Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-05-05Gerrie Anderson Building Inspection Secretary AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING MONDAY EVENING, MAY 5, 1997, AT 6:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2ND FLOOR 200 SOUTH MAIN STREET GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 11. OATH OF TRUTH III. NEW BUSINESS A. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA97-10, SUBMITTED BY LOYD EVANS FOR LONGHORN, INC., FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 204 NORTH DOOLEY STREET AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA97-11, SUBMITTED BY GRAPEVINE TOWNSHIP AND REVITALIZATION PROJECT, INC., FOR 600 WEST COLLEGE STREET, AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. IV. MINUTES BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 7, 1997, MEETING. V. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION VI. ADJOURNMENT IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND YOU HAVE A DISABILITY THAT REQUIRES SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS AT THE MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AT (817) 481-0377 AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS WILL BE MADE TO ASSIST YOUR NEEDS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 551.001 et seq. ACTS OF THE 1993 TEXAS LEGISLATURE, THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MAY, 1997 AT 5:00 P.M. V/ - ll�i /I/- ' ; - ox- 7�v DIRECTOf� OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES aE3 5 t A e, e R-TH �t cues -0. • +° • n c � ' R-5.0 R—MF-2 Z65-10 X68 t .7 P � e\ - K KAC. St \ (W UJI Z82--50 . 1K )" \9i5 t. 7 I r A • Y f ^ T a n >•r —W 7 n. : ,u, �> < . ry a rJ r " at•'. F- I i ' F- I G tJ { • , w n )r ') ^ `.i .w' Ite<i Z r„ u , r 1" )"° s• . u , to cQ "'^ � � , ) ■ .{[ Ca1WE$$ R S A Y .—" _ • )• 1• M•ry Y „ +" x W _ �.�TURNER STREET — t OR o r •. ' r 3588 v BZA97-1062.: ,a LOYD EVANS FOR g�Y° 41-2121 '•'� '33j0 GaPQ�N�s LONGHORN, INC. cc i t5�00 6�'PPR� 13 tN`�tSiC`i t s ' I S6mS9 E 10 33392 C -O A 361 ' o _—. " u ` S�1e2-01 EL °dy Za}•At. �00t 2 - L0 6922 S0 CU91-16 .. . r:OR�N•. 38 ' E. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY :a a t�tP _,r -R c 14i..� i. i u •mel - d T6 .0 'uds-G2 cc O31•.:•[[pp�_� .. » y i'P•' I I M C biQ vi Fj ••;�• .r .t >< IES_ I•.� I - :�7 IL ( •z92 0g ' tUa$ cr '�_,11 I t'u� I PT r, i NI k iti ZZ ) K 2+ •E 1, ty tJ { ( t ' C �!.CC 'E.c� , ' { S\NG , rJ r - ' s , w. , aJ. .s. » !s) . • � ( --.--'.'—jam. I ..?�I.I. ,�J\NF 6� ( I1 ,) .I E E >• . •1 E� 3'q f SR3GG i • I b -.�� `'.. T#�- " Z K � � � ,I, >. ,; _ i�l �� y I�:I.,! .•SIR=7.' _ �j��l• q w m 36 LT GU _0.06 , °'b )ab . •_ '� 'r�: j:• •I:.i.—'�I:i'.'.�!�LL,' ,' i :, _U88 F, s'.; t •1� ' i' u ' I I• Ii y11J l l _ : [ b 5 GU • { I .v < ( 3 t 1�i"1 � 1 � t u u r .i r 1 , �l_L��_____ ' ' ttw UMM ?• r I' r Ea ..w s: ,s •t . L' '. 1¢i�.k i.1 i l I � L I _ I I Y o • I_ _` _ ■ 1 zea-• I Sa.n2� r 13-0t n a •• , C8D' t P •r w 1 )Sst LJ za -o :�1 : , : Zgz� or• SP Q 1 - I sol,. xj •19a-1�2 •: n ` O „ac '�' zsa'�.9 L4 CU93-0e I CULr1Z9SO JK { 82-40Z90-0� tttttt t a+o. 90-6' CUBT J r'-----lj 1_z5 Cu95-12 ^+ � -O6 •' ���. 1 Z92-05 JO� r yb P. 1 Ll ,1' OpNli-3'--- u>. • 2.pT� , s iJ—•tl ,iT ._._ t � - - '" v' _---y—'t �`y<M{��:��.�;�`�� ` � ` P L - i I �- rl .�..—I i. 4 I ' •t) K �. )V _. —� -). II ' .t uv- 'r a I au 14; DU kAA 611 441 1113 LOU HILLMAN Prudential Lou Hillman Realtors (617) 481 2573 Office 203 E. Naftwe-,A Highway (BI 7) 481-1113 Fax Grapevine, Taxas 760!51 (817) 355-4725 Voice Mall Dennis RE'Wers' To:rom: i,t iK4 F 11 Fam Pages: Phone: Date., L2,5-6 -7 Re: Cc - 0 Urgent 11 For Review cl Please Comment 0 Please Reply 13 Please Recycle 0 Comments: RECEIVED CITY OF GRAPEVINE APR 3 1997 BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICA-PPM t WNG 1. APPLICANT NAME:- Vaft4l. ADDRESS. CITY/STATE: � zip: 7 HOME: WORKU'Yh"--0;4Z —FAX:Q'&'i5-C-cf-78 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: t"6- fq ADDRESS. -7 5f 0 0 S Cj CITY/STATE: zip. HOME: WORK: CSC d I FAX:( 7) 2-2o .0(oct 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) &41 1A uj 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. (It "'L A,-01 C. -j ( 5 RECEIVED 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIALARNA098hS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE IAN :E(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPEC PAIMINiNG ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. te 03/31/97 14:35 FAX 817 481 1113 LOU HILLMAN '03 -'2b -,.q7 11:0U FAN 817 481 1113 LUL' HILLMAN RECEIVED APR 31997 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE 0 G SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TVPFI APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER (PRINT OWNER SIGNATUR E; '--'q SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS -5/";r DAY OF 1992 NbtARY PUBL THE STATE OF TEXAS DAT OF I IGONSE EXPIRATION--' SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS —DAY OF 199 JEAN REEVES N*UwV PubUc WOTARY PUBLIC FOR HE STATE 01: TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS (SwCantu. Emp 11/06/2000 1 000 DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 200 S MAIN STREET GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 C0RR,ESP0NDfNCf-ADJ7BM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 0:2CU1APP6ZA 4 1/9/ R00 F O0 o M sy S 1�3y Z z C �Vm n TURNER ROAD H L M ARCHMKn INC. ' M= rA l GT/10 A r � —1 M =M Ve Yp City Council adopted the Grapevine Township Revitalization Plan to stimulate reinvestment and restoration of the orignal township area which is bounded by Ball Street on the west, Dooley street on the east, Dallas Road on the south and Northwest Highway on the north. The plan encourages adaptive reuse of existing residential structrues for commercial and office uses where it is no longer economically or physically possible to renovate the structrues for residential use. The City chartered the Grapevine Township Revitalization Project, Incorporated to assist in creating interest and involvement of the private sector in the renovation of properties in the area. The subject property is one of the first projects undertaken by the Grapevine Township Revitalization Project (GTRP). The property and house were acquired through a land exchange with the Grapevine First United Methodist Church. The Grapevine First United Methodist Church received a tract of land on South Scribner which will provide needed additional off-street church parking. The variance application is being submitted in conjunction with a request to rezone the subject property from R-7.5 Single Family to PO, Professional Office. The variances are necessary for the rezoning to be approved. /mr 2 .,r, ...,e �L v 181 - °cr"t' ii S`'�t ,F .n�f!'"` ' ., '� �) .J,,r�`.K -¢'' t •r� 111 � I;,�-r''" , z• Z �j` C 91-17 tvvl ), e �. t r ) _ - m -U'31--03 Cu STja n�° Hca' Z a Z )03 Gov i I . jCNI ppIC PP K K vi Irw �I'rw . w !f7 f` -t6 •u k I I w -- I �` 'av`1f ?0 a 0.1 ra ^l 2 fA / i 6n 64d E K x x GU CJI Cc w 0.0 R 70 SU8970-.��'�{. !c ..Ia ((� � � � '.(" p � R min c; �= ✓: - 1� R -� — Z80-1 {--- �: a s J -17 J p x pK { Z' CBD 8 I �iru ° h. y,i .. L 'r+ 'Ci t.r• .c I •c I '.'7t S8 COLLEGE ST. — c� sp QN R-5 . 0 -- L4 CU93 ,. ZSt-39 >P• C—Y']��L_. _ . 1., a- 6 —1 82-40 1�0 190-E I ORO. 4�< 90-6z Z9 -03 -\ N 0.89 a�. { I ��to — _-- —_1tSt 25 �U95 2 -- — {— " GU -- BZA97-11 GRAPEVINE N TOWNSHIP REVITALIZATION z 1P _2 6 PROJECT s5� _-: - GU CUED-08� Z.� v 1 HCO ---- - CUF9 03 g�; 0 l9� 08 �J� 1E r' 1. APPLICANT NAME: OA Em CITY OF GRAPEVINE ADDRESS: Cl ti Ha Jn 0 IS moo o CITY/STATE:CTrn aeu f f) ZIP: 1 C+ HOME: WORK:- 61-2-421-bM0 FAX:21 -q2)-GLA2LA PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: -6,T -a pe v, i n p--Tc-j ?e V t' I c� c c -{ 1 ADDRESS: � Hot I i ;--")C)o S m OL pe E�' ZIP: CITY/STATE: I I rel N a WORK: � k--) - qS 1 -0 ?3S -C) FAX: Z 12 - L1 � I - CL(E' L� STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) R-1 Al '- To W n o f r�-T- 0- cy-- 0 1 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. M o rrh'/,, l annoarancz 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) C f ,, k*'��' �cTle c APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER (PRINT) OWNER SIGNAI �-k DAY OF SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS,- u Fte't 'fev*�" SUSAN M. HOWARD • •A Texas Notary Public, State• k'.Q i0m,.Uj, raj 02-18-01• OTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF '19 -97 - • 04 •SUSAN M. HOWARD • ♦ Notary Public, State of Texas• •My Commission ExDlres 02-18-0•1 Kel 37-19WITER., M. DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 FRIOWAV"Ag W-1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 200 S MAIN STREET GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 a) 4 WALL j I �wwr/ V� SITE I COLLEGE O ,11 t i I I IRA E. WOODS 0 3 VICINITY MAP