Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-02-03 AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEEThNu MONDAY EVENING, FEBRUARY 3, 1997, AT 6:00 P.M. COURT ROOM/COUNCIL CHAMBERS, #205 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD GRAPEVINE, TEXAS I. CALL TO ORDER II. OATH OF TRUTH III. NEW BUSINESS n A. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-49, SUBMITTED BY JESSE C. SAENZ AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ` RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-50, SUBMITTED BY JERRY M. LOBAN AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. C. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA97-01, SUBMITTED BY DAVID BARNHOUSE AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. D. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA97-03, SUBMITTED BY TEXAS BANK AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. E. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-51, SUBMITTED BY GRAPEVINE KAWASAKI-POLARIS AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. IV. MINUTES BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 2, 1996, AND JANUARY 6, 1997, MEETINGS. V. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION VI. ADJOURNMENT IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND YOU HAVE A DISABILITY THAT REQUIRES SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS AT THE MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AT (817) 481-0377 AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS WILL BE MADE TO ASSIST YOUR NEEDS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 551 .001 et seq. ACTS OF THE 1993 TEXAS LEGISLATURE, THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 31 ST DAY OF JANUARY, 1997 AT 5:00 P.M. DIRECTOR OF VELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OF 11A MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER - 1d-- SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-49 JESSE C. SAENZ MEETING DATE: MONDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment d2ny- the variance requests to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 1911 Mill Pond Drive, platted as Lot 6, Block 6, Parkwood Addition as follows: 1. Section 42C.3.,'Accessory Buildings - requires an accessory building to be located no nearer than six (6) feet to any rear lot line and shall be subject to the same side yard requirements as the principal structure. In the case of a corner lot, no accessory building shall be located within any side yard required on the street side. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a fifteen (15) font encroachment into the required fifteen (15) foot side yard for-an accessory storage building and to allow an encroachment of five (5) feet into, the required' six (6) foot`rear yard setback If approved. it would allow an accessory—storage building to be located within the fifteen (15) foot side yard setback and on (1) foot from "the rear Rrope by line. SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds no special conditions exist. There is adequate space on the lot for a complying structure. BACKGROUND INFORMATION• j Mr. Jesse Saenz submitted a request for-a variance to allow the development of an accessory building as shown on the plot plan. This case came to the attention of the Building Department as the result of a complaint. I 0Abza\96-49.4 . 1 �, 12LAY 9 • • a > 1 Y a N C r 11aCe• 6 is 26 K F 23 24 0. N K I 16 N b ri a n 11 Z9 70 i CrIATSVORTM OR 103 32 -ITIPWII= 27 24 24 m S2 p y� >t » M tl e2 a3�,t 45 K 8 10 21 37 Yt 17 tt.M7• : w f 17 1 at WEST 9A� ze 36 U b Is b 2 a• 7 50v�N ► 27 35 11 I+ t4 3 4 7 w �� M K 13 a K pp. �• ~� 16 23. Y 4322 6 hV 31 o OMM • 2s • n .i r c 3 R•sxyfl`1� 8 ' 26 y g a• A�1k 1 W 2 , 12 W 2 t O o 3 27 W • Z7 _�SS 6 t3 pp¢C 3 { x » iR 2G �fAc Ia/M • 26 3 ?r 4 3 Q 14 2 a e a zt < 27 + PID 25 n ir Q 2 7 23 22 21 2• Y+ : 34.. `::5 r 182 �:. 22 R � cues OR. �: 1 IS K` 2 3 O 26 it 17, O, a NO Qp0• i` q ` 93 to + 3� s " 1e Iz 1+ i a 2sRp`(S�NjS'21 Q C r 17 RjM C� u u 26 �(((---� Ltt u 21 I ,1 a 3 p �g125. Q 18 3 Y�c�c n L= Q ss > 1 22 i' u .. v+ s c ) 6 • w rn z 14 1:01 Q< ¢ _< 3.640 AG 1 13 8 zi • W SAME RIOM RO.: 23 7 za ! Y 6 2s 7 a 6 6 J 3 z I 72 !7 21 s 6. 7 6 t K U '12 in ie 2• r, g AiLL POW DR it 7 2 21 r • 2 : • s , 3 2 1 : 17 w` C`•\p`_`i j 6 i 2 ' 7 •• ii a 13 Is, RplS�MyV�V�� '.: y s ClIlk OR. ^''( G Pp A i Q 1 M000 Gu_ �6�25 t 104 1 a 3 2 5 6 7 's • Y t2 n 14 Z94—OT 1671• Q E s R i E 4 c BZA96-49 7•w CU8 6 s u '16 JESSE C. SAENZ i i `3. 3 :2 t ' 3Jt a TV48EFILM oa • 77AN19 IR Of 5 q3 N y. 6 'NE pR L33 K v lit In 10413 MQ�RpO u S . ' • I 12, e 1 3 trr • VALT#i*l OR eee• tza, 2 38 e 3 z2 23 za 1 A 2•e+• -'� TR ' 2 25 24 291-07 11241 AC 121 123 CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION • APPLICANT NAME- '55:---;qP r ADDRESS: 1911 Mill Pond Dr. CITY/STATE: Grapevine, Texas ZIP: 76051 HOME: 817-481 -5757 -WORK:-972-/'-'56-1621 FAX---------- 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME- Besse and ',4aomi Saenz ADDRESS: 1911 Mill Pond Dr. CITY/STATE: Grapevine, Texas 76051 -ZIP. HOME. 817-481-5757 WORK: 972-256-1621 FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 1911 Mill 'Pn-nrq Dr. Lot 6 , Block 6 , Parkwood Addition 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SHEET. SEPARATE Section 42 . Pages S . , Segments C,D To Place a 10 x 12 wooden shed on the southwest corner of our lot within r- 1:4- of the rear Property line and 5 ft inside the 15 ft required side yard for corner lots. 2 L 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR L0T__._OR TRACT SHAPES_ ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT_MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. I am requesting that the board consider my plea to allow me to finis the storage shed I started building outside the boundaries set by - Section 42 of city code. I unknowingly started building a shed without a permit of the street side of my backyard since the biggest portion of the lot is on that side. The lot itself is L shape and is only 30 tt from the patio egde to the back fence, but once it passes the southwest corner of the- house, it opens up to a larger yard. The southeast corner of t yard is where the water runs to when it drains off my neighbor' s house and our house making it an unsuitable location to store things T ;;l --n r1rPat9 i-ha thought of having to cut some of my two year old trees since all 12 trees were planted as part of a massive landscape project. I appeal to the good nature of the board for a fair decision in evaluating this request. It wasn't my intention to snub or do thing knowingly behind the city' s back that required approval when I start, this shed. 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. N/A 3 t 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHEF DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYP Jesse enz APPLICANT SIGNATUR 7-- OWNER (PRINT) Jesse d Na saenz OWNER SIGNATUR t SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS C�fL�'DAY OF g TA Y P B FOR THE S ATE OF TEXAS DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 19 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DEL/VERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 4 SURVEY PLAT This is to certify that I have, this date, made a careful and accurate survey, on the ground, of property located at 1911 Mill Pond Drive, being Lot 6, Block 6, of PARKWQOD ADDITION, an Addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-194, Page 15, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. DW*o Ws MILL , POND DRIVE M COV 0 61.824 f �) XFND R =830.45' •�• 0 FND X ET o 0.I ' A 9d'OOh�h W W 6LXK a PLAT 6 M i A' 4 4 RICK 3 7 r�8.8' 1 3.5 Il. s 5 N BRICK RESIDENCE Wg 1 o. OCL T 6 133' a Or145:° 02.6' B) ° a t P! '110.7 t Uj I c LOT 641 . $ tr WMD t 12+ METAL BLDG.IO K NO IGUNDATIO UT � __ \_1 PLAT W I 1 10'U TILITY E SMT. o N a PER PLAT. 0 Y ° I TO Lawyers American LOT 7 Title Company in connection with the transaction described in GP No.--9306205=1-1.The plat shown hen:un is a correct and accurate epresentation of the property,lines and dimensions at: as indicated;location and type of buildings are as shown;and EXCEPT AS SI IOWN,all improvements are located within the boundaries thy: distances indicated, and EXCEPT AS SHOWN there are no visible and apparent easements, encroachments or protrusions on the yr wnd. a SCALE + DlkTE ?ze/93 SUPJ ell Phillip Anderson Reglsternd Prolession.hl 93-3r;75 A & W SURVEYORS, INC. Land Surveyor No 4828 JOB NO. P.O. BOX 870029 DRAWN BY MESQUITE, TX. 75150 (214) 681-4975 MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFFI IAL� MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER f SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-50 JERRY M. LOBAN MEETING DATE: MONDAY, FEBRUARY 3, '1997 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the variance request to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 917 Meadowbrook Drive, platted as Lot 6, Block J, Brookhollow Estates as follows: 1. Section 15.G.1., Single Family District Regulations, Front Yard Setback, requires a front yard setback back of thirty (30) feet. The proposed variance request would allow a five (5)foot reduction of the front yard setback for the existing residence If approved it would allow a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback for the existing residence as shown on the plot plan Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment deny the variance requests to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 917 Meadowbrook Drive, platted as Lot 6, Block J, Brookhollow Estates as follows: 2. Section 15.G.1., Single Family District Regulations, Front Yard Setback, requires a front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a five (5) foot reduction of the front yard setback for the proposed garage addition If approved it would allow a twenty-five (25)foot front yard setback for the proposed-garage addition as shown on the plot plan. 3. Section 15.J., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, Off Street Parking, requires all required off-street parking to be located behind the front building line. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow required off-street parking to encroach five (5) feet into the required front yard setback If approved it would allow the required off-street parking spaces to encroach five (5) feet into the front yard setback. a 1 <1 SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds special conditions exist for the first request as the existing encroachment is not the fault of the owner. ` Staff finds no special conditions exist for the second and third requests. It should be noted that the encroachments could be slightly Less than five (5) feet, but since the survey does not show the actual setback at various points across the front of the house, Staff has modified the applicants request to a conservative five (5) feet. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Mr. Jerry Loban submitted a request for the variances to allow the development of a proposed garage addition as shown on the plot plan. 0\bza\96-50.4 2 KIT pnu uTR - N R R ,"t'.j . ) 9 2 2 1 1 ICU TR tce IRV tR 1 e • ea • Sit � i � a .•e 11 3� 14 A� • ' t• h �� 42 13 1 111 1 I t 7 a 20.w156 562tle - w ' 11 2+ GN 1 t 42 „ MC a S07A1 TR as Aoov oA „ 1 a."K� 4 it 3 a • 7 a t0 u 2 so (� 41 4S V : � TR 6 IT to 13 1t to l7 14 13 1 IM (,♦ 14 MI 11 1 m Tot se 2 1 b BZA96-50 ° TIT �-�- ST tla Zltt• n 1 � 3 , JERRY LOBAN n '� m t, n 12 11 a � . • OR w a' U 1• b �.. w SZ S S 14 S 6 2R 3R 4R M• 743 t U j $3 4 4 15 4 7 21 7 rT a w S 12 • �W t® 27 24 11 > 54 3 1 K J • O TR e93 7 2 SANOtt1RST CT yl 2 2 17 cl 2 c / 24 A 27 6 > / 1 7 21 a M 56 1 1 Ia 1 r n .• s f/ `a2�8 ac .z+e IS ACV' 3 2 1 . 1, � IG 17 0 TR t M 4 p 1 3 IT r -04 CIRCLE VIEW CT 2 2 TITy1 r 1 Is .1a S � � Ln• Ut R-3. 75 a 7 ,aa :, — N 4 1 N1i• 2 PRD-12 23K e a R � TIT K 2R g S 7T• i 3 z7aV " SHADYBROOK DR. 3R SD .Rm i r [,T 78: 4' n 1 Q 6 J TR SJ H Q .S J 7 ♦A 6 ec O ` CC %,, A e V 7A f M sr¢ Z73-ii W 1 E 6 3.•RC 1st K ZN-W > R —.Mn a,.4 ACO ° M72 tl AC S 7e 4 -3 TR 9 ° SC � 163 Sli :2 Y TR 4C R—MF—2 i4ela a U% 3.37 K u 1�; 14 is 1c n �PN4'( • KOCH ST R 0 4v LJ Sq 2 7 It\ 1tn 1 rar OA R s tm\20 1`u 1 R—MF—2\ IT K —Pf1�a 2 ` ENEIKO" 174swe � v a ) SjpR s^ 85 3 aa28 6 2 TR 4C C AC1 U3 PO : S mug AC tm 6 12 9 7 u K TR 4J S PT K ' TR,_ 5-374 wC P P w rT (,yr 1 HC / a TTIT2 u 1 4 E 7J74 '� p Z >a 4T 2 S PT 1 3a 1 31 L44 AC To go rF •.z F pd ~z Z89-S70 Z82i1-23 s a, M sww Z810-302 gc Y I.ts x1 4 31 A -- N R 127 e \6a�5 25��5 TR .( Mae.2 TR us C ] , O N ] \ U94 }g 9 2 tp�t� T4 .«;e a pOfl �' . ( \ N _ I.zo.c Z81 1"0SS HC C $ 8 NORTHWEST HIGHWAY 0 \\11 11-02 I (J ]Ic, GO ( H C 1-4. C" u CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION 1. APPLICANT --)EPP—Y M L05AN NAME- ADDRESS: 917 hlEA-D6VV8RWK- D2 CITY/STATE: GlbAFEVlWf j TEXPf-S zip: 7605/ HOME- 8l74'31LIOZZ62 WORK: 817419-873/ FAX: &W81-7-60-46a 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME- .J ERRY M LOSAM ADDRESS: 917 MEADOWSRCOCOK -D)2 CITY/STATE: 6&PfV/NE � 7L-MS_zlp: 7605-1 HOME: 8/7-49/-62:2G WORK: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 917 MO�MOW BOOK. LOT 6 .9Z6CX J 51206i-196LLOW E-,�TATE-,S TYfP—D c5EC-71-01\-1 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. c75EF A--1-TlYCP-e-D SIR& PLANNING 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (Z) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. cSEE- A-77—AC14ED Q�C�Ft� 2 0 1996 PLANNING ITEM 4. 917 Meadowbrook Drive, Lot 6, Block J, Brookhollow Estates Third Section. ITEM 5. The following variances are to section 15.G.1-Front Yard Setback for R75 Single Family Resendential. 