Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCU2018-02/PD2018-01/Z2018-01GIRAPEVINIE V fi o 7 ~ i `- ''� `: ` ' `A S=' CITY OFGRAPEVI NE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICAT-_1NF4f3MAT!ON Applicant Name: TGreystar GP II, LLC c/o Andrew Ord Applicant Address: !600 E Las Colinas Blvd City/State/Zip !Irving, Texas 75039 Phone No. k6945t. 9 q-y,R . gLkL . a ! '� Fax No. ((843.302.0214 Email Address Mobile Phone 858.846.8521 Applicant's interest in subject property jPurchaser--------^_— PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property (n/a Legal Description: Lot �1 Block Addition Glade1360 Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11" sheet Size of subject property: acres +/- 20.32 square footage fi/- 885,357 Present zoning classification 1LI Light Industrial District Requested zoning district Present use of property Vacant Proposed use of property Multifamily Development The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that would allow the proposed use is Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning 12 acres. Sec. 22.F.0 PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner I(multiple owners, see attached) Prop Owner Address City/State/Zip r� Phone No. R -MF 2 Multifamily District R Mf Multifamily District PART 1. APPLICANT_tN-i-ORMA.-T Applicant Name Applicant Address: City/State/Zip Phone No Fax No CITY OFGRAPEVINE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Email Address i Mobile Phone �— Applicant's interest in subject property PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property I Legal Description: Lot � Block i Addition Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11" sheet Size of subject property: acres, square footage Present zoning classification) Requested zoning district Present use of property Proposed use of property The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that �- would allow the proposed use is Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning I PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner IThe Gardner 360 WLC Partnership - West c/o Paul A. Gardner Jim Prop Owner Address 117101 Preston Road, Suite 100 JAN City/State/Zip Dallas, TX 75248 - Eay�— Phone No. 972.669.9955 Fax No 972.669.9977 � V IN PART 1. APPLICANT -INFORMATION Applicant Name: Applicant Address. City/State/Zip Phone No Email Address F Applicant's interest in subject property PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Z 18-01 CITY OI=GRAPEVINE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Fax No Mobile Phone Street Address of subject property Legal Description: Lot Block Addition' Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11" sheet Size of subject property: acres square footage Present zoning classification _ Requested zoning district Present use of property Proposed use of property The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that would allow the proposed use is Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning --. PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner ;Grapevine Holdings, L.P. c/o Paul A. Gardner Prop Owner Address 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 ---------------._— City/State/Zip Dallas, Texas 75248 Phone No. 972.669.9955 Fax No. 1972.669.9977 PART 1. APPLICANT—INFQRMATtON Applicant Name: Applicant Address: City/State/Zip Phone No. Email Address Applicant's interest in subject property PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Zig-o, CITY OFGRAPEVINE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Fax No Mobile Phone Street Address of subject property Legal Description: Lot[— Block [— Addition Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11" sheet Size of subject property: acres] square footage Present zoning classification Requested zoning district Present use of property ....------------ Proposed use of property The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that would allow the proposed use is Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning — PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION D LN Property Owner KFF, Limited Partnership c/o Kathy C. Blackstone, Treasurer JAN 0 !013I Prop Owner Address 11366 Dublin Road By — City/State/Zip Columbus, Ohio 43215 Phone No 1614.351.6227 Fax Na '614.274.6794 ❑ All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at tlWd.WcreWLof the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ' ❑ AllP ublic hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be contin hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ 1 have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Greystar GP II, LLC c/o Andrew Ord Print Applicant's Name The State of (Texas County of I Wj,k" PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON Before me (notary) uk—ox on this day personally appeared (applicant) Andrew Ord known to me (or proved to me on e oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office thisFA day of I C�e—CeLAA A.D. 2014 WFNDY COKER • = NotorVPublic, state of Texas MV Commission Expires ' 27, 2019 January Notary In and For State of Texas (multiple owners, see attached) Print Property Owner's Name Property Owner's Signature The State of County of Before me (notary) on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D. F Notary In and For State of F ❑ All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the descretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a tater date L1All All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry Public hearings maybe continu to hearing Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ t have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name The State of County of Before me (notary) Applicant's Signature on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office thisr day ofl — AD (Grapevine Holdings, L.P. c/o Paul A. Gardner Print Property Owner's Name The State of (Texas Notary In and For State of Property Owner's Signature County of Iw Before me (notary) f �y�-Yl�)ftill d l�j on this day personally appeared (applicant) Paul A. Gardner — known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day ofi—�����iVtl3 — A.D. I 8- d 01 "] o0 �Y. ,, LYNELL R. MANNING --- ---- ---- —-------- - -- _ r• *;My Notary ID # 124988264 Expires July 14, 2020 •• P 0 F � Notary In and For State of Texas q111 I .JAN 0 2 2013 By ❑ All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the descretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry Public hearings maybe continued t he� hearing Public hearings will not be tabled ❑ Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ 1 have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name The State of County of Before me (notary) j Applicant's Signature on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office thisl day Notary In and For State of , A.D. lThe Gardner 360 WLC Partnership - West c/o Paul A. Gardner Print Property Owner's Name Property Owner's Signature The State of Texas County of t D AK,.,Ws Before me (notary) I L\11-I&C- lk "tJI tJV-) on this day personally appeared (applicant) IPaul A. Gardner known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this ) n` day of'` A.D & 01.1 LYNELL R. MANNING My Notary ID # 124988264 Expires July 14, 2020 • E O F �� ••• Notary In and For State of (Texas By LID U JAN 0 y Z01,33 ❑ All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at thetion o e . st Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continu o the 4)(MO( hearing Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name The State of County of Before me (notary) Applicant's Signature on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this --s day of A, 0. Notary In and For State of [KFF, Limited Partnership c/o Kathy C. Blackstone, Treasurer Print Property Owner's Name The State of ' County of F�PAn iLl _ Property Owner's Signature Before me (notary)y/�,�X a on this day personally appeared (applicant)'q�j�k✓ known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this 5;1 _ day of0ft*t ' A.D. 12M -2,j .� Rebecca Herift 81adGg" Notary Pu*, Swe of Ohio My Commission E*w 11-13.2020 Notary In and For State of `01/j� ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 7Z IS4 t All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. l have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Grystar GT 11, L�q)j/o Andrew Ord Signature of Applicant Date 1 k.2,/14, Signature of Property Owner (multiple owners, see attached) Date W Q V ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ta.'o All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. 1 have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership -West c/o Paul A. Gardner Signature of Property Owner I (��w l - Date I 12 _l5 Z 0 f .7 JAN 0 2; ?0 13 l "Z A KNOWLEDGEMENT Iq 11O All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when Filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date Grapevine Holdings, L.P. c/o Paul A. Gardner Signature of Property Owner Date By ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. l have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date KFF, Limited Partnership c/o Kathy C. Blackstone, Treasurer Signature of Property Owner Date i ! a/'� .JAN 0 2 2013 By C(A1'9--0Q TO -9 T 5 IN M E� 1AN re" -v T F: 1 ! S 41 CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent/company/contact Greystar GP II, LLC c/o Andrew Ord Street address of applicant/ agent 600 E. Las Colinas Blvd City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent: Irving, Texas 75039 Telephone number of applicant/ agent Fax number of applicant/agent 972.444.2197 843.302.0214 Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent I 858.864.8521 PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property n/a Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11 " sheet) Lot 1 Block A Addition Glade/360 Size of subject property +/- 20.325 Acres+/- 885,357_ square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: L1 /PCD Multifamily Development Circle yes or no, if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum / maximum district size for conditional use request 2 acres. Sec. 22.F.2 Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: Sec. 22. 1.1 (CUP to allow maximum 3 stories not to exceed 44 feet in height). Sec. 56.1 (Parking Re i PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Re esti to r z+c, Name of current property owner. (multiple owners, see attached) '-St—reii address of property owner. City / State -74p— Code of property owner Telephone number of property owner. Fax number of property owner TO -9 T 5 IN M E� 1AN re" -v C (A IS 0 a L k VIN, tT F X A 8 CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant l agent:lcompanylcontact Street address of applicant/ agent: City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent Telephone number of applicant l agent Fax number of applicantlagent Email address of applicantlagent Mobile phone number of applicantlagent PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2'x i 1 " sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage _ Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: Circle yes or no, if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum /maximum district size for conditional use request: Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner.- wner:The TheGardner 360 WLC Partnership -West c/o Paul A. Gardner Street address of property owner. 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 City/ State/ Zip Code of property owner —� Dallas, TX 75248 Telephone number of property owner. Fax number of property own 972.669.9955 972.669.99 It LID L C(A M -04a RA CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/ agent./company/contact —of Street address / agent- City-/ State / Zip Code of applicant / agent: Telephone number of applicant/ agent: Fax number of applicant/agent Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property.- roperty.Circle Circleyes or no, if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum /maximum district size for conditional use request: Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: Grapevine Holdings, L.P. c/o Paul A. Gardner Street address of property owner: 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 - �- City / State /Zip Code of property owner.- wner:Dallas, Texas 75248 Dallas, Telephone number of property owner. -Fax 972.669.9955 number of property owner: 972.669.9977 m Q w m L11�L--- By Culua Ng}�/ P* a7y, ��fj LRAP,fl ENW' . w a T E \ A s > CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent/company/contact Street address of applicant/ agent: City I State / Zip Code of applicant / agent: Telephone number of applicant / agent: Fax number of applicantlagent Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property (metes &bounds must be described on 8 112" x 11 "sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres _ Square foots e Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property.- roperty:Circle — — Circleyes or no, if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum / maximum district size for conditional use request. - Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner.' KFF, Limited Partnership c/o Kathy C. Blackstone, Treasurer Street address of property owner.- wner1366 Dublin Road 1366 City / State /Zip Code of property owner Columbus, Ohio 43215 Telephone number of property owner: 614.351.6227 Fax number of property owner. 614.274.6794 ILIA 0 12' 7013� C (41 ?_0 '0A ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ❑ In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations (example. buffer yards, distance between users) ❑ In the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Application of site plan approval (Section 47, see attached Form "B'). ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL US Q ST ANQ DACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY E-" Greystar GP II, LLC c/o Andrew Ord Print Applicant's Name: The State of Texas County Of `p Before Me b U�f on this day personally appeared (notary) Andrew Ord (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this t � r ` day of Dx� /d A. D. 201 SI (multiple owners, see attached) Print Property Owners Name: The State Of County Of Before Me (notary) �A� N&O't, Notary In And For State Texas Property Owner's Signature: on this day personally appeared (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas T M T 0 T � JAM 021 2013 By— c°�.•••.b%, WENDY COKER '•. Notary Public, State of Texas �� My Coirrnission Expires January 27, 2019 (multiple owners, see attached) Print Property Owners Name: The State Of County Of Before Me (notary) �A� N&O't, Notary In And For State Texas Property Owner's Signature: on this day personally appeared (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas T M T 0 T � JAM 021 2013 By— kvio-D ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ❑ In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations (example: buffer yards, distance between users) ❑ In the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Application of site plan approval (Section 47, see attached Form "B') ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements ❑ All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process ❑ 1 have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowtedge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SiGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: The State of County Of Before Me (notary) Applicant's Signature: on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership -West c/o Paul A. Gardner Print Property Owners Name: The State Of Texas A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas Property Owner's Signature: County Of P -r " i S Before Me LY N�t-�- iL . M i4 Non this day personally appeared (notary) Paul A. Gardner (property owner] known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed (Seat) Given under my hand and seal of office this _ day of ��-W -- , A.D. $ Q LYNELLR.MANNING'�'` My Notary ID # 124988264 No n And For State Of Texas Expires July 14, 2020 1n ,,,, ra r --N JAN 0 2 2 10 13 CUIT-0a ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ❑ in the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations (example. buffer yards, distance between users) ❑ in the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Application of site plan approval (Section 47, see attached Form "B'). ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47. Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing Public hearings will not be tabled ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ t have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowled a that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: The State of County Of Before Me (notary) Applicant's Signature: on this day personalty appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seat) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D. Grapevine Holdings, L.P. c/o Paul A. Gardner Print Property Owners Name: The State Of Texas County Of 11AIi1� Notary In And For State Of Texas Property Owner's Signature: -�2Z" ----- Before Me bloalt, K4uoi ..— on this day personally appeared Paul A. Gardner (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this I _) day of A.D. i� { A.D. 2 01 0-01 LYNELL R. MANNING My Notary ID # 124988264 11 Not41ndForState Of Texas Expires July 14, 2020 Gula 0 ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ❑ In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations (example: buffer yards,, distance between users) ❑ In the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood ❑ Application of site plan approval (Section 47, see attached Form "B') ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements ❑ All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings maybe continued to the next public hearing Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ i have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SiGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Mame: The State of County Of Before Me (notary) Applicant's Signature: on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D Notary In And For State Of Texas KFF, Limited Partnership c/o Kathy C. Blackstone I) --al t-,_ L� , r u �s Stu L Print Property �7} Owners Name: Property�wner's Signature: The State Of r ) 0 County Of L Before Me�on this day personally appeared r (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. ti r rT (Seal) Given under my hand and seat of office thi y ) � day o L",�-qb ��' , A.D--2e�-- VoAry in And Fo ate Of Texas (�W/ D — Rebecca Hendrix BadOm Notary Public, Stale d0ho My Commissar Eon 11-13.2010 l By V1 CITY OF GRAPEVINE SITE PLAN APPLICATION Form "B" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/ agent:/company/contact Greystar GP II, LLC c/o Laird Sparks Street address of applicant/agent: 600 E. Las Colinas Blvd. City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent- gentIrving, Irving,Texas 75039 Telephone number of applicant/ agent: j Fax number of applicant/ agent, 972.444.2197 jl 843.302.0214 Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent 858.864.8521 Applicant's interest in subject property Purchaser PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property n/a Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11" sheet) Lot 1 Block A Addition Glade/360 _ Size of subject property __ _ ____ _ +/-20.325 _Acres +/- 885,357 _ Square fo_ otage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: L1 /PCD R -MF Multifamily District Give a general description of the proposed use or uses for the proposed development: Multifamily Development Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: Sec. 22.1.1 (CUP to allow maximum 3 stories not to exceed 44 feet in height). Sec. 56.1 (CUP to E PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner. (multiple owners, see attached) Street address of property owner, City/ State /Zip Code of property owner. Telephone number of property owner- Fax number of property owner: l By cul?.o;k -, GRAPEVINE,. TF, ti C ! C �,:� CITY OF GRAPEVINE SITE PLAN APPLICATION Form "B" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent:/company/contact Street address of applicant/agent City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent. Telephone number of applicant/ agent: Fax number of applicant/ agent- gentEmail Emailaddress of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicandagent Applicant's interest in subject property: PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x i1"sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: ) Proposed use of the property. 1 Give a general description of the proposed use or uses for the proposed development Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership -West c/o Paul A. Gardner Street address of property owner. 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 City / State / Zip Code of property owner. Dallas, TX 75248 Telephone number of property owner 972.669.9955 Fax number of property owner: 972.669.9977 Q C M�OTI JAN 0 2 2m Ey C(A%1?W0'A A' VE CITY OF GRAPEVINE SITE PLAN APPLICATION Form "B" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent./company/contact Street address of applicant / agent: City/ State /Zip Code of applicant / agent.- gent.Telephone Telephonenumber of applicant / agent: Fax number of applicant/ agent.- gent:Email Emailaddress of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent Applicant's interest in subject property: PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 112"x i i" sheet)�� Lot _ _ Block Addition _ Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classrfrcation. Proposed use of the property. Give a general description of the proposed use or uses for the proposed development: Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: Grapevine Holdings, L.P. c/o Paul A. Gardner Street address of property owner 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 City / State / Zip Code of property owner Dallas, Texas 75248 Telephone number of property owner: _ Fax number of property owner: 972.669.9955 I 972.669.9977 FL, M5E0T T JAN" 0 By cut?"o;) -AA VINE?, ` IT E , A ,CITY OF GRAPEVINE SITE PLAN APPLICATION Form "B" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/ agentfcompany/contact Street address of applicant / agent City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent., Telephone number of applicant/ agent: ^i Fax number of applicant / agent.- gent:Email Emailaddress of applicantlagent I Mobile phone number of applicantlagent Applicant's interest in subject property- ropertyPART PART2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 112"x 11 "sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification. i Proposed use of the property: Give a general description of the proposed use or uses for the proposed deveiopment Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner.- KFF, Limited Partnership c/o Kathy C. Blackstone, Treasurer Street address of property owner.' 1366 Dublin Road City / State / Zip Code of property owner Columbus, Ohio 43215 Telephone number of property owner: 614.351.6227 ax number of property owner.- wner:614.351.6227 ! 614.274.6794 ]� � Mb � 0 T T CAA19,0;t ❑ Attach a final plat, or replat, of the approved subdivision by city council showing property boundary lines, dimensions, easements, roadways, rail lines, and public rights -of way crossing and adjacent to the tract ( 1 blueline copy) ❑ If a master development plan is required, attach a statement showing the proposed use substantially conforms to the master development plan. ❑ Submit a site plan showing all information required by Section 47. E., Site Plan review requirements (see attached requirements). ❑ Provide all required information demonstrating compliance with all conditions imposed on any conditional use, site plan zoning, or conditional use zoning. ❑ All site plans must conform to the approved concept plan. Any changes to a site plan, approved with a conditional use or a conditional use, can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE FILING OF A FINAL SITE -PLAN Greystar GP II, LLC c/o Andrew Ord Print Applicant's Name: Applica 's g ure: The State Of Texas /� County Of r'UAU5 Before Me _ZbJL on this day personally appeared Andrew Ord (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the p�u%oses and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this Hol day of A. D. 201$' WENDY COKER Notary Public, State of Texas UP4:4k kxkk My Commission Expires Nota In And For St e f Texas > ` ° January 27, 2019 Notary (multiple owners, see attached) Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas J't `) -, x,1.,5 "Niia ", .v Cu I to a ❑ Attach a final plat, or replat, of the approved subdivision by city council showing property boundary lines, dimensions, easements, roadways, rail lines, and public rights -of way crossing and adjacent to the tract ( t blueline copy) ❑ If a master development plan is required, attach a statement showing the proposed use substantially conforms to the master development plan. ❑ Submit a site plan showing all information required by Section 47.E, Site Plan review requirements (see attached requirements) ❑ Provide all required information demonstrating compliance with all conditions imposed on any conditional use, site plan zoning, or conditional use zoning. ❑ All site plans must conform to the approved concept plan Any changes to a site plan, approved with a conditional use or a conditional use. can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE FILING OF A FINAL SITE PLAN Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership - West c/o Paul A. Gardner n�y4 g Print Property Owners Name: Property wner's dignature The state or Texas County Of j%�/►� S Before Me L� IJEL L ��.1J��1�7 on this day personally appeared Paul A. Gardner (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed_ (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this i115day of _PG&t—,y>n 1B Ch A_D. 2018 ;zo;:P�•P°&¢•. LYNEtLR.MANNING :e My Notary ID # 124988264 Notary nd For State Of Texas Expires July 14, 2020 CUVRI-0Z U Attach a final plat, or replat, of the approved subdivision by city council showing property boundary lines, dimensions, easements, roadways, rail lines, and public rights -of way crossing and adjacent to the tract ( 1 blueline copy) U if a master development plan is required, attach a statement showing the proposed use substantially conforms to the master development plan. ❑ Submit a site plan showing all information required by Section 47 E., Site Plan review requirements (see attached requirements). ❑ Provide all required information demonstrating compliance with all conditions imposed on any conditional use, site plan zoning, or conditional use zoning ❑ All site plans must conform to the approved concept plan Any changes to a site plan, approved with a conditional use or a conditional use, can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE FILING OF A FINAL SITE PLAN Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A. D. Notary In And For State Of Texas Grapevine Holdings, L.P. Go Paul A. Gardner t A�!