Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 03 - Z10-02, PD10-04 Stone Bridge Oaks
C_ 3 �y 10 #_ 31,41 S_� TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR MEETING DATE: JULY 20, 2010 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF ZONE CHANGE REQUEST Z10-02 AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD10-04 STONE BRIDGE OAKS r---I r ` ___ tit Grapevine 5� APPLICANT: Anthony Natale of Grenadier Homes r I ,.H.1635 PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: Northwest —! I The subject property is located at 4632 Trevor Trail «E' and is proposed to be platted as Stone Bridge Oaks I IL The subject property comprises 19.17 acres and Hall.lohnson Sy�� ADP; has approximately 1,540 feet of frontage along Grapevine-Euless Road and 236 feet of frontage L Li m _m _ I along the south State Highway 360 service road. Glade Rd. `m I REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a zone change to rezone 19.165.acres from"R-TH"Townhouse District to "R-5.0" Zero Lot Line District for the development of 66 single familV detached lots. The applicant is also re guesting a planned development overlay to include but not be Limited to deviation from the front rear,. and side yard setback requirements and the building and impervious_ coverage requirements within the "R-5.0" Zero Lot Line District standards. Initially approved by Council at their May 16, 2006 meeting, Stone Bridge Oaks was comprised of 138 townhouse units with a number of considerations relative to the development criteria for the "R-TH" Townhouse District guidelines in place at that time. Deviation to lot width, building coverage, front, rear, and side yard setback, building 0:IZGU210-02.4&PD011-04.4 1 July 12,2010(5:17PM) separation, street width, and sidewalk location were all thoughtfully discussed and subsequently approved as part of the request. Twenty-four townhouse units have been constructed as well as the entire internal street network and essential city services at the subject location. The applicant requested an amendment to the original planned development overlay at Council's April 20, 2010 meeting to allow development of 66 single family detached lots but later withdrew the request during the Planning and Zoning Commission's deliberation on the request. Similar to the previous request considered in April, the applicant has submitted a zone change application to rezone the subject property to a category that is more closely associated with the type of residential product he intends to build on the site. The applicant once again proposes 66 single family detached lots-47 lots will be 52-feet in width; 11 lots will be 62-feet in width; and eight lots will be 72-feet in width. Average area square footage for the 52-foot width lots is 5,644 square feet; average area square footage for the 62-foot width lots is 6,556 square feet; and average area square footage for the 72- foot width lots is 7,702 square feet. Average area square footage. for all 66 lots is 6,131 square feet; the largest lot in the proposed subdivision is 8,750 square feet and the smallest is 5,200 square feet. Density for this proposal is 3.44 units per acre; eight units per acre is the maximum allowed in the district. Relative to the planned development overlay request, the applicant proposes a 20-foot front yard setback for both living space and the garage with the possibility of a five foot encroachment into this area for a front porch; the "R-5.0" Zero Lot Line District requires a minimum 25-foot front yard setback. The rear yard setback is proposed to be ten feet rather than the 25-feet required for the district. Between lots the applicant proposes to meet the district side yard standard of six feet however on corner lots that require fifteen feet of setback the applicant is proposing ten feet of side yard on the street side. Maximum building coverage will be no greater than 58 percent and impervious coverage no greater than 68 percent of the total lot; district standards are 40 percent and 60 percent respectively. The original planned development request for the townhouse project provided 73 additional off-street parking spaces to off-set the lost on-street parking due to the 25-foot width streets that were designated as fire lanes. A parking study conducted by the private engineering firm Huitt-Zollars concluded that a similar subdivision with lots fronting on streets that were typically 31-feet in width from curb-to-curb would have available at most, one additional on-street parking space per lot. In response to the parking study the applicant has provided an additional 13 spaces, bringing the total number of off-street parking spaces to 86; this revised total of 86 off-street parking spaces provides an additional 0.96 spaces per unit which is nearly what would be available given a typical standard width street. See the attached parking study. Common area open space has been reduced from 8.7 acres to 8.0 acres as a result of the enlargement of the back yards of some of the proposed lots. The applicant had designed elevations that will complement the townhomes that have already been constructed. O:IZCU210-02.4&PD010-04.4 2 July 14,2010(11:04AM) PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned "R-TH" Townhouse District with a planned development overlay and is partially developed. HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The northern two-thirds of the subject property as well as the property to the north were rezoned in the 1984 City Rezoning from 1-1" Light Industrial District to "PCD", Planned Commerce Development District. The southern third of the subject site and the property to the south were rezoned from "C-2" Community Business District to "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District at that time. The property to the north remains undeveloped. The property to the south was rezoned from "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District to "CN" Neighborhood Commercial District in March 2000 (Z00-05, Ord. No. 00-37). A conditional use permit for a retirement community was approved at that time as well. The site plan for the retirement community has been amended several times since the original approval. The property to the west was zoned "R-7.5" Single Family District and "C-2" Community Business District prior to the 1984 City rezoning, at which time the area zoned for community business was rezoned "R-7.5" Single Family District. The site was subsequently developed with the Glade Woods subdivision.. A zone change (Z02-06) was approved on the subject tract at Council's September 17, 2006 meeting rezoning the property from"PCD".Planned Commerce Development District to"R-M F-1' Multifamily District for a 124-unit condominium project that was deed restricted to no more than six units per acre. The project never moved beyond the initial planning stages. At Council's May 16, 2006 meeting a zone change (Z06-03) and a planned development overlay (PD06-06) was approved on the subject property to allow for the development of 138 townhomes on 23.58 acres that had been previously zoned "R-MF-1" Multifamily District. A subsequent modification to the planned development overlay(PD07- 01) was approved by the Site Plan Review Committee at their March 28, 2007 meeting which allowed for the slight adjustment of the location of lots near the southeast corner of the site to preserve trees. Council considered at their April 20, 2010 meeting Planned Development Overlay PD10-02 on the subject property whereby the applicant proposed redeveloping the property to allow for 66 single family lots;the applicant later withdrew the request during the Commission's deliberation. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "PCD"Planned Commerce Development District—Southern Baptist Convention office building SOUTH: "CN" Neighborhood Commercial District and "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District -- Glade Corner Retirement 0:/ZCU/Z10-02.4&PD010-04.4 3 Jury 12,2010(5:17PM) Community and vacant property EAST: "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District—vacant property WEST: "R-7.5" Single Family District— Glade Woods subdivision AIRPORT IMPACT: The subject tract is not located within any of the noise zones as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport.Environs" map. MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Residential High Density land use. The proposed zone change does not comply with this designation. THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION: The Thoroughfare Plan designates Euless-Grapevine Road as a Type D Minor Arterial with a minimum 75-foot right-of-way developed as four lanes. Irs 0:/,ZCU210-02.4&PD010-04.4 4 July 12,2010(5:17PM) Z1, CITY OF GRAPEVINE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION 1- Appiicant(Agent Name l Company Name �RE 64 ID41-59 Address 3 W tf T,( - C.v-' 1 :. e. City . - - ate ---- //Z°p � Phone# `t`""✓� Fax## Email 2. Applicant's interest in subject p"r y i 3. Property owner(s)name i.-d 1� &� LP Address -City JZW�G _ _state J' - - —zip Phone# 'I -*Og+ ._.._fax## q: Address of subject property f' -b--7, T t Legal Description:Lot Block Addition '°��. Phi g Size of subject property o'��d j acres squarefoot Metes&Bounds must be-described on 8'/z 0 x 9 V shit 5. Present ZoningClassiifation (Z —TW 6. Present Use of-Property TD`.1 t� 66,Zb 7. Requested Zoning District 8. The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive ictiue zone that would allow the proposed use is 9. Minimum/Maximum..Disbdd size for requested zoning 0:VCMVP-ZN 7 ,i 5199 wwwsLgrapeAne.ib-us 2010 0 10. Describe the proposed use �� - :a � a All Zone Change Requests are assumed to be complete when fled and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretlon of the staff: Based on the size of the agenda,your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by appiMcants and Interested citizenry. Public hearings may be coniffaued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request-can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the requbements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal 1 I. Signature to authorize a,zone change request and pure a zone change request sign on the subject property. Applicant{pant): LZ Applicant signature: Li 4".1; Je tv"nr 3&6, i46 Greet tr4xer � c Or �ls Li-C cPropertyOwner(print): UAA Ejd 4,ei /qaA&Jef Property tersignatufe: 3 201!0 o-AzcuuU�P_7x 3 arse waw-A.grapevme.tLus The State of County of b Itr.5 __-- Before me .6A6f%,/ X14L I C __ on this day peronally appeared - known to me (or proved to me on the oath of orthrough h,,&el I .s mss-,- _(description of identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed- Given under my hand and sea] of office this �� day of _I'VIIA , A.D. JOANNA J. KN®X =r = Notary Public, State of Texas Notary SI ture ray Commission Expires riArC March 29,2014 rNPi{t141 The State of r d , 5 County of 4:L' _ Before me Ilem r` on this day personally appeared known to me (or proved to me on the oath of or through (description of identity card or other document)to be the person whose name is subscdbed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of once this 3 r-'wl clay of , A.D. PQ S °11111 JOANNA J. KNOX � � RY P6 4 ;'a = Notary Pubiio,state of Texas = v commission Expires Notary S' tore arch 29{2614 o:�zcuvPP,zN 4 sus www.cLgrapwhe.t#_us OV, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Alf Zone Change bequest are assumed to be complete when fated and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda,your application may be scheduled to a later date. AM public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tablet I have read and understand aff of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this aplxlicadan have been met at the time of submittal. Signature ofApplicant Date: Signature of Owner !"' 3&0 it /� Date: 0�/o C�lt� �f� ' �� ��ne( rf'r (�rfAed Ipan E(Atdyej AAAAJV-r 0, O:VZC AAPP ZN 5 5199 wwwxLgrapevine bu* G VINE T E x A S CITY OF GRAPEVINE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1.APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent:/company/contact 4-,V7-b A)`>r nlA7" . Street address of applicant/agent �6 D 3 W HT6-R,,-J,-- �o City/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent: �� --15a39 Telephone number of applicant/agent: Fax number of applicant/agent: i4--?'�LP- s3&6 461-- 67!; - 6 3--Ta. Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent 8z,6T rr -r mAwA-6-GR PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property 4633k Ikevog Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 112"x 19"sheet) Lot Block Addition . n t 093 I nd C 3 Size of subject property r Acres Square footage Present zoning classification.- Proposed use of the property., ¢.-- TAj I TWnl I�n�[ES snt F�Y�'luy 6�M�s Minimum/maximum district size for request: Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from: PART 3.PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner_ Ci�7e ( , G'ra earne- Street address of p operty owner., 6,90 be, ke,r b f-. S r, zs a City/State/Zip Code of property owner: Zki(3*4 6� `FX 3 Telephone number of property owner.' Fax number of propertyowner �Ta- boa.— ms 05 C:IZCUIFotmslapp.pd-doc 2 9/16/2009 a • Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Devellopment and note the request on the site plan document • Describe any special requirements or owdMons that require dewaik n of fhe zoning distrcet regulations. • Describe whether the proposed overlay will,or will not cause substantial harm to the value,use or enjoyment o;other property in the neighborhood. • Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value,use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood_ ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the . . uirernents of Section 47,Site Plan E uiraments_ ❑ AN planned devekapmerrt overlay applicoons are assumed to be compete when fried and MW be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discration of the staff. Based on Me size of the agenda,your application maybe scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and tes0mony given by appkcants and interested citizenry- Public hearings maybe continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings"I not be tabled_ ❑ Any changes to a site plan(no matterhow,nrrnor or malcrr)approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public heanng process. ❑ f have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this a lication have been met at the time of submittal. FART 4.SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST ANO PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: APFi+canP Sigoafure The State Cif 9° county Of ba L S�___ d/ / j Befane Me �!]la yo d( kl,.,C on aus dayp�naffyapPe�d.—�1 � !gip -- (notary) I (agvlfrrant) known to me(or proved to me on the oath of card or other doctrrnen o to to the person Y&ose name is subsa d to the forego-g irstrtmett and acknowledged tome that he exectded the same for the pwlwses and consideration therein expressed. 33 day�f JOANNA J. KNOX =� Notary Public,State of Texas _, My Commilssion Expires Parch 29,2014 � nAndF&7 afr print Property owners Name: y ow`n—$lgnatrrre: The State Of b/Of Beef)re Me �.11}ll tau on 54is dap personasy appaa ed Ale (noWy) ( known to me(or proved to rue an the oath of card or saflrer doemnano to bs the person whose name is subscrked to Me. instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed Ow same fordre pt>rposes and emsiideerafkw theraer expressed. (Sea)Given under day of AD r urrrr•„ KNOX , - o��4,pr,�fc, JOANNA J.