Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
HL2010-02
H L I C, -- 021 CITY OF GRAPEVINE HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT APPLICATION IN, APPLICANT/AGENT NAME �- k bol COMPANY NAME MWAR ol V CITY/STATE/ZIP WORK PHONE FAX NUMBER 2. APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN SUBJECT PROPERTY (-)G"il e r - f - 3. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME if Oat- Uo f ADDRESS '3 6 1 (- CITY/STATE/ZIP TK 7 WORK PHONE Sil 7 2 9'-3(o FAX NUMBER 4. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY FOR HISTORIC LANDMDESIGNATION & /,3 E -i e- K o, s n LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT '-/ BLOCK 106- , ADDITION SIZE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY ACRES 70 c 01 SQUARE FEET METES & BOUNDS MUST BE DESCRIBED ON 8 1/2" X 11" SHEET 5. PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION R -7, 5- 6. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY N�,C-("^ � /-o -� OAZCUTORMS�APPHIST 1/08 www.ci.grapevine.tx.us 7. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACING A HISTORICAL LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF WILL DETERMINE THE AGENDA FOR EACH OF THE PUBLIC HEARING DATES. BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE AGENDA, YOUR APPLICATION MAY BE RESCHEDULED TO A LATER DATE. APPLICANT (PRINT) APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER (PRINT) 144 ® t ic i_' OWNER SIGNATURE ---7� The State of Z&2s 0:\ZCU\F0RMS\APPHIST www.ci.grapevineAx.us 1/08 County of rpt.oj - Before me fry c on this day personally appeared known to me (or proved to me on the oath of or through (description of identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this 4 day of _ A.D. 26L) SEAL ` Nota nature a"'vOl•r"6e ., SARA LORUSSO g Not Public, State of Texas My Commission Expires December 21, 2011 The State of County of Before me on this day personally appeared known to me (or proved to me on the oath of or through (description of identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this SEAL O:\ZCU\FORMSWPPHIST www.ci.grapevineAx.us day of , A.D. Notary Signature 1/08 6R 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 N P 3 4 6 7 9 1 `� N�o, 1 2 a oaa 100 S PT 1 1 / ESTILL 4 110 ST 6 7 8 1 2 4115 6 7 8 1R 3 4 5 1 I I �, I- 6 NPT 7&8 1R 4 5 NPT 6&7 9 10 11 1212 3 1®3 13 4 16 TR 58 7&8 2R t tent, 5 6 7&8- 1 2 3: 6 7 S 1 w 9 10 11 12R 5 R -MF -2 6 C R-12:5 E TEXAS ST 3 -10fo -S ��J3 3 5 6 1R 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 -13R 1 AB 1 fi 1 7 1 7 z 1A W J 2R © 3 4 6 171 1 {}9 3 X37" - F/,40 1 1 3 4 110 6 7 8 1 2 4115 6 7 8 wmmM 0 1 inch = 200 feet A 2 13 ■ 609 & 613 East Texas -N 40 1 inch = 100 feet April 2, 2010 Ms. Christine Lopez Fort Worth Star Telegram P.O. Box 1870 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 RE: Grapevine Account # CIT 25 Dear Ms. Lopez, VIAFACSIMILE 817-390-7520 Please find enclosed the following for publication on Sunday, April 4, in the Northeast Edition of the Neighborhood Extra Section of the Fort Worth Star Telegram. (One time only) Item Notice of Public Hearing CU10-04 - Blooming Colors Notice of Public Hearing CU10-05 - Grapevine Lawn Equipment Center Notice of Public Hearing PD10-02 - Stone Bridge Oaks Notice of Public Hearing HL10-01 & HL10-02 - 605 & 613 E Texas Street Meeting Date April 20, 2010 April 20, 2010 April 20, 2010 April 20, 2010 As always, your assistance is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions please contact me at (817) 410-3155. Albert L. Triplett, Jr. Planner II DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT The City of Grapevine - P.O. Box 95104 •'Grapevine, Texas 76099 - (817) 410-3154 Fax (817) 410-3018 - www.grapevinetexas.gov CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS On Tuesday evening, April 20, 2010 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine will hold a public hearing to consider the following items: CU10-04 - Blooming Colors Nursery - submitted by Vilbig and Associates for property located at 2221 Ira E Woods Avenue and platted as Lot 7, Block 1, DFW Business Park. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to amend the previously approved site plan to allow a 20 -foot pole sign. The property is currently zoned "CC" Community Commercial and is owned by Blooming Colors Nursery and Landscaping. CU10-05 - Grapevine Lawn Equipment Center - submitted by Michael Cantrell for property located at 204 West Dallas Road and platted as Lot 413, Lipscomb & Daniel Addition. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow the sales, service and outside storage of lawn equipment. The property is currently zoned "LI" Light Industrial and is owned by John Horobec. PD10-02 - Stone Bridge Oaks - submitted by Grenadier Homes for property located at 4632 Trevor Trail and platted as Stone Bridge Oaks Addition. The applicant is requesting a planned development overlay to amend the previously approved site plan to allow the development of 66 single family lots. The property is currently zoned "R-TH" Townhouse District and is owned by Lifestyle Grapevine 360, LP. HL10-01 & HL10-02 - 609 & 613 East Texas Street - submitted by Mark Born for property located at 609 & 613 East Texas Street and platted as Lots 3 & 4, Block 105, College Heights Addition. The applicant is requesting designation as a historical landmark sub- district. Such sub -district may include buildings, land, areas, or districts or historical, architectural, archaeological or cultural importance or value that merit protection, enhancement, and preservation in the interest of the culture, prosperity, education, and welfare of the people. The property is owned by Mark Born. After all parties have been given an opportunity to speak, the public hearing will be closed and the Commission and the City Council will deliberate the pending matters. Please contact Development Services Department concerning any questions, 200 S Main Street, Grapevine, Texas 76051 or PO Box 95104, Grapevine, Texas 76099, 817-410-3155. A copy of the site plan for all the above referenced requests is on file with the Development Services Department. 2 HP OfficeJet K Series K80 Log for Personal Printer/Fax/Copier/Scanner DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 8174103018 Apr 02 2010 11:24am Last Transaction Date Time Twp Identification Duration Page� Result Apr 2 11:24am Fax Sent 98173907520 0:36 2 OK Star -Telegram 400 W. 7TH STREET FORT WORTH, TX 76102 (817) 390-7761 Federal Tax ID 26-2674582 Bill To: CITY OF GRAPEVINE SECRETARY PO BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099-9704 FEW me F.�I INVOICE D Q - 0 Customer ID: CIT25 Invoice Number: 309576781 Invoice Date: 4/4/2010 Terms: Net due in 21 days Due Date: 4/30/2010 PO Number: Order Number: 30957678 Sales Rep: 073 Description: CITY OF GRAPEVI Publication Date: 4/4/2010 CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS On I3580 1 136 136 LINE $1.72 $233.24 Sales Discount ($150.76) Misc Fee $10.00 Net Amount: $92.48 a©p �� 3 CHPJSTYL-HOUAND Y Commission Expire Jul 31, 2012 THE STATE OF TEXAS County of Tarrant Before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, this day personally appeared Deborah Baylor Norwood, Bid and Legal Coordinator for the Star -Telegram, published by the Star -Telegram, Inc. at Fort Worth, in Tarrant County, Texas; and who, after being duly swom, did depose and say that the attached clipping of an advertisement was published in the above named paper on the listed dates: BIDS & LEGAL DEPT. STAR TELEGRAM (817) 390-7501 e—\ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME, TF ' �d Thank You For Your Payment --------------------------------------------- Remit To: Star -Telegram P.O. BOX 901051 FORT WORTH, TX 76101-2051 Customer ID: Customer Name: Invoice Number: Invoice Amount: PO Number: Amount Enclosed: CIT25 CITY OF GRAPEVINE SECR 309576781 $92.48 Legal Notices amend ously, a plan to foot PC - Blooming Nurspry - Colors and Land - ono piaicea as B, Lipscomb & I Addition. The ant is re- ing a condi- use permit to the sales, e and outside le of lawn nent. The rty is currently "LI" Light In - al and is owned hn Horobec. 