Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 03, 27, 28, 29, 30 - Z18-01, CU18-02, PD18-01
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION! FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 2018 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Z18-01 , CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION CU18-02, AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD18-01, THE PRESERVE it -- 1_7___________ __;t: :- APPLICANT: Greystar GP II, LLC �—_ Grapevine fo Lake ie R 1 PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: I l I.H.1635 Northwest The subject property is addressed as 101 East Glade I P4Q- ,,a Road and is proposed to be platted Lot 1, Block A, Glade/360 Addition. The subject property comprises 20.4 acres and has approximately 367 feet of t �Fw frontage along Glade Road and 1 ,240 feet of sy 3 I Hall-Johnson Aso Airport a L� a frontage along the northbound State Highway 360 ��-- _ service road. Glade Rd. ;, I H c 3 REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE, CONDITIONAL USE, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a zone change to rezone 14.34 acres from "LI" Light Industrial District and 6.07 acres from "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District to "R-MF" Multi-Family District for the development of a 399 unit multi-family project. The applicant is also seeking a conditional use permit to exceed the height regulations, vary from the parking requirements and allow for a reduction in the front yard setback relative to the flexible design standards in the "R-MF" Multi-Family District. A planned development overlay is also being requested to deviate from but not be limited to the building separation requirements in the "R-MF" Multi-Family district. It is the applicant's intent to develop a 399 unit, gated, multi-family complex on approximately 20 acres beginning at the southwest corner of Glade Road and State 0:/ZCU/Z18-01.4;CU18-02.4;PD18-01.4 1 February 14,2018(2:47PM) Highway 360 and continuing northward approximately 1 ,200 feet along the State Highway 360 service road. This project, consisting of 399 units (19.6 dwelling units/acre)will have two primary points of access—one at the easternmost edge of the property along Glade Road and a second point of access near the northernmost boundary of the site along the northbound State Highway 360 service road. This development will consist of 256, one bedroom units ranging from 705-1,020 net square feet in size; 102, two bedroom units ranging from 1 ,092-1,268 net square feet in size; and 20, three bedroom units 1 ,393 net square feet in size. Also as part of this project the applicant intends to develop 21 brownstone-style apartments that are three-stories in height and resemble a product similar to an attached townhome with attached garages and guest parking; these brownstone apartments will range from 1 ,310-1,747 square feet in size. The flexible design standards within the conditional use section of the "R-MF" Multi-Family District, allow through the conditional use process, consideration of height in excess of the two-story, 35 feet maximum as stated in the district, as well as a reduction in the required parking and reduction of the front yard setback. All of the structures in this project other than the clubhouse will be three stories and 39 feet in height. Total required parking for this project is 798 spaces; the applicant has conducted a parking study which recommends a ratio of 1.60 spaces/unit (639 total units). The applicant is providing 685 spaces in the form of 347 surface spaces, 100 carport spaces, 140 garages spaces, and 90 tandem spaces (behind garages). An additional eight spaces have been provided for people who wish to walk the on-site trail that do not live on the property. Relative to the reduced front yard setback, although the buildings are set back well beyond the minimum 40 foot requirement, the applicant has added driveway access and public parking along this portion of the frontage along East Glade Road. The "R-MF" Multi-Family District regulations require a minimum building separation of 50 feet for structures that are arranged face-to-face or back-to-back. The applicant is seeking a planned development overlay to slightly reduce this separation to 39 feet between buildings 4 and 8 and a separation of 46 feet between buildings 3 and 9 in order to provide a more efficient arrangement of the structures on the site relative to the existing topography. Two monument signs are proposed, one located near the Glade/State Highway 360 intersection and the other near the entrance to the property from State Highway 360. Both signs are 6' in height, 60 square feet in size. Usable recreational open space provided by the applicant in the form of hiking trails, nature preserve areas, a dog park, and pool area in in excess of 200,000 square feet - 99,750 square feet is required. Contained in your packet, along with the site specific exhibits, is an affidavit of compliance signed and sealed by the project architect stating the project is in compliance with the recently adopted Design Standards Manual for Multi-Family and Vertical Mixed Use Development. Specifically, this project is located within District 1 , State Highway 0:/ZCU/Z18-01.4;CU18-02.4;PD18-01.4 2 February 15,2018(8:46AM) 360/Airport District. This district has ten, district specific standards which the affidavit and accompanying checklist demonstrate compliance along with the general standards required of all districts. Along with the affidavit and checklist is a set of exhibits that graphically demonstrate compliance with specific elements of the design standards. PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District and "LI" Light Industrial District and is undeveloped. HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject property was zoned 1-2" Heavy Industrial District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. The property to the north was zoned "R-1" Single Family District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. At a February 3, 1997 meeting the Council approved a zone change (Z97-20) and a conditional use permit (CU97-73) on the subject site rezoning approximately 14.34 acres from "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District to "LI"for outside storage in conjunction with an office/warehouse development that never materialized. At the September 15, 2015 meeting the Council considered and denied a zoning change and a conditional use permit to rezone approximately 68 acres from "LI" Light Industrial District and "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District to "R-MF" Multi-Family District for a two-phase multi-family project on the subject site comprised of 714 total units. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District and D/FW International Airport—vacant undeveloped property and vacant undeveloped airport property SOUTH: City of Euless and D/FW International Airport EAST: D/FW International Airport—vacant undeveloped airport property WEST: State Highway 360 right-of-way AIRPORT IMPACT: A portion of the subject tract is not located within any of the noise zones as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map and an approximate equal portion of the tract is located within "Zone A" Zone of Minimal Effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" Map. Few activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in "Zone A" except for sound sensitive activities such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The applicant's proposal is an appropriate use in this noise zone. 0:2CU/Z18-01.4;CU18-02.4;PD18-01.4 3 February 15,2018(8:46AM) MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Commercial/Mixed Use land use. The applicant's proposal is not in compliance with the Master Plan. THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION: The Thoroughfare Plan does not designate this portion of Glade Road east of State Highway as a thoroughfare. /rs 0:/ZCU/Z18-01.4;CU18-02.4;PD18-01.4 4 February 15,2018(8:46AM) ... ma E 0' 't GP�e m aeue "ey1F � aa,B Fp ♦e 26,e2 r sv5G e b b _... .. r m: ......... ....... .. ,oe,eec ... 13 VLIN Z .,I, N 0R440 p� �� 1"_�_� I. _L -- g.fNp,,�pN rNr�a, IAI CN C �..... e, ....................... ,x ,w e .c raa2 le c . ¢ N .m xeaec pot ,.E a -112 a, e e a z ,a e in B c , , J c7 „ as s A e L Z f0 e m ++ n 4 e ,a ,a ,. ' e b „ „ e OpK� p OL 59g B e - 00p�RGN 0 ASS e ORt H ' a cI'5 Feet 0 250 500 750 1,000 �*ME, Z18-019 C U 18-02, P D 18-01 I E Y A S'& w�E The Preserve WIF This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine ITIGIS department--s of icial and unofficial sources were Date Prepared: 2/7/2018 used to gather this nfermat—Every effort was made tp ens,e the a,c,,acy of th,s data Ind—,no guarantee,e given or lmphed as to the accuracy of said data Kimley))) Horn MEMORANDUM To: Andrew Ord �,`P�E•OF Greystar c?:' ••;S From: Scot Johnson P.E., PTOE j............................ ... � Jake Halter, EIT / SCOT A. JOHNSON / Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. /................................/ t Registered Firm F-928 l+�; ' •92615:=• ,�f Date: February 12, 2018 tI FSStO' Subject: The Preserve Parking Demands in Comparable Multifamily Developments Introduction Greystar Residential is proposing to build The Preserve, a high-end multifamily development on the east side of State Highway 360 in Grapevine, Texas. This memorandum documents the two lines of inquiry which were investigated to support the proposed 1.60 spaces per unit parking rate: national research and local observations of parking occupancy at comparable sites. Careful sizing of parking areas to specific uses will prevent the waste of space and building materials that is caused by providing parking that is rarely if ever used. Excessive parking also has negative impacts on often-hidden issues like walkable design, storm water runoff, and urban heat island effects. Parking Research ITE publishes Parking Generation, a compendium of parking demand research at sites across the country. ITE provides more information on each base parking demand rate than do most other sources, although the number of observations is still limited. The ITE data do not contain any significant amount of mixed-use or TOD-influenced observations, but do track suburban and urban differences. Table 1 shows the average rates for some multifamily uses which are similar to the proposed site. Table 1 — ITE Parking Generation Observed Demand Use—ITE Classification Unit Average Parking Demand Low/Mid-Rise Apartment Unit 1.23 Suburban, Weekday Low/Mid-Rise Apartment Unit 1.20 Urban, Weekday Low/Mid-Rise Apartment Unit 1.03 Urban, Saturday Kimley O Horn Page t Local Observations To make empirical observations of actual parking usage, comparable multifamily sites were found in the City of Grapevine. Observations were accomplished at eight sites, as some potential sites could not be accessed for observations. The average occupancy of the sites was 95%, or typical for the market average. Parking occupancy observations were made overnight, at 10 PM or later. The exact number of occupied parking spaces and enclosed garages were counted during the observations. It should be noted that each enclosed garage is treated as an occupied parking space for the purposes of the occupancy study. Since some of the garage spaces are empty or used as storage, this means that the observed parking demand is artificially high. Many of the sites also had some trailers, boats, and other vehicle-related objects located in parking spaces, and these were counted as occupied spaces as well. Since all of the sites had ample unused parking spaces, these objects did not impede the normal parking operation of the sites. Attached to the end of this report is a parking data table listing the results of the data collection. The following tables show the details of each site and the observations: Table 2-Weekday Parking Demand at 6 Local Sites (7 Observations) Dwelling Observed Parking Demand Observed Observed Study Site Units Bedrooms (Including Enclosed Garages) Demand Demand Overnight Per Unit Per Bedroom Royal St.Moritz 336 528 467 1.39 0.88 Te rrawood 291 401 400 1.37 1.00 Twenty-Four99 348 486 452 1.30 0.93 Marquis at Silver Oaks 480 732 703 1.46 0.96 Montelena(Tuesday 1/23) 256 400 323 1.26 0.81 Montelena(Wednesday 1/24) 256 400 330 1.29 0.83 Wildwood Creek 344 524 344 1.00 0.66 Weekday 6-Site Totals: 2311 3471 3019 1.31 0.87 Weekday 6-Site Averages: 330 496 431 Table 3 -Saturday Parking Demand at 7 Local Sites Dwelling Observed Parking Demand Observed Observed Study Site Bedrooms (Including Enclosed Garages) Demand Demand Units Overnight Per Unit Per Bedroom Royal St. Moritz 336 528 448 1.33 0.85 Cross Creek 392 544 444 1.13 0.82 Terrawood 291 401 397 1.36 0.99 Twenty-Four99 348 486 443 1.27 0.91 Marquis at Silver Oaks 480 732 735 1.53 1.00 Montelena 256 400 290 1.13 0.73 Wildwood Creek 344 524 331 0.96 0.63 Saturday 7-Site Totals: 2447 3615 3088 Saturday 7-Site Averages: 350 516 441 1.26 0.85 Kimley>>) Horn Page The weekday observed parking demand including garages across the six sites averaged 1.31 vehicles per unit with a range of 1.00 to 1.46 spaces per unit. The average number of vehicles per bedroom was calculated to be 0.87, ranging from 0.66 to 1.00. The Saturday observed parking demand including garages across the six sites averaged 1.26 vehicles per unit with a low observation of 0.96 and a high of 1.36. The Saturday average demand was observed to be 0.85 vehicles per bedroom, varying from 0.63 to 1.00. Four of the study sites included garages on the property. Residents often park in the "driveway" of their garages, which leads to double counting since the garage is counted as occupied, and the vehicle is counted again as being on the site. Since the "driveways" do not count as parking spaces, this results in an artificially high ratio of parked vehicle to units or bedrooms. Even with this assumption that enclosed garages skew the occupancy of the sites to be higher than reality, the highest observed parking rate was 1.53 vehicles per unit and 1.00 vehicles per bedroom, both of which are below the 1.60 spaces per unit and 1.13 spaces per bedroom that are proposed for the Preserve. Summary Observations of comparable local and suburban sites show that the effective parking demand of 1.31 occupied spaces per unit is slightly higher than ITE averages. This observed number is known to be somewhat high due to the assumption of garage spaces being occupied. A comparison of the national ITE rates, observed parking rates, and provided parking supply can be found in the summary table below: Table 4— Summary Table ITE Average Observed Preserve Suburban, Urban, Urban, Weekday Saturday Proposed Weekday Weekday Weekend Parking Demand per Unit 1.23 1.20 1.03 1.31 1.26 1.60 Parking Demand per Bedroom - - - 0.87 0.85 1.13 The proposed supply of 1.60 spaces per unit for the Preserve will provide the right balance of available parking while preserving the nature oriented design of the site. END Attached: Parking Count Data Summary Table Observed Observed Tuesday Wednesday Saturday Apartment Complex No.of Dwelling Units Parking Demand Parking Demand 1/23/2018 1/24/2018 1/27/2018 per Dwelling Unit per Bedroom Vehicles+ Vehicles+ Vehicles+ Garages Counted Garages Counted Garages Counted 58 Efficiency 208 One Bedroom Colonial Village 117 Two Bedroom 251 286 253 0.64 0.41 67 Three Bedroom 450 Total D.U. Outlier-Count not Outlier-Count not Outlier-Count not 2300 Grayson Drive 701 Total Bedrooms included included included N/A Efficiency N/A One Bedroom Grayson Square N/A Two Bedroom 332 361 326 N/A N/A N/A Three Bedroom NIA Total D.U. No Room Data-Data No Room Data-Data No Room Data-Data 2100 Grayson Drive N/A Total Bedrooms not included not included not included 0 Efficiency 152 One Bedroom Royal St. Moritz 176 Two Bedroom N/A 8 Three Bedroom 1.39 0.88 467 448 336 Total D.U. Unable to enter 2050 Grayson Drive 528 Total Bedrooms complex Gate 0 Efficiency 240 One Bedroom Cross Creek 152 Two Bedroom N/A N/A 0 Three Bedroom 1.13 0.82 444 392 Total D.U. Could not count North Could not count North 2701 Grapevine Mills Blvd N 544 Total Bedrooms half of property-Gated half of property-Gated 0 Efficiency 193 One Bedroom Terrawood 86 Two Bedroom N/A 1.37 1.00 400 397 12 Three Bedroom 291 Total D.U. Unable to enter 3225 Grapevine Mills Blvd N 401 Total Bedrooms complex Gate 0 Efficiency 222 One Bedroom Twenty-Four 99 114 Two Bedroom N/A 1 30 0.93 452 443 12 Three Bedroom 348 Total D.U. Unable to enter 3601 Grapevine Mills Parkway 486 Total Bedrooms complex Gate 0 Efficiency 264 One Bedroom Marquis at Silver Oaks 180 Two Bedroom N/A 1.53 1.00 703 735 36 Three Bedroom 480 Total D.U. Unable to enter 3701 Grapevine Mills Parkway 732 Total Bedrooms complex Gate 0 Efficiency 128 One Bedroom Montelena 112 Two Bedroom 1.29 0.83 323 330 290 16 Three Bedroom 256 Total D.U. 501 Turner Road 400 Total Bedrooms 0 Efficiency 188 One Bedroom Wildwood Creek 132 Two Bedroom N/A 0.81 0.53 277 259 24 Three Bedroom 344 Total D.U. Unable to enter 820 E Dove Loop Road 524 Total Bedrooms complex Gate t p� cu a SILVER TREE PARTNERS January 2, 2018 City of Grapevine 200 S Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 Mayor, Members of City Council, and P&Z Commissioners, Silver Tree Partners and Greystar respectfully request your approval of 20 acres to be rezoned for The Preserve, a MF Class A Development comprising of Brownstones, Resort Flats, and Lodge Flats. The current zoning of Industrial and PCD are impractical because of size, shape and topography. Yet, these features work extremely well with our proposed development. The Preserve meets Grapevine's new MF Design Guidelines and mirrors a Lodge Style Development with its exterior facades, curvature streets and plentiful landscaping. Amenities include a mile walking trail, 24-hour fitness center, large dog park facility, business center with computers, conference room with audio/visual capability, and resort style pool with cabanas. There is no site better suited for this type of development within the City of Grapevine. By incorporating the natural topography of the property, this development avoids any resemblance to cookie-cutter developments of the past. Buffered by SH360 to the west and over 350 acres of DFW Airport land east and south, it truly is surrounded by a preserve. We have worked with your Planning and Parks Departments, ArchiTexas and many other engineers and consultants for over three years to ensure the Preserve fulfills the needs of the residents while still protecting Grapevine's high quality standards. We believe with your approval the Preserve will be a community the City of Grapevine uses as a template for future multifamily housing. Sincerely, Paul Gardner, ew Ord, [�VJ Silver Tree Partners Greystar AN 0 ? s By 17101 Preston Road Suite I00 Dallas, Texas 75248 tel (972) 669-9955 fax(972) 669-9977 www.silvertreepartners.com GR YSTAR® January 9, 2018 Development Services—Planning Division 200 S. Main St Grapevine,Texas 76051 RE: "The Preserve"Planned Development Overlay Application Letter. To whom it may concern: "The Preserve" is a 399 unit 3-story apartment community, comprised of resort and lodge-style architecturally themed buildings. Most of the buildings have "tuck-under" internal garages and the remainder are surfaced parked with carports. The Preserve mirrors a lodge-style development with its exterior facades, curvilinear designed streets and plentiful landscaping which have all been designed to adhere to the newly approved "Design Standards Manual for Multifamily and Vertical Mixed-use Development"(The Guidelines). Exterior amenities that complement the natural landscape include an extensive hike and bike trail/sidewalk with fitness stations intermixed, outdoor kitchen/BBQ pavilions, dog park and dog wash facility and resort style pool, to name a few. Interior amenities include, but are not limited to, 24-hour fitness facility, 24 hr. digital package concierge, business center with computers and conferencing and spacious club and gaming room. As a part of the requested Planned Development Overlay Application process, we are requesting that the"face to face"distance between 3 sets of buildings be less than 50'. As mentioned above,our site plan is required to have a "non-orthogonal" design which caters to a more curvilinear site plan design of winding roads and asymmetric building orientation. For this reason, it has forced our buildings into diagonal configurations that satisfy this requirement but unfortunately makes it extremely difficult to comply with the 50' rule. There are essentially 3 places where the buildings are less than 50' —one is 46.7' (Bldgs. 3 & 9), the 2°d is 32.5' (Bldg. 2 and single-story Clubhouse) and the Yd instance shows a min. separation of 39' (Bldgs. 4 & 8) but an average of closer to 44'. We feel that the "non-orthogonal" relationship of the building layout is an important design principle that adds value to the enjoyment of the development and is more important than the buildings proximity to one another in these minor cases. Thank you, GREYS AR " LLC a Dela are limi d li b i company By: Name: At-Appeo-1 bRQ Title: VtcF pR.EsIpt--n{� ]9487790v.2 �. Z12--01 �;.- . , "A I CITY OFGR.APEVINE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION PART 1.APPLICAIT INFORMATION — — — Applicant Name: Greystar GP II,LLC c/o Andrew Ord Applicant Address: f600 E Las Colinas Blvd City/State/Zip Irving,Texas75039 -`-.------------------- Phone No. �4 8 q-ra . u Lk. k • aJ01 Fax No. (843.302.0214 I Email Address — Mobile Phone �858-8Z-8521 r Applicant's interest in subject property(Purchaser - PART 2.PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property (n/a Legal Description: Lot [,— Block Addition[Glade/3G0 Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet Size of subject property: acres)r/ 20.32 square footage f+ -885,357 -- Present zoning classification LI Light Industrial District Requested zoning district f R-MF-2 Multifamily District r Present use of property acant — Proposed use of property Multifamily Development The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that `R Mr Multifamily District would allow the proposed use is ` Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning 2 acres. Sec.22.F.0 PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner [(multiple owners,see attached) Prop Owner Address�y� —_ ---------------- - —- - --- - -- D � �-a-�---- - City/State2ip - - - ------------ - JAN 02 2013 Phone No. i ----- Fax No. I - --- By ---- -GR' A P E4 CITY OFx~~« RAPEVUNE ������ ��W��J/�� APPLICATION �-��'��- ��` /,^/���u_ PART 1./\PPUCA Applicant Name | Applicant Address: | Cuy/StamZip | Phone No ' Fax No � / i --'�-�-- -�� --- --'-- � --- -------�--------�----- Email Address Mobile / ' | | ----'- --� - --- ------ ---- Applicant's interest in subject property | PART%. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address cf subject property | | } - �-- ---'� -- ---'- -- ----'- -'--- - -- -------' Legal Description: Lot | Block | Addition: Legal description of subject property (metes& bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11" sheet Size of subject property: acres aquare footag� ' [--� --- ----- -� ----- i'-------�---� � Present zoning classification i Requested zoning district i | - - ' - - - -- -'� - '-- - - -Present use uso of property / !� ��--�------ - — ------'----'----------- Proposed use ofproperty | The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that ! would allow the proposed use /u � | Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning � PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION U Property Owner /The Gardner 3bOYVLCPa�ne,ship VVestc/o Paul A.Gardner » / Prop Owner Address/l710l Preston Road,Suite 1OU ------- ----------'---- City/BboteiZip [DaUas,T%75Z48 ���������������_�����_������ Phone No |97Z�09v955 Fax No [972.609-9977 ❑ All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the descretion of the staff Based on the size of the agenda,your application may be scheduled to a later date. �/� ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry Public hearings maybe confinued t he%Lp/c� hearing Public hearings will not be tabled �_�v ❑ Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ 1 have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name Applicant's Signature ------------- The State of County of Before me (notary) on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me(or proved to me on the oath of card or other document)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D I I Notary In and For State of (The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership-West c/o Paul A.Gardner Print Property Owner's Name Property Owner's Signature The State of Texas County of Before me (notary) 1 LyPE��- �1A" i v,�4) on this day personally appeared (applicant)[Paul A.Gardner known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this( day of -DO w-Puz- A.D. a OIrJ ?q " LYNELL R.MANNING ��^J My Notary ID#124988264 Expires July 14,2020 — T------T- Notary In and For State of (Texas n ACKNOWLEDGEMENT taoot All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership-West c/o Paul A. Gardner Signature of Property Owner Date /Z _I 7 E,�' n fir , AP� �. •.E IR _�EV°�� CITY OFGRAPEVINE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION PART 1.APPLICA�INFORMATION Applicant Name: Applicant Address: j _ �--------`-- ---- City/State/Zip Phone No. Fax No. Email Address Mobile Phone �— Applicant's interest in subject property F PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property Legal Description: Lot Block Addition Legal description of subject property (metes& bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11" sheet Size of subject property: acres square footage Present zoning classification Requested zoning district Present use of property Proposed use of property The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that would allow the proposed use is Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION VN Property Owner KFF,Limited Partnership c/o Kathy C.Blackstone,Treasurer Z013 Prop Owner Address 1366 Dublin Road By City/State/Zip Columbus,Ohio 43215 ` Phone No. 614,351.6227 Fax No i614.274.6794 ❑ All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when fled and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the tion o e staff Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continu o the 4,YMD hearing Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name Applicant's Signature The State of County of Before me (notary) on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of AD Notary In and For State of [KFF,Limited Partnership c/o Kathy C.Blackstone,Treasurer 1 7 L Print Property Owner's Name Property ner's Signature The State of i County of 1 Before me(notary) kg&l ,,b D on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of ' C�'�'4�✓/ �� A.D. d l IIA Rebecca Notary In and For State of * *; Notary Publie,SkMe of Ohio My Commission E*n 11-13.2020 2 p JAN 0 2 20,113 I�u By ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 7,kswo All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when riled and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date KFF, Limited Partnership c/o Kathy C. Blackstone, Treasurer Signature of Property Owner Date p T M T 0 T T .JAN Q 2 2013 By ❑ All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at ttW,..WcreQjLof the staff Based on the size of the agenda,your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continZ V?XTAD` hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4.SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUE PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Greystar GP II,LLC do Andrew Ord Print Applicant's Name Wfinture The State of Texas County of Before me(notary)I on this day personally appeared (applicant) Andrew Ord known to me (or proved to me on t e oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this Lt day of DG��C�r A.D. 2014 WENDY COKER Notary Public,State of Texas :h= My Commission Expires �;;�` January 27, 2019 Notary In and For State of Texas (multiple owners,see attached) Print Property Owner's Name Property Owner's Signature The State of County of Before me (notary) on this day personally appeared (applicant)I known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D. Notary In and For State of I JAN 0 4 '2213 By ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 7Z IS*0 t All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Gr star G II, /o Andrew Ord Signature of Applicant Date Signature of Property Owner (multiple owners,see attached) Date p M Lu JAN 0 2 �n1, By Z Rftlo( "Y'1 APE ° I N ` CITY OFGRAPEVINE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION PART 1.APPLICANT INFORM,4TlON- - ,-. Applicant Name: Applicant Address. City/State/Zip --- ---- -_ — - Phone No Fax No. Email Address F — Mobile Phone Applicant's interest in subject property PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property — — Legal Description: Lot Block Addition j Legal description of subject property (metes& bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet Size of subject property: acres f square footage '— Present zoning classification F Requested zoning district E Present use of property Proposed use of property — — The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that would allow the proposed use is Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning -- PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner lGrapevine Holdings,L.P.c/o Paul A.Gardner imil Prop Owner Address[17101 Preston Road,Suite 100 — City/State/Zip (Dallas,Texas 75248 By Phone No. 1972.669.9955 _ Fax No. 1972.669.9977 ❑ All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the dascretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date I Ail public hearings w#i be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry Public hearings may be contin totjx4,,c& hearing Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ i have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name Applicant's Signature The State of County of Before me ( ry) on this day personally appeared (applicant) notes known to me(or proved to me on the oath of card or other document)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of`�— A D Notary In and For State of Grapevine Holdings, L.P.c/o Paul A.Gardner Print Property Owner's Name Property Owner's Signature The State of Texas County of Before me(notary) Lys WAI djl� on this day personally appeared (applicant) Paul A.Gardner known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this �5 day of (��G M I A.D. 129+8- r. ° h LYNELL R.MANNING --- ----- — —---- - ------ - �r My Notary ID#124988264 ,:�TF�f�E�• Expires July 14,2020 ' Notary In and For State of Texas p � Cg � � dC JAN 0 2 2013 By AMOWLEDGEMENT Z 1qvO t All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant ( Date Grapevine Holdings, L.P. c/o Paul A. Gardner Signature of Property Owner Date 12 S - �Z 7 I BAN l ' By Cu I8-�a ;GR A VI T F Y A S ,a CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent/company/cwrtact Greystar GP II, LLC c/o Andrew Ord Street address of applicant/agent 600 E. Las Colinas Blvd City/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent: Irving, Texas 75039 Telephone number of applicant/agent: Fax number of applicant/agent 972.444.2197 843.302.0214 Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicanbagent 858.864.8521 PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property n/a Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on B 1/2"x 1 i"sheet) Lot 1 Block A Addil+on Glade/360 Size of subject property _ +/- 20.325 Acres- T q!