HomeMy WebLinkAboutBZA2017-14January 9, 2018
Three 60 Resources
Attn: Todd Murphy
1229 S. Pine Street
Grapevine, TX 76051
RE: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA17-14
927 S. Church Street, legally described as Tract 20, William Dooley Survey
A1111aff] =0
This letter confirms on January 8, 2018, the Board of Zoning Adjustment pp
following request: _pLoved the
Section 27.F.2., "PO" Professional Office District, Density Regulations, requires a
minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. The Board approved a variance allowing a lot size
of 8,913 square feet for an existing lot.
Section 27.0.I., "PO" Professional office District, Area Regulations, requires a
minimum lot width of eighty -feet (80'). The Board approved a variance allowing a lot width
of sixty-three feet (63') for an existing lot.
Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures allows the Board of Zoning
Adjustment to approve the remodeling and/or enlargement of a nonconforming use.
The Board approved a special exception allow the existing non-residential structure to remain
as developed in addition to site improvements as shown on the site plan.
Please do not hesitate contacting our office if you have any questions. A copy of the minutes
will be available after they have been approved at the next regular Board of Zoning
Adjustment meeting. If you need a copy for your records, please contact Connie Cook at
817-410-3158.
Thank you,
Ron Stombaugh
Development Services Assistant Director
Don Dixson, Assistant &Wding Official
Mande Pancholy, Plans Examiner
Development Services Department
The City of Grapevine * P.O. Box 95104 * Grapevine, Texas 76099 * (817) 410-3165
Fax (817) 410-3012 * www.grapevinetexas.gov
SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMEN
JANUARY 8,2018 MEETING I
At their January 8, 2018 meeting, the Board of Zoning Adjustment acted on the
following cases:
80 - v a - * 0 2 !_ -•
1 M
Zma
Block A, Grapevine Lake Estates
The Board withdrew BZA1 7-04 for property addressed at 3547 Red Bird Lane, at
Staff's request.
During the review process staff determined that the special exception request for the
subject site was not needed due to the approval of BZA86-19 on April 3, 1986, allowing
for two (2) variances—a rear yard encroachment and a front yard encroachment for an
;txisting resir-
:•. •
e
-renvo I E.,
Z
r -T -211;&M,
William Dooley Survey
Section 27.F.2., "PO" Professional Office District, Density Regulations, requires
minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. The Board approved a variance allowing a I
size of ,913 square feet for an existing lot. 11
8
Section 27.6.I., "PO" Professional office District, Area Regulations, requires a
minimum lot width of eighty -feet (80). The Board approved a variance allowing a lot
width of sixty-three feet (63') for an existing lot.
Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures allows the Board of Zoning
Adjustment to approve the remodeling and/or enlargement of a nonconforming
use. The Board approved a special exception allow the existing non-residential
structure to remain as developed in addition to site improvements as shown on the site
plan.
0ABZA\2018\CityManager0utcome
The Board tabled the followina reauest
Z17-15 — David Klempin, 428 East Wall Street, platted as Lot 6, G E Hurst
Subdivision
Section 15.G.1, "R-7.6" Single Family District, Area Regulations requires a
minimum front yard setback of 30 -feet. The Board tabled a variance request allowing
a front yard depth of 16 -feet for an existing lot to the north along East Wall Street.
Section 15.G.4., "-7.5" Single Family District, Area Regulations requires a
minimum lot width of 95 -feet for a reverse frontage lot. The Board tabled a variance
request allowing a lot width of 72 -feet for an existing lot.
O ABZA1201810ityMa nagerOutcome
AGENDA
CITY OF ' a '
BRIEFING
r SESSION
BOARD • • ADJUSTMENT
MONDAY, JANUARY 8,2018,6:00 P.M.
"'LANNING
AND ..ZONING CONFERENCE
,Nr ROOM •.•.; ,.
SECOND FLOOR CITY HALL
10 SOUTH MAIN
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 1-6051
Xfflffls• •'•ffl
r
A. Board of Zoning Adjustment to conduct a briefing session to discuss ite
scheduled to be heard in the January s 2018 public
IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS PUBLIC MEETING AND YOU HAVE A DISABILIT
THAT REQUIRES ARRANGEMENTS AT
CONTACT THE OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AT (817) 410-3158 A
LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS WILL B
MADE ASSIST YOUR
•moi. • •• a. w11 _
r • , • . ,
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ASSISTANT O.
AGENDA
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING
MONDAY, JANUARY 8,2018,6:15 P.M.
PLANNING AND ZONING CONFERENCE ROOM
SECOND FLOOR — CITY HALL
200 SOUTH MAIN STREET
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051
• •.�10
t
A. •. • of • • Adjustment to conduct a public hearing relative to Board
of s • '• 14 submitted by --• for
property located at 3547 •'-• Bird Land and consideration of
B Board • • • Adjustment to conduct a public hearing relative to Board
of • • Adjustment Case BZA1 7-14
submitted by ••• Murphy,for
property located at 927 S. Church Streetand consideration of
moi. • of i ! Adjustment to consider the minutesof • i- a
2017 meeting and take any necessary action.
V. ADJOURNMENT
DISABILITYIF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND YOU HAVE A
. REQUIRES
•. i.♦ ARRANGEMENT
••.,A..