� /,Z7Liat� Print Property Owners Nance: Property Owner's Signature The State Of Texas County Of ,/� Before Me l� iJi✓I�i. lc--. AA W fly, on this day personally appeared Paul A. Gardner (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. �7 (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this S day of 1�5-6 &% WV__ A.D. 26+8—d--ol 1 LYNELL R. MANNING My Notary ID # 124988284 Notary no For State Of Texas ;F Expires July 142020 i CPN (A -13-, OA ❑ Attach a final plat, or replat, of the approved subdivision by city council showing property boundary lines, dimensions, easements, roadways, rail lines, and public rights -of way crossing and adjacent to the tract ( 1 blueline copy) ❑ If a master development plan is required, attach a statement showing the proposed use substantially conforms to the master development plan ❑ Submit a site plan showing all information required by Section 47 E., Site Plan review requirements (see attached requirements). ❑ Provide all required information demonstrating compliance with all conditions imposed on any conditional use, site plan zoning, or conditional use zoning. ❑ All site plans must conform to the approved concept plan. Any changes to a site plan, approved with a conditional use ora conditional use, can only be a roved by city council through the public hearing process. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE FILING OF A FINAL SITE PLAN Print Applicant's Name: The State Of County Of Before Me (notary) Applicant's Signature: on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of KFF, Limited Partnership c/o Kathy C. Blackstone Print Property Owners Name: A. D. Notary In And For State Of Texas Property owner's Signature The State Of 41, County Of Before Me , t2��� I�r� I//- /02 ILS YL�/ on this day personally appeared (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein }expressed. 1 (Seal) Given under my hand and seat of office this � `"— day of - ( s'Y) CJ e / A.D. N6t;§P In And For State Of,Taxas / D Rebecca Herax 8ladcs m * _= Notary Pu*. SM10 of Ohio My Commission ExOm 11 -13 -MO Q M Q r1 CWT-44ox ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Conditional Use and Special Use Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or a special use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or special useermit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been metaftho time,-Qf submittal. Signature of Applicant Greystar �P1i��C c/o Andrew Ord Date: 1'2--1 k,+ I I-+. Signature of Owner (multiple owners, see attached) Date: By cutTWO ma ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Conditional Use and Special Use Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or a special use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or special use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: Signature of Owner (ewe ! —/ "a -*1-u !2� The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership -West c/o Paul A. Gardner Date: Z 0 7 CVtT-'0a ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Conditional Use and Special Use Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or a special use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or special use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: Signature of Owner (01�/X1li%41L 41 _ !%T' u Grapevine Holdings, >__P. c/o Paul A. Gardne Date: _12 l 5 a D 17 tp By CUM"O;L ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Conditional Use and Special Use Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or a special use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or special use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: Signature of Owners KFF, Limited Partnership c/o Kathy C. Blackstone, Treasurer Date: Q GEA VINE, ;T E Y 4 s CITY OF GRAPEVINE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent:/company/contact G f spar C -,P It , UX c� o RhdiC(,� Orcl Street addres§ of applicant/ agent.- gent:(RdL) ( -a D L)E Lr, Colinas 61Y,4. City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent: I rvi n , 'fexRs -1503'i Telephone num er of applicant /agent: Fax number of applicant / agent. 912. 444. 2191 U3.3DZ .c>2-14 Email address of applicant /agent Mobile phone number of applicant/ agent 3355. S1v4.852- I Applicant's interest in subject property: Cvrckg5e r- PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property V% lot Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11 " sheet) Lot I Block A Addition (glad¢ 36-1) Size of subject property roperty +/- Z0.7Z Acres — � OW 5 135 -f scare footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: L,I Li f%f 4-crusf,C)i- ct t4ulfii �aw�;l Qc\rc10 �nc� Minimum / maximum district size for request- 2- aGrGS . gee -f ov► ZZ. F_ C Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from: 13vOct V% *pQr-- i-hw., rerr[W►ev,} o f SD' ce -tb Facc t3acic � 3gck � PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: CMVL-0PLJE OWKE2S, ss -c Attie Street address of property owner.' City / State / Zip Code of property owner: Telephone number of property owner: Fax number of property owner: O:\ZCU\l Forms\app.pd.doc Fnommmo U 2/14/2017 JAN 312013 By P(s I F-0 I VINE M*7 E A S VT CITY OF GRAPEVINE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/ agent./company/contact Street address of applicant/ agent: City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent. Telephone number of applicant/ agent: Fax number of applicant/ agent. Email address of applicant / agent Mobile phone number of applicant/ agent Applicant's interest in subject property. PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11 " sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: Minimum / maximum district size for request Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: J'V,, Cjanc ner 3100 WL -C PAe:TME GfbP'- We -S+ c�o PaOl A. (-,ird ner- Street address of property owner: 11t)1 Pres-fovi P-nad, Sui fie I,00 City / State / Zip Code of property owner: Telephone number of property owner: 2— [API . q 9 5 5 Fax number of property owner: 9-12- JA09.95 ? i 0AZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.docIIhl �p ��i3 2/14/2017 !1 0:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc 2/14/2017 QA VINE_ '3T E 4 S CITY OF GRAPEVINE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/ agent./company/contact Street address of applicant/ agent: City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent: Telephone number of applicant/ agent Fax number of applicant/ agent Email address of applicant/ agent Mobile phone number of applicant/ agent Applicant's interest in subject property: PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11 " sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: Minimum/ maximum district size for request Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: bra v►v%e HvUd , s I L.P. c10 Paul A. Street address of property owner.' 11101 Prestm 1ZVnd , Sv i4e 100 City / State / Zip Code of property owner: Ua11as fx 11;Z40 Telephone number of property owner: '111Z.(0V1j. 19` S5 Fax number of property owner: 172. tale .9 i"1I 0:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc 2/14/2017 �Csl ?- 0 1 INE zT E x " S CITY OF GRAPEVINE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent:/company/contact Street address of applicant/ agent. City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent: Telephone number of applicant/ agent Fax number of applicant / agent. Email address of applicant/ agent Mobile phone number of applicant/ agent Applicant's interest in subject property: PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11 " sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property. Minimum / maximum district size for request: Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: V -fl, Liw,4eA P-R✓+vier5i-►i� c�d ICs T31gcl�s-rvv,e, Trc�SUYGIr. Street address of property owner. i3AP VZDC�c► City / State / Zip Code of property owner: C01W%16vS , Ohi D 4 3 V 5 [77e-lephone number of property owner: to . 3C I. c„22J- Fax number of property owner: w 4.2-74.LP-794 O:\ZCU\l Forms\app.pd.doc 2/14/2017 By PU?-0 i O:\ZCU\l Forms\app.pd.doc 2/14/2017 JAN 31 '�0,` i'3 ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. ❑ Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. ❑ Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PlIgRLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SV6JECt PRO Y G4rz�}areiFtl,uC c/o Aviclresorci ( \1A 9 Print App ' ant's Name: Applica S to . The State Of —rcyl 1r7 County Of -D 4t/"1 ova Before Me on this day personally appeared ey) (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the pur oses and cons ration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D. " WENDY COKEN •`�,°. Notary Publio, Slot@ fatRV is f3� My Oa `rnrni§6iLrn i �pif@$ January 27, 2919 Notary In And For State xas Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas O:\ZCU\l Forms\app.pd.doc 2/14/2017 JAN 31 '�0,` i'3 ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. ❑ Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. ❑ Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas Gcafe 00,0 FDiAIVIGS t L.P• c -lo Paul A. G;cr� t er . 6Z6�- Print Property Owners Namey Property Owner's Signature: The State Of ^TeXGs County Of �a 11,ZS Before Me Ly � �. 'v yT w +N I iJ'S on this day personally appeared Prqu l A • G Ards c r (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for thepurposesand consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this U day of JAPu �— 7 , A.D. t��• -nbls LYNELL R. MANNING r: My Notary ID # 124988264 tarynd For State Of Texas '-;;F ;F; *.••" Expires July 14, 2020 O:\ZCU\l Forms\app.pd.doc 2/14/2017 By P41,T-o i ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. ❑ Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. ❑ Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas IVIe- C,a 4ylevr WD WAC PR hherSk;? - fcst cv) A Cxrc(v►c�r Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State Of n County Of 1J�,I'I'i�1wT1E '�n L 1 ` (� / l Before Me L7 0�i (�i 2-. 1 V 414 0 IV � on this day personally appeared 1 ,:i V l A • (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the puu-rp'o�ses and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this I U day of J6 �v u'dy� , A. D. 0-01,f. LYNELL R. MANNING s.: My Notary ID # 124988264 to I And For State Of Texa Expires July 14, 2020 OAZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc 4 2/14/2017 PD1 o 1 ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. ❑ Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. ❑ Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ 1 have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: The State Of County Of Before Me Applicant's Signature: on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas V -K L-Mii-f-4 Partti,'-r41"� C(o 1B4,-c14s-Vme ITraqsurer Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State Of t) o 0-1OLiv County Of Before Me I1�,�?A% on this day personally appeared (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. �i t (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this - l 6"' day of/ L A. D. Rebecca Hendrix Blackstone My Commission Expm 11.13.2020 2/1 In And For State Of�exas "�// d 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. r Signature of Applicant Date: Signature of Owner Date: 0:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc 2/14/2017 D �M5T0TT I 3j/ 4 P61 rr-0 I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry, Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: ` "/e� © `9 ljj4e C,ace(vier 3t9® V.ILc. N(Iy'er sA; r _ we`i-st c- to Pew I A . eGfAliter Signature of Owner Date: O 2CU11 Forms\app.pd.doc 2/14/2017 13y_--_-__._---- 4 pp I T-0 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: �ra�evi�ne N�lc(ii,�s ` L P• c I ® Paul A �`ccly►-er Signature of Owner Date: 0:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc 2/14/2017 1�[�f�DaC�r �i IU By 4 Ppig-o � ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: Signature of Owner ' Date: 0:2CU\1 Forms\app-pd.doc 2/14/2017 4 PLATTING VERIFICATION This verification statement must be signed prior To the submittal of this planned development overlay application It has been determined that the property described below does require platting or replatting and the applicant has been instructed on this procedure. It has been determined that the property described below is currently platted or does not require platting or replatting at this time. Address of subject property Legal description of subject property Public Works Department Date This form must be signed by the public works department and submitted along with a completed application to the planning and zoning department Mff8V� 0:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc -' _ j 6 2/14/2017 E F\G ENME c AFH 2- 1. sa 1T113 n111 a T12 A IA 12 R2 11R2 G0.PPp Oil 3 3 11 2BI12 rn 21 TI 2� 2e 'e Ir 71112 ILI � 12 12 Go—zs B ti z 0 9 2� 21 21 p ........... 12 2 13 3 1 4 is 21 ............. 1� 12 3 0' 1 0" T, 3 . ...... ...... ... . .......... .. ...... 15 21 3 : . ..... .......... 14 2all 411 —111 1fOVL s: T� Noe Is 14 13 13 I 2 1 3� 2 1P IDN' , 1 12 2 C C 3 . 31 11 10 . 4�OA?--( .......... 1539 ................ 1-111112AI-1-1 11l' Feet 0 250 500 750 ............ .... ................ TI ........... ......... 1A .................... 1-1211-1 IAI Gip sli NO _V VINE, N Z18-019 CU18-02, PD18-01 1C S�' T E X �A VIP The Preserve Date Prepared: 2/7/2018 This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department Various official and unofficial sources were used to gather this information. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data, however, no uammtee is given or implied as to the accuracy of said data. 1 1 OAY' o 2 2 1T113 n111 a T12 A IA 12 R2 11R2 2 3 3 2< ap 1 21T111 71112 � 12 12 32 B z z J6 12 2 13 3 11 1x 13 14 0' 1 0" T, 3 ""0* T, —A T� Is 14 13 13 I 2 1 3� 2 1P IDN' , 1 12 2 C C 3 . 31 11 10 . 4�OA?--( 1539 �A Feet 0 250 500 750 1,000 _V VINE, N Z18-019 CU18-02, PD18-01 1C S�' T E X �A VIP The Preserve Date Prepared: 2/7/2018 This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department Various official and unofficial sources were used to gather this information. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data, however, no uammtee is given or implied as to the accuracy of said data. \zI8-v1 C uR•oa LEGAL DESCRIPTION (ZONING TRACT) Being a parcel of land located in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas a part of the Green W. Minter Survey, Abstract Number 1083, and being all of that called 14.324 acre tract of land described in deed to KFF Limited Partnership, an Ohio limited partnership as recorded in Volume 14006, Page 43, Tarrant County Deed Records, and also being a part of that called 23.918 tract of land described in deed to The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership -West as recorded in Volume 15348, Page 75, Tarrant County Deed Records, and being further described as follows: BEGINNING at a highway monument with an aluminum disc found at southwest corner of said 14.324 acre tract, said point also being at the intersection of the north right-of-way of Glade Road (a variable width right-of-way) with the east right-of-way of State Highway 360 (a variable width right-of-way); THENCE along the east right-of-way line of State Highway 360 as follows: North 29 degrees 23 minutes 17 seconds West, 193.24 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 27 degrees 58 minutes 48 seconds West, 195.10 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 31 degrees 03 minutes 10 seconds West, 99.30 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 41 degrees 19 minutes 29 seconds West, 104.66 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; Northwesterly, 399.12 feet along a curve to the right having a central angle of 06 degrees 02 minutes 03 seconds, a radius of 3789.72 feet, a tangent of 199.74 feet, and whose chord bears North 28 degrees 10 minutes 40 seconds West, 398.93 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 25 degrees 24 minutes 31 seconds West, 26.27 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 02 degrees 57 minutes 29 seconds East, 52.70 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 24 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds West, 21.60 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "JBI" set for corner, said point being the northwest corner of said 14.324 acre tract, said point also being the southwest corner of that said 23.918 acre tract; North 25 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West, 40.30 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 81 degrees 25 minutes 40 seconds West, 30.15 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; JAN 02 2015 Z19"01 CUM'oQ North 25 degrees 10 minutes 36 seconds West, 77.41 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "JBI" set for corner; THENCE North 64 degrees 49 minutes 24 seconds East, 346.30 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "JBP' set for corner; - THENCE North 25 degrees 10 minutes 36 seconds West, 99.74 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "JBI" set for corner; THENCE North 18 degrees 59 minutes 34 seconds East, 5.93 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "JBP' set for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 31 minutes 47 seconds East, 449.09 feet to a point for corner in the east line of said 23.918 acre tract, said point being the west line of Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, said point also being in the centerline of Bear Creek; THENCE along the center line of Bear Creek and the east line of said 23.918 acre tract and the west line of Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport as follows: South 48 degrees 50 minutes 35 seconds East, 38.58 feet to a point for corner; South 79 degrees 25 minutes 45 seconds East, 205.58 feet to a point for corner; THENCE continuing along the east line of said 23.918 acre tract and the west line of Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport as follows: South 01 degrees 20 minutes 13 second West, 30.64 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "JBP' set for corner; South 01 degrees 06 minutes 45 seconds East, 239.36 feet to a five-eighths inch iron rod found at the southeast corner of said 23.918 acre tract, said point also being the northeast corner of said 14.324 acre tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 00 minutes 54 seconds East, 993.83 feet along the west line of the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport to a monument with brass disc found for corner, said point being the southeast corner of said 14.324 acre tract, said point also being in the north right- of-way line of Glade Road; THENCE along the north right-of-way line of Glade Road as follows: West, 234.43 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "JBP' set for corner; North 79 degrees 23 minutes 48 seconds West, 132.59 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 888,946 square feet or 20.407 acres of land. a � Ub J A N 002, Z!Oj 53 By z�TWO 1 CUT -02 "This document was prepared under 22 TAC 663.23, does not reflect the results of an on the ground survey, and is not to be used to convey or establish interests in real property except those rights and interests implied or established by the creation or reconfiguration of the boundary of the political subdivision for which it was prepared." p T (INI T T JAN 0 2 2013 By Albert Triplett From: Paul Lee Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 8:48 AM To: Albert Triplett Cc: John Robertson; Ron Stombaugh; Richard Larkins Subject: TRC Comments Expires: Tuesday, January 08, 2019 12:00 AM Albert, The Preserve — • The engineering plans submitted are too preliminary. • Provide a site drainage area map. The specifics of the storm drain discharges will be reviewed in future plans to assure that we do not have an erosive condition. • More detailed grading showing retaining walls and other features that will affect the site. • A CLOMR and LOMR Will be required. Show the Floodway on the plan. Label the FEMA and ultimate floodplains on the site plan. • The plan needs to be coordinated with Landscape plan and Trail. The Trail cannot be constructed on 3:1 slope. • Indicate the Improvements along the frontage that will be required on Glade Road. Show the Glade Road improvements currently under construction by DFW airport. This should include striping etc. • The TIA submitted previously was done before the discussion that DFW may be widening Glade Road. I am not sure if this will still be valid. Rich will need to see if a updated TIA to show the new conditions is required. Intersection improvements may be needed. • Sidewalks will be required along Glade road frontage. • The utility plan shows a connection to the Future TRA sewer line. This will require TRA approval. Is the intent to wait until TRA completes this construction and accepts the work prior to starting this project? The connection should be not more than 90 degrees to the flow. • The Sewer and Water lines will be private and should not be located in a public Easement. The site plan shows fire lane easement, this is not required or advised. • Dog Park and dog wash will require details to have storm drain protected from unsanitary conditions and sanitary protected from storm water inflow. • We may have more comments after meeting with Bryan on how private water lines and fire hydrants will be handled. Boomerlacks Make sure lot numbers match the plat. Corkys Gaming Bistro No Public Works Comments. Concept site plan for undeveloped lot would require a signal and improvements at the intersection with Kubota Drive. Paul M. Lee, P.E. Sr. Civil Engineer oleeCcDG raoevinetexas.eov Office: 817-410-3144 Cell: 817-564-6649 February 2, 2018 Ms. Christine Lopez Fort Worth Star Telegram P.O. Box 1870 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 RE: Grapevine Account # CIT 25 Dear Ms. Lopez, VIA FACSIMILE 817-390-7361 817-390-7520 Please find enclosed the following for publication on Sunday, February 4, 2018, in the Northeast Edition of the Neighborhood Extra Section of the Fort Worth Star Telegram. (One time only) Item Meeting Date Notice of Public Hearing Z18-01, CU18-02, PD18-01 —The Preserve February 20, 2018 As always, your assistance is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions please contact me at (817) 410-3155. Sin rely, Susan Batte Planning Technician CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS On Tuesday evening, February 20, 2018 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine will hold a public hearing to consider the following items: Z18-01, CU18-02, PD18-01 — The Preserve — submitted by Greystar GP II, LLC for property located at 101 East Glade Road and proposed to be platted as Lot 1, Block A, Glade/360. The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 20.32 acres from LI Light Industrial to R -MF Multifamily for the development of a multifamily apartment complex. The applicant is also requesting a conditional use permit to allow three stories, a reduction to the parking requirements and a planned development overlay to deviate from but not limited to building separation. The property is currently zoned LI Light Industrial and is owned by The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership West, Grapevine Holdings and KFF Limited Partnership. After all parties have been given an opportunity to speak, the public hearing will be closed and the Commission and the City Council will deliberate the pending matters. Please contact Development Services Department concerning any questions, 200 S Main Street, Grapevine, Texas 76051 or PO Box 95104, Grapevine, Texas 76099, 817-410-3155. A copy of the site plan for all the above referenced requests is on file with the Development Services Department. E TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 02/02/2018 14:13 NAME CITY OF GRAPEVINE PW FAX 0 TEL 8174103003 SER.