1. Request a variance of 4 feet for the existing foundation southeast comer which encroaches approximately 3.6 feet over the 30' setback line. (See 1996 Plat and revised Site Plan.) 2. Request a variance of 4 feet for a garage addition which has the same encroachment as the residence foundation of 3.6 feet. (See Site Plan) ITEM 6. When this residence was originally constructed in 1973, it was encroaching over the platted 30' building line at the southeast corner of the foundation. This condition was not discovered until an accurate survey was done on November 23,1996 by Arthur Surveying Company. The plat supplied when we purchased the house in 1980 indicated that the foundation had more than a foot of clearance from the setback line. Consequently it appeared that there was plenty of room without encroachment to build a garage on the front of the house and because of that;the original garage was built into an extra bedroom and office. The original plan to build a garage on the front was conceived using, as correct, the 1980 plat information. It had been certified as correct by James H. Dowdy P.E. in 1980 so there was no reason to doubt its' validity. This plat was also used to apply for a loan to accomplish the garage, various interior and exterior remodelling tasks. The garage addition was the major factor in securing the loan amount necessary. This loan closed on Friday December 6, 1996. That was when the plat was given to us with the encroachment shown. This was verified by measuring from the property line established by Arthur Surveying Co. Please note (Brookhollow Estates Plat) the irregular placement of the homes on the west side of Meadowbrook Drive which indicates why no one has noticed the encroachment until this recent survey. It is because of this irregular placement of the homes on the west side of Meadowbrook Drive that we submit that the existing home with a garage addition will have only a positive visual impact on the neighborhood and enhance the value of all surrounding properties. ITEM 7 No unique circumstances other than form inspection did not catch the error. ITEM 8 Included with this application is the 1980 plat, the 1996 plat, a site plan(revised 1996) and the original Brookhollow Estates plat. DFC 207996 A�"A// NG 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHEF DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) • CW-> XCY M 13AN APPLICANT SIGNATURE- OWNER (PRINT) rA. OWNER SIGNATURE Z- SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF -tam 19� 10A SALLY D.HIMLIN OTARY P BL C FOR-THE STATE OF TEXAS ° o NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF TEXAS My Comm.Exp. 10-18-99 DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS 16j, DAY OF 19 G SALLYD. HIMUN 0 A P IC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS ° a NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF TEXAS <.or My Comm.Exp. 10.18.99 DATE OF ! NSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SER VIC C E l V E D PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION DEC Q 1996 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 PLANNING A , �MT�1 v M�lT•f L ' ' / j �-..._ ,'IO a+-e TICK i 16 �' NAB• F \.y 11. \ `I + 6 �/� 23 ftoN � 14 T �0 24 jIs a\ i Y �o` • 4 _ 13 p 6 25 _ � s s 4 APPRONEO THIS THE_ 12 ; g ® ii 26� BY CITY COUNCIL,CITY C BY a M L 27 ±. e 10 28 p' MONUMENTS HAVE BEEN REGULATIONS. {'• �• +ao-, �`� , OWNERS 0 D STEWA w •I ACV &MMM0011,0W ESTATES _ A N � 33� SAO \ ° \ rJ 4►.i4 SURVEY PLAT THIS 6 TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE, IRIS UAIE, WE A CAREFUL AND ACCURATE SUMY UN fHE 6ROUNI) OF IIIE I­'I,'UI'LI(I( L"fED AT NO. ___j17_MFAD0WBROOK_DRIVE___ ; IN THE CITY OF______GRAPEVINE__....GRAPEVINE TEXAS, DESCR18CU AS FOLLOWS: LOT NO. — 6 BLOCK NO. U OF BROOKHOLLOW ESTATES. THIRD SECTION AN ADDITION TO THE CIT(_OF GRAPEVINE TARRANT COUNTY, TM ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME -388=6-L AT PAGE OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. LOT 14 LOT 15 NORTH N 00' 6'.00' _W_ 70.00' — — F.C.P. I.R.F. 5'7 E. C7) .loco L 'V� to OZ LOT 7 p LOT 5 11.4: O ui 7.3' — 0 ;6 4 0 14.0' bl) 917 MEADOWBROOK DRIVE 00 [3 SINGLE STORY RESIDENCE UJI V) A14 4.0'. VEFD :1 2 2.0.4' 9.4' DEC 2 0 1996 0) P/ NNING 00 LOT 6 z DRIVE R=229.58' L=12.32 Dn PLAT CALL L-1 2-50' !?9 01-� (SO, 0. R=443.68' L=40.1 4' DENM TITLE COMPANY TO THE LIENHOLDERS AND/OR THE OWNERS OF THE PREMISES SURVEYED AND To G.F. NO. 96—AB 417979—G THE UNDERSIGNED DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS THIS DAY MADE ON THE GROUND OF THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON AND IS CORRECT, AND THAT THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS, SHORTAGES IN AREA, BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, OVERLAPPING OF IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS OR RIGHT OF WAY THAT I HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON, AND THAT SAID PROPERTY HAS ACCESS TO AND FROM A DEDICATED ROADWAY. I FLOOD NOTE: IT IS MY OPINION THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HERON—IS-hLO—T WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAND AREA ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP. COMMUNITY—PANEL NO.1400-9295-JI. PRESENT EFFECTIVE DATE OF MAP AUG. 2, 1995 HEREIN PROPERTY SITUATED WITHIN ZONE X U SHADED) DATE: NOV. 23, 1996 1* 30' kS.C. NO.: 9611109 -- SCALE: S T ARTHUR SURVEYING COMPANY, INC. Registered Professional Land Surveyors U L A...RTHUR.. P.O.Box 54 — Lewisville, Texas 75067 ..... Office: (972) 221-9439 Fax: (972) 221-4675 2t'j fss�0*.'pCam/ SU 14 6 -SDOo Exr Fgl r�o�rE LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT_�_ BLOCK / ,2 OO.0 N O L L O C/� 5.S 77/$ TC•S %ij/it AN ADDITION TO THE CITY Of ,e ,q ,p tea-i//,!/�' , /,4/TC,e q N T COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PG,4 T RECORDED IN VOLUME 38�'-G 5> T PAGE 3 3 OF THE PG A T RECORDS Of_Tip COUNTY, TEXAS '7 ..7 _. . 7- t RcTr�'1' 4 JQS+ o-. G.,a. 1'} `�l ¢ - o e - k 2') 4,3 4 217 oc r o �E1VED DEC 2 0 1996 SCALE ,AMES H ,v+W; cf C.ISTERED CNGINEF.R MEPESY CERTIFY THAT ! -_�0 .G���� 'HE AACVF PLAT WAS COMPILEo FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY MADE CIS �' ��•t••O'f' 1HE C',ROUNC ONDEP Mr PERSONAL eUPFRVISION. AND THERE ARE NO DAMES H. DOWDY ENCROAL;MMEN'S CONFW—'�. nR PROtRUSICNS EXCEPT AS NOTED THE •; f t� ® '..AND ABRSOC'ATEB ONLT EASEMENTS SMOWN ARE 1HI CNFS ME SURVEYOR HAS PERSONAL 1AMES•H. DOWDY KNOWLEDGE Of AND iME ONES SHOWN ON THE RECORDED PLAT �•"• 33886 5FS /STAR ' �OtJaL EN 1 P.O. BOX 507 ARI.INGTON, TEXAS 76010 DATE fi MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OF IA MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER-71 SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA97-01 DAVID BARNHOUSE MEETING DATE: MONDAY FEBRUARY 3, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the special exception to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 221 Starnes Street, platted as Lot D, J. J. Hall Addition as follows: 1. Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures allows the Board of Zoning Adjustment to permit the remodeling or enlargement of a nonconforming use or structure. The proposed special exception would allow the construction of an accessory garage building to be constructed on a lot with an existing single-family residence in a R-MF-1, Multi-Family Zoning District as shown on the Qlot plan SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds a special condition exists as the setbacks will comply with R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations for accessory building requirements. The erection of this structure will result in the demolition of an existing nonconforming accessory building per the application submitted by the owner. BACKGROUND INFORMATIQ Mr. David Bamhouse submitted a request for the special exception to allow the development of an accessory building as shown on the plot plan. This property was originally zoned for single family use, and was later rezoned to multi-family in 1984. I j o:MW7-oi.a x I I" M Sat f — L"K M 2Yt ti22.: � M:a 2.• t f 70 G aac K R—T11E" Q . 5 z ' a r 1g ' .6 1 Il 1 cN Fas7 M a zfa E R • K u rc zz .40• Ta a" Is t 5 ABS .�K ,[ ' W CT R-TN 4 t g 14 u l442 55-04 n M'I* s .n.0 M 17 Ltr K -5.Q R oc -MF--2 1 3 zEtg1 Z65 0 NMTH ST i 68 : R u`101, M / E,O LPG [ 2 R K r :PCH. ST 3 • s s ftx, Is a . W 3\2\g -j Z82--s0 1q3� 7.....94 3 f• 1= l 1 12 M1 L N h r maw © rmmc S 12A 2 at .7 A r t .23 K M M �.` 2•R 2b ♦ M rp.. /:.,�iR]EF iR! 0 G: r q t2 D 14 r n i Z! �. xaa tb n b z K V • K o f Vt., 7 Z78-t}'[ If µ 7 a s T� Z89-07 ,r7 a0 a r Tit yEEsS r rC +.o i 1. >s19 T:. R T M OR L72 1R \ � of 92 - TR 1M TR TM M M 1w M tw 7lfA 7 ! p M 21N J =` x zr 2O 2, a ABC K .mac K tea=• .Nt. 36 BaNraa OR C 86ilx? c s N m• 17 fs u n a r TR at at a 3R 2R r �1 5t E r CU 8 -08 R _ 1-21 1 \10 O�PP N�gS E�- RQWf � Kc =y 1 a cc 0 'QPF . 13 wi AOp 2 t • 3fi e R s< 1 ke tO 16�g6 a ifa \\\qz C is P \6 N U zR r 182 41 zA [ _ mt Z83t.�1. 35�4 2 r s 6q 3m3� CU9f-16 a tR • 1.5 fA. 1•aA S i 1 • 2= t.: OR T H NORTHWEST HWY. BZA97-01 Acp �N`•Rle �.pP w, t: w r�R amp kry '�.. • A L'at Is ZR ti� • Cr C O A ♦ 2l. _, 1 t ,tab u IAA ID -• lz .S2 [ TR 1%04 Tf. TP t. 10,1. i•4 TR 49 ! 1-4 .Ni q .: W 44t RAR H OUST r i Y E 1ar R � b 3" 3e C � t M aV 68 Ib' , tR t1 { 14t �Ct .' I ,t 1 S 1. . ! i �. a t 2 7 t 5 S [ ♦ b� `t aPAc�lSn �. H 1 2�6aC • f.;{ E WILL 1 a 2 ST �. 13• IT lfl { TRS2 V f : ! {N G[ Y r[ F ` f W 1 2�1 . ! iTa 1 2 1 . it t ♦ u 24 tP X• .. •, Tit �Y 12 I { 2 � ! TEkAS � cT t f7t [ i E t 71 S r!It a� Z - TR < TR Ta TR p t6 s2b.i2 I tR I tR },S 11 ' b. �•a tO iCtD 2b K r.! t4 .l,E t`]'t C E TEXAS ST �a 1 a b� NG ' v r.n •n a[2 is i,e K •qa tot ft2• n ' .� K} `- 7 ti 8�9-10 SB etJ�j )-if9 t. 1 �j'i ' a '• 1 1 t 7 1 M 17 84-53 tI(Y[TN ST as C VORTN cT: 1 a6� OFT s Nt f Ik ----�-- GV 0.06 tt s c �6 a r� Nif I i' .r Ri rti►T' ET��t[ (>!1r1{ U88 f �N .T svT : 1 �l . s s ' tTii�{ rr jj�: •W 1 Cj 4 'A J Z7T T 2 %a f2 i i•. It it t �: 11 _ i.4i211117 S t 7r L Iu -J STREET 'LASEC • w U89 O 1 ♦ r oc K / rr er 1 ! � "'. ( ! '�! f] 1 1 � [ t 1 t � a ! : O • [ -! 2 1 l 3 � •12 1 a S..i hr+��♦ iR tl _ u FR IC IN ST i ` { 7 ► r ,r a s Q i H is :;?r 13-0f •7 S.r 1 s Qry7 I C Q� f t In li { ..•i @ s 1 RvA[rON�Z:or ss6,q t C8� j 1 Y ��1 jj t 1.E:. I ce Z86{ i t { I y� f irR• 1 s i i ! t2 u tt s CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION 1. APPLICANT-�N-NAME: /iUllb 6"fO�NAME - ADDRESS:- 2 4nl CITY/STATE:-�R P�U/Nf / ZIP: L HOME. 34- '53 I WORK: �L- FAX: 2. PROPERTYY OWNER(S) NAME:- tV(��- Lim-b4 64oykOW ADDRESS:-- SaryIS CITY/STATE: ZIP: HOME: FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 2 2l N- 5774OU(F-- I Z.07' b I � ,3-,j4ALL 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. r "'�,°J-T�r�-r-t''d-.-,�1(v►C�►T�' ���U�ST' ���G1�4L G��I s o r 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. WAS 7. EXFLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. aN 14FT24 TROX47-X fWt3> . PWT£�> Z)Ec, I cN7 Flu-3> �z Ricopb mt� 31 )g� $? 41 I9494 -195T ©k7P11Vo01V(f-�- Fc(Z 2741 C(i% of GW&IAL WkS M3. COn'PLq-T l0N OF )QE&)U ES TC-f) S TR�LCIUk E—L* 3 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE)(�bA V LINDA Af)0V11-?,1 APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER (PRINT) OWNER SIGNATURE-jA SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 1 gq7 v u STATE OF TEXAS April 12, 1997 NOTARY rUBI IC FOR HE DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 1991-2 W CMOLM HICKS NOTARY UBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS MY coMNrrsSioMCORES 4 A April 1Z 1997 DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, 7X 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 -- h co cn Z _ — �c' 8' UTILITY EASEMENT per piet — — OI N �0 Ilia F)ROPStip �$ � � R cn C �y ' o� rci Erao o a s s r oo �D ��£� �rrt/�L£7/iN o r ED z � � „ nr ITi a e .. a 7�• o 0 ■ x C7 A`C S Z 2 qQ 29.7 G n C3nC ONE STORY FRAME I n r g RESIDENCE �o n o'e a, c•e 5 �y 40'BLDG. LINE x � H I o 70.0' DRECTMAL CCMF�OL LIrE . M a o 221 NORTH S TA RIVES �b d ro STREET e o 50' R.O.W. DEDICATED WITH PLAT pNOCor � N r� z , D S: n' w• cn m o � VOL 1,9974 OFG, 448 1�JJf 448 8 ft. casement fo` Jlorm Waler---� f 2Z5 2P5 Opr i� G 50 M v N 1�S! .• 1?S! . cotAl lD F I C4 1 V i 200 I 40 40 200 I I O D c`1 I K c �I Iv d X o I L d E V) I.c W o I Z Id o 'o A I o t) 0 1 N a 1 I h r 200 40 - 40 1 260 50 MAP OF -- J. J. HALL'S R F'VI5/ON---- oc L-07--J It ro 22. INCLU3/V6 S i —5F A iDDI rl� � TO YO vTHC L. " AP /NE Approved: CsrY oR GR� C iNE o C RCT�4Y Y ?dAY 31948 et --40: Ftbd fot Roc« MAII 4 1946 .t And Recotd*J 4afriment No !s g MELVIN "MEV FAULK.Country C" ? l T.ttatrt entry.TO"'I �� MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFF IAL MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER / 17 SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA97-03 JAMES L. HEWLETT/TEXAS BANK MEETING DATE: MONDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the special exceptions to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 1205 South Main Street, proposed to be platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Texas Bank Addition as follows: 1.' Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures allows the remodeling or enlargement of a nonconforming use or structure. The proposed special exceptions would allow the existing building to remain as developed and to allow the remodeling of the existing parking lot area If approved it would allow Texas Bank to remodel the drive through lanes and the entrances and exits of the property as shown on the site plan SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds a special condition exists because the building was developed under the prior Zoning Ordinance and the applicant is attempting to create a better traffic flow through his property. Additionally, the applicant has worked with the City,to redevelop the driveways and intersections along Main Street to help alleviate a traffic hazard. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Mr. James L. Hewlett submitted a request for the special exception to 'allow the redevelopment of Texas Bank's parking lot. Texas Bank originally submitted a layout upgrading their parking lot and the drive through lanes to better serve their patrons. The City worked with the applicant to help solve the traffic hazard at the entrances to Municipal Way (which accesses the Library and the Community Activities Center) and to Texas Bank. The site plan is not in the packet but will be delivered to you later this week. MR/ga 0:\BZA\97-03.4 I `1 TA lz P' 1.2•P. 4st DALLAS RD. —'1 Tow- Y .463 AC Ts 264 c I. 1, I ^ TS t .74 AC j't ' 'ate : •` n, 1.. •..KA r 1 r.n a% ,t C 22 t {� r /{ / To 29At Z -0-9 ` "^ ' r.y 3F •` .7u: H[ O. .c3:AC >Tp. 4 k- 1 X 1...-- T, r �4 �S(CIA wrfC 1 • J.Klaw � i �•plt fn �. 1 1 .J(r� Y ,w`' ".r• I r.x K r Y! 1 aw �c I• '•-'.1"r��. s is 1-. .. 1 t 1 i I tiY s ��cBg '�C •.. 7 T e °° es. $ - I cop, _ Ts NASH ST. `_ t s g 4 F 1 Q GUIr GU _, 24 (!�! DT. i yr` K s:. 1 t `�' UN`Cu86=012 ' ` 0 Z8T-�Bt 1 32A LWPTIWN 4E a jA Z81-1 1 A 21 N. s 280-08 1 Z 1 ICI . 6 T / TA Po GU TF IJ • .3"U 2.84 AC. C „ Gu ��pp MUN� I N E t �a TQ IF2 RPp I o 1 `• s c, 3c At Gl1 G `60�2 ! t�-�i5 AC. 1 —� VINE ST. , 2, 21 . 2 7 'ji 2 t a r . .. CU 823 -02 AC 13 ,• 3t . . 80 132A J 22 G A , •�•• •�• — u s < 70 la — S 21 ¢ S y .^ y i2 0 S .3• AC a yW� I 2¢ J Z Z j • S I m i cc i le 7 HANGER L.N. R ' jy Q j F iF m 42 AC t ` 5. y 12 I s ► BZA97-03 l &C TEXAS BANK e 1i q 7 1 jJ 1 1 &6 , Y` l .62 Ac TRc41 � s621 Ac SU91-03 1 , t 9 cc PQ \\2 < 1.c- ac Z87-1 7 AC. LA uQ b1-06-1997 1-:51P11 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 18174240545 Fl.0 CITY OF GRAPEVINE RECEIVED BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATIC10 13 1997 1 APPLICANT James L. Hewlett PLANNING NAME- , ADDRESS: 11300 N. Central Expressway, Suite 400 CITY/STA, ZIP Dallas Texas 75243 I E. - HOME: 972/495-7361 WORK: 214/369-5020 FAX: 214/265-9460 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Texas Bank I i-- - ADDRESS: 1205 South Main Street, CITY/STATE: Grapevine Texas ZIP: 76051 HOME: WORK: 817/481-9688 FAX: 817/421-7922 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 1205 South Main Street 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. See Attached Listing -Exhibit "A" 2 01-06-1997 12:51PM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1E174240545 P.C�4 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. The conditions that exist for requesting variance is that the bank was built in.1967 and has remained in same configuration of setbacks, landscaping, parking, etc. since that date. No physical changes are being requested except for a new drive-in teller lanes to replace out of date teller facility. 