_ +/- 885,357 Square footage Present zoning classification: I Proposed use of the property.' L1 /PCD Multifamily Development Circle yes or no, if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum/maximum district size for conditional use request- 2 acres. Sec. 22.F.2 Zoning ordinance provision requinng a conditional use. Sec. 22.1.1 (CUP to allow maximum 3 stories not to exceed 44 feet in height). Sec. 56.1 (Parking Re ►rG"- PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Re 5-Vi 7 o rzt�iv Name of current property owner IF (multiple owners, see attached) Street address of property owner City/State/Zip Code of property owner.- Telephone number of property owner Fax number of property owner C CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent/company/contact Street address of applicant/agent — City/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent __--_- - --- -- ---_ Telephone number of applicant/agent Fax number of applicanbagent Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicarit/agent PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet) Lot Block Addition -- --------------- Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: Circle yes or no,if applies to this application — Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum/maximum district size for conditional use request- Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use. PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership-West c/o Paul A. Gardner Street address of property owner. 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 City/State/Zip Code of property owner Dallas, TX 75248 Telephone number of property owner. Fax number of property ow 972.669.9955 972-669.99 JAM 0 2 20i3 By r'�q R A EE V L)�E� T Y, r A 'S CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent:/company/contact Street address of applicant/agent City-1 State/Zip Code of applicant/agent: Telephone number of applicant/agent Fax number of applicant/agent — Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property _ Acres_ Square footage Present zoning classfcatlon: ; Proposed use of the property. -- ---------------------- ----- — Circle yes or no, if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum/maximum district size for conditional use request: Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: Grapevine Holdings, L.P. c/o Paul A. Gardner Street address of property owner. 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 City/State/Zip Code of property owner. Dallas, Texas 75248 Telephone number of property owner: LFax number of property owner. M 972.669.9955 972.669.9977 u JAN 0 y i�{13 ay __J c ,GR VINE TE ' , , �. CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent:/companylcontact Street address of applicant/agent: City-1 State/Zip Code of applicant/agent: Telephone number of applicant/agent: J� Fax number of applicantlagent Email address of applicantlagent Mobile phone number of applicantlagent PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11'sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of sutVact property Acres _ _ Square loot Present zoning classification. Proposed use of the property. i Circle yes or no,if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum/maximum district size for conditional use request i Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use. PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner KFF, Limited Partnership c/o Kathy C. Blackstone, Treasurer Street address of property owner 1366 Dublin Road City/State/Zip Code of property owner Columbus, Ohio 43215 Telephone number of property owner. Fax number of property owner. 614.351.6227 614.274.6794 JAN 0 2 2013 UU By co u I ?-O:t ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ❑ In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations(example:buffer yards, distance between users) ❑ In the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood ❑ Application of site plan approval(Section 47, see attached Form "B'). ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major)approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL US Q ST AN ACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Greystar GP II, LLC c/o Andrew Ord , Print Applicant's Name: Ap t' ture: The State of Texas County Of Before Me Lef on this day personally appeared Andrew Ord (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this 1 day of r►Vl/� A.D. 201$i ....ob WENDY COKER tirr` i.. S Notary Public,State of Texas My Commission Expires January 27, 2019 Notary In And For State Texas (multiple owners. see attached) Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D. Notary In And For State Of TexasMR M U LBy 0 2 20i3 C(A I -o� ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ❑ In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations(example:buffer yards, distance between users) ❑ in the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Application of site plan approval(Section 47, see attached Form'8) ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements ❑ All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry Public hearings maybe continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled ❑ Any changes to a site plan(no matter how minor or major)approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process ❑ i have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared _ (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D Notary in And For State Of Texas The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership-West c/o Paul A. Gardner �,Aa" - Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State Of Texas County Of V- � ✓� Before Me LV NeLU, on this day personally appeared Paul A. Gardner (notary) (property owned known to me(or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed (Seat) Given under my hand and seat of office this_�day of A.D. 20" d V 1.17 "``¢h: LYNELL R.MANNING ' /V *' My Notary ID#124988264 Not n And For State Of Texas Expires July 14,2020 , OF f'E JAN 0 02 2013 By cult-oa ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document J In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations(example.buffer yards, distance between users) ❑ In the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Application of site plan approval(Section 47, see attached Form 'B'), J The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47. Site Plan Requirements. ZI All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. J All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing Public hearings will not be tabled ❑ Any changes to a site plan(no matter how minor or major)approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. J I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature; The State of County Of Before W on this day personalty appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed (Seal)Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D. Notary in And For State Of Texas Grapevine Holdings, L.P. clo Paul A. Gardner -- Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State of Texas County Of T AU-11-s Before Me wow, K"oi 13. on this day personally appeared Paul A. Gardner (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seat)Given under my hand and seal of office this day of V�(i�Vtt BErZ— A.D. �8 o LYNELL R.MANNING �. ►v�^�"�` c No My Notary ID#124988264 tary 1 nd For State Of Texas 'TF bV Expires July 14,2020 s l {' JAN 0 2 2013 � By CWT.-OA ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ❑ In the same letter,describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations(example:buffer yards distance between users) ❑ In the same letter,describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood ❑ Application of site plan approval(Section 47, see attached Form"8) O The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan(no matter how minor or major)approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ i have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowied a that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal)Given under my hand and seal of office this day of ,A.D Notary In And For State Of Texas KFF, Limited Partnership c/o Kathy C. Blackstone ( � Print Property Owners Name: Property ner's Signature: The State Off y County Of F r!)A-I , �n B JFtog'A' ��VN l O'l"� , fY� Y y appeared Before Age � �✓ ��}�on this da personall (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the -�purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal)Given under my hand and seal of office thl,�A� ) day off r�i✓b P A.D-2&1-&- n Q 1 b� A SF� ry to And Fo ate O,fnTe Rebecca Hendrix Notary Pubic,Stale d OW 11 E My Commission E q*"11-M2020 i j� J A�1 0 " LJ FO F NON By I ?.0i VME,'IT E CITY OF GRAPEVINE Ali* PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent/company/contact G( s air &iP II , Ll.0 And re-(4 0rcl Street addresN of applicant/agent lnol-) E I.GS colilnas 61Yd. City/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent: IrOv TeacRS �15C3 Telephone num er of applicant/agent Fax number of applicant/agent: ci1Z . 444 . 2-t9-f U3. 3DZ .oz 14 Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent &P4 . gFz 1 Applicant's interest in subject property. Wrctg5er PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property N JA Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet) Lot I Block A Addition (ql a d @ 3101) Size of subject property +/— ZO.3 2 Acres 80 5 ( 3s Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property.+pert n_ L L I La�f 4N4`US[ ,OI G t �U t-� tQ Wl I 1eVG ID 'MGM-, l Minimum/maximum district size for request: Z AGrcS . gee--iovj ZZ, �7_ C Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from: StAkli� �e(aar5fi�v, rec}vircWyev,} F �' � ice FaGc ry' 8acIc 3gcV- PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner. MVL-0PIE oWMF-es , SIZE ATlooctiE Street address of property owner.' City/State/Zip Code of property owner Telephone number of property owner Fax number of property owner 0:2=1 Formslapp.pd.doc C31 2 2/14/2017 r ply- oi IT E " 8 CITY OF GRAPEVINE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent/company/contact Street address of applicant/agent. City/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent: Telephone number of applicant/agent Fax number of applicant/agent Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent Applicant's interest in subject property. PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification. Proposed use of the property: i Minimum/maximum district size for request. Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner 'inQ Clardner 31o0 W I-C PAZ7WE --.4 '1P- We-S+ c/o Pavl A. Gard ne r Street address of property owner 11t01 PrestLAq Svi to I400 City/State/Zip Code of property owner , TX '1 5 2.'4 o Telephone number of property owner. Fax number of property owner: T72-- LOLP I . 9 55 9-12—. 1ol09-'191-7 0:\ZCU\l Forms\app.pd.doc JAN v 2 2/14/2017 By INE Ali,°T I A s'V CITY OF GRAPEVINE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent:/company/contact Street address of applicant/agent City/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent. Telephone number of applicant/agent: Fax number of applicant/agent Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent Applicant's interest in subject property. PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11 sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: Minimum/maximum district size for request. Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: iap V►v�e Hvldih s L. P. clo Paul A (*(ccIher Street address of property owner. I'�Iol Fres-ho Izvtqd , Sui4e loo City/State/Zip Code of property owner PA11as TX 152� o Telephone number of property owner. Fax number of property owner. 172. Li t;� . 9911 0\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc 2 2/14/2017 3 a Vr CITY OF GRAPEVINE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent:/company/contact Street address of applicant/agent. City/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent Telephone number of applicant/agent: Fax number of applicant/agent: Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent Applicant's interest in subject property. PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: I Minimum/maximum district size for request. Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from. PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: 4ffF Livv,4e� Pqv+v1er5i-Air G1V ►La i314c{G3�-pv� Trc�svYcr. Street address of property owner: 13taco QDO�A City/State/Zip Code of property owner. CcAUK 6vS , O►li[) 43215 Telephone number of property owner Fax number of property owner. La14 . 351 . (v2Z-- Lei 4 . 2-14 . (P-794 0\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc 2 2/14/2017 M" I PW ?- 0 I Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. • Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. • Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. • Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan(no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT5WFRLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SYBJECT PRO Y Gruel v,inr a t 1 ,uC cIo Andras. 0rcl ( b4fa Print App ant's Name: Applica S to . The State Of —r../�Vlr� -MIUCounty Of Ova Before MeIkXW on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the pu oses and cons ration therein expressed. Ay�r��f (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of . A.D. WENDY COKER --- Notary Pubfic:, #9#®A#ie►g§ i� My comrMigiiign ExpifpS E•..z;�,••' Notary In And For State xas January 2�, g919 Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal)Given under my hand and seal of office this day of .A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas rp O:\ZCU\l Forms\app.pd.doc Lo D 3 2/14/2017 JAN 31 NIS By w ?-o I • Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. • Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. • Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan(no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of . A D. Notary In And For State Of Texas Grope ViVle HoOIl—S t L.P. Flo Paul A. (^creirer .. Print Property Owners NameJ Property Owner's Signature: T The State Of ^eXczS County Of Before Me Ly N�� �. 1 v y N I N'S on this day personally appeared Pr,V A eirdN C►- (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. �2 (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this 1 Q cJ� day of A D 01-0 o LYNELL R.MANNING My Notary ID#124988264 taryl nd For State Of Texas '-;;F;f;Et'•` Expires July 14,2020 0.\ZCU\l Forms\app.pd.doc D Lb 3 2/14/2017 JAiN 3I By P�> I -� ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: '4rafevitie t-Wl'11 s CID Paul "icicdp%-er Signature of Owner Date: VBy OAi� v 1Z�i012=1 Forms\app.pd.doc 2/14/2017 PWIT.- D I ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. ❑ Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. ❑ Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. 7 Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major)approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ 1 have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of . A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas Gar4W NOD WLr- FRrtrerdk',,p - Vcst c/o P60 A- C- .rettgc�r Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State Of;�nl 1r�' ,� County Of IJ/,A 1w'r1S A l I ` ' p Before Me v7 01� _'IL- IY WFJ1►yl on this day personally appeared I c-1 V i A ' (—ZAr-A er (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this U " day of ,JAN u'DL>'/ - AD 0-01t . p�"••°` '• LYNELL R.MANNING _• My Notary ID#124988264 to I And For State Of Texa Expires July 14,2020 O:2CU\l Forms\app pd doc n `Z �� U 3 2/14/2017 ev 0 11F -0 I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: I It I I Is -r Signature of Owner Ckvffi�V(- ouv�ers Date: 0:\ZCU11 Forms\app.pd.doc JAN, 1 4 2/14/2017 c By rs I �- a ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: / --/d - eRo`g ,' ne C,rrc(tneY- LC we )t c to PcsuI A • e�r4rcltitr- Signature of Owner Date: a O:\ZCU\1 Forms\aPp P d.doc JAN �� ���9 4 2/14/2017 By 0 F- 0i • Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. • Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. • Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. • Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan(no matter how minor or major)approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. J 1 have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of . A D. Notary In And For State Of Texas I/ t-iv►nik4 *rov►e 'Tre4svrer c c, Print Property Owners Name: PropertyOwner's Signature: �}, / The State Of �• ��o County 04&.VA11 Before Me / on this day personally appeared (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this�day of A.D.Z�d l�0� Ft At Not ry In And For State Of Texas Rebecca Hendrix Blackstone `%, __ My Cmission Expires 11-13.2020 lJ o:� om WBY 3 2/ PLIT. o I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: t6FF i L'ivol �ecl Rar'tV-V--r-q'L-►i f o( D �' '-�C I ore r. Signature of Owner Date: Iln O:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc �C,C�2/14/2017 PLATTING VERIFICATION This verification statement must be signed prior To the submittal of this planned development overlay application It has been determined that the property described below does require platting or replatting and the applicant has been instructed on this procedure. It has been determined that the property described below is currently platted or does not require platting or replatting at this time. Address of subject property Legal description of subject property Public Works Department Date This form must be signed by the public works department and submitted along with a completed application to the planning and zoning department Dff � ff0RL f J"" 0:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc J ` i� 6 2/14/2017 ey SILVER TREE PARTNERS January 31, 2018 City of Grapevine 200 S Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 Mayor, Members of City Council, and P&Z Commissioners, The Exhibit attached to this letter outlines our proposal as to the Extension, Construction, and Regional Connectivity of the Grapevine Trail System. Trail Portion A - Will be installed simultaneously with The Preserve development, which will commence approximately 90 days after Council approval. Trail Portion B - Will be installed upon Council approval and development on that tract of land. Trail Portion C - Will be installed upon Council approval of development, which request is coming before the City within the next 2-3 months. Trail Portion D — This Bear Creek Park Trail extension has full support of the Grapevine Parks and Recreation Department. The landowners of Tracts A and B agree to provide $200,000 and the landowner of Tract C agrees to provide $50,000 to the City of Grapevine for construction of this portion of the Trail. Hope the details above help explain the Exhibit attached to this letter. As always, we are happy to answer any questions you may have concerning this proposal. Sincerely, Paul A. Gardner Terry Castleberry M--- 17,01 Landowner Tracts A and B Landowner Tract C Preston Road Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75248 tel (972) 669-9955 fax(972) 669-9977 www.silvertreepartners.COM Proposed Grapevine Trail Extension Exhibit (2N i Public Trail Addition w Crm* Puft Tr" B TEXAS i 9 4 Htia H i i 4, � , a V � s ;n i W.Glade Rd. ` JAPE 31 2C18 By � `Z t to,v 1 C u Roo a LEGAL DESCRIPTION (ZONING TRACT) Being a parcel of land located in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas a part of the Green W. Minter Survey, Abstract Number 1083, and being all of that called 14.324 acre tract of land described in deed to KFF Limited Partnership, an Ohio limited partnership as recorded in Volume 14006, Page 43, Tarrant County Deed Records, and also being a part of that called 23.918 tract of land described in deed to The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership-West as recorded in Volume 15348, Page 75, Tarrant County Deed Records, and being further described as follows: BEGINNING at a highway monument with an aluminum disc found at southwest corner of said 14.324 acre tract, said point also being at the intersection of the north right-of-way of Glade Road(a variable width right-of-way) with the east right-of-way of State Highway 360 (a variable width right-of-way); THENCE along the east right-of-way line of State Highway 360 as follows: North 29 degrees 23 minutes 17 seconds West, 193.24 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 27 degrees 58 minutes 48 seconds West, 195.10 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 31 degrees 03 minutes 10 seconds West, 99.30 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 41 degrees 19 minutes 29 seconds West, 104.66 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; Northwesterly, 399.12 feet along a curve to the right having a central angle of 06 degrees 02 minutes 03 seconds, a radius of 3789.72 feet, a tangent of 199.74 feet, and whose chord bears North 28 degrees 10 minutes 40 seconds West, 398.93 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 25 degrees 24 minutes 31 seconds West, 26.27 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 02 degrees 57 minutes 29 seconds East, 52.70 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 24 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds West, 21.60 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped"JBI" set for corner, said point being the northwest corner of said 14.324 acre tract, said point also being the southwest corner of that said 23.918 acre tract; North 25 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West, 40.30 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 81 degrees 25 minutes 40 seconds West, 30.15 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; pC� � C� OdC� JAN 0 2 2018 By Z142"01 C u North 25 degrees 10 minutes 36 seconds West, 77.41 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped"JBI" set for corner; THENCE North 64 degrees 49 minutes 24 seconds East, 346.30 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped"JBI" set for corner; THENCE North 25 degrees 10 minutes 36 seconds West, 99.74 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "JBI" set for corner; THENCE North 18 degrees 59 minutes 34 seconds East, 5.93 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped"JBI" set for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 31 minutes 47 seconds East, 449.09 feet to a point for corner in the east line of said 23.918 acre tract, said point being the west line of Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, said point also being in the centerline of Bear Creek; THENCE along the center line of Bear Creek and the east line of said 23.918 acre tract and the west line of Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport as follows: South 48 degrees 50 minutes 35 seconds East, 38.58 feet to a point for corner; South 79 degrees 25 minutes 45 seconds East, 205.58 feet to a point for corner; THENCE continuing along the east line of said 23.918 acre tract and the west line of Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport as follows: South 01 degrees 20 minutes 13 second West, 30.64 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped"JBI" set for corner; South 01 degrees 06 minutes 45 seconds East, 239.36 feet to a five-eighths inch iron rod found at the southeast corner of said 23.918 acre tract, said point also being the northeast corner of said 14.324 acre tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 00 minutes 54 seconds East, 993.83 feet along the west line of the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport to a monument with brass disc found for corner, said point being the southeast corner of said 14.324 acre tract, said point also being in the north right- of-way line of Glade Road; THENCE along the north right-of-way line of Glade Road as follows: West, 234.43 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped"JBI" set for corner; North 79 degrees 23 minutes 48 seconds West, 132.59 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 888,946 square feet or 20.407 acres of land. � n„ O U JAN 0 2�13 ay Z k TWO COWTS-02 "This document was prepared under 22 TAC 663.23, does not reflect the results of an on the ground survey,and is not to be used to convey or establish interests in real property except those rights and interests implied or established by the creation or reconfiguration of the boundary of the political subdivision for which it was prepared." pC� C� C� Od � JAN 0 2 2013 By Via Electronic Mail Rons @rapevinetexas.gov Mr.Ron Stombau gh 200 South Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 RE: Zoning Change Application for Property at the northeast conger of Glade Road and SH 121,Applicant: Greystar GP II, LLC Dear Ron; Thank you for your assistance with our zoning application referenced above. Pursuant to your previous conversations with Greystar, we are forwarding this letter to confirm the status of the proposed development's compliance with the City's Design Standards. Accompanying this letter is our completed District-Specific Design Standards checklist. As you will see from reviewing the accompanying checklist,we are pleased to confirm that we are either in virtually total compliance with the Design Standards, in almost all cases to the letter, or, in a few instances, in compliance with the spirit of the Design Standards. Of course, we are at the beginning of the zoning and entitlement phase, and as is normal during any development process, allowances must be made for reasonable modifications as the design is further developed in detail. In any such event, it is our intention to remain in compliance with the spirit and intent of the Design Standards at all times. Thank you very much for your consideration of the accompanying checklist. We look forward to continuing our dialogue with City Staff as we go through this process. Since y your ` i Donald eeks, AIA ' -.r, +:. ' Meeks + Partners, Architect for Greystar CC: Andrew Ord 19846382v.2 District-Specific Design Standards 1. Architectural Accommodations of Grade Change Complies: Does the plan retain grade to support the building plate including terraces,pati- Yes No In Spirit os,decks and any accessory buildings adjoined to the primary structure? F Comments: Will Comply. We've identified a number of opportunities to accomplish this. In specific, there are 5 prominent locations where we have designed in turn-down footings. These are high impact locations that will be enjoyed esthetically and functionally by residents and their visitors. Additionally, in the same spirit above, it is currently proposed (pending final engineering allowances) that most of the buildings will have 2' to 4' breaks (step-downs) in the foundations that allow the buildings to step-down with the declining grade which minimizes retaining wall usage and maximizes the architecture and its' ability to accommodate grade change. 2. Pedestrian Connection Beyond The Project And District Complies: Does the plan provide pedestrian connections from units within the project to Yes No In Spirit existing trails, sidewalks or other public and private walkways. 