2 Stone a Oaks - sub- iby Grenadier s for property A at 4632 r Trail and d as Stone a Oaks Addi- he applicant is sting a planned )pment overlay lend the previ- approved site to allow the >pment of 66 family lots. roperty is cur - zoned "R-TH" louse District is owned by Vie Grapevine .P. 1 & HL10-02 - 613 East Texas - submitted ark Born for tv located at may include sings, land, ar- or districts or xical, architec- t, archaeological cultural impor- e or value that rvation in the st of the cul' - prosperity, ed - in, and welfare epeople. The rty is owned by Born. III parties have given an on- site con - Development Service Department Public Hearing Property Owner Research Applicant: Dubay, Edward Case No.: HL10-01 & HL10-02 Address/Legal Description: 609 & 613 E Texas St 0AZCU\Forms\ZCU.31.doc 1 I✓ f V/ I t/ College Heights Addition- 218 Austin St Chestnut, John M Grpvn 757 Trails End Cir Blk 102 N 1/2 Lot 7 & 8 Hurst Tx 76054 College Heights Addition- 224 Austin St Chestnut, John M Grpvn 757 Trails End Cir Blk 102 S 1/2 Lots 7 & 8 Hurst Tx 76054 College Heights Addition- 617 E Texas St Doren, Scott Van Grpvn 617 E Texas St Blk 105 Lot 5 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 235 Austin St Dubay, Edward Sr Etux Carol L Grpvn 235 Austin St Blk 105 Lots 1 Thru 4 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 235 Austin St Dubay, Edward Sr Etux Carol L Grpvn 235 Austin St Blk 105 Lots 1 Thru 4 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 235 Austin St Dubay, Edward Sr Etux Carol L Grpvn 235 Austin St Blk 105 Lots 1 Thru 4 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 235 Austin St Dubay, Edward Sr Etux Carol L Grpvn 235 Austin St Blk 105 Lots 1 Thru 4 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 614 E Texas St Emrich, Joshua A Etux Lisa Grpvn 614 E Texas St Blk 107 Lot 4 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 238 Austin St Evbuomwan, Nosayaba Grpvn 925 Minters Chapel Rd Blk 104 S 1/2 Lot 7-8 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 610 E Texas St Fisher, Glenda J Grpvn PO Box 1171 Blk 107 Lot 3 Grapevine Tx 76099 College Heights Addition- 609 E Worth St Fletcher, Jan Grpvn 609 E Worth St Blk 109 Lot 3 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 523 E Texas St Freyre, Arturo Grpvn 523 E Texas St Blk 104 Lot 6 Grapevine Tx 76051 0AZCU\Forms\ZCU.31.doc 1 I✓ f V/ I t/ Development Service Department Public Hearing Property Owner Research Applicant: Dubay, Edward Case No.: HL10-01 & HL10-02 Address/Legal Description: 609 & 613 E Texas St 0:\ZCU\Forms\ZCU.31.doc 2 V/ I/ College Heights Addition- 224 Wood St Hammock, Cody Etux Emily Grpvn 224 Wood St Blk 103 Lot 6R Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 220 Wood St Harrington, Ona M Grpvn 2760 Fuller Wiser Rd Blk 103 N 1/2 Lt 6-7 Euless Tx 76039 College Heights Addition- 232 Austin St Hodges, Thomas E Est Grpvn -502 W Valverde St Blk 104 N 1/2 Lot 7-8 Crystal City Tx 78839 College Heights Addition- 626 E Texas St Hood, Ross Etux Joyce Grpvn 626 E Texas St Blk 107 Lots 6 & 7 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 626 E Texas St Hood, Ross Etux Joyce Grpvn 626 E Texas St Blk 107 Lots 6 & 7 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 614 Estill St Howard, Wanda Faye Grpvn PO Box 504 Blk 103 Lot 3 Grapevine Tx 76099 College Heights Addition- 620 Estill St Jimenez, Flor Grpvn 1342 S Pine St Blk 103 Lot 4 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 618 E Wall St King, Hazel Grpvn 2138 Sierra Dr Blk 101 Lot 4 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 618 E Wall St King, Hazel Grpvn 2138 Sierra Dr Blk 101 Lot 5 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 622 Estill St Litsel Llc Grpvn 820 E Dove Loop Rd Apt 1523 Blk 103 Lot 5 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 625 E Texas St Millican, Peggy & P J Weeks Grpvn 4027 Cr 1037 Blk 105 Lots 6 & 7 Greenville Tx 75401 College Heights Addition- 625 E Texas St Millican, Peggy & P J Weeks Grpvn 4027 Cr 1037 Blk 105 Lots 6 & 7 Greenville Tx 75401 0:\ZCU\Forms\ZCU.31.doc 2 V/ I/ Development Service Department Public Hearing Property Owner Research Applicant: Dubay, Edward Case No.: HL10-01 & HL10-02 Address/Legal Description: 609 & 613 E Texas St 0AZCU\Forrns\ZCU.31.doc 3 Z I/ U LZ V/ College Heights Addition- 518 Estill St Oler, Darrel & Richard Lilly Grpvn 705 Simmons Dr Blk 102 Lot 6 Euless Tx 76040 College Heights Addition- 306 Austin St Pearson, Joann L Grpvn 306 Austin St Blk 106 Lts 7 & 8 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 306 Austin St Pearson, Joann L Grpvn 306 Austin St Blk 106 Lts 7 & 8 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 221 Austin St Porter, Donald Etux Elizabeth Grpvn 225 Austin St Blk 103 Lot 1R Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 225 Austin St Porter, Donald Etux Elizabeth Grpvn 225 Austin St Blk 103 Lot 2R Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 612 E Wall St Richcreek, Kelly A Grpvn PO Box 5899 Blk 101 Lot 3 Marysville Ca 95901 College Heights Addition- 209 Austin St Rios, Asension Reyna Grpvn 209 Austin St Blk 101 S 1/2 Lot 1-2 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 613 E Worth St Stearns, Laura Grpvn 613 E Worth St Blk 109 Lot 4 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 618 E Texas St Tschirhart, Jeffrey Etux Lisa Grpvn 618 E Texas St Blk 107 Lot 5 Grapevine Tx 76051 College Heights Addition- 603 E Worth St Wright, Jason Benjamin Grpvn 603 E Worth St Blk 109 Lot 1 Grapevine Tx 76051 Blk 109 Lts 1 & 2 College Heights Addition- 603 E Worth St Wright, Jason Benjamin Grpvn 603 E Worth St Blk 109 Lot 1 Grapevine Tx 76051 Blk 109 Lts 1 & 2 College Heights Addition- 602 E Texas St Zvonecek, Brian G Grpvn PO Box 93654 Blk 107 Lot 1 R Southlake Tx 76092 0AZCU\Forrns\ZCU.31.doc 3 Z I/ U LZ V/ Development Service Depa Public- • Property Applicant: Dubay, Edward Case No.: HL10-01 & HL10-02 Address/Legal Description: 609 & 613 E Texas St Proof of Notice in the City of Grapevine, Texas Case No. HL10-01 & HL10-02 Planning and Zoning Commission Pursuant to Article 1011 F, Vernon's Civil Statutes: I, the undersigned being a Planner for the City of Grapevine and having the records pertaining to applications for change of zoning and the notices sent pursuant thereto under my supervision and control, in the performance of the function of my office and employment, do hereby solemnly swear and affirm that pursuant to Article 1011 F, Vernon's Civil Statutes, written notices were served on the parties listed above in the City of Grapevine, zoning Case CU05-08 on this the 9th day of April 2010. (D) — Duplicate (,h — Indicates notice addressed and stamped. Executed this the 9th day of April 2010. City of Grapevine Ma7fner State of Texas County of Tarrant Before me Susan Batte on this day personally appeared Ron Stombaugh known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) given under my hand and seal of office this 9th day of April 2010. soa,21- /� Notsfy in and for State of Texas 01illlll/l't44� SUSCir) ire i Q.