NTS BASED UPON PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ZONING THE FOLLOWING VARIANCES ARE REQUESTED: f BUFFER AREA BETWEEN A PO DISTRICT AND A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAT 25 FEET TWICE THE BUILDINGS HEIGHT. VARIANCE REQUESTED OF 16 FEET VARIANCE FROM THE MASONRY REQUIREMENTS IS REQUESTED. DUE TO THE NATURE OF THE PROJECT. I00% VARIANCE REQUESTED PARKING OF AUTOMOBILES SHALL BE SEPERATED FROM RESIDENTIALLY ZONED DISTRICTS BY A 6 FOOT BUND FENCE OR 60 LINEAR FEET. 38.2 FOOT VARIANCE IS REQUESTED IN LINEAR SEPERATION A PO DISTRICT SHALL BE SEPERATED FORM A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BY A 10 FOOT BUFFER STRIP. VARIANCE REQUESTED IS 8'-6' WHEN A NON RESIDENTIAL USE IS ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL USE THEY SHALL BE SEPERATED BY A 6 FOOT HIGH FENCE ETC, VARIANCE REQUESTED 100% RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY RADIUS PERMITTED. PARKING REQUIREMENTS ARE REDUCED TO 8 SPACES VARIANCE OF 3 SPACES OTHER NOTES: FLOOR AREA RATIO ALLOWED: 1.0 PROVIDED. MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIRED 10,000 S.F. PROVIDED: 16,901.28 SF MINUM OPEN SPACE REQUIRED 20% PROVIDED. 32% (5,450 SF) MAKIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE PERMITTED: 60% PROVIDED: 11% (1781 SF) MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURVACE PERMITTED: 80% PROVIDED: 68% (11,451) LOT WIDTH REQUIRED: 80 FEET PROVIDED 160 FEET LOT DEPTH REQUIRED: 100 FEET PROVIDED: 106 FEET FRONT YARD REOUIRED 25 FEET PROVIDED: 31 FEET HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 17' - 6 - REAR YARD REQUIRED: 25 FEET PROVIDED: 77-6" LIGHTING WILL BE DESIGNED TO REFLECT AWAY FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND WILL BE CONTAINED UPON THE SITE. PARKING LOT ILLUMINATION Q 1 LUMEN PER SF OFF SITE LITE .2 LUMEN PER SF PARKING REQUIRED: 5 + 1/300 S.F. PARKING PROVIDED: 8 EXISTING BUILDING AREA: 805 SF AREA OF ADDITION: 976 SF TOTAL AREA: 1781 SF 2022 WEST NORTHWEST HWY. Z i 1 i 2r-4' i I 1 t i 1 t ' 1 8" 4 l EUall 1 i / 1 I C) i CONCRETE 1 i 1 I I 1 i ' 1 1 i 1 Wt ZONING CASE Z96-17 (ORDINANCE •. ray THE ZONING FROMO SINGLE REQUEST IS TO REZONE TO PO, PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN DESIGNATES THE PROPERTY AS MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE 7 t I RD le i 1 i 1 _ARD I I I t I C) i i 1 i CONCRETE 1 PARKING I I LOT I I LI 1 { r >I 1 C) ( 1 1 O1\ I 1 12 -ELM I, i N 1 zl I I t 1 6 i ♦ • • Wt 1 ELM 1 I o) NI Iff - 1 i z 1 I 'aYi J t o m I I 1� o I v I i I s I z I 1 1 r 1 t t 241 ELM t 1 I I NEW COI -RETE SIDEWALK 1 1 —1 28'-6' 1 1 1 N 88'26'28' w 56.85' 6' WOW wnvAcrft� PRaPEan uNE S 88'30'00' E 167.77' o NEW SEWER LINE AND EASEMENT -• -•----- ACCESS.1E -----. -.- ---W--.�.--------------- 5 41 j J • • ♦ dr♦ Ar♦ 4r♦ Ir . d-♦ LI BOLLARD 2 30`E—LLDING UNE _------�---�— L1 BOLLARD fp �_, 1 18 ------------ 0 1v i N to '}•-- ---•-----� IK 1 OELM i I �I Fass1w ------O-�3GBUY.tNNG UNE 10' u ELM z' m U O W �I o DEWALK k UTILITY taxa. 24' 20'ElM 10' —.- — ELM -- ----C� _ _— -----©-----------_- NEW CONVRETE SIOEWALK 5 84'3000" '++ q4O 24' ELM O rr� CURB NORTH ta1 NON TANGENT CURVE R-200 L-31.34 LC-S40'12'03'W 28.23 P1 41591 30'-W BACK OF CURET TO BACK OF CURB CONCEPT PLAN OF LOT 1 R, BLOCK 44R ORIGINAL TOWN OF GRAPEVINE THE APPLICANT IS THE GRAPEVINE TO SHIP REVITAUZA11ON PROJECT, INC. for BZA 97-11 OWNER: CHARLIE AND BARBARA NUNN 4 v V z' Z U O W �I o bit 3 N Wt Nil �i Z o) NI o) -1 I I 1 r � t i t rr� CURB NORTH ta1 NON TANGENT CURVE R-200 L-31.34 LC-S40'12'03'W 28.23 P1 41591 30'-W BACK OF CURET TO BACK OF CURB CONCEPT PLAN OF LOT 1 R, BLOCK 44R ORIGINAL TOWN OF GRAPEVINE THE APPLICANT IS THE GRAPEVINE TO SHIP REVITAUZA11ON PROJECT, INC. for BZA 97-11 OWNER: CHARLIE AND BARBARA NUNN 4 v V STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, April 7, 1997, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Randy Howell Carl Hecht Ery Meyer Dennis Luers Jill Davis Russell Anderson Chairman Vice -Chairman Secretary Member Member 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum. Also present was City Councilman Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: Marcy Ratcliff City Planner Chris Hooper Assistant to City Manager Tim Fleming Plans Examiner/Field Coordinator Gerrie Anderson Secretary Chairman Randy Howell called the meeting to order at 6:02 P.M. The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA97-08 