17 71 Does the plan provide pedestrian connections to places within the development that abut pedestrian walkways that the City's approved plans identify for the future? �,. Comments: We Comply. Accommodations have been made to provide for future connection points (both trail, sidewalks and streets) to the adjacent property to the north. Specifically, we have established an 8' wide "boardwalk" that runs along the western frontage of the project defined as the "borrowed landscape" (Parkway) that will tie into future developments to the north. Additionally, we will be providing a 10' wide public hike/bike trail that will extend northward and tie into future proposed developments to the north. Lastly, our plan shows an easement off the roundabout feature that will accommodate future vehicular tie-ins/connections to the adjacent property as well. a 3. Preserve and/or Restore The Natural Characteristic Of The District Complies: Does the plan include landscape development that continues the natural charac- Yes No In Spirit teristics of the projects surroundings? n Comments: I� Will Comply. Our landscape plan includes natural drifts and groupings/groves of trees that will be restorative to the site and will extend the natural mosaic of the adjacent undeveloped and open space areas into the site. Tree species used will be natural to the site, ones that accentuate the resort/lodge theme (e.g. Columnar Pines) and from the City's approved plant material list. 4. Perpetuate Residentially Derived Styling And Forms Complies: Yes No In Spirit Does the plan use the following architectural components? r7 F F • Pitched roof(gable or hip) • Organized roof massing where a dominant roof has subordinate roofs that extend form it. • 12 inch roof overhang • Roofed porches and balconies • No more than 45 horizontal feet of continuous wall without a horizon- tal offset of at least 4 feet • Dormers that break the cornice • Windows that align both horizontally and vertically • Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmet- rically within the form • Three stories maximum. These three stories may be over a parking podium. • Openings are treated with a jamb and/or head surround • The Void-to-Solid relationship for window-in-wall elements is less than 50% Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. z 5. Provide Buffer Adjacent To Residentially Adverse Conditions Complies: Does the plan provide a buffer between residential land use and adjacent envi- Yes No In Spirit ronmental conditions (e.g. loud sound) that would negatively impact the livabili- r 17 ty of the residential land? !—. Comments: To the West, our development will be set away from Hwy 360 by a generously landscaped ("borrowed landscape") public and private street scape - roughly 25' to 60' in width off property line. Additionally, the development will also slope down and away from the 360 frontage rd. towards Bear Creek - a fall of 30 - 60' (avg. 46') depending on the cross section you take. Lastly, the buildings will be equipped with acoustically rated and engineered windows to dampen any ambient sounds, within acceptable levels recommended by our acoustical engineer, from hwy 360 or the Airport. [To the East, our development is buffered from the airport by almost a mile of open space, '/2 mile of flood plan (included in the open space), a creek, and towering trees that seclude it from sight as the development is nestled down closer towards Bear Creek (a vertical drop of 76' from the airport to Bear Creek). [Our development will effectively "re-knit" the natural landscape and tree canopy that once existed on the site. The site itself is currently devoid of lots of trees compared to the surrounding parcels so we will be restoring or "re-knitting" that natural landscape into our development. p 6. Provide A Land Use And Scale Transition Between Multifamily/Vertical Complies: Mixed-Use Development And Abutting Single Family Development. Yes No In Spirit If the plan abuts an area of single-family residential land use,does it provide a F7 F_ r "residential transition"?A residential transition must include two components: L� • Height Transition: For any element with a height above 35ft, this ele- ment can't exceed one foot above 35ft in height for every lft of setback beyond 15ft. For example,you may have 36ft at 16ft setback, 37ft at 17ft and so on. . Scale Transition: Any element located within 20ft of a property line abutting a single-family land use must not have an elevation face area more than 1200 sq. ft. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 3 7. Provide Development That Maximizes Uses Appropriate To The Value Of The Complies: Setting And/Or Characteristic Of The Context. Yes No In Spirit If the surrounding street-level use is NOT predominately residential, does the 7 F F7 plan provide—or is the structure such that it could be leased to provide—first- floor or street-level land uses that are consistent with the context? If the plan has a distinct locational opportunity(such as being close to logistic, movement or transit hubs), does it provide—or is the structure such that is could be leased to provide—first-floor or street-level land uses that are consistent with this context? If the answer to either question is YES, does the plan provide—or could be rent- ed to provide—these land uses for at least 70% of the street-fronting first-floor space? Comments: We perceive the value of the setting, characteristic of the context, and the distinct locational opportunity to be Nature and how we are leveraging our relationship with that context. Our development maximizes this setting by "re-knitting" the natural landscape into our site design, introducing the first phase of a public hike/bike trail and trail-head so people - both our residents and the Grapevine community at large - can enjoy the environment, and delivering the resort/lodge derived style architecture to compliment and flow with the natural setting. 0 8. Perpetuate Commercially Derived Styling And Forms Complies: Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms that include the following Yes No In Spirit elements: 71 F • A predominately flat roof concealed by a raised parapet of at least 12in in height • All openings are vertically and horizontally aligned • Balconies are projected • Steel construction is exposed • The first floor plate is at least 15ft high at the street level • Void-to-solid relationships are 50% or greater void Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. k 4 9. Preserve And Extend Thematic Streetscapes Complies: Does the plan continue the established streetscape of its surrounding District? Yes No In Spirit This includes: ❑ • Matching light fixtures and spacing of light fixtures • Matching tree species, scale, placement and spacing • Matching paving material and paving pattern • Continuation of defined inset areas for on-street parking Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 10. Maintain Compatibility With District Thematic Sign Features. Does the plan Complies: provide signage that is compatible with signage in the surrounding District? This Yes No In Spirit includes: ❑ ❑ • Maintaining the relationship of signage to street-fronting building planes • Marinating the general appearance of the District's signage • Maintaining sign illumination consistent with the District and its nightscape • Use of sign types consistent with the District and the context. This in- cludes commercial tenant signs, premise signs and project signs. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 5 11. Provide Responsive Interface To Open Space And Open Space Amenities. Complies: Does the plan address open space in ways that extend the open space into the Yes No In Spirit project?This includes: 71 ❑ F7 . Elimination of parking aprons in the foreground between the structure and the open space . Extension of landscape species and patterns characteristic of the open space into the project . Orientation of buildings to that building placement breaks free from the normal orthogonal relation to street and bears relationship to features of the larger landscape • Extension of trails into the project • Use of fence design that does not visually disrupt the continuous ground plane Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. • 6 12. Resort/Lodge/Prairie Styling And Forms. Does the plan use architectural Complies: styles derived from resort/lodge/prairie architectural precedents? These include: Yes No In Spirit • Flat pitched gable or hipped rooves with long and un-interrupted ridges and cornices • Large roof overhangs with structural bracing such as brackets, angled braces, canted braced and exposed rafters • Tapered columns that are full masonry or have masonry bases • Use of flat roofs to accent pitched roofs • Variable plate heights • Vertical and Horizontal alignment of openings • Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmet- rically within the form • Use of decks and terraces • Architecturally enclosed balconies . Projected window jambs and/or headers • Structural details derived from timber construction detailing • Use of siding and masonry • Upper story insets within,or projections over,a lower story base Comments: We Comply. A few examples of the highlighted features that we designed to in order to characterize the style are... * Large Roof Overhangs with exposed rafters * Structural Bracing * Timber Frame Accents * Tapered Stone Columns * Architecturally Enclosed Balconies * Metal Awnings * 80% Stone All these architectural features help the community to meld into the natural setting and make it feel a part of the environment that is its' home. 13. Curvilinear Organization Of The Development Plan Complies: Does the plan have a curvilinear organization? This includes: Yes No In Spirit • Gracefully meandering streets and drives with bends in the street and '- 17 drive alignment that is responsive to grade • Merging street intersections where operations permit • Organically-shaped parking areas • Building orientations that are not tied to uniform street frontage • Drifted groupings of trees in lieu of straight rows with uniform spacing Comments: We comply. We conform to all 5 bulleted points above. The site plan is non-orthogonal in nature, is not regimental in design and is curvilinear in its' appeal. Our site streets and parking meander in a non-orthogonal arrangement providing aesthetically pleasing visual interest for both the community and our residents. 14. Conceal Visibility Of Service And Parking Functions Complies: Does the plan place service and parking functions so that such functions are Yes No In Spirit NOT in the foreground yard space between any arterial or primary street and F. F7 E the buildings that are facing that street? L� Comments: Yes. We comply. The public realm is buffered by a large "borrowed landscape" (Parkway) setback (25'-60') of tree groves, meandering 8' wide sidewalk, resort/lodge styled buildings and a thoughtful dog park. Parking and trash functions are strategically situated away and screened from public view by buildings and landscaping. The only parking areas that are visible from the public realm is the public parking area for the hike/bike trail-head and the public leasing parking in front of the club/leasing center - both of which are nicely and sufficiently landscaped. 8 15. Perpetuate Historic/Indigenous Derived Architectural Styling And Forms. Complies: Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms derived from the historic or Yes No In Spirit indigenous character of the District? Such aspects include: C 0 El • Commercially-scaled first floor with a 15ft plate • For building of three floors or greater, a tripartite architecture • Decorative and embellished front parapet • Street canopy • Portrait orientation of openings and subversion of openings • Continuous vertical corners often expressed as pilasters • Occasional use of roof forms as accent elements on the front elevation • Void-to-Solid ratio with greater void at the street level and greater solid at other levels • Treatment of openings with jamb and/or header surrounds • Use of belt courses to establish horizontal reference for placement of openings • Use of decorative brick bands and details Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 9 16. Use Of Thematic Exterior Material, If Such Material Is Characteristic Of Dis- Complies: trict And Complies With The General Material Standards. Yes No In Spirit If there is a surrounding District context,does the plan continue with the use of the dominant and characteristic material of the surrounding District? If so, is the use of that material in compliance with the General Material Stan- dards of the Building Manual? Dominant use of material means material that comprises at least 70% of the building exterior excluding openings. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 17. Orthogonal/Block Orientation Of The Development Plan. Does the plan have Complies: a block/orthogonal organization?This includes: Yes No In Spirit • Straight streets with right angle intersections F7 • Continuous street wall defined by alignment of buildings • Uniform spacing of street trees and street fixtures • Continue the urban blocks which are adjacent to the project • Have decorative cross walks or other intersection enhancements Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. • 10 18. Pedestrian/Residential Activity Connection Between The Public Street And Complies: Living Units Fronting The Street. Yes No In Spirit Does the plan present the public street with an external expression of the resi- 71 El 11 dential activity? This means that the street level of the residential development is not commercially used or made capable for commercial use. This includes porches, stoops, terraces, patios, fenced front yards and steps up from an ap- proach grade. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 19. Maintain Height And Scale Compatibility With The Height And Scale Char- Complies: �w acteristic Of District. Yes No In Spirit When height and scale are important attributes of the surrounding District's F identity, is the plan compatible with this height and scale? Such compatibility can be achieved through one or both of the following: • Upper-story setbacks that create a building mass at the street consistent with context . Horizontal offsets at the street level which reduce the lower floor pre- sentation of mass when the characteristic block size is exceeded. This creates the image of a block that is further subdivided through built rec- ognition of individual properties as described in the"Bay Modulation" section of the Building Manual. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 0 20. Use Of Bay Modulation Patterns That Are Compatible With Bay Modulation Complies: Of The District. Yes No In Spirit Does the plan create a street frontage that continues the bay modulation of the D ® El block? Bay modulation refers to the architectural expression of individual build- ings within the block face. This is important to emulate the traditional block face of a downtown where buildings are normally built lot-line to lot-line in direct juxtaposition. In such downtowns,there is a complex street wall referred to as the"Bay" and the rhyth- mic and varied offset and appearance of that bay is referred to as"Bay Modula- tion:' Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. • 12 21. Provide An Urbanized Streetscape. Does the plan provide an urbanized Complies: streetscape along the primary street frontage that is consistent with the char- Yes No In Spirit acteristic urban street fabric within the District? Key features of an urbanized streetscape include: . The architectural plane fronting the primary street must create a con- tinuous street wall along the primary street frontage. Buildings must establish a"built-to" zone which extends from the primary street front property line and extends into the property a distance of 3ft and at least 75% of the primary street frontage much lie within this zone. NOTE: the location and depth of this zone may be modified upon City approval when the modification results in lateral expansion of a sidewalk space for a sidewalk restaurant or sidewalk retail or in the creation of an arcade along the street. . Street trees used in the streetscape should continue the use of an exist- ing tree species when the larger urban setting contains a thematic tree. If the surrounding urban setting does not have a thematic tree, the plan must choose from a list of approved plants. • Street lights must continue the uniform spacing and placement charac- teristic of the surrounding primary street. When a larger urban setting contains a thematic light or light standard,the plan must use that light standard.When no thematic light exists,the plan must choose a light or light standard appropriate for urban streetscape use. . Decorative paving should continue the characteristic paving material and pattern of the urban context when that context includes a thematic sidewalk treatment. When no thematic treatment exists, the project must use a sidewalk paving material and pattern appropriate for urban streets- cape use. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 13 22. Provide A"Borrowed Landscape" For The Primary Street Frontage Complies: Does the plan provide a"borrowed landscape' along the primary street frontage Yes No In Spirit that preserved the general character of the District?This includes: fu n • Elimination of parking aprons or walls between the building and street ICI !J unless the landscape space abutting the street is greater than 20ft Creation of an expanded parkway that is varied in dimension with the minimum parkway expansion being 15ft from the street right of way and with variations in width occurring at least every 200ft. Creation of pads for horizontal mixed use qualifies as varied Borrowed Landscape space • Use of a pedestrian trail in lieu of a pedestrian sidewalk. Sidewalks within the borrowed landscape space must be meandering pedestrian ways at least 8ft wide. Comments: We Comply. Our "borrowed landscape" (Parkway) includes a variable width (-25'-60' from property line - not including public ROW add] width) open space along the street frontage, with pedestrian access, that moves in and out of the frontage area providing pedestrian connectivity from the site to adjacent trails and future connection points. Our security fencing is set back from the street, linking the buildings, at the building level so the frontage area does not give the appearance of a "compound". Around the perimeter and where the opportunities arise, we use the buildings themselves as a security barrier with the security fence connecting each building. This puts our lodge-style building architecture thoughtfully in the foreground while pushing the fence to the background where it belongs. The tree drifts and groves in the frontage area extend the natural mosaic of the adjacent areas into the site along the "borrowed landscape" parkway. 14 23. Promote Horizontal Mixed Use Complies: Yes No In Spirit Does the project create opportunities for stand-alone retail/restaurant pads with- (—I in the street frontage of the primary street? In no case should the provision of a !J retail pad consume more than 50% of the multifamily frontage. Where the multifamily frontage is 300ft or less, a retail pad leave-out is not required. This retail pad requirement may be waived upon City Approval but a requirement for variable street definition (#24) still applies Comments: Retail is infeasible for this location for the following reasons... • Site constraints: Due to site topo (the site falls between 30' and 60' towards Bear Creek), visibility is poor. The large areas needed for big-box retail or bulk distribution warehouse (the site's current zoning) would require a cost-prohibitive level of earthwork to clear sufficiently flat pads for the building, parking areas and loading areas. • Access constraints: Access is poor due to limited Glade frontage and "right-in right-out" (one-way) limited access off of 360 frontage. • Demand constraints: There is inadequate residential density as the airport land dominates most of the retail trade area. • Operator constraints: Retail operators have overwhelmingly selected 121 and Glade Road to the west and Highway 114 to the north as viable locations. The site has been zoned industrial for over two decades, but industrial operators have selected other locations around the airport with level topography. 24. Provide Variable Street Definition Within The Block Face Along Primary Complies: Streets Yes No In Spirit Does the plan create a variable street definition through the variable setback of F multifamily structures fronting the primary street? No more than 50% of the project frontage may adhere to a uniform setback dimension. Horizontal offsets in the development plan set back line must be no less than 10 ft. Comments: We comply and far exceed both the 50% and the 10ft. rule above. In accordance with the natural and organic theme of the design, the building's fronting both Glade Rd. and the 360 Frontage Rd. are canted at differing angles that create a varied presentation of the architecture to the public realm in a way that is non-regimental and non-uniform. Our closest building to the property line along the frontage roads is 25' vs. the 10' minimum above. Our furthest building is roughly 60' from the property line. 15 District Specific Stan- 360/Airport Grapevine Grapevine Gaylord/SH Central Tran- dards (A = Applicable) District Mille South Mills North 26 District sit District District District 1 Architectural accommo- A A dation of grade change 2 Pedestrian connection A A A A A beyond project and district 3 Preserve/restore charac- A A teristic natural mosaic 4 Residentially derived A A* styling and forms/ pitched roof 5 Buffer adjacent environ- A mental encroachments 6 Land use/scale transition A A from MF/SF 7 Maximize value capture A A opportunities 8 Commercially derived A A** A styling and forms 9 Preserve/perpetuate A thematic streetscape 10 Compatible with district, A A A thematic signage features 11 Responsive interface A A A with open space and amenities 12 Resort/lodge derived A A styling and forms 13 Curvilinear organization A A A A of development plan 14 Conceal visibility of ser- A A A vice/parking functions from arterials/primary roads 15 Historic/indigenous A derived styling/forms 16 Use of thematic exterior A material if characteristic of district and complies with standards A* =When closer to topography and golf course A** =When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas 16 17 Orthogonal,block orga- A nization of development plan I%w 18 Pedestrian/residential A activity connection between street and living unit fronting street 19 Height and scale com- A patibility with height and scale characteristic of district 20 Bay modulation pattern A compatibility with the- matic bay modulation of district 21 Urbanized streetscape A 22 Provide"Borrowed" A landscape for street en- hancement 23 Promote horizontal A A A mixed-use 24 Variable street definition A to create a more complex street scape Cr A* =When closer to topography and golf course A** =When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas 17 General Standards for Multifamily Development Part A: Site and Design 'ft► a. Contextual Relationships 1. Community Structure: Each plan for a project larger than 100 units must Complies: provide: Yes No In Spirit i. Benches: at least one every 700ft or one per block,whichever is less ' 17 F ii. Bike Racks: a capacity for 4 bikes at each residential building and 14 at the central pedestrian facility iii. Trash Disposal Units: one trash receptacle at each bench iv. Pedestrian Lighting: one light standard at least every 100ft Continued from below (Due to lack of space): Bike racks will be located at each building as required. In addition we will provide a bike rack at the proposed trail head into the creek trail. Pedestrian lighting of open spaces and trail amenities will be designed to Comments: comply. Will Comply. We have strategically placed benches and trash receptacles at locations to both comply with the requirements and to work in the open space areas we have created. See above... 2. Cognitive Structure: Development site plans should avoid a"maze-like" Complies: arrangement of streets and drives and should provide a clear demarcation of Yes No In Spirit sub-areas arranged with reference to an internal destination. XI ❑ 17 Comments: There are various sub-areas (Pavilion area, Courtyards, Dog Park, Trail-head & Clubhouse etc.) integrated throughout the site that will drive community interaction through Cognitive Structure. o 3.Edge Definition: Planting of the edge must provide visual concealment of Complies: at least 70%of the perimeter fence using evergreen plants. Moreover, at least Yes No In Spirit 70% of these plants must have foliage from ground to top capable of providing a screen. Edge screening must be planted in natural drifts that appear as native plant clusters. Continued from below (Due to lack of space): The landscaping along our ornamental fencing will further screen the material to soften the edge of Comments: our community. Our perimeter fence is not continuous —in many cases we use the buildings themselves as entry barriers which reduces the amount of fencing needed and also provides less of a "compound" feel. 4.Traffic Calming: Any multifamily plan must illustrate traffic calming mea- Complies: sures using traffic tables, intersections,traffic circles,chokers, roadway neck Yes No In Spirit downs at intersections,center island narrowing or rumble strips. Speed bumps are prohibited. `- Continued from below: Not only will these help to slowdown traffic but they will also Comments: provide safe pedestrian access and connectivity between the open space areas. We Comply. In 2 locations where the street runs are longer we've employed raised cross-walks to slow traffic speeds internal to the project, which essentially mimic the raised traffic table concept. 18 b. Connections Beyond The Project 1. Relationship With And Connections To The City Fabric: The site plan for Complies: any multifamily development must portray the extent to which the following Yes No In Spirit elements of the City Fabric are continued or otherwise responded to: Lam' i. Curb Cuts and Driveways: Development plans much seek to continue flow between projects by coordinating points of ingress and egress so that efficient maneuvers to and from serving public streets are possible. Coordination of routing traffic volumes anticipated by individual project TINs is a required consideration of a development plan being considered by the City. ii. Thoroughfares And Roadways: A development plan that lays within the path of a thoroughfare as planned or committed to by adjacent devel- opment or of a thoroughfare that has been adjusted by the Council must make provision for the extension of the right of way of such thoroughfare when traffic projected densities necessitate extension. iii. Trails:A proposed multifamily development plan must consider appropriate trail routing through the proposed development so that a cohesive trail network can evolve over time. iv. Open Space: The proposed development plan must consider exten- sion of the open space or expansion of the open space, or consider how development portrayed by the development plan can relate to and define the open space. v Contextual Characteristics: Any multifamily development plan must illustrate how various aspects of the context will also be manifest in the development design. Key aspects of the context include streetscape themes, continuity of water or water bodies, extension of indigenous plan drifts, continuity of road sections,treatment of parking,protection of and continuity with adjacent land uses,continuation of tree canopies and canopy species, continuity of natural features, extension of surface water management strategies, and continuity of edge treatments. Continued from below: iv.We Comply. Open space will be shared and extended between future land-uses and tracts of land. v.We Comply.We are re-knitting the natural fabric as a part of our built environment in an aesthetically pleasing meandering arrangement as a backdrop to the enhanced ecology. Comments: i. We Comply. We have easements in place that will allow for an adjacent land-use to the north to connect into our public/private roundabout trailhead entry feature. ii. N/A iii. We Comply. At full build-out, a 4-phase (3 different landowners) —2-mile extension of a 10' wide hike and bike trail has been coordinated all the way to Bear Creek Park as a part of this development proposal, thus fully connecting the existing Grapevine hike and bike trail system with the southern gateway of the City. Phase 1(—.25 MI.) will be constructed as a part of this development. o 19 c. Lot Occupancy 1. In a development plan that's required to be curvilinear as outlined by the Dis- Complies: trict Specific Standards, such a plan must establish a building relationship to the Yes No In Spirit street such that: i. At least 60% of the interior street and drive-fronting buildings within the development plan design and 75% of buildings facing public streets serving the project must be sited so that the front building plane (the plane facing the street) is not parallel to the street right of way. ii. A minimum of 30% of the yard space along interior streets and drives, and 50% of the yard space fronting public streets serving the project, must be covered by a landscape approach defined by organic plant mass- ing and natural drifts. Comments: i. 7 out of the 11 (63.6%) interior buildings are not parallel to the interior street right-of-ways they front on. 6 out of the 7 buildings (85.7%) that front public streets are not parallel to the street right of way they front on. The curvilinear nature of the street pattern inherently keeps the buildings from being parallel to the street. ii. We will comply. The defined parameters above will feature the themed organic plant massing and naturalistic drifts. 