• B � � W 13 0AZCU1Forms\ZCU.31.doc 4 0-01 0-02 Chestnut, John M Fletcher, Jan 757 Trails End Cir 609 E Worth St HL10-01 & HL10-02 Hurst Tx 76054 Grapevine Tx 76051 DUBAY, EDWARD Freyre, Arturo 523 E Texas St Grapevine Tx 76051 Doren, Scott Van Hammock, Cody Etux Emily Litsel Llc 617 E Texas St 224 Wood St 820 E Dove Loop Rd Apt 1523 Grapevine Tx 76051 Grapevine Tx 76051 Grapevine Tx 76051 Dubay, Edward Sr Etux Carol L Harrington, Ona M Millican, Peggy & P J Weeks 235 Austin St 2760 Fuller Wiser Rd 4027 Cr 1037 Grapevine Tx 76051 Euless Tx 76039 Greenville Tx 75401 Wright, Jason Benjamin Hodges, Thomas E Est 603 E Worth St -502 W Valverde St Grapevine Tx 76051 Crystal City Tx 78839 Zvonecek, Brian G Hood, Ross Etux Joyce Oler, Darrel & Richard Lilly PO Box 93654 626 E Texas St 705 Simmons Dr Southlake Tx 76092 Grapevine Tx 76051 Euless Tx 76040 Richcreek, Kelly A Rios, Asension Reyna Pearson, Joann L PO Box 5899 209 Austin St 306 Austin St Marysville Ca 95901 Grapevine Tx 76051 Grapevine Tx 76051 Emrich, Joshua A Etux Lisa Howard, Wanda Faye Stearns, Laura 614 E Texas St PO Box 504 613 E Worth St Grapevine Tx 76051 Grapevine Tx 76099 Grapevine Tx 76051 Evbuomwan, Nosayaba Jimenez, Flor Porter, Donald Etux Elizabeth 925 Minters Chapel Rd 1342 S Pine St 225 Austin St Grapevine Tx 76051 Grapevine Tx 76051 Grapevine Tx 76051 Fisher, Glenda J King, Hazel Tschirhart, Jeffrey Etux Lisa PO Box 1171 2138 Sierra Dr 618 E Texas St Grapevine Tx 76099 Grapevine Tx 76051 Grapevine Tx 76051 File#:0-01 ♦ 0-02 i/i ♦, 613 EAST TEXAS STREEI_ Because you are a property owner within 200 feet of the subject tract of land as shown by the last City -approved tax rolls, you received this notice. If you cannot or do not wish to attend the hearing, the attached form is provided for your convenience. If owners of more than 20% of the property within 200 feet of the subject tract object to the case, a 3/4 vote of the City Council is required to approve the request. Purpose of Request: The public hearing is to consider an application submitted by Mark Born for property located at 609 and 613 East Texas Street and platted as Lots 3 & 4, Block 105, College Heights Addition. The applicant is requesting designation as a historical landmark sub- district. Such sub -district may include buildings, land, areas, or districts or historical, architectural, archaeological or cultural importance or value that merit protection, enhancement, and preservation in the interest of the culture, prosperity, education, and welfare of the people. The property is owned by Mark & Denise Born. Hearing Procedure: When: 7:30 PM, TUESDAY, APRIL 20, 2010 What: JOINT PUBLIC HEARING GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Location: PUBLIC HEARING: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2nd FLOOR COMMISSION'S DELIBERATION SESSION, 2nd FLOOR 200 S. MAIN STREET, GRAPEVINE, TEXAS Applicant and Other Speakers' Presentation. Public Input, Neighborhood Associations, Property Owners Within 200 feet, Interested Citizenry. Questions from City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission for Applicants, City Staff and Guests Present. i File 1 1 609 WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM ON MONDAY APRIL 19 2090 Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest) and/or (have the following comments) Current Property Owner (printed) Property Address: Lot , Block , Addition Property Owner Signature: Property Owner Name (printed): Daytime phone number: Telephone: (817)410-3155 Fax: (817)410-3018 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Department of Development Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 ITEM # TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER J. SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR MEETING DATE: APRIL 20, 2010 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT HL10-01 & HL10-02 r ---I I ' ___________ __ Grapevine 5 Lake APPLICANT: Mark & Denise Born , �OLe Ro. I i I �yC\' I. H.Ig35 "'°``h"` PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: The subject property is located at 609 & 613 East r I Texas Street and platted as Lots 3 and 4, Block 105, S DFW 3 1 I Hall -Johnson y�so Airport a College Heights Addition. L, m I Glade Rd. F- `c O 'S REQUESTED HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a Historic Landmark Subdistrict designation for property located at 609 & 613 East Texas Street and platted as Lots 3 and 4. Block 105, College Heights Addition to be known as the Tillery/Smith Homeplace. The Historic Preservation Commission at their January 27, 2010 meeting adopted the preservation criteria for the subject property addressing such issues as setbacks, driveways, parking, exterior finishes and other architectural embellishments were established by the Historic Preservation Commission to preserve the historic integrity of the property. The Tillery/Smith Homeplace represents the culmination of the hard work of several generations of related and extended families of Grapevine. It is a property that grew over R:\AGENDA\04-20-10\HL10-01.4.doc 1 April 15, 2010 (10:45AM) SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "R-7.5" Single Family Residential, various single family residences SOUTH: "R-7.5" Single Family Residential, various single family residences EAST: "R-7.5" Single Family Residential, various single family residences WEST: "R-7.5" Single Family Residential, various single family residences The subject tract is located within "Zone A" Zone of Minimal Effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" Map. Few activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in "Zone A" except for sound sensitive activities such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The applicant's proposal is/is not an appropriate use in this noise zone. MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as a "RL" Residential Low Density District. The applicant's proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan. Jsb 0:\ZCU\HL10-01A.doc 3 April 12, 2010 (10:26AM) April 23, 2010 Mark Born 3613 Grandview Dr Grapevine, TX 76051 RE: GRAPEVINE FILE #HL10-01 & HL10-02 Mr. Born, This letter is to verify that 609 & 613 East Texas Street and proposed to be platted as Lots 3 and 4, Block 105, College Heights Addition has been designated as a Historic Landmark Subdistrict by the City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 20, 2010. A copy of Ordinance 2010-15 and 2010-16 is enclosed. Please do not hesitate to contact us if we may be of further assistance. Sincerely, ,/n /�� Susan Batte Planning Technician DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT The City of Grapevine - P.O. Box 95104 - Grapevine, Texas 76099 - (817) 410-3154 Fax (817) 410-3018 - www.grapevinetexas.gov 4Lk D- i - IMOd 80A L SNOLL03d'SNI -_)Nloltnq !-WINCK) 40 MaWILA,`I�I� U, CC) Lies UdOh4�V ddV 4 3M- IJU891) 0 cm) ccl `00-057T Design Guidelines Tillery Property Block 105, Lot 4 235 Austin Street Grapevine, Texas Grapevine Township Revitalization Project, Inc. City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Grapevine, Texas 76051 January 27, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE I. INTRODUCTION ■ What are Design Guidelines ■ Why do we need Design Guidelines ■ Basic Preservation Theory ■ Period of Significance ■ Purpose of Design Guidelines II. SITE ■ Setbacks ■ Driveways, Parking Lots ■ Service and Mechanical Areas ■ Fences and Walls III. BUILDING FABRIC ■ Preservation ■ Exterior Finishes ■ Stone Masonry ■ Metal Siding ■ Windows and Doors ■ Paint IV. EMBELLISHMENTS ■ Awnings -Canopies ■ Exterior Lighting ■ Building and Ground Signs V. NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ■ New Construction Infill ■ Additions to Historic Buildings • New Building Form, Mass and Scale ■ New Building Materials Page 2 PREFACE Allowing this property to authentically tell its own story of its period and time, while reinforcing the historical period of significance with necessary preservation, rehabilitation and restoration, is the goal of this historic landmark designation. The Tillery/Smith Homeplace represents the culmination of the hard work of several generations of related and extended families of Grapevine. It is a property that grew over time to include a main house, garage and outbuildings covering four lots in the College Heights Addition to the City of Grapevine. The large families