HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-12-02AGENDA
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
SESSIONBRIEFING
BOARDOF • ADJUSTMENT
MONDAY EVENING, DECEMBER 2,2002, AT 6:00 P.M.
PLANNING AND ZONING CONFERENCEROOM
SECOND FLOOR - CITY HALL
11 SOUTH
GRAPEVINE,
A. Board of Zoning Adjustment to conduct a briefing session to discuss items
scheduled to be heard in the December 2, 2002, public hearing.
�� •,:111:14 LOAN M4 Atli"Tlz I i •
• .- •NEE
T WILLIAMS
AGENDA
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING
MONDAY EVENING, DECEMBER 2, 2002, AT 6:15 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2ND FLOOR
200 SOUTH MAIN STREET
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
1. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
111. NEW BUSINESS
A. Board of Zoning Adjustment to conduct a public hearing relative to Board of Zoning
Adjustment Case BZA02-20 submitted by Kelly M. Brown, D.C., Inc., for property located at 744
Ball St, and consideration of same.
B. Board of Zoning Adjustment to conduct a public hearing relative to Board of Zoning
Adjustment Case BZA02-21 submitted by John A. Denton, for property located at 471 Caviness
Dr, and consideration of same.
IV. MINUTES
Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider the minutes of the November 4, 2002, Briefing Session
and Public Hearing.
V. STAFF REPORTS
Building Official to brief board on status of new construction projects.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND YOU HAVE A DISABILITY THAT REQUIRES
SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS AT THE MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES AT (817) 410-3158 AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS
WILL BE MADE TO ASSIST YOUR NEEDS.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 551.001 et seq. ACTS OF THE 1993 TEXAS
LEGISLATURE, THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED
ON THIS THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2002, T 5:00 M.
S OTWILLIAMS
B ILD NG OFFICIAL/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF
D E OPMENT SERVICES
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas, met in regular
session, Monday evening, December 2, 2002, at 6:15 P.M., in the Council
Chambers, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas with the following members
present:
Carl Hecht
Chairman
Dennis Luers
Vice -Chairman
Ron Cook
Secretary
Kip Bruner
Member
Jim Kelso
Member
Debbie Holt
Vt Alternate
Carl Tomerlin
2nd Alternate
constituting a quorum. Also present were City Council Representative Sharron
Spencer, Matthew Boyle, City Attorney and the following City Staff:
Scott Williams Building Official
Ron Stombaugh Planner 11
Gerrie Graham Development Services Assistant
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Carl Hecht called the public hearing to order at approximately 6:15
P.M.
ROLL CALL
Chairman Hecht announced that all members were present.
NEW BUSINESS
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA02-20,744 BALL STREET
KELLY M. BROWN, D.C. INC.
The first item was for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider BZA02-20,
submitted by Kelly M. Brown, for property located at 744 Ball Street, platted as
Lot 1, Block 1, Grapevine Kawasaki Addition, City Of Grapevine. The following
requests were from Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73:
Section 25.G.1 "CC" Community Commercial District Regulations, Area
Regulations requires that every lot have a minimum lot width of 120 -feet.
The applicant requested a variance of approximately 30 -feet to this requirement
Board of Zoning Adjustment
12/02/2002
measured at the front building line and if approved by the Board would allow a lot
width of approximately 90 -feet.
Section 25.G.4 "CC" Community Commercial District Regulations, Area
Regulations requires that every lot shall have two side yards each of with will be
not less than 20 -feet in width.
The applicant requested a complete variance of 20 -feet to this requirement on
the north side of a proposed building located approximately 190 -feet west of the
front property line along Ball Street and a complete variance of 20 -feet on both
the north and south side of a proposed building located approximately 500 -feet
west of the front property line along Ball Street.
Section 53.H.2.a Landscaping Regulations requires that whenever a vehicle use
area abuts a public right-of-way, a perimeter landscape area of at least 15 -feet
shall be provided between the abutting vehicle right-of-way and vehicle use area.
