The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCA2017-91A Future With A Past 21 August 2017 Zachary Cryer Structured Foundation Repairs 13301 Trinity Blvd, #133 Euless, TX 76040 RE: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS #CA17-91 210 WEST WALL STREET GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 This letter confirms on August 21, 2017 the Historic Preservation staff approved with conditions #CA17-91 for the property addressed 210 West Wall Street, legally described as Block: 12, Lot: 1, Starr Addition, Grapevine, Texas. The following was approved on this Certificate of Appropriateness: 1) To replace rotted wood and shim the foundation piers as per the attached engineering report from Crannell, Crannell & Martin as per the attached drawings with the conditions a building permit is obtained from the Building Department. An appy ed Certificate of Appropriateness is not an approved Building Permit and a permit is / is not required. Contact the City of Grapevine's Building Department at 817-410-3165 for fees and information regarding permits. Thank you, I �,, k -I �,- David Klempin cc. Property Owner Historic Preservation Officer CA File mmb . THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE HISTORIC PRESERVATION - 636 South Main Street - Grapevine, Texas 76051 Phone 817/410-3556 - Fax 817/410-3038 Ttlmd Nzd IT 1140 '.� / CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION Date glz� /%Number �"Cf,4 % - '7/ Property Owner Name, Address & Phone Number /IL 1(,e jltr MGA Phone: - Mobile: Email: *P�ropertAddress include an suite number ocI0 W W'1I �- Grr,,,e, 7'c60�1 Tenant Name/Occupancy/Use Request/Description of Work to Be Done ✓h Drawings/Sketches Attached Yes o No Material Samples Attached lease list Applicant Name, Address & Phone Number Stru, fivrec.( e x fl, tns. Block P a Lot I Subdivision _S -I' /� rr �(d^ Photographs Attached o Current o Historic / hereby certify that this information is correct to the best of my knowledge and that the said work will be done in conformance with all submissions herein set forth, and in compliance with the City of Grapevine's Historic Overlay District Ordinances and Building Codes. APPROVAL OFA CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF OTHER REQUIRED BUILDI G PERMITS. Signed x Print Name�frAK" ner or Contractor Office Use o Approved- o Approved with Conditions: Staff HPC o I Denied Chair- Historic Preservation Commission Building Official Historic Preservation Officer Date THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT. A SEPARATE BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE FILED AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT BEFORE STARTING WORK. DELIVER TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT OFFICE 817-410-3556 636 SOUTH MAIN STREET, GRAPEVINE, TEXAS Tarrant Appraisal District Real Estate 08/21/2017 Account Number: 40621839 Georeferencei ¢m 1 Property Location: 210 W WALL 5T, GRAPEVINE, 76051 '0 9 k F^*9 Owner Information: PROPOP LL2' 1609 BUCKINGHAM DR 3.PrSgr Owners ROANOKETX 76262 Legal Description: STARR ADDITION Block: 12 LoC 1 Taxing Jurisdictions: 011 CITY OF GRAPEVINE 220 TARRANT COUNTY 906 GRAPEVINE-COLLEYVILLEi9D 224 TARRANT COUNTY HOSPITAL 229 TARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE This information is intended for reference only and is subject to change. it may not accurately reflect the complete status of the account as actually carried in TAD's database Certified Values for Tax Year 2037 t Appraised value may be less than market value due to state•mandated limitations on value increases ft A zero value indicates that the property record has not yet been completed for the indicated tax year ttt Rounded ♦ This represents one of a hierarchy of possible values ranked in the following order. Recorded, Computed, System, Calculated 5 -Year Valup mictnry Tax Year land Im r- 2017 Total°' arket Vallre $75 85 $292.29 $368143 raised Value $.75,85. $292,24 5368,7.43 toss.Buildin Areattt $3;68,143 2:a13 .et Leasable Area it, $369,143 2,41' nd S Ft $219,376 15,170 nd Acres + $219,37 4.3482 t Appraised