Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ Item 06 - MinutesSTATE OF TEXAS I ®R COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE ■ P & Z WORKSHOP MINUTES FEBRUARY 12, 2002 The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Workshop on this the 12th day of February, 2002, in the City Council Conference Room, 2nd Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas with the following members present -to -wit: William D. Tate Roy Stewart Larry Oliver Herb Fry Kevin Busbee Danette Murray B J Nicholson Rob Undersander Michael Crapp Mayor Council Representative Chairman Vice -Chairman Member Member Member Member Alternate constituting a quorum, Bill Bimmerman and Chris Coy absent, and the following City Staff: And Citizens: Roger Nelson H. T. (Tommy) Hardy Joe Moore Hugo Gardea Cindy Jackson Michael Hampton Pamela Huntress Wilbur Goltz Alma Goltz City Manager Director of Development Services Asst. Dir. Of Parks and Recreation Township Restoration Coordinator Planner 11 Planner 11 Planning Secretary It was noted Herb Fry and B. J. Nicholson were not present during some of the meeting and did not participate in the voting. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Larry Oliver called the Workshop to order at 6:07 p.m. Wk021202 1 P & Z WORKSHOP MINUTES FEBRUARY 12, 2002 ITEM A. - PRESENTATION REGARDING THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROCESS WITHIN THE CITY Mayor Tate introduced the topic with Committee members commenting on the importance of the historic district. He noted that the City would continue to deal with different issues on a case by case basis and continue to manage and deal with all aspects of Historic Preservation over the course of time. Mr. Oliver stated that the Commission agreed and supported the Councils' views regarding Historical Preservation and the Commission was interested in learning more about the process of identification of historical value. Hugo Gardea, the Grapevine Township Revitalization Coordinator, made a presentation to the Committee outlining the National Historic Preservation as well as State and Local history. He also explained that a resource survey study categorized structures over 50 years old and found approximately 300 structures within Grapevine city limits. About 150 of those categorized have already been established as Historical Landmarks. After giving an overview of the Grapevine Historic Preservation Ordinance, including the purpose, duties, responsibilities, designation and maintenance of structures, Mr. Gardea answered questions of the Commission. No action was taken. ITEM D. - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO DISCUSS AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 26, "HC" HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, RELATIVE TO ALLOWING FOR AUTOMOTIVE STATE SAFETY INSPECTIONS FACILITIES WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Next for the Committee to consider was an amendment to Section 26, "HC" Highway Commercial District, relative to allowing for automotive state safety inspections facilities with a conditional use permit. Staff recently visited with the owners of K & M Inspections, located at 120 East Northwest Highway, about relocating their automotive state inspections business. Their desired site for relocation is the former Southwest Marine Boat Sales and Service located at the northwest corner of Dooley Street and Wall Street. Both sites are zoned "HC" Highway Commercial District; however, Section 26.D.3 of the zoning ordinance limits the permitted and conditional uses when a site has access to and frontage on a street other than a State Highway or Central Avenue. Automotive repair and service uses are not provided for in this section, and thus are not permitted at the Southwest Marine location. The zoning ordinance does not currently distinguish between a state inspections facility and other automotive repair uses. However, an inspections facility could be considered different and less obtrusive as vehicles are not stored on the premises Wk021202 2 P & Z WORKSHOP MINUTES FEBRUARY 12, 2002 for long periods of time and the business does not involve actual repair. Vehicles are simply tested for safety and environmental compliance, often within a period of 15- 20 minutes each. Regulations governing state inspections facilities are evolving as new EPA -required equipment necessitates more space to accommodate the operations, and the resources needed to run a modern inspections operation will continue to lead to more comprehensive and diversified automotive uses. However, some businesses will continue to exclusively offer state inspections services, and it may be sensible to provide for automotive state inspections facilities specifically on sites within the "HC" Highway Commercial District, including those with access to and frontage on minor streets, with a conditional use permit. After discussion, Kevin Busbee moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to bring forth to public hearing the Amendment to Section 26, "HC" Highway Commercial District, relative to allowing for automotive state safety inspections facilities with a conditional use permit. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Murray, Undersander, and Crapp Nays: None ITEM E. - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO DISCUSS AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 52, TREE PRESERVATION, RELATIVE TO TREE PRUNING RESTRICTIONS Next for the Committee to consider were the proposed amendments to Section 52, Tree Preservation, relative to tree pruning restrictions. Joe Moore, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director, was present to answer questions. The Parks and Recreation Department recommended the proposed amendments noting that it is standard practice to trim trees in the public right-of-ways at least fourteen feet off the pavement to allow for school buses, trash trucks, moving vans, and similar vehicles to travel the streets without causing damage to vehicles or injury to trees. Also, the clearance for sidewalks or accessible routes suggested in the amendment would change to eight feet above any sidewalk or pedestrian access route. It was noted not only that the City had been constructing its trail system using this standard guideline for many years, but also these requirements are the minimum height standards by the State Transportation Standards. Mr. Oliver questioned if 14 feet was necessary and suggested the school buses were ten feet and the buses fit within the present regulation of a ten foot clearance. Wk021202 3 P & Z WORKSHOP MINUTES FEBRUARY 12,2002 Mr. Oliver noted a 14 foot clearance would be difficult for most homeowners. Mr. Hardy suggested Mr. Moore revisit the issue and report back to The Commission at a future workshop. No action was taken regarding Section 52, Tree Preservation. ITEM B. - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO REVIEW THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROVISIONAL LIGHTING STANDARDS OUTLINED IN SECTION 55.A.5 Next for the Committee to consider was to review the effectiveness of the provisional lighting standards outlined in Section 55.A.5. On April 17, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council approved provisional lighting standards to be applied to new applications for conditional use permits received between the dates of 04/17/01 and 04/17/02. Since that time, all new conditional use permit applications have had to submit a photometric study of the site illustrating compliance with the new ordinance. Some of the applications that have had to meet the new lighting standards in the past year include CU01-22, Kings Smokehouse; CU01-27, Classic Hummer; CU01-46, CVS Pharmacy; CU01-68, Baylor Professional Office Park and CU01-71, Wal-Mart Supercenter. Additionally, site plan applications that have been approved administratively have complied with the new lighting standards. With the April 17, 2002 deadline approaching, the effectiveness of the provisional lighting standards in achieving the stated purpose of preventing glare on public roadways, protecting the privacy of residents and reducing atmospheric light pollution should be reviewed. Mr. Hardy stated that over the past year, developers have recognized the need to address new lighting standards and have been able to comply. Cindy Jackson confirmed that even small developers were able to comply with the new requirements. It was agreed to establish the drafted ordinance as policy and set a public hearing. Kevin Busbee moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to adopt the drafted ordinance and set a public hearing regarding the Provisional Lighting Standards in Section 55.A.5. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Murray, Undersander, and Crapp Nays: None Wk021202 4 P & Z WORKSHOP MINUTES FEBRUARY 12, 2002 ITEM C. - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO DISCUSS AMENDMENTS 0,111111'aTO SECTION 13, "R-20" SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT, SECTION 14 "R-12 5" _ SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT, SECTION 15, "R-7.5" SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT SECTION 16 "R-5.0" ZERO -LOT -LINE DISTRICT, SECTION 17 "R-3.5" TWO- FAMILY DISTRICT, SECTION 18, "R-3.75" THREE AND FOUR -FAMILY DISTRICT AND SECTION 20 "R-TH" TOWNHOUSE DISTRICT RELATIVE TO ESTABLISHING LIMITS ON THE FREQUENCY, TIME AND LOCATION OF STORAGE CONTAINERS USED IN RELATION TO CURBSIDE STORAGE SERVICES, MOVING SERVICES AND OTHER SUCH SERVICES Next for the Committee to consider were the amendments to Section 13, "R-20" Single Family District, Section 14, "R-12.5" Single Family District, Section 15, "R-7.5" Single Family District, Section 16, "R-5.0" Zero -Lot -Line District, Section 17, "R-3.5" Two -Family District, Section 18, "R-3.75" Three and Four -Family District, and Section 20, "R-TH" Townhouse District, relative to establishing limits on the frequency, time and location of storage containers used in relation to