2. Building Relation to the Street and Orthogonal Plan Layouts: Plan designs Complies: that are required to be orthogonal, as outlined by the District Specific Standards, Yes No In Spirit must establish a building relationship to the street such that: n ❑ F i. The development plan must establish a"build-to" line for the interior !� streets and drives of the project that will vary from the required 3ft build- to line along the plan's exterior public streets as specified in the District Specific Standards. This build-to line must be at least 9ft form the street or drive back of curb. ii. The presence of repetitive stoops, terraces or porches which project into the yard space created by the build-to line cannot be closer than 5ft to the street or drive back of curb and must project at least 4ft from the primary building mass. These projections must be architecturally contained such that they are part of the overall facade composition. The offset space created between the projected stoop, porch or terrace and the primary building mass must be a landscape space,leaving a 5ft minimum pedestrian space at the street edge. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. `r. 20 d. Parking: Placement and Configuration 1. Parking Facility Type: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Parking: Parking must best structured when the pro ect exceeds 20 units per acre•Project, e C exceeding 40 units per acre in any other Character Zone must provide structured parking. ii. Surface Parking Areas: Projects with a unit density between 28 and 39 units per acre that provide aggregated surface parking must comply with the following: 1. Aggregated parking areas with more than 70 parking spaces (not including street or drive head-in parking) must be located in a place that is not visible to the primary street serving the project or located so that the parking area may be screened. Parking garages located such that they front a public street must have architectural eleva- tions that complement the design style of the multifamily structures. "Complement" in this context means that they must share similar horizontal offsets, organization of openings, and use of materials. 2. Aggregated parking areas in non-orthogonal development plan designs must also have a curvilinear configuration. 3.Aggregated parking areas must be landscaped Comments: Not applicable because our proposed development's density is 20 units/acre. However, all our aggregated parking does have a curvilinear configuration and is landscaped. 2. Head-in parking along streets: Before the parking demand for aggregated Complies: parking areas is determined,head-in street and drive parking must be provided Yes No In Spirit to the extent permitted by the streetscape design. F F7 F7 Comments: We Comply. Head-in street and drive-parking is maxed out throughout the site and zonally spaced out to accommodate maximum convenience to the resident. 21 e. Site Open Space Requirement 1. Open space as a percent of total development area: At least 20% of the site Complies: area identified in any multifamily plan must be set aside as open space. Site areas Yes No In Spirit `w that qualify as open space set asides include: i. Areas protecting existing natural features and/or plant communities ii. Areas used for the surface management of storm water that are not structures iii. Any retained water iv. Project amenity areas that are visually accessible from streets and/or drives v Playgrounds vi. Pedestrian trails vii. Borrowed street landscape areas viii. Pedestrian accessible areas between structures open to access by the project population Comments: We comply and well exceed this standard, offering all of the above elements in our proposed community in a quantity greater than the 20% standard. Aside from borrowed street landscape, pedestrian accessible areas and trails, project amenities, and all other internal open space that meets the above definitions, we have set aside approximately 4 acres of natural open space that will protect existing natural features and plant communities. Additionally, we will be providing a —1/4 mile 10' wide public hike/bike trail replete with fitness stations and nature informational placards. 2. Form giving influence: Open space provided within any development plan Complies: must serve as a frontage for at least 25% of the structures within the project, Yes No In Spirit where buildings can define the edge of open space, except for the Transit Center 7177 District where street frontage is prioritized. Comments: We exceed this standard, which is a standard that renders the outdoor environment as a primary focal feature of the community. Very conservatively, at least 7 buildings meet this requirement out of the 20% requirement of 3.6 buildings. . 22 f. Preservation of Natural Drainage 1.Natural Drainageways: Any development plan for multifamily development Complies: in Grapevine must illustrate the extent to which natural drainage within the lot, Yes No In Spirit parcel or tract exists and is preserved through design initiatives that preserve, restore or replicate natural drainage patterns. Any disruption of natural drainage patterns must be approved by the City of Grapevine. Comments: We Comply. We have employed a dry riverbed design in certain areas of the site to help replicate the natural environment, catch and direct surface drainage off the site with the added benefit being that this design will provide an enhanced pedestrian experience for our residents and guests. 23 g. Storm Weather Management Facilities 1. Storm weather management structures: Any development plan for mul- Complies: tifamily development in the City of Grapevine,where structured storm water Yes No In Spirit �Ow management solutions are requires must adhere to the following: n i. Minimize structured means of water management: Plans must min- imize the use of cross drainage structures, armored channels, concrete flow ways, and other structured solutions to storm water management, unless such structures are for the purpose of creating a pedestrian or urban activity at a water edge. ii. Maintain natural shapes and form in the creation of detention/re- tention facilities and created drainageways (a.k.a. flow management facilities): Water collection points and/or pools created by nature have shapes that are clearly organic. Therefore,plans should avoid straight lines, hard angles, and regular geometric shapes in the creation of flow management facilities. iii. Landscape with natural elements: Where storm water management design creates conditions that support indigenous plants, measures must be taken to landscape such facilities in ways that allow such plants. iv. Respect natural sub-systems: Proper design of flow management fa- cilities should,where appropriate, include diverse ecological settings such as deep water (limnetic zones) in combination with shallow water(lit- toral zones),wetlands, ephemeral flows, and greater states of hydration which can support plant communities associated with these zones. Comments: We Comply. We have employed a dry riverbed design in various locations to help catch and direct surface drainage off the site while ensuring safety and quality of life for our residents by avoiding storm water flowing above ground, which can present risk to pets and residents alike during a runoff event. 24 h. Grading 1 Grading for multifamily development in the City of Grapevine must adhere to Complies: the following: Yes No In Spirit i. Avoid steep grades: Grades equal to or greater than 20% are consid- ered steep and shall not be graded to create building lots. However, indi- vidual buildings which make grade transition within the building,porch or terrace expansions are permitted and therefore the limited disturbance of grade needed to accomplish this is permitted also. ii. Conform to standards for tree protection: Any tree over three inches in caliper remaining on a lot, parcel or tract (that is, trees not approved for removal) and exposed to the building activity or within 30ft of the building activity(hereinafter regulated trees) shall be protected as fol- lows: a. Tree fencing: Regulated tree trunks shall be protected within a visible"tree fence" at least 36 inches tall and protecting the tree and ground around the tree to a minimum distance from the trunk equal to the distance of the tree drip line or 10 feet,whichever is less. b. Tree marking: All regulated trees shall be marked with a green surveyor tape which indicates"Protected Tree" status. �w c. Ground compaction avoidance: Measures shall be taken to min- imize ground compaction within the dripline of a Regulated Tree. Grading within the ground protected by a tree fence is prohibited. d. Maintenance of normal hydration: Measures shall be taken to maintain normal hydration of a Regulated Tree. Comments: Will Comply. We have no grades on site that exceed 20% related to building lot construction. We will comply and will use the best arborilogical practices to make sure preserved trees are protected so they will thrive post construction. 25 Part B: Building Design Standards a.Street Interface 1. Semi-public space adjacent to streets: Complies: `► Yes No In Spirit i. Canopies and store fronts are limited to urban setting such as primary ❑ E street frontage in the Transit Center Character Zone. ii. In any single building block,there must be at least one expression of a first-floor, semi-public space within the street-facing elevation. If a cano- py of storefront is used to meet this standard, it must occupy at least 50% of the length of the elevation. 2. Residential Design Standards: If building frontage defines the edge of an open space, each building block must have at least one first-floor pedestrian space that is part of the architectural design. i. Store fronts must be set within a minimum first-floor plate height of 15ft. and must be comprised of vertical and horizontal subdivisions with- in which any area of un-supported glass is no smaller than 16 square feet. Vertical and horizontal subdivisions shall be at least two inches wide. Comments: ( We Comply. 2. Residential Design Standards: If building frontage defines the edge of an open Complies: space, each building block must have at least one first-floor pedestrian space that Yes No In Spirit is part of the architectural design. i. Store fronts must be set within a minimum first-floor plate height of 15ft. and must be comprised of vertical and horizontal subdivisions with- in which any area of un-supported glass is no smaller than 16 square feet. Vertical and horizontal subdivisions shall be at least two inches wide. Comments: We Comply. All of our buildings have multiple first-floor "pedestrian spaces" in the form of the access breezeways. 26 b. Elevation Composition 1. The exterior design of any multifamily structure must comprise an overall Complies: pattern. This pattern includes: Yes No In Spirit i. Regulating lines that organize its elements F7 17 ii. Proportioning iii. Hierarchy of dominant and subordinate elements Comments: We Comply. Our compositional intent complies as it enacts the use of"proportioning" and "hierarchy of dominant and subordinate elements". CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 27 b. Elevation Composition (continued) 2. Openings and features of any building must have a common justification. Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. When a pitched roof design is used, all windows—except dormer win- �1i ❑ dows—must be below the cornice detail. � ii. When a flat roof design is used, all windows must be at least 2ft below the parapet. iii. When both a pitched roof and flat roof design are used in the same elevation,the window heads must align horizontally. iv. Windows may abut the cornice detail if the window header modulates the banding or detailing of the cornice. v Openings within an elevation must have a common reference line that engages the sill or head. vi. Windows within an elevation must have a common vertical reference line from the first to the top floor. vii. Windows must align with the features that define the architectural form. For example,windows in a gable cannot be arbitrarily distributed within the face of the gable unless specifically approved by the City. viii. Excepting first floor store front or vertical mixed-use structure, all openings must be square or portrait in orientation. ix. Windows, doors and other openings must be articulated within a pro- jected surround or header unless otherwise approved by the City. Comments: We Comply. Please refer and compare to Architectural elevations. One nice item of note is that we are using accented stone sills and headers as our window projected surrounds. These standards above elevate the role of windows from mere utilitarian openings to architecturally striking features unto themselves. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 28 b. Elevation Composition (continued) 3. All elevations of a structure must receive equal treatment of style on all el- Complies: evations of a structure so as to avoid the common pitfall whereby only the Yes No In Spirit �w street-facing fagade is adequately styled and structured. C F7 Comments: We Comply. Each and every building face presents the same high standard in this guideline. 4. Forms created within the elevation, such as towers,bays and plate changes, Complies: must be derived from functions within the plan. Design approaches which seek Yes No In Spirit to decorate a"space plan" derived independent of the elevation design are pro- hibited. Comments: We Comply. 29 b. Street wall complexity and exterior offsets 1. Building offsets: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Residential building blocks may not have more than 50 linear feet of M-7 II wall without a wall offset. ' ii. Horizontal wall offsets must be at least 4ft. This may include balconies if contained within the confines of the offset. Any balconies projected from the face must have an architectural enclosure. iii. Architectural forms such as enclosed porches, stair towers,projected bays or stacked balconies maybe projected from the building block or recessed within it and must be accompanied by a roof in the roof massing that corresponds to the architectural form. Comments: We Comply. I • 30 d. Void to Solid Ratio 1. For the first floor of a vertical mixed-use plan wherein the first floor has a Complies: l commercial use,the void-to-solid ratio must be greater than or equal to 1.5:1 Yes No In Spirit \w (the amount of void being greater than the amount of solid). The solid portions of the first floor facade must extend vertically to the floors above and parapet detail. Comments: Not Applicable. We are not a vertical mixed-use project. (Please excuse the check in the box. can't get it to un-check.) 2. For floors above the first floor in a vertical mixed-use plan (or for all floors in Complies: a residential plan),the void-to-solid ratio must be less than or equal to 0.5:1 (the Yes No In Spirit amount of void being less than the amount of solid). n Comments: We Comply. • 31 e. Architectural Enclosures 1. All projected stair towers, elevator shafts,and cantilevered building projec- Complies: tions (other than balconies) must be architecturally enclosed. This means that Yes No In Spirit they must be enclosed in an architectural skin and must be expressed as a roof form. ' Comments: We Comply. • 32 f. Roof form: Rooves and the roof lines they create are essential design elements for higher-value structures. Visible roof design must: 1. Be legible. There must be a clear organization of a dominant roof mass from Complies: which subordinate roof masses extend. Yes No In Spirit XZ F 17 Comments: We Comply. 2. Be balanced. A single roof pitch must be used within the total composition. Complies: Different roof pitches are permitted for tower forms which are not engaged with Yes No In Spirit the general roof form. Permitted roof forms include gables,hips,barrels if used a F F1 17 secondary forms, sheds if used as secondary forms, and flat. Comments: We Comply. • 33 g. Style Integrity 1. The use of architectural detailing associated with a style must use the charac- Complies: teristic detailing of that style. Yes No In Spirit X' C F Comments: We Comply. A few examples of features that we designed to in order to characterize the style are... * Large Roof Overhangs * Structural Bracing * Timber Frame Accents * Tapered Stone Columns * Architecturally Enclosed Balconies * Metal Awnings * 80% Stone 2. The use of systems or materials that replicate the work of a trade or artisan are Complies: prohibited. Construction details which are traditionally derived from the work Yes No In Spirit of an artisan (such as a metal smith, carpenter or stonemason) must use a mate- F rial in which the characteristic craftsperson can work. F' Comments: We Comply. • 34 h. Chimneys 1. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles,the chimney must be ter- Complies: minated with a chimney cap that conceals the metal spark arrestor and visually Yes No In Spirit reads as a traditional tile flue system, unless otherwise approved by the City. C F7 E Comments: Not applicable. We don't have Chimneys. 2. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles,the chimney shaft must be Complies: enclosed with unit masonry, stone or 3-coat stucco with a minimum dimension Yes No In Spirit of 4.5ft x 3ft,unless otherwise approved by the City. F F7 Comments: � Not applicable. We don't have Chimneys. 3. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles,the rise of the chimney shaft Complies: must be detailed so that the chimney has complexity in plan as well as elevation. Yes No In Spirit J F7 F7 Comments: Not applicable. We don't have Chimneys. • 35 Part C: Building Construction Standards a.Materials and Application of Materials 1. Primary Material. At least 70% of the exterior facade of a 4-story structure or Complies: 80% of the exterior fagade of a 3-story structure or 100% of the exterior facade of Yes No In Spirit a structure less than 3 stories must be one of the following: i. Brick. Clay brick,modular size,hard-fired and meeting severe weath- er standards. Embossed or molded brick is generally prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. All brick shall be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all building corners—both inside and outside—must be executed in a toothed masonry fashion. Weeping or slumped joints are prohibited. ii. Stone. Stone must be laid in a typical load-bearing pattern. Character- istics of such pattern include: 1. Tight mortar joints with no more than 30% of joints larger than 3/8 inches. 2. Coursed patterns such as Ashlar, Coursed Chopped Stone and Coursed Rubbed Stone. Mosaic and un-coursed rubble stone-work are prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. ( 3. Cultured stone or other faux stone products are prohibited. fir► 4. All stone must be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all cor- ners—both inside and outside—must be executed in a toothed ma- sonry fashion. iii. Other Stone. Cut stone/smoothed-face stone or Cut stone/smoothed- face stone that is mechanically attached with a stone veneer system may be used provided that the system uses a true stone. Comments: We will Comply. Stone will be real coursed stone to fit the (iii.) definition above. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 36 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 2. Secondary Material. No more than 30% of the building facade may be a sec- Complies: ondary material.This includes: Yes No In Spirit i. Stucco. 3-coat stucco on lath over a structural frame with expansion joints concealed by filling the joint with expandable filler that is troweled flat with the stucco, is the same color as the stucco and that matches the stucco surface texture is permitted. Dryvit/EFS type systems are prohibit- ed. Stucco is not permitted in the Central Transit District. ii. Metal. Architectural metal wall systems are permitted. iii. Siding. Wood or Cementacious siding is permitted in those Character Zones where pitched roof styles are permitted. Comments: We Comply. We will be using a cementacious siding (along with 80% stone) to compliment the architectural design. This product also maintains itself over time and doesn't cup, buckle or warp like real wood tends to in the sometimes extreme Texas weather fluctuations. 3. Roof Material. Acceptable materials include: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Flat Roof. Flat rooves may be either a built-up bituminous roof or a membrane roof provided that it is installed in accordance with the man- ufacturer's specifications and issued a 30-year warranty. All flat rooves must be hidden from ground level view,behind a 12-inch parapet. ii. Pitched Roof. These may be either a standing-seam metal roof with standing folded and soldered seams,a commercial metal roof if approved by the City, slate, clay tile, or 40-year high profile composition single. All composition shingle rooves must have closed valleys. Concrete single products with a relief greater than '/2 inch are prohibited. iii. Parapet Cap. These must be either clay brick, cut stone, cast stone, tile,or terra cotta. Pressed metal maybe used if is it specifically created to decoratively cap a parapet and if specifically approved by the City. Comments: We will Comply. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 37 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 4. Material Change. Material changes in any elevation may occur only under the Complies: following conditions: Yes No In Spirit i. Change occurs at an inside corner. ii. Change that occurs at an outside corner must wrap the corner and change at a location at least 12 inches from that corner and be designed as the termination of an architectural detail. iii. Change that occurs wherein the different material is contained within a distinct architectural form that projects from the primary architectural mass. iv. Change that reflects an offset between a lower and an upper floor where the offset is at least 6 inches. Material changes within the same architectural plane are prohibited. Comments: We Comply. is CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 38 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 5. Relief.The City seeks to promote relief and dimension in architectural surfac- Complies: es, details, and motifs with the following requirements: Yes No In Spirit i. The following materials are prohibited: Fiberglass, Styrofoam or stuc- co-over-styrofoam,plastic, aluminum. Stucco applied to look like pro- jected stone, Stucco applied to look like cast stone, Stucco applied to look like terra cotta, cementacious boards used in any application which makes a corner, cementacious boards used in any application which makes a mitre or decorative shape, Masonite or Masonite products,com- position wood products used as an exterior material, trimcraft used as a soffit board, or other smooth finished soffit board. ii. Relief in the treatment of cornices, overhangs,gable projections,bay windows,dormers,water tables,belt coursers, sills, surrounds,timber components and other expressions must be executed in ways that pro- duce depth, shadow and texture. iii. In coursed rubble stonework, stones must be laid into the wall as the stone would lay on the ground. No more than 20% of the stones in any elevation may be"flipped" sideways. iv. The minimum projection in any built-up profiles and decorative assembly must be 3/4 inch per element of the assembly. A cornice detail comprised of three stepped bricks must have a total projection of 2 and 1/4 inches. Comments: As corroborated by City consultants, cementitious trim - provided it is dimensionally acceptable - will require less maintenance, have stronger architectural appeal, and exhibit superior durability in our climate than conventional wood. It will not cup, buckle or warp which starts to look rundown over time. Should City consultant allow, we would like the opportunity to explore (in-field mockup) and ultimately incorporate what we think will be an overall better trim product in terms of cementitious trim material use on the buildings. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 39 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 6. Carpentered Exterior Trim. Complies: Yes No In Spirit �W i. All carpentered exterior trim must be high-quality finished grade wood stock. ii. If a trim installation is to be joined along any continuous run of mate- rial,the required joint must be a"spline joint" iii. All outside corners must be mitered and blocked with sufficient clo- sure that the joint is not visible from the street. iv. Corners must be closed by a carpentered joint. Trim clips are prohib- ited. v Facia and gable rake must be stepped at the drip mold unless hidden by a gutter. vi. Carpentered trim that forms the veneer pocket must have a complex- ity achieved in trim mold,built-up step molding, or other traditional detail such as a dentil mold. Comments: As corroborated by City consultants, cementitious trim - provided it is dimensionally acceptable - will requires less maintenance, stronger architectural appeal, and superior durability in our climate than conventional wood. It will not cup, buckle or warp which starts to look rundown over time. Should City consultant allow, we would like the opportunity to explore (in a field mockup) and ultimately incorporate what we think will be an overall better trim product in terms of cementitious trim material use on the buildings. 40 b. Wall Construction 1. Wall Section. All wood-framed exterior walls must be constructed as follows: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. When shim- or flange-mounted windows are used in masonry ve- neered walls, framing may be conventional 2x4 framing. LX ii. When shim-mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or oth- er permitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, exterior walls must be framed with 2x6 members in order to achieve a 3.5-inch minimum offset within the opening. iii. When flange-mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or other permitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, a double 2x4 framing assembly is required that allows the flange to be mounted on the inner 2x4 section with the second 2x4 section providing the required offset from the window sash or door at the opening. Comments: We will Comply. 2. Parapets. Where there is a flat roof, a parapet must extend at least 12 inches Complies: above the roof surface and conceal the roof material from ground-level view. Yes No In Spirit El F F Comments: N/A • CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 41 b. Wall Construction (continued) 3. Cornice Detail. All wall terminations at the roof must have a cornice detail Complies: comprised of at least 2 projected elements. Parapets must have a cap detail com- Yes No In Spirit prised of at least 2 projected elements. I—{ Comments: We will Comply. 4. Window Surrounds, Belt Courses and Base Courses. Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. All openings in the exterior skin must have an architecturally appro- priate header and sill with an optional jamb. The required header and sill must project at least 3/4 inches beyond the wall veneer.Window headers or sills may be either stone,cast stone, terra cotta,heavy timber (where appropriate for the style), or wood (where appropriate for the style). ii. Other architectural details like belt courses and base courses must be executed in the above materials and have a minimum projection of 3/4 inch per element of detail. Comments: We will Comply. As mentioned above, our windows will have a cast-stone header and sill that will adhere to this requirement. • 42 c. Roof screening and appurtenances 1. Roof Projections. No plumbing stacks,venting stacks, skylights, or attic Complies: ventilators may penetrate the roof surfaces facing the street/drive. If there are Yes No In Spirit multiple street/drive facing exposures, no roof projection may penetrate the roof slope that slopes to the"fronting" street or drive. All such penetrations must be mounted straight and perpendicular to the ground (except for skylights and attic ventilators) and painted to blend with the roof color. Turbine vents are prohibit- ed. All vent stacks must have lead jacks. Comments: All our appliances for the residences are electric so there won't be an excessive amount of gas derived penetrations. The majority of roof penetrations will be limited to plumbing stacks and painted to match. We will have ridge vents and no turbines. 2. Roof Mechanical. Roof mechanical must be screened behind a parapet wall or Complies: platform that is recessed into a pitched roof so that the incline of the roof slope Yes No In Spirit creates a parapet wall. Comments: We will comply. Not applicable because mechanical equipment will be at grade. However, where and if we decided to place the mechanical equipment on roof, it will be screened per the above requirement. 