Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CU2011-26/PD2011-06/Z2011-06
CITY OF GRAPEVINE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION 1. Applicant/Agent Name S PK-DEvr-L-op M�'T / po&(AE Company Name SW T)suF-k-oPm"T �Artrovks Address 31,10 U3, SOSLALAV-E 7RA-14D. c--W-'A MO City State - - 7TLA As -- Zip MC>i2- Phone#, (q(-7) 747--t,961 Fax#6(-7-) -7Y2.- 1e62 (091 Email Mobile# (�d17 2. Applicant's interest in subject property e KAsg�, -ra Dewr-Lop 2-76 wvrr MF Tzoj 3. Property owner(s) name C -i -TV 1ZAj14 I Address -7600 'Pres-roo ID S -m,97-01 City "F114wo State - - Zip -1501-- L4 Phone LJJ7-8o5?- Fax# 912_- tiqj_- 147-T 4. Address of subject property —w6ri rj:A-t -rF -T, rA 8 15; Legal Description: Lot i Block Addition Size of subject property U-0101 acres _y 1 q, talq square foot Metes & Bounds must be described on 8 Y2 "x 11" sheet 5. Present Zoning Classification 'tai- MF -7.. 6. 7- 6. Present Use of Property S I-N�.LIF 16emu-V -REzsbf=-PJT1AL I 7. Requested Zoning District 'P, --MF . ....... .. . (PD) ., L-11 The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that would allow the proposed use is 0AZCUTorTns\APPZNCP.doc 9/16/2009 9. Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning WA 10. Describe the proposed use PF.aposeo 7�1 2.78 MF A P(;(-rmr-NT Z)uEwPm tjj- 11. The Concept Plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 45, Contents of a Concept Plan, Section 45.C, All Zone Change Requests are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zonechange request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. 11. Signature to authorize a zone change request and place a zone change request sign on the subject property. Applicant (print): Applicant signatui Property owner (print): C'.74L/ ([ /tkej 5 Property owner signature: ry �j'SEP �� 0-AZCUTbrms\APPZNCP.doc 9//612009 3 The State of -reyk5 �f County of CA ((V1 Bre me (J LN V I &c vv2a on this day personally appeared efo11 1:1 , J, 'Bonai�n Di e_ known to me (or proved to me on the oath of LAQ o u-3 4 4--A' )i -q- or through (description of identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of _S442L!j A.D. --)-011 V SE Y P& STEPHANIE GONZA LEZ - I Notary Public State :I ToxasDNcrary Signature Of My Comm- Expires 12-07-2013 I )4 The State of -I- E�,A A5 Y/ County of 0 ni I Before m e VO a L'o Int 2Ct [-e 2- on this day personally appeared Swv--- Le -LS -S known to me (or proved to me on the oath of dlyj-' Cj-�v P�Ciyi L TT ALg- S�— or through Lyt ULor--\ +0 (description of identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and -consideration therein expressed, Ir, Given under my hand and seal of office this day of . SW k d'-'kk- A.D. SERA STEPHANIE 0ONZALEZ Notary Public Notary Signature ry State of Texas My Comm. Expires 12-07-2013: 0AZCU1Forms\APP2NCP.doc SEP 13) 2011 9116f2009 Y 1 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when riled and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the for zone change request and acknow) have been met at the time of submMA �ySignature of Applicant Date a f 71 , l,4 Signature of Property owner Date: 0:1ZCU\FormsWP.ZNCP.doc 9/[612009 s as set forth by the application requirements of this application IS 13 X1$1 —O Platting Verification This Verification Statement Must Be Signed Prior To The Submittal of This Zoning Application. !iC It has been determined that the property described below does require platting or replatting and the applicant has been instructed on this procedure. It has been determined that the property described below is currently platted or does not require platting or replatting at this time. Address of subject property NdNE: A -r _''vile T1n,e. Legal description of subject property Lcsr ftztoc'K A ` Public Works Department This Form Must Be Signed By The Public Works D With A Completed Application To The Plannh O.VCUkFormS1APP2NCP.doc 9/16/2009 L Date Sued Along 179 e (� ent. 6 CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Street Address of subject property 1 U Legal Description: Lot �Block Addition Legal description of subject property (metes, & bounds must . described can 8 112" x 11 " street Size of subject property; acres square tort Present zoning classification Proposed use of property — mr. u, �- d� Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional PART OWNER INFORMATION 0tdC. , `Property Owner 1 � Prop Owner Address � � atyltatetipPhone No, ' 417 52, Fax No. �ZZ - L t 144 7.4 submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the ragoe-st on the site plan do --mem In the sarrie fetter, describe or shove on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations (example. buffer yards, distance between usersl In the same letter, describe whather the proposed conditional use wilt, or will not c,1trse substawtial hairn to the value, use, or enjoyrr7ant of other pre petty in the neighborhood. dso, describe hour the proposed conditional use will add to the value, case I nt ofotlaer ro, ert in dire neighborhood. (� (� Application of sale plant approval (zoction 47, see attached Foup B'). Tit f � The ,site pia.submission ubmission shall rennet the regurrements of section ;, bits Blatt �'�uirernennts. "III) SPP 7 2011 I Ail conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be Complete when, filed and will be placer{ on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the site of the agenda, ,your application may be scheduled to a later date. .All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city Council through the public hearing process, I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use pen -nit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A CONDITI AL USE REQUEST SIG ON THEsuaJECT PROPERTY `. 'B ALA Print Applicant's Name karat' t - The State of County of col Fin Before me (notary)'S�010ml'e I°i 2ot g n this day personally appeared (applicant) F6�9 44 1E known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) ment) fo be the person whose nate is subscribed 'to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged ed to rye that he executed the sarne fuer the purposes and -consideration therein expressed, ( eai) given under my hand and seal of office this! dayof! A.D. €:ZO STEPHANIE,:GONZALEZNotaryblicState oxasComm. Cxp12-07-2013 Notary In and For State sof I `� 1 C Print Property Owner's ane The Mata of County of x G Fir perty net's Siagnatuze Before me(notary)� ® Yin � I J L. V% 4* on this day personally app () known to rye (oar proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for tete purposes andconsideration thereat expressed. (Seat) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of _ JOY L Mary � Stam of Texas Notary In and For urate of om ; ir11-037-2014 SEP 72011 CU11--ab SITE PLAN APPLICATION Applicant flame: ` . Applicant Address: _ y 17- city/State/zp f 7-4 #tine No. � Fax No. Email address ` Mobile ' ons -:;4923 Applicant's interest in sub ect property PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject or Legal Description: Lot BlockAdditio Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11" sleet Size of subject property: acres i - Present zoning classification „ � Proposed use of property �� aIle P4 Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use = PART`` 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION . Property der el r Prop eVYr¢er Address City/State/Zip Phone No, Fax No. SES 7 101 W I I— ICTLO )( Attach a final plat, or noplat, of the approved subdivision by city council showing property boundary ;fines; dimensions, easements, roadways, rail lines, and public rights -of way crossing and adjacent to the tract ( 1 blueling copy) If a master development plan is required, attach a statement showing the proposed use substantially conforms to the master development plan. Submit site plan showing all information required by Section 47.E, Site Plan reviewrequirements (see attached requirements). Provide all required information demonstrating compliance with all conditions imposed on any conditional use. site plan zoning, or conditional use zoning. X Ail site plans must conform to the approved concept plan. Any changes to a site plan, approved with a conditional use or a conditional use, can only be approved say city council throiigh the public hearing process, PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE FILING OF A SITE PLAN r---------------- Print Applicant's Name 4c'n a As s ' nature The State of Co my of I U0 Before me friotary) Jn this day personally appeared (applicant) IB ra;� 6(6y, I LW known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this! day ofj SA0P*_):;ler AD 2-1D I I P STEPHANIE GONZALEZ F_ Notary Public Slal(i of Texas NlAjfOr My Comrn_ Fxpires 12-07-2013 Notary In and For State of Print Property Owner's Name property towner Sig��nature The Mata of County of 'Cl Before me (notary) on this day personal- A ly appeared tape 4o-aM) � NW -MA - known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the' foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this) day ,f l AD, Notary to and For State of i I k SEP 7 2 * ILLUMINATION PLAN C�A I I -'S� b An illumination plan to include a site photometric (including ill umiry ated signs) and all fixture details shall be submifted as part of the site plan review process. Applications will not be accepted without this requirement. I hereby acknowledge that an illumination plan has been Included as a part of this submittal. 4 Klzwe 966?ttt"c> -WRj\Aro &Y PlAWAKIMAS Signature of App cant Am Signature, of Property Dower 11= H, SEP 7 A—CKJV0-Wj,EQQEM—ENT -;�Lo Cal I C Signature of Applicant Date I q101I1I-?v1 Signature of Property Owner mm 51 � GIP rp Ii, � SEP PLATTING VERIFICATION This verification statement must be signed prior To the submittal of this conditional use application Cwt -ab It has been determined that the property described below does require platting or regia in and the applicant has been instructed on this procedure. It has been determined that the property described below is currently plafted or does not require platting or replatting at this time. Address of subject property, Legal description of subject property Works Department Date ubr' ork� This for must be signed by the public works department and submifted along with a completed application to the planning and zoning department r'R S1 -:-P 7 CITY OFGRAPEVINE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION M11, 11, �',JJJlJJ1 Applicant Name: -E-..ii 1 11 Applicant Address: 1311,9 Bevv. 4/ ydJ�rr /�'o City/State/Zip Phone No. K-017 -74-Z Fax No. JCW?J-74Z-/0fZ Email Address PhoneJAO-7-7) 6-il-.512-3 Applicant's interest in subject property j,:Z-7.9 r Ah.&'r6-.0- PART 2, PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property I N,,pe; A -r -N15 -rz*,IE Legal Description: Lot Block [A Additionj 4A4&V.1,A,1—X- Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 112" x 11" sheet Size of subject property: acres Famo+ square footage 14-7-7, /- 24 SF Present zoning classificationl �—Mr-:Z Iasi Property Owner I el 7-,-/ "Top Owner Address City/State/Zip )7Z4V-"Z' / 72;M 5 -7S,oz-J- Phone No. FCL -4) 4-77-214:M- Fax No. .It Submit a letter describing the proposed planned development use and note the request on the site plan document ;e Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations 1W In the same letter, describe whether the proposed overlay will, x will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property In the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed overlay use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 4% Site Plan Requirements. )d All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application maybe scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled gk Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY R UES SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY UAMOwA P4W-E F/7 Print Applicant's Name 'Appllc s S' ature The State of I r - County of Before me (notary)' on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on tioathhof card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seat of office thisF day of �Lru*Tu�, A.D.F% 9C)I I —0; � � — QV H H OWE DIANNE JONES MM� Y COMMISSION EXPIRES Navefter26,412 % � 4/ aa- ., K � Print Property Owner's Name The State of As County of cot I' ri I,, I I'vp-`V- P/Qpnkrty �OwnA 1 Before me (notary)' 9p this day personally appeared (appliesw) 6 c4+ oLa w, ic6ilk , Ket Vt t w 'L Gf74 1 known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or1 ot/her document) to be the person whose name -is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given'under my hand and seal of office thisFo OJ I . 'q T day of q,-�A %X1/1 , A.D. 1-4 -2 -JTU-HAN!r- ("01NIZA11LEZ Notary kitp, of Itlxal' 2 fV07l-22013013 - t Notary In and For State of '* ILLUMINATION PLAN An illumination plan to include a site photometric (including illuminated signs) and all fixture details shall be submitted as part of the site plan review process. Applications will not be accepted without this requirement. I hereby acknowledge that an illumination plan has been included as a part of this submittal. Signature of Applicant I � ?