curbside storage services, moving services and other such services. A relatively new trend in self -storage facilities and moving services involves curbside pickup and/or drop-off of various sized storage boxes and containers at a customer's residence. While a convenient and useful service, some regulation may be warranted to prevent interruption of vehicular and pedestrian traffic and a decrease �in neighborhood aesthetics. During the month of December, a complaint was received by the City with regard to the placement of storage containers associated with one of these services. The items were placed in the street for a period of at least two weeks, creating a potential traffic hazard as well as an unappealing sight. The goals of the draft amendment are to prohibit placement of storage containers in public right-of-ways and to establish limits with regard to the length of time that the containers can be placed outside and the number of instances such services can be utilized in a specified period of time. These changes are proposed within the single family, two-family, three and four - family, and townhouse residential zoning districts. Mr. Oliver questioned if Multi -family Districts could be included within the Sections to be amended and Mr. Hampton stated that all residential districts could be amended. Mr. Oliver felt limiting the number of days these facilities could be used was a positive change. Kevin Busbee moved to bring forward to a public hearing the proposed amendment changes. Mr. Undersander seconded the motion, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Murray, Undersander, and Crapp Nays: None Wk021202 5 P & Z WORKSHOP MINUTES - FEBRUARY 12, 2002 ADJOURNMENT With no further business to discuss, Kevin Busbee moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to adjourn the meeting at 8:25 p.m. and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Murray, Undersander, and Crapp Nays: None PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ON THIS THE 19th DAY OF MARCH, 2002. CHAIRMAN ATTEST: SECRETARY Wk021202 6 P & Z BRIEFING SESSION FEBRUARY 19, 2002 01i" STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Special Briefing Session on this the 19th day of February, 2002 at 7:00 p.m. in the Planning and Zoning Conference Room, 200 South Main Street, 2nd Floor, Grapevine, Texas with the following members present -to -wit: Larry Oliver Chairman Herb Fry Vice Chairman Kevin Busbee Member Chris Coy Member B J Nicholson Member Rob Undersander Member Michael Crapp Alternate Bill Bimmerman, Jr. Alternate constituting a quorum, Danette Murray absent, and the following City Staff: H.T. (Tommy) Hardy Michael Hampton Scott Dyer Suja Joseph Pam Huntress Director of Development Services Planner 11 Sr. Civil Engineer Grad. Civil Engineer Planning Secretary Chairman Oliver called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ITEM 1. BRIEFING SESSION Chairman Oliver announced the Planning and Zoning Commission would conduct a briefing session relative to the following cases: CU01-72 ROSSI'S HOUSE OF SPIRITS CU02-01 CHIXMEX CU02-03 HUMMER SU02-01 CINGULAR WIRELESS Z01-17 & CU01-67 NISSAN TR02-01 CMPA to discuss development issues. ADJOURNMENT After a brief discussion, Chairman Oliver adjourned the meeting at 7:25 p.m. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ON THIS THE 19th DAY OF MARCH, 2002. ATTEST: SECRETARY NOTE: Planning and Zoning Commission continued with the Joint Public Hearing BS021902 2 JOINT HEARING FEBRUARY • 2002 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Joint Public Hearing with the City Council, on this the 19th day of February, 2002, in the City Council Chambers, 200 South Main Street, 2nd Floor, Grapevine, Texas with the following members present -to -wit: Larry Oliver Chairman Herb Fry Vice -Chairman Chris Coy Member Kevin Busbee Member B J Nicholson Member Rob Undersander Member Bill Bimmerman, Jr. Alternate Michael J. Crapp Alternate constituting a quorum, Danette Murray absent, and the following City Staff: H. T. (Tommy) Hardy Michael Hampton Scott Dyer Suja Joseph Pam Huntress CALL TO ORDER Director of Development Services Planner II Sr. Civil Engineer Grad. Civil Engineer Planning Secretary Mayor William D. Tate called the joint meeting to order at 7:50 p.m. and Chairman Oliver called the Planning and Zoning Commission deliberation session to order at 8:45 p.m. INVOCATION Planning and Zoning Commissioner, Rob Undersander, delivered the Invocation. JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST CU01-72 — ROSS1'S HOUSE OF SPIRITS First for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request CU01-72 submitted by Stefano Rossi for property located at 342 021902 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 19, 2002 South Main Street, Suite 100 and platted as Lot 6A, Block 2, City of Grapevine. The applicant was requesting a conditional use permit to allow the possession, storage, retail sale and off -premise consumption of alcoholic beverages (beer and wine only) in