submitted by Mr. Ken Johnson who requested variances for 914 West Sunset Street, legally described as Tract 9R3H, Abstract 518, Grapevine, Texas. The following variances were from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: FOR THE EXISTING LOT FRONTING WEST SUNSET STREET Section 15.F.2., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, Density Requirements, which requires a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. The proposed variance would allow a reduction of 1,902 square feet to the lot size. If approved, it would allow a minimum lot size of 5,598 square feet. BZA Minutes 04/07/97 Section 15.F.6., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, Density Requirements, requires the minimum square footage of a dwelling unit to not be less than 1,200 square feet. The proposed variance would allow a reduction of 142 square feet. If approved, it would allow a minimum floor area of 1,058 square feet. Section 15.G.2., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, Density Requirements, requires the depth of the rear yard to be 25 feet. The proposed variance would allow an 8 foot reduction of the rear yard setback. If approved, it would allow the depth of the rear yard setback to be 17 feet. Section 15.G.4., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, Area Regulations, requires a lot width of 65 feet. The proposed variance would allow a 5 foot reduction of the lot width. If approved, it would allow a 60 foot lot width. Section 15.G.5., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, Area Regulations, requires a lot depth of 100 feet. The proposed variance would allow a reduction of 7 feet. If approved, it would allow a 93 foot lot depth. PROPOSED TEXAS STREET LOT Section 15.F.2., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, Density Requirements, requires a lot size to have a minimum area of 7,500 square feet. The proposed variance would allow a reduction of 1,902 square feet. If approved, it would allow a lot size of 5,598 square feet. Section 15.G.1., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, Density Requirements, requires a front yard lot depth of 30 feet. The proposed variance would allow a reduction of 8 feet. If approved, it would allow a front yard lot depth of 22 feet. K BZA Minutes 04/07/97 Section 15.G.4., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, Density Requirements, requires the width of the lot to be 65 feet. The proposed variance would allow a reduction of 5 feet. If approved, it would allow a lot width of 60 feet. Section 15.G.5., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, Density Requirements, requires the depth of the lot to be 100 feet. The proposed variance would allow a reduction of 7 feet. If approved, it would allow a lot depth of 93 feet. Section 15.J., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, Off -Street Parking, requires the parking of automobiles to be allowed as an accessory use to any principal permitted use provided that such shall not be located in a required front yard. The proposed variance would allow parking to encroach within the front yard setback. If approved, it would allow an 8 foot encroachment for the parking of automobiles within the required 30 foot front yard setback. Marcy Ratcliff explained that Staff found that special conditions existed due to the existing lot dimensions --particularly the lot depth, and because of the existence of two street frontages. The applicant's proposal to subdivide the lot and construct a single family home on the new lot that will front on Texas Street is compatible with the surrounding single family development within the neighborhood. The lot immediately to the west is similarly developed with two separate single family homes occupying a total lot area that approximates that of the applicant's. Ms. Ratcliff also noted that Mr. Johnson, the applicant, proposed to replat the lot and as a condition of his request remove an existing detached garage. Mr. Phil Parker of 326 Pebblebrook Drive, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained that he was representing Mr. Johnson and would answer any questions the Board may have. Randy Howell announced that one letter of protest had been received. 3 BZA Minutes 04/07/97 With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Carl Hecht then made a motion that special conditions exists due to the existing lot dimensions --particularly the lot depth, and because of the existence of two street frontages. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Carl Hecht made a motion to grant the following variances, in accordance with the site plan, to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: FOR THE EXISTING LOT FRONTING WEST SUNSET STREET Section 15.F.2., to allow a reduction of 1,902 square feet to the lot size allowing a minimum lot size of 5,598 square feet. Section 15.F.6., to allow a reduction of 142 square feet, allowing a minimum floor area of 1,058 square feet. Section 15.G.2., to allow an 8 foot reduction of the rear yard setback, allowing the depth of the rear yard setback to be 17 feet. Section 15.G.4., to allow a 5 foot reduction of the lot width, allowing a 60 foot lot width. Section 15.G.5., to allow a 7 foot reduction of the lot depth, allowing a 93 foot lot depth. 4 BZA Minutes 04/07/97 PROPOSED TEXAS STREET LOT Section 15.17.2., to allow a reduction of 1,902 square feet, allowing a lot size of 5,598 square feet. Section 15.G.1., to allow a reduction of 8 feet, allowing a front yard lot depth of 22 feet. Section 15.G.4., to allow a reduction of 5 feet, allowing a lot width of 60 feet. Section 15.G.5., to allow a reduction of 7 feet, allowing a lot depth of 93 feet. Section 15.J., to allow parking to encroach within the front yard setback, allowing an 8 foot encroachment for the parking of automobiles within the required 30 foot front yard setback. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None The next item of business for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA97-09 submitted by James Gilleylen, representing the Grapevine Township Revitalization Project for 600 West College Street, platted as Lot 1 R, Block 44R, Original Town of Grapevine Addition. The following variances were from Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 27.B.3., Professional Office District requires parking facilities within 60 feet of a residentially zoned district be separated from said lot by a blind fence or wall at least 6 feet high. The proposed variance would eliminate the 6 foot blind fence or wall requirement along the western property line. If approved it would allow the existing vegetation along the western property line to separate the two uses as shown on the site plan. 5 BZA Minutes 04/07/97 Section 50.6.1., Screening, requires a non-residential use adjacent to a single family district to provide screening of not less than 6 feet in height in accordance with screening Alternates A or E. The proposed variance would eliminate the 6 foot screening requirement along the western property line. If approved it would allow the existing vegetation along the western property line to separate the two uses as shown on the site plan. Section 27.H., Professional Office District Buffer Area Regulations requires an appropriate buffer screen to be provided in accordance with the provisions of Section 53 of the Zoning Ordinance. Additionally, no building or structure shall be located nearer to any residentially zoned property than a distance equal to two times the height of such building or structure or 25 feet, whichever is greater. The height of the structure is 17.5 feet. The proposed variance request would allow a 16 foot reduction to the 35 foot building setback requirement. If approved it would allow the structure to be located 19 feet from the adjacent residential property on the north as shown on the site plan. Section 27.M.4 Professional Office Design Requirements requires a 10 foot buffer strip whenever a Professional Office District is adjacent to any residentially zoned property. The proposed variance request would allow a reduction of 9 to 5 feet on the width of the buffer strip along the north property line. If approved it would allow a 1 to 5 foot wide landscaped buffer strip along the north property as shown on the site plan. Section 53.H.2.b, Landscaping Regulations requires a 10 foot perimeter landscape area to be located between the property line and the edge of the adjacent off-street parking or vehicular use area. The proposed variance request would allow a reduction of 9 to 5 feet on the width of the perimeter landscape area along the north property line. If approved it would allow a 1 to 5 foot wide perimeter landscape area along the north property as shown on the site plan. Section 54, Masonry Requirements requires all buildings and