Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-02-03AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEEThNu MONDAY EVENING, FEBRUARY 3, 1997, AT 6:00 P.M. COURT ROOM/COUNCIL CHAMBERS, #205 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD GRAPEVINE, TEXAS I. CALL TO ORDER II. OATH OF TRUTH III. NEW BUSINESS i- A. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-49, SUBMITTED BY JESSE C. SAENZ AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ` RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-50, SUBMITTED BY JERRY M. LOBAN AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. C. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA97-01, SUBMITTED BY DAVID BARNHOUSE AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. D. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA97-03, SUBMITTED BY TEXAS BANK AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. E. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-51, SUBMITTED BY GRAPEVINE KAWASAKI -POLARIS AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. IV. MINUTES BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 2, 1996, AND JANUARY 6, 1997, MEETINGS. V. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND YOU HAVE A DISABILITY THAT REQUIRES SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS AT THE MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AT (817) 481-0377 AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS WILL BE MADE TO ASSIST YOUR NEEDS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 551.001 et seq. ACTS OF THE 1993 TEXAS LEGISLATURE, THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 1997 AT 5:00 P.M. _ i7j.� 9 DIRECTOR OF VELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDINGOF 11A MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER - 1d-- SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-49 JESSE C. SAENZ MEETING DATE: MONDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment d2ny- the variance requests to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 1911 Mill Pond Drive, platted as Lot 6, Block 6,Parkwood Addition asfollows: 1. Section 42.C.3., Accessory Buildings - requires an accessory building to be located no nearer than six (6) feet to any rear lot line and shall be subject to the same side yard requirements as the principal structure. In the case of a corner lot, no accessory building shall be located within any side yard required on the street side. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a fifteen (15) font encroachment into the required fifteen (15) foot side yard for -an accessory storage building and to allow an encroachment of five (5) feet into, the required'six (6) foot `rear yard setback If approved. it would allow an accessory— storage building to be located within the fifteen (15) foot side yard setback and on (1) foot from "the rear Rrope by line. SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds no special conditions exist. There is adequate space on the lot for a complying structure. BACKGROUND INFORMATION• j Mr. Jesse Saenz submitted a request for -a variance to allow the development of an accessory building as shown on the plot plan. This case came to the attention of the Building Department as the result of a complaint. I <}jf i 0Abza\96-49.4 . 1 �, Y2LAY 9 • • 4 > 1 Y a N _ C r Safe • j : 6 is 26 K F23 24 0. N K I it It b ri a n 11 Z9 70 i CrIATSVORTM OR 10332 32 N - 21 $ a = 27 24 24 >. m p y� >t » M tl e2 a3 � K 45 K 8 10 21 37 Y6 17 YLM7 • : w f 17 1 4t WEST 9A� ze 36 U b Is b 2 a• 7 50v�N► 27 35 11 I+ t4 3 47 w �� M 34 13 a 46 pp. �• ~� t2 21. 45 16 23. Y 4322 6 hV 31 o OMM • 2s • n .i r c 3 R• sxyfl`1� 8 ' 26 y g a• A�1k 1 W 2 , 12 W 2 t O o 3 27 W - • 27 _�SS 6 t3 pp¢C 3 { x » TR 2G � fAc 14.464• 26 3 ?r 4 3 Q 14 2 a e szt < 27 + PID 25 v 7 ir 23 22 21 2• r : 34.. ` :: 5 r 182 �:. 22 R � cues OR. �: 1 O 26 14 17, K` 2 3 O, x NO Qp0• i it ` q ` n to + 3�s " 1e 12 1+i a 2sRp`(S�NjS' 21 Q C r 17 RjM d u u 26 �(((---� Ltt u 21 I ,1 a 3 p �g125. Q 18 3 Ync �c Ys L = Q ss > 1 22 i' u .. v+ s c ) 6 • w TR z 14 1:01 Q< ¢ _< 3.648 Ar - 13 G I 13 8 zi • W SAME RIOM RO.: 23 7 24 ! Y 6 2s 7 a 6 3 J 3 z I 72 !7 it s 6. 7 8 t K U ' 12 in ie 2• V g AiLL POFD DR3 28 it 7 2 21 r • 2 : • s , 3 2 1 : 17 C`• \p` _`i j 6 i 2 7• u 13 RpIs,`(5 y s^' G Pp A i Q v000 V U 104 1 a 3 2 5 6 7' s • V 12 n 14 Z94—OT 1671 • Q E s R i E 4 c BZA96-49 7• w CU8 6 s u'1612 13 L@5 IIC JESSE C SAENZ i 2z 3 i `3. 3 :2 t ' 3,66.;. TV48EFILM oa • 77AN19 IR `,u 5 q3 N y. 6 'NE pR L33 K v TR In 10413 MQ�RpO u s ' • I 12, e 1 3 4r • VALT#i*l OR eee • tz 38 e 3 z2 23 z4 1 A 2 •e+ • -'� 1R ' 2 25 24 291-07 1u41 Ac 121 123 CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION • APPLICANT NAME- '55:_­_;qP r ADDRESS: 1911 Mill Pond Dr. CITY/STATE: Grapevine, Texas ZIP: 76051 HOME: 817-481-5757 WORK: 972-256-1621 FAX ---------- 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME- Besse and ',4aomi Saenz ADDRESS: 1911 Mill Pond Dr. CITY/STATE: Grapevine, Texas 76051 -ZIP. HOME. 817-481-5757 WORK: 972-256-1621 FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 11 Mill Pond Dr. Lot 6, Block 6, Parkwood Addition 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY SHEET. USE A SEPARATE Section 42. Pages 5, 6, Segments C,D To place a 10 x 12 wooden shed on the southwest corner of our lot within r- -1:4- of the rear property line and 5 ft inside the 15 ft required side yard for corner lots. �Ik 016 IF; 2 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOL_OR TRACT SHAPES_ ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT _MUST DETERMINE A CI SPEAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. I am requesting that the board consider my plea to allow me to finis the storage shed I started building outside the boundaries set by section 42 of city code. I unknowingly started building a shed without a permit of the street side of my backyard since the biggest portion of the lot is on that side. The lot itself is L shape and is only 30 ft from the patio egde to the back fence, but once it passes the southwest corner of the house, it opens up to a larger yard. The southeast corner of t yard is where the wAter runs to when it drains off my neighbor's house and our house making it an unsuitable location to store things T ;;l --n rlraarl i -ha thought of having to cut some of my two year old trees since all 12 trees were planted as part of a massive landscape project. I appeal to the good nature of the board for a fair decision in evaluating this request. It wasn't my intention to snub or do thing knowingly behind the city's back that required approval when I start, this shed. 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. N/A t_1 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHEF DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYP Jesse enz APPLICANT SIGNATUR 7 -- OWNER - -OWNER (PRINT) Jesse d Na saenz OWNER SIGNATUR t SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS CJ_�L�'DAY OF 19 ( � SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 19 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 .DEL/VERY ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 GRAPEVINE, 7X 76051 F# CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 SURVEY PLAT This is to certify that I have, this date, made a careful and accurate survey, on the ground, of property located at 1911 Mill Pond Drive, being Lot 6, Block 6, of PARKWOOD ADDITION, an Addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-194, Page 15, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. 1�t MILL POND M COV o�� 6 9. � f x b'` 61.82 i XFND ! k �RICK I' LCERIN DRIVE 0.1 ��-" ( (X4ET \ I ' A : -�h-r 1 PLAT ' 6 I ....A' 30' B L. � X8.8 �3.'S 3.5 Il. 18.9' _ o.a' i PBRICK RESIDENCE 11.3' M 133' tj rigy' 26' • a t � .o r �, �a.Yvc' Ui a• � s ym "lp A It LOT / r • t • 12` tr METAL BLDG. W] NO IDUNDATIO 10 CO ` IRS W I 1 10' U TILITY E SMT. o N PER PIAT. 0 Lawyers American LOT 7 To Title Company in connection with the transaction described in GP No. __9306205=1-1 . The plat shown hen:un is a correct and accurate epresentation of the property, lines and dimensions at: as indicated; location and type of buildings are as shown; and EXCEPT AS SI TOWN• all improvements are located within the boundaries thy: distances indicated, and EXCEPT AS SHOWN there are no visible and apparent easements, encroachments or protrusions on the yr wnd. a SCALE , DikTE `�z�/93 SUPJ o11 Phillip Anderson Registered Prolession.11 93-3 75 A & W SURVEYORS, INC. Land Surveyor No 482E JOB NO. P.O. BOX 870029 lll)n)A)AI ov �ACC!'1111TC TV 7e�cn in��. nr.. •�-rn MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFFI IAL MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER f SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-50 JERRY M. LOBAN MEETING DATE: MONDAY, FEBRUARY 3, '1997 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the variance request to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 917 Meadowbrook Drive, platted as Lot 6, Block J, Brookhollow Estates as follows: 1. Section 15.G.1., Single Family District Regulations, Front Yard Setback, requires a front yard setback back of thirty (30) feet. The proposed variance request would allow a five (5) foot reduction of the front yard setback for the existing residence If approved it would allow a twenty-five (25) Loot front yard setback for the existing residence as shown on the plot plan Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment deny the variance requests to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 917 Meadowbrook Drive, platted as Lot 6, Block J, Brookhollow Estates as follows: 2. Section 15.G.1., Single Family District Regulations, Front Yard Setback, requires a front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a five (5) foot reduction of the front yard setback for the proposed garage addition If approved it would allow a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback for the proposed -garage addition as shown on the plot plan. 3. Section 15.J., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, Off Street Parking, requires all required off-street parking to be located behind the front building line. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow required off-street parking to encroach five (5) feet into the required front yard setback If approved it would allow the required off-street parking spaces to encroach five (5) feet into the front yard setback. a 1 <1 SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds special conditions exist for the first request as the existing encroachment is not the fault of the owner. ` Staff finds no special conditions exist for the second and third requests. It should be noted that the encroachments could be slightly Fess than five (5) feet, but since the survey doesnot show the actual setback at various points across the front of the house, Staff has modified the applicants request to a conservative five (5) feet. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Mr. Jerry Loban submitted a request for the variances to allow the development of a proposed garage addition as shown on the plot plan. 0\bza\96-50.4 2 KITp�ju uTR - NRR �i� j ICU M tce IRV tR 1 © , w 6 ea R Sit � i � e.•.e 11 ' 3� 14 A� • ' t• h �� a2X TIT 56% 13 1 111 1 I t 7 a 20.w156 562418 - w ' 11 20 GN 1 t 42 „ MC a S07A1 TR sRl t+oovettbalc oA „ 1 a." K� 4 U ) 6 t 7 a to u 2 so (� 41 4S V : � TR 6 I7 I6 13 1• to l7 14 71 I IN (,J a Mt 11 1 m TR se 2 1 b BZA96-50 ° TIT�-�- ST tea t1+2 • n 1� 1, JERRY LOBAN n '� m t, n 12 11 a � . • OR w a' S 14 S 6 2R 1R 4R M • 743 IU j $1 4 4 15 , 7 21 7a w e 12 • je t® Z7 24 r > 54 ) 1 K • O TR 593 7 2 SANOti1RST CT y) 2 2 17 cl 2 c / 24 26 27 6 > / 1 7 21 a M K 1 1 b 1 r n .• sac fj �a2�8 z+e ISK V' 3 2 1 . 1, emIG 17 0 TR t M 4 p 1 1 ITZY -04 CIRCLE VIEW CT 2 2 TIT y1 r 1 Is .1a S � � Ln • Ut R-3.75 a 7 ,aa :, — N 4 1 N1i• 2 PRD -12 23K e a R � TIT K 2R g S PT • i 1 z7aV " SHADYBROOK DR. 3R SD4 .Rm i r 1.14 HM 78; 4' u 1 Q 6 J TR SJ a Q .S J 7 ♦A 6 ec O OC %,, A e V 7R M sr¢ 273 -ii W 1 E 6 3.• RC 1st k ZN-W> R —.MnC a,.4 AC O '' M72 tl K S 7e 4 - 3 TR 9 ° SC � 163 Sli :2 Y TR 4C R —MF —2 i4ela a U% 337 K u 1�; 14 is >< n t'�P�A ( • I KOCH ST tp Sq ' GREEK R • 1.81 R s� Q� �4" K LZ AC 04v 27 \ e1`1R HILL rar DR R s tm\20 I R —MF —2\ IT K —Pf1�a 2 ` SNEt:KO" 174swe V a ) SjpR s^ 85 3 aa28 6 2 TR 4C t11C K PO: S 1° -Is AC PT 7 R —7o , — KID6 12 9 7 u K TR 4J S PT 1R ' TR ,_ 5-374 wCP P w rT (,yr 1 HC / a TIT 2 u 1 4 i 5274 '� p Z 39 4T 2 S PT 1 1a 1 31 L44 AC M go rF •.z F pd ~z Z89 -*70 Z82" -23s a, M sww 2810-302 gc Y t.ts x1 4 31 A -- N R 1 s7 e \6a�5 25��5 TR .( Mae K TR 4 us C ] it O N] \ U94 }g 92 tp� t� r4 .«;e a pOfl t �' . ( \ N _ t.zo .c 281, 1"0 SS HC C 8-1 NORTHWEST HIGHWAY $ 9 11 -02 Ic ] , HC 1-4. C" u 1 . N CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION APPLICANT --)EPP-Y M L05AN NAME - ADDRESS: 917 MEA-D6VV8RLoK,- D2 CITY/STATE:GPjAFEVlWf j TGXPf-S zip: 760:57 HOME- 80-4-31LIOZZ62 WORK:817419-873/ FAX: PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME- ] ER RY M LOSAN ADDRESS: 91-7 MEADOWSRCOCOK -D)2 CITY/sTATE:6&PLYWE� 7EMS_zjp: 76051 yi- 61 HOME- 817-491-62:2(0 817-6t9- 873l I l FAX -vow -v t 9-46 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 917 MO�DOW EJ200K / 6T 6 .9Z6CX J 51206i-196LLOW E-,�TATE-,S TYfP—D c5EC-71-01\-1 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. c75EF A--1-Tl-e-D RI= r-c-aj=x!4- PLANNING 2 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. c E 47-7,9C-A-f5—D 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (Z) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. cSEE- A-77—AC4qED 2 0 1996 PLANNING ITEM 4. 917 Meadowbrook Drive, Lot 6, Block J, Brookhollow Estates Third Section. ITEM 5. The following variances are to section 15.G.1 -Front Yard Setback for R75 Single Family Resendential. 