Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-01-06!r AGENDA t CITY OF GRAPEVINE I E� BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING MONDAY EVENING, JANUARY 6, 1997, AT 6:00 P.M. COURT ROOM/COUNCIL CHAMBERS, #205 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD GRAPEVINE, TEXAS I. CALL TO ORDER II. OATH OF TRUTH III. NEW BUSINESS A. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-43, SUBMITTED BY WILLIAM S. EASTWOOD AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-46, SUBMITTED BY VICKIE DIEDRICK AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. C. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-47, SUBMITTED BY MICHAEL J. PUPPO AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. D. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-48, SUBMITTED BY JOE LANGFORD AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. IV. MINUTES BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 2, 1996, MEETING. V. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION VI. ADJOURNMENT IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND YOU HAVE A DISABILITY THAT REQUIRES SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS AT THE MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AT (817) 481-0377 AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS WILL BE MADE TO ASSIST YOUR NEEDS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 551.001 et seq. ACTS OF THE 1993 TEXAS LEGISLATURE, THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 1997 AT 5:00 P.M. DIRECTOR OF OEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFFICIAI(J---�� RON STOMBAUGH, PLANNER 2L5 SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-43 -WILLIAM S. EASTWOOD MEETING DATE: MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment denv the variance recnlPst to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for the propos Park Central Addition, addressed as 1917 Rose Court, Grapevine, ' 1. Section 16.G.6, R-5.0, Zero Lot Line District Regulations, Den requires a twelve (1,2) foot separation between buildings on a The proposed variance would allow an eight (81 foot reductioi requirements. ` If approved it would allow a four (4) foot sepa subject accessory building and the house on the adjacent pr 2. Section 42.C.3., Supplementary District Regulations, re( accessory building to be separated ten (10) feet from the r have the same sideyard setback as required for the main strt feet. The proposed variance would allow a seven (7) foot redui between buildings, and an eight (8) foot reduction of the tb k If d ld II uires a detached ain residence and cture, eleven ( 11) tion in separation rewired sideyard 2YAac . aR rove , 1t MUM a oW a minimum separ5J11o11 U1 UIICC 1,31 ICCI between the accessory building and the main structure and a minimum of three (3) feet between the accessory building and the side property line SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds a special condition does not exist for the proposed variance, as there is room on the lot for a complying structure. Additionally, the separation requirements between structures are partial) due to fire safety and emergency access requirements. z-- �'C i'Ic BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Mr. William S. Eastwood filed a variancerequest on October 29, 1996. This case is a result of a complaint. The Board of Zoning Adjustment tabled this case at their December 2, 1996, meeting at the request of Mr. Eastwood due to being out of town at the time of the meeting. MR/pa 0:\BZA\96-43.4 2 u 4 t+C 1 14 33 to 17 � 34 ,� n m3, ). n X 37 3° 3, at .. 0 43 e l J • J , u 4 3 ' l 23 zz 31 1 r 3° Ze 10 _ ' 13 7 7 BR00cDATE OR x 2+ 2' 12 26 14 ` It �j 7 se 1 43 14 t „ 2 4Z ) 10 !S 14 . 2•49 K 1.774 Ac 3 2 da • 1 7 1 Q l ¢ S `I o 6 3 4 ..npN 2) Nom" 2 6 10 li 30 U ❑ is xP �E 2 3 1 v 46 t1 ID i 17 ' 21 z , , N 111 3q a 2 \ 2] 0 2a i 2 2, , 4 1 i V N 13 6 3e C m ' 24 77 36 20 C) C 3 ° S 1 3s 19 2e t i, ` 3 P i, 2B ) '44; 7 34 37 a a^,pENy� OR N 21 2526 u 31 5 SEOLIDIA 4 1, 5 5� 63 Z g tz 3335 x 34 33 32 71 30 32 6 CIR / 7 8 70 S 3,6z5 O to 6 7 t w 7 ,t IJ 931 2� 2e 2' M 25 24 O J] 17 6 C) E e Q \ 10 31 to t2 13 14 15 i6 I7 19 1, 2P 21 22 Z3 1 34 II t0 , = J 16 7 1 S 1 w e V 2Z 18 11 57ccpLE4000OR " 35 IZ CARLSEAp 13 8 p J w r 16 39 9 re cn t, � ¢ 3s Q 29 78 27 26 25 2. 23 ,536 .. 43 42 41 47 121 39 13 CT 37 14 15 IS 16 w 14 9 IS W W U 20 ¢ 37 20 to t5 16 17 10 11 20 eA 49 Sd 51 52 20 1^ J REDWOOD t3 1! - to 21 tl t2 I9 3 6/ vINO[NG CREEv S TR. 13 u 6 AZ � 35 Y 47 aP 49 ' S8 51 52 SJ 5. S5 56 57 58 5, 60 -- O N !4 i7 n 61 62 6] 6+ 67 GRAPEvIt/E-COLLEYv(LLE :�U ti a 4 8 7 6 6 4 ] 2 I 10 17 16 IS I.R 16 R._MF_2 5a 13 7 P� 411 , e PP ROSE T, CAC 3 (� o�PKE Ol.J , ( l/ ,N S ]5 1ER e .I 4 Y� Z72-28 25 tEP 2 2, 2 t 9 �} f la 13 12 U 10 3 34 ] 30 LILAC '87-05 dAZt 1 RMF2 � 103ACAC. 0 , e 9 0 t m Y A 28 2 26 2, 2 22 37 k % 2S \268 e J0 7 ii 3 '� r •t %J" I -D 3. 24 2q � la 2 2 tt u R_3 • C J W to C D ED RESTRICTED TO 16 1°"=021 36 43 16 UNIT PER ACRE 1 •.j a BZA 96-43 2 31 `= a TR 2A16 i8 a[ 2 Y AT RBR00 DR 2 WILLIAM cc 0 w 1513 t2 11 10 4 TR 2E9C 1 e 7 6 2.772 e i Q2 A 5 4 3 - - 34 - 7 ,1 23 O Y EASTOO D PRITCHARD DRIvE�8 , 7 6 :f m 2;13 1527 11 t0 9 7 6 S 4 3 2 2. IS o 8 1 2 ] 5 23 22 1i t] 12 11 >! 9 0 2. 8 la zE i2Eq � 371 0 ( INMDOD RD 9 Il .623 a (" V //1 aN, V, 7 I 17 t8 218 6 6 10 0 � 5t n ' -i2 j TR zc34 GRPP 0l CU88-03 1' P� , a' t w ` .6 A< I .83 ac / - S 3t �� s C 85-10 24 IS N 3 c u TR 2Ei! _'N _ INE' 4'�v T t2 4 Y `� ^KJ N 4 u TR y( Ty Cf Ml 3 11 ^ A (� 2 V al N PT ] 7.8 ArI 8 AI A ib 5 TP 3 t 7 166 6 z 31UA 2 z Ai , �1 n ;A Pt.7 2 1 - 4 5 THIS MAP wAS COMPILED BY FREESE AND , IK>40LS. INC. L7SwC DATA OeTA94ED FROM TKCITY OF CRAPEV14E AND THE TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT. CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION 1. APPLICANT NAME: ADDRESS: 1 17/ 1 Pos 5 CITY/STATE: G U/I eV15 / ZIP: 7605-1 — HOME: r22 6 Z- WORK: Z -/y 6714L 15'3 71 FAX: 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: WILLII'l --) - &61. F:-�-rwaLIO ADDRESS: RalF, CT- CITY/STATE: Vlvr/ --12—(ziP: 6D S HOME: ?/7 Y2-1 (p"q62--WORK: Z -1q -CS'4' 5-32�AX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) t 0 T 6. 6 1- 0 C A- 2 P44Z I -S C (P-fWei'V 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. 