3. Gutters, Downspouts, Scuppers and Collection Boxes. These must be copper Complies: or an enduring prefinished metal with a minimum 20-gauge thickness. Gutters Yes No In Spirit must be a minimum of 6 inches,half-round profile and attached with gutter straps. Downspouts must be a minimum of 4 inches and round. Elbows and bends must be a minimum of 4 inches,plain and round. Fascia mounted gutter systems are prohibited unless custom designed and integral to the architecture. Comments: We will Comply. • 43 d. Windows and Glazing 1. Glazing and Glazing Systems. Reflective glass is prohibited. Tinted glass and Complies: dark adhesive films where the transmission coefficient exceeds 27% is prohibited. Yes No In Spirit �a. Stained glass is allowed provided that the glass is crafted in accordance with sol- ❑ dered camping or"H" camping. No acrylic or pourable techniques are allowed. L� Glazing systems may be used in certain accent areas of specifically approved by the City. Comments: We will Comply. 44 Part D: Landscaping, Fencing and Screening a. Site Landscaping 1 Leaf Mass Between Buildings. All multifamily development must provide Complies: trees between buildings. At least 60%of the planted area must be comprised of Yes No In Spirit over-story(canopy). E ® F Comments: We Comply. We have provided a significant amount of trees between each building and will exceed the requirement as the trees take root and mature. 2. Layered Landscaping at Building Entries. Landscaping must be provided at Complies: building entries and must be "layered" The building entry landscaping area must Yes No In Spirit be comprised of at least 3 layers: one upper layer of medium evergreen shrub n approximately 30-36 inches high and 2 layers of shorter shrubs or one shrub and ICJ an ornamental grass. These must be planted in beds having a minimum width of 72 inches. Upper layer shrubs must be 5-gallon container plants planted 30 inches on center with triangular spacing. Lower layer shrubs may be 3-gallon container plants planted 24 inches on center with triangular spacing. Comments: We will Comply. The planting areas defined on our landscape plan will allow for the layered look of ground covers and shorter up to large upper layer shrubs. All of our planting beds are at least 72" wide and we will comply with the size and spacing requirements of this section. • CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 45 a. Site Landscaping (continued) 3. All landscape beds must be associated with walkways,roadways, amenity Complies: feature,buildings or screens. Floating,ornamental or non-associated landscape Yes No In Spirit `r beds are prohibited. ❑ (7 Comments: We will Comply. All of the proposed landscape planting beds on the site are associated with or adjacent to pedestrian walkways and the buildings. All of our pedestrian walks meander through landscaped open spaces with the beds immediately adjacent to the walkways. The planting areas will be informal and will contain a mix of native and culturally appropriate landscape materials. 4. Plant Sizing. Shrubs that serve a screening function must be sized at the time Complies: of planting such that they can serve as an effective screen within 2 years of the Yes No In Spirit planting date. 3-gallon plants must be planted 30 inches on center with triangu Ell, F7 - lar spacing and 2-gallon plants must be planted 24 inches on center with trian- gular spacing. Smaller container and bedding plants must be planted at least 12 inches on center with triangular spacing.. Comments: We will Comply. Shrubs used for screening such as along our security fencing and plant material within the planting beds and building entrance areas will comply with the plant sizing requirements. 10 46 b. Fences and Screening Walls 1. Fence Materials. Visible perimeter fences that are compliant with the General Complies: Standards may be made of unit masonry,wrought iron with unit masonry corner Yes No In Spirit columns, or masonry. If masonry, corner column and masonry interim column spacing is not to exceed 15ft and must have a masonry knee wall supporting wood or wrought iron infill. Comments: We will Comply. Our fencing has been designed to comply with these requirements. 2. Gate Materials. Gates in fences constructed in accordance with Dbl above Complies: may be made from wrought iron with a wrought iron frame (complying with Yes No In Spirit General Standards) or wood with frame members measuring a minimum of 1 � F El and 1/2 inches thick by 3 and 1/2 inches wide and planks measuring at least 1 and 1/2 inches thick. Gates must be comprised of the same material as the fence. Comments: We will Comply. • CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 47 b. Fences and Screening Walls (continued) 3. Corner Expression of Support Structure. All property corners of a property Complies: ( line fence much be supported by a masonry column that is at least 10 square Yes No In Spirit rw inches. XI 17 El Comments: We will Comply. 4. Thin wall construction, cast or embossed concrete walls,picket materials not Complies: in compliance with the General Standards, iron fences with mechanical connec- Yes No In Spirit tion assemblies,pre-fabricated decorative elements designed to slip over stock or tubular steel shapes,and plastic or vinyl fence component systems are prohibit- ed. Comments: We will Comply. • 48 c. Street Visible Wrought Iron 1.Frames and other structural support members may not be less than 1 and 3/4 Complies: inches in either width measurement or 1 and 3/4 inches in diameter if round. Yes No In Spirit F7 ❑ Comments: We will Comply. 2. Pickets that are 5ft in length or height or less must have a minimum width of Complies: 3/4 inches in either width dimension or diameter.When pickets are longer or tall- Yes No In Spirit er than 5ft,the minimum with dimension is increased to 1 inch in the dimension that faces the street or 1 inch in diameter. Comments: We will Comply. 3. Panels must be made of metal plate material with a minimum thickness of Complies: 3/16 inches. Yes No In Spirit es Comments: We will Comply. • CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 49 c. Street Visible Wrought Iron (continued) 4. The wall thickness of any tubular steel must not be less than 3/32 inches. Complies: Yes No In Spirit ® ❑ Comments: We will Comply. 5. Decorative elements such as finials and rings must be made of solid stock Complies: �,. material and welded to the pickets or to the frame made from the pickets if the Yes No In Spirit pickets are solid stock material. Attachments to the pickets or frame and all other components of the wrought iron construction must be welded. Mechanical con- E_- F F nections are prohibited. Comments: We will comply if applicable. • 50 ORDINANCE NO. 2018-019 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS GRANTING ZONING CHANGE Z18-01 ON A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE GREEN W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1083 (101 EAST GLADE ROAD), DESCRIBED AS BEING A TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "Ll" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND "PCD" PLANNED COMMERCE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO "R- MF" MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, applications were made to amend the Official Zoning Map, City of Grapevine, Texas by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these requested changes should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested change should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, the effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings, encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning change, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the change in zoning lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this change in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that a change in zoning classification for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City of Grapevine Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended and changed by Zoning Application Z18-01 to rezone the following described property to-wit: being a 20.407 acre tract of land out of the Green W. Minter Survey, Abstract 1083, Tarrant County, Texas being Lot 1, Block A, Glade 360 Addition (101 East Glade Road), more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and Ordinance No. 2018-019 2 made a part hereof, which was previously zoned "LI" Light Industrial District and "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District, respectively, is hereby changed to"R-MF" Multi- Family District, all in accordance with Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, as amended. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the herein change in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety Ordinance No. 2018-019 3 and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20th day of February, 2018. APPROVED.- William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Ordinance No. 2018-019 4 ORDINANCE NO. 2018-020 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ISSUING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CU18-02, ALLOWING THE APPLICANT TO EXCEED THE HEIGHT REGULATIONS, VARY FROM PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AND ALLOW FOR A REDUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK IN A DISTRICT ZONED "R-MF" MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT FOR LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADE 360 ADDITION (101 EAST GLADE ROAD) ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a conditional use permit by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this conditional use permit, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the conditional use permit lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this conditional use permit and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this conditional use permit for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Ordinance No. 2018-020 2 Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code, by granting Conditional Use Permit No. CU18-02 to allow the applicant to exceed the height regulations, vary from the parking requirements, and allow for a reduction in the front yard setback, in a district zoned "R-MF" Multi-Family District Regulations within the following described property: Lots 1, Block A, Glade 360 Addition (101 East Glade Road) all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein conditional use permit. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safely from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not Ordinance No. 2018-020 3 to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20th day of February, 2018. APPROVED.- William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Ordinance No. 2018-020 4 ORDINANCE NO. 2018-021 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS GRANTING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD18-01 TO DEVIATE FROM, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, THE BUILDING SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS RELATIVE TO THE "R-MF" MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT FOR LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADE 360 ADDITION (101 EAST GLADE ROAD) ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,- PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a planned development overlay by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the viewto conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this planned development overlay, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the planned development overlay lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this planned development overlay and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this planned development overlay for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Ordinance No. 2018-021 2 Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a planned development overlay in accordance with Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix"D" of the City Code, by granting Planned Development Overlay PD18-01 to deviate from, but not be limited to, the building separation requirements relative to the "R-MF" Multifamily District within the following described property: Lot 1, Block A, Glade 360 Addition (101 East Glade Road)all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein planned development overlay. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safely from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to Ordinance No. 2018-021 3 exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20th day of February, 2018. APPROVED: William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Ordinance No. 2018-021 4 l to �( 1 SITE OPEN SPACE 169,160 SF �. E« O I I I (GROSS AREA) r 1 USABLE OPEN SPACE I L J Pq _' 47,140 SF NSI LE II a I I a Ll' wl I I d .. .. NaAOE ewo C 25.514 " I 13.5615E LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) 11,734 SF ' 1 M1 W.—SOUAAE FEET S 105CAPE CALCULATIONS(LOT 1.BLOCK A) 20.407 ACRES -�\Yl 9.680 SF ( ` TOTAL 50[PARKING UO,94e Y (20.407 AUKS) J, O d1055 ONI(RIO AREA 220,9Y4 SF 5&41Z OF STE -f_ TOTAL NU/-wn/muR OPEN SPACE AREA mm SF SS.41x OF SITE V NUIlDI Of OITS/ELDG.S 29Y/1)S,JIe 4 10.7331 O 91E tf_ �P RT:O�® FROIN® (�SS PARKING tJARE FOOTAGE.•0.1iAM10) 22.OW% ES 7.3115 SS TREE PER PLANTER ISLAND AND TERN" YES YES YES i NKE/SD v SIDE PLAN P AUETTEENA/CNN HEIGHT) YES YES YES 8.411 SF NIH-Y 97 IN NON mA ANO N W R R CTI IN NON-EEI ON 1(OPEN SPACE PER$ECNON SA SECTd I({�TARIE RISEN ._ I TREL/2000 SF O MON-WROILAR OPEN SPAQ leS let 1 IRFE/4000 Y O NON-WHIC"OPEN SPACE PLUS EpSTNO 11tEE5 IN R000 P AN" YES �- LIUPER SECTION 22.SECTION F(3) VS,)SD Y 2e5,-Y 250 SF/UNIT (]2.06'.h 0 ]e SO 100 1"•30 N GREYSTAR - THE PRESERVE OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT 1J Grapevine,Texas „r._. } ��r Z7 Y •I 'Y:f y�C 97l •��, aT t .. ' a ._ ' . � i - - "• d ' 3 r M I District Standard # 1 - Architectural Accommodation of Grade Change Aft All 4 Foot Ver rc*ai gaterenc- 6 BLDG 3 BLDG 2 tt us k. BLDG 7 58 Foot BLDG t IXi 8 ' V _�.. a �4a1. .._ _ � Difference BLDG 12 -y BLDG 10 OBLDG 16 _ OW SLOG 11 �0 0A' YO i, Bl©G 13 Y µ Buildings are designed to minimize use of retaining walls o - BLDG15 and maximize architectural accommodation of grade change by: w - Implementing turn-down (thickened) footings - - Stepping buildings down the grade throughout development v .- - .. _ - �I • • � �-• ' '� F� -:�. =.k,K �'t - 'ram .+�+ �rt�`i '+r+►. ��, r J � it - y. rx ' rr -`' fir: • • . - . • i • . • _ _ •- -- - m I District Standard # 2 - Pedestrian Connections - Concrete Public Hike & Bike Public Trailhead & Parking pw _ r . II Emm- m . ,. �r:���►a•s' ,• ._ ,rye 2 • - A . � .,.. :.t.�,-• _.. ->.. �� u. u..1' -r' �+ ..� . ..� i irk• k. .._ _ _ .-.. ' !•�*� � �� ' ► � t. � .eta ,„ . �,•. 1 ... - 'i ` . k Yam. � 'la � ►;e " T _ c...s �. PRAIRI! Pt k47 I lk x,. '�4 rr1�Ai III z aer% 40— s. '�i' �, •` " ; , rye � a .t7k fsy wT� � Jam' 1 •� 1 � • / 1/ i r i j� . '•;, _.._w -� �: it - y ," �, "r��' .R � �•r � ~', 'ems ,-'•• � tA�•t, �.' � r A'k'� ? .a • i J Y r+ District Standard # 3 Preserve & Restore Natural Mosaic x CLUB 0 OUSELU } BLDG } i RUN 61,DG Restorative r andscape Design LO 4+ Acre •«.rp � f -` �'' Nature Area to�be�disturbed District Standard # 5 - Buffer BLDG I • j 0 © ® Ji1c Lam; CLUB p MOOLD BLDG 16 1 BLDG 11 BLDG 14 BLDG 13 O Western Buffer OG �-25' - 60' Wide Private Landscape Buffer `DG' along Frontage. e Road 20' Vertical Drop to Center of Site from Frontage Road Noise Reducing Windows - All Units � • a go; tt Non-orthogonal Bidg. -^ 1•`. d Orientation 44 Meandering Streets'- ql n ofg Intersections 4ok � Freefo'r, f ` - Tree Layo ut�, r � .Mow 4 Organ,ica ly Shaped �f Altr jay�w ��II��3" � �,.'� �� i �, � ♦` � x 11111110 tV 41 . Ell.. +♦ �� .. i �.� t�7 .ate �>r AtWrti. 40 ►t � r .E District Standard # 22 - " Borrowed "e Landsca ( Parkway)p B G 4 r Y SLOG 1 BLDG 2 } r CLUB OUSE tz '�y1 ft1JR ARO t ti v BLDG 7 /► 1M fi ` G . LDG 5 RI DG 8 ti BLDG 9 BLDG 12 ` BLDG 10 t' BLDG 16 a 7 tAW17. .1 NL /^^BL.DG i 1 BLDG 14 j M DC.13 BLDG1 . 25' - 60' Wid-e orrowed z Landscape" (Parkway) for Street = - Enhancement (Between Property Line and Building Fa ade 1 General - Internal Destinations Map �g t . Pavilion Park Outdoor Grilling Stations/Dining r - Multimedia, p - Lawn Ga ea a. F v ' oU O dw e 44g �. BLDG 6 �j 8L 9 BLOG IC I+ RUN I ' + Acre Nature Preserve Dog Park and Club Amenity & Grand Courtyard Wash Facility - 24-Hour Fitness Center Business Center Digital Package Concierge 6LW, - Clube&m with Kitchen/Games - Outdoor Fire Pit A - Outdoor Grilling Stations/Dining Publ c Trailhead - Outdoor Multimedia & Parking Swimming Pool Grand Courtyard AN - - LargeDistrict Standard # 12 - Resort/ Lodge Derived Styling Forms -- --W I Roof Overhangs TimberFrame Accents AwningsMetal • • Y' r t.: , 4 _ EVEN - Architecturally r,. • - '' �' :.. - '°!ate _ _ - _ •.�,• ..-i - .-ate � ..- Enclosed Balconies 80% Stone • • Stone Columns r low ., . . .irrr y ' _ � "-�!'Y Jam. �*`;K-:' � ��1`' ,y-•« � "`� ���'--� ""' .d }�� • ► �: rim Ji� pr A .twit' �: --•F � •, . t t - 6 \ \ LOCATION MAP m NOT TO SCALE \ \ 5 \ ao, `\ COI \ \ \\ E GLALA (�_AO w DE \ ; ROAD NOFl Z I \ \ NORTH \ \ \ w\ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET - QLLVQ LEGEND = o o�m r \ \\\ ® w SANITARY SEWERPIPE SIDEWALK C, CURB \ \ WM WATER INLET METER \ ^\ MH MANHOLE IM IRRIGATION METER ¢H w Y -„ WE WATER EASEMENT S Q!N W _ RDW RIGHT OF WAY o Z = CI PROPOSED CURB INLET \\ GI PROPOSED GRATE INLET ®2 v MH PROPOSED MANHOLE r+ I 02t TRAFFIC CIRCUURON EXISTING PAVEMENT PROPOSED FIRE LANE \* \. PROPOSED PAVEMENT IN R.O.W. �•lP:j••• F'Fgf - . l ® PROPOSEOTRAR *: •'� :* ,DAVID EMEYERS I PROPOSED SIDEWALK '81512 rcm ~m s a� oa a = Y \ p* s __ `— __ _ — Tn 4 \ q I I I L I I I I \ UL LU U) F V, Ire ERB CASENAMETHEPREEERVE \\ �� ` •r^� _ LOCAT UMIBER Mimi 1 EAST GLADE ROAD:LOT 1.BLOCK ` � A,GUDEJ380 ADDITION $ I I \ \ I MAYOR ETARY SS DATE: �'c \ I I �' PLAW NNG ANO ZONING COMMISSION gym£ \ V \ EM I i _ — GLADE ROAD R _ — — .—— —— -- — -- — ----- — — — — — — — -- -----O� ———_-- — — — -`' SHEET.1 OF 35 'sue FO�i HWY� ATE: — .� .. 'GLADE RO t� cR cD 'RE �- -- -- =~=R� - _. APPROVAL DOER NOT AIRHOR�ANY WORK IN SHEET NUMBER "<W CONPUCL iCESANY CODES AUTHORIZE ORDINANCES fin v_ - w-_-w w I DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF FORT WORTH PAVEMENT CONNECTTo LOCATION MAP m DALLASTORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT I I EXISTING NOT TO SCALE VOL.4892.PG.439 Pcm TANFDAR�D� a TAPER PAVEMENTWIDTH I I O EXISTING FLOODPIAIN / / �BOLINOARY,PETN FEMA __--__----_------ _____________ FROM R.O.W. CLADE CLADE pyj PROP NRN LANE p p w -- ROAD Z �( __- I __ �T _ SO'00'S4'E 593.63' ROP.HTREIPINE(TYP) PROP.FH '4 •! ✓ �1�R-. I 0 N GARPDRT TYP -N R A CARPORT TIP. R— J I / St•6B'46"E 239.36' /— —— _ � _ / / / •7 — 111ci LAI STRIPING Zuni rFIlTUNTRAdB•sswR // / / / � � I ' ..� w — —4— � �c\C � L�se�� —�N — — —y _ I I 07 7 EX TRA 36 ssvR f 11 I I I _ / Fl `°°H — w—mow �� t3 FH F F a Ji I bl I PROP. FH % T. PROP. -- S PROP. - SLOG 2 GATE _ S I PROP.LEFT K APPROXIMATEIMYEARWATER I BLIX35 d - �`� DUMPSTER 14 - FH - TYPE II d TURN LANE O Z SURFACE ELEVATION ION TYPE I. �° ® PROF, TcH G �k 1 1—LIFI(ROUND Z f e „II I 1 FLOODPWNREC AMATION 8 : 3 PROP.PH : ^'O I PROP.FIRELAN(TT'PJ - TYPE NA - ' IN FEET BIDS= BACK RAMP- ONCOR EASEMQNI TYPE III .. I I GRAPHIC SCALE ET za D o T oV✓.: yU $ I � I =t SITE DATA SUMMARY O 555 154K HOIIST — :GA-TE.'.I II1 I - O I)3m- I CURRENTACR 2E05N)ING L —d \ DDPOOL CLUB GI a PROPO NG R1FDRY D H m '^E O PUBLIC w pQ=OWIDa 3 QFvpoWi m'o O PROPOSED PAE 0TTALLTBDGS RETANG SPACES PROP (M895 S.F.)241 AG WALL (MIN2 TYPE,v ID TOTAL BUILDING AREA (175A37S.F.)4.M AC. CE PROP. O=J FH- SPEED TABLE \ \ J H w Y / I/ ( ' i `� \ o- ie 1 I I FLOOR AREA RATIO OTAL ' K y ul BUILDING AREMOTAL LDT 2(M y W Z /1 i l/ 1 I I — I BLDGB 5 I FH BDG9 PROP.FH \` 1 11 1 0 OF AREA-NAXW%) � S O I / C GI a� -- _� I- T 'ram / TYPEN IXPP \ ` 1 1 EXISTING APPROK I I TYPEN g �'� `�Cq6 Y 1 I I l TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA (42),8b 5.F.)9.81 AC, oZ d CREEK BANK 1 I / 9.a _ - PROP a - aw MEDIAN TOTALOPEN SPACE ■ — 0. BLOG] .. (e�_ / '-� TT I- s ft \ 3r F °f�� n a 'O] �r9 I I (M ) H81.00I S.F.110.B0 AC. , ox. Y 1 TOTAL BUILDING AND PAVED _ \ •' a 1 I r I I AREAS (427.5385.F.)9.81 AC. 1 - S CARFVRT,TYP I 9 \ DUMPSTER \ �Pm 1 PROP. - 11 PROP NRN LANE - TOTM NUMBER OF UNITS 399 UNITS '.y:........,.,I•y TOTAL DMBER OF e� I _ ROPI.CURB '"II UBENDITR DOEONMSSIT Y 585 BEDROOM PETHi PPROP. NE(YP) / / 19.55 UNRS'ACREPOsANITARr SEWER SMNHOIE .i+..D'A'VP ID.B!ES1s iMtEsER Y4;OE':R;•, "4 / R' a i \ l / _ UNIT MATRIX —GI �n PROP STORM \ Y PROPOSED /// _ Q Q MANHO.LE(TYP) �a ' /}/ DOG W Z ASH ///' / ux R W I I _ / _ ♦5 ,> \ia�(`� "� Pm vux /// / / GRriPEVINEtULESS occuvrgn GWSi xven wrtrPGrt vFA % 'N m = U U O BOUNDARY UNE mb usrieKviean bM m iesn 2m Od,^ r N i IWALL(TvPPE) ,o no O ROUND s urtrMeo c o ama a H m L ! M z,Ne e3AM 71. 6.1M x I / // '/ / r z�__ _C) l 1 s.a rrPE I , •moo ,\ Jy� \ / / �,� Doc.No.o2B93B5ma can s ,a H �aszb z:.abo !% !/" J' J I — J / /a /� y1°tee u• a+nom em a ivsb4 w SPEEDUl- / +Q• /// tl 31A: i eerl` 8M 4 4soe \\ EXISTING AFPRDX DRAI SWALE NAGE SWALE BANK 1 / { '✓�✓�' u ,/ !/ l a t� — � 6sx 7 a an - I CancT PARKING DATA SUMMARY J' REc= W W TOTAL PARKWG REONRED 839 gy ibtn b sx byb • \V ! EXISTING APPROX ( I : 1e6/z bM eb LbzK llseLu OPAINAGE�"WAyLE CENTER' 639 1.fiD SPACFSIUNIT (INCLUDE513 HC SPOTS) :Bdr1bM Bb 33]e 3536 N W W (ttPJ TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 666 14?/aMiM/3,ubN 820 i3 I3A33 W } :7j` ,• V\\ CARPORT,TYP. RTK.a h yGl \ BLDG 15 P, I SURFACE PARgNG �] BNli earn zlBi L18A 3i.260 344m W d F » 6 M ADP.FH RYP.1 TYPE IA R \ / -- (1 ) ser:ebm ,iz9 1191 as A]3m IML Z a.] Y \ NCLUGES 10 HC SPOTS _ /\ V"' / PUBLIC TRAIL PARKING B ear/is eats I_ 30.wa iza L� (9 O !y 0 (INCLUDES HC VAN SPOT) ae,l z.s bM is wi I— E&ezo /r/ LL r / A_1 J� CARPORF PARKID (INCLUDESd HC SPOTS) aerns ea.n/^wraR ISas 3.388i 9.090 d3]0 LL O Z dFH \LL / 5 " \ 4 // N�1 �a`Vy\ TANDEM PARKING 90 ix3 nir35mn sblhw+raea ir<ei 26xo b oAez IS)m xz s% Q '/gg� / \ \�ti\ �. \\\ _ ♦ : ` e wJ \ \G'�S�FL° GARAGE PARKING mr, rOrAi 3%Ise a24zM See IeK% L (..) ,�QJ \ PROP.FH i- 0'3" I M PROP.IM '? _` y FH DUMPSTER VR // • \O A ��A/n Q - � / - .. NVARIATIONS ARE NOTED WITt1ALITTLE LETTER FOLLOWING THE UNIT NAME(•ASK' v/ I" O (TYP.) \ P �,1Y 4� / _ _ '(P V FOREXAMPLETN4 UNRVARIAPONSREFLECTMIDRALTE nONSTOTHEBASE �.. 185�. Np UNIT PLANS(WNDOWS,ADJUSTMENTS,TUBS VS.SHOWERS,BALCONY SIZES,ETC.). 1et TYPE PE NA / / - I _ 15'UNDERGROUND ••• ONCOR EASEMENT DOC.NO.D2(KGDSZB0 N� / PROP.2a STORM ESMT. �,(�� /'�/.j6O•N0 \ / / -- N� 5N oV PROPERTY \ O ® PROP. // SNB uNE - / eIDGs - wTER RO LEGEND so � T� J\��' APPROXIMATE BUILDING HEIGHTS 1o94AcP smom•UL�uGR NIDUSTIA DSTRC MDfiBT / PROP.FN P H v. 0C>C(i�njFz� Es ACCESSIBLE PARKINGSYMBOL (REFERTOARCHPIANSFORBLDGMATERNLS) ACRESFROMPCD•PLANNOCOSTRICT TO ILYMMERCmPUBUCE DEVELOPMENT .. \� PROP.GATE PROPOSED FIRE HYDNUMBEROFPARKINDRANT DEEVELOPIENT OF A XKI UNIT WLT4FAMILY DEVELOPMENT n• \\\ SPACES W a O f SS SANITARY SEWER PIPE BUNIONS NO. BUILDING TYPE HE1GNT Q •EXCEED THE BE REQUEST CU184l2 KSA13EGNESTHE v Ia 160703" TYP. TYPICAL CLUBHOUSE 3B-0' iSTORY IXCEED THE MEM,NT REOUIREMENTS.VARYFROM THE .Q]s/ ` \ PARKING REOUIRENENTS,MID ALLOW FOR A REDUCTION IN IL CASE NAME THE PRESERVE Z DEFINITIONS n \ \ sQ OO y R 3789.72' SW BIOEWNK 2 YPE III LODGEF AT 39-0 3STORIES THE FROM YMDSETBACK RE ATNE TO THEE EXIB E CASE NUMBER Z-1,CUt8A2.PD1601 BROWN \ i \ L-39 CI CURB INLET 3 TYPE III LODGE FLAT 39'-0• 3 STORIES DFJSGN STANDARDS IN THE R#MULTIfMILY DISTRICT. W LOGITION:101 EAST GLADE ROAD;LOT 1,BLOCK •ATTACHED TONETHRE STORYSTPARKIN WITH `6' A5�a 2B°10'40•W WM WATER METER 'n A GLADEGfiO ADDITION G ATTACHED GARAGES AND GUEST PARKING Oj \ R d TYPE NA LODGE FLAT 34HI' =STORIES TG DI DEVEIDPMENi TBEUIWTEDTO11SAP.EOUEST J 6 URBAN FEST3:U AMEIARTMENT C=398.93' MH MANHOLE I Q ^ NCK UNDER CORRIDOR ACCESS GARAGE PARKING 1 '" \ \ 5 TYPEI RESORT FIAT -0• =STORIES •TOTRICT. FROM BUT NOT BE UAITED TOME BUIIDID L.L AND PEWAY F A M'TRADITIONAL FROM SURFACE DES PARKING S TRAIL \- N24°54'46"W PROPOSm 1YWATEft IM IRRIGATION NIFTIER SEPMATON RC-0UIREl1EN1HNTHE'R4JF MULTIFAMILY J •BREEZEWAY FTATS:TRADRIONAL SURFACE PARKWG SPACES '. 5° '05'V✓ '4180 ,.�` �' WE WATER EASEMENT 8 TYPE II RESORT FLAT 39'-0' 35TORIES DISTRICT. ui PARI�O APARtMENT WRH STAIRS AND lNlTS Si ACCESSIBLE \ BNESOFNDER ALL ''P^T ACCESSED FROMACOVERED BREEZEWAY WfM VAR SPACE1 � 4�30' LANES OF SH 380 ROW RIGTtT OF WAY ] TYPEI RESORT FLAT 3B4Y 35TORIES V �'vbl� SECRETARY G PROPOSED CURB INLET NOTES DATE: Pi AVAILABLE COVERED PARKING SPACES e ——— — \ B TYPE N IADGE FLAT 3a4Y 3 STORIES $ EFFICIENCY UNITS:ON BEDROOM UNITS WITH NET PROP, -- �, Q GI PROPOSED GRATE INLET 1. ALLDNENSIONSARE TO FACEOFCURSUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE y RENTABLE AREA RANGID FROM]OPT50 Sd Ff �.APB 9 TYPEN LODGE FIAT 39'AY' 35TORIES 2 ALL RADII ARE2 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWSE. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION gjgj NEF SO FT:REPRESALL LOTS ENTS CONDITIONED SPACE AE9MT. �'` 3 :;Ay PROP.DECEL 41 LANE p�E{LV\GERD EX�t~ y PROPOSED HANDLE t0 TYPE THI BROWNSTONE 3IA1' =STORIES 3.ALL FIRE HYDRANTS ARE TO BE LOCATED IN AN WATER EASEMENT. $ 8+^ AND UNCONDITIONED SPACE MAALDCONY,EXTERIOR PROP.MASTER ` V�,\. \\ 5185�3� �.. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION 11 TWEII RESORT FIAT W'-0• 3STORIES ! 4.HAND MPAI(WGIS PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH Ab15TANDARDS FOR STORAGE CLOSET) � N3�JNO EXISTING PAVEMENT 12 TYPE THi BROWNSTONE 38'-0• 33TORIES 5. ALL GATES MUSTCOMPLY WITH APPLICRBIE FIRE G)QE CHAIRMAN 9 � ��/� ZBP .�, 3G S• BO I� e. REFERENCE IAIIDSCAPE PLANS FOR INTERNAL SIDEWALK LOCATIONS AND RAN 13 TYPEI RESORT FLAT 3a-0• 3STGIES SIZES,lAND9CAPW0 AREASAND OPEN SPACE OATS: $ PROPOSED to WIDE MONV�N/// / / FORA RO.W. `.NO f'' PROPOSED FIRE LANE ]. ALL BUILgNO SEPARATIONS PER R-MF.FpCEIBACK TO FACEBACN SEPARATION d� a WATER MAIN EASEMENT / W i/ - `J 14 TYPE TH1 BROWNSTONE 3I-0• 3 STORIES IS SIT MN AND END TO END OR FACEIBACK TO END SEPARATION IS THE PROPOSEDPAVEMENTNRO.W. -- GREATEROF3a NIN OR&/ICONS HEIGHT. S4 F PROPOSED t 3,=LF OF IY WATFA MAIN ��J\ 15 PE RESORT FLAT 34�V =STORIES 8.REFERENCE ATTACHED GRAUNG PLANS FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED SHEET:20F 35 a3 CONNECTING AT EIILESS GRAPEVINE ROAD. �/ S 18 TYPE NA LODGE FLAT 39VP 3STORIES TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS. SHEET NUMBER /I/ a18 P�.f1Qf AREA FOR PROP. ®BKIRING STAGING PROPOSED TRAIL 9. ALL REWIREMENTS OF THE GRAPEVINE BOIL EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE APPROV TES NOT AUTHORIZEANYWORKN 'Ua �s1 i�TGRAPEVINE DAD / - 17 TYPEI RESORT FLAT 34-0' 33TORIE3 SHALLBEA�TDURINGTN PERIOD OFCONSTRUCTION. CONFLICT WIIN ANYCODESORORDNANCES / .,\ \(R WATER MNN pROPOGED BIOEWAU( 10.CONSTRCTION RiCAL CONDUCTORS ASSOCIATED WITH NEW 'SgY£ i%i/ / / IX.B•WATER 18 TYPENA LOOGE FLAT 39'd 35TORIES CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND. DFPARTMENTOF pEVELOPMENTSERVICES ......... ...... _. - - - - - - ......... _ ....... 28'-Y p 30._9' BALC. PATIO — — _ f MUD BENCH - rW.H. AN. ° ° 5 BEDROOM W.LC. BALC. PATIO F_0 b L� BEDROOM NTRY KITCHEN '- IT-8'x 10'-5' U1'-Y x 9'-d p i IINNE LIVING L — - 11'-d X 17•-7 W.A.C. fl w. III � DINING D. e LIVING DINING BATH 8'-IT x 1,'-9• - 15'-6 X 14'-6 ( W.HI BATH PAN. LNINGIF IB DINING x 1 Npgql I� �� I '"E BATH I� eENW LLa L FF J • �II /\ 11'-I'x lo'-EE s O BEDROOM D. KITCHEN ° r= i 12'-D•X 9'-2• <:::o KITCHEN ENE o ENTRY „'-�X9'- r�J I W.I.C. ENTRY BENCH PAN. ° — UN IT '4�o UNIT 144 UNIT 042 /4"_�'_p' NET: 854 4"=�'_0'• NET: 839 2 4^_�'_O" NET: 110 BALC. PATIO , GROSS: 502 / GRO55: 972 / GROSS: 771 •Ali.: VARIATON-TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER A4u: VARIATION-TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER Ala: VARIATION-DIRECT ENTRY TO GARAGE 'A2b: VARIATION-DIRECT ENTRY TO GARAGE&TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER ?� 'A2c: VARIATION-TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER E i 8 2fi S NUB BENCH o E BALC. PATIO ENTRY MDD BENCH KITCHEN r T 14-r X 12'-D' BEDROOM " J G W.I.C. ( ENTRY ( `s 12'-r X I1'-E' r - KITCHEN W.I.C. I�I r Iv_r x 9'-0' j I W.I.C. I I° W r--i � s \. "E� PAN. BATH W.H. , W. p'0 �� b BATH !. x LNING DINING r BATH =' IT-d x 2I•-r -- 0 LNING DINING 0❑°' BEDROOM ,.Y�%' LNING DINING „',•X,4'_P r lr-i x lE'-d � I 0I PAN. 3 CASE NAME:THE PRESERVE ��� CASENUN CU 1S02 ANDPD1Sa1 9 L- LO 10 EAST— LOT 1.BL0K H A GLADFJafiO AOIXTION I KITCHEN p BEDROOM II'—OE X 12'-6 -- ;:':';' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (W.H. o BALC. PATIO y UN I t 145 BALC. PATIO CWI1I474>— � I DATE' g NET: 794 p I I A Y GROSS: 857 3 UNIT .43 UN I t 14I SHEET:3 OF 35 9 •ASa: VARIATION-ENTRY DOOR ADJUSTMENT/OUTSIDE CORNER WINDOW BUMP •AS b: VARIATION-ENTRY DOOR ADJUSTMENT/OUTSIDE CORNER VANOOW BUMP NET: 751 NET: 705 •A5c: VARIATION-NB CHANGED TO SHOWER �/4= —O /}"_�-Q APPROVAL DOES NOT AIRHORIZE ANY WORKIN _ •ASd: VARIATION-ENTRY DOOR ADJUSTMENT/OUTSIDE CORNER WINDOW BUMP/TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER GROSS: 810 GROSS: 786 CONELICTWITHANYCODESORORDINANDEs - •A5e: VARIATION-ENTRY DOOR ADJUSTMENT/OUTSIDE CORNER WINDOW BUMP/TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER •A3a: VARIATION-DIRECT ENTRY TO GARAGE&ELONGATED KITCHEN ISLAND Al.: VARIATION-TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER DEPARTMENT oP OEVELOPMENr sERVIOEs •A3b: VARIATION-TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER 12 2z 2017 UNIT PLAN - THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners ARCH I T E C T U R E ^ LAN D P L A N N I N G 3 a GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP �MaaR�DR��DRE«� m1 7.