PLEASE CONTACTOFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT 1
3158 AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS
WILL BE D TO ASSIST YOUR NEEDS.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 551.001 et
seq. ACTS OF THE 1993 TEXAS LEGISLATURE, THE BOARD OF ZONING
ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS
THE D DAY OF . .R : 11•
77-�(- 7 B/s 1,
RON STOMBAUGFU
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT
FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
BUILDING OFFICIAL
RON STOMBAUGH, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
ALBERT L. TRIPLETT JR, PLANNER 11
SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA17-14
927 SOUTH CHURCH STREET
Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment Mjarove the following variances and
special exception to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for property
located at 927 South Church Street, legally described as Tract 20, William Dooley Survey,
Abstract 422 as follows:
Section 27.F.2., "PO" Professional Office District, Density Regulations, requires
minimurn lot size of 10,000 square feet.
The applicant is requesting a variance of 1,087 - square feet to this requirement and if
approved by the Board would allow a lot size of 8,913 square feet for an existing lot.
Section 27.G.I., "PO" Professional office District, Area Regulations, requires a
minimum lot width of eighty -feet (80').
The applicant is requesting a variance of seventeen feet (17') to this requirement and if
approved by the Board would allow a lot width of sixty-three feet (63') for an existing lot.
jdir�l [off$
FEW& IR -is 1 [0 9 1
The applicant is requesting a special exception to allow the existing non-residential
structure to remain as developed in addition to site improvements as shown on the site
plan.
. . - olk"1111groug
Staff finds that special conditions exist for the variances and special exception requested.
Specifically, the site is an existing developed lot, and the existing structure was built in
1936 prior to the rezoning of the site in the 1984 City Rezoning. Platted and developed lots
exist adjacent to the subject site, eliminating the possibility to expand the site to meet the
0ABZA\2017\Cases\BZA1 7-14.4
area and width requirements.
Proposed site improvements have necessitated the variance requests to address the
current lot width and area and a special exception request to address the existing structure
within the required front yard. The property is currently zoned "PO" Professional Office
District. An existing 1,022 square foot dwelling is proposed to be used for general office
uses. Site improvements on the subject site include: conversion of the dwelling into an
office and providing seven off-street parking spaces. The Board of Zoning Adjustment
approved BZA15-12 at the October 5, 2015 meeting, on a lot within the immediate area, to
allow a non-residential structure and detached accessory to remain as developed along
with a parking lot expansion for general office uses.
The application was submitted by Todd Murphy. The property is owned by Lorna Jill
Sathre.
O:\BZA\2017\Cases\BZA17-14.4 2
P') -a fV Irl - 14
19- y5Iq a,
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATIO1
ADDRESS:
CITYISTATE: ZIP:195 ()
HOME: WORK: MOBILE. -
W -310
2. PROPERTY OWNER(S):
NAME:
C�l
ADDRESS: - 4
E-MAIL/-'
CITYlSTATE:0,oIo_s ZIP:
HOME:911-ZleZ-�5�-I,, WORK: FAX:
��Jjlr 1 0 a•
I 1 1:
_Y�2_ 4 q
STREET ADDRESS, LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY:
(Please attach Survey of the Subject Property)
ADDRESS: 9zz '5: s7X�r_7__
LOT: BLOCK: SUB -DIVISION:
4. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE
SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET:
7
1%111_111;_1-61wy z 6 �1_ Aq CID 6 —7 7-alV e_- i --5;Q I'= -r
/- g
oA=uVbrmsAappbza
www.graptvinetem.gov
1199 Revised 1/06,1/13, 1114
I
PR
IN1 Lao,
5. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS
WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL
EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS,
VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC.
THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR
CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS
DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE
REQUEST.
�, w � 1� w 1 1 w w � i i i . • � �
� i ) # ass'• � + w j
wwi iw � i w . #• i w . a i i. iw. wws
7. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER
DRAWINGS OR PHOTOGRAPHS NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD.
SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE
VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN
APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.)
o: tzcdlfbm6appbza
www.grapevinetexas.gov
1190 R—Lsad 1/06, 1113, 1114
THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF IMLL DETERMINE THE AGENDA FOR EACH OF THE
PUBLIC HEARING DATES. BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE AGENDA. Y_OURAPPLICATION MAYBE
RESCHEDULED TO A LATER DATE,
APPLICANT (PF
APPLICANT SIC
OWNER (PRINT
OWNER SIGNA
o.lz¢ult mislappbza
www.w2peviaetms.gov
1199 Revised 1106,1113,1114
The State of —7�'
County of
Before me A14 -c -he-, U on this day personally appeared
known to me (or proved to me on the oath of
or through = s t9 C- _(description of
identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument
and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein
expressed.
Given under my hand and seal of office this (&` day of A�W A.D. T&q 7-
SEA
(;Eo MITCHM
-!&I Notary Public, Q§ Siege
Comm. Expile Siete yle)(
D 1303j3j5 6
NOtOfY ID 13032325.6_
The State of
County of
UA -gr -y- Signature
Before me ICA:AZk t�cxd\"F—' on this day personally appeared
J-
' -1a'< X�A-4-07-5 known to me Cor proved to me on the oath of
or through 'Dir- -
(description of
identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument
and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein
expressed.
Given under my hand and seal of office this 3- Ch
day of
SEAL
DBRASNotary Signature
HAM
My Notary ID # 7473W6
EVk%-SepWnVw25.2021
6
a*NzcuIfbrrnskaDpbza
wwgrapovinoloyas.gov
1199 Revised 1106. V13, 1114
10. Master Site Development Plan.
D. LIMITATIONS OF USES: None specified.
E. PLAN REQUIREMENTS: No application for a building permit for construction of a
principal building shall be approved unless:
A Plat, meeting all requirements of the City of Grapevine has been approved
by the City Council and recorded in the official records of Tarrant County.
2. A Site Plan, meeting the requirements of Section 47, has been approved.
3. A Landscape Plan, meeting the requirements of Section 53, has been
approved.