{rotary Public,State of Texas it .r MyComrnissionExpires March 29,2014 N;n fnAtrdForState Texas „r /\J 0_%ZCUW-mmslapp.pd.doc 3 1/27/2010 20; ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be Placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the stag, Based on the size of the agenda,your application may be scheduled to a lamer date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public bearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter hoar minor or .major) approved with a planned development ovediay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of foam months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. if after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before Me Commission and Council said application shall be considered ndthdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the f wr month period. I have read and understand aff of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development ovedayr and aclrnowWge that all requirements of this application have been met at the Unie of sularrrittal. Signature of Applicant Date: 61 3 ;jyO f � V -3 Signature of Owne Date. 05 0 1 0 XZCL?FomaApp.pd.dac MAI 112712©10 LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, LP Monday,July 12, 2010 Mr. Ron Stombaugh Planning and Development Manager City of Grapevine 200 South Main Street Grapevine,Texas 76051 RE Application to change PD and Zoning for Stone Bridge Oaks Dear Mr.Stombaugh: Please find enclosed our application to change the PD and Zoning for our Stone Bridge Oaks subdivision. Based on our presentation to the City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 20, 2010, and the feedback that was given to us at that time,combined with the Huitt-Zollars Study that was commissioned by the City of Grapevine, we have made some significant changes to our overall request. Before the overall submission is discussed in detail, it is important to provide some background information as to the reason for our request. During the past 2 years,there has been a significant economic slowdown,and this has severely impacted the health of the real estate housing market throughout the country.Our project in Grapevine has not escaped this impact, and during this time period, it has proven extremely difficult for us to sell these 2 story town homes that are completed. Many of them have been finished and vacant for in excess of 18 months.The few sales we have made recently occurred only after a significant price reduction below our cost to build the TH's. During this time period,our local market, and more specifically our interested potential purchasers, have told us that they desire low maintenance living(which we currently offer), but in a single story home (which cannot be successfully accommodated on our current TH lots).We looked at the possibility of enlarging the TH lots to accommodate a one story TH, but at this time the market for TH's has become almost non-existent. In contrast,we currently have 13 potential purchasers on a waiting list for a detached patio home product. Furthermore,the banking environment has also become exceedingly difficult for approving construction loans for TH's.With these factors in place, it has become very clear to us that we need to change the remainder of our subdivision to patio homes.We did consider the comment to leave the northern portion of the site as TH lots, but based on the above, it does not make sense for us to continue building a product that can only be sold at below our costs. 580 Decker Drive,Ste 280,Ewing,TX 75062 LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, LP Enclosed in our packet is an updated plat,which shows that the total number of TH lots is 24(these lots have completed TH's),and then there are 66 proposed single family lots(48—52ft lots, 11—62ft lots, and 7—72ft lots),for a grand total of 90 lots.The previously approved plat had a total of 137 TH lots_ That is an overall decrease in density of 47 lots. A number of important items have been changed from our previous request(per feedback from P&Z and City Council,and based on the Huitt-Zollars Study)and a summary of our overall request is as follows: • We are asking that the zoning on the land area we are re-platting to be changed to R-5.0 zoning, with a PD overlay to accommodate several of the items outlined below. • The number of indented off-street parking spaces has been increased from the previously approved number of 73,to 86 updated spaces(added 13 more spaces,with 7 more across from the Amenity Center and an additional 6 more at the far south end of the community)...this takes our overall off-street parking from approximately 0.5 spaces per home to 0.96 spaces per home (which is very close to the 1.0 spaces per home achieved in a typical single family subdivision) • All preserved trees shown on the previously approved landscape plan will remain preserved on the updated landscape plan • Open space has changed only slightly from the previously approved 8.7 acres to a proposed 8.0 acres due to the enlargement of several backyard areas that have no trees, and make no sense to leave as open space as they would be very difficult to maintain,and also they are not big enough to be utilized effectively by the community. However,there will be more overall green space in the newly proposed layout based on the grassed areas separating the individual proposed single family homes(versus the connected TH's within buildings).Overall,we are providing significantly more green/open space than is typical for a single family community. • Previously we had requested vehicular gates for the overall community,and these have been removed from our current request based on feedback from P&Z and City Council. However,to address the safety concerns of our existing homeowners,we have proposed adding street pole lighting at all key locations.within the entire site(see enclosed Landscape Plan for all locations and light pole details). • Also based on feedback from P&Z and City Council,front yard setbacks are proposed to be enlarged to 20 ft for building and garage,with the ability of a front porch to encroach into this area by no more than 5 feet(previously approved for the TH's was a 10 foot building setback, with a 20 foot garage setback). • Rear yard setbacks are proposed to remain the same as previously approved,with a 10 foot building setback(this is not an issue with our homebuyers as they desire a maintenance free lifestyle,and don't want huge backyard that necessitates more maintenance; also they don't want a pool in their backyard due to maintenance,and there is a community pool for everyone to enjoy that is already completed).Also, our patio homes have all been designed to have a large and functional covered rear patio area,and this will increase the livable rear yard area to match the homeowner's lifestyle,while keeping maintenance issues at a minimum. 580 Decker Drive,Ste 280,Irving,TX 75062 LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, LP • Side yard setbacks are proposed to meet typical Grapevine standards for single family homes of 6 ft.This side yard is increased to 10 feet on the private street side of a corner lot. • Per the Huitt-Zoliars Study,the fire hydrant spacing within the Stone Bridge Oaks community was questioned. The City of Grapevine has a maximum fire hydrant spacing of 500 ft for single family development,and the maximum distance between fire hydrants on this project is 480 ft, so the project meets City requirements. • Overall maximum building coverage will be 58%,and the overall maximum impervious coverage will be 68%, both of which are less than the existing TH's.With all single family lots backing up to large green/open areas,coverage is not an issue. There are no single family lots which back up to each other in a traditional single family community. • The architectural elevations of the. proposed single family homes have been custom designed by an award-winning architect to harmoniously blend and complement the existing TH buildings. • Landscaping of the proposed single family lots will be similar to the existing landscaping of the TH's. • Maintain existing private roads as currently built with existing franchised utilities and services. Widening these existing roads is not possible between the existing TN's.Also,since the roads are crowned for proper drainage, it is not possible from an engineering perspective to simply add more concrete to these roads.There are also significant issues with paving over franchised utility easements. It is our belief that with the above proposed changes(and enclosed in our Application Package),our Stone Bridge Oaks project will succeed, and create a wonderful community within the City of Grapevine for all its residents to enjoy and be proud of.With a successful project,the City of Grapevine can increase its property tax base,and use these funds to help sustain and improve the overall well-being of the city.We view ourselves in partnership with the City and also with our current and future residents, and we understand the importance of our project,and that is why we are confident that this updated approach will produce the best results for everybody. Thank you for your consideration_We greatly appreciate it!l! If you require any additional information, please don't hesitate to contact our project manager Anthony Natale at 214-794-5366 or anthony @grenadierhomes.com . Yours truly, Dean Eldridge Manager Trike Partners, LLC,General Partner of Lifestyle Grapevine 360, LP 580 Decker Drive,Ste 280,Irving,TX 75062 HUITT-ZOLLARS,INC. r 500 W.7th St. r Suiie 300 r Mail Unit 23 r Fort Worth,TX 76102.4773 r 617.335.3000 phone r 817.335.1025 fax r haitt-zollarscom — June 29,2010 Mr.Ron Stombaugh City of Grapevine 200 S.Main Street Grapevine,Tx 76051 Ref: Analysis of Proposed Stone Bridge Development Grapevine,Texas Dear Mr. Stombaugh: Huitt Zollats has been asked to provide an independent review of the proposed Stone Bridge Development. As due diligence for this assignment, HZ has reviewed the planning and zoning files for this project and past projects on the site, conducted a site visit to review the existing conditions, and interviewed the applicant. Particular attention was placed on the change in use and the affect this change may have on traffic, parking, and other issues that may influence the quality of life in the City of Grapevine. History of the site: The Stone Bridge Development began in 2006 with a zoning case to change the site from multifamily zoning (R MF1) to a townhome project (R-TH) with a PD Overlay. The MF zoning allowed for a density of six (6) units per acre. The proposed project was to consist of 138 units with a density of 5.38 units per acre. Each unit was to range from 2000-3400 square feet. This was approved in May of 2006. The original townhome project was characterized as catering to the young professional and empty nesters looking for low maintenance. They wanted to keep as much of the property in a natural state and available to the community property as possible. This led to a desire for front loaded garages with reduced yard requirements. The project included a community center with a pool. The Developer constructed the utilities and streets for the entire project. These were inspected and accepted by the City of Grapevine. Twenty-four (24) of the townhomes were constructed and Twelve (12) have sold. The streets were constructed to a 25' width. They are privately maintained and have been striped and dedicated as a fire lane. They are in good condition. Since these are marked as fire lanes, parking along the side of the street is not available. The streets were constructed with roll over curbs so that no curb cut would be required for drive approaches. Each unit has a two (2) car garage and space for tandem parking in front of each garage. Additional off street parking was. provided in clusters allowing for guests. !JUN 3" 9 20110 i� .� r Analysis of Proposed Stone Bridge Development Grapevine,Texas Jane 29,2010 Description of the project: The current proposal is to revise the PD overlay to allow for single family lots with various widths. The new layout is for 90 residential lots, thus reducing the density to 3.4 units per acres (47 lot reduction). It is also being characterized as being for people desiring low maintenance. The architecture of the proposed units is complementing the existing townhomes. The units will vary in size from 1900 square feet to 2700 square feet. This is slightly smaller than previous townhome units. Each new unit will still have a two (2) car garage and also have the space for two (2) tandem off street parking spaces. The new project will have the same number of off street parking as the previous approved plan. These will be continued to be reserved for guests and this will be enforced by the HOA and deed.restrictions. One of the concerns is that by deviating from the townhome project the product may be more attractive to a wider market than anticipated. If families with multiple driving age children or others with more cars move to the area, parking could be an issue. Traffic Concerns: The standard residential street is 30 feet from face of curb to face of curb. This is 5 foot less than the existing paved roads of the site. If residents, in a standard single family residential subdivision, park on both sides of the streets, it leaves a single 12 foot lane for traffic to pass. This is usually acceptable since people are not allowed to park across the driveways and there are places for oncoming vehicles to wait. The uncomfortable narrow street also slows traffic in residential areas making pedestrian movements safer_ A typical front driveway in a single family residential subdivision with 50 feet wide lots has 20 feet of space taken by driveways, leaving 30 feet for on street parking in front of the lot. A typical parallel space is striped at 22 feet long which means there is a maximum of 1.3 cars per lot. Depending on the number of cul-de-sac's and knuckles,this could be reduced to as low as one (1) space per lot.. Even though the street section of Stone Bridge is only 25 feet wide, it is marked as a fire lane. This prevents parking in this area and allows for the full width of the road for traffic. The roadways have been laid out in a curvilinear manner to match the existing terrain which has the same traffic calming affect reducing speed. With the 71 off street parking spaces that have been proposed, this leaves 0.78 parking spaces per lot. However, these spaces are reserved for guests where in a typical subdivision people may park their personal vehicles in the street nightly. It would be anticipated that this neighborhood would have fewer vehicles than a standard residential subdivision due to the target market of empty nesters and others without children of driving age. The change in the density or land use should have no affect on drainage or sanitary sewer. JUN 21010 t1AproJ'\BUS_DD'VICIVILIstone bridge(2)(2).doex Analysis of Proposed Stone Bridge Development Grapevine,Texas .Tune 29, 2010 Conclusions: From a parking and traffic perspective, the proposed plan is a large improvement over the existing approved plan. If the developer was to continue with the approved existing plan, there would be about 0.5 off street parking per unit. The proposed plan would make 0.78 off street spaces per unit. There are possible opportunities to add a few more off street parking spaces to bring this closer to the one (1) parking space per unit that would be found in a normal single family development. In our professional opinion, this development will not require the number of parking spaces as the typical single family subdivision. The limited and restricted parking may help control the target market to the empty nesters that are being marketed. For aesthetic and future maintenance concerns, the Developer should take care to cut the existing streets as much as possible. The streets are in good condition. Cutting these streets could cause potential future weakness that should be avoided. unless no other alternative is reasonable. The Developer should review the location of the existing utility stubs to utilize them for the new units and avoid any unnecessary changes. The townhome project required fire sprinklers. Therefore the waterline designed and installed placed fire hydrants accordingly. The Developer should be required to review this layout with the Fire Department or provide residential fire sprinklers in the new units. Sincerely, uitt-Zollars,Inc. aul M.Lee,P.E. Associate/Project Manager cc: file Attachments JUN 20§0 Haproj\BUS_DEVICIVII,IsWne bridge(2)(2).doex 77- Analysis of Proposed Stone Bridge Development Grapevine,Texas June 29, 2010 UN 2010 H:\vroi\BUS DEWIV1Ustone bridge(2)(2).docx Analysis of Proposed Stone Bridge Development Grapevine,Texas June 29,2010 OWN �:x n � ..., ����.�-:.�'Hr�'-�-�:a,� uze�°�' yam" :`,.-/ �,,�1 �'.