� / f Date L--- Signature of Property Owner Ix Date F -- / I � 110 This verification statement must be signed prior To the submittal of this conditional use application It has been determined that the property described below does require platting or replatting and the applicant has been instructed on this procedure. It has been determined that the property described below is currently platted or does not require platting or replatting at this time. Address of subject property uwp A7: -rM5 TY07 G7 M M Date This form must be signed by the public works department and submitted along with a completed application to the planning and zoning department i n° ME W GU TR 5B1 24.03 AC TR4 9.5 AC TR 5B 16.91 AC TR 5B HCO 16.91 AC 0 1 inch = 300 feet TR 5D 3.01 AC l,rCL 26` 4 TR 1 E 2.9 AC i� TRACTAR 2.324 @ 16 • � • lii '1b 3A u x.53 AC • . -� Z R=MF-2 :: w • TRrl D6C• . .1.49 RC • � • •TR 151•TFC T T 3.422 @ cc 1 R2 3.422 @ iR2B 4@ 1R2E 661 VO -1 GO'? Akl � Zl 061-06 Grapevine Terrace Apartments I iR3 September 30, 2011 Ms. Christine Lopez Fort Worth Star Telegram VIAFACSIMILE P.O. Box 1870 817-390-7520 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 RE: Grapevine Account # CIT 25 Dear Ms. Lopez, Please find enclosed the following for publication on Sunday, October 2, 2011, in the Northeast Edition of the Neighborhood Extra Section of the Fort Worth Star Telegram. (One time only) Item Notice of Public Hearing ZI 1-06, CU1 1-26 & PD1 1-06 — Grapevine Terrace Apartments Notice of Public Hearing CUI 1-27 — Grapevine Ford —Lincoln Notice of Public Hearing CU I 1 -28 - Baylor Medical Center Notice of Public Hearing HL09-02-- D E Box Addition As always, your assistance is greatly appreciated. at (817) 410-3155. Sincerely, 'S�Oaw 4,70 Susan Batte Planning Technician Meeting Date October 18, 2011 October 18, 2011 October 18, 2011 October 18, 2011 If you have any questions please contact me DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT The City of Grapevine - RO. Box 95104 rapevine, Texas 76099 - (817) 410-3154 Fax (817) 410-3018 - www.grapevinetexas.gov CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS On Tuesday evening, October 18, 2011 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine will hold a public hearing to consider the following items: Z11-06, CU11-26, PD11-06 - Grapevine Terrace Apartments - submitted by SPK Development Partners property located at 2311 West Grapevine Mills Circle and proposed to be platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Grapevine Terrace Apartments Addition. The applicant is requesting to rezone 11 acres from "R -MF -2" Multifamily District to "R -MF" Multifamily District for the development of a 4 -story apartment complex. The applicant is also requesting a conditional use permit for density, height and parking and a planned development overlay to include but not be limited to deviation from maximum length of buildings and distance between buildings. The property is zoned "R -MF -2" Multifamily District and is owned by City Bank. CU11-27 - Grapevine Ford -Lincoln - submitted by Carroll Architects for property located at 801 East State Highway 114, and platted as Lot 2, Block A, VTG Grapevine Addition. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to amend the previously approved site plan to remove the used car sales building and allow the addition of a new car sales showroom for Lincoln and a pole sign. The property is zoned "PCD" Planned Commerce Development and is owned by AIGTLP-Texas LP. CU11-28 - Baylor Medical Center - submitted by Baylor Medical Center for property located at 1650 West College Street and platted as Lot 1A, Block A, Grapevine Medical Center Addition. The application is requesting a conditional use permit to amend the previously approved site plan to allow an expansion to the hospital. The property is currently zoned "CC" Community Commercial District and "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District and is owned by Baylor Regional Medical Center. >-=�" - D E Box Addition - submitted by City of Grapevine for property located generally south of East Wall Street, west of Ruth Street, south of East Worth Street and east of Eckley Street and platted as the Lots 1-6, Block 1, Lots 1-16, Block 2, Lots 1-6, Block 3, Lots 1-6, Block 4, Lots 1-16, Block 5, Lots 1-4, Block 6, Lots 1-8, Block 8, Lots 1, 2A, 2B, 3R, Block 9, D E Box Addition. The applicant is requesting designation as a historical landmark sub -district. Such sub -district may include buildings, land, areas, or districts or historical, architectural, archaeological or cultural importance orvalue that merit V protection, enhancement, and preservation in the interest of the culture, prosperity, education, and welfare of the people. The property is owned by multiple owners. After all parties have been given an opportunity to speak, the public hearing will be closed and the Commission and the City Council will deliberate the pending matters. Please contact Development Services Department concerning any questions, 200 S Main Street, Grapevine, Texas 76051 or PO Box 95104, Grapevine, Texas 76099, 817-410-3155. A copy of the site plan for all the above referenced requests is on file with the Development Services Department. HP OfficeJet K Series K80 Personal Printer/Fax/Copier/Scanner Last Transaction Date Time Jae Identification Sep 30 3:07pm Fax Sent 98173907520 Log for DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 8174103018 Sep 30 2011 3:08pm Duration Pages Resul 1:09 3 OK Star -Telegram 400 W. 7TH STREET FORT WORTH, TX 76102 (817)390-7761 Federal Tax ID 26-2674582 I i; Bill To: � 4 CITY OF GRAPEVINE SECRETARY PO BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099-9704 CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS On Sales Discount Misc Fee THE STATE OF TEXAS County of Tarrant I3580 1 I W 2.( L4 i --) 3 7 - - Customer ID: CIT25 Invoice Number: 318120831 Invoice Date: 10/2/2011 Terms: Net due in 21 days Due Date: 10/31/2011 PO Number: Order Number: 31812083 Sales Rep: 073 Description: CITY OF GRAPEVI Publication Date: 10/2/2011 i,.�--.. 98 98 LINE $3.62 $354.76 ($168.76) $10.00 Net Amount: t�rt�tttat�lifgo Before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, this day personally appeared Deborah Baylor Norwood, Bid and Legal Coordinator for the Star -Telegram, published by the Star -Telegram, Inc. at Fort Worth, in Tarrant County, Texas; and who, after being duly sworn, did depose and say that the attached clipping of an advertisement was publish f ip the above named paper on the listed dates: BIDS & LEGAL DEPT. STAR TELEGRAM (817) 215-2323 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME, THIS Thursday, Notary Thank You For Your Payment --------------------------------------------- Remit To: Star -Telegram Customer ID: CIT25 P.O. BOX 901051 Customer Name: CITY OF GRAPEVINE SECR FORT WORTH, TX 76101-2051 Invoice Number: 318120831 Invoice Amount: $196.00 PO Number: Amount Enclosed: Development • Public Hearing Property Owner Research Applicant: Grapevine Terrace ApartmentsCase No.: Z11-06, CU11-26, PD1 1-06 Address/Legal Description: 2311 West Grapevine Mills Circle 0AZCU\FormS\ZCU.31 b.doc V/ Grapevine Mills Addition 2240 W Grapevine Mills Grapevine Lodging Partners Lp Blk 6 Tract Ar Cir 2240 W Grapevine Mills Cir CC Grapevine Tx 76051 Grapevine Mills Addition 2225 E Grapevine Mills Cir Grapevine Mills Ltd Prtnshp Blk 1 Lot 1 R2C PO Box 6120 CC Indianapolis In 46206 Suggs, Henry Survey 2611 Anderson Gibson Rd City Bank A 1415 Tr 1A01 5219 City Bank Pkwy CC Lubbock, TX 79407-3544 Landmark At Grapevine 2847 Anderson Gibson Rd Shafipour, Nasser Etux Etal Blk 1 Lot 1 4001 Tara Dr CC Colleyville Tx 76034 Grapevine Mills Addition 3000 Grapevine Mills Pkwy Grapevine Mills Ltd Prtnshp Blk 1 Lot 1 R3 PO Box 6120 CC Indianapolis In 46206 Land ark At Grapevin 847 Anderson Gibson Rd Shafipour, Nasser Etux Etal Blk 1 of 1 CC Colleyville Tx 76034 Anderson, Andrew W 2853 Anderson Gibson Rd U S A Survey PO Box 17300 A 26 Tr 51301 Fort Worth Tx 76102 GU Anderson, Andrew W 1600 Fairway Dr U S A Survey PO Box 17300 A 26 Tr 4 Fort Worth Tx 76102 GU Suggs, Henry Survey 2103 Anderson Gibson Rd Carter Grapevine Partners Etal A 1415 Tr 1 E PO Box 1395 HCO Palm Desert Ca 92261 Anderson, Andrew W Anderson Gibson Rd Carter Grapevine Partners Eta[ Survey PO Box 1395 A 26 Tr 5B Palm Desert Ca 92261 HCO Linkside At Grapevine 2601 Eagle Dr Toll Tx Iv Lp Blk 1 Lot 1X 2557 SW Grapevine Pkwy Ste 100 R-5.0 Grapevine Tx 76051 Suggs, Henry Surve 2611 Anderson Gibson Rd City Bank A 141 Tr 1 5219 'ty BanTc *wy R -MF -2 —. ubbock, TX 79407-3544 0AZCU\FormS\ZCU.31 b.doc V/ Development • "6',ublic Hearing Property Owner Research Applicant: Grapevine Terrace ApartmentsCase No.: Z11-06, CU11-26, PD1 1-06 Address/Legal Description: 2311 West Grapevine Mills Circle Proof of Notice in the City of Grapevine, Texas Case No. Z11-06, CU11-26, PD1 1-06 Planning and Zoning Commission Pursuant to Article 1011 F, Vernon's Civil Statutes: I, the undersigned being a Planner for the City of Grapevine and having the records pertaining to applications for change of zoning and the notices sent pursuant thereto under my supervision and control, in the performance of the function of my office and employment, do hereby solemnly swear and affirm that pursuant to Article 1011 F, Vernon's Civil Statutes, written notices were served on the parties listed above in the City of Grapevine, zoning Case Z11-06, CU11-26, PD1 1-06 on this the 7th day of October 2011. (D) — Duplicate (,/) — Indicates notice addressed and stamped. Executed this the 7th day of October 2011. City of Grapevine Pla er State of Texas County of Tarrant Before me Susan Batte on this day personally appeared Ron Stombaugh known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing ins f� acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and of office this 7th day oftober 2011. Non and for St to of Texas 2 Suggs, Henry Survey 2611 Anderson Gibson Rd City Bank A 1415 TK 1A0 , 5219„C ityBank Pk bock, -7940"0 7 3' 544 R -MF -2 TX Suggs, Henry Survey 2717 Anderson Gibson Rd City Bank A 1415 Tr 1 D03A 5219 City Bank Pkwy R -MF -2 ! I Lubbock, TX 79407-3544 Suggs, Henry Survey 2511 Anderson Gibson Rd City Bank A 1415 Tr 1 D03C 5219 City Bank Pkwy R -MF -2 Lubbock, TX 79407-3544 Suggs, Henry Survey 2707 Anderson Gibson Rd City Bank A 1415 Tr 1 D03B 5219 City Bank Pkwy R -MF -2 Lubbock, TX 79407-3544 Suggs, Henry Survey 2611 Anderson Gibson Rd City Bank A 1415 Tr 1 D03 5219 City Bank Pkwy R -MF -2 Lubbock, TX 79407-3544 Proof of Notice in the City of Grapevine, Texas Case No. Z11-06, CU11-26, PD1 1-06 Planning and Zoning Commission Pursuant to Article 1011 F, Vernon's Civil Statutes: I, the undersigned being a Planner for the City of Grapevine and having the records pertaining to applications for change of zoning and the notices sent pursuant thereto under my supervision and control, in the performance of the function of my office and employment, do hereby solemnly swear and affirm that pursuant to Article 1011 F, Vernon's Civil Statutes, written notices were served on the parties listed above in the City of Grapevine, zoning Case Z11-06, CU11-26, PD1 1-06 on this the 7th day of October 2011. (D) — Duplicate (,/) — Indicates notice addressed and stamped. Executed this the 7th day of October 2011. City of Grapevine Pla er State of Texas County of Tarrant Before me Susan Batte on this day personally appeared Ron Stombaugh known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing ins f� acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and of office this 7th day oftober 2011. Non and for St to of Texas 2 4.OB27 @ m TR5B1; ,140827 Q TR 581 24.03 AC 0 1 inch = 300 feet TR 5B 18.91 AC TR 58 16.91 AC TR 5D 1R2E TFi'fb3A _ • l2t V1) .1AC. . .2.5a.5a . 