The applicant requested a variance of from 10 to 15 -feet to this requirement
along Ira E. Woods Avenue.
Section 53.H.2.b Landscaping Regulations requires that whenever a vehicle use
area abuts an adjacent property line, a perimeter landscape area of at least 10 -
feet shall be provided between the abutting property line and vehicle use area.
The applicant requested a complete variance of 10 -feet to this requirement along
the northern property line and the abutting vehicle use area.
Mr. Stombaugh explained that Staff found that there were special conditions for
all requested variances, specifically, the lot was narrow and physically
constrained on all sides by rights-of-way prohibiting expansion. He explained
that the lot was located at the northwest corner of Ball Street and Ira E. Woods
Avenue, and to the north was the DART right-of-way.
Mr. Stombaugh explained that the City Council approved on the first reading of
an ordinance, the rezoning of this site from "LI" Light Industrial District to "CC"
Community Commercial District at the November 19, 2002 meeting. He
explained that the Board of Zoning Adjustment considered and approved a
number of variances on this site at their September 8, 1994 meeting. He
explained at that time, the Grapevine Kawasaki dealership was going to relocate
to this site, but the relocation never occurred. Mr. Stombaugh explained that due
to the subject property being rezoned and a different development plan
proposed, new variances were needed.
Mery Crosten, architect representing the applicant, Kelly Brown, of 2424 Went
Terrace, Fort Worth, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and explained that they felt
the proposed layout for the site was the most effective possible, and would not
2
Board of Zoning Adjustment
12/02/2002
be obtrusive to the neighborhood to the north.
Konstatine Bakintas of 714 Cabernet Court, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth
and explained that his property backed up to the site. Mr. Bakintas wanted the
Board to know that he and two other neighbors were available to answer any
questions.
Joe Slagle of 712 Cabernet Court, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and
explained that his property also backed up to the site. Mr. Slagle explained that
he was not opposing the variances but was concerned about the height of the
buildings. He asked the Board to consider and make note in the minutes that Dr.
Brown had agreed to a maximum of 30 foot high buildings on the site.
Chairman Hecht explained that of height restrictions were imposed, it would have
to be done by City Council.
Sarah Fullenwider of 706 Cabernet Court, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and
explained that she lived two houses away from the 200 foot property owner
notification area. Ms. Fullenwider explained that if the side yard variance were
granted, the building could then be placed on the property line which would be
closer to the homes. Ms. Fullenwider asked that if the Board granted the
variance to the side yard, a stipulation be put on the variance that the building be
no higher than 30 feet.
Dr. Kelly Brown of 7304 Hicks Court, Colleyville, Texas, took the Oath of Truth
and explained that he told the neighbors he would take under advisement
building the structure no higher than 30 feet. Dr. Brown explained that the design
of the building was 27 feet high. Dr. Brown noted that he did not feel any of the
proposed buildings would be higher than 30 feet, but did not have a binding
agreement with the neighborhood.
Chairman Carl Hecht announced that 19 property owner response letters had
been received. Chairman Hecht explained that the property owner's within 200
feet of the property had concerns about the height of the buildings.
With no one else to speak regarding the case, Kip Bruner made a motion to close
the public hearing. Jim Kelso seconded the motion which prevailed by the
following vote:
Ayes:
Hecht, Cook, Bruner, Kelso, Tomerlin
Nays:
Nays
Absent:
None
Abstain:
Luers
Carl Tomerlin asked if the height restriction could be placed on the site plan.
3
Board of Zoning Adjustment
12/02/2002
Mr. Stombaugh explained that the issue about the height requirement was not
advertised; therefore, the Board could not make any condition tied to the concept
plan relative to the height.
Matthew Boyle explained that in the past the Board had not considered a
variance and made it conditional upon any of the elements attached to the site
plan because that goes beyond the jurisdiction of the Board of Zoning
Adjustment.