F. DENSITY REQUIREMENTS: The following bulk and intensity of use requirements
shall apply:
MAXIMUM DENSITY: The maximum density within a P-0 District shall not
axceed a floor area ratio of 1.0.
2. MINIMUM LOT SIZE: The minimum lot size in a P-0 District shall be ten
thousand (10,000) square feet. Planned Professional Office Centers,
approved as a conditional use permit, shall be a minimum of two (2) acres.
3. MINIMUM OPEN SPACE: At least twenty (20) percent of the total lot area
shall be devoted to non -vehicular open space. (Non -vehicular open space is
any area not devoted to buildings, parking, loading, storage or vehicular use.)
a. Landscaping in excess of the required minimum open space that is
located in the rear yard of the site shall not be used to meet the
minimum open space requirements for the site.
4. MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE: The combined area occupied by all
main and accessory structures shall not exceed sixty (60) percent of the total
lot area.
5. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: The combined area occupied by all
main and accessory structures, parking, storage, loading and other paved
areas shall not exceed eighty (80) percent of the total lot area.
G. AREA REGULATIONS: The following minimum standards shall be required:
1 LOT WIDTH: Every lot shall have minimum width of eighty (80) feet.
022117 3 Section 27
terminated by the Board of Adjustment in accordance with provisions
of Section 67A of this Ordinance.
E. CHANGING NONCONFORMING USES:
1 Any nonconforming use may be changed to a conforming use, and once
such change is made, the use shall not thereafter be changed back to a
nonconforming use.
2. The Board of Adjustment may grant a change of use from one
nonconforming use to another nonconforming use provided such change is
to a use permitted in a zoning district where the original nonconforming use
would be permitted, or provided that such change is to a use permitted in a
more restrictive classification. However, such change of use and occupancy
shall not tend to prolong the life of a nonconforming use. Upon review of the
facts in accordance with Section 67A, the Board of Adjustment may establish
a specific period of time for the return of the occupancy to a conforming use.
3. The Board of Adjustment may approve the remodeling or enlargement of
nonconforming use when such an •' would • tend to prolong th
I
life
• the nonconforming use. Upon review • the facts, the Board
Adjustment may establish a specific period of time for the return of th
occupancy to a conforming use.
F. LIMITATIONS ON CHANGING NONCONFORMING USES: No nonconforming use
shall be changed to another nonconforming use, which requires more off-street
parking spaces or off-street loading space than the original nonconforming use,
unless additional off-street parking and loading space is provided so as to comply
with the requirements of Sections 55 and 56.
The number of dwelling units or rooms in a nonconforming residential use shall not
be increased so as to exceed the number of dwelling units or rooms existing on the
effective date of this Ordinance.
No nonconforming use may be expanded or increased beyond the lot or tract upon
which such nonconforming use is located as of the effective date of this ordinance
except to provide off-street loading or off-street parking space upon approval of the
Board of Adjustment.
All nonconforming uses being expanded under the provisions of this Ordinance shall
comply with the other applicable provisions of this Ordinance.
G. TERMINATION OF NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES:
1 In the event of damage or destruction of a nonconforming structure to the
091515 3 Section 43
December 22, 2017
Ms. Christine Lopez
Fort Worth Star Telegram
P.O. Box 1870
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
RE: Grapevine Account # CIT 25
Dear Ms. Lopez,
Please find enclosed the following for publication on Sunday, December 24, 2017, in the
Northeast Edition of the Neighborhood Extra Section of the Fort Worth Star Telegram.
(One time only)
Item
Notice of Public Hearing:
. MW
As always, your assistance is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please
contact me at (817) 410-3155.
Sincerely,
Albert L. Triplett, Jr.
Planner 11
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
On Monday evening, January 8, 2018 at 6:15 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 2nd
Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, the Board of Zoning Adjustment of the
City of Grapevine will hold a public hearing to consider the following items:
Case Number/Name: BZA17-04, Mark Peeples
Location: 3547 Red Bird Lane, proposed to be platted as Lot 1, Block A,
Grapevine Lake Estates
Current Zoning: "R-7.5" Single Family District
Proposal: The request is for the following special exception to the
Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 43.E.3, Nonconforming Uses
and Structures allows the Board of Zoning Adjustment to approve the remodeling and/or
enlargement of a nonconforming use. The applicant is requesting a special exception to
allow the existing residential structure to remain as developed as shown on the plot plan.
Case Number/Name: BZA1 7-14, Todd Murphy
Location: 927 South Church Street, legally described as William Dooley
Survey, Tract 20, Abstract 422.
Current Zoning: "PO" Professional Office District
Proposal: The request is for the following variances and special exception
to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 27.F.2, "PO"
Professional Office District, Density Requirements, requires a minimum lot size of 10,000
square feet. The applicant is requesting a variance of 1,087 -feet to this requirement and if
approved by the Board would allow a lot area of 8,913 square feet for an existing lot.
Section 27.G.1, "PO" Professional Office District, Area Regulations requires a minimum lot
width of eighty -feet (80'). The applicant is requesting a variance of seventeen -feet (17') to
this requirement and if approved by the Board would allow a lot width of sixty-three feet
(63') for an existing lot. Section 43.E.3, Nonconforming Uses and Structures allows the
Board of Zoning Adjustment to approve the remodeling and/or enlargement of a
nonconforming use. The applicant is requesting the existing non-residential structure to
remain as developed in addition to site improvements as shown on the plot plan,
Case Number/Name: BZA17-15, David Klempin
Location: 428 East Wall Street, Lot 6R, G.E. Hurst Subdivision
Current Zoning: "R-7.5" Single Family District
Proposal: The request is for the following variances to the Grapevine
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.6.1, "R-7.5" Single Family District,
Area Regulations requires a minimum front yard setback of thirty -feet (30'). The applicant is
requesting a variance of fourteen -feet (14') to this requirement, and if approved by the
Board would allow a front yard depth along East Wall Street of sixteen -feet (16') for an
existing lot. Section 15,G.4, "R-7.5" Single Family District, Area Regulations, requires a
minimum lot width of ninety-five feet (95') for a reverse frontage lot. The applicant is
requesting a variance of thirty-eight (38') feet to this requirement and if approved by the
Board would allow a lot width of fifty-seven (57') feet for an existing lot.