5a AC .. . TR•1D6C- - • -1.49 AM I� • . . . . y 'TR1b1' V 3AC _ 1 R2 3.422 @ iR' 1 3,422 @ TR 1R28 2.9 AC iR3 4 @ 124.4 TRACTAR a� 2 324 @ Zl •• CUl 1-26PD1 1-06 Grapevine Carter Grapevine Partners Etal PO Box 1395 Palm Desert Ca 92261 City Bank 5219 City Bank Pkwy Lubbock, TX 79407-3544 Grapevine Lodging Partners Lp 2240 W Grapevine Mills Cir Grapevine Tx 76051 Grapevine Mills Ltd Prtnshp PO Box 6120 Indianapolis In 46206 Shafipour, Nasser Etux Etal 4001 Tara Dr Colleyville Tx 76034 Toll Tx Iv Lp 2557 SW Grapevine Pkwy Ste 100 Grapevine Tx 76051 USA PO Box 17300 Fort Worth Tx 76102 Z11-06, CU 11-26, PD1 1-06 Grapevine terrace apartments Alk i� • '� i Because you are a property owner within 200 feet of the subject tract of land as shown by the last City -approved tax rolls, you received this notice. If you cannot or do not wish to attend the hearing, the attached form is provided for your convenience. If owners of more than 20% of the property within 200 feet of the subject tract object to the case, a 3/4 vote of the City Council is required to approve the request. Purpose of Request: The public hearing is to consider an application submitted by SPK Development Partners property located at 2311 West Grapevine Mills Circle and proposed to be platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Grapevine Terrace Apartments Addition. The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 11 acres from "R -MF -2" Multifamily District to "R -MF" Multifamily District for the development of a 4 -story apartment complex. The applicant is also requesting a conditional use permit for density, height and parking and a planned development overlay to include but not be limited to deviation from maximum length of buildings and distance between buildings. The property is zoned "R -MF -2" Multifamily District and is owned by City Bank. A copy of the site plan is on file with the Development Services Department. Hearing Procedure: When: 7:30 PM, TUESDAY, OCTOBER nhat: JOINT PUBLIC HEARING GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL • PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION • • A-ING: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2nd FLOOR COMMISSION'SDELIBERATION SESSION,d FLOOR 00 S. MAIN STREET, GRAPEVINE, Applicant and Other Speakers' Presentation. Public Input, Neighborhood Associations, Property Owners Within 200 feet, Interested Citizenry. Questions from City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission for Applicants, City Staff and Guests Present. WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN.5 PM ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2011 As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest) and/or (have the following comments) Current Property Owner (printed) Property Address: Lot , Block , Addition Property Owner Signature: Property Owner Name (printed): Daytime phone number: Telephone: (817)410-3155 Fax: (817)410-3018 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Department of Development Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Z11-06, CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION CU11-26, AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD1 1-06 GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission table zone change application Z11-06, conditional use application CU11-26 and planned development overlay PD1 1-06 to the November 15, 2011 meeting and take any other necessary action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION An application for all three requests was submitted by Mr. Jonathan Koster for property located at 2311 West Grapevine Mills Circle. This property, currently zoned "R -MF -2" Multifamily District, is intended to be rezoned to the new multifamily category "R -MF" Multifamily District for a four-story, 278 unit apartment complex. A conditional use request to consider standards other than those established for density, height, and parking is proposed along with a planned development overlay to vary from the buffer area and design requirements within the district. One issue relative to the abandonment of a portion of Anderson -Gibson Road could not be resolved prior to the public hearing which requires the case be tabled to the November 15, 2011 meeting. /rs R:\AGENDA\2011\10-18-11\Z11-06.4.doc, PD1 1-06.4 10/12/2011 3:04:56 PM three access points. The apartment mix is as follows: • 144 one bedroom units ranging from 750 to 800 square feet in size • 118 two bedroom units ranging from 1,050 to 1,150 square feet in size • 16 three bedroom units all 1,272 square feet in size A total of 478 parking spaces (1.72 spaces/unit) have been provided to serve the complex. Buildings 1 and 6 will provide a total of 85 podium (underneath the structure) spaces. Buildings 2, 3, 5, 6 will provide 78 garage spaces and 78 tandem spaces (behind the garage). A total of 237 surface spaces will also be provided, 60 of which will be covered. The applicant is utilizing the conditional use permit process to vary from the following requirements: • Density: 20 units/acre maximum allowed; the applicant is proposing 26.7 units/acre • Height: two stories, 35 feet maximum allowed; the applicant is proposing four stories not to exceed 50 feet • Parking: 2.5 spaces required per unit; the applicant is proposing 1.72 spaces per unit • Front yard setback: minimum 40 foot required; applicant proposes a front yard at it's narrowest point of approximately 25 feet The planned development overlay is also necessary for the applicant to develop the site as intended relative to the following areas: • Location of off-street parking: the ordinance establishes the front yard as both a building setback and landscaped setback area; the applicant proposes to provide parking at several locations in this setback area • Design requirements relative to building length: the ordinance establishes that the length of any building shall not exceed 200 linear feet; the applicant proposes that no building will exceed 250 linear feet • Design requirements relative to building separation: minimum separation between any two unattached buildings shall be 20 feet or the height of the building whichever is greater; the applicant proposes a separation of approximately 20 feet between buildings 1 and 2, building 2 and the clubhouse, buildings 4, 5, and 6 and between buildings 3 and 7. • Design requirements relative to building location and vehicle use/parking areas: ordinance requires a minimum 15 foot separation between buildings and vehicle use areas; applicant proposes an elimination of this requirement relative to the tandem spaces located immediately behind garages • Landscaping: the ordinance requires a minimum of 10 feet of landscaped area between parking/vehicle use areas and adjacent property lines; the applicant is providing between two and six feet of landscaping in several small areas relative to turn -around areas near the north and south entries and near the drive accessing the OAZCU1Z11-06.41.doc, CU11-26.41 and PD11-06.41 2 November 8, 2011 (4:09PM) to exceed the height maximum of 50 feet. The planned development overlay was utilized to allow the multifamily use within the "CC" Community Commercial District. Although approved as submitted the Commission determined and the Council agreed to reconsider the request as part of a City initiated case to bring the zoning into compliance with the actual land use. At the March 21, 2006 meeting, Council approved a zone change (206- 04) and a planned development overlay (PD06-02) on the subject property rezoning approximately 11 acres from "CC" Community Commercial District to "R -M-2" Multifamily District for a condominium project consisting of four towers, each twelve stories in height containing 94 living units per each tower. The planned development overlay allowed for variances to density (35.5 units/acre), height (160 feet), side yard setback, building length and separation, parking (2.1 spaces/unit) and buffer area. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "R-TH" Townhouse District—existing townhouse development SOUTH: "HCO" Hotel/Corporate Office District --undeveloped EAST: "CC" Community Commercial District – Grapevine Mills Mall WEST: "GU" Government Use District and "HCO" Hotel/Corporate Office District—developed as the Cowboys Golf course and the City's municipal golf course and vacant property The subject tract is located within "Zone B" Middle Zone of Effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. In Zone B, the following uses may be considered only if sound treatment is included in building design: multi -family apartments, motels, office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, and personal and business services. Single-family residential and sound sensitive uses such as schools and churches should avoid this zone. The applicant intends to provide sound attenuation for the dwelling units in this project. The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Commercial land use. The applicant's proposal is not in compliance with the Master Plan. /rs 0:1ZCU1Z11-06.41.doc, CU11-26.41 and PD1 1-06.41 4 November 8, 2011 (4:09PM) TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION„ FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 20, 2011 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Z11-06, CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION APPLICATION CU11-26 AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD1 1-06 GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS I 1 r r~ ____ -- Grapevine APPLICANT: SPK Development Partners Lake 1 0 ve Ao•. I I I I i IgA' I.H. 1635 Northwest 1 PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: I (aE foga, co y? ; The subject property is addressed at 2311 West r Grapevine Mills Circle and is proposed to be platted 1 Hall -Johnson Sy,�so Aiirrport a ; as Lot 1, Block 1, Grapevine Terrace Apartments Addition. The site contains approximately 11 acres 1T--- and has approximately 1,314 feet of frontage along Glade Rd. — d Anderson -Gibson Road. F� c O REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE, CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a zone change to rezone approximately 11 acres from "R -MF - 2" Multifamilv District to "R -MF" Multifamilv District for the development of a four story, 278 unit multifamily development. The applicant is also requesting a conditional use permit to vary from the established standards relative to density, height, parking and front yard setback and a planned development overlay to include but not be limited to deviation from buildina lenath. buildina separation and location. location of off-street parking and landscaping. The applicant intends to develop a multi -structure apartment complex consisting of seven main buildings comprising a total 278 units that will have controlled (gated) access at all 0:\ZCU(Z11-06.42.doc, CU11-26.42 and PD1 1-06.42 1 December 12, 2011 (3:58PM) three access points. The apartment mix is as follows: • 144 one bedroom units ranging from 750 to 800 square feet in size • 118 two bedroom units ranging from 1,050 to 1,150 square feet in size • 16 three bedroom units all 1,272 square feet in size A total of 478 parking spaces (1.72 spaces/unit) have been provided to serve the complex. Buildings 1 and 6 will provide a total of 85 podium (underneath the structure) spaces. Buildings 2, 3, 5, 6 will provide 78 garage spaces and 78 tandem spaces (behind the garage). A total of 237 surface spaces will also be provided, 60 of which will be covered. The applicant is utilizing the conditional use permit process to vary from the following requirements: • Density: 20 units/acre maximum allowed; the applicant is proposing 26.7 units/acre • Height: two stories, 35 feet maximum allowed; the applicant is proposing four stories not to exceed 50 feet • Parking: 2.5 spaces required per unit; the applicant is proposing 1.72 spaces per unit • Front yard setback: minimum 40 foot required; applicant proposes a front yard at it's narrowest point of approximately 25 feet The planned development overlay is also necessary for the applicant to develop the site as intended relative to the following areas: • Location of off-street parking: the ordinance establishes the front yard as both a building setback and landscapedsetback area; the applicant proposes to prove e parking at several locations in this setback area • Design requirements relative to building length: the ordinance establishes that the length of any building shall not exceed 200 linear feet; the applicant proposes that no building will exceed 250 linear feet • Design requirements relative to building separation: minimum separation between any two unattached buildings shall be 20 feet or the height of the building whichever is greater; the applicant proposes a separation of approximately 20 feet between buildings 1 and 2, building 2 and the clubhouse, buildings 4, 5, and 6 and between buildings 3 and 7. • Design requirements relative to building location and vehicle use/parking areas: ordinance requires a minimum 15 foot separation between buildings and vehicle use areas; applicant proposes an elimination of this requirement relative to the tandem spaces located immediately behind garages • Landscaping: the ordinance requires a minimum of 10 feet of landscaped area between parking/vehicle use areas and adjacent property lines; the applicant is providing between two and six feet of landscaping in several small areas relative to turn -around areas near the north and south entries and near the drive accessing the 0:\ZCU\Z11-06.42.doc, CM 1-26.42 and PD1 1-06.42 2 December 12, 2011 (3:58PM) podium spaces near building 1. The D/FW International Airport Noise Compatibility Office has submitted a letter recommending against the request citing that the project is an incompatible land use inside the airport noise contour. If approved however the Airport recommends the following: A 25dB Noise Level Reduction recommended by the FAA be mandated and confirmed for the project; The applicant provide full disclosure of the airport noise impact to all first and subsequent purchasers/renters; An avigation easement be dedicated At the November 15, 2011 public hearing, all three requests were tabled to the December 20, 2011 meeting to give the applicant the opportunity to more concisely answer questions from the Council and Commission relative to the conditional use request and variances