Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBZA1998-10 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, May 4, 1998, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Randy Howell Chairman Carl Hecht Vice-Chairman Ery Meyer Secretary Dennis Luers Member Russell Anderson 1 st Alternate Ron Cook 2nd Alternate Kip Bruner 3rd Alternate constituting a quorum with Member Jill Davis absent. Also present were City Councilmen Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: H. T. (Tommy) Hardy Director of Development Services Scott Williams Building Official Stephen Kindrick Planner I Betsy Dunham Plans Examiner Gerrie Anderson Secretary CALL TO ORDER Chairman Randy Howell called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA98-09—AT&T WIRELESS SYSTEMS 400 STATE HIGHWAY 114 WEST The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA98-09, submitted by Bob Steinweg for AT&T Wireless Systems for property located at 440 State Highway 114 West and platted as Lot 1 R-1, Block 1 R, Payton Wright Addition. The following requested variance is from Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 26.1.1.,Highway Commercial District Height Regulations which restricts the height of principal structures to thirty-five (35) feet. The applicant requested a variance to allow a fifty-three (53) foot variance resulting in an eighty-eight (88) foot maximum height for a flagpole. Mr. Kindrick explained that Staff found a special condition existed, specifically that the BZA MINUTES MAY 4, 1998 ordinance did not take into account the height of flagpoles when district height restrictions were set. Mr. Kindrick explained the past variances granted on the property. Mr. Kindrick also explained that a Conditional Use Request CU98-16 and Special Use Request SU98-03 was heard by City Council on April 21, 1998 to amend the approved site plan of Conditional Use Permit CU96-06 (Ordinance 96-24) for automobile sales, specifically to relocate an existing eighty-eight (88) foot flag pole, and a special use permit to allow the collocation of a cellular tower in conjunction with a flagpole. Mr. Kindrick explained that Council approved the first reading of the ordinance and the second reading of the ordinance to be held on Tuesday May 5, 1998. Mr. Kindrick noted that the approval or denial of the Conditional and Special Use requests would be based in part on the outcome of the variance request. Bob Steinweg, representing AT&T Wireless Systems of 17300 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, Texas, 75248, took the Oath of Truth and explained that AT&T Wireless Systems approached Payton Wright about attaching an antenna to their flagpole for the upgrade of service on State Highway 114. Mr. Steinweg explained that a small amount of space was needed to locate the equipment cabinet and that was the purpose for relocating the flagpole. Mr. Steinweg noted that the antenna would not be visible and that the flagpole would still be used to fly the American flag only. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis Carl Hecht made a motion that a special condition existed, being that the ordinance did not take into account the height of flagpoles when district height restrictions were set. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis Carl Hecht then made a motion to approve the request to Section 26.1.1., Highway Commercial District Height Regulations allowing a fifty-three-(53) foot variance resulting in an eighty-eight (88) foot maximum height for a flagpole which would still be used to fly BZA MINUTES MAY 4, 1998 the American flag only. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA98-10 - DANNY PARLINGTON, 607 N. RIVERSIDE DRIVE The next item of business was for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider BZA98-10, submitted by Danny Parlington for 607 N. Riverside Drive, platted as Lot 2, Block B, The Woods Addition. The following variance requests was to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 42.C., Accessory Building Regulations which require detached accessory buildings to be located at least six (6) feet from side property lines. If approved, it would allow a four (4) foot - six (6) inch variance resulting in a one (1) foot - six (6) inch side yard setback. Section 42.F., prohibits the face of a private garage from being located less than twenty (20) feet from a side or rear lot line. If approved, it would allow a reduction of fourteen (14) feet, resulting in a 6'-0" setback from the rear property line. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found no special condition existed; it was a self imposed hardship. Mr. Williams explained that there was adequate parking in the form of an attached front entry garage. It was noted that the applicant worked with Staff to modify the carport to gain a ten (10) foot separation from the main structure, however, due to the location of the existing pool and the twenty (20) foot rear setback requirement, the side and rear encroachments could not be rectified without a variance. Danny Parlington, applicant, took the Oath of Truth and expressed confusion concerning other carports in the area and the twenty (20) foot setback. Mr. Williams explained to Mr. Parlington that there were violations throughout town and that many carports were built when the zoning ordinance did not address carports, or were built illegally without staff's knowledge. BZA MINUTES MAY 4, 1998 Tim Dunning, 613 N. Riverside Drive, took the Oath of Truth and explained how Mr. Parlington had improved the property and expressed that he had no problem with the variance requests. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Dennis Luers made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis After discussion concerning whether or not there was a hardship, Ery Meyer made a motion that a special condition did not exist. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA98-11- DAVID WINTERS, 517 ESTILL STREET The next item of business was for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider BZA98-11, submitted by David Winters for property located at 517 Estill Street, platted as Lot 5, Block 100, College Heights Addition. The following variance requests are from Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-72: Section 15.F.2., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, Lot Size, requires lots for any permitted use shall have a minimum area of 7,500 square feet. If approved, it would allow the reduction of 875 square feet, resulting in a lot size of 6,625 square feet for the existing lot. Section 15.G.1., Single Family District Regulations, Area Regulations, requires a minimum front yard depth of 30 feet. If approved, it would allow a reduction of eight (8) feet, resulting in a front yard setback of twenty-two (22) feet. BZA MINUTES MAY 4, 1998 Section 15.G.4., Single Family District Regulations, Area Regulations, requires a minimum lot width of sixty-five (65) feet. If approved, it would allow a reduction of fifteen (15) feet, resulting in a fifty (50) foot lot width for the existing lot. Section 15.G.6., Single Family District Regulations, Area Regulations, requires a minimum of twelve (12) feet between principal or accessory buildings on adjacent lots. If approved, it would allow a reduction of six (6) feet resulting in a six (6) foot setback between the proposed residence and the carport on the adjoining property. Section 15.J., Off Street Parking Regulations, prohibits off-street parking from being located in the required front yard. If approved, it would allow the location of one off-street parking space within the required front yard. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found that special conditions existed for the request to Section 15.F.2., as the lot is existing; Section 15.G.1 ., in order to. maintain continuity of setbacks with other houses along the street; Section 15.G.4., as the lot is existing; Section 15.G.6., being the proposed structure would meet the setback requirements for R-7.5; Section 15.J., as the narrow lot width leaves the applicant little choice but to provide one parking space in the front yard. Marcia Willett of 618 Highview Lane, Grapevine, and representing the applicant, took the Oath of Truth and explained that the applicant wanted to build a house that would be similar to the neighborhood. Ms. Willett also explained that they had been working with Hugo Gardea with the Grapevine Township Revitalization Project about changing the roof line to more of a traditional look instead of modern. Randy Howell mentioned that four letters of approval had been received. There were questions concerning the residence only having a one car garage and there being five (5) feet between the garage and the living area. Ms. Willett explained that they had another plan with a two-car garage and the plan was not possible without encroachments. BZA MINUTES MAY 4, 1998 Mr. Howell expressed that he was hesitant about the one car garage. Mr. Howell noted that he felt that a two-car garage could be built on a fifty (50) foot wide lot, with the same square footage of living space. David Winters, applicant of 547 N. Rice, Hamilton, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and explained that a two car garage would come very close to the living area of the residence on the adjacent lot. Mr. Winters explained also that if the house were to be moved back on the lot, it would be too close to Wall Street and too close to the noise of the auto body shop located on Wall Street. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Ery Meyer made a motion to close the public hearing. Russell Anderson seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis Ery Meyer made a motion that special conditions existed for Section 15.F.2., as the lot is existing; Section 15.G.1 ., in order to maintain continuity of setbacks with other houses along the street; Section 15.G.4., as the lot is existing; Section 15.G.6., being the proposed structure would meet the setback requirements for R-7.5; and Section 15.J., as the narrow lot width leaves the applicant little choice but to provide one parking space in the front yard and to be consistent with other lots in the area. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis Ery Meyer made a motion to approve the requests to Section 15.F.2., Single Family District Regulations, Lot Size, allowing the reduction of 875 square feet, resulting in a lot size of 6,625 square feet for the existing lot; Section 15.G.1 ., Single Family District Regulations, Area Regulations, allowing a reduction of eight (8) feet, resulting in a front yard setback of twenty-two (22) feet; Section 15.G.4., Single Family District Regulations allowing a reduction of fifteen (15) feet, resulting in a fifty (50) foot lot width for the existing lot; Section 15.G.6., Single Family District Regulations allowing a reduction of six (6) feet, resulting in a six (6) foot setback between the proposed residence and the carport on the adjoining property; and Section 15.J., Off Street Parking Regulations allowing the location of one off-street parking space within BZA MINUTES MAY 4, 1998 the required front yard. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA98-12, CHRIS AND TAMMY SONDERHOUSE 2509 BEAR HAVEN DRIVE The next item of new business was for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider BZA98-12, submitted by Chris and Tammy Sonderhouse for property located at 2509 Bear Haven Drive, platted as Lot 24, Block 1, Timbercreek Village. The following variance requests were from Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 20.B., R-TH, Townhouse Zoning District Regulations prohibits accessory uses between the front building line and the front property line. If approved, it would allow a pool to be located beyond the front building line, ten (10) feet from the front property line. Section 20.13.1 ., prohibits private swimming pools closer than seventy-five (75) feet from adjacent residential districts. If approved, it would allow a fifty-five (55) foot reduction to the setback, resulting in a twenty (20) foot setback from the adjacent R-7.5, Single Family Zoning District. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found special conditions existed being the lot is unusually shaped, with no ability to locate a swimming pool without a variance and that the front of this lot faces the rear of adjoining properties. Mr. Williams explained that the subdivision has site plan zoning, with the stipulation that any specific issue not regulated by the site plan requirements would revert to the regulations in the R-TH Zoning District. Mr. Williams explained that Staff felt that the unusual arrangement of the lot within the subdivision warrants a variance from the prohibition of accessory uses in the front yard. Mr. Williams also explained that Staff felt that it was possible that the seventy-five (75) foot setback requirement for swimming pools from adjacent residential districts may not have been considered at the time the subdivision was approved. Mr. Williams noted that the Building Board of Appeals, at their March 9, 1998, meeting granted a request allowing a solid fence in the required and established front yard. BZA MINUTES MAY 4, 1998 Randy Howell announced that five letters of protest and one letter of approval had been received. Tammy Sonderhouse, applicant of 2707 Martin Drive, #1026, Bedford, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and clarified that she would have a private yard, completely enclosed with a seven (7) foot solid stucco wall. Kim Koogler of 2505 Bear Haven Drive, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained that she was protesting the request for the construction of the pool. Ms. Koogler explained that she was concerned for the safety of children that walk through the area from Timberline Elementary and cross a bridge that is on the Sonderhouse's lot. Ms. Koogler was also concerned about the trees that would be lost because of the construction of the pool and her property value decreasing with the construction of a pool that would be adjacent to the back of their lot. Marilyn Robertson of 2513 Bear Haven Drive, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained that originally she was in agreement about the construction of the wall and pool, but having spoken with a real estate agent about the construction of the pool effecting the value of her property, she was now protesting the variance requests. Chris Sonderhouse, applicant, took the Oath of Truth and explained that the bridge over the creek that the children use for going to school would no longer be available to the public. Mr. Sonderhouse also noted in response to the safety of children in the area, this situation is not unusual; all neighborhoods have children and pools. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis There was discussion concerning the location of pools in the R-TH, Townhouse Zoning District. Mr. Williams explained that the subdivision was zoned SP, Site Plan Zoning District, not outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Williams explained that anything not specifically addressed in the ordinance was required to comply with the R-TH Zoning District and according to the R-TH requirements, a pool could not be built in the front yard. BZA MINUTES MAY 4, 1998 After further discussion, Carl Hecht made a motion that no special condition existed. Russell Anderson seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA98-13 - MIRANDA F. WORTHINGTON, 1218 CIRCLE VIEW COURT The next item of new business was for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider BZA98- 13, submitted by Miranda F. Worthington for property located at 1218 Circle View Court, platted as Lot 14, Block 1, Forest Lake Addition. The following variance request was from Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.G.1., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, Area Regulations which requires a thirty (30) foot front yard setback. If approved, it would allow a six (6) foot reduction, resulting in a twenty-four (24) foot front yard setback. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found a special condition existed being the house was existing and was built prior to the requirement for setback inspections. Mr. Howell announced that three letters of approval had been received. Ms. Miranda Worthington, applicant of Clear Springs Road in Dallas took the Oath of Truth and explained that she had lived in the house for 10 '/2 years and, in process of selling the home the survey showed the encroachment. Brian Rush of 1225 Circle View Court, Grapevine, took the Oath of Truth and explained that he lived across the street from the property and was in approval of the request. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Dennis Luers made a motion to close the public hearing. Russell Anderson seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis BZA MINUTES MAY 4, 1998 Dennis Luers then made a motion that a special condition existed being the house was existing and was built prior to the requirement for setback inspections. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis Dennis Luers made a motion to grant the variance to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 15.G.1., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations allowing a six (6) foot reduction, resulting in a twenty-four (24) foot front yard setback. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA98-14 — DENNIS AND SHARON VANDESTEEG, 1834 CAMELOT DRIVE The next item of business was for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider BZA98-14, submitted by Dennis and Sharon Vandesteeg for 1834 Camelot Drive, platted as Lot 4, Block 2, Canterbury Village. The following request was from Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 14.G.1., Depth of Front Yard for R-12.5, Single Family District Regulations which requires a front yard setback of thirty-five (35) feet. If approved, it would allow a five (5) foot variance to the front yard setback requirement, resulting in a front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. Mr. Stephen Kindrick explained that Staff found a special condition existed, being an existing structure on an existing lot. Randy Howell noted that two letter of protest had been received. Mr. Dennis Vandesteeg, applicant, took the Oath of Truth and explained that the house had been constructed in 1992. Mr. Vandesteeg explained that his contractor had said he had checked the building lines, a building permit was issued and inspections were made on the foundation. BZA MINUTES MAY 4, 1998 With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Ery Meyer made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis Ery Meyer then made motion that a special condition existed being the structure was existing on an existing lot. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote.- Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis Ery Meyer made a motion to grant the variance to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 14.G.1., Depth of Front Yard for R-12.5, Single Family Zoning District allowing a five (5) foot variance to the front yard setback requirement, resulting in a front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. Russell Anderson seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA98-15— SIGNS NOW, MASON HARPER, 326 E. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY The last item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA98-15, submitted by Mason Harper representing Signs Now for property located at 326 E. Northwest Highway, legally described as Tract 49E, Abstract 946, A.F. Leonard Survey. The following variance request was from Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 60.J., Sign Regulations for HC, Highway Commercial Zoning District. If approved, it would allow a roof mounted sign on a structure in a HC, Highway Commercial Zoning District. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found that special conditions existed being the structure does not have adequate wall space for a wall sign. Mr. Williams also explained that the BZA MINUTES MAY 4, 1998 site does not have an acceptable space to locate a pole, ground, or monument sign. Mr. Williams explained that the sign structure was erected in 1996, after a permit was issued by Staff. Mr. Williams explained that the drawings submitted did not indicate that the sign was a roof sign, and no inspections had been requested. Mr. Williams went on to explain that Mr. Harper recently applied for a permit to change the copy on the sign, and staff was using that opportunity to bring the sign into compliance. Randy Howell noted that one letter of approval had been received. Ruth Ann Smith of 7721 Douglas Lane, North Richland Hills and owner of the company took The Oath of Truth and explained that a new sign was necessary because the company name had changed. Forest Smith of 7721 Douglas Lane, North Richland Hills and owner of the company took the Oath of Truth. Mr. Smith showed photographs of the sign and structure. Mr. Smith explained that if the sign were lowered to the edge of the roof, he would not be able to change out the lighting in the sign. Mr. Williams explained that he had spoken with Mason Harper and Mr. Harper had agreed to lower the sign. Mr. Williams explained that he would have recommended denial if they had not agreed to lower the sign. Mr. Williams explained that a permit was issued for the existing sign and that the comparison of the sign plans submitted and the actual sign that was constructed were different. Mr. Williams also noted that the sign had never been inspected. Mr. Cook suggested the property owner build a fagade and then the sign would be legal. Mr. Williams noted that such modification would comply. There was discussion concerning how the sign and/or building would be modified to comply with the ordinance. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Dennis Luers made a motion to close the public hearing. Russell Anderson seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis BZA MINUTES MAY 4, 1998 After further discussion, Carl Hecht made a motion that a special condition existed being the building does not have adequate wall space for a wall sign and the site does not have an acceptable space to locate a pole, ground, or monument sign. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis Carl Hecht then made a motion to grant the variance to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 60.J., to allow a roof mounted sign on a structure in a HC, Highway Commercial Zoning District having the bottom of the sign be flush with the bottom front edge of the roof that faces Northwest Highway. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis MINUTES Next the Board of Zoning Adjustment considered the minutes of the April 6, 1998, meeting. Ery Meyer made a motion to approve the minutes of the April 6, 1998, meeting. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis ADJOURNMENT With no further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion to adjourn. Russell Anderson seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Davis The meeting was adjourned at approximately 7:45 P.M. MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT /� / FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFFICIAL► JO ANN STOUT, PLANNER II RON STOMBAUGH, PLANNER I SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA98-10 DANNY PARLINGTON 607 N. RIVERSIDE DRIVE MEETING DATE: MONDAY, MAY 4, 1998 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment deny the requests to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for property addressed as 607 N. Riverside Drive and platted as Lot 2, Block B, The Woods Addition as follows: Section 42.C., Accessory Building Regulations which require detached accessory buildings to be located at least 6'-0" from side property lines. If the request is approved. it would allow a 4'-6" variance resulting in a 1'-6" side yard setback. Section 42.F., prohibits the face of a private garage from being located less than 20' from a side or rear lot line. If the request is approved, it would allow a reduction of fourteen (14) feet, resulting in a 6'- 0" setback from the rear property line. SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds no special condition exists; this is a self imposed hardship. The residence has adequate parking in the form of an attached front entry garage. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: An application was submitted to the Building Department by Mr. Parlington following a violation notice when Staff observed the construction. The applicant has worked 0:1BZA19810-4 with Staff to modify the carport to gain a ten (10) foot separation from the main structure. However, due to the location of the existing pool and the twenty (20) foot rear setback requirement, the side and rear encroachments cannot be rectified without a variance. 0:IBZA19810-4 � �ro CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION 1. APPLICANT NAME: 1�A N Al `f ?AR f_rdVC=rD/y ADDRESS & O r) A]. CITY/STATE: G R-A ft't uzkl i^ 1'4 ZIP: 7 d 1 HOME:63"17� ' 4 - 3`oI WORK:C'�\ I �i)7at�-�7�1 FAX(SS IrA `l),. -370/ 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: -ra.A M E AS 7%PPLZ IIV47 ADDRESS' CITY/STATE: ZIP-- HOME: WORK: FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) L a T oL , 1b-,o La LC B, 1/4 L WOODS , HA-SC ONE Airy AD61T N -W TgC alYY yP-&k ZL� bdE -MRRa►„eD. W, Ao&Rbx--mr,- -m -rIfE PIA'r ZW UDk. 3t25-l9L 7 Qy MEM RWi bS &TAelZ9n -1207X 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. i1pLCL of Ste, W A �� � � JRIT i ._ F 7L 'F r Y ��-��, _ ��' ���� ►fit_ ofl=Rr LJ:;�L_I rB?- `I. FT - 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. I�ol r-Rf)lvr DfF 7-)1[-: NOvsC WAcN TR.11mg TO S i Air U L-Tit-ny (i9r)E Ti 1 '1-29 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2)THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. 7-0 2/- y Ar s 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED- THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC. THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF WILL DETERMINE THE AGENDA FOR EACH OF THE PUBLIC HEARING DATES. BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE AGENDA YOUR APPLICATION MAY BE RESCHEDULED TO A LATER DATE. APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) '1:)AAJA-A �tqRLrJy6-DOV - APPLICANT SIGNATUREv� - OWNER (PRINT) ��/Vlq"� OWNER SIGNATUR = SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF , 19 /cy 00000aeacoo��CC'�coa000IOOX'Cooa ,qY cV1• - t_pa=s >,rnr• xti'o-wo}-coma ococ ,- A< DEBBIE SMITH "' Notary Public.State of Texas N i LJBL W�iE ATE OF TEXAS I My Commission Expires 8-17-00 ` Notary Public,State of Texas 4: 9,F Ur,(!.� My Commission Expires 8-17-00 rOa�Opn�pv.nr._,npnnn^.^.^r-^r.^•-�.,nn�rn.�J(h.="D,�:�;✓n �...._.....• 00:^a:ihJ^^m.�nr-_n�n�nrrr✓��ryJMLaO�'Y_'- DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF _ _ Oa000Ofi:tiG"r 000oa00"o f DEBBIE SMITH NOTARY ;FQR, E STATE OF TEXAS .....,� 1 ' Notary Public,State of Texas *aY'o1 My Commission Expires 8-17-00 a DEBBIE SMITH n�e^ooego .,c;M._.-,;: Nolar P DATE OF L''E-X Xri+0N-00 � {/L-IMMIC')-,"lcc..2h�r.Yt^,no'+—,,,,,---.+ 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF WILL DETERMINE THE AGENDA FOR EACH OF THE PUBLIC HEARING DATES. BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE AGENDA, YOUR APPLICATION MAY BE RESCHEDULED TO A LATER DATE. APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) r APPLICANT SIGNATURE— OWNER (PRINT) dIVIVY OWNER SIGNATUR SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY O2F : , 19 00000000000DDOODDOWDO0DDDOOOC-0OQ')DOOOOOOOOD f A a� : DEBBIE SMITH Notary Public,State of Texas N UBL 6 -IE ATE OF TEXAS My Commission Expires 8-17-00 f Notary Public,State of Texas P ,�oF Ei% My Commission Expires 8-17-p0 000000ooDOGOOCo0000"ODooxoD00000000000000 `�c�00C:�ODDODDOOOQOGDOOODGOODnODnmr,}OD000o00 DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF fit✓ , 19 � f � . 000000000000000000000ODWO00006, DEBBIE SMITH NOTARY s�DD & , TATE OF TEXAS ? ` Notary Public,State of Texas J9rF pf tE �t My Commission Expires 8-17-00 r `i; DEBBIE SMITH 00000�0000o0o00D0oo0e 0r. 0�000000000a_r•x� Nota P DATE O F- _ AXP*RA +0N-oo . =k`:•"•OOOODOOOD06'JD00006ODOOCODODODODnnnmpO-.r:•.