value may be less than market value due to state•mandated limitations on value increases ft A zero value indicates that the property record has not yet been completed for the indicated tax year ttt Rounded ♦ This represents one of a hierarchy of possible values ranked in the following order. Recorded, Computed, System, Calculated 5 -Year Valup mictnry Tax Year Appraised Land Appraised Impr - Appraised Total --, Market Land Market Impr Market Total 2Q16 Z0i5 $75.85. $232,293 $3;68,143 $75,$5 1292,293 $369,143 2014 475,850 $219,376 $295,22 $7*�,$5 $219,37 $295,2" 61 2013 $35,85 4219.376 $29522 $75,85 $219,376 $295,27. 61 2012 $75,85 $214,150 $290.00 $75,65$2141501 $290,G➢ $75;850 $214350 $240,0"0, $75,65!3$214.350 7190;00 Deed Date: 0211212015 Deed Page: Deed volume: Instrument: D216029324 State Code: fl Commercial TAD Map: 2126.460 MAPSCO: TAR -0271,4 Agent; �V�..f 1]ViIG$,efli: 04/28/2017 Protest Deadline: 05/31/2011 Aggralsal Situ 80864512 Site (dame: GLENN LAW FIRM Class: OPCLowRlse # of Parrol5t 1 Primary Building: Bullding Namet GLENN LAW FIRM140621M Building Type: Commercial Year Bulltt 1939 Jeff D. Crannell .................... 50800 �QNAL 1/29/16 +0.9 0664/�-91 1) REPLACE SUB -STANDARD VENTS AT NORTH CRAWLSPACE W/ VENTS THAT WILL NOT BE COVERED W/ FUTURE EXTERIOR PAINT JOBS 2) INSTALL GUTTER ALONG THE NORTH SIDE 3) CONSIDER INSTALLATION OF A PERMANENT BLOWER OR DEHUMIDIFIER IN NORTH CRAWLSPACE +0.1 0.0 +0.7 +0.9 +1.1 10.0 +0.3 +0.7 +1.3 +1.2 +0.3 +0.7 +1.5 +1.1 +1.3 +0.6 +2.2 +1.7 +2.6 +2.6 +2A +1.3 4 �rEi�F"7�PPRQI*RIAr�4 S x CRA' OF qMPMNE R A EXISG DRAINS DE R MENTI JF _,....•.....DEr�Er i°�:4EN'; �E��l:lt`c.S CONTACT SUILDi iPd�-,PEC-TIONS FOR PERMIT INFORMATION +2.6 +3,2 1+3.2 +2.6 f N +2.1 +2.1 +2.7 +3.0 +0.6 1+1.8 RESET/RE-SHIM INTERIOR PIERS WI STEEL SHIMS AT A FUTURE DATE WHEN CRAWLSPACE SOILS HAVE DRIED 080917 -qt January 29, 2016 Page Two RE: Initial Engineering Evaluation - Foundation Inspection 210 W. Wall Street Grapevine, Texas Moisture was observed standing in the north crawlspace and appears to be grey water from a plumbing leak. The source is not known at this time. If a leak is discovered repair leak and allow the crawlspace moisture content to reduce to a drier condition. If moisture continues, it may be from rainwater runoff and the following recommendations to improve the exterior drainage are proposed below. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the following repairs be made: 1. Check for and repair any plumbing leaks. 2. Replace sub -standard vents at north crawlspace with vents that will not be covered with future exterior paint jobs. 3. Install gutter along north side and discharge away from the foundation. 4. Consider installation of a permanent blower fan and/or dehumidifier in the north crawlspace. 5. The foundation can be re -shimmed at a future date when crawlspace soils have dried. Reset/re-shim interior piers at that time. The above repairs are designed to correct the most probable causes of moisture in the crawl space. If the crawl space remains wet after the above repairs have been completed, contact this office for a re -inspection. There are other less probable causes of moisture that may may require additional repairs. Foundation movement can be caused by seasonal variations in the moisture content of the soil. A consistent foundation water program should be implemented on all structures to minimize foundation movements. During dry seasons of the year, soil should be watered evenly. During wet seasons of the year, water should flow away from the foundation at all times. Limitations of Liability: This structural. inspection was conducted in accordance with generally accepted practices and procedures. The inspection of the site was limited in scope to a visual examination of the exposed interior and exterior finishes on the structure and of the adjacent ground surfaces. Destructive analysis of the foundation was not performed during this inspection. The repairs recommendations, if any, are intended to be the most cost effective and practical solution to common foundation problems. Installation