# 000F9N912268 DATE,TIME 02/02 14:13 FAX N0./NAME 8173907361 DURATION 00:00:34 PAGE(S) 02 RESULT OK MODE STANDARD ECM February 2, 2018 Ms. Christine Lopez Fort Worth Star "telegram P.O. Box 1870 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 RE: Grapevine Account # CIT 25 Dear M's. Lopez, VIA FACSIMILE 817•-390-7361 817-390-7520 Please find enclosed the following for publication on Sunday, February 4, 2018, in the Northeast Edition of the Neighborhood Extra Section of the Fort Worth Star Telegram. (One time only) Item Meeting Date Notice of Public Hearing February 20, 2018 Zia -01, CU18-02, PD18-01 The Preserve As always, your assistance is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions please contact me at (817) 410-3155. Siri, rely, 0 i�/J? - Susan Batte From: Lopez, Christine < Sent: Friday, February 02, 2018 4:38 PM To: Susan Batte Subject: Re: Grapevine News Notice Susan, ad received Christine Christine Lopez Legal Classified Representative Phone: 817-390-7522 X VEMMIMIN On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Susan Batte <sbatte grapevinetexas.gov> wrote: Please see attached - I am also faxing a copy just in case you don't receive this email *** External email communication — Please use caution before clicking links and/or opening attachments *** MEDIA Sta sTelegram r -- Arlington Citizen -Journal I The Keifer Citizen 1 La Estrella MansfieldNews-Mirror Star -Telegrams Northeast I Weatherford Star- T egrarn star-telegram.com 1808 Throckmorton St. I Ft Worth, Tx. 76102-6 15 city S� *** MEMO INVOICE *** OtrcrAtarYledI $113.78 Advertising Dept I I t�U 6 BILtEVACCOUNT NUMBER 17 1 ADVERTISER/CUENT NUMBER 2 1 ADVERTISER/CLIENT NAME 02/12/2018 600620 600620 CITY OF GRAPEVINE SECRETARY MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO Star -Telegram CITY OF GRAPEVINE SECRETARY Star -Telegram - Advertising PO BOX 95104 PO BOX 51847 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099-9704 Livonia, MI 48151 Billing: Contact Sales Rep. Credit: Email ssecreditandcollections@mociatchy.00m Payment is due upon receipt. !TM JO11 NEWSPAPER 12 14 13 16 16 BILLED 17 TIMES 16 Ligi START STOP REFERENCE DESCRIPTION PRODUCT SAU SIZE UNITS RUN RATE AMOUNT 02/04 02/04 0003512353 CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS On Tuesda) Telegram 1 x 49 L 49 1 $2.22 $108.78 02/04 02/04 0003512353 CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS On Tuesda) Upsell ST.Com 1 x 49 L 49 1 $0.10 $5.00 Invoice Total $113.78 ON ago �l-7 003 THIS IS A MEMO INVOICE AND MAY OR MAY NOT REFLECT ALL CHARGES OR CHANGES THAT OCCUR ON THE FINAL INVOICE. PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN LOWER PORTION WITH YOUR REMITTANCE SW -Telegram 1 BIMNG PEWOD- 2 ADVERTIS£WCUENT NAME MEDIA 02/12/2018 CITY OF GRAPEVINE SECRETARY Star -Telegram - Advertising TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 3 TERMS or PAYMENT PO BOX 51847 Livonia, MI 48151 $113.78 Upon Receipt *** MEMO INVOICE *** Star -Telegram Star -Telegram - Advertising PO BOX 51847 Livonia, MI 48151 PAGE* 5 1 BILINGDATE 1 02/12/2018 II NEMPAPER REFERENCE 0003512353 6 BILLED ACCOUNT NUMBER 600620 7 ADVERTISERICLIENTNUMBER 600620 M W-1 NIA I'MA 'KIIHOWAUVM Befor a Notary Public in and for said County and State, t personally appeared for the Star -Telegram, published by the Star -Telegram, Int. at Fort Worth, in Ta distributed in other surrounding Counties; and who, after being duly sworn, did Zfo lowing clipping of an advertisement was published in the above named paper �Lb 061 Y 77 Subscribed ai Notary Publi, LESLIE BUC,KL Notary Public State c4 Texas z xplfes A 4 Co E\�)lfes A 0 128( 5 0 4. tNE1A9'13E5Ss,:i" ,. Ti.ZP 1"flE 1: G.- . FORT WORTH, CITY OF AIRPORT 1000 THROCKMORTON ST FORT WORTH 76102 4401 DFW AIRPORT MINTER, GREEN W SURVEY Abstract 1083 Tract 2A ✓ FORT WORTH, CITY OF AIRPORT 1000 THROCKMORTON ST FORT WORTH 76102 1500 E STATE HWY 114 WORTHINGTON, RICHARD SURVEY Abst ract 1655 Tract 1 ABST 1655 TRS ✓ GARDNER 360 WLC PARTNSHP WEST PO BOX 116908 CARROLLTON 75011 4501 STATE HWY 360 MINTER, GREEN W SURVEY Abstract 1083 Tract 21301 A2 2131 & 2133./ KFF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1366 DUBLIN RD COLUMBUS 43215 101 E GLADE RD MINTER, GREEN W SURVEY Abstract 1083 Tract 1A ,,- '111'111111111111'11111'III'I'111��11111111111"'1'llllllll'11i11 City of Euless Planning & Development 201 N Ector Euless, TX 76039 '1111111111'1llll'lll'1111111'111 I'I'I'1'111'1111111111'111111111 City Of Dallas (Airport) 1500 Marilla Street Dallas, Tx 75201 III'1111I I'1111111""'ll'llll'I'I'lJill Christina Wood DFW International Airport P O Box 619428 DFW Airport, Tx 75261-9428 1111111'1'111'11'1"1111111111'111111'111111'lllll"'I'I'111111�� TXDOT 2501 SW Loop 820 Fort Worth, TX 76133-2300 �n- Z18-0" .31.xls ------- 2 IAIA I VIL <3 —2 pN '1 2 IDt ,1 3 z4X53 D �2 13 40 TR IA2 13 E 5 22 3 —30 32 B Io 'i z 1r 7 -M HIM 17 12 6 1 1 1 11 11 12 11 1< 15 11 'R A, 4 11 2 "p, 2 4 13 N , D �2 \,ONB 2— 1 43 1� IA 33 r 1, 31 15 lap"? gick 11 4 I ,QNpOfk A — —u— .6%k A, B Feet 0 250 500 750 1,000 VIN -,E, N T E X A S"t Date Prepared: 2/7/2018 ., FORSNP Z18-015 CU18-02, PD18-01 The Preserve This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department. Various official and unofficial sources were used to gather this information. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data, however, no guarantee is given or implied as to the accuracy of said data, ;EN '"SNe ------- 2 IAIA I VIL <3 —2 pN '1 2 IDt ,1 3 z4X53 D �2 13 40 TR IA2 13 E 5 22 3 —30 32 B Io 'i z 1r 7 -M HIM 17 12 6 1 1 1 11 11 12 11 1< 15 11 'R A, 4 11 2 "p, 2 4 13 N , D �2 \,ONB 2— 1 43 1� IA 33 r 1, 31 15 lap"? gick 11 4 I ,QNpOfk A — —u— .6%k A, B Feet 0 250 500 750 1,000 VIN -,E, N T E X A S"t Date Prepared: 2/7/2018 ., FORSNP Z18-015 CU18-02, PD18-01 The Preserve This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department. Various official and unofficial sources were used to gather this information. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data, however, no guarantee is given or implied as to the accuracy of said data, CITY OF AIRPORT FORT WORTH 1000 THROCKMORTON ST FORT WORTH 76102 GARDNER 360 WLC PARTNSHP WEST PO BOX 116908 CARROLLTON 75011 KFF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1366 DUBLIN RD COLUMBUS 43215 Z18 01 020718 101008AM Labels - Count: 4 I111111'I'Ill'11'I"I111111111'111111'111111'I1111"'I�I�Illlllu TXDOT 2501 SW Loop 820 Fort Worth, TX 76133-2300 III' 111111111111111 I.I I I..I I I I I' I I I' I I 11111""' 11.I I11' I' I•111I I Christina Wood DFW International Airport P 0 Box 619428 DFW Airport, Tx 75261-9428 '1111111111'lllll'III'1111111'IIII�1�1�1�111'1111111111'I'1111111 City Of Dallas (Airport) 1500 Marilla Street Dallas, Tx 75201 '111'111111111111'11111'III'I'111"11111111111"'1'llllllll'11i11 City of Euless Planning & Development 201 N Ector Euless, TX 76039 Page 1 ■ SPON�o PSN OP \NZEPRP�at ' E Z18-01, C U 18-02, P D 18-01 -T E Y A S` wr The Preserve Date Prepared: 2/7/2018 This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department. Various official and unofficial sources were used to gather this information. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data, however, no guarantee is given or implied as to the accuracy of said data. 041 H� —GAS". PAW19E OR ALPO pN P. °a +,az I C f :a aG FA loll a 3 3 za5 az°23 P a a a, a e a a.s3 z, a: as B a , A e Z z Z 'o a m Is a a e tip c o ,e a a ,o 11 11 ,a ,< 1511 11 a a, or ,s 12 oPK O 0 ,a D a B zo,« GAP ANO az12 „ za 31.. ro a � a 1� 2— A o ,o„ ' Feet 0 250 500 750 1,000 SPON�o PSN OP \NZEPRP�at ' E Z18-01, C U 18-02, P D 18-01 -T E Y A S` wr The Preserve Date Prepared: 2/7/2018 This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department. Various official and unofficial sources were used to gather this information. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data, however, no guarantee is given or implied as to the accuracy of said data. File #: Z1 8-01 9 C U 18-02, PD1 8-01 THE PRESERVE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Because you are a property owner within 200 feet of the subject tract of land as shown by the last City -approved tax rolls, you received this notice. If you cannot or do not wish to attend the hearing, the attached form is provided for your convenience. If owners of more than 20% of the property within 200 feet of the subject tract object to the case, a 3/4 vote of the City Council is required to approve the request. Purpose of Request: The public hearing is to consider an application submitted by Greystar GP II, LLC for property located at 101 East Glade Road and proposed to be platted as Lot 1, Block A, Glade/360. The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 20.32 acres from PCD Planned Commerce Development and LI Light Industrial to R -MF Multifamily for the development of a multifamily apartment complex. The applicant is also requesting a conditional use permit to allow three stories, a reduction to the parking requirements, and a reduction in the front yard setback and a planned development overlay to deviate from but not limited to building separation. The property is currently zoned LI Light Industrial and is owned by The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership West, Grapevine Holdings and KFF Limited Partnership. Agendas, packets, minutes and videos can be viewed online at: http://grapevinetexas.gov/index.aspx?nid=89 Hearing Procedure: When: 7:30 PM, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2018 What: JOINT PUBLIC HEARING GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Location: PUBLIC HEARING: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2nd FLOOR COMMISSION'S DELIBERATION SESSION, 2nd FLOOR 200 S. MAIN STREET, GRAPEVINE, TEXAS Applicant and Other Speakers' Presentation. Public Input, Neighborhood Associations, Property Owners Within 200 feet, Interested Citizenry. Questions from City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission for Applicants, City Staff and Guests Present. File #: Z18-01, CU18-02, PD1 8-01 THE PRESERVE WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY 19 2018 Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest) and/or (have the following comments) Print Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: Signature: Phone No. Telephone: (817)410-3155 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Technician Department of Development Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 Z18-01, C U 18-02, P D 18-01 THE PRESERVE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN NOTIFICATION AREA SUPPORT OPPOSITION CONCERN: I LETTER 0 LETTERS 1 LETTER CONCERNED CITIZENS THAT DOES NOT OWN PROPERTY WITHIN NOTIFICATION AREA SUPPORT OPPOSITION: 3 LETTERS 0 LETTER GRAPEVINE BUSINESS OWNERS: SUPPORT: 2 LETTERS UNABLE TO VERIFY ANY PROPERTY OWNERSHIP SUPPORT: 10 LETTERS TO: City of Grapevine RE: Support for the Zoning Request #CU 18-02 Property Owner: KFF, LLC As the property owners of the 14.33 acre corner of Glade Road & State Highway 360, we are in favor of allowing the Multi -Family Project # CU 18-02 to be developed. You have our full support in favor of approval of zoning request #CU 18-02. We have owned this property for almost 20 years and are convinced that the developer, Graystar will develop a remarkable product on this stretch of 360. The proposed layout and pictures remind us of condominium developments in high end resorts around the country. The 360 corridor is in need of a top notch Multi -Family project verses another industrial or commercial building. We can envision many of the single family homeowners in the area downsizing to a quality development like this in the future. A in f or of this proje t. ishel, Partner KFF,LLC By PROPERTY OWNER OF SUBJECT PROPERTY T LMOEddTr FEB 19 2018 +U FEB 19 2018 February 19, 2018 Mr. Larry Oliver, Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, TX 76051 RE: Z19-01, CU 18-02, PD18-01 "The Preserve" at 101 East Glade Road Northeast corner of Glade Road and Highway 360 Dear Chairman Oliver, 11 \A/ v� VV DFW International Airport would like to comment on the proposal to rezone approximately 20.407 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Glade Road and Highway 360 from `PCD' Planned Commerce Development District and `LI' Light Industrial to 'R -MF' Multi- family district for the development of a multifamily apartment complex. The proposed apart- ments would be immediately adjacent to DFW International Airport property and thus we would like to inform you of what residents can expect should the City approved the proposed project: • The property is proximate to the existing arrival and departure activities of DFW Air- port's three west side runways being only 0.7 and 1.3 miles from the southern ends of Runway 13R/31 L, 18R/36L and 18L/36R. The proposed development would be sub- ject to routine and regular noise from DFW aircraft operations. • The property would also be subject to ground -related airport effects from proximate DFW facilities including aircraft maintenance operations and DFW Department of Pub- lic Safety testing and training facilities. • The property is also abuts the 65 decibel Day -Night Level (DNL) noise contour which was promulgated by the North Central Texas Council of Governments to the cities sur- rounding DFW Airport and adopted by the City of Grapevine in Ordinance 78-2. • DFW is forecast to continue to grow its air operations benefitting Grapevine and .the local DFW Region which could bring additional air traffic in the future. DFW's land use plan includes future development on Glade Road proximate to the proposed apartment site (refer to DFW's website at see https://www.dfwairport.com/landhere/ DFW Airport urges the City to consider these facts in its decision to rezone and allow residen- tial development on this property and recommends: 1. Design and construction of the buildings sufficient to achieve a noise reduction of at Dallas Fort Worth International Airport P.O. Box 619428 DFW Airport, TX 75261-9428 least 25 dB outdoor to indoor in order to reduce interior noise levels. It should be not- ed that the level of noise reduction recommended may not be adequate to negate the vibration associated with the low -frequency rumble of jet departures. 2. Dedication of an avigation easement to the City of Grapevine, the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport Board, and the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth. 3. Full disclosure of the proximate industrial activities to all first time and subsequent po- tential residents. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 972-973-5573. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Sandy Lancaster Environmental Program Manager DFW International Airport 972-973-5573 cc: Bruno Rumbelow, City of Grapevine R. Horton, VP DFW Environmental Affairs Paul Tomme, Legal Counsel Sam Tan, DFW Environmental Affairs Dallas Fort Worth International Airport P.O. Box 619428 DFW Airport, TX 75261-9428 RED OAK CAPITAL 4357 LIVINGSTON, HIGHLAND PARK, TX 75205 February 7, 2018 City of Grapevine 200 S Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 RE: Zoning Request #CU 18-02 Dear Grapevine P&Z and City Council, As a nearby landowner, I know this site very well. I have examined the plans and I am reaching out to you today to offer my support for the zoning request # CU 18-02. The topography and characteristics of this tract of land uniquely lends itself to the high quality, resort style, multi -family development as proposed. I appreciate the fact that this development will allow people to enjoy the natural beauty of this property by having a hike and bike trail where residents can experience and appreciate the terrain. It's a great amenity and a small way to obtain serenity in our increasingly stressful lives. I would much rather see the features of this property preserved in a well thought out housing area by someone as reputable as Greystar, than watch it turn into an industrial eyesore. I fully support this zoning request and hope that you will as well. Please vote in favor of this project. Sincerely, Alan Moore � _.- d ��pl i FEB 112019 L PROPERTY OWNER NOT WITHIN NOTIFICATION AREA 4 4 0 1 City of Grapevine Development Services February 10, 2018 Re: Zoning Case #CU 18 — 02 I support the rezoning of this land. There appears to be an enormous amount of Industrial Land available. A Residential Use for this Tract of Land will buffer the Industrial uses Nearby and inside the airport. People pay sales tax and Industrial uses do not have as many people. The corner location will give the residents an opportunity to travel both north and south to areas of employment. Glade Road offers the east and west destinations. People attend and volunteer at festivals and other organizations. I live near this site and know it will NOT impact my value of my residence negatively. Tim Lancaster D T Mo T 0 V T 1913 Waterford Dr FEB 19 2018 Grapevine, TX 76051 By CONCERNED CITIZEN THAT DOES NOT OWN PROPERTY WITHIN NOTIFICATION AREA February 13, 2018 Mr. Ron Stombaugh City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, TX 76099 Re: CU#18-002 —Multi -Family Development (SH 360/Glade) Dear Ron, Please let this letter serve as a letter of support for the proposed multi -family project located at the NEC of SH 360 and Glade Road. I understand that the current zoning classification is Light Industrial ("LI"). Given that this site is located at the southern entry to our City, I'm not sure an industrial development is what I want to see along SH 360. Secondly, with the topography and the creek bordering this site, this project appears to be the best use to take advantage of those site constraints. I'm not sure of any other applicable uses along a highway frontage would be able to deal with the topographic features in the manner that this project proposes. Thank you for allowing my input on this zoning case. Sincerely, Matt Moore 3116 Joyce Way Grapevine, TX 76051 817-201-6982 pEoNflux FEB 19 2018 CONCERNED CITIZEN THAT DOES NOT OWN PROPERTY WITHIN NOTIFICATION AREA Grapevine FSU February 15, 2018 To Whom This May Concern: Zoning Case #CU 18-02 has my support. A quality rental development is greatly needed in this part of the city. This development will eventually create new home buyers in the Grapevine area. I greatly prefer this development over any industrial as currently zoned. Please approve zoning case #CU 18-02. Regards, Jarvis Boyd Owner/ Operator Grapevine Chick-fil-A FEB 19 2111 D By GRAPEVINE BUSINESS OWNER Scott's Marinas at Lake Grapevine, Ltd. February 16, 2018 City of Grapevine Planning and Zoning Council 200 S. Main St. Grapevine, TX 76051 Re: Zoning Request #CU 18-02 Gentlemen: I would like to submit my support of the Greystar development of the Multi -Family Project # CU 18-02. 1 have owned and operated the marinas on Lake Grapevine for over thirty-five years. Grapevine has long been noted as a community driven city focused on its residents. The addition of an aesthetically pleasing, quality development for Multi -Family living would be a welcome addition to the area along SH 360. The area along SH 360 has attracted more residential than commercial development. Grapevine has so much to offer its residents with its lakes, shopping, community events and attractions. The multi -family development would complement the area. The concept appears well conceived and should attract families to the City of Grapevine who are relocating to the area. I would ask you to vote "Yes" on CU 18-02. Sincerely, Jvinxt�Z_4�_ Marshall Funk GRAPEVINE BUSINESS OWNER 11226 Indian Trl * Dallas * Texas 75229 972-484-1826 Feb 5, 2018 City of Grapevine Staff and Council, We have been communicating with Silver Tree for over a year now about their project. Our interaction with them has been nothing but professional and positive. We support their Zoning Request #CU 18-02 for a Multi -family project on Hwy 360. We have noticed the successful residential projects in this corridor, and we are excited about the project they are bringing before the council now. We have seen Silver Tree's commitment to lead the effort to expand the Grapevine Trail System from the current Bear Creek Park to the east side of Hwy 360 all the way to Glade Road. From what we've seen in their concept plan, this project should meet and exceed the City of Grapevine expectations for the district along Hwy 360. Silver Tree has taken a challenging site and creating a unique opportunity for the future residents of Grapevine with their project. I hope everyone sees the benefit that we do and supports this project. Regards, Troy Lewis Newstream Commercial 817-602-0578 FEB15 TON T 19 zoic D UNABLE TO VERIFY ANY PROPERTY OWNERSHIP February 3, 2018 City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Grapevine, TX 76051 Ladies and Gentlemen: Attn: Mayor, Members of City Council, and P & Z Commissioners I fully support the multi -family project and the accompanying zoning request captioned # CU 18-02. 1 have had an ownership interest in a Grapevine property since 1974 and I have every reason to anticipate that Greystar's proposed development will enhance my property's value. You already know that the proposed development looks like a condominium development, and that Greystar is considered to be among the biggest and best quality builders in the nation. We've observed, as you have, that Highway 360 has failed to become the Commercial and Industrial corridor many of us had anticipated. The proposed Greystar project promises instead to be a first-rate multi -family area that resembles a Mountain Retreat like those you've seen in Colorado or Idaho. Please support this project with your "Yes" vote. Sincerely yours, Glenn Julius 1002 Peebles Court Arlington, TX 76013 FM-T-yTer FEB 19 2018 �U By UNABLE TO VERIFY ANY PROPERTY OWNERSHIP 2/7/2018 • • • Rachel Cowley -Portillo 3010 Blair Oak Drive Rowlett, Texas 75089 City of Grapevine Planning and Zoning Department 200 South Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is in support of Zoning Request # CU -18-02. I am in favor of allowing the Multi -Family Project development. It is my understanding that Greystar Properties is one of the country's foremost upscale developers and that the other developments owned by this company have succeeded in improving the property value and revenues of surrounding areas. This particular development of mountain retreat style condominiums is sure to attract clientele that will have a positive impact on the city and will provide the city with future homeowners as they transition into homeownership. This development will be the only multi -family development in this decidedly desired area The land around Highway 360 has been far more successful in residential development than it has in commercial or industrial developments. The development of Highway 360 has had little to no impact on the value of this property for commercial or industrial use. I have owned a portion of the land in question for several years and I feel that this development will have a significant positive impact on the value of the property. I appreciate your time and would like to implore you to vote in favor of the proposed rezoning of this property. I fully support this request and hope that you do as well. Sincerely, Rachel Cowley -Portillo T 010 ' i T FEB 19 2018 UNABLE TO VERIFY ANY PROPERTY OWNERSHIP City of Grapevine 200S Main Grapevine TX 76051 Attn: Mayor, Council and Planning and Zoning Ref :Zoning Request CU 18-02 I own prosperity near Hwy 360 and Euless- Grapevine Rd intersection and have owned this property for over 50 years. The nearby area north of 360 has been dead dead dead for any kind of commercial or light industrial development for ever. I support zoning request #CU18-02 .because it makes since. This high quality attractive Multi family development will raise property values in this area . I would live here. It looks like it could be in Vail Co and has the potential to be near Grapevine parks and trails that exist south of 360. Lets do it! Coming from 183 or Arlington on 360 this is the front door to Grapevine . These modern and progressive buildings leave an impression of quality and high standards that Grapevine has become noted for. I am for this project and hope you are too. Thanks for voting yes on zoning request #CU 18-02 Sinc y To Reid 817 416 8474 FEB 19 2018 I U UNABLE TO VERIFY ANY PROPERTY OWNERSHIP ERRY G CASTLEBERRY 1801 SHENANDOAH DRIVE EULESS, TX 76035 January 24, 2018 City of Grapevin- 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 Attention: Grapevine Planning and Zoning Commission Reference Zoning Request #CU18-02 Gentlemen: Av family has owned property in Grapevine for over 50 years. We are thrilled that Greystar Development has applied for a zoning request to build a development along highway 360. 