{r`i 74 �? LH '_ ° I I GU I I Y� b • g • • , 3 = 1 Its • _� � I J 1 N 23 a s a 1w I 13 l Q — - n r =a s x r � _ l I R—T. 5 � �u.J7 � w 1 • GU • 1` = R S • 7 • �• a n a n ups K • 0 is H u u 26 z b n a 17 !a ,. =y TIl LAK wood LN u, l,..c • ySSa�i • s a s a s •y n v m NAR O ! 3 ` =s :s a s al s n 1• v K m 14 �� j� q46 1 • Z78-14 1` 7 \ a o • a..i� E .7 = oNC LN OAK. 111 n z . a s a • • a It Q = BUSHONG RD. 1u - = . • •1 , a i - I - I - I —1 « I .. I u 14 z r U n x is t• n 1 Z9 -10 u7 . FUVO (OE RIVERSIDE DR. N. CC OR R—7. 5 • 1 a 1, 1 1 _ • 7 • , a 21 • ,a >� ,.:. IF 7l i. _j u b n IS 17 u 1 H u ,2 n =a u n � VENT m a ¢ " = 7 n O 1 a • ,7 BZA98-10 2' u = la p�,N N'Y 17 " ,. 94 Is • 17 1-4. c 1 la •` W 1. n PARLINGTON • M G_' g a 7 7 a. . 1•_7 m a (A • ud ,z. 7 7 sr } ' l ¢ • r W U , . ILA a Oa b Il 7 ®�l A • ` a 7 O a a LZ J 7.1%6 K SW DEL l 2 _ p Ac n:c" 14 F z R 7. 5 u R 3 5 R-3 . 75 u 113 R—MF— n I s WILDWOOD DR. A�q R—MF—I �ONARO PRD-1 AC 1 MCA a15 SU�ga6 «„ ra s•o R—TH u 14 .. IMI 4 R—TH TM„ 42A a.a R-MF-2 � / � MF+2 . 3U�5HDAI & FD+ ERR ;�SZt�P%RT"f Lrru� I I ' t 1 �+ UV�RWoAtC� � `► r �o i t � I I r � I f ' I ' � i 1 I + r �NXIo� ►�©575 1 I � r A. I I I i I i >•-IavSE C- 41 05 L 4 4L sat- 220- CT) 6)7 W . ...... 7777" 00 it I 7—;7 ,oRj k � V) gq x V E KAW411FIt- PARLINGHN .S VAI E,Ol,'"I F X A3 PU VOUNCV OFTARRANT "It?lite- fjetlfwjd�rs mIldhir the 1)%......14 the rlelni.%em star-eyrd and to 1:1,0()f) I 1�---by certify that the property dewihedf herein HAVIAKIN MU" CMIPANY - -Vehill a special A-om hfirard area,&,.t idwalird 1y the lire Im IN•:ipreff does hereby certify that 0,qswitvey was this day friff(te FV'r-ind Twumance Adminisiraitm. lin","Inent of flnus!" mod Urban rinthr efutuU144.11C prolway legally dc"wribcd herrml and Is correct.and that Dcvefoptmenf, the flood hn7ATd area being Identified dwe,at,w,(lig,rcimnlet,ceniffires.Rhottritze.,in mra,hmindary line conflicts. I the Fed I Insurance Administration Mad Iformid rrwl.vu 1,11leti1q.'-f-11131ping of invinventent-t.Ashir lines or roads In place. x(jeVO.0 Boundary AVP effil"I've n— V X,clv a%All—n hcmm,mitt ifial said Vf4jwq1 Y tare ItExesti to aril (Turn a AQ �Vm%e7 ,hA4,t1kA 1"adway excern as slut1wr in. for file D11-1. M1101 22, 19% IMSIS VOR RVANNQ. AP sunw.imn co. 0141,1 No .03-127/96 David Pollard TIPS 91518 1q03 Central Drive,Sulfa 309 ledlord.IX ?61121 Metro(1317)267-1240 CITY OF GRAPEVINE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT SE #B 98 0 DANNY PARLINGTON Because you are a property owner within 200 feet of the subject tract of land as shown by the last City-approved tax rolls, you received this notice. If you cannot or do not wish to attend the public hearing, the attached form is provided for your convenience. Purpose of Request: The applicant has submitted an application to the Department of Development Services for 607 N. Riverside Drive, platted as Lot 2, Block B, The Woods Addition, Tarrant County, Texas. The following variances are to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 42.C., Accessory Building Regulations requires detached accessory buildings to be located at least 6'-0" from side property lines. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the recluest, it would allow a 4'-6" variance resulting in a 1'-6" side yard setback. Section 42.F., prohibits the face of a private garage from being located less than 20' from a side or rear lot line. If the Board of Zoning Adiustment approves the request, it would allow_ a 14' variance_ resulting in a 6-0" setback from the rear property line. A copy of the site plan is on file at the Department of Development Services, 200 S. Main Street, Grapevine, Texas. HEARING: WHEN: MONDAY May 4 1998 AT 6 PM WHAT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING LOCATION: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2ND FLOOR, 200 SOUTH MAIN STREET PROCEDURE: 1. City Staff Introduction of Case and Applicant 2. Applicant and Other Speakers' Presentation 3. Public Input from Neighborhood Associations, Property Owners Within 200 feet, Interested Citizenry 4. Questions from Board of Zoning Adjustment for Applicants, City Staff and Guests Present. 5. Public Hearing Closing 6 Determining if a Special Condition Exists 7. Vote CASE #BZA98-10 CITY OF GRAPEVINE DANNY PARLINGTON ALL WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM ON FRIDAY, May 1, 1998. Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest) and/or (have the following comments) Print Name, Address, City, Zip, Lot, Block and Subdivision: Signature: Phone # Telephone: 817-410-3155 Fax: 817-410-3012 Mail responses to: Directquestions/deliver_responses to: Board of Zoning Adjustment Planning & Building Inspections Division Department of Development Services Department of Development Services City of Grapevine City of Grapevine P. O. Box 95104 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, TX 76099 Grapevine, TX 76051 iHIGIMEW LN 10 3 4 E9 1 2 C 5 6 7 111 9 10 11 12 TR 53A 8 / 21 20 19 18 7 16 15 5.55 AC 25 24 23 22 O 26 LAUWOOD LN LAKEWOOD 6 0 1 �0= 3 5 2 �~,`3 4 5 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 � 4 4 � S S 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 �18L17 16 15 3 d L� 6 2 LN OAK LN A 2 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 - H 2 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 _ 1 1 2 3 4 5 S 3 TR 52E RIVBERSIDE NO TH RIVE 1.07 ® 4 1E 17- 2D 2 25 1 18 5 1 2 21 2 zz 6 5 24 i.� 20 19 7 13 2222 - x 12 11 23 3 8 1 2 ���'� 10 9 4 HEVE 3 FOOD 9 8 15 5 6 5 , 1 2 14 6 � 13 125 F, 22 21 FT� j� 11 1 O 1 1 1 _ RSjb�, 9 2 2 2 8 3 NT 3 13 3 4 D� SOU 10 g 4 5 xE �,tty g ,_-� � 8 1 4 5 10 7 6 2 3 12 5 g 13 R 12 11 14 14 , 10 12 1 = goo BZA98 - 10 BZ498-10 M. & David Torres McCormick Timothy J. & Pat Gunning DANNY PARLINGTON 601 Riverside Dr. N. 613 N. Riverside Dr. Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 Kevin S. & Barbara L. Lewis Max D. & Aris Jones George R. & Brenda Kuketz 619 N. Riverside Dr. 625 N. Riverside Dr. 631 N. Riverside Dr. Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 Paul D. & Paula J. Goynes Kathryn J. Allison B.L. & M.L. Dennler 1243 Brian Ct. 1219 Brian Ct. 631 Heather Wood Dr. Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 Carl E. & Patricia Banfi Kathy M. Kibbee Frank J. & Kathy S. Martinez 625 Heather Wood Dr. 619 Heather Wood Dr. 1220 Cable Creek Dr. Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 George S. Bynum Monty W. & Janet M. Williams David W. & Shery S. Liddell 1226 Cable Creek Dr. 612 N. Riverside Dr. 618 N. Riverside Dr. Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 R. Wayne & Norma C. Simonson Gary Nelda Penney Jon L. & Jeanne Bickford 624 Riverside Dr. N. 1231 Tamarack Ct. 1301 Bayou Rd. Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 Billy E. Moore & Windola Howell Chris Paul Accardo Kurtis M. & Jacquelin E. Krantz 1305 Bayou Rd. 610 Oak Ln. 606 Oak Ln. Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 Grapevine, TX 76051 Samuel L. Hill Dean A. Kinunen 105 e. Harwood Rd. #101 1300 Cable Creek Ct. Euless, TX 76039-3421 Grapevine, TX 76051 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PUBLIC HEARING PROPERTY OWNER RESEARCH Applicant � — -- Address 0 7 !l/�1�St � � Legal �f: �_ �Ik. T� e 4ctocis Page_ ` Of Pages Le al Description Lot Block Tax Roll Name/Address IJ 1J1 CL/ Ide 73 JR ell_ ld � i C � DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PUBLIC HEARING PROPERTY OWNER RESEARCH Aq n f�c '?q K// Case# xk? Applicant Address O7 �. �Slc�e — Legal Of Pages Page_ Leqal Description:�:� Bt lock Tax Roll Name/Address 11 a4 !�.AL G r SP 4ir` / cJ 117u dye La rrlan 56�- DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PUBLIC HEARING PROPERTY OWNER RESEARCH Applicant Address ?—I✓C--5e r— �� Legal Of Pages Page., Legal Description Lot Block Tax Roll Name/Address � / f Sn `� � l 436> //�c�L U Q ��1rio /4 �CC /3 6 s o u------------ /r"zi �O 3-1 3��1 ,j(Sa i RECEIVED CASE #BZA98-10 APR 3 01998 CITY OF GRAPEVINE DAN NY PARLI NGTON PLJA+vIVINr, ALL WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM ON FRIDAY, May 1, 1998. Procedure to Respond: As a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract or an interested citizen), I (approve) ( p Y J ) ( ) ( pP )., , (protest) and/or (have the following comments) 414�- Ze-ZZ r '� 'zelcJ� G cJ eo 1 , Print Name, Address, City, Zip, Lot, Block and Subdivision: 7-X OSI /0 30119 SignatureR. ' eet�- Zl Phone#: Clelepho e: 817-410-3155 ' Fax: 817-410-3012 Mail responses to: Direct questions/deliver responses to: Board of Zoning Adjustment Planning & Building Inspections Division Department of Development Services Department of Development Services City of Grapevine City of Grapevine P. O. Box 95104 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, TX 76099 Grapevine, TX 76051 CASE #BZA98-10 CITY OF GRAPEVINE DANNY PARLINGTON ALL WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM ON FRIDAY, May 1, 1998. 4 Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest) and/or (have the following comments) l 1r. Cj �. Print Name, Address, City, Zip, Lot, Block and Subdivision: (Y- Signature.-_':Z�A—. � Phone #: Telephone: 817-410-3155 Fax: 817-410-3012 Mail responses to: Direct uestions/deliver responses to: Board of Zoning Adjustment Planning & Building Inspections Division Department of Development Services Department of Development Services City of Grapevine City of Grapevine P. O. Box 95104 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, TX 76099 Grapevine, TX 76051 U4/ZU/Ub 08:E4 1"511 HUY 1140 UrNb rLNtx & r mr WJUU1 CASE #BZA98-10 CITY OF GRAPEVINE DANNY PARL,INGTON ALL WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE [V�i UST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM ON FRIDAY, May 11 1998. Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or(an interested citizen), I approve) an are Me icallomrig commen s APR 2 91998 Please note that the improvements to his property made by Mr. Parlington, including the subject accessory building, have substantially improved its appearance and in my opinion has thereby enhanced appearance of the entire neighborhood. Print Name, Address, City, Zip, Lot, Block and Subdivision: Signature: O&II629C zoopif Phone #:__ 'C S3 Tele hone: 817-410-3156 Pax: 817-410-3a12 Mail responses to: Direct cmestionsideliver responses to: Board of Zoning Adjustment Planning & Building Inspections Division Department of Development Services Department of Development Services City bf Grapevine City of Grapevine P. O. Box 95104 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, TX 75099 Grapevine, TX 76051 04-29-1998 09:28AM 817 967 1145 P.01 ,,GRAPEVINE T E. X -A 5-. A Future With A Past April 16, 1998 Ms. Janice Gregory Fort Worth Star Telegram P.O. Box 1870 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 RE: Grapevine Account # CIT 25 Dear Ms. Gregory, Please find enclosed, the following for publication on Sunday, April 19, 1998, in the Northeast Edition of the Neighborhood Extra Section of the Fort Worth Star Telegram. (One time only) Item Meeting Date Notice of Public Hearing- BZA98-09 —AT& T Wireless Systems May 4, 1998 Notice of Public Hearing: BZA98-10 — Danny Parlington May 4, 1998 Notice of Public Hearing: BZA98-11 - David Winters May 4, 1998 Notice of Public Hearing: BZA98-12 — Chris & Tammy Sonderhouse May 4, 1998 Notice of Public Hearing: BZA98-13 — Miranda F. Worthington May 4, 1998 Notice of Public Hearing: BZA98-14 — Dennis & Sharon Vandesteeg May 4, 1998 THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 Phone Metro 817/481-0377 As always, your assistance is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions please contact me at (817) 410-3155. Si erely, of Williams Bui ing Official Development Services Enclosure r , CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS On Monday evening, May 4, 1998, at 6:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 200 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas, the Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Grapevine will hold a public hearing to consider the following items: Case Number/Name: BZA98-09 —A T & T Wireless Systems Applicant: Bob Steinweg Location: 440 State Highway 114 W. Lot 1 R-1, Block 1 R, Payton Wright Addition Current Zoning: "HU Highway Commercial Proposal: The request is for the following variance to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 26.1.1, Height, which restricts the maximum height of any principal structure to 35'. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the request, it would allow a variance of 53' to the maximum height restriction, resulting in a maximum height of 88' for an existing flagpole to be relocated on the property. Case Number/Name: BZA98-10, Danny Parlington Applicant: Danny Parlington Location: 607 N. Riverside Drive Lot 2, Block B, The Woods Current Zoning: "CC" Community Commercial District Proposal: The request is for the following variances to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 42.C., Accessory Building Regulations which requires detached accessory buildings to be located at least 6-0" from side property lines. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the request, it would allow a 4'-6" variance resulting in a 1'-6" side yard setback. Section 42.F., prohibits the face of a private garage from being located less than 20' from a side or rear lot line. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the request, it would allow a 14' variance resulting in a 6'- 0" setback from the rear property line. Case Number/Name: BZA98-11, David Winters Applicant: David Winters Location: 517 Estill Street Lot 5, Block 100, College Heights Current Zoning: "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations Proposal: The request is for the following variances to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.F.2., Lot Size, which requires a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the request, it would allow the reduction of 875 square feet, resulting in a lot size of 6,625 square feet for the existing lot. Section 15.G.1., Area Regulations, requires a minimum front yard depth of 30'. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the request, it would allow a reduction of 8', resulting in a front yard setback of 22'. Section 15.G.4., Area Regulations which requires a minimum lot width of 65'. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the request, it would allow a reduction of 15', resulting in a 50' lot width for the existing lot. Section 15.G.6., Area Regulations which requires a minimum of 12' between principal or accessory buildings on adjacent lots. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the request, it would allow a reduction of 6', resulting in a 6' setback between the proposed residence and the carport on the adjoining property. Section J., Off-Street Parking which prohibits off-street parking from being located in the required front yard. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the request, it would allow the location of one off-street parking space within the required front yard. Case Number/Name: BZA98-12 — Chris & Tammy Sonderhouse Applicant: Chris & Tammy Sonderhouse Location: 2509 Bear Haven Drive Lot 24, Block 1, Timbercreek Village Current Zoning: R-TH, Townhouse/SP, Site Plan Proposal: The request is for the following variances to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 20.B., Accessory Uses which prohibits accessory uses between the front building line and the front property line. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the request, it would allow a pool to be located beyond the front building line, 10' from the front property line. Section 20.B.1. Accessory Uses which prohibits private swimming pools closer than 75' from adjacent residential districts. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the request, it would allow a 55' reduction to the setback, resulting in a 20' setback from the adjacent R-7.5 Zoning District. Case Number/Name: BZA98-13 — Miranda F. Worthington Applicant: Miranda F. Worthington Location: 1218 Circle View Drive Lot 14, Block 1, Forest Lake Addition Current Zoning: R-7.5, Single Family Zoning District Proposal: The request is for the following variance to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.G.1, Area Regulations which requires a 30' front yard setback. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the request, it would allow a 6' reduction, resulting in a 24' front yard setback. Case Number/Name: BZA98-14, Dennis & Sharon Vandesteeg Applicant: Dennis & Sharon Vandesteeg Location: 1843 Camelot Drive Lot 4, Block 2 Canterbury Village Current Zoning: "R-12.5" Single Family District Proposal: The request is for the following variance to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 14.G.1, Depth of Front Yard, which requires a minimum front yard depth of 35'. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the request, it would allow a reduction of 5', resulting in a front yard setback of 30'. Cpf�R,ipyii FED. I.D. NO. 22-3148254 AD ORDER NO. ��� t7n Monday.evenen> any 4, 12821603 i 199$ st 6:00�P. in-tha City Ltauncll Ctt�ontber5;2nd _400 W SEVENT. •Floor, 200 ulh Main S 76102 Street. Grapevine, Texas - ACCOUNT NO. CIT25 the 11aprd.al' �i,,�l►diust therti'i0t"thC & ai Grape ulna vY b.o�Ilc hear- ng coer the fouawirrg THE 9 N 7 is._Nam" &7A9 County ' Ilppliearl!~bohtelrle 1`tl* 440 c in and for said Count and State this da Before Y14 W,�4ot xR 1 loc t R-� y Y '>naytotr rigtlt'A�dnyY � r Curient.Zomng erson Comm8tilal j MMIE BRYANT p J Proposal TTh as - Billing Specialist for the Star T9 'the evinnst vanan e, fie. by the Star-Telegram Inc. at Fort Worth, in Tarrant Count Texas; and ?iGrapewne,fCamprehenslve ;Zonmg Ordinance 82Z3 Yr r C. who, ,Seetionf 26�1"3i J1etght� orn, did depose and say that the following clipping of an advertisement was which restr'iets a maximum . hei h"if a riltip"strut pu Is h*ture�ttw 95_Jf the'Soara of ned paper on the following dates: 1ZonmgJAdl1ul trnea proves g the requ0J1fA wo01d�aIlbw at(* variance ofr53 tite:maX mum height;res ti��r±± r sutbnngg tin a r713 Imum tinl6Mr of,.88'�fgi.'ansti •1lag. , 1p►upe re[�ocated,rohe ;: DATEDbanhYPaHinumton "� DESCRIPTION App1icarrt. annyi arlin TOTI(L AD SIZE LOcatldN 50g N�Riverslde: — INCH/LINE RATE Drive tt:2Sy 8tgyai By;Ffie* , Currerriit Toning ac mptir 4/19ME k� OF GRAPEVIN I358 1x 237E 237 1 . 417334 . 17 Commerccaa plstnc�'.roposbI Th *�ork _ ej. the fol!owirig jyaribntes to ,— - -the Grapevine-fdmprexten- '3ive Zaningi79Dr� arecea.1S2 ` 73:Section:.47�C�,-Ac&essq-`0 -- fry': BuildingL 'Regulations wlach requires detached me �; cessoi�b0II#1n Aobe:IpqaV14 ed at eastl6 „fromisrde- property lines IfgthesBoard i_b,Zgningy�Adlustment-9 allows 4 e6':vareantce re utt ,.Ing an a 1-6,:•side yard= et.'1. l.back Section 42 F;:pro Ib ,its,the fa06-a a private ga — - - - i rage from being located less . than 20 from a side "[ ear 6 lot'line ff the Board of.•Zon �+ ing'Adlustrrtentapprovestha essory uses`be'" the It the BoardpfZorong ust — request;It-would zIla' a 14' ,r3rIt bulldmkg tine and,the meptrapp�oves variancebYesUlting�nla 6-0 G root properly jive H the d would allow-arati6int +setbackifrom:the fearfpropq a oaidrof zPoning gdlusst�nent ed•:elgn on a structure-in.a fN.. pP ove§ ;lie- reque rt HC Highway=Comme_fFi'a Wouldallow a ool to be:lo- Zo District. tatetl bryarfdi lrorit 4url ApDF %yuklars f igg,fve IO'-itroni the front' La Inters. rgperty tine Section �+ , - ��17. Esu4 StrOiH'I a?,4ctlesfoYy�,'�uses SUBSC', t talock,kDO Coll whlcfrpiohibifs private swim- esgrrts;rs. `12n apdools ebser than 75, E THIS THE 20th DAY OF APRIL 1998 "'front eM suiehtiaf°dis•' i yurre yio 7t 7rb, kt #w Beard of Zoning ' t -fteggla- �y9plOAllo he.re-. Prle l is q st.gtwgyhe-,s4 w:c 5j re Notary Public oposal The re uestt it uctiom the setback :•.re-,, GOKE the foAotinng.,varianEes'to 'sulhrig fn a�0'.`setback 1`rom s Dstd_cijacent .R 7 594��Zonings EXPIRES the-Grapevine Camprehen- -- sive"Zonmg Ordinance 73 :Section 1 F 2 Lat +57 TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS 6 � llmlSer/1arele 98; r S¢e':which requires a.mmr iranda•E°Wotthmgton.r mum: lot site of 7,500 pp plicaht Miranda f: War square feet ff the Board'of _thin�ton — Zoning Adlustr*nt apppproves Location 1218 Circle View Me request it would'.allow Drive-,Lot 14 Block 1 For PLE� the-reduction of 875 square est-take Addition feet r'resulting irtalotsize of Currerrt Zoning;R 7 5 Single' RECONCILE WITH MONTHLY STATEMENT. THANK YOU, 6,65 squarefeetforthe'ex Family Zoning District •sting lot Section 15.GA Proposal The request_i3:for. Area:f2egulations reqquires a `the'following..varianceto the(ION AND RETURN THE LOWER PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT minimum front yard depth of ;Grapevine r•Comprehensive.i - - 30 .ff the Board of.;Zoning' Zonings ordinance;=82-73• Adjustment approves the re- Section 15 G.1,'Area Regula flues; it would allow a reduc .tions,,.which iequires=a,.30'-i *,,bon-off 8,resultingH We front fronts yard setback. if-the StC yand sethack'of.22:Section 1r4 ?Area.-'Regulations •Board;e Zoning Adjustment r 'OebvLia.the-.ieguest;ritwoud.