With no further discussion, Kip Bruner made a motion that there were special
conditions, specifically, the lot was narrow and physically constrained on all sides
by rights-of-way prohibiting expansion. Jim Kelso seconded the motion which
prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes:
Hecht, Bruner, Kelso, Tomerlin
Nays:
Cook
Absent:
None
Abstain:
Luers
Kip Bruner then made a motion to grant the following variances to:
Section 25.G.1 "CC" Community Commercial District Regulations, allowing a lot
width of approximately 90 -feet;
Section 25.G.4 "CC" Community Commercial District Regulations, Area
Regulations which will allow a complete variance of 20 -feet to this requirement
on the north side of a proposed building located approximately 190 -feet west of
the front property line along Ball Street and a complete variance of 20 -feet on
both the north and south side of a proposed building located approximately 500 -
feet west of the front property line along Ball Street;
Section 53.H.2.a Landscaping allowing a variance of from 10 to 15 -feet to this
requirement along Ira E. Woods Avenue; and to
Section 53.H.2.b Landscaping Regulations allowing a complete variance of 10 -
feet to this requirement along the northern property line and the abutting vehicle
use area.
Jim Kelso seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes:
Hecht, Bruner, Kelso, Tomerlin
Nays:
Cook
Absent:
None
Abstain:
Luers
rd
Board of Zoning Adjustment
12/02/2002
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA02-21 471 CAVINESS DRIVE
JOHN A. DENTON
Next, the Board of Zoning Adjustment considered BZA02-21, submitted by John
A. Denton for property located at 471 Caviness Drive, platted as Lot 1, Block 2,
Banyan Place. The following request was from Grapevine Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance 82-73:
Section 42.C.3 Supplementary District Regulations, Accessory Buildings,
requires that no accessory building shall be located nearer than 6 -feet to any rear
property line.
The applicant requested a variance of four -feet to this requirement and if
approved by the Board, would allow a setback of two -feet from the rear property
line for an accessory building.
Mr. Stombaugh explained that Staff found that there was no special condition for
the requested variance. Mr. Stombaugh explained that with a building separation
requirement of 10 -feet between principal/accessory buildings on the same lot the
applicant could move the accessory structure approximately 2 -feet to the west.
He also explained that a slight reduction in the size of the structure could then
eliminate the need for a variance.
John Denton, applicant of 471 Caviness Drive, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth
and explained that he had had a boat parked on the side of his house for the last
13 years. He explained that he would like to build a shed to house his boat. Mr.
Denton noted that he had no neighbors to his rear, only the City park.
Chairman Hecht announced that one letter of approval had been received.
With no one else to speak regarding the case, Kip Bruner made a motion to close
the public hearing. Ron Cook seconded the motion which prevailed by the
following vote:
Ayes:
Hecht, Luers, Cook, Bruner, Kelso
Nays:
None
Absent:
None
Mr. Denton showed photographs of the existing driveway on the side of his
house. He explained that he would like to build the shed in the area of the
existing driveway.
After further discussion, Jim Kelso made a motion that a special condition did not
exist. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Board of Zoning Adjustment
12/02/2002
Ayes:
Hecht, Luers, Cook, Bruner, Kelso
Nays:
None
Absent:
None
The variance was denied.
MINUTES
Next the Board of Zoning Adjustment considered the minutes of the November 4,
2002, Briefing Session and Public Hearing.
Ron Cook made a motion to approve the minutes of the November 4, 2002,
Briefing Session and Public Hearing. Kip Bruner seconded the motion which
prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes:
Hecht, Luers, Cook, Bruner, Kelso
Nays:
None
Absent:
None
ADJOURNMENT
With no further discussion, Kip Bruner made a motion to adjourn. Ron Cook
seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes:
Hecht, Luers, Cook, Bruner, Kelso
Nays:
None
Absent:
None
The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 P.M.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZqNING ADJUSTMENT OF
THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THE JADAY OF
2003.
C �HA I R �Mf''='�
SECRETARY