1 have seen renderings of the project and it promises to be one of the finest developments in North Texas. It would add to the appearance of this area of Grapevine and I feel it could also increase the value of my property. I would urge Grapevine to approve this project for Greystar Development. Thank you. Sincerely, NIP ^ FEB 1 9208 UNABLE TO VERIFY ANY PROPERTY OWNERSHIP KAY CASTLEBERRY 1801 SHENANDOAH DRIVE EULESS, TX 76039 January 24, 2018 City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 Attention: City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission Reference Zoning Request #CU18-02 Ladies and Gentlemen: As a property owner in the vicinity of the zoning request listed above. I would like to express my encouragement for the city to approve this request by Greystar Development with a development called The Preserve. My family has owned our Grapevine property since 1973. All of the development around our property in the past few years has been residential. I sincerely feel that Greystar's development would enhance the value of my property and would also be a favorable look for the area along Highway 360 in Grapevine. Your approval of this project would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, FBv 9 2n18 Kay Castleberry UNABLE TO VERIFY ANY PROPERTY OWNERSHIP January 24, 2018 (City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Street tGrapevine, TX U5051 bear Planning and Zoning and Council: I'm writing you in support of the I''Aulti-family Project #CU 18-20, which I ibelieve will enhance the value of my property in tl°ie area. Since Highway 1360 has been built, I think the are=a is a good hou!iing area rather ikhan an ,area for commercial building. I have seen renderings of the development plans ,as well as drawings of the buildings themsrrlves. I think they are of the first quality and will be an outstanding feature of the neigh tiiorhood. Please vote in favor of this project, which I believe; will benefit the City of Grapevine. Sincerely, (Martha Wells 3831 Turtle Creek Blvd. # 1OB (Dallas, TX 75211) 214-522-1300 FEB 19 2018 UNABLE TO VERIFY ANY PROPERTY OWNERSHIP 2-12-2018 Grapevine City Council or Planning and Zoning RE: #CU18-02. To whom it may concern, You have my full my full support in favor of approval of zoning request #CU18-02. From my research Greystar is known as one of the biggest and best quality builders in the country. This stretch along 360 is better suited for housing areas rather than commercial or industrial use. Like you, I have studied the development plans and building elevations. There is no denying it will be a nice addition to the city of Grapevine. I urge you to support the zoning request #CU18-02 by voting in favor of Greystar's sensible development plan. Not only will It will bring quality of life improvements to future residents, but generate new tax revenues to benefit Grapevine and the area business community. I fully support this request and hope you do as well Sincerely Chad Cowley Cell: 817-939-7431 L4 111 i. FEB I_r�rr UNABLE TO VERIFYANY PROPERTY OWNERSHIP Carrie (Young) French 4520 Hickory Meadows Lane Keller, Texas 76244 Grapevine City Council Re: Zoning Request # CU 18-02 February 6, 2018 I have been a resident of the Grapevine area for over 40 years. I want to express my suppo i for your allowing the multi -family project # CU 18-02 to proceed with development. am one of the Grandchildren of W.L. Cowley who owned this property and placed it in trust for myself, my brother and sister, and our cousins. We know it was his wish to have the property developed and we fully support that happening. This location on Highway 360 is perfectly suited for residential housing and what is proposed here is a continuation of what has been going on there for the past 10 to 15 years. Our understanding is that the developer, Greystar, is one of the biggest and best quality builders in the country. The proposed development, as shown in the attached pictures, would be a useful and pleasing addition to the area. Properties of this type are in great demand at present. I, for one, would fully support providing the opportunity for the people who would live there to be a part of our community and support our local businesses. I know, I have been one. In addition, these folks would be potential future buyers for housing, thus contributing to keeping the property values high. This benefits us all. Please vote YES in favor of this project and help keep the momentum going. 1 am hopeful, as is my extended family in the area, of your support. Sincerely, Carrie (Young) French FEB 19 2018 I. UNABLE TO VERIFY ANY PROPERTY OWNERSHIP WI ENS REAL ESTATE City of Grapevine 200 S. Main St. Grapevine, TX 76051 Dear Grapevine P&Z/Council: P.O. Box 1156 Midlothian, TX 76065 (972) 816-2008 February 6, 2018 I personally wanted to voice my support of the Greystar development "The Preserve". I have reviewed their proposed site plan and development features and feel strongly that it will benefit the area along SH 360. This is a quality development and it will draw quality tenants to this area. I've represented office/commercial properties in this region of the DFW Metroplex for the past 15 years and one of the most common challenge I face is companies finding quality rental housing for their employees. Most of my office clients are tied into the DFW Airport business and they need high quality apartment/condo units for their employees. This project should provide what is needed in the market. I really like the possibilities of how this development will enhance your parks/trail system. With the adjoining creek/flood plain areas, it appears to be a great way to utilize this area for a much needed connection to your existing trail system which benefits thousands of area citizens including pets. Thank you for all you do for the community! Serving on council and P&Z is usually a "thankless" job! I appreciate your time and sacrifice. Sincerely; Kim A Wiens FEB 19 2018 UNABLE TO VERIFY ANY PROPERTY OWNERSHIP CC Item # 3 Al .29 �, 3 p PZ Item # 3 4 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION! FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER \� SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 2018 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Z18-01, CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION CU18-02, AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD18-01. THE PRESERVE �_, Grapevine i Lake I 1) Ove Rano: APPLICANT: Greystar GP II, LLC PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: The subject property is addressed as 101 East Glade Road and is proposed to be platted Lot 1, Block A, Glade/360 Addition. The subject property comprises 20.4 acres and has approximately 367 feet of frontage along Glade Road and 1,240 feet of frontage along the northbound State Highway 360 service road. REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE, CONDITIONAL USE, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a zone change to rezone 14.34 acres from "LI" Light Industrial District and 6.07 acres from "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District to "R -MF" Multi -Family District for the development of a 399 unit multi -family project. The applicant is also seeking a conditional use permit to exceed the height regulations, vary from the parking requirements, and allow for a reduction in the front yard setback relative to the flexible design standards in the "R -MF" Multi -Family District. A planned development overlay is also being requested to deviate from but not be limited to the building separation requirements in the "R -MF" Multi -Family district. It is the applicant's intent to develop a 399 unit, gated, multi -family complex on approximately 20 acres beginning at the southwest corner of Glade Road and State 0:/ZCU/Z18-01.4; CU18-02.4; PD18-01.4 1 February 14, 2018 (2:47PM) Highway 360 and continuing northward approximately 1,200 feet along the State Highway 360 service road. This project, consisting of 399 units (19.6 dwelling units/acre) will have two primary points of access—one at the easternmost edge of the property along Glade Road and a second point of access near the northernmost boundary of the site along the northbound State Highway 360 service road. This development will consist of 256, one bedroom units ranging from 705-1,020 net square feet in size; 102, two bedroom units ranging from 1,092-1,268 net square feet in size; and 20, three bedroom units 1,393 net square feet in size. Also as part of this project the applicant intends to develop 21 brownstone -style apartments that are three -stories in height and resemble a product similar to an attached townhome with attached garages and guest parking; these brownstone apartments will range from 1,310-1,747 square feet in size. The flexible design standards within the conditional use section of the "R -MF" Multi -Family District, allow through the conditional use process, consideration of height in excess of the two-story, 35 feet maximum as stated in the district, as well as a reduction in the required parking and reduction of the front yard setback. All of the structures in this project other than the clubhouse will be three stories and 39 feet in height. Total required parking for this project is 798 spaces; the applicant has conducted a parking study which recommends a ratio of 1.60 spaces/unit (639 total units). The applicant is providing 685 spaces in the form of 347 surface spaces, 100 carport spaces, 140 garages spaces, and 90 tandem spaces (behind garages). An additional eight spaces have been provided for people who wish to walk the on-site trail that do not live on the property. Relative to the reduced front yard setback, although the buildings are set back well beyond the minimum 40 foot requirement, the applicant has added driveway access and public parking along this portion of the frontage along East Glade Road. The "R -MF" Multi -Family District regulations require a minimum building separation of 50 feet for structures that are arranged face-to-face or back-to-back. The applicant is seeking a planned development overlay to slightly reduce this separation to 39 feet between buildings 4 and 8 and a separation of 46 feet between buildings 3 and 9 in order to provide a more efficient arrangement of the structures on the site relative to the existing topography. Two monument signs are proposed, one located near the Glade/State Highway 360 intersection and the other near the entrance to the property from State Highway 360. Both signs are 6' in height, 60 square feet in size. Usable recreational open space provided by the applicant in the form of hiking trails, nature preserve areas, a dog park, and pool area in in excess of 200,000 square feet - 99,750 square feet is required. Contained in your packet, along with the site specific exhibits, is an affidavit of compliance signed and sealed by the project architect stating the project is in compliance with the recently adopted Design Standards Manual for Multi -Family and Vertical Mixed Use Development. Specifically, this project is located within District 1, State Highway 0:/ZCU/Z18-01.4; CU18-02.4; PD18-01.4 2 February 15, 2018 (8:46AM) 360/Airport District. This district has ten, district specific standards which the affidavit and accompanying checklist demonstrate compliance along with the general standards required of all districts. Along with the affidavit and checklist is a set of exhibits that graphically demonstrate compliance with specific elements of the design standards. PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District and "LI" Light Industrial District and is undeveloped. HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject property was zoned 1-2" Heavy Industrial District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. The property to the north was zoned "R-1" Single Family District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. At a February 3, 1997 meeting the Council approved a zone change (Z97-20) and a conditional use permit (CU97-73) on the subject site rezoning approximately 14.34 acres from "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District to "LI" for outside storage in conjunction with an office/warehouse development that never materialized. At the September 15, 2015 meeting the Council considered and denied a zoning change and a conditional use permit to rezone approximately 68 acres from "LI" Light Industrial District and "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District to "R -MF" Multi -Family District for a two-phase multi -family project on the subject site comprised of 714 total units. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District and D/FW International Airport—vacant undeveloped property and vacant undeveloped airport property SOUTH: City of Euless and D/FW International Airport EAST: D/FW International Airport—vacant undeveloped airport property WEST: State Highway 360 right-of-way AIRPORT IMPACT: A portion of the subject tract is not located within any of the noise zones as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map and an approximate equal portion of the tract is located within "Zone A" Zone of Minimal Effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" Map. Few activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in "Zone A" except for sound sensitive activities such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The applicant's proposal is an appropriate use in this noise zone. 0:/ZCU/Z18-01.4; CU18-02.4; PD18-01.4 3 February 15, 2018 (8:46AM) MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Commercial/Mixed Use land use. The applicant's proposal is not in compliance with the Master Plan. THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION: The Thoroughfare Plan does not designate this portion of Glade Road east of State Highway as a thoroughfare. /rs 0:/ZCU/Z18-01.4; CU18-02.4; PD18-01.4 4 February 15, 2018 (8:46AM) March 5, 2018 Andrew Ord Greystar GP II, LLC 600 E Las Colinas Blvd Irving, TX 75039 RE: GRAPEVINE FILE #Z18-01, CU18-02, PD18-01 To Whom It May Concern, This letter is to verify that your request for property located at 101 East Glade Road and platted as Lot 1, Block A, Glade/360 to rezone 14.34 acres from "LI" Light Industrial District and 6.07 acres from "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District to "R -MF" Multi -Family District for the development of a 399 unit multi -family project, a conditional use permit to exceed the height regulations, vary from the parking requirements, and allow for a reduction in the front yard setback relative to the flexible design standards in the "R -MF" Multi -Family District and a planned development overlay is also being requested to deviate from but not be limited to the building separation requirements in the "R -MF" Multifamily district was approved by the City Council on February 20, 2018. A copy of the approved site plan and ordinances are enclosed. On February 20, 2018, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the City Council approve the request as stated above. Any changes to a site plan approved with a conditional use or a special use (no matter how minor or major) can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. No Conditional Use Permit shall be valid for a period longer than one (1) year from the date on which the City Council grants the Conditional Use, unless within such one (1) year period: (1) a Building Permit is obtained and the erection or alteration of a structure is started, or (2) an Occupancy Permit is obtained and a use commenced. The City Council may grant one additional extension not exceeding one (1) year, upon written application, without notice or hearing. No additional extension shall be granted without complying with the notice and hearing requirements for an initial application for a Conditional Use Permit. Please do not hesitate to contact us if we may be of further assistance (817)410-3155. Sincerely, Susan Batte Planning Technician DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT The City of Grapevine - P.O. Box 95104 - Grapevine, Texas 76099 - (8 17) 410-3154 Fax (817) 410-3018 - www.grapevinetexas.gov Mail Processing Center Federal Aviation Administration Southwest Regional Office Obstruction Evaluation Group 10101 Hillwood Parkway Fort Worth, TX 76177 Issued Date: 01/18/2017 Laird Sparks Greystar 600 E. Las Colinas Blvd Suite 2100 Irving, TX 75039 ** Extension ** Aeronautical Study No. 2015 -ASW -4410 -OE A Determination was issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) concerning: Structure: Building Building 1 Location: Grapevine, TX Latitude: 32-52-54.00N NAD 83 Longitude: 97-04-27.00 W Heights: 563 feet site elevation (SE) 41 feet above ground level (AGL) 604 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) In response to your request for an extension of the effective period of the determination, the FAA has reviewed the aeronautical study in light of current aeronautical operations in the area of the structure and finds that no significant aeronautical changes have occurred which would alter the determination issued for this structure. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the effective period of the determination issued under the above cited aeronautical study number is hereby extended and will expire on 07/18/2018 unless otherwise extended, revised, or terminated by this office. You must adhere to all conditions identified in the original determination. This extension issued in accordance with 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and, if applicable, Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerns the effect of the structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. If we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at (817) 222-5933. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2015 -ASW -4410 -OE. Signature Control No: 254028434-317671444 Andrew Hollie Specialist Page 1 of 4 (EXT) SILVER TREE PARTNERS January 31, 2018 City of Grapevine 200 S Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 Mayor, Members of City Council, and P&Z Commissioners, The Exhibit attached to this letter outlines our proposal as to the Extension, Construction, and Regional Connectivity of the Grapevine Trail System. Trail Portion A - Will be installed simultaneously with The Preserve development, which will commence approximately 90 days after Council approval. Trail Portion B - Will be installed upon Council approval and development on that tract of land. Trail Portion C - Will be installed upon Council approval of development, which request is coming before the City within the next 2-3 months. Trail Portion D — This Bear Creek Park Trail extension has full support of the Grapevine Parks and Recreation Department. The landowners of Tracts A and B agree to provide $200,000 and the landowner of Tract C agrees to provide $50,000 to the City of Grapevine for construction of this portion of the Trail. Hope the details above help explain the Exhibit attached to this letter. As always, we are happy to answer any questions you may have concerning this proposal. Sincerely, c' Paul A. Gardner Terry Castleberry Landowner Tracts A and B Landowner Tract C 17101 Preston Road Suite ioo Dallas, Texas 75248 tel (972) 669-9955 fax (972) 669-9977 www. silvertreepartners. com Tof Proposed Grapevine Trail Extension Exhibit liar Creak Park Trail - I W. Glade Rd. I 41) Public Trail Addition 0 Kimley»>Horn To: Andrew Ord Greystar From: Scot Johnson P.E., PTOE Jake Halter, EIT Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Registered Firm F-928 �4P�EOF i* y. • 'q� *'ai s j ................................ ... * .� SCOT A. JOHNSON / /.............. ....... o / ,�9 2 615 Date: February 12, 2018 t SS ' �1 ($ Subject: The Preserve ON J�' 0�'� Parking Demands in Comparable Multifamily Developments Introduction Greystar Residential is proposing to build The Preserve, a high-end multifamily development on the east side of State Highway 360 in Grapevine, Texas. This memorandum documents the two lines of inquiry which were investigated to support the proposed 1.60 spaces per unit parking rate: national research and local observations of parking occupancy at comparable sites. Careful sizing of parking areas to specific uses will prevent the waste of space and building materials that is caused by providing parking that is rarely if ever used. Excessive parking also has negative impacts on often -hidden issues like walkable design, storm water runoff, and urban heat island effects. Parking Research ITE publishes Parking Generation, a compendium of parking demand research at sites across the country. ITE provides more information on each base parking demand rate than do most other sources, although the number of observations is still limited. The ITE data do not contain any significant amount of mixed-use or TOD-influenced observations, but do track suburban and urban differences. Table 1 shows the average rates for some multifamily uses which are similar to the proposed site. Table 1 — ITE Parkina Generation Observed Demand Use —ITE Classification Unit Average Parking Demand Low/Mid-Rise Apartment Suburban, Weekday Unit 1.23 Low/Mid-Rise Apartment Unit 1.20 Urban, Weekday Low/Mid-Rise Apartment Unit 1.03 Urban, Saturday Kimley»>Horn Local Observations Page 2 To make empirical observations of actual parking usage, comparable multifamily sites were found in the City of Grapevine. Observations were accomplished at eight sites, as some potential sites could not be accessed for observations. The average occupancy of the sites was 95%, or typical for the market average. Parking occupancy observations were made overnight, at 10 PM or later. The exact number of occupied parking spaces and enclosed garages were counted during the observations. It should be noted that each enclosed garage is treated as an occupied parking space for the purposes of the occupancy study. Since some of the garage spaces are empty or used as storage, this means that the observed parking demand is artificially high. Many of the sites also had some trailers, boats, and other vehicle -related objects located in parking spaces, and these were counted as occupied spaces as well. Since all of the sites had ample unused parking spaces, these objects did not impede the normal parking operation of the sites. Attached to the end of this report is a parking data table listing the results of the data collection. The following tables show the details of each site and the observations: Table 2 - Weekday Parking Demand at 6 Local Sites (7 Observations) Table 3 - Saturday Parking Demand at 7 Local Sites Observed Parking Demand Observed Observed Dwelling Study Site Bedrooms (Including Enclosed Garages) Demand Demand Units Overnight Per Unit Per Bedroom Royal St. Moritz 336 528 467 1.39 0.88 Terrawood 291 401 400 1.37 1.00 Twenty -Four 99 348 486 452 1.30 0.93 Marquis at Silver Oaks 480 732 703 1.46 0.96 Montelena (Tuesday 1/23) 256 400 323 1.26 0.81 Montelena (Wednesday 1/24) 256 400 330 1.29 0.83 Wildwood Creek 1 344 1 524 1 344 1.00 1 0.66 Weekday 6 -Site Totals: 2311 1 3471 3019 1.31 0.87 Weekday 6 -Site Averages:1 330 1 496 1 431 Table 3 - Saturday Parking Demand at 7 Local Sites lr'tey=fioln tom Observed Parking Demand Observed Observed Dwelling Study Site Bedrooms (Including Enclosed Garages) Demand Demand Units Overnight Per Unit Per Bedroom Royal St. Moritz 336 528 448 1.33 0.85 Cross Creek 392 544 444 1.13 0.82 Terrawood 291 401 397 1.36 0.99 Twenty -Four 99 348 486 443 1.27 0.91 Marquis at Silver Oaks 480 732 735 1.53 1.00 Montelena 256 400 290 1.13 0.73 Wildwood Creek 1 344 1 524 331 1 0.96 1 0.63 Saturday 7 -Site Totals: 2447 3615 3068 1.26 0.85 Saturday 7 -Site Averages:1 350 516 441 lr'tey=fioln tom Kimley>>> Horn Page 3 The weekday observed parking demand including garages across the six sites averaged 1.31 vehicles per unit with a range of 1.00 to 1.46 spaces per unit. The average number of vehicles per bedroom was calculated to be 0.87, ranging from 0.66 to 1.00. The Saturday observed parking demand including garages across the six sites averaged 1.26 vehicles per unit with a low observation of 0.96 and a high of 1.36. The Saturday average demand was observed to be 0.85 vehicles per bedroom, varying from 0.63 to 1.00. Four of the study sites included garages on the property. Residents often park in the "driveway" of their garages, which leads to double counting since the garage is counted as occupied, and the vehicle is counted again as being on the site. Since the "driveways" do not count as parking spaces, this results in an artificially high ratio of parked vehicle to units or bedrooms. Even with this assumption that enclosed garages skew the occupancy of the sites to be higher than reality, the highest observed parking rate was 1.53 vehicles per unit and 1.00 vehicles per bedroom, both of which are below the 1.60 spaces per unit and 1.13 spaces per bedroom that are proposed for the Preserve. Summary Observations of comparable local and suburban sites show that the effective parking demand of 1.31 occupied spaces per unit is slightly higher than ITE averages. This observed number is known to be somewhat high due to the assumption of garage spaces being occupied. A comparison of the national ITE rates, observed parking rates, and provided parking supply can be found in the summary table below: Table 4 — Summary Table The proposed supply of 1.60 spaces per unit for the Preserve will provide the right balance of available parking while preserving the nature oriented design of the site. END Attached: Parking Count Data Summary Table ITE Average Observed Preserve Suburban, Urban, Urban, Weekday Saturday Proposed Weekday Weekday Weekend Parking Demand per Unit 1.23 1.20 1.03 1.31 1.26 1.60 Parking Demand per Bedroom - - - 0.87 0.85 1.13 The proposed supply of 1.60 spaces per unit for the Preserve will provide the right balance of available parking while preserving the nature oriented design of the site. END Attached: Parking Count Data Summary Table Observed Observed Tuesday Wednesday Saturday Apartment Complex No. of Dwelling Units