associated with this property were an important part of the social and cultural fabric of Grapevine's past. The first person listed on the tax records for this property in 1913 is H. S. Jenkins. In 1942, Jack V. Tillery and his wife Sylvia Ballard Tillery began to acquire property in Block 105, purchasing Lots 1 and 2. By 1943 they purchased Lot 3 and in 1944 purchased Lot 4. In 1942 the Tillery Family built a home on Lots 1 and 2. The following year, outbuildings were built on Lot 3 to serve the main residence. The Tillerys were a large Grapevine family with cousins and double -cousins. In 1974 the property was acquired by Claude D. Smith and his wife Lorene. Their son, Don R. Smith, married Wanda Tillery, daughter of Cleo Tillery. Wanda recalled that the wood frame home was very nice, well -kept and that Mrs. Smith kept the hardwood floors polished daily. The house was framed by a white painted picket fence along Texas and Austin Streets. In 1983, gas from a gas leak in the middle of the street traveled under the Smith's house. In the morning, while Mrs. Smith was in the kitchen and Mr. Smith was shaving, the house exploded. Both were hospitalized for a long while but survived. The City of Grapevine compensated them for the loss of their house. When they recovered from their injuries they constructed a new brick home on the original site. Page 3 INTRODUCTION What are Design Guidelines? Design guidelines are written documents that help ascertain the cultural and architectural importance of a Historic District or Landmark within the City of Grapevine. They provide for a common ground for making educated decisions for proposed alterations to property (including new construction) and ensuring those modifications will be compatible with the architectural character of the historic district or landmark for which they apply. Design guidelines are also intended to be recommendations and not rigid or direct interpretation of work to be executed on a property. Although appropriate, they do not require that buildings be restored to a historical period or style. They are intended to be flexible and used to promote communication about how appropriate design alterations can blend into and enhance the architectural character of the historic district or landmark. Why do we need Design Guidelines? Design guidelines are needed to preserve the architectural and cultural integrity of a historic district or landmark. They are intended for the property owner(s), their architects or designers and the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission to use as a base reference for proposed exterior modifications to property within the historic district or landmark. They will serve as a basis for decisions about appropriate treatments and compatible new construction. The Historic Preservation Commission, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Grapevine City Council have approved these design guidelines for this historic district or landmark. The Historic Preservation Commission, through the Certificate of Appropriateness review process, will use these guidelines for making informed, consistent decisions about design alterations. The Commission, however, realizes that there is more than one solution to a historic preservation design objective, and as such, will use these guidelines for a base reference only. Basic Preservation Theory and Integrity What makes a property historically significant? On a national level, and locally, properties must generally be at least 50 years old before they may be considered or evaluated for historic significance. However, exceptions do exist for properties less than 50 years old when the property is clearly significant. Historic properties must meet certain criteria that demonstrate their significance. This criteria is different from the national level to a local level. Generally speaking, a property must meet at least one of the following criteria to be considered historically significant: ■ Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history; or • Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or ■ They embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic value, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or ■ They have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. In addition to meeting one of the criteria above, a property must also possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and/or association. Integrity is the ability of a property to convey its significance and to retain historic integrity, a property should have to possess at least half of the seven aspects of integrity. A district or landmark's integrity will come from the district or landmark having a Page 4 substantial number of significant structures (that retain integrity) within its boundaries and for when they were significant - their Period of Significance. Period of Significance Each historic district or landmark is significant during a period in its history, which it represents or is associated with, thus a Period of Significance. The period usually begins when the district or landmark was first constructed to when it reached it peak activity in construction. Buildings and structures that date within the Period of Significance are considered "historic" and contribute towards the character of the district or landmark. Buildings and structures built outside of the Period of Significance are generally considered "non -historic" and not contributing to the character of the district or landmark, however, there may be buildings which will have gained significance and considered historic. Purpose of Design Guidelines Grapevine's cultural heritage is uniquely preserved in its Main Street, industrial and adjacent residential neighborhoods. The historic core of Grapevine has served as the center of the community for more than 100 years and retains many buildings that reflect its early character. The city's history remains alive in its preserved buildings and neighborhoods. Historic preservation and economic development are partners in the success of downtowns throughout the country. Grapevine is no different. The historic districts and landmarks within Grapevine have strengthened the economic stability of our local Main Street commercial area and stabilized and improved the values of property in the historic residential neighborhood. The City of Grapevine also recognizes that the character of the historic districts and landmarks is of community interest. Design guidelines are written to ensure that preservation efforts and property investments are protected by providing appropriate guidance on the preservation/rehabilitation of historic landmarks and direction for their future development. The City of Grapevine, in 1991, adopted the Historic Preservation Ordinance, Appendix G, Code of Ordinances, thus creating the Historic Preservation Commission and a historic overlay zoning ability in an effort to protect the city's rich, cultural and architectural heritage. The Commission, through the ordinance, was given the power to recommend specific Historic Districts and Landmarks within the city. Any exterior alterations to buildings and properties within Grapevine's Historic Districts or to a designated Historic Landmark require a Certificate of Appropriateness (CA) prior to commencing work. Many modifications are simple and routine, and can be approved by city Staff within a few days after the CA application is made. More significant projects may require the review and approval by the Historic Preservation Commission, which meets monthly. II. SITE This section of the design guidelines concentrates on the development of site planning and preservation of site features and their relationship to the property. The goal of this section is to encourage continued preservation of the property's site, while yet still allowing development