HomeMy WebLinkAboutSFRA2026-001795City of Grapevine
Building - Residential
i 'k 10i
PO 63, 955, 104
Alteration
Gvaoev ��e, Te�.as
d
10
81' 4'0-3166
Project At 26-001795
Project Description: 11. S��a�! 7 p: 1�gE, eX,eC,; 2 elp:Of
�Ez�,ECTPOMC REviEWt
W,
ISSUed 05 2", 202a �'� 1, 2 - 16 PM
ADDRESS
INSPECTIONS
I S07 Pax; ,,,vcoo Dr -
G,apcvine, TX '76105,
I � Bu�dk,,cj Finav'
LEGAL
INFORMATION FIELDS
Parkwood Aodil.;on Bilk 7
APPLfCANT ikJA%1E Jnd.',viduai,
Jetlfei;(, Ellison
Lot -31
S
—APPLICANT PHONE NUMBER
214' 8,56 %34
`05842!66'
APPLIC'ANT rE MAIL vicki@etitefoundationrepairs.
HOLDER
VALUATION
3095
J oft I Ic-c Elkson
Souitc Foo"acie
2036
&te Foaada?�Cn,
'CONSTRU CTION TYPE
VB
,310) 80 1 - 14 76
'OCCUPANCY GROUP
R-3
COLLABORATORS
DOCW, EIN T S INAIISC 0 1 Pc!,m:tApp"!cmcF
,807Pw1\,.,,,od.paf
- joffeno Elksotl
Cin� all, er�c,-� 1
80, 7 ParkwoodDi'05,08.26,nd
Ewe Foz,,n,,Jatic!
DOCU,'0ENTS MISC 02
pepau's
'ZONINIG DISTRICT
R-7.5
`10�80 0 , 1
OWNERS
FEE TOTAL
PAID DUE
- Chns.ophc, Wood
Pcmr, Foc%. i$'! 50.00
S 1 5C00
Flw Foe) Sinvlo Xlerattlo,i
150,00 $ 115 0 , 0
TOTALS 1 1_110.(K)
S 4150.00 S 000
U-nm0mr,
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING IS CORRECT To 71 HE BEST OF
t.!Y KINOWLEDGE AND ALL WORK WILL BE PERFOR%1ED ACCORDING TO
THE DOCU%4ENTS APPROVED BY THE BiJiLDfNG DEPARTJENT AND IN
"'OtAPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE ORDINANCE REGULATING
CONSTRUCTION. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT T HE ISSUANCE OF THIS PER;%41IT
DOES NOT GRANT OR AUTHORIZE ANY VIOLATION OF ANY CODE OR
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OFGRAPE ViNE,
i FUPTHER%10RE UNDERSTAND THAT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE
NOT REVtEIVNED FOR HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILJ7�' BY THE CITY AND THAT
THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAiNING
SUCH APPROVAL FRONT THE APPROPRIATE STATE AND OR FEDERAL
AGENCY?S.
P a,: , e 1 2
May 21 2026
Sigoaturc Dwe
City of Grapevine Building - Residential Alteration
R-oject 4 26-001,795
NOTICES
I; ALL w,-)Tk must be done m comphance wflh the 2021 iNTERNATdONAL BUILDING CODE.
"ALL work ISSUED P110 —' tO Ja;Ma�'y I, 2024, mus< be done ji, compiiance vj;ih the 2006 INTERNATIONAL
BUILDING CODE,
2,� C,,y Approved St,'imped PIUIS MHUSt b(' Orl-sits: for ALL INSPECTIONS,
1 Project: address MLISIL be crpdy posted at ihe ob site.
NOTES
> 24 HOUR INSPECTION NUMBER
METRO (81 7t 410-3010. CUT OFF Tl%lE FOR Alk INSPECTION IS 71-30 Ahl--- CUT OFF TIME FOR P141,
INSPECTION IS 12.30 RAI,
> PERMIT ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICATION ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE,
Tt-flS PERMIT SHALL EXPIRE IF WORK IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN i, 180 DAYS) OF ISSUANCE OR 1F
WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 1180 DAYS'i. THE ISSUANCE OR
GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT AND OR APPROVAL OF PLANS. SPEC!FiCATIONS AND
COMPUTATIONS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO BE A PERr'vIfT FOR, OR AN APPROVAL OF ANY
VIOLATION OF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE CODES AND ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED ON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND OTHER DATA
SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING DEPARTk4ENT FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE
CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND OTHER OR REQUIRING
CORRECTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ffSELF.