Parking Demand Parking Demand 1/23/2018 1/24/2018 1/27/2018 Vehicles+ Vehicles+ Vehicles+ per Dwelling Unit per Bedroom Garages Counted Garages Counted Gara es Counted 58 Efficiency 208 One Bedroom Colonial Village 117 Two Bedroom 251 286 253 67 Three Bedroom 0.64 0.41 450 Total D.U. Outlier - Count not Outlier - Count not Outlier - Count not 701 Total Bedrooms 2300 Grayson Drive included included included N/A Efficiency N/A One Bedroom Grayson Square N/A Two Bedroom 332 361 326 N/A Three Bedroom N/A N/A N/A Total D.U. No Room Data - Data No Room Data - Data No Room Data - Data N/A Total Bedrooms 2100 Grayson Drive not included not included not included 0 Efficiency 152 One Bedroom Royal St. Moritz 176 Two Bedroom N/A 8 Three Bedroom 1.39 0.88 467 448 336 Total D.U. Unable to enter 528 Total Bedrooms 2050 Grayson Drive complex Gate 0 Efficiency 240 One Bedroom Cross Creek 152 Two Bedroom N/A N/A 0 Three Bedroom 1.13 0.82 444 392 Total D.U. Could not count North Could not count North 544 Total Bedrooms 2701 Grapevine Mills Blvd N half of property - Gated half of property - Gated 0 Efficiency 193 One Bedroom Terrawood 86 Two Bedroom N/A 12 Three Bedroom 1.37 1.00 400 397 291 Total D.U. Unable to enter 401 Total Bedrooms 3225 Grapevine Mills Blvd N complex Gate 0 Efficiency 222 One Bedroom Twenty-Four 99 114 Two Bedroom N/A 12 Three Bedroom 1.30 0.93 452 443 348 Total D.U. Unable to enter 486 Total Bedrooms 3601 Grapevine Mills Parkway complex Gate 0 Efficiency 264 One Bedroom Marquis at Silver Oaks 180 Two Bedroom N/A 36 Three Bedroom 1.53 1.00 703 735 480 Total D.U. Unable to enter 732 Total Bedrooms 3701 Grapevine Mills Parkway complex Gate 0 Efficiency 128 One Bedroom Montelena 112 Two Bedroom 16 Three Bedroom 1.29 0.83 323 330 290 256 Total D.U. 501 Turner Road 400 Total Bedrooms 0 Efficiency 188 One Bedroom Wildwood Creek 132 Two Bedroom N/A 24 Three Bedroom 0.81 0.53 277 259 344 Total D.U. Unable to enter 524 Total Bedrooms 820 E Dove Loop Road complex Gate SILVER TREE PARTNERS January 2, 2018 City of Grapevine 200 S Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 Mayor, Members of City Council, and P&Z Commissioners, Silver Tree Partners and Greystar respectfully request your approval of 20 acres to be rezoned for The Preserve, a MF Class A Development comprising of Brownstones, Resort Flats, and Lodge Flats. The current zoning of Industrial and PCD are impractical because of size, shape and topography. Yet, these features work extremely well with our proposed development. The Preserve meets Grapevine's new MF Design Guidelines and mirrors a Lodge Style Development with its exterior facades, curvature streets and plentiful landscaping. Amenities include a mile walking trail, 24-hour fitness center, large dog park facility, business center with computers, conference room with audio/visual capability, and resort style pool with cabanas. There is no site better suited for this type of development within the City of Grapevine. By incorporating the natural topography of the property, this development avoids any resemblance to cookie -cutter developments of the past. Buffered by SH360 to the west and over 350 acres of DFW Airport land east and south, it truly is surrounded by a preserve. We have worked with your Planning and Parks Departments, ArchiTexas and many other engineers and consultants for over three years to ensure the Preserve fulfills the needs of the residents while still protecting Grapevine's high quality standards. We believe with your approval the Preserve will be a community the City of Grapevine uses as a template for future multifamily housing. Sincerely, Paul Gardner, iewPOrd, T M T 0 Silver Tree Partners Greystarr, 11h u Z 17101 Preston Road Suite too Dallas, Texas 75248 tel (972) 669-9955 fax (972) 669-9977 www.silvertreepartners.com GREYsTAR (9) January 9, 2018 Development Services — Planning Division 200 S. Main St Grapevine, Texas 76051 PNT-D 1 RE: "The Preserve" Planned Development Overlay Application Letter. To whom it may concern: "The Preserve" is a 399 unit 3 -story apartment community, comprised of resort and lodge -style architecturally themed buildings. Most of the buildings have "tuck -under" internal garages and the remainder are surfaced parked with carports. The Preserve mirrors a lodge -style development with its exterior facades, curvilinear designed streets and plentiful landscaping which have all been designed to adhere to the newly approved "Design Standards Manual for Multifamily and Vertical Mixed-use Development" (The Guidelines). Exterior amenities that complement the natural landscape include an extensive hike and bike trail/sidewalk with fitness stations intermixed, outdoor kitchen/BBQ pavilions, dog park and dog wash facility and resort style pool, to name a few. Interior amenities include, but are not limited to, 24-hour fitness facility, 24 hr. digital package concierge, business center with computers and conferencing and spacious club and gaming room. As a part of the requested Planned Development Overlay Application process, we are requesting that the "face to face" distance between 3 sets of buildings be less than 50'. As mentioned above, our site plan is required to have a "non -orthogonal" design which caters to a more curvilinear site plan design of winding roads and asymmetric building orientation. For this reason, it has forced our buildings into diagonal configurations that satisfy this requirement but unfortunately makes it extremely difficult to comply with the 50' rule. There are essentially 3 places where the buildings are less than 50' — one is 46.7' (Bldgs. 3 & 9), the 2"d is 32.5' (Bldg. 2 and single -story Clubhouse) and the 3rd instance shows a min. separation of 39' (Bldgs. 4 & 8) but an average of closer to 44'. We feel that the "non -orthogonal" relationship of the building layout is an important design principle that adds value to the enjoyment of the development and is more important than the buildings proximity to one another in these minor cases. Thank you, GREYS Wdd'li a Dela acompany By: Name:2Ek� bR� Title: VICE' ptzo65IC)el- z 19487790v.2 Via Electronic Mail Ronsggrapevinetexas.gov Mr. Ron Stombaugh 200 South Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 RE: Zoning Change Application for Property at the northeast corner of Glade Road and SH 121, Applicant: Greystar GP II, LLC Dear Ron; Thank you for your assistance with our zoning application referenced above. Pursuant to your previous conversations with Greystar, we are forwarding this letter to confirm the status of the proposed development's compliance with the City's Design Standards. Accompanying this letter is our completed District -Specific Design Standards checklist. As you will see from reviewing the accompanying checklist, we are pleased to confirm that we are either in virtually total compliance with the Design Standards, in almost all cases to the letter, or, in a few instances, in compliance with the spirit of the Design Standards. Of course, we are at the beginning of the zoning and entitlement phase, and as is normal during any development process, allowances must be made for reasonable modifications as the design is further developed in detail. In any such event, it is our intention to remain in compliance with the spirit and intent of the Design Standards at all times. Thank you very much for your consideration of the accompanying checklist. We look forward to continuing our dialogue with City Staff as we go through this process., Sinc.ey6y yours �! 01 Donald 44eeks, AIA Meeks + Partners, Architect for Greystar CC: Andrew Ord 19846382x.2 District -Specific Design Standards 1. Architectural Accommodations of Grade Change Complies: Does the plan retain grade to support the building plate including terraces, pati- Yes No In Spirit os, decks and any accessory buildings adjoined to the primary structure? Comments: Will Comply. We've identified a number of opportunities to accomplish this. In specific, there are 5 prominent locations where we have designed in turn -down footings. These are high impact locations that will be enjoyed esthetically and functionally by residents and their visitors. Additionally, in the same spirit above, it is currently proposed (pending final engineering allowances) that most of the buildings will have 2' to 4' breaks (step-downs) in the foundations that allow the buildings to step-down with the declining grade which minimizes retaining wall usage and maximizes the architecture and its' ability to accommodate grade change. 2. Pedestrian Connection Beyond The Project And District Complies: Does the plan provide pedestrian connections from units within the project to Yes No In Spirit existing trails, sidewalks or other public and private walkways. Does the plan provide pedestrian connections to places within the development X that abut pedestrian walkways that the City's approved plans identify for the future? Comments: We Comply. Accommodations have been made to provide for future connection points (both trail, sidewalks and streets) to the adjacent property to the north. Specifically, we have established an 8' wide "boardwalk" that runs along the western frontage of the project defined as the "borrowed landscape" (Parkway) that will tie into future developments to the north. Additionally, we will be providing a 10' wide public hike/bike trail that will extend northward and tie into future proposed developments to the north. Lastly, our plan shows an easement off the roundabout feature that will accommodate future vehicular tie-ins/connections to the adjacent property as well. 3. Preserve and/or Restore The Natural Characteristic Of The District Complies: Does the plan include landscape development that continues the natural charac- Yes No In Spirit teristics of the projects surroundings? Comments: �/�J Will Comply. Our landscape plan includes natural drifts and groupings/groves of trees that will be restorative to the site and will extend the natural mosaic of the adjacent undeveloped and open space areas into the site. Tree species used will be natural to the site, ones that accentuate the resort/lodge theme (e.g. Columnar Pines) and from the City's approved plant material list. 4. Perpetuate Residentially Derived Styling And Forms Does the plan use the following architectural components? . Pitched roof (gable or hip) • Organized roof massing where a dominant roof has subordinate roofs that extend form it. • 12 inch roof overhang • Roofed porches and balconies . No more than 45 horizontal feet of continuous wall without a horizon- tal offset of at least 4 feet . Dormers that break the cornice . Windows that align both horizontally and vertically • Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmet- rically within the form . Three stories maximum. These three stories may be over a parking podium. • Openings are treated with a jamb and/or head surround . The Void -to -Solid relationship for window -in -wall elements is less than 50% Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. `a Complies: Yes No In Spirit El 5. Provide Buffer Adjacent To Residentially Adverse Conditions Complies: Does the plan provide a buffer between residential land use and adjacent envi- Yes No In Spirit ronmental conditions (e.g. loud sound) that would negatively impact the livabili- ty of the residential land? Comments: To the West, our development will be set away from Hwy 360 by a generously landscaped ("borrowed landscape") public and private street scape - roughly 25' to 60' in width off property line. Additionally, the development will also slope down and away from the 360 frontage rd. towards Bear Creek - a fall of 30 - 60' (avg. 46') depending on the cross section you take. Lastly, the buildings will be equipped with acoustically rated and engineered windows to dampen any ambient sounds, within acceptable levels recommended by our acoustical engineer, from hwy 360 or the Airport. [To the East, our development is buffered from the airport by almost a mile of open space, '/z mile of flood plan (included in the open space), a creek, and towering trees that seclude it from sight as the development is nestled down closer towards Bear Creek (a vertical drop of 76' from the airport to Bear Creek). [Our development will effectively "re -knit" the natural landscape and tree canopy that once existed on the site. The site itself is currently devoid of lots of trees compared to the surrounding parcels so we will be restoring or "re -knitting" that natural landscape into our development. o 6. Provide A Land Use And Scale Transition Between Multifamily/Vertical Complies: Mixed -Use Development And Abutting Single Family Development. Yes No In Spirit If the plan abuts an area of single-family residential land use, does it provide a "residential transition"? A residential transition must include two components: . Height Transition: For any element with a height above 35ft, this ele- ment can't exceed one foot above 35ft in height for every lft of setback beyond 15ft. For example, you may have 36ft at 16ft setback, 37ft at 17ft and so on. Scale Transition: Any element located within 20ft of a property line abutting a single-family land use must not have an elevation face area more than 1200 sq. ft. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 7. Provide Development That Maximizes Uses Appropriate To The Value Of The Complies: Setting And/Or Characteristic Of The Context. Yes No In Spirit If the surrounding street -level use is NOT predominately residential, does the 1X7 F plan provide—or is the structure such that it could be leased to provide—first- floor or street -level land uses that are consistent with the context? If the plan has a distinct locational opportunity (such as being close to logistic, movement or transit hubs), does it provide—or is the structure such that is could be leased to provide—first-floor or street -level land uses that are consistent with this context? If the answer to either question is YES, does the plan provide—or could be rent- ed to provide—these land uses for at least 70% of the street -fronting first -floor space? Comments: We perceive the value of the setting, characteristic of the context, and the distinct locational opportunity to be Nature and how we are leveraging our relationship with that context. Our development maximizes this setting by "re -knitting" the natural landscape into our site design, introducing the first phase of a public hike/bike trail and trail -head so people - both our residents and the Grapevine community at large - can enjoy the environment, and delivering the resort/lodge derived style architecture to compliment and flow with the natural setting. 8. Perpetuate Commercially Derived Styling And Forms Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms that include the following elements: • A predominately flat roof concealed by a raised parapet of at least 12in in height • All openings are vertically and horizontally aligned • Balconies are projected • Steel construction is exposed . The first floor plate is at least 15ft high at the street level . Void -to -solid relationships are 50% or greater void Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. v Complies: Yes No In Spirit :71 F F 9. Preserve And Extend Thematic Streetscapes Complies: Does the plan continue the established streetscape of its surrounding District? Yes No In Spirit This includes: El F 17 • Matching light fixtures and spacing of light fixtures • Matching tree species, scale, placement and spacing . Matching paving material and paving pattern • Continuation of defined inset areas for on -street parking Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 10. Maintain Compatibility With District Thematic Sign Features. Does the plan Complies: provide signage that is compatible with signage in the surrounding District? This Yes No In Spirit includes: . Maintaining the relationship of signage to street -fronting building planes . Marinating the general appearance of the District's signage . Maintaining sign illumination consistent with the District and its nightscape . Use of sign types consistent with the District and the context. This in- cludes commercial tenant signs, premise signs and project signs. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 11. Provide Responsive Interface To Open Space And Open Space Amenities. Does the plan address open space in ways that extend the open space into the project? This includes: . Elimination of parking aprons in the foreground between the structure and the open space • Extension of landscape species and patterns characteristic of the open space into the project . Orientation of buildings to that building placement breaks free from the normal orthogonal relation to street and bears relationship to features of the larger landscape . Extension of trails into the project • Use of fence design that does not visually disrupt the continuous ground plane Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 17 F7 I I 12. Resort/Lodge/Prairie Styling And Forms. Does the plan use architectural Complies: styles derived from resort/lodge/prairie architectural precedents? These include: Yes No X . Flat pitched gable or hipped rooves with long and un -interrupted ridges and cornices . Large roof overhangs with structural bracing such as brackets, angled braces, canted braced and exposed rafters • Tapered columns that are full masonry or have masonry bases . Use of flat roofs to accent pitched roofs . Variable plate heights . Vertical and Horizontal alignment of openings . Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmet- rically within the form . Use of decks and terraces . Architecturally enclosed balconies . Projected window jambs and/or headers . Structural details derived from timber construction detailing • Use of siding and masonry • Upper story insets within, or projections over, a lower story base Comments: EM] We Comply. A few examples of the highlighted features that we designed to in order to characterize the style are... * Large Roof Overhangs with exposed rafters * Structural Bracing * Timber Frame Accents * Tapered Stone Columns *Architecturally Enclosed Balconies * Metal Awnings * 80% Stone In Spirit 17 All these architectural features help the community to meld into the natural setting and make it feel a part of the environment that is its' home. 13. Curvilinear Organization Of The Development Plan Complies: Does the plan have a curvilinear organization? This includes: Yes No In Spirit • Gracefully meandering streets and drives with bends in the street and `X E drive alignment that is responsive to grade • Merging street intersections where operations permit . Organically -shaped parking areas . Building orientations that are not tied to uniform street frontage . Drifted groupings of trees in lieu of straight rows with uniform spacing Comments: We comply. We conform to all 5 bulleted points above. The site plan is non -orthogonal in nature, is not regimental in design and is curvilinear in its' appeal. Our site streets and parking meander in a non -orthogonal arrangement providing aesthetically pleasing visual interest for both the community and our residents. 14. Conceal Visibility Of Service And Parking Functions Complies: Does the plan place service and parking functions so that such functions are Yes No In Spirit NOT in the foreground yard space between any arterial or primary street and r1_1 7 the buildings that are facing that street? Ix Comments: Yes. We comply. The public realm is buffered by a large "borrowed landscape" (Parkway) setback (25'-60') of tree groves, meandering 8' wide sidewalk, resort/lodge styled buildings and a thoughtful dog park. Parking and trash functions are strategically situated away and screened from public view by buildings and landscaping. The only parking areas that are visible from the public realm is the public parking area for the hike/bike trail -head and the public leasing parking in front of the club/leasing center - both of which are nicely and sufficiently landscaped. 15. Perpetuate Historic/Indigenous Derived Architectural Styling And Forms. Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms derived from the historic or indigenous character of the District? Such aspects include: . Commercially -scaled first floor with a 15ft plate . For building of three floors or greater, a tripartite architecture . Decorative and embellished front parapet • Street canopy • Portrait orientation of openings and subversion of openings • Continuous vertical corners often expressed as pilasters • Occasional use of roof forms as accent elements on the front elevation • Void -to -Solid ratio with greater void at the street level and greater solid at other levels . Treatment of openings with jamb and/or header surrounds . Use of belt courses to establish horizontal reference for placement of openings . Use of decorative brick bands and details Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 9 Complies: Yes No In Spirit F 7] 16. Use Of Thematic Exterior Material, If Such Material Is Characteristic Of Dis- Complies: trict And Complies With The General Material Standards. Yes No In Spirit If there is a surrounding District context, does the plan continue with the use of 171 = —J the dominant and characteristic material of the surrounding District? If so, is the use of that material in compliance with the General Material Stan- dards of the Building Manual? Dominant use of material means material that comprises at least 70% of the building exterior excluding openings. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 17.Orthogonal/Block Orientation Of The Development Plan. Does the plan have Complies: a block/orthogonal organization? This includes: Yes No In Spirit •Straight streets with right angle intersections 1:111 7 J • Continuous street wall defined by alignment of buildings • Uniform spacing of street trees and street fixtures . Continue the urban blocks which are adjacent to the project Have decorative cross walks or other intersection enhancements Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 10 18. Pedestrian/Residential Activity Connection Between The Public Street And Complies: Living Units Fronting The Street. Yes No In Spirit Does the plan present the public street with an external expression of the resi- I F7 E dential activity? This means that the street level of the residential development is not commercially used or made capable for commercial use. This includes porches, stoops, terraces, patios, fenced front yards and steps up from an ap- proach grade. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 19. Maintain Height And Scale Compatibility With The Height And Scale Char- Complies: acteristic Of District. Yes No In Spirit When height and scale are important attributes of the surrounding District's identity, is the plan compatible with this height and scale? Such compatibility can be achieved through one or both of the following: • Upper -story setbacks that create a building mass at the street consistent with context . Horizontal offsets at the street level which reduce the lower floor pre- sentation of mass when the characteristic block size is exceeded. This creates the image of a block that is further subdivided through built rec- ognition of individual properties as described in the "Bay Modulation" section of the Building Manual. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. R 20. Use Of Bay Modulation Patterns That Are Compatible With Bay Modulation Complies: Of The District. Yes No In Spirit Does the plan create a street frontage that continues the bay modulation of the block? Bay modulation refers to the architectural expression of individual build- ings within the block face. This is important to emulate the traditional block face of a downtown where buildings are normally built lot -line to lot -line in direct juxtaposition. In such downtowns, there is a complex street wall referred to as the "Bay" and the rhyth- mic and varied offset and appearance of that bay is referred to as "Bay Modula- tion" Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 21. Provide An Urbanized Streetscape. Does the plan provide an urbanized streetscape along the primary street frontage that is consistent with the char- acteristic urban street fabric within the District? Key features of an urbanized streetscape include: . The architectural plane fronting the primary street must create a con- tinuous street wall along the primary street frontage. Buildings must establish a "built -to" zone which extends from the primary street front property line and extends into the property a distance of 3ft and at least 75% of the primary street frontage much lie within this zone. NOTE: the location and depth of this zone may be modified upon City approval when the modification results in lateral expansion of a sidewalk space for a sidewalk restaurant or sidewalk retail or in the creation of an arcade along the street. • Street trees used in the streetscape should continue the use of an exist- ing tree species when the larger urban setting contains a thematic tree. If the surrounding urban setting does not have a thematic tree, the plan must choose from a list of approved plants. . Street lights must continue the uniform spacing and placement charac- teristic of the surrounding primary street. When a larger urban setting contains a thematic light or light standard, the plan must use that light standard. When no thematic light exists, the plan must choose a light or light standard appropriate for urban streetscape use. . Decorative paving should continue the characteristic paving material and pattern of the urban context when that context includes a thematic sidewalk treatment. When no thematic treatment exists, the project must use a sidewalk paving material and pattern appropriate for urban streets - cape use. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 13 Complies: Yes No In Spirit E El E 22. Provide A "Borrowed Landscape" For The Primary Street Frontage Complies: Does the plan provide a "borrowed landscape" along the primary street frontage Yes No In Spirit that preserved the general character of the District? This includes: • Elimination of parking aprons or walls between the building and street unless the landscape space abutting the street is greater than 20ft . Creation of an expanded parkway that is varied in dimension with the minimum parkway expansion being 15ft from the street right of way and with variations in width occurring at least every 200ft. Creation of pads for horizontal mixed use qualifies as varied Borrowed Landscape space • Use of a pedestrian trail in lieu of a pedestrian sidewalk. Sidewalks within the borrowed landscape space must be meandering pedestrian ways at least 8ft wide. Comments: We Comply. Our "borrowed landscape" (Parkway) includes a variable width (-25'-60' from property line - not including public ROW add'I width) open space along the street frontage, with pedestrian access, that moves in and out of the frontage area providing pedestrian connectivity from the site to adjacent trails and future connection points. Our security fencing is set back from the street, linking the buildings, at the building level so the frontage area does not give the appearance of a "compound". Around the perimeter and where the opportunities arise, we use the buildings themselves as a security barrier with the security fence connecting each building. This puts our lodge -style building architecture thoughtfully in the foreground while pushing the fence to the background where it belongs. The tree drifts and groves in the frontage area extend the natural mosaic of the adjacent areas into the site along the "borrowed landscape" parkway. 14 23. Promote Horizontal Mixed Use Complies: Yes No In Spirit Does the project create opportunities for stand-alone retail/restaurant pads with- I in the street frontage of the primary street? In no case should the provision of a retail pad consume more than 50% of the multifamily frontage. Where the multifamily frontage is 300ft or less, a retail pad leave -out is not required. This retail pad requirement may be waived upon City Approval but a requirement for variable street definition (#24) still applies Comments: Retail is infeasible for this location for the following reasons... • Site constraints: Due to site topo (the site falls between 30' and 60' towards Bear Creek), visibility is poor. The large areas needed for big -box retail or bulk distribution warehouse (the site's current zoning) would require a cost -prohibitive level of earthwork to clear sufficiently flat pads for the building, parking areas and loading areas. • Access constraints: Access is poor due to limited Glade frontage and "right -in right -out" (one-way) limited access off of 360 frontage. • Demand constraints: There is inadequate residential density as the airport land dominates most of the retail trade area. • Operator constraints: Retail operators have overwhelmingly selected 121 and Glade Road to the west and Highway 114 to the north as viable locations. The site has been zoned industrial for over two decades, but industrial operators have selected other locations around the airport with level topography. 24. Provide Variable Street Definition Within The Block Face Along Primary Complies: Streets Yes No In Spirit Does the plan create a variable street definition through the variable setback of LA_E F multifamily structures fronting the primary street? No more than 50% of the project frontage may adhere to a uniform setback dimension. Horizontal offsets in the development plan set back line must be no less than 10 ft. Comments: We comply and far exceed both the 50% and the 10ft. rule above. In accordance with the natural and organic theme of the design, the building's fronting both Glade Rd. and the 360 Frontage Rd. are canted at differing angles that create a varied presentation of the architecture to the public realm in a way that is non -regimental and non-uniform. Our closest building to the property line along the frontage roads is 25' vs. the 10' minimum above. Our furthest building is roughly 60' from the property line. 15 A* = When closer to topography and golf course A** = When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas in District Specific Stan- 360/Airport Grapevine Grapevine Gaylord/SH Central Tran - dards (A = Applicable) District Mille South Mills North 26 District sit District District District 1 Architectural accommo- A A dation of grade change 2 Pedestrian connection A A A A A beyond project and district 3 Preserve/restore charac- A A teristic natural mosaic 4 Residentially derived A A* styling and forms/ pitched roof 5 Buffer adjacent environ- A mental encroachments 6 Land use/scale transition A A from MF/SF 7 Maximize value capture A A opportunities 8 Commercially derived A Ate* A styling and forms 9 Preserve/perpetuate A thematic streetscape 10 Compatible with district, A A A thematic signage features 11 Responsive interface A A A with open space and amenities 12 Resort/lodge derived A A styling and forms 13 Curvilinear organization A A A A of development plan 14 Conceal visibility of ser- A A A vice/parking functions from arterials/primary roads 15 Historic/indigenous A derived styling/forms 16 Use of thematic exterior A material if characteristic of district and complies with standards A* = When closer to topography and golf course A** = When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas in 17 Orthogonal, block orga- A nization of development plan 18 Pedestrian/residential A activity connection between street and living unit fronting street 19 Height and scale com- A patibility with height and scale characteristic of district 20 Bay modulation pattern A compatibility with the- matic bay modulation of district 21 Urbanized streetscape A 22 Provide "Borrowed" A landscape for street en- hancement 23 Promote horizontal A A A mixed-use 24 Variable street definition A to create a more complex street scape A* = When closer to topography and golf course A** = When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas 17 General Standards for Multifamily Development Part A: Site and Desi a. Contextual Relationships 1. Community Structure: Each plan for a project larger than 100 units must Complies: provide: Yes No In Spirit i. Benches: at least one every 700ft or one per block, whichever is less FX_ 171 ii. Bike Racks: a capacity for 4 bikes at each residential building and 14 at the central pedestrian facility iii. Trash Disposal Units: one trash receptacle at each bench iv. Pedestrian Lighting: one light standard at least every 100ft Continued from below (Due to lack of space): Bike racks will be located at each building as required. In addition we will provide a bike rack at the proposed trail head into the creek trail. Pedestrian lighting of open spaces and trail amenities will be designed to Comments: comply. Will Comply. We have strategically placed benches and trash receptacles at locations to both comply with the requirements and to work in the open space areas we have created. See above... 2. Cognitive Structure: Development site plans should avoid a "maze -like" Complies: arrangement of streets and drives and should provide a clear demarcation of Yes No In Spirit sub -areas arranged with reference to an internal destination. 17 F7 Comments: There are various sub -areas (Pavilion area, Courtyards, Dog Park, Trail -head & Clubhouse etc.) integrated throughout the site that will drive community interaction through Cognitive Structure. 3. Edge Definition: Planting of the edge must provide visual concealment of Complies: at least 70% of the perimeter fence using evergreen plants. Moreover, at least Yes No In Spirit 70% of these plants must have foliage from ground to top capable of providing a screen. Edge screening must be planted in natural drifts that appear as native plant clusters. Continued from below (Due to lack of space): The landscaping along our ornamental fencing will further screen the material to soften the edge of Comments: our community. Our perimeter fence is not continuous —in many cases we use the buildings themselves as entry barriers which reduces the amount of fencing needed and also provides less of a "compound" feel. 4. Traffic Calming: Any multifamily plan must illustrate traffic calming mea- Complies: sures using traffic tables, intersections, traffic circles, chokers, roadway neck Yes No In Spirit downs at intersections, center island narrowing or rumble strips. Speed bumps F F are prohibited. Continued from below: Not only will these help to slowdown traffic but they will also Comments: provide safe pedestrian access and connectivity between the open space areas. We Comply. In 2 locations where the street runs are longer we've employed raised cross -walks to slow traffic speeds internal to the project, which essentially mimic the raised traffic table concept. 18 b. Connections Beyond The Project 1. Relationship With And Connections To The City Fabric: The site plan for any multifamily development must portray the extent to which the following elements of the City Fabric are continued or otherwise responded to: i. Curb Cuts and Driveways: Development plans much seek to continue flow between projects by coordinating points of ingress and egress so that efficient maneuvers to and from serving public streets are possible. Coordination of routing traffic volumes anticipated by individual project TIA's is a required consideration of a development plan being considered by the City. ii. Thoroughfares And Roadways: A development plan that lays within the path of a thoroughfare as planned or committed to by adjacent devel- opment or of a thoroughfare that has been adjusted by the Council must make provision for the extension of the right of way of such thoroughfare when traffic projected densities necessitate extension. iii. Trails: A proposed multifamily development plan must consider appropriate trail routing through the proposed development so that a cohesive trail network can evolve over time. iv. Open Space: The proposed development plan must consider exten- sion of the open space or expansion of the open space, or consider how development portrayed by the development plan can relate to and define the open space. v. Contextual Characteristics: Any multifamily development plan must illustrate how various aspects of the context will also be manifest in the development design. Key aspects of the context include streetscape themes, continuity of water or water bodies, extension of indigenous plan drifts, continuity of road sections, treatment of parking, protection of and continuity with adjacent land uses, continuation of tree canopies and canopy species, continuity of natural features, extension of surface water management strategies, and continuity of edge treatments. Complies: Yes No In Spirit E F7 El Continued from below: iv. We Comply. Open space will be shared and extended between future land -uses and tracts of land. v. We Comply. We are re -knitting the natural fabric as a part of our built environment in an aesthetically pleasing meandering arrangement as a backdrop to the enhanced ecology. Comments: i. We Comply. We have easements in place that will allow for an adjacent land -use to the north to connect into our public/private roundabout trailhead entry feature. ii. N/A iii. We Comply. At full build -out, a 4 -phase (3 different landowners) —2 -mile extension of a 10' wide hike and bike trail has been coordinated all the way to Bear Creek Park as a part of this development proposal, thus fully connecting the existing Grapevine hike and bike trail system with the southern gateway of the City. Phase 1(—.25 MI.) will be constructed as a part of this development. o c. Lot Occupancy 1. In a development plan that's required to be curvilinear as outlined by the Dis- Complies: trict Specific Standards, such a plan must establish a building relationship to the Yes No street such that: F F i. At least 60% of the interior street and drive -fronting buildings within the development plan design and 75% of buildings facing public streets serving the project must be sited so that the front building plane (the plane facing the street) is not parallel to the street right of way. ii. A minimum of 30% of the yard space along interior streets and drives, and 50% of the yard space fronting public streets serving the project, must be covered by a landscape approach defined by organic plant mass- ing and natural drifts. Comments: In Spirit F i. 7 out of the 11 (63.6%) interior buildings are not parallel to the interior street right-of-ways they front on. 6 out of the 7 buildings (85.7%) that front public streets are not parallel to the street right of way they front on. The curvilinear nature of the street pattern inherently keeps the buildings from being parallel to the street. ii. We will comply. The defined parameters above will feature the themed organic plant massing and naturalistic drifts. v 2. Building Relation to the Street and Orthogonal Plan Layouts: Plan designs that are required to be orthogonal, as outlined by the District Specific Standards, must establish a building relationship to the street such that: i. The development plan must establish a "build -to" line for the interior streets and drives of the project that will vary from the required 3ft build - to line along the plan's exterior public streets as specified in the District Specific Standards. This build -to line must be at least 9ft form the street or drive back of curb. ii. The presence of repetitive stoops, terraces or porches which project into the yard space created by the build -to line cannot be closer than 5ft to the street or drive back of curb and must project at least 4ft from the primary building mass. These projections must be architecturally contained such that they are part of the overall facade composition. The offset space created between the projected stoop, porch or terrace and the primary building mass must be a landscape space, leaving a 5ft minimum pedestrian space at the street edge. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 20 Complies: Yes No In Spirit d. Parking: Placement and Configuration 1. Parking Facility Type: Complies: Yes No i. Structured Parking: Parking within the Transit Center Character Zone must be structured when the project exceeds 20 units per acre. Projects E 17 exceeding 40 units per acre in any other Character Zone must provide structured parking. ii. Surface Parking Areas: Projects with a unit density between 28 and 39 units per acre that provide aggregated surface parking must comply with the following: 1. Aggregated parking areas with more than 70 parking spaces (not including street or drive head -in parking) must be located in a place that is not visible to the primary street serving the project or located so that the parking area may be screened. Parking garages located such that they front a public street must have architectural eleva- tions that complement the design style of the multifamily structures. "Complement" in this context means that they must share similar horizontal offsets, organization of openings, and use of materials. 2. Aggregated parking areas in non -orthogonal development plan designs must also have a curvilinear configuration. 3. Aggregated parking areas must be landscaped Comments: In Spirit 11 Not applicable because our proposed development's density is 20 units/acre. However, all our aggregated parking does have a curvilinear configuration and is landscaped. 2. Head -in parking along streets: Before the parking demand for aggregated parking areas is determined, head -in street and drive parking must be provided to the extent permitted by the streetscape design. Comments: Complies: Yes No In Spirit We Comply. Head -in street and drive -parking is maxed out throughout the site and zonally spaced out to accommodate maximum convenience to the resident. Mi e. Site Open Space Requirement 1. Open space as a percent of total development area: At least 20% of the site area identified in any multifamily plan must be set aside as open space. Site areas that qualify as open space set asides include: i. Areas protecting existing natural features and/or plant communities ii. Areas used for the surface management of storm water that are not structures iii. Any retained water iv. Project amenity areas that are visually accessible from streets and/or drives v. Playgrounds vi. Pedestrian trails vii. Borrowed street landscape areas viii. Pedestrian accessible areas between structures open to access by the project population Comments: Complies: Yes No In Spirit F7 F7 We comply and well exceed this standard, offering all of the above elements in our proposed community in a quantity greater than the 20% standard. Aside from borrowed street landscape, pedestrian accessible areas and trails, project amenities, and all other internal open space that meets the above definitions, we have set aside approximately 4 acres of natural open space that will protect existing natural features and plant communities. Additionally, we will be providing a —1/4 mile 10' wide public hike/bike trail replete with fitness stations and nature informational placards. 2. Form giving influence: Open space provided within any development plan Complies: must serve as a frontage for at least 25% of the structures within the project, Yes No In Spirit where buildings can define the edge of open space, except for the Transit Center 7-171- District where street frontage is prioritized. Z Comments: We exceed this standard, which is a standard that renders the outdoor environment as a primary focal feature of the community. Very conservatively, at least 7 buildings meet this requirement out of the 20% requirement of 3.6 buildings. . 22 f. Preservation of Natural Drainage 1. Natural Drainageways: Any development plan for multifamily development Complies: in Grapevine must illustrate the extent to which natural drainage within the lot, Yes No In Spirit parcel or tract exists and is preserved through design initiatives that preserve, restore or replicate natural drainage patterns. Any disruption of natural drainage patterns must be approved by the City of Grapevine. Comments: We Comply. We have employed a dry riverbed design in certain areas of the site to help replicate the natural environment, catch and direct surface drainage off the site with the added benefit being that this design will provide an enhanced pedestrian experience for our residents and guests. 23 g. Storm Weather Management Facilities 1. Storm weather management structures: Any development plan for mul- tifamily development in the City of Grapevine, where structured storm water management solutions are requires must adhere to the following: i. Minimize structured means of water management: Plans must min- imize the use of cross drainage structures, armored channels, concrete flow ways, and other structured solutions to storm water management, unless such structures are for the purpose of creating a pedestrian or urban activity at a water edge. ii. Maintain natural shapes and form in the creation of detention/re- tention facilities and created drainageways (a.k.a. flow management facilities): Water collection points and/or pools created by nature have shapes that are clearly organic. Therefore, plans should avoid straight lines, hard angles, and regular geometric shapes in the creation of flow management facilities. iii. Landscape with natural elements: Where storm water management design creates conditions that support indigenous plants, measures must be taken to landscape such facilities in ways that allow such plants. iv. Respect natural sub -systems: Proper design of flow management fa- cilities should, where appropriate, include diverse ecological settings such as deep water (limnetic zones) in combination with shallow water (lit- toral zones), wetlands, ephemeral flows, and greater states of hydration which can support plant communities associated with these zones. Comments: Complies: Yes No In Spirit 7 We Comply. We have employed a dry riverbed design in various locations to help catch and direct surface drainage off the site while ensuring safety and quality of life for our residents by avoiding storm water flowing above ground, which can present risk to pets and residents alike during a runoff event. 24 h. Grading 1 Grading for multifamily development in the City of Grapevine must adhere to Complies: the following: Yes No In Spirit i. Avoid steep grades: Grades equal to or greater than 20% are consid- X, E ered steep and shall not be graded to create building lots. However, indi- vidual buildings which make grade transition within the building, porch or terrace expansions are permitted and therefore the limited disturbance of grade needed to accomplish this is permitted also. ii. Conform to standards for tree protection: Any tree over three inches in caliper remaining on a lot, parcel or tract (that is, trees not approved for removal) and exposed to the building activity or within 30ft of the building activity (hereinafter regulated trees) shall be protected as fol- lows: a. Tree fencing: Regulated tree trunks shall be protected within a visible "tree fence" at least 36 inches tall and protecting the tree and ground around the tree to a minimum distance from the trunk equal to the distance of the tree drip line or 10 feet, whichever is less. b. Tree marking: All regulated trees shall be marked with a green surveyor tape which indicates "Protected Tree" status. c. Ground compaction avoidance: Measures shall be taken to min- imize ground compaction within the dripline of a Regulated Tree. Grading within the ground protected by a tree fence is prohibited. d. Maintenance of normal hydration: Measures shall be taken to maintain normal hydration of a Regulated Tree. Comments: Will Comply. We have no grades on site that exceed 20% related to building lot construction. We will comply and will use the best arborilogical practices to make sure preserved trees are protected so they will thrive post construction. 25 Part B: Building Design Standards a.Street Interface 1. Semi-public space adjacent to streets: Complies: Yes No L Canopies and store fronts are limited to urban setting such as primary X street frontage in the Transit Center Character Zone. ii. In any single building block, there must be at least one expression of a first -floor, semi-public space within the street -facing elevation. If a cano- py of storefront is used to meet this standard, it must occupy at least 50% of the length of the elevation. 2. Residential Design Standards: If building frontage defines the edge of an open space, each building block must have at least one first -floor pedestrian space that is part of the architectural design. i. Store fronts must be set within a minimum first -floor plate height of 15ft. and must be comprised of vertical and horizontal subdivisions with- in which any area of un -supported glass is no smaller than 16 square feet. Vertical and horizontal subdivisions shall be at least two inches wide. Comments: We Comply. 107 2. Residential Design Standards: If building frontage defines the edge of an open Complies: space, each building block must have at least one first -floor pedestrian space that Yes No is part of the architectural design. F L Store fronts must be set within a minimum first -floor plate height of 15ft. and must be comprised of vertical and horizontal subdivisions with- in which any area of un -supported glass is no smaller than 16 square feet. Vertical and horizontal subdivisions shall be at least two inches wide. Comments: In Spirit F In Spirit 171 We Comply. All of our buildings have multiple first -floor "pedestrian spaces" in the form of the access breezeways. 26 b. Elevation Composition 1. The exterior design of any multifamily structure must comprise an overall Complies: pattern. This pattern includes: Yes No In Spirit i. Regulating lines that organize its elements '='' F7 7 ii. Proportioning iii. Hierarchy of dominant and subordinate elements Comments: We Comply. Our compositional intent complies as it enacts the use of "proportioning" and "hierarchy of dominant and subordinate elements". CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 27 b. Elevation Composition (continued) 2. Openings and features of any building must have a common justification. Complies: Yes No i. When a pitched roof design is used, all windows—except dormer win- dows—must be below the cornice detail. ii. When a flat roof design is used, all windows must be at least 2ft below the parapet. iii. When both a pitched roof and flat roof design are used in the same elevation, the window heads must align horizontally. iv. Windows may abut the cornice detail if the window header modulates the banding or detailing of the cornice. v. Openings within an elevation must have a common reference line that engages the sill or head. vi. Windows within an elevation must have a common vertical reference line from the first to the top floor. vii. Windows must align with the features that define the architectural form. For example, windows in a gable cannot be arbitrarily distributed within the face of the gable unless specifically approved by the City. viii. Excepting first floor store front or vertical mixed-use structure, all openings must be square or portrait in orientation. ix. Windows, doors and other openings must be articulated within a pro- jected surround or header unless otherwise approved by the City. Comments: 07 In Spirit We Comply. Please refer and compare to Architectural elevations. One nice item of note is that we are using accented stone sills and headers as our window projected surrounds. These standards above elevate the role of windows from mere utilitarian openings to architecturally striking features unto themselves. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 28 b. Elevation Composition (continued) 3. All elevations of a structure must receive equal treatment of style on all el- Complies: evations of a structure so as to avoid the common pitfall whereby only the Yes No In Spirit street -facing facade is adequately styled and structured. 17 F7 Comments: We Comply. Each and every building face presents the same high standard in this guideline. 4. Forms created within the elevation, such as towers, bays and plate changes, must be derived from functions within the plan. Design approaches which seek to decorate a "space plan" derived independent of the elevation design are pro- hibited. Comments: We Comply. 29 Complies: Yes No In Spirit Ln� El 171 b. Street wall complexity and exterior offsets 1. Building offsets: L Residential building blocks may not have more than 50 linear feet of wall without a wall offset. ii. Horizontal wall offsets must be at least 4ft. This may include balconies if contained within the confines of the offset. Any balconies projected from the face must have an architectural enclosure. iii. Architectural forms such as enclosed porches, stair towers, projected bays or stacked balconies maybe projected from the building block or recessed within it and must be accompanied by a roof in the roof massing that corresponds to the architectural form. Comments: We Comply. 30 Complies: Yes No I MM In Spirit 7 d. Void to Solid Ratio 1. For the first floor of a vertical mixed-use plan wherein the first floor has a Complies: commercial use, the void -to -solid ratio must be greater than or equal to 1.5:1 Yes No In Spirit (the amount of void being greater than the amount of solid). The solid portions '- of the first floor facade must extend vertically to the floors above and parapet xi E F7 detail. Comments: Not Applicable. We are not a vertical mixed-use project. (Please excuse the check in the box. I can't get it to un -check.) 2. For floors above the first floor in a vertical mixed-use plan (or for all floors in a residential plan), the void -to -solid ratio must be less than or equal to 0.5:1 (the amount of void being less than the amount of solid). Comments: We Comply. Complies: Yes No In Spirit F7 7 e. Architectural Enclosures 1. All projected stair towers, elevator shafts, and cantilevered building projec- tions (other than balconies) must be architecturally enclosed. This means that they must be enclosed in an architectural skin and must be expressed as a roof form. Comments: We Comply. 32 Complies: Yeses No In Spirit i! ` 17 f. Roof form: Rooves and the roof lines they create are essential design elements for higher -value structures. Visible roof design must: 1. Be legible. There must be a clear organization of a dominant roof mass from Complies: which subordinate roof masses extend. Yes No In Spirit Comments: We Comply. 2. Be balanced. A single roof pitch must be used within the total composition. Complies: Different roof pitches are permitted for tower forms which are not engaged with Yes No In Spirit the general roof form. Permitted roof forms include gables, hips, barrels if used a secondary forms, sheds if used as secondary forms, and flat. Comments: We Comply. 33 g. Style Integrity 1. The use of architectural detailing associated with a style must use the charac- Complies: teristic detailing of that style. Yes No In Spirit 17 F F Comments: We Comply. A few examples of features that we designed to in order to characterize the style are... * Large Roof Overhangs * Structural Bracing * Timber Frame Accents * Tapered Stone Columns * Architecturally Enclosed Balconies * Metal Awnings * 80% Stone 2. The use of systems or materials that replicate the work of a trade or artisan are prohibited. Construction details which are traditionally derived from the work of an artisan (such as a metal smith, carpenter or stonemason) must use a mate- rial in which the characteristic craftsperson can work. Comments: We Comply. 34 Complies: Yes No In Spirit h. Chimneys 1. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the chimney must be ter- Complies: minated with a chimney cap that conceals the metal spark arrestor and visually Yes No In Spirit reads as a traditional tile flue system, unless otherwise approved by the City. Comments: Not applicable. We don't have Chimneys. 2. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the chimney shaft must be Complies: enclosed with unit masonry, stone or 3 -coat stucco with a minimum dimension Yes No In Spirit of 4.5ft x 3ft, unless otherwise approved by the City. 71 Comments: �i �J Not applicable. We don't have Chimneys. 3. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the rise of the chimney shaft Complies: must be detailed so that the chimney has complexity in plan as well as elevation. Yes No In Spirit 7 17 Comments: Not applicable. We don't have Chimneys. 35 Part C: Building Construction Standards a.Materials and Application of Materials 1. Primary Material. At least 70% of the exterior fagade of a 4 -story structure or Complies: 80% of the exterior facade of a 3 -story structure or 100% of the exterior fagade of Yes No a structure less than 3 stories must be one of the following: i. Brick. Clay brick, modular size, hard -fired and meeting severe weath- er standards. Embossed or molded brick is generally prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. All brick shall be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all building corners—both inside and outside—must be executed in a toothed masonry fashion. Weeping or slumped joints are prohibited. ii. Stone. Stone must be laid in a typical load-bearing pattern. Character- istics of such pattern include: 1. Tight mortar joints with no more than 30% of joints larger than 3/8 inches. 2. Coursed patterns such as Ashlar, Coursed Chopped Stone and Coursed Rubbed Stone. Mosaic and un -coursed rubble stone -work are prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. 3. Cultured stone or other faux stone products are prohibited. 4. All stone must be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all cor- ners—both inside and outside—must be executed in a toothed ma- sonry fashion. iii. Other Stone. Cut stone/smoothed-face stone or Cut stone/smoothed- face stone that is mechanically attached with a stone veneer system may be used provided that the system uses a true stone. Comments: We will Comply. Stone will be real coursed stone to fit the (iii.) definition above. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 0 In Spirit F a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 2. Secondary Material. No more than 30% of the building facade may be a sec- ondary material. This includes: Complies: Yes No i. Stucco. 3 -coat stucco on lath over a structural frame with expansion LILIJ joints concealed by filling the joint with expandable filler that is troweled flat with the stucco, is the same color as the stucco and that matches the stucco surface texture is permitted. Dryvit/EFS type systems are prohibit- ed. Stucco is not permitted in the Central Transit District. ii. Metal. Architectural metal wall systems are permitted. iii. Siding. Wood or Cementacious siding is permitted in those Character Zones where pitched roof styles are permitted. Comments: 187 In Spirit F We Comply. We will be using a cementacious siding (along with 80% stone) to compliment the architectural design. This product also maintains itself over time and doesn't cup, buckle or warp like real wood tends to in the sometimes extreme Texas weather fluctuations. 3. Roof Material. Acceptable materials include: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Flat Roof. Flat rooves may be either a built-up bituminous roof or a membrane roof provided that it is installed in accordance with the man- X F7 ufacturer's specifications and issued a 30 -year warranty. All flat rooves must be hidden from ground level view, behind a 12 -inch parapet. ii. Pitched Roof. These may be either a standing -seam metal roof with standing folded and soldered seams, a commercial metal roof if approved by the City, slate, clay tile, or 40 -year high profile composition single. All composition shingle rooves must have closed valleys. Concrete single products with a relief greater than 1/2 inch are prohibited. iii. Parapet Cap. These must be either clay brick, cut stone, cast stone, tile, or terra cotta. Pressed metal maybe used if is it specifically created to decoratively cap a parapet and if specifically approved by the City. Comments: We will Comply. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 37 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 4. Material Change. Material changes in any elevation may occur only under the Complies: following conditions: Yes No i. Change occurs at an inside corner. ii. Change that occurs at an outside corner must wrap the corner and change at a location at least 12 inches from that corner and be designed as the termination of an architectural detail. iii. Change that occurs wherein the different material is contained within a distinct architectural form that projects from the primary architectural mass. iv. Change that reflects an offset between a lower and an upper floor where the offset is at least 6 inches. Material changes within the same architectural plane are prohibited. Comments: We Comply. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 38 LL 17 In Spirit a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 5. Relief. The City seeks to promote relief and dimension in architectural surfac- Complies: es, details, and motifs with the following requirements: Yes No In Spirit i. The following materials are prohibited: Fiberglass, Styrofoam or stuc- I ,, co -over -styrofoam, plastic, aluminum. Stucco applied to look like pro- jected stone, Stucco applied to look like cast stone, Stucco applied to look like terra cotta, cementacious boards used in any application which makes a corner, cementacious boards used in any application which makes a mitre or decorative shape, Masonite or Masonite products, com- position wood products used as an exterior material, trimcraft used as a soffit board, or other smooth finished soffit board. ii. Relief in the treatment of cornices, overhangs, gable projections, bay windows, dormers, water tables, belt coursers, sills, surrounds, timber components and other expressions must be executed in ways that pro- duce depth, shadow and texture. iii. In coursed rubble stonework, stones must be laid into the wall as the stone would lay on the ground. No more than 20% of the stones in any elevation may be "flipped" sideways. iv. The minimum projection in any built-up profiles and decorative assembly must be 3/ inch per element of the assembly. A cornice detail comprised of three stepped bricks must have a total projection of 2 and 1/4 inches. Comments: As corroborated by City consultants, cementitious trim - provided it is dimensionally acceptable - will require less maintenance, have stronger architectural appeal, and exhibit superior durability in our climate than conventional wood. It will not cup, buckle or warp which starts to look rundown over time. Should City consultant allow, we would like the opportunity to explore (in -field mockup) and ultimately incorporate what we think will be an overall better trim product in terms of cementitious trim material use on the buildings. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 39 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 6. Carpentered Exterior Trim. Complies: Yes No i. All carpentered exterior trim must be high-quality finished grade wood stock. ' ii. If a trim installation is to be joined along any continuous run of mate- rial, the required joint must be a "spline joint." iii. All outside corners must be mitered and blocked with sufficient clo- sure that the joint is not visible from the street. iv. Corners must be closed by a carpentered joint. Trim clips are prohib- ited. v Facia and gable rake must be stepped at the drip mold unless hidden by a gutter. vi. Carpentered trim that forms the veneer pocket must have a complex- ity achieved in trim mold, built-up step molding, or other traditional detail such as a dentil mold. Comments: ❑00 In Spirit As corroborated by City consultants, cementitious trim - provided it is dimensionally acceptable - will requires less maintenance, stronger architectural appeal, and superior durability in our climate than conventional wood. It will not cup, buckle or warp which starts to look rundown over time. Should City consultant allow, we would like the opportunity to explore (in a field mockup) and ultimately incorporate what we think will be an overall better trim product in terms of cementitious trim material use on the buildings. 40 b. Wall Construction 1. Wall Section. All wood -framed exterior walls must be constructed as follows: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. When shim- or flange -mounted windows are used in masonry ve- � (— neered walls, framing may be conventional 2x4 framing. ii. When shim -mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or oth- er permitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, exterior walls must be framed with 2x6 members in order to achieve a 3.5 -inch minimum offset within the opening. iii. When flange -mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or other permitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, a double 2x4 framing assembly is required that allows the flange to be mounted on the inner 2x4 section with the second 2x4 section providing the required offset from the window sash or door at the opening. Comments: We will Comply. 2. Parapets. Where there is a flat roof, a parapet must extend at least 12 inches Complies: above the roof surface and conceal the roof material from ground -level view. Yes No In Spirit E F 17 Comments: N/A CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 41 b. Wall Construction (continued) 3. Cornice Detail. All wall terminations at the roof must have a cornice detail comprised of at least 2 projected elements. Parapets must have a cap detail com- prised of at least 2 projected elements. Comments: We will Comply. 4. Window Surrounds, Belt Courses and Base Courses. Complies: Yes No In Spirit Complies: Yes No i. All openings in the exterior skin must have an architecturally appro- priate header and sill with an optional jamb. The required header and sill Z must project at least 3/4 inches beyond the wall veneer. Window headers or sills may be either stone, cast stone, terra cotta, heavy timber (where appropriate for the style), or wood (where appropriate for the style). ii. Other architectural details like belt courses and base courses must be executed in the above materials and have a minimum projection of 3/4 inch per element of detail. Comments: In Spirit We will Comply. As mentioned above, our windows will have a cast -stone header and sill that will adhere to this requirement. 42 c. Roof screening and appurtenances 1. Roof Projections. No plumbing stacks, venting stacks, skylights, or attic Complies: ventilators may penetrate the roof surfaces facing the street/drive. If there are Yes No In Spirit multiple street/drive facing exposures, no roof projection may penetrate the roof slope that slopes to the "fronting" street or drive. All such penetrations must be 17 X mounted straight and perpendicular to the ground (except for skylights and attic ventilators) and painted to blend with the roof color. Turbine vents are prohibit- ed. All vent stacks must have lead jacks. Comments: All our appliances for the residences are electric so there won't be an excessive amount of gas derived penetrations. The majority of roof penetrations will be limited to plumbing stacks and painted to match. We will have ridge vents and no turbines. 2. Roof Mechanical. Roof mechanical must be screened behind a parapet wall or Complies: platform that is recessed into a pitched roof so that the incline of the roof slope Yes No In Spirit creates a parapet wall. 171 71 Comments: We will comply. Not applicable because mechanical equipment will be at grade. However, where and if we decided to place the mechanical equipment on roof, it will be screened per the above requirement. 3. Gutters, Downspouts, Scuppers and Collection Boxes. These must be copper or an enduring prefinished metal with a minimum 20 -gauge thickness. Gutters must be a minimum of 6 inches, half -round profile and attached with gutter straps. Downspouts must be a minimum of 4 inches and round. Elbows and bends must be a minimum of 4 inches, plain and round. Fascia mounted gutter systems are prohibited unless custom designed and integral to the architecture. Comments: We will Comply. 43 Complies: Yes No In Spirit d. Windows and Glazing 1. Glazing and Glazing Systems. Reflective glass is prohibited. Tinted glass and Complies: dark adhesive films where the transmission coefficient exceeds 27% is prohibited. Yes No In Spirit Stained glass is allowed provided that the glass is crafted in accordance with sol- dered camping or "H" camping. No acrylic or pourable techniques are allowed. Glazing systems may be used in certain accent areas of specifically approved by the City. Comments: We will Comply. 44 Part D: Landscaping, Fencing and Screening a. Site Landscaping 1 Leaf Mass Between Buildings. All multifamily development must provide Complies: trees between buildings. At least 60% of the planted area must be comprised of Yes No over -story (canopy). Comments: We Comply. We have provided a significant amount of trees between each building and will exceed the requirement as the trees take root and mature. In Spirit E 2. Layered Landscaping at Building Entries. Landscaping must be provided at Complies: building entries and must be "layered." The building entry landscaping area must Yes No In Spirit be comprised of at least 3 layers: one upper layer of medium evergreen shrub approximately 30-36 inches high and 2 layers of shorter shrubs or one shrub and an ornamental grass. These must be planted in beds having a minimum width of 72 inches. Upper layer shrubs must be 5 -gallon container plants planted 30 inches on center with triangular spacing. Lower layer shrubs may be 3 -gallon container plants planted 24 inches on center with triangular spacing. Comments: We will Comply. The planting areas defined on our landscape plan will allow for the layered look of ground covers and shorter up to large upper layer shrubs. All of our planting beds are at least 72" wide and we will comply with the size and spacing requirements of this section. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 45 a. Site Landscaping (continued) 3. All landscape beds must be associated with walkways, roadways, amenity Complies: feature, buildings or screens. Floating, ornamental or non -associated landscape Yes No In Spirit beds are prohibited. 17 F7 Comments: We will Comply. All of the proposed landscape planting beds on the site are associated with or adjacent to pedestrian walkways and the buildings. All of our pedestrian walks meander through landscaped open spaces with the beds immediately adjacent to the walkways. The planting areas will be informal and will contain a mix of native and culturally appropriate landscape materials. 4. Plant Sizing. Shrubs that serve a screening function must be sized at the time Complies: of planting such that they can serve as an effective screen within 2 years of the Yes No In Spirit planting date. 3 -gallon plants must be planted 30 inches on center with triangu- lar spacing and 2 -gallon plants must be planted 24 inches on center with trian- gular spacing. Smaller container and bedding plants must be planted at least 12 inches on center with triangular spacing.. Comments: We will Comply. Shrubs used for screening such as along our security fencing and plant material within the planting beds and building entrance areas will comply with the plant sizing requirements. 46 b. Fences and Screening Walls 1. Fence Materials. Visible perimeter fences that are compliant with the General Complies: Standards may be made of unit masonry, wrought iron with unit masonry corner Yes No In Spirit columns, or masonry. If masonry, corner column and masonry interim column spacing is not to exceed 15ft and must have a masonry knee wall supporting ".. wood or wrought iron infill. Comments: We will Comply. Our fencing has been designed to comply with these requirements. 2. Gate Materials. Gates in fences constructed in accordance with Db 1 above may be made from wrought iron with a wrought iron frame (complying with General Standards) or wood with frame members measuring a minimum of 1 and 1/2 inches thick by 3 and 1/2 inches wide and planks measuring at least 1 and 1/2 inches thick. Gates must be comprised of the same material as the fence. Comments: We will Comply. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 47 Complies: Yes No In Spirit El LE b. Fences and Screening Walls (continued) 3. Corner Expression of Support Structure. All property corners of a property line fence much be supported by a masonry column that is at least 10 square inches. Comments: We will Comply. 4. Thin wall construction, cast or embossed concrete walls, picket materials not in compliance with the General Standards, iron fences with mechanical connec- tion assemblies, pre -fabricated decorative elements designed to slip over stock or tubular steel shapes, and plastic or vinyl fence component systems are prohibit- ed. Comments: We will Comply. 48 Complies: Yes No In Spirit F Complies: Yes No In Spirit n 17 El c. Street Visible Wrought Iron ITrames and other structural support members may not be less than 1 and 3/4 Complies: inches in either width measurement or 1 and 3/4 inches in diameter if round. Yes No In Spirit F 17-1 Comments: We will Comply. 2. Pickets that are 5ft in length or height or less must have a minimum width of Complies: 3/ inches in either width dimension or diameter. When pickets are longer or tall- Yes No In Spirit er than 5ft, the minimum with dimension is increased to 1 inch in the dimension that faces the street or 1 inch in diameter. I� Comments: We will Comply. 3. Panels must be made of metal plate material with a minimum thickness of Complies: 3/16 inches. Yes No In Spirit 7 717 Comments: We will Comply. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 49 c. Street Visible Wrought Iron (continued) 4. The wall thickness of any tubular steel must not be less than 3/32 inches. Comments: We will Comply. 5. Decorative elements such as finials and rings must be made of solid stock material and welded to the pickets or to the frame made from the pickets if the pickets are solid stock material. Attachments to the pickets or frame and all other components of the wrought iron construction must be welded. Mechanical con- nections are prohibited. Comments: We will comply if applicable. 50 Complies: Yes No In Spirit F 117 Complies: Yes No In Spirit W U w nQ y� O r -I LJ d— — — — — — — — — — — — — L"mom I ��C FC � z bppiQ �n �g R'St� � tl� go! R� woo__ o �b ��gUggbg� � as E E 8. g gR 0 Off Y6 0 6 O�1 � O M� m W ~ 2c W a Q�LU CL H Z W (L �� W LU 1 w V) LU cz CL W cry W cz M u f. MU .vr- - ML TOIL vl Aft 11 � E j i ' 4 4, i � District Standard #1 - Architectural Accommodation of Grade Change -QF -4 4?1�"(;6t Ve'-rhdal Qjffereftel- BLDG 3 BLDG 2 BLCG 7 e. IM it ertkwal Difference U V BLDG 1 i 11 r] BLDG 13 A Buildings are designed to minimize use of retaining walls commodation 0and maximize architecturat,, of grade change by: - Implementing turn -down (thickened) footings - Stepping 1JUHU!"95 UUMI LHU qUdUt! L"UUU$J"UUL development 40 �1 "Zrd 0 Pot- W-t5s;fwl BLE)G z Rl Dia 8 0 �+ r pp�� urprun, t " 7 ati i 9 ar.Ioff 4 'p. D 4 •1111I:461N19 AMP -� � • ^ 1 � 3 �r r � �! •� art.' ��+'���� V� \ Y �'� �� j _ � : Y - __ . �' _ �Y _ 1 ��� ��j4 � Yom. ' �_ ,-'. t •� .a�'R r� �� �., �� ��'' s -tom J off: .E:: moi`- �..- '�, '�'►' e 1` t' ��yrrsy'lir �R `lam ow�4 }40+ +All AS Air 0 era I lid rd PRAIRIL SITENDOR IT I It ( I IT N I'S KOO I 'Ap III %L If) L 1, Iii! tn,., I Me M 1-1-11 46." Ali en' 13e Cal Asir 4v: S. 0 0 - rda 0 graillowf D 9 0 t6:mk 4- = I 0 1% 0 i3mrricr Standard as - u st Eastern Buffer,#. 141 14W -r;.. Densely Wooded Floodplai 1 Mile to DFW Airport - 35"Vertical Rise to Airs Noise Reducing.-Windo - w & - I 4WE .0 lo ti=�i �t{i+ ��,t�r wi'1`, t � a ` i�•� I t� �. .!` ` xIL Non -orthogonal Bidg'.Pb, f 0rientation $ � '' • I i � •.,-�. + .�i�.�' LY Meandering.