of piers around a part of the foundation is intended to reinforce the areas which appear to have deflected since construction of the building. Underpinning will not improve the performance of the foundation in non -underpinned areas. Most buildings are not constructed with the ability to perform as a structurally suspended slab; therefore, installed piers will not prevent adjacent exterior or interior walls from settling. Further analysis may be performed if desired by the building owner; our office will assist with any additional analysis desired by the building owner. , Aq-9< CRANNELL, CRANNELL & MARTIN CORPORATION 257o FM 407 STE. 209, Highland Village, TX 75077 OffiQQ 9-72-691-66o5 TSPS FIRM #6o5 January 29, 2016 Mike Kellerman mikek@armorhealth.com RE: Initial Engineering Evaluation - Foundation Inspection 210 W. Wall Street Grapevine, Texas To Mike Kellerman, Per your request, our office inspected the above referenced building; foundation on January 28, 2016. The purpose of this inspection was to visually check all exposed portions of the foundation and note any structural deficiencies. This existing one-story building; is constructed of wood framing with wood siding exterior supported by a pier and beam foundation. All exposed portions of this foundation were visually inspected from the interior, exterior and crawlspace. For the purpose of this report, the building faces generally south and is seventy-seven and seventeen (77 & 17) years old. The following items were noted: INTERIOR Sheetrock cracks: Office 1: Over door, over window, over entry. Office 2: Over window, over closet, southwest corner. Office 3: Over door, over window, over office 1, south wall. Kitchen: Over door. Hall: Over bath door, over office 6 door. Entry: Over office 2 door. Hall Bath: Over door, southwest corner. North Entry: Over office 3, ceiling separation. Office 5: Northeast corner. Office 2 Bath: Southeast corner, over door. Office 6: West wall, southwest corner, over window. Conference: Northwest corner, under window. Doors out of square: Conference door slightly out of square. All interior floors were measured using an electronic compulevel. These elevation readings indicate that the foundation levels exceed the ASCE allowable limits of 11/16" per 20 feet. January 29, 2016 Page Three RE: Initial Engineering Evaluation - Foundation Inspection 210 W. Wall Street Grapevine, Texas Extensive repairs may be necessary to fully reinforce the building according to accepted building codes. This option is available to the building owner, however, it is standard practice to only repair areas which have failed and make additional repairs as necessary. Soil borings may also provide additional information regarding underlying soil conditions. This information is not provided, nor is required for a level B inspection. If further evaluation is desired, the building owner may obtain soil data from a geotechnical testing facility and provide it to this office. Locations of existing piers if any are approximate and locations were provided by others. This report does not guarantee the quality or exact locations of any existing structural repairs. The behavior of the subject foundation and soil area was taken into consideration to up to the inspection date. The results stated in this report are based on the information provided to the engineer and on the conditions observed at this time of inspection. Other problems may become evident as the seasons and climatic conditions change. Such problems or the advent of additional information may be reason to revise the report. Not all defects are noted in this report. No foundation warranty is expressed or implied by this report, and no warranty is expressed or implied about the future condition of the foundation systems. This report is consistent with a Level B evaluation as described by the Texas Board of Professional Engineers Policy Advisory 09-9$A. If you have questions or require additional information, please contact this office. Sincerely, (-V1 .. .. .. FF D. CRANNELL .....5oaoo...... Jeff D. Ciannell, P.E. TBPE FIRM #605 1/29/16 �f&'Alf -,?/