After all parties have been given an opportunity to speak, the public hearing will be closed
and the Commission will deliberate the pending matters. Please contact the Department of
Development Services concerning any questions, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine,
Texas, 76051 or P.O. Box 95104, Grapevine, Texas, 76099, 817-410-3158.
Connie Cook
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Albert L. Triplett Jr.
Planner 11
City of Grapevine
200 S. Main Street
Grapevine TX 76051
817.410.3155
Albert Triplett
Friday, December 22, 2017 1:05 PIVI
Connie Cook
FW: News Notice
From: Lopez, Christine [mailto:
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2017 1:03 PIVI
To: Albert Triplett <atriplett@grapevinetexas.gov>
Subject: Re: News Notice
ad received
Christine
Christine Lopez
Legal Classified Representative
Phone: 817-390-7522
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Albert Triplett < wrote:
Hello Ms. Lopez,
attached is the news notice for this weekend. Please acknowledge your receipt of this
email and attachment. Thank you.
Albert L. Triplett Jr.
1
City of Grapevine
200 S. Main Street
Grapevine TX 76051
* * * External email communication — Please use caution before clicking links and/or opening attachments * * *
Sta Telegr&iy
Arlington Citizen -Journal I The Keller Citizen 1 La Estrella
Mansfield News -Mirror j Star -Telegram Northeast i Weatherford Star -Telegram
star-tategrarr>.com 808 Throckmorton St. I Ft Worth, Tx. 76102.6315
*** MEMO INVOICE ***
Fed ID# 26-2674582
$262.52
SALESREP t24 'ADVERTISERINFORMATIONAdvertising Dept BILLING PERIOD 8 1 BILLED ACCOUNT NUMBER 17 1 ADVERTISER/CLIENTNUMBER I2 AOVERTISER/CLIENT NAME
02/07/2018 600620 600620 CITY OF GRAPEVINE SECRETARY
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO
Star -Telegram
CITY OF GRAPEVINE SECRETARY Star -Telegram - Advertising
PO BOX 95104 PO BOX 51847
GRAPEVINE, TX 76099-9704 Livonia, MI 48151
Billing: Contact Sales Rep. Credit: Email
Payment is due upon receipt. SaITM
°
" NEWSPAPER
112114 3
5 s BILLED t7 TIMES 's
s
0003510469
START STOP
REFERENCE
DESCRIPTION PRODUCT
SAL SIZE UNITS RUN
RATE
AMOUNT
12/24 12/24
0003510469
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS On Monday Telegram
1 x 116 L 116 1
$2.22
$257.52
12/24 12/24
0003510469
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS On Monday Upsell ST.Com
1 x 116 L 116 1
$0.04
$5.00
Invoice Total
$262.52
IDo-C
oo-ui`7- 03
THIS IS A MEMO INVOICE AND MAY OR MAY NOT REFLECT ALL CHARGES OR CHANGES THAT OCCUR ON THE FINAL INVOICE.
.......... ....
PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN LOWER PORTION WITH YOUR REMITTANCE
Star-lblegram / BILLING PERIOD 2 ADVERTISER/CWENT NAME
MEDIAS 02/07/2018 CITY OF GRAPEVINE SECRETARY
Star -Telegram - Advertising 23 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 3 TERMS OF PAYMENT
PO BOX 51847
$262.52 Upon Receipt
Livonia, MI 48151
*** MEMO INVOICE ***
Star -Telegram
Star -Telegram -Advertising
PO BOX 51847
Livonia, MI 48151
4 PAGE#
5 1 BILLING DATE
1
02/07/2018
II NEWSPAPER REFERENCE
0003510469
6 BILLED ACCOUNT NUMBER
600620
7 ADVERTISERICLIENT NUMBER
600620
Account # _ Ad Number
600620 0003510469
Attention:
CITY OF GRAPEVINE SECF
PO BOX 95104
GRAPEVINE, TX 760999704
eller Citizen I La Estrella
beast I Weatherford Star -Telegram
Worth, Tx. 76102.63151800.776.7827
UBLICATION
PO Amount Cols Depth
lav eveni 1 $257.52 1 116.00 li
I tl4MENMOTA *W
County of Tarrant
Before me, a Notary Public in and for
said County and State, this day
personally appeared CHRISTINE
LOPEZ, Bid and Legal Coordinator for
the Star -Telegram, published by the
Star -Telegram, Inc, at Fort Worth, in
Tarrant County, Texas; and who, after
being duly sworn, did depose and say
that the attached clipping of an
advertisement was published in the
above named paper on the listed
dates:
1 insertion(s)
Published On:
December 24, 2017
(Principal Clerk)
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO
BEFORE ME, THIS 7th day of
February in the year of 2018
Notary !Public
BZA17_14_122017_034615PM Labels - Count: 20
BOB G LEWIS LORNA SATHRE
6403 WESTGATE DR 4994 THUNDER RD
DALLAS DALLAS
75254 75244
CHURCH ST ASSOCIATES LLC NATIONSBANK OF TEXAS TR
923 S CHURCH ST PO BOX 1479
GRAPEVINE FORT WORTH
76051 76101
CITY OF GRAPEVINE OSIANA PROPERTIES LLC
PO BOX 95104 3307 WESTOVER CT
GRAPEVINE GRAPEVINE
76099 76051
GPV RELIEF &COMMUNITY EXCHANGE RANGER REAL ESTATE LLC
602 SHADY BROOK DR 1000 S MAIN ST STE 150
GRAPEVINE GRAPEVINE
76051 76051
JAMES D FAMILY PRTNSHP GREEN
PO BOX 1618
FRISCO
75034
JAMES R MADDUX
3404 LAKERIDGE DR
GRAPEVINE
76051
JERRY SMITH
1514 TERRACE DR
GRAPEVINE
76051
JERRY D SMITH
1231 BRIAN CT
GRAPEVINE
76051
JK REALTY GROUP LLC
8241 MID CITIES BLVD STE 100
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
76182
KEHACATY FAMILY PROPERTIES LLC
106 N DENTON TAP RD STE 210-18
COPPELL
75019
Page 1
0 1111111�
03 agIAT a I a - , a
!DL AU F1551
WWII=, MATIM-1
convenience.