Page 1 of 7 - Date: May 8, 2026
Adam A. Green, P.E. (TX), MBA
Austin | Dallas | Fort Worth | Houston |San Antonio | Waco (469) 751-7694
www.CrosstownEngineering.com
Date: May 8, 2026
Attention: Elite Foundation Repairs (via email) & Property Owner
Subject: Pre-Repair Foundation Repair Evaluation
Slab Foundation
1807 Parkwood Dr., Grapevine, TX
Good Afternoon:
Crosstown Engineering (CE) was retained to inspect the subject foundation and to provide an opinion re-
garding the performance of the foundation and opine as to whether or not Elite Foundation Repairs (the
contractor) has prepared a reasonable limited repair plan. This report provides our reasonable professional
opinion of the condition of the foundation on the date of our inspection and does not take into consideration
any changes in the condition of the foundation or soils after that date. The contents of this report supersede
any verbal comments made regarding the structure before, during or after the inspection.
Scope of Work Limitations:
This report is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide a detailed inventory of defects
or a technical evaluation of the property. The inspection excludes the framed superstructure, detached
buildings, privacy or retaining walls, general site drainage away from the structure, material and soil sam-
pling/testing, and verification of concrete reinforcement or knowledge of the location of interior grade
beams, boxed structural members not in plain sight or previous repair work. Removal of floor coverings
or performance of invasive tests or procedures is not included.
Document Review:
The contractor provided a limited repair plan that included the pier locations and pre-lift elevations for the
structure for our review. No other information was provided regarding prior engineering reports, recom-
mendations for foundation repairs or construction documents relative to this structure. If existing piers are
shown in the limited repair plan, their locations were provided by the client and are approximated. We do
not certify their performance or existence. If the reader would like to determine if they are present, they
must contact the owner or contractor to obtain an engineering certificate for them.
General Observations:
For the purposes of this report directions will be described using the terms left, right, front, and back with
the front referring to the side of the structure indicated on the limited repair plan.
The structure is one story tall with a slab-on-grade foundation. The primary structural system of the struc-
ture is a wood framed system with exterior brick veneer and interior drywall with various finishes. The
foundation was not exposed during our inspection and was covered with various floor-covering types.
Page 2 of 7 - Date: May 8, 2026
Adam A. Green, P.E. (TX), MBA
Austin | Dallas | Fort Worth | Houston |San Antonio | Waco (469) 751-7694
www.CrosstownEngineering.com
Grading, Drainage, Erosion and Vegetation Observations:
The terrain immediately surrounding the structure was visually observed during the inspection. We ob-
served the following:
• The gutter system is adequate.
• The drainage system is adequate.
• The terrain is landscaped with grass, several trees, and some shrubbery. Some trees and/or shrubs
are close to the foundation.
Floor Elevation Discussion:
A relative elevation floor survey was performed using a Ziplevel Pro-2000B to map the surface topography
of the floor of the living area and garage (if present). The floor plans and the elevations are illustrated on
the limited repair plan. The elevations were adjusted based on the flooring type encountered to be on the
same plane as the base point floor type. If a garage was present, the garage ceiling was measured and
adjusted to be on the same plane as the foundation. Garage floors are designed to slope and are not as
effective in measuring foundation movement.
Visual Observations:
Brick cracks, drywall cracks, foundation cracks, garage brick separations and trim separations were ob-
served. Based on our observations of the structure, the structure’s physical damage, and review of the
elevation map, we believe the structure has experienced foundation movement over the life of the structure,
resulting in differential movement of the slab-on-grade foundation.