�-•'.. IUN HAproj\BUS_DEVICNILIstone bridge(2)(2).docx �Mr S Analysis of Proposed Stone Bridge Development Grapevine,Texas June 29,2010 M jUN 3 HAproj\BUS_DEVICIVILIstone bridge(2)(2).docx %- Market Profiles Martdog and Markdiagltereartk CansuMmrs April 10,2010 Mr. Dean Eldridge Lifestyle Grapevine LP 580 Decker Dr., Ste 280 Irvine,Texas 75D62 Dear Dean, At the request of Jahn Egnatis of Grenadier Homes, the staff of Market Profiles has conducted a review of the market around your Grapevine project. The project is known as Stone Bridge Oaks. Based on our review of available data. Market Profrles has drawn specific conclusions relative to potential future actions to be undertaken by the partnership. First, let us state that Market Profiles has been active in the DFW area since 1978. We have conducted thousands of market reviews across the country_ These include the Irvine Ranch in Southern California, the Highland Ranch in Denver, Colorado, Stonebridge Ranch in McKinney. Texas,and The Hills project in New Jersey.. Based on-our review of available data, we have drawn the following condusions relative to the market and your Stone Bridge Oaks community specifically: • Based on the experience of Market Profiles, currerrt lending restrictions on attached product will cause a slow clown of th e development process for attached product. • The absorption rates of the competitive Townhouse alternatives suggest that a continuation of the Stone Bridge Oaks townhouse product would lead to a Community build out of 6.5 to 7 years_ • The demand for attached product is only 5% to 10% of the total market opportunity. Given current prices for the existing product half of the potential market is priced out of the market. • Changing the potential product to a small lot program would expand the market potential of the community to the point that the potential absorption of the community would be 24 to 36 months. The target segments remains the same, there will just be more consumers showing interest because the product will be detached. The staff of Market Profiles looks forward to our future involvement in this and other projects that are brought to the market by your firm. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this project. Sincerely Marts J Gram President Market Profiles Texas P.O. Box 5716 Round Rock,Texas 78683-5716 (512)788-2197 %h BACKGROUND AND CONCLUSIONS Over the past several months, the staff of Market Profiles has had numerous conversations about the market in Dallas. More specifically, we have discussed the market in Northeast Tarrant County and Grapevine relative to the townhouse market. Over the years, Market Profiles has conducted thousands of consumer interviews with buyers and prospective buyers interested in new homes. Based on those interviews,we have come to some conclusions about the short term prospects for town home sales and potential impact on cities and surrounding communities. Based on the numerous (over 100,000 interviews) consumer interviews, Market Profiles has concluded that the potential market for town home product typically falls into two different buyer groups. The first is the price-sensitive buyer group. These consumers typically can not afford most new homes in an area, but want a new home close to work and entertainment areas. A town home becomes the alternative for that buyer segment. The second group is represented by people seeking life-style opportunities. These consumers seek a low maintenance product with the master on the first floor. If the floor plans are too narrow, they can not feature the master on the main floor. These consumers are also very concerned with the investment potential of their purchase. During poor economic times, the town home product is the first in an area to stop selling. It is not that the product will not sell at some point, it is just that the dominant purchaser of the product is not motivated to purchase because of the economic market. Sased on the consumer interviews, we also determined that only about 511A to 10%of the market is interested in an attached product at any point in time. This basically means that only 5 bo 10 out of 400 consumers are actually interested in an attached product. There are many reasons for this low interest in.this type of product. first, many believe thanks to Realtors, that this is a poor investment The second is that most consumers vivant some type of yard. A handful of builders actually take all of this into account and feature product that these consumers want and therefore continue to sell even in poor economic times. In the past,we have seen attached product sold in the market and then when the economy sours, whole communities fall into disrepair. This happens because the sales stop and the builder goes into bankruptcy_ In the DFW area a major current example is Portrait Homes. They did well in good economic times because they focused on the price-sensitive consumer that could not afford single family homes in the area in which they built homes. When the economy goes bad, banks stopped being willing to finance projects with attached designs. Financing is only available if the builder could prove strength in the market and a history of positive profits. Today, the problem is not just a tack of interest in this type of product by consumers. It is also the tack of financing. Most lenders now require that 50% to 75% of a building or phase be pre-sold before a building or phase is started. For pensitive buyers, this does not present a problem because they are typicalE renters. for the luxury buyers, this presents a major problem. When they sell their current home, they savant to move into their new home rather than rent on a temporary basis. This has effectively cut the potential market in half or more. While completing projects with attached product will be difficult, detached product is much less difficult to finance, build and sell. Detached product opportunities represent 90%of the demand. Clearly, the risk on 90% to 95% is significantly less than 5% to 10%. As the price goes up, the odds of attracting price sensitive buyers goes down. The demand also goes down with the restriction on financing_ While the demand might have been 5%o to 10%, it drops to below half of that because of the drop in interest by the consumers left In the market for the type of product being built_ The Stone Bridge Oaks community is being absorbed at significantly discounted prices from the market peak of 2006. The highly recognized research companies in the Dallas area have indicated that the market is over built with townhouse and condo product. A brief review of the competitive market indicates that town home products in and around the Stone Bridge Oaks site are achieving approximately 1 sale per month. Given that there are 110 town home lots remaining in the community, the build out of the comrnunk would take 6'f to 7 years. The table on the next page provides the data used for our conclusions. On the other hand,a detached patio home product similar to that currently in design for this target market could sell at a rate of 2 to 3 units per month. This would increase the sates rate by 3 tunes and reduce the build out from 6 to 7.5 years to approximately 24 to 30 months. The target segments for your product programs would be the adult segments in the market. These include Adult Singles, Empty Nesters, and some Young Marrieds_ The older segments are the most willing and able to purchase the higher price ranges of new product required at the site. Most of the competitive alternatives have focused on the restrictions of the site rather than the needs of the target segments. In Moth situations the target market is the empty nester and adult single. The older consumers or empty nesters have the economic purchasing power to purchase higher priced product with less maintenance as hart of their decision to make a Iife style change. Same would have purchased town homes, but not when the delay of move in is taken into consideration. The Older consumers will purchase a home on a smaller lot to down size their home and reduce their maintenance requirements. This allows these consumers to travel, go to events, or other activities that might have otherwise been discounted because they have to spend too much time on the upkeep of their single family homes. During poorer economic periods, these consumers retract to the comfort of what they are used to which is their current housing situation_ Over the past several months the staff of Market Proles has conducted numerous interviews with yourself and your sales staff. Through our discussions, we have recognized that the consumer has retreated to their comfort zone and we had to give them a reason to think about changing their living arrangement. This process will be significarWy easier in the Grapevine area with detached,small lot product than it will with high priced attached town home product. Market Profiles has been involved with product targeted at the empty nester for many years. One of the key conditions that we have observed over the years is that the move-down or retirement buyer takes 6 months to a year to make a decision about the purchase of that move-down or retirement home. This has been true regardless of the economy. Here we have the added negative of poor economic times on a national basis. Many of these consumers have invested in the stock market and tie their fixture to the success of these investments. This tie to economic conditions for the primary target segment has also had a significant impact on the thought process about the purchase of a town home or single family product. A town home purchase is a significantly riskier investment than a patio home or other small lot product. This also reduces the viability of town home product. Higher gas prices and rising energy costs have also significantly impacted these buyers in their purchase decision process. Years ago, we found that housing is somewhat tied to the auto industry with regard to purchase decisions by the consumer. Treads in the auto industry often follow or lead those in housing. The current trend is toward more energy eMdent cars_ The trend in housing is also following this trend. For the first time in hWry another country has taken over the top spot in size of home being purchased by the residents. Australia is now the number one country for the average see home purchased. Smaller homes are clearly in our future. The viability of town home product has just been pushed into the future because of the economic risk in the primary target group. Savings have long been a major motivator for the consumer regardless if it is automobiles, housing or other major purchase item. For this reason, producing small lots makes significantly more cense than a continuation of the town home product_ Hopefully, this analysis and explanation of the impact of current economic tunes will satisfy those needing the information. We at Market Profiles do not believe that waiting for 6.5 years to complete a project is a prudent decision for either a city or a bank. For a city, a slow performing community raises the question, "that community has realty been a slow projecL why don't people like to live in this city?' Speed for what ever reason suggests growth and vibrancy. N r gym• � a�O; � � O ; � t Wi I� ti I - � i ! i m I rL ou 10 I + - 1 1 } I � ,a0 � t t O In 69 to no Im i ' .39 -it _ I .N; IRjI Cj I - 9-2 tH I I i I ' 1 :M Q CN O D O Lo N Ne cn CL 'O. I Ci C 4 tom. W o� 32 52 : SCIx I w ra $�u FEEL all D' V� ORDINANCE NO. St AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING ZONING CHANGE Z10-02 ON ATRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE G.W. MINTER SURVEY,ABSTRACT NO. 1083, DESCRIBED AS BEING A TRACT OF LAND LYING' AND BEING SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "R-TH" TOWNHOUSE DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO "R-5.0" ZERO LOT LINE DISTRICT REGULATIONS; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN. MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE, AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH AN OFFENSE OCCURS OR CONTINUES; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, applications were made to amend the Official Zoning Map, City of Grapevine, Texas by making applications for same with the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these requested changes should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested change should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, the effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among otherthings the characterof the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings, encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning change,that the public demands it,that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the change in zoning lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population;facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this change in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that a change in zoning classification for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City of Grapevine Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine,Texas same being also known ORD. NO. 2 as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended and changed by Zoning Application Z10-02 to rezone the following described property to-wit: being a 19.165 acre tract of land out of the G.W. Minter Survey, Abstract No. 1083, Tarrant County, Texas (4632 Trevor Trail) more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A", attached hereto and made a part hereof,which was previously zoned "R-TH" Townhouse District Regulations is hereby changed to "R-5.0" Zero Lot Line District Regulations, all in accordance with Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, as amended. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the herein change in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future,to lessen congestion in the streets;to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air, to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation,water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. ORD. NO. 3 Section 8. That the fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20th day of July, 2010. APPROVED: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ORD. NO. 4 ORDINANCE NO. 'Ix AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ISSUING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 41 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE, BY GRANTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD10-04 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 66 DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a planned development overlay by making applications for same with the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance foroff-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine,Texas, did considerthe following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general Welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS,the City Council further considered among otherthings the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this planned development overlay, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the planned development overlay lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this planned development overlay and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this planned development overlay for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community. ORD. NO. 2 NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BYTHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a planned development overlay in accordance with Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine,Texas, same being also known as Appendix"D"of the City Code, by granting Planned Development Overlay PD10-04 to allow for the development of 66 detached single family lots in the "R-5.0" Zero Lot Line District within the following described property: Stone Bridge Oaks II Addition (4632 Trevor Trail)all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein conditional use permit. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to secure safely from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation,water, sewerage,drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine,Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. ORD. NO. 3 Section 7. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00)and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. That the fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine,Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20th day of July, 2090. APPROVED: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ORD. NO. 4 wwr¢s PROJECT LOCATION s� 4 Y 5 cwr m. NOTES= PRIVATE STREET SYSTEM NOTES: 1. Bearings are referenced to a 23.577 acre tract as recorded 4. "Notice: Selling a portion of this addition by metes and bounds 1. ALL STREETS IN TON RIG OAKS 1 PRIVATE S EB D E O S I SHALL BE R E AND in D206328958 Deed Records of TarrantCounty, Texas. C Y. is a violation of city ordinance and state law and is sub'ect Y 1 to fines and withholding of utiYt and building permits 9 Y 9 P CONTAINED IN LOTS 2 AND 3 BLOCK AND SHALL BE IN A I PRIVATE 2, a2 • iron rods with N ENGR. INC." set of ACCESS, PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT. all boundary corners, block corners, points of , block 5. Lot 17 and 22 Block 1, Lot 3 Block 2, Lot 18 and 35 Block 3, 2. PRIVATE STREETS SHALL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY MANDATORY curvoture, points of tongency, and angle points and Lot 39 Block 4 ore dedicated to and maintained by the homeowners association for landscaping and screening HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION (H.O.A) iprivate ri t of-wa unless otherwise noted. n Pr 9h - Y purposes. 