Purpose of Request: The applicant has submitted an application to the Department of
Development Services for 927 S. Church Street, legally described as William Dooley
Survey, Tract 20, Abstract 422 The following variances and special exception to the
Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73:
Section 27.F.2, "PO" Professional Office District, Density Requirements. The
2pplicant is requesting a variance of 1,087 -feet to this requirement and if approved by the
Board would allow a lot area of 8,913 square feet for an existing lot.
Section 27.G.1, "PO" Professional Office District, Area Regulations. The applicant is
requesting a variance of seventeen -feet (17') to this requirement and if approved by the
Board would allow a lot width of sixty-three feet (63') for an existing lot.
Section 43.E.3, Nonconforming Uses and Structures allows the Board of Zoning
Adjustment to approve the remodeling and/or enlargement of a nonconforming use.
The applicant is requesting a special exception to allow the existing non-residential
structure to remain as developed in addition to site improvements as shown on the plot
plan.
WHEN: MONDAY, JANUARY 8,2018, AT 6:15 PM
WHAT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING
LOCATION: CITY COUNCIL P & Z CONFERENCE ROOM, 2ND FLOOR, 200 SOUTH
MAIN STREET
1. City Staff Introduction of Case and Applicant
2. Applicant and Other Speakers' Presentation
3. Public Input from Neighborhood Associations, Property Owners within 200 feet,
Interested Citizenry
4. Questions from Board of Zoning Adjustment for Applicants, City Staff and Guests
Present
5. Public Hearing Closing
6 Determining if a Special Condition Exists
7. Vote
ALL WRITTEN • •
BE
LATER
THAN 5
. ON
MONDAY,
, . .. • • ' •.
As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve)
(protest) and/or (have the following comments)
Print Name, Address, City, Zip, Lot, Block and Subdivision:
Signature:
-. , 11M Q.
Board of Zoning Adjustment
Department of Development Services
City of Grapevine
P. O. Box 95104
Grapevine, TX 76099
0:\BZA\2017\Gases\BZA 17-14.3
Direct questions/deliver responses to:
Planning & Building Inspections Division
Department of Development Services
City of Grapevine
200 S. Main Street
Grapevine, TX 76051
received from
................................................
Todd Murphy
Three 60 Resources
1229 S. Pine St.
Grapevine, TX 76051
i •
Fee type
BZA APPLICATION FEE
received by
- ........ I ...............®®........
Connie Cook
Development Services
200 S. Main Street
Grapevine, TX 76051
(817) 410-3158 Phone
(817) 410-3018 Fax
ccook@grapevinetexas.gov
Permit Receipt
Receipt No.: 17-04696
Receipt No.:
17-04696
Receipt Date:
12/05/2017
Receipt Time:
1:56 PM
Payment Method:
Check
Payment Note:
CK1742
Project ID #:
BZA-17-4572
Project Type:
Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA)
Address:
927 S Church St.
Amount
$ 100.00
Amount Paid $ 100.00
100-32940417-000
Account Summary
$ 100.00
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas, met on Monday
evening, January 8, 2018, at 6:00 P.M. in the Planning and Zoning Conference Room,
2nd Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, for a Briefing Session with the
following members present to wit:
Debbie Holt Chairman
Ken White Vice -Chairman
Tracey Dierolf Secretary
John Sheppard Member
D Todd Parrish Alternate
constituting a quorum with Member George Dalton absent. Also present was City
Council Representative Sharron Spencer, City Attorney, Matthew Boyle, and the
following City Staff,
Ron Stombaugh Development Services Assistant Director
Albert • Planner 11
Connie Cook Development Services Assistant
Chairman Debbie • called the Briefing • • the Board • Zoning Adjustment •
order at approximately 6:00 P.M.
NEW BUSINESS
Mr. Stombaugh briefed the Board of Zoning Adjustment regarding the items scheduled
to be heard in the regular public hearing.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further discussion, Ken White made a motion to adjourn. Tracey Dierolf
seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Holt, White, Dierolf, Sheppard, Parrish
Nays: None
Absent: Dalton
The Briefing Session was adjourned at approximately 6:05 P.M.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018.