Damage observations were notable on the front and right of the structure and are correlated with floor
elevation data.
Foundation Repair Recommendations:
Elite Foundation Repairs has recommended performing the following in the approximate locations of the
structure as indicated on the limited repair plan:
x Install 7 total pilings (5 exterior, 2 exterior with concrete breakouts).
The foundation repairs are to meet or exceed the 2021 IRC.
Upon review of the contractor’s elevation drawing and evaluation of the property and our visual inspection
and verified elevation map, we believe the proposed limited repair plan to be a reasonable solution. This
does not rule out the possibility of needing a limited foundation repair plan in the future should damages or
foundation movement worsen or change. Re-evaluation of the structure in the future may be prudent.
Maintenance Opportunities:
We recommend pre-lift and post-lift plumbing tests be performed on the sewer and potable plumbing lines.
The results of the tests should be immediately provided to our office.
Page 3 of 7 - Date: May 8, 2026
Adam A. Green, P.E. (TX), MBA
Austin | Dallas | Fort Worth | Houston |San Antonio | Waco (469) 751-7694
www.CrosstownEngineering.com
Maintaining a fully functioning gutter system will minimize ponding, soil loss and erosion, and will help
control seasonal movement near the foundation. The gutter system should direct storm-water discharge
away from the foundation through downspouts to a well-drained area that is graded away from the founda-
tion. Optimally, we recommend the gutter system discharge via in-ground solid pipe to a low-lying area
far away from the foundation.
Vegetation maintenance and a foundation and yard-watering program will also help control seasonal move-
ment. Maintaining consistent moisture levels in supporting soils at all times of the year is necessary. It is
important that the soils be stabilized and maintained with grass or ground cover around the perimeter of the
structure to prevent erosion and an exposed or improperly embedded foundation. Large to medium-sized
trees, and even large or numerous shrubs, growing too close to a foundation can dramatically effect the
moisture content of the soils within the zone of influence beneath the structure. Root systems extract large
quantities of water from underlying soils and result in large volumetric changes in the soils (shrinkage). As
the tree absorbs water from the soil and the soil volume decreases, the foundation will settle in unsupported.
If problematic roots are observed, we recommend removal or installation of tree root barriers.
Grading of the soils around the foundation is a critical element to your foundations health. Sloping the soils
away from the home and preventing water from ponding near the foundation is needed to prevent soil
“heave”. If ponding is noticed near the foundation during the rainy season, consult with an engineer or a
drainage contractor immediately. Over-saturated soils can cause “heave” or settlement and contribute to
foundation movement.
Expectations:
The proposed limited repair plan is intended to provide a reasonable repair to improve the performance of
the foundation and is not intended to level the foundation. The contractor shall determine the amount of
elevation correction needed based on the reaction of the structure during the lift in order to minimize dam-
ages and additional stress. The purpose of the piling installations is to support the failed areas and improve
elevations in areas of differential settlement. Please see the limited repair plan for more information.
Because the structure has endured pre-repair foundation differential movement, residual differential eleva-
tion and perceptible floor slope or some leaning door frames/windows or other noticeable issues may remain
following the foundation repairs.
The soils beneath and surrounding the structure are known to shrink and swell as the seasonal soil moisture
content fluctuates. Moving forward, we anticipate that some cracks in the interior and exterior walls will
surface due to seasonal movement within the soils, even after foundation repair. Periodic repair of this type
of cracking may be needed.
Underpins (a.k.a. Pilings or Piers) are constructed of steel or concrete and cost and performance will vary.
Generally speaking, the deeper a piling is installed, the better it will perform. Shallow installations may be
acceptable if they are terminated into rock. This information is meant to serve as a guideline and the owner
must decide a reasonable cost/benefit on the property. Piling design is best done with data from a site-
specific soils investigation. Such an investigation was not provided and is not a part of this scope of work
but we strongly recommend obtaining this data. If this data is not provided, our pier design is only intended
to be a minimum standard based solely upon average soil conditions in the general location of the property
and as such, may not necessarily provide maximum performance.