10 17 � � 5'�771o1-�/ 169 � TOR AX TV d 1) 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. 8t)(G-41w6 L4,yC 4-- STi2(jc-r(j/ -E IS jt)/'y' A, - V --4(-L- 011/S Gtl. C�2 rr/ 2 o f Z-& .� Z -V 7'72 76� JIV /V &4C,17 6141Y�kI471-_ZZ 8t)(G-41w6 L4,yC 4-- STi2(jc-r(j/ -E IS jt)/'y' A, - V --4(-L- FSM 1P6,1McJ it 1/` 7-0 Z -V 7'72 / l ei F7- tAf c --s r 5e i i alla-c.. The z-�v� . 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. I UPC-�Jt ( /•vf> %�(� ��-4 14 f1 *ZI2/ lxp'"x / F T tt��! rz- q 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) , _s .tel - �. APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER (PRINT) OWNER SIGNATU SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF /)C4Z&L 1 19 .,PAV '04� 0 KEVIN D. BAILEY NOTARY PUBLIC of it State of Texas Comm Exp 09-14-97 m DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS /6 DAY OF 199v 0 KEVIN D. BAILEY It' NOTARY PUBLIC JE State of Texas COMM Exp 09-14.97 -)V-g -2 DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DE VEL OPMEN T SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 From: William S Eastwood To: Board of Zoning Adjustment, City of Grapevine, Texas Subj: Application for zoning variation, enclosed. I hope this cover letter will help to clear up my position in requesting a zoning variation for my residence at 1917 Rose Ct. Unaware of the easement along my north property line, I built a small tool shed in my back yard in the only logical place to put it. I realize now that it will have to be moved or torn down because it stands less than three feet from my next door neighbors residence. I am requesting the variance in order to comply with this restriction. If approved, I will move the shed three feet east but it would remain on the easement. I built it low, standing only seven feet tall at the tallest point so it would not be visible from the street (see enclosed photos). My next door neighbor, Mr. Mike Comparoni owns the house with the easement restriction. He doesn't mind having the shed where it is right now and has offered to help me move it gree feet east if this request is approved. If there is some document he would need to sign, he has indicated his willingness to do so. He can be contacted at work at 214-650-6269 or at home at 251-0279. If you have any questions of me please call me at 421- 6962. If you are unable to approve this variance I will tear the shed down as there is just no place else to put it. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, William S. Eastwood (PLAT S.88'55'22" E. 56,0') MEASURE S.88'55'22" E. 55.9 DIRE:CT1 NAL CON OL LINE �n \\\\ M i ;t o a 13RICK & FRAMC 00 N RESIDENCE O z TA� 71 Z 40.0\ F-- � I , Q� I. cL Q LOT 6 ---�J 0.13 ACRES I1 17=77 I 1/2" I.R. FND. 117.0' TO LILAC LANE ll ' Buildi M -v D r -- V) D m v) D O (• • 0 O ,p, O (I� W cn 00 V U) cn w o U O v U I Q rn RESIDENCE REFERENCE NO.: 37214 MORTGAGE CO.: AMERITEX 620 W. PIPELINE RD, HURST 76053 TITLE CO.: FIRST AMERICAN 11364 NORWOOD DR, HURST 76054 PURCHASER: EASTWOOD GF# 93-160OND/LJ ADDRESS: 1917 ROSE COURT, GRAPEVINE, TEXAS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 6, Block 2, PARK CENTRAL GARDEN HOMES, an Addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the Revised Plat recorded in Volume 388-214, Page 34, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. The following easement does not affect this Lot: Easement recorded in 8457/1536, DRTCT. 1917 ROSE COURT 1/2" I.R. FND. 1/2' LR. FND. (PLAT S.88 -55-22"E. 56.0') MEASURE 5.88'55'22"E. 55.9 117.0• TO DIRECTKNAL CON OL LINE LILAC LANE 25' BUILDING 111 Building Line LINE RESIDENCE L; D M I L; co C: 18.7 ;u (A RICK FRAME C; P4 AES16EN�E 0, 5 Z Z ci� �< Lno� 40.0\ L! :E Ln 43- U, 7 LOT 6 1' b U 11 Building Line 0.13 ACRES I < L) 1 ® I �n i . 11 .5 & U.E. 388-214/34 5 MEASURED J (PLAT N.88 -55-22"W. 56.0') 1/2' I.R. FND. _' 6.05 1/2" I.R. FND. 11 -NORjTH SCALE:=30' IIIIIIfflI1111 FLOOD CERTIFICATION According to FIRM Map 4843999030 G DATED: 1-6-93 II'l, property Is not located In a special flood hazard area. This property Is located In zone SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION OF The und.,,,Ig..d Registered Public surveyor C-111ti-S to Purchaser, Lender and Title Company as nomad above and lheir Underwriters that (A) this plat—Y and the properly description 3#1 forth heron ora a true at 'u correct representation of facts found at the time of an actual on -the -ground I.—Y: (9) -h survey was and such location. a I and conducted by the surveyor, or under his supervision: (C) all monumenis shown hereon 0:13.na encroachments or I... and type .1 material -­ correctly shown: (D) . xcopl as shown, there ate no visible JAMES H. DOWDY right -o( -ways t:. shortages in of boundary onto the property (here or* no visible discrepancies. conflicts, - 2970 line. .. (E) the size, location, and type of Improvements a as shown hereon; (F) the distance c-pf .' shown; from In nearest Inlersecling street Is per plot; (G) the h.properly has access to a public street unless .1h.—Iso noted; (H) the flood statement Is based on most recentdata available to the surveyor, and while 0 : hissurvey property may she, the pperty a, to ap. In. special flood hazard area, all flood zones may be subject S U R a some d.gree of flooding, for more nf rm .11. . confect the local flood pinto adminisiralor or the Frdernl Emergency Management Agency: (I) affecting Ihe property, evidence of which is isibi . on the ground, or of which h ch the surveyor hos Iegot notice. 1JAMES H. DOWDY &r—�,, ASSOCIATES, INC. 2-I6-93 2569GRAVEL DRIVE DRIED: FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118 -. 4. s r. L t r b .flaw w tr `r t e •: r vim• t: w r- '-~"'moi' 1►,.r1E: • IN 9 31 • •41 DI i ilk i .1 !► �� As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest) and/or (have the following comments) ����•rLFEWm� Print Name, Address, City, Zip, Lot, Block and Subdivision: 0 V Ah 1. t� J W Signature: Marcy Ratcliff, Planner Department of Development Services City of Grapevine P. O. Box 95104 Grapevine, TX 76099 t -f en m E S `1 a os-, n'r t 40 CL.