and continued adaptive use. In general, retain the historic relationships between buildings, landscaping features and open space. Avoid rearranging the site by moving or removing buildings and site features, such as walks, drives and fences, that help define the property's historic value. Page 5 SETBACKS The distance a building sets back from the front property line relays the visual continuity or presence of buildings and structures within a district and landmark, especially in a commercial or residential area. Buildings within a residential area were sited to provide front and side open spaces between neighbors, thus resulting in front, side and rear yards The relationships between buildings, landscaping features and open space should be preserved. Avoid rearranging the site by moving or removing buildings and site features, such as walks, drives and fences, that help define the historic district and landmark. Also maintain building orientation pattern, with the front facade facing the street. Building setbacks should be consistent with adjacent buildings or with the style of the building. Setbacks are an important ingredient in creating an attractive streetscape. Buildings should be set back to a line that is consistent with their neighbors and land use. For example, a residential setback should retain the setback of adjacent and nearby structures, with landscaping along the street right-of-way. DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING LOTS Driveways should be located perpendicular to the street; circular drives should not be allowed (unless proven with historic documentation) in front or corner side yard, so that the character of the landscaped yard can be reinforced. The visual impression of a parking lot has the potential to impact a historic landmark. Parking lots should be located such that they are considered secondary to other features and in those spaces that were customarily open spaces between and around buildings. New parking lots should not be allowed to interrupt the continuity of landscaped front or corner side yards. This is important to both the preservation of historic character, and to the strengthening of the residential district and landmark. Their visual impact of a parking lot may be minimized through various methods, which may include a softening of the ground surface (in lieu of asphalt or concrete) and breaking up of parking into different areas between and around buildings. Also, screen existing or new parking lots from streets and pedestrian areas. Existing or new parking lots located adjacent to streets and sidewalks should be screened to the height of car hoods. FENCES AND WALLS Historically, fences and walls around historic houses defined yards and the boundary around property and gardens. Wood picket fences, wood rail fences and barbed wire or decorative wire fences were the common fence types in Grapevine's early residential neighborhoods. Traditionally, picket fences surrounded the front of the house while rail and wire fences surrounded the agricultural portions of the property. Existing historic fences should be maintained. New fences and walls. Simple wood picket fences, wood and wire, wrought iron fences and stone walls are appropriate for this historic property. Avoid chain-link fences, privacy fences and concrete block fences along the front of property. Wood privacy fences may be allowed when installed in the rear yard and behind the front facade of a residence. Utilitarian/privacy fences should not be installed in front of a historic building or beyond the line of the front facade of a historic building. Replacing fences and walls. If replacement is required due to deterioration, remove only those portions of historic fences and walls that are damaged beyond repair and replace in-kind, matching the original in material, design and placement. If replacement is necessary for non -historic fences, or new fences are proposed, locate and design the fence in such a way that will compliment the historic boundary of the property without concealing the historic character of the property. SERVICE AND MECHANICAL AREAS Service and mechanical areas and equipment should be screened from the viewshed of the street and other pedestrian areas. This includes garbage and equipment storage areas. Mechanical equipment, including satellite dishes, should not be located in front or corner side yards or should be set back from the edges of roofs, and screened so that they are not visible to pedestrians and do not detract from the historic character of buildings. This section of the design guidelines concentrates on recommendations for the preservation of original building materials within this property. The goal of this section is to encourage continued preservation of the building materials, while yet still allowing necessary repair/replacement where required. The use of inappropriate treatments in repair and restoration work can seriously damage historic buildings. These guidelines present general directions for appropriate action. PRESERVATION The Preservation, Restoration, Rehabilitation and Reconstruction philosophy adopted by these design guidelines are the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (see appendix). The following treatment philosophy should be considered for improvements or alterations to this property. 1. If a new use is required for a historic building, consider uses that are compatible with the original use of the building and that would require minimal change to the defining characteristics of the property. Converting a residence into a Bed & Breakfast Inn would be considered a compatible new use. 2. Each historic building within this district and landmark is a product of its time (when constructed). The original design of each building should be respected for what it is and not altered to something it was not or giving it an "older" period look. Preserve, stabilize, and restore the original building form, ornament and materials. However, when rehabilitating, removal of non -historic or unsympathetic additions is encouraged. 3. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance on their own right shall be preserved. Older structures or additions may have, at some time, been renovated with such care and skill that the renovation itself is worthy of preservation. Reconstruction of building elements should reflect the size, scale, material and level of detail of the original design. Where replication of original elements is not possible, a new design consistent with the original style of the building may be used. 4. Preserve and maintain original character defining features and architectural styles of historic buildings and structures. Key architectural features of a building or structure are those that help convey the integrity and significance of the property to the Period of Significance. They may included, but are not limited to, doors, windows, siding, roofs, structural systems and decorative ornamentation. 