that are part of the planned development overlay. See the attached exhibits. PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned "CC" Community Commercial District and is developed in multiple lots with nonconforming single family homes. ■ 1601 J[*J,"kYAU*J a g 0. . ki, I M4JJJ fa"telfi .. . The subject property and the property to the north, east, and west was zoned "I-1" Light Industrial District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. The property to the south was zoned ....L- ___------------1"Light-Industrial-Dist-ri"r-ior-t�&-t-he-1-984-City-Rez-enit-"-1-984-the-Gity-c--hanged-the--- _------- _—. zoning designation for the site to "PID" Planned Industrial Development. The property to the north was then rezoned in 1985 as a part of the "Terra Tract" to "R -MF -2" Multi -Family District (Case No. Z85-60, Ord. No. 85-60), however the property was not developed. In October 1995, the property to the north was part of a zoning request (Case No. Z95-06) whose purpose was to amend, revise, eliminate or terminate portions of the deed restrictions and the letter of agreement as adopted in Ordinance No. 85-60, and rezone portions of the site. At the September 7, 1999 meeting, Council approved the rezoning of the property to the north (approximately 14.3 acres) from "R -MF -2" Multifamily District to "CC" Community Commercial District for a proposed restaurant development that never materialized. At the November 16, 2004 meeting, Council approved a rezoning of approximately 8.69 acres of property to the north of the subject site from "CC" Community Commercial District to "R -MF -1" for a proposed multifamily/condominium project. This same property was later rezoned at the February 21, 2006 (Z06-02) to "R-TH" Townhouse District for the development of a 39 unit townhouse development. A planned development overlay (PD06-01) was also used relative to access to the public right-of-way, minimum lot width and size, front, rear, and side yard setbacks, maximum building coverage and maximum impervious area. 0:\ZCU\Z11-06.42.doc, CU11-26.42 and PD11-06.42 3 December 12, 2011 (3:58PK Council considered and approved a zoning change (Z05-05), conditional use request (CU05-68), and planned development overlay (PD05-07) on the subject property for a four tower, 12 -story condominium project at their January 17, 2006 meeting. The project involved the rezoning of approximately 11 acres from "PID" Planned Industrial Development District to "CC" Community Commercial District and a conditional use permit to exceed the height maximum of 50 feet. The planned development overlay was utilized to allow the multifamily use within the "CC" Community Commercial District. Although approved as submitted the Commission determined and the Council agreed to reconsider the request as part of a City initiated case to bring the zoning into compliance with the actual land use. At the March 21, 2006 meeting, Council approved a zone change (Z06- 04) and a planned development overlay (PD06-02) on the subject property rezoning approximately 11 acres from "CC" Community Commercial District to "R -M-2" Multifamily District for a condominium project consisting of four towers, each twelve stories in height containing 94 living units per each tower. The planned development overlay allowed for variances to density (35.5 units/acre), height (160 feet), side yard setback, building length and separation, parking (2.1 spaces/unit) and buffer area. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "R-TH" Townhouse District—existing townhouse development SOUTH: "HCO" Hotel/Corporate Office District --undeveloped EAST: "CC" Community Commercial District - Grapevine Mills Mall WEST: "GU" Government Use District and "HCO" Hotel/Corporate Office - -- Ustric"evelope-i_as_the-Lowboys-Goaf-course--andAhe-aty's---------- municipal golf course and vacant property "TARNIZENHIRgams The subject tract is located within "Zone B" Middle Zone of Effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. In Zone B, the following uses may be considered only if sound treatment is included in building design: multi -family apartments, motels, office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, and personal and business services. Single-family residential and sound sensitive uses such as schools and churches should avoid this zone. The applicant intends to provide sound attenuation for the dwelling units in this project. MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Commercial land use. The applicant's proposal is not in compliance with the Master Plan. /rs 0:2CU211-06.42.doc, CU11-26.42 and PD11-06.42 4 December 12, 2011 (3:58PM) 18 October 2011 Mr. Larry Oliver Chair, Planning and Zoning Commission PO Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76051 DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 3200 EAST AIRFIELD DRIVE, P.O. BOX 619428 DFW AIRPORT, TEXAS 75261-9428 www.dfwairport.com T 972 973 8888 F 972 973 5751 RE: Zoning Application Z11-06, Conditional Use Application CU11-26, and Planned Development Overlay PD1 1-06 filed by Grapevine Terrace Apartments for property located at 2311 West Grapevine Mills Circle. Dear Chairman Oliver: Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) appreciates the opportunity the City of Grapevine provides to comment on items on the Grapevine Planning and Zoning Commission's regular agenda. DFW views with concern the proposed 278 unit, four story Grapevine Terrace Apartments development at 2311 West Grapevine Mills Circle. The proposed development lies adjacent to the arrival and departure corridors for Runways 18R/36L and 18L/36R at a distance of about 3.25 miles from those runways. During South Flow operations, which occur about 70% of the year, between 300 and 350 arriving aircraft will typically pass within 0.5 mile of the proposed residences at between 775 and 1,175 feet above the ground. During North Flow operations, about 30% of the year, approximately 200 - 250 departing aircraft will typically pass, at climb power settings, within 0.5 mile of the proposed residences at altitudes of between 1,900 and 3,400 feet above the ground. This volume of air traffic at the altitudes noted can be expected to annoy some unknown number of the residents of this proposed development, if it is approved. The proposed development is inside the 65LDN contour and adjacent to the 70LDN contour. The FAA recommends against this kind of incompatible land use inside the airport noise contour. Please refer to attached graphics for orientation. If the City finds approval of the proposed development to be in its best interest, the Airport strongly recommends the following: 1. The 25dB Noise Level Reduction recommended by the FAA be mandated and confirmed for the construction project; 2. The applicant be required to provide full disclosure of the aircraft noise impact to all first, and subsequent purchasers/renters of residences in this project; and, 3. An avigation easement be dedicated to the City of Grapevine, the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport Board, and the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Please contact me at 972-973-5570 at your convenience should you want to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, 0� 40 ( - Harvey Holden, Noise Compatibility Planner LI i'1 DFW Noise Compatibility Office FUNT 2 4 2011 cc: Sandra Perkins Ron Stombaugh �4 W1� February 28, 2012 Rick Simmons SPK Development Partners 3110 W Southlake Blvd, #120 Southlake, TX 76092 RE: GRAPEVINE FILE #Z11-06, CU11-26, PD11-06 Dear Mr. Simmons, This letter is to verify that your request for a special use permit to rezone 11 acres from "R- MF -2" Multifamily District to "R -MF" Multifamily District for the development of a four story, 278 unit multifamily development. The applicant is also requesting a conditional use permit to vary from the established standards relative to density, height, parking and front yard setback and a planned development overlay to include but not be limited to deviation from building length, building separation and location, location of off-street parking and landscaping on property located at 2311 West Grapevine Mills Circle and proposed to be platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Grapevine Terrace Apartments Addition was denied by City Council on December 20, 2011. On December 20, 2011, the Planning and Zoning Commission, recommended the City Council deny the request. A waiting period of one (1) year between the date an application for amendment to the zoning ordinance, or a requested change in zoning, is denied by the City Council and a new application for such a change or amendment is accepted, is hereby established. The one-year waiting period shall be applicable to all requested amendments and changes for the same zoning district, or districts, on all or any portion of the property previously considered for amendment or change in zoning; provided, however, said one-year waiting period shall not be applicable to any proposed amendment or change instituted by the City Council or Planning and Zoning Commission or to any proposed amendment or change denied by the City Council without prejudice. Please do not hesitate to contact us if we may be of further assistance. Sincerely, Susan Batte Planning Technician DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Tie City of Grapevine - P.O. Box 95104 - Grapevine, Texas 76099 (817) 410-3154 Fax (817) 410-3018 - wv v.grapevinetexas.gov 3030 LBJ FREEWAY SUITE 1660 DALLAS.TEXAS 75234 972/248-3006 FAX 972/248-3855 TOLL FREE 888/298-3006 September 7, 2011 Mr, Rick Simmons Integrated Real Estate Group 3110 W. Southlake Blvd, Suite 120 Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Tr-rrffic Access Slucly — Grapevine Terrace Apartments Dear Mr. Simmons: SEP 8 2011 This engineering analysis was conducted to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed Grapevine Terrace Apartments located along Grapevine Mills Circle between the intersections of Anderson Gibson Circle and Anderson Gibson Road in Grapevine, Texas. The proposed apartments will include 278 units and is planned to be completed in 2012. The primary access to the apartment complex will be provided via a proposed (gated) access point on Grapevine Mills Circle which will serve both apartment residents and visitors. This access point will serve as the west leg to the existing intersection of Grapevine Mills Circle and a driveway providing access to the Grapevine Mills Mall. Two gated access points will also be provided via Anderson Gibson Circle, a section of which is proposed to be an internal roadway for the development. These access points will provide entry and exit for residents only. The proposed site plan for this development is provided in Figure 1. Existing and Background Conditions Adjacent to the site, Grapevine Mills Circle is a four -lane undivided roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 mpli. Anderson Gibson Circle and Anderson Gibson Road are two-lane undivided roadways with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. The existing and proposed intersection lane configurations are shown in Figure 2. Existing turning movement counts were collected during the AM and PM peak periods on Thursday, August 25, 2011 at the intersections of Grapevine Mills Circle with Anderson Gibson Road and Anderson Gibson Circle. 24-hour machine counts were also collected on Grapevine Mills Circle in the vicinity of the proposed primary access location to the development. These counts are summarized in Figure 3. Background traffic volumes at build -out (2012) were obtained by increasing the existing traffic volumes at an annual rate of three (3) percent. These volumes are also shown in Figure 3. C tj di -acs Grapevine Terrace Apartments Traffic Study September 2011 Trip Generation The number of trips generated by the development is a function of the type and quantity of the land use within the development. The number of vehicle trips generated by the proposed development were estimated based on the trip generation rates and equations provided in the publication entitled Trip Generation, Eighth Edition, by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Estimates of the number of trips generated by the site were made for the AM and PM peak hours, as well as on a daily basis. The trip generation equations and directional splits for this development are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Table 3 presents the number of trips generated by the proposed development at site build -out. Table 1. Trip Generation Land Use for Land Use Code Avg. Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Apartments 1 220 1 T = 6.06(X) + 123.56 1 T = 0.49(X) + 3.73 T = 0.55(X) + 17.65 T = Trip Ends; X = Number of Units Tahip'). ilirectinnal C»lits fnr Prnnnsed l7evelonment Land Use Directional Split' Size Average Weekday Avg. AM Peak PM Peak Land Use ITE Code Weekday Hour Hour Apartments 220 1 50/50 20/80 65/35 `XX / YY = % entering vehicles / % exiting vehicles Tahie 3_ Fstimnted Trin Generation for Pronosed Develonment Build -Out Year 2012 Land Use Size Average Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Apartments 278904 Units 904 1,808 28 112 140 111 60 171 Trip Distribution and Assignment The distribution and assignment of site generated trips to the study area roadways and intersections were performed based on the local traffic patterns, the existing traffic counts, knowledge of the study area, and proposed location of site access points. The directional distribution percentages are shown in Figure 4. The estimated AM and PM peak hour site generated traffic volumes at site build -out are also shown in Figure 4. Total traffic volumes at build -out (2012) were obtained by adding the site generated traffic volumes to the background traffic volumes (Figure 4) and are shown in Figure 5. -2- Grapevine Terrace Apartments Traffic Study September 2011 Capacity Analysis Intersection capacity analysis was performed for the AM and PM peak hours under existing, 2012 background and total traffic conditions. Table 4 presents the capacity analysis results for the study area intersections under existing conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. Table 4. Capacity Analysis Results - Existing Traffic Conditions 2011 Grapevine Mills Circle and Anderson Gibson Circle(Two-Way Stop Control) EB WB NB SB AM Peak 9.9 (A) N/A 0.5 (A) 0.0 (A) PM Peak 10.4 (B) N/A 0.3 (A) 0.0 (A) Grapevine Mills Circle and Mall Driveway ( o -Way Stop Control) EB WB NB SB AM Peak N/A 9.2 (A) 0.0 (A) 0.1 (A) PM Peak N/A 10.8 B) 0.0 (A) 0.6 (A Grapevine Mills Circle and Anderson Gibson Road (Two -Way Sto Control) EB WB NBL SB AM Peak 10.2 B) N/A 7.9 (A) 0.0 (A) PM Peak 10.7 (B) N/A 7.7 (A) ' Delay in seconds/vehicle (Level of Service) As shown in Table 4, the study area intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service (Acceptable LOS = LOS D or better) under AM and PM peak hours. To evaluate the traffic impacts of the background growth in traffic volumes, capacity analysis for the study area intersections was also performed for 2012 background traffic conditions using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 3. Table 5 presents the results of this analysis. Table 5. Capacity Analysis Results - Background Traffic Conditions (2012) Grapevine Mills Circle and Anderson Gibson Circle (Two -Way Stop Control EB WB NB SB AM Peak 9.9 (A) N/A 0.5 (A) 0.0 (A) PM Peak 10.5 B N/A 0.3 A) 0.0 (A) Grapevine Mills Circle and Mall Driveway/DrivewayA (Two -Way Stop Control) EB WB NB SB AM Peak N/A 9.3 (A) 0.0 A 0.1 (A) PM Peak N/A 10.9 (B) 0.0 (A) 0.6 (A Grapevine Mills Circle and Anderson Gibson Road (Two -Way Sto Control EB WB NBL SB AM Peak 10.2 B) N/A 8.0 (A) 0.0 (A) PM Peak 10.8 (B) N/A 7.8 (A) 0.0 (A) 'Delay in seconds/vehicle (Level of Service) -3- cull -ab Grapevine Terrace Apartments Traffic Study September 2011 As shown in Table 5, the study area intersections are predicted to continue operating at acceptable levels of service under 2012 background traffic conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. To evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed development, capacity analysis for the study area intersections was also performed 2012 total traffic conditions using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 5. Table 6 presents the results of this analysis. Table 6. Capacity Analysis Results — Total Traffic_ Conditions (2012) Grapevine Mills Circle and Anderson Gibson Circle (Two -Way Sto Control) EB WB NB SB AM Peak 11.3 (B) N/A 0.4 A) 0.0 (A) PM Peak 13.0 (B) N/A 0.3 A 0.0 A) Grapevine Mills Circle and Mall Drivewa /Drivewa B (Two -Way StControl) EB WB NB SB AM Peak 10.3 B) 10.0 (B) 1.4 A) 0.1 A PM Peak 10.5B 12.7B 1.4A 0.7A Grapevine Mills Circle and Anderson Gibson Road Two -Way Stop Control EB WB NBL SB AM Peak 10.4 (B) N/A 8.2 (A) 0.0 (A) PM Peak 11.2 B) N/A 8.0 A 0.0_(A) t Delay in seconds/vehicle (Level of Service) As shown in Table 6, the study area intersections are predicted to continue to operate at acceptable levels of service (Acceptable LOS = LOS D or better) during the AM and PM peak hours with site traffic under 2012 total traffic conditions operating at similar delays and level of service as background traffic conditions. Deceleration Lane Analysis The proposed access point to the Grapevine Terrace Apartments on Grapevine Mills Circle was analyzed based on the predicted traffic volumes to determine if a right turn deceleration lane would be required. Although Grapevine Mills Circle is not a TxDOT roadway, guidelines in TxDOT's Access Management Manual state that a right turn deceleration lane should be considered on a roadway with a posted speed limit of less than or equal to 45 mph when peak right turn volumes are greater than 60 vehicles per hour. Based on the posted speed limit on Grapevine Mills Circle (30 mph) and the projected peak site -generated southbound right turn volumes at the access point during the PM peak hour (16 vehicles), TxDOT's value is not exceeded and a southbound right turn deceleration lane is not recommended at this location. The proposed access point on Grapevine Mills Circle was also analyzed to determine if a northbound left turn deceleration lane would be required. Based on the capacity analysis results for this intersection shown in Table 6, the northbound approach is predicted to operate with minimal delay (1.4 seconds/vehicle). Additionally, 51 vehicles are predicted to make the Grapevine Terrace Apartments Traffic Study September 2011 northbound left turn maneuver during the PM peak hour translating into less than a vehicle per minute. Based on the low northbound and southbound through volumes at this location and the roadway configuration (four -lane undivided), 51 northbound left turn vehicles are not predicted to significantly impede traffic operations on Grapevine Mills Circle. Therefore, a northbound left turn deceleration lane is not recommended. Queuing Analysis The Grapevine Terrace Apartments will be a gated community. Visitors can only access the community using the access point on Grapevine Mills Circle by utilizing the call -box located at this driveway. Queuing analysis was performed for this access point to determine if visitor queues at the call -box would impede traffic operations on Grapevine Mills Circle. Assuming that 20 percent of the total entering traffic at this access point is visitor traffic, approximately 14 vehicles are predicted to use the call -box option to access the residential development during the PM peak hour. At an average service time of three (3) minutes per visitor at the call -box, and assuming random arrivals, the maximum queue is not predicted to exceed two (2) vehicles. This queue can be safely accommodated within the development and is not projected to impede traffic operations on Grapevine Mills Circle. Additionally, a review of the proposed site plan indicates that the developer proposes to provide to two (2) entering lanes into the development at this access point further reducing the likelihood of the entering traffic blocking Grapevine Mills Circle. Sight Distance As part of this traffic analysis, the available and required intersection sight distances were evaluated for motorists accessing Grapevine Mills Circle from Driveway A. The sight distance required at the site access point on Grapevine Mills Circle was estimated using procedures developed by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and published in the 2004 edition of A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. At this location, motorists should be able to see if and when adequate gaps exist to perform their desired maneuver. Table 7 shows the required and available sight distances for the vehicles on the eastbound approach to Grapevine Mills Circle from Driveway A. Table 7. Required Sight Distance at Access Point on Grapevine Mills Circle Major Roadway Driveway A Speed Limit 30 mph Required Sight Distance to the Left 355 feet Available Sight Distance to the Left > 600 feet Required Sight Distance to the Right 355 feet Available Sight Distance to the Right > 600 feet -5- Grapevine Terrace Apartments Traffic Study September 2011 Based on field measurements and the existing roadway conditions, adequate sight distance is available for the turning movements exiting the development from the proposed site access point on Grapevine Mills Circle. Conclusions The following conclusions can be made as a result of this traffic access study: ® The proposed multi -family residential development is predicted to generate 1,808 trips on a daily basis with 140 trips during the AM peak hour and 171 trips during the PM peak hour. The intersections of Grapevine Mills Circle with Anderson Gibson Road and Anderson Gibson Circle currently operate at acceptable levels of service and are predicted to operate at acceptable levels of service under 2012 background and total traffic conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. Additionally, the primary access point on Grapevine Mills Circle is predicted to operate at acceptable levels of service under 2012 total traffic conditions. The projected southbound right turn peak hour volumes (16 vehicles) are not predicted to exceed TxDOT's minimum criteria for consideration of a right turn deceleration lane (60 vehicles). The installation of a southbound right turn deceleration lane is not recommended at the intersection of Grapevine Mills Circle and Driveway A. Northbound left turning traffic for Driveway A on Grapevine Mills Circle is not predicted to significantly impede traffic operations on Grapevine Mills Circle. A northbound left turn deceleration lane is not recommended. 0 Queuing analysis results indicate that the entering traffic at the proposed access on Grapevine Mills Circle will be stored within the development and is not predicted to impede traffic operations on Grapevine Mills Circle. o Adequate sight distance is available for the exiting traffic at the intersection of Grapevine Mills Circle and Driveway A. We appreciated the opportunity to provide these traffic engineering services for you. Feel free to contact me at (972) 248-3006 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Kelly D. Parma, P.E., PTOE Project Manager Lee Engineering, LLC TBPE Firm Registration # F-450 -6- N a E w ux ye aid g W+ 4 d „ At s I i I i 4 G N Anderson Gibson Road Grapevine Mills Circle CU I :0 Not to scale Mall Driveway Existing Intersection Lane Configurations Anderson Gibson Road Grapevine Mills Circle Grapevine Terrace Apartments Driveway A y �R Mall Driveway Anderson Gibson Circle Proposed Intersection Lane Configurations LEGEND:' = Stop Control Figure 2 r Lec Enci1 aviine Anderson Gibson Road Grapevine Mills Circle Nm 9 (6) 4-263 (224) 1 (I) 59 (259) —10 - Note: --► Note: Existing traffic volumes collected on Thursday, August 25, 2011 Anderson Gibson Road /NM X Grapevine Mills Circle Anderson Gibson Circle 4— [3,706] [2,696] —► Mall Driveway Existing Traffic Volumes (2011) k-9 (6) 4-271_(231) 1 (1) 61 (267) -► Y 3 (5) —A 41 (226) ---► 0 Not to scale 4-276 (231) Anderson Gibson Circle �v A-285 (217) 4 (3) 5 (21) 4-284 (238) 59 (251) -� 3 5 (21) 42 (233) ---► N N Mall Driveway Background Traffic Volumes (2012) LEGEND: XX = AM Peak Hour; (XX) = PM Peak Hour; [XX] = 24 -Hour Figure 3 I Lco Enci11 ninc- Anderson Grapevine Mills Circle CIAII-�)b to scale Anderson Gibson Road Grapevine Mills Circle Mall Driveway Assumed Directional Distribution Grapevine Terrace Apartments Anderson Gibson Circle Driveway A =o Nov ri o 1'—'4 (16) 5 (22) 13 (51) 13 (51) 0 (0)----► 0 (0) —,4 0 0 0 000 Mall Driveway Site Generated Traffic Volumes LEGEND: XX = AM Peak Hour; (XX) = PM Peak Hour o� 6 (23) d--4 (16) 0 (0) 16 (S) —► Figure 4 Lca c1 anrcoc3inc Anderson Gibson Road Grapevine Mills Circle 6 (23)--�o 74 (318)—► Grapevine Terrace Apartments Driveway A No! Oo `.