6. According to FEMA Panel • 48439CO215 H, entire tract is labeled 3. D.E. - Drainage Easements Zone B.L. - Bulding Line C.M. - ControllingMonuments 7. Easement dedication area (Lot 2 & 3 Block 5): 132,432 s.f. U.E. - Utility Easements Net platted area; 702,375 s.f. M.O.A. - Homeowners Association Total Plotted Area: 834,807 s.f. IRF - Iron Rod Found P.U.D.E. - Public Utility and Drainage Easement 8. All retaining wals to be maintoined by Stone Bridge Oaks and coA•a�nnnei� Stone Bridge Oaks IOwners Association. LOCATION MAP 560 .70.4v RR P rw V1 � (p ZP 0 30 60 120 t LINE TABLE A9- 5 L , LCOWON AREA "-�-� s o SCALE: V - 60' 36 E� LINE N0. BEARING DISTANCE FOR o+rR, S�yO �PUN,xh- aw v"..;fl � '� KaPG k 1. S 43.37'56" E 27.26' '1 • SG IF 2. N 20.59'40' E 15.00, ,>'` 0-PJ6- 3. 4. N 32.12'41' W N 22.56'01" 31.75' •v, O3 5. W S 00.34'04" E 32.' 35.0000' -p � �G �}. 6. 7. N 88.44'48" E S 89.25'56' W 26.73' 17.09' 33 6i� {off U 34 S00° 30'42"E - 713.16' S. N 89.25'56" E 37.95' 9. 10. N 00.35'04" W N 71.17'07' E 17.50'-- 19.75' > -� --" ux A* -"ary5_- gsv ''>c'qr: `\'---_-_' '„• °,i0. n✓ '1. soo-,naz•¢1n.zA w•n-R sx.as sou wr s>.u• I 3 ii. 12. S 52.26'20" W N 13.51'18' W 33.36' 25.65, t? °�. (^ r. --- sw.s,m"'+ 6 ,z '\ Po " _y,. w,s•.° m e,. .,o' q� a°.b, LCTOMMON AREA18 BLOCK S 11i t 13. N 13.51 '18' W 15.19' rd £ 32 LOt 3 k P UA 1, O° -\ 4r,6, w° O 14. N 56.58' 41 ' E 10.00' tam` . Pf VA1E ,r ° 15. S 89. 29'18" W 9.36' \ - O w• z'''--- •\ a •� .Imo -,,,0 o�e vOSCOVy�PG. O-ta is CURVE TABLE CURVE NO • DELTA RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING 23'52" 40.00' 62.41' 39,58' 6. 27' 4 ° 1. 5 S 5 5208"E 42 36'S8 75. 00 55. 78 29. 25' S4.51' N 1.14' 2. 0 04 "E i4 43 53 40. 00 52.17 30-54 48.55 3. S38. 32 08 E 4. 49. 22`38" 132.50' 114. 19' 60. 91' 110.69' S25.21'46"E 5, 16. 57'03' MOB' 8.88' 4.47' 8.84' NBO.57'25"E 6. 70'21'00" 60.00, 73.67' 42.29' 69.13' S63'32'25'E 7, 17'31'31" 167.50' 51.23' 25.82' 51.03' S41.47'04"E 8. 24'18'24" 235.00' 99.69' 50.61, 98.95' N20.52'07"W S. 87.38'10' 25.00' 38.24' 23.99' 34.62' S54.53'50"E 10. 74.55'01" 25.00' 32.69' 19.15, 30.41' S23.36'12"W 11. 74.50'51' 50.00, 35.32' 38.26' 60.77' S23.34'07"W 12. 74.50'51' 25.00' 32.66' 19.13' 30.39' N23.34'07"E 13. 13.59'03' 35.00' 8.54 ' 4.29 ' 8.52 ' N74'17'33'E 14. 42.36'58' 75.00' 55.78' 29.25' 54.51' N01. 14'04"E 15. 20.17'32" 100.00, 35.42' 17.90, 35.23' N71.08'19"E 16. 89.21'28" 24.50' 38.21, 24.23' 34.45' S16'18'49"W 17. 38'19'56" 150.00, 100.35' 52.14' 98.49' NOD* 54'27"W 18. 109.44'26" 50.00' 95.77' 71.06' 81.79' N36.36'43"W 19. 19.44'26' 285.00' 98.19, 49.59' 97.71' N08.23'17'E 20. 53.46'48' 250.00' 234.66' 126.78' 226.14' NOB•37'54'W 21. 90.00,00, 20.00' 31.42' 20.00' 28.28' S43.31'04"W 22. 55.57'38" 40. 00' 39.07' 21.25' 37.53' N63.30'07"W 23. 90:13'57" 20.00' 31.50' 20.08' 28.34' N46.21'57"W 24. 89.46`03" 35.00 54.84' 34.86' 49.40' S43'38'03'W 25. Z2. 14'39" 130. Do' 50.47' 25.56' 50.15' S09.52'21"W 26. 22.14'39" 95.00' 36.88' 18.68, 36. 65' S09.52'21"W 27. 16.33'53" 200.00' 57.82' 29.11' 57.62' S12.42'44"W 28. 11.36'37" 200.00' 40.53' 20.33' 40.46' S10.14'06"w 29. 21.30'22" 150.00, 56.30' 28.49' 55.97' S10. 14'29"W 30. 27.51'13' 450.DO' 218.76' 111.59, 216.61' S41.26'19"E 31. 44'24'20" 350.00' 271.26' 142.85' 264.52' S06.09'46"E 16. N 88.44' 48' E 25.94' •x.� R,yr , - v 27 26 2., .o. ,�_ J 0D 17. N 62'42'30" E 49.98' _"w,c -Eynt 31 O 28 2a L.A„�•w ;i/ Iv) 18. S 54•14'49" w 35.29' >/- '#� `g 29 Via• _ S01•14'59"E - 324.31' %-ar 19. N 69.00'20" W 35.00' 19 ` �iy •; -`,r\. `A ._'-'_----.----- 20. S 24. 10'26' E 37.94' - s _t•.§'• _ _°- mw zsas• zc -�m i'uc �'� 2S y /' ���- •ss-c w m,. 21. N 40.36'52" E 70.17' fL} EFrc• &. \ 30 22. S 49.23'08" E 44.09' NE -96 23. S 30.37' 48" E 49.58' GfLPG' a .c }° �. TAYLOR LANE `,z' 21 24. N 59.22'12" E 13. 00' S"p4�3°$ rr ,- u"ar,zm' �, ;\ •>.ro s >13>sxs LOT 3 m.o(x 5 `b -,_` �p•j�, 25. N 30.37'48" W 25.84` v1�C��. p rn,r. 1zR1-o°s'zTs"e} �" a\ :•O, OZ Sg e�- n = �ar PRIVATE ACCESS 4 P.UD.E. "m �' - .g.T •F2t'ti $ 26. N 16.08'42" E 33. 31' Y ��3 7 a - ,ate u.r oy �. 8 20 19 n 16 15 27. N 13.27' 15" W 8` 28. S 39.04'26" E 17.72' 1 20\ o29.N 00.26'05' W 27.87' s+a \, ,�.,'__,�____ ar .x.rr-_- --_------.-_--.-_-.- -.-_-_- 30. N 00 26 OS W 29.48 ----- - - 1' z2 21 _-}5'gt-- -_ ,p ,: ro• sx.ar zo t9 \`Wac` '..,` a.. a �-,.•s:-r :,z.»sz.00aa. 23 �•ual• < i2 17 sor u>wwr sorusrw az�,S " n0 24 ® u yr +e.Rr - K �-�. ------ "- a,--- -vui--------- 1 ' 1ao•,sse4 ao.sR �"'''�• 32Z• 15 ' h+" 500-34'29"E - 259.95' y•."�'C ( '>o"' *wazp� u.zr - 14 } jP "� '�T\ LOT 17BLOCK t §, V �•ft <>r O _ . t3 14 ' \bxraawx COMMON AREA 4_ IseS < A' e 1 1___t.__ ~' O� ` ,'3 �O� , COMMON MM3 % AREA/PRNATEIr ,�" ,• $ _______ Aa nI uR +w i�N DRAINAOE ESMT. •'^'°t��a. x.ov .�Y sz.ar .arrusr. uzoa M Or" 6 CASE NAME: STONEBRIDGE OAKS II CASE NUMBER: PD10-02 LOCATION: 4632 TREVOR TRAIL MAYOR SECRETARY �ALTE*'PANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN ,DATE SHEET: 8 OF 9 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES // c7x ` ??°3 e. p R' r z . LOT 18 BLOCK 3 12// `'p •'1406°42'$5aJ ° 3 70�5033'f for aa>.' '°,aLij " ca DRN�� A/SMT. s3 I / RECEIVED 1354.2 J n / s,m". c4 a•pe sxo" in S° 9A 7 a°p s,y° n.ar u saar M "PLAT" h o? CAO/ \ yk- k�. / 90 ( 2 / /` ® 12 ( PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL cA'YQ400 o g I oo, N�y�`ar\\ m // 1 Go C13 / / 3 ^p 4 �_----- a n , lcn °040 a $ a I gym �/ /00-,T / \ // \ c / / Np e - se, " - 9 a" 1� Date Approves: J � fat �p(ptg �22cx' j 3 F\ // 1s h..,i .°r //^G�4to > / ^p• ;'i:.°s ^4 i ZUI0 12 it A 44 -- - ` o of \ / ,�i' I ,•� a�/ \ // n / \ t accfec o ai -__ae- o' o r ILL! r g .r '1 '1 W / - W Ae. z _c ,•c o�,Vov ° --- -r r :s ` �i� ---- y ( \ // / \ e 'Za3p� \ e� Ea• a9 1rsA - - - Z Chairman: r Mayor- 1! a/ 2 o z r e ti 2 (a ,� �\ / 1 / i z e N 84. VOR s, _ _ a.VE------ 4O, to / / \ �o. C2 r-----�'- . Secretary:Clt ar c' s 3 > rn SO1° 10'11"E SOt° 10'11"E " / 1 \ / 13 / \ / F--� 1� �® a<_?_ na's••,o,y 'Wry ss.rr s�+T LOT 3 BLOCK5 `�• orze seT azm' _01a PUM 't m / 1 / / PRNATE ACCESS k P.UD.E. Rm = Of (n 94.43 12.70 1 1 �/ Q2 / //\ N22°32'33"E z" 0 u•z• --mow--- 4 // \ 5.0T _f� I N ' F AT 1 1 B 1 \/ / I I I w •per .'oo.{'.e� `mu..a• s°r °"sa.»• sz.00' Ewa FINAL -� ,5 // I > , _ - -- s�� aE. - ----- -----------_ m�< p bl y� 2 �I3 1 6 1 7 1 c4$StoNE ro \ // I I I I I 2D i Won 1 2 - - -------- - � -------- - - - - �P ----- 1- B c STONE BRIDGE OAKS II 5 11 11 sL�Es J�s4 \\ //// I j n 19 i 11 Q 3 s s q 7 r e 9 to oho a I 66 LOTS SINGLE FAMILY 1 I I I 1 0. 5 LOTS OPEN SPACE J 1gD w oW r 2 LOTS PRIVATE ACCESS 1_.- I 1 i �,J z o 1 30DL ; 11 PONT OF BEcn4Nc BEING A REPEAT OF A PORTION LOT 22 81.00K 1 i / M1'1 i m•1rw sear f� ' I ar COMMON AREA ; ;;' `LOT 3 BLOCK 2 ;--1--�� z t� " se.,r 1 OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS) ,, oarw >z,w sorza•sa-. %'� .q� -"� �r_"--,�- _ 1 ' 'tL•� +Z>w•� R sera ,�1.a Ngy I a 19.165 ACRES OUT OF THE No1.15112"W 284.02' wna£n.aw. G.W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083 ° oaxulwN sa se£, z ar : %' "F NOl° 15'12"W - 669.32' %" v mL aexr 2 a x ras oma OxTAx vwaa£ xow. Tw,mxAes IN THE rae MMY mAL °Fpc'`T0N EULESS GRAPEVINE ROAD CITY OF GRAPEVINE (VARIABLE R.O.W3 TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS --- r- ------ I I �-----------I �-----------,---------1 w �-------T-----�-----T---------I-----7-------I w I----- I i I II I I OWNER I I I I> I LIFESTYLE GRAPEVI NE 360, L.P. I01 1 580 DECKER DRIVE, SUITE 280 1 0� 1 ( 1 0 I ( j 0 I I I I I I ( I O� I I I _ I � IRVING, TEXAS 75062 3 I l 0 � 1 i I I 972-402-8905 Cn m d 0. PREPARED BY a0 o " n o g CORWIN ENGINEERING, INC. 0 M t 200 W. BELMONT. SUITE E TOTAL ACRES 19.165 -- ALLEN, TEXAS 75013 3 a 972-396-1200 m TOTAL LOTS 66 JUNE 2010 SCALE I" - 60' THIS PLAT FEED IN INSTRUMENT • ZONING: PD 06-06 SHEET 1 OF 2 .. O oso:xolae.aq� 6 zz zm0 a ot. xu OWNER'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT LEGAL DESCRIPTION - Stone Bridge Oaks II WHEREAS, GRAPEVINE 360, L.P., is the owner of a tract of land situated in the G.W. Minter Survey, Abstract No. 1083, in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of a 23.577 acre tract, as described in Clerks File No. D206328958, in the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, being a portion of Stonebridge Oaks, an addition to the City of Grapevine Texas as recorded in the Plat Records of Torrent County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING, at a % inch iron rod found at the southwest corner of said Stonebridge Oaks Addition; THENCE, North 89133'55" East, with the south fine of said Stonebridgge Oaks, for a distance of 6.50 feet, to a %2 inch iron rod found, being in the east One of Euless-Gropevine Road (Variable R.O.WJ, for the PDNT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; THENCE, North Ots 1512" West, with the east line of Euless -Grapevine Road, for a distance of 669.32 feet, to a %2 inch iron rod set; THENCE, North 88' 31*04" East, deporting said east line for a distance of 211.87 feet to a Y2 inch iron rod set; THENCE. North 20104'25" West, for a distance of 84.63 feet to a %2 inch iron rod found at the point of curvature of a curve to the right having o radius of 75.00 feet, a tangent of 29.25 feet and a central angle of 42136'58", THENCE, with said curve to the right for an arc distance of 55.78 feet, (Chord Bearing North OP 14'04" East - 54.51 feet), to a %2 inch iron rod found at the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE. North 22132'33" East, for a distance of 5.07 feet to a %z inch iron rod found; THENCE. South 67127'27" East, for a distance of 100.00 feet to a %2 inch iron rod found; THENCE, North 22132'33" East, for a distance of 101.50 feet to o %2 inch iron rod found; THENCE. North 67927'27" West, for a distance of 89.85 feet to a %2 inch iron rod found, being a point on a curve to the right having a radius of 35.00 feet, a tangent of 4.29 feet, and a central angle of 13159'03'; THENCE, with said curve for an arc distance of 8.54 feet, (Chord Bearing North 74' 17*33" East - 8.52 feet), to a %2 inch iron rod found at the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE, North BP 17'05" East, for a distance of 77.05 feet to a %2 inch iron rod set; THENCE, North 08142'55" West, for a distance of 54.28 feet to a I/2 inch iron rod found at the point of curvature of o curve to the left having a radius of 235.00 feet, a tangent of 50.61 feet and a central angle of 2401874"; THENCE, with said curve to the left for an arc distance of 99.69 feet, (Chord Bearing North 20152'07" West - 98.95 feet), to ( %2 inch iron rod found at the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE, North 3310119" West, for a distance of 48.94 feet to a V2 inch iron rod found at the point of curvature of a curve to the left having a radius of 167.50 feet, a tangent of 25.82 feet and a central angle of 17131'31'; THENCE, along said curve to the left for an arc distance of 51.23 feet, (Chord Bearing North 41. 47.04" West - 51.03 feet), to a %2 inch iron rod found at the point of reverse curvature of a curve to the right having a radius of 132.50 feet, a tangent of 60.91 feet and a central angle of 49122'3B"; THENCE, along said curve for on arc distance of 114.19 feet, (Chord Bearing North 25151'31" West - 110.69 feet), to a %2 inch iron rod found at the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE, North 01110'11" West, for a distance of 12.70 feet to a n/2 inch iron rod found; THENCE. South 37133'40" East, for a distance of 87.11 feet to a %2 inch iron rod found; THENCE, North 52026120" East, for a distance of 197.50 feet to a %2 inch iron rod found; THENCE. North 37133'40" West, for a distance of 108.18 feet to a %2 inch iron rod found; THENCE, South 89125'56" West, far a distance of 210.96 feet to a %2 inch iron rod set, being a point on a curve to the right having a radius of 40 OO feet, a tangent of 30.54 feet and a central angle of 74' 43'53"; THENCE, along said curve for an arc distance of 52.17 feet, (Chord Bearing South 38132'08" East - 48.55 feet), to a %2 inch iron rod found at the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE. South 0111011" East, for a distance of 94.43 feet to a %2 inch iron rod set; THENCE. South 890 25'56" West, for a distance of 143.61 feet to a Y2 inch iron rod set, being a point in the east One of said Euless -Grapevine Road; THENCE, North 01115'12" West, along said Euless -Grapevine Road far a distance of 284.02 feet to a %2 inch iron rod found; THENCE. North 8912556" East. deporting said east line and along the north One of said 23.577 acre tract, far a distance of 403.79 feet• to a %2 inch iron rod farad; THENCE, South DO.34-29" East, continuing along sad north line, far a distance of 259.95 feet, to a %2 inch iron rod found; THENCE. South 700 30'42" East• continuing along said north fine, for a distance of 200.00 feet, to a %2 inch iron rod set; THENCE, North 61003'42" East, continuing along said north fine, for a distance of 230.47 feet, to a %2 inch iron rod set at the most easterly northeast corner of the 23.577 acre tract being in the west fine of State Highway 360 (Variable R.O.W.); THENCE, South 25107'03" East, along the east fine of the 23.577 acre tract and along the west One of State Highway 360. far a distance of 149.86 feet, to a "x" cut found; THENCE, South 0911718" East, continuing along said fines, for a distance of 36.40 feet, to a '/2 inch Iron rod set; THENCE. South 24157'00" East, continuing (long said fines, for a distance of 49.98 feet, to a Brass Monument found; THENCE. South 64157'44" West, departing the west One of said State Highway 360 and continuing along the east One of the 23.577 acre tract• for a distance of 159.45 feet, to a %2 inch rod found; THENCE. South 00130'42" East, continuing along said east fine, for a distance of 713,16 feet, to a %2 inch iron rod set; THENCE. South 88149'45" West, continuing along said east fine, for a distance of 108.54 feet, to a %2 inch iron rod set; THENCE, South 01114'59" East. continuing along said east Fme, far a distance of 324.31 feet, to a % inch iron rod found at the most southerly southeast comer of the 23.577 acre tract; THENCE, South 8963355" West, along the south One of the 23.577 acre tract, fa a distance of 613.97 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing t9.165 acres of land. I AT AREA CI IMMARY TART F oam�aao�oao�aoo�©oo�©©m aamu©©m�oao�©ao�oom�a© oao�oao�©a©�000�000���� oom�o>oo�mac��oao����� ■��I oao�o©o0m© OEM I ©mi©©lima©��������i��� m�����ma������� NOW, THEREFORE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360. L.P. does hereby adopt this plat of STONE BRIDGE OAKS It, an addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, end does hereby dedicate to the public use forever the right-of-way and easements shown hereon. The easements shown hereon are hereby reserved for the purposes as indicated. The utility easements shall be open for all City or franchised public utilities for each particular use. The owner shall be responsible for all maintenance and repair of the paving and drainage facilities lying outside of dedicated public street right-of-way. The owner shoe be responsible for all maintenance and repair of drainage facilities within public "right to drain" easements and other private drainage easements, said maintenance and repair shall include but not be limited to continued and unimpeded passage of flows, repair of hike and bike trots, retaining woes, erosion and scour damage, and tree removal. No buildings or auxiliary structures shall be constructed, reconstructed, or placed upon, over, or across the easements as shown. Said easements being hereby reserved for the mutual use and accommodation of all public utilities using, or desiring to use same. Any City or franchised utility shaehove the fullright to remove and keep removed all or parts of any fences, trees, shrubs, or other improvements or growths which in any way endanger or interfere with the construction, maintenance, or efficiency of its respective system on the easements and all City or franchised utilities shall at all times hove the full right of ingress and egress to and from and upon said easements for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, patrolling, maintaining, and adding to or removing all or parts of its respective system without the necessity at any time of procuring the permission of anyone. thave reviewed the City's Findings concerning dedicotions and Ida agree that the statements are true and correct This plat approved subject to allplotting ordinances, rules, regulations, and resolutions of the City of Grapevine, Texas Witness my hand this the day of , 2010. LIFESTYE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. Dean Eldridge The State of Texas County of Before me, a Public Notary on this day personally oppeared DEAR! ELDRIDGE known to me to Be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D. 2010 AVICATION RELEASE Notary igna ore THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT WHEREAS, LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360. L.P., hereinafter called "Owner" (whether on or more), is the owner of that certain parcel of land situated in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, being said property as described as shown on this plat. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of ONE AND 00/100 (SI.00) DOLLAR and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby fully acknowledged and confessed. Owner does hereby waive, release, remise and quitclaim to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, the Daeos-Fort Worth International Airport Board, the cities of Dallas, Texas and Forth Worth, Texas, their successors and assigns, hereinafter called "Cities", for the use and benefit of the public and its agencies, any and aO claims for damages of any kind to persons of property that Owner may suffer by reason of the passage and fright of aO aircraft in the air space above Owner's property above the height restriction as presently established by Ordinance No. 73-50 for the City of Grapevine, known as the Airport Zoning Ordinance of the Doeas-Fort Worth International Airport, to an infinite height above sane, whether such damage shah originate from noise, vibration, fumes, dust, fuel and lubricant particles, and all other effects that may be caused by the operation of aircraft, landing at, or taking off from, or operation at or on the Dohas-Fort Worth International Airport. This instrument does not release the owners or operators of aircraft from liability for damage to person or property caused by falling physical objects from aircraft, except as stated herein with respect to noise, fumes, and lubricant particles. It is agreed that that this Release shah be binding upon said owner and his heirs and assigns, and successors in interest to said property; and it is further agreed that this instrument shall be a covenant running with the land, and shah be recorded in the Deed Records of the county or counties in which the property is situated. EXECUTED at , Texas, this -cloy of , 2010 LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. Dean Eldridge The State of Texas County of Before me, the undersigned, a Notary Pubic in and for the State of Texas, on the this day personally appeared DEAN ELDRIDGE, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the some for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D. 2010 Notary Signature SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that 1, WARREN L. CORWN, do hereby certify that [prepared this Final Plot and the field notes from an actualand accurate survey of the lad, that the caner momanenta shown thereon were properly placed under my personal supervision In accordance with the subd(vison Regulations of the City of Crap-mi, Texas. WARREN L. CORWN R.P.L.S. No. 4621 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLN Before me, the undersigned. a Notary Public in and far the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared WARREN L. CORWN. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument. and acknowledged to me, that he executed same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hind and seal of office, this_ day of , 2010 NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF TEXAS STATE HIGHWAY 360 (VARIABLE R.O.W.) � � sxa'saw Up � ) son vsaarrr csrr. O j�wszmu-r i EAST ENTRY EASEMENT DETAIL sc&E r - 50' f' � sn•zrzi u r rs.r. _S_U_E,-exa5sow �� `y�aata NORTHWEST ENTRY EASEMENT DETAIL SCALE r - 5a TYPICAL LOT SETBACK DETAIL N.T.S. O a o J1'�p�r�vTrsxw.�ir m O rx s¢ am Z SOUTHWEST ENTRY EASEMENT DETAIL SCALE 1 • 50' NAME: STONEBROGE OAKS O NUMBER: PDIO-02 ION: 4632 TREVOR TRAIL MAYOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION µ" ram eo IVED a Z& DATE: SHEET: 9 OF 9 APPOVAWORKRIN CXL WITH ,1$JY OR ORDN E FINAL PLAT OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS II 66 LOTS SINGLE FAMILY 5 LOTS OPEN SPACE 2 LOTS PRIVATE ACCESS (BEING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS) 19.165 ACRES OUT OF THE G.W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS OWNER LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. 580 DECKER DRIVE, SUITE 280 IRVING, TEXAS 75062 972-402-8905 PREPARED BY CORWIN ENGINEERING, INC. 200 W. BELMONT, SUITE E ALLEN. TEXAS 75013 972-396-1200 JUNE 2010 SCALE 1" - 60' ZONING: PD 06-06 SHEET 2 OF 2 .. ....� ♦ did • ' J r 1.- r: t • a+'.i�ie1`ir .. � 1 7Y.1 - YGtF t Grenadier Homes Enrich Your jo of Life 0 Ca/a/ Grapevine, Texas TREE LIST Conmmn Nana• Bmanical Name Naliv BeId C}prtss T odium dtsicham Tree Yes B. CWk CAiemismacraarpa Tree Y Chi.UmCak Tree Y Cedar Flu Ulevu f!' Tree Y« ai— pi -A, Pima, —hi Tree No Desert WiWb c inp / Tree Yes F tam Red Cade, J ip—virgmiana Tice Yes Idcev(Lk Quexu.sglaum,des Tree V Iuceb AFlm I'l mspa ,6ho Tree Yes Magnoly. Souihav 11 Rua/iagmnd�om Ticc Ycs Red Oak Quenus rerano Tree Y Ddarim Pine PI asddanca SrreRtrez No Japanese [Pack Rue Pinris rhunbergirvio Snmllnee No F\'e's N-W- Sophum tents S—.,: Yes Me_van Ram Pruniumezirana S.Iltree Yes PossamhauHolh /les den duo S,reR tree Yes Redbnd O horror Cercisaanadenss var. I—, 0".honm S,rmI— Yes Yaupon HORv Il---na S—H tree Yes • c NOTES Jurisdiction of Project GENERAL LANDSCAPE REcw,—Au C`R mc: KEY 1. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD10-02 IS A REQUEST TO C-0FGRAPE wE AMEND THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN OF PD0606(ORD. PLANK GfiZONJNG e174)0-3155 06-31) FOR A TOWNHOUSE ADDITION, SPECIFICALLY TO ALLOW THE —E. OF WCPNSPG AND RIRRIIATR)N PROP05ED WOOD 5LF %6 FiNZ DEVELOPMENT OF 66 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. EIJMD A-- AR—JRALBARR[ERS E O. MOMPSON STATEOFTICEBUIIDARI - - - - - - - - - - - PPOP05N9 MN FENCE nE mInRADo 2. EXISTING ENTRY LANDSCAPE AND SIGNAGE TO REMAIN. wosTw, TEXAS �RwI EXISTING FENCE (12) 3. ALL PERATETER/EXISTINO OLD FOREST TREES TO BE PRESERVED. (512)—aT%tPAees (FAA) 4. ALL EXISTING PLANTED TREES TO BE PRESERVED. Landscaping Requirements • EXISTING'IfiES 5. ALL COMMUNITY CENTER PLANTING AND AMENITIES GewPEY1NEORDINACsTS TO REMAIN. STi;.T1oN al. "PD• PLANNED DEYFDAPMEMOVEIOAY I SECTION 51. REQUDtEMENTS FOR OPEN SPACEAND 0.�IFA'110NAREAS 6. WALK ALONG EULESS-ORAPEVINE ROAD TO REMAIN, SECTON 53. a SCAPE RLat —NE PPOPOSED 1�E5 ( Im L60 7. EVERGREEN SCREEN ALONG EULESS-GRAPEVINE ROAD TO REMAIN. A. PARxwc TOTAL: a31 PARKA`C SPACES PROVmEDSa.A PERIMfT 8. EXISTING IRON FENCE TO REMAIN. GcE PAR[[uc: ao IJNTTs®2nJNrt=lao 'hPAR[IN ,: S-0UNRS®CONK-lea POBLIC OFF 6TREETPARIIaiG: =86 9. NEW TRAIL WITH BENCHES. EYJSTING ifiES (OLD FGii517�E5) B. PARXEac LorrREES s IANosCweE PARRMG AREAS MEEt 1PA IIVD.'G LANDSGkPE REQURIFAffATR. 10. TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL HOME -- 1 TREE PER LOT. PARE-G AREAS MEET P�G TREE REQ—S. 11. TYPICAL IRON FENCING BEHIND HOMES. c. NON-vE3+GE M M SPACE YA TREE EQ. ECMENTs OPEN �, AVERAGE HOME FROM YAK -ERR SQ. FT. 12. TYPICAL WOOD PRIVACY FENCE BETWEEN HOMES. ON S ISTREETTREEPERFROFnYARDPROYIDED /' D. ALL NOMES TO BE LANDSCAP®P'FROM YARD. \ \, E. LAND U EPE DESIGNED AS NOT W GESTRULT 1NC VAR' AT ENIRD�S 1 I F. TREE MIIIOATpN \ w[1 EXISTLNGOLDRC TR�S GRWTERPUN "CAIIPERTO REMAIN. ANY 1 OBSTRDCIDIGWOItRAT NEW ENIRANCETO BE 3 IRANRPLANTED ON FIE MILG.IINDERGROUND AUTDMA CSPRINKLPG SYSDiT110 B6 PROVR)ED. I — 1 SYSTEtd STANTC CODESIGNED AND AP DARDSAxw LBV LR3T6®IRRIOwT00. SYSTPtd TO MORM TO EQ - I mra • L TREVOR x.OPEN oo SPACE . R�eao uN s=n,aao SQ.F .RBQUD FD \ - \ I II ! {e52,631SQ.PACRE)OPENSPA('&PROVRIED (PREVI0115 PD DDEDEVELOPMENT PLAN OPEN SPACE=R)ALIIE) \ TAYLOR LANE I I I I I 9 1�I a N Z I \ II Y TREVOR TRAIL ea.N _. ,O�rurrr�rr �..��.,.....:�APEVINE ROAD II �II II� li FTi �-� 4 SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN ® G N: CD ggzz�: k11: N 4E OF T•,Y r. •'w S • G=A�tOL RELDMAN " '4Five CAPE 'qG g- aco) W Y ao Fagg 4QRix 1-1 W J m > W W W> UJ Z �. a Q N � to L1 FILE NUMBER PDIO-02 4dd' -- Ft 72 ,�min ;� • 1 • • (� �i -LMIR MUEEME -i,- I ® , wOWL . �IONAJ NObI 1Hono0 jM iiv ••9G 3ONDJ N 3ON33 NO2fl 1H_J(IoZj llb'1 „9b FIN- r • I � .I Mast" Bedroor i PFFV Covered Patio OF Covered Patio Sittings Master Bedroom MasterStudy ath �>;FamOyRoom 0013 W.I.0 00*n 0 A, EO-02 S,� PEE N\G ---------------------- 6I o I ----- I ! I t I I o� I I 0 U)) IR J 6 o� 0 O 3 LOT SUMMARY LEGEND TOWNHOME LOTS NUMBER OF UNITS - 24 0 52' WIDE LOT ACREAGE 4.169 DENSITY - 5.8 UNITS/ACRE TYPICAL LOT WIDTH - 30.5 FEET - 62' WIDE LOT SINGLE FAMILY LOTS NUMBER OF UNITS - 66 52' WIDTH - 47 O - 72' WIDE LOT 62' WIDTH - 72' wIOTH - 8 a ACREAGE - 19.165 ACRES DENSITY - 3.4 UNITS/ACRE LOT 18 BLOCK 3 . STREET G�PD JO t TYPICAL LOT SETBACK DETAIL ' N.T.S. O I Z O Y N � V 4 mwa S T 73 1 ^ p !1 0VO W > `l 3ol N Z Y COMMON ' AREA/PRIVATE DRAINAGE ESMT. CASE NAME:STO CASE NUMBER:P I Z LOCATIOM 4632 O3 MAYOR 2 ' DATE: - PLANNING AND CH. ' DATE: SHEET! 1 OF ' APPROVAL DC WORK IN CONE 7 GV O I DEPARTMENT 0 EULESS GRAPEVINE ROAD (VARIABLE R.O.W.) -- I > — — — — — — — — — — — —'— — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I I — — I T I----i---- i-----I I -------7-----I I� I I I I I 1 1 I I p Yoo ¢ SITE EXHIBIT OF w" m STONE BRIDGE OAKS II m NOTES: 66 LOTS SINGLE FAMILY 5 LOTS OPEN SPACE 1. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST PD10-04 IS A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A 66-UNIT SINGLE FAMILY 2 LOTS PRIVATE ACCESS DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE "R-5.0" GUIDELINES TO INCLUDE BUT NO BE LIMITED TO DEVIATION FROM THE FRONT AND REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE, AND IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE (BEING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS) ZONING CHANGE REQUEST Z10-02 IS A REQUEST TO REZONE 19.165 ACRES FROM R-TH TOWNHOUSE DISTRICT TO R-5.0 9.165 ACRES our OF THE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 66 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. G.W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083 2. PARKING TOTAL: 446 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED/4.96 PER UNIT IN THE GARAGE PARKING: 90 UNITS 0 2/UNIT - 180 PRIVATE PARKING: 90 UNITS 0 2/UNIT - 180 CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PUBLIC OFF STREET PARKING: - 86 PREPARED BY OWNER 3. OPEN SPACE CORWIN ENGINEERING, INC. LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. 300 sq. ft. x 90 UNITS - 27,000 SQ. FT. REQUIRED 200 W. BELMONT, SUITE E 580 DECKER DRIVE, SUITE 280 352,631 SQ. FT. (8.0 ACRE) OPEN SPACE PROVIDED ALLEN, TEXAS 75013 IRVING, TEXAS 75062 (PREVIOUS PD DEVELOPMENT PLAN OPEN SPACE - 8.7 ACRE) 972-396-1200 972-402-8905 JULY 2010 ZONING: PD 06-06 O 8 2 1 TREE LIST Camnon Name R f fcal A'ame Nofiv T— B Rld Lyp— T odmmdWkh— T. Yes Bur Oak Qaernrs mocreco� Tree Yes Ormkapa Oak ¢rernrs rmrh{enberga Tree Yes Cedar lhn ilhrrteserexr�ha Tme Yes Chmere ftlnhe Palnefa chi—m Tree No Ten Wig— chioN^'li", T. Yes E.—Red Cede Janf➢erusvirgin— Tree Yes Lacey Oak Lhrereasgl—idea Tee Yes NOTES Jurisdiction of Project GENERAL LANDSCAPE REGULATORY AUTDORITHiS: KEY 1. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PDIO-02 IS A REQUEST TO ciry OFGRAPEVINE AMEND THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN 01, PD06-06 (ORD. PLANNING a zUN NG h1T 41R3155 N S IC LLY TO ALLOW THE l PFLIN059D lr. E5 (511 TIT, 05T) TEEE5 (aP FM5f nE OMNI (('OLE f 06-31) FOR A TOWNHOUSE ADDITIO PECBe A DEVELOPMENT OF 66 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. TEKASDEPARTMENT OF LICENSINGANDREGULATION ELIMINATION OF ARCIBTECTURALBARRIERS LO. TIIOMPSON STATE OFf ICE BtBLONG 2. EXISTING ENTRY LANDSCAPE, AND SIGNAGE TO REMAIN. 92o COLORADO AUSrN, TEXAS 7E701 (512)W-3211 3. ALL PFRIMF,TER/F.XISTiNG OLD FOREST TREES TO BE PRESERVED. 0 2>473-28e6(1—) 4. ALL EXISTING PLANTED TREES TO BE PRESERVED. Landscaping Requirements LANDSCAPING: 5. ALL COMMUNITY CENTER PLANTING AND AMENITIES TO REMAIN. PER CITYOFGRAPEVP,4EORDNACE SECTION 41. "PD" PLANNED DEVEUJPMEM'OVERLAY SECTIOB SI REQUIREMENT:SFOROPENSPACEANDRECREATIDNARLAS 6. WALK ALONG EULESS-GRAPEVINE ROAD TO REMAIN. SEL'rlbl�sl LANoscnrERFm1LA'DONs T EVERGREEN SCRF.FN ALONG EULESS-GRAPEVINE ROAD TO REMAIN. A PARKING TOTAL: 431 PARKNG SPACES PROVIDEDl9 T9PER UNIT S. EXISTING IRON FENCE TO REMAIN. GARAGEPARKN0:90UNlTS@MNIT-ISO Px1VATEPARKD.G. 90 UNITS �i} 1/UNIT- I80 PUBLIC OFF STREET PARKING: -86 9. NEW TRAIL WITH BENCHES. B. PARKINOLOARB l2WNDSUYIN 10. TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL HOME -I TREE PER LOT. .PARKING AREAS MEET PARLIVINGEENDOUIRERENTS. ENTR ('PARKING AREAS MELT PARKING TREE R[QUI.REMENIS. 11. TYPICAL IRON FENCING BEHIND HOMES. c. NON vcBlcucnx orEtasrncETREEREQu1xeMlxrs AVERAGEHOMEFRONTYARDDPR IFT. I STRL'LT TRLE PER FRONT YARD PROviDIiD CASE NAME: STONEBRIDGE OAKS II CASE NUMBER: PD10-04 Z10-02 LOCATION: 4632 TREVOR TRAIL MAYOR SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 2 OF 10 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 12, TYPICAL WOOD PRIVACY FENCE BETWEEN HOMES. D. ALLHOMESTOBEI.ANDSCAPEDINPR TYARD. --- L LANDSCAPE DESIGNED AS NOT TO OBSTRUCT THE VIEW AT ENTRIES AND VXITS. ' - ALL TREES WORK AT NE ENTR•BLETERE ORTRUMNG R RP ANTED M SORSTRUCTING WORK AT NEW FNTRANCETO BE ANY TRANSPLANTED ON SPIT 1 O.SYWbM DEERONND AND NIO LLED BY UCENSPO IRRGATOR ISYMFM 3 TO CON—M T01'CEQ STANDARDS. n OPEN SIAIt, ) i 3W OBEN PAREQROM 12 1 631 S .IT.0.0 ACRE) 352,631SQ. IT. ACRE)OPENLAN PEN SPACE (PREvl0U5 PD O[VCLOPMBNT PLAN OPEN SPAC[-B T ACRE) �)F IT ITT 1, iace6Rrk Elm Ulmap—i/aha Tree Yes `. -`Ply ➢. _�� Magnol'a, Soethem AfaRnoha grarsd�ora Tree Yes Red Oak Qaercm fesana Tree Yea Eldelice Pine Pi—, eldanca Srmlttree No \ �— -- I Z7 1- IRpaneseBlackl`i- Prmrslhaebergrana Snuiltre< No \v E-%Necklace Sophora fl lh SRmlllme Yes I , Me* - Plum P.—marrcona Small tree Yes \ auuz Passamh—ibily I! deed S III— Yes I r Redbud 'Okl.hano' C se d 's Par. fe h '0kIRham S II a Yes / Yeupon Holly ., .Il nm --.. S II[ a WSJ _ __... GB1ttJL��Q z 15= a. U) LIJ Y as 0 Lu ch 41 °W ui w ZPW N N��(5 L1 473 in 210 mm F-21.6 in 700 MITI - A� ieaLrcwclr:: �'�" iorwnaufi + 61REET 6NE 6'�IA (INPCW6VIXE6 LF/IN600.YN NOTES GENERAL LANDSCAPE 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALI.. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS, AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGE TO SAID UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES CAUSED BY HIS/HER CREW AND SUBCONTRACTORS. 2. ALL LAWN AND LANDSCAPE BED AREAS ARE TO BE SEPARATED BY 14 GAUGE EDGING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. 3. ALL TREES AND PLANTING BEDS ARE TO BE LAID OUT IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR FOR REVIEW BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR PREPARATION OF PLANTING AREAS. CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR FAILURE TO OBTAIN OWNERS REVIEW OF THE LAYOUT INCLUDING MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED. 4. BOULDERS AND NATURAL ROCK MATERIAL USED IN BEDS AND SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR FAILURE TO OBTAIN OWNERS RENEW OF THE ROCK QUALITY AND POSITIONING AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED. ALL BOULDERS TO BE •PLANTED' A MINIMUM OF 4' INTO THE PLANTING BEDS. I. fHE Lb f FIKt1T 5PA,L 0E A5 5PECIF1En ANn 5LFM I'p WOMI /faIITECTIV, A?:A UGIt(1Na, mtwJVJ..ram. 972-484-790I. iFE COMP,EtE PIXiI� OW., 0E 5M-cr `.n A5 fGLLOW5: ISM-`a.'-StR-Ni-15C:IiNS-6,K-C,:A-S,A 4-n312 �F34. 2. THE LUMINAM 5HA_ 0; MOM THE LNVEPS' Ca LEC1OW W4IH a PGL,O1M\b 5MCIFICAfION5: '*0P1105-A TYPE 5 HOOZONTA, PEFL:CfM15MA aA55 L;NS 6A.I.A5f- A 150 H01 PPc5M SOPUM. (OALLA51 I5 MTV F OP 271 VO f5.) -CaO-- P-ACK POVv W COAT PIXT-M * HOOP FINI%-COMM 5NNn; *LUMINOU511NG5- OLACK COOP S. 1YE ARM 100E 19G91(AN 5LA, 4. TIE ARM 514- t3E OF ONE PIECE UNIi2En PLUW WM COVS1R�ilON, FU.,Y VvELG:n ANn AS`�MO.:n. Tli S.IP FIf1EP StA.L VE CA5f kUMIVJM VATH AV INIEPNA. VAPEW'AY MP VaE 5fOP, THE APM 9ikI. FIE rMMWP WITH OUCK CONV'CfOP5. a, AP.M %W-L KAY� A CA5f A.UMIMJM HIM VELPE19 TO TIE TOP OP 111E ARM FOR ATTACHING fit FIXM. a FI'ME %ALL 0E MOUtN1En WITH Mr 5NEILE55 51;iL 006f', TWOI[L'N Ili fG' G' THE ARM PIMP WO THE FIXT-M, 46 ATTACHWIf POW! %ALL HAVE A 51.ICONE PAP FOIZ 5WN.e THE PIXP,BE fO ARM CONW10V. hE PRJA 511ALL 51,11'CA P A 41' FOUr. hE CA51F ALUMIKi1M 5,I1' FITTED %A,L HAVE SIX S,f*LE55 5Ta CIA' POWT SEf 5CPE+A5 POP 5EC mr, Tic ARM f0 TIE Pad . 