1. Request a variance of 4 feet for the existing foundation southeast comer which encroaches approximately 3.6 feet over the 30' setback line. (See 1996 Plat and revised Site Plan.) 2. Request a variance of 4 feet for a garage addition which has the same encroachment as the residence foundation of 3.6 feet. (See Site Plan) ITEM 6. When this residence was originally constructed in 1973, it was encroaching over the platted 30' building line at the southeast corner of the foundation. This condition was not discovered until an accurate survey was done on November 23,1996 by Arthur Surveying Company. The plat supplied when we purchased the house in 1980 indicated that the foundation had more than a foot of clearance from the setback line. Consequently it appeared that there was plenty of room without encroachment to build a garage on the front of the house and because of that; the original garage was built into an extra bedroom and office. The original plan to build a garage on the front was conceived using, as correct, the 1980 plat information. It had been certified as correct by James H. Dowdy P.E. in 1980 so there was no reason to doubt its' validity. This plat was also used to apply for a loan to accomplish the garage, various interior and exterior remodelling tasks. The garage addition was the major factor in securing the loan amount necessary. This loan closed on Friday December 6, 1996. That was when the plat was given to us with the encroachment shown. This was verified by measuring from the property line established by Arthur Surveying Co. Please note (Brookhollow Estates Plat) the irregular placement of the homes on the west side of Meadowbrook Drive which indicates why no one has noticed the encroachment until this recent survey. It is because of this irregular placement of the homes on the west side of Meadowbrook Drive that we submit that the existing home with a garage addition will have only a positive visual impact on the neighborhood and enhance the value of all surrounding properties. ITEM 7 No unique circumstances other than form inspection did not catch the error. ITEM 8 Included with this application is the 1980 plat, the 1996 plat, a site plan(revised 1996) and the original Brookhollow Estates plat. 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHEF DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) • CW-> XCY M 13AN APPLICANT SIGNATURE— OWNER (PRINT) J, %�rA. LOJ36M OWNER SIGNATUR dk- SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS & DAY OF -gym -� , 19cL(e, r0`•" SALLY D. HIMLIN .i7 I0TARYP BLI ° o NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF TEXAS my Comm. Exp. lo. t8-99 UA It: OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS 16j, DAY OF Ic/� c2, , 1 9Y SALLY D. HIMUN ° a NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF TEXAS or ,�My Comm. Exp, tote -99 x rss DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERYADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT sERv1czpECElVED PLANNING DIVISION DEC 2 Q 1996 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 PLANNING pf- I've" 16 5 b 2 Qi 6 23 14 7 4 J 13 a 25 L) 4 1226 IF 9 41 le, 27 $0 4 ear 28 At. SIX ga?", ST." APPROVED THIS THE — BY CITY COUNCIL, CITY C BY Z,,-Aot&T 4- Ad By. gy( 2�A"A-:ac- DO MONUMENTS HAVE BEEN REGULATIONS. OWNERS 0 D STEWA it •p ftv 8MMM0011,0W ESTATES SURVEY PLAT THIS 6 TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE, IRIS UAIE, MADE A CAREFUL AND ACCURATE SUMY UN fHE UROUND OF IIiE F'I{UPLItI'rLUCAfED AT NO. ___917 MEADOWBROOK DRIVE___ ; IN THE CITY OF ______GRAPEVINE _ TEXAS, DESCR18EU AS FOLLOWS: LOT NO. — 6 BLOCK NO. U OF BROOKHOLLOW ESTATES. THIRD SECTION__ AN ADDITION TO THE _� CIT(_OF GRAPEVINE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME —388-64 AT PAGE --33-- OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. LOT 14 1 LOT 15 NORTH N 006'00" W 70.00' _ _ 5' U.E. M�fai Bldg, �t�:q��e1J tt') \ LOT 7 p LOT 5 N 11.4 - ui 0 107. Or 14.0' d' r� A 917 MEADOWBROOK DRIVE 30, \�� SINGLE STORY RESIDENCE LJ (�, Cj/"•'� /J�� Bl. V) A/, 4.0' -* — VE FD 27.T 20.4: 9.4' O DEC2 U 199 PANNI 4.In DO NG I.R.F. N M LOT 6 ,•'.•cDNc.: Z sZj.,=• ,4 'DRIVE • \T n CJCf , w R=229.58' S jQ. L-12.32' 2 0.0 y { PUT Cau. u-12.50') cQ� 9 O41 rj�, (SO,jfj�� R 0.�,� �� R=443.68' L=40.14' DENTEX TITLE COMPANY TO THE LIENHOLDERS AND/OR THE OWNERS OF THE PREMISES SURVEYED AND TO G.F. NO. 96_ AB 417979—G THE UNDERSIGNED DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS THIS DAY MADE ON THE GROUND OF THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON AND IS CORRECT, AND THAT THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS, SHORTAGES IN AREA, BOUNDARY UNE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, OVERLAPPING OF IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS OR RIGHT OF WAY THAT I HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON, AND THAT SAID PROPERTY HAS ACCESS TO AND FROM A DEDICATED ROADWAY. FLOOD NOTE: IT IS MY OPINION THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN_ i5_ NOT WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP. COMMUNITY -PANEL NO. 1400 -9295 -JI. PRESENT EFFECTIVE DATE OF MAP AUG., 1995 , HEREIN PROPERTY SITUATED WITHIN ZONE --- - EDl DATE: NOV. 23, 1996 SCALE: 1' = 30'_ _ AS.C. NO.: __ 9611109 % - • .yF STfq• A` R� ARTHUR SURVEYING COMPANY, INC. /:.: e Registered Professional land Surveyors U L ARTI P.O.Box 54 — Lewisville, Texas 75,067 Office: (972) 221-9439 Fax: (972) 221-4675�i� l Fss•; °•: ~� O t t i -cc 7- t RcTr �'6' 4 1'} �Jc�2Q-� rfoE dos 6 -SDOo Ex -r- Fgl LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT _�_ BLOCK % ,2 OO.0 N O L L d C/� 5.S 77/$ n_—.S %ij/it ' AN ADDITION TO THE CITY Of ,e ,q p tea- E//,!/ �' , / ,4 /C eq N T COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PG,4 T RECORDED IN VOLUME 38�'-G 5> 1 PAGE 3 3 OF THE PG A T RECORDS Of _7 /Z.44AIT COUNTY, TEXAS �h4.�•� i -cc 7- t RcTr �'6' 4 1'} — o �h4.�•� poUL-s p . •__` ,���• at u_� xray.,, y..� cX Rj ��- or s , r RECEWED DEC 2 0 7996 .�''"�� PLANIVING ��`` Off, .•+AES H w+WE,• A Rf C.ISTFRED ENGINEER HEPESY CERTIFY THAT SCALE ! -,_ C .G���% �.F-}',9 7HE AACVF PIAN WAS Co* P)IfD FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY MADE CIS 1HE f.ROWNC ONDEP Mr PERSONAL SUPFRVISION. AND THERE ARE NO ��•t••O'f' !` y'�• s� ENCROAC"-f 'S CO-I'W"' nR PROtRUSIONS EXCEPT AS NOTED THE JAMES H. DOWDY A •; « OMIT EASEMENTS SHOWN AWE tHf CNfS ME SURVEYOR HAS PERSONAL AND ASSOCIATES H. KNOWLEDGE Of AND THE JAMES. DOWDY ONES SHOWN ON THE RECORDED PLAT �•"• 33886 P.O. BOX 507 ' ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76010 �OtJaL EN 1 DATE fi MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OF IA MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER`"%} SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA97-01 DAVID BARNHOUSE MEETING DATE: MONDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the special exception to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 221 Starnes Street, platted as Lot D, J. J. Hall Addition as follows: 1.Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures allows the Board of Zoning Adjustment to permit the remodeling or enlargement of a nonconforming use or structure. The proposed special exception would allow the construction of an accessory garage building to be constructed on a lot with an existing single-family residence in a R -MF -1, Multi -Family Zoning District as shown on the Qlot plan SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds a special condition exists as the setbacks will comply with R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations for accessory building requirements. The erection of this structure will submitted by the owner. BACKGROUND INFORMATIQ Mr. David Bamhouse submitted a request for the special exception to allow the development of an accessory building as shown on the plot plan. This property was originally zoned for single family use, and was later rezoned to multi -family in 1984. I j 0:VmW7-01.4 x I f1' I" c 3.32 ac "t21C 1=20 b M :a o 4.M K 5 m It 601,N �Sr M 2tu F •�'VR � ! >R r M Sa 1 — M sal _._.. ®1 19"Uh k iiMM= V' n' r r 7r. r t T M • { a� z SING _ f zt v r z3 •ri IC If 14 µ 7 m � 4 ifa iQ — —4 M AE t .E 84-53 w >. uLr[� �AZT8-t TU*AmM ST ' M t.♦ OR L72 use - : fR t♦ [[ r ! 92 5 S -ft K � M ]M � ryt -TN M M M MAN 4 f [ r _` x r m z+ TAB C a K K AC K R sec It [♦ n a u LPz n 15-04 C 86� t: N t M 30 .n -C f BANYAN OR 1 s1. MIT Isr K � Ir r is R- . Q n a r -W-2 a �[ 2R N if1 rC 2,814 : r a / � Z65-10 168R GRPe` �5y �oZLN m�iru - E a 0 pRK ' NORTH ST p� s 36 8 a ,6�y$ MIlt Z 1C7/7� C c J9 U 2 2R Z83,41. 004 Z r s 6q X30 1 1141a. u • s .t Ja as s c e ona "[ t ` 14 I. Fsp's _ i 1: N t .. 2110. l e zJ 1[ ^ z, a :Pat ST 3 OR T H NORTHWEST HWY. s Acp a W I6 � LW FL a. � ar : Tt tac • Cr C � Z8z-s0 1 '�T til : � i°♦►35 7 6,4 3 uab � t7• •i M2 M M1in r a • TR J:N � tKY �t Q. jar yy Q K Z JMa 2-0 26 30 M 350 � isu t 0♦2 F ' 12 13 14 rn 13 Z!Z z2♦.a r n i K K LE t_J ' { a� z SING _ f zt v r z3 •ri IC If 14 µ 7 m � 4 ifa iQ — —4 M AE t .E 84-53 w >. uLr[� �AZT8-t TU*AmM ST ' M t.♦ OR L72 use - : fR r ! 92 � M ]M � ryt T11 11111 M M M MAN iA Aa _`` 13 - RvA[O.j LOr ISS[ _` x r m z+ a K K AC K 'a2 • sec It [♦ n 2s C 86� t: N BANYAN OR ' 1 5t s1. Ir r is u n a r MRM a �[ 2R N if1 E r a CU�B-O8 i -2t � GRPe` �5y E P pVW Fic m�iru - a a 0 pRK ' -13 p� s 36 8 a ,6�y$ E Z 1C7/7� C c J9 U 2 2R Z83,41. 004 Z r s 6q X30 1 1141a. u • s .t Ja as s c r• 23 t "[ t ` 14 I. Fsp's _ i 1: N t .. 2110. l e zJ 1[ ^ z, a OR T H NORTHWEST HWY. Acp `EuA I6 � LW FL a. � ar : Tt tac • Cr C a 1 '�T til : � 1� 1'f' l uab � t7• � r • TR J:N � TP �aaM�l �t Q. jar yy BA. l"le Z M Jt► JE FC 177M aV 68 Its LE t_J ' { a� z SING _ f zt v r z3 •ri e .E 84-53 w >. uLr[� as M GU 0.06 { use - U89 _ u FR KL 14 1 >E rtT{ t t zoo- _`` 13 - RvA[O.j LOr ISS[ f C 6o'O cc' 1 Z8ro1 SE Y 1Y f e. gPQjI7" 1 ! 'aC —.44 E EST!LL ST t ` fr' ! NGT Y fi t j t 2fJ� a{ tea[ ~ N \36 .JO i• 1 ::e Y• t X .; I av TEka5 ST 'r f11 t..t I. T11l -, K . a2: ! >4 j I t. p a Ea we ) K 2- ! i]a j J •E ps�t� C a Et [EcaS act '',Ez K ra��^, r .Ss n}n{ cc . 1 [ i at 5 K N n[ 4 A w rT 3r 1 jR�G� (A to • 1 E l a Ira J 1 a 7 E ( [ Q ! ISS JF•' a '" sr. f z f J �'t 3 z< i.I I F:I� J s z J s3 cIr 4pRTN CT a6� N FT 2 e f Ri J6 a •t �11 f.r It �fTlitl •�'��� S{f 7�1 o F 1 aF :f ftP rTi er p [ [ 1 t [ ! [ � {1 ! s. 4; is W SA,t�fl ' I L 1_ :a �' s k k 5T � c{� i 6J ke Z861 t F kz u Y'ic s CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION 1. APPLICANT-�N NAME- D/ivllb 6"�OVISL ADDRESS:- 2 4nl CITY/STATE:- vilufZIP: L HOME. 34-'53I L - rl)<5 WORK.. FAX: 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME:--, Lim-bpq 6wvkOWL ADDRESS:- Sary?L- .45 4&4� CITY/STATE: zi P: HOME- FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 2? -1 N- S774OU(F-S, Z -07-b, 1414LL 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. I 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. WAS 7. EXFLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. aN 14F%24 TROX47-X fWt3> . PWT£�> Z)Ec, IcN7 Flu -3> -195T ©k7P11Vo01V(f-�- Fc(Z 2741 C(7% of GW&IAL wks M3. A1oW- CcWFob l N G- COn' PLq-T l0N 0F 3 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT APPLICANT OWNER (PRI OWNER SIGI SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF , 191% ��MY �((ffAjj,RuOnLsYQNmHIoCyKySm April 12, IN7 0 I, SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 1991-2 CMOLYN film mms April iZ 919E] 4/- -IQ -q A DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERYADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 Z o. 8' UTILITY EASEMENT per pint a110 a S a =a a r Mi Q a a °7. n �'a�:a�'•;ae aS�e 5 R'4 �-Q w) LY Sli2kLfliQl: 4 a o0ao d�C M 7J � R"oV 1J�L WJ urns D% F /D� �1 FT£rR Cd''�pL£TIfN F w or RkT z) o rn o �• 5TR ttcTu.�1.� � N � F— E a� o , 02 moi. N -Q p� ED $m ziS� °R� a>7y 9����XXrn000� a �A9 K.p tT7 � rCA ���� NUJ F, co %' N FF 0M/ Rry t•7 J Oj ('i •_• Tn N Z • c0 F N `� z N Z \ Q n n ` N HC � � U o R O~ N �-Q w) LY Sli2kLfliQl: 4 ONE N 30.3' STORY Y FRAME RESIDENCE N 8' 40' BLDG. r� F I rAr i o0ao d�C CyM R"oV 1J�L WJ urns D% F /D� �1 FT£rR Cd''�pL£TIfN F w or RkT z) 111 5TR ttcTu.�1.� � N � F— E a� o , 02 moi. N -Q p� ED $m ziS� °R� a>7y rCA N rn FF 0M/ Rry t•7 J Oj ('i •_• ONE N 30.3' STORY Y FRAME RESIDENCE N 8' 40' BLDG. r� F I rAr i 221 NORTH STA RIVES STREET 50' R.O.W. DEDICATED WITH PLAT /— A J (:'' o0ao d�C cn Eras 111 N co F— E a� o , 02 moi. N -Q p� ED $m ziS� °R� a>7y rCA N rn 0M/ Rry t•7 J Oj ('i •_• Q n n ` N HC U R O~ N � ?r -i x � H N a � o � y O q' O O ~ tip J 2 rb 221 NORTH STA RIVES STREET 50' R.O.W. DEDICATED WITH PLAT /— A J (:'' VOL 1,9974 OFG, 448 1�JJf 448 8 ft. casement fo` Jlorm Wa%er ---� I 2Z5 225 Opr i� G 50 M v N i I� a• u, 1�S! .• 1?S! . cot lD i I C4 M 1 V i 200 I 40 40 200 I I O D c`1 Ui I K c �I Iv d X o I L d E V) l.c W o I Z Id o 'o A I otf) 0 1 H a 1 I h r 200 40 - 40 1 240 50 MAP OF -- J. J. HALL'S R F'VI5/ON- oc L-07--J It ro 22. INCLU3/V6 S i --5 A DD/TI�O�� TO THC L. *'Y OF Ci AP v/NE Approved: CsrY oR GRA a SNE o C RCT�4Y Y ?dAi 31948 et- -40: Ftbd fot Roc« MAY a 1946 .t And Recotd*J 4afriment No ! s g MELV{N "MEL" FAULK. Country C" ? l �% Tut—.n4 entry. TO"'I / �� MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFF IAL MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER / 17 SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA97-03 JAMES L. HEWLETT/TEXAS BANK MEETING DATE: MONDAY,FEBRUARY 3, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the special exceptions to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 1205 South Main Street, proposed to be platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Texas Bank Addition as follows: 1.' Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures allows the remodeling or enlargement of a nonconforming use or structure. The proposed special exceptions would allow the existing building to remain as developed and to allow the remodeling of the existing parking lot area If approved it would allow Texas Bank to remodel the drive through lanes and the entrances and exits of the property as shown on the site plan SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds a special condition exists because the building was developed under the prior Zoning Ordinance and the applicant is attempting to create a better traffic flow through his property. Additionally, the applicant has worked with the City, to redevelop the driveways and intersections along Main Street to help alleviate a traffic hazard. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Mr. James L. Hewlett submitted a request for the special exception to 'allow the redevelopment of Texas Bank's parking lot. Texas Bank originally submitted a layout upgrading their parking lot and the drive through lanes to better serve their patrons. The City worked with the applicant to help solve the traffic hazard at the entrances to Municipal Way (which accesses the Library and the Community Activities Center) and to Texas Bank. The site plan is not in the packet but will be delivered to you later this week. MR/ga 0:\BZA\97-03.4 I `1 TA o , .yr 9 K _ DALLAS Ra �• P' 1.2• —'1 Tow- tp 26A 374 j't F 7A Y .463 AC Ts 264 c I . 1,I ^ 'TS j .7s AC 'ate : •` r /{ / 22 To 29At Z —09 ` "^ ' r.y 3F •` . 7w: : H [ O . .c3: AC >Tp. 4 k� 1 x L. M r ,�,E CIA wrfC 1 • r Klaw � i �•plt fn �. 1 1 —I ` Y ,w `' ". r. t i• x K r Y I Z aw I• '•-'.1 " r� �. s is i -. .. 1 t 1 i I tiY s �� cBg '�C •.. 7 T e °° es. $- cop, _ Ts NASH ST. `_ t sq 1 F 1 Q GUIr GU _, 24 (!