�Streets '�A ,y M e rg,i n g of'00( S reef Intersections S ? Freeform a r ; r ` �Tree ayout } Organ.icatly Shaped -Are' District Standard #14 - Parking Concealment r i SLOG 5, , VW I fswlt �. + 0 Parking Concealed Behind Buildings, Landscape Buffer, and Grade Change District Standard = 2 Z - "Borrowed La ncisca ne"" ( F s Q ,y, + M �. � P tw• � •fir•. �. (� ,, ilk ' 'fit- �' $ ` �j p • aC AL -7 r • p OC Ab Ah Ah Ak A Alk A% i Ah AL [wolf General Standard - Internal Destinations vil ion Park Outdoor Grilling Stations/Dining Multimeal,jo,46, . Lawn Games µ. uB d ou BLDG ,2 BLDG 10 4+ Acre Nature Preserve Dog Park and Lot'Wash Facility v r rs" BLDG 15 Public Trailhead & Parking Club Amenity & Grand Courtyard - 24 -Hour Fitness Center - Business Center - Digital Package Concierge -- - Clubroom with Kitchen/Games - Outdoor Fire Pit - Outdoor Grilling Stations/Dining - Outdoor Multimedia - Swimming Pool - Grand Courtyard I w 0 r. _ � y� � �' � • �i it •. ^ +' 'p s i. . - IRV' _ a 0 a ;illfrw I old Ah rb, -■-W- 11*4+ . a :rorfrrIlrs Y s :1 ■ Or_ 0 �1 IE \ V, �t 41l k w s� l �raf��a , •, ti for e • } r c ml I I \' 1� le �\. MI — LOCATION SS SANITARY SEWER PIPE TSF''. TYPICAL sw SIDEWALK I CURB INLET ` M WATER METER MH MANHOLE Im IRRIGATION METER WE 'CATER EASEMENT ROW RIGHT OF WAY CI PROPOSED CURS INLET GI PROPOSED GRATE INLET MH PROPOSED 'MANHOLE TRAFFIC CIRCULAMON o EXISTING PAVEMENT 400,r PROPOSED FIRE LAME PROPOSED PAVEMENT IN R.O.W. PROPOSED TRAIL I � PROPOSE[ SIDEWALK CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: X18.01. CU 18.02, PDIB-01 LOCATION, 101 FAST GLADE ROAD; LIST 'I, BLOCK A, LADE/360 ADDITION' LA L' _ •IAYORSECRETAR DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: HEFT: 1 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN +GONFLIOT'A'I'fH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES k. t r yy o � f � 4 r'ci •a; J � i r ; o 400,r CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: X18.01. CU 18.02, PDIB-01 LOCATION, 101 FAST GLADE ROAD; LIST 'I, BLOCK A, LADE/360 ADDITION' LA L' _ •IAYORSECRETAR DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: HEFT: 1 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN +GONFLIOT'A'I'fH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES m � i CL o 400,r M1 IL I � CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: X18.01. CU 18.02, PDIB-01 LOCATION, 101 FAST GLADE ROAD; LIST 'I, BLOCK A, LADE/360 ADDITION' LA L' _ •IAYORSECRETAR DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: HEFT: 1 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN +GONFLIOT'A'I'fH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES -T NUME i CL o 400,r IL -T NUME w z CL < su 3fc—;r GLADE ROW < M uj cn 19P-4 INS APFKQX. All I— x i � I - — > - --- #�- MFi` y'y' DRAI 4AG E SWALE BA PROP.TRASH 104 TYPE THI A� e COMPACTOR & RECMULE BI EXISTING APPROX J DRAINAGE SWALE CE TER PROP. FH (TYP) MH CARPORT, TYP. )L TYPEIA 41 N INTI MH < .40 TYPETHI Op Er c'a 0 zz "0' �C2) V'\ PROP, FH PARKING DATA SUMMARY TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 639, 1.60 SPACES I UNIT 639 (INCLUDES 13 HC SPOTS) TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED .2-11-6-90 SURFACE PARKING 347 (INCLUDES 10 HC SPOTS) PUBLIC TRAIL PARKING (INCWDES 1 HC VAN SPOT) 23,45234,526 CARPORT PARKING100 (INCLUDES 4 HC SPOTS) TANDEM PARKING 90 GARAGE PARKING 140 256 64% w U) uj L r W X uj z w CL 1-r C2 (D LL' 0 ui F - z =5 0 L) F- z < .2-11-6-90 6,994 3,536 1,768 6;984 23,45234,526 X07 7° 47,680 1 4i,520 21 5%. 13,122 1-3.3ZP 42.4,148 399 1100%: 7 M100,414 - W. DINK | | 81-10^X111-9" F77i - BALC..ZPATIO KITHEN 1=1160141 wl 0 15 IL j 'WIN ITO AEP GTNET: 794 OSS: 857 * A5a:VARIATION-ENTRY DOOR ADJUSTMENT/OUTSIDE CORNER WINDOW BUMP *A5b:VARIATION-ENTRY DOOR ADJUSTMENVOUTSIDECORNERWINDOWBUMP * A5o: VARIATION -TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER * A5d: VAR|AT|0N~ENTRYDOQR ADJUSTMENT/OUTSIDE CORNER M8NQ'DW BUMP/TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER * A5ec VARIATION -ENTRY DOOR ADJUSTMENT/OUTSIDE CORNER WINDOW BUWP/TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER � 1/4"=V-0" / x^� NET: 751 '�° � GROSS: 810 * A3a: VAR TO GARAGE 8e ELONGATED KITCHEN ISLAND * AJbc VARIATION—TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER //�—v—u GROSS: 771 * A2o VARIATION- DIRECT ENTRY TO GARAGE * A2b: VARIATION -DIRECT ENTRY TO GARAGE &c TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER * A2c VARIATION -TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER 26'-S' ' U L, I NET: 705 (D 1 /4)7=1 GROSS: 7B6 * Ala: VARIATION -TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER � SHEET:APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK INi l CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF | LIVING&INING � 1=1160141 wl 0 15 IL j 'WIN ITO AEP GTNET: 794 OSS: 857 * A5a:VARIATION-ENTRY DOOR ADJUSTMENT/OUTSIDE CORNER WINDOW BUMP *A5b:VARIATION-ENTRY DOOR ADJUSTMENVOUTSIDECORNERWINDOWBUMP * A5o: VARIATION -TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER * A5d: VAR|AT|0N~ENTRYDOQR ADJUSTMENT/OUTSIDE CORNER M8NQ'DW BUMP/TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER * A5ec VARIATION -ENTRY DOOR ADJUSTMENT/OUTSIDE CORNER WINDOW BUWP/TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER � 1/4"=V-0" / x^� NET: 751 '�° � GROSS: 810 * A3a: VAR TO GARAGE 8e ELONGATED KITCHEN ISLAND * AJbc VARIATION—TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER //�—v—u GROSS: 771 * A2o VARIATION- DIRECT ENTRY TO GARAGE * A2b: VARIATION -DIRECT ENTRY TO GARAGE &c TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER * A2c VARIATION -TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER 26'-S' ' U L, I NET: 705 (D 1 /4)7=1 GROSS: 7B6 * Ala: VARIATION -TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER � SHEET:APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK INi l CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF | I-lu' x 101- DINING 1,7,—e x 9,—g, PAN. pfL )ROOM #3,I KITCHEN "—lcr X 10'-1 13'-7° V 12'-a` L J, 0 -0 NET: 1,39 1/41)=l) 3-013 GROSS: 1,44 I W. JET: 1,129 iSS: 1,192 NET: 1,268 GROSS: 1,384 GROSS: 1,079 GROSS: 1,164 lb C-4 1-3 20'-U' UNIT THI lepl, FL.010;z CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Z18-01, CU 18 02 AND PD 18-01 NET: 1,310 1 /4"= 1 0 LOCATION: 1011 EAST GLADE ROAD LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADE/360 ADDITION GROSS: 1,920 a 1 - MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: P - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIR N !!: �A DATE: IP SHEET:5 OF 35 . . . . . . . . . . . APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES fa DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES W. 1. C. -U' W.H. 0 STOR 20'-0" 20'-Y' U:N I mTdm or H 2' A ICLMOOR CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Z18-01 CU 1802 AND PD 18-01 1 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICE� LOCATION: 101 EAST G LADE ROAD NET: 1,530 LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADE/360 ADDITION GROSS: 2,220 MAYOR SECRETARY tg 17 DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: ug SHEET: 7 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICE� N. 17 27'-Y' 1/4"=V-0" NET: 1,747 GROSS: 2,620 Lis 9 0 5 CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Zia -01, CU 11&02 AND PD 1:8-01 LOCATION: 101 EAST GLADE ROAD LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADE/360 ADDITION Pr WY—OR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING commissioN O o lu DATE: 34 SHEET: 9 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN I I u 112/�2/20117 � I x �i U it o N c v a a, v, : N, CASE NAME: TME PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Zl8-01, CU 1'8-02 AND PD 1"i LOCATION: 101 EAST GLADE'ROAD N. LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADE/360 ADDITION 1U1AYt3R SECRETARY HATE: m 'r PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GHAIRMAN" 0 T, DATE: s sr 9 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORISE ANY .woRk IN CONFLICT ANY DE OR ORt1NA10E5, C, DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 0 �i U it o RIBBED MTL, ROOFING PAINTED STL. BRACING RE: MANUF. PAINTED STL, COLUMN RE: MANUF. co ICONC. FINSH SURFACE RE: CIVIL DRWGS. m 12 PARKING STALF— PARKING STALL A NOTE: CARPORTS MAY VARY IN LENGTH AND NUMBER OF BAYS PROVIDED. REFER TO SITE PLAN. CARPORT ELEV—SECT MASONRY CALCULAT11ONS - 81 % VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:6.2 *TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE & BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID D POINT OF ROOF HGT. 7 LEVEL 3 —LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 KEYNOTE LEGEND: 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER 9141 FIBER CEMENT SIDING A RIBBED MTL, ROOFING PAINTED STL. BRACING RE: MANUF. PAINTED STL, COLUMN RE: MANUF. co ICONC. FINSH SURFACE RE: CIVIL DRWGS. m 12 PARKING STALF— PARKING STALL A NOTE: CARPORTS MAY VARY IN LENGTH AND NUMBER OF BAYS PROVIDED. REFER TO SITE PLAN. CARPORT ELEV—SECT MASONRY CALCULAT11ONS - 81 % VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:6.2 *TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE & BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID D POINT OF ROOF HGT. 7 LEVEL 3 —LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 KEYNOTE LEGEND: 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING A 3 FIBER CEMENT SIDING B 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL 5 ACCENT ROOF 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 7 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS 8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM—MITERED CORNERS 9 TYPICAL 6" PLANE CHANGE 2'1 151 131 16 L8 MME i r I t I��+-`r�.....L CT -.-r -- LEVEL 'I MASOIN:RY CALCULATIONS VOM ®SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:6.8 *TAKEN FROM FF TO TDP OF PLATE & BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID MID POINT OF ROOF HGT aTE LEGEND: t.[ 9 ti i e t o 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER a FIBER CEMENT SIDING — A m n 3 i st LEVEL 3 I 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL d' Q O 5 ACCENT ROOF 0 V I COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF ar 7 LEVEL 3 Y B FIBER CEMENT TRIM'—MITERED CORNERS' a 9 TYPICAL 6" PLANE CHANGE ( m 1 h 6 ( C a � 1 N I � ( � �I 6 a .c a v u i � I � ( � I� T �,_ ( i i ( C m a `a I � I O 3 a 4 m a co i LEVEL 2 U G a N fl. m ' I i i 3 v m a m I FT:4 U 4 n CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE d. CASE NUMBER: Z1&01, CU 18-02 AND PD 1&01 LOCATION: 101 EAST GLADE ROAD LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADE/360 ADDITION a _ f.._ LEVEL 2 '— U DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION a 1 r I t I��+-`r�.....L CT -.-r -- LEVEL 'I MASOIN:RY CALCULATIONS VOM ®SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:6.8 *TAKEN FROM FF TO TDP OF PLATE & BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID MID POINT OF ROOF HGT E 0D LEVEL 1 aTE LEGEND: t.[ 9 ti e t o 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER a FIBER CEMENT SIDING — A m n 3 i st LEVEL 3 I 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL d' Q O 5 ACCENT ROOF 0 V 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF ar 7 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS Y B FIBER CEMENT TRIM'—MITERED CORNERS' 9 TYPICAL 6" PLANE CHANGE ( m 1 h 6 ( C a � 1 N I � ( � �I 6 a .c a v u i � I � ( � I� v a Q m v c a ( i mss; en ( C m a `a I � I O 3 a 4 m a co i LEVEL 2 U G a N fl. m ' I i i 3 v m a m I Q V U 4 n E 0D LEVEL 1 aTE LEGEND: t.[ 9 ti e t o 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING — A m n 3 FIBER CEMENT SIDING — B I 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL d' Q O 5 ACCENT ROOF 0 V 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF ar 7 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS Y B FIBER CEMENT TRIM'—MITERED CORNERS' 9 TYPICAL 6" PLANE CHANGE ( m 1 h 6 ( C a � 1 N I � ( � �I 6 a .c a v u i � I � ( � I� v a Q m v c a ( i 0 o a g : G xT C ( C m a `a I � I O 3 a 4 m a I I ig i II i :a u c a 1 f rn m `o U G a N fl. m ' I i i 3 v m a m I Q V U 4 n CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE d. CASE NUMBER: Z1&01, CU 18-02 AND PD 1&01 LOCATION: 101 EAST GLADE ROAD LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADE/360 ADDITION a ,y a MAYOR SECRETARY U DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION a 1 O HAI MAN DATE: a SHEET. 12 OF 35 a i I APPROVAL DOES NOT WOIN' AUTHORIZE ANY s CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINA CES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOP�r1ENT �Et��I SIS E m 1 201 a m E ""Ill", a! A� �'�t,. G It4'§ i } p 4ai p €yE I �21K 2 �i fI ,pt ate} o- I 4 s Fa �3t B2 �o B2 L-7 NUNN A6 r-, r1 B2 m o� B2 LO B2 5':' 9 i ,<.: •:.. „ .a.........._.. 'i .c r....:: n.t .. t...z 4E .: ...r.. &�:. ...rr.w. .r. ... .. ... .— _: ;: .,.,� ._,.<: .., ,......: ........... :. ....� .. ,._,. <, _.. ,..,.._;:. i tJ IC � I a m a I ! v 6 � AI � :C Ic € t0 k C Q N 1 I LN tl w 1 t n j N Qs O m b 4 1 1 C l) 2 S e C m YJ b N 4 O N 4 O i I E ;o II u 4 ! 1., 4 4 ' O 4 E ca a v a m +s c. a; 0 'a i 5':' 9 i ,<.: •:.. „ .a.........._.. 'i .c r....:: n.t .. t...z 4E .: ...r.. &�:. ...rr.w. .r. ... .. ... .— _: ;: .,.,� ._,.<: .., ,......: ........... :. ....� .. ,._,. <, _.. ,..,.._;:. i MID POINT OF ROOF HGT. FE LEVEL 3 iT OD c:::zzzz= Ht LEVEL 2 co Ff LEVEL 1 1 | TYPICAL STONE VENEER 51 161 I31 11 MID POINT OF ROOF co 0 1 7 A � LEVEL 3 JEF q LEVEL 2 smilml mmllml � _ LEVEL 1 �` CALCULATIONS - 0% VORSOUD CALCULATIONS - 1:3.7 *TAKEN FROM FF TO TDP OF PLATE BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID MID POINT OF ROOF HOT, o LEVEL 3 co co 4 LEVEL 2 A5cnI A2c A2c L . --L . I .J L A2 A2 A5 A7 641L FK�\77 Asa I, �01 ............ . . . .. . ....... ............ .. ........................... ........................................ - . ... ..... .. ........ .. - -- ------ ----- of yr tP CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Z18-01, CU 18-02 AND PD 18-011 LOCATION: 101 EAST GLADE ROAD LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADE1360 ADDITION ,A, 114A INCY—OR SECRE AR's DATE - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION -CWA-lRMA—N- T DATE: S: EET: 17 0 F 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WO I� IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINA DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SEFMCiS ,12 '217 ............ . . . .. . ....... ............ .. ........................... ........................................ - . ... ..... .. ........ .. - -- ------ ----- A7 I� Ase A5c A A5c I A5 r ^C a A2 A2 0 A5 ..... ......... . ____ ...m _ _._. _. _ ___ _ .__._.__------ ..__..__ w _ _. _ .._...... 0 A7 7��7/ Asa' ��Qo1 Ee 1 { CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Zl8-01, CU 18-02 AND PD11 LOCATION. 101 EAST GLADE ROAD LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADE1360 ADDITION Lhda-� h�lAYC7R'SECRETARY DATE: j 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION � { 4MHAIRMAN Y t ; t DATE: SHEET: 18 OF 35 APPROVAL DOE'S NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN' Y-- CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANGE's DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERV, "$ Ee ASS L L TI N - VOID: L_ID CALCULATIONS - 1:7.7 *TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE & BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID' KEYNOTE .-LEG'! 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING — A 3 FIBER CEMENT SIDING — B 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL 5 ACCENT ROOF 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOT 7 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS 8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM—MITERED 9 TYPICAL 6" PLANE CHANGE �6 E; i I i a r Z f ( S F C C C C f ;SE NAME: THE PRESERVE Y CASE NUMBER: Z1'8-01, CLI 18-02 AND P i8�1, LOCATION: $01 EAST GLADE ROAD ' LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADE1360 ADDITION n a , f IECRET E l'�R S .` DATE: � Y' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISIStOW �6 E; i u B3 ,I P r rr 1 i CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Z18-01, CU 18-02 AND:h 11",'t " LOCATION: 101 EAST GLADE ROAD 107 LCT 1, BLOCK A, GLADE/360 ADDITION! � L' j'y M k 1� MAYOR SE RE' ,. I DATE: P'LANN ING AND ZONING COMM!Iis[OI �, cH "16�I�IAh1 DATE: SHEET: 21 OF 3" I APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANLY 6R�£ INI r CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR OSI ILI DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTI SERV(66," ,I P r 107 j'y M k 1� ,. m �L- J 18"4,, CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: ZI &01, CU 18-02 ANDPO LOCATION, 10I EAST GLADE ROAD LOT 1,::BLOCK DE/360 ADDITION r�Wdi Yvi . � MAYOR DATE: RE*— PLANNING AND ZONING COMM1199110. hil::: eHAI RMAN DATE: SHEET OF 3,5 :22 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORIJINX W,,6 tx, IN 158 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTlSERVI�, ES m io- jt /1 0,10 1 s a -MASIONRY CALCULATIONS - 80% ®SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:5.6 *TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE & BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID KEYNOTE LE E M I IT, ffol II ffill ► roTs ;®• ■ 1 M 0 9 rr� b 3 -- _LEVEL co t L �} LEVEL 2 iAFFIf m� ai M 0 9 121'. 0 11i 141 1'3 MASONRY CALCULATIONS VOID: OLID CALMATIONS *TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE & BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SCUD MASONRY CALCULATIONS - VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 14-8.6 *TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE & BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID KEYNOTE LEGEND TH2A TH3 L64 TH2 F17:L: TH2 1�77 TH3 r nil F.O.M CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Z1M1, CU 18-( LOCATION: 101 EAST GLADE R( LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADE/360 AD L MAYOR DATE: 3�Qbta PI ANRING AND ZONING CNAIFW DATE: ii i SHEET: 26 APPROVAL 'DOES NOT AUTH( CONFLICT WITH ANY CODE',' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOI E 9 vi O 9 L ji i� MASONRY CALCULAPONIS — K2 go Lo;u "m LW TT Tt" WJ = .. ....... . VOID:SOUID CALCULATIONS — 1:22.0 *TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE & BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID 3 n MAN _� IIII� 7777B � MID POINT OF ROOF HGT. KEYNOTE LEGEND 1 I TYPICAL STONE VENEER 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING — A 3 FIBER CEMENT SIDING — B 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL 5 ACCENT ROOF 6 COMPOSITION COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 7 ARCHII TTIECTURAL BRACKETS 8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM—MITERED CORN, 9 TYPICAL 6' PLANE CHANGE MID POINT OF ROOF HGT_ 00 T Q0 LEVEL 3 Lo co T LEVEL 2 1� 1� MAILROW PARCEL - --- ------ --- ------- --- - - - ------------- ..... .. . ..... - ------ ..... ..... -- - ---- .... . ...... .. --- --- ------ ------- - ---------- ----- -------- ---------- e� �p �ENDINd FRM LOUNGE PATSO I CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Zl"l, CU fl LOCATION- 101 EAST GLADE LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADFJ36G Y II it i'i�lllPLAWN6 AND ZONING L�GHAI DAT8- NET: 6,724 SO, FT. GROSS: 8,558 SQ. FT. APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHI CONFLICT WITH ANY CODE,' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELO x MID POINT C MID POINT OF ROOF HGT. I 5 MID POINT OF ROOF HGT. co 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING — A 3 FIBER CEMENT SIDING — B 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL 5 ACCENT ROOF 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 7 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS 8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM—MITEREI 9 TYPICAL 6" PLANE CHANGE 10 ,j STORE FRONT SYSTEM I UA 1: r Ii p SHEET: 30 OF 5 APPROVAL DOES N07 ALITH6 RIZE ANY Vtel: k IIN O CONfLICT WITH ANY CODES OR DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT tOcl II I 7 F UA 1: r SHEET: 30 OF 5 APPROVAL DOES N07 ALITH6 RIZE ANY Vtel: k IIN CONfLICT WITH ANY CODES OR DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT tOcl 7 F A -D ZJ r. OUTLINE OF EX .......... TREE MASS - TYPICAL o .......... f V Fs fi APPROXIMATE CENTER 7 LINE OF EXISTING CREEK Le A p ............ "g XA 10 'j" -4 V -v 0, 41 <1 ur A ti N 3qg N, xA . ..... . . .... . REMAINDER TRACT vryry &e, Op r V, 'u, LOT 2, BLOCK A gi 1:0 T 00, 2,062,567S QUAREFEE 47.350 ACRES 09"5 651 1 AN x 4, G .. .. . ..... or N P, f=Yl4ZTlKlr—' 36" TPA %........... . . ......... SANITARY SEWER LIME ..... .. . ........ . ... ... ... . ... .. .. .. ......... OUTLINE OF EXISTING TREE MASS - TYPICAL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT \A , wl, <\ EXISTING fid' AND FUTURE 60' TRA SANITARY SEWER L9 EASEMENT FUTURE 48" TRA SANITARY SEWER LINE LINE TABLE BEARi N89017D�,'W Ina M-1 N 00011,01V 32 N000O&8VfE S45�2OG i ,M S! 7-0V�60W S38011i''y bi S4005:�V8&8 S08 -02-30-W M044136* S4902VWT S73III 041'sot EIRL # S4005"IIE S14034'8&E CONCEPTUAL TRAIL ROUTE - SEE SHEETS 33-35 DESIGNED B ZOINING TRACT LOT 1, BLOC K A SEE SHEET 32 FOR CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT - MONUMENT SIGN CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Z19-01, CUl 8-0:2 AND PbliI-1 LOCATION: 101 FAST GLADE ROAD LOT 1 , BLOCK A, GLADE1360 ADDITION a , s '14 3 c, v, A. , •aYs,. ��. a&` xr W ,r 4 r 11 00 _g r _ 058 s .. .... �: r, a ,r.::. , F ..,,. '.... t �:.. - rz> .. m 1 :F, � ,:'., .«,., ,. A ._�... }�, i ,- >•t!`i �, `os,.,:,. ,. .x.. ,�.r r ;'"' ,S� `Aa < t '.,. .. .. „ .^+.,..yam' _-.�«.,_. , _.. .; :.. .., ,h. " �. °...,. .. ;. 1 , (�,o rr:.,, � alb. s"'--,.. ... m m -.. x t ~F r �+I m iTi „ 9i ^�,, M: -_. 4� H �: � ,. � r. : , 4: :;. r t .. "', wrc •. [.. Si +.,r_, 5"' S:. •„.. TMti^. ... x .,_ x :. ,-<... , ) w E_ -ou _ a� `; 5 s. ., ,. ,r ... ,. S. �5',,,;';'vt:. ., ,.... I; ..r 1 >i®` >>rr OTO oogo' rr >00 7 0 m MT1 m' m . > �F o. >z' In � m >m> >MOr, tl€19 1 z ��' m �. ,$ • o c: > m > ®f 1 ,E� a cm „ � I i �^B h m 0 ct L I ,,.,., 6 )1 {'� v it C,, m 0 0 CA PATI 0 f � rTl IAMZM r� qw- q Eta IME law (D In Z tT4CDCc) t-,)- 0 0 CA� Q C ®G� Why > 0: MR Z 3 a . , mo 7 0 Kv. 0 a 13 0 m 0 13 0 0 0 61 8' 0 m MT1 m' m . > �F o. >z' tl$ � m >m> tl€19 X47 z ��' m �. ,$ • o c: > m > ®f 1 ,E� a cm „ � I i �^B h m 0 ct L I ,,.,., 6 )1 {'� v it C,, ®G� Why > 0: MR Z 3 a . , mo 7 0 Kv. 0 a 13 0 m 0 13 0 0 0 61 8' 0 m MT1 co JW �. ®G� Why > 0: MR Z 3 a . , mo 7 0 Kv. 0 a 13 0 m 0 13 0 0 0 61 e. tl$ � 1; tl€19 �. ,$ • ®f 1 ,E� a I i �^B Iia }{i ii r � Y t, It^ pp � , 6 � � F F iI ' hl mms 9 m . . . . ...... . . .. .. ... .. 50 25 0 50 100 ... ...... .... rA < SCALE: 1 59-0" . .... ...... APPROXIMATE CENTERLIINE OF V EXISTING CREEK E-- ............ . EXERCISE t INTERPRETIVE SIGNAG�E, OR BENCH AREA . . .. .. ... ... t .. . ........ . ....... ...... Ir tt ... .. .. ...... !e lll� CONCEPTUAL ROUTE V, FOR PROPOSED HIKE -�,�,, I Al AND BIKE TRAIL 'j W� ..... llll'! -L"O, li,�Z, "C' IM! , --z z , \ " " " "": � , t�, t "t NO, I I ------------- ... . ... .. . . .... ............ .. ....... .. . .......... . . 4%t ; ,�, -� -, yq'i;, % /A 99 40' 2 . ..... .... N 4 OU FLINE OF EXISTI G "V a_ s4 'TREE MASS hy") 2— TYPICAL W. Z "YJ f ly 2/7/18 116301 Quorum Drive Suite 2100 B Addison, Texas 75240 Main 972.248.7676 Fax 972.248.1414 wwwjbipartners.Gorn 6 M LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) V . .. ... . ..... . 15' ONCOR ELEC. R.O.W. �l f ESMT. 7 -T 7 585-93, N250 01 r ....... 60 TRAIL HEAD FOR THE PROPOSED HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL. P REFER TO LANDSCA E PLAN ... STA '-fGH'WA*f E TO INCLUD BENCHES, TRASH RECEPTACLE, BIKE RACK SHEET 32 SIGNAGE AND 8 PARKING SPACES INCLUDING I (VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.) ACCESSIBLE SPACE. DALLAS INTERW 2/7/18 116301 Quorum Drive Suite 2100 B Addison, Texas 75240 Main 972.248.7676 Fax 972.248.1414 wwwjbipartners.Gorn 6 M LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) V OUTLINE OF EXISTING TREE MASS - TYPICAL IN �lyo. 14D E. 20' TRA SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT lVl4'l6,31,,VV 1,>/-, - SCALE: 1'" = III CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Z13-01, CUl 8-02 AND PI LOCATION: 101 EAST GLADE ROAD LOT I , BLOCK A, GLADE/360 ADDITION *A,4 MAYOECF DATE: J22�-b z PLANNING AND ZONING COMMK CHAIRM-AN DATE Qtll SHEET: 35 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE At CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR OR DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT LAND:�)uAPE I'l*j"%LAN 2/7/18 7 14-M OUTLINE OF EXISTING TREE MASS - TYPICAL APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING CREEK Cb 4002'30"E 163.50' Ce) c) w EX1 36' SAN SWR- TZ FUT. WSAN. SWR. w z NOTE: THE TRAIL LAYOUT SHOWN IS CONCEPTUAL. THE FINAL TRAIL LAYOUT IS TO BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. FUT. 60' TRA SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT 1 LOT 2, BLOCK A 2,062,567 SQUARE FEET 47.350 ACRES — — — — — — — — — — — — - 1%w 2500927"W 1325.10' D,16 047" 15' STATE HIGHWAY 360 ONCOR ELECRIC"\N R.O.W. & EASEMENT (VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.) 127 �99 y — — — — — — A4104TO8" R=320.01Y L=23137' T=122.15' ChB=N20059'09"W Ch=228,24' SCALE: 1'" = III CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Z13-01, CUl 8-02 AND PI LOCATION: 101 EAST GLADE ROAD LOT I , BLOCK A, GLADE/360 ADDITION *A,4 MAYOECF DATE: J22�-b z PLANNING AND ZONING COMMK CHAIRM-AN DATE Qtll SHEET: 35 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE At CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR OR DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT LAND:�)uAPE I'l*j"%LAN 2/7/18 7 14-M