5. Original character defining features and elements should be repaired where needed and replaced only when repair of original materials is not possible because they are deteriorated beyond repair. Repair elements and features using the gentlest means possible. Any missing or severely deteriorated elements may be replaced with replicas of the original. The new feature or element should match the old in design, color, texture and other visual qualities and where possible, materials. Ensure that roof, window, porch and cornice treatments are preserved, or when preservation is not possible duplicate the original building element. EXTERIOR MATERIALS Page 7 Original wood finishes should be maintained and painted or, when necessary, replaced in kind. Modern synthetic siding materials such as vinyl or metal bear little resemblance to historic siding materials. The application of such modern synthetic materials often involves the removal of original decorative elements such as cornice, corner boards, brackets, window and door trim, etc. New synthetic siding shall not be installed; removal of existing such materials is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish and appearance. Original asbestos siding should be maintained and painted, or when necessary, replaced with synthetic siding to match the existing asbestos siding. The removal of asbestos siding over existing and original wood siding is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish and appearance. STONE MASONRY Stone masonry as a residential building material was not used very much in Grapevine. The primary use of stone masonry is as a veneer for the residence, garage, and several outbuildings Original stone masonry should be preserved and maintained. Preserve the original mortarjoints and masonry sizes, tooling and bonding patterns. Repointing of mortar joints where there is evidence of deterioration is encouraged. New repointing should match the existing in materials, color, size, and hardness. Clean historic stone walls carefully. Do not use abrasive cleaning methods for historic stone masonry, such as sand blasting and high-pressure wash as they can damage the surface of stone. Additionally, some chemical cleaners, which are designed to remove paint from different masonry surfaces, may be used if caution is exercised and the manufacturer's recommendations for particular stone is followed. Original masonry surfaces should be maintained and not be painted, unless severe deterioration of the stone can be shown to require replacement. The color or texture of replacement stone should be matched with the existing stone masonry. METAL SIDING AND ROOFS Metal as an exterior building material was traditionally used on industrial or agricultural buildings within Grapevine. The metal of choice was either natural (unfinished) steel or steel with a galvanized protective coating. Preserve and maintain all original architectural metal that contributes to the character of the buildings and structures on this property. Protect metal from corrosion by maintaining protective coatings and provide proper drainage of water to discourage accumulation, which may lead to rust and corrosion. Repair historic metal by patching or splicing where necessary. This will allow the greater overall character of buildings and structures to remain. Also use the gentlest means possible when cleaning historic metal or when removing rust (in preparation of a new coating). WINDOWS AND DOORS Windows and doors are arguably the most important character defining feature of buildings. This property contains different windows and doors. Historic windows and doors contribute to the architectural character of buildings and should be preserved and maintained. Windows varied from the wood, double hung windows front of the residence to non -historic aluminum replacement windows at the back. Doors consist of wood stile and rail doors with vision panels (glass) to overhead wood doors and rolling steel doors. Original window and door (including framing and lights or panes of glass) configurations, orientation, and proportions should be preserved and maintained. Any new windows and doors should be designed, Page 8 located and sized to compliment existing historic windows and doors. If requiring replacement (or new where previous originals removed), replace in kind. When replacement is necessary, do so within the existing historic opening size and matching the original design. Use same size to avoid filling in or enlarging the original opening. Where existing windows and doors were constructed of wood, replacements should also be wood, likewise with steel windows and doors. Clear or very slightly tinted glass may be used. No reflective or heavily tinted glass shall be used. Should the owner wish to install security bars, they should be installed on the interior of windows and doors. Storm windows. The use of interior storm windows is encouraged where needed. Storm windows are available which can be installed on the interior of windows. This helps to preserve the exterior historic character of the building. Should storm windows need to be installed on the exterior of the historic wood windows, storm windows constructed of wood and configured to match the historic sashes (i.e. one over one sashes) are recommended. If metal storm windows are installed, paint to blend with surrounding elements. PAINT Traditionally, paint was used to protect underlying building materials (typically wood) from deterioration. Paint was also used for decorative purposes on wood and metal and brick masonry in the Main Street Historic District. Plan (re)painting carefully. Good preparation is always the key to successful painting of historic buildings. The substrate should always be cleaned from dirt and residue and washed down using the simplest means possible, no power washing on soft substrates. The substrate, especially if wood, should be given plenty of time to dry out. Paint colors should be complimentary to each other and the overall character of the house. When possible, research the original paint color and finishes of the building's historic period; the right colors respect the historic building. The Historic Preservation Commission has adopted four historic paint palettes appropriate to city Historic Districts or Landmark's character, which may be proposed and approved through the Minor Exterior Alteration application process. The Historic Preservation Commission, through the regular Certificate of Appropriateness process, should review any proposed colors that not within the adopted palettes. IV. EMBELLISHMENTS AWNINGS -CANOPIES New awnings and canopies should not be installed above windows or doors. EXTERIOR LIGHTING Lighting is an important element in residential areas. Appropriate light fixtures consistent with the historic character the properties are recommended. Avoid exposed lighting of any kind unless it is part of a historic fixture. BUILDING AND GROUND SIGNS Signs are critical to the success of commercial property. They provide pertinent retail or merchant information for a potential shopper or critical tourist information for visitors to Grapevine. Page 9 For businesses located in residential buildings, which have a generous setback, appropriately scaled monument signs are encouraged. In general, building signs should be small (in relation to the size of the building) and limited to one per business. Off premise signs, flashing signs and plastic backlit signs should not be allowed. Roof top signs should be avoided as they can detract from the architectural character of a historic roof or profile of a building. Signs may be constructed of painted wood or metal. Lighting of signs should be done externally with incandescent bulbs or ground lighting using appropriate fixtures to the style of the building. Avoid garish colors or patterns, avoid a clutter of signs and limit the number and size of signs. Neon signs are not recommended. Sandwich board signs are typical of historic commercial and retail areas and may be appropriate for this property. They should be maintained and removed after business hours. Chalkboards are encouraged for daily changing messages. Sandwich board signs, which are directed towards pedestrians should be limited to 24 inches wide by 36 inches high and no more than one per tenant. Sign lettering should be consistent with the architectural style of the building. Generally, serif styles may be used for commercial and retail uses within late 19th and early 20th century buildings. San serif styles may be used for commercial and retail uses within buildings dating from the 1930-50s. V. NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION This section of the design guidelines concentrates on