Page 4 of 7 - Date: May 8, 2026
Adam A. Green, P.E. (TX), MBA
Austin | Dallas | Fort Worth | Houston |San Antonio | Waco (469) 751-7694
www.CrosstownEngineering.com
Disclaimer:
We do not warrant the future performance of the subject foundation and the reader is urged to review the
Disclosure & Disclaimer for other limitations and standard recommendations. The limit of liability is lim-
ited to the fee paid for this opinion. No further agreement shall be made, altered, or varied except by written
instrument.
Neither Crosstown Engineering, its sub-contractors, nor Adam Green, P.E., are responsible for liability to
the owner or others for acts or omissions of the contractor to carry out the repairs in accordance with their
agreement or for the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, procedures or the safety precau-
tions incident thereto. The contractor is solely responsible for the warranty of the work they performed in
accordance with their agreement.
Please see the pier specifications (if provided) and limited repair plan for more information.
Sincerely,
Crosstown Land Development Services
Texas Engineering Firm (F-15944)
Adam Green, P.E., MBA
Professional Engineer (TX #116597) 5/8/2026
Page 5 of 7 - Date: May 8, 2026
Adam A. Green, P.E. (TX), MBA
Austin | Dallas | Fort Worth | Houston |San Antonio | Waco (469) 751-7694
www.CrosstownEngineering.com
DISCLOSURE & DISCLAIMER
It is known to knowledgeable professional engineers that the soils in this area are subject to movement due to expan-
sion, contraction or densification of the soils etc. This soil movement could possibly cause the foundation to move
after the remediation plan within the attached report has been implemented and may impact the stability of the foun-
dation and cause damage.
NO WARRANTY IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY THIS ENGINEER AS TO THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS
FOUNDATION OR THE REPAIRS THERETO. Diligent foundation maintenance to maintain consistent soil condi-
tions along the perimeter should reduce further problems after the recommendations within this report have been
implemented. However, seasonal moisture variations, water leaks, erosion and other factors may affect the stability
of the foundation and put it in danger of further damage.
REPORT LIMITATIONS
This report is written for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a detailed technical evaluation of the
property or an inventory of defects. The opinions expressed in this report are based on a visual evaluation of current
conditions observed at the time of the inspection. THERE IS NO WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, CON-
CERNING THIS ENGINEERING REPORT.
The information in this report supersedes any verbal comments, expressed or implied, made by Crosstown Land De-
velopment Services or its principals, agents or employees. The client agrees that neither CLDS nor its employees or
owners will be responsible for:
1. Knowledge of the subsurface conditions without extensive geotechnical data obtained from onsite drilling and
testing of the recovered samples,
2. Knowledge of cracks, vertical differential displacement of floors without uncovering of the floor by the client; and
3. Any other element such as joists or beams and other structural members that is boxed or otherwise not readily
available to CE for viewing, and releases CE from any liability attributable to such knowledge or conditions.
Any prescribed repair or maintenance plan detailed by this report is based on observations of apparent performance
of the facility at the time of this structural survey. Compliance with any code or specification other than as expressly
noted is specifically excluded.
The provided Floor Elevation Map and resulting recommendations are based on conditions as they now exist and
DOES NOT IMPLY OR WARRANT THAT OTHER PROBLEMS AND OR AREAS MAY NOT MANIFEST IN
THE FUTURE.
This report was prepared expressly for the client and expressly for the purposes indicated by the client. Permission
for use by any other person for any purpose, or by the client for different purpose is denied unless otherwise stated in
writing by CE.
CE SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ACTS OR OMISSIONS BY THE CONTRACTOR OR HIS SUBCON-
TRACTORS PERFORMING WORK ON THIS PROJECT, OR THE FAILURE OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PER-
FORM THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REPAIR PLAN. CE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCE OR PROCEDURES OR THE PRECAU-
TIONS INCIDENTAL THERETO.