�! DT. i yr ` K s:. 1 t `�'UN`Cu86=012 ' `0 Z87-�Bt 132A LWPTIWN 4E a jA Z81-1 11A 21 N. s 280-08 1 Z 1 KI .6 T / TA Po GU 12 qTF U • .3"U 2.84 AC. r „Gu ��pp MUNE I N E t �a TQ IF2 RPp I o 1 `• s c, 3c At GU G `602 ! t�-�i5 AC. 1 —� VINE ST. , 2, 21 . 2 7 'ti 2 t a r ... CU823 -02 AC 13 ,• 3t .. 80 132A J 22 G A , •�•• •� • — 70 IG S 21 ¢ S y .^ y i2 0 S .3• AC a yW� I 2¢ J Z Z j • S I m i cc i le 7 HANGER L.N. R' jy Q j F iF m 42 AC t ` 5. y 12 I s ► BZA97-03 l &C TEXAS BANK e 1i q 7 1 IJ 1 1 &6, .62 Ac TRc41 � 6621 Ac SU91-03 1 , 1 9 cc PQ \\ 2 < 1.c- ac Z87-1 7 AC. LA —1Q b1-06-199? 1-:51P11 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 18174240545 F'.0 CITY OF GRAPEVINE RECEIVED BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATIC10 13 1997 APPLICANT James L. Hewlett PLANNING NAME- , ADDRESS: 11300 N. Central Expressway, Suite 400 CITY/STA, ZIP Dallas Texas 75243 I E. - HOME: 972/495-7361 WORK: 214/369-5020 FAX: 214/265-9460 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Texas Bank I i-- - ADDRESS: 1205 South Main Street, CITY/STATE: Grapevine Texas ZIP: 76051 HOME: WORK: 817/481-9688 FAX: 817/421-7922 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 1205 South Main Street 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. See Attached Listing -Exhibit "A" 'd N 01-06-1997 12:51PM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1E174240545 P. C14 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. The conditions that exist for requesting variance is that the bank was built in. 1967 and has remained in same configuration of setbacks, landscaping, parking, etc. since that date. No physical changes are being requested except for a new drive-in teller - lanes to replace out of date teller facility. 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. All variance items listed in item #5 (Exhibit "A") above have existed since 1967 and received approvals at that date. The bank is not asking for any additional variances beyond what is currently existing. 3 U l -06-1997 12 : 52PM DEUELOF11ENT SERV I CES IS 1", F. 05 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) APPLICANT SIGNATUR OWNER (PRI OWNER SIGNATUR well es L. Hewlett SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS ##DAY OF '19- ,!!;)/I LOIS POWELL o a NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF TEXAS my Comm. Exp. 6-11-2000 DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS WkDAY OF .., , NOTA 110 0 LOIS POWELL o NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF TEXAS o, MY comm. Exp. 6-11-2000 DATE 19 q?' 0 DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERYADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, 7X 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 Cl d � C O R c .N LU CD !�-0.0 o o `Y' z O C m C N O Z U N d 0ul Q Q,. _ ate' '4-f N °' V to .r .a s •L o 3 N O v E c c V O N o 3 O V �.. =• 4+ 1.. C.4 � m030 O caN cc Z dQ. N O N '� N ~dc� i v �6NgNQ'a d CL c �.r �« �Mcnn. c a y C L v ,� V cr Q N y y 0 _ 'fl 0 CL tQ Q Yy oma. ca co Qcoo•N E~ L E.0 O � 'O Q C�... � O w NP,N OO{y d. O N ca •� V �, :+ a0 r M E L N R co C V 0 C )� r ,� r t� testi 3 W N 0 X W y O O C_ G� m C Ui 'Q .�.+ 'D k p •Ri O �+ V N= O N cGci�".' N .a Z'0 cr .3 c O (D W c4 L p - CD — m ev v L ai V Z c E c ami c O '° c '� Q .a f- wr N d ++ — t0 +d' +p•' 'Nc L QCM �C X >cnOc O O+W d U d M J:3 N cE�IOD > +a 4) i +o0as cZs t.- O + rR: N p , d OL l4 d C A M N a O L p eY6 C O am *- i p, ++ .x J O O a 3 M wR o p w d a• p, O. c p E 0 i O p O `• c ,0 m O E >+ V d Of d. �0.. O y O. O � � 3 E— ���.c° L N c CL c 3� V O y.. .O II c `� = c O N i Z a cc 0> d c Q� .N 0— .- C� N 'x m �m 3c N,' (Dcnxa o°'r-X(Dc L O 0 M = •p � c W Q H E til W ,= O> .19 C .L c� N N D rn UH m Hcn CL (n m x0Ec•� O L d N d • • • • • • •i 0 O. m 0 .0 0 � W F•• X W W z a X W C N"' cr 0 4+ r.+ ` - � + + + E + O 4.1m R a) w 0, W w 0 z 4.0 O 0 *.# 0 0 uj m z z C w N N N O O 0 L. ZH w d (D of O L O O uj d.� �- V-- C = LO CC OC 'O to v o.CL 'v W'r- N N a0i LL N O N .y .N Ui O .a H .0 Ri � : y H > N o O O L 0o c N M +.• Cf L CA L o00 � O O O M=O �.: r- O „- C N"' cr 0 4+ r.+ ` - � + + + E + O 4.1m d (D 0 N C a) w 0, + w 0 *a 0� 4.0 O 0 *.# 0 0 W O N e- 00 • O�-WC'q 0 O�ww ,� w w d (D H cD LO ti OC 'O to Qe-+'e! CAti Net�wmWM W'r- LL N O N .y .N Ui N .N .N : y H > 0 0 O O O O O O O M=O O O N O U U u u O U �- .r «. U U ... U ++ O x LL ca cv m ca cc m m m R c0 tv M M M C 0 o '50 F-- .0 U. N p w o m m W d clL `~ O L N � W N o _ W i as cv CL ,o >O _ W R 0 O E C O 5 .. W 0. _ •� Z °? 0 0v- O cM 0 c'' cmQ L o O �_ v m s W Y ySD O p N .x m 3 U C C co a O e- E m C S 0) Z m p, 4.* • i C_ N d� E ECC CD 0 v-Qa � xWrN X a� d— E'E �U °° E °.'•cQ'E�E O� �.N w� i.+ w A C1 o c CM O O O N O J O O Of C •0 y L .rN ��� EEE�3oa.EEa�Nc�t� cN 0"a0 'c•EO�cc�'v�•E'E6(D 7z m• a 0 o m 'E. 3v .� 0 o. c O a -� O N -o OL. " 9 1 L ,a E O In F •� >> cn �- c c Z m R H 0 0 cm 'L w _ E m= ''x'c cXX� �o�00c 0� V ca._ cv m cao o °'= a=x. - m �' E'x ai aw ��� ����JJLI.m 0 W. (n wz '�11t1 111111�f1t111 1111 11O) o L a = ® c R W v4) v 3 m c m C � CY)z > a w 1 C. -a �. N d' O ° C1 R> uj1 r4 (DvL�O Z p = i R Ci o 3 o C R a. N L O La W.Q' M �.. ,�, ti N R O ++ O R V N 0 o v m � V °� c m a cc a o Y cm CL - •4 O N N d > V V co ° N ° E a ti CCL w D7 d w x Y R m W d R CL V V d i C (/i L O t/i c c X ++ 'M+ Z L R O G. _ 3 d c a�i•x� 75 0 N d 'tQ E ° H E -0d •° LL N W O d a O L 'W 00 c d i R N 'C R C c �- R O d F- N 3 d •3 w R W c aEmoW,�= c Cy 3 0 �0 � �� o mw> w 3 cW R a M L ow CM v R a L R 3 a N c �_v c�w—�n..aa L°� as o=�Xo�•co0a a U) �a R O d CO 0 a v> - et c) .L > m� R O R m tp c W N c �.W R 3a,0'0a� H m Z c= c`v i Z = v 'C cL .R J L 'O =..,:eta N •R `� o.•- d o �a I! R V c F- L E 0 fl. � c���,o�m °O RR0 O csc OCA c00 cmc(a -0,+ L cc . — m t c o R = y,, 0 Q_ OR.W M CL 0) _ ami.Rc'� .NWY Co X i 0)(aW c + R N R L i c i R O X 'O c Y 0 o. 'X m C 'i� O R vWF- .Rc 0 F- Q..� 0 F-442wa 0 R d 0 .=w`.rF- O O 4) 75 V .Q C. R 0 c TY c CL m o' 0 R V m m C 0 0 R E N v = o cr _ =02 •y a� O W U z Q a w U N W E0 1-0 z .0• F- L cn W O N R G NOTE THE REotsREMENTS OF THE GRAPEVIME "GU" GOVERiiiIii�tENTAL USE SOL EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE SHALL Be MET DURING TWE PERIOD OF CON$IVAXr3M '1 qo. Gf5 EXTERIOR WALL MATERIALS, EXCLUDING DOORS AND V WDOyA, ARE BMCK ON ON141OUR CONSTRUCT ON TWA =100% MaSaaf 28 REM YARD SETBACK Moslem REQUIREMENT m70% SIGN "A" ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION aNALL BE ONI40UR CONSTRUCTION ANY slGfudE REVISION$ SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 60, SM STANDARDS ADTC f 0�1U11wo miiijtUP TIO La1ES I rAlu uANb I j AI.L 6W6006 1 GAUtT ", e4virMWT1 M 6HA61e ONLY TE p0mrL16HE0 hFTCR hi N tkMTlt I Cowr6ltTwN ooc Ncw DRtvctir Te Lt,Gpfj 1 EXISTING SIGNS AND GRAPHICS TO REMAIN EXISTING LANDaCAFwo Ala fWV6 or mous EXISTING UJ OWAFMG Wj � 6rk 1 0* J 4f I a" VIA TggFFIC FLOW -$Pon ' orB .r i1 7 RL,"" 11 I .. SIGN "A„ NEW BIS. SIGN "C' 4P ! O6 X 18'01(llfks.6) /a IrActb M�IIf 4nufM wine Rlnatas- . _....4mde►rM4W,M. _�.. .. En3Trq PAVEl1lNT � = FDVW is" CrAmow" TEMPORARY SIGNS WILL BE INSTALLED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE FOR TRAFFIC FLOW �G bfly r �1 L ryy,p•I New suMuDA oRAsS LAmpecarm SIGN B Ld p O tl LOW Q Z C. g 11 V z M0 oad W H I>y 2 W W W UaGWW� QQ2 121 Q N Oaf J zw FW O K UIZ in O N UJ N]J azOg UZ J�W n ag�c H W I= w O Z SI C :GIZ `— I-' ill f t�y�a�I�P1f/fMA11(. Blareta Kew• 1n II Pitt -U!" 1si4.,6M6 PEL W. aaeuePA•s ♦ Existvi PAVEMENT I Resets, ■oessaw• rftwlea, fs Y" j TRAFFIC FLOW ("--4 f7lMatbi 11111106 _j SIGN q8" Np••f�Klpef iA• NorL AIN7MESlHou6 ARB a 1 FAIM I& VAC" FALf aMI CUApi GLLVL DUP2.l 101erf lemre6l ttbreaN lowest 0 TV-IM40ANK tw(A C-.xlsTYiO LAND.if.APNO ExISTING �ANOBCaPSp ' � IDOWWO CUPS M6Y.wM 25' FRow YARD SETBACK ftwu to 4VKD 1. CASE NAME: Lot i Block t Taxed Bank Addition "• a:x -' oaf Too a CASE NUMBER: CP97-01 1 BZA9T , ` _ =�. } TeemeBank 1205 South Main Street tY'A 18'_d g Grapevine, Texas ` _ �./ �''a'.�: 14.20.0• �.-- - --- u. ERANp ( I Typf W Par" Space 8' X /8' rRAFFICLF OW LVffTM PAVEMENT 1 (T Q fll- NI$ o"D ExlaTra LMOOGPINO �'rsrl''b ctxEr EXISTING SIGNS AND GRAPHICS TO REMAIN �klf1:_4�tR$!r1 `�— -- -- _ MAIN STREET "PO" PROFESSIONAL DIME USE Tin C"SAHK 12x8 S. Yale SSeet arepavte4 Texas The TexasBank mpecUWly loguests dust the following Yananua be considered. TM Hank w- onge qtly dupned and constructed in 1 w7 ono et But tete met all regoNsotlermta of the CNy of Grapevine. Eike But date the City h- motl8fed requirements, same of which maks the extsdng Bank building not In full W w compliance wide current treads. TBulk Is not regRdnB for new varietces, only varlarxas to aYow forme existing In lkHng to W accMK d As co musicled. TM following an the *Pacific varwl,es Wing requested: f I�� Cumnl zoning- •P4 Proteeelorel Office 0I61trIer no -bang. requested . Toth Sib Ares declot right of ray el comer fu Munalpel Ohm, . 2.937 oq.h. Rasleed tow 116.411 sq.tL • 5.1 Ing Sgwn Fasting. > EOWng .gore footage 7,84117.12 aq.h. > Additional square toot." (excluding canopy for Dnve4n Tenats) 120.00 eq.A Tosquare footage 7,977.12 aquae feet I Tocol unpentoua Me 71,282 square foot or 62% _ Signs and Grephles• existing to be accepted plus Aeon monument signs as shown on attached Site Pun submission. 3'4" Squame FYI3TING COMPLIANCE Plat - ad existing property as no been planes CnE RuiEQreUqEueVTnFdD PPlotOR is being esbnfhad with this Submission. TexasBank DRIVE IN TELLER ATM SERVICE SIGN "A" 3'-0" SQUAWS C) .n TeexasB4ank TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL GRAPHICS SIGN "B" 3'-0" Square Cie.. TexasBank ONE WAY DO NOT ENTER SIGN 6tC" Nm" Fv.wr OF hon)*'. ithee 14 NOT Ai 4e2MN, iiEP{ A Tb CiV{L 8t1dw+ILs1L {1777 MNI r 1 ISIGN "A" Y Sb Pan. a has, She Pan Is Wing submMeM nW d with this submission. AN existing conditions gslW W be Approved he with Iminor additions W lw W ditioIng requested to a.ppmwd. _EXISTING COMPLIANCE VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR THIS ITEM • Landscape Pan- the existing landscaping and irrigation system Is regueatid In be Approved with tad BmAK addition of new wd*uping between the oow drlw In wan ui and tnew employee Puking lot and the new ace ndspn od es on mnorth m e uMnmg frothe nagg""m o Mumcipsl BoulerW. E TIhG CO PLMNCE VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR THIS ITEM Denney Cnuta: Maximum Dewfty- nue m an floor ares roto of 1.0 actual FAR. 1- 07 > Minimum Lot Slze minimum i. 10,000 .qui n feat :duel is 116,0" aq.N. gross or 116,411 sq.R. not after ROW taken > Minimum Open Space- immature 20% open apace ac ual Is 4A,128 sq.R. or 36% based upon gross > Maximum Building Coveraperwknum 60% actual is 9,961 sq.A or S % bawd uPon grow > Mazfmum Impervious Sun""40% of tow Ac1w1 Is 71,262 .q.11. or 42% bawd upon Bret • Ana Raguatlons > Lo Wmathminimum 60 feat Mol Is 261 feet > Lot Depth- minimum 100 feat actual lc 16{ (tet > Front Yard. minimum 26 feat andu spe4 actual is 1 feet H• Building Setback ectu.l It 86 fast •I- on comer of now street. Municipal Boulovand .,fuel is 63 fast H- Thre stmt was int m oelstence when me cumnt building was bulit FxI3TING GOMPILaNCE VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR THI3 ITEM > Side Yard. minimum ta 101«1 and—Pod actual ansa from 16 fast to 21 fast > Rear Yard- minimum is 26 fast actual is 168 feat .l - To mar edge of existing parking actual is TS feat H• Distance between buildings -not leas than 20 feet not applicable • Height• minknum me Holy or 20 fel In height existing la one *toy Existing building is 26 foot +I. New Orl-417 'i" FXIS�N�C�=CE VAR�CE REQUESTED FORnIS ITEMVAR�CE REQUESTED FOR nlS ITEM unw..Pink Existing landscaping and intgagon in pace and to name... The cow for landscaping will be Increased from this existing conditions by the addition of a 7,310 .gttan feat landscaped awn buflor between the Mw Dnw4n Toler lanes and me Employee Parking. This area will be Irrigated and connected to tui exisumg Irrigation system. Two sensing Uses will be removed at me entrance& from the property to Municipal Soulal.m. Tian wail also be thin /ms removed by the City of Grep-Ins when the mlignmetu of Municipal Boulevard Is completed. Tian is not suMcient landscaping along the front yard (Main Stmt) with the existing parking m comply with me new ommance. This was in compliance when conauuced. Then is also not sufficient landscaping islands within the existing parking to comply with the new ommance. ��IS�N6 COMPLIANCE VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR THIS/�M on.~ paring TW existing angular parking will be netnped wrth perpendicular parking spaces. The parking tp— will be 9 fast x 10 met with a minimum 24 int drive. Required parking of elm parking space for 360 feet of pro— floor am 17,977.62 • 26.69 Parking provided • 8/ un Off tmxl Loading• elm .PACO I. require by new ordinance- none i. pmvieed E%SETING COMP IMCE VARUNCE REQUESTED FOR THIS ITEM Design Re tuinn is Oudoor oorege not applicable > Mechanical and electrical equipment new roof top A/C equipment is provided > Lighting ..:sung lighting is requested to W approved and tad how lighting for the Dnao4n Teller to be approved as designed and as required by the Federal Banking regulations. Tian will also be email flood lights directed at the now monument "directional• sign.. > Masonry ngulrunamesC ,Hng building is all masonry EXISTING COMPLIANCE YARIANCE REQUESTED FOR THIS ITEM VICINITY MAP nor 10 3CN.1 APPLICANT: THE SfTEGRASERVICE GROUP, IHC. 11300 N. Central Exproaaway, suite 400 Dallas, Texas 75243 Teleptlon t 2141388.8020 Facsimfle 2141285.8460 Atcfdbet of Record Janne L Hewlett, AIA President OWNER: Tex"Bank 1205 S. Main StmeN Grapedns, Texas 78061 Telephone 8171481.9688 Facaifnile 8171421-7922 Roy Stewart, Dictator PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ',..... Chaifmn Date: I Sheat: ONE OF FOUR APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN ISI CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY SITE PLAN SUBMISSION I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TEXASBANK ADDITION SHEET 1 OF FOUR SUBMISSION DATE: January 13, 1,, r oZ s Q C >6 m~• Q O C z k 0 W ul " �r 8� iia fxr><fA•$wtQ CI0.�, etc lesse Date: asetaN+e DRAawea mumom i oP D40M •g • CASE NAME: Lot i Block t Taxed Bank Addition "• a:x -' oaf Too a CASE NUMBER: CP97-01 1 BZA9T , ` _ =�. } TeemeBank 1205 South Main Street ' k>o = g Grapevine, Texas b x o� :55 og tto YDS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ',..... Chaifmn Date: I Sheat: ONE OF FOUR APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN ISI CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY SITE PLAN SUBMISSION I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TEXASBANK ADDITION SHEET 1 OF FOUR SUBMISSION DATE: January 13, 1,, r oZ s Q C >6 m~• Q O C z k 0 W ul " �r 8� iia fxr><fA•$wtQ CI0.