�;,aapproves the -request itwhlot-ich• requires a minimum would allow a 6 reduction off Zoni of 6A -if theBoard resulting m a 24 front yarr) _of Zoning Adjustment a setback d1 s • 400 W.SEVENTH ST.•FORT WORTH,TEXAS 761( - allow reduction of 15 ire se umbeUfVame BZA98 sulting in a 50-Iot width:for pehhK i&W Sharoh — - the -existing lot Section Wand' t e, ACCOUNT • 12 15 G'6 Area;'Regulapons xppLicantr Dennis &'Sharon NUMBER C I T 2 5 3 3 4 . 17 whicti.requires a;mmimum of ': andest, 12 between pprincipal of - Location 1843 Camelot cessory bulldifig s on aifja- Drive Lot4 dock 2 Canter- centlots ffthe-BaardofZon bury�llage IF ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL(817)390-7885 mg Adjustments proves the. Current Zoning.."R 12 5"Sin-:, Cequest d would allow a:Te- gle'FamriyDistrict tluction of b; resulting iri a Proposal`The'request is:fair' 6 setback between the pro- the followaig variance to the I posedresidenceandthecar Gra evi a Comprehensive port'ar the ad oining proper 'Zoning,-,.-Ordinance.'Ordinance 82-.73: ty Si ctlpnJ _StreetP--ark f$pction'f 14.G;i Depth;of mg which prohibits off-street Frorlt:Yard vihicli reqquires,A. parkijig form being located mihmum front yard de th of in the,reqquired front yard.-,lf 35 .=1f.the Board of Zoning a'-.Bii_. of Zonmg Adjust Adpostment appYoves'the:re ment:approves'the request quest itwould,allow a reduc- rt would aliow'the locabon o bon at 5,resultingg in a front oneoffstreetparkmgg space, yard setbackof.30 within the ,,required front yartli; umberJNameIBZA9& x a< •^ •er SigrfL. sNov�Masonkiarp- �Case:�Titntber�lamea$ZA9� er .�2°�'- & InmyTsondp, A icairt Signs Now Mason PLEASE PAY house`- arper Applicam chPls_A.� Tammy tocatlon 32s er Northwest' THIS AMOUNT SonderhoLse t. Highway Tract 49E •Ab . 0 4 334 .17 Location 2509 $ear Haven stract d6 A`F Leonard Sur- Dnvet,Lot24+,BlPck1 Tim- -vey bercreek V;Ilage', Current Zoning "HC Highway' Currefit. rzoning RTH Commercial Townhouse/SP;Site Plan Proposal The'request is for Proposal The request rs for •the4ollowin��"variance to the . the following variances to Grapevine tiighwayCommer� PLEASE WRITE IN AMOUNT ENCLOSED _ the ;Grapevine•:Comprehen- ciall Zomng.Ordinance: 82- sive.Zonmg Ordinance P82- 73,SSection 60:J.''Si�rl Reg'j 73 Section 20.B.,gccesso- ulatibn'siorthe.,Iq a'hwe e tpRAIIE`71NE. E A. 5'= A Future With A Past May 6, 1998 Danny Parlington 607 N. Riverside Drive Grapevine, Texas 76051 CERTIFIED LETTER - P 618 607 210 RE: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE#BZA98-10 DANNY PARLINGTON, 607 N. RIVERSIDE DRIVE This letter confirms on May 4, 1998, the Board of Zoning Adjustment denied BZA98-10 for 607 N. Riverside Drive, platted as Lot 2, Block B, The Woods Addition. The following variance requests were from Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 42.C., Accessory Building Regulations which would have allowed a reduction of 4'- 6" in the side yard setback for a carport, resulting in a 1'-6" side yard setback. Section 42.F., which would have allowed a reduction of 14 feet to the required 20 foot rear yard, resulting in a six (6)foot setback from the rear property line. The violation must be corrected within ten (10) days of receipt of this certified letter. A copy of the minutes will be available after they have been approved at the next regular Board of Zoning Adjustment meeting. If you need a copy for your records, please contact Gerrie Anderson at 817-410-3158. ank u, S tt Williams ding Official Department of Development Services Bza9810-5 THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES P.O. Box 95104 • Grapevine. Texas 76099 Phone Metro 817/481-0377 ul ui W � q} r z cn W E W " .. WNOa o = ? F- 'o t cn f � Z OAi UQ �__- O oZ OZw � � Wa az wai Z F z LL a O O .. Q � O v J F- _ m - a Z e t14 vi 1- g 1 U W i Wriz LL Pt _CD O 06 D _ O J Q O.��( o�S /jIra � Q� W O Z :9 O N U cf) m z p � ' zw _ W W fn a > Y ZU -` » � O W cNo avers v OW yr� WWWOC a nai a a r� cn �, -- � � z a U) r- m 0 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NUMBER 6 � DELIVERY TO NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED PROPERTY OWNER LETTER PUBLIC HEARING PROPERTY OWNER LIST REQUESTED VOTING RECORD BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPROVED DENIED s-c-) CITY PLANNER � DEVELOPMENT SERVICES «�o^ CITY OFGRAPEVINE, TEXAS�CtZ ISSUED TO Z ON THIS DATE OWNER ORAGENT ACTION AUTHORIZED AT Ty ACTION AUTHORIZEDZ,�� PLAN REVIEW RECEIPT ONLY; NO WORK AUTHORIZED [� PERMIT ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICATION ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE. This permit shall expire if work is not commenced within 18O days of issuance or if work iosuspended or abandoned for o period of 180 days. TOTAL FEE $ NAME (PR|NTED)' 0JK4PANYNANE 24 HOUR INSPECTION NUMBER 2l-7?7:3� 7�7.77� 7 . METRO (817) 41O'3O10 CUT-OFF TIMES: 7:30A.M. 'A.K4. INSPECTION 12:30P.K4. ' P.K4. INSPECTION The issuance uvgranting of this permit and/or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be u permit for, or an approval of, any violation uf any ofthe provisions of the codes and ordinances of the City of Grapevine. The ioouonoo of a permit based on p|one, opeoifioauiona, and other data ohuU not prevent the Building Department from thereafter requiring the correction of errors in said p|ana, opeoihoationo, and other data or requiring | corrections of the construction dno|L FILE ai SENUER: I also wish to receive the V aComplete Items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. w ■Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. following services(for an ■Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): card to you. of Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address permit. Write'Retum Receipt Requested'on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery in a The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date a, delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. L 0 v 3.Article Addressed to: 4a.Article Number d E ) 4b.Service Type �v7 mil. 1 J(I e-1 S(c+ if ❑ Registered Certified Ix rn ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured e l �7 0 �- p ¢ � �c1 i� �� 6 7 ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD G 7.Date of Deliver IX 5.Received By:(Print Name) 18.Addressee's Address(Only if requested W and fee is paid) t t- g 6.Signat •(Addressee or t) o , a. - 381*,---December 190 102595-97-B-0179 Domestic Return Receipt P 618 607 210 Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided. Do not use for International Mail See reverse Sent,tQ Street&Numbs c�7 -17. f i v erg �r Post Ctlfice,State,&ZIP Code Postage $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee u) Return Receipt Showing to Whom&Date Delivered E Retum Receipt Showing to Whom, 'US ID' ID r),7, cn C. rn c: 0 0 3 to CD C .... (D 0 CD (C) :5. ' (D =3 ;P ;a -,10 (D < (7) 0 (D x T. CL CO 0- CD (D 0 o- C) C T. 71 CD rr-. N z ol 0 U: NCO 70 m2m m -q>:E -+,� CEO> Cal �DrM DDO zmrj z U. -4-io -ILL: 0033 0�- olm oz IT M033 m Z33 Zl- UZO UZ M>Z m 21: )0)3 D r m cri 41