Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 09 - Master Thoroughfare Plan GRAD 'VIN CITY COUNCIL MEETING Yr e x .w s r- DATE: February 5, 2019 New Business Item No. 9 Master Thoroughfare Plan Proposed Update PRESENTED BY: BRYAN BECK, P.E. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CRAP '1'IY r c s Today 's Presentation • Proposed Modifications • Discussion • Requested Action? UU V Recommendation # I • Remove Wall Street from MTP — Built one block from Northwest Hwy; standard spacing is one-quarter mile between facilities — Current Plan's expansion is inconsistent with adjoining development J I J Wall Street � E DOPE LOOP RD _ removed from plan � E NORTHWEST HWY a WALL ST LALA J � d sr m DALLAS RD r4`.' L' A VI Yr e x .w s r- Recommendation #2 • Re-align Southwest Grapevine Parkway from SH 26 to Mustang — Allows a continuous south- bound movement to SH 121 frontage road — Shifts work trips away from residential land use — Traffic demand better suited to adjoiningSG. MUSTANG p1i r F commercial uses r LJ W 1y6 circulation — Improves Aly;. around GCISD facilities Q Tr � � ERLINE UR Qom^ PROSECT P UU V Recommendations #3 and #4 • Downgrade Park Boulevard from 6 to 4 lanes — Less than 1 mile in length; corridor built-out — Traffic volume 17,959 vs. capacity 28,000 Al — Speeds too high: 50% of motorist above 40 mph • Downgrade N. Dove & Dove Loop from 4 to 3 lanes from _ Northwest Hwy north to the r o lake — Right-of-way and pavement RD Q width do not support 4 lanes - Volume 8,300 vs. capacity 16,000 Y O CL — Proposed section supports 114 future bike/pedestrian uses � `, �R,'IwEs H A WIN Yr e x .w s r- Recommendations # S and #6 • Downgrade Dooley Street from : — 4 to 2 lanes Dallas Rd. to Northwest Hwy Al. • Two lane appropriate for residential use — 4 to 3 lanes Northwest Hwy to terminus • Corridor is built-out • Upgrade Fairway Drive from 2 to 3 lanes — Roadway close to a;) capacity N �I zc Cu �Q : — Development remains J J ° Turn lane warranted Gs E DOVE�4°P RO ' Ix r U B ry � ry A NI Yr e x .w s r- Recommendation #7 • Downgrade Euless-Grapevine Road from 4 to 3 lanes (Glade Road to Hughes Road) — Traffic volume 3,680 vehicleser day Y vs. capacity 14,000 vehicles per day — Corridor is built-out — Four lane divided construction would impact trail and trees in existing ROW HUGHESR❑ J� ' - -- - - ---E -- - LU 0- < LU u+ GLADE Rd CRAP '1'IY r c s Recommendation # 8 • Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions' plans — DFW Airport: Closely coordinate with current � land use master plan and 1 ,000 acre DFW Tract — DFW Airport / Euless: Glade Road — Southlake: Pool Road, Kimball Road and Lonesome Dove — Flower Mound: Freeport Expansion A NI Yr e x .w s r- Recommendation #9 • Reduce roadway classifications from 8 to 5 ROADWAYS A Major Arterial 100' min. 6 with median A* Major Arterial Consult TxDot for ROW width B Major Arterial 80' min. 4 with median C MinorArterial 80' min. 4 with turn lane Current D MinorArterial 75' min. 4 E Collector 75' min. 4 E* Collector 65' min. 4 w111' travel lane width F Collector 60' min. 2 CLASS TYPE A Principal Arterial 100' 6 lane divided B Major Arterial 80' 4 lane divided15 lane undivided Proposed C MinorArterial 70' 4 lane undivided D MinorArterial 70' 3 lane undivided J E Collector 60' 2lane UU V N Recommendation #9 continued Revise Roadway Cross Sections Utilities, Utilities, "de'a" Allows for two sidewalk Two traffic I"c&, 11' .143e and left turn laties and buffer* Plus curb amd gutter 16, fctio�s 281-jol &�t Major inters -39' it 21. W-24. 14- 100* R,O�W, 140' R.O.W. at raiijor intersections 6 1� trait.c la-s. 11' wi4le Ba—er median with left Four traffic ]an ous �ane t.o-..y left tu�n� UZI SiJe,,alk ne.—CO.tlnU es LI 24' 12, ini— 24' 14'+ 1317 1 L2' 48' 951 R.O.W. desirable 751 R.,). 9C' R.D.W, LOCAL STREETS Foqr,�rafflc la$le$ of I each — LV 14 112' 14 112, 15, 40- 1 60'.70' R.O.M. gSl2Cfljjnq 75' on utility l9cations .1! Id, f- UU V N � xRecommendation #9 continued • Proposed Roadway Sections I d 12�-,IAY I TYPE A PRINCIPLEARTERIDAL (6 LANE) DIVIDE I Li 3. 1 ........... ggz ... ......... 7 TYPE B I LOCAL STREET MAJOR ARTERIAL (ASPHALT) 4 LANE DIVIDED i0l;IC— y. IIL TYPE 13 dR MAJOR ARTERIAL 5 LANE UNDIVIDED LOCAL STREET, FIREL �E a FEF (CONCRETE) IAI LLE——1 I j I LI 12- 12. 2 2— L11L 7, T r E C T- E E L, EK MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR (2 LANE) 2 t'�EUNDIVIDED 'Cl��T—1 1— A-H IRCCI 11-1 T.1 PLAN REMSIONS ;11sm prsAl Il nT 1 T TC L- 11 TAE—ft I L-1 11�-11 21T I-1IF 'T 6 C'1 1— 111 6 LI-AL All 1'�l II�— —Iv5 LN..D—Hfi— D.t. TTl z 1-1 TI .1Alt I I 1.A' C1 C1—1 T, Al-,CII 17.1,11C1 3 PL111C. SECTIONS B-1 B" GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 1 11 T 1111111T All.11 11 TYPE D \\�—1 11�11"1 C'. 11 CC-111.1 IPA I CitydGmpevine MINOR ARTERIAL —A111 111 —1— —11—l—1. Public Woft Department �w 11 11 M X—1— 1�1-1—TI—Ir .3 LANE UNDIVIDED —I—CIL C.CITI -17-- F-- LL, NNW GRA V Master Thoroughfare Plan Current Proposed City of Grapevine Thoroughfare Plan City of Grapevine Thoroughfare Plan Revised August 15,2017 Revised 1/1 512 01 9 H orita�e Avv.at Rid Rcsr Csvnk kiporl Pro osed Roads R------------- Kcrised Road Clnssdfcatfons I ------ --------- qt. —_—._._.t. I o - � isT I © — — F � ROARWAVS n.�a is nii� � i i/ e� HG sv u pro sA, 4 7 mnni ♦ RO>RW6V5 CLH65 TYPE f.f• it niiwH N ^N -n4 e ay53neu en eee WE ----Ga�ir..Bountla�r ee W � _ —.— nlmy nm p NinorPna�al ]] mane urtl itlatl $ 'l7Y GRA Y Y Discussion/Requested Action?