�, etc lesse Date: asetaN+e DRAawea mumom i oP D40M F7-1 71 Pwve—ku Tou, yet f Lo. 6OUT-H 61,FVAnt'Q P444'. Iv a r -al ROOF DRAIN CLAMPING RING WATER CUT-OFF "ASTI(r, EPPM ROOFING ME!HI5FR-ANr= ROOF IN5ULATION 5OAR0 Exn=R WALL Maymms An wommi, EUX"FOR THE MAULTIRAMA00"WN AM TMCANOPY OMTW IWW DNA W MU9tL#4= FAsm of cmo" swjj- as Dwff To vATcm rm v=Tm suamm comcRm PAmem COMMERCIAL SYSTEM" PLAN OF: Tarated'"k L CASE #: CPST-01 & BZA9743 - 4— LOCATION: 1205 S. Main Street > 0 TexasBwk Addition z Mayor Se"sumv LU Date: PLANNING AND ZONM COMMISSION WAw Chaiman Date: Shoot: TWO OF FOUR APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY VKW 114 CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OUTLINE OF NEW CANOPY OUTLINE OF "VIESOLD" EX15TIN6 EPUILVINCv COMMERCIAL SYSTEM" rJC)F--rH Ze ,kL,e Il.c wel.-r EL-F,\/Anct� 6CAL-0: L 0 51A S t}.-1/ t�= 1".<-- - 4— LXTll Cw wor VIVO U�m or ppa"MWT6 11" amu" awuow"4, > 0 (1) z < LU rJC)F--rH Ze ,kL,e Il.c wel.-r EL-F,\/Anct� 6CAL-0: \/15UAL AUTO TELLER SYSTEM" (5 REWIRED) Lu -DIEBOLO, Q P,50 P" \/:51ON TELLER b IN NOON, V CASEWORK (BY FZ:Lj MTL. DECK BANK EQUIP. SUPPLIER) CONT. ANC5,1-E! SUPPORT 05 ROOF DRAINPNUEMATIC TUBE SECTION ScAll: HIS 06SCALE: Nn CASE NAME, Lot I Block I TexamOmmilt Addition CASE NUMBER: CP97-41 & OZA91-03 Terasawk 1206 South main Street Grapevine, Texas CITY SITE PLAN SUBMISSION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TEXASBANK ADDITION 0% SHEET /M OFFOUR SUBMISSION DATE: HIT January 13, 1 L 0 51A S t}.-1/ t�= 1".<-- - 4— LXTll Cw wor VIVO U�m or ppa"MWT6 11" amu" awuow"4, > 0 (1) z > LU \/15UAL AUTO TELLER SYSTEM" (5 REWIRED) Lu -DIEBOLO, Q P,50 P" \/:51ON TELLER b IN NOON, V CASEWORK (BY FZ:Lj MTL. DECK BANK EQUIP. SUPPLIER) CONT. ANC5,1-E! SUPPORT 05 ROOF DRAINPNUEMATIC TUBE SECTION ScAll: HIS 06SCALE: Nn CASE NAME, Lot I Block I TexamOmmilt Addition CASE NUMBER: CP97-41 & OZA91-03 Terasawk 1206 South main Street Grapevine, Texas CITY SITE PLAN SUBMISSION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TEXASBANK ADDITION 0% SHEET /M OFFOUR SUBMISSION DATE: HIT January 13, 1 7Nf/xtNRaSLtnt2Ge0es. Ar Prated No- 410190 luxis Date: //Bv/(f7 RfWlw DFtAWWO NLVABW OF &*!ETS z 0 :z ca A > 0 (1) z > LU 7Nf/xtNRaSLtnt2Ge0es. Ar Prated No- 410190 luxis Date: //Bv/(f7 RfWlw DFtAWWO NLVABW OF &*!ETS mm l\ r --ASPHALT PAVING G FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS BY CITY v v v v v v - OF: LOCATION: ADDITION: --CONCRETE MUNICIPAL BOULEVARD = PAYING Mayor FUTURE MUNICIPAL 4 "' • • - 8'. AF IRF j• �Y�TM�D ,.rr'2tj C_ 20' $' r0 O t eR IOR $ 89.18�27��• P NTNG ANI 6 �� 661 - tl p G . e�' es* e 269.,38! -y' -ASPHALT 660 �r �t� 7' tic'.:;'.;' �. •yy 9?3:. 65y I. ;•� i PAVING slr'Y G 6 to' y6. tEt6yo1,. NEW t8" CON - :6 t(GI�•.'�-30 R~'�,•:•:•:•:•'•'•'•• Q'� °* 6 660 ` CURB k GUTTER 6 6 tom'• .'.;�.•'�.,',.':':':':, _�' '1 . • '" s. y . `30•R • 1 1 R y t t(G .. INSTALL CURB s CUTTER .' •.. ; ; �- `t 30'R 0 yy0 - _ __ CITY INSTALLATION O••• • MAINTAIN 1S- (MN a oy ti a `'•' i Of DRIVEWAY 6MDIAN �tl ,'.':•:':•:':•:•:•. DE ALONG GUTTER ?' ryt�4 R NNG 6y6' I TexasBank CPST-01 i BZJA9743 1206 S. Main Street Lot 1 Block 1 Texaa8ank Addition 20 1 o zo 40 Secretarysoe feet f' 20' ZONING COMMISSION 65 ' ' RESEAL -0 o1,p,•' .,` - S THREE OF FOUR .......... ........... _ .. PAYING ,G - f 1� :;� ;.;� 5 t �. • ROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE by11666t ` t 66yjT - /^i C FLICT WITH ANY CODES OR Of 6y 2'S•R ;1!o ayi ... - _ J DE ARTM�l4T OF DEVELOPMENT S ' . PROP. CURB STOPS I 4 18'-'{---,26'18' • ` SAWCUT LINE TEXAS BANK POINT N n rn LEGEND - ii -11. rOl 11 It 1 I.- TELEPHE MH tl 11 It i 1 ;t 1 i 41 ioi 1 1 ® SANITAI Y SEWER MH WATER VALVE OD STORM RAIN MH WATER METER © II. ti it 101 11 1 I II II i 1 1 1 � FIRE HYDRANT 11 II I 1 - II t t OAK T E IW il' t t II i I' 5198.6811 CREPE MYRTLE WOOD POLE FENCE 5178.:634 12 CONCRETE PAVING 1 1 1 I t I 1 11 14 I I ul I I' I I II 1�I LJ 11 II U 1 1 1 1 � -LJ POINT N NORTHING LEGEND - 0 CO O FLAG POLE OT TELEPHE MH 0 PP OO ELECR MH O LAMP POST ® SANITAI Y SEWER MH WATER VALVE OD STORM RAIN MH WATER METER © GAS M d GAS METER RK IN ES. STREET ICN � FIRE HYDRANT 5284.3193 8 TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE 5266.3205 OAK T E 505t.4383 �••.J 10 © MISC. MH 5198.6811 CREPE MYRTLE WOOD POLE FENCE 5178.:634 12 CONCRETE PAVING �y GE[•4 PINE GRASSED AREA T(�I-1 14 fO NE 5282.0280 RESEAL EXIST. IEALT PAMENT 5281.5920 PAVEMENT REMOVE EXIST. NEW CONC. 0 PAVEMENT DRIVEWAY W/CURB 5307.7141 X 600.00 VC PROPOSED TOP OF CURB 5325.7137 X 600.00 P PROPOSED TOP OF PAVEMENT - ... 1 5/8' IRF NEW 18' CONCRETE CURB 8 GUTTER - - - - TEMPORARY ASPHALT CURB ad40 - 2 =z _ EXISTING STORM SEWER 52 5.-563: PROPOSED STORM SEWER n!:6.8711 e. PROPOSED CURB STOPS POINT N NORTHING EASTING 1 5009.5816 5406.4884 2 5035.3883 5406.1586 3 5036.1300 5365.5264 4 5010.1233 5365.8562 5 5051.5326 5328.3;74 6 5051.3243 5310.3178 7 5051.0461 5284.3193 8 5050.8378 5266.3205 9 505t.4383 5246.8123 10 5072.5012 5198.6811 11 5:07.1077 5178.:634 12 5258.8787 5244.4116 13 5248.8246 5265.0292 14 5249.0329 5282.0280 15 5286.7081 5281.5920 16 5286.3930 5307.5974 17 5276.3092 5307.7141 18 5276.5175 5325.7137 POINT N NORTHING EASTING i9 5305.8258 -- 55i 7,6381 _�/J/_ 20 52fl7.9d65 8 M tm MUNICIPAL BOULEVARD NEAR 5t 76.0701 •. 21 S. TC:.riit1S SI 76.2nR9 22 `30e. 1606 'ita6 7826 23 5288.4394 5156 7837 24 527;8589 5:56.2554 N NOSE. 25 5261.0283 5I 4'..7187 26 524;2124 © 5133.3506 27 5?72_5281 5095.0545 '_' 2h 5212-'601 5:780.5402 M CORNER OF TRACT B i MUNICIPAL BLVD 2 SHOWN E EON. 325- SOUTH OF C/LT ON . AND 51 EAST OF C/L OF MAIN STREET) 29 ': 6� �72: `rflSS.tl Shc 30 - ... 1 5/8' IRF I CITY SITE PLAN SUBMISSION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION a 5, ad40 iGCW 1975 52 5.-563: n!:6.8711 5031 4921 34 5233."091 DESIGN: GBW SCALE: 1'=20' 5046.7418 35 " `31.35:5 506d 9007 36 5025.4165 DRAWN: GBW APPRVD: BRC 5103.5676 TEXAS BANK ADDITION '_ -- -- _�/J/_ 8 M tm MUNICIPAL BOULEVARD NEAR •. "'"•-•._.,,._-._._. . ..-+"•c- j{{t 1y INTERSECTION OFMAIN STREET AND ST N NOSE. - - © O ELEV. = 635.97' B.M. /2 406.7_2 _`-"� '_' - - -- - M CORNER OF TRACT B i MUNICIPAL BLVD 2 SHOWN E EON. 325- SOUTH OF C/LT ON . AND 51 EAST OF C/L OF MAIN STREET) > •....� /�,-•'" _._ _._.\ N 89'1 __ 4' f Qt. W ..__.__ ._..__ ._ - ... 1 5/8' IRF I CITY SITE PLAN SUBMISSION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TExa DESIGN: GBW SCALE: 1'=20' OATE:DECEMSER, TS NOTES: i STORM SCONTRTEWERS AOR TO TE ERIFY NLETSLTO BE REMOVED DTOF ING AND \ I DRAWN: GBW APPRVD: BRC I J0_9 NO.: TEXAS BANK ADDITION CONTACT ENGINEER IF A DISCREPANCY IS FOUND. 6'<; - fB 1205 SOUTH STREET 2. RDETAILS EFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLAN//S FOR ADDITIONAL ��� GRAPEVINE,IN TEXAS G DE TEMS, -., SHEET OF FOUR LANDSCAPINGU A1N0 PAVINGTISPL`CIRCATIONS. 3. TEXAS BANK MAY ELECT TO REPLACE PORTIONS OF THE ASPHALT PAVEMENT RATHER THAN RESEAL I O \ CASE NAME. CASE NUMBER: Lott Blad`\Texas8mt4tAdditlon CPBT-01 i B2'A97-03 THISWOR --MaT AND IS -PROGRESSFORCO ANO IS NOT WORK- USED TO fK UYD FOR CONSTRUCTION art PEgI��► la. i PcaWaac� aa® Dr�aoHa¢�E PLAN 4. REFER TO SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR GENERAL NOTES. 5S 120souch ank Main 1208 /�l t 3 P7 o�.,er,,. s.w • w.m.� Grapevi, Texan ne O-tANi-NAM 1 11062 $U PATE MUNICIPAL BOULEVARD I I I I I I I UNDEVELOPED CONDITIONS DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS UNDEVELOPED CONDITIONS AREA AREA N0. (ACRES) C Tc is 1,00 Qe (Mw) (WMR) (wM0 (CFS) 01„ (CS) COLLECTION POINT 1 0.70 0.8 10 5.8 11.6 3.2 6.5 PROPOSED 10' CURB INLET 2 0.42 0.8 10 5.8 11.6 1.9 3.9 PROPOSED 10' CURB INLET 3 1.57 .82' 10 5.8 11.6 5.6 11.3 EXISTING 10' CURB INLET 4 5.81 .36e 20 4.6 8.3 11.8 20.3 SAME AS AREA NO. 3 NOTES: 1. COMPOSITE 'C' AREA 3(FOR UNDEVELOPED CONDITIONS (•) AREA 4 = (O.BK0.87+0.3x5:.$3 62 6.81 - 0.0.36 2. DEVELOPED CONDITION FLOW TO BE DIVERTED TO EAST WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT (PER CITY STAFF). MUNICIPAL BOULEVARD > - I- f----------_ DEVELOPED CONDITIONS DEVELOPED CONDITIONS I I I I ( AREA AREA NO. (Acm) C Tc (Mw) IS I,oe OS (NMR) (wMRY ( FS) aeo (cfs) COLLECTION POINT 1 0.70 0.8 10 5.8 11.8 1 3.2 6.5 RELOCATED 10' CURB INLET 2 1.10 0.8 10 5.8 11.6 5.1 10.2 RELOCATED 10' CURB INLET 3 1.21 0.8 10 5.8 11.6 5.6 11.2 EXISTING 10' CURB INLET IGO 0 100 200 acele feet i" - 100' TdRM SEWER CALCULATIONS DEVELOPED CONDITIONS AREA 1 AREA 2 Q_ = 6.5 cfs Q,w = 10.2 ole 0-= 21.t cls Qcw,= 18.5 cls S, = 0.389 S. = 0.14% V• = 10.3 fps V = .10.7 fps DIES 00(7JWENT REPRESENTS WORK -W -PROGRESS .WO 4 NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION OR PER Ilia/Q7 OTAKiNWICAS pl. T52659 CASE NAME: Lot 1 Block 1 Texas8ulk AddlBon CASE NUMBER: CP97-01 d EZAST-03 TexasBank 1205 South Main Street Grapevine, Texas 1. ALL DRIVEWAY AND PARKING ELEVATIONS ARE TO TOP OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. REFER TO APPROVED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PUNS FOR GRADES ON WALKS, BERMS, AND ALL OTHER LANDSCAPED AREAS. 3. FIELD CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LATEST APPROVED ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING PLANS, AND GOVERNING CITY OF GRAPEVINE SPECIFICATIONS. 4. ALL EXCESS EXCAVATED MATERIAL AND STRIPPINGS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A PROPER MANNER OFF THE PROJECT SITE. S. THE TOP 3 INCHES OF SOIL SHALL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED ON THE SITE AND SPREAD OVER THE SITE AS TOP SOIL DURING FINAL GRADING. 6. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS. FINAL GRADES WITHIN 10 FEET OF STRUCTURES SHOULD SLOPE AWAY FROM STRUCTURES AT A MINIMUM 5 PERCENT GRADE. 7. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION FOR PAYMENT PURPOSES. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN REQUIRED DRIVEWAY PERMITS FROM THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 9. TRANSVERSE CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE SPACED NO MORE THAN 12 FEET APART ON ALL PAVING. tO.ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE NORTH CENTRAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT (NCTCOG) STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, EXCEPT AS NOTED. IN THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT, THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL GOVERN. 11. ALL LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL APPLICABLE UTILITY COMPANIES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SO THAT UNDERGROUND LINES CAN BE MARKED. ANY UTILITIES WITHIN IMMEDIATE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE UNCOVERED. TEXAS ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY (817) 336-2328 SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE ENTERPRISE 9800 TU ELECTRIC (817) 858-2569 LONE STAR GAS (8 17) 571-9496 AT&T, MCI 1-800-245-4545 FORT WORTH WATER DEPT. (817) 871-8295 GTE (972) 413-1105 PARAGON CABLE (817) 488-7526 12. ALL LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL APPLICABLE UTILITY COMPANIES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SO THAT UNDERGROUND LINES CAN BE MARKED. ANY UTILITIES WITHIN IMMEDIATE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE UNCOVERED. 13. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING STREETS, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC., ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FREE OF MUD AND DEBRIS FROM CONSTRUCTION. LI.THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48 HOURS (2 WORKING DAY) PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. 15.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PLACE FILL OR WASTE MATERIAL ON ANY PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER. IF THE CONTRACTOR PLACES EXCESS MATERIAL IN AREAS WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION, HE WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM SUCH FILL AND HE SHALL REMOVE THE MATERIAL AT HIS OWN EXPENSE. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION AND WILL PROVIDE THE NECESSARY TRAFFIC BARRICADES AND WARNING SIGNAGE TO PROTECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. ALL BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS. LIGHTS, DEVICES, ETC. FOR THE GUIDANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIANS MUST CONFORM TO THE 1980 TEXAS MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, AS CURRENTLY AMENDED, BY THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. 17.ALL REINFORCING STEEL AND DOWEL BARS IN PAVEMENT SHALL BE GRADE 60 AND SUPPORTED AND MAINTAINED AT THE CORRECT CLEARANCES BY THE USE OF BAR CHAIRS OR OTHER APPROVED SUPPORT. 18. NO PERSON SHALL OPEN, TURN OFF, INTERFERE WITH, ATTACH ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO 00 SO BY THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. ARRANGEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION WATER SHALL BE MADE THROUGH CITY OF GRAPEVINE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ADEQUATE SANITARY FACILITIES FOR USE BY WORKERS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. 20. ALL PAVING TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) TO A NEAT LINE AND THEN REMOVED. 21. NO TRAFFIC SIGNS ARE TO BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 22. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING FACILITIES FROM DAMAGE. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. I � In ZN d M t t 0 7, a a 0 r 0� .!I," � C4 0 W LA. a 'W ( ClIM,.- QQZ 4$QQ>..F-cr NW 0 m''s w oa n - Z 4 1 W 0 �in N Q cra 1 !� r � 4' .� r "" 0 u 4. 0-4 �N� aD L ih w i.c k �.. i 0 < :M .. } N,. t ! ? s t OU Q '` z LjD ani -� �,� �, �z. "• ;, U 07 kjA SY 3N1'1 9NI011na cz E �• •-. �� x- ;��N3N(3S` A x..01 " 9*6 Od ZO`<S l0A_Wdl JM .8 VOR 11 n 1 ({7 L• J. 40� t .2 ►LS NIVIN R C4 41.1lVMHOIH undS) a aCIEg cn J m�� CL a10 0 Z w ^ — — — — _LO '9d '1-61_88£ " t0A IV "td 2sd iN3rgsv3 Aims( ,S l ONLLSIX3 - -'�j Z.S£'OCtZ - 3.S1A0�------ J - 3-' {.9£.T.V.00 S sg _ _ —89'06Z — — W CL _ I 'f— X518 '`Jd 'l6Y* l0A '1N3W3SV3 3NIl 83h+13S ,OL JNLLSIX3 — — — — .., ICf3NIA3 VNO 30 .1110 ti L %o 001 I � In ZN d M t t 0 7, a a 0 r 0� .!I," � C4 0 W LA. a 'W ( ClIM,.- QQZ 4$QQ>..F-cr NW 0 m''s w oa n - Z 4 1 W 0 �in N Q cra 1 !� r � 4' .� r "" 0 u 4. 