structures in the Professional Office District to have at least 70 percent of the total exterior walls, excluding doors and windows, constructed of brick, stone or other masonry or C: BZA Minutes 04/07/97 material of equal characteristics in accordance with the City's Building Code and Fire Prevention Code. The proposed variance would allow a 100 percent reduction of the masonry requirement. If approved, it would allow the existing wooden structure and the proposed addition to be constructed of wooden materials, which complement the historic integrity of the structure and maintain the aesthetic appearance of the West College Street Historic District. The variance application is being submitted in conjunction with a request to rezone the subject property from R-7.5 Single Family to PO, Professional Office. The variances are necessary for the rezoning to be approved. James Gilleylen, representing the Grapevine Township Revitalization Project, took the Oath of Truth and explained that this was the first project being brought before the Board for the revitalization project. Mr. Gilleylen explained that Charles and Barbara Nunn would be taking over this project and would be in charge of the construction. Ms. Ratcliff explained that in order for the house to be moved onto the lot, the church had to rezone the property in 1996, from R-TH, Townhouse to R-7.5, Single Family. Ms. Ratcliff explained to the north the property is zoned R-TH, Townhouse. Jill Davis expressed concern about College Street being too narrow for commercial business and that the property was surrounded by residential. Chris Hooper, Assistant to City Manager addressed a question from the Board concerning how the west runway would effect this area. Mr. Hooper explained that the property was not within the west runway zone, which commences just below State Highway 114 and east of the Super 8 Hotel that is now under construction. Mr. Gilleylen explained the Grapevine Township Revitalization Project Committee was established to make opportunity for the restoration of the historical areas and to make sure the plans for renovation to the structure would not hurt it from being on the National Register. Mr. Gilleylen explained that Charles and Barbara Nunn plan to completely renovate the exterior and interior of the structure, and the structure will exceed the quality of most of the buildings on College Street. F& BZA Minutes 04/07/97 Barbara Nunn took the Oath of Truth and explained that the house dates back to the 1880's and was owned by the Buckner family. Chris Hooper added that there is varied office and residential occupancies along College Street. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Ery Meyer made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer then made a motion that special conditions exists for the following proposed variances: #1 and #2, being the installation of a screening fence in the middle of a creek bed is not practical; #3, that being the addition to the existing structure was designed to complement the structure, while maintaining its historical integrity and is in keeping with the residential feel of the West College Street corridor; #4 and #5, that being the physical constraint created by the location of the addition to the existing structure and the required handicapped parking space. Additionally, the driveway access also provides a second entrance and exit to the property creating good traffic flow; #6, that being the existing structure is wooden and the proposed addition is in keeping with the historical integrity and with most of the residential structures in the West College Street Corridor. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers Nays: Davis Absent: None Ery Meyer made a motion to grant the following variances to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, for 600 West College Street: Section 27.B.3., to allow the elimination of the 6 foot blind fence or wall requirement along the western property line, allowing the existing vegetation along the western property line to separate the two uses as shown on the site plan. 8 BZA Minutes 04/07/97 Section 50.B.1., to allow the elimination of the 6 foot screening requirement along the western property line, allowing the existing vegetation along western property line to separate the two uses as shown on the site plan. Section 27.H., to allow a 16 foot reduction to the 35 foot building setback