�,-max-w o wR,u DEscN � JDa No.wD33 � - - ......... .._............ _... - - -....... - ... 42 S 3e z w fi ._ f ° BALL. PATIO /�II PDR. I MUD 9ENDH 1 ° DINING M. BEDROOM b . BEDROOM #2 12'-7'X"' 1a•-10'X Iov-lT M. BEDROOM �__ _ ° WI•C• a 12'-6 X 12-7 LIVING BALL. PATIO �_� uLI W.I. 00 WC. .I.C. I i I; D � o _ BEDROOM 2 � 0 ' W.I.C. D❑ KITCHENLl e'-g x Is'-rrl--/Y g ' M. BATH H. 110 W M. BATH e LIVING D❑ _ _ BATH � 2 4'-2 %13'-6 I ; DINING I ON. "'-°'x 9'-r PDR. M. BAT � I r _ — N— � � I I J PAN. W.I.C. — — la o BATH L KITCHEN I -� o f uN. W. W.I.C. BATH 2 a — — LIVING�DINING _ — — — M. BEDROOM "°° I � fi'-6 z t3-Y ._.__.-._.._.._._._ DE BALC. 12'-U'%1z'-p � I PAN. b BEDROOM 3 T KITCHEN MUD BENCH BEDROOM 2 � PATIO 6 j 10'-10'x AI'-I L 1 J ll'-Y%12'-V W.I.C. ENTRY 0 UNIT 51 GR085: 1,tas4 UNIT CI UNIT 53 y 1/4.•=1'-0" NET: 1.393 .4 NET: 1,268 w•-6 GROSS: 1,441 GROSS:1,384 i I I ° W.LC. I BALC. PATIO � 'I BALC. PATIO BEDROOM a W.Q.C. la'-II'x 13'-7 DINING ° V 1 BEDROOM PDR. 2 � LIVING � 12'-6%I I'-7 ITT X 13'-T WING KITCHEN o 11-1V%9-7 b _ N E BATH DINING BATH 9'9 %1a'6 ❑� PAN LL KITCHEN 13'-V x 8'-6 "D0 C-E NAME:THE PR01,CU I 9E _ CASE NUA®ER ZiB-01,LU/BUZAND Pa 1801 / L—c..I.EAST CiAOE ROAL S Q O LOT 1,BLC X GLADE/380 ADOITION .� / M. BEDROOM —' UTIUTY B — W.I.C. M. BATH 13•-T X II'-Y STUDY ENTRY DA ENTRY W.H. 1a'-10'X 9--10' W.I. PLANNINGANDZCNWNGCCMMISSION a \ ' W. 6 - - ❑� I I❑� 41 — — —LLYJ �W.H. 9ENCH D— UN I : .} n /,W� Y 1 8G ' UNIT Mai I SHEET:4 OF 35 8 '. 3 5 •I/�"—�'_D' NET: 1,122 �/4"—�' D" NET: 1,079 APPNOVALDOE6 NOT AlDH CIEANYY C- H GROSS: 1,192 GROSS: 1,079 CONFLICT WITH ANY CODE60R ORdNANCE9 '. DEPAR,MENTOPD—LCPMENTSE CM d j i 72 22 2077 UNIT PLAN THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners ARC N I T E C T R E o f L A N I P L A N N N G 4 GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP aid.x ro9 9 �n,uD�uv aoe No.rb9i3 6 5 3 1 i F S ' a 3 2a,-D' 2-R 20'-0' C a _— -- AN. WINE �� ❑ L PDR. - J W. l ❑J BATH KITCHEN °Oo s A — a J i ' ❑ W.I.C. b b LIVING DINING 0[2 W.N.1[ $ BEDROOM g 15•-iV x 12•-6' i S ENTRY PATIO U 4 g a Y UNIT TH1 - 3RD FLOOR 2 UNIt tHI- 2ND FLOOR ' UNIT THI - 1ST FLOOR -EN EON„HEME- CASE NUMBERZIMH CU1S-ANDPD-1 1�4 1•-0,• 1�4 1,-0• 1�4 —1 —D NET: 1,�m EAST GLADE ROAD LDT 1.eLoac A.GuoF�xa AoolnoN GRC53 1.920 _.-.R DATE: g PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE' j J #y p 3 �4 7h SHEET:5 OF 35 g i APPROVAL DOES NOT AfRHORIZE ANY WORK IN _ CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT S ERNCEE 12 22 2017 UNIT PLAN - THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners ARCHITECTURE M 5 LAN D P L A N N I N G '!l11 a rE.uuoWw.wME smEnm.HasraN.Tz>mrs 3 GRAPEVINE,TX—GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUPaT-m, ,..v. b,m o DDNc ruK omr� NOB 40.14033 O E ipp ' 3 S I 6 S B I e 75 4 20'-P 20'-P a u u ❑ a ! i i G PAN. 4 s BEDROOMP#2 BATH DINING B $') LNE Go KITCHEN I ;� ,� ; - �a a Tb b b M. �L �I W.N. BATH LI BENCH ONAGE LIVING ta'-tP x io'-P i PATIO s PDR. ENTRY TOR M. BEDROOM W.LC, g 17'4 x 17'-T F t i UNIT TH2 - 3RD FLOOR rw1vUNIT TH2 - 2ND FLOOR UNIT TH2 - IST FLOOR CASENMBER ETHE 01,0 802ANDP01801 ' ' ' I I NET: 1,515 LOCATION:101 FAST GLADE ROAD i r/ 1/4'=1'-0' f" 1/4'=i —0' 1/4'=1'-0" LOT I.BLOCK&GLADE ADDITION A GROSS: 2,18' MAYORDATE. � s PUNNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SHEET:6 OF 36 APPaOVA--NOTAtfTHORIZEANY-IN 8 CONFLICT PATH ANY COOES OR ORDINANCES - DEPARTMENT OFDEVELOPMENTSE- 12 22 2G11 Meeks +Partners ARCHITECTURE ���/j� NIT PLAN - THE PRESERVE L A N D P L A N N I N G •-�� GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP mt , ' mxr�mioEst� p aae No.14033 a i i I � I a I I 5 i I 1 I 5 s $]gg zo•-v zo•-V zv-T 3 � I o O O I � - - - KITCHEN BEDROOM 2 -r X 12'-' T4 7 g 5 X„' BATH L e /\ PPN. — — -- E I _ tos W.I.C. -- DININGLill CD t LA M. E i BATH a — -_- --- - _ tPAT10 GE ( W.H. \ r PDR. LIVING 1!X1'-" ENTRY TOR M. BEDROOM W.LC° 4 0 0 g E 3 UNIT TH24 - 3RD FLOOR 2 UNIT TH2t4 - 2ND FLOOR ' UNIT TH24 - 1ST FLOOR CASE N�'DMETHE PRE C BO AND PD,E-0, • LOGTION:101 EAST GLADE ROAD 5 1/4'=1'-0' 1�4•=1'-0' NEi: t,53o LOTI,ELOOKA•GLADEfHeOADOTICN a caoss: zazo MAYOR .1-11ANY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ; 421 l�A, Cf DATE: I. F 3 SHEET:70F 35 B APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY NARK IN CONRICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 12 22 2017 UNIT PLAN - THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners ARC H I T E N I T R E m 7 LAN D P L A N N N G a le000 MalDwx oRrh slmEnm-HasrCN,r<Trma = GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP �ruN.oEw;N � JOB NO 14033 O ......... .............. - ......... ......... ......... - ................................ 5 6 I S 27'-P 27'-P _ 27'-T - I I BATH #2 W.I.C. I M. BATH BEDROOM#2 M. BEDROOM ! I - - - L - - -- - - --- -J W.I.C. V u PAR. ❑ ° BATHLl 13 UTILITY E � KITCHEN j W.I.C. LIVING ja 14, I� BEDROOM 3 px _ I I'-a,x Imo„ ( w.H.l STORAGE — II Lam- � �J �I °;> DINNING PATIO STORAGE STUDY LOFT PDR. IO ENTRY IA, — ° o EASE R-E THE S p�p i I 3 UNIT TH3 - 3RD FLOOR 2 UNIT TH3 - 2ND FLOOR 1 UNIT TH3 - 1ST FLOOR OASE RUNS-ZIB-0SCU I& AND POIBO, 9 LOCATION:101 EAST GLADE ROAD § /4�•-l' O�� 1/4��-�• �• /4••-�'_O� NET: 7,741 LOT I.BLCO A,GIADE,3E0 AOWTION x ' GRO55: 2,fi20 MA�OR ; DATE: '' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION '', DATE: SHEET:8 OF 35 APPROVAL DOESNOTAUTHORIZEANYWORKIN _ CONELICTWITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES - ]DEPARTMENTCFDEVELOPMENTSERVICES 12 22 2017 UNIT PLAN - Meeks +Partners ARCHITECTURE THE PRESERVE N N K 8 LA D PLAN N I G R�4 a GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP mxrmruK OEsr�1 � aoe No.1<o33 ............ -_ ---- ................ -- � I � I � I A4a A4 3 I, B2 ® ® E ® E32 i r ® ® El J 9 I, a I � ' El a ® ® - - — i Ala Al fi I e SUILDINCs TYPE I - LEvEL 2 A4a A4 s B2 ® ® ® ® 7B—2 ® ® El El — Laia ' ...� Y B1 — ® � B1 p CI 9E NMdE:THE PRESERVE ® -- —11 ® GSE NIR.BER 21B01.W 180t AND P0,B0, a — LOCATION:fa,EAST GLADE ROAD 5 -. Al a Al LOT 1,SLOCK A,GLAOH]CO ADgTION s DATE: PI NINGM—NINGCOMMIWION e 5 �V Ate, Y z SHEET:90F 35 p I 5UILDING TYPE I - LE\/EL I gr �t•'(�G' APPROVALDOESNOTAIffNORQEANYWOPo(IN C WCT WiIN ANY CODES OR ORgWJiCES /�,-� a„ DEPARrMENr of OEVELOPMENi SERVICES F ' � 12 22 2017 Meeks +Partners BUILDING PLAN - THE PRESERVE ARCHITECT IRE 9 L AN DP LAN NING •*■ GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP �`� mN�niN.oEaw d00 N0.1403 O ',' . .. .................................. . ...... .................................................... ... ................................. ................................. .. ................ .........................................--- ------ ------------------------------------ fi L A4c A4 B2 13 D B2 Ep El Bl Bi El [93 CASE NUMM Zl"I,W 1�AND PD lal EASTGLADEROADLOT LO 1.BLOCK A.��ADDITION Ala Al PL NINGMDMNINGCOMMIWION Sm cw IT, SHEET:10 OF 35 BUILDING 7*10PS I Lg\/SL 3 OF --DOnNOTAUTHOMZ—MW1N CON—T—CO—OROR—CES DEPARTMENT Of DEVELOPMENT SERNcw Meeks +Partners A R C H I T E U R E C T BUILDING PLAN THE PRESERVE N 10 L�N D P L A N IN G GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP JOB NO-14M - _ - ......................... -- _..........--- - -- KEYNOTE LEGEND: pBp 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER i 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING-A { t 3 FIBER CEMENT SIDING-B 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL 6 5 ACCENT ROOF I 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF B 7 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS a 6 1 FIBER CEMENT TRIM-MITERED CORNERS 8 RIBBED NIL RWRNC 9 TYPICAL 6'PLANE CHANGE e -P BAY P90IH RIBBED MTL.ROOFING 72 __- Qa tl I, I i •�$ PAINED SR.BRACING RE NANUF. _ PANTED SIL COWNN PANTED SR.CDLUMN RE:NAIUF. RE:MANUF. b CONC.FINSH SURFACE CONC.RNSH SURFACE £ y RE CIVIL DRWGS. RE:CIVIL ORWGS. ' d PARKING STALL PARKING STALL BNO E.CN POR S MAY VM IN j LENGTH AND NUMBER OF BAYS PRO`ADED.REFER TO SITE PLAN & CARPORt ELEv4t I ON 4 SECTION 4 1/4••_1• 0" CARPORT ELEV-SECT � 8 s F F S I - MID POINT OF ROOF HGT. & _ a _. _ LEVEL 3 _ R u 8 T CASE NUMBER:ZI R I.M I 4 �T - „yr r, SY33 CPSE NUMBER:215-01 W 1802 AND PD iB-01 _4 h _ ��T BLOCK A GLADE/3BO PDpTION .Y I. 1 m k DATE: � I _ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 9 ��SU I LD f NCB tYPE I 114 - FRONT ELEI/14t I ON MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 81% b VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:6.2 DATE: " Y .TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE SHEET:11 OF 35 k BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID I.. APPROVAL DOES NOT AOTHORIZE ANY""I N 355 CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES a 12 22 2017 BUILDING ELEVATIONS — THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners �A ARCH ITECT 81 RE i>If1 11 LAND P L A N N I N G a GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP cEPnw.oEar� � d06 N0.140.T3 O ' KEYNOTE LEGEND: 5 I 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER j 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING-A 3 FIBER CEMENT SIDING-B 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL 5 ACCENT ROD, 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 7 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS 5 ',. 8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM-MITERED CORNERS E 9 TYPICAL 6•PLANE CHANGE I � I J E MID POINT OF ROOF HOT. r -- I 2 - •a I ...'. ._. LEVEL 3 i m e L ._ ....... II1 LEVEL 1 a 5 BUILDING TYPE 1 4 114 — SIDE ELEVATION MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 84% i 1/811-1'-0" VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:6.8 .TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE h BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID E d I 9 MID POINT OF ROOF HOT. ` ..... .... 1 t._ 05 ASE NAMe THE PREs S LEVEL 2 _ C - �' C ERV£ 5 Po1am R T t BLOCK A cLADF/360 ADDrrlox rr I r k r MAYOR LEVEL 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 82% ij crsv � a DATE I BUILD INCH TYPE 1 4 1 e4— REAR mxyAT I ON x 1 SHEET:12 OF 35 e VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:4.8 ivF y APPROVAL WTHNY CODHORIZEA.NAN.IN : yct� CONFLICT WITH ANY A-ORIZE ANY ORKI -TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES &BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID '.. 12 22 2017 Meeks +Partners BUILDING ELEVATIONS - THE PRESERVE L A R C HI T E C T U R E M w^ a A N D P LAN N I N G 1 L 1smnM wwL uxr.E airr<nuo xaaraN.nrrms = GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP cox®TUKCEsry JOB NO.IQ33 O ..........................— bl B2 B2 A6c A6 13 El D > �o V174" 71 [3 El A3b A7 El A3 A7 7A F---7 L fi B2 g 13 D 82 82 A�6o A 6 El k ® D 13 D Z El El D CASEPRMER� NUWERZI"I.Ml8 MDPD1801 t-4 u--1 A3b A 7 A3 A7 LOT 1,BLOCK ADORION -OR PL NINGMDMNINGCO-IMON ( 5UILI:)[N(3 TYPE 11 LEVEL I D/? SHEET:13 OF 35 i R=N=� -DO-AWHOWE-WIN ` �'f CIXiRICT WITH ANY CODES OR OM-S 12 22 2017 A BUILDING PLAN Meeks +Partners ARCHITECTURE THE PRESERVE LA N D P L A N N IN G m 13 :6 GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP JOB N 0.14033 .............. ... ........ .................... ............................. ...................... Ell 82 B 2 A6a A6 13 El 13 D 1;� Egli m m ® Y 0 D IWIE NAME THE ME- It EN� Zl"i.Ml�AN PD-1 A3b El -TON:10�TGIAOE� A7 A3 A7 LOT 1.BL=&GIADE ADDITION A MAY PIANNING AND ZONING COMMIMON A BUILDING LEVEL SHEET:14 OF 35 -1-GOE.NOTA-...----lN CGN-WITH A CQO0ORORO[NANMS DEPARTMENT OF DE4ELOPMENT SERVICES f Meeks +Partnerl BUILDING PLAN ARCHITECTURE THE PRESERVE LANDPLANNING 14 GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP NO.14033 ............................. ............ ................... .. .................................... ............... .................................._KEYNOTE... ...................... LEGEND: pip 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING-A i FIBER CEMENT SIDING-B 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL 5 ACCENT ROOF 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 7 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS byy 8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM-MITERED CORNERS 9 TYPICAL 6-PLANE CHANGE Ali fi t MID POINT OF ROOF HGT. ........... 7 7 �7! t LE I EE I HH: Illy � LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 �ENU ER:ZI"I,CIJl�ANDPDl jjj L. 41 LOCATO-0 EASTa_ADERC,kD L T 1, GLADE=ADO(TION T- I a'F I 7 _LEVEL 1 1 1 DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MASONRY CALCULATIONS 85% —E SHEET:15 OF 35 r;;'� 5ULDING rrf=rm ii rmovr rnmvxrioNi VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS — 1:14.3 APPROVALDOMNOTAIJTHORII 55 ,TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDI—S BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID DEPARTMENT Of DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Meeks +Partners BUILDING ELEVATIONS U A R C H I T E C T THE PRESERVE L " D PLAN A N NI R E N G M 15 GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP - - - - -- _............................. .......... _... KEYNOTE LEGEND: 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING—A 3 FIBER CEMENT SIDING—B 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL 3 5 ACCENT ROOF 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 7 1 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS i 8 F18ER CEMENT TRIM—MITERED CORNERS 9 TYPICAL 6"PLANE CHANGE S MID POINT OF ROOF HGT. i LEVEL 3 §§ a � 5 1. LEVEL 2 \ — g , L LEVEL 1 a 5U LDING TYPE 11 - SIDE ELEVATION MASONRY CALCULATIONS — 80% VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS — 1:3.7 y -TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE &BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID � I 5 4 E F I MID POINT OF ROOF HOT. ..... - -..li�_— — — — f_ I e 1 s L=7 — —LEVEL 3 ; 7. LEVEL 2 L - ` — — CASE NUMBER ZIP&01.LU ZANDPD1B01 LOGTON:141 EAST GUM ROAD b __— - LOT I,BLOCK A.GUD&350 ADgTION .� i p m LEVEL 1 DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 1 b I CHAImmm- 4 Dv. A MASONRY CALCULATIONS — 81% - DU I LD INCH TYPE 11 - REAR ELE\/14t I ON r `�1 *N SHEET:160E 35 z VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS — 1:5.6 APPRGVALDDEGNGTAMHORI— -TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE CONFLICT`MTH ANY CODES OR ORUNANGES { dt BALCONIES INCWDO)AS SOLID DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES g 6 8 I 12 22 2017 Meeks +partners BUILDING ELEVATIONS - THE PRESERVE A R C H IT E N T I RE r. 16 a LAN D P L A N N N G -I GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP B�MBxDR�DRNE�N.m_xD n� ',, mxcmiui�5tr+ JOB N0.14033 O rt a i � j ®' ro Is 13 ® 13D ® ; ' A5c ® ® A5c A5 P El A5 ) a � 7 F I. A7 A7 !I L_ J 3 I NJV uji Aye - — — — — — — — _' A5c - 13 E 9 ED] El ® ® 9 al A2c A2c A2 A2 6 - e i rWN5uIL1:)ING TYPE III - LEVEL 2 e Imo•-r � a I I I I I � I I I I L - - J IL- - - - J J J L - - J L J L - - J L — J J _ — J L - - J $ F 'L E 'll i h L. J i. e I � ` 1 VAs A5b ® A5d — 11- _ �113 ® ll El J [3 El ® u a I Alb Alb Ala Ala I CASENAME:THE PRESERVE ° LASE NDMSER:218d1,CU 1S02 AND PD IB-01 S - LDGTION 101 EAST pADE ROAD 5 - LO4I,SLOCKA Gf-ADEl390 p➢DRION 5 � 4 i DATE: PLANNING pN0 20NING DOMMISSIDN 5 BL{ILDINIG TYPE III - LEVEL 1 € �$ ` DAM x „.7 SHEET:17 OF 35 n�T��G•SST � APPROVAL GOES NDT ADTNORIZE ANY NTIRK iN 5 ' �y,�.w.s.c CONFiICT WITH ANY COOES OR ORpNANCE3 S DEPARRAEN4OF DEV/30PMENi SERVICES F 6 12222017 Meeks +Partners BUILDING PLAN - THE PRESERVE ARCHITECTURE 17 LAN D P L A N N I N G ;•; *• GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP - oxafrruu.omw dOR%1403 O ._ ......................................................... .. .................................................................................. ............ . ...... ..................................... ..................... . ... ................................. ............................... ................................................................... . ... .......................................................... . .............. pfi fE D 13 El p El A5c D A5c A5 A5 A7 A7 Rill r7l A5e A5c D ED] El A2c A2c A2 A2 GSENUAIDMZI"I,CUIS-ANDPD—j W��DE ROAD LOT I,BLOCK A gADEISBO ADOPTION I. DATE_ PI NW—D—G—sslm D -- BUILDING T'rl=S III LEVEL 3 SHEET:18 OF 35 .�4 DOESNOTA�HoMM—IN�—�CODES OR ORDI—S DE--OFDEV OME-S—CES 12/22/2DI7 Meeks +Partners BUILDING PLAN ARCHITECTURE THE PRESERVE LAN DPLANNING M 18 GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP .......... ... ..................................... ........................... ...................................... ... . ... ............................................ ——--—----------- ....................... . . .................................................... .. ................... ....................... -----------_----------_---------_-- ....... KEYNOTE LEGEND: 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING-A 3 FIBER CEMENT SIDING-6 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL 5 ACCENT ROOF 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 7 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS a FIBER CEMENT TRIM-MITERED CORNERS TYPICAL 6"PLANE CHANGE IF gg rt MID POINT OF ROOF HOT 4a LEVEL 3 __H- 11 _m'. _Wl LEVEL 2 CASE NAME THE—SERVE CASENUMEER 11-1,-38 I0ANIIII-I LOCATION 101 EAST ROAD L OT 1,131.0�A,GILA ADgTION I, ............. r LEVEL 1 MAYCR DATE PLANNING AND 20NING COMMISSION MASONRY CALCULATIONS 80% A Bull-DING Irl"IPrE ill FRONT ELAVATION DATE VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS — 1:7.7 -TAKEN FROM F TO TOP OF PLATE SHEET:19 OF 35 &BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOUD APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHO ANY IN CCONFLICT WTH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SEWCES 12/22/2017 Meeks +Partners T U BUILDING ELEVATIONS A R.C H I THE PRESERVE LAN D P L EC T A N N I R E N G m 19 GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP 7—Z " p SOB NO 14033 KEYNOTE LEGEND: pfip ' 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER y 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING—A f 3 FIRER CEMENT SIDING—B � 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL 5 ACCENT ROOF 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 7 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS S 8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM—MITERED CORNERS 9 TYPICAL 6"PLANE CHANCE MID POINT OF ROOF HOT. e ' — 4 v Z LEVEL 3 - � :� r 4 —1 S�L37� .{ ..._.. = LEVEL 2 r TIT LEVFL 1 I BUILDING TYPE III - SIDE MAVATION MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 85% VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:10.8 -TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE &BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLO a� I � I I I 4 i ' MID POINT OF ROOF HOT, 3 e 1.. — _ � a - FPO uu I _ LEVEL 3 — — LF Ink L k i b EU - - CAS E NMAE:THE PRESERVE g ' I CASE NUAWER:218-01,CJ lI D AND PD 1801 '� �: L L .... - = LOCATION:101 EAST C DE ROAD ; .... ...... _ _ .... {{ �. _. -_ .._ __ _ LOT 1.BLOCK A GLADEI300 ADDITION ti LEVEL 2 e -- f 1 MAYOR ... ...... ......_ I �, '- � ....... `- ,._.. •J �E� � DATE LEVELI PLANNINGANDZONINGCOMMISSION B I . Y MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 83% DATE BU 1 LD INCH TYPE III - REAR ELEVATION SHEET:20 OF 35 VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:7.0 O g ,- APPRDVALDOESN.TAUT„OWZEAN--IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR OR-CES b -TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE , &BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOUD L DEPARTMENT OF DEVI:LOPMEW SERVICES 12 122 2017 Meeks +partners BUILDING ELEVATIONS — THE PRESERVE A R C N I T E N T I R E 20 a LAN D P L A N N N G GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP BOo EMORU DRrvEsuREnOo.roDS DN X M9 0 mNrmru.L DES. JOB NO.14033 _... _ . .. . _ z ' J L-- - A 31 II' � I � i f ! a i 199'-11' a1 I I I I I I I I i i L _ _ J L — J', L - - J L - - J { 9 El El I i I • �� _ ' ® ® �I - Ir ® ® T-1 B3 B3 13 A3a ® ® A3a A3a ® ® A3a 10 � F i i� e �,� BUILDING TYPE IY - LE�/EL 1 a ! a ' CASE NAME:THZl"l, l 5 LASE N:1011 ZibG1,LU 16a2 AND PD 18D1 LOGTION:IO A. GLADE ROAD b OT I.SLOCK0.GLADE/380 ADdilON a ' L I —OR g i/ DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 9 b i e fZ ([N�N - fmN SHEET:21 OF 35 •{��� APPROVALDOES NOTAI ESOREANYV/ b CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORgNMIMSCES b DEPA ENTOFDE4ELOPMEWSERYICES 6 1 1 I 12 22 2017 BUILDING PLAN - THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners a ARCH I T E C T U R E ^ L A N D P L A N N IN G L ,Nm�Nauuow�aREnm-xDlmon,TxTms GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP cGxcEynyyo9.gtal JOB N0.14033 O - . . . ............................................................. . . .......................................... .... . .. .. ..................................................... . ...... . . .. ................ ... .. .............................. - ------- - ------------ it 13 El cl A6c A6a A6 A6 cl -- ® ® ®1 13 El El El j, 13 El CE I? El D Fn rT A3b D A3b A3 A3 B3 Bi 13 9 El ElFF 3 1\/ - LSVEL. 2 CARE NAME:THE PRESERVE 6 USE NUMER,Zl"i.W 15 AND PD 1-1 LOCATION:iD1 FAST GLADE ROAD b LOT 1,BL=A. ADMION DATE. —NINGANDWNING—S)ON "q DATE: e SHEET:22 OF 35 �.�r-p" CONFECT WITH ANY DVAR�ENTOFD�0= 12/22/2017 Meeks +Partners ARCHITECTURE H rT E C T U R E L D P L A N N I N BUILDING PLAN THE PRESERVE G M 22 GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP JOB N0.14033 — —_ -- — — ............. . ---- _... — -- s , it 3 a E 6 � I 5 3 , 3 i i - � I ® ® ® � I 13 C1 Aft A6a A6 A6 C1 13 ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® j ® i e � I a�a -- 1 rTg I � A3b ® ® A3b A3 ® ® A3 I B3 Q B3 ® — ® ® ® ® ® F ' al ® ® 9 f� I� 3 8 e 7 BUILDINC$ TYf=I= IY — L rmvEL 3 i S 3 CASENAME:T ERVE 6 LASE NON@ERZ-1, :ZiBD1,W iSp2 AND PD 1501 LOT LOT 1.BL iDi EAST CNADE ROAD 3 OCKA GI-ADEI9fi0 ADDRION M 5 � DALE: PUNNING AND ZONING COMA95SION .475 �C 8ur N SHEET:230E 35 '�c �C 4.`'r% MPRDVAL DOES NOT ANTNORIZE ANY WORN IN H5 C RICT--ODES OR ORgNANCES i DEPARIMEM OFDEN:LOPMEWSEANCES 6 12 22 2017 Meeks +Partners BUILDING PLAN THE PRESERVE ARCHITECT ORE ^3 L A N D P L A N N I N G L U GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP �NEG�Enoo o GONNctrlu,u DEao1 ,IOB N0.1403 O � I KEYNOTE LEGEND: i 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING-A UARDRAIL 3 FIBER CEMENT SIDING-8 4 TYPICAL METAL G 5 ACCENT ROOF 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 7 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS 5 8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM-MITERED CORNERS 9 TYPICAL 6"PLANE CHANGE 5 4 i MID POINT OF ROOF HGT. r LEVEL 3 I m � .. I � T .-.. - _ r , I , a __.__JEVEL 14L � ME BUILI�INC� tYPE IV - FRONT ELEVI4TION MASONRY CALCULATIONS — 80% % CAS N101NESTG DE a CASE NUMEER l—,CM,SU2ANOP01B0, T» ,^., LDT LO,a,E EJ—ROAD 5 LOT 1.BLOCK0.GLADFl3G0 ADDRIGN A VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS — 1:5.6 R .TAKEN FROM FT TO TOP OF PLATE at2 y� % N h DATE. BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION F DATE: g Y SHEET:24 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY='N CONRICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES '.. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES '. i 12 22 2017 Meeks +partners BUILDING ELEVATIONS — THE PRESERVE ARC H I T E C T U R E N N N I N G M 24 a LA D P LA ,e000�MDRULDRINEsuRE mao Nousrar;rxnms = GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP mxcmru.L�yda JOB NO.14033 O r KEYNOTE LEGEND: 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING-A g j t 3 FIBER CEMENT SIDING-B 1 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL 5 ACCENT ROOF 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 7 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS H 8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM-MITERED CORNERS 9 TYPICAL fi°PLANE CHANGE j ' MID POINT OF ROOF HGT. I i .. ........ --__— — — — T i,fL m .......__ LEVEL 3 .3 T ...........— — LEVEL 2 g I _ 3 I LEVEL 1 m a e MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 83% € �,,�BUILDINC� TYPE IV - SIDE ELEVATION VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:10.3 .TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE € &BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID 3 5 - S I I S MID POINT OF ROOF HGT. i I ....... - --- —fi � F 71 — — — — a r: __ } L{.4� III LEVEL 3 _j LEVEL 2 - ....... r. THE E N�QR 21801 W 1BR002AAOND P01801 IOGTIO ( LI b LEVEL 1 - __-- — MAYOR S C�NETA Y� DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 80% ° F DATE: HUILDINC: TYPE Iy - REAR ELEV,4TION SHEET:25 OF 35 VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS — 1:8.6 TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATEAPPROVAL DOES NOT AMTHORI2E ANY WORK IN T '.I &BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLD s>'� CONFLICT WITH ANY CGDES OR 0- -DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 12 122 Zan Meeks +Partners ARCHITECTURE M L^� BUILDING ELEVATIONS LAN D PLAN INING �!-�` . i6WOMFMORW.ORIYE 9111El100-HgbTON,T%TMg � GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP P coN�ruKOESDN .L JOB NO.14033 O III I it t 6 I I Elli ❑ I TH2A TH3 TH2 __ TH1 TH2 TH3 TH2A ❑ o � I P 6 I 2 5L. Cx. TYPE TI-II - LEvr= . 2 i P f F LL F.O.M. F L - - - - J L - - - - L �I - - - - J — - - - L- - - -J ; s TH2A TH3 TH2 TH1 TH2 TH3 TH2A s y g P ' 00.5E NAME:THE PRESERVE e OASE NUMBER:ZI"I.W 1U2 AND PD 1801 LO 101 EAST OLAOE ROAD 5 LOTT 1.BLOCX A.GLAOEl380 ApIXfION .Y I 3 DATE: _ PLANNING AND ZONING D MISSION I BLDC�. TYPE tH1 - LEvEL 1 �� �°q•,� �`� 17877�01 1 S "l_ Cl DAE g j N SHEET:26 OF 35 TE OF APPROMWESNOTAIR MZEANYMWIN H j y CONFLICT`MTH ANY CODES OR ORgNANCES 6yk .EPA EWOFDEVELOPMEN,SERVIOES 6 1 12 22 2017 BUILDING PLAN - THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners A R C N I L A N I E ^� L A N D P A N N G L GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP cpxcEPruu omr JOB t 6 �p J � I Ii yp '. P g I i 5 I I 9 8 i 3 n 4 a 9 4 p� s P i s El ® ® ® ® FTH2A TH3 ® ® TH3 TH1 H2A ® TH2 TH2 ® C ENAME:T 9 CASE NDMBER Zl—,21Ba1,WlB@ AND PD iSG1 LO O,EAST GLIDE ROAD F --- _ LOTT I.1,BL BLOCK A GLADEYJfiO pODfiION 3 i �iAVdl�— 4 i onTE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION y BL )G. TYPE tHi - LBvEL 3 �� SHEET:270E 35 P JtS "PR VALDOESNOTANTHOM EANYV'A—N P >' CONRIOT`MTHANYOOOESORORNN MS DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT 9ERNCE3 y b 12222017 BUILDING PLAN - THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners ARCHITECTURE 27 L A N D P L A N N I N G a GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP Doxl�ruN.DEsca, doe NO,14033 o ',' ... ...... . ... ............................................ ... ...................................... ........ ................................................................... .. ...... .................................................. ..................................................... .......--------- . .. ..... .................................................... II KEYNOTE LEGEND: t 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING-A 3 FlBER CEMENT SIDING-8 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL 1111 11 5 ACCENT ROOF 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 7 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS B FIBER CEMENT TRIM-MITERED CORNERS 9 TYPICAL 6"PLANE CHANGE MID POINT OF ROOF HOT Ell ILL I I LLJ LEVEL 3 ED I � , i I i Tj 4 T t MASONRY CALCULATIONS 85% MASONRY CALCULATIONS 82% SIDE ELE\10014TION BLDG. T"rfmrm THI REAR ELEVATION VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS 1:22.0 VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:7.6 -TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE -TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE 8,BALCONIESINCLUDED AS SOLD &BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLD MID POINT OF ROOF HCT. :_T Iff r m T LL1_ 7 H� j LEVEL 3 ....................... JR7 .... ........ ....... LEVEL 2 7 CASE RAME THE PRESERVE m CAS NUMBER71"I.W18-AND PID-1 LOCA ON:101 EAST GLIDE ROAD b LEVEL 1 _lk; LOT 1,BLOCK A,GUDEf380 ADMION fi �El A MAYOR DATE_ MASONRY CALCULATIONS 80% F PLANNING COMMISSION 5LDCx. TYPE THI FRONT ELEVATION CHAIRMAN VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:5.0 .TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE DATE &BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLD SHEET:28 OF 35 APP OVA-DOESNOT-HORIZEARY-IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 12/22/2017 Meeks +Partners ARCH C H I T E C T U R E L m BUILDING ELEVATIONS THE PRESERVE P L A N IN I N G 28 GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP JOB NO-14033 8 tl tl s t i / \ a F M LROOM / o / / a / / o a E b Yi0R1C ROOY P a , 1 = = 1 affimm II II II II II ffi91 s i y�% II II II II II II � II I I I lIAWFB d c� 13 � E CASE NAME:THE PRESERVE S CASE NUMBER:Zl"I.M 13 AND PD 13D1 6�F � LOGnolt fat EASTC X ROAD b LOT 1,SLoa a GLADErxa ADdr1oN J S ? — FROM PORCH - DATE � O O PLANNINGANDZONINGCOMMISSICN ! - � \ WTE F 1 CLUHH OUSE FLOOR P1.0" SHEET:29 OF 35 FT. `s B9'—1 a' / Crc O55: b,556 SO.I. APPROVAL DUES NOT.....