° k-4 (16) Io k-9 (6) 285 (21, ) �--322 (258) T 5 21 13 (51)� 59 (25l)---ib- 251)---►5 5(21)� n o n Mall Driveway ca n- 0 Not to scale Anderson Gibson Circle ..v IC10 (26) *-288 (254) 3 (5) 58 (241)---* LEGEND: XX = AM Peak Hour; (XX) = PM Peak Hour a V- Total Traffic Volumes Figure 5 Lct1G®17ccRitlG Site Build -Out (2012) The development group shall provide Grapevine with a MF project that is the highest -class project in the market focused on higher end renters. This approach shall provide the project with longer term stability of ownership, a 47% increase in tax base (approximately $1,050,000 in total tax revenue per annum versus $561,000), developer funded construction of the hike and bike path connector (City savings of $300,000), clean up a blighted area, reduce the maintenance cost to the City (landscaping and paving), provide for the highest and best use of the site, increase the visibility to adjoining land tracts with similar qualities, and increase value to adjoining properties. The project will represent one of the few, if not the only, truly institutional quality multi family projects in Grapevine, that will consistently attract the highest qualify investors during its life cycle. This institutional appeal will ensure the project is maintained to the highest industry standards throughout its lifecycle. We desire to work with the development team to design a "green building" which will include energy saving items such as insulation above code requirements, vapor barrier, vinyl windows, water saving fixtures, etc. Heating and HVAC equipment will be designed to provide efficiencies greater than standard. See list below of additional benefits not found in other projects in Grapevine: • 90% Masonry Construction • Capture spectacular views of Lake Grapevine and its Golf Courses • Energy Star Development Features • One of the only MF projects with 100% elevator access in every building • Project is 100% ADA accessible, national average is less than 3% of units ADA accessible • Trash collection by staff at each unit • Abundance of green space over requirement • Over 250 trees saved on the property • Wood Plank Garage Doors • Hike and Bike Trail Access Grapevine Terrace is the proposed development of 278 unit multi -family project located on Anderson Gibson Road in Grapevine, Texas. The property consists of 10.4 acres of land owned by SPK Development. The property is currently zoned MF - 2 which will allow for 208 total units of 2-3 story walk-up multi -family product It is our understanding that the City of Grapevine desires development in this area to be of higher quality, provide amenities to attract higher end renters, and help position this high traffic / visibility area within Grapevine (adjoining Grapevine Mills Mall) as a highly appealing destination. The demographics of the area support this type of project with a focus specifically on higher end renters by choice. The site offers many existing and natural amenities not commonly found in other multi family projects in the surrounding DFW area. The topography to the back of the site presents occupants with unimpeded views of the golf courses and distant panoramic views of Lake Grapevine - views that are not available anywhere else in the DFW area. The site is located adjacent to a major retail area, which offers occupants shopping, dinning, and entertainment within walking distance to the property. The project is surrounded by Grapevine Mills Mall, Cowboys Golf Course, and two parcels of undeveloped land to the north and the south of the proposed development This project shall be developed by a joint team of developers and operators that have completed over 60 multi family projects, and have over $450 million of _ projects under development The project team consists of The Pogue Group, Integrated Real Estate Group, and JLK Benton Group as formed in a development partnership, SPK Development Project Details Units: 278 Total (1 Bdrm. -144, 2 Bdrm. -118, 3 Bdrm. -16) Unit Sizes: Average unit size of 948 SF (750 SF to 1,272 SF) Buildings: 8 Separate Structures (Including Standalone Clubhouse) Floors: 4 story structures (2 building with podium parking below) Parking: 478 parking spaces (podium, garage, covered and surface parking) Parking Ratio: 1.72/unit Building Area: 247,903 SF Green/Open Area: 45.47% of the site Open Space Required: 69,500 SF, over 90,000 SF shall be provided Building Amenities: Elevators in each building, direct access garages, pool, fitness, hike and bike path connection, walking trail, wifi, Iouge, and game room Unit Amenities: Hardwood Plank FIoors, energy efficient appliances, granite countertops, balconies, courtyard views, golf course/lake views Greenscape: Retention of existing trees and natural landscaping (as per tree survey conducted) Landscaping: Utilize existing trees and blend . new landscaping into the green environment DFW Airport Authority: Noise mitigation requirements are met and disclosure of airport noise in each lease shall be provided Traffic Study: No concerns identified based on the time and new volume of traffic in the area Parking Study: Recent research by ULI indicates that multi -family rental residential units generate an average peak presence of roughly 1.5 resident cars per unit and 045 visitor cars per unit. Variances have been requested for height, set backs, parking, and building length. To maximize green space, which is irreplaceable, we request these variances in order to develop a higher class of product which allows the use of existing topography for the spectacular views, and utilize existing trees on the site. The site plan as proposed has over 200,000 square feet of green/open space with over 80,000 square feet of dedicated open space and recreation areas which is 20% greater t an ity requirements. See attached MR A for details on the requested variances. A particular concern from both the City staff and the development group is always the desire to ensure adequate or minimal parking to satisfy building ordinances, but to also look at the unit types and sizes in determining the best parking scenario. In this proposed plan we have provided 478 parking spaces. Parking will be provided by structured, garage, covered, and surface areas. As outlined by industry experts, the typical parking ratio for new rental multi family should be 1.5/resident unit and .15/visitor unit. This development shall be parked at a ratio of 1.72/unit that is above the industry standard. The development group has worked closely with City staff to provide a product that fits within the vision of the surrounding area in terms of class, construction type, amenities, and finishes that make it a compliment and blend in well with the larger luxury resorts in the area. The intent is to build a resort like project along with saving the existing natural topography and tree growth that has made Grapevine so special. We request your approval of the Conditional Use Application and Planned Development Application for Grapevine Terrace. We look forward to breaking ground early next spring on the project pending your approval. A" Summary of Variance Requests Conditional Use Variance Request The property is zoned for multi-family(MF), which would allow for 2-3 story walkup garden apartments with a total of 208 units. The proposed project represents a major upgrade in appearance, materials, parking, elevators, and views compared to the project contemplated by current zoning - and is far more consistent with the image Grapevine should command as a leading entertainment, retail and residential community - than the image that would be conveyed through development of an as - of -right project. The target market for this planned development is the affluent spectrum of the rental population that desire custom/condo type features and fixtures. We are not focused on the efficiency or first time renter, but rather the aging population that desire condo type living and the vast social, environmental and transportation conveniences afforded by the City of Grapevine. Density Requirement: 20 Units/acre maximum allowed Deviation: Request for 26.7 Units/acre We believe this request is very practical when compared to recent rezoned projects that have received approval. The increase in density allows for the offset of higher material costs incurred with building some structured parking, elevators, higher end o as compare o -t an 85$/o requiremen , az�d - o - construction. Additionally, the site is difficult to develop due to the lack of depth to the property, power easement to the west of the site, topography, and location of offsite utilities. We have incorporated approximately 3.21 acres of green space saving approximately 200 existing trees on the property. This green areas will be used for bike path, dog park, walking park, children play area, etc. Height Requirement: 2-3 stories, 35 feet maximum allowed Deviation: Request 4 stories, not to exceed 50 feet The additional height allows for the creation of more open space, less surface parking field, and allow us to target units that will demand higher rent and take advantage of the views to the west of the property - further offsetting the higher construction costs driven by our desire to build extremely high quality, long lasting product. Due to the site development constraints and the acreage utilized for open space, it is necessary to build 4 stories to achieve the desired level of quality. Parking Requirement: 2.5 spaces per unit Deviation: Request 1.72 spaces per unit. Tandem spaces behind garages shall be counted as acceptable parking spaces Recent developments have been approved with similar parking requests that have included rezones. Industry standards, as shown in the parking summary, indicate a 1.5/unit national average. Tandem parking has also been approved in most, if not all, projects in Grapevine. Front Yard Setback Requirement: Minimum 40 feet required Deviation: Request front yard setback of 24 feet The setback variance is requested since the property adjoins an easement area that the City of Grapevine owns. The area shall be maintained as a landscaped area with a hike and bike path unless approved by the city to sell to the developer. The actual setback to Grapevine Mills Parkway is over 70 feet inclusive of the easement area, far exceeding the typical front yard setback requirement. ESS � PLANNERS, Inc. City of Grapevine Development Services Planning Division 200 South Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 Case Name: Grapevine Terrace Apartments Case Number: Location: Grapevine Mills Mall Ring Road 117 WWW.NT5AKCHITECT5.COM September 6, 2011 As I am sure you know, this site has been looked at many times since the Mall was developed and each time it did not progress on to a finished project. This site has certain inherent advantages and disadvantages the make it more challenging than most. The site backs up to the Cowboys Golf Course and has a substantial landscape buffer from the Grapevine Mills Mall ring road, so there are some very nice view premiums. There are also some substantial disadvantages. The site is separated from adjoining properties by fairly substantial topography in the front and the back. There is a TXU power line easement along the back of the property that makes about 20% of the site virtually unusable. They will not allow parking in the easement and the Fire Department will not even accept fire lanes in the easement. In spite of this the land is still expensive because of the location. In choosing how we would like to develop the site we decided that maximizing views to the golf course was necessary, therefor we chose four story buildings. Since we were approaching the site with taller buildings we felt that elevators and garage parking were necessary to create the "Premium" project that the site dictated. Unfortunately the cost of the elevators also pushed us to larger buildings to mitigate the cost of the elevators. Since the buildings along the golf course were to have elevators it seemed logical to have all of the buildings be the same height and have elevators. This allows us to make 100% of the units handicapped accessible/ adaptable. 1) We are asking for higher density than current zoning, in part to make the project large enough to be a manageable size and in part to be able to afford to offer higher amenities. Zoning allows 20 U/A and we are requesting 25.25 U/A. This is within reasonable limits of what has been granted on other projects in the city and there are Hotels and a Mall adjacent or near the site 2) We are requesting an increase from two stories with a 35' height limitation to four stories with a 50' height limitation. We feel this is justified because of the substantial buffers provided by the golf course in the back and the ring road mature landscaping in the front, as well as the topographic isolation of the site. 3) We are proposing a parking ratio of 1.7 parking per unit instead of the 2.5 per unit that is called for in the zoning ordinance. We are counting the 9x20 tandem spaces in front of the single car garages in our parking count. This ratio is in line with many other ord' area and has proven successful in other similar projects. Premium renters are Iik 1� fewer, but nicer cars and store other vehicles off site. SEP 7 2011 L� 1 AKCIHITECTS * PLANNERS, Inc. ,69-41 1 6 FAX 972-6( 4) In order to keep the opening behind the Clubhouse as wide as possible we are requesting that the separation between buildings and at the north edge of the site be twenty feet instead of 20' or the height of the building. It is highly unlikely that any building will be built close to the north boundary because of the TXU easement cutting diagonally across that portion of the site. The spaces between the buildings are chiefly there to aid in fire fighting on preventing the spread of fire. Since we are proposing four story buildings we have worked with the Fire Marshal to provide increased fire protection for the buildings and the fire fighters. These added protections will include standpipes behind the buildings along the golf course and on each of the upper floors of each building as well as full sprinkling of the buildings that have reduced access to the rear of the buildings. The three buildings not backing up to the golf course will have normal residential sprinklers. 