recommendations for the construction of new buildings within this property. New buildings are considered additions to historic buildings or new, stand alone construction. The goal of this section is to encourage appropriate and compatible new construction for this property, while still retaining the historic architectural character. i.L `IK�P► Fc � illi 0 N The Secretary of the Interior's guidelines for new buildings in historic districts or landmarks encourage similarity of form and materials, but not actual replication. Review of proposed designs will be based on the compatibility of the design within the context of the property's adjacent and nearby historic buildings. The design of new buildings should have key elements of the building's historic period of significance including massing, scale, fenestration and materials. Infill buildings should not be absolute reproductions, and appear as clearly contemporary. Only when a previously demolished historic Grapevine building can be accurately replicated may a reproduction be considered. Infill buildings between historic buildings should be similar in setback, roof form, cornice line and materials, to one of the adjacent buildings. Relate height of new building to the heights of adjacent structures. Avoid new buildings that tower over existing ones. ADDITIONS TO HISTORIC BUILDINGS Additions to historic buildings should compliment the style of the main building if possible; otherwise they should adhere to the general style with simplified details. New additions should be designed in a manner that makes clear what is historic and what is new and done in such a manner that the least amount of historic materials or character defining features are not obscured, damaged or destroyed. A new addition should, if at all possible, be located at the rear of the historic building. If this is not possible, the addition may be added to the side but recessed from the front line of historic building facade or if a connection is used to separate old from new. New vertical additions should be set back from primary facades so as not to Page 10 be readily apparent from the facing street. When reproducing elements that were originally part of a historic building they should be replicated when evidence of the actual detail has been documented by photographs, drawings, or remaining physical evidence. If no evidence exists, elements typical of the architectural style may be used. Historic photographs can provide information on the original elements of the building. NEW BUILDING FORM, MASS AND SCALE Traditionally, mass and scale are building patterns, particularly on Main Street and in the adjacent residential areas, that defined an edge and height for a historic district. New construction forms, massing and scale should incorporate or compliment the existing mass and scale found within this property. The new work should be differentiated from the old, while yet clearly contemporary buildings. At a minimum, new construction should reflect the forms, massing, roof shapes, cornice lines and building materials of the primary structures within the district and landmark. NEW BUILDING MATERIALS New building materials should be visually compatible with the predominate building materials for this property. This property was primarily built with 3 building materials: stone, wood and steel. Wood siding and stone are appropriate exterior building finishes for this property. Metal siding would be appropriate for detached accessory outbuildings. Fake brick or stone or gravel aggregate finished materials are not recommended. New building construction should, as best as possible, be representative of these primary materials. Secondary materials on new construction could be those used in other buildings within this property. Modern synthetic siding materials, such as vinyl or composite hardboards bear little resemblance to historic materials on this property and should thus be avoided. Newer contemporary synthetic materials, such as fiber cement, may considered for new construction and in a location where they appear similar in character, texture and profile to traditional building materials. All new wood or metal materials should have a painted finish except on some building buildings where the use of unpainted aluminum or galvanized steel was part of the original design and should be maintained. Page 11 GRAPEVINE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION FORM 1. Name Tillery/Smith Homeplace Historic And/or common 2. Location Address 235 Austin Street land survey Location/neighborhood block/lot Block 105, Lot 4 tract size 3. Current zoning R-7.5 4. Classification Category _ district _ building(s) _ structure X site Ownership _ public X private Accessible _ yes: restricted _ yes: unrestr. no Status X occupied _ unoccupied work in progress Present Use _ agriculture _ commercial _ education _ Entertainment _ government _ industrial military 5. Ownership Current owner: Marc Born phone: 817 329-0836 museum park residence _ Religious _ scientific _ transportation other Address: 3613 Grandview Drive city: Grapevine state: Texas zip: 76051 6. Form Preparation Name & title David Klempin organization: Historic Preservation Commission Contact: Wallis Hotel (CVB) phone: 817 410-3197 7. Representation on Existing Surveys Tarrant County Historic Resources National Register of Historic Places Recorded Texas Historic Landmark other Texas Archaeological Landmark 8. Date Rec'd: 9. Field Chk date: for office use only Survey Verified: Yes By: 10. Nomination Archaeological _ Structure _ District Site Structure & Site No 11. Historic Ownership original owner John S. Estill significant later ownersJack V. Tillery and Claude D. Smith 12. Construction Dates alterations/ additions iginal construction alterations/additions 14. Site Features Natural Open lot with trees urban Condition Check One: Check One: _ excellent _ deteriorated _ Unaltered _ Original site good _ ruins _ altered _ Moved (date: ) fair unexposed Describe present and original (if known) physical appearance; include sole(s) of arebitecture, current condition and relationsbip to surrounding fabric (structures, objects etc.). Elaborate on pertinent materials used and sole(s) of architectural detailin& embel- lishments and site details. Vacant Lot with no existing structures. 16. Historical Significance Statement of historical and cultural significance. Include: cultural influences, special events and important personages, influences on neighborhood, on the city, etc. The Tillery/Smith Homeplace represents the culmination of the hard work of several generations of related and extended families of Grapevine. It is a property that grew over time to include a main house, garage and outbuildings covering four lots in the College Heights Addition to the City of Grapevine. The large families as- sociated with this property were an important part of the social and cultural fabric of Grapevine's past. The first person listed on the tax records for this property in 1922 is John S. Estill. In 1942, Jack V. Tillery and his wife Sylvia Ballard Tillery began to acquire property in Block 105, purchasing Lots 1 and 2. By 1943 they purchased Lot 3 and in 1944 purchased Lot 4. In 1942 the Tillery Family built a home on Lots 1 and 2. The following year, outbuildings were built on Lot 3 to serve the main residence. The Tillerys were a large Grape- vine family with cousins and double -cousins. In 1974 the property was acquired by Claude D. Smith and his wife Lorene. Their son, Don R. Smith, married Wanda Tillery, daughter of Cleo Tillery. Wanda recalled that the wood frame home was very nice, well -kept and that Mrs. Smith kept the hardwood floors polished daily. The house was framed by a white painted picket fence along Texas and Austin Streets. In 1983, gas from a gas leak in the middle of the street traveled under