4. Tif POLE fO 0E 5ME n1312 WIN a FOLLOW1Na FEATUPE5: POLE 15A 4' POM WIN A FLJIFV MCOMTK DA5E - PAL, PO.E HlrHf TO G: 18 TWOXHO1f 1W COMPLEX. (CMWNIAI, PAWWAY LLK5 fO P: AN OV,PAL, IEI0IFOf 16 ) ,.. 13A)" 5HA,. 0E CA5f ALJ.MINUM n356 ALLOY, ME OF AN'PG1:Y11Y, FCJPEIGN hMTEKIAL, OP COSMETIC I'L,EP'i. EASE CGS7IVG 51A_L 0E HEAP TREAtED fO A t-6 CONDITION, N,V OF .NIFOP,M WA.I. Tl4CKVE55. WfH NO V*Wl' G OR MOLn 5NIFTIN61. -CA)110N: POLES %OB-G VEV:P 0E eP.:cfEn VAiI10Uf 11i LaVJNAI'� INSiPL,En. WAPWMvfY IS V APEP IF fH; ROLF 15 EU lfr W9TH091H? HIMIWE. n WABEA' N,,y 15V01 xn IF hC PO.E IS ND GPOU En _Wr Ili E 11M 0Aa AFTEP IVSTPLLA110V. 5• ANOVI? 0O.T5 9iALL It HY OP GA.VANIZW 5M_ EIQtt GA.VANIZFn HEX NIIf5 ANn fLAS WA%vb, A4V7 A DOLT CIZCLE 1EM".AT 5-IA L 6E PP.OVIMP, PJJCHOP fhb f FOP P0k5 Aff" V 4" X 24" X 3". UCM H5 150HPS 14' MOUNTING HEIGHT i one grits square equals one mounting height 12' 14' 16' 1 S' 6.80 5.00 3.85 3.00 2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20 -68 150 .39 .30 .27 .20 ,15 .12 SECTION 02910 - SOIL PREPARAMN PART 1 - GENERAL A. DESCRIPTION 1. PROVIDE COMPLETE GRADING AND SOt_ PREPARATION, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS, AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. B. EXAMINATION 1. EXAMINE SITE TO VERIFY REQUIRED ROUGH GRADING HAS BEEN COMPLETED CORRECTLY PRIOR TO BED PREPARATION WORK, 2, EXAMINE SITE TO VERIFY THAT ALL INVASIVE PLANTS AND THEIR ROOTS HAVE BEEN REMOVED PRIOR TO BED REPARATION WORK. C. APPROVALS 1. ALL 'APPROVED EQUAL' MATERIALS MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. PART 2 - PRODUCTS A. MATERIALS 1. COMPOST: 1.1. COTTON BUR COMPOST 1.2. SHALL BE SUPPLIED BY: GREENSENSE COMPOST, GARLAND, TX. OR, CLEAR FORK MATERIALS, ALEDO, TX, OR APPROVED EQUAL. 2. FERTILIZERS AND SUPPLEMENTS: 2.1. A 6-2-4 GRANULAR FERTILIZER NTH A WATER SOLUBLE SLOW RELEASE ORGANIC BASE SUCH AS GREENSENSE, OR SUSTANE. OR APPROVED EQUAL. 3. MULCH 3.t. SHALL BE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH, SHREDDED NATIVE MULCH, OR APPROVED EQUAL PART 3 - EXECUTION A. BED PREPARATION AND PREPARATION FOR SOD INSTALLATION 1. GENERAL 1.1. INSPECT ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND OTHER ITEMS OF WORK PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED. DO NOT PROCEED UNTIL DEFECTS ARE. CORRECTED. 1.2, INSPECT THAT ALL INVASIVE PLANTS AND THEIR ROOTS HAVE BEEN REMOVED COMPLETELY. 1.3. ALL AREAS TO BE PREPARED WITH ORGANIC TECHNIQUES ONLY. 2. SHRUB BEDS: 2.1. BREAK UP AND TILL EXISTING SOIL TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES, 2.2. ADD A 3 INCH LAYER OF COMPOST TO THE BEDS, 2.3. TILL EXISTING SOIL. AND COMPOST TOGETHER TO A TOTAL OVERALL DEPTH OF 8 INCHES. 2.4. RAKE OUT ROCKS AND CLODS AND FINE GRADE THE BEDS TO DRAIN IN APPROPRIATE DIRECTIONS. 2.5. TOP -DRESS BED WITH A 3 INCH LAYER OF MULCH AFTER PLANTING. 3. SOD AND SEED AREAS 3.1. LIGHTLY CULTIVATE COMPACTED SOIL AND RAKE THE SOIL SMOOTH. 3.2. ADD Yz INCH COMPOST TO ALL AREAS. 3.3. FINE GRADE TO DRAIN IN APPROPRIATE DIRECTONS. END OF SECTION 02910 MEMMEMMEN i I 1 LIGHTING DETAIL No Seale L 4 9 O 1) SECTION 02915 - LANLINCAPE PLANTING PART 1 - GENERAL A. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1.COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY AND LOCAL REGULATIONS EXPERIENCE LANDSCAPE MATERIALS AND WORK. GOVERNING 2.EMPLOY ONLY EXPERIENCE PERSONNEL FAMILIAR WITH REQUIRED WORK. PROVIDE ADEQUATE SUPERVISION BY A QUALIFIED FOREMAN WITH A MINIMUM OF TEN(10) YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH PROJECTS OF SIMILAR COMPLEXITY. 3.DO NOT MAKE SUBSTITUTIONS OF TREE, SHRUB AND GRASS MATERIALS. IF REQUIRED MATERIAL IS NOT OBTAINABLE, SUBMIT PROOF OF NON -AVAILABILITY TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 4.PROVIDE QUANTITY, SIZE, GENUS, SPECIES AND VARIETY OF TREES AND SHRUBS INDICATED AND SCHEDULED FOR LANDSCAPE WORK WHICH COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI Z60.1 'AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK', AND ANY APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS CONCERNING DISEASE AND INSECT INFESTATION. B.REFERENCE STANDARDS !.AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, APPROVED NOV. 6, 1996 BY AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE, INC. 2. SHINNERS & MAHLER'S, ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS, BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS (BRIT), FORT WORTH, TEXAS, 1999. 3.HORTUS THIRD, CORNELL UNIVERSITY, 1967. C.PREPARATION 4.COORDINATION NTH BUILDING AND ENGINEERING PROJECT ACTIVITIES. 5. COORDINATE THE WORK OF THIS SECTION WITH THAT OF REGULAR AND EMERGENCY WATER UTILITY ACTNITIES ON THE SITE. 6. COORDINATION WITH IRRIGATION SYSTEM: 6.1. THE UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE PLANTING OPERATIONS. 6.2. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE OPERATIONAL AT THE TIME THAT PLANTING OPERATIONS COMMENCE. 6.3. COORDINATE WORK NTH THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. D.ALL PLANT MATERIALS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE NURSERY -GROWN, INCLUDING TREES. 1. CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS SHALL HAVE BEEN 'STEPPED -UP* AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT ROOT GIRDLING. 2.CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS SHALL HAVE BEEN IN THE CONTAINER FOR A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) MONTHS PRIOR TO DELIVERY TO THE SITE TO ENSURE ADEQUATE ROOT DEVELOPMENT. 3. THE 'ROOT FLARE' OF ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL NOT BE COVERED WITH SOIL. E.THE FOLLOWING TREE CARE PROCEDURES SHALL BE ADHERED TO: 1.DO NOT MAKE FLUSH CUTS OR LEAVE STUBS WHEN PRUNING. LEAVE THE BRANCH COLLAR INTACT. 2.DO NOT USE ANY TYPE OF PRUNING PAINT ON WOUNDS. 3.00 NOT USE ANY TYPE OF TREE WRAP, EXCEPT, TRUNKS MAY BE WRAPPED WITH BURLAP DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS ONLY. 4.00 NOT STAKE OR GUY ANY TREES. IN SPECIAL CASES, TREE STAKING MAY BE NECESSARY TO PRESERVE A TREE THAT CONTINUES TO BLOW OVER. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY TREES THAT NEED STAKING FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR. 5.D0 NOT HANDLE ANY TREE BY ITS TRUNK, ANY TREE HANDLED IN SUCH A MANNER SHOULD BE REJECTED. F.WARRANTEE 1. UNCONDITIONALLY WARRANT ALL PLANTS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR AFTER THE DATE OF INSTALLATION INITIAL ACCEPTANCE. REPLACE MATERIALS NOT IN VIGOROUS, THRIVING CONDITION AS SOON AS WEATHER PERMITS AFTER NOTIFICATION BY OWNERS THAT THE PLANTS HAVE DIED OR ARE OTHER WISE NOT ACCEPTABLE, GUARANTEE REPLACEMENT PLANTS FOR ONE YEAR, STARTING FROM THE DATE REPLACEMENT IS MADE. 2.WARRANTY EXCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF PLANTS BECAUSE OF INJURY BY STORM, NATURAL DROUGHT, DROWNING, HAIL FOR FREEZING, IF REASONABLE CARE WAS TAKEN TO ADEQUATELY PROTECT THE MATERIAL, AND IN THE OPINION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE PROBLEM OCCURRED AFTER THE DATE OF INITIAL ACCEPTANCE. �l U `��, eacsnrra�araavnl. wrrL�c.r n'NDJC'Pr it i LF EiA1.M MG kl. � � IY.TIi%Fi(!'JLNRLM1VStVt ruurtEvnmewrfif� VYUUIIIIIW�-111� WWI` feYJ¢fi141` RJ Ir.1/i H[Yt7QEr5 a Aaf 'U rn PART 3 - EXECUTION A. PREPARATION FOR PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION 1. EXAMINE THE SUB -GRADE UPON WHICH THE WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED, VERIFY GRADE ELEVATIONS AND VERIFY THAT BEDS HAVE BEEN LEFT LOW BY OTHER TRADES. OBSERVE THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THE WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED AND CONFIRM THAT UNSATISFACTORY CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. B. TIME OF PLANTING 1. CARE IS TO BE TAKEN SO THAT NO PLANTS SIT IN POTS IN THE SUMMER HEAT FOR MORE THAN 1 HOUR. IF PLANTING DURING HOT SEASONS (NOT PREFERRED) PLANTING IS TO BE DONE IN SMALL SECTIONS WITH STOCKPILED PLANTS TO BE PROTECTED FROM THE SUMMER HEAT (SHADE AREAS). C. TREE PLANTING 1, STAKE LOCATIONS FOR TREES PRIOR TO DIGGING HOLES. 2. DIG PITS WITH ROUGH SIDES AND WHICH HAVE TAPERED WALLS, A MINIMUM OF TWICE THE MOTH OF THE TREE BALL. A PEDESTAL SHOULD BE LEFT IN THE CENTER OF THE HOLE AND THE TREE BALL SET UPON THAT PEDESTAL. 3. SET PLANTS IN THE CENTER OF THE HOLE AND ON THE PEDESTAL, PLUM AND VERTICAL, AND AT SUCH A DEPTH THAT THE CROWN OF THE TREE BALL WILL BE LEVEL WITH THE SURROUNDING GRADE. 4. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE SET TO MEET THE SAME RELATIONSHIP TO THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE SURROUNDING SOIL THAT THEY BORE TO PREVIOUS EXISTING GRADE OF SOIL. 5. BACKFILL WITH EXISTING TOPSOIL AND WATER IMMEDIATELY. 6. FORM A SHALLOW BASIN SLIGHTLY LARGER THAN THE PIT TO FACILITATE WATERING, REMOVE PRIOR TO MULCHING. 7, COVER ALL TREE BALLS WITH A MINIMUM OF 3' OF SPECIFIED MULCH. EXTEND MULCH OUT TO THE EDGE OF THE TREE PIT, BUT KEEP AWAY FROM TRUNKS, 8, ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL UNACCEPTABLE FOR REUSE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF SITE, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER, D. SHRUBS, TALL GRASSES AND PERENNIAL PLANTING. 1. REMOVE CONTAINER AND SET PLANT MATERIAL AT SUCH A LEVEL THAT AFTER SETTLEMENT, THE CROWN OF THE BALL MLL BE AT FINISHED GRADE. 2. GENTLY CUT OUTER ROOTS OF ANY ROOT➢ALLS THAT HAVE 'POT-BOUND' PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3. COVER PLANTING BEDS WITH A MINIMUM 3' LAYER OF SPECIFIED MULCH. E. SOD PLANTING 1. LAY SOD IN AN ORDERLY MANNER TO COVER ALL BARE SOIL AREAS. 2. WATER ALL AREAS OF THE SOD UNTIL THOROUGHLY WET. 3. ROLL SOD WITH A SOD ROLLER AFTER 24 HOURS AFTER LAYING AND WATERING SOD TO OBTAIN A UNIFORM, SMOOTH FINISH. 4. FILL JOINTS WITH COMPOST IF NECESSARY TO FORM A UNIFORM GRASS LAYER. 5. KEEP SOD ADEQUATELY WATERED UNTIL SOD MAKES A FIRM CONNECTION TO THE SOIL. F. SEED PLANTING 1, AREAS SHALL BE RAKED TO A DEPTH OF Y/", SMOOTH AND FREE OF STONES AND DEBRIS. 2. APPLY SEED EVENLY AT THE RATE RECOMMENDED. 3. RAKE AND WATER TO ESTABLISH A FIRM CONNECTION OF THE SEED TO THE SOIL. 4. KEEP SEED AREA MOIST (NOT WET) UNTIL SEED GERMINATES AND GRASS IS APPROX. )�" IN HEIGHT. 5. KEEP AREA ADEQUATELY WATERED UNTIL A STAND OF THE GRASS IS ESTABLISHED. 6. RE -SEED TO ESTABLISH A THICK STAND OF GRASS IF NECESSARY. END OF SECTION 02915 �u NM IN�E twlitCgii HJA' .eui,wnl=tM1es+:oew� rays/sra cY Fvoro-w. r�r cecn YU'JVF f!R I/ 3 LF 9U1MMOttt FR'M11'A,LE24wifi9"E}iSftY fa'Xa.-� "..-VaUr, 9f011111w.,`,k N.V,,Lvintl CASE NAME: STONEBRIDGE OAKS 11 CASE NUMBER: PD10-04 Z10-02 LOCATION: 4632 TREVOR TRAIL MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 3 OF 10 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TREE PLANTING ON SLOPE IME r"LANITNG 11-01'a zco WU Irk, W, rm"wL- raWnXxu vnn aarctimMt I(trl Nifl YIStIW Q'JLT ��` y-y. ' W� Atll"N � � ",I. VIM I^ �. �• �, '41h. iGPSLL :' IVIMax M1WN ICI I- -I A I I_ I' �1-1�1 n 1•Inrt fNi'iY,. l KXFLt NttN I,X.l r o.Yn�l> o eL u ur , �II TII-I II II _III II IPl III III T I �-) I I- I ( I � I- RVf NOtLIEG AW I I ITf� - I eIc n a 11-1�1=.JI1---I'' 5HPLU & O?NMMMA. tTA55 PI.ANTIN;I nEfNI, LSE:Fx1:xr�,�P.MXS. I'VI NW. PI.PN %FAIN, 5= a W Y as O NUj 0 o 03 Qz IxLi. LLi F J O COCOZ W WOZ > LLJ z II.' a H OM FnU) 40 m plan h front elevation a SINGLE FAMILY HOME FOR A 62 FOOT WIDE LOT' ErElan f Ian e evation b SINGLE FAMILY HOME FOR A 72 FOOT WIDE LOT plan e ront elevation a w/optional bdrm 4 & bath 3 SINGLE FAMILY HOME FOR A 72 FOOT WIDE LOT lan g ront elevation b SINGLE FAMILY HOME FOR A 72 FOOT WIDE LOT CASE NAME: STONEBRIDGE OAKS II CASE NUMBER: PD10-04 ZIO-02 LOCATION! 4632 TREVOR TRAIL MAYOR SECRETARY DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE SHEET: 4 OF 10 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING ELEVATIONS OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS II 66 LOTS SINGLE FAMILY 5 LOTS OPEN SPACE 2 LOTS PRIVATE ACCESS (BEING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS) OUT OF THE G.W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PREPARED BY OWNER CORWIN ENGINEERING, INC. LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. 200 W. BELMONT, SUITE E 580 DECKER DRIVE, SUITE 280 ALLEN, TEXAS 75013 IRVING, TEXAS 75062 972-396-1200 972-402-8905 JUNE 2010 ZONING: PD 06-06 PLAN GA PLAN GA ELEVATIONS ELEVATION A PLAN GO ELEVATION A w/ OPT SINGLE STORY PLAN GD ELEVATION, B or as nM PLAN GO ELEVATION B w/ OPT SINGLE STORY PLAN GD ELEVATION A_w/_OPT SINGLE STORY PLAN GO ELEVATION A PLAN GD ELEVATION A PLAN GD ELEVATION B w/ OPT SINGLE STORY Lilt ■■ ,� Ii�r:�•�Q'i`�' ilirpn u�� Intel= . PLAN GO CASE NAME: STONEBRIDGE OAKS II CASE NUMBER: PD10-04 Z10-02 LOCATION: 4632 TREVOR TRAIL MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 5 OF 10 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SINGLE FAMILY HOME FOR A 52 FOOT WIDE LOT BUILDING ELEVATIONS OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS II 66 LOTS SINGLE FAMILY 5 LOTS OPEN SPACE 2 LOTS PRIVATE ACCESS (BEING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS) OUT OF THE G.W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PREPARED BY OWNER CORWIN ENGINEERING, INC. LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. 200 W. BELMONT, SUITE E 580 DECKER DRIVE, SUITE 280 ALLEN, TEXAS 75013 IRVING, TEXAS 75062 972-396-1200 972-402-8905 JUNE 2010 ZONING: PD 06-06 IF • � � --iI� �i'��` "'��*i'lll L ■ " �i 1 1'r'ii I ,` ■■■ ` f ►� l� �aa i I � �' �■■♦� :: �ei;�V'I�rrrrii= ��a fiiB ■■ Ir �� + ■ ��•Yt,� fit* ryr PAN Ism MIN OWN WE ME I lommom Omni TREVOR TRAL 10 20 SCALE: I" - 10' CASE NAME: STONEBRIDGE OAKS 11 CASE NUMBER: PD10-04 Z10-02 LOCATION:4632 TREVOR TRAIL ---MA-YOR SECRETARY DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 6 OF 10 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE LOT LANDSCAPE PLANS OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS 11 66 LOTS SINGLE FAMILY 5 LOTS OPEN SPACE 2 LOTS PRIVATE ACCESS (BEING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS) OUT OF THE G.W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PREPARED BY OWNER CORWIN ENGINEERING, INC. LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. 200 W. BELMONT, SUITE E 580 DECKER DRIVE, SUITE 280 ALLEN, TEXAS 75013 3 IRVING, TEXAS 75062 972-396-1200 972-402-8905 JULY 2010 ZONING: PD 06-06 r_ auall uma oaa ,laaoaaan nuor... uon HIMn • lur— Il ua ane.' OOIYiRijn ll — Itltll "--- :: l aall I I. f��at,al �♦ts;,�� ',,!aalialYl.a (.��. ,. ��, ?.'.�Olam �I mor4o Flom SEIM%� �'�� ennaamu ';�� ❑ _ � ' III �_' ,:. I I`.,+ �- � ,�, +� ..� 0 10 20 SCALE: 1" - 10' CASE NAME: STONEBRIDGE OAKS II CASE NUMBER: PD10-04 Z10-02 LOCATION: 4632 TREVOR TRAIL MAYOR SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 7 OF 10 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE LOT LANDSCAPE PLANS OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS II 66 LOTS SINGLE FAMILY 5 LOTS OPEN SPACE 2 LOTS PRIVATE ACCESS (BEING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS) OUT OF THE G.W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PREPARED BY OWNER CORWIN ENGINEERING, INC. LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. 200 W. BELMONT, SUITE E 580 DECKER DRIVE, SUITE 280 ALLEN, TEXAS 75013 IRVING, TEXAS 75062 972-396-1200 972-402-8905 JULY 2070 ZONING: PI) 06-06 CASE NAME: STONEBRIDGE OAKS II CASE NUMBER:PD10-04 Z10-02 LOCATION: 4632 TREVOR TRAIL MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 8 OF 10 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TYPICAL ARCHITECTURAL STREETSCAPE OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS II 66 LOTS SINGLE FAMILY 5 LOTS OPEN SPACE 2 LOTS PRIVATE ACCESS (BEING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS) OUT OF THE G.W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PREPARED BY OWNER CORWIN ENGINEERING, INC. LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. 200 W. BELMONT, SUITE E 580 DECKER DRIVE, SUITE 280 ALLEN,TEXAS 75013 IRVING, TEXAS 75062 972-396-120D 972-402-8905 JUNE 2010 ZONING: PD 06-06 PRIVATE STREET SYSTEM NOTES: 1. ALL STREETS IN STONEBRIDGE OAKS IISHALL BE PRIVATE AND CONTAINED IN LOTS 2 AND 3 BLOCK 5, AND SHALL BE IN A PRIVATE ACCESS, PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT. 2. PRIVATE STREETS SHALL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY MANDATORY HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION (H.O.A.) I \ I S09°17'18"E / 4a.VO LOCATION MAP 36p 36.40, i/ xx�s w"x. N.T.S. P� N3 LOT 16 BLOCK 3 .