeet. Building Official, Larry Gray explained that Staff had recommended the Building Board of Appeals deny the applicant's request for approval of a six-foot wrought iron fence with 50% through vision within the established front yard area of a reverse frontage corner lot in R-7.5 zoning district. He stated that Staff did not determine a special condition existed for this property, as the ordinance could be reasonably complied with. With no questions for the Building Official, Larry Gray, Joanne Washburn of 428 E Wall Street, Grapevine, Texas, addressed the •Board; she explained that she wanted to enhance the property, that she had complied with the 50% through vision and her special condition was the irregularity of the lot positioned on the corner with Highway Commercial businesses across the street. She requested favorable consideration of her request. Dave Custable asked if any property notices had been received. Ms. Washburn stated that the city had sent them for the previous case and assumed they would be sent again. She stated that she had talked to all her neighbors. Staff stated that the case was tabled to a specific date and not required to resend notices. PA 3 With no further questions for Mr. Gray or Ms. Washburn, and no additional speakers, Becky St. John made a motion to close the public hearing. Shea Kirkman seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, Kirkman, St.John, Custable, Harris Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None Jerrold Sklar made a motion that a special condition did not exist to support the request, and deny the variance requests to Section 7-127, Fences, Front Yard Requirements and Section 7-128, Reverse frontage corner lot requirements. Shea Kirkman seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, Kirkman, St.John, Custable, Harris Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 6. Building Board of Appeals to consider the minutes of October 13, 2025, meeting and take any necessary action. Next the Building Board of Appeals to consider the minutes of the October 13, 2025, meeting. Dave Custable made a motion to accept the minutes of October 13, 2025, Briefing and Public Hearing. Jerrold Sklar seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, Kirkman, St.John, Custable, Harris Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 7. Building Board of Appeals to consider the 2026 Meeting Agenda Schedule and take any necessary action. Next the Building Board of Appeals considered the 2026 Meeting Agenda Schedule. Shea Kirkman made a motion to accept the 2026 Meeting Agenda Schedule. Jerrold Sklar seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, Kirkman, St.John, Custable, Harris Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None ADJOURNMENT With •, further discussion, Jerrold Sklar made a motion to adjourn. Becky St. John seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following •" Ayes: Lipscomb, Sklar, Kirkman, St.John, Custable, Harris Nays: one Abstain: one Absent: one The meeting was adjourned at approximately • P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THE •.:. DAY OF MARCH • SECRETARY 2