Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOMA2018-4174 ,t7iD p 7T 7P I i l! 5 0 ® t2b 201E ` ^ DATE OF ISSUANCEE:: i v I'�I \ PERMIT#: BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION (PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY-COMPLETE ENTIRE FORM) JOB ADDRESS: I Rj� Cfr *4 &61�(LY /' i9bF— >N O 57 SUITE # /0 0 LOT: BLOCK: SUBDIVISION: BUILDING CONTRACTOR(company name): R I=S! E a G F9 U e1C14E�t& A'/= 1k, CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS: �(� Q f Nr RAw j� hiz CITY/STATE/ZIP:WF ZP j��T Uj�3 / PH:�l g� )S�/—�Q a # PROPERTY OWNER: Q d6_i) Cy11, "4AZ TM ) CURRENT MAILING `ADDRESS: p� � [�iN5"]- CITY/STATE/ZIP: �7 / i PHONE NUMBER:(/ PROJECT VALUE: S /,. �j A(/T & OIRE SPRINKLERED? YES NO WHAT TRADES WILL BE NEEDED? (Check ones that apply)ELECTRIC_ /PLUMBING MECHANICAL_ DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE DONE: — USE OF BUILDING OR STRUCTURE: errs (� FFr G NAME OF BUSINESS: Hon g}/J MEdmAl_ Total Square Footage under roof:�7O X 6 D/ Square Footage of alteration/addition: Or I hereby certify that plans have been reviewed and the building will be inspected by a certified energy code inspector in accordance with ColW i State Law. Plan review and inspection documentation shall be made available to the Building Department(required for new buildings, tJ ,.alterations and additions) 01 I hereby certify that plans have been submitted to the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation for Accessibility Review. Control Number: (Not required for 1 &2 family dwellings) O I hereby certify that an asbestos survey has been conducted for this structure in accordance with the regulatory requirements of the Texas Department of Health. (REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITIONS,ADDITIONS AND OR ALTERATION TO COMMERCIAL AND PUBLIC BUILDINGS) I hereby certify that the foregoing is correct to the best of my knowledge and all work will be performed according to the documents approved by the Building Department and in compliance with the City Of Grapevine Ordinance regulating construction. It is understood that the issuance of this permit does not grant or authorize any violation of any code or ordinance of the City Of Grapevine. I FURTHERMORE UNDERSTAND THAT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT REVIEWED FOR HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILITY BY THE CITY,AND THAT THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING SUCH VAL FROM THE APPROPRIATE STATE AND OR FEDERAL AGENCY(S). A O PRINT NAME:Q�¢nJ.�. M t,�jE SIGNATUR OIL4 PHONE#,(' ) (� /—5 R EMAIL: i ❑ CHECK BOX/IF PREFERRED TO BE CONTACTED BY E-MAIL THE FOLLOWING IS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT Construction Type: Permit Valuation: $ Setbacks A roval to Issue Occupancy Group: Fire Sprinkler: YES NO Front: Electrical Division: Building Depth: Left: Plumbing Ar Zoning: Building Width: Rear: Mechanical Occupancy Load: un/ 1Z Vt0.A,1 4 Ri ht: Plan Review Ap royal: Date: /- Building Permit Fee: Site Plan Approval: Date: Plan Review Fee: Fire Department: Date: Lot Drainage Fee: M 1 D Public Works Department: Date: Sewer Availability Rate: Health Department: Date: Water Availability Rate: Approved for Permit: Date: . �) Total Fees: Lot Drainage Sub .i Approved: Total Amount Due: P O.BOX 95104,GRAPEVINE,TX 76099(817)410-3165 0 FORkIMSPERMITAPPLICATIONS 1 c2 Re,1l104,5'06,M7j 1M9,4111 l'Les`"t sr =� ' ti ndation . to .air & C, n tru; ,©, CA o00 z 5 Z � �+ y P = m Q ® * a 008 Sp&g B Dr,-�dford, Texas. 76021 —Office(8i 8��29 _ � y m J CO)o * o $ent* ctor n H. Murphy Jr. fV (682) 5 ale$ m if o � Q p w Y Em iRl - ww� y `0 C �^ Pm m � ® , cco � ® Q ,- c� 2 m � � v i ccw ' ccww WC1C J W U1p � Z � W0 oo (Tj0 o o w 0 lL TFoO�r to ation Repair - StMem 3 > ch q -v D ; o ? r a m calla of�Iff_ R gion Soil Pric}jlag) — 1 ` C� CO D Z � z z >�s ecXon Tie 4&etter for Clien Dr. C ��I n D �� ° o O � n i n C0 p + l�cation o ,truc�re) � u 80 South Main St. Grapevin Tie 760- 4 O —s z v Cell 817// 9 3181 - L!