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. All variance items listed in item #5 (Exhibit "A") above have existed since 1967 and received approvals at that date. The bank is not asking for any additional variances beyond what is currently existing. 3 Ul-06-1997 12:52PM DEUELCIF11ENT SERU I CES IS 1",4.240545 F.05 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) ,JaT� ,-, APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) ies L. Hewlett APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER (PRINT) Roy/�tAqq OWNER SIGNATURE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS #LDAY OF Q�aA' ' 19- 7 / v LOIS POWELL NOTARY PUBLIC NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS my Comm.Exp.6-11-2000 DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS WkDAY OF QAA 19 q7' 110 LOTS POWELL N TARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TE-7A-S NOTARYo PUBLIC STATE OFTEXAS MY Comm.Exp.6-11-2000 DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, 7X 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 4 c O O O �+ •N 0 W 03 rn Z c = o •E o .0 � -o `Y' Z U `� 4' 0 c m o� 0E NEm =co 0 _ aQ � d 4 d '7 n �v to In w "3 3 L V L 3 N o .L ++ U U c %- c 0 «; �+ O 0cn ±� = C. M O E c y 0 �G V a0+ .0 c m 0 tm m0 0 �; M 0 N � c m c .3 v � m �- N = � a�i y Z cn O c' N C 0 •� ,� N a ~ ai r M 0 v 4)i N m axi . 4) 4) 'o cc r•- N — O g U _ — C. E ,� ,� �., cn n. c a cn ,� cn 0 0 -0O y c L U U Val N N N Cr Q• d = '� tQ = E 0 •0 = 4) M 0 = .= O N O N Uf E ~ L V! 4) ~ 41 3 cC ~ Q Y k U �+- c o� .- 40 0 40 4a O Ov- oo N 0 � 'O '- � � N U > Q.' (D cm IV 4 C .0 �_ .- c w N 1, N O U. d N LL N d 0 LL �, �;, 00 O e- Q� 1- O ~ m G dV O N 11 1� 1, ED 4) V) R C +�-+ m0 � ~ It! Cn Cc 0. 'r 0 •c � �.. m N W W � N •� w LLJ c d Y Ul '0 +.' 0• .o C fl. 0 - mV c C U O m U L .c Z 0 Z C. > Z w aCM O (.) a as may R •c a to 'n .i V) -a c a a "0 3 a a cep , •� c 0 'i o c O > cc c cc > ca 'vi U d ev m W cA _ W O W E _ .� D R cO L cZ = N -0Z C 0 z (D ME0r c° �, = c °o � dgoac � a� 3o � v .c 0n 0 0 0 � °' � (Ac O. 0 3 � C� c -0 3 �v n 0� � L •o cc me c 0- o cc a� z EL z_ R > c'� V) c V d r = V) L- N c �' �„ C• Ri V) h % d 0 E 3 c N ++ d d a X '0 O O c X O c U X M '0 -c X L � 0 a, � •- -per ui E wuj ca > w U ctw Y 0 c .L c cn c — 0 a. 0 N ca O m -0 � '° o o C. m U = N (D rn U F- m 1- cn a Mm -j c �. x0Ec •� O L y V) 4) • • • • • • •i • f" L O C. m 0 .O 0 � W z R m z C V! U) U) uj z vim-• O U) L. O Z H of L. d.� V-- O C O �- c o. c v "a = 'C N U) ai O .aU) .IIII Ri N c O O 00 c N +.• L M CD L L O O O w. w C co U) C' U) + + ' O N a! 00 w- `~ (D d v- v- co r- '! O r- tD M C 0) LO ti Qe- +•' e! O! ti Net � MtD � W 'Cr- V U) _ LL N O N •U) ,U) to U) .U) .N :y R H N N ' U. a C Ri R! t!) cv to cv tQ Ri R t0 a W '5 O F- .0 U. U) v- d W d o L vJ � � � N o _ W i as tv ,o O _ W R N O E to O 5 UJ _ •� Z °? o � v_ o cM v c '' C) Q Lo O 0 v msW U) Y y � O p N .x �a 3 U c C a E ' te! ,� +r. CDur U CC CD C N _ E � � C v- Q a � x W e- N x a� C- — •� •_ > V?CD 0 poN d 0 ( N_ yJ � 'C O `er oa E 'E 0U °° E °.) •cQ 'EE O � �. N � � i.+ w A d a p) O C C C U) O _) C C O) C •0 y L N C V 0) .0 .0 •C � C 2 .0 'C L O C 73 Z d C. a) W E E � „_, p •� R 3 -C 00 m 'E . w 3v •E d o . c O a J Uf -� 0 o L. d I I L .a E C CO _ E C) � '' x 'c •E 'x 'x � � c � � v� cna: � wc3 aw JJLLm 0 W.(n � wz 'Oc 111111 � f1t111 1111 11v, o L a = C t/! ® O � �' V ° � 3 v- y d •3 W r� '.� oMcvc >% c 3 Lv m = CY) z � - c >> a w cm '..... a• E 0 �ii 4 p = i tOi 3 to L 'O U Z M R ��,, C N '' CL ;G ' t4 C c W L C�z� to O N t4 ti H y� �• tQ = ,+�� C �' C �! V v m L G� c .0 d '3 N Q1 a N _ N_ V O to d d > .O V t� co C A cQ t4 N O C) O R! t- L .G C E o N '� cr E +L.. +'_' C CD ~ (D .N cW cad 3 w cc 0 UJ� U � L rnW O S C i C. i H a 0 0 P v a N d d CM N a L O 0) O- cA N C .� N U y� O �.+ CO — D axCe u N 4) o ao c cIX cc � F- � 0 LL 0 o c0 avic4) EH o 3 E . • �, E y •c + � � a cm co � > c� c� 3 Xo � � _ 4- CW �«- � W O C •N (D W C 0 >+= m v N a c � a. y c) w. t cn3dc W 0 c E c i a o a� 0 �, 3 CY c° O .> .� ow3cW v o �° W mac° w v to- L cI F- V R m a ` O cr > a w to 3 :_ .0 N N W L `O w v w +r . CL • i � ,� d � iII a.•a 4) � Q a E ° _rn > � � O O R m tp C W 3 N C O. W O i W o ;� -61 a � cNa :.. z c = v Lz ago z •v c 3 c Q � E c- Q a� q a. �. CL C m EO CL C m O E0 > 0) 0� d Q c >+ 0 U s CM dU L EU L t,y C 3 0 'C +, r- c 00 = C (D C .c }, 04) ciNccz cv3Y :c0Z +rcvc 0 — z m o 'v c L "0 con t= m w R o C L (Q �•' N C- F= m .� r- 0 M a c ° L cn t ,r � o. L C cn E H w o � i N ca x ca o• 0) c ° (° X c v a X 0 �_ r- - 0. W m 0 0 .00 0 3 .N W �G N Cor i cf co W = O 'c c) 3 �' W c 4a R! to R i .i C i m o x 'O C 0 � ° .0 +•� C G) O _ Y v rr L 'x .0C C '� O O t .0 Q. C d d R d d ch m t cNQ J O O 0 "GU"GOVERNMENTAL USE . NOTE: THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GRIIPEVIA Sae.EROSION CONTROL ORdnANCE SHALL TDC"BANK Be MET DURING THE PoftM OF CON$IVAXTIQM 2 qo.Gf5 12M S.Main SeeN EXTERIOR WALL MATERMIS,EXCLUDING DOORS AND Wavlows. Qrncevbe Text ARE BRICK ON ONEi1OUR CONSTRUMM TWKA-100% MINIMUM 2S REM YARD SETEAGK The Dow equiren requests that the following Variances"da the Cited.TM Hank was oiramse ay tlupnof and constructed m t afT Ban at Moslem REOUMEMEM a70% SIGN"A" L that Lase mat all ratua.nww of the City o/ar.p.yw.Slera that dlde the City hu modified raqulrer4Ma,some of which mak.me i ing buill Bank { �'9� u. building not In full eomplWK.s wait eurnld utbKs.Tho Sank Is not requesting fa raw varlaneas,only varlanraa to•Yore for the asLating building ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION IItN1L EE fxaeiatrR CONSTRUCTION to be accepted as coma sucnd.Th.following an the .—Me vsnnces Wing requested: CEEi F 7_ N ANY swam REVSSIONa SHALL MlQi THEi�� : Cumnl zoMn9-"P4 Prohde filed Office `Total alb Area 1 Office ohnitc no change n ium ed , z 4e• Raquattl E9iTa OF SECTION 6o,SKIN STANOAROa 19,ON ag•R x Nannies right of easy mcomer for Municipal Sivtl. 1 S.411 aq.ft Rwlastl tow r16.411 eg.R i ' • SulldIng Sgwn Food. Ft07C f �lIM1N�i pRINtUP Tq t IRS I lLICLUANb a L j � l / r.ur.0 eq.REtinro t agwia EHA6Le ONLy'1�„e DdMON5HE0 hPfL'K (N.N fbR"(tifI TuWut. DivNnTeam) .0yomare o t" T772wfast OK"WTOW OF ww Dv6@P L"ZiDs Total z Inpen AOUS Ana 71,282 square fast Or 62% •'+ o 3'-0"Square Signs and anphles"Meting to be accepted plus row,monument sign...shown on attached Sin Plan.u0muaen. s 1 FXr3vINa COMPLIANCE YARfA.NCE REQUESTED FOR TMIE ITEM ®5jS5, EXISTING SIGNS AND GRAPHICS TO REMAIN _ Plat"the existing property Me not been platted and fW required Plat is Wing MemMad wish this Submission. O J46geMrJ(d flDI6 � Site Plan,a mrr like Plan Is being wbmhted with this submission.AN existing conditions an requested W be approved with that minor 0: EX67a1D LANDMXNO ExieTwo LANDWAPE/D addition*being_EXISTrequesING atl to also N aE VARIANCE �. -- _EXISTexi COMPLIANCE VARIANCEREn system REQUESTED FOR THIS ITEMIn Wdaupa PWr the existing wet landscaping he and IMpatlon arking is n d the h to a apPnvetl wan n t emW addition W new luewpirg QI between Me new dffw In tsien red the new employees Parking lot red the new beldscepod area on the roM muMrg lean tM U reeYgMmM of MUMcipld BouerW. 5 Pxl TIAa CO PLMNCE VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR THIS ITEM { le?Cd.SrBclilk °'n>" `"te"`• Maximum Dewhy-mWmum Ro°r area rNio W 1.0 atlwi F.A.R.Ia.OT Minimum Lot Sbpvics-ai m h m10,000%sewn lost actual le ae9%t q..fi.gross or r16,1p ag.R net agar ROW taken EIGSTa90 PAVEMENT > Minimum Open Spam•snag.um 20%open apace actual Is 9,9929 sq.R or%b based upon gross Maximum Building Covanparwfmum te% actwl la 9,96/aq.R are%bassi upon gross 0 )fDAoe DRIVE IN TELLER > Maximum Impervious Sudac6a0%of tow actual Is 71.282.q•R or 42%based upon arose W T7FIC FLOW �-_ft tea __ X 18'0' r—---'T TRAFFIC FLOYY\ p' .f i • Ana ReOulatlons 1 AGM M V klrf IF11C64i L--•--r--J �gRRyIpF > Lot Widthminfmum e0 fast Mwl is 251 fast —3 Raw" y nrfklµt" PPM.0- � Q.AT'ly i � ATM SERVICE > LoI Depth•Minimum 100 fast .cruel la 1a fastUJI 4 SIGN"A" - - - --_ ,_ _ { > Front Yard-minimum 26 fast landscaped actual Is 9 fast Hit Building S.Ibeck •child Is 96 fast.lit 1„• t. 7 t I 2 — — 4 { SIGN "Al" t/L f 7 Thn stint wu rrot In edstenu�wMn mo cumnt bulldmg...bufit /'l ExI3TINa OMPL ANCE Y RIA.CE REOUE6TFD FOR THI3 ITEM > 3lde Yard.minimum la 101.1 landscaped actual gnat from 16 feet to Zi feet �� rwn ( ( I T41"Square > Raar YeM•minimum is 26 fast actwl is 169 fast.I- TEMPORARY SIGNS WILL BE INSTALLF1ME INSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE FOR TRAFFIC FLOW Torueadga°festsungpandng actualh TSfeeta- Q ( NEW NIUMUDA LANDSCAPwO 'bftd ( { > Distenc.between buildin w 1 I L O'S'�• w+t i lei height 20 feat not frog I.im Y NEW gUMUOA GRASS LANDKXNG I his Heigh"mfnknum gas story or 20 fe.l In MfgM exishnp is one story Exlatln9 bu#41 ts 26 lest N• z {SIGN"C" t' - --- t_ ..-_4 SIGN"B"' s New DnEXI beer canopy 4 iT'•4" � � EXISTING COMPLIANCE VARMNCE REQUESTED FOR THIS ITEM � > b o e O 1 T ■{(_ .......Pmty � l�B i\ Existing Wrlandsca anti imbe Inc in pieceIncreased and One remain. The ante for wWaupinq will W Incnseed from tW existing conditions by the addition o(a 7,310 Nuan rash landscaped born I r J b __-_ -_- __- _ i buffer between the new Onw•In Taller Lanes and me Employee Putting.This area will b inngaad and c°nrecbd to me existing / inigatlon eye—.Two existing tesa will be removed at me aMnnua from I W properly to Municiptl BoubvaM.TMre will also I j�.ems be three tress removed by the City of Gnpevins when the nldlgnamid of Municipal Boutavard 1.complased. O I I {-� �T (�)PN/FMA11<. Rea6HP Kwy to TRAFFIC Than is not sufficient landscaping along the front yam(Main Stroh)with the existing parking to empty with Me new ordinance. ,t+ryH-Ur'04AA,�, me. IYSURPA,.s 4 EXLs PAVEMENT This was in compliance when coneuucted. U GS`Y TRAFF LOW q ^ 1 ty' RaSe""as"We"O' �rtXra6s�,wudr DIRECTIONAL Them h also not sufficient landscaping Islands within the existing 41 Parking to comply wiM tM new ordlnnu. TRAFFIC FLOW er-oag fAm611V 6htL1 EXISTING COMPLIANCE VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR THIS ITEM gOQZZ —r- — r; GRAPHICS oneuashwang U 0..7 Q 4 ' The existingangular parkingill be resW d wish perpendicular parking The tPaw will be 9 fast.I feet with yW(L O ® minimum 24 feet on-, w W parpen W q aPacee. Parking Q W= N C. y o b SIGN "Bit Required painting of am parking apace nor 300 fast of prow floor area 17,977.82 •26.69 f Parking provided •et ten Z�Z N 1 ' V ---_�--�i'--�II'• • ODatml Loading•one spate Is required py new ordimnct-mom LukFO THIS imd o z k' a --- P aca2P� i [r�r ___—___ —J EM SIGN 1�" ( yY N T-0"Square Design Requirements T O Q Z I ___ _sAx { Q 1.- > Outdoor Waage not applicable I- ;3 N > Mechanical and electrical equipment now roof top A/C equipment Is _ m bTAI VA 1[} L .P - provided f Lighting existing lighting is requested to be approved and this new lighting for the G YQ �•d• S7 A• l;y { DnvNn Telen to be approved as designed and We required by the Federal Banking regulations. .Them will also small Rood N 'i _. lights directed at the new monWMnt'dheetloeW sfe m. `' M C W __ b1,e• II:Ls U! > Masonry requirements taisUng building i.all masonry N N Q _ .y r NofC'.AbL'TME4hrOLLS Aa8 1a "Kaii,WAdh ( � EXISTING COMPLIANCE VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR THIS ITEM 0 y '? 1 N"A\ iAGf ant'pnt6i c:fvt DIMe7.j Mwrr eAmrat► ( 1�►.A«.7i/fil lI� 0 Q N O = S Ij o .mVaeN tteeH ~ J ( 4 C m o 4 TEW 4xhAN1Gdrwa ° { ONE WAY s SitU) U, W h ( � s { DO NOT w :s =_ Q o Z Io= ch - - LL o ENTER _ =old Z Ul k h $ 2.69 (� W a CASE NAME: Lot,Block t TexasBank Arkiftion N 01 d k �l . 1 ( h SIGN C °W �; • µ„� Li. lass; c9 O S ° li I ( S cc 19 CASE NUMBER: C xassB n BZA9T a 6 �m 7� 1 s { 2061T South Main Sheet S y= '9 v>a� y 212 z w dz ❑ ❑ I { Grat2ovine,Texas k s g 5 �J I Yo e� $• zF z m 36t 1 6 �tfr9PArlh �og e3 tt"= Yng G p , PLAN OF: Texa3Bank Qr d = FxMTa/O LANOSCAPINO °TMO LANDSCAPING CASE E: CP97.01 S BZAST-03 0 Y ga ;; • v �" N Polls'9 CUPS--Tt� MINIMUM 26'FRONT YARD SET9ACK �ryt�,,G,cyR,p I I IOCATiON: 1206 S.Main Street g a ~a¢ 2 ?' ADDITION: Lott Block °m 31.0 _ d TexasBank Addition Hits nn xg gy;o xo w �.Q'' K' .- - 94; Q',i 01%IS'_d SIGN"S" t Co� NDTE:F4U+T OP,4GTi1At. V e 3 UZ may+ M4Lt IS MITT Ai at'". arrE xy �3 Q gas g 1. {iTL M+J i s 0 8 06 i x Typfcel Parking Space V X 1Ir Mayor Secretary u�Q y- R-wf- Data: x282 169 a W 1 fRAFFiC FLOW Lasrr+D PAVEMENT ! VICINITY MAP TMS/�s.>m+�rv..•see O ` ``Y rq scu.t z 1\WY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION P, Ms.: I . CITY SITE PLAN SUBMISSION Was,OMc NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION rl$o"D SIGN Chdmwt TExASSANK ADomoNIF aeeuS+e •', ) APPLICANT: THE Sl7EaNaSERNCE GROUP,INC. CXIXM16 ctxEt `✓ 11300 N.Central Expro6away,suite 400 Date: 3q,g Ex9aT No LANDSCJd INO Dallas,Texas 76243 Telopttons 2141369.6020 Facsim8s 21428S•8460 EXISTING SIGNS AND GRAPHICS TO REMAIN Architect of Raced 4 Jamae L Havelatk AIA President Stoat: ONE OF FOUR SHEET OF FOUR OWNER: TGX"B&* APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN -- 1205 S.Main Strait CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. ( _h I'f E_Pla t -- -- - NUUN STREET Teleentins,phone Texts 76061 J =pYi/rIN GTRai'r l — Telephax Texas 1.9868 �jGAtrO: I/°2dL Oa-— ___ Facaimille$17/421-7922 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SUBMISSION DATE: "PO"PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USE Roy Sbwart,Director January 3.19 97 Y�T6 --�kw kr LM.du• *lMt � ! 20 z Exmmmv W.LTREATVANTONF OF DRVE9t Taw WALL I + ~ s L-9 ROOT U cc WILLLTWAI WN►Old NEW - - --- Ik -�' P.f��oT EI�EVftT(L'�N f`10 Ez-T�H e"1,aV,4-rio j a 4uFt.tM:(/e' ILO' Exn=R WALL MATmmiABMmomxi, .Le:yet a I=o' EUX"rOR rME aYM.LTVAERAM11011 AND TMCANOPY OVEATM NEW DIVA W TUIMLANO FAwA of GWo"Snail ea DRMf To mATCN he v=Tm ammma OoNcREIA PA,eta. E+ ! I I � � KA*r vwve-w Tou,L 5 PLAN OF: 7exar8anA DtlibN7l h4 2 '-� CASE R: CP97-0tiBZA97 1 fdw� Gk,A/c=o• LOCATION: 1205 S.Mai n Sheet -- Tex.-Rank Addtdon G�G(10fJ� tioU�'++ W��T E�EVATt©t�l tJ�LLS yet-f=0' Mayor S.aamy 6LAL6:I/e,,.(Sp, Date: PLANNING AND ZONM COMMISSION i 0 ® +¢ tq• tJeORAA,I Chai"nan ° 1 !E WA&.Lw `" r — --- ----- ------ - - ca - Date: 4- �r— --L G�A4,2 -- Sheet TWO OF FOUR I i � LU '�+ o APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK tlW CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES N i � LtY.A.tor 0 6mWwor /GCA DT�A3t} �aw a cbo"lOVT4 U u7tD ccuuwl BNuowWy OUTLINE OF NEW CANOPY 60()T H Er,E\lATlV 1 ( Of/n+., OUTLINE OF °frOA:i "DIEHOLD' EXI5TINCv COMMERCIAL EUILDING --- ROOF DRAIN 5Y5TEM" --- CLAMPING RING WATER GUT-OFF MASTIC "/15UAL AUTO 4 0YA EPDM ROOFING ! TELLER SYSTEM" _ 4t MEMBRANE U I (5 REOWREDJ t- ( PnilesGN°_ gettro ROOF IN5ULATION < t _ CITY SITE PLAN SUBMISSION D.we Dow //Bv/6f7 ESOARD E W NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ILI Imo' v PIWP,_ FLA L I VI51ON TELLER TEXASBANKADOtT70N RB°wan. WI W NDO " fCht.fit y8d.t-O° L— ---- -- CASEWORK(BY DRAW ONtANK BANK MTL. DECK ,�—.