0-4 �N� aD L ih w i.c k �.. i 0 < :M .. } N,. t ! ? s t OU Q '` z LjD ani -� �,� �, �z. "• ;, U 07 kjA SY 3N1'1 9NI011na cz E �• •-. �� x- ;��N3N(3S` A x..01 " 9*6 Od ZO`<S l0A_Wdl JM .8 VOR 11 n 1 ({7 L• J. 40� t .2 ►LS NIVIN R C4 41.1lVMHOIH undS) FROM : GBW ENGINEERS PHONE NO. : 214 840 2156 Jan. 13 1997 10:24AM P2 STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § WHEREAS, TEXAS BANK IS THE OWNER OF A 2.710 ACRE TRACT OF LAND IN THE WILLIAM DOOLEY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 422, SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING THAT DESCRIBED IN VOLUME 7302, PAGE 2076, OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY. AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: (DRTCT) I DESCRIPTION FOR A PORTION OF A 4.0 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO AMERICAN BANK OF COMMERCE, RECORDED IN VOLUME 4367, PAGE 115, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; i BEGINNING AT A 5/8" IRON ROD FOUND FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 4.0 ACRE TRACT AND BEING THE SW CORNER OF A CALLED 25 ACRE TRACT AS DEEDED TO THE GRAPEVINE INDEPENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT IN VOLUME 3759, PAGE 556. (DRTCT) THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 406.72 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD FOUND IN THE EAST LINE OF MAIN STREET; (A 100' R.O.W.) THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 47.SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 290.18 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF MAIN STREET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD FOUND, SAID ROD HAVING A TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATE, NORTH CENTRAL ZONE VALUE OF f Y=7023889.403 AND X=7404707.943; i THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 406.38 y FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 36 SECONDS EAST WITH THE WEST LINE OF i SAID 25 ACRE SCHOOL DISTRICT TRACT A DISTANCE OF 290.68 FEET TO THE POINT i OF BEGINNING, AND CONTAINING 2.710 ACRES OR APPROXIMATELY 118,037 SQUARE FEET OF LAND. JAN 13 1997 PLANNING THE INTEGRASER VICE GROUP, INC. PROJECT • DESIGN • CONSTRUCTION • FACILITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES F1 January 13, 1997 Ms. Marcy Ratcliff City Planner Community Development Services Department City of Grapevine 307 W. Dallas Road, #209 Grapevine, TX 76099 Re: Case Name: TexasBank Lot 1, Block 1 TexasBank Addition 1205 Main Street Grapevine, Texas Dear Marcy, James L. Hewlett, A.I.A. President ARCHITECTURE•INTERIORS-PLANNING Royal Central Tower, suite 400 11300 N. Central Expressway Dallas, Texas 75243 telephone 214/369-5020 facsimile 214/265-9460 RECEIVED .IAN 13 1997 We are submitting the Site Plan Application and Plat for the TexasBank project. I was led to believe that the Variance for "Conformance Compliance" of existing conditions was to be submitted with the Site Plan on January 13,1997. In asking some questions about a "Time Line" schedule that Bob Price and other city engineers were requesting it was discovered from Teresa on Friday that the schedule for the variance application was last Monday. We respectfully request that this Variance request be included in the next Board of Adjustment hearing. It is extremely important to the Bank as well as the City that we not allow the project to be extended for one additional month. The schedule for the City to realignment of Municipal Boulevard is critical to the City, however, they have agreed to provide continual access to the Bank. Therefore, they must defer construction commencement until we have almost completed the Drive -In Teller addition. I have enclosed a tentative schedule that I developed as a result of our meeting with various representatives of the City on Thursday, January, 9, 1997. I believe that we have addressed all items required for submission, but recognize that due to the fact the building is existing there may be some items that we have overlooked. Page Two January 13, 1997 Ms. Marcy Ratcliff Please let me know if you require any further information. We shall look forward to working with you on this Project. Thank you for your assistance. Best regards, Ap�icant for the Owner and Developer J es L. Hewlett, AIA eident cc: Mr. Roy Stewart TexasBank, Grapevine, Texas JAN 13 1997 PLANNING i MEMORANDU MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: 1A DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OF�FICIA MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER 7JR BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-51 GRAPEVINE KAWASAKI -POI ARTS MEETING DATE: MONDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment consider the special exceptions to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 311 East Northwest Highway, platted as Lot 1, Block 2,i A.F. Leonard Addition as follows: The requested special exceptions would allow the existing non -conforming development to remain as dev he remodeling of the exterior grave ar a. annr v i wou .:allow the existing development to remain as developed and the remodeling of the exterior gravel area as shown on the site plan. u /VI't 4 e t2ls- z'Cz Z� SPECIAL CONDITION: (4C -C iL - 1...._1 )n meeting the current sign ordinance regulations. %CKGROUND INFORMATION: Wilbur Goltz submitted a request for the special ex( gnway. request proviaes an opportunity to work with the applicant tc improvements to the site. The site plan is not in your packet bui week. MR/ga 0:\BZA19651.4 1 g amenities especially ild develop a new pole )n to allow Grapevine ut making any exterior I improvements. The surrounding fence line. rming pole sign along n made to upgrade the ihway is eminent. This make some aesthetic will delivered later this i `I I :. N 2 • 'k . �-�R to AC 31 ar z2 ,• rf14M.Z �..etl t9AC t it •Irl R-TH R—T„ t. 14 42 TR 20 .35 AC - 2,814 R-5.0 R-iNF_2 F+2 19 2r A. C.M AC ? Z82--50zgz-sa Tuft 12 29 .- :: M r TO 3•t Ta TR r.2�2 Ac "PTMA 2E y 1 AC T. ti 2e rn F 15.0 X35" S• { i. 303 f ill 3i' iR 34 G� � � Z" 1 T"2O1 0 v o e : K � 3.• Ac u• Z99 -a7 V%• 'J(�J ,(t 3 !. 'F 89-07 278-1In 111 3" 39 y TM 3eE Ser 93 a s TURNER TN m 3tA . �. >e I.72 TR TR ., Tx 3es n, r. TM rr. m J aTMe ui Tit 364 25 :3s : •• Q ' 2i r t31 r 2 Po AC K K At ('1, R j t oo 86,E 5 'N gi �. BZA96-51 .. x xe r e E t caft. 9i-21 GRAPEVINE e �ll CoA KC Y' �::..:. KAWASAKI POLARIS �AappN t 11 36 a•os r i'_ t sj \92 C 9 •< 16 ■ Wossc9 2 �\C19-07. : u 1k Z8"i. 3504 2 r ' 6422 070 EX191-i s w >. to s c � • ,p� !) I���ts k ___� �f - .) _' 1' •. t `.`� -A -C CU91-16 k CC ' CU92 f r _ _ NORTHWEST HWY•- 4 Zrt�i 5i c o ' � .e CUl;S 2 � �7 io • � s r . s in SlE f� . K TMT. 9 c P s K SCEP C J�c'o — 5 z • .�••. . WALL ST. � TV wi i ri rA••A . 6g Gt { � II11.a 3!sF, • f �Rj I' ai. .%".: 3 .5 Elect n I 'a ,'., • i 54C • ! j k ' j 11.:'1 1• ! f '� I �' 3 l i t ['� �.� t t ^ . x K PQ �l5 r �. ' Z�,6 I f E E E573LL ST (` B w., ( k� Ir Y►r ,N iiy^ t - `3 1 \fig H r" ��.. i '• ( 7 a Z, s i 3 t: K TS 14 13 12 ,�, { TEXAS 5T "' e e f e Ar l t s I TI . TEXAS Tit 1 el. k 111 k IA (� - TE t �z TM! w •01 IK S•'C Y 15 63;f t0 C— TE ItAS S* S7D 11 2 .3'r! ) .•S i• ez. K .A tri '�I 8 j VJ ` t 2 7 A S . K i "At Arg=du K s e I IAS ; 1 ! c j T 1 t MIT E sa ..1 34 ( ZRIG W I 2 E l F E I E �•. 'J ' C: 2 3 9 clT �. i0 3. • 11 V J � t 1A IC9 I s �� ; 5 i '• kr es w u u WORT S 1 t NQ,1\ 7' k Mii Iri'E (.. 1 i O•..., { ..Fk i 1 i : t:. �1p 3 • i15 l = `. rr /1 r`r�• E .� I_E�h1 S'•'7 3 �j o . 1 2 3 . ! k'( GVkk' 015 <2 •! 1 11 iF-i w 4 Ts j I , �,'I Z82-2 k ` nt ZXZ91-*So •�, .. ' ,. STREET _LEt trt AC CU91Li`5 1 F 1Ct 1. 1177t w22 17� E•ri irl ' , Inoik l.S: a.t s i ' j;. It is n� •1 2 s�s ..y lv uiu ST 7V 1127 ° •1 C. �{ i f " r ; t ( �_ CAMWN ST3 pt TIJF AC 2 I7.5 S 'O I u la' 1°�iF� f •F�l'.1.__; 1 it �O\� 6 TOTAL isA a Tot 2T IQ 2M R i2F07 1 ° 2''6 AC r . 64 CU93-08 CU��9 1 c." \ ' .c •� 1 } Z82-39 t�ls k s r lr may: 1 Sd 82-401 ' - z90-0� C j' ORD. 8 70- 1 L i . „r , - ra . 90-64 ( Cus7 '• r_. .ud5_>c U95-12 I-06 ' -�• \ �-/ im CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION APPLICANT NAME- -760S/ A E- ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: ZIP -760,S'// HOME- WORK: . . .. ......... . , /- 2- -�-IOCD FAX: 2. PROPFRTY OWNER(S) NAME- w /00 "- ADDR,'---SS:-o L / - '(Lo - - (' 1 cT� CITYP TATE: ZIP: HOME- WORK: FAX: 4. STREE.71- ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 5. LIST 7AE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECI° C VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEE'l' rifz�)l / p n DEC PLANNING 2 3 STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE RE UEST. L., a vi d s r -a pe vAr-e/`s �'e vi�'e �,cK ©- �er ©rcY / vra yG.c S l�rQ Ve- tie-Gvc e �tyrce- t�Jv� !�1 �� Wg5 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. /&/ 4-#q1c- e DEC 3 a 1996 PLANNING 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHEF DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, ANC THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIEC BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) APPLICANT SIGNATUR OWNER (PRINT) (%/ t- xu I- I I OWNER SIGNATUR SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS -27 DAY OF A/s116q&i , 19 9( to.►.. •�4 =PUBLIC a o M-0140600 /-0?,2-_-2e V v DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 GRAPEVINE, 7X 76051 N CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I V E PLANNING DIVISION DEC 3 0 1996 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, 7X 7609,PLAN N I ISI G RT9 ao FAIT E%16T. MLE 7 Low OD. P me s+eN OOrw TO M AV I I ( rtaw It II M+ICIOW.LY LIT 5" rt.A nc PACE - 10' OD. PR'E 0 Ur O.D. P" &-16N'-�rll TIO— I. - Id -Id ZOy= OW00 Y cOMO AL "IsT FTxE _ sum TO RMHN/ 1W 'a--4_-d--4_-5-4:-3-5_p— _ o.._o_o--.o—_e=o_ ►RO►OYD1Y � K'RR1'D1 wrom CD sTtd� rams" � o N fi ,. � IAVIN6 (1 SrORA6E AREA I 1 -r- 2w EXISTINS BUIL NN6 xl _.-I-' ' N• $ ( PROPOSP SITE FOR �D 'PAW 4- "TM I I SRAPEVINE KAWASAKI APPROX. 0400 s0. Pr. o ' rROPOSW 1.7 fwN i I I MOO sGR@N I x16• ► T's7m. FOMssEf I i slALes �L IN ME E o ►tom ANE fT`� �oM6Ti116 q — ZI-W — — — �----! L� Ob►L/VY ARG f I e 0 0 i o C Meter fO 5 MTRp TO vaA1-615. I 0 1 I� ZOIlD W6111NY OOM''CtG1AL 1 O C O ii%T77TlTTllT77TiTlTlJYT/T1�77T1177%7/77777 P14AW ZOMW W6MrMY Commvtc1AL VICINITY MAP f> LNOSCAPM MCA MY 2 TRRM OR GTYy AC4e"AMZ TRIM LbT TO M MAW= KTWN 6 MOMRb ArTm 0&4%ZTION Or c" dn•►Ro'2Me"m TO NOItRNesr 00". i GENERAL NOTES: 1• ALL REOUMQD, S Or 5MMON 55. OFT STREBT 11"WiNs. sK#4 L. Be NET. 2. ALL itMiUWZHMRM Or Sa.TION 60, O546N IM&A.ATIONS. SmLL Be MET. X 5. ALL FtMoutofts4mas Or TME 6RApeviw SOIL EROSION ORDINANCE 94ALL Be MEr 4. OMM M MOM 6MTZ OZ! TMOLIOW 6RAP"I C. TEXAS'f6= S. APPLICANT. tdORLLY ARC 4MWTS 9m S. MMN ST. SUITE MO 6RAf^CHiW- TEXAS 16M WHIM +40MAY COHyO SYNOPSIS MOM MATOYEO ARBA AT fMMOMS h EXCUIP p FROM AREA OAL44LATIOW WRC. M AREA POIt F'MAtl01N GA(.GlR.ATlpb EYGLICE M rARKMK AnO tTtlK AROtMIO RTINI..DM,6 �. tMMLDN•► w ARO M PROIo� urovL+eets 6TORAx AREw CONWTbNAL WE PBa6r NOIt A{tFOMOT'1N; SALG4 �vE«1ctEs. ao wATeRcRArT~�' ALL-TeutwA+N 6ifAPCYMIE KAMA4AIO — 40 E /tl t"OesT "W. LOT L FLOCK 3. M. LEONARD Accwrw" cmm6R cU rl-Oi, x "40. OZA 4" coprwpr. r¢n Ih •Y•`Mne^M1 er Neiy bd. W l..y ...y of dew pvrr�inurtrn Nq.1 No D- 9y. PRN D.I. of I. - 05' p .LYfNRY 3+, PWT U3 Wliu �a or Ta, b `tPtO ifC r io A; �• Ci Rl V>W VlT i @IMS Nit NeFO Ty r•wed I Ny wawa t'. $d.'BC Oeervl p r•p..p W h aNsw•• a .ww.a, rww..i.< wiv eaaM M•�� w 34 o- u•aw •A :v o -•».y e <•ro.rra .M ar Taw. r" Al I OF I STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OFTARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, December 2, 1996, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Randy Howell Chairman Carl Hecht Vice -Chairman Ery Meyer Secretary Dennis Luers Member Jill Davis Member Russell Anderson 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum. Also present was City Councilman Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: Scott Williams Building Official Ron Stombaugh City Planner Tim Fleming Plans Checker/Field Coordinator Gerrie Anderson Secretary Chairman Randy Howell called the meeting to order at 6:02 P.M. The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-40 submitted by David Wilson who requested variances for 829 South Dooley Street. The variances are from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 31.F, Light Industrial District, requires a minimum lot size of twenty thousand (20,000) square feet. The proposed variance would allow a ten thousand -six hundred and twenty-one (10,621) square foot reduction in the required lot size. If approved, it would allow a lot size of nine thousand -three hundred and seventy nine (9,379) square feet. Section 31.G.1, Light Industrial District, requires a minimum lot width of one hundred (100) feet. The proposed variance would allow a fifteen (15) foot reduction in the required lot width. If approved, it would allow a lot width of eighty-five (85) feet. BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Section 31.G.2, Light Industrial District, requires a minimum lot depth of one hundred fifty (150) feet. The proposed variance would allow a seven (7) foot reduction in the required lot depth. If approved, it would allow a lot depth of one hundred forty-three (143) feet. Section 31.G.3, Light Industrial District, requires a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet in depth which shall be utilized as a landscaped setback area. Front yards shall not be used for any building, structure, fence, wall, parking or storage area, except that signs shall be permitted in this area. The proposed variance would allow parking in the required front yard setback. If approved, it would allow two (2) parking spaces in the required front yard setback. Section 31.G.4, Light Industrial District, requires every lot to have two side yards, each of which shall not be less than fifteen (15) feet in width. The proposed variance would allow a three (3) foot reduction to the required side yard to the north. If approved, it would allow a side yard of twelve (12) feet along the north property line. Section 53.H.2.b, Landscaping Regulations, requires that whenever an off-street parking or vehicular use area abuts an adjacent property line, a perimeter landscape area of at least ten (10) feet in width shall be maintained between the edge of the parking area and the adjacent property line. The proposed variance would allow a five (5) foot reduction in the perimeter landscape area depth. If approved, it would allow a perimeter landscape area of five (5) feet. Mr. Stombaugh explained that Staff found special conditions existed for all the proposed variances because the lot and structure, previously used as a single family residence, were existing in a zoning district now zoned Light Industrial. Mr. David Wilson, applicant, of 501 Smith Street, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained about the lot, parking and that the plat was going before the City Council December 17, 1996. There was discussion about there being enough parking for future uses of the property. The Board discussed the option of deleting the two head -in parking spaces E BZA Minutes 11/04/96 shown on the plot plan and adding a third parallel space in line with the two parallel spaces shown on the plot plan. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Carl Hecht made a motion that special conditions existed being the existing zoning of the property is now LI -Light Industrial and had previously been single family and that the structure is also existing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Carl Hecht then made a motion to approve the variances to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 as follows: Section 31.17, Light Industrial District, allowing a ten thousand -six hundred and twenty one (10,621) square foot reduction to the required twenty thousand (20,000) square foot lot size, allowing a lot size of nine thousand -three hundred and seventy nine (9,379) square feet. Section 31.G.1, Light Industrial District, allowing a fifteen (15) foot reduction to the required one hundred (100) foot lot width, allowing a lot width of eighty-five (85) feet. Section 31.G.2, Light Industrial District, allowing a seven (7) foot reduction to the required one hundred -fifty (150) foot lot depth, allowing a lot depth of one hundred forty-three (143) feet. Section 31.G.3, Light Industrial District, allowing the required thirty (30) foot front yard, which shall be utilized as a landscaped setback area, be reduced to twenty (20) feet, allowing a ten (10) foot variance; where one (1) parallel parking space would be permitted. The two (2) head -in parking spaces as shown on the plot plan are to be deleted. 3 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Section 31.G.4, Light Industrial District, allowing a three (3) foot reduction to the required fifteen (15) foot side yard requirement, allowing a side yard of twelve (12) feet along the north property line. Section 53.H.2.b, Landscaping Regulations, allowing a five (5) foot reduction in the required ten (10) foot perimeter landscape area depth, allowing a perimeter landscape area of five (5) feet. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-42, submitted by Jon Kennedy who requested variances for 1060 East Northwest Highway, platted as Lot 1, Block 1, TWK Addition. The variances were from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures, which allows the Board of Zoning Adjustment to approve the remodeling or enlargement of a nonconforming use or structure. The requested special exception would allow the enlargement of an existing building and the use of an existing concrete pad for parking. Section 53.H.2.b, Landscaping Regulations, which requires that whenever an off- street parking or vehicular use abuts an adjacent property line, a perimeter landscape area of at least ten (10) feet in width shall be maintained between the edge of the parking area and the adjacent property line. The requested variance would eliminate the required ten (10) feet of perimeter landscape area around the proposed off-street parking area. If approved, it would allow the development of an off-street parking area without the required ten (10) foot perimeter landscaping. Section 31.H, Light Industrial District, which requires whenever a Light Industrial District abuts a residentially zoned district, a landscape buffer zone of not less than twenty-five (25) feet in depth shall be provided from the lot line. 4 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 The requested variance would allow a nine (9) foot reduction in the required buffer zone at the new building line, and a twenty-two (22) foot reduction in the required buffer zone at the end of a concrete pad at the entrance of the new building. If approved, it would allow a buffer zone of sixteen (16) feet at the building line and three (3) feet at the end of the concrete pad. Mr. Stombaugh explained the case and noted that Staff found that special conditions existed for the proposed special exception since the building and concrete pad already exist; for the proposed variance to the landscaping requirement around the concrete pad to be used as a parking area because the concrete pad is in place two hundred - twelve (212) feet along the rear lot line and one hundred -ninety-five (195) feet along the east lot line; and for the proposed variance to the buffer requirement due to the irregular shape of the lot and the existing building placement within the lot. A solid wood screening fence already existed along the rear and west property lines. A one thousand -nine hundred and forty two (1,942) square foot warehouse addition is proposed to be added to the existing 6,978 square foot warehouse. The concrete pad will be used for loading/staging access to the new warehouse addition. A five thousand -ninety two (5,092) square foot proposed office addition will be added to the four thousand -six hundred and sixty seven (4,667) square foot existing office area. Additional parking will be provided at the front of the building. Mr. Jon Kennedy, applicant, took the Oath of Truth and explained that the building was built in 1980 and there were variances at that time. Mr. Kennedy explained that he was proposing to double the office size. Mr. Stombaugh noted that the required number of parking spaces, (37) per the gross square footage of the building, were provided. Mr. Kennedy explained that the area to the north, that is shown with slash marks on the plot plan, is already existing concrete and will be removed for the expansion of the building on the north end. The front entry will be changed to the north side. There was discussion concerning how trucks would enter the property. Mr. Kennedy explained that the trucks would enter the property through the north entry between the concrete area west of the parking area and the building. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Dennis Luers made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 9 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer made a motion that special conditions exists for the proposed special exception since the building and concrete pad already exists; for the proposed variance to the landscaping requirement around the concrete pad to be used as a parking area because the concrete pad is in place two hundred -twelve (212) feet along the rear lot line and one hundred - ninety-five (195) feet along the east lot line; and for the proposed variance to the buffer requirement due to the irregular shape of the lot and the existing building placement within the lot. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer made a motion to approve the special exception and variances to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 43.E.3., to allow the enlargement of an existing building and the use of an existing concrete pad for parking; Section 53.H.2.b. to allow the elimination of the required ten (10) feet of perimeter landscape area around the proposed off-street parking area; and to Section 31.H., to allow a nine (9) foot reduction in the required buffer zone at the new building line and a twenty-two (22) foot reduction in the required buffer zone at the end of a concrete pad at the entrance of the new building, allowing a buffer zone of sixteen (16) feet at the building line and three (3) feet at the end of the concrete pad. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Mr. Williams explained that Mr. Eastwood submitted a letter to the Board requesting his case be tabled until the January, 1997, meeting. Carl Hecht made a motion to table BZA96-43, submitted by Mr. William S. Eastwood, until the January 6, 1997, meeting. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: N BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-44, submitted by Mr. Richard Pemberton who requested variances for Lot 21, Shorecrest Acres Addition. The following variances are from Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.F.2.,Single Family District - Area Regulations, which requires a minimum lot size of seventy-five hundred (7,500) square feet. The proposed variance would allow a seven hundred (700) foot reduction of the minimum lot size. If approved, it would allow a minimum lot size of sixty-eight hundred (6,800) square feet for -the existing lot. Section 15.G.1., R-7.5 Single Family District - Area Regulations, requires a thirty (30) foot front yard setback. The proposed variance would allow a ten (10) foot reduction of the front yard setback. If approved, it would allow a twenty (20) foot front yard setback. Section 15.G.2., R-7.5 Single Family District - Area Regulations, which requires a twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. The proposed variance would allow a one (1) foot reduction of the rear yard setback. If approved, it would allow a twenty-four (24) foot rear yard setback. Section 15.G.5., R-7.5 Single Family District - Area Regulations, which requires a minimum lot depth of one hundred (100) feet. The proposed variance request would allow a fifteen (15) foot reduction of the minimum lot depth. If approved, it would allow an eighty-five (85) foot minimum lot depth. Mr. Williams explained that staff found special conditions existed for,the proposed variances due to the unusually small existing lot size. Mr. Williams explained that the lot size presented considerable hardship in placing even a small structure on the lot. 7 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Mr. Larry Dickherber of 1830 Teton Drive, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained that when he purchased his house, he was informed by the City and his builder that nothing would be built on the lot behind him because of it being too small. Richard Pemberton, applicant, of 1829 Chris Craft Drive, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained that the well on the property used to be a community well for Shorecrest Acres, but it was shut off when new City water lines were installed. Mr. Pemberton explained that the well was plugged and the house would not be built over the well. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Carl Hecht then made a motion that a special condition existed for the proposed variance due to the unusually small existing lot size and that the lot size presents considerable hardship in placing even a small structure on the lot. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Carl Hecht made a motion to approve the following variances to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.17.2., to allow a seven hundred (700) foot reduction of the minimum lot size, allowing a minimum lot size of sixty-eight hundred (6,800) square feet for the existing lot. Section 15.G.1., to allow a ten (10) foot reduction of the front yard setback, allowing a twenty (20) foot front yard setback. Section 15.G.2., to allow a one (1) foot reduction of the rear yard setback, allowing a twenty-four (24) foot rear yard setback. I? BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Section 15.G.5., to allow a fifteen (15) foot reduction of the minimum lot depth, allowing an eighty-five (85) foot minimum lot depth. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-45, submitted by Ms. Donna Potter for 1423 Rio Bend Court, and platted as Lot 5, Block 1, Wood Creek Estates. The variance was to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 42.C.3., Supplementary District Regulations which requires a detached accessory structure to be at least ten (10) feet from the main residence and have the same sideyard setback as required for the main structure. The proposed variance request would allow an accessory structure to encroach five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot building separation. If approved, it would allow a minimum separation of five (5) feet between the accessory building and the main residence. Mr. Williams explained that staff found a special condition existed for the proposed variance due to an effort to preserve trees, and if granted, will result in greater setbacks from the side and rear property lines than are required. Mr. John Metzler of 1412 Hampton Road, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and asked Ms. Potter what was intended to be built and would any trees be removed. Ms. Donna Potter, applicant, took the Oath of Truth and explained the need for an extra two car garage and wanting to move the garage closer to the house in order to protect the root area of the oak trees toward the rear of the lot. Cyncha Farris, who lives behind the property, took the Oath of Truth and expressed concern to which trees would be removed. V] BZA Minutes 11/04/96 With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Ery Meyer made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer made a motion that a special condition existed and that being due to an effort to preserve trees, and if granted, will result in greater setbacks from the side and rear property line than are required. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer than made a motion to approve the variance to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 42.C.3., allowing an accessory structure to encroach five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot building separation, allowing a minimum separation of five (5) feet between the accessory building and the main residence. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Next, the Board of Zoning Adjustment considered the minutes of the November 4, 1996, meeting. Ery Meyer made a motion to approve the minutes, with changes, of the November 4, 1996, meeting. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: None 99 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Carl Hecht asked why the zoning ordinance required a ten (10) foot separation from the auxiliary structure and the main structure. Mr. Williams explained that the requirement for separation between buildings is for access, and open space reasons to avoid clutter in the neighborhoods. Carl Hecht briefed the Board on the TransComp 1996 meeting that he attended in Atlanta. Mr. Hecht explained that the North Texas Commission attended the annual meeting of the National Industrial Transportation League to get the word out nationally that the Metroplex is a logistic center; a place to do warehousing and distribution. Mr. Hecht explained that there was excellent response of people inquiring at their booth. Mr. Hecht also explained that Grapevine had all the entities with the adoption of the Freeport Tax Exemption, to be a truly logistic center. With no further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion to adjourn. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyers, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: None The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1997. ATTEST: SECRETARY CHAIRMAN 11 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, January 6, 1997, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Randy Howell Chairman Carl Hecht Vice -Chairman Dennis Luers Member Jill Davis Member Russell Anderson 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum with Secretary, Ervin Meyer absent. Also present was City Councilman Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: Scott Williams Ron Stombaugh Gerrie Anderson -0 - Building Official City Planner Secretary Chairman Randy Howell called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-43 submitted by William S. Eastwood who requested variances for 1917 Rose Court, platted as Lot 6, Block 2, Park Central Addition, Grapevine, Texas. The variances were from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 16.G.6., R-5.0, Zero Lot Line District Regulations which requires a twelve (12) foot separation between buildings on adjacent properties. The proposed variance would allow a reduction of eight (8) feet to the separation requirements. If approved, it would allow a four (4) foot separation between buildings on adjacent properties. Section 42.C.3., Supplementary District Regulations which requires a detached accessory building to be separated ten (10) feet from the main residence and have the same sideyard setback as required for the main structure, eleven (11) feet. The proposed variance would allow a seven (7) foot reduction in separation, and an eight (8) foot reduction of the required sideyard setback. If approved, it would allow a minimum separation of three (3) feet between the accessory building and the main structure and a BZA Minutes 1/06/96 minimum of three (3) feet between the accessory building and the side property line. Mr. Williams explained that staff recommended denial of the request, as there is room on the lot for a complying structure. Mr. Williams also noted that Mr. and Mrs. Eastwood were not able to attend the meeting. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Dennis Luers made a motion to close the public hearing. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Carl Hecht then made a motion that no special condition existed. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-42, submitted by Vickie Diedrick who requested variances for 2315 High Drive, platted as Lot 14, Block 9, Grapevine Lake Estates. The variances were from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 14.G.1., R-12.5, Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, which requires a front yard setback of thirty-five (35) feet. The proposed variance would allow a ten (10) foot reduction of the front yard setback. If approved, it would allow a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback. Section 14.G.5.- R-12.5., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, which requires the lot depth of one hundred (100) feet. The proposed variance would allow a one and six tenths (1.6) foot reduction of the lot depth along the west side of the lot. If approved, it would allow a ninety-eight and four - tenths (98.4) foot lot depth on the west side of the lot. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found special conditions existed for the proposed variance due to the lot being originally platted with a twenty-five (25) foot front building BZA Minutes 1/06/96 line; other developed lots in this subdivision have a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback, and that Staff found the second request was justified, as the existing lot has a ninety-eight and four -tenths (98.4) foot lot depth, and an increase in depth is beyond the control of the applicant. Matthew Kerlee of 2307 High Drive, Lot 15, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained that he was against the variance to the twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback. Mr. Kerlee explained that in 1983, his father had built his house with a thirty-five (35) foot front yard setback due to City requirements. Mr. Kerlee expressed concern to see continuity on the street. Vickie Diedrick, applicant of 1800 Fern Court, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained that she was trying to purchase the lot contingent on variances being granted by the Board of Zoning Adjustment. Ms. Diedrick explained that she was planning to build a 1650 square foot single story house, with a side entry garage. Ms. Diedrick noted that Mr. Kerlee's lot was bigger and deeper. Donna Snider of 203 North Capri, Duncanville, Texas, and owner of the lot, took the Oath of Truth and explained that when she purchased the property, the front yard setback was twenty-five (25) feet. Ms. Snider explained that she has been unable to sell the property due to the lot size and setback requirements. The members discussed that the house could be moved back on the lot four (4) feet which would leave the front yard setback at twenty-nine (29) feet instead of the requested twenty- five (25) feet. After further discussion, Jill Davis made a motion to close the public hearing. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Jill Davis made a motion that a special conditions existed, being the shallow depth of the lot, the lot is existing and was platted with a twenty-five (25) foot building line at the time the property was purchased. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer BZA Minutes 1/06/96 Jill Davis then made a motion to grant the variance, with an amendment, to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 14.G.1., R-12.5, Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, to allow a six (6) foot reduction of the required thirty (35) foot front yard setback, allowing a twenty-nine (29) foot front yard setback; and to grant the variance to Section 14.G.5., R-12.5, Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, to allow a one and six tenths (1.6) foot reduction of the lot depth along the west side of the lot, allowing a ninety-eight and four -tenths (98.4) foot lot depth on the west side of the lot. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-47, submitted by Michael J. Puppo who requested a variance for 1094 Woodbriar Drive, platted as Lot 11, Block 3, Winding Creek Estates, Phase 2. The variance was from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.G.1., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, which requires a thirty (30) foot front yard setback. The proposed variance request would allow a one (1) foot reduction of the front yard setback. If approved, it would allow a twenty-nine (29) foot front yard setback. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found a special condition exists for the proposed variance due to the existing encroachment not being the fault of the proposed homebuyer. Mr. Williams noted that Ms. Puppo was present to answer any questions. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Jill Davis made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Jill Davis then made a motion that a special condition exists due to the existing encroachment not being the fault of the proposed homebuyer. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 4 BZA Minutes 1/06/96 Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Jill Davis made a motion to grant the variance to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 15.G.1., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations to allow a one (1) foot reduction of the front yard setback, allowing a twenty-nine (29) foot front yard setback. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer ;; Lo):8W�'Jim, as 1111111111111, 111 IBM NFA1121 The next item of business for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-48 submitted by Joe Langford with Quality Wood Craft, Inc., who requested variances for 516 East Franklin Street, platted as Lots 3 and 4, Block 114, College Heights Addition. The variances are from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.G.1., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations which requires a front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. The proposed variance would allow a seven (7) foot reduction of the thirty (30) foot front yard setback. If approved it would allow a twenty-three (23) foot front yard setback for the existing house. Section 15.G.2., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, which requires a twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. The proposed variance would allow a twenty-four (24) foot reduction of the twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. If approved, it would allow a one (1) foot rear yard setback for the second residence. Section 15.G.3., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, which requires a six (6) foot side yard setback. The proposed variance would allow a one (1) foot reduction of the six (6) foot sideyard setback for a proposed garage addition. If approved, it would allow a five (5) foot sideyard setback. 5 BZA Minutes 1/06/96 Section 15.B., Single Family District Regulations - Accessory Uses, which does not permit a second residence on a lot zoned for R-7.5, Single Family District. The proposed special exception would allow an existing second residence to remain. Mr. Williams explained that staff found special conditions existed for the first and second requests (front yard and rear yard setbacks) being the existing violations are not the fault of the owner. Mr. Williams stated that Staff found no special conditions existed for the third request (sideyard setback) as these lots had already been extensively developed, and the second residence could potentially be used as a garage. Mr. Williams stated that he wished to amend Staff's position regarding the fourth request. He asked the Board to allow the existing nonconforming status of the second residence to remain. Mr. Ron Winsett, owner of 516 E. Franklin Street, took the Oath of Truth and explained that one (1) foot was needed to build a twenty (20) foot wide, two -car garage on the side of his house. Mr. Williams explained that Dick Ward, Fire Marshall, expressed concern about Fire Department access to the back of the property where the second residence was located. Mr. Williams also explained that one of the lots was already overdeveloped at 43% lot coverage. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Mr. Winsett explained that the second residence was fully equipped as a residence and it was occupied by his cousin. Mr. Winsett also explained that the original owner of the property had lived in the rear residence and then built the new house in front. Randy Howell explained he felt that denial of the sideyard setback variance would not stop the building of the garage, which would comply with the ordinance if built at nineteen (19) feet in width. n. BZA Minutes 1/06/96 After further discussion, Carl Hecht made a motion that special conditions exists for Section 15.G.1. and Section 15.G.2, due to the existing violations not being the fault of the owner and that the structure is existing; and to Section 15.8. because the second residence is existing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Carl Hecht made a motion to approve the following variances to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.G.1., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, to allow a seven (7) foot reduction of the thirty (30) foot front yard setback, allowing a twenty-three (23) foot front yard setback for the existing house. Section 15.G.2., Single Family District Regulations - Area Regulations, to allow a twenty- four (24) foot reduction of the twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback, allowing a one (1) foot rear yard setback for the second residence. Section 15.B., Single Family District Regulations - Accessory Uses, to allow a special exception for an existing second residence to remain. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: Meyer Carl Hecht then made a motion that a special condition does not exist for Section 15.G.3., for a one (1) foot variance to the required six (6) foot side yard setback. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: Howell Absent: Meyer MINUTES Next, the Board of Zoning Adjustment considered the minutes of the December 2, 1997, meeting. BZA Minutes 1/06/96 Jill Davis made a motion to table the minutes of the December 2, 1997, meeting until February 3, 1997, in order for Member Ery Meyer, who was absent, to review them. Randy Howell seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Meyer Mr. Williams explained that a coffee shop was going in the old service station at the northwest corner of Main Street and College Street and that the Grapevine/Colleyville I.S.D. was going to occupy the old Western Sizzlin Steak House on East Northwest Highway for their Vista Program. With no further discussion, Jill Davis made a motion to adjourn. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Meyer The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1997. ATTEST: SECRETARY A STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, February 3, 1997, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Randy Howell Carl Hecht Ery Meyer Dennis Luers Jill Davis Chairman Vice -Chairman Secretary Member Member Russell Anderson 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum. Also present was City Councilman Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: Scott Williams Marcy Ratcliff Gerrie Anderson Building Official City Planner Secretary Chairman Randy Howell called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. BZA96-49 JESSE C. SAENZ The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-49 submitted by Mr. Jesse C. Saenz who requested variances for 1911 Mill Pond Drive, platted as Lot 6, Block 6, Parkwood Addition, Grapevine, Texas. The variance was from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 42.C.3., Accessory Buildings, which requires an accessory building to be located no nearer than six (6) feet to any rear lot line and shall be subject to the same side yard requirements as the principal structure. In the case of a corner lot, no accessory building shall be located within any side yard required on the street side. The proposed variance would allow a fifteen (15) foot encroachment into the required fifteen (15) foot side yard for an accessory storage building and to allow an encroachment of five (5) feet into the required six (6) foot rear yard setback. Mr. Williams explained that staff found no special conditions existed, that there was adequate space on the lot for a complying structure. BZA Minutes 02/03/97 Jesse Saenz took the Oath of Truth and explained that he interpreted the code to be that structures are to be fifteen (15) feet from the curb for corner lots. The shed was built in accordance with his interpretation of those regulations. Terry Walker of 1912 Wood Creek, the neighbor directly behind Mr. Saenz, took the Oath of Truth and explained that the shed looked professionally built and recommends the Board grant the variance. Bryan Kline of 1836 Meadowcrest, took the Oath of Truth and explained that he had followed the regulations to build his shed, Mr. Kline noted that there is no unusual topography of Mr. Saenzs lot and the shed could be located in another area of the yard. Mr. Kline also noted that this project was started three years ago and has not been completed. The Board asked Mr. Saenz why he did not obtain a building permit. Mr. Saenz explained that he had talked with someone from the City and was told he could do anything he wanted in his back yard. He did note he obtained a permit to move his fence and for paving for his R.V. which is parked legally in his side yard. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None After further discussion, Carl Hecht made a motion that no special condition existed. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None The variance was denied. The next item of new business for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96- 50, submitted by Jerry Loban who is requesting the following variances to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 917 Meadowbrook Drive, platted as Lot 6, Block J, Brookhollow Estates: OAF BZA Minutes 02/03/97 Section 15.G.1., Single Family District Regulations, Front Yard Setback, requires a front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. The applicant requested a variance to allow a five (5) foot reduction of the front yard setback for the existing residence. Section 15.G.1., Single Family District Regulations, Front Yard Setback, requires a front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. The applicant requested a variance to allow a five (5) foot reduction of the front yard setback for the proposed garage addition. Section 15.J., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, Off Street Parking, requires all required off-street parking to be located behind the front building line. The applicant requested a variance to allow required off-street parking to encroach five (5) feet into the required front yard setback. Mr. Williams explained that Staff recommended approval for the first request because the existing encroachment is not the fault of the owner, but denial was recommended for the second and third requests because no special conditions could be found. Mr. Williams also explained that the encroachments could be slightly less than five (5) feet, but since the survey does not show the actual setback at various points across the front of the house, Staff modified the applicants request to a conservative five (5) feet. Mr. Loban, applicant, took the Oath of Truth and explained that ten years ago, he had planned to build a garage with the survey which showed the residence to be one (1) foot behind the setback line. Mr. Loban explained that when he had a recent survey done, it showed the existing house encroaching three and one-half (3.5) feet. Mr. Loban explained he could build the garage at an angle and not encroach into the front yard setback, but it would be costly With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Ery Meyer made a motion to close the public hearing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None 3 BZA Minutes 02/03/97 After further discussion, Carl Hecht made a motion to reopen the public hearing and Ery Meyer seconded the motion in order for the Board to discuss with Mr. Loban an alternate way of building a garage without encroaching the front building line. The motion to reopen the public hearing prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None After discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion to close the public hearing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer made a motion that a special condition existed for Section 15.G.1., Front Yard Setback Requirements because the existing encroachment is not the fault of the owner. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer then made a motion to grant the variance to Section 15.G.1., Front Yard Setback Requirements to allow a five (5) foot reduction of the front yard setback, allowing a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback for the existing residence as shown on the plot plan. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer then made a motion that no special conditions existed for Section 15.G.1., Front Yard Setback Requirements allowing a five foot reduction of the front yard setback for the proposed garage and for Section 15.J, Off -Street Parking, allowing required off-street parking to encroach five (5) feet into the required front yard. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None 0 BZA Minutes 02/03/97 The second and third variance requests were denied. The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA97-01, submitted by David Barnhouse who is requesting a variance for 221 Starnes Street, platted as Lot D, J. J. Hall Addition. The variance was from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures allows the Board of Zoning Adjustment to permit the remodeling or enlargement of a nonconforming use or structure. The proposed special exception would allow the construction of an accessory garage building to be constructed on a lot with an existing single family residence in a R -MF -1, Multi -Family Zoning District as shown on the plot plan. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found a special condition existed, as the setbacks would comply with R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations for accessory building requirements. Mr. Williams explained that the erection of the structure will result in the demolition of an existing nonconforming accessory building per the application submitted by the owner. David Barnhouse, the applicant, took the Oath of Truth and explained that the existing storage building would be demolished and he would like to build a new accessory building that would be the same size as the house that is located on the lot. Mr. Barnhouse explained that the accessory building would be used for his Father's hobby of rebuilding vintage cars. The Board asked Mr. Barnhouse if the structure would at any time be used for any type of business operation. Mr. Barnhouse stated that it would not. With no one else to speak either for or against the request and only one letter received in favor of the request, Dennis Luers made a motion to close the public hearing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None After some discussion, Dennis Luers made a motion that a special condition existed and the special condition being the zoning is improper for the existing use and the existing non- conforming structure will be removed and a new one built. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 5 BZA Minutes 02/03/97 Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Dennis Luers made a motion to approve the special exception to Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures to allow the construction of an accessory garage building to be constructed on a lot with an existing single family residence in a R -MF -1, Multi Family Zoning District as shown on the plot plan. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None 9 ONTRI: The next item of new business was for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider BZA97- 03, submitted by Texas Bank for 1205 South Main Street, proposed to be platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Texas Bank Addition. The variance is to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures allows the remodeling or enlargement of a nonconforming use or structure. The proposed special exceptions would allow the existing building to remain as developed and to allow the remodeling of the existing parking lot area. If approved, it would allow Texas Bank to remodel the drive through lanes and the entrances and exits of the property as shown on the site plan. Marcy Ratcliff explained that the bank was built under the 70-10 Zoning Ordinance. Ms. Ratcliff explained that Municipal Boulevard, which runs along the banks north property line will be realigned with Vine Street to provide better traffic flow in and out of the parking area of the bank and the Public Library. She explained that Mr. James L. Hewlett, the architect, submitted a request for the special exception to allow the redevelopment of Texas Bank's parking lot. Texas Bank originally submitted a layout upgrading their parking lot and the drive through lanes to better serve their patrons. The City worked with the applicant to help solve the traffic hazard at the entrances to Municipal Way (which accesses the Library and the Community Activities Center) and to Texas Bank. Marcy Ratcliff explained that Staff found special conditions existed because the building was developed under the prior Zoning Ordinance and the applicant is attempting to create 0 BZA Minutes 02/03/97 a better traffic flow through his property. Additionally, the applicant has worked with the City to redevelop the driveways and intersections along Main Street to help alleviate a traffic hazard. Mr. Jim Hewlett, architect for Texas Bank and applicant, took the Oath of Truth and explained that they were working with the City on alternative ways to locate the traffic lanes around the building and traffic flow. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None After further discussion, Carl Hecht made a motion that special conditions existed, being ---- the building was developed under the prior Zoning Ordinance and the applicant is attempting to create a better traffic flow through his property. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Carl Hecht then moved to grant the special exception to Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures to allow the existing building to remain as developed and to allow Texas Bank to remodel the drive through lanes and the entrances and exits of the property as shown on the site plan. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None The special exception was approved. BZA96-51 - GRAPEVINE KAWASAKI -POLARIS Next for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-51, submitted by Grapevine Kawasaki -Polaris who requested special exceptions for 418 East Northwest BZA Minutes 02/03/97 Highway, platted as Lot 1, Block 2, A.F. Leonard Addition. The special exceptions are to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: The requested special exceptions would allow the existing non -conforming development to remain as developed and allow the remodeling of the exterior gravel area. If approved, it would allow the existing development to remain as developed and the remodeling of the exterior gravel area as shown on the site plan. Marcy Ratcliff noted the applicant had submitted a revised proposed site plan dated February 3, 1997. As a result of the revised site plan dated February 3, 1997, Staff revised the recommendation from consideration to approval. The revised site plan indicates some landscaping along the front property line adjacent to East Northwest Highway and a revised pole sign which meets the current sign regulations. As a result of these changes, Staff found a special condition for the existing development. The building as exists has a metal exterior, and the development and layout of the property limits the amount of landscaping allowable along Northwest Highway. Ms. Ratcliff went on to explain that Mr. Wilbur Goltz submitted the request for the special exception to allow Grapevine Kawasaki -Polaris to use the non -conforming development in conjunction with a Conditional Use Permit CU97-04 for automotive sales and service for motorcycles, all terrain vehicles and watercraft. The applicant proposed to pave the existing graveled area up to the surrounding fence line and provide a screening wall for proposed storage areas. Phil Morley, architect and applicant of 920 South Main Street, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained about the property being built in 1985, prior to the current zoning ordinance and that the existing sign is shown as 26 feet which will be cut down to 20 feet. Mr. Morley explained that the owner will pave the area as per City specifications. Ms. Ratcliff commended the applicant with his efforts in working with Staff on the signage. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Ery Meyer made a motion to close the public hearing, Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer then made a motion that a special condition exists being it is an existing development has provided additional landscaping and revising the existing pole sign to L-01 BZA Minutes 02/03/97 conform with the Sign Regulations. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, suers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer made a motion to grant the special exceptions to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 to allow the existing non -conforming development to remain as developed and allow the remodeling of the exterior gravel area with modifications of the pole sign to meet requirements as shown on the February 3, 1997, site plan. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, suers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None MINUTES Next, the Board of Zoning Adjustment considered the minutes of the December 2, 1996, meeting. Ery Meyer made a motion to approve the minutes of the December 2, 1996, meeting. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, suers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: None The Board of Zoning Adjustment considered the minutes of the January 6, 1997, meeting. Carl Hecht made a motion to approve the minutes of the January 6, 1997, meeting. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, suers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: None W BZA Minutes 02/03/97 MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION The Board was informed that their next meeting would be held in the new City Hall at 200 South Main Street and all were invited to the open house to be held February 18, 1997, at 5:00 p.m. 1 0 0 With no further discussion, Dennis Luers made a motion to adjourn. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: None The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 1997. /)9'E'Zi�ETT—ARY 02296MM CF(AIRMAW- 10