— 1. E CIXiFLICT WITH ANYCODES DESO OR ORdNANCE3 � I DEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERVICE3 6 V ' I 12 22 2077 � Meeks +Partners A R C H I T E C T U R E CLUBHOUSE PLAN — THE PRESERVE L A N D P L A N N I N G g 29 s GRAPEVINE,TX-GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP n � r a ID,.�Sl6!.�L55B31n-vw.,. cDN�P,uK Dev Jab NO.14033 O -......... .. ...._..........__-- _ --- .__...... --.._. — -- ---.__. -- ....__ .. ......_._ ....... - .........IN IN I'm r KEYNOTE LEGEND: t Ali I 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING-A MID POINT OF ROOF HGT. - / _ _ — _ __.. / :�i ��� 3 FIBER CEMENT SIDING-8 /. 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL 5 ACCENT ROOF 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 7 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS f .....I• ............___ / �E � 8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM-MITERED CORNERS ; 9 TYPICAL 6'PLANE CHANGE A-_ �I / -- 10 STORE FRONT SYSTEM { _ 1 s . I � � CLUBHOUSE — NORTHWEST ELEVATION CLUBHOUSE — EAST ELEVATION ■ i ar MID POINT OF ROOF HGT • j7 FT 777 e 4 F _ _ } L CLUBHOUSE — REAR ELEVATION - MASONRY CALCULATIONS — 94% Lu -TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PATE of 4-or °s MID POINT OF ROOF HOT. VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS — 1:3.7 ag� / TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE 8 / k BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOUD € \ c y I :. ®I ® .® e ..._..... IM 3 ............. ._... CASENMIE:THE PRESENVE e _- _. �,\ b GSE NUMSETL 21801.CU 139t AND PD iB01 - / - _ - LOG 101 EAST( ROAD H -: ......._.... -:. .. ;� LOT I..BLOCKA GlADEW380 ADIXTION -. •. - g I q P _. sT f it Tz _L PLANNING ANO ZONING COMMISSION 2 �1 p AT Lu ji DEdo ULI 'm 5 ty, #n SHEET:30 OF 35 CLUBHOUSE — FRONT ELEVEVATION \�� sod APPROVAL WTH T=00ES0 2E ANNANMS H55 �2 CONRICT WITH ANY CODES OR OftDINANCE3 i P DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SEIiVICE3 a i 72 22 2017 Meeks +partners LAN D P LA CLUBHOUSE ELEVATIONS - THE PRESERVE A R° N I T T 30 A N NING GRAPEVINE,TX—GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP EOu EMO W 0RNE9 @tl00-Hq o mN�rluiDEstGv � JOB N0.14033 � '. N b 1 OUT. OF EXISTINGr - I I d ®`E`r r /f f �""�--�,✓� ``1.,,, ,.� \ I i SEE SHEET 32 FOR TREE MASS- ,PICAL,� CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN ° c PROJECT MONUMENT 200 100 0 200 400 SIGN ZONINGTRACT SCALE:1" 200.-9• �' _ LOT 1 BLOCK A 888,946 SQUARE FEET' -� %fir/ / ��� f 20.407 ACRES j �s DA /TIORT WORTH APPROXIMATE CENTER INTERNATIONAL LINE OF EXISTING CREEK .�' �!/ `` ` j6 AIRPORT \l P �, •` // o °"J; ;..�° i''�/ - 1I` `, i�� '/�../''i' / aow9c� SITE �^ v o '-]_ t' S 'r l y c. ._✓/ 'tom i'�/. "' ✓ f , //,f <j p 5 L f/ � j� ivC� i+�' l✓1 j L--/� f ZONING TRACT GLADE ROADW o DE ROAD � r 7-1 REMAINDER TRACT LOT 2,BLOCK A s �_.. 2062567 SQUARE FEET N 30 - / 47350 ACRES S".40+30' 09°56I3cti: I NA _ �,` / ��7 rv _ �P� � LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING 36"TRA o SANITARY SEWER LINE CONCEPTUAL y' TRAIL ROUTE-SEE SHEETS 33-35 OUTLINE OF EXISTING TREE MASS-TYPICAL \/��� .- f�s EXISTING SANITARY a SEWER EASEMENT EXISTING 20'AND FUTURE 80' TRA SANITARY SEWER LS L9 /�/ \ EASEMENT FUTURE 48"TRA SANITARY SEWER LINE S05.58' a 5 L4 --------------- F ti E UNETABLE 1 LINE BEARING DISTANCE m L1 N89°1T09'YV 21.89 m L2 N14°i6'31•W 126,04' CASENAMEERZ18-1,Wl N L3 N00.3219"VJ 286.88• CASE NUMBER ZIB-01,CU1B42 AND PD1Bd1 P L4 N06°$910911E 52SO' LOTI,B-A,GIADEl350ADOTION LOGMON:101 EASTGU ROAD 31 L5 NDO°08'35"E 51.65' 12 Lb S05°58'30"E 155.70' L7 S24°02430"E 163.50' �`� SECRETARY L8 S45°26'30'E 49.50' DATE., a L9 565°1 4'30"E 93.90' PIANNNG AND ZONING COMMISSION L10 S12.58'30"E 138.30' L11 S05.53130'W 135.80' N L12 S11°40'30"E 154.00' ij n L13 517°59'30'W 53.80' DATE, N L14 S09°58'30'E 145.07 g L15 S38•11'30'E 129000' SHEET:31 OF 35 L16 S40053'3V'E 115.60' L17 S08.024301W 67.70' APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN i COWLICT-ANYCODESOR ORDNANCES p L18 S20°44'301W 85.80' 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES a L19 S49°26'30'E 263.70' p L20 S73°47'30"E 101.20' DESIGNED BY: PROJECT N L21 S42.36'1r'E 146.00' , LANDSCAPE PLAN - OVERALL NO. � L22 szs•zszsW ,oD.00• L23 S20°23'40'W 54.55' B. ZONING DOCUMENTlarBi 16301 Quorum DINe - DRAWN BY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Addisoonn.Tema 75240 GRSOOI L24 540°58'41"E 130610' L25 S14°34'30"E 99.40' < {, Mein 972.248.7916 7 L26 S39°37'45"E 95,97' 416 y Faz972.248.1414 THE PRESERVE AT GRAPEVINE SHEET NO. CHECKED BY: f t�+P ^�"�s>o�� www.lbiFBrtners com c L27 S65°07'45"E ,76.46' OF 2r//18 Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas o NO. REVISIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION BY DATE NO. REVISIONS DURING PLAN REVIEW BY DATE P Y .31 o` SCREENING ALONG PROPERTY LINE 11 7- �j J lI 7 J J • / AND FENCE UNE ADJACENCY > 1 ( ;LEAF MASS BETWEEN BUILDINGS ) PROPOSED FORMAL GARDEN AREA WITH COVERED PARKING- �l AND NATIVE PLANTINGS. TYPICAL I IIU I� ; \ PROPOSED RETAINING / \ PET YARDS. TYPICAL AT EACH FIRST PROPAl ING�\,��?. I I. �� ? - WALL �\ FLOOR. SURROUNDED BY TUBULARPROPOSED RETAINING WALL ALONG PROP 100 YR. 4 COVERED PARKING ;. STEEL FENCE TO MATCH PROJECT FENCE PSEATI�NG WALL ALONG PROP. LINE OOD PLAIN. - 'I TYPICAL If, �t" / / / STORM WATER / MANAGEMENT AREA 1 � _ RIVER BED"WITH "• ` i NATIVE PLANT SPECIES I ,J Ilt s � _ STORM f', , :i -r � � _ S70RM _ � SCALE: 1" 50'-0" ; J u IL> NOTE: DISTURBED NATURAL PRESERVE AREAS ARE TO BE r t I�Illq I l - SEEDED WITH A NATIVE GRASS I I �Lr�s .,- TwAIRPORT / l i 9Lm2 SEED MIX, AND ESTABLISHED - J /- - � INTERNATIONALWITH TEMPORARY IRRIGATION. ? I I .I ' : i ." E01 \ AI PORTDALLAS/FOR I � � _aLOGA � � v � I T WORTH I TYPEI l EX. 48'TRA QSNR SAN L�In Vt � A I ( I) . . 1 4, \�1 ' I �• �1 I � a � SITE 9 : ! Q w AI�L�� u 1 I 7 — w TRAcr / /! -L GLADE ROAD °o GLADE ROAD / w I I COVERED PARKING" TYPICAL C ,,., i. ` ■' o,o I_ WIDE CONCRETE E 1 pyI I ll LOO a / / n �,�, • TRAIL ALONG GLADE f° an ,. �gg�`,/ OVERLOOK n I / ` �`" _ .i.ROAD. � X//! l I SEATING AREA ,I I i ao IH alma L PROPOSED -_�¢ I I I - TYPEn r-�, _- STORM �:. :� 9 PROJECT LOCATION MAP 1 - 1, �, MONUMENT SIGN (NOT TO SCALE) N l , LEGEND o A } II 1� PROPOSED SHADE/CANOPY TREE TRA SAN d EX. . " 7-� i SWR.EASEMENT ♦ - • ,' -'� '\ l' FROM APPROVED CITY PLANT LIST _ SAN.SWR. �. PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE s. / II gip`. �. P \� Y A, FROM APPROVED CITY PLANT LIST CABANNA STORM WATER , - ,- --• 61 RomV - PROPO S PLANTING a MANAGEMENT AREA / )_ - -- i i -'\/ % Y + ��., '� "--., °' - AREASSEDFROMD APPROVED CITY - rrn 'DRY RIVER BED WITH. ` _v 12 .Q'r i. a eu4, _ PLANT LIST i d 1 NATIVE PLANT SPECIES /.. •,,. ) _ j ;�., 2�. PARK - r i — — — — — — PROPOSED RETAINING WALL : // �4 8'WIDE CONCRETE TRAIL _ ALONG FRONTAGE ROAD A TUBULAR PROPOSED FENCE IGHT TYPICAL 24"SQ. STONE COLUMN STONE AND PATTERN TO MATCH OUT _ / ...,. BUILDINGS 'CONCEPTUAL H ROUTE FOR S , �:` - t _ 8'TYP PANELS / \\\ y = PROPOSED HIKE AND BIKE -- ' o -/ice - PROPOSED DOG ( ) (+) -- T - TRAIL ALONG CREEK a 1z - 5 /SEE SHEETS 33-35 _ I �� ',�. J: "/, ETMt WASH BUILDING /' °a BENCH AREA WITH DRAINAGE 1 y ` . / _�•` >` } _ TRASH RECEPTACLE / e \ // / '�� ' 1 • f t i 1 d°- PET YARDS. TYPICAL AT EACH FIRST _ Q.SURROUNDED BY TUBULAR o r STEEL FENCE TO MATCH PROJECT r- �� \ i / =� ��,�. .- ✓ V i '?� ! I 1 FENCE di \\ I- ) ,:� I \; '• ��✓f J, BL00u TREE PLANTING"DRIFTS" ALONG O S \ - ` l l iTYP TtN F . •i' • SHARED LANDSCAPE AREA I O r ✓ � - ., a., sA�/, I I PROPOSED RETAINING WALL N // 'a' .S \°P�i t - e/O• � j �' �! INTERACTION OF PEDESTRIAN I .. MOVEMENT AND LANDSCAPE EDGES 2"(TYP ® E f---, TUBULAR STEEL FENCING WITH 5 �s �/ /% V• ,_-�._X' T1PE nA _ I ,., // SCREENING AND O 2"TUBE STEEL TOP RAIL � 'o LANDSCAPING IN FRONT NOTES' LAYERED 1 _ _ 8'WIDE CONCRETE 2 1"TUBE STEEL PICKETS O 4"O.C. COLOR FINISH: PROPOSED RETAINING -- \ - I - O - TRAIL ALONG FRONTAGE ROAD MAX. LOW-GLOSS BLACK WALL ALONG PROP P YR;- • ' �I l Q 3'TUBE STEEL POST FLOOD PLAIN I s •eLnO te. J LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS(LOT 1,BLOCK A) �4 ACRES6 SOU SET ®2"TUBE STEEL BOTTOM RAIL E �` TOTAL 51 O APPROVED ORNAMENTAL PICKET FINIAL 5. T 1 Q TE AREA 888,946 SF (20.407 ACRES) CASE rw.tE'n1E PRESERVE aT GROSS PARKING AREA 220,994 SF 24.86%OF SITE CASE NUMBER:--------- ANO POIB(11 TOTAL NON-VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE AREA 492,574 SF 55.415 OF SITE V TUBULAR STEEL PERIMETER FENCE LOCATION:101 EAST GLADEROAD LOT 1 BLocK A,auOEctco ADDITION NUMBER OF UNITS/BLDG.SF 399/175.378 SF 19.73x OF SITE O� SCALE: 1/2" = V-0" ,i��- • l - ��'[`�C1EL REOGIRED PROMOEO INTERIOR LANDSCAPING .��- —� v -` ' \ • '1 PROPOSED (GROSS PARKING SQUARE FOOTAGE x 0.10) 22,099 SF 44.395 SF �— PROP. STORM DRAIN- \ i I _ I RETAINING WALL 1 TREE/400 SF OF REOD.INTERIOR LANDSCAPE Sfi TREES 73 TREES NOTE a SEMNT. \ \ L 1 TREE PER PLANTER ISLAND AND TERMINUS YES yE5 PLANT QUANTITY AND VARIETY MAYCHANGE OATS: to 1,� \ LAYERED LANDSCAPE BASED ON FINAL DESIGN.ALL PLANT ; PLANTINGS AT PERIMETER LANDSCAPING MATERIALWILLCONFORMTOSEC710N63 MAINTENANCE PROVISION: P R 6 TON OF H •R P VN PLAA.W AN.zONIN000MMISSION EXISTING /' (MIN 2'WIDE PLANTING AREA 30'MIN HEIGHT) YES YES be NjointlyR nldAseverally responsible fornthenmintenan maintenance all an h B LDING ENTRANCES GRAPEVINE LANDSCAPING REGULATIONS C e o s all /-` - ,/ i UI 1 TREE/50 LF OF PERIMETER AREA YES YES landscaping.All d landscaping shall be maintained in a neat w •:' 4 PET YARDS. TYPICAL AT EACH FIRST ping require ping EE ,-�"--- - FLOOR. SURROUNDED BY TUBULAR and orderlymanner at all times.This shall Include mowing,edging, j OUTLINE -.� NON-VEHICULAR OPFN mACG ANDv f'N. NOTE: ALL PLANT MATERIAL WILL pruning,fertilizing,watering,weeding,and other such activities r . ? l- STEEL FENCE TO MATCH PROJECT FENCE. z OF SITE IN NON-VEtllcuuR OPEN SPACE cc man to the maintenance of landsca 1 - BE FROM THE APPROVED CITY ping.Landscaped areas shall DOTE: N `\ I\ J - _ d BENCH AREA WITH TRASH PER SECTION 53,SECTION I(4),TABLE INSET PLANT LIST AND/OR NATURAL TO plants kept free of trash,litter,weeds and other such material shall or °- RECEPTACLE 1 TREE/3000 SF OF NON-VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE 165 181 / plants not a part of the landscap ng.All plant materials shall be _o l 1 TREE/4000 SF OF NON-VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE THE SITE AND WILL BE SELECTED, ma'nta'ned in health and ii condition a I- WHERE POSSIBLE, TO RESTORE Y grow g s s appropriate for SHEET:320E 35 y TUBULAR STEEL FENCING WITH PLUS EXISTING TREES IN FLOOD PLAIN AREA YES the season of the year.Plant materials which die is be replaced = j - < l SCREENING AND LAYERED AND EXTEND THE NATURAL MOSAIC with plant material of similar wriety and size. t LANDSCAPING IN FRONT USABLE OPEN SPACE OF THE ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL OOESNOTAU REEANYMRKIN PER SECTION 22.SECTION F(3) 99.750 SF 285,000 SF INTO THE SITE. CONPLIC—THANYCODESORORDINAHCEs 8'WIDE CONCRETE TRAIL ALONG 250 SF/UNIT (32,06%) OEPARrMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERVICES � ✓ !( - FRONTAGE ROAD I o DESIGNED BY: o ac TRAIL ALONGIL CREEK.AND E TO INCLUDNCE E A - .- PRNJO. MONUMENT/SIGNAGE, BENCH, TRASH "'---"F LANDSCAPE PLAN y RECEPTACLE AND BIKE RACK B. ZONING DOCUMENTno 16X Quorum DO,, m DRAWN BY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SaIe200B LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN GRS001 e Addisn,Texas 75240 TRAIL HEAD PARKING 8 SPACES {T ' Main 972.248.7676 i TOTAL INCLUDING 1 ACCESIBLE G3 Fax 8721481414 THE PRESERVE AT GRAPEVINE SHEET N0. PARKING SPACE CHECKED BY: F OF t�+P \\�••��� www.lbipartners.com NO. REVISIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION BY DATE NO. REVISIONS DURING PLAN REVIEW BY DATE 2/7/18 Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas 32 0 o` ����1 �i 50 25 0 50 100 I \� �2` I SCALE 1-50'T APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE >' ~J / EXISTING CREEK -✓ / I \� / 7 / EXERCISE/INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE- I �' / v/ ��y F `� �, r� <r /`- A� 5..�vJ OR BENCH AREA \ /. CONCEPTUAL ROUTE � FOR PROPOSED HIKE ,\ /..1, 4J^� .: \ � r--- ''`.i^,J---�`--`- �"✓\ S �s// ` f,. \ AND BIKE TRAIL r� `f�_,1 ,'% ..^i-y /,'..___ -� `- OUTLINE OF EXISTING 0),'% I ,.T�f-_ �`_ / �^ `+��.\ r �rg-9d --.: ! _•- -^\ -`- \�./. i TREE MASS-TYPICAL r s � 'FUTTwi6o 1 t /"_ irk,J _�_----- _�,� ✓ r� \ ��� y 1 ,f, �\.'"'��_--�_� `� "�✓ -r y-'1 �- �SANITARY - 1 }, _�__f- • SWR r j ✓.' ` '�-...�.--.�' ----.-...,w__ / �.,-Vim.-.,� ^EX TRA 20 1'- `' SEWER �fI EX 36 SAN. �i• ( ...:. t\-> �_ —41 EXERCISE/INTERPRETIVE OR BENCH AREA" SMITARY �'_�'�`\ r'} ESMT.- -_- /1 _.,� -c-- - _ ESMT- ._y -- J ,..JlrEXISTING��� /� F S TREE _ I a OUTLINE w v FuT.46 �- A \ A �'� I I 7 LOT 2,BLOCK A ��- NOTE THE TRAIL LAYOUT SHOWN IS 2,082,567 SQUARE ET I I CONCEPTUAL THEFINALTRAIL �' r` `LAYOUT IS TO BE DETERMINED IN THE - " a ao FIELD AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION I Q T _ r ir ✓•CONCEPTUAL ROUTE II y II 4 _ AND BIKE TRAIL,, - - -- -f I I -� CONCEPTUAL ROUTE A / f, FOR PROPOSED HIKE �. FOR PROPOSED HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL 1} I 4� - } . `DRAINAGE �� y� I .;l ti REiAI N WALL' \4 1 - ,I I ` - ESMT _ t / ALONG PROP_,oO YR� FLOOD PLAIN ✓ / ,5 r f` -�1 I �ti ) .`�L� SSANITARY ` 1 I f - - SEWER ESMT I ^ l� r ` III�1 �./I ✓� - r� v� { l I I ONCORELEC. `�,�� I � --- - Y L,Y� E ii R.O.W.& ES MT - -�- 158693 J it ---i- r ' —___ r ----r _ --v------- -�� REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN Us � _...----gyp.___-� .-.. _ - TRAIL HEAD FOR THE PROPOSED HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL ^� _.WGH A'f Jl/0 SHEET 32 E TO INCLUDE BENCHES,TRASH RECEPTACLE,BIKE RACK SIGNAGE AND 8 PARKING SPACES INCLUDING 1 (VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.) ACCESSIBLE SPACE. m DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL CASE NAME.THE PRESERVE AIRPORT CASE NUMBER Z-1,CU-2 AND PD-1 N LOCATION:101 EAST GLADE ROAD LOTI,E—A,GLADE/360 ADDITION V w N �p s SITE MAYOR S C DIRT N NI DATE ZONG a 1' TRACT PIANNINGANUZONINGCOMMISSION w I GLADE ROAD o GLADE ROAD o 0 CHAIRMAN N GATE. r N O m a SHEET:33 OF 35 0 APPROVAL DOES NOT AOTHORIZE ANY WORK IN Y CONFLICTWITHANV CODES OR ORDINANCES ..�. LOCATION MAP DEPARTMENTOF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (NOT TO SCALE) S 0 DESIGNED BY: PROJECT ___... LANDSCAPE PLAN NO, W 1 g, ZONING DOCUMENT 16301 Ouorum Dd- S0te200 B TRAIL PLAN — SHEET 1 GRS001 \`-- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY: JBt- 'a `I?.3' .`..; MOB n 722 48.7676 it FW2246"" THE PRESERVE AT GRAPEVINE SHEET NO. 41blbiper s CHECKED BY: F OF t�+py .,.„, mers.m m c N0. REVISIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION BY DATE NO. REVISIONS DURING PLAN REVIEW BY DATE 2nn6 Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas 33 0 o` —;� �. x.. -- �`AN �-'—' �'I �� OUTLINE OFEXISTING� _ TR!EE MASS; TYPICAL_ � \�,s rJ so zs o so 100 �OUTLINE OF EXISTING 7 SCALE r ,A �,�r� � � 1 A TREE MASS-TYPICAL J� •=sD•-a• h APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING CREEK �/ l -' ` } \ ` / DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT �` SITE TURNAROUND- aQ 150 !llJJJ i !Jt.- 111 ( ` i Sid J ,lj END CONCEPTUALNO y i 1 s i _ ` W % ZONING END OF �Z '<� TRACT W GLADE ROADW o GLADE ROAD w w I \ / 1 Z f v LOCATION MAP � L (NOT TO SCALE) o J CONCEPTUALROUTE r a 1 ✓ r �""�.- _��-� FUT.48"SAN SWR / r f {— i' �. _ �l/�� FOR PROPOSED HIKE `\\ OUTLINE OF FJ9STING \\ \ \ AND BIKE TRAIL 7 Y' �-- f t" �\%TREE MASS TYPICAL \. `\ ���/L - �>� ~` s ----_—_--- __— ..-i FUT.60 j i r TRA SANITARYEX 20 i ----- ----- SEWER n TRA SANITARY ESMT. - v�-- —_— SEWER '�\. - -, •,. J"^` '. l'' i -- `f ` ff ~ NOTE:THE TRAIL LAYOUT SHOWN IS a l ESMT. — ... LOT 2,BLOCKA / 5--� \ F _ :!J CONCEPTUAL.THE FINAL TRAIL W _—__--- —�--- ". 2062567`SOUARE FEET• // '� LAYOUT IS TO BE DETERMINED IN THEE { l 499 / J FIELD AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. SO ACRES � (' J \ W 50* DRAINAGE \ ,\ \ \\\ ZY ESMT- OUTLINE OF EXISTING r TREE MASS TYPICAL15. SANITARY SEWER f,f r,� —/ r__ N25°.1 ESMT. 7 - i J 1036-15 r - — \ ---- N25°09'27W 1325.10 _ t'N""_ 'F� HIGH�NAY 360 � ------- �—. --ONCOR ELEC..1" \ ! STAY" • --------- ROWS I WIDTH R.O.W.) E — ---- ESMT. �—=' i (VARIABLE F i f � N E 5; m CASE NAME:THE PRESERVE rj) CASE NUMBER:Z1 a01,CU MC AND PU1801 LOCATION:101 EAST GLADE ROAD X LOT I,BLOCKA,GLADErl60ADDITON 'R F W W MAYOR SECS— N J DATE: a 05 PIANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION O N CHAP V n UA O m SHEET:34 OF 35 Y APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT NTH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES O O DESIGNED BY: PROJECT rn LANDSCAPE PLAN N0. ZONING DOCUMENT 16301 Quorum DnVe DRANK BY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Sufe200Bexas 40 TRAIL PLAN — SHEET 2 GRS001 Main 972.248.7676 y Fax 972246"" THE PRESERVE AT GRAPEVINE SHEET N0. 91 8P wxw lbipaMers mm CHECKED BY: •f OF "- ° NO. REVISIONS WRING CONSTRUCTION I BY DATE N0.I REVISIONS DURING PLAN REVIEW BY DATE 27/16 Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas 34 o` -1 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE.1"=5C'-0' DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT H. S s p 9� SITE tip 5 y PH.1 rn GLADE ROADW o AGE ROAD � a OUTLINE OF EXISTING �i XIAE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING CREEK TREE MASS-TYPICAL w o 223ME 2g1' 6 � � N 99° LOCATION MAP o 65 p of (NOT TO SCALE) APPROXIMATE a 545°A b.50p"E 9 Sp3,s��o — ,� S24'0230"E 163.50' E S. 0 a GULL I NE OF EXISTING _---- -- TREE MASS-TYPICAL —--- ___ EXI 36'SAN.SWR. _—_—— —_— ~W_W —— _— FUT.48"SAN.SWR. --------------- W ------------- Z ------------- NOTE.THE TRAIL LAYOUT SHOWN IS = -------------- CONCEPTUAL THEFINALTRAIL F LAYOUT ISTO BE DETERMINED IN THE hsa°oB3s CONSTRUCTION - ___—__— ———————— —FIELD AT TIME OF . � Ho6s9' /// -- ----------- a 62S" FUT.60' ------------------- --_---- N 1n i� TRA SANITARY ___----- ��� SEWER co EASEMENT 1 LOT 2,BLOCK A N J 2,062,567 SQUARE FEET i EX.20' 47.350 ACRES TRA SANITARY / SEWER / EASEMENT / ------ _------_— E ___------ N25°09'2T'W 325.10' F (V RF9S\CR N14'16'31^yV / � — R1693985' c <F la qp sss,� 5 L_56529 STATE HIGHWAY 360 c o R.OW&EASEMENT g642''W (VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.) no�NF R Ng° — GhBCh35fi329' O�O 917p —___----- fi30� a 2j Bg9 N�4 50 5C318-02 4 CASE NUMBER ZI8-0iANDPD1e-01 LOCATION'.101 EAST GLADE ROAD N A41'47'08' LOT1 BLOCKA,GLA-WADUTION R=320.00' 0 L=233.37' T=122.15' ChB=N20'59'09'W MAYOR SEC�- 2 Ch=228.24' rn Onre: a PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION I 0 C—T-�— o it cv DATE. n 0 SHEET:35 OF 35 N o_ APPROVALDOESNOTADTFIORIZEANYWORKIN Y CONFLICT VAT-1 ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTN-OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES K O DESIGNED BY: PROJECT 0217,118 LANDSCAPE PLAN NO.ZONING DOCUMENT 0 163010uwum Drive 11330100E TRAIL PLAN — SHEET 3 GRS001NOTFORCONSTRUCTION Addison,Texas 75240 Main 972.248.7676Fax 9722481414 THE PRESERVE AT GRAPEVINE SHEET NO.CHECKED BY:N0. REVISIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION BY DATE NO. REVISIONS DURING PLAN REVIEW BY DATE Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas 35 o` MEMO TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER \✓� MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 2018 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A, GLADE 360 ADDITION PLAT APPLICATION FILING DATE.................................................... February 13, 2018 APPLICANT..................................................................Paul Gardner, Silvertree Partners REASON FOR APPLICATION ................................................Platting unplatted property to build apartment complex PROPERTY LOCATION............................................................North of Glade Road and east of SH 360 service road ACREAGE ..............................................................................................................67.757 ZONING................................................................................................ Existing LI & PCD Proposed R-MF NUMBEROF LOTS...............................................................................................Two (2) PREVIOUSPLATTING................................................................................................. No CONCEPTPLAN...................................................................................Z18-01 , CU18-02 SITEPLAN ..........................................................................................................PD18-01 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT................................................................................... No AVIGATIONRELEASE................................................................................................Yes PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED.................................................................................... No C:\Users\sporter\AppData\Local\Microsoft\W indows\INetCache\Content.0ut1ook\6EK9H87L\G1ade360_P.doc PLAT INFORMATION SHEET PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A, GLADE 360 ADDITION I. GENERAL: • The applicant, Paul Gardner with Silvertree Partners is preliminary platting 67.757 into an apartment complex. The property is located north of Glade Road and east of State Highway 360 service road. II. STREET SYSTEM: • The development has access to Glade Road and SH360. • ALL abutting roads: ❑ are on the City Thoroughfare Plan: Glade Road ❑ are not on the City Thoroughfare Plan: SH360 ❑ Periphery Street Fees are due as follows: Type of Roadway Cost / LF Length Cost ❑ Major Arterial (A) $ 234.57 / LF ❑ Major Arterial (B) $ 178.35 / LF ❑ Minor Arterial (C) $ 203.06 / LF ❑ Minor Arterial (D) $ 170.33 / LF ❑ Collector (E) $ 170.33 / LF ❑ Collector (F) $ 150.98 / LF ❑ Sidewalk $ 25.00 / LF ❑ Curb & Gutter $ 15.00 / LF ❑ Periphery Street Fees are not due: ❑ Developer is required to construct the north half of a Four(4) Lane Undivided Roadway of Glade Road to match up with the four (4) lane bridge over SH360. III. STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: • The site drains northeast towards Bear Creek. • The developer will be required to design for onsite as well as offsite drainage in accordance with the requirements of the City of Grapevine's Code of Ordinances. CAUsers\sporter\AppData\LocalWicrosoft\W indows\INetCache\Content.0ut1ook\6EK9H87L\G1ade360_P.doc IV. WATER SYSTEM: ❑ The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ® The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development. Additional off site water system improvements will be necessary to serve the site. V. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: ® The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ❑ The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development. VI. MISCELLANEOUS: ❑ Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are not required for: ® Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits for: Lots 1 and 2, Block A, Glade 360 Addition ❑ Single Family Residential ( $ 2,414/ Lot) ® Multifamily ( $ 1 ,134/ Unit) ❑ Hotel ( $ 43,632/ Acre) ❑ Corporate Office ( $ 20,523/ Acre) ❑ Government ( $ 4,414/ Acre) ❑ Commercial / Industrial ( $ 5,739 / Acre) ® Open Space Fees are not required for: Lots 1 and 2, Block A, Glade 360 Addition ❑ Open Space Fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits and/or any public infrastructure improvements for ❑ R-5.0, R-TH, Zero Lot District ( $ 1,416.00 / Lot) ❑ R-7.5, Single Family District ( $ 1 ,146.00 / Lot) ❑ R-12.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,071 .00 / Lot) ❑ R-20.0, Single Family District ( $ 807.00 / Lot) C:\Users\sporter\AppData\Local\Microsoft\W indows\I NetCache\Content.Outlook\6EK9H87L\Glade360_P.doc ❑ Public Hearing Only ❑ Variances were required on the following items: ❑ Front building line ❑ Allowing a setback of 3 feet for the rear property line for an accessory building ❑ Lot width & depth ❑ Max. Impervious Area ❑ Landscaping Regulations, allowing no landscape buffer between the edge of the parking area and the adjacent property line. ❑ The following items associated with this plat are not in accordance with the current subdivision standards: ❑ 50' ROW dedication not met: Developer is proposing to dedicate variable width private access easements throughout the development. The access easements will be owned and maintained by a Home Owners Association (HOA). ❑ Length of cul-de-sac street exceeds the 600-foot limit: ❑ Driveway Spacing not met. VII. STATEMENT OF FINDINGS: A. The City has determined that the right-of-way and easements required to be dedicated for streets, utilities, drainage, access, sidewalks and other municipal needs and services are consistent with the City's ordinances and master plan, are reasonable and are connected to the proposed project in the following manner: ❑ The right-of-way provides for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. ® The onsite utility easements provide for a utility network to serve the development of this site. ® The onsite drainage easements provide for a drainage network to serve the development of this site. ® The onsite access easements provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. C:\Users\sporterWppData\Local\Microsoft\W indows\I NetCache\Content.Outlook\6EK9H87L\Glade360_P.doc B. The City further finds that the required dedication is related both in nature and extent to the impact of the proposed development as follows: ❑ The right-of-way is necessary to provide for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. ® The onsite utility easements are necessary to provide for a utility system to serve this development and connect to existing utilities on surrounding property. ® The onsite drainage easements are necessary to provide for storm drainage improvements to serve the development of the site. ® The onsite access easements are necessary to provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements are necessary to provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. ® All of the dedications benefit the development to at least the extent of the impact of such on the development. VIII. RECOMMENDATION: The members of the City Council and The Planning & Zoning Commission consider the following motion: "Move that the City Council (Planning and Zoning Commission) approve the Statement of Findings and the Preliminary Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Block A, Glade 360 Addition." C AUsers\sporter\AppData\LocaWicrosoft=indows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\6EK9H87L\GIade360_P.doc 4r~ / DALLAS/FORT WORTH ITIONA AIRPORT ao O� (c, o / CITY'OF FORT WORTH I DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT VOL. 5070, PG. 408 518 GLA / C19 CENTER OF BEAR CREEK -- ��� y{�1w ROAD GLADE�,,� ROAD CI OF FORT WORTH LA {ORT WORTH 9 '2`E i/ Z� INTE �13(JAL AIRPORT O �.p PrFPh�� W VOL. 5350, PG. 677 �t t / -524 52ay yn 8522 LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) ' LOT Z.11M A5.19 _ s a va.__:. h° : _ `?t'. / 2,062.567 SQUARE FEET sAA\Yn oS\E.WE`P 7,a0•9w"'brO'0V47.J50 ACR j 0yEA't +l''2<D 510 --vCI e 52 G -j82) f "- *L APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 100 AR '� N =g2° _ � j,�j'.- _ w - OOOPUIN PER FERIA MAP 484J9C0115K y^P SEPT EMBER 2009.' \ \ o o>+a Uo n> r THE E GRAPHIC SCALE N /T WLC PAR v��v� //// �s��•6pwq:�r � �2 PART OF VOL 15348,PGL)76 _\y0 t+Lg P,,) �Ir - ( xm o wRRENT ZONING D!FEET S R i�� ,0 f. 522 ) G I inch loo fL Ay`F20' NOTES' M 5 \�� _ Nlo 2 63° 1. THE BASIS OF BEARING IS DERIVED FROM CPS OBSERVATIONS USING THE CITY OF y i 52a ,I \\\\ N / / APPRo>azN1Are LaanoN v tao TEAR \A11859.34'E`I � to 1" / - GRAPEVINE GEODETIC MONUMENTS. (COORDINATE SYSTEM: NORTH CENTRAL ZONE N� \\\e / ROODN-P.fELA MAP NO: &J9 15 V �. 26 I / T I5'FASEMFNi AND. $�, \\ /, MAP REUSED 4➢TEMBER Z5.-x 9.- -§,Qj' ,^71 i, Sz 526 - 528- 4202 STATE PLANE COORDINATES,HAD 83) $ RKHT-OF-WAY Q' W\i 53" WOCORNETEUIPoO oEU,fRY\ \\ 526 - -` � I I WLC PARTNERSHIP 'REST 524 __ 2.BENCHMARK: CITY OF GRAPEVINE MONUMENT NO.9(ELEVATION-589.64') p .S I a.NO.0209305276 �� - Zs - _ 6At1ED W ) `�` CITY OF GRAPEVINE MONUMENT NO.12(ELEVATION=576.96') N25'1 52 VOL 15341L PG 7S- - 3. ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURACE Il \\ -52s :� -99 07 / , _ WRRENT ZONING,PGD - I_- - 5'Ee gyA RATE MAP NUMBER 48439COl 15K MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 25.2009.A PORTION _ _- - CIl OF THE SUBJECT TRACT LIES`IDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA ZONE AE. \ PROPOSED ZONING R YF .e y - Q CITY OLS'F OR WORTH ,5oa AREAS DETERMINED TO BE INSIDE THE t00 YEAR Fl00DPLAIN AS SHOWN ON THE ozjs� \\ / DALLAS WOR RNATIONAL:AIRPORT MAP. \ �J 526 5 89 PG,'439 - CEItTET� 53 b~ � -, Po- 552 ._v.f - , : ,. 53B ' F E g 1 4 20 i d {{i s3A- \ \ 5 -16 T� \\ V �, 542LOT 1.BLOCK A 54' ARE FEET aANtE TABLE S'1R4I` ws l 1 s<6a 2GwZ�ACRM - h. ,) sLRTNETt9aP.- Sae - ............................... e NO. LENGTH DELTA RADIUS TANGENT a 53 BEARI5-2rE ataRO erFj oY AN ONTO Lm°€D PARTNERSHIP Snn PRELIMINARY PLAT C1 47.53' OOS59'W' 455.ar 23.79' sm,s'2B'E 47.51' h� .