APPROVED:
,/--
CHAIRMAN
2
Board of Zoning Adjustment
01-08-2018
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas, met in regular
session, Monday evening, January 8, 2018 at 6:15 P.M., in the Council Chambers, 2nd
Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas with the following members present:
Debbie Holt Chairman
Ken White Vice -Chairman
Tracey Dierolf Secretary
John Sheppard Member
D Todd Parrish Alternate
constituting a quorum with Member George Dalton absent. Also present was City
Council Representative Sharron Spencer, City Attorney, Matthew Boyle, and the
following City Staff:
"• Stombaugh Development Services Assistant Director
•- • Planner 11
Connie Cook Development Services Assistant
Chairman Holt called the Public Hearing Session of the Board of Zoning Adjustment to
order at approximately • P.M.
BIRD LANE
The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA1 7-04 submitted
by Mark Peeples for property located at 3547 Red Bird Lane, Proposed to be platted as
Lot 1, Block A, Grapevine Lake Estates.
Mr. Stombaugh explained that Staff found during the review process that the special
exception requested for the subject site was not needed due to the approval of BZA86-
19 on April 3, 1986, allowing for two (2) variances—a rear yard encroachment and a
front yard encroachment for an existing residential structure.
With no questions for Mr. Stombaugh, and no additional speakers, Ken White made a
motion to close the public hearing. Tracey Dierolf seconded the motion which prevailed
by the following vote:
Ayes: Holt, White, Dierolf, Sheppard, Parrish
Nays: None
Absent: Dalton
Ken White made a motion to Withdraw BZA1 7-04. Tracey Dierolf seconded the motion
which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Holt, White, Dierolf, Sheppard, Parrish
Nays: None
Absent: Dalton
I OFAIE M V IMIN
CHURCH STREET
Next for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA1 7-14 submitted by Todd
Murphy for property located at 927 South Church Street legally described as Tract 20,
William D. Tate Avenue.
Section 27.F.2., "PO" Professional Office District, Density Regulations, requires a
minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. The applicant requested a variance allowing
a lot size of 8,913 square feet for an existing lot.
Section 27.G.I., "PO" Professional office District, Area Regulations, requires a
minimum lot width of eighty -feet (80'). The applicant requested a variance allowing a
lot width of sixty-three feet (63') for an existing lot.
Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures allows the Board of Zoning
Adjustment to approve the remodeling and/or enlargement of a nonconforming
use. The applicant requested a special exception allowing the existing non-residential
structure to remain as developed in addition to site improvements as shown on the site
plan.
Mr. Stombaugh explained that Staff found that special conditions existed for the
variances and special exception requested. Specifically, the site was an existing
developed lot, and the existing structure was built in 1936 prior to the rezoning of the
site in the 1984 City Rezoning. Platted and developed lots existed adjacent to the
subject site, eliminating the possibility to expand the site to meet the area and width
requirements.
Mr. Stombaugh stated that the proposed site improvements necessitated the variances
requested to address the current lot width and lot size, and a special exception
requested to address the existing structure within the required front yard. The existing
structure was proposed to be used for general office space. Site improvements included
the conversion of the existing dwelling into office space and seven (7) off-street parking
spaces.
With no questions for Mr. Stombaugh, Todd Murphy of 1229 South Pine Street,
Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of Truth; he gave a brief presentation to the Board and
requested favorable consideration of his request and offered to answer any questions of
the Board.
With no questions for Mr. Murphy, and no additional speakers, Ken White made a
motion to close the public hearing. Tracey Dierolf seconded the motion which prevailed
by the following vote:
2 Board of Zoning Adjustment
118118
Ayes:
Holt, White, Dierolf, Sheppard, Parrish
Nays:
None
Absent:
Dalton
Ken White made a motion that a special condition existed for the requested special
exception and variances. Specifically, the site was an existing developed lot, and the
existing structure was built in 1936 prior to the rezoning of the site in the 1984 City
Rezoning. Platted and developed lots existed adjacent to the subject site, eliminating
the possibility to expand the site to meet the area and width requirements.
Tracey Dierolf seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Halt, White, Dierolf, Sheppard, Parrish
Nays: None
Absent: Dalton
Iken White then made a motion to grant the following variances to "PO" Professional
Office District, Area Regulations: Section 27.F.2., allowing a lot size of 8,913 square
feet for existing • and a motion -g. • to Sectionallowing •width
of • for • l and a motionto grant a special-• • -•. • to
Section •Nonconforming Uses and Structures allowing existing
shownnon-residential structure to remain as developed in addition to site improvements as
on plan. Tracey Dierolfseconded • • prevailed by
following vote:
Ayes:
Holt, White, Dierolf, Sheppard, Parrish
Nays:
None
Absent:
Dalton
V! MAU
WALL STREET
Next for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA17-15 submitted by David
Klempin for property located at 428 East Wall Street platted as Lot 6R, G.E. Hurst
Subdivision.
Section 15.6.1, -7.5" Single Family District, Area Regulations requires
minimum front yard setback of 3 -feet. The applicant requested a variance of 14 -feet
requesting a variance of 14 -feet allowing a front yard depth of 16 -feet for an existing lot
to the north along East Wall Street.
Section 1.G.4., "R-7.5" Single Family District, Area Regulations requires a
minimum lot width of 95 -feet for a reverse frontage lot. The applicant requested a
variance of 23 -feet, allowing a lot width of 72 -feet for an existing lot.
Mr. Stombaugh explained that Staff found a special condition existed for the variances
requested. Specifically, the subject site was an existing lot that was originally platted in
1948 predating the City's first zoning ordinance enacted in 1955. Additionally,
developed, platted property existed to the south and west along with dedicated street
right-of-way (Wall Street; Dooley Street) to the north and east which prohibited any
possible expansion of the lot.