� tf LIN£ TABLE x5 COMMON AREA., °- SEE INSET z or z .p3�� ews- LINE N0. BEARING DISTANCE FOR ENTRY 6ETAL 52c0°0� Es"ese°'s 4'a, 1. S 43° 37' 56" E 21 .26, NA sx5' 2. N 20°59'40" E 15.00, 't xsAs T 3. N 32°12'41" W 31.75' J•'so tT� 4. N 22°56'01" W 32.98, W Q 5. S 00° 34' 04" E 35.00' q,FG ve 33 ACT, 6. N 88° 44' 48" E 26. 73' ti� I 7. S 89°25'56" W 17.09' �% .�c�� �' 34 .............. NOTES: 1. Bearings are referenced to a 23.577 acre tract as recorded in D206328958 Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. 2. %2" iron rods with "CORWIN ENGR. INC." set at all boundary corners, block corners, points of curvature, points of tangency, and angle points in private right-of-way unless otherwise noted. 3. D.E. - Drainage Easements B.L. - Building Line C.M. - Controlling Monuments U.E. - Utility Easements H.O.A. - Homeowners Association IRE - Iron Rod Found P.U.D.E. - Public Utility and Drainage Easement B. 9. N 89 25 56 E N 00°35'04" W 37.95 17.50' O a`"u. e� �--- to. N 71°17'07' E 19.75' 11• S 52°26'20" W 33.36' -- 12. N 13°5118" W 25.65' _ r' s°µ\>'sT'6w OCK5 `,z pU.D.E 3 B55 `, '\ 32 13. 14 - N 13°51' 18° W N 56° 58' 41 " E 15.19' 10. 00' a1ze� LaT & wss�'\ 15. S 89°29'18' W 9.36' PRIVATE •wC` s• 19' 16. N 88'44'48" E 25.94' 17. N 62°42'30" E 18: S 54°14'49" W 35.29' r' t9 s`a •\ 19. N 69'00'20" W E 35.00' 37.94' $ \^ 20. 21. S 24'10'26' N 40°36'52" E 10.17' v 22. S 49°23'08" E 44.09' pc\110 P 16 Qt "`sEe;- e\ `, V 23. S 30°37'48" E 49.58' F,G41S, PG' 'CY` u65set `�,`, ' 24. N 59°22' 12" E 13.00' pR Vco'S& P O/°Es01NUT"cE tx.o°; w" eo• wo'6' \ 2^ 25. N 30°37'48" W 25.84' 01. , 2t.nwl 42.5rw E z6' 26. 27• N 16°08`42" E N 13°27'15" W 33.31' 9.60' 28. 29. S 39°04'26" E N 00° 26' 05" W 11.72' 27.87' '/ �g x:$ • 20 1 \� 30. N 00°26'05" W 29.48' o• _ O G2 i 21 /0 4- "Notice: Selling a portion of this addition by metes and bounds is a violation of city ordinance and state law and is subject to fines and withholding of utility and building permits". 5. Lot 17 and 22 Block 1, Lot 3 Block 2, Lot 18 and 35 Block 3, and Lot 39 Block 4 are dedicated to and maintained by the homeowners association for landscaping and screening purposes. 6. According to FEMA Panel • 48439CO215 H, entire tract is labeled Zone "X". 7. Easement dedication area (Lot 2 & 3 Block 5): 132,432 s.f. Net platted area: 702,375 s.f. Total Platted Area: 834,807 s-f. 8. ALlretaining walls to be maintained by Stone Bridge Oaks and Stone Bridge Oaks Il Owners Association. 0 30 60 120 sypEe�� SCALE: 1" - 60' ONES\Q -�6 CURVE TABLE CURVE NO. DELTA RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING 1. 89°23'52" 40.00' 62.41' 39.58' 56.27' S45'52'08"E 2. 42°36'58" 75.00, 55.78' 29.25' 54.51' NOt°14'04"E 3. 74°43'53" 40.00 ' 52.17' 30.54' 48.55' S38°32'08"E 4. 49°22'38" 132.50' 114.19' 60.91, 110.69, S25°21'46"E S. 16'57'03' 30.00' 8.88, 4.47' 8.84' N80°57'25"E 6. 70°21'00" 60.00' 73.67' 42.29' 69.13' S63°32'25"E 7. 17,31,31" 167.50' 51.23' 25.82' 51.03' S41°47'04"E 8. 24°18'24" 235.00' 99.69, 50.61' 98.95' N20°52'07"W 9. E7°38'10" 25.00' 38.24' 23.99' 34.62' S54°53'50"E 10. 74°55'01" 25.00' 32.69' 19.15, 30.41' S23°36'12"W it. 74°50'51" 50.00, 35.32' 36.26' 60.77' S23°34'07"W 12. 74°50'51" 25.00, 32.66' 19.13, 30.39' N23°34'07"E 13. 13°59'03" 35.00' 8.54 ' 4.29 ' 8.52 ' N74°17'33"E 14. 42°36'58" 75.00' 55.78' 29.25' 54.51' N01°14'04"E 15. 20°17'32" 100.00' 35.42' 17.90, 35.23' N71°08'19"E 16. 89°21'28" 24.50, 38.21' 24.23' 34.45' S16°18'49"W 17. 38°19'56" 150.00, 100.35' 52.14' 9B.49' N00°54'27"W 18. 109°44'26" 50.00' 95.77' 71.06' 81.79' N36°36'43"W 19. 19°44'26" 28500: 98.19, 49.59' 97.71' N08'23'17"E 20. 53°46'48" 250:00234.66' 126.78' 226.14' NOB°37'54"W 21. 90*00,001, 20.00' 31,42' 20.00' 28.28' S43°31'04"W 22. 55°57'38" 40.00' 39.07' 21.25' 37.53' N63°30'07"W 23. 90:13'57 20. 00' 31.50' 20. 08' 28.34' N46°21'57"W 24. 89°46'03" 35.00' 54.84' 34.86' 49.40' S43°38'03"W 25. 22°14'39" 130.00, 50.47' 25.56' 50.15, S09°52'21"W 26. 22°14'39" 95.00, 36.88' 18.68' 36.65' S09°52'21'W \A6 G gy, QG• 27. 16'33'53" 200. 00' 57.82' 29. 11' 57.62' S12°42'44"W t ppR A53 28. 11°36'37" 200.00' 40.53' 20.33' 40.46' S10'14'06"W ��G Np\•• 29. 21 ° 30' 22" 15000' 56.30' 28.49' 55.97' S10° 14' 29 "W 30. 27°51'13" 450:00' 218.76' 111.59' 216.61' S41°26'19"E 31. 44°24'20" 350.00, 271.26' 142.85' 264.52' S06109'46"E S00° 30'42"E - 713.16' G0 o0& 99•,gs6'w sz eS s7 tb 60,. 3 �O 6G�p. QO- ti zJ.z6 LOT 18 BLOCK 3 of GPO JG\.• 5q 67 0 % zs• COMMON AREA Vo^Fz' 27 26 - 25 Voe. Zo• o I;OR 29 28 24 sz.6y,eo.W ?a.or. �1 I(n e I SOt°14'59"E - 324.31' n po•es:,. - ---___ _- ___-._, 23 Szoo. L(z 5•W'M^W EIR , 30 n _ cz9 ' �• 22 S ' .,x.o° s2.00 zac .ca 66.9° clots. ,w�Ri a1" 6 'S1'2 TAYLOR LANE 9 sz 21 K DOeC 3 °'+,906° LOT 3 BLOCK 5"0, g� AyEP PRIVATE ACCESS & P.U.D.E. - ON 20 19 17 16 15 zsEA - __ -._ _ 20'BL. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ TEF 1_.o3W_____ _ l'�Sw____-___ -_ - _ _ _ _--- OIF jp 20�. -! - M1 �Z�V,L 3 2>2J s5 SZO. 53w' Sra@9{ 22 ,. 27 20 _�,bz zoo• sz.00' 277.14 6. n • p 17 - \ yzs,/ yF26N'S9"E 6441 NOP,459 x2,33' n J,, 2� 66_ua 24 ® e°5' , yr w x00.66's„'F a.120.Po' 15 _ Oi. ____ �, er u J5 J�Bs v•ler SOOO'34'29"E - 259.95' Yer 15,e, e "•t3'20'rzz , LOT 17 BLOCK 1 S, rn - `1j Io COMMON AREA m't V mw yo.�ra N00_3,'15 UE� O le lxpNKE E5M1'. t, Om 1 LOT 39 BLOCK 4 �c, Q COMMON AREA/PRIVATE I Noaao Oo,-w Re NO S N �� DRAINAGE ESMT. 6 Q5 1//' 12 /' ?O` ° 42'S5"W� y� TpT3233 �.w 5,. \./ / mks C8 N0854 28 1 , SO' F I(n� rn �� s _ ISO 8a \ /' // O/� ka9 rnl fo / 2 / oR400 0 o I N&9e \ /// 1s �`� A° G11 //' to //' C13�2 / / 3 no0 4 =- -o oQ m,ev9�°j a-°FSFss°o \ NO/' \\ /' //\cy9yreor�V/1e�`i` w`'ssn. Q'OQ ' F / 1'� F, \ / n / /\ '9 s'4CC B<o �.` ro •• ��'a'.i' 2 cv� MJ -- - ° to��-(�`I�,,.63'�1l � I,n yoa,0 On z - - - w IN %;° ` .'i`Gf \�y\S / I \�/' %,/ 2j63,zpF %�.r N20a463' G N 3 $" > °f S01° 10'11"E SO7° 10'11"E y 4��� , \ / 13 /' \\ / h " o a°ny GO 94.43' 12.701 ,1 1, �i' Q2 / ;a N2250733 E T i m 1 1 / s /' $ (' 2 �a = 7 �, c STONE \\ / / / 1 1 1 1 t9 I zo I uJ a 2 0 S,a.. suoESD 2 O4 cs \ //' 1 I i 16 1 i 1 0 0 m Pi 763_ \ 1 1 17 1 1 I9 Y o N x. h- 1 7276q \/ 16 l O I M 40 n, 8 I O 0� I`-�I I i i i 1 J I° x W y_��' Z m �< LOT 22 BLOCK 1 I % I�• ° Nar fo'trw 59. > N I, I 0 c o°� -�--�" Z s COMMON AREA $ ji °itopw LOT 3 BLOCK 2\I ,f u.[•___________ COMMON AREA i WIN, , r or N01° 15'12"W ° 284.02' aN E .a.w. 6COEATION ME HEETl OF 2 ., 1. ENTRY 0ET.1 ----{ i-----------------I I ------ I 1I- ^ 1 I �3 I I I� I O I0 I 1- J o 0 0 0 3 --- I> I I I 10 I I I I I i I I la3 I I I p o W 6 M T a ED 0 74 t3 t� 1 az 13 32z7• ® 21 N1250053•E.OM z �2.000' 76,00' Vz szcy.' s,•sa, I 760t 4 12 6 � n III LOT iB BLOCK 3 COMMON ARE"PRIVATE ORNNACE ESMT. �3 10 12 IT s rRglC -- --- �1� s0'9' s�•e'3o cxo -� w LOT 3 BLOCK 5 ? �� za ss E ,22.00 55zs• PRIVATE ACCESS & P.11ME. _______ ____00m'u.E. ___ 1 _-_--__ 2 __ ____-._ _.-_- _ _-_-.-_-_ _ ___ -____ __-__-_ 26'BL. O 3 4 _ 5 6 7 AR w :S21• 25 2D..O e Jr INIAT 9 3' 6x.05' w • " t2.39' 8 e I,.00` xU,•26' 6•w 6IR S2.00' 1, sor,s•Jif Zq+3.,s• 19Z47' _ if \sa ENEET 2 ar 2 Y" nr N01° 15'12"W - 669.32' FOR ENTNY OF- �6w� p„,�°w .1 q,65 S.F. EULESS GRAPEVINE ROAD (VARIABLE R.O.W.) --T---- T-----I-----T-------I - - - - i - - - - I -----I - I I I I I w I I I I I I I I I o� 0 0 m > CASE NAME: STONEBRIDGE OAKS II CASE NUMBER: PD10-04 Z10-02 LOCATION: 4632 TREVOR TRAIL MAYOR SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 9 OF 10 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 4,5 "PLAT" _- (0 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL N Date Approved: Date Approval: Chairman: Mayor: Z Secretary: City Secretary: N UN'a FINAL PLAT mza OF 00 , STONE BRIDGE OAKS II 11Qo 66 LOTS SINGLE FAMILY 5 LOTS OPEN SPACE 2 LOTS PRIVATE ACCESS POINT OF BEGINJNG BEING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS) 19.165 ACRES OUT OF THE G.W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS j OWNER / LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. / 580 DECKER DRIVE, SUITE 280 / IRVING, TEXAS 75062 972-402-8905 PREPARED BY CORWIN ENGINEERING, INC. TOTAL ACRES 19.165 200 W. BELMONT, SUITE E y ALLEN, TEXAS 75013 TOTAL LOTS 66 972-396-1200 JULY 2010 SCALE V • 60' THIS PLAT FILED IN INSTRUMENT • 70NIN0: PD 06-06 SHEET 1 OF 21 OWNER'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT LEGAL DESCRIPTION - Stone Bridge Oaks II WHEREAS, GRAPEVINE 360, L.P., is the owner of a tract of land situated in the G.W. Minter Survey, Abstract No. 1083, in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas Grid being a portion of a 23.577 acre tract, as described in Clerks File No. D206328958, in the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, being a portion of Stonebridge Oaks, an addition to the City of Grapevine Texas as recorded in the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING, at a s/e inch iron rod found at the southwest corner of said Stonebridge Oaks Addition; THENCE, North 890 33'55" East, with the south line of said Stonebridge Oaks, for a distance of 6.50 feet, to a i/2 inch iron rod found, being in the east line of Euless -Grapevine Road (Variable R.O.W.), for the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; THENCE, North 07° 15'12" West, with the east line of Euless -Grapevine Road, for a distance of 669.32 feet, to a %2 inch iron rod set; THENCE, North 88°31'04" East, departing said east line for a distance of 211.87 feet to a %2 inch iron rod set: THENCE, North 20"04'25" West, for a distance of 84.63 feet to a %2 inch iron rod found at the point of curvature of a curve to the right having a radius of 75.00 feet, a tangent of 29.25 feet and a central angle of 42° 36'58", THENCE, with said curve to the right for on arc distance of 55.78 feet, (Chord Bearing North 01° 14'04" East - 54.51 feet), to a I/2 inch iron rod found at the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE, North 22° 32'33" East, for a distance of 5.07 feet to a I/2 inch iron rod found; THENCE, South 67°2717" East, for a distance of 100.00 feet to a %2 inch iron rod found; THENCE, North =32'33" East, for a distance of 101.50 feet to a %2 inch iron rod found; THENCE, North 67° 27'27" West, for a distance of 89.85 feet to a I/2 inch iron rod found, being a point on a curve to the right having a radius of 35.00 feet, a tangent of 4.29 feet, and a central angle of 13" 59'03"; THENCE, with said curve for on arc distance of 8.54 feet, (Chord Bearing North 74° 17'33" East - 8.52 feet), to a %2 inch iron rod found at the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE, North 81617'05" East, for a distance of 77.05 feet to a I/2 inch iron rod set; THENCE, North 08' 42'55" West, for a distance of 54.28 feet to a I/2 inch iron rod found at the point of curvature of a curve to the left having a radius of 235.00 feet, a tangent of 50.61 feet and a central angle of 24° 18124"; THENCE, with said curve to the left for an arc distance of 99.69 feet, (Chord Bearing North 20' 52'07" West - 98.95 feet), to a I/2 inch iron rod found at the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE, North 33` 0119" West, for a distance of 48.94 feet to a %2 inch iron rod found at the point of curvature of a curve to the left having a radius of 167.50 feet, a tangent of 25.82 feet and a central angle of 17° 31'31"; THENCE, along said curve to the left for an arc distance of 51.23 feet, (Chord Bearing North 41° 47'04" West - 51.03 feet), to a I/2 inch iron rod found at the point of reverse curvature of a curve to the right having a radius of 132.50 feet, a tangent of 60.91 feet and a central angle of 49122'38"; THENCE, along said curve for an arc distance of 114.19 feet, (Chord Bearing North 25° 51'31" West - 110.69 feet), to a I/2 inch iron rod found at the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE. North 01" 10'11" West, for a distance of 12.70 feet to a %2 inch iron rod found; THENCE, South 37' 33'40" East, for a distance of 87.11 feet to a I/2 inch iron rod found; THENCE, North 52' 26'20" East, for a distance of 197.50 feet to a I/2 inch iron rod found; THENCE, North 37'33'40" West, for a distance of 108.18 feet to a %2 inch iron rod found; THENCE, South 89625'56" West, for a distance of 210.96 feet to a %2 inch iron rod set, being a point on a curve to the right having o radius of 40,00 feet, a tangent of 30.54 feet and a centrolangle of 74043'53"; THENCE, along said curve for an arc distance of 52.17 feet, (Chord Bearing South 38' 32'OB" East - 48.55 feet), to a %2 inch iron rod found at the point of tangency of said curve; THENCE, South 011 1011' East, for a distance of 94.43 feet to a I/2 inch iron rod set; THENCE, South 89° 25'56" West, for a distance of 143.61 feet to a %2 inch iron rod set, being a point in the east line of said Euless -Grapevine Road; THENCE. North 01' 1512" West, along said Euless -Grapevine Road for a distance of 284.02 feet to a I/2 inch iron rod found; THENCE, North 89" 25'56" East, departing said east line and along the north line of said 23.577 acre tract, for a distance of 403,79 feet, to a %2 inch iron rod found; THENCE. South 00' 34'29" East, continuing along said north line, for a distance of 259.95 feet, to a %2 inch iron rod found; THENCE, South 70' 30'42" East, continuing along said north line, for a distance of 200.00 feet, to a %2 inch iron rod set; THENCE, North St' 03'42" East, continuing along said north line, for a distance of 230.47 feet, to a I/2 inch iron rod set at the most easterly northeast corner of the 23.577 acre tract being in the west fine of State Highway 360 (Variable R.O.W.); THENCE, South 25° 07'03" East, along the east line of the 23.577 acre tract and along the west line of State Highway 360. for a distance of 149.86 feet, to a "x" cut found; THENCE. South 09' 17'18" East, continuing along said lines, for a distance of 36.40 feet, to a I/2 inch iron rod set; THENCE, South 24' 57'00" East, continuing along said lines, for a distance of 49.98 feet, to a Brass Monument found; THENCE, South 64657144" West, departing the west line of said State Highway 360 and continuing along the east line of the 23.577 acre tract, for a distance of 159.45 feet, to a I/2 inch rod found; THENCE, South 00' 30'42" East, continuing along said east line, for a distance of 713.16 feet, to a %2 inch iron rod set; THENCE, South 88" 4945" West, continuing along said east line, for a distance of 108.54 feet, to a %2 inch iron rod set; THENCE, South 01' 14'59" East, continuing along said east line, for a distance of 324.31 feet, to a % inch iron rod found at the most southerly southeast corner of the 23.577 acre tract; THENCE, South 89° 33'55" West, along the south line of the 23.577 acre tract, for a distance of 613.97 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 19.165 acres of land. I.nT ARFA SUMMARY TARLF a_aa�iaa©ioamia��■©o�iaa ima®0 OUR ■�©� ��'®ioa®Cm��■ima®i���i��� also■©ate■®©���i�ii����'i NOW, THEREFORE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. does hereby adopt this plat of STONE BRIDGE OAKS 11, an addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, and does hereby dedicate to the public use forever the right-of-way and easements shown hereon. The easements shown hereon are hereby reserved for the purposes as indicated. The utility easements shall be open for all City or franchised public utilities for each particular use. The owner shall be responsible for all maintenance and repair of the paving and drainage facilities lying outside of dedicated public street right-of-way. The owner shall be responsible for all maintenance and repair of drainage facilities within public "right to drain" easements and other private drainage easements, said maintenance and repair shall include but not be limited to continued and unimpeded passage of flows, repair of hike and bike trails, retaining walls, erosion and scour damage, and tree removal. No buildings or auxiliary structures shall be constructed, reconstructed, or placed upon, over, or across the easements as shown. Said easements being hereby reserved for the mutual use and accommodation of all public utilities using, or desiring to use same. Any City or franchised utility shollhave the fullright to remove and keep removed all or parts of any fences, trees, shrubs, or other improvements or growths which in any way endanger or interfere with the construction, maintenance, or efficiency of its respective system on the easements and all City or franchised utilities shall at all times have the full right of ingress and egress to and from and upon sold easements for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, patrolling, maintaining, and adding to or removing all or parts of its respective system without the necessity at any time of procuring the permission of anyone. I have reviewed the City's Findings concerning dedications and Ido agree that the statements are true and correct This plat approved subject to allplatting ordinances, rules, regulations, and resolutions of the City of Grapevine, Texas Witness my hand this the day of .2010. LIFESTYE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. Dean Eldridge The State of Texas County of Before me, a Public Notary on this day personally appeared DEAN ELDRIDGE known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the some for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D. 2010 AVIGATION RELEASE Notary Signature THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT WHEREAS, LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P., hereinafter called "Owner" (whether on or more), is the owner of that certain parcel of land situated in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, being said property as described as shown on this plat. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of ONE AND 00/100 (31.00) DOLLAR and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby fully acknowledged and confessed, Owner does hereby waive, release, remise and quitclaim to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport Board, the cities of Dallas, Texas and Forth Worth, Texas, their successors and assigns, hereinafter called "Cities", for the use and benefit of the public and its agencies, any and all claims for damages of any kind to persons of property that Owner may suffer by reason of the passage and flight of all aircraft in the air space above Owner's property above the height restriction as presently established by Ordinance No. 73-50 for the City of Grapevine, known as the Airport Zoning Ordinance of the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport, to an infinite height above some, whether such damage shall originate from noise, vibration, fumes, dust, fuel and lubricant particles, and all other effects that may be caused by the operation of aircraft, landing at, or taking off from, or operation at or on the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport. This instrument does not release the owners or operators of aircraft from liability for damage to person or property caused by felling physical objects from aircraft, except as stated herein with respect to noise, fumes, and lubricant particles. It is agreed that that this Release shall be binding upon said owner and his heirs and assigns, and successors in interest to said property; and it is further agreed that this instrument shall be a covenant running with the land, and shall be recorded in the Deed Records of the county or counties in which the property is situated. EXECUTED at. , Texas, this_day of , 2010 LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. Dean Eldridge The State of Texas County of Before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on the this day personally appeared DEAN ELDRIDGE, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the some for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D. 2010 Notary Signature SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, WARREN L. CORWIN, do hereby certify that (prepared this Final Plot and the field notes from an actualand accurate survey of the land, that the corner monuments shown thereon were properly placed under my personal supervision in accordance with the subdivison Regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas. WARREN L. CORWIN R.P.L.S. No. 4621 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN Before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared WARREN L. CORWIN, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office, this_ day of .2010. NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF TEXAS STATE HIGHWAY 360 (VARIABLE R.O.W.) t;o •s �•25�E � s� "W a le o I -T. rn A 1 EAST ENTRY EASEMENT DETAIL SCALE V • SW I i w > of �j e] 2I E I �,ta�» o7w S755-21.24•V 6x.Ni VCd6ll]Y [Set 1( ))) U 1, � Set�l]Y ESur. ��7-- ;sin ss• "��., - ' NORTHWEST ENTRY EASEMENT DETAIL SCALE V - 50' TYPICAL LOT SETBACK DETAIL N.T.S. w Ld i Ld J 0 ] 2V1 Y Z ,sxswow cur SOUTHWEST ENTRY EASEMENT DETAIL SCALE V • 50' CASE NAME: STONEBRIDGE OAKS 11 CASE NUMBER: PDIO-04 ZIO-02 LOCATION: 4632 TREVOR TRAIL MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 10 OF 10 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FINAL PLAT OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS II 66 LOTS SINGLE FAMILY 5 LOTS OPEN SPACE 2 LOTS PRIVATE ACCESS (BEING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS) 19.165 ACRES OUT OF THE G.W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS OWNER LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. 580 DECKER DRIVE, SUITE 280 IRVING, TEXAS 75062 972-402-8905 PREPARED BY CORWIN ENGINEERING, INC. 200 W. BELMONT, SUITE E ALLEN, TEXAS 75013 972-396-1200 JULY 2010 SCALE 1" • 60' ZONING: PD 06-06 SHEET 2 OF 2 plan ge plan ge ront elevation a front elevation a w/optional bdrm 4 & bath 3 plan ge front elevation a w/optional second floor plan ge ront elevation b w/optional three -car garage plan ge ront elevation b plan ge front elevation b w/optional second floor — ,"--" pplan gen front elevation a w/optional three -car garage uaril< plan ge ront elevation b w/optional bdrm 4 & bath 3 Yw, w . nlr CASE NAME: STONEBRIDGE OAKS II CASE NUMBER:PD10-04 Z10-02 LOCATION: 4632 TREVOR TRAIL MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 11 OF 13 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING ELEVATIONS OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS I1 66 LOTS SINGLE FAMILY 5 LOTS OPEN SPACE 2 LOTS PRIVATE ACCESS (BEING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS) OUT OF THE G.W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PREPARED BY OWNER CORWIN ENGINEERING, INC. LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. 200 W. BELMONT, SUITE E 580 DECKER DRIVE, SUITE 280 ALLEN, TEXAS 75013 IRVING, TEXAS 75062 972-396-1200 972-402-8905 JULY 2010 ZONING: PD 06-06 plan gf ront elevation a Flan gf front elevation b plan gf front elevation a w/ol2t agarage/home office/casita plan gf front elevation b wit garage/home office/casita CASE NAME: STONEBRIDGE OAKS II CASE NUMBER1PD10-04 Z10-02 LOCATION: 4632 TREVOR TRAIL MAYOR SECRETARY DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 12 OF 13 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING ELEVATIONS OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS II 66 LOTS SINGLE FAMILY 5 LOTS OPEN SPACE 2 LOTS PRIVATE ACCESS (BEING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS) OUT OF THE G.W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PREPARED BY OWNER CORWIN ENGINEERING, INC. LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. 200 W. BELMONT, SUITE E 580 DECKER DRIVE, SUITE 280 ALLEN, TEXAS 75013 IRVING, TEXAS 75062 972-396-1200 972-402-8905 JULY 2010 ZONING; PD 06-06 mini �ImmlWUmlmimmlmlmlWlmnmlmmimmminllmilln6! ��"-' — Im1lmlmnnlmlmllmlllmnlmlmlWlmimlml 1 n 11 ■■■ �■ �■ 11 /■ �' � � /■■ �■ � � ■■� �� EN 6n�.11►����1d�1�1� 11�lIY����1� � 1��11 PMR r11 1P. LII plan gg front elevation a flan gg ront elevation b w/opt garage/casita flan gh ront elevation b plan gg front elevation a w/opt garage/easita r.�.t �= � 71 III Iiimn � .-.��...�_ rz��rrs�— wx s ` �,mmnmmnm, ■ � � �'� ...Ire:. � iE' ■ �� 1�G rmuuuouauuuumlmlmnumlmuuuumimmmnmlmmlm v = ■ • _ —�■�� i�t ii 1 � ■ ®�� •• ■■�. -- 11 �._... ��. _veal (_ a� III hllHH�n I=11I IlliiiiN1-1-1 MIN Iloin �m�IN1�U®�1���I���Illliml Ian 1�1� ■Ilminln yl I��jinmljn� plan gh ront elevation a plan gh front elevation b w/ optional 3-car age plan gg front elevation b plan gh ront elevation a w/ optional 3-car garage CASE NAME: STONEBRIDGE OAKS II CASE NUMBER: PDIG-04 Z1O-02 LOCATION; 4632 TREVOR TRAIL MAYOR SECRETARY DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 13 OF 13 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES' BUILDING ELEVATIONS OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS II 66 LOTS SINGLE FAMILY 5 LOTS OPEN SPACE 2 LOTS PRIVATE ACCESS (BEING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS) OUT OF THE G.W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1083 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PREPARED BY OWNER CORWIN ENGINEERING, INC. LIFESTYLE GRAPEVINE 360, L.P. 200 W. BELMONT, SUITE E 580 DECKER DRIVE, SUITE 280 ALLEN, TEXAS 75013 IRVING, TEXAS 75062 972-396-1200 972-402-8905 JULY 2010 ZONING: PD 06-06 MEMO TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION 2 FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER MEETING DATE: JULY 20, 2010 SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT APPLICATION STONE BRIDGE OAKS II (BEING A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF STONE BRIDGE OAKS) PLAT APPLICATION FILING DATE............................................................ July 13, 2010 APPLI CANT........................................................................................Mr. Anthony Natale REASON FOR APPLICATION ........................Platting site for Single Family Residences PROPERTY LOCATION.....................................................4601 Euless-Grapevine Road SITE ACREAGE .....................................................................................................19.165 ZONING...........................................................................................Existing: Townhomes Proposed: R-5.0; Single Family Residential and Townhomes NUMBEROF LOTS................................................................................................66 lots 2 Private access lots 5 Open Space lots PREVIOUS PLATTING......................................................................................May 2006 CONCEPTPLAN....................................................................................... .......PD10-04 Z1 0-02 SITE PLAN .......................................................... ........................................................ No OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT..................................................................................Yes AVIGATION RELEASE.......................................................................... ...Yes ................... PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED...................................................................................Yes 0:IAGENDA12010107-20-101 toneBridge0aks.doc PLAT INFORMATION SHEET FINAL PLAT APPLICATION STONE BRIDGE OAKS II I. GENERAL: • The applicant, Mr. Anthony Natale, is platting this 19.165 acre site to build 66 single family homes. The site is located south of the Southern Baptist Convention Addition between Euless-Grapevine Road and State Highway 360. II. STREET SYSTEM: • The development has access to Euless- Grapevine Road and SH360. • abutting roads: ® are on the City Thoroughfare Plan: ❑ are not on the City Thoroughfare Plan: ❑ Periphery Street Fees are due as follows: Type of Roadway Cost 1 LF Length Cost ❑ Major Arterial (A) $ 234.571 LF ❑ Major Arterial (B) $ 178.351 LF ❑ Minor Arterial (C) $ 203.06 / LF ❑ Minor Arterial (D) $ 170.331 LF ❑ Collector (E) $ 170.331 LF ❑ Collector (F) $ 150.981 LF ❑Sidewalk $ 25.00 I LF ❑Curb & Gutter $ 10.00 I LF ® Periphery Street Fees were paid during the platting process of Stone Bridge Oaks: May 2006. III. STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: • The existing stormwater runoff flows west to east under SH360 and ultimately to Big Bear Creek. • The developer will be required to design for onsite as well as offsite drainage in accordance with the requirements of the City of Grapevine's Code of Ordinances. 0:IAGENQA1201 0107-20-101stoneBridge0aks.doc IV. WATER SYSTEM: ® The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ❑ The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development. Additional off site water system improvements will be necessary to serve the site. V. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: ® The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ❑ The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development. VI. MISCELLANEOUS: ❑ Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are not required for: ® Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits: for Stone Bridge Oaks II ® Single Family Residential ( $ 2,7781 Lot) ❑ Multifamily ( $ 1,291 1 Unit) ❑ Hotel ( $ 47,631 1 Acre) ❑ Corporate Office ( $ 22,0231 Acre) ❑ Government ( $ 7,6881 Acre) ❑ Commercial/ Industrial ( $ 6,3521 Acre) ❑ Open Space Fees are not required for ® Open Space Fees are required for Stone Bridge Oaks II ® R-5.0, Zero Lot District ( $ 1,416.001 Lot) ❑ R-7.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,146.001 Lot) ❑ R-12.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,071.001 Lot) ❑ R-20.0, Single Family District ( $ 807.001 Lot) 0AAG ENDA1 2010107-20-101StoneBridge0aks.doc ❑ Public Hearing Only ❑ Variances were required on the following items: ❑ Front building line ❑ Rear building line ❑ Lot width & depth ❑ Max. Impervious Area ® The following items associated with this plat are not in accordance with the current subdivision standards: ® 50' ROW dedication not met: Consistent with the original Stone Bridge Oaks Addition, the Developer is proposing to dedicate variable width private access easements throughout the development. The access easements will be owned and maintained by a Home Owners Association (HOA). ❑ Length of cul-de-sac street exceeds the 600-foot limit: VII. STATEMENT OF FINDINGS: A. The City has determined that the right-of-way and easements required to be dedicated for streets, utilities, drainage, access, sidewalks and other municipal needs and services are consistent with the City's ordinances and master plan, are reasonable and are connected to the proposed project in the following manner: ❑ The right-of-way provides for future widening of public streets thatwill serve the development of this site. ® The onsite utility easements provide for a utility network to serve the development of this site. ® The onsite drainage easements provide for a drainage network to serve the development of this site. ® The onsite access easements provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. O:IAG ENDA1 2010 107-20-1015toneBridge0aks.dac B. The City further finds that the required dedication is related both in nature and extent to the impact of the proposed development as follows: ❑ The right-of-way is necessary to provide for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. ® The onsite utility easements are necessary to provide for a utility system to serve this development and connect to existing utilities on surrounding property. ® The onsite drainage easements are necessary to provide for storm drainage improvements to serve the development of the site. ® The onsite access easements are necessary to provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements are necessary to provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. ® All of the dedications benefit the development to at least the extent of the impact of such on the development. Vlll. RECOMMENDATION: The members of the City Council and The Planning & Zoning Commission consider the following motion: "Move that the City Council (Planning and Zoning Commission)approve the Statement of Findings and the Final Plat of Stone Bridge Oaks I1". O:%AG ENDA12010107-20-101sto neBridgeQaks.doc APPLICATION FOR PLATTING CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS TYPE OF PLAT: Preliminary —Final X Replat _Amendment PROPERTY DESCR;IPTIO JCL Name of Addition: Number of Lots: Gross Acreage, Proposed Zoning: Location of Addition: __ ��'�of m �► �. TT� PROPERTY OWNER: Name: S �ea, �mili �. o� Contact: - OUSE Address: 690 bia46,r br.,si. City: TL State: Zip: -4S_ 6'a Phone: (ft- 4&2,-' 9� Fax: 1 -- - _- o Signature: it Email: • APPLICANT: Name: Contact:_ + /V Address: f6O 15 Whi 1-4 gock:11-4# C 1)AV > State: Zip: ZS9 Phone: ( *— 5 34L �._ Fax: , - 6�"�° 6 3 �a Signature: �)Email: . SURVEYOR: Name: (?OP-VI-TPf EWA I ,yJ6t Contact: W Cd }DJ Address:goo W. 6SLM06 5fe.E City: . AU-90 Aid_g: State: T�4- ,Zip: ?50('S Phone: MOD Fax: & � " fly'7 .�._._. Email: * * * FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application Received: / /ZOIL� By: L;P�_P5h4 i-e. C-i Lj Fee Amount: $ Check Number: ..I– —