� - �ONW1 pa, y C2 23.92' W-41.Ir 30.ar +2.64• N35-WOI•E 23.29' �.� O1-RREN�(___ING,Uu - �� ii ��� PR OSFD ZOIANG R YF C3 24.30' 019'W25' 7+.00' 12.27' NZ377-37-E 24,19' �.- - W \ -5 -. $ G4 3a60' DSa76.25' 30.ar N04D23TE �� a�,f1 ,y 558_ 552 s GLADE 360 ADDITION C5 V.10' G703o'49• w.ar 21zv S605e•00'E 3A7B' 1y s�"�' "' hA '_ - 3" - - -- - LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A N GO 26ZTr 212WW 71.00' 247.18' SIODO'HYW 13a.4a' �.P_°.d1 �P° � � � �-yp - 562__ 16' sSa - _ a'WWy -- -168 g you 67.757 ACRES OUT OF THE S Go 7.91, 0mzo'a• sn4.72 43.9e' N2V49'41'w 7.90' `3.2W � •y0 .ri'a h Q ,> \ ozo9°t�eo --- ao��°P`�o°1v L5, AND THE GREEN W.ELIJAH C. R INTER SURVEY,Y SURVEY, TABSTRACT NACT UMBER 1083 n co 394.2r 00eD0.02• 37a�72 197.3Y S2a99'40•E 304.09' ,, �• ary , +51'ry90� k'U7� n SS>� � :\ ��. 0�GJ9`>`' � n clo 29&W 0D4s1'W 3774.72' 149.2T s2a54'39•E 29e.2s ry4j°L� alh L6� hha ,w s S CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS N Gil 569.66• MW41'47- 1954,W 2551 NW-31.42•W 567.64' _ 0�'I• ST,' �` \ �` .ar y'� .,�'O` . %qf'8; .. �i ,� .P��. EXISTING ZONING: LI & PCD E C12 572.5r me•4r4r 19e4.e5' 2a63J' s335r42E Brass• 0 9+'.`�. [ / `� ''�" s '� �`` PROPOSED ZONING: R-MF 1= �® 7 S99'fie,p0`11 f r \ � � ��� ?'"" � � 'C?199®9y °ow/ Bp \ 5 °% SILVER TREE PARTNERS APPLICANT LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE TABLE gd�,r30 •`t168. _ '%�\ \ �S/`9i/ /`�°t 55< 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 ° N0. BEARING LENGTH NQ BEARING LENGTH Na BEARING LENGTH Na BEARNG LENGTH h ,X 66 `1t \\ // S ! y x G71 6� \: Dallas, Texas 75248 LI Na91IN YD9•W 21.89' L20 S145V30'E 99.40' L39 N25D9.2rw I325.10' L59 52993179E 181.2Y a 1 L2 N141e'31•W 126.Os' L21 s3957'47'E 05.9T L40 N1214'So'w 276.76• L59 S797S4e•E 4&7Y LEA. 31AWes\\ POB POINT OF BEGINNING 9°ji `%/ / M11�acg �, t-& GRAPEVINE HOLDINGS, LTD OWNER m L3 Noo'3Y19•W 286.BS L22 S63D7'45'E 176.48' L41 M'02.48'W 1a61' Leo 590D0'00'E 700.74' �'+ ` o'F3�'s.°? u N0659'09'E 62.W L23 N04'3S32'E ea.2r L42 N90'00'00'w 517W Let SOGD0'00'E 301.68' M IRFAD RIONWAY ROE)FOUND WITH ALUMINUM DISC ��gh1p v� p o�p �' Ja o Td+�p g1s 4'� 17101 Preston Rood, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 CIRS CAPPED IRON ROD SET a-19 . s / R�S .>P P° � Dallas, Texas 75248 +n u N000e 3sE 51.6V L24 NW4Ir2e'E 277.10' L43 mwWo0'w 6a4r L62 S791a,411 54.3r 6 p y4• ; MON MONUMENT ryyrya / D L6 545969709E 49.50' L25 N19'10'16'W I9.91' L44 N45D2'4B'W 17.67 L63 52995'+7'E 186.06' ROW RIGHT-OF-WAY G L7 ss514'30'E 93.9V L25 N37W21•E 6a12' L45 NI2,4'50'1Y 277.069 L54 5'L758'48"E 196.52' HWY HIGHWAY a109'S ,o6j1'N .y�� THE GARDNER 360 WLC PARTNERSHIP-WEST OWNER a LO 512589709E 136.70' l27 533'44'SYW 67.N' L46 N25D727W 1325.10' L85 S31D3.10'E +OIA6' ELEC ELECTRIC�T 17101 Preston Rood, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 L9 SOS5330W Ias6o tee 56449aew u6.2r L47 N25,73e-W 15+3.8I' PP POWER POLE Dallas, Texas 75248 h L10 51759'30'1N 33.80 L29 504'33'32W 7e.6Y Lb 564'40'24 UGL UNDERGROUND LINE TV 19.5Y / TV TRAFFIC VAULT L11 SUnl'30'E 129.00' Lao N2510.30'W 2s9o' L49 N1510'3e'W ,Oar TSP TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE / KFF, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ; L12 SIo5r30•E 115.e0' L31 N64.49'24•E 2e.ar L50 N64.49'24E 19.57 TSB TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX /,o';y AN OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OWNER LP LIGHT POLE C � , o L13 SOa'D2'3D•W 67.70 L32 S23IW36'E II.6e• L5+ N25,0'36'W 79.12' CONC CONCRETE fry�S�cta ^ 1810 Arlingate Lane N L14 S20'4430•W a5.aa l33 N6331'31'E /5.00' L52 N415Y35-W 42.53' MHST MANHOLE STORM F� a,Fz Columbus, Ohio 43228 Lts 5734T3o'E 101.20' t34 N2594931'W 54.059 L53 N415Y35'11f 39.99' x°���/� JBI PARTNERS, INC. .R LIG S423WI2'E 146.ar L35 S2574.31-E 725r L54 N0257.29•E 21.05 SURVEYOR 16301 Quorum Drive, Suite 200 8 u7 s299e'Is'w taaar ue une'2e•E 104.ea' Lss s4n9'29•E 104.69' (972) 248-7676 Lia s2D7s4mw 54.5a' L37 563-31'31'W 16.00' L56 S3,03'10'E 102.21' Addison, Texas 75001 LIG S405a•41'E 130.10' L38 42510.36'W 159195' L57 S2rW'48'E /9140' Contact: Chuck McKinney it THPE No. F-438 TBPLS No. 10076000 s 0 THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN CABINET_ SLIDE DATE February 13, 2018 Sheet 1 of 3 A CENTER BEAR CREEK \ 11�6 J` - Sat Sa6 JS\ 'hp� , 528 5 s 5 . 325.18' S2•�S5" Saa sae DALLAS/FORT WORTH o g INTERNATIONAL CITY RT WORTH - s3q 5�6 AIRPORT 1 DALLAS�FORT WORTH IN ATIONAL AIRPORT a` - 52B <Qo i \ `11P S?4b�3o. Vde 5350. PG. sJz N C) Y, \ $� M1 \r'.•B ` 536 w 526 53a J \_ 5 yyqq 53z GLADE w GLADE 2D UTDTY EASFAIENT ro r.RA 39Z P20M � 5 ROAD ROAD vat.rant Pc.xma 5 a =- �e - S 528 - 526. s �6 O S _ 526 Q 5�1 �a 52aS2a Z w C-01- \\\ CENTER q>e 0 \ a M 5' 3 .1n�E EAR CREEK S2a �S. ss W LOCATION MAP I �q,� � � ,� ��, ,\\\�,;,\ s6.r 52. S 52° .� p (NOT TO SCALE) :4t, - �,� i A ♦w\ a' o rN4�Aq� G�h' �v 524 sz6 3�4 6z8' :�Y� 6 49 a \ \ ♦�\ /c4 eAD ANC Qr \\\ D.S �� S� 522 0- szSbO'22'30"E ys` .5� 522 5 N \ b j S c A 7.50' z - sze5266za 6.sa GRAPHIC SCALE .a N_00'05.3 �� ��� *o,,'°•�4'of' Po / \ - _ 68.58' �_ �.\ \\ , �.\.\ `brava., _ .5 v1AT 2 BLOCK �IN FEET)� - , A 41�7'O8� OQaI '�5� St R052467 SQUARE FEET �j I 'ch= 100 IL �S�Y N41 �� 47.350-AC$ES Sz9 s R=320.Ob�� L-233.37 T=122.t5' s EASE ENT AND_ \ /h ���///» c DF-WAY •/-y /,\, (`ti 1B=N20'59 08'W PNVYLLLLIDRM DEU °4 Nap Jpa9y Si„_\ \\/ "\ /�� \ GRAPEVINE HOLDINGS LTS \ -� Ch=228.24' ;No.DzolJoszn 6\\ °z�a `N / / (CAi1ED 30.341 ACRES) Sza u ��\ -"aaNr\ / /, 7� VOL 16152,PG._Gry^ 5�^ 16'41'47' \�\ /��Y\ j cuRRENrzouwc.Pw� �3 536 R-1939.65' \\52e -t=565.29' SJs T-284.66' r o \ / / °r L °P Rq 524 2d UT-EASEMENT 4 d0` 522 \ChB=N33'31'42'W Jam\ / / 4.TA&t• Aa A pars- TO TR A.)J9•2 vDP20a8 7) `' PG Gt / v Ch=563.29' �"ro aSrT„O�'""4+RyyIn' \\ \\\ /phWgQVSrp4c Np'ZLAj,: \ 52a pf � Sq Ss \ �\\ '"aOjG°SE oE4 �av6.,\ �� N•vG Vl�� ry �,(/�� \ S32 J32 \\\\ \\\ ?pSta,lbr\ \3�\ \ < /•a!522 ,T / S49'26'30'E 263.70' � 06 54 CURVE TABLE NO. LENGTH DELTA RADIUS TANGENT CHOIR BEARING CHORD 53e C1 47.56 00539'09' 455.00' 23.79' S531S'28'E 47.51' C2 23.9Y 045'41'Ir 30.Do' 12." N3630.01'E 2A20' \- "} 5aD / PRELIMINARY PLAT C3 24.30' 01938'25' 71.ar 12.27' N232r37E 24.18' 53< \T\ C4 3DW 05826.25' J0.ar ,&78' N04W37'E 29.29' \ s g1° \ GLADE 360 ADDITION 2 '�� 53B /0' \: /; LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A N C5 37.10' 07030'49' 30.00' 21.34' S80'36'00'E 34.70' \1 Gs 26277r 212Vs0e' 71.ar 247.11r S1DwI01w 136.48' \\ � \�� / 67.757 ACRES OUT OF THE 6 C7 1211' 00615•41' 30.00' 1.64' N571ID'09'W 3.21r \\\ 5 ELIJAH C. CLARY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 323, 8 AND THE GREEN W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 1083 N Ce 87.91' OOI2C04' J774.72' 43.06' N25'49'41'W 57.90' LEGEND Safi v 15'EASEMENT AND \�\ \ /\� h C9 394.2r 005'W02' 3764.72' 197.3Y S2B`DW40'E 394.09' POE POINT OF BEGINNING Sa m HIGHWAY MONUMENT B OR ELIVERY \ e N \ O' CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS N c1t 56p.s6' 06'4P4Y 1954.85' 296.80' N333t'4Y1Y 567.64' MOC RS D CAPPED FOUND ROD SETTM ALUMINUM DISC \ Jj 1 CIO 29&JN 00431'40' 3774.72' 149.26 5283439'E Z98.23' *., ,COMP LLC \ IRE IRON ROD FOUND DOD N0.D209305277 \ n \ /' EXISTING ZONING LI k PCD E C12 572.5r 016'41'4r 1964.e5 2a&3s S33n1'42'E 57a55• MON MONUMENT 552 \ / PROPOSED ZONING: R-MF F ROW RIGHTAY WAY SILVER TREE PARTNERS HWY wcHWAY , 5�i APPLICANT ESMT EASEMENT \ ELEC ELECTRIC LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE TABLE PP POWER POLE s �\ Dallas, Preston Road, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 Dallas, Texas 75248 UGL UNDERGROUND LINE N0. BEARING LENGTH NO, BEARING LENGTH N0. BEARANC LENGTH N0. BEARMC LENGTH N TRAFFIC VAULT LI N891r09'W 21.89' l20 51434'3NYE 99.40' L39 H25MV27'W I325.10' L58 S29TSI7-E 101.27' TSP TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE / L2 N141631'W 125.04• L21 S393r45E 95,97 L40 N1214'S0'W 275.76' L59 S792s48'E 4&7r TSE TRAFFIC SIGNAL Box / GRAPEVINE HOLDINGS, LTD OWNER m L3 N0032'19'W 28&aB' L22 S551D7*45*E 17&48' L41 N439Y48W 10.61' L80 590a0'00'E 300.74' LP LIGHT POLE / GONG CONCRETE / 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 L4 N0e39.09'E 82.50' L23 N0433'= 8&2Y L42 N9000'00'W 53.79' L61 S9pWO0'E 301.6a' MHST MANHOLE STORM Dallas, Texas 75248 L5 MOOVW35'E 51.65' L24 M64.49.28'E 277.10' L43 N90.00WW 60.47' L62 S797S4rE 54.3r NOTES: c LO S4528'30'E 49.50' L25 1479'40.16'W 29.91' L44 N45VY4B'W 17.69' L63 S29R717'E 186.05' d L7 s6514'3o'E Daar L26 N3758'21'E 60.12' L45 N1214!" 277.05' L64 52778'48'E 10&32' 1.THE BASIS OF BEARING IS DERIVED FROM GPS OBSERVATIONS USING THE CITY OF THE GARDNER 360 WLC PARTNERSHIP-WEST GRAPEVINE GEODETIC MONUMENTS.(COORDINATE SYSTEM: NORTH CENTRAL ZONE OWNER a 5 LB S12`5B3CrE 131130' L27 S33-44.57-W 07.BY L46 t=V27-W 1375.10' L65 53193'10'E 101.05' 4202 STATE PLANE COORDINATES,NAD 83) 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 8 L9 5053630'111 135.80' L25 SW49'28'W 206.2r L47 N2510'3519 151&51' 2.BENCHMARK! CITY OF GRAPEVINE MONUMENT NO.9(ELEVATION=589.64') Dallas, Texas 75248 L10 S1739'30'W 5180' L29 SO43,V3rW 76.66' L48 S64'40'24W 19.5Y CITY OF GRAPEVINE MONUMENT NO.12(ELEVATION=576.96') % 01 S3111'30'E 129.00' L30 N2510'36'W 2&90' L49 N2510`36'W 10LW 3.ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURACE KFF, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP o RATE 8T MAP NUMBER 48439CO115K MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 25,2DO9,A PORTION AN OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OWNER S L12 S4030'E 11&00• L31 NW49'24'E 25.00' L50 N54'49'24'E 19.52' OF THE SUBJECT TRACT LIES NITHIIN SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA ZONE AE. L13 S000Y30'W 87.70' L32 S2510135'E 19.56' L51 N25IV36'W 79.12' AREAS DETERMINED TO BE INSIDE THE 100 YEAR FLOOOPLAIN. 1810 Arlinyate Lane N L14 S20Y4.31YW 85.80' La N6331.31'E i&ar L52 N418Y35'W 4T.56 Columbus, Ohio 43228 L15 AS734r101.201 L34 M2524.31'W 54.05' L53 N4111=5'W 39.89' JBI PARTNERS, INC. SURVEYORLis .arL35 S2524.31'E 725r L54 NO25r29'E 21.05' LITarL35 S4119'29'E 104.6e L55 S41'IW29'E 104.69" Addis OUTNm Drive, Suite ZDD B Addison, Texas rive, (972) 248-7676ue .ss' Ls 56331'31'W 1&ar L30 s3lvstrE tDz.21• Contact: Chuck McKinney 6. L1D .10' Lae N251o'3a'w ts9&9s' L57 s27x'4rE 1.46' TBPE No. F-438 TBPLS No. 10076000 THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN CABINET__, SLIDE DATE February 13, 2018 Sheet 2 of 3 OWNER'S CERTIFICATE AVIGATION RELEASE Surveyor's Certificate NOW, THEREFORE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT KFF Limited Partnership,an Know All Men By These Presents: STATE OF TEXAS @ Ohio limited partnership,The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership-West, and Grapevine Holdings, THE STATE OF TEXAS$ LTD dose hereby adopt this plat of GLADE 360 ADDITION, an addition to the City of COUNTY OF TARRANT 11 COUNTY OF TARRANT§ Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, and does hereby dedicate to the public use forever the That I,Mark W.Harp,of JBI Partners Inc.,a Registered Professional Land Surveyor of the State right-of-way and easements shown hereon. The easements shown hereon are hereby WHEREAS,KFF Limited Partnership,an Ohio limited partnership, The Gardner 360 WLC of Texas, do hereby certify that I prepared this plat cnd the field notes made a part thereof WHEREAS,KFF Limited Partnership, an Ohio limited partnership, The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership-West, and reserved for the purposes as Indicated. The utility easements shall be en for all Citya from an actual and accurate survey of the land and that the comer monuments shown thereon D, p p' t' particular use. The maintenance of paving r the Partnership-West, and Grapevine Holdings,LTD,hereinafter called'Owner',are the owners of were properly placed under my personal supervision, In accordance with the platting rules and Grapevine Holdings,LTD are the owners of a parcel of land located in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, franchised public utilities for each that certain easements is the responsibility of the property g parcel of land situated in the City of Grapevine,Tarrant County, Texas,being Bald regulations of the State of Texas and the City of being a part of the Elijah C.Glory Survey, Abstract Number 32f and being a part of the Green W.m Minter Survey, P Y p p y owner. No buildings a auxll structures property as described as shown an this plat. NOW THEREFORE,h consideration of the sum of g y Grapevine, Texas. Abstract mite and being all of that called Volume aora tract of land described in deed to RKFFecords, Limited Partnership, shall be oldconstructed,asn reconstructed,a placed upon, over, a across the easements ors ONE AND 00 100 Sl.00 DOLLAR and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and that Ohio limited partnership era recorded In Vdume to The Page er Tarrant County Deed Records,end being all of shown.Said easements being hint reuse so for the mutual use and eeeomity 3h on of sufficiency of which is hereby g p Dated this, the_day of 2016. that celled 275, tract of land described in deed to The Gardner 360 f that Partnershi West re recorded in Volume all public utilities using,a desiring to use same. My City or franchised utility shall haw Y Y Cully acknowledged of and confused,Owner does hereby waive, p- release,remise and quitclaim B to the City of Grapevine.Texas Tarrant County, Texas, the Dallas-Fort 15348.Page 75, Tarrant Count Deed Records,and also being a art of that called 30.341 acre tract of land the full right to remove and keep removed all a parts of any fence& trees,ahruba,aFOR REVIEW AND PRELIMINARY PURPOSES ONLY 9 Y 9 D Worth International Airport Board, the called of sm. fa,7exaa and Fort Worth, Texas,their described in e deed to Grapevine Holdings Ltd as recorded In Volume 16182,Page 9,Tarrant County Deed Records,and other Improvements a growths which y any wry endanger or Interfere with the successors and assigns. hereinafter called'Gilles, for the use and benefit of the public and Its Mark W.Ha R.P.LS. 6425 being further described as follows: construction,maintenance,a efficiency of its respective system I the Band egre and all 9 p r, / City a franchised utilities shall at all times have the full right of ingress and egress to agencies,any and all dolma for damages of any kind to pmons or property that Owner may JBI Partners, Inc. BEGINNING at a highway monument with an aluminum disc found at southwest comer of said 14.324 acre tract,mid and from and upon said easements far the purpose of constructing,reconstructing, suffer by reason of the passage and flight of all aircraft in the air space above Owners point also being at the Intersection of the moth right-of-way of pads Road(a valable width right-of-way)with inspecting,patrolling,maintaining,and adding to or removing all or parts of its respective property above the height restriction as presently established by Ordinance No. 73-50 for the the east right-of-way of State Highway 360 a variable width right-of-way); system without the necessity at any time of procuring the permission of anyone. We have City of Grapevine,known as the Airport Zoning Ordinance of the Dallas-Fort Worth International 9 Y 9 Y ( 9 Y): Airport, to an Infinite height above some,whether such damage shall originate from noise, STATE OF TEXAS reviewed the a t. his plat concerning dedications and I in agree that the statements era vibration,fumes,dust,fuel and lubricant partidw, and all other effects that may be caused by THENCE North the east right-of-way line of State Highway.24 feet fdlowx true and correct. Thin plat approved subject to all plotting ordinances,rules.regulations. the operation of aircraft,landing a North 29 degrees 23 minutes 17 seconds Weat,193.24 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc and resolutions of the City of Grapevine,Texas P 9 L a taking off from,ea operating at a on the Dallas-Fat COUNTY OF DALLAS 9 9 Y Worth International Airport This Instrument dove not release the owners or operator of found for toner, Witness my hand this the day of 2018. aircraft from liability for damage to person or property caused by falling aircraft or falling BEFORE ME, the undersigned,a Notary Public In and far The State of Texas,on this day North 27 degrees 58 minutes 48 seconds West, 195.10 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for caner, physical objects from aircraft,except as stated herein with respect to noise, fumes,dust,fuel, personally appeared Mark W. Harp,known to me to be the person and officer whose name Is and lubricant particles. It is agreed that this Release shall be binding upon said owner and his subscribed to the foregoing Instrument,and acknowledged to me that he executed the same North 31 degrees 03 minutes 10 seconds West, 99.30 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc heirs and assigns, and successors in interest to said property; and It Is further agreed that found for comer, (Signature of KFF Limited Partnership Repreaenative) this instrument shall be a covenant running with the land, and shall be recorded In the Dead for lino purposes and considerations therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. North 41 degrees 19 minutes 29 seconds West, 104.66 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc Records of the county or countles in which the property Is situated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the_de of found far caner, (printed Title of KFF Sign") Y Northwesterly,399.12 feet along a curve to the right having a central angle of D6 degrees 02 minutes 03 2018. aeeonde, a radius of 3789.72 feet, a tangent of 199.74 feet, and whose chord bears North 28 degrees 10 minutes EXECUTED at Texas, this_day of 2018. a 40 seconds West.398.93 feet to a one-half Inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped'JBI'set fa comer, m North 25 degrees 24 minutes 31 seconds West, 26.27 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc STATE OF $ kv found for toner, (Signature of KFF Limited Partnership Repreaenative) Notary Public,State of Texas North 02 degrees 57 minutes 29 seconds East, 52,70 feet to a highway movement with an aluminum disc COUNTY OF $found for comer, (printed Title of KFF Signee) 00 o North 24 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds West,21.60 feet to a ona-half inch iron rod with yellow cap BEFORE ME,the undersigned, a Notary Public in and fa The State of Texas,an this day stamped'JBI'set for comer,said point being the northwest caner of said 14.324 acre tract, Wald point ciao being Dereonally appeared known to me to be the person and 'n the southwest comer of that said 23.918 acre tract; officer whose name Is subscribed to the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged to me STATE OF / r North 25 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West,40.30 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc that he executed the some for the purposes and considerations therein expressed and in found for comer, the capacity therein stated. NTh, North 81 degrees 25 minutes 40 seconds West, 30.15 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc COUo° OF found fa comer, GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the_day of BEFORE ME, the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for The State of Texas, on this day c North 25 degrees 10 minutes 36 seconds West,1585.93 feet to a one-half Inch Iron rod found fa comer, personally , theappe ud known to to to ex the person and a said point being the northwest caner of said 23.918 acre tract,said point also being the southwest caner of said 30.341 sae tract; officer the same for the purposes and considerations therein expressed and in the capacity officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing Instrument,and acknowledged to me that he we North 25 degrees 09 minutes 27 seco nds West,1325.10 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found fa comer, Notary Public, stated.,State of Texas -�c Northwesterly, 565.29 feet along a curve to the left having a central angle of 16 degrees 41 minutes 47 GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the_day of seconds, a radius of 1939.85 feet, a tangent of 284.66 feet, and whose chord boors North 33 degrees 31 minutes GIVE 42 seconds West, 563.29 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for comer, 2018. f. North 41 degrees 52 minutes 35 seconds West, 50.00 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc Witness my hand this the day of 201& found fa caner, Northwesterly, 233.37 feet along a curve to the right having a central angle of 41 degrees 47 minutes OB Notary Public, State of Texas seconds, a radius of 320.00 feet, a tangent of 122.15 feet, and whose chord bears North 20 degrees 59 minutes 09 (Signature of The Gardner 360 WLC Partnershp-West) .2ore seconds West, 228.24 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum din found fa toner, North DO degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, 68.58 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc (printed Title) found fa caner, North 89 degrees 17 minutes 09 seconds West, 21.89 feet to a one-half Inch Iron rod with yellow cap EXECUTED at Texas, this_day of 2018. stamped'JBI'set fa comer In the seat right-of-way line of Euleea-Grapevine Road par a street right-of-way deed to the City of Grapevine as recorded in Document Number D205161589, Tarrant County Deed Records; STATE OF $ (Signature of The Gardner 360 WLC Partnemhp-West) THENCE along the east right-of-way line of Euless-Grapevine Road as follows: COUNTY OF North 14 degrees 16 minutes 31 seconds West, 126.04 feet to a one-half Inch Iron rod (printed Title) with yellow cap stamped'JBI'set far comer, BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public In and for The State of Texas,on this day North 00 degrees 32 minutes 19 seconds West, 286.88 feet to a one-holf Inch Iron rod with yellow cap personally appeared known to me to be the parson and stamped'JBI'set for comer; officer whose name Is subscribed to the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged to me North 06 degrees 59 minutes 09 seconds East,62.50 feet to a five-elghths Inch Iron rod with yellow cap that he executed the same for the purposes and considerations therein expressed and In STATE OF ¢ stamped'SURVCON INC.'found for comer, the capacity therein stated. North 00 degrees 08 minutes 35 seconds East, 51.65 feet to a point for comer In the centerline of Bear COUNTY OF $ Creek,mid point also being to the west line of the Dallas/Fort Worth Intemational Airport; GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the_day of 2018. BEFORE ME, the undersigned,a Notary Public In and fa The State of Texas, on this day THENCE along the centerline of Bear Creek and the mat line of said 30.341 acre tract and the west line of the personally appeared - known to me to be the person and Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport as follows: officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged to me South 65 degrees 26 minutes 08 seconde East,325.18 feat to a point for comer, that he executed the some for the purposes and considerations therein expressed and In South 05 degrees 58 minutes 30 seconds East, 155.70 feet to a point for corner, Notary Public, State of Texas the capacity therein stated South 24 South 45 degrees 26 minutes 30 seconds East, 49.50 ferees 02 minutes 30 seconds East, 163.50 et tooaopoiint fardm� GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the_day of PRELIMINARY PLAT South 65 degrees 14 minutes 30 anands East,93.90 feet to a point for comer, 2018, South 12 degrees 58 minutes 30 seconds East, 138.30 feet to a point for comer; GLADE 360 ADDITION South 05 degrees 53 minutes 30 seconds West, 135.80 feet to a point far comer Witness my hand this the day of 2018. South 44 degrees 39 minutes 30 seconds East, 258.10 feet to a point for comer, South 33 degrees 24 minutes 30 seconds East, 220.50 feet to a point far comer; Notary Public,State of Texas LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A o. South 50 degrees 22 minutes 30 seconds East, 287.50 feet to a point for comer; North 71 degrees 31 minutes 30 seconds East, 268.20 feet to a point for comer, (Signature of Grapevine Holdings, LTD) South 11 degrees 40 minutes 30 seconds East,154.00 feet to a point for comer, 67.757 ACRES OUT OF THE South 17 degrees 59 minutes 30 seconds Weal, 53.80 feet to a point for toner, (printed Title) EXECUTED at Texas, this day of 2018. EUJAH C. CLARY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 323, m South 09 degrees 58 minutes 30 seconds East, 145.00 feet to a point for comer, AND THE GREEN W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 1083 0 South 38 degrees 11 minutes 30 seconds East, 129.00 feet to a point for comer, „n South 40 degrees 53 minutes 30 seconds East, 115.60 feet to a point for comer, CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS South 08 degrees 02 minutes 30 seconds West, 67.70 feet to a point for toner, STATE OF (Signature of Grapevine Holdings, LTD) a South 49 degrees 56 minutes 30 seconds West, 271.30 feet to a point for comer; P EXISTING ZONING: U & CD South 20 degrees 44 minutes 30 seconds West, 85.80 feet to a point for comer, COUNTY OF (printed Title) PROPOSED ZONING: F South 49 degrees 26 minutes 30 seconds East, 263.70 feet to a point for comer, South 73 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds East, 101.20 feet to a point for comer, BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public In and for The State of Texas,on this day South 42 degrees 36 minutes 12 seconds East, 146.00 feet to a point for comer, personally appeared known to me to be the person and SILVER TREE PARTNERS rR South 29 degrees 26 minutes 25 seconds West, 100.00 feet to the northeast comer of sold 23.918 acre officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged to me STATE OF § APPLICANT tract of land; that he executed the some for the purposes and considerations therein expressed end in e COUNTY OF Dallas, Preston Road, Suite 100 the capacity therein stated. 4 Oallas, Texas 75248 972) 669-9955 THENCE continuing along the centerline of Bear Creek and the mat line of said 23.918 Aare tract and the west line 4 of the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport as follows: GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the_day of/F rp BEFORE ME, the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for The State of 7exaa, on this day South 20 degrees 23 minutes 40 seconds West, 54.55 feet to a point for comer, 2018. personally appeared known to me to be the person and South 40 degrees 58 minutes 41 seconds East, 130.10 feet to a point for comer, officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me m GRAPEVINE HOLDINGS LTD South 14 degrees 34 minutes 30 seconds East, 99.40 feet to a point for comer, that he executed the same for the purposes and considerations therein expressed and In , OWNER South 21 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds East, 222.15 feet to a point for caner, the capacity therein stated. South 44 degrees 08 minutes 29 aeconds East, 375.19 feet to a point for caner; Notary Public,State of Texas 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 South 39 degrees 37 minutes 45 seconds East, 95.97 feet to a point for comer, GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the_day of Dallas, Texas 75248 South 65 degrees 07 minutes 45 seconds East, 176.46 feet to a point for carrier; 2018. ; South 20 degrees 43 minutes 45 seconds East, 212.81 feet to a point for toner, v South 48 degrees 50 minutes 35 seconds East, 144.20 feet to a point for caner, n South 79 degrees 25 minutes 45 seconds East, 205.5E feet to a point for comer THE GARDNER 360 WLC PARTNERSHIP-WEST OWNER PLANNING & ZONING COMMISION: Notary Public, State of Texas o THENCE continuing along the coat line of said 23.918 acre tract and the west line of the Dallas/Fort Worth 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 kgi International Airport as fellows: Date Approved: Dallas, Texas 75248 South 01 degrees 20 minutes 13 second West,30.64 feet to a point for caner, South 01 degrees 06 minutes 45 seconds East, 239.36 feet to a five-eighths Inch iron rod found at the southeast comer of sold 23.918 acre tract, sold point also being the northeast comer of said 14.324 acre tract; Chairman: KFF, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP c THENCE South 00 degrees 00 minutes 54 seconds East, 993.83 feet along the west line of the Dallas/Fort Worth Secretary. AN OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OWNERo International Airport to a monument with brow disc found for comer,said point being the southeast comer of said 1810 Arlingate Lane kqi 14.324 sae tract, sold point also being in the north right-of-way line of Glade Road; Columbus, Ohio 43228 THENCE along the north right-of-way line of Glade Road as follows: GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL: West,234.43 feet to a one-half Inch Iron rod with yellow cap stamped 'JBI'set for comer, JBI PARTNERS, INC. SjRygYgs .� North 79 degrees 23 minutes 48 seconds West, 132.59 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing Date Approved: 16301 Quorum Drive, Suite 200 B a` 2.951,513 aquae feet or 67.757 acres of land. (972) 248-7676 Mayor: Addison, Texas 75001 Contact: Chuck McKinney City Secretary. TBPE No. F-438 TBPLS No. 10076000 THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN CABINET- SLIDE DATE February 13, 2018 Sheet 3 of 3