3 Board of Zoning Adjustment
1/8118
Mr. Stombaugh stated that the subject property was currently owned by the Grapevine
Township Revitalization Project. An existing 1903 constructed home previously located
in Southlake had been donated to the Grapevine Township Revitalization Project and
was subsequently moved to the subject property in December 2017 due to time
restraints of the land it resided upon being prepared for commercial development.
With no questions for Mr. Stombaugh, Paul W. McCallum, Convention and Visitors
Bureau Director, of 636 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of Truth;
he provided background information to the Board regarding the development of the
Grapevine Township Revitalization Project (GTRP) and background information in
regards to obtaining the subject structure. He also explained why Staff had been unable
to proceed with the submittal to the Board of Zoning Adjustment prior to relocating the
structure onto the property. He requested favorable consideration of his request and
offered to answer any questions of the Board.
With no questions forproperty owners Johnof
Street,Wall • of 4I8 East WallStreet,• . • of
Street and David Eubank of 405 East Texas Street, Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of
Truth. Each property owner explained ! the Board there objectionsto the request
regarding the placement of the structure on the lot and the overall size of the structure
being too large for the lot. They stated that special treatment had been given and
objected to rules being overlooked, whereas they were all required to abide by the
Historic Preservation Department and City rules when their homes were constructed,
They expressed their concerns regarding foundation, siding and electrical in reference
to building •!- orientation of ! - on - property, !
curbing and paving of • discussed regarding the timing
of the case being presented around holidays and ample notification had not been given,
discussion was held regarding tabling the case. Several homeowners expressed their
appreciation !r the historical issues Mr. McCallum had discussed, however, felt the
structure was not compliant with codes and requested the Board deny the request.
John Sheppard asked Mr. Franks if the orientation of the house on the property were
different would it make a difference. Mr. Franks stated that he would not have an
objection if the Wall Street side were 30 -feet like other properties on the south side of
the street.
Mr. Barfield requested the Board table the motion, he suggested that all homeowners,
Historic Preservation and city staff meet together and see if something could be worked
out.
John Sheppard asked Mr. Barfield, how many days would be needed if a motion were
made to table the case. Mr. Barfield stated he thought all could be done in thirty days.
With no more testimonies and no further questions, Assistant City Attorney, Matthew
Boyle addressed the Board. He stated he was not there to speak for or against the
case. He was there in the capacity as Assistant City Attorney and not offering any
factual testimony. He explained that there were two (2) different bodies represented
relative to the Board of Zoning case presented. One Board was Historic Preservation
Commission and the other was Board of Zoning Adjustment. Mr. Boyle explained the
jurisdictions, differences and responsibilities of each. Mr. Boyle stated that the lot could
4 Board of Zoning Adjustment
1/8/18
not be developed without a variance and fell into the Boards prerogative to consider the
variances requested, he further explained that there had been a precedence for the
requested variances. On March 7, 2005 for 308 Ruth Street (southwest corner of East
Texas Street and Ruth Street) for lot width (25 -foot variance to the 95 -foot lot width
requirement for a reverse frontage lot) and to the front yard setback (15 -foot variance
along East Texas Street),
Debbie Holt asked Mr. Boyle for clarification in reference to the size of the property and
size of structure adding to the need for a variance. Mr. Boyle stated that the 23 -feet was
inherent to the property in itself.
John Sheppard asked Mr. Boyle if the property at 308 East Texas Street and the current
Board of Zoning case were similar because they had been vacant lots and homes
brought in. Mr. Boyle stated he was making a comparison to the specific properties,
dimensions of those properties and the applicability of the zoning ordinance to those lot
dimensions.
PreservationDebbie Holt recapped what Mr. Boyle had stated and asked if the Historic
Commission would be able to work with the neighbors• - -• Mr. Boyle stated
that
a Certificate of Appropriateness had been applied for and granted.
With no further questions • Mr. Boyle,. McCallum, readdressed the Boa
•
regarding updates to the subject property. Mr. McCallum clarified that all aluminu
siding would be removed, windows would be replaced and the foundation would
♦ -d
Debbie Holt asked Mr. McCallum if neighbors could sit down and discuss concerns. Mr.
McCallum stated they could visit with either David Klempin or himself, a Certificate of
Appropriateness had been approved and certain design guidelines had to be followed,
however if they would like to give input, obtain specific details or obtain further
information they could discuss it with them.
With no further questions for Paul W. McCallum, Ron Stombaugh, readdressed the
Board and clarified lot dimensions of the subject property.
With no questions for Ron Stombaugh, Norman Barfield, readdressed the Board
regarding his concerns and requested the Board table the case for 30 days.
With no questions for, Norman Barfield, property owner Katie Roberts of 208 South
Dooley Street, Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of Truth; she explained that she owned
an historic home that had been moved into the city. She requested the Board consider
the smaller homes on the South Dooley side regarding the six-foot (6') side yard
between the subject house and the existing residence, she stated if the structure were
moved further back off the front property line it would make the side yard even tighter.
With no questions for, Katie Roberts, Neal Cooper of 404 East Wall Street, Grapevine,
Texas, took the Oath of Truth; he explained it had been his experience that utilities and
sewer easements were not always known or properly identified. He stated that this
particular sewer line ran through lots one to five and a plat from 1948 had an unusual
turn right at the subject lot. He expressed his concern that with the tight placement of
rj Board of Zoning Adjustment
118/18
structure a sewer easement may coincide with the location of a garage or house. He
further stated that sewer easement locations were not covered under a Certificate of
Appropriateness.
Debbie Holt asked Mr. Cooper what would happen if construction started and found the
sewer line incorrectly located. Mr. Cooper explained the process he had been required
to follow.
John Sheppard asked Paul McCallum if the structure had been added onto. Mr.