requirement, allowing the structure to be located 19 feet from the adjacent residential property on the north as shown on the site plan. Section 27.M.4, to allow a reduction of 9 to 5 feet on the width of the buffer strip along the north property line, allowing a 1 to 5 foot wide landscaped buffer strip along the north property as shown on the site plan. Section 53.H.2.b, to allow a reduction of 9 to 5 feet on the width of the perimeter landscape area along the north property line, allowing a 1 to 5 foot wide perimeter landscape area along the north property as shown on the site plan. Section 54, to allow a 100 percent reduction of the masonry requirement, allowing the existing wooden structure and the proposed addition to be constructed of wooden materials, which complement the historic integrity of the structure and maintain the aesthetic appearance of the West College Street Historic District. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers Nays: Davis Absent: None Next the Board of Zoning Adjustment considered the minutes of the February 3, 1997, and the March 3, 1997, meetings. Ery Meyer made a motion to approve the minutes of the February 3, 1997, meeting. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: None PI BZA Minutes 04/07/97 Ery Meyer made a motion to approve the minutes, with one correction, of the March 3, 1997, meeting. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: None With no further discussion, Carl Hecht made a motion to adjourn. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: None The meeting was adjourned at 6:50 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MAY, 1997. ATTEST: SECRETARY CHAIRMAN 10 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, May 5, 1997, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Randy Howell Carl Hecht Ery Meyer Jill Davis Russell Anderson Chairman Vice -Chairman Secretary Member 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum with Member Dennis Luers absent. Also present was City Councilman Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: Marcy Ratcliff Chris Hooper Ron Stombaugh Ron Emrich Tim Fleming Gerrie Anderson City Planner Assistant to City Manager City Planner Heritage Foundation Director Plans Examiner/Field Coordinator Secretary Chairman Randy Howell called the meeting to order at 6:04 P.M. The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was a request from Mr. Loyd Evans to withdraw BZA97-10 who had requested variances from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 204 North Dooley Street, platted as Lot 1A, Block 6, W. R. Boyd Center, Grapevine, Texas. The applicant requested a Conditional Use Permit CU97-19 for building materials and supplies with outside storage specifically for irrigation and landscaping equipment. The Planning and Zoning Commission tabled action on the applicant's conditional use permit to May 20, 1997, in order to revise the site plan to include more landscaping to the proposed site. The applicant since that time has opted to not make any changes to the site plan as requested by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The applicant instead has requested to withdraw his application from the Board of Zoning Adjustment. The withdrawal will allow the applicant to change his mind and resubmit a similar application without waiting for a year. BZA Minutes 5/5/97 Carl Hecht made a motion that Board of Zoning Adjustment Case BZA97-10 be withdrawn without prejudice, and the applicant has the right to submit another request without waiting for one year. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Luers The next item of business for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA97-11 submitted by Chris Hooper, representing the Grapevine Township Revitalization Project for 600 West College Street, platted as Lot 1 R, Block 44R, Original Town of Grapevine Addition. The following variance was from Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 56.C.4., Off -Street Parking Requirements requires a minimum of eleven off- street parking spaces for a Professional Office use. The applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the minimum required off-street parking spaces from 11 spaces to 8 spaces. If approved, it would allow 8 off-street parking spaces as shown on the site plan. Marcy Ratcliff explained that Staff found a special condition exists because the revised parking lot layout on