5) Our proposed buildings are up to 250' in length, which is more than is allowed in your ordinance. We have provided a substantial offsets along the outfacing sides of out longer buildings to provide the kind of relief that the ordinance was trying to insure. We have chosen to request longer buildings to be able to provide 100% elevator accessible buildings that are economically sensible. It is our desire to build a project that we can all be happy with and one that will be economically viable. Much of our development team has worked together for nearly twenty years producing successful projects across the state. We are confident that this will be another in that long line of successful projects. Thank you for your consideration, SPK Development Partners SEP 7 2011 Planned Development Overlay Variance Request Location of Off -Street Parking Requirement: Establishes the front yard setback as both a building and landscape setback Deviation: Request to provide parking in the setback area The setback variance is requested since the property adjoins an easement area that the City of Grapevine owns. The area shall be maintained as a landscaped area with a hike and bike path unless approved by the city to sell to the developer. The actual setback to Grapevine Mills Parkway is over 70 feet inclusive of the easement area, far exceeding the typical front yard setback requirement. Design Requirements Relative to Building Length Requirement: Establishes that the length of any building shall not exceed 200 linear feet Deviation: Request that no building shall exceed 250 linear feet This site contains 8 building structures of which 5 of the buildings are approximately 250 feet in length. Due to the building area being approximately 8.2 acres, more efficient buildings with higher degree of fire safety and access must be developed. In addition, elevators in each building are cost prohibitive in smaller building units - and elevators are essential in high quality product that we desire to build to complement the other recent development activities of the City of Grapevine. Design Requirements Relative to Building Separation Requirement: Establishes that minimum separation is a minimum of 20 feet or the height of the building, whichever is greater Deviation: Request that the separation be 20 feet Utility, site costs and total buildable square footage of 8.2 acres requires the layout in a fairly tight geometric area. This development approach also creates a feel more common to resort / high quality condo development - than a typical, average quality sprawling suburban development project. Design Requirements Relative to Building Location and Vehicle Use/Parking Areas Requirement: Establishes that a minimum of 15 foot separation between buildings and vehicle use areas Deviation: Request an elimination of this requirement relative to tandem spaces located immediately behind garages All tandem parked projects require a variance from this ordinance. It appears most projects located in Grapevine have received approval of this request. Landscaping Requirement: Requires a minimum of 10 feet of landscape area between parking/vehicle areas and adjacent property lines Deviation: Request between 2 and 6 feet at the entry areas to the property at the north and south end of the property for turn -around. Request that will ensure security and safety to both project residents and potential parking conflicts with Grapevine Mills Mall. This is requested so we may provide gates at the north and south entrances to the property on Anderson Gibson Road. OT 20'19' IN CENTERLINE DATA Mo mwc wANM L -I N 3006 / w - 22.56 L-2 N OV42'S5' w1.02' i.02' 4-3 N W4255 W 25A L-4 S W42'W E 6.00' L-5 N 66'77'05' E It.66' " N 1844'40' w 25.24' L-7 s 6916630' w 35.6% L -B S 31'1 W -6. ra' L-9 N 3r44'40' W 22.66 TOTAL PAYING (PARKING AL UK AIWA 143152 SS. 31. FLOOR AREA RAID 1. 31NTATION CONTAINER SCREENING WADS AND PAI SPE WILL BE CDNSIRUC1E0 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CTYS DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS 2 LIGHTING FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WHEN CITY OF GRAPEVINE CODES. 3. ALL FRE LANE PIRA AT INTE MIONS ARE 35 UNLESS OTHERMSE SPECIFIED - 4. ALL DIMENSION ARE ID THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. S. ALL THE REW EETEMM OF THE GRA"NE SOA. EROSION cD RROL OINMNWCE SNAl BE ME DINING THE PERIOD OF CONSIRucnDN. 6, ALL ON-SITE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS ASSOCIATED WRH NEW CONSTRUCTION SFNLL BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND, 7. REFER TO LANDSCAPE ELAN (SHEET 2 OF 15) FOR ALL DOSING TREES AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPING FOR THIS OEVET.OPMENT. THE LANDSCAPING FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 53 OF THE CRY OF GRAPEVINE ZONING CODE S. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLA! (SHEET 2 O 15) FOR RECREATION. ADM SPACE PROPOSED FDR THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE RECREATIONAL OPER SPACE REWIRED IS 69,500 Sy (250 SS. PER UNIT). THE RECiffARIXYL OPEN 'SPACE PROWOED 6 80,970 SF. 9. THE DOSTNG VARLVTA.E WIDTH PUBLIC UFUTY. ACCESS AND HIE AND ONE TRAIL EASEMENT (LE. +/-1.05 ACRES) WILL DE AWDOED/VACATED BY SEPARRE INSTRUMENT. THE EASEMENT ABANDONMENT PROCESS SHALL L BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CRY OF GRAPEVINE STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES. ALAI'S FROM 'R -MF -2' MI.TIFA P Y DBTRICT TO 'R -W' MULTEAYLY IST FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FOUR STORE, 278 UNIT MULTffAMLY .MW. CONOMONdL USE REQUEST CUII-26 IS A REDtEST TO VARY THE ESTAWSED STANDARDS RELATIVE TO DENSITY, FEDHT, PARIOND FRONT YARD SETBACK. PLANNED OEYEWPMENT MULAY PDII-06 6 A EST TO INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO DEVIATION FROM BUILDING TH. BUILDING SEPARATOR AND LOCATION, LOCATION OF OFF -SODEN N69'3t3'37*W CLD6HDUSE BUILDING TIDE I VUEUTRG TYPE 2 ENDING TYPE U BUILDING TYPE M BtBLDIG T'IFE TV PROVIDED PROVIDED PRDYIOFD PROVIDED PROVM PROVIDED C cs Sws;:r U:: PROPOSED DENTITION J LOCATION OF OFF-STREET PAIONG RRDING ImGM 49'-1' 40'-6' 49'-2' lAkitl. P.'J 49'-2' _. DESIGN fEMIEMEI RFIATN'E �11 �Nlilrlat f aa.ir 1 6,567 17,095 9.41113 OC K Oqt 9Rn. Jl�ucr 116 tU4 �t6:� � i 22.M.6 Ir wl OHE 011E-.-'OF:L-.-F-• __� -I nr"",ez LOA hu. usp tt+r x I TOTAL PAYING (PARKING AL UK AIWA 143152 SS. 31. FLOOR AREA RAID BULOERS 3 AND 7. 22M.5 DUN REQUIREMENTS RELATIVE THE ORDINANCE RMUIRE.S A MINIMUM 15 F00T SEPARATION KTWE>:R THE A'PlJW 6 PROPOSING AN ELIMINATION OF THIS REOURDRNT R]ATNE TO THE TANDEM TOTAL FLATWORK POOL 6 FUSE AD BK 30.152 S.F. 6. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AEA 6557 17095 PPRozrlATur 13,871 1 Ot6 15,648 ALAI'S FROM 'R -MF -2' MI.TIFA P Y DBTRICT TO 'R -W' MULTEAYLY IST FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FOUR STORE, 278 UNIT MULTffAMLY .MW. CONOMONdL USE REQUEST CUII-26 IS A REDtEST TO VARY THE ESTAWSED STANDARDS RELATIVE TO DENSITY, FEDHT, PARIOND FRONT YARD SETBACK. PLANNED OEYEWPMENT MULAY PDII-06 6 A EST TO INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO DEVIATION FROM BUILDING TH. BUILDING SEPARATOR AND LOCATION, LOCATION OF OFF -SODEN N69'3t3'37*W CLD6HDUSE BUILDING TIDE I VUEUTRG TYPE 2 ENDING TYPE U BUILDING TYPE M BtBLDIG T'IFE TV PROVIDED PROVIDED PRDYIOFD PROVIDED PROVM PROVIDED TOTAL PROPOSED DENTITION J LOCATION OF OFF-STREET PAIONG RRDING ImGM 49'-1' 40'-6' 49'-2' 49'-2' 49'-2' TOTAL DESIGN fEMIEMEI RFIATN'E �11 �Nlilrlat f aa.ir 1 6,567 17,095 9.41113 OC \� Y- - •�- M36 .a ©. !� . p L!e c 1 UK (N wa"a t f >s ?M1JW. ,.......16rT ,♦ P rP�'\ NnWC91t 9/WASH .._._.4k999169VLV tw1N �_ OWN 46 LAIR /�.Oi ,IAv I►q �O. 'O x # #;# 1 # '# # 1.9 IT#: t# # VAW, Cwt 42 U10 r� w 40.76' 6 w 30.46' �r E 31OW s N E 3296' w 23AT I 23.67 ' w 67n6' I, WAR' E w 17.52' ' w 17.52' 0 30 6D 120 160 E 26.16' w 4&34' w 2439' SCALE N FEET ' E 31A2' E 29,w waN ' E 2058' • w 2295• dP� 4 a¢l� p�lt� ' w 22�• VICINITY MAP - SUAE = N.`S. Ma 9f N' f3616i UR R N' m. IaIOG{1[ Aa10 9P1wN 1M1wo s Ir I2fI9 ewrrs rro6lo�dy;d ew ea9l 6,1C raw LIVID tl N' RE1NE n1rA1 IWDrAP _�L= rt �4R `m"g BARKING SPACE DETAILS rrts I � •, 1 _ e CIS©,RAPE1/{NE r_ir} \N1.LJ '"^"..% 14 ®{2pINANQ� # _ _- � N9V5 '.T. �6r63TII�E Ip.ID 4316.O61ow6 '.. . OF 01110041E, 11M 6i amm RW6DD SORT RIOIR DRILY 0® IM IT74� 06111Nt9A 1111L mAL C so" a+v r 4xi omm po16D6j �`!^�'� �'� -i (rF+J C{ :✓ ✓-.J -J P 1< ANAL SWVF FOOU! \, \ 1 { / ,.- K' Kik �+� • At t 750 t C SETS AREA CALCULATIONS -'7 RAIN 1 46 76. LOT ATEA jO,4 1 7H 1160 7 & LOT AREA 45 945 S.F. - eVW1 2 i II�UERVIOJS COVERAGE 250,904 S.f. 55.41 946ITTED 6 1 ox 383 65 roTx euIDRG 77.61110 SF. n.t _As4OtN_. i9 -l896 W.8'...... 'ANDITRONAL USE YAR C REOUEST SECTION REGULATION REQUIREMENT PROPOSED MWWN 2.F.1A DOM 20 tNHS ACRE UK" ALLOWED. THE APPLICANT 6 PROPOSING 26,8 U IM ACRE 21.1 HEIGHT TWO SI MMES. 35 FEET MA>DINIM ALLOWED. THE AILiJCANT IS PROPOSING FOUR NOT TO EXCEED 50 FEET, S.C.1 PAWNG 2,5 SPACES REOumn PER UNIT. INE APPLICANT 6 PROPOSING 11.2 SPADES PER 1*11. TANDEM SPACES (9.41T) LOCATED R0EDIATELY 8E}UD C,ARACES SFULL EE WlR1IED AS ACCEPTABLE PAW SPACM 2AI FRONT YARD SETBACK MINRRNN 40 FEET REDUM. INE 1V+FS1C1Nf 6 PROPOSING A FRONT YARD AT IT'S NWWNIST PONT OF APPROWIELY 24 FEET SECTION CLD6HDUSE BUILDING TIDE I VUEUTRG TYPE 2 ENDING TYPE U BUILDING TYPE M BtBLDIG T'IFE TV PROVIDED PROVIDED PRDYIOFD PROVIDED PROVM PROVIDED TOTAL PROPOSED DENTITION TOTAL LOCATION OF OFF-STREET PAIONG RRDING ImGM 49'-1' 40'-6' 49'-2' 49'-2' 49'-2' TOTAL DESIGN fEMIEMEI RFIATN'E TOTAL BURdNO AREA 6,567 17,095 9.41113 13,071 15,016 is 648 22.M.6 O M REQUIREMENTS RELATIVE TOTAL LOT AREA ACRES 10.4 10.4 10.4 LOA 10.4 10.4 TOTAL PAYING (PARKING AL UK AIWA 143152 SS. 31. FLOOR AREA RAID BULOERS 3 AND 7. 22M.5 DUN REQUIREMENTS RELATIVE THE ORDINANCE RMUIRE.S A MINIMUM 15 F00T SEPARATION KTWE>:R THE A'PlJW 6 PROPOSING AN ELIMINATION OF THIS REOURDRNT R]ATNE TO THE TANDEM TOTAL FLATWORK POOL 6 FUSE AD BK 30.152 S.F. 6. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AEA 6557 17095 9,493 13,871 1 Ot6 15,648 TOTAL OPEN SPACE 201,961 Si. 44 'ANDITRONAL USE YAR C REOUEST SECTION REGULATION REQUIREMENT PROPOSED MWWN 2.F.1A DOM 20 tNHS ACRE UK" ALLOWED. THE APPLICANT 6 PROPOSING 26,8 U IM ACRE 21.1 HEIGHT TWO SI MMES. 35 FEET MA>DINIM ALLOWED. THE AILiJCANT IS PROPOSING FOUR NOT TO EXCEED 50 FEET, S.C.1 PAWNG 2,5 SPACES REOumn PER UNIT. INE APPLICANT 6 PROPOSING 11.2 SPADES PER 1*11. TANDEM SPACES (9.41T) LOCATED R0EDIATELY 8E}UD C,ARACES SFULL EE WlR1IED AS ACCEPTABLE PAW SPACM 2AI FRONT YARD SETBACK MINRRNN 40 FEET REDUM. INE 1V+FS1C1Nf 6 PROPOSING A FRONT YARD AT IT'S NWWNIST PONT OF APPROWIELY 24 FEET SECTION V REGULATION .,.v1...,, ••,••P•,'•••� ,•� ••,••••REQUIREMENT PROPOSED DENTITION 22.4 LOCATION OF OFF-STREET PAIONG THE ORDNANCE: ESFAEISES THE FRONT YARD AS BOTH A OULDW THE APPLICANT 6 PROPOSING TO PROVIDE PARIGNO AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS N THIS SETBACK AREL FOR; SETBICN AND LARDSCAPQI SETBACK AREAL Z7A 3 DESIGN fEMIEMEI RFIATN'E THE ORDINANCE ESTA&ISES THAT THE LENGTH OF ANY SIADNG THE APPLICANT 6 PROPOSING THAT NO BUILDING WILL EXCEED 230 LINEAR FEET. LOCATED IN THE TO WILDING LENGTH NGTHH S OLI NOT EXCEED 200 UNEAR FEET. 22.M.6 O M REQUIREMENTS RELATIVE THE ORIANAHCE E5DAIStES THAT THE MINORUM SEPARATION BETWEEN THE APPUCAVI IS PROPOSING A SEPARATION OF APPROD A4TOY 20 FEET BETWEN TO WILDING SEPAPATiON MY TWO UNATTACHED WRIUDS SHALL BE 20 nxr OR TE BUA.UNDS i AND 2, BULORG3 2ND THE CLUBHW�, SIFLONOS 4, 5, AND 5 AND BETWEEN HEIGHT CA THE *WfEVEA 6 GREATER, BULOERS 3 AND 7. 22M.5 DUN REQUIREMENTS RELATIVE THE ORDINANCE RMUIRE.S A MINIMUM 15 F00T SEPARATION KTWE>:R THE A'PlJW 6 PROPOSING AN ELIMINATION OF THIS REOURDRNT R]ATNE TO THE TANDEM ro BUILDING LOCATION NO BUILDINGS; AND VOvc E I� AREAS SPACES LOCATED IMMEDIATELY BEHIND GAUGES. VEHN:UE IRKING AREAS S3Dl2 LANDSCAPING THE ORDNANCE REMO A MWMJM OF 10 FEET OF LANDSCAPED TIE APPLICANT 6 PRoposm BETWEEN RMO AND SC FEET OF IAADSCA ENC N SEVERAL SMALL AREA BETWEEN PARIWD/VEHRXE USE AREAS AND ADJACENT AREAS RELATIVE TO LUN -AROUND AREAS NEAR TE NORTH AND SNH ENTRIES AND HEAR THE �. I��D i PROPERiI' LABS, DRIVE ACCESSING; THE PODIUM SPACES NEAR BUILDING I. �-11fay]OZ `'~1"w ` crawl ar. w DVI$ PUNNING AMP ZONING COMMRSION a - DATE: am 1 w 1_ APPROM ODES NUT AUOIOOREM ANY WORK N CONFLICT WON ANY cam OR ORDMV M OEPARHMENF OF CEVFI POTENT SERVICES IT - JOSEPH T. Rm 66356 L 12/09/2011 �m SUBMITTAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2011 REVISED. OCTOBER 7, 2011 REUSED: NOVEMBER 10, 2011 REVISED: DECElfWR 09, 2011 �mm©mmmman mom© ©mmmoon ©EER FOR; GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS`"'' A f �I31®mmmmmm®©OUR LOCATED IN THE ©mc�mmmmmcm©MEW AND THE momommm ©omm©mmmmmmmm■n m©m©mmmmmmmo� ©om©©©mmmmmmmm ©moomm©ommmmmmm mom©©m©m©©®mm® momm©mmm©msmm® �. I��D i mmomm©ommm mmn , , • �momomm©mm©moon momm©mmmmm©omm ®mm©mm©mmmoomm mmommmmmmmmoma moommornommmmma o®mommmmmmmmomr �-11fay]OZ `'~1"w ` crawl ar. w DVI$ PUNNING AMP ZONING COMMRSION a - DATE: am 1 w 1_ APPROM ODES NUT AUOIOOREM ANY WORK N CONFLICT WON ANY cam OR ORDMV M OEPARHMENF OF CEVFI POTENT SERVICES IT - JOSEPH T. Rm 66356 L 12/09/2011 �m SUBMITTAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2011 REVISED. OCTOBER 7, 2011 REUSED: NOVEMBER 10, 2011 REVISED: DECElfWR 09, 2011 CITY OF GRAPEVINE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS M2tr,w. owhm ASI oEkIDFMN7 pmws Y% IMS AINWIS . TIC 3710 W 90UI11/IT6UA. /ib 306 W. l7WIkC 114 }1n 80UIMME Tea 71AG AOOI19Nff. IFA1K 7'/OG T MM F.