CE expressly DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE and the client
expressly disclaims that it has contracted for or received any warranty of fitness for a particular purpose with respect
to this report. THE REPORT UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS THE OPINION OF CE AND THERE ARE NO
WARRANTIES THAT EXTEND BEYOND THE DESCRIPTION ON THE FACE OF THIS AGREEMENT.
SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW
EXISTING
STRUCTURE
FOUNDATION
STEEL SHIMS
CONCRETE
CYLINDERS
CONCRETE CAP
OPTIONAL:
TWO COLUMNS OF #3 OR
#4 SCEDULE 60
REBAR EPOXY OR
GROUT IN PLACE
OPTIONAL:
REBAR SHALL
PREVENT LATERAL
DISCONNECT
BETWEEN
CYLINDERS. 12", 18",
OR 24" SECTIONS
MAY BE USED
12" LENGTH
6" DIAMETER
AND/OR
8" LENGTH
4" DIAMETER
PILE SECTIONS
PR
E
S
S
E
D
P
I
L
I
N
G
S
S
H
A
L
L
BE
D
R
I
V
E
N
T
O
R
E
F
U
S
A
L
MI
N
I
M
U
M
3
0
0
0
P
S
I
SOIL
CROSSTOWN ENGINEERING
FBPE FIRM F-15944 - WWW.CROSSTOWNENGINEERING.COM
(972)-533-9203 - DALLAS METROPLEX
CONCRETE PRESSED PILING SPECIFICATIONS
3$5.:22''5*5$3(9,1(7;05/08/2026
FRONT
GARAGE
MONO-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.1
-0.1
-0.2
0.0 0.0
0.2 0.2
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.2 0.4
0.60.4
0.2
0.0
0.0 0.1
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.2
0.2 0.4
0.4 0.3
0.5
*MINIMAL LIFT ON ALL PILINGS
CROSSTOWN ENGINEERING
TBPE FIRM F-15944 - WWW.CROSSTOWNENGINEERING.COM
(469)-751-7694 - DALLAS METROPLEX
1807 PARKWOOD DR., GRAPEVINE, TX
LIMITED REPAIR PLAN *NOT TO SCALE - ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE*
PRE-LIFT ELEVATIONS BY CE (05.07.26) POST-LIFT ELEVATIONS BY CE (________)
LEGEND
ELEVATION BASEPOINT PROPOSED PAD/BLOCK EXISTING PIER
PROPOSED BEAM EXISTING PAD/BLOCK PROPOSED BREAKOUT
EXISTING BEAM PROPOSED PIER EXISTING BREAKOUT
0.0 (X.X)
x INSTALL 7 TOTAL PILINGS (5 EXTERIOR, 2 EXTERIOR WITH CONCRETE BREAKOUTS).
CONSTRUCTION NOTE: IF INTERIOR PILING LOCATIONS ARE SHOWN ON THIS MAP THEY ARE APPROXIMATED AND ARE LOCATED WITHOUT
KNOWLEDGE OF THE LOCATIONS OF THE INTERIOR GRADE BEAMS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE FIELD JUDGEMENTS BASED OFF OF THEIR GRADE
BEAM INVESTIGATIONS AND OBSERVED SLAB QUALITIES TO FIELD LOCATE THE FINAL INTERIOR PIER LOCATIONS. FINAL SCOPE CHANGES SHALL BE
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD.
PLEASE NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS PROVIDED FOR PRELIMINARY PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES ONLY. IF EXISTING PILINGS ARE SHOWN
ON THIS MAP, THEIR LOCATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT AND IS APPROXIMATE. CE DOES NOT CERTIFY THEIR PERFORMANCE OR EXISTENCE. IF
THE READER WOULD LIKE TO DETERMINE IF THEY ARE ACTUALLY PRESENT, THEY MUST CONTACT THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN AN
ENGINEERING CERTIFICATE FOR THEM.
05/08/26