�^ Phone #: <3 17 " 3 0c J - 6) `- k 1 • --I • 0 1 Marcy Ratcliff, Planner Department of Development Services City of Grapevine 307 W. Dallas Road, Room #209 Grapevine, TX 76051 C''ASE #BZA.9643 CITY OF GRAPEVINE WILLIAM S. EASTWOOD'� NOV Z , ALL WRI'T7['EN C011RESPONDIN"ST B EIVED BY TEAS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 1996 Procedure to Respond: Asa Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) r (an interested citizen), I (approveC(protjest) and/o a ollowing comme Print Name, Address, City, Zip, Lot, Block and Subdivision: [001 wcy- =L � \ \i . Signature: Marcy Ratcliff, Planner Department of Development Services City of Grapevine P. O. Box 95104 Grapevine, TX 76099 Phone #: 329 -1�t3 Marcy Ratcliff, Planner Department of Development Services City of Grapevine 307 W. Dallas Road, Room #209 Grapevine, TX 76051 CASE #BZA9643 WILLIAM S. OOD UM. WON • YLXmm g MEMO, •n'D C96 21: 1-/6 As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approv pro and/or (have the following comments) Print Name, Address, City, Zip, Lot, Block and Subdivision: U Signature: Marcy Ratcliff, Planner Department of Development Services City of Grapevine P. O. Box 95104 Grapevine, TX 76099 U, T-9AL PC- 1-4 o /�;1 C 5 Phone #: F 1 '7— q;- z� Marcy Ratcliff, Planner Department of Development Services City of Grapevine 307 W. Dallas Road, Room #209 Grapevine, TX 76051 FROM : CD�,IER-TEK, Inc. PHS NO. : 817 481821E Nov. 26 19% 1; : 11 PM NOVCASE #BZ�VF6-43 CITY OF GRAPEVWE WRITTENWILLIAMS. EASTWOOD ALL '3 i 3.' i ]BY TM OFHCE NO LATER THAN 5 PM ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 27,1996 As (a Property Owrwx within 200 feet of the subject twt) or (an interested citizen I (approve rotest) and/or (have the fallowing comments) Print 'Name, Address, City, jZi�p, Lot, Block and Subdivision: ---q Signabare: Marcy Ratcliff, Planner Department of Development Services City of Grapevine P. 0. Box 95104 Grapevine, TX 76099 Phone # ni * V 4-Yxx L11 TAT T 9' Marcy Ratcliff, Planner Department of Development Services City of Grapevine 307 W. Dallas Road, Room €f209 Grapevine, TX 76051 MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF, ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFFICIAL AoJ RON STOMBAUGH, PLANNERS SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-46 VICKIE DIEDRICK MEETING DATE: MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 1997 ,SO P�'RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the variances requested to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 2315 High Drive, platted as Lot 14, Block 9, Grapevine Lake Estates as follows: 1. Section 14.G.1., R-12.5, Single Family District Regulations -Area Regulations, requires a front yard setback of thirty-five (35) feet. The proposed variance request would allow a ten (10) foot reduction of the front yard setback If approved it would allow a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback. 2. Section 14.G.5., R-12.5, Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, requires a minimum lot depth of one hundred (100) feet. The proposed variance request would allow a one and six tenths (1.6) foo reduction of the lot depth along the west side of the lot If approved it would allow a ninety-eight and four -tenths (98.4) foot lot depth on the west side of thelot, SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds a special condition exists for the first proposed variance due to the lot being originally platted with a twenty-five (25) foot front building line; other developed lots in this subdivision have a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback; the shallow depth of the lot adds further reason for reduction. Staff feels the second request is justified, as the existing lot has a ninety-eight and four -tenths (98.4) foot lot depth, and an increase in depth is beyond the control of the applicant. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Ms. Vickie Diedrick submitted a request for the variances to allow the development of a new residence. The Board has previously granted similar requests in this subdivision. 1 S CATE % 2-0 2-002 0 2 SURVEY :� ...� ..c J P • I m= m a -zee a. Y-1 are .7. M K t at .•e6 . R—� 1»K 7J K ac ..t r. Ae we Z 2 1OC TR IM t a J a c 7FRtms • t 2 3 . t 2 i 2 s a t s M tAt t Yw t•t .•3° K 7 ZcIm IA.27 K bl L i NR [7:: t7 : t SI 22 S U U Y r t 8 'C l 2%Ac STit 9.[ M 2R5 at r N 2 a ° n LAKE CREST OR In a irR w•u Am ... 3 .:: U :.: 3 T '.; V w• K 112 K lzp _ N w W 0 fit �5 s W ` N 2: 3 7 6 /2/137 a 1R u tR <.rs Qk 0 •. tat 6 VEST vnoo TR t 2 ' 3 Us 't O 4 6 ` �[N 1 ♦ , u u wt Ktt t) 1t 27l 2lIR 2m 29 a . � SPUR s 25 31 7 HIGH DR N ° , 7 K 17 n SM 2M z2R 2IA :.: 32 LAKE FOFLS � t 2,R >0 v i t 2 3 < 6 C 7 • S� : ..2 24 330 Q � N a t ♦ p U.. r S . ) 1. ` y „ ¢ U 12 M 5 N ZA 3♦ < 6 i ! . 16R 1 RIDGE LI7 .. '.. 24 35 a : la W ¢¢ 0 27 MERCURY 2 n a S 6 7 6 ♦ N U I, 1A a 5R iR 711 p 3 N 26 3 24 trt u+l 60�a' � < u_w„lN�aR�5 14 13 4 1 7N 25 37 /y� c 27 x: to 23 24 N PENINSULA DR- 1. : 5 1 2 ) a S c r: • ♦: r u0.. :i :.. FOREST:: MLL n 325,0 16 ° n IR 26 u 21 x n is 17 16 rs It 13 12 = ' 22 EYINRIAE OR l7 7 - Y I7R.. BZA96:-46 TR N w I z 3 < s e ! e' ♦ la 21 .16 oc 2 n. J s VICKIE DIEDRICK . w 1 N 17R Is 'es l3a `: u u -1S5 .. Ac �N LONE ST 26 1, 2 3 a 22 Is � x 5. 61 7R 6R y1 UR 12tf LL 27 M lA3 .7 1.55 Ac 1 .. 23A a a '.5 ; JAR 2 ). 11 J 154 153 TR 28 TR 291A M281 L♦ K X77 K 2{ A U ti �`9FSr I :. 3.04 AC 121 H 13 �. Ta 36Is � 6x t. 2. , ss AC TR 1 267 AC _�_ KIMBALL RD. , 2 T34 5 6 7 H r 3Q H ?g 27 26 25 2a 23 21. 26 WREN OR ° 2 p SOIJTF6FQRE OR t 23 � It3 17 Z <22 2• 6 `r _16 4 , J 23 21 n IS is GU , < 16 K 17 Ilr 20 6. 70. • LL s is r,i 2 s 6M�Yy. 3 < S 66 c CCS 7 16 K l WREN LCT t2 g 71757 cc WATE CT.: 7 la ' Is 1 Ia U U c p cc u < 3 t i 2 3 a 3 60� a I's / U 22625 14 7 'a LU 2 J S 6 14 C `, r LL 12 : 6 • 12 l t2 Il N i 6 7 13 / \ ` R08 IN OR KIMBERLY 0& 12 ti• !�. \ 1° L 22 23 2a 25 ♦ LL i N 2 3 a 3 6 , 6 1 11 f 1” N. N M 2• 23 zz 23 24 25 12 26 t � ` L LL Mae �j CAROEN CT 3 r z ew AC 2 3 < 7 yls a s 6 2 / x 5 6 °, 7 c$o 1 3 5t �µ 7 [ • / / CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION 1. APPLICANT NAME: Ira ADDRESS. S. CITY/STATE: 64pefco l'v'j-p— -zip: HOME20— q3A—Tl3Q WORK: 91) FAX: Lj8f -33 r71 6�&2-2-9 PROPERTY OWNER(S) SN" d e r CITY/STAT Q 0 ZIP: HOME: 9 ?-o? 5�42 2-42 3 WORK: Sil '5,-31 1 i, -I( FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 31 've, 64 G-(2iq 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. q g .14 f, 6--r\ A ,o- biat s i'd e, IDO I mta y b v Re3tt I - r rnA e4. w)prs Pct rc�,�-s e Q y In; �.