the site plan protects the streetscape and eliminates a driveway on College Street which maintains the residential open space appearance. The Grapevine Revitalization Project submitted variances for BZA97-09 to the Board last month. The Board approved those variances. The applicant's zone change request went before City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 15, 1997. City Council tabled action on the case because of the their concerns with the site plan. The concerns expressed were due to the large off-street parking area visible from College Street and a usage that would require so many parking spaces. Council instructed the applicant to revise the site plan by reducing the number of parking spaces and redesign the parking lot to be more inconspicuous. The revised site plan addresses the concerns of Ron Emrich, Heritage Foundation Director and the Historic Preservation Commission. 2 BZA Minutes 5/5/97 City Council adopted the Grapevine Township Revitalization Plan to stimulate reinvestment and restoration of the original township area which is bounded by Ball Street on the west, Dooley street on the east, Dallas Road on the south and Northwest Highway on the north. The plan encourages adaptive reuse of existing residential structures for commercial and office uses where it is no longer economically or physically possible to renovate the structures for residential use. The City chartered the Grapevine Township Revitalization Project, Incorporated to assist in creating interest and involvement of the private sector in the renovation of properties in the area. The subject property is one of the first projects undertaken by the Grapevine Township Revitalization Project (GTRP). The property and house were acquired through a land exchange with the Grapevine First United Methodist Church. The Grapevine First United Methodist Church received a tract of land on South Scribner which will provide needed additional off-street church parking. The variance application was being submitted in conjunction with a request to rezone the subject property from R-7.5, Single Family to PO, Professional Office. The variances are necessary for the rezoning to be approved. Roy Stewart, City Council Representative, took the Oath of Truth and explained that there were ample parking spaces on the property, although it did not appear that way. Jill Davis asked Ms. Ratcliff if the revitalization district was going to be part of the zoning ordinance. Ms. Ratcliff explained that the Planning and Zoning Commission, at their next work session to be held May 27, 1997, would be reviewing a draft copy. With no further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion to close the public hearing. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: suers 3 BZA Minutes 5/5/97 Randy Howell explained that he was happy with the site plan and the parking lot would be less noticeable being to the side of the structure and screened by landscaping. Ery Meyer then made a motion that a special condition existed and that being the revised parking lot layout on the site plan protects the streetscape and eliminates a driveway on College Street which maintains the residential open space appearance. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Luers Ery Meyer moved that the variance be granted for 600 West College Street, to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 56,C.4., Off -Street Parking Requirements, allowing eight off-street parking spaces as shown on the site plan. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Luers Next the Board of Zoning Adjustment considered the minutes of the April 7, 1997, meeting. Ery Meyer made a motion to approve the minutes of the April 7, 1997, meeting. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Luers Ms. Ratcliff explained that the grading work along Main Street, just north of McDonalds was for the Trinity Industries property. Their mass grading plan is to remove dirt from the west to relocate to the east side of the property. Ms. Ratcliff 4 BZA Minutes 5/5/97 also explained that a Burger King and Kinko's Copy Place was going to be constructed east of Grandy's restaurant. With no further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion to adjourn. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Luers The meeting was adjourned at 6:20 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 1997. ATTEST: RUM -6—H A R M� 5