conjunction with a wine consulting business. On February 19, 2002, the applicant requested the item be withdrawn from consideration. In the Commission's Deliberation Session, Herb Fry moved, with a second by Kevin Busbee, to approve the withdrawal of Conditional Use Request CU01-72, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Busbee, Nicholson, Undersander, and Bimmerman Nays: None CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST CU02-01 - CHIXMEX Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request CU02-01 submitted by Jeane Pendery for property located at 1000 International Parkway, Terminal A, Location 37, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. The applicant was requesting a conditional use permit to allow the possession, storage, retail sale, and on -premise consumption of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine, mixed drinks) in conjunction with an existing restaurant (Los Amigos) at the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. Gilbert Ramsey, representing the applicant, was present to answer questions and request favorable consideration of the request. With no further guests to speak, one letter of approval, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's Deliberation Session, Rob Undersander moved, with a second by Herb Fry, to approve Conditional Use Request CU02-01, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Busbee, Nicholson, Undersander, and Bimmerman Nays: None CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST CU02-03 - HUMMER Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request CU02-03 submitted by Ronald Hamm for property located at 2501 William D. Tate Avenue and platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Classic Hummer. The applicant was requesting to amend the previously approved site plan of CU01-27 (Ord. 2001-49) for a new 021902 2 O A A A Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 00 and used automotive dealership, specifically to expand the site of the proposed dealership by 5.9 acres and add a 40 foot pole sign. Tom Durant and Ronald Hamm, the owner and applicant, were present to answer questions and request favorable consideration of the request. On June 19, 2001, City Council approved Conditional Use request CU01-27 on this site allowing for the Classic Hummer automotive dealership. Three buildings were approved on a 7.778 acre site with that request, including a 19,952 square foot show room and sales area for a Hummer franchise, a 15,560 square foot parts distribution facility and a 5,506 square foot fleet sales facility that was to be relocated from the existing Classic Chevrolet dealership located at William D. Tate Avenue and State Highway 114. With the acquisition of approximately 5.923 additional acres of land to the north of the original site, the layout of the Classic Hummer dealership has been expanded and modified. The Hummer dealership show room has been expanded slightly to a size of 21,721 square feet and relocated to the northern half of the tract. The parts distribution facility maintains its 15,560 square foot size as well as its location in the rear of the development. The owner is now proposing to keep the fleet sales at the current Classic Chevrolet location, while relocating the pre -owned sales offices from that dealership into a 10,718 square foot building at the Hummer site. The originally proposed Hummer obstacle course has been removed with this request. Additionally, a high number of existing trees have been preserved along Arlington - Grapevine Road and the creek located in the rear of the site. Five existing trees located in proposed open space areas are proposed to be removed and mitigated. The five trees have a cumulative size of 93 caliper inches, and are proposed to be replaced with 31 three-inch caliper trees throughout the site. The applicant proposes a 40 -foot pole sign located at the southwest corner of the property for the pre -owned sales. A monument sign for the Hummer Dealership is proposed just north of the main entrance off of William D. Tate Avenue. Mr. Durant explained that with the proposed construction along State Highway 114, these changes were necessary for the continued operation of the Classic Chevrolet Dealership. With no further guests to speak, no letters, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's Deliberation Session, there was discussion regarding the pole sign, noting a twenty foot pole sign would be consistant with the adjacent Frank Parra site. Chris Coy moved, with a second by B J Nicholson, to approve Conditional Use Request CU02-03 with the stipulation that the 40 foot pole sign be replaced with a 20 foot pole sign, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: 021902 3 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 19, 2002 Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Busbee, Nicholson, and Bimmerman Nays: Undersander SPECIAL USE REQUEST SU02-01 — ZONE SYSTEMS, INC. Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Special Use Request SU02-01 submitted by Zone Systems, Inc. for property located at 525 Industrial Boulevard and platted as Lot 3, Grapevine Industrial Park. The applicant was requesting a special use permit for the installation of a 75 foot monopole communications tower with a 11 feet six inches x 20 foot equipment shelter building measuring 10 feet six inches in height. In December, 2001, City Council denied without prejudice a proposal for this same 75 -foot Cingular Wireless monopole, stating that more information and analysis regarding alternative sites in the proposed service area would be required. The applicant has provided coverage maps for five alternative sites along with a written statement on why each of these five sites is considered less desirable than the proposed Industrial Boulevard site. Peter Kavanagh, representing Cingular Wireless, was present to answer questions and request favorable consideration of the request. Mr. Kavanaugh explained the alternate choices of locations that Cingular Wireless had researched and the results of the various studies conducted. He explained that representatives from Baylor Hospital had denied Cingular's request to collocate, and Cingular had no agreement with TXU to utilize their poles. Chris Coy questioned why two poles could not used in place of one and Bill Bimmerman asked if the light poles at the Best Buy would equally suffice. Mr. Kavanaugh stated that the current request was definitely preferred by Cingular Wireless. Dr. Ed Lancaster, a Grapevine resident, spoke in support of the request stating that this request was a good land usage. With no further speakers, one letter of protest, one letter of support, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's Deliberation Session, there was discussion regarding the current zoning and the future zoning of this lot and surrounding area. Mr. Oliver stated that it would be possible for the location to be zoned commercially in the future. Mr. Fry also noted that for the past four years the Commission has denied almost all monopoles submitted for approval. Vote 1. Chris Coy moved, with a second by Bill Bimmerman, to deny Special Use Request SU02-01, and the motion failed by the following vote: Ayes: Fry, Bimmerman, Coy 021902 4 JOINT,. FEBRUARY • 1! (11 ) Nays: Nicholson, Oliver, Busbee, and Undersander Vote 2. Rob Undersander moved, with a second by B J Nicholson, to approve Special Use Request SU02-01 with the stipulation that the pole be allowed only with the current zoning, and the motion failed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Undersander, and Nicholson Nays: Busbee, Fry, Coy, and Bimmerman Vote 3. Kevin Busbee moved, with a second by Rob Undersander, to approve Special Use Request SU02-01. Mr. Busbee amended his motion to include the stipulation that the approved pole must include at least three collocates. The motion failed by the following vote: Ayes: Busbee and Undersander Nays: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Nicholson, and Bimmerman Vote 4. B J Nicholson moved, with a second by Rob Undersander, to approve Special Use Request SU02-01 with the stipulation that the tower be allowable only with the current zoning, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: .� Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Nicholson, and Undersander Nays: Fry, Coy, and Bimmerman ZONE CHANGE REQUEST Z01-17 & CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST CU01-67 — NISSAN Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Zone Change Request Z01-17 and Conditional Use Request CU01-67 submitted by Nissan for property located at 440 West State Highway 114 and platted as Lot 1R-1, Block 1R, Payton -Wright Addition. The applicant was requesting to rezone approximately 7.003 acres from "HC" Highway Commercial District to "CC" Community Commercial District Regulations. The applicant was also requesting a conditional use permit for the sale and service of used cars for a period not to exceed two years. The State of Texas requires all new automobile dealerships to obtain a new vehicle dealer license from the Texas Motor Vehicle Commission. This process usually takes one year to complete, providing there are no appeals involved. In the event of an appeal, the process could take up to two years to complete. The applicant is proposing to utilize the site for the sales and service of used cars until a new vehicle dealer license is obtained. The request to rezone the site to "CC", Community Commercial District is to accommodate the request for 021902 5 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 19, 2002 used car sales since the sales of used cars is not an allowed use in the Highway Commercial District. The Conditional Use Permit will have a maximum time limit of two years during which time the applicant will be going through the application process with the Texas Motor Vehicle Commission. The conditional use permit will expire either at the time the applicant receives the new vehicle dealer