McCallum stated for the most part it was original.
With no further questions for Paul McCallum, and no additional speakers, Ken White
made a motion to close the public hearing. Tracey Dierolf seconded the motion which
prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Holt, White, Dierolf, Sheppard, Parrish
Nays: None
Absent: Dalton
Discussion was held regarding public notification and tabling of the case. Debbie Holt
asked Ron Stombaugh if the case had been advertised, Mr. Stombaugh stated that it
had been advertised like all cases, 15 days prior to the public hearing and personal
property notices were sent ten (10) days prior to the public hearing.
Debbie Molt asked Ron Stombaugh if the house could remain on the property for an
additional 30 days, Mr. Stombaugh stated there would not be any problem,
Matthew Boyle re -addressed the Board, he explained, if the Board intended to table this
case, the most efficient way would be to re -open the public hearing and make a motion
to continue the public hearing in this case to the Boards February 5th regularly
scheduled meeting, this eliminated having to re -advertise, republish and all members in
attendance and public would know when to return.
John Sheppard made a motion to consider a motion to reopen the public hearing on this
case BZA17-15 and continue the public hearing to the Boards February 5, 2018
meeting. Tracey Dierolf seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes:
Holt, White, Dierolf, Sheppard, Parrish
Nays:
None
Absent:
Dalton
John Sheppard made a motion to close the public hearing. Tracey Dierolf seconded the
motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Holt, White, Dierolf, Sheppard, Parrish
Nays: None
Absent, Dalton
MINUTES
6 Board of Zoning Adjustment
1/8/18
Next the Board of Zoning Adjustment considered the minutes of the November 6, 2017,
Briefing Session, Public Hearing and Work Session.
Tracey Dierolf made a motion to accept the minutes of the November 6, 2017, Briefing
Session. John Sheppard seconded the motion.
Ayes:
Holt, White, Dierolf, Sheppard, Parrish
Nays:
None
Absent:
Dalton
Tracey Dierolf made a motion to accept the minutes of the November 6, 2017, Public
Hearing. Ken White seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Holt, White, Dierolf, Sheppard, Parrish
Nays: None
Absent: Dalton
Tracey Dierolf made a motion to accept the minutes of the November 6, 2017, Work
Session. Ken White seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Holt, White, Dierolf, Sheppard, Parrish
Nays: None
Absent: Dalton
9111101112-4,01
With no further discussion, Ken White made a motion to adjourn. Tracey Dierolf
seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Holt, White, Dierolf, Sheppard, Parrish
Nays: None
Absent: Dalton
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 7:36 P.M.
7
Uwaae-In"D
mum.,
Board of Zoning Adjustment
1/8/18
IF
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
=k�
LOT 2RA BLOCK 51
APPROVED is
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
DENIED
TARRANT COUNTY
PLAN M 11011
CASE #
MURPHY PROJECT
NOVMBER 25, 201'1
DATE 1- 8 - l8
ACCESSIBILTY SLOPE
REQUIREMENTS
. 2% MAX SLOPE
ON ACCES. PAWW
AND AISLE
•ACCESSABLE ISLE TO
SJULDIN3 ENTRY
CS7
5% MAX SLOPE AND Ifs MAX
°)z
148.00'
ORPSO SLOPE
O
!=
NO VERT CLE RISE OVER W WW
DEVELOPER / BUILDER
�
o
':' �•''. :.
t Vi
°'>;t:
�: 9.
I�
TODD MURPHY
PHONE: SrI-9Ab-9163
d
�
>.
a:::��: N..
W
([
1
toddMleclrlcal-Sriebeveeaan
o
`':SP
t
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
-SrACE � -'SPACE` ''PPAq. IrncE-•
sw.cE ' SPACE`
I �
r3N 971 C410GH bTREET
�: CONC. i" ;.2s, .' •; 3',; 4 S.`•. b. 1 Ir W C,RAPEVI E TEXAS
:=A;z
WALK
ONE STORY FRAME !
�: f'!,!
D SI
T�
V 1
a
TT
...•,.,.,; (�
(�
PIER & BEAM HOUSE '•i -
FOOTPRINT !�Y�. �'1:
.. ... _ . ':. '!:;:.: �i''}': �.i ., , �
_ _
WINCHESTER RESIDENTIAL DESKaN
c�
W I
o
o_
1,D22 SOFT. ..<".•�
''-',r� '' = -
'8.00
-
•':
Jim
D
DAVID WINCFEb1ER
BT1-896-3766
W
coo
m
�
E -y�
- - ;,y
Via.', ..'
; !.,'
CP
Izmm FLORIDA DRIVE SUITE W
0
bm ARLMGTON TEXAS 16Ot3
rn� I
-
N
t
_
I M
z
w
z
......
- .:..
I
o
J
148.00'
�
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
I.4
Q
U
PARKING CALCULATIONS
FLA 5 PAW 42 . 5 SPACES (.5 ME)
LEASABLE MCE SPACE . SINS SQ Fl. (.1 SPACES)
�
MWITW PEQwRED PAWM • 1 SPACES
—
ACTk1k PAWINS • i SPACES
LOT 60SSB e
0
LOT COVERAGE
3
Lot Size = 8,913 SQ. FT.
MaX Allowable Impervolus Surface = 1,130 SQ. FT.
80% MAX COVERAGE
m
Impervious Surface Main Buildirg = 1,10¢) SQ, FT.
Impervious Surface Parking/Sidewalk - 3,956 SQ. FT.
SCALE: 11 = 20'-0"
Total Impervious Surface - 50156 SQ. FT.
56.1% COVERAGE
PLAN " 11011