* MAN". (A!lDA: 1/OYAI E 6APAIp6' 00ffAtT• .WAND C 1dOIR k $W W0.EDPAFE W WREW,11TATOROJIT77477 RDNI; (a95 9A07m TEE Awe fmo15m"mN1a mu cww. IO9BN t RDE SITE PLAN . FOR; GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS`"'' A f 10.3982 ACRE TRACT LOCATED IN THE H. SUGGS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1415 AND THE A.W. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 26` CITY OF GRAPEVINE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS M2tr,w. owhm ASI oEkIDFMN7 pmws Y% IMS AINWIS . TIC 3710 W 90UI11/IT6UA. /ib 306 W. l7WIkC 114 }1n 80UIMME Tea 71AG AOOI19Nff. IFA1K 7'/OG T MM F.* MAN". (A!lDA: 1/OYAI E 6APAIp6' 00ffAtT• .WAND C 1dOIR k $W W0.EDPAFE W WREW,11TATOROJIT77477 RDNI; (a95 9A07m TEE Awe fmo15m"mN1a mu cww. IO9BN t RDE PRELIMINARY PLANT LIST Shade Trees Common Name m Bald Cypress (� Burr Oak Cedar Elm Live Oak Q Shumard Red Oak ® Ornamental Trees Common Name Yaupon Holly Large Shrubs Common Name Dwf. Burford Holly e Nellie R. Stevens Holly Botanical Name Size Qty. Taxodium distichum 3" Cal. 3 Quercus macrocarpa 3" Cal. 8 Ulmus crassifolia 3" Cal. 14 Quercus virginiana 3" Cal. 24 Quercus shumardii 3" CaL 27 Botanical Name Size Qty. Ilex vomitoria 8'-10' Ht. B Botanical Name size Qty. Ilex cornuta burlordi nana 5 GaU30" Ht. Min 60 Ilex x Weilie R. Stevens' 5 Gal/30" Ht. Min 38 MAIWENANCEr REQUI EO PLANTS MUST BE MAMTANEO M A IWALTHY CONDITION AT ALL TI B. TIS PROPERTY OUMR 16 RESPONSIBLE FOR REGULAR UE:EDMG, Ma" OF GRA88, IRRIGATMG. FERTILIZING, PRUNING, AND OTHER MAINTENANCE OF ALL PLANTNJGS AS NEEDED. ANY PLANT THAT DIE$ MIST BE REPLACED UITN ANOTHER LIVING PLANT THAT 18 OOh$ Afl6LE UM4 TW APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN UOTHIN (90) NMETY DAY$ AFTER NOTIFICATION FROM THE CITY. THE BWLOMG OFFICIAL MAY EXTEND TFE TM PERIOD UP TO AN ADDITIONAL (So) DAYS DUE TO UEATHER CONSIDERATIONS. IF TLE PLANTS HAVE NOT BEEN REPLACED AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTP1C.4VON AND/OR EXTENSION, THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL BE M VIOLATION OF TNIS ORDNANCE: ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITY LINES RESULTING FROM TAE NEGLIGENr:E OF THE PROPERTY OUNER OR NIS AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES N THE 90TALLATION AND MANTE7NANCE OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPMG IN A UTILITY EASOPENT l8 THE RESPONSIBILITY OF T1 -E PROPERTY OUI.r1ER IF A PUBLIC UTILITY DISTURBS PLANTS UNTHM AN EASEPIENT, 17 SMALL MAKE EVERY REASONABLE EFFORT TO PRESERVE THE PLANTS ANA RENRN THEM TO THEIR PRIOR LOCATIONS AFTER THE UTILITY WOW IF NON erwLESB, SOME PLANTS DIE, IT is THE OBLIGATION OF THE PROPERTY OWNER TO REPLACE THEM. slre IRRICsATICN IRRIGATION SYSTEM UILL BE DESICdWD AND INSTALLED BY A LICENSED IRRIGATOR PER 1009 TCE92 REQUIREMENTS WE QWPLIANCE AREA sF, AVER REA f49 Y3Y SR PARKHM SPA OSS PAIM. AREA 19%DFUNUMPARFMAHEA 397 660 S.F. REWMW TREES ff PEIT400SQ FT YY PROVIDED IRMtf PFA 4W 80. FT 11 ARFAOWAVED 664 S.F. SPACE II o QISREDOPENAREATR8 3 PER4a00S.F. 53 OP89NAREA TREES 53 R Y 1SLF. REGMED TREES /60 LF FRONDED UliO F 90EXYSTINO REGUNEV 22MEME 8N 6a PRONDEO SCREENING SNRUOS AN PLAWWATIOMU OPEN SPACE REWS REOLNtEO• S. F. I WA LNn' 376LWfiSX3309.b 5005.. 670 S.F. E U I T V r tamr r v 110 APPV'D DENIED 4-3 __. CASE # LC $ $ ORDINANCE # DATE c I AP�>OM > ., � ADB1101i DATE PLAMIR9r AN® ZONING CO W =M OA1G eUWW _2 O IS AM'RW0. DOES NOT ADR1067Z NIT VM W1 CM#T= WN NiY tnDEs OR OfMANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEbQOPNENT SQtMCE; IOL�;u;i'isH:u.: CLIENT: 9 Mgmrod nem Emme Cr 3110 w. sous, maw. BUR. 120 SDRMLkW, T—, 79082 (817) 7424851 cuoeWd: R OWd. E S1mmmW landscape architects Xg „��nNNM� W27D fW 972)SWa7 h 72) 50O.7MHrU fr f *� ,]0911 )WR PfiRN1rMG PURPOSES On GROPEVINE TERRACE APTS ,N; PMRB.T "NUMBER, err -1162 CITYS4VOAWTAL- LANAM4PEPLAN PL 1.®T PRELIMINARY PLANT UST Shade Trete Cormnon Name Bald Cypress Burr Oak OCedar Elm n Live Oak Shumard Red Oak Ornamental Trees Common Name 01 Yaupon Holy Large Shrubs Common Name o Dwf. Burford Holly a Nellie R. Stevens Holly Botanical Name Size Qty. Taxodium distichum 3" Cal. 3 Quarcus macrocarpa 3" Cal. 8 Ulmus cra3sitalia 3" Cai. 14 Quercus virginiana 3" Cal. 24 Quercus shumardil 3" Cai. 27 Botanical Name Size Qty. OP—NERAL MAINTENANCE; pEwmED PLANTS MUST LSE MAWTAMD M A WALTMY WAVITION AT ALL TIf E8. ME PROPERTY OU ER 10 WSPON8119LE FOR REGW.AR UESDWA Ha" OF GRAMS, DORM47044 FLae ALU N3 MP MW0*k AND OTHER MAMTENAMM CP ALL PLANTUM AS NMDED. ANY PLANT THAT DIES MUST ME 110PL.ACM W1714 ANOTHER UVR42 PLANT n"T 18 COPPAT19" YMTM TME APPIWVW LANC*CAPE PLAN ANNIN PW NM7 Y DAYS AFTER NoMr.4004 MOM THE CITY. rx& MILOM OMC1AL 11%4r El(TETdti TME TIME PERIOD UP TO AN ADDrTf WAL (901 DAYS WE TO U AnER CCNSIDERATIONS. P TWE PLANTS :14W NOT DEW RFPLaCE'D AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTIFICATTGN AN2/09 EXTENSION, TME PROPERTY CU EiR SMALL BE M WCLA170M CF TM8 OIWRNANM ilex vomitoria 8'-70' Ht. 8 ANY DAMAGE To UM17Y Lms RM LTM FROM THE NEGLL.IGSNCE WZ y CF 7FE PROPERTY GUNER OR 1418 AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES IN Til Q W Ct 4, q Q mrALLAwN ANP PlANTENAN= OF REG7<IiRIM LAN DOCAPINGi IN A UrI1 r EA86MEJT I8 TSE IR'8PVN8t61Ltrr OF TME PROPERTY OIUJER P A Ptat.IC UTILITY DIOTLOWS PLANTS UXTMN AN EASENEM it &44LL Botanical Name Size Qty mA KE EVERY 1EA8oN4®LE Ef -Gw, To PRLSORyE THE PLANTS AND ARM TW UMr wow F Ilex comuts burfordi nerm 5 Gal/W' Ht Min 60 Naa716ME88, 8a'1E PLANTS VW- r6-6 1COLOATTON OFT$00 PROPERTY ilex x'Nellie R. Stevens' 5 Gal/30" Ht Min 38 00OR to REPLACE TFEK s» AR16 ATION firm"Tirw SYSTEM 9NLL W DESION150 ANP NSTALUP BY A UMNO D IR OGATOR PER awe TY.w R willes'ENM CITY OF GRAPEVINE t . tl E .._._. ORDI7��' � .�-.- -- DATE ,urumaxis AU — — elo rte 4w Ma Z"4 covomw cdttadM+ JM - ..A.. a - WW^ lots *W M DMZC MY WOW N 03OW��al WPAMM t1T or 09va"kwa CLffxr.• ,MN12W fed Haat &" 3IIlw. 8.th dx en'd. soii®12/ sw*hke. Tarot n m (817)'142 -Ilii come* RidmM E s6n� W �yQ WZ y Q W Ct 4, q Q CITY OF GRAPEVINE PPV'D DENIED ASE # i RDINANCE # �„ �- UE----- ! CUEW. JMn.tae Real Elate Gmup 3r08w. SWthW a ewe. suite 128 SONId*e, Toru 7SW (av) 741-+esT FAX;(M7)T41-1851 Cantor: XanneM,F-t,o OAR t/ J bpe 4 B �e - Q ApWIWAI 006 1107 KIRiDRK AMT ilQat 18i N aYbtCf THAI NII' CODES � d W� O0ART104T or DE•/F1.Opmmy .Soto= CUEW. JMn.tae Real Elate Gmup 3r08w. SWthW a ewe. suite 128 SONId*e, Toru 7SW (av) 741-+esT FAX;(M7)T41-1851 Cantor: XanneM,F-t,o landscape architects �0".ow ,IpaoNnYY Owe.rro n.tx7§ob, pe pTliea0.T47t w arnalo»re tr F to nml, RW PEAM077NO PURPOSES ONLY GRAPEVINE TERRACE APTS. GRAPEMW,TEMAM pom SWAfirMLlW Pj ' 03 is t/ J Q 18i W� x Z •\\r„ Vii► 1A� Q L n• WCL �s Q landscape architects �0".ow ,IpaoNnYY Owe.rro n.tx7§ob, pe pTliea0.T47t w arnalo»re tr F to nml, RW PEAM077NO PURPOSES ONLY GRAPEVINE TERRACE APTS. GRAPEMW,TEMAM pom SWAfirMLlW Pj ' 03 is 006 ENLARGEMENT SCAM tW-r CITY OF GRAPEVINE APPV'Q DENIED CASE # -�C I t AFPRDM OAFS NDT AUU*W= I WDW N omnw IMOFDe1MIR cow DEPARTMENT H' OFVEIAPYEMT sotvi Es v,��, cmweMmm CUE: W"W.d Rest E.196 G" 9100 W BtuXY4e BM Suet 120 S.Olk e. Tams 76M 1817) 142.1881 FAX: (017) 742-1852 Cwdtel Kue,dh Fwnbm W U .8 Q I- ttt, a w c WCL Q C� C� Mnu 0et;n meP „OO aMMOW MA.I]7t rcNNW�d7tte, M,oxao-r,n n ernteo-7ete A � R uas„ FM Mquarme PURPOSES Oft Y GRMEVINE TERRACE MTS. 0PAOE M TEXAS "MIAd w"IW RMAAAEIV/tW FL /.Wf mr.wxrou�s lEtKOWtAR sxm Mr 4!!!!!!C !?.t�Iil4llll 11181111 d!!iiJl(IIIIII E! NJ s■0�■ 1 BUILDING TYPE I - RIGHT ELEVATION 4 STORY BLDG. CASE NUMBER: 211 X06, CU11-26, PD71-O6,� LOCATION: 2311 WEST GRAPEVINE MILLS CIRCLE; LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE., sir. 6 a 15 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING STONE PERCENTAGE = 12% EXTERIOR WALLS ARE 10OX MASONRY PER CITY ----- CITY OF GRAPEVINE DEFINITION. APPV'D DENIED CASE # ORDINANCE DATE BUILDING TYPE I - PROM ELEVATION Ia4 STORY BLDG. °" W -w SPK DevelopmentPartners s BUILDING TYPE I • LEFT eLEVATION STORY $LDCs_ «Kn. w . rr ,m-..m CITY OF GRAPEVINE AP -MM DENIED -4-3 . CASE # ORDINANCE# DATE LOCATION: 2311 WEST GRAPEVINE MILLS CIRCLE; LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: wvT 7 or 15 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I BUILDINCs TYPE I - REAR ELEVATION A BtORY BLDG. •`� ". `-0 SPK Development Partners Grapevine Terracue Apt. NTS Architects & Planners CASE NUMBER: Z11-06, CU11-26, PD11-06 LOCATION: 2311 WEST GRAPEVINE MILLS CIRCLE; LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHIM7• 8 - 15 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING STONE PERCENTAGE = 3% EXTERIOR WALLS ARE 100% MASONRY PER CITY DEFINITION, rw CITY OF GRAPEVINE APPV'D---___ -- DENIED CASE # -UuCUi ORDINANCE AE DATE SPK Development Grapeviinle Terrace Apt. NTS Architects & Planne Partnersrs ME ❑ a �_..� cn.=\ m ign uueem �frc�s car.ro�.+suw IETKP�E aswzoswo 4ixh�+LR€—_ mco�a xx wac w arc M. KTK RMM 1lTTAO CASE NAME., GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS CASE NUMBER: Z11-06, CU11-26, PD11-06 LOCATION: 2311 WEST GRAPEVINE MILLS CIRCLE; LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: &WEP. 9 or 15 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFUCT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WEVINE DENIED -----"-/-3. ORQINANCE # DAA' (. SPK Development Partners Gl*-apevine Terrace Apt. NTS Architects .. Lwow A � rar., Asrsc. �w�Yc r : -a was— r "®■ ro i:ra— m_rr,_a CASE NAME: GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS CASE NUMBER: 711-06, CU11-26, PDII-06 LOCATION: 2311 WEST GRAPEVINE MILLS CIRCLE; LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SNEEr 10 OF 15 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WTH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING STONE PERCENTAGE - 3% EXTERIOR WALLS ARE 10OX MASONRY PER CITY DEFINITION. P• e: ' pi.t e Terrace APPV'D DENIED CASE# �-b - ORDINAN,QE DATE . INITS Architects t ers El no -- - ---------- ----------- . ---- --------- - - - ------ - ------------ - ----------- n El El 13 ---- --------------- --- - - - ----------------- - -- ---------------- - -- --- n WAIWAM160 wpro mm mKoW." m.eaou* ---- CITY OF GRAPEVINE APPWD DENIED CASE #L-ob ORDINANCE ;fes DATE CASE NAME: GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS CASE NUMBER: Z11-06, CU11-25, PDII-06 LOCATION: 2311 WEST GRAPEVINE MILLS CIRCLE; LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS ADDITION OR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN . DATE: piaT 11 - 15 APPROVAL DOES N07 AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES maMfllwlpljj�lllq 111111 q I' gli�,iiiiii, jlll �ill I W-10irtlim • lill ll�♦I! I GASE NAML: UKAYtVINt ICKKAUt AVAKIMCNIJ CASE NUMBER: Z11-06, CU11-26. PD11-06 LOCATION: 2311 WEST GRAPEVINE MILLS CIRCLE; LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: ya7 12 - 15 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING STONE PERCENTAGE - 3% EXTERIOR WALLS ARE 100% MASONRY PER CITY DEFINITION. GRAPEVINECITY OF APPV`D MENIED CASE , ORDINANCE �j DATE I =-aDo 5ULDINIG TYPIa - FRONIT ELVATION ias�+ax.eta CRW! MOiONMC CITY OF GRAPEVINE 144-3 DENIED u I I T",t a- LEFT ELEVATION ORDINANCE # 6CALE: I0- I'-®' DATE CASE NAME: GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS CASE NUMBER: Z11-06, CU11-26, PD11-06 LOCATION: 2311 WEST GRAPEVINE MILLS CIRCLE; LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: srUr 13 OF 15 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I� IN mavATION 5CALE= 0' - IT ROM loatm new m woms,mergr. rexmaw 14TA vN� Hm�Qogw s-rsur. mr�.a eu. IE i0 CASE NAME: GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS CASE NUMBER: Z11-06, CU11-26, PD11-06 LOCATION: 2311 WEST GRAPEVINE MILLS CIRCLE; LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS ADDITION SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: &4aT: 14 OF 15 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING STONE PERCENTAGE = 3% EXTERIOR WALLS ARE 100% MASONRY PER CITY DEFINITION. 6!±9I_ CITY OF GRAPEVINE DENIED V tl I� �� Y BUILDING tY cASE# ORDINANCE # DATE k 11111111pliq 111111111111111111,111 11111'' urapevinte Terracte Apt. mem ma" traman C faCYOIWC enk ewcs� wm ag4S t# -- au000murw suxo.urx .�¢tameimc._- em�oa+ s= r epc__--- ami[uarec m. CITY OF GRAPEVINE APPYD DENIED CASE # ORDINANCE # } DATE �1 CASE NAME: GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS CASE NUMBER: Z11-06, CU11-26, PD11-06 LOCATION: 2311 WEST GRAPEVINE MILLS CIRCLE: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GRAPEVINE TERRACE APARTMENTS ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: 15 or 15 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES �. i.11111pil q 01 11111 M= ULDING Y 4 o REAR ILEVATION Grapuevinu--% Terrace Apt. NTS Architects & Planners