—.-- PPL ER)IP. SHEET OF FOUR CONT. ANGLE CASE NAME Lot I Block I TexaaBft*Addltlon ',.... SUPPORT CASE NUMBER: CP9741 i BZA91-03 05 ROOF DRAIN PNUEMATIC TUBE SECTION 2D5,7SokckR Main Strict SUBMISSION DATE: SCALE: NTS SCALE: NIS Grapevine,Texan January 13,1997 OF �T9 ... No.I OATS RMS104 A11110Y. 2 FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS BY CITY-\ 3 _ --- OF: r«,sank CASE#: \\\ \ CP47-01 i BUYT-03 �-j-, LOCATION: 1206 S.Main Street ,5'0 '^••• - I ADDITION: Lot 1 Block 1 --CONCRETE `\.\ �\\ PAVING ---.� TezaeBank Addition MUNICIPAL BOULEVARD _ > _ " `` I-- ------ - secretary sc 1 20, feet 0 Maya a ••i FUTURE MUNICIPAL 7,Z7(' 4 "' ---' p4 • �S/b".IRF•?•j• BO�TM�D ZI t� 20' t0 O ,t 9'R ...10 R 10 R• ..5/E' /RF i / l S 89:18' t1l.AND ZONING COMMISSION LEGEND � qq Lx 6 {:.:::::::::: e Z 3.\-ASPHALT 66y 5 S ' j0 1:y5p5 y5try .PAVING u 10' 66 t 1` • 6 /c ~ 6* 0 CO O FLAG POLE 656�! ` 6y CURR k GUTTER 6y5,t}�'."._ .'.. ,t .• �' 30'R ..INSTALL CURB# GUTTER •.•'•^.:•.:�_.�•--I I` 1 OT TELEPH E MH �a PP t 30'R 30>R t 0 •- ••• ,p >y5lt - AFTER CITY INSTALLATION 'MAINTAIN 1S- MIN a c` ( '`T' • .�_... ...•.•.'. - I Of ELECTR MH 4 LAMP POST t5 1Io. T•L �,,?py e 4 Of DRIVEWAY 6 MDIAN- oO DE ALONG GU ER • . 651. ry 11 3p R"�\ NUM. SANITAI Y SEWER MH WATER VALVE •yy' ii 6 yY .5 �` SI'' X., C OD STORM )RAIN MH w W P.. 65 \ ® RESEAL R WATER METER `! T of - 1, S THREE OF FOUR T .•. t tt .. ......•..'. ASPHALT '�� © GAS M d CAS METER PAVING �. • Ae PROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY IN ORK IN STREET IGN Z;C FIRE HYDRANT • t�6 1 6y1T CFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINAES. • 66yT 4 2.5'R� A 1'1 - - / TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE y1• ay ; J DE ARTMMEl4T OF DEVELOPMENT SERVIC OAK T E •f 5AwCUT -j i_ tOI i i 1 PROP. CURB �( I '� © MISC. MH it 11 1 1 It iol STOPS _ Ii et I lit 1 I CREPE MYRTLE W600 POLE FENCE \ •_ 11 11 lot 11 I 1 1 CONCRETE PAVING :1 I I i t - I I t t TEXAS BANK 1 III I I. . 18'-'{---,26'--�{--18' I f• PINE O GRASSED AREA `a t 1 11 1 1 11 11 .••'•';.. _ I• - I( (-� NEW ASPHALT RESEAL l_ 7 PAVEMENTX15T. PAVEMENT ' NEW REMOVE EXIST. ' - :•i.' P �- I ;7 •.,.•:••.•. _. '_- __ - - I DRIVEWAY 0 PAVEMENT AY W/CURB • / ! I I i �`--RESEAL ' \ PAVING X 600.00 F C PROPOSED TOP OF CURB Q'?' tjC ( I I I 1S X 600.00 P PROPOSED TOP OF PAVEMENT •3m t �� d a i �' 1= �, r1 E ,j,. C ' NEW 18" CONCRETE CURB do GU 7TER I X. I { TEMPORARY ASPHALT CURB _ EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER 1 { .NEW 18' CONCRETE / - /• a l I \ PROPOSED CURB STOPS O _ I I CURB.k CUTTER -CRASS AREA• _�' i t RESEAL k _ c�, I �\ v�C7 ` i -ASPHAL7l 6y6• • Cki I POINT NORTHING EASTING POINT NORTHING EASTING s PAY1N l N N (� I t0' REMOVE J j fO �t 1 5009.5816 5406.4884 19 5305 d25B 55t 7,6381 STOPS AST. CURB I ! 1 ( 2 5035.5883 5408.1584 20 87,9866 5176.0701 t I D { 3 5030.1300 5365.5264 21 5 T::.B 105 51 is 2684 4 5010.i 233 5365.8562 22 ,308.1606 �ta5 1826 5 5051.5328 5328.3174 23 528d.as9a •156 td3t 5051.3243 5310.3;78 24 52Tt.8589 5156.2554 - i I 7 5051.0461 5284.3193 25 526t.02B3 51511 7197 ,` tl 5050.8378 5266.3205 26 5.4 12a 139 3506 ~'ASPHALT ' 1 9 505t.4383 5246.8123 27 7 .il8t 09 .'1�a5 PAVING (( o I 1 ' 10 5072.5012 5198.6811 28 5 72.-60t 1NDa02 •� / ! ,'( ( 11 5107.1077 5178.1634 29 C 2s 51`,s tlsal r 12 5258.8787 5244.4116 V) 5 fi' ? St JF 7122 13 5248.8246 5265.0292 11 an`2 I. U 7y I.•. - ',:: j + it 3249,0329 5282.0280 52 S6t- •6.6111 I j 15 5286:7081 5281.5920 35 ..7 i+ •os1 a..21 2.5R 9•R.� ` �_ _ {� tt ! 16 5286.3930 5307.5974 34 233<091 50436.79418 2.5•R� - ;(9'R . •':9'R; LJ•• ",y •• 17 5276.3092 5307.7141 35 .._i 552s 50689007 RESEAL ENO CURB - p• _ 18 5276.5175 5325,7137 36 5025.4165 5103.5876 `*sPHALT /{/ .W/1' TAPER '•1'.• - 6y6 p6 1 `j PAVING __ __ _� p SMM#1 F MUNICIPAL BOULEVARD NEAR EA TI _ore ' -�`_••--__._._��•. -_--_ •. •__ _-_. _ 6y7• c. OF M DI N NOS AIN STREET AND \\ _ ,! --.. -..�. -v:E QUHD CPS MONUMENt ON V. INTERSECTION OF 4 S _ a• OF MEDIAN NOSE. B.M. /2 406.7_2 _` - - _ - - B i MUNICIPAL ACT-_-�r _ __ 2 SHOWN E EON. 325O 50UTHOOF C/LTONOR . __ AN 0 51 EAST OF C/L OF MAIN STREET) " _ M VIER OF TRACT /'�-- ---- N 89'1 4'1�" W -. - _ CITY SITE PLAN SU13MLSMN °> .•• �� J J I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5/ar IRE • \�� ( TEXASURKADDITM DESIGN: GBw SCALE: 1'=20' OATE:DECEMBER. 1996 NOTES: \ DRAWN: GB W APPRVD: BRG J08 NO.: i STORM9T[WERS AOR TO T NLETS VERIFY LTO 8E EMOV DTIANO ��\ I TEXAS BANK ADDITION CONTACT ENGINEER IF A DISCREPANCY IS FOUND. 6'<; f 1205 SOUTH GRAPEVINE,AIN TE AS STREET 2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING ETAILSINCLUDING NCLU LING PAVINGTIIOPNIREMOVAIF CATIONS.ITEMS. ��� \ SHEET OF FOUR Y\ 3.TEXAS BANK MAY ELECT TO REPLACE PORTIONS OF CASE NAME: Lott- \Tex4rBmtftAdditlon THS WORK-C-PROr ESS AND IS PG•1M�nM({3 QnM® [�(i�QOGdGa1G( f�lLGll�l THE ASPHALT PAVEMENT RATHER THAN RESEAL IT. CPB7-01 i TO CO STR IS NOT \ TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION \\\` CASE NUMBER: B2'Ai7-03 OR rE a 4.REFER TO SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR GENERAL NOTES. TexasaanA 7/3 Q7 1205 South Main �ANtNAM M6 E2 DATE: a.•e..••.s.w•w.m.� Grap"m,Tetum 13,1097 B oelae.Lae W. OAT[ REVISION ARRROV. E � 1 MUNICIPAL BOULEVARD I MUNICIPAL BOULEVARD I , i Q I ' GENERAL NOTES 300 0 too 200 scale feet 1. ALL DRIVEWAY AND PARKING ELEVATIONS ARE TO TOP OF CURB UNLESS 6 (jtl i* 100' OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. REFER TO APPROVED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PUNS FOR GRADES ON WALKS, BERMS,AND ALL OTHER LANDSCAPED AREAS. 3. FIELD CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LATEST APPROVED ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING PLANS, AND GOVERNING CITY OF GRAPEVINE ; P S ECIFICATIONS. (• _ _ S _ 2 /tS STORM SEWER CALCULATIONS 4. ALL EXCESS EXCAVATED MATERIAL AND STRIPPINGS SHALL BECOME THE DEVELOPED CONDITIONS PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A PROPER AREA 1 AREA 2 MANNER OFF THE PROJECT SITE. 5. THE TOP 3 INCHES OF SOIL SHALL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED ON THE _6,,` ` I O_= 6.5 cfa Q,�= t8.5 0.2 cls SITE AND SPREAD OVER THE SITE AS TOP SOIL DURING FINAL GRADING. -- } _ -= 21.t cla Oc = i cfa � S, = 0.389 ST = 0.14% 6. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM j ��'•-` i V• = 10.5 fps V• _ 10.7 fps BUILDINGS. FINAL GRADES WITHIN 10 FEET OF STRUCTURES SHOULD SLOPE '� AWAY FROM STRUCTURES AT A MINIMUM 5 PERCENT GRADE. 7. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION FOR PAYMENT PURPOSES. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN REQUIRED DRIVEWAY PERMITS FROM THE CITY OF f GRAPEVINE AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. TRANSVERSE CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE SPACED NO MORE THAN 12 FEET W 1f w t✓t 1/� _ �\ APART ON ALL PAVING. F '-� � F \ \ 10.ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM THE CITY GRAPEVINE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE NORTH CENTRAL RAL COUNCIL OF \\ GOVERNMENT(NCTCOG) STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, EXCEPT AS NOTED. IN THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT, THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL GOVERN. i1'� ' 1 \_ �`•�.� I�`_� ys%� 1\ -�.� 11.ALL LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR t 111 r Jam` �r Ir, SHALL NOTIFY ALL APPLICABLE UTILITY COMPANIES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO I' -_-- (�~��_ -�`--' ( \� CONSTRUCTION SO THAT UNDERGROUND LINES CAN BE MARKED. ANY UTILITIES WITHIN IMMEDIATE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE UNCOVERED. TEXAS ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY (817) 336-2328 / SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE ENTERPRISE 9800 TU ELECTRIC (817) 858-2569 LONE STAR GAS (817) 571-9496 AT&T. MCI 1-8GO-245-4545 FORT WORTH WATER DEPT. (817) 871-8295 GTE (972) 413-1105 PARAGON CABLE (817) 488-7526 12.ALL LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL APPLICABLE UTILITY COMPANIES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SO THAT UNDERGROUND LINES CAN BE MARKED. ANY UTILITIES �U ,/ II '�I I �/ r j WITHIN IMMEDIATE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE UNCOVERED. �' h 13.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING STREETS, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC., ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FREE OF MUD AND DEBRIS FROM CONSTRUCTION. U.THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48 HOURS PLAN OF: TexasSank (2 WORKING DAY) PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. CASE k: CF'97-01 3 EiZAYT-03 15.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PUCE Flll OR WASTE MATERIAL ON ANY PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER. LOCATION: 1206 S.Main Street IF THE CONTRACTOR PLACES EXCESS MATERIAL IN AREAS WITHOUT WRITTEN Lot I Block 1( / PERMISSION, HE WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM SUCH ADDITION: Tox&*Bank Additlon FILL AND HE SHALL REMOVE THE MATERIAL AT HIS OWN EXPENSE. i6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION AND WILL PROVIDE THE NECESSARY TRAFFIC BARRICADES AND / WARNING SIGNAGE TO PROTECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. ALL BARRICADES, I WARNING SIGNS, LIGHTS, DEVICES, ETC. FOR THE GUIDANCE AND PROTECTION •...••.. �..er�i 5- "• --t --� / /jJ MAY- Secretary OF TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIANS MUST CONFORM TO THE 1980 TEXAS MANUAL OF Date. UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, AS CURRENTLY AMENDED, BY THE TEXAS ( DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. 17.ALL REINFORCING STEEL AND DOWEL BARS IN PAVEMENT SHALL BE GRADE 60 AND A AND MAINTAINED AT THE CORRECT CLEARANCES BY THE USE COMMISSION PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 18.N0 PER CHRSONNRS SHALL OPEN, TURNOR OTHE R OFF. INTERFERE WITH, ATTACH ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY UNDEVELOPED CONDITIONS DEVELOPED CONDITIONS chairs AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. ARRANGEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION WATER SHALL BE MADE THROUGH CITY OF GRAPEVINE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. Date: 19.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ADEQUATE SANITARY FACILITIES FOR USE BY WORKERS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. 20.ALL PAVING TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE SAWCUT(FULL DEPTH) TO A NEAT LINE Sheet: FOUR OF FOUR AND THEN REMOVED. 21.NO TRAFFIC SIGNS ARE TO BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. CONFLICT MTH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. 22.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EXISTING FACILITIES FROM DAMAGE. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES UNDEVELOPED CONDITIONS DEVELOPED CONDITIONS RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. AREA AREA C Tc ly IIOD as aim COLLECTION AREA AREAt.-gl Is Ilce Qy QIo COLLECTION NO. (ACRES) (uw) (alnw) (INAR) (CFS) (CFS) POINT NO. (ACM) (N/re0 (wpwY (CIS) (Cn3 POINT Trey DavYENT REPRESENTS CITY SITE PLAN SUBMISSION WDRX-W-PROGRESS AND is NOT NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 0.70 D.8 t0 S.8 11.6 3.2 6.5 PROPOSED 10' CURB INLET 1 0.70 5.8 11.8 3.2 6.5 RELOCATED 10'CURB INLET TO BE Usro FOR CONSTRUCTION2 0.42 0.8 10 5.811.6 1.9 3.9 PROPOSED 10' CURB INLET 2 1.10 5.8 11.6 5.1 10.2 RELOCATED 10'CURB INLET OR P 1/131Q7 TEXA3 ANK ADDITION DESIGN: GSW SCALE: i'=20' DATE:DECEMBER. 1995 DRAWN: GBW APPRVO: BRG JOB NO.: 3 1.57 .82• 10 5.8 I i.e 5.6 11.3 EXISTING 10' CURB INLET 3 1.21 5.8 11.6 5.6 11.1 EXISTING to. CURB INLET 4 5.81 .36e 20 4.0 8.3 11.8 20.3 SAME AS AREA N0. 3 TEXAS BANK ADDITION in 1205 SOUTH MAIN STREET NOTES: AVE GRAPEVINE, TEXAS --- t.COMPOSITE'C" FOR UNDEVELOPED CONDITIONS(•) SHEET IVFFOUR AREA 3 n (O.Bxl.01+0.3x0.58)/(t.S7) a 0.62 CASE NAME: Lot l Block l Texas8ank Addition DR&ONAGE AREAS NAP, DE7QQLS cat NOTES AREA ♦ _ O.Bx0.87+0.3x3.94/6.81 = 0.38 CASE NUMBER: CP97-01 d 8ZA9T-03 2.DEVELOPED CONDITION FLOW TO BE DIVERTED TO Tex7.01 EAST WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT(PER CITY STAFF). Sank 1205 South Main Street SUBM ON DATE:ease Grapevins,Texas 1uary 13,1997 I I a Qg. CIE J cn m °�a10 o Zw ^ — — — _ _LO 'Od 'L6t_9W 'IOA IV"td 2sd iN3►N35V3 Ainun ,Sl ONLLS►X3 — -'�jS£'OCtZ - 3.S�AO � - - - - - - J - 3 {.9£XV.00 S sg _ 99'06Z — — CL W I 'f— �518 '`Jd 'l6Y* l0A 1N3W3SV3 3NIl 83h+13S ,OL JNLLSIX3 — — — — Cf 3NIA3 VNO 30 A113 ti L %o 001 I I I al I I Wc� Z C7"W M ti r^MI o o O J i lyV,can CS a OO � cn OOY� W Z ,. rF r .T o 4 Q f k 51� U cn I to uj '"• 'fig a k C!I L+- I N O 1 q .�W ( !7• QQ; Q M,Q ZNW O ^Ir ,µ_►west-„1 ° +Iva {r� N ' �4v O I d Gn -. TS fF 3Pr V1 i. kir. rt ae�i� W I l Sv V I _ F oU N I . I Z z n I Y� . D a �,I , �z "• U I :" �'i N ,• r 3Nn 9NIOl1ne SZ * „ - LN3W3S Atllt111.At 9*6 Od ZOVS IOA "Wdl 9NLLSIX3 � in ino .2 ►LS NIVN R4 C4 kvmkblH undS) FROM : GBW ENGINEERS PHONE NO. : 214 840 2156 Jan. 13 1997 10:24AM P2 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT � WHEREAS. TEXAS BANK IS THE OWNER OF A 2.710 ACRE TRACT OF LAND IN THE WILLIAM DOOLEY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 422, SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING THAT DESCRIBED IN VOLUME 7302, PAGE 2076, OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY. AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: (DRTCT) I DESCRIPTION FOR A PORTION OF A 4.0 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO AMERICAN BANK OF COMMERCE, RECORDED IN VOLUME 4367, PAGE 115, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; i BEGINNING AT A 5/8" IRON ROD FOUND FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 4.0 ACRE TRACT AND BEING THE SW CORNER OF A CALLED 25 ACRE TRACT AS DEEDED TO THE GRAPEVINE INDEPENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT IN VOLUME 3759, PAGE 556. (DRTCT) THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 406.72 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD FOUND IN THE EAST LINE OF MAIN STREET; (A 100' R.O.W.) } THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 47. SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 290.18 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF MAIN STREET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD FOUND, SAID ROD HAVING A TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATE, NORTH CENTRAL ZONE VALUE OF f Y=7023889.403 AND X=7404707.943; i THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 406.38 y FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 43 MINUTES: 36 SECONDS EAST WITH THE WEST LINE OF i SAID 25 ACRE SCHOOL DISTRICT TRACT A DISTANCE OF 290.68 FEET TO THE POINT i OF BEGINNING, AND CONTAINING 2.710 ACRES OR APPROXIMATELY 118,037 SQUARE FEET OF LAND. i i i RECEIVE® JAN 13 1997 PLANNING i f -1 James L.Hewlett,A.I.A. I_J ' President THE INTEGRASERVICE GROUP, INC. ARCHITECTURE•INTERIORS.PL INNING PROJECT•DESIGN•CONSTRUCTION•FACILITY Royal Central