� �►�, � ,� rv Ou',W'�'nA lwhtly--' r� Ism Lot- ('_s N o�� Oa#:4 it - 6L--- I ,a- ot�*& r V -ela 1. r Q) P� C'�- I '; P� I- Ll Are- prt- 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. or� P4 on r pt Av-j Fuind r7 Lt �Ves ro o of r4 0-."( r c-ob �''vj c'e., a - - N e. Older es ki v e. \Ate ,Ave. yolAe- ,. 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES; IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. c u U vj WA -S a) 1AA OJ A I = (-�-IA 04\a -AG CeAR��- � s . -�- �, s Dorf - cr (AA, q 1 e-, pro ap r+--\ 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) APPLICANT SIGNATU OWNER (PRI OWNER SIG[ aj iz t J --- SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF N6Vt-*,-1v-Cv-, 19.6)(f j G.... /nom 912.3-`)s DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF v e -m 16,e 1954 NNiFEAKAV WKIN S40TARY BLIC FO IR TRE --ES December 23, 1997 DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRA DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, 7X 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 < OLIVIA MARTINEZ Notary Public State of Texas My Comm. Exp. Sept 23, 1998 j G.... /nom 912.3-`)s DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF v e -m 16,e 1954 NNiFEAKAV WKIN S40TARY BLIC FO IR TRE --ES December 23, 1997 DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRA DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, 7X 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 a MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFFICIAL RON STOMBAUGH, PLANNER 2t—"S SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-47 MICHAEL J. PUPPO MEETING DATE: MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve' the variances requested to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 1094 Woodbriar Drive, platted as Lot 11, Block 3, Winding Creek Estates, Phase 2, as follows: 1. Section 15.6.1., Single Family District Regulations-Area Regulations, requires a thirty (30) foot front yard setback. The proposed variance request would allow a one (1) foot reduction of the front yard setback. If approved. it would allow a twenty.-nine 29) foot front yard setback.` SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds a special condition does exist for the proposed variance due to the existing encroachment not being the fault" of the proposed homebuyer. The Building Inspection Department was provided with a form survey prepared—by a professional surveyor in 1993. This survey showed no encroachments. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Mr. Michael J. Puppo submitted the request to the Development Services Department as a result of a closing survey of the property. 0:\bza\96-47,4 'i 1 , Ra— 32� _ L] a 1 3 c 12 ;2 1 zT 3 a s i 7 e^U a: 3 1 y S�\ 6 S S GNERS RAGE OR 3 2-a a GREENS OR p n a 2'� 6 26 , ' X 3 7 SANTE FE TR x c T t j 3< �"'� � 1 c s • c a 3 2 t t2 3 tO�pS 2 t to 6 6 2 23 Vc?`s� 3 csi 3 6\ ,< 'a �_?c ' µ 0 2 13 2 Q 20 7 I � 101 : / 14 1 N \\ n 13 12 V 9 3 13 a6 /+ AUTUGW RIOGE LN v 5 >E v t 7 1z s.dc7 1 t 3 a 6 7 a CDR s 6 � 10 n BZA96-47 RA DR a ' (L 5 r J. PJPPO 221021 zo „ ,. 2.n9 K 001 V- 23VICHAEL a•_ PECOS OR 2 J,�a9 ( ,rcu0 t _ { 6.927 C. Z•.. 1' Tri 2 3 D©VE. RD. 7� 6 3 3 2 1 �, 2 5 6 7 1 6 . ,a �� a >< ,< FR—MO-2 —�— F— Tot .058 .. V UA a 16 I : P P � ( PI 6RA74C7itrOOd OR 6 ` TR 4 10 V. 9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 E t n >l v 1 z aA �� 3 2a it n O 31 30 25 2a 13: 0 �; u X33 ` 1.663 t 2- ' 1.41461 a rt J�7; TR 6w1 12 16 33 32 R .1 17 26 13 K �. ( ( 1 {,._, I`jV'\/j .60 AC u 4- SANDELL DR. 22 15 § m O ,N, N 23 to ';. 3 0 1 16 G 13 1< QAC 9 e n. a 1 6 3 a 9 3 Y 1 21 16 z 1 0 39 33 3s 33 , i 3e 37 Ci Paz 31 l0 12 11 v 2S SCP Q �' A 2A 21 22 23 Z< 25 26 20 17 ' 1 2 d J Q EVERGLeOE T • rD 3.63. 10 Xk-2T iis T " 10 BRENTCQVE DR. 16 L,- m `3 `u `� 12. n T21 } ( J t4 4 26 t K � la 4 '6 r' a 2 2 t 1 � 3' 1:b 24 Is vE n 1461 tz It c s 1 Q do 44 46 47 Y3 u a ra 6 ~1 11 s 6 cc T >• 0 15 1a n 16 n 26 y b >i u 3 34 >E 3 a 81G SEND OR TR c1n 3 14 ♦ z2 o 6 r 3t �' . t3 t IOLEBROdi 0R: a 7: 6 , 1B `: u 13 14 5 - 13 t Y 5 21 26 21 la L1 EZ it to , : • G 5 16 r4 662 zs 33 to za 17 3< 35 x' 37 x n d' 12 .3 ` R 1 tK 5 u < .66 r r4 a;10 Ta 2G } 'la 0 22 v 33 m31 BRQ©KGATE DR. • >a 2 15 D ze :, 5 2Ti ,.x � 15 26.. 21 Q 11I 16 a' 26 6 A0 TR :63 : t. N 24 t 43 30 O 7 t '51<6 2 3m z 42 ? G 16 1, T4 9 2.44 c TR 2 1374 nc 2 6: 5 4 3 21 1 -94 11 m0 6 5 32 y 3t: 3 .L 0 . 8 1t W 'i 1iV' t T2 2 o 37 n aN\ YN s n W 2 6 Iz b la IT 13 z \ 6 1 11 20P z 21 . 3 a o �^ }a: : 0 i 36 a T -2 2a z 27 14 ze 36 3 3 m Y 1 m 14x 25S < F 3.6 " ASPENY000 OR N CIO CTIA SEOv32 16 5 : o h c e 36 17 33 4 "S31 33 32 11 36 F 2e :- zs 25 z. ss G 7 6 25 u 3 6 6 is 7 z 76 4 12 70 12 34 16 ': 1 311T : 1} 1f 15 1i 16 t4 2P 21 22 z3 Z 34 /t to ` 4 = 1G 7 J 111 O 17 t <• it J! STEEPLEw00D OR `} n 3i.; 12 f 15 6 'CARLSSAO :j i 16 : 4 41 12 29 <'6 27 x 23 2a 23 a5 as 43 42 aF U 34 36 37 13 CT 1, 15 t6 14 4 cc 15 Y a2 13 Ia 15 16 /7 M 14 20 a3 ;'6 a7 <, � Sd '53 21 20 J ..i is 4 St 52 P 18 t7 12 I7 WINDING CREEK S asREDwOl)O TR R— '• 45 46 47 46 1 41 11 S• St S2 S3 S< S SC 57 56 5a: / [! 67 42 V k 65 ♦ • T i 6 < 1 2 t 18 P K j •,aaK a2 <3 GRAPEVINE-COLLETvILLE .5u o OEo1Ca7tOra al : a... R—MF-2 ` s t 1.11 z. s c 7 i �.. Is zMENS f04 1. CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION APPLICANT/ NAME-- 16 Ale CITY/STATE: 9,00AP"l, 22.ZIP: (17-7- ' "e- 37 /7 WORK:-dp/7- HOME:- -?&�p - // �y 7- FAX: oP 2. PROPERTY OWhLER() -jZ 11 1 &2!9 �A 24 NAME • ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: zi p: HOME{ ?17) qyF-half) WORK-. -770 -ly0- 76a�L_FAX: :720-2-00-70 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) T 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. / 74L-0- 0 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. if ios 4,uG S&9j�ZEV I o e4,s�n��— 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) APPLICANT SIGNATUR OWNER (PRINT) ���\ �•-�r'� a OWNER SIGNATUR SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF N o agM6v%-� - 192�C 4k .., wil l►J SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF ypj&y,gm,/ , 192-� R. C. L08EY 0--apove-0 popol Ndwy Pdk oft of Tint my m"It"ll Is — 11 S 7 `t DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Being Lot 11, Block 3 of WINDING CREEK ESTATES, SECTION 11, an Addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the Corrected Plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A.; Slide 535, Plat Records, Ter-ront County, Texos, Lot lc' Lot 9 56^ W S 4,>'. �4 5 13.58•�i nt � x2Bw Lot 17 .,84 5 Pool 'I N Lot 10 Lot 12 (A za zs' 2.5' Two Story I� Brick and Frame Residence Scale: I"= 20' x x 2.b' x — x – v ( Q a 9g I w 30' Bldg. Line — I Lot 11 Block 3 29.5• .. Fna. _ -JLHI-1172i 'dJ' E Center lire control monumentotion found Note: was urea for controlling nlanumcntafion. This lot is not in the 100 year flood ,hazard zone, Zone A, according to the HUD Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 48439CO205 H, dated 8/02/95. This lot is in ,,clear Zone X; local droinoge was no: investigoted. 