the Smith's house. In the morning, while Mrs. Smith was in the kitchen and Mr. Smith was shaving, the house ex- ploded. Both were hospitalized for a long while but survived. The City of Grapevine compensated them for the loss of their house. When they recovered from their injuries they constructed a new brick home on the original site. 17. Bibliography 18. Attachments District or Site map Additional descriptive material _ Site Plan Footnotes Photos (historic & current) Other ( Designation Merit A. Character, interest or value as part of X the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City of Grape- vine, State of Texas of the United States. B. Location as the site of a significant historical event. C. Identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the city. D. Exemplification of the cultural, eco- nomic, social or historical heritage of the city E. Portrayal of the environment of a group of people in an era of history characterized by a distinctive architec- tural style. F. Embodiment of distinguishing charac- teristics of an architectural type or specimen. Recommendation The Grapevine Township Revitalization Program re- quests the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commis- sion to deem this nominated landmark meritorious of designation as outlined in Chapter 39, City of Grape- vine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Further, the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commis- sion endorses the Preservation Criteria, policy recom- mendations and landmark boundary as presented by the City of Grapevine Development Services Depart- ment. G. Identification as the work of an archi- tect or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the city. H. Embodiment of elements of architec- tural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent a sig- nificant architectural innovation. I. Relationship to other distinctive build- ings, sites or areas which are eligible for preservation according to a plan based on historic, cultural or architec- tural motif. X J. Unique location of singular physical characteristics representing an estab- lished and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, community or the city. K. archaeological value in that it has produced or can be expected to pro- duce data affecting theories of historic or prehistoric value. L. Value as an aspect of community sen- timent or public pride. Burl Gilliam, Chair Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission David Klempin Historic Preservation Officer Scott Williams, Director Development Services Department Historical Marker The Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission and the Grapevine Historical Society have a cooperative marker pro- gram for properties that are officially (individually or located within) designated Historic Landmark Sub -districts. Please indicate if you are interested in obtaining one or both markers for your property. There is no fee for either of the mark- ers, however, the Grapevine Historical Society will only fund two (2) of the medallion and text plaque (second option), per year, on a first come, first serve basis. Check One: p Yes, I am interested in obtaining a bronze Historic Landmark Plaque for my property from the Historic Preservation Commission. I understand there is no fee for this plaque. p No, I am not interested in obtaining a marker for my property. o Yes, I am interested in obtaining a bronze Historic Marker (medallion and text plaque) for my property from the Grapevine Historical Society. Below for office use only o Historic Preservation Commission's Historic Landmark Plaque. o Historic Preservation Commission's Historic District Plaque. o Grapevine Historical Society's Historic Landmark Marker. 110 M dA&m O Historic Landmark Marker, O Historic District Marker, O Historic Landmark Marker, O Historic District Marker, existing GHS marker. existing GHS marker. new GHS marker. new GI IS marker. MEMO TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FROM: DAVID KLEMPIN, HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFFICIAL RON STOMBAUGH, PLANNER MEETING DATE: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2010 SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK OVERLAY #HL10-02 TILLERY/SMITH HOMEPLACE 235 AUSTIN STREET, BLOCK 105, LOT 4 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 MARC BORN, OWNER •1111__.1_ IM OK recommends the Historic Preservation Commission approve the proposed Historic Landmark Subdistrict overlay to the Grapevine Historic Preservation Ordinance 91-73 (Appendix G — Grapevine Code of Ordinances), as amended for following properties addressed as: 235 Austin Street, legally described as Block 105, Lot 4, City of Grapevine. BACKGROUND: On January 14th Mark Born submitted an application for Historic Landmark Designation #HL10-02 for Block 105, Lot 4. The Tillery/Smith Homeplace represents the culmination of the hard work of several generations of related and extended families of Grapevine. It is a property that grew over time to include a main house, garage and outbuildings covering four lots in the College Heights Addition to the City of Grapevine. The large families associated with this property were an important part of the social and cultural fabric of Grapevine's past. The first person listed on the tax records for this property in 1913 is H. S. Jenkins. In 1942, Jack V. Tillery and his wife Sylvia Ballard Tillery began to acquire property in Block 105, purchasing Lots 1 and 2. By 1943 they purchased Lot 3 and in 1944 purchased Lot 4. In 1942 the Tillery Family built a home on Lots 1 and 2. The following year, outbuildings were built on Lot 3 to serve the main residence. The Tillerys were a large Grapevine family with cousins and double -cousins. In 1974 the property was acquired by Claude D. Smith and his wife Lorene. Their son, Don R. Smith, married Wanda Tillery, daughter of Cleo Tillery. Wanda recalled that the wood frame home was very nice, well -kept and that Mrs. Smith kept the hardwood floors polished daily. The house was framed by a white painted picket fence along Texas and Austin Streets. In 1983, gas from a gas leak in the middle of the street traveled under the Smith's house. In the morning, while Mrs. Smith was in the kitchen and Mr. Smith was shaving, the house exploded. Both were hospitalized for a long while but survived. The O:\Historic Preservation Commission\CAs\2010 HL\HL10-02.4.doc January 28, 2010 (2:35PM) City of Grapevine compensated them for the loss of their house. When they recovered from their injuries they constructed a new brick home on the original site. Staff recommends approval of #HL10-02 to record the history of the property and to have input in the future development for this site. A set of the proposed design guidelines are attached. O:\Historic Preservation Commission\CAs\2010 HL\HL10-02.4.doc January 28, 2010 (2:35PM) Historic Preservation Commission Public Hearing Property Owner Research Applicant: Mark Born Case No.: HL10-02 Address/Legal Description: 235 Austin Street Legal bescription Situs Address Tax Roll Name/Address College Heights Addition- 614 Estill St Howard, Wanda Faye Grpvn PO Box 504 Blk 103 Lot 3 Grapevine Tx R-7.5 College Heights Addition- 620 Estill St Jimenez, Flor Grpvn 1342 S Pine St Blk 103 Lot 4 Grapevine Tx R-7.5 College Heights Addition- 235 Austin St Dubay, Edward Sr Etux Carol L Grpvn 235 Austin St Blk 105 Lots 1 Thru 4 Grapevine Tx R-7.5 College Heights Addition- 235 Austin St Dubay, Edward Sr Etux Carol L Grpvn 235 Austin St Blk 105 Lots 1 Thru 4 Grapevine Tx R-7.5 O:\Historic Preservation Commission\CAs\2010 HL\HL10-02.31.doc 67 ( 8 17 521 525 0 ESTILL ST 218N PT 6 7&8 2 518 7&8 224 7&8 6 232 523 6,i 6 522 HC 1R 3 4 5618 6 7 602 610 114 626 626 1 7 609 1613 1 _ 6171 621 1 625 HL10-02 235 Austin Street �C 9 E R -MF -2 223 p� a 9 708