Tower,suite 400 11300 N.Central Expressway MANAGEMENT SERVICES Dallas,Texas 75243 telephone 214/369-5020 facsimile 214/265-9460 ® RECEIVED January 13, 1997 Ms. Marcy Ratcliff JAN 13 1997 City Planner PLANNING Community Development Services Department City of Grapevine 307 W. Dallas Road, #209 Grapevine, TX 76099 Re: Case Name: TexasBank Lot 1, Block l TexasBank Addition 1205 Main Street Grapevine, Texas Dear Marcy, We are submitting the Site Plan Application and Plat for the TexasBank project. I was led to believe that the Variance for "Conformance Compliance" of existing conditions was to be submitted with the Site Plan on January 13,1907. In asking some questions about a "Time Line" schedule that Bob Price and other city engineers were requesting it was discovered from Teresa on Friday that the schedule for the variance application was last Monday. We respectfully request that this Variance request be included in the next Board of Adjustment hearing. It is extremely important to the Bank as well as the City that we not allow the project to be extended for one additional month. The schedule for the City to realignment of Municipal Boulevard is critical to the City, however, they have agreed to provide continual access to the Bank. Therefore, they must defer construction commencement until we have almost completed the Drive-In Teller addition. I have enclosed a tentative schedule that I developed as a result of our meeting with various representatives of the City on Thursday, January, 9, 1997. I believe that we have addressed all items required for submission, but recognize that due to the fact the building is existing there may be some items that we have overlooked. Page Two January 13, 1997 Ms. Marcy Ratcliff Please let me know if you require any further information. We shall look forward to working with you on this Project. Thank you for your assistance. Best regards, App icant for the Owner and Developer RECEIVED CCCI` ED JAN 13 1997 J es L. Hewlett, AIA P(�N N I N esident cc: Mr. Roy Stewart TexasBank, Grapevine, Texas MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OF�FICIA MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER 7J R SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-51 GRAPEVINE KAWASAKI-POLARIS MEETING DATE: MONDAY FEBRUARY 3, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment consider the special exceptions to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 311 East Northwest Highway, platted as Lot 1, Block 2,iA.F. Leonard Addition as follows: The requested special exceptions would allow the existing non-conforming development to remain as de v he remodeling of the exterior grave ar a. a r v i wou allow the existing development to remain as developed and the remodeling of the exterior gravel area as shown on the site plan. u/ VI't 4 e t2ls-fie SPECIAL CONDITION: ( 4C Staff finds a limited special condition exists for portions of the development. Staff feels the applicant could make some effort to provide some landscaping amenities especially around the proposed paved area. Additionally, the applicant could develop a new pole sign meeting the current sign ordinance regulations. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Mr. Wilbur Goltz submitted a request for the special exception to allow Grapevine Kawasaki-Polaris to use the non-conforming development without making any exterior changes to the metal buildings and no proposed landscaping improvements. The applicant is proposing to pave an existing graveled area up to the surrounding fence line. Also, the applicant is requesting to use the existing non-conforming pole sign along Northwest Highway. Staff is concerned that little effort has been made to upgrade the property to the current standards. The widening of Northwest Highway is eminent. This request provides an opportunity to work with the applicant to make some aesthetic improvements to the site. The site plan is not in your packet but will delivered later this week. i MR/ga 0AMAM51.4 1 I C. 'T• �. MST w to — • f14M.Z :. N 2• 'k.�-�R to C 31 ar 22 ,• r �..etl t9K t it va R-TH 42 TIT 20 M K - , R-5.0 R-iNF_2 F+2 A. C.M AC ? Z82-sa zgz-sa Tuft 12 29 .- ::M r TO 3" Tit TR r.2�2 K "pTMA A y J AC T.ti 2e rn F 15.0 �35" S• { i.303 f ill 3i' iR 34 E1.4% � + Z" 1 T"2O1 2e o e : K 3.• K u• Z99-a7 'J(�J ,(t 3 !. 'F 89-07 Z78-T 111 3" 39 m 3eE 3er 93 137, �} lug TURNER TN m 3t. . �. >e I.72 TR TR ., Tx 3es n, r. m rr. m _i aTMe ui Tit 364 25 :3s : •• Q '2i r t31 r 2 Po IC K K Ac ('1, R j t oo 86,E 5 'N gi �. BZA96-51 . . x xe r 0 E t caft. 9i-21 GRAPEVINE e �ll�oA KC Y'�::..:. KAWASAKI POLARIS�AappN t 11 36 a•os c i'_ t sj \92 C 9 •< 16 ■ Wossc9 2 �\ C19 -07. : u h Z8"i. 3504 2 r ' Sg22 070 CIJ91-i s w >.to s c � • ,p� !) I���ts k ___� �f - .) _' k' •. t ` .`� frsr'•c CU91-16 k CC ' CU92 f r _ _ NORTHWEST HWY• - 4 Zrt�i 5i c . ' � .e CUl;S 2 � �17 io• � • .s in SlE f� 5 K �T.9 P s K SCE J�c 'o — ,t,z • .�••. . WAIL ST. � TV ��--- 1 ri r{••• .68 l t { w� I� 11.a `t 3!cFr • f �T� u alr 3 .5 Elect n l � 'a ,'r, •i54C• ! k • j 11 F:'1 1 ! f '� I �'3 l t ['1 1.2 •. t ^ . se K PQ�l5 r �. ' Z�,6 I f E E E573LL ST (` B w . , ( k�Ir Y►r ,N iiy^ t - `3 1 \fig H r"��.. i '• ( 7 a Z, s i 3 t : It TS 14 13 12 { TEXAS 5T " ' e e f e sr l t s I TI . TEXAS Tit 1 el. k iq k 1< (� - aS�TE t �z w! w •.1 I•C S•'C r 15 63 F t0 C— TE 1tAS S* S7D 11 2 .ly! ) .•S r•ez. K .A t.25.+SI 8 j N ` t 2 7 a S . K i"At ff9�d At K 3 i S e I , ; 1 ! c j T 1 t M IT E sa ..1 34 ( ZRIG W I 2 2 3 9 clT �. i0 3. • ~ 11 V J � t IC9 I s �� ; 5 i ' • k r es k is a WORT S 1 1 N,Q,11 \ 7 ' k 4i7 Ir1=1' (.. 1 i O•..., { .. Fk i 1 i �1p 3 • i15 l = `. rr 11/1 r`r�• E .� I_E�h1 S'•'7 3 o . 1 2 3 . ! k'( SkSt- � 015 < 2 •! 1 i w 4 Ts j I, ','I Z82-2 k ` nt tt Z91-*So •�, .. ' ,. STREET _LEt trt AC CU91vl`5 170 t 3. k7 t r1 22 17F� E•ri ir1 ' , Inoi k p�: a.t s i ' I;.11 is n � •1 2 s�s ..y lv uiu ST 7V 1127 °• 1 C. �{ i f " r; t ( �_ CAMWN ST TIJS•C 2 I7. 5 S ' O I u la' 1°�iF� f •F�l'.1.__; 1 it �O\� 6 TOTAL isA a Tot 2T i2F07 1 ° 2.76 AC r 64 CU93-08 CU� � 9 1 c." \ ' Sd 82-40 i ' - z9o-o� C / �.. 0 1'ORD. 8 z.-1 , ' L i TIT 3 =• — ra. .ud5_>c U95-12 N -06 ' -�• \ �-/ 6 -.5 CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION 1 APPLICANT NAME' ADDRESS:--- CITYISTATE: ZIP:--76 HOME- WORK: Z J"Z�C� FAX: . 2. PROPFRTY OWNER(S) NAME- ��"77 ADDR ---SS:—o L CITYP TATE: :5:r � ZIP: HOME- im(K- Y" —WORK: FAX: 4. STREE. 71- ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 5. LIST PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECL C VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEE'l' !ep-c- Ge 7� =��- s � � ��� l� � � Igo DEC PLANNING 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE RE UEST. n/ ©- �er f5> t vtce- 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. HECENED DEC 3 a 1996 PLANNING 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHEF DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, ANC THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIEC BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE)—_ �` r^"`�'— -►�Z.C� �t�c — f' APPLICANT SIGNATUR OWNER (PRINT) / 1, RU L--T �--� OWNER SIGNATURE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS -2 7 DAY OF /�6116gix , 19 9( to.►.. •4 =PUBLIC , a o NOTARY ARY PUt3L1�. FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS M DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 19 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I V E D PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION DEC 3 0 1996 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 7609,P LAN N I N G A VICINITY MAP copyright: ZONW 006*YAY W��AL C. ,,—1,—1..� EXIST POLI! 104 SIMi TO ftmNm IwDa Nq.1 No W,==g-IF— Q,--- 8�,k 06:1.4am wromw D—by,. ve SYM"m My 7-1 D.I.of I.— PROPO-AM M<4VV;;ED -r-2w ,sToR-A4e AREA EXISTINS 5LIUNN6*1 v PROPOSP SITE FOR PAM 4'"Tft GRAPEVINE KAV4ASAKI Arrltox.0400 so 1-r. SPA6ft n" rflorosw 1.7 VVM 11CAREM CWAOMM or ,WasME -4AFW AMMA W 2 TRM SPACZ& LAND- 4"Cffy�b AC4e"AMZ TOM LIST To w rLA^Tw Pcn*N#mowne Al�l ArTM CDlq%.CTWN OF iny tev *m4toyepe"m TO Now"Oew ww. FlK� L-A.e GENERAL NOTES: 05,, 1. ALL REOUMQD,�OF SWMON 55. I N a OFF STREET 11"WiNs.SHALL Be wr 2.ALL ftMGWIt&4eMS Op SwTION 60, 546N R56I)LATIONS.SHALL Be ICT. 0"PLAY AREA S.ALL RMOUIREMM"OP THE 6*ApEVIW 1 or a SOL EROSION OROIKAMCe SHALL Be MET T , to o 4.OMER :t MOM 6MTZ 0i I TO ftv�"1-6 15+ TMIOW ORMP"M TEXAS'16= 14 3, 5.APftW—A&r. -W S.RAIN ST.SUITE MO 6RAFEVJW—TEXAS 16M wosakizMeD+-&&%^Y co"'atcIALWHW+"W%y Com"MaIAL SYNOPSIS in ►LASTIc PACE C--hw am ewe MESENT LAND USE: COMMEICtAL CLOIENT LAND USE DEOWTK)N Pa CITY MASUA PLAN COMMEICIAL rMX'U5tD LANE)USE 76"Murc HC NUmBER OF STOFtErx I -QRPMMI WE S.F. ACTUAL F6LF=TWE ACTUAL ARFA, Is x /X 12 I OD.""a �A w A�- 7;&Wfflrgr— SIDEWALK AAEA- 291&F. MAXPALIM VILIUS APILk At;I VAL WAMMMAJU AMA, 91.5x(57.353 SFJ :BULOW 09= Ion ACTUAL VAWINQ 8 W44W 9-emrrTAL DATE.— JAWARY I&IM MOM 14474HIM,AREA AT INKONS 02 EXCUmpow mom Ajar AREA CALC%L^Tk)W VchDi-ey STREET CL E C-ONDMIOW.L WE PERMIT ^WhDmahM SALeS zomw W�y commv�uAL A44-180MAM ONAPMVC KAKA6AA0 Sh..t Nu-b—, 40 1- low. LOT I.VLOOK X AP.L90K*Mp Acorno" c 'or a."re,"Ne Al I OF I STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OFTARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, December 2, 1996, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Randy Howell Chairman Carl Hecht Vice-Chairman Ery Meyer Secretary Dennis Luers Member Jill Davis Member Russell Anderson 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum. Also present was City Councilman Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: Scott Williams Building Official Ron Stombaugh City Planner Tim Fleming Plans Checker/Field Coordinator Gerrie Anderson Secretary CALL TO ORDER Chairman Randy Howell called the meeting to order at 6:02 P.M. BZA96-40. DAVID WILSON The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-40 submitted by David Wilson who requested variances for 829 South Dooley Street. The variances are from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 31.F, Light Industrial District, requires a minimum lot size of twenty thousand (20,000) square feet. The proposed variance would allow a ten thousand-six hundred and twenty-one (10,621) square foot reduction in the required lot size. If approved, it would allow a lot size of nine thousand-three hundred and seventy nine (9,379) square feet. Section 31.G.1, Light Industrial District, requires a minimum lot width of one hundred (100) feet. The proposed variance would allow a fifteen (15) foot reduction in the required lot width. If approved, it would allow a lot width of eighty-five (85) feet. BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Section 31.G.2, Light Industrial District, requires a minimum lot depth of one hundred fifty (150) feet. The proposed variance would allow a seven (7) foot reduction in the required lot depth. If approved, it would allow a lot depth of one hundred forty-three (143) feet. Section 31.G.3, Light Industrial District, requires a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet in depth which shall be utilized as a landscaped setback area. Front yards shall not be used for any building, structure, fence, wall, parking or storage area, except that signs shall be permitted in this area. The proposed variance would allow parking in the required front yard setback. If approved, it would allow two (2) parking spaces in the required front yard setback. Section 31 .G.4, Light Industrial District, requires every lot to have two side yards, each of which shall not be less than fifteen (15) feet in width. The proposed variance would allow a three (3) foot reduction to the required side yard to the north. If approved, it would allow a side yard of twelve (12) feet along the north property line. Section 53.H.2.b, Landscaping Regulations, requires that whenever an off-street parking or vehicular use area abuts an adjacent property line, a perimeter landscape area of at least ten (10) feet in width shall be maintained between the edge of the parking area and the adjacent property line. The proposed variance would allow a five (5) foot reduction in the perimeter landscape area depth. If approved, it would allow a perimeter landscape area of five (5) feet. Mr. Stombaugh explained that Staff found special conditions existed for all the proposed variances because the lot and structure, previously used as a single family residence, were existing in a zoning district now zoned Light Industrial. Mr. David Wilson, applicant, of 501 Smith Street, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained about the lot, parking and that the plat was going before the City Council December 17, 1996. There was discussion about there being enough parking for future uses of the property. The Board discussed the option of deleting the two head-in parking spaces 2 BZA Minutes 11/04/9 6 shown on the plot plan and adding a third parallel space in line with the two parallel spaces shown on the plot plan. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Carl Hecht made a motion that special conditions existed being the existing zoning of the property is now LI-Light Industrial and had previously been single family and that the structure is also existing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Carl Hecht then made a motion to approve the variances to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 as follows: Section 31.17, Light Industrial District, allowing a ten thousand-six hundred and twenty one (10,621) square foot reduction to the required twenty thousand (20,000) square foot lot size, allowing a lot size of nine thousand-three hundred and seventy nine (9,379) square feet. Section 31.G.1, Light Industrial District, allowing a fifteen (15) foot reduction to the required one hundred (100) foot lot width, allowing a lot width of eighty-five (85) feet. Section 31 .G.2, Light Industrial District, allowing a seven (7) foot reduction to the required one hundred-fifty (150) foot lot depth, allowing a lot depth of one hundred forty-three (143) feet. Section 31.G.3, Light Industrial District, allowing the required thirty (30) foot front yard, which shall be utilized as a landscaped setback area, be reduced to twenty (20) feet, allowing a ten (10) foot variance; where one (1) parallel parking space would be permitted. The two (2) head-in parking spaces as shown on the plot plan are to be deleted. 3 BZA Minutes 11/04/9 6 Section 31.G.4, Light Industrial District, allowing a three (3) foot reduction to the required fifteen (15) foot side yard requirement, allowing a side yard of twelve (12) feet along the north property line. Section 53.H.2.b, Landscaping Regulations, allowing a five (5) foot reduction in the required ten (10) foot perimeter landscape area depth, allowing a perimeter landscape area of five (5) feet. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None BZA96-42 - JON KENNEDY The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-42, submitted by Jon Kennedy who requested variances for 1060 East Northwest Highway, platted as Lot 1, Block 1, TWK Addition. The variances were from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures, which allows the Board of Zoning Adjustment to approve the remodeling or enlargement of a nonconforming use or structure. The requested special exception would allow the enlargement of an existing building and the use of an existing concrete pad for parking. Section 53.H.2.b, Landscaping Regulations, which requires that whenever an off- street parking or vehicular use abuts an adjacent property line, a perimeter landscape area of at least ten (10) feet in width shall be maintained between the edge of the parking area and the adjacent property line. The requested variance would eliminate the required ten (10) feet of perimeter landscape area around the proposed off-street parking area. If approved, it would allow the development of an off-street parking area without the required ten (10) foot perimeter landscaping. Section 31 .H, Light Industrial District, which requires whenever a Light Industrial District abuts a residentially zoned district, a landscape buffer zone of not less than twenty-five(25) feet in depth shall be provided from the lot line. 4 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 The requested variance would allow a nine (9) foot reduction in the required buffer zone at the new building line, and a twenty-two (22) foot reduction in the required buffer zone at the end of a concrete pad at the entrance of the new building. If approved, it would allow a buffer zone of sixteen (16) feet at the building line and three (3) feet at the end of the concrete pad. Mr. Stombaugh explained the case and noted that Staff found that special conditions existed for the proposed special exception since the building and concrete pad already exist; for the proposed variance to the landscaping requirement around the concrete pad to be used as a parking area because the concrete pad is in place two hundred- twelve (212) feet along the rear lot line and one hundred-ninety-five (195) feet along the east lot line; and for the proposed variance to the buffer requirement due to the irregular shape of the lot and the existing building placement within the lot. A solid wood screening fence already existed along the rear and west property lines. A one thousand-nine hundred and forty two (1,942) square foot warehouse addition is proposed to be added to the existing 6,978 square foot warehouse. The concrete pad will be used for loading/staging access to the new warehouse addition. A five thousand-ninety two (5,092) square foot proposed office addition will be added to the four thousand-six hundred and sixty seven (4,667) square foot existing office area. Additional parking will be provided at the front of the building. Mr. Jon Kennedy, applicant, took the Oath of Truth and explained that the building was built in 1980 and there were variances at that time. Mr. Kennedy explained that he was proposing to double the office size. Mr. Stombaugh noted that the required number of parking spaces, (37) per the gross square footage of the building, were provided. Mr. Kennedy explained that the area to the north, that is shown with slash marks on the plot plan, is already existing concrete and will be removed for the expansion of the building on the north end. The front entry will be changed to the north side. There was discussion concerning how trucks would enter the property. Mr. Kennedy explained that the trucks would enter the property through the north entry between the concrete area west of the parking area and the building. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Dennis Luers made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 5 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer made a motion that special conditions exists for the proposed special exception since the building and concrete pad already exists; for the proposed variance to the landscaping requirement around the concrete pad to be used as a parking area because the concrete pad is in place two hundred-twelve (212) feet along the rear lot line and one hundred - ninety-five (195) feet along the east lot line; and for the proposed variance to the buffer requirement due to the irregular shape of the lot and the existing building placement within the lot. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer made a motion to approve the special exception and variances to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 43.E.3., to allow the enlargement of an existing building and the use of an existing concrete pad for parking; Section 53.H.2.b. to allow the elimination of the required ten (10) feet of perimeter landscape area around the proposed off-street parking area; and to Section 31 .H., to allow a nine (9) foot reduction in the required buffer zone at the new building line and a twenty-two (22) foot reduction in the required buffer zone at the end of a concrete pad at the entrance of the new building, allowing a buffer zone of sixteen (16) feet at the building line and three (3) feet at the end of the concrete pad. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None BZA96-43, WILLIAMS, EASTWOOD Mr. Williams explained that Mr. Eastwood submitted a letter to the Board requesting his case be tabled until the January, 1997, meeting. Carl Hecht made a motion to table BZA96-43, submitted by Mr. William S. Eastwood, until the January 6, 1997, meeting. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 6 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None BZA96-44, RICHARD PEMBERTON The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-44, submitted by Mr. Richard Pemberton who requested variances for Lot 21, Shorecrest Acres Addition. The following variances are from Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.F.2.,Single Family District - Area Regulations, which requires a minimum lot size of seventy-five hundred (7,500) square feet. The proposed variance would allow a seven hundred (700) foot reduction of the minimum lot size. If approved, it would allow a minimum lot size of sixty-eight hundred (6,800) square feet for-the existing lot. Section 15.G.1., R-7.5 Single Family District - Area Regulations, requires a thirty (30) foot front yard setback. The proposed variance would allow a ten (10) foot reduction of the front yard setback. If approved, it would allow a twenty (20) foot front yard setback. Section 15.G.2., R-7.5 Single Family District - Area Regulations, which requires a twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. The proposed variance would allow a one (1) foot reduction of the rear yard setback. If approved, it would allow a twenty-four (24) foot rear yard setback. Section 15.G.5., R-7.5 Single Family District - Area Regulations, which requires a minimum lot depth of one hundred (100) feet. The proposed variance request would allow a fifteen (15) foot reduction of the minimum lot depth. If approved, it would allow an eighty-five (85) foot minimum lot depth. Mr. Williams explained that staff found special conditions existed for,the proposed variances due to the unusually small existing lot size. Mr. Williams explained that the lot size presented considerable hardship in placing even a small structure on the lot. 7 BZA Minutes 11/04/9 6 Mr. Larry Dickherber of 1830 Teton Drive, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained that when he purchased his house, he was informed by the City and his builder that nothing would be built on the lot behind him because of it being too small. Richard Pemberton, applicant, of 1829 Chris Craft Drive, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained that the well on the property used to be a community well for Shorecrest Acres, but it was shut off when new City water lines were installed. Mr. Pemberton explained that the well was plugged and the house would not be built over the well. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Carl Hecht then made a motion that a special condition existed for the proposed variance due to the unusually small existing lot size and that the lot size presents considerable hardship in placing even a small structure on the lot. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Carl Hecht made a motion to approve the following variances to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.17.2., to allow a seven hundred (700) foot reduction of the minimum lot size, allowing a minimum lot size of sixty-eight hundred (6,800) square feet for the existing lot. Section 15.G.1., to allow a ten (10) foot reduction of the front yard setback, allowing a twenty (20) foot front yard setback. Section 15.G.2., to allow a one (1) foot reduction of the rear yard setback, allowing a twenty-four (24) foot rear yard setback. 8 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Section 15.G.5., to allow a fifteen (15) foot reduction of the minimum lot depth, allowing an eighty-five (85) foot minimum lot depth. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None BZA96-45. DONNA CASE POTTER The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-45, submitted by Ms. Donna Potter for 1423 Rio Bend Court, and platted as Lot 5, Block 1, Wood Creek Estates. The variance was to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 42.C.3., Supplementary District Regulations which requires a detached accessory structure to be at least ten (10) feet from the main residence and have the same sideyard setback as required for the main structure. The proposed variance request would allow an accessory structure to encroach five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot building separation. If approved, it would allow a minimum separation of five (5) feet between the accessory building and the main residence. Mr. Williams explained that staff found a special condition existed for the proposed variance due to an effort to preserve trees, and if granted, will result in greater setbacks from the side and rear property lines than are required. Mr. John Metzler of 1412 Hampton Road, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and asked Ms. Potter what was intended to be built and would any trees be removed. Ms. Donna Potter, applicant, took the Oath of Truth and explained the need for an extra two car garage and wanting to move the garage closer to the house in order to protect the root area of the oak trees toward the rear of the lot. Cyncha Farris, who lives behind the property, took the Oath of Truth and expressed concern to which trees would be removed. 9 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Ery Meyer made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer made a motion that a special condition existed and that being due to an effort to preserve trees, and if granted, will result in greater setbacks from the side and rear property line than are required. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer than made a motion to approve the variance to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 42.C.3., allowing an accessory structure to encroach five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot building separation, allowing a minimum separation of five (5) feet between the accessory building and the main residence. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None MINUTES Next, the Board of Zoning Adjustment considered the minutes of the November 4, 1996, meeting. Ery Meyer made a motion to approve the minutes, with changes, of the November 4, 1996, meeting. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: None 10 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 MISCELLANEOUS-REPORTS AND DISCUSSION Carl Hecht asked why the zoning ordinance required a ten (10) foot separation from the auxiliary structure and the main structure. Mr. Williams explained that the requirement for separation between buildings is for access, and open space reasons to avoid clutter in the neighborhoods. Carl Hecht briefed the Board on the TransComp 1996 meeting that he attended in Atlanta. Mr. Hecht explained that the North Texas Commission attended the annual meeting of the National Industrial Transportation League to get the word out nationally that the Metroplex is a logistic center; a place to do warehousing and distribution. Mr. Hecht explained that there was excellent response of people inquiring at their booth. Mr. Hecht also explained that Grapevine had all the entities with the adoption of the Freeport Tax Exemption, to be a truly logistic center. ADJOURNMENT With no further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion to adjourn. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: None The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1997. APPROVED: CHAIRMAN ATTEST: SECRETARY 11 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, January 6, 1997, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Randy Howell Chairman Carl Hecht Vice-Chairman Dennis Luers Member Jill Davis Member Russell Anderson 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum with Secretary, Ervin Meyer absent. Also present was City Councilman Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: Scott Williams Building Official Ron Stombaugh City Planner Gerrie Anderson Secretary CALL TO ORDER Chairman Randy Howell called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. BZA96-43, WILLIAMS. EASTWOOD The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-43 submitted by William S. Eastwood who requested variances for 1917 Rose Court, platted as Lot 6, Block 2, Park Central Addition, Grapevine, Texas. The variances were from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 16.G.6., R-5.0, Zero Lot Line District Regulations which requires a twelve (12) foot separation between buildings on adjacent properties. The proposed variance would allow a reduction of eight (8) feet to the separation requirements. If approved, it would allow a four (4) foot separation between buildings on adjacent properties. Section 42.C.3., Supplementary District Regulations which requires a detached accessory building to be separated ten (10) feet from the main residence and have the same sideyard setback as required for the main structure, eleven (11) feet. The proposed variance would allow a seven (7) foot reduction in separation, and an eight (8) foot reduction of the required sideyard setback. If approved, it would allow a minimum separation of three (3) feet between the accessory building and the main structure and a BZA Minutes 1/06/96 minimum of three (3) feet between the accessory building and the side property line. Mr. Williams explained that staff recommended denial of the request, as there is room on the lot for a complying structure. Mr. Williams also noted that Mr. and Mrs. Eastwood were not able to attend the meeting. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Dennis Luers made a motion to close the public hearing. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Carl Hecht then made a motion that no special condition existed. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer BZA96-46 -VICKIE DIEDRICK The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-42, submitted by Vickie Diedrick who requested variances for 2315 High Drive, platted as Lot 14, Block 9, Grapevine Lake Estates. The variances were from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 14.G.1., R-12.5, Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, which requires a front yard setback of thirty-five (35) feet. The proposed variance would allow a ten (10) foot reduction of the front yard setback. If approved, it would allow a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback. Section 14.G.5.- R-12.5., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, which requires the lot depth of one hundred (100) feet. The proposed variance would allow a one and six tenths (1.6) foot reduction of the lot depth along the west side of the lot. If approved, it would allow a ninety-eight and four- tenths (98.4) foot lot depth on the west side of the lot. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found special conditions existed for the proposed variance due to the lot being originally platted with a twenty-five (25) foot front building 2 BZA Minutes 1/06/96 line; other developed lots in this subdivision have a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback, and that Staff found the second request was justified, as the existing lot has a ninety-eight and four-tenths (98.4)foot lot depth, and an increase in depth is beyond the control of the applicant. Matthew Kerlee of 2307 High Drive, Lot 15, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained that he was against the variance to the twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback. Mr. Kerlee explained that in 1983, his father had built his house with a thirty-five (35) foot front yard setback due to City requirements. Mr. Kerlee expressed concern to see continuity on the street. Vickie Diedrick, applicant of 1800 Fern Court, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained that she was trying to purchase the lot contingent on variances being granted by the Board of Zoning Adjustment. Ms. Diedrick explained that she was planning to build a 1650 square foot single story house, with a side entry garage. Ms. Diedrick noted that Mr. Kerlee's lot was bigger and deeper. Donna Snider of 203 North Capri, Duncanville, Texas, and owner of the lot, took the Oath of Truth and explained that when she purchased the property, the front yard setback was twenty-five (25) feet. Ms. Snider explained that she has been unable to sell the property due to the lot size and setback requirements. The members discussed that the house could be moved back on the lot four (4) feet which would leave the front yard setback at twenty-nine (29) feet instead of the requested twenty- five (25) feet. After further discussion, Jill Davis made a motion to close the public hearing. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Jill Davis made a motion that a special conditions existed, being the shallow depth of the lot, the lot is existing and was platted with a twenty-five (25) foot building line at the time the property was purchased. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer 3 BZA Minutes 1/06/96 Jill Davis then made a motion to grant the variance, with an amendment, to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 14.G.1., R-12.5, Single Family District Regulations -Area Regulations, to allow a six (6) foot reduction of the required thirty (35) foot front yard setback, allowing a twenty-nine (29)foot front yard setback; and to grant the variance to Section 14.G.5., R-12.5, Single Family District Regulations -Area Regulations, to allow a one and six tenths (1.6)foot reduction of the lot depth along the west side of the lot, allowing a ninety-eight and four-tenths (98.4) foot lot depth on the west side of the lot. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer BZA96-47, MICHAEL J. PUPPO The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-47, submitted by Michael J. Puppo who requested a variance for 1094 Woodbriar Drive, platted as Lot 11, Block 3, Winding Creek Estates, Phase 2. The variance was from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.G.1., Single Family District Regulations -Area Regulations, which requires a thirty (30) foot front yard setback. The proposed variance request would allow a one (1) foot reduction of the front yard setback. If approved, it would allow a twenty-nine (29) foot front yard setback. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found a special condition exists for the proposed variance due to the existing encroachment not being the fault of the proposed homebuyer. Mr. Williams noted that Ms. Puppo was present to answer any questions. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Jill Davis made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Jill Davis then made a motion that a special condition exists due to the existing encroachment not being the fault of the proposed homebuyer. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 4 BZA Minutes 1/06/96 Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Jill Davis made a motion to grant the variance to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 15.G.1., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations to allow a one (1)foot reduction of the front yard setback, allowing a twenty-nine (29) foot front yard setback. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer BZA96-48. JOE LANGFORD, QUALITY WOOD CRAFT, INC. The next item of business for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-48 submitted by Joe Langford with Quality Wood Craft, Inc., who requested variances for 516 East Franklin Street, platted as Lots 3 and 4, Block 114, College Heights Addition. The variances are from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.G.1., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations which requires a front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. The proposed variance would allow a seven (7) foot reduction of the thirty (30) foot front yard setback. If approved it would allow a twenty-three (23) foot front yard setback for the existing house. Section 15.G.2., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, which requires a twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. The proposed variance would allow a twenty-four(24) foot reduction of the twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. If approved, it would allow a one (1) foot rear yard setback for the second residence. Section 15.G.3., Single Family District Regulations -Area Regulations, which requires a six (6) foot side yard setback. The proposed variance would allow a one (1) foot reduction of the six (6) foot sideyard setback for a proposed garage addition. If approved, it would allow a five (5) foot sideyard setback. 5 BZA Minutes 1/06/96 Section 15.B., Single Family District Regulations -Accessory Uses, which does not permit a second residence on a lot zoned for R-7.5, Single Family District. The proposed special exception would allow an existing second residence to remain. Mr. Williams explained that staff found special conditions existed for the first and second requests (front yard and rear yard setbacks) being the existing violations are not the fault of the owner. Mr. Williams stated that Staff found no special conditions existed for the third request (sideyard setback) as these lots had already been extensively developed, and the second residence could potentially be used as a garage. Mr. Williams stated that he wished to amend Staffs position regarding the fourth request. He asked the Board to allow the existing nonconforming status of the second residence to remain. Mr. Ron Winsett, owner of 516 E. Franklin Street, took the Oath of Truth and explained that one (1) foot was needed to build a twenty (20) foot wide, two-car garage on the side of his house. Mr. Williams explained that Dick Ward, Fire Marshall, expressed concern about Fire Department access to the back of the property where the second residence was located. Mr. Williams also explained that one of the lots was already overdeveloped at 43% lot coverage. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Mr. Winsett explained that the second residence was fully equipped as a residence and it was occupied by his cousin. Mr. Winsett also explained that the original owner of the property had lived in the rear residence and then built the new house in front. Randy Howell explained he felt that denial of the sideyard setback variance would not stop the building of the garage, which would comply with the ordinance if built at nineteen (19) feet in width. 6 BZA Minutes 1/06/96 After further discussion, Carl Hecht made a motion that special conditions exists for Section 15.G.1. and Section 15.G.2, due to the existing violations not being the fault of the owner and that the structure is existing; and to Section 15.8. because the second residence is existing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Carl Hecht made a motion to approve the following variances to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.G.1., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, to allow a seven (7) foot reduction of the thirty (30) foot front yard setback, allowing a twenty-three (23) foot front yard setback for the existing house. Section 15.G.2., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, to allow a twenty- four (24) foot reduction of the twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback, allowing a one (1) foot rear yard setback for the second residence. Section 15.B., Single Family District Regulations - Accessory Uses, to allow a special exception for an existing second residence to remain. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Carl Hecht then made a motion that a special condition does not exist for Section 15.G.3., for a one (1) foot variance to the required six (6) foot side yard setback. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: Howell Absent: Meyer MINUTES Next, the Board of Zoning Adjustment considered the minutes of the December 2, 1997, meeting. 7 BZA Minutes 1/06/96 Jill Davis made a motion to table the minutes of the December 2, 1997, meeting until February 3, 1997, in order for Member Ery Meyer, who was absent, to review them. Randy Howell seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Meyer MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND DISCUSSION Mr. Williams explained that a coffee shop was going in the old service station at the northwest corner of Main Street and College Street and that the Grapevine/Colleyville I.S.D. was going to occupy the old Western Sizzlin Steak House on East Northwest Highway for their Vista Program. ADJOURNMENT With no further discussion, Jill Davis made a motion to adjourn. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Meyer The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1997. APPROVED: CHAIRMAN ATTEST: SECRETARY 8 w 0 ::n 0 0 0 08 ;o 'n --1 0 0 C/) CL ;:PCD:y =r 0 0 - 0 CD =r CD CD 0 2)-7 > :3 CD 0 < CD 3 o L -(D+l r- %< (n C: > -0 — cn = c (D Z3 "D CD -a CD ca 0 x CD 3 PL P z r-r a) (n F) 0 m cn C: Ln 0 3 = 04 0) "n (D -0 CD D6 (D 0 0 57 CD CD CD 0) 3 0 0 :3 0 c:3 -a c P 0a G) 0 -n cn :3 0) 03 (D CCnD0 ID * — �' w m 0) (D 0 CD CL CD :3 < CA :3 :5 " N m ' (0 O a (n M 0 cn a C: :3 0 0 (D X :3 cn < m 0-- a) (D -,j m o 0 CL > N 0 (D M "< ;U - - X 0 0 CL =3 X C/) W. CD CD CD M c M (a < w -0 —0) (n 0 0) > M Z CD CL (a 0. =r C/) (D CD a) 0 CD < 0) -07 a z6 a) :03 -(-D4, (0,) ID > 0 > D CL o Cl) D c(D (n :3 0 :3 CD 0 CL M 0 (n CL 0 cn %< (D 0 0 (D 0 z a) 0 Fn CD (n M 0 c N CD :y 0 0- CD CE w G) (D 0 0- D :3 0 w CD CD w Z " 0 = (D (n CL 0 cn 0 0 -1 C) =4 5* o w =r 3 (D CD cn m - 0 (D -o (D :3 x CD 7 M ' (a (D En —h " C D-(Q 0 (n 3 cn 0 Co CD 0 =T 0 w - -" < 3 :3 0 c cn , P N) - M > :3 CD CD :3 0 w CD 1 :3 CL CD 0 - 5. a W-" (D CD 0 o 0 :r (a :3 0 (n c 0 C- 0 :3 (n 5* c -n 0 CD cD cD 3 CD 0- CD X (n CD l< cn 2) 0 3 0 m -0 w :3 CD 0 M D C cn CD CD :3 (n CL 0 0 3 0 rr Cn cr (D (D 0 0. -0(D 0 CD CD CD (D 0 =r 'n 0 -n 3 < 0— 0 -3. 0 En 0 (n 0 U) y :3 CD (D D C-) -0 (D (D 0 , 5' - < (1) C/) 0 co a) CO < -1 -1 :3 cr(0 (D (D 0 cr a) CD C. :3 CD (D (D -0* =r (D En Q- CD 0 CD 0 0 0 n) =3 -1 ;a > 3 3 0 (D (D CD x :3 0 D (n 0 0) 0 CD -0 CL "I I ;:;: u cr (D x 0 9. O c CD D D 0 r� :3 0 =3 0 CL -7 U) 0 0 cl) M M Cc l< (D (D ::r 3 wcn M (D7 CD (1) (D =3 Cn :3 -1 -1 m 0 (n O 0 0 cn :3 W. =3 0 =r 0 S a- :3 0 w 3 3 CD m �,< m CD CD * CD X. = 3 :3 � cr 03 0 " ::� CD 3 cn 0 CD 0 0 C: cn :2. m w 0 0 :E =3 - -.h < CD 0) Ul :3 CL =r 0 0) 0 CD 9 m 0 =3 3 -a 0 0 6 CD (n cc ET (D aa- CD 0 (n a) ::r w :3 (n 3 6 CD (n CL 0 =r 0 CD c :r (D (D ::E 0) CD cr G) cl cr CD zT 0 (n. (D 3 6 (D cn CD 0 CD E - < CD :r-0 (D 0 57 (D 0 CD r- CD 3 • CL m < 0 a a) 2. CD w :3 CD CD =3 0-) cr :3 (n - 0- cc CL a- (D - %< (a con co 0 QI > Z � 4 ::r --1 0 OJ > z > < 9. :� "a * -� --q 0 co COO 0) to c cr a) l< 0 0 CD M =r 0 0 (D 0 :;- (D Z)-7 0 0 Zr =r a (D ;;: N m m CD CD (0) U) < 5 Q) CD 3 0 0 0 r > 0 3 1 0 m =) X, Cn =3 (D (D cn (n (D CD (n . . m 42 -0 0 C CD 0) w :3 -n n -a =3 0- w < :3 U ::r 0 CD 0 (D a) CD cn CD ;:L CD — =3 -0 a ;K, =r co : 3 (D ::r (D 0 0 =r 21 CD CD CD 0) :3 (D — 0 CD 'D :3 -n w CL Cn CD *�j C =) — (D 0 C CD ::r =r CL w =r m :3 :3 (D CD 0) D 1+ 0 0 N CD 3 (D :3 C) cn 0 (D O. -1 -1 (n (D m CL - 2: (D (n (n , X" --h 0 Err 0 (D col CD 0 X cr (D CD 0 0) 0 0 0 CL C 0 0 0 =r (D a) X 0- CD --r o 0 (a < -0 X N =3 (n (n :3 :3 (D < C-) (D 0 C 00 ::r cr 0 0 C- CD (D (D CD (D (D (D a) 0 ;7 CL K — W m — CL =r (n u W (D =r :E :3 CD (D (D M. (n :E l< (D 0) N) (D 5' cr 0 (D =r a) cn m o m(a 3 (D 0) o CL (D CD a) cn (n co (D (D 0 C-) (D 0) CD N (n CD (D 0 CD — 1 0 zr (D. 0 N 0- CL CD 0- a) (D (n 0 0 CD 0 (n cD 3 :E =r CD =r cr :E w cn CD w (n W =r m (D CD a 0 c 0 (D — 0 :3 — -n CD (D 0 C: (D (D 0 (D (n (n (D =T m (D -0 3 "n -n ::rCD — 0 (D (n �D- :T o D - =r — -,, - (D -, o < CL (D c CD (D 0 m m 0 u (0 (n x -0 0- cn a- w (D a- M , CD 0 c (D 0 CL zT -0 (D (n 07 C7 (n (D CL (D (n 0- 0 a) , 0 0 (o 0 5* 0 < %< = : Fad ,- w C: 0 _0 C CD -4(0 :3. (n — 0 i-n :T a =3 :T :3 (D Ln (D (D 0 0 0- o (D (D (D > 0 (n 0 :3 zr 3- --#, U). = < (n o -0 0 0 =T 0 0 :3 (D CD m :3 0- 0 0 M -1 (D (D :3 0- — cr :E 3 -0 0 (D CD 0 5 (D 0 m M 0 (D CD< < 0) 3 = K 0 (D (D 3 m :3 a) (D w 0 < 0 0 0 CD 0 — X M (n CD 0 M < 0 0 ::r o- < (D (D (D =3 :3 0- (D CD W 0- (D :r (n D CD '0 CD a cn 0) CD D ::r 0 a- 0) (n CL w OL CD (D N (n (D 0 (D 0 D %< CL 0 CD (D r-L 0 CL 0 o (D CD =r 0) U) CL (D D CD 3 0(D =r M N (n 0 =3 :7 0 CD x m m 0 :3 --+� 0 c>- G) w (n (D (D w 3 M (n -+13 =) — CD (n 0 0 w =r x 0 =3 (n (D o _0 _0 Q. - —. :3 -1 — — CD =3 CD cr CT (D C)- W. cy- (D cn 0 (D 0 < 0 5 — :3 (D M (n =r CSC m ::r (D CD Q) =T 0) -1 (D i < 0 CD CL 5 cl- 0) 6- CD 5T > z > < 0 =r U) cr-a =r a) Cl) (1) co CO) —i Co 0 co cr a) %< 0 0 0 (D =r CD 0 =r CD =r (D CD CD =r 0) CD CD =r 0) (D m N cn %< CD cntD (f) .0 0 (D -'s o (D > CD CL CD CA cn CD =r 8 D D r— W 0 (D D * ' * * r� :3 c 9 Q- CD 0 CD C CD :3 =3 CD 0) 0 0) 0) cn —0 0) cn ZY =r 0 -1 X CL(a 0 CD 0 cr cL , 6- cr (D :3 X-0 :3 "0 CD D (D -a Q. -0 cr cr 0 CD =T -- a) CO CD 0) -& --ft - 1� CO -0 :3 (D 0 =1 0 0 M cn 0 '-J r 0 CD - 3 0 o 0 1+ m 0 cn cr a 0 En 0 M 0 z z m =-0 3 0 Q. =rr 0) >< 1� 0 0 6, 57 cr Q.