1, the undersigned, hereby certify that the survey map hereon, and the accompanying description, depicts and describes the results of o careful and accurate survey, mode on the ground, Ono to the best cmy knowledge and belief, is a true and correct depiction and description of the properly surveyed, and that there are no apparent encroachments or protrusions across boundory .:nes, shortages of area or boundary, except as shown hereon. The only easementsthe undersigned has knowledge, are those as shown, however ihis property is subject to any and ail easements, reservations, and restrictions that may be of record. Any reference to the 100 year flood plain or flood hazard zone, is an eslimote based an the data stated hereon, and should not be interpreted os a study or determination of the flooding propensities of this property. Note: This survey was performed in connection with the transaction described in. GF No. 96 CR 414224–A, for American Title Company P.O. BOX 14293 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76094-1293 ( 817 ) 274-5883, Metro ( 817 ) 261-8138 Legend: O Iron Rod Found —x—x— Wood or Wire Fencr • Iron Rod Set 0 Control Monument All iron rods ore 1/2" rebor unless otherwise rioted. ROCKLU ] C. XL%K9 �•.p Qo�t��% Q. 9tiv � sit Richard C. Maki Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4587 Date: 11/18/96 Job No. 16344-8LK �_ >j W N ryQ 4F vD ' p o, ojV�( jd LOT 1 1 , BLOCK 3. CREEK ESTATES, SECTION II, an AddiLion to the City of Ct,ipeeine, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the flat tecotded in Cabinet. A, Slide 535, Plat Records, Tarrant Cou n v y, Texa.S. Common v known as 1094 1koodbtiar Drive. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATFO IN ZONES) X —AS DELINEATEDON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL NO. EFFECTIVE DATE..3W-)-.LOCALIZED FLOODING NOT DETERMINED. P. O. Box 13556 • Land Surveying Arlington, Texas • Land Planning f O DATA SURVEYING, INC. 76094.0556 • Topographic Metro 261.2878 Mapping r SCALE LEGEND o iron rod -x --x-- fence line T- --E-- ...... utility line I hereby certify this to be a true and correct representation of a survey made on the ground under my supervision and there are no,visible encroachments or. protrusions except as shown. GLENN W. MILLER R.P.LS. - STATE OF TEXAS NO. 4223 DATE 43-o2-�3t MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFFICIAL ke- RON STOMBAUGH, PLANNER t? SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-48 JOE LANGFORD - QUALITY WOOD CRAFT, INC. MEETING DATE: MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the variance requests to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 516 East Franklin Street, and platted as Lots 3 & 4, Block 114, College Heights Addition as follows: 7 it,— a2_— .4 L. !7 1 " ,7 & [�!�_7_ T_�_L__ T!1�_L T___l_L_�_ ♦ i___1_�!_�_ 11LR.q. 1\Gr'tAA"./{!1!J 1411 �J t reduction of the thirty (301 nce. If approved, it would isting residence as shown on 2. Section 15.G.2., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, requires a twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. }'i The proposed variance request would allow a twenty-four (24) foot reduction of the required twenty. -five (25) foot rear „yard setback. If an rp oved, it would allow a one (11 foot rear yard setback for the existing second residence. Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment d= the variance request and special exception to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 516 East Franklin Street, and platted as Lots 3 & 4, Block 114, College Heights Addition as follows: 3. Section 15.G.3., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, requires a six (6) foot side yard setback. The proposed variance request would allow a one (1) foot reduction of the six (6)foot sidyard setback for a proposed gage addition to an existing residence.If approved, it 1 would allow a five (5)`foot sideyard setback for the garage addition as shown on the loot PI= '4. Section 15.B., Single Family District Regulations - Accessory Uses, does not permit a r f'y second residence on a lot zoned for R-7.5, Single Family District. The applicant has requested a special exception to allow an existing residential use to remain.�� i SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds special conditions exist for the first and second requests (front yard and rear yard setbacks) being the existing violations are not the fault of the owner. Staff finds no special conditions exist for the third request (sideyard setback) as these lots have already been ''extensively developed, and the second residence could potentially be used as a garage. Staff finds no special condition exists for the fourth request (to allow an existing residential use to remain). Staff finds no hardship for this request, as this is not a permitted use that other properties in this zoning district enjoy. Staff feels that the structure should be allowed to remain but the nonconforming use should cease. The owner could then consider using this structure for the desired garage. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Mr. Joe Langford submitted a request for the variance to allow the development of a proposed attached garage to the existing main residence as shown on the plot plan. 0:\bza\96-48.4 2 SEE SHT 2126-464 t`* 11 TpiK S •@ tlr� i e =l 1 ' 6 TR 26Gt i M ZT TR ]6a 5 8 IaS 6 .R Ptf ' '� .5I6 at CT T 1 CU92-oa 8 - 32 38 CU9f-16 1 CC I le r ^ - d'1s�yi l ra )• i� \ ^ a„ a ii is iR 4<el T` 76 eo CUdS 2 ZAq; a r 4^at p (1 G aF a t p ^l a •, i 0 1 t243i ' • 2 P• AR E ! ! ! + 1 .55 a aeTaO i TR s TR );al TP ^^ Ta M n „ TR aTR TP T M P �P`�0 ♦ ' SSD V a L@a]@ � '( R rR' w ea 6 s .1 .: .. - G YY 1-18 >� x w z79 jai I C R F ISE a l2E 1a'9 � B �QI ' TR aaq 68 (' 181 N PT k• � a TaS + (J� t' (,la ��C� I I� )1 • !. 1 I 'S6 2 TR aC F 1 c, (l I l SAS ]o c gPP�t �i• 2�6 E ES I6 2ST it I) ! TR 52 FI I N Dt NPT Ilat N ,� ' •]8 4 I ^ I I I 2 l a 1 6 •t ♦ U1, f 6' +Tot `3� 24 TR !9C TR �/ S F1 - 4 ' V/ 2 l T t18'aa I ! ' • 2 Q T GT 6 c Pt II 2 f + 1011 111 2-Q • TR < TR TR TR ' e ' 62i I 3z TA (TA as ` a e 2a la Oaf 60 6ea ) F 2S I 638 >l c E ::.� E TEXAS ST J t. 0 ', tt 2 ��;.�'s 3 ..s to w• ( 1 I -1 t H 11 t 11 ly N PT Il (f ) jk1GG —TA T !--jP E �. a t� �: l Ti �T'1 2c_ 9 aC ' la ,� 3 ] VJ 1 a i jt 7a I? 3 4 5aj� ' 0 2 3 . 6 (T I 1 -53 IJ ae as C�t(j' F � i z a � ✓� conWORTH Sh ST --7ce;-i W l Z LO C 0, b �6a60 11 S r I I 1 f �pp�•! I I- ,3� 1 . GU Q ] 4 ►i S ' 2 fF.-,' t 1PT)j PTaI PaT' U88- 0.06 U N 5 PT 5 Pt 4 I 4 I, 1 l' W 1 E ,e Tp PT lz I o aTIPT'� i;J j' L 2)l s�E�T� z } FRANKLIN ST. ; STREET CLOSEC T U 1 3 E PT R E v E T�u'• • — •, U89 0 174 P OFVP 1 iT Pr 1 z 16;IWI�1„! s �aT: s ill: z ��k ,� ;t 2 ) a s 2 u FR Ki IN ST t5 ` ' i- ' ; ti� `:?� �^ Z p • �, - to 1 I i ' ; �' �R i i 1 4 ST N -r-11,E Z80-1 P' s Pr r ' z P) i o s P a 2+ 2.� I 21 13 3 z ' r Ra La T.ISSIO ! CBDi I Z86 i ( I ; I i� a� i �iT ; a ( I 12 Il •lf• c ! 2432 oT° Sp c r%N 3 IPZ94-1 P ! FZL13 j- i Ul i` 1 �'o =r ! q CU93-08 ; C4,41 2 282-39 ; 7 >T' 1 t.PT'a- 6 8 2 —4 0 1 lc s ( i Z90-09� Z K 7 y►'�? T Iti'r St —a I lO I ORS.8?a'�.ai,.3 z I s IT "!' s l >� c 90-64 CU8 T !] E_ ' 2-25 FU95-12 ^r -06 c BZA96-48 1 43 ,.o LI a TR �� ;_ +erjc a Z92-05" 92 -�St.e'P-6 JOE LANGFORD `-31 x A Fr l - r L PS eo�m` i ,: 2L2 gjZa T,= � TR zl:z 4c ap I :n I .Il6 t P #2� !- RD rN - si Zl , K t IJ; a 'Cl DALLAS _ i s_ Te lel TTP 26A ' 3R Y � '� 82 w TR 26A - 1 I ' TP Ill I A64 C m ' p 'T' Ta <l f -Ta a[ "a - f j I.�, 9]6 4 ias Y 1 HC ra —2 Z91-09 ���� l..,i� I , 'e --PCD 14 AC 3P • Tu �_ N �+ 1 ' . l: w I rp ,+ art 'TR 'r{ I -! a TP �« `PSiE. =Ac s y I 1�. P r:t. 6 � i� 52 Ar 11 EY `TagO.y T Tn e 83 iTa{ S IK':' I 0 1 !`� @ �� j i _ I I � 9 _a 1 :.as] a_ GU ; t CITY OF GRAPEVIN BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMEN*1 Tug) 1. APPLICANT NAME - ADDRESS: 642- P112"44:f2 Pkwy CITY/STATE: AP_LjiN(61_0t! - _22 ZIP: 74�e' j /_-3, HOME- - WORK; Z73 2 -FAX: 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: R(5 N/ IV N :5- E -T 7 - ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: ZIP: 7G OS5 HOME:62Z) -WORK:(2/'/) FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 3 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. - K, - I_QA ca) :?,,F g_)Cr_qLE_ s I rhy C, L5—L. 64Z 6 61-8 Ac, K, F Z, (Z- 0 ul- R 0 1 1_02 �A; "'t 2 -_ox P, a P D () 691A f-, IF LVZ 6- S In Y A R 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND NOV l !V DETAI� ANY SPECIAL CON�IONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION Jt-'ro Y THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EMSTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. T/`i'6 c)4jeAr cz e4.,�6zI,C 0 P20PC2TY /NTo <fOµPLIbAIC E" W1 /?E4SOLAr16N R1 ,Rrv�� ��0P�lzT Ia >�A✓� ARn<c; f✓o�v�v r25 %o A14j/E )eyoio . rAXf /7/AdSE AA1,0 72� G r:-5-rR-LR,6JZ)2 ,Z1Nt f'z, 12 A u-(21 I-t/e/26 A77AC&l A ST�tJG%L/�t'�9 /'4J,9*MA1CF /S /V�EDt�r / I7L�l.�F2t= E� ��Ji�TN,� J�Ged� � -2 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. i � , ♦ ♦ � Y t � � ,I w r r t i �r - ,d `- -'--'- ----- — �� _ aI 0 FA 0749 -mm , zA-fgc 5 ,S�Qs/Ln Bzz" C7puyr,-o ; o �9��w I /�RAtir TU Bc issuesn P, U b Nov 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN HER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) -ILL /- APPLICANT SIGNATI IRF OWNER (PRINT) lel�4 OWNER SIGNATOR" SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS U DAY OF A4V,' , 1915� S NANCY MITCHELL o Notary Public State of Texas or OF Commission Expires 3-5-97 k' SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS �j DAY OF ADV, io� NANCY MITCHELL 'TC 'LL Notary, Public c 3t Texa State of Texas s Expires Commission expires 3:-&-9]7 g /5 -/CTI 99 DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 l'-12ADPWAIP 7-Y 7Rf)s; I I—,R.4PFV1A1F- TY 76099 SURVEY PLAT BEING LOTS 3 & 4, BLOCK 114 OF COLLEGE HEIGHTS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 310, PAGE 13, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. SCALE: 1" = 20' 29' Asphalt Pavement 5 E ,e- "- — A � it 1.1, -' a• — F---100.30' (Meas.) '+o �i?. GIDDENS ALLEY (16' WME) 100.0' (Plot) *P (NOT IMPROVED) PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 516 EAST FRANKUN AVENUE IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS CERTIFIED TO: SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION RONNIE R. NANSETT, PAULA L. NINSETT ANDr EVERETT L. WINSETT THE UNDERSIGNED DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS THIS DAY MADE ON THE GROUND OF THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON AND IS CORRECT AND THAT THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS. SHORTAGES IN OVERLAPPING OF IMPROVEMENTS TEXAS BANK — GRAPEVINE E.CEEE T ASRSHOWN�HERE AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY tiF SURVEYED ON THE GROUND JUNE 23, 1994 THIS SITE UES W1THW ZONE X (OUTSIED THE 500 YR. FLOOD) •) y, y T ♦F ACCORDING TO FIRM COMMUNITY PANEL No. 48059800300 A, 4���¢!, ��Y DATED JANUARY 1. 1994 LEGEND n` THE BEARINGS SHOW HEREON ARE BASED ON THE RECORD PLAT. El GM GAS METER MICHAEL W. SKINNER MICHAEL W. SKINNER p AC AIR CONDITIONER `Q 508 P' RPLS No. 5018 _04-- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNE S1Ov ,SS�,4.�A 520 SOUTH MAIN STREET SUITE 145 0 PP POWER POLES U RV GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 PH: (817) 421-6383 FAX: (817) 421-6463 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, January 6, 1997, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Randy Howell Chairman Carl Hecht Vice -Chairman Dennis Luers Member Jill Davis Member Russell Anderson 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum with Secretary, Ervin Meyer absent. Also present was City Councilman Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: Scott Williams Ron Stombaugh Gerrie Anderson Building Official City Planner Secretary Chairman Randy Howell called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. BZA96-43 WILLIAM S. EASTWOOD The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-43 submitted by William S. Eastwood who requested variances for 1917 Rose Court, platted as Lot 6, Block 2, Park Central Addition, Grapevine, Texas. The variances were from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 16.6.6., R-5.0, Zero Lot Line District Regulations which requires a twelve (12) foot separation between buildings on adjacent properties. The proposed variance would allow a reduction of eight (8) feet to the separation requirements. If approved, it would allow a four (4) foot separation between buildings on adjacent properties. Section 42.C.3., Supplementary District Regulations which requires a detached accessory building to be separated ten (10) feet from the main residence and have the same sideyard setback as required for the main structure, eleven (11) feet. The proposed variance would allow a seven (7) foot reduction in separation, and an eight (8) foot reduction of the required sideyard setback. If approved, it would allow a minimum separation of three (3) feet between the accessory building and the main structure and a BZA Minutes 1/06/96 minimum of three (3) feet between the accessory building and the side property line. Mr. Williams explained that staff recommended denial of the request, as there is room on the lot for a complying structure. Mr. Williams also noted that Mr. and Mrs. Eastwood were not able to attend the meeting. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Dennis Luers made a motion to close the public hearing. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Carl Hecht then made a motion that no special condition existed. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-42, submitted by Vickie Diedrick who requested variances for 2315 High Drive, platted as Lot 14, Block 9, Grapevine Lake Estates. The variances were from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 14.G.I., R-12.5, Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, which requires a front yard setback of thirty-five (35) feet. The proposed variance would allow a ten (10) foot reduction of the front yard setback. If approved, it would allow a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback. Section 14.G.5.- R-12.5., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, which requires the lot depth of one hundred (100) feet. The proposed variance would allow a one and six tenths (1.6) foot reduction of the lot depth along the west side of the lot. If approved, it would allow a ninety-eight and four - tenths (98A) foot lot depth on the west side of the lot. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found special conditions existed for the proposed variance due to the lot being originally platted with a twenty-five (25) foot front building 0 BZA Minutes 1/06/96 line; other developed lots in this subdivision have a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback, and that Staff found the second request was justified, as the existing lot has a ninety-eight and four -tenths (98.4) foot lot depth, and an increase in depth is beyond the control of the applicant. Matthew Kerlee of 2307 High Drive, Lot 15, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained that he was against the variance to the twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback. Mr. Kerlee explained that in 1983, his father had built his house with a thirty-five (35) foot front yard setback due to City requirements. Mr. Kerlee expressed concern to see continuity on the street. Vickie Diedrick, applicant of 1800 Fern Court, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained that she was trying to purchase the lot contingent on variances being granted by the Board of Zoning Adjustment. Ms. Diedrick explained that she was planning to build a 1650 square foot single story house, with a side entry garage. Ms. Diedrick noted that Mr. Kerlee's lot was bigger and deeper. Donna Snider of 203 North Capri, Duncanville, Texas, and owner of the lot, took the Oath of Truth and explained that when she purchased the property, the front yard setback was twenty-five (25) feet. Ms. Snider explained that she has been unable to sell the property due to the lot size and setback requirements. The members discussed that the house could be moved back on the lot four (4) feet which would leave the front yard setback at twenty-nine (29) feet instead of the requested twenty- five (25) feet. After further discussion, Jill Davis made a motion to close the public hearing. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Jill Davis made a motion that a special conditions existed, being the shallow depth of the lot, the lot is existing and was platted with a twenty-five (25) foot building line at the time the property was purchased. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer 3 BZA Minutes 1/06/96 Jill Davis then made a motion to grant the variance, with an amendment, to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 14.G.I., R-12.5, Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, to allow a six (6) foot reduction of the required thirty (35) foot front yard setback allowing a twenty-nine (29) foot front yard setback; and to grant the variance to Section 14.G.5., R-12.5, Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, to allow a one and six tenths (1.6) foot reduction of the lot depth along the west side of the lot, allowing a ninety-eight and four -tenths (98.4) foot lot depth on the west side of the lot. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-47, submitted by Michael J. Puppo who requested a variance for 1094 Woodbriar Drive, platted as Lot 11, Block 3, Winding Creek Estates, Phase 2. The variance was from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.G.1., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, which requires a thirty (30) foot front yard setback. The proposed variance request would allow a one (1) foot reduction of the front yard setback. If approved, it would allow a twenty-nine (29) foot front yard setback. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found a special condition exists for the proposed variance due to the existing encroachment not being the fault of the proposed homebuyer. Mr. Williams noted that Ms. Puppo was present to answer any questions. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Jill Davis made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Jill Davis then made a motion that a special condition exists due to the existing encroachment not being the fault of the proposed homebuyer. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 11 BZA Minutes 1/06/96 Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Jill Davis made a motion to grant the variance to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 15.G.1., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations to allow a one (1) foot reduction of the front yard setback, allowing a twenty-nine (29) foot front yard setback. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer The next item of business for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-48 submitted by Joe Langford with Quality Wood Craft, Inc., who requested variances for 516 --- East Franklin Street, platted as Lots 3 and 4, Block 114, College Heights Addition. The variances are from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.G.1., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations which requires a front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. The proposed variance would allow a seven (7) foot reduction of the thirty (30) foot front yard setback. If approved it would allow a twenty-three (23) foot front yard setback for the existing house. Section 15.G.2., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, which requires a twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. The proposed variance would allow a twenty-four (24) foot reduction of the twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. If approved, it would allow a one (1) foot rear yard setback for the second residence. Section 15.G.3., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, which requires a six (6) foot side yard setback. The proposed variance would allow a one (1) foot reduction of the six (6) foot sideyard setback for a proposed garage addition. If approved, it would allow a five (5) foot sideyard setback. 5 BZA Minutes 1/06/96 Section 15.B., Single Family District Regulations - Accessory Uses, which does not permit a second residence on a lot zoned for R-7.5, Single Family District. The proposed special exception would allow an existing second residence to remain. Mr. Williams explained that staff found special conditions existed for the first and second requests (front yard and rear yard setbacks) being the existing violations are not the fault of the owner. Mr. Williams stated that Staff found no special conditions existed for the third request (sideyard setback) as these lots had already been extensively developed, and the second residence could potentially be used as a garage, Mr. Williams stated that he wished to amend Staffs position regarding the fourth request. He asked the Board to allow the existing nonconforming status of the second residence to remain. Mr. Ron Winsett, owner of 516 E. Franklin Street, took the Oath of Truth and explained that one (1) foot was needed to build a twenty (20) foot wide, two -car garage on the side of his house. Mr. Williams explained that Dick Ward, Fire Marshall, expressed concern about Fire Department access to the back of the property where the second residence was located. Mr. Williams also explained that one of the lots was already overdeveloped at 43% lot coverage. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Mr. Winsett explained that the second residence was fully equipped as a residence and it was occupied by his cousin. Mr. Winsett also explained that the original owner of the property had lived in the rear residence and then built the new house in front. Randy Howell explained he felt that denial of the sideyard setback variance would not stop the building of the garage, which would comply with the ordinance if built at nineteen (19) feet in width. P BZA Minutes 1/06/96 After further discussion, Carl Hecht made a motion that special conditions exists for Section 15.G.1. and Section 15.G.2, due to the existing violations not being the fault of the owner and that the structure is existing; and to Section 15.8. because the second residence is existing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Carl Hecht made a motion to approve the following variances to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.G.1., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, to allow a seven (7) foot reduction of the thirty (30) foot front yard setback, allowing a twenty-three (23) foot front yard setback for the existing house. Section 15.G.2., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, to allow a twenty- four (24) foot reduction of the twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback, allowing a one (1) foot rear yard setback for the second residence. Section 15.B., Single Family District Regulations - Accessory Uses, to allow a special exception for an existing second residence to remain. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Carl Hecht then made a motion that a special condition does not exist for Section 15.G.3., for a one (1) foot variance to the required six (6) foot side yard setback. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: Howell Absent: Meyer MINUTES Next, the Board of Zoning Adjustment considered the minutes of the December 2, 1997, meeting. BZA Minutes 1/06/96 Jill Davis made a motion to table the minutes of the December 2, 1997, meeting until February 3, 1997, in order for Member Ery Meyer, who was absent, to review them. Randy Howell seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Meyer Mr. Williams explained that a coffee shop was going in the old service station at the northwest corner of in Street and College Street and that the Grapevine/Colleyville I.S.D. was going to occupy the old Western Sizzlin Steak House on East Northwest Highway for their Vista Program. With no further discussion, Jill Davis made a motion to adjourn. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Meyer The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 P.M. [Ouffel amw an I ki I= gKfa'&-K*J ga g - 1 igal =I =I -.4111 PINK*] 2:4 -1 ATTEST is SECRETARY C HAI MA f 0