license or at the end of two years, whichever is first. The Planning and Zoning Commission, at the January 15, 2002 public hearing, voted to table the above referenced case to the February 19, 2002 public hearing to give the applicant an opportunity to address site issues regarding screening, lighting, noise, and landscaping. The applicant requested an extension, asking that the case be tabled until the April 16, 2002 public hearing. In the Commission's Deliberation Session, Chris Coy moved, with a second by BJ Nicholson, to table Zone Change Request Z01-17 and Conditional Use Request CU01-67 until April 16, 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Murray, Nicholson, Busbee, and Undersander Nays: None PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION LOT -1, BLOCK 1, CLASSIC HUMMER Next for the Commission to consider was the Statement of Findings and Preliminary Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Classic Hummer submitted by Ronald Hamm for property located at 2501 William D. Tate Avenue, east of State Highway 121 and west of Stone Myers Parkway on the north side of Prospect Parkway. The applicant was requesting to preliminary platting 13.701 acres for the purpose of re -platting site for the development of the Hummer Dealership. The property is zoned "CC" Community Commercial District and is owned by Thomas R. and Susan R. Durant. In the Commission's Deliberation Session, Chris Coy moved, with a second by Bill Bimmerman, to approve the Statement of Findings and Preliminary Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Classic Hummer, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Busbee, Nicholson, Undersander, and Bimmerman Nays: None FINAL PLAT APPLICATION LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CLASSIC HUMMER Next for the Commission to consider was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 1, Block 1, Classic Hummer submitted by Ronald Hamm for property located at 2501 William D. Tate Avenue, east of State Highway 121 and west of Stone 021902 6 P tirt l Myers Parkway on the north side of Prospect Parkway. The applicant was requesting to final platting 13.701 acres for the purpose of re -platting site for the development of the Hummer Dealership. The property is zoned "CC" Community Commercial District and is owned by Thomas R. and Susan R. Durant. In the Commission's Deliberation Session, Chis Coy moved, with a second by Bill Bimmerman, to approve the Statement of Findings and Final Plat Application of Lot 1, Block 1, Classic Hummer, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Busbee, Nicholson, Undersander, and Bimmerman Nays: None TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION TR02-01 — CMPA Next for the Commission to consider was Tree Removal Application TR02-01 submitted by CMPA, Inc. for property located at 1450 Hughes Road and platted as Lot 1, Block 1, CMPA Office. The applicant was requesting a tree removal permit to remove some existing trees. A site plan for the CMPA Office Phase II development was approved administratively on November 9, 2001. At that time, the applicant showed six existing trees with a cumulative total of approximately 68 caliper inches in the rear of the property that were to be preserved. However, the construction on the site involves relocating an existing detention pond near the proposed building footprint to the far north side of the tract. A large amount of fill dirt is necessary to fill in the old detention pond and ensure proper drainage to the new one. Consequently, the applicant is requesting to remove the existing trees that are affected by this construction and replace them with 21 trees, including 18 Red Oaks and three Callery Pears, planted throughout both phases of the CMPA project. As shown, the total sizes of the 21 mitigating trees will be 68 caliper inches. In the Commission's deliberation session, Herb Fry moved, with a second by Chris Coy, to approve Tree Removal Application TR02-01, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Busbee, Nicholson, Undersander, and Bimmerman Nays: None CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES Next for the Commission to consider were the Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of the January 15, 2002 regular meeting. Bill Bimmerman, moved, with a second by Herb Fry, to approve the Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of January 15, 2002. The motion prevailed by the following vote: 021902 7 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 19, 2002 Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Busbee, Nicholson, Undersander, and Bimmerman Nays: None ADJOURNMENT With no further business to discuss, B J Nicholson moved, with a second by Chris Coy, to adjourn the meeting at 9:25 p.m. and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Fry, Coy, Busbee, Nicholson, Undersander, and Bimmerman Nays: None PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ON THIS THE 19h DAY OF MARCH, 2002. CHAIRMAN ATTEST: SECRETARY 021902 8