-0 0 (D CD (D (D 0 0 0 CD X --ft -% o- ch ::r cL =r (D `0 CD CD cD r (D (D W n) CD 1 1:3 ::3 (D D 0 0 (D -a -4 -0 ::r C/) X -0 ::r (D CD CD 0) 0) D a) -, = 0 c — — (1) c — (D 0 (D -J D -0 C -a 6 -a ;:I. D ;L D CD CD = (D P7 CO U) (C) (P CD C (D (c) (D (D (C) ::r ::r CD — 0 CD CD (A) (D (A) CD 0 :7 CD — — w (D C/) CD 0 CD cn cn CL :3 D cl 0- o -n CL o -n 0 C- CD CD 0 (D a) = x 0) (D 0 (J) :0' C/) 0 (D CD -0 - cr m 3 'n- a' 3 :3 < o 1 — m 0 -0 < (D CL < r- 5 r 0 CD 0 a) -n M w CD M (D 0) (D CD w CD < CD 0 0 0 0 0 a) (a M. a D M cr ::r 0 w a) D- M CD 0 M, CD 0 06 DOMM c — 3 cDw --h (D :3 0 = M :3 0, Fn, 5D =3 =3 (n 0 l< 0 0 0 CD CD :3 C: 0 C 0 M C 0 Co CD w C) (D 0 CD r- 0 0 CD w 0 3 (D — 0-4 M (a CD CD -- 0 CL U) CD -0 CD 0 0 0 3 cr 0 0 X l< -CC: C(nD 0 (n CD M M 0- :3 w CD w CD CL(a CL = to (D W CD CD 0 -0 0 CL -3. 0 M 5 * c (n cr c m 0 Q. ?Z- 0 CD 0� 0 0 0 CD ::r — 0 E L). 0 CD 2� X ::E w cn 0 CL — ::r 0 (D 0 =r =r 0 X, cr — CD CL <. co w (n =r cn tw 0 0 0 0 0 fix < = :3 CD Q) < (n < cn = CD w , =r :E x w (a 0- cr 0 CD I = m m i-n M. -1 0 -n 0 -n =r M CD CD 0 =3 cn I M :3 CL M 0 cn 0 0 (D I(D 0 :;� 0 c - :3 CL :3 :3 =r < (n F U) CD 0 0 cn cr 0 6 W CD rD CD -a (n 0 =3 c 0 0 0 M aL :;�* 0 (n 0 FD = ::p ED cn =r -1 :T CD a) CD CD — — C- — CL Cn < (D 6 CL :3 (D CD — CL a -0 =3 (D CD 1(D =� (D — CL cc a C/) a cn CD C D c CD < (D9 0 (Da w r a)"'o (D C c CD :3 cr cr (D ► CD 0 :3 Ln - < ---h CD - T (D 0 w 0 a) 0 CD 0 0 o o 0 :3 CD cn a) :3 0 :3 0 C: 0 -0 (c CL 3 :3 CD 6 cn Ln :3 C: x X 0 (D 0 0 cr w CD — Q. 0 :3 --#% -41 -1 CL CL 0 cn U =r -+% * 3 in CD CD CD M a- C M (D (D (D CD :r -0 =r -0 (D M -n =r :3 <CD 0 (D :3 CT CD (D CD w cr (a CL CD 0 D -n CD W CD %< CD 0 0 CD 0 -1 CD CD 63 0 x :3 c- m 0 -0 0 (n 0 U) 67 0 (n CD 0 (n =r CD cr 0). :3 — % -, CD 0 C :3 CD 6 ::r M (n a) 0 0 (D w :T o 3 ::r ::r < a) n D :3 (a 0 �l ;:� �o Q. m m 0 m m CD CL a — > z > 3 m > Z C/) m > z > S= 0 m > > > z > > 003 cr 0) -< 0 cr a) CD - Cr fj) `< = (D cr w I< CD r-r a) l< CD W CD :* " N (n << CD = :2 (n %< CD < cn %< (D -< CD 0 CD (n %< CD �< << (D > (D (n Co x-D CL CD co co CD co (n C3- (n cn 0 CD (n U) "a 0 CD 0 -- o CD W D w :3 C cn :3 0 < 0 (D D CD CL cn c -- CD C— X CD ril a U cr (D = -< — x�< (D = - CD CL a: (D l< (n CD CL CA 0 �Ei: 0 1 4 X CD (n ;o -n 0 o w 1 0 Z, CD (D (D 3 — C C)- 0 CD 0 (a 0 =r :7 cn CD =3 - X (D < a a cn z z :r -0 0 w X Z Z M —W'—P,) CD Z Z 3: 0 C. 0- z z :r z z m 0).Co CD Ln CD =) :3 -n CD 3 0 0 w CL (n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < W w (D m 3 (D (D M CD (D cD w cD (n CD (D (D W a- (D CD CD -h (D 3 (D CD CD CD W 0 0 0 :3 w a CD 3 cn =Y - 0 0 , CL boo :3(D 6' CD < CD 0 (D 0- :3 (n 3 CL CD (D (n 0 CD (D CD 0 (D CD =Y (D w w 0 CD 0 CD =cr < CD 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :r :3 W Lin Cn - CD w w w CD — :3 CD 0 0 r005 CD 0 — F: :z W o -4, -1 w o CD %< (D CD CD 3 a CD CD cn (D 3 CD CD 0 (D 0 %< 0 --h :3 *< �-0 -< < :3 CD < CD CD W. CL CD CD CD :7 CD (n w CD CL 0 0 CD Zy' CD 0 .7 (Q .7 0 CD 0 CD (D w 0 r— D 0-- 0 r- W w CL 00 63 :3 0 cn(D (D < < (D (D cn 0 (D l< 0 0 -n �n o (D 0 0 (n < = 0=3 3(n 0 (n =3 (D w 0 :3 :3 CD (D & 0 Q C. (D &(D CD < Er o 3 w 1-1 W (DE OMWO CD (D < c- 0 :3 Fn 37 Zn (n CD CD :3 (n < c (n 0 (D 0 m m CL W M W CD 0 :D :0 D 0 cn 0 U) 0 (n 0 CD < CD C: cn = 0 CD :3 P7. :3 CD --h 0 0- 0 0 -0 =r (D 0 :3 0 CD (n (D L (D :E — --I (D (a5 (n (D Zr CD -h 0 rn cn 0 M 0 (D 0 (a CD c O = 0 =3 0 0 CD -T CD 0 0 0 — <0 * CD ono -0 CD W W CD zr 0 (0 (n -I --%, . . (D w W CL M (D CD r- — < CD -1 < (n 0 0 CL 0 (n w o ::r cD G) c 3 u ::r :3 0 (A 0 M CD (n CD M cr (0 w (D Ln 0 0 0 0 (D 0- . 0 -+, =3 0) M' cL w G) o x -n -n =3 D 0 0 :3 - 0-n -, L- — (D 0 0 w :3 o =3 -, ;:z 0 C� 0- CL E -< " " -1 -0 ��:. W -a(Dorn (D 0 (D < ::r M CD (D D 0 (D (0 a- cl cn CD < CD Cn Cn -n 5 Ct CL (n = 0 -1 3 CD CL 0 0 CD 0 CD :3 0 CD -n n w C- 0 0 rr cn m (D 3 5 0 cD 3 0 6 CD 0 cn c m :3 0. -0. w 0 0 < (D 3 66 5 p, m m --% �-j C m o 3 ;:4:r: 3 Co :3 0 -1 0 CL CD CD -0 0) ca :3 =3 cn cn (n Co M m CD 0 -- CD " (D CD (n m Iz cr 0 m JZ,) — --I B CD :r cr ::r 0 CD ;0 (D m CD (n CD 0 n 0 N (D CCDL C :3 0 z z M =3 .0 (n M CD c 0 x x > :3 0 C :3 -0 7-1-0 0 0 ::r cr , 0 0 0 C (D CL cn CD CL (n 0 — 0 :3 3 0 u) CD Z (D (D cD 0 5 (n cn 0 0 3 m cn 0 ::r CT :3 :3 . (D (D - 0 "a 0 =r :3 2 CD > (D CD - g ca m a(o CL cQm 0 CD CD 0 0 < CD M 71 m 3 o- 0 (D 3, D o -n 0. x CD =3 0 0 :3 =r =r • 0 M 0 0 (a c- 0 0 0 3 =r Fn- =r :3 S- F ;:v Fi CD — 0 M 0 CD CD 0 :3 (D -- io cD 3 0 (D 0 < " (nCr =r cn =r 3 m 5 -a 0 C:: 0 3 CD (n Cr 0 M (n (D — M (n CL 3 CD ---h CD N CD - " �z =4 M 0 CD m CO 0 0 r- CD Zr CD C M = :3 0 5' -3 CD 0 (D (n N < =3 C < — cn cn �r- 0 m CD < m -1 0 c =:;4 FD CD CL (D - C .0 CD -- cD CD (n W 0 5: D 0 CL :3 =r CD 0 cn =3 (n 0 CD 0) (Q cn CD 0 (D 0- 0 0 (D (0 (D 0 = !::� CD (n 0 F :3 3 ID En a) X :3 c cn (D :3 (n cr CL CT * ::r :3 :3 0 =r CD CD (c vN CD c cn > (n '< CD 0 0 CL =r -- C) cn D 2) :3 a) M a) 3 a) (D 0 c c CD :3 — CD -0 :3 CD -0 CD CL cn =r (0 ET 0) (n < :3 (D CD =r c CD c CD CD 0 -0 =r C: 0 Lq (D 3 "n (D CD 0 (a (n :T (D ET FD x. :E CD a) 0 CD CD CD CD =5 CD =r 0 (n (n 3 0 FD' 3 n < = :r * CL 0 0 C: M 0 3 :3 (D 37 0 CD 0 -1 0 o :D CD 0 :3 CD * :3 (n C—L -Oh :3 0 (D 1� =3 0 CD C: :3 C: =r (D 0 CD 0 (n :3 :3 En 0 0 (D =3 0 -0 0 CL 0- - -4, D_ 0 0 0 0 C: =r 0 — DL CD =r o 0 M C -a -1 -n = :3 5* :3 C G) " 0 < — (D CL 0 -0 (D 0 (0 (n J�j 0 CD 0 0 0 — 0) — cn w o =r :3 cn 0) N) =3 :3 ::r 0 0 (D :3 -0 — cn S= cn* 2) CD (D 0) 0 2. 6 u a) a) 0 CD 0 (n :3 (n D_ (D X O� =3 0) (D cn CL =r 0 = 0- o cn < CD _0 - -n 0 :3 CD (n (n 3 0 o 5 CD (D =5 CL CD cn 0 0 w 0 3 0) x (n CD :3 (D < -0 :3 CD 6 cn :3 cn 0) C: z 0 a) cr CD ::r :3 h (D CD M 0 M cr CD cn (n cn 0) 0 3. 0 CD 5- Cr CD 3 =r 0 (n 3 C (n (D :3 0 =3 rZ CD 3 cn co 0 0 :T 0 0) CD -0 -n - :3 ::r CD (n 0 0 0- (D CD — ::r CD a) (c -n (D 0 , CL (D — CD :3 CD =3 0 (D CD (0 =3 Zr a) CD 0- cr 0 CL OL(O cn 0 0 C 0r.=. (n 0) 0- CD 0 CT (D =r Cr CD (D CD CD CD CD (D :3 (D l< 0 M %< 3 -CD' -0 CD 0 fn — cn 0 CL (c) -1 o cr :3 cn 0 CL Sn X CD --% 0 x co :r =r = 0) 0 l< -, n 0 < , cn w cn (D = c =3 = CD. cr :3 CF CD 0 0 m Q- cr 3 (a (D C. =F c x T(D C- N N CL < 3 w 0 cn 0 CD 0 0 o 3 E 0 In :3 w CL CD CD --h 5. r- O 0 < -S M 71 -cn ::33- =3 :? a- 0 --%(a CD CD (0 CD (0 (0 :3 cn (a 0 --% . E - CD (0 CL * z r- =r a-p 0 a_ { X K w --4 0 --4 CD cf) 0-- 0 --4 co > Z � MUZO > z > om 03 V 6: (D -01) co- Cr 0 m D =r D (D *13 U) =r cr 0) C: C. 0 (D cr 0) < " N --I wo r Cr (n X CL (D 0 a a) - cD (n 6< (D 0 :3 =3 cn �< CD > 0 (D = 5- — U) CD cn (n (D cn (n 0 0) 3 CD ::r 0) '"D 0 - D (D 0 :3 cn 0 n :3 0 CO < 0 M (D co 0 (D a) Z 0 0 CL =3 a) X 0 3 0 r- =3 -4* M 0 a CD C o 0 0 cn '(D :3 w CD a) 5 (D m Z cr 3 CD CD (D(D =r --4 (D :3 :3 -- 0 0 Fn cL m 5' 0- CD CD CD (D _a a M =3 x 0 z z -r CD N z z -r X C: CL CD (D -4 a) cr --., a 0 0 (a C X CL X (Dam -0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 -0 CD 5 =) :3 * cr c :3 :3 M CD r 3 CO CD C/) D (n m CL 0 (n (D :3 (D (D (D (D CD CD o CD 9. %< (n CL (D -00 Z M CD (D m 3 :3 x co :T " (n (D 0 6 w 0 cr > (D C:I -aka - :3 0 77 m CL 3 :3 c < CD Q- o cn C/) 0 (D CL(o , (Q -0 !;-.6. , 0 to > M M — 5' 3 , 5, x o 0 (n < 0 :3 0 0 =3 zr =r D (n < =r 0 0 0 0 cr " CD 0 C UD CD CD (D (n (D -0 C W 0 cn :r 0 0 (D m , C: x to 8 �F :3 (D rj 6 :1 — * * w .7 (o c (n c CD (D 0 (D o CT) =rr- 0 (D m m <. w =37 (n :3 - 3 -0 — (D U) CD CD 0 0 -n (D Q- CD cT " -- — CD CL = W :3 0 cn :3 fl) -0 -- -0� X (D =3 0 a) 0 < �n -0 co �n — _0 D(D CD - 0 :3 a) CD ::r CD c 0 CD 0 0 =� CL CT 0 (D D 0 T. (D ::r (n 0 ::r salt CD CO) m ::r a 0) zT 0 :3 77 (D 0 CL 0 Q- (D CD 0 0 (n 67 :T En 0 xfn (D (n 0 0) :3 N CL :3 :3 CL C/) 0 -0 0 0 C: ="q (n (D (D c 0 (D 0 0 (D (0 (D x :3 (D (D 0) >CD :3 w C- -0 ,0 C (D a D- CD oi 0 (D 3 =3 5 a) = :3 (D C (D cn :3 (n :3 37 (D < _0 cr 0 (Q CD x — 57 CL 0 3 o r- w N cn (D in- 0 CL (D =r 0 :3 :3 -0 0 (n CD :3 (D :3 (n cr CL (D. C: X 0--o " 0 CL — to to * " rD (D (D " CD 3 (D Fj :3 CD 0 0 -00) J, x < 3 =r _0 0 0 0 CD m 0 CD m 5. o (o ;w CD W m (D 0- 0 0 :3 o (D cn (D :3 0 , ;L 0 o 3 c Z- � x 0 m 0 CL 0 M -0 U) h -0 "D (n W 0 0 m (0 (D Zr :3 3 Cl 5 =T 0 — X m 0 =r 0 0 0 (D (D -0 0 a) " 0 a) CD 0 CL CL < w X--0 :3 r_ (D CD CD 0 cn 5* CD 0 -0 5: < CD CL (D (n m 0 -1 — CD 0 (D ;I CD m N 0 =3 co 0 :3 0) N 3 w I w w 2� l< , 0 cn a- (n > 0 M CD CL :3 -n 0) - 5. ZY =r 0 0 w 0 (D :3 cn 0 CD (C CD 0 CD cn r� a) (D - < :E CL G) Z > Z,� < w --icO > z > 3 > z > CD ::r (r 0) 0 (A CD cn a) cr a) 0 cr 0) l< 0 5 x to N CD -a -- 0) cr M X to `< (D 0 x 0 (n %< m CD CD (n -< CD -0 (D W (n ch 5 24 CD > CD (0 cn CD (n Cn m (n U) CD (n C/) =r cn M 0 3 cr CD cn a) C.- 0 CD rr z 0 3 E� :3 — (a =r CD 0) CD =3 0 :3 0) 0. =r CD N CD (D 0 =3 (0 CD < :3 C: a) CL =r 77 C/) 0 -0 (D =3 CD CD :3 =r c =r (D =4 CD CD 0 CD 0 CL (D CD CL < Q) x =r cr a) z z m :3 z z m -0 o :E Fn' z z m CD 0 0 0 0 CD @ 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 > CD :3 =) * "D(n a) -0 T 3 E 3 0 CD u) c :3 =3 :E CD 0 M -" M CD (D CD 0 " 0 (D CD (D < w U) CD (D CD ::r U (D x- CL CD CD < CL C: -< CO < 0 0- (D CD cn — -1 :7 :3 CD Cn (D — (DOS CO "0 < 0 (D =r CL CD a) < =3 CL =r -I -b 0 0 CD (D cr Z57 0 0 FD7 N M 0 CD co x (o CD (D(n CD 0 0 0- 0 (a C D =3 a 0 6D CD CD w CD =r < (D CL 0 9 CD =r w Fn CD 0 CD CD CD =3 CD l< a) =r 0 0) =3 0 CD -1 (n 'D 0 < (D =r �< l< :3 ID 0 > (n < (D = ::4 6- ;T (0 CD 0) -" CL C— (D CD o — (D zw 6 x 0 CD > CD n 0 CD 0 CD -3 :3 -0 p- 0 C X 3 F5* :E w r- a) r- 0 cn CL CD (n CD cc UF_0 r- :3 o CL r- C: --I — ;a. C: :T = CD c c (D CD 8 0 CD (a CD CD (D 0) 0 :3 CD -n ca (n 3 < (n =—T CD CD 0 (n CL 0 =r-0 CD -1 > CD :3 r cn Cl — CD (D Cr 3 > CD 0 0 CD :3 0 CD 0- cn C 0 (n w cn — x m 0 0 CD 0 0 CL 0 0 0 CD CL :3 - (n N =3 in— CL (D 0 w :3 0 cn :3 (n 0 0. M 0 D :3 a) CL (D 0) CD 0 t< X CL (D 0 0 CD 5 D 0 0 0 cn CD::r (Dc :3 w (n =3 CD =r m (D -CnL CD 0 3 0 0 < D =r CD 0 Q) w CD 0 U) :3 0 0 0 (D CL a (D 0) 0) < < CD W cl (D �< =r "CD CD oo 0 X 37 �O (D 0. 0 =r 0 0 OL : 1< 23 0 M cn -0 to 3 CD C;- (D Z n :r a) 0 OL 0 ::r h (D CD CD a CD 0 0 x 0) 0 0) :3 < (D Z 0- CD 0 CO 6 Cl) 0 3 CD CL 0 CD CD -n -0 0 :3 :3 CL CL 3 ::r CL 0 CD Cl) 0 CD 0 0- — < CD 0 0 0) cr =r @. CL -0 CL :r CD = 3 D (D 0) CE) I CD (n Cr 5 0 5* << (Q << * (D (D cn (0 (1) 0 0 Q- w CD CL M > z > 60 0 0 -0 (D 3 m K = --4 > -r — -3 m 0 ;:v G) 2: 0 co (D X x 3 =7 :3 (D (D ?:� :E -If N N - 0 0 a- < m -"% (D m > m < < (D 0 0 (n 0 (D m 0* —,. cr -, CD 0 CD -a :r CD (D cn cn 0 (p ::r 5* -0 0 cD CO cr " 0 . . . . :E CD -, -n w m C < 3 cD D a) 0 5- -:3. M C CD 0 — "0 9 0 c 0 < 0 0 o cn cc 0 W m =3 CD �< =r CD :� — %< =3 l< (Q 0 a) = - 0 0 CD C (a 0) :3 =3 - 3 cp (D 0 CL(Q =3 --, *�j C ::p, -, CD n = CD CD < :3 -n w ::r m (D -0 O 'D 0 (n CD w (n 14 :3 CD 0 w (n 0 0 co 0 =3 0 CD 0 w 0 (n 0 w CD — c 0 < - =) -h CL < CD CD Cr CD 0 X CL CD W n CD W CD 0 w CD a CL 0 =r (D z z -r 3 X -1 a) F E ::E = -1 c cn =r w 3 m (o — — 0 CD M :3 0 0 0 -.0 0 (a — — o — =3 (D (D 0 0 (0 D w < (n 3 CL 0 CD 3 M — =r 0- x (n -11 -1 CD `0 cn :3 CD =r * 0 0 -,1 o M (D CD — :Z CD CD 0 CD _0 3 CD CD CD D — :D 0 —, w CD en 0 :3 0 M cn < M (D 0 o CD w X.-0 0. :3 3 0- (n CL G) � ::r 0 CL w U) a (D 0 m o U) (n m -0 CD C, — (D ::r a > 0 — m w (D 0 15. CD M — 0 a) CD cn '. :3 — =3 (D =r w (n =3 (n 5- 0- — 0- -0 X m :3 CL 0 =r cn aa M CD (n CD (D X :3 X CL cn (0 -0 a) 0- M CD :T CL 0 0 -0 < a CD -0 w ;v — (D ;-- < — 0 W CD 0 M CD ::r (D o jF = " w 0 (D C- CD CD 0 (D. c 0 :7 —0* �n (D < W -0 N 0- 3 w 3 0 CD —0, D m _0 3 cc (n -0 CL (D :7 _0 :7 (D C/) (n c D CD -- 0 o �o 0 cn =r — - 0 0 :3 x CD :3 CD (D (D ::r :3 0 0 :3 -n — W w (0 :3 0 0 :3 "0 :3 — 0 F. .., 0 m cn 0 0 M (n :3 (D m D :3 -0 C: w (D D 3 (0 (D =3 -n -1 J �< 0 ::E > w m r- 0 n (n 0 =r CD =3 0 0 . 0 0 CL -0 CD — o =r (n -0 0 :r 0 CD M (n n =r CD 0 =r (D :3 0- 0 3 a"CD 0 (D cD (n < < N) cm�7n CD :3 (n -a I CL3 CD (n 0 w (D :T -- 0 (D W (n CL < CD 0_ 0 (n -0 to m w =3 0- 5' cD 0— c _0 :3 cn < a) :3 -0 (D 0 3 T- o 0 o (D CD 5' M (D Cn (0 0 C) CD cn U :3 00 a) 67 0 (D (D :3 w w w 0 (D — w CD =3 w 5' CD w 0 cn CD (n 5' 0 -41 M 0 3 0 cn CL :3 cc 6, < N) CD :0 ZT W co 0- :r 0 zT 0 (n CD 0 (0 CD — w 0 (D 0 0 ;::� 0 :3 CD > 0 CD NO _0 CL cn --4 CL CD CL (D C: (n 0 CD 0 0 (D CL X :3 (D 5* (D (D U) ;I < D 0 CD (D — — .,0 a) — CD =r (D Q- (n CL CD < 0 :r c: (D CD (D il) 3 0 (D (D (D -Ax C/) :T — x D (D CD 0 (n M 0) -0 0 :3 0 :3 3 U) c CD CD :3 -0 :5. i— cn (D -1 CL cn -0 (D U) (D 0 -0 o 00 CD CL-0 0 :3 CD (D (n 0 M CD CD M. =3 _0 --1 3 0 C)- 0" < (—D 0 0 M :3 CD ZT Ln CD X. -1 (D - -, 0• 0 Z) CD cn < zr =-0 0 M , I -r (n — m. G) < :3 -- 0 — -n 0 -a zr or o -n — — < 0 (D (D (D o 0 a- 0 (D a- CD :T -, m 0- CD :3 " (Q m 0 -0 m (n (D -o ---+, CD CD < :3 (D CD. �< CD n 0 C) 07 c D =r cr 0 0 :3 F), CD CQ -0 0 0 (D o l< x 0 -1 cn =r X m 0 m , co w CD C c w C (D 0 cn -0 F 3 cD 0 ::r 0 CL -a 3 :3 CD =3 (D -n M :—:;; C_ CD (D 0 (n (n 5 (1) 5* 0 (D (D 0 (C) M < x (D a 0 0 0 (D M (a 0 3 w (a 0 9� :E C: 6 (D 0- =3 a- w 0 CD < (D a- w CD (D ri (D CL 0 w w =T 0 5. 0 CD =r < (D CD CD :3 — CD X (n < =r CD (D z (0 — M < 0 3 (n 0 CD CD (D cn M E5'-o CD D '-, — -0 0 0 : :3 (n cn CD 0 Pl.) I (a -0 0 U 0, N CD < <. 0 U) -n -0 0 CD 0 -0 -0 QL 0 0 w(3, X. 0 a) CD 0 -a 3 41 < En =) 0 CD 3 CD -a C/) m 3 D m CD (D CD CD CD (o 0 CD D M, Q- :3 �— :3 a) n :3 =:� a CD CD 0 (D =r CD -, — %< r- — 0 > z > 00 > z > -r m 3 z K > Z > -0 cL N M c z > 003 a w l< a) 0) :r cr 03 < (D (D CD Cr M '< CD 0 (D 0 - W .< " N(nCD < CD %< 0 (D0 D < %< CD F)7 > CD to to (D CA Cn 0 (D CD Cl) !:q :E co C (D cq CA CD 0 0 D 1� (D =3 =3 :3 cn M I * w K 0 (C CD ril 5' 3 CD 0 CD co CD (D (D 0 (D 0 =r 0 " co CL " " < 0 co CL o =3 0 0 3 -T CD C 3 D 0 =r 0 m 5- 3 L CL w (D CA Z Z M (D N Z Z M CL 3 D w z z :r =r CL CL 0 (D CD QL z z -r 3 (D Q- :3 CL (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 CL 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD CD 6 ::r , = CD 0) (D (D CD (a (D CD CD ::r (D CD CD 0 0 (D (D 3 N co (a 5 * " 3 :r 3 3 > 0 0 0 0 3 = 0 CD (D 0 = :T CD W 3' (D CD 0 5" c cn (D 0 :3 :30 (a> 0 0 :3 0 :0:r 3 @ 0 3 0 CD m 3 0 :3 0 (o 0 n 0 :3 (n < (D 3* (D 1< 0 %< 0 5n CD 0 (D =r w < 3 -a 0 -0 CD (D (D :3 zy- < (n (0 (D r— (D (D c- :r c < c cro 0 m 0 c (D < CD 0 --h X CD w = (D w 0 (D < (D (D co Y <) (D 5- (n CD (D CL 3 0 CL c 0 CD 0 0 Fn m =3 CD w (D (D a) x (n < C: < (n < :3 — (D (D ::r (D 0 CD 0 �n (D 3 ::r 0 (n 0 CD M. :3 >< (n 0 .h QL CD (n :3 (D :E -n 0 1 0 =3 — n 0 CD CL > 0 c amo (D--h CD (D(D crCL (n(D ::r (D 3 < 0- 0 " D cn (n (D 0 3 0 5 c- 0 CD CD w w =3 D 0 3 :3 (D 3 (D " (a < 0- (A 0 CD G) (0 M M 0) O N) zT —4 (D(D 0 <(D (.0 0 Tn- 3 -0 5' 0 (D 0) (0 (D 6D 0 3 0 O.0) 0(D -0 :::;� :3 CL CD -a 3 3 ET F)* — 0 CD 3 CD 5 w — < (D m (D cr = 0 -03 w 0 CD (D (D (D 3(D a cn 3 D- (0 CD 0 T m cr =3 (0 a) cn (0 < < 0) Fn' (D (n (D CD -D-I � D � crv� m Dp o CNN Ow m CDCCOOCn 3 `- .. � pD cn 3 3 D O 0 Co n w m* cn � m m o o c o o rn z Q _ � � D � C mm j z � m � C m CA z zz v z O� � * CD rn -� � o, cn xx0 ° z v Qm m CL � m 0m� �' � O v zco aCD m -� cn rn o p m o c CD <. m z o O Q = O m �' 3 � r� D rn > 3v ° � o Q- - —• to o D = O m o m of n D N fin' tD 3 m Q cCn < > O D o D � c_n EL O 0 z m � O a• z \ > O o o m �- � y :3o m a F c- c c 5' C co w m Qm z m --I (D n O rn CD � _ m m cu rn o � 0� CDN -� � o