&il: Dat 8 !ca aZI c m The structure at the above location was built in or around the yea L975 T ctux O having a "Slab Foundation" has been found to need an install of( rs)ZCo Crete aline Z for a partial under pining installation. When testing the level of the oundation, tlt� ttost »` amount of dropping of the foundation was a negative of(- 3.1) to (- 2.0) from a base of(Base 0.0). The SLAB (Base 0.0) readings was taken near the back of the building close to the back inside walls and on top of the backside of Outer Grade Beams:The dropping reading wexe taking near the front of the building close to the front walls and Outer Grade Beams. NOTE. The building is 160' foot long and is 50' feet deep plus 6' feet that is included in front of the main building. This area is a covered 6' foot section which makes a total of 56' feet deep. There is a concrete walkway and sidewalks around three sides of the building that will have (Break-Outs and patches preformed) which concrete cylinders piers will be installed. Long the front 160' foot of the building and a 30' foot section on both sides of the building. This 30' area starts from the front corners of the building and moves backwards about 25' feet or one half of the sides of the building. This area will have (5x) five piers under the side's walls installed on both sides. This will make a total of(10x) ten piers on the sides and long the front of the building there will be (24x) twenty-four piers installed. A total of(34x) partial under peering of piers installed to stabilize the foundation. NOTE. There were several signs of very small cracks on of the bricks (Veneer) on all sides of the building. These problems were some of the signs that indicated that the foundation had dropping issues. I had mentioned these problems to the Dr. Hogan at an earlier time that they were signs or issues that something was causing damage to the foundation. NOTE. All of these problems were mostly cause by water flowing under the slab over the years. Water has been flowing under the slab from the back left corner to the front right corner of the building. The slope of the land is toward down town or to the north which rain water flows. NOTE. This right, left and back area are issues. The main dropping of the foundation is on the front left corner, right side and the front of the building. The main issues that caused the foundation were caused by the following 3x three things. (1.) One Because of the water flowing under the slab it is causing or making wet mud that will move or flow like honey. Also manmade or raised foundations will move in the same way that foundations being higher or above the ground that the structure was to be built on. Any areas like ponds, creeks, lakes, rivers the earth under a foundation does move at times to a lower level. It will move faster if water is also involved under that foundation. (2.) Second a foundation or a new building on a very small man made hill (Tbe Lot) it is natural for the earth under the foundation, to move down to the current compacted soil level or to an even lower level. The dirt that was taken or removed from under the new street to be in front of the building was taken out to lower the street level for drainage. The soil removed is now a non-compressed soil which was then used to build up the lot or plat that the building is to be built on, giving the lot a higher level. The soil now being non- compressed and over time the weight of the building would pack the soil down and compressing it again. The problem is that the soil will not compress at the same rates. (3.) Third a slab which is poured at the same time in its entirety is called a "Monolithic Slab". The reason I do also mention this is a slab is like a "See Saw" one big piece of concrete with rebar in it to strengthen and keep the slab together. If you lift say the right side of a building, the left side area is going to move at some point down. This problem gets worse if number (1 and 2) are also happening. By lifting both sides of the building at the same time as we also lift the front of the building this should stabilize the foundation from moving down and to the right side again. NOTE. The bricks fired in the late fifties and early sixties were heavier than those manufactured today. Because of this and the type of clays used to make bricks and the lesser air level added at that time, it took more time and it took more fire (HEAT) to cure the bricks. The weight of bricks were heaver back then which made them better but heaver. This extra weight of the bricks on this better made building which is dropping anyway because of the years of water flow under the slab which cause less support to the slab. This extra weight is why we will have to use double piers in each dug hole to be able to get the lift to raise the outer grade beams walls. Also dug holes with piers will have to be only be 6' foot apart instead of the normal 8' foot a part to get the lift needed. NOTE. Other areas of the building according to my inside reading showed that the middle area of this building may need a mud 'sack process if grade beam lift does not work completely. NOTE. I do think that the concrete cylinder under the outer grade beams lift method will fix 95% of the leveling that needs to be performed. This process does address and effect 8' to 10' foot inward toward the center of the slab. This will most of the time correct the slab dropping and effect the lower areas in the middle of the slab. NOTE. There were no other structural damages to the ` l air e�{{�WWWOfEthis building in the other or different locations that peer' wdl nofbbpe'r'f �rL� 7i8lst($pjg. i Overall: The Slab will become stable and I feel that th Fifida. 'on if it has concrete cylinders (piers) installed in the areas shown in th0eggLo , j ,awl #i -theslah. If this needed "Partial under pining" of the buildingis not fixed soolhDkWill16n.l WAR IN �`��'Q' �WANCE. larger and more expensive problem. (See Attached — PWNS TO BE NOTE. All problems discussed can be fixed by stabilizin �Thanks, T qqLL�'' KEPT ON Agent of- Restore is Do*n. R M arp4k.y Jr.pglWany 17i6-211 page 2 BUILDING INSPECT ON DIVISION: RELEASE DOES NOT gpply TO CONSTRUCTION IN EASEMENTS OR PUBLIC RIGHT OF-WAY. ALL_G11�lNGFS NII icT E) - . ___ r , Tompkins & Associates Professional Engineering F-8729 October 31, 2018 Restore Foundation Repair& Construction Don H. Murphy Jr. (682) 521-5824 RE: Foundation Repair Review Commercial Building: Per your request, our firm has reviewed the Foundation elevations and recommended Repair Plan at 1280 South Main Street, Grapevine, TX, 76051. The purpose of our inspection was to ascertain the structural adequacy of the repair plan to secure the building. Based on our review, we find that the foundation repair plans meet the general accepted plans and procedures for the recommended repair. All work to meet or exceed 2845-IBC building codes. ZocG I hereby certify that the recommended repair plan and installed foundation repair system is adequate for a Permanent Concrete Slab Foundation. I further certify that the findings and conclusions contained in this report have been, to the best of my knowledge, correctly and completely stated with no bias, and is based upon my observations and experience. No responsibility is assumed for the events that occur after the final inspection and submission of this report and no warranty is either expressed or implied. At your service, — Kent D. Tompkins, PE Registered Professional Engineer OFGRgPEytNE State of Texas #82501 �rS�R R CO TSN RUCTION FiEE'' .� 'VliE's�"✓ — OF- r �T JTHORIZ_E P.NY WORK IN �A;ffp�j dv7 }y'j �� !NG :NODE OR •.� A. �� ZONING ORDINANCE. /S 1 E CI`It ss 4Iz, r , 1 + :r _3E KEPT OPJ r i JC)u SIT_ A 11MES DATE: BY: BUILDIN 2201 Midway Road, Suite 108-H Carrollton,TX 50015"' "OF244=269,,24Y TO C '� ALL CHANGES MUST BE APPROVED R ams os ION:aleaQs 6ZL8-3x TS09L XLaulnad�zJ 900SL XL uolitour 81oZ-T£-of :ale 1S ulLW S 08ZT HSOT alms 'PA IMAMYSI TOZZ 4 td.nudaH uogvpunod SpadWd julmaumioa 'aossV V supjdutoL VMILM n o • 0 • 4 o n •- N ro • a CD 0 0 • c • • • z m 0 • m • -n O C Q x cn N z • y Iw. 00 I N G 90 Q A n bid Orz � • r • rt O • 7 • CITY OF GRAPEVINE • RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION • SHEET: OF: RELEASE DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN ^~~��,11 •CONFLICT WITH THE BUILDING CODE OR ZONING ORDINANCE a r • CITY APPROVED PLANS TO BE KERT I >:y ul ; 01 THE JOB SITE AT r TIMES Q rr:F G:�: •T/ • F,LL �+ 1 DATE: BY: n °Q tlyF`R ga,� BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION: lh`�� w • RELEASE DOES NOT APPLY TO CONSTR6CT14 IN �r IG HT-O F-WAY. ALL .. HANGLS MUST BEAPPROVED w. rn alms 41)ON :aleaS 6ZL8-4 1S09L `XZ `aucnadezD uo� our °. SiOZ-i£-OL :a;eQ `.�S u?�Y�i S, I 900SL XZ II H801 aj?nS *pd SLmP.11 IOZZ w [n laQ aitd f ado 1"puaptsaH -aos dmo sV 18 su• I Q ,L C G 4 , rT T ^�'- i - PRESET! ©ILINGS Y L -+E ."rf2 aLN i CD IIhi r _1 N N 1 - c. IIJo' zn a7 7�c �z iq T ull n �'z c; 00 rQ G �: } ` ZA) 0 rt c O 7 s . .. r— N RELEgSED ENE r�oa?, m:.• slll FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET: RELEASE DOES — OF: AUTHORIZE ANY— yV0 o; o CONFLICT WITH THE BUILD RdG CODE OR ZONING ORD NANC , [ y : ` •mil rll F°f z �__�APPROt1ED P' -A i ,a ...E E....Sa � � NS TO FIE KEPT TFi E Ji3E3 S,TE AT ,4O DATE: MES N -- BY: NOT APPLY TO CONf3TRUCTION IN EASEMENTS OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AIL CHANGES MUST aC solid RAW mi as ■\mimmi■ m■snaa■m iiii/Ni Ziii■■ilt - ♦` mNiimi■ ENS Oman \namnaii i� mia ■U■� e / _ �iiiifM i■■■11ii naiiimU mms(i� U■Uiii Ir ii s I ti■! P.S/!iU■ i■■air, ■iiii■\■� iii1N s i/i9in �•� �a e' • '� !il E a ONES ■■■mina■ u� ■a ,. 1■U fl Snaiimi/ ■mmnaaf ■//mina a Sam a MEMO U ! miimmmim IN 7L7: NMINl1 ■!Nm Nmmim■i MEN MEN mNmmii mnas■na some an ■■mmmmmm willusl•Jr ra 74 • ai/ - mmmNmmmmm i\mm■ mm�m■mom !ii/immi nam//m\\ IN,�7aE ■mm■m m■i■!m/m m!■im■■i /m\m\\na `-'ICE! •■ woo NONE mom :���NINa NiNNmNNIN fNrm::: ■�INmNNa NINiINNINO �ININa "1aE •7t►Jt!iyR \ _ i '>'11i�Z`MiW O \�qY/ d■iiimR �■ Giri-BONN NONE mom iaii6 --ionYa r,- atil\Y tEdL'7 _d ■■smlai Jim ■ m iii ai ■ ma ■ mm■ . . �, Um iii U Ni■ nailer"mmi i■ i� I�mnaiii N���aN ■ari■i 11'[�'� mm is S■ im °!■■i ■ ►sib �mii�iii ijNman mass 0 WN ' v iii■�S■! \s�` !n■ � �1ii� mo \m■ ■IUI na\" f lsf auii a/�Ini 4 t�" r ■UL �� iii i■am/Ili im■ • r mild■m! on WE E�� N\4.a: ti ■ �ml liS ■i tlt■■ � !'. :, iU■llma■ as no v..� amiC-" i■!■a)pil mimi��;'�°y,■ ,y • 7 /a man" iii i imi■Ylras �iU■■■U N0 A an � • ■ • • ammm/■i on iiim mass mammas inanammina mamma • " . , - a: �:: i.m�m O�E:• aim\ m . - • . L .namiN iU to a am •mm a nam inafNa iMEMOS a wiI immamm mi a C�i■mammiii imiiiim/ ■m■" 0 " a V INS iNNN pii� ^iiama■mma na■mmmam mammal �m■ ' 3 . ; '• mnaamnamm ran masmsm U ■ e • lams■■ S■Niiim mmimm IS an • . , A INNS! ■■%mu ENORMOUS mmm\NON mums ■ ■ j; [ • am\ N o a WINNOW ON sommmmmm la maim ■ U INN Simamaiiiii mmmimmamff ' f ■ ■ IN mii m■iUii m■saimmasa■■i/rw mi ■ ": ■ i\N■ ■ No on i■■iii mamf� i U U mmmmm�. no" no iiiiiii soSmimfi"on was was momNNii■■ a am am on mom MEN mom .an : • ■ NN ■